WEBVTT - Ep41 "Is there any such thing as true news?"   (Truth Part 2: the Internet)

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>We all know about the problems of fake news and

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and many people are worried about it. But

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is it possible that the Internet, on balance is better

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>for the dissemination of truth. What does this have to

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>do with Barbar Streisand's house, or Soviet agriculture, or Kenyan

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>elections or Twitter revolutions. Welcome to Intercosmos with me David Eagleman.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm a neuroscientist and an author at Stanford and in

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>these episodes we sail deeply into our three pound universe

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to understand why and how our lives look the way

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they do. Today's episode is about truth and misinformation and

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. So in the last episode I discussed the

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>issue of truth, which has been at the center of

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue about politics, about social media, about journalism for

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>many years now. And in twenty sixteen, a panel of

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>experts was interviewed and they said one of the grand

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges was the issue of truth on the Internet. So

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're going to talk about today. And twenty

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>sixteen also happened to be the year that the term

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>post truth was officially introduced to the Oxford English Dictionary.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So what does post truth mean? It was defined as

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>quote denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief. Now,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this got enenthrined by lexicographers at no

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>less of publication than the Oxford English Dictionary seemed to

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>clinch the argument that this was indeed a new phenomenon.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But to anyone with even a cursory knowledge of history,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a little strange. It is, to my mind,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the strangest romanticization to believe, for a second, that people

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in earlier generations, in earlier centuries millennia, did not predicate

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>their actions on emotion and personal belief. Now, in the

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>last episode, I mentioned just a smattering of events that

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>defined the twentieth century, like Nazism in Germany and communism

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in China and the USSR and fascism in Italy, and

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the massacre of the Tutsi by the Hutu in Rwanda

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Kame Rouge in Cambodia and the rape of

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Nanking by the Japanese and on and on. And the

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to notice is that this was all in the

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>last century, mere decades ago, And this was all pre

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>internet drop of fuel for these movements, which collectively killed

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>probably one hundred million people. Every drop of the fuel

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was not driven by facts, but instead emotion and personal belief.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't get a Hutu to pick up a machete

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>against a Tutsi based on provable assertions. You get him

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all worked up over emotionality. You don't get a Chinese

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>student to murder her professor in the Cultural Revolution with

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>some factual argument. You do this by convincing her that

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this little red book is the greatest thing she can

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>aspire to. You don't ever get a young man to

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>murder his neighbor based on a provable scientific point, but

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>instead by emotion. So it's not only an illusion, but

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a dellusion to believe that people used to operate

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on the facts. Although I'm pointing to the twentieth century

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to remind us that this was all happening just yesterday,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we only need to take a ten thousand foot view

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of the centuries before to see how driven the world

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>has always been by emotion and personal belief over facts.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Just consider the European Wars of Religion, also known as

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Wars of Reformation, in which through the sixteenth and

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, Catholics and Protestants murdered one another.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>In just one piece of that war, called the Thirty

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Years War. It's estimated that eight million people died. Now,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the world is not Christian, so

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>most people can't even see the difference between Catholics and

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Protestants and those millions of deaths, all that human suffering.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't based on facts and truth, it was based

0:04:55.040 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>on emotion and personal belief. This is similar to the

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>bloody geopolitically defining wars between the Shia and the Sunni Muslims.

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know the difference between Shia and Sunni,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it stems from a debate over succession after the prophet

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Mohammad died. Some felt the leadership torch should pass two

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>qualified candidates, and others thought it should only go through

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Mohammad's bloodline. So, for example, Saudi Arabia is Sunni, Iran

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is Shia, and they can't get along. And these competing

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>views of succession have been in conflict for fourteen hundred

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>years and provides a lot of the explosive fuel in

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. You've got Syrian civil war over these lines.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got Iraq fracturing over this divide. You've got growing

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>fissures in a number of Gulf states. So if you

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>happen to be taking up arms in this battle between

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Sunni and Shia, perhaps you come up with a story

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell yourself. This is based in fact and not

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>base based on personal beliefs. There's a factual and correct

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>answer to the question of succession from a prophet, and

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's mysterious to you why other people can't see it

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as clearly as you can, and for that matter, why

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the overwhelming majority of the world doesn't even understand what

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you're arguing about. Now. I'm not intending to criticize anyone's

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>beliefs here, but I am only intending to point out

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that it is hallucinatory to believe that society used to

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>operate on facts, and then starting in twenty sixteen or so,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we stopped basing our behaviors on facts and sunk into

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>personal beliefs. This idea is so goofy. In fact, I

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>saw the Economist tweet some years ago on how we're

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>entering a post truth world, and a commenter to that

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>tweet wrote, why didn't you see this coming years ago?

