WEBVTT - The Execution of Christa Gail Pike 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Folks, the state of Tennessee has not executed a woman

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in some two hundred years, and Krista Gail Pike is

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fighting to not be the next. And with that, welcome

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to this episode of Amy and TJ. Presentz wrote, this

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is a story that got a lot of headlines of

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year because there was a date

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>put on the books for an execution, a rare execution

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of a woman in Tennessee.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, she was set, I say, is said, there's

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 2>not Auz is said to be executed on September thirtieth

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>of this year. But Krista Pike has now filed a

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>lawsuit to stop her execution. She says that executing her

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>would violate her constitutional rights and her religious beliefs. Will

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>get into exactly how she's saying an execution would do

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>both of those things to her. It's interesting, It's creative.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's creative, you just said, because my next question to you,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we we just we happen to cover a lot of

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>executions in rooms. We see this thing fighting, fighting, fighting

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to stay alive.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, attorneys will come up with all sorts of different

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>reasons as to why their client shouldn't die, whether it

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>they go back to the trial and find some reason

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>why they didn't get a fair shake, or they'll go

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>and try and find reasons why their client is not

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>mentally stable enough to face an execution. But this woman's

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>attorneys are claiming she has a condition and she has

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>a religious belief that would preclude her from being executed.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Look, we've come up, and we say we've come up.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They a lot of attorneys have come up with all

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of ideas for how to save their client. We

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>don't see necessarily robes it work that often, but sometimes

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it delays the process or they go through the process.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>This is and it shouldes.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Do people feel any differently in the country when we

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about execution and people have their opinions about whether

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we should have it or should not have it, But

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>do we feel any differently when it comes to executing

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a woman.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely we do. Yes, there is something about even sending

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a woman to prison for the rest of their lives.

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>We just heard a jury this is so interesting. A juror,

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>i should say, speak out after the last trial of

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Corey Ritchins and she said, we sat there in that

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>jury room and we all came into it thinking she

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>was guilty, but we all started talking about how possibly

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>she might not be because the idea of sending a

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>mother to prison for the rest of her life, the

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>idea of taking a mother away from her children for

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the rest of their lives, was very It was very

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>present in the room when they were trying to come

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 2>to the conclusion. So, yes, I do think we have

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 2>an aversion as a country, as a society in punishing

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>women for crimes because we think of them as mothers,

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>We think of them as people who others count on,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and we try not we try to. We wish for

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the best, we hope for the best. We don't want

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 2>it to be true.

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>And we don't want them to be monstrous exactly. We

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>it just doesn't work.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>These are ok not to label women, but yes, we

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>don't see we see them as nurturers. Like you said,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So when stories and we have seen plenty of robes

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of mothers in the country, famous stories of mothers killing

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>their children, they're shocking.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>We can't we just can't it. It doesn't make sense.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>So here we are. I don't