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And he cited what he thought were the obvious main causes.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He said, low basic education and lousy media. So his

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>argument was that given bad education and bad media, how

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>could we expect otherwise but to evolve into a cauldron

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of disinformation. But of course, our system and reach of

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>education is better than it has ever been in the

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>history of the world. Around the entire globe, we've seen

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>increased government spending on education. We've seen increased access to

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>education for girls and women. We've seen improved quality of

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>education everywhere. I look these stats up recently. In eighteen twenty,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>only seventeen percent of the population got even a basic education.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That's less than one in five people. By twenty twenty

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the number was over eighty six percent, so it's almost

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>nine out of ten people worldwide. This is an incredible

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>change in two hundred years, and it just keeps going up.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is mostly for reasons of societies realizing the

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>importance of education, but also the helps enormously because it

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>translates to access. So anyway education has improved. It's the

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>number of kids in school, how long they stay in school,

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the schooling, all that has been going up,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and this, of course is directly correlated with reduced poverty

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and increased economic growth for a country and increased social stability.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in these sorts of statistics, by the way,

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you should read The Better Angels of Our Nature by

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>my colleague Stephen Pinker, who for some reason is one

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the few people making the clear statistical argument about

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the massive improvements in the world. So let me return

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to this guy on Twitter who said we should have

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>seen post truth coming in twenty sixteen because of our

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible education. His argument clearly means something emotional to him,

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't have a leg to stand on factually.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And his second point was about lousy media. Now us

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that in the last episode, So I'm not going to

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time with it here except to say

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that people seem to hold an illusion that media used

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to be very good. Even very smart people say things

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to me like, well, back in my day there were

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>only two or three news stations and we got all

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>our news in the same place. But as I argued

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in great detail in the last episode, the real story

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is much more nuanced. People have always lived in their

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>echo chambers and gotten their opinions from their friends and

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>their neighbors and their family and their culture. And of course,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>aside from the news stations, there were newspapers of every stripe,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and magazines of any political orientation, and pamphlets that would

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>show up in your mailbox that could have the most

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>extreme views imaginable. So there's nothing new about receiving misinformation

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or disinformation. So remember that if we're asking the question

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of whether something has degree rated about truthtelling, really try

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to view history through this lens of the question, did

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>people used to tell the truth more than they do now? Now,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what I've set the table with so far is that

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing new about not telling the truth, and about

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>swimming in the pool of our own beliefs and functioning

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in our own echo chambers and taking up arms against

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>our neighbors who believe differently. But I want to be

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>super clear about something. By me pointing out that there's

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing new about misinformation, please don't take that as me

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that we shouldn't be fighting misinformation. We should fight

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it tooth and nail. We should constantly improve our society

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that way. That is our obligation to try to maximize truthtelling.

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>But the reason for my historical rant is that it

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>helps us sharpen our focus on the question of this episode,

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which is how much does the Internet have to do

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>with disinformation? To what degree is that the Internet's fault

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that we see all sorts of misinformation and disinformation that

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is predicated on emotional and personal belief rather than facts.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Has the Internet made things worse? The main arguments I

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>hear about how the Internet has made things worse seem

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to depend on issues that have always been with us. First,

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people complain that on the Internet, a story gets magnified

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>based more on the reaction it provokes than its truth value.

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that misinformation often comes packaged with clickbaity

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>headlines in sensational stories that are designed to grab attention.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>This can make it more likely that people will share

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>misinformation even if they're not sure that it's true, or

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps they don't even believe that it's true. But again,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>note that this has always been the case. That's how

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we get which trials in the past because it may

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>or may not be true, but I heard so and

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>SO say it, and it's a story too good to repeat,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to pass that on. That's how we

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>get McCarthyism, where people are blacklisted based on accusations that

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they are Communist sympathizers. That's how the Soviet Union gets

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of political executions because of the story

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that so and so is not aligned with the party.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps no meaningful evidence is presented, but the accusation is

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>clickbaity and designed to get local attention, and it does. So.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Let me give a different example of how the Internet

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>can actually make truth a little harder to see, and

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with the issue of sock puppeting.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>This is setting up, let's say, a fake account to

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>pretend that you're on the other side of some issue. Now,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>usually there's not a lot that you can do with this,

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes it can have a big effect. For example,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>when the United States withdrew all its troops from Afghanistan

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in twenty and twenty one, the Taliban just leveraged basic

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>social media one to secure their takeover, which is on

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>social media. They pretended to be the Allied forces withdrawing

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and they gave instructions to the population like, hey, everyone

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>should evacuate this town now there's about to be a

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of bombing. And this way, when the Taliban rolled

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>into these towns, there were many fewer people there to

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>stand up and provide resistance. So what the Taliban had

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>done is called sock puppeting. In other words, they had

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>put their hand inside of the puppet and pretended to

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be somebody else doing the speaking. So, not surprisingly, truth

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>can get complex on social media because social media is

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>not always the right tool for the job for that.

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.599
<v Speaker 1>So these are the general kinds of concerns that scholars

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have about the Internet. But I want to present an

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>argument that has gotten essentially zero airtime, which is whether

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a possibility that the Internet has made things better? Now,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>how you might say, could the Internet have made truth

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seeking better? Well, here's how it all has to do

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>with information flow. For an analogy, think about arteries. For

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>maximal health, you need unobstructed blood flow in your arteries,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and in exactly this way, societies need the free flow

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of information. Things that block that flow can be fatal

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to a nation. And I'm going to give you several examples.

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So first, political censorship. This has been a familiar specter

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>throughout the last century, with state approved news outlets ruling

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the press and airwaves in places like Romania or Cuba,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>or China or Iraq, among lots of others. So the

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>official newspapers of the former Soviet Union had a complete

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lock on the news, and foreign newspapers were allowed only

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if they were published by communist parties with the approval

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Soviets, and censorship did not end with news stories.

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Copying machines were tightly controlled by the Soviets to prevent

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>dissemination of self published books or magazines. Even weather reports

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>were censored. In Nikolai Chichesku's Romania, certain temperature extremes translated

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>into time off of work, so the weather reports were

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>doctored so that these levels were not reached, and it

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was the same in the Soviet Union. Stalin doctored weather

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>forecasts if they suggested that the sun would not shine

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on the day of celebration for the labor movement, and

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>censorship reaches into every aspect of nations under control of dictators.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>In Saddam Hussein's Iraq, maps of Baghdad were not allowed

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to be printed lest some enemy of the state get

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a hold of a map and then they could decipher

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the street names for easy navigation. And the weather reports

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>there weren't just doctored they were locked away as classified information.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'll give you another example which demonstrates how not

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>new some of our problems are. People are worried about

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>deep fake photographs, which I'll talk about next week. Well,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Soviets were doing this over a century ago. They

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>had a not so secret fondness for rewriting their national

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>story on the fly, so they routinely edited photographs to

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>remove people who had fallen out of favor with the party.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a famous example. There's a photo which

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>proudly captures Lenin and other Soviet leaders in Red Square

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and Moscow in nineteen nineteen. So you can see Lenin

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and standing on his left, you see Leon Trotsky, and

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on Lenin's right is a man named Kamenev, and there's

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a bearded man two rows in front of Trotsky, a

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Bolshevik leader from Georgia. Okay, well, if you look at

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a release of this photo some years later, the official

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Soviet version of the photo, you see that after Leon

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Trotsky fell from party favor, he was airbrushed out of

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the photo. In the revised photograph, there's just an empty

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>space where he used to be, and kamon f on

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the right has disappeared as well, and the bearded Bolshevik

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>leader never existed in the photo either. I'll put this

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>photo the before and after version on my website so

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you can check it out at eagleman dot com slash podcast,

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>and I'll also show another photograph. There's Joseph Stalin and

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a man who is left named Nikolai Yezhov. Yezhov

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was a ruthless, awful guy. He was the head of

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the secret police, the NKVD, and he spent years brutally

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>purging enemies of the state, typically without evidence and often

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for personal reasons. But then in nineteen forty, Yezhov earned

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the same treatment that he'd been handing out. He was

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>stripped and beaten and shot in the basement of an

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>NKVD station. So Stalin wrapped up loose ends by deleting

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yezhov from history by airbrushing him out of the photo. Now,

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not surprisingly, governments that are infamous for blocking information flow

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are the same ones we think of when we hear

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of purges and shortages and repression and civil and political

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>rights and isolation. Censorship rarely works well for regimes, and

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps this is because a population that's fed doctor messages

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>never truly falls for the trick. A friend of mine

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>who was raised in the Soviet Union tells me that

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>everyone held two separate things in their heads, what they

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to say to each other and what they

0:18:48.640 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>actually believed. So there are lots of complaints that people

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have about the Internet, but the way to really understand

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>why it's better for the truth is to deeply understand

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the disaster of centralized command of the truth. Censorship can

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>involve more than books and photos, and whether the tyranny

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of information control can actually bring down a nation. I

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the previous episode about a Soviet scientist named

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Trophym Lyashenko. He was an agronomist who proposed these stunning

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>new scientific theories about how to grow wheat better and faster,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and he was highly favored by Stalin and so Laishenko

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>rose up through the ranks of power. But it turns

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out his theories were scientifically fraudulent, but that didn't stop

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>him from gaining impressive influence in the party, and by

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen forties he steered the agricultural program for the

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>entire USSR. Now there was a grave problem with this

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>centralized command, which is that the USSR spanned thirteen time

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>zones and an astounding variety of soils and climates and

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>local knowledge, and so applied to a landscape that size,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this central rule setting was disastrous for wheat production. Local

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>farmers knew better how to care for their crops, but

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>they were disallowed the freedom, and scientists who disagreed with

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Lyashenko found themselves disbarred from their positions, and several agronomists

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>were executed. Part of the downfall of the USSR can

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>be traced to this centralization of agricultural decisions. It ruined

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and it crippled confidence in the new system.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>So the lesson for history is that a centralized tyranny

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>rarely works as well as local information and nested feedback loops,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is where the Internet shines. Historically, the more

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>successful strategy has always been to confront free speech with

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>free speech, and the Internet allows that in a natural way.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>It democratizes the flow of information by giving open access

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to the newspapers of the world, the photographers of every nation,

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the bloggers of every political stripe. Now, I talked last

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>week about how in any conflict, people will post the

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>worst videos from the other side and try to imply

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that that is representative of the opposing population so they

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>can whip up support. And that's an issue to always

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on. That's a genuine problem. But even

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that is far better than the other problem, which is censorship.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>As soon as you give one side, any side, a

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>total lockdown on the news, you have a much deeper

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>level of problem. So coming back to a democratic Internet

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that has open to everyone, of course you're going to

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>get some postings that are full of doctoring and dishonesty,

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>while others strive for independence and impartiality. But in the

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>end all are available for the end user to sift

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>through for reasoned consideration. It's far better than having zero

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>choice about the story that you're fed. And beyond news sites,

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the simple redundancy of information online changes the censorship equation irreversibly.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So just imagine Hussein trying to eradicate maps when anyone

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>can serve satellite photos to two meter resolution. Or imagine

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Chichescu trying to doctor weather reports when anyone can pull

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>up the weather of the world. Orginej. Stalin trying to

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>delete Trotsky from photographs when the photos are mirrored on

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Google images, and the Internet Archive in a thousand other sites. Now,

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>this inability to erase information from the Internet took on

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a name two decades ago. It's called the Streisand Effect.

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>This happened because in two thousand and three, a guy

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>snapped an aerial photograph of Barbara Streisand's home in Malibu,

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and the guy posted the photo on his website for

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>privacy reasons. Streisand wanted it off the net, and when

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't comply, she sued him. But her actions had

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a drastic, unintended consequence. Until that moment, almost no one

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>knew where her home was, and by trying to suppress

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the information, she promptly drove over a million visitors to

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>his site. So observing this Streisand incident in two thousand

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and three, internet watchers realized they were seeing the new

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>rules of the game in action. Trying to suppress information

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:11.959
<v Speaker 1>on the Web only magnifies it. And this new inability

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to hide information found perhaps its highest expression in wiki Leaks,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which was launched in two thousand and six by the

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Australian journalist and activist Julian Assange. His mission, he said,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was to open governments. The site seems like it's mostly

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>dying now some seventeen years later. But what it did

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was published documents disclosed by anonymous sources, and it got

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to about ten million such documents. And the documents it

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>leaked were as varied as their country is of origin.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember when they leaked Sarah Palin's Yahoo email account.

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>They leaked membership lists of illegal parties in the UK.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>They leaked internal United Nations reports and senatorial campaign documents,

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and oil scandals and airstrike videos. In twenty ten, WikiLeaks

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>released eighty thousand classified documents about the war in Afghanistan,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and by the end of that year it published close

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to four hundred thousand documents from the war in Iraq.

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And the thing to observe about those leaks is that

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they weren't impotent. Sometimes they directly fomented social change. So

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>consider this incident in which an icelandic bank gagged the

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>national broadcaster of Iceland from reporting on its debt default risk.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>A whistleblower got the info onto WikiLeaks, and Icelanders went

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>into an uproar and that rapidly led to new legislation

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in their parliament ensuring media freedom. So if you care

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about truth. You should care about the power of the Internet,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'll mention something else where. Getting information out leads

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to good things happening. So WikiLeaks published lists of blacklisted

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>websites from the governments of Denmark and Norway, and Thailand

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and Australia. And in most of these cases the blacklisted

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sites were pornographic or violent, but it never takes long

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>before other sites get slipped onto the list. For example,

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Thailand Censorship list advertises a filter against child pornography,

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>contained over one thousand sites that were felt to be

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>critical of the Thai royal family, and Assaunge maintains, as

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>many people do, that censorship approaches like Internet filtering become

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>invariably corrupted. And another thing, the speed of information flow

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet allows rapid, massive democratic response. I remember

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nine, when the Internet was newer,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>when Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced he was going

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to shut down Parliament until March thirtieth. And what he

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>said is that he needed time to work on a

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package. But a lot of people suspected he was

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just trying to prevent a vote of no confidence from

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the opposition parties. So such a vote would force an election,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>which is something Harper desperately wanted to avoid. So a

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Canadian student, unhappy about this shutdown and has perceived reasons

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>for it, he started a Facebook group that quickly swelled

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to two hundred and fourteen thousand members, and it precipitated

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>real world rallies all across Canada with crowds of thousands.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of breakneck speed of messaging equates to

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a departure from the days of spreading the word by

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>pamphleting or shouting from horseback. It allows the citizenry to

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>become a rapid response democratic organism. If a bunch of

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>individual brains happened to share an opinion, they can combine

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>rapidly to be heard. Now, obviously, that has both pros

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and cons, and this is one of the plays. This

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is where I think the advent of the Internet does

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lead to a quantitative and qualitative change, because it allows

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>crowds to pull together very quickly, sometimes frighteningly so. And

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes giant crowds prove useful for protesting something bad. Then

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they provide terrifying brainless muscle. But going back to

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of the net, one of the biggest benefits

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>began even when the Internet was quite young. Movements sprang

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>up to keep governments from tampering with the democratic voting process,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and this holy grail of fairness got achieved via Internet

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>movements in which citizens leveraged live online mapping to aggregate

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and display activities during elections. Take, for example, the crisis

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>mapping tool ushahidi dot com, which was originally developed when

0:28:55.560 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>violence erupted following the disputed Kenyan presidential elections of two

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. Using Ushahidi, anyone with a cell phone

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>could send a text message to report disturbances or defamation

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or vote tampering, or even simply to say that everything

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>went well there. And so by constructing a dynamic map

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the trouble spots, they could attract the world's reporters

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to expose the fraud. And to this day, reports from

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Ushahidi typically feature alongside those of full time journalists. And

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this is all helping to ensure that an election is

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as free and fair as possible. And that's a big

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>deal because many elections all around the globe continue to

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be famously and unabashedly fraudulent, not in the most advanced countries,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but certainly in places like Afghanistan, where elections are characterized

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>by widespread fraud of the tallies and intimidation and ballot

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stuffing and people paid to vote multiple times using fake

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or duplicate voter cards. As it turns out, a lot

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of voters are scared or reluctant to discuss any fraud

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that they witnessed, but sending a text message is easy

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and so mobile crowd monitoring of elections has been a

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>growing trend around the planet. By aggregating little bits of

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>information from the millions of folk reporters on the ground,

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>This method keeps governments one step more transparent then they

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>might otherwise volunteer to be in the absence of watchful

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>eyes and far reaching voices. And there are similar trends

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that publicly track journalist safety, especially those who are potentially

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in danger from their own governments. There's a saying in

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>journalism that if you turn on a bright light, the

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>roaches scatter. So with these aggregation sites, each person with

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a cell phone contributes just a few photons and the

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>sum is enough to light up the country. So the

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>argument I've made is that the Internet provides the potential

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to enhance democracy. But it's really important that we note

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that this benefit is in danger in many countries. So,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, aligned with China's Great Wall is China's Great firewall.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese internet filters put blanket blocks on political statements that

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the government does not allow, and apparently internet users are

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hired to post positive observations about the government on forums

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and chat rooms. Now, I don't know if you were

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>following this back in two thousand and six, but at

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the time, the Internet was still young and companies were

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>still struggling to figure out who was going to ascend

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to the top. And Google agreed to allow China to

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>censor search traffic because this seemed like an acceptable price

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for Google for the opportunity to tap into a market

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of four hundred million Internet use So the Chinese government

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in China was allowed to filter the Google search results.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean? If you search from anywhere

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in the world for Tienemann Square protest, you get a

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>reasonable set of search results, But if you performed the

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>same search inside China's borders, you would get a very

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>different set and you would not see any of the

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>iconic photographs of that event. Well, come back to Google

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. But first I want to mention how

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>easy it has always been to demonstrate the Chinese firewall.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>That this has changed a little bit recently. But some

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago you could go to say buyd dot com,

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the major Chinese search engine, and you type

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in something like the name of your local city and

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you get several result returned. Now you type in something

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like Falloon Gong, which is a spiritualist movement on the

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese blacklist, and you get an error message reading this

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>web page is not available. It appears that perhaps a

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>server has gone down on by news end. What just happened? Well,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>when Chinese servers detect an incoming packet with a prohibited term,

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they return a reset message which falsely tells the request

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that there was an error retrieving the page. This makes

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it look as though the problem is related to the

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>requested site, and the Chinese servers then put the requesting

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>machine's IP address on a blacklist for a few moments.

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you try entering your innocuous first search again,

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll get an error message. Now because you've been temporarily

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>blocked out of China at least as of a few

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago. You could try this on any Chinese search

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>engine of your choice and you'd get exactly the same result.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Now let's return to Google in the Chinese market. What

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>happened at the beginning of twenty ten was that Google's

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>servers in China were hacked and the information was taken

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>from different accounts, and it appeared that the hackers had

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a special focus on the accounts of Chinese political dissidents,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and Google was pretty sure the Chinese government was behind

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the break in. So as a result, Google changed its

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>mind on the topic of censorship and circumvented the Great

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Firewall of China by rerouting through Hong Kong, and eventually

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>China banned Google altogether. So Google ended up surrendering a

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>large piece of the lucrative Chinese market. But this kind

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of move is critical if you don't want to support

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>government censorship. And by the way, I need to make

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>clear that internet censorship is not limited to China. Most

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the countries that impinge on Internet freedom will come

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as no surprise, nations like Burma and Cuba and Egypt

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and Iran and North Korea and Saudi Arabia and Syria

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and Uganda and a bunch of others. But sometimes people

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are a little surprised to discover that some Western countries

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>try to get in on the action here. Some years ago,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, the Australian Labor Party proposed a set of

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>laws to censor blacklisted sites at the level of the

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Internet service providers. They claimed the sites they wanted to

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>censor were involved in child pornography or terrorism. But then

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>WikiLeaks released the list of the blacklisted sites, and the

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>list encompassed other sites as well, some of them seemingly random.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>The filtering legislation didn't pass in Australia, but the fact

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>that it had some momentum reminds us to always keep

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>an eye on this. In other words, if you care

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about truth on the Internet, we need to think about

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>more than people saying stupid stuff online. The bigger worry

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>from a historical angle is about state control of what

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 1>information you can or cannot access. And this is the

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>beauty of a technology that seeks to network everyone's brain

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>together and democratize things and hear everyone's voice. Obviously, some

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of those voices will be less useful than others, and

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>people at the political extremes will purposefully lie and make

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>up have truth. But it is better than Stalin or

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Giping or Chichescu or Hitler or Polpod or Mussolini allowing

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you to hear only the messages that they want you

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to hear and nothing else. So look, whatever side of

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the political spectrum you're on, just think of how you

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>would feel if Biden or Trump got to control the

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>news entirely during his presidency and you wouldn't be allowed

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to see the other side. If that sounds like a

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>nightmare to you, then you see why I am so

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about this technology when we have a conversation about truth.

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>This networking technology makes it impossible to do all the

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>things that so many countries have enjoyed doing during the

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, like controlling the news and doing historical rewrites.

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>By aggregating citizen information, you get some different problems, like

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise, but noise is typically better than

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>an iron fist. This is why the Internet is sometimes

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>categorized as a liberation technology. And indeed citizens everywhere find

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>ways to drill holes in the silicone curtain. For example,

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>from inside China, lots of young people make secure connections

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to a proxy server, a server outside of China, and

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>then the filtering technologies applied on Chinese servers don't apply.

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>So daily millions of young people in China make these

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>connections to servers in Hong Kong and they surf X

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook or they use Gmail from there. The most

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>oppressive governments will probably always try to implement strict firewalls,

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but this will presumably lead to a black market for

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>home brewed satellite uplinking with which to circumvent it, like

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Amagino line. So retaining the capacity of the Internet to

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>allow all viewpoints, this is something that's going to require

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>constant vigilance for a lot of places in the world.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The future is going to be a zeros and one's

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>arm race between countries and their citizens, and like any

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>cat and mouse game, both sides are going to adopt

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>each other's technologies. I'll give you an example of the

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>cat and mouse game that we saw coming into focus

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>even a decade and a half ago. So in two

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmed Dinijad declared victory

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>over his opponent MUSAVII, but the outcome was suspected of

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>being rigged, and almost immediately the pronouncement was followed by

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>protests in Tehran and in the Iran more broadly, and

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in cities around the world. Now, as you may remember,

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>those protests quickly went bad. Paramilitary snipers on the rooftops

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.720
<v Speaker 1>opened fire on the crowds, and bodies began to collapse

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in the streets. But as quickly as things went bad,

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they went viral. So web surfers in every country watched

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>instantly delivered photos and videos of attacks and murders, and

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>protesters inside Iran used Twitter and other sites to aggregate

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>crisis information and update situations and post links to freshly

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>uploaded videos. Cyber dissidents took down Ahmed Dinijad's website with

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a denial of service attack, and a few days after

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>after this had begun, and editorial in the Washington Times

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>admiringly dubbed the events the Twitter revolution. Now in cat

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and mouse style, the government leveraged their tools too. Amadinijad

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>replied not only by banning rallies, but more importantly by

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>blocking cell phone transmissions and text messaging and shutting down

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet for forty five minutes to set up filtering software.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Iran presumably could have opted to take the whole country

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>offline permanently during this time, but in the cat and

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>mouse game, that option would cripple the government's crisis response

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>communications as much as it would the protesters, so in

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the end, the protesters won the digital race in that

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>round in Iran, broadcasting the post election oppression to a

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>worldwide audience. But the cat and mouse countermeasures have gone

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on and on. After Masa Amini's death in Iran in

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, citizens took to social media to protest, but

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps blocked access to social media

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 1>platforms and in fact shut off the Internet in parts

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of the country, and just in the past few months,

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>WhatsApp and Instagram have been blocked in Iran due to

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>protests against the government, and last year, Iran was ranked

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the second worst place in the world for Internet censorship,

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, includes not just social media, but

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>also websites relating to health, sports, science, news, and so on,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.320
<v Speaker 1>all of which should shake us out of our assumptions

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet is simply open and free and immune

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to a future of government intrusion and something to merely

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>gripe about when someone posts something that we dislike. This

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>reminds us that the Internet is a liberation technology and

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.760
<v Speaker 1>reminds us of the criticality of keeping the Web open

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and online. For those of us who happen to be

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.959
<v Speaker 1>lucky enough to live in non repressive countries, we should

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>always take steps to keep it open and increase government transparency,

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>even in the face of opportunities for misinformation and disinformation.

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the Internet tips the balance in favor of

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a better society. Censorship is increasingly difficult to pull off now.

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>The stalins and touchescos and Husseins have to work a

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>lot harder to try to keep information away from the populace.

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to have an all Trump or an

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all Biden controlled media. News gets out fast, and once

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's out, it's hard to take back or rewrite it retrospectively.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>And because of the ability to ensure fair voting and

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>shine a light on government misdeeds, the ability for regimes

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep a tight grip on the data available to

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>its citizens is increasingly going to become a nightmare of

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the past now. Obviously, one of the major problems of

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, just like in all times with all news sources,

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>is learning to not accept stories at face value. It

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>goes without saying that a good education will teach children

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>or adults the need to consider the source, to evaluate

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the evidence as best we can. Now, it's not surprising

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that the older generations are worried about what younger generations

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are stepping into with this technology. But I do think

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that because of all the emphasis on fake news and

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the imminence of deep fakes, which I'll talk about next week,

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the younger generations will actually be

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>much better at filtering news. As far as I can tell,

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the older generations are the ones stuck with the illusion

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that if something is written and down it must be true,

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>whereas younger kids are more skeptical. So when I talk

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with people young and old about truth on the Internet

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and how to evaluate the flood of information, I emphasize

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>two points. First, to be critical of our own biases.

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>We all have biases, and these can lead us to

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>believe things that we shouldn't. So be aware of your

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>own biases and try to be objective when evaluating information.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And the second thing is to try to engage in

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>dialogue with people you trust and who you think are

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>smart and who are on the other side of an issue.

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Try to steal man the other side. If you haven't

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>heard that term. This is the opposite of straw manning,

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a technique for misrepresenting an opponent's argument to

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>make it easier to attack. Steal manning is a technique

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for strengthening an opponent's argument so you can better understand it.

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>To steal man and argue in you need to identify

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the premises and the conclusion, and you need to work

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand the assumptions that underlie the argument. This allows

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>you to try to understand the argument from your opponent's perspective.

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you have to come to a conclusion

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of agreeing with the other person, but this is an

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>extremely valuable technique to say, Okay, I'm going to put

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>myself in a totally different pair of shoes, or more exactly,

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in a different brain with a different world model, and

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see what my assumptions are and different

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ways that I might believe this argument. Now, again, this

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that in the end you need to adopt

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that person's point of view, but I believe if you

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>take on this intellectual habit, you'll find yourself a little

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>more mature in your worldviews. You'll be slightly less able

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to say that you think some complex situation is actually

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>really simple and hence less willing to dehumanize some other

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>group of humans. So let's wrap up today's episode. As

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned last week, I got interested in this question

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>because several colleagues called me in twenty twenty and asked

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>if I would be on a grant with them to

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>restore truth in the media and on the Internet. And

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought the idea was a little misguided because fundamentally

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it rested on a poor memory of what truth used

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to be, a retrospective romanticization. The key with the Internet

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is that there's good and bad, but on balance, it

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as clear that it comes out positively. So

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>when a pundit asserts that the Internet is responsible, in

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 1>part or and whole for our perceived decline into a

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>post truth world, I interpret that that statement stems from

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ignorance about pre Internet history. As a history buff, I

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>really asked myself what was the world like pre and

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>post Internet? And I hope I've convinced you even a

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I hope I've reminded you about how much

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>worse the world was pre Internet. And I hope I've

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>convinced you even a little bit that the Internet may

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>actually be the most important tool we've ever had for

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>surfacing truth. Essentially, it's impossible now for a government to

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>control the news that we are exposed to. Instead, a

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>million flashlights on the ground will end up shedding light. Now,

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it goes without saying that when you have a million

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>people swinging flashlights around, there's a challenge that we face,

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>which is whose flashlight being? Do you believe? And obviously

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of misinformants and disinformants, just like there

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have always been, But at least now we have the

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>possibility of getting exposed to different points of view. And

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 1>again I know that most people people will not look

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for different points of view, but happily it's generally impossible

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to not get hit in the face with different points

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of view, at least sometimes when you're surfing around and

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it might make you mad to see some other viewpoint

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and your best interpretation is that they are deceitful, lyars

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>or misinformed. But at least that point of view enters

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>your hopper and the possibility at least exists to incorporate

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it into your consideration. So as you can see, I'm

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>generally optimistic about the Internet and the existence of this technology.

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But finally this all leads us to the next question,

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the next era of invention, which is what happens now

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that we have AI on the radar, And that is

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>next week's episode. See you then go to eagleman dot

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>com slash podcast for more information and to find further reading.

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Send me an email at podcast at eagleman dot com

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>with questions or discussion and I'll be making episodes in

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 1>which I address those until next time. I'm David Eagleman

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is Inner Cosmos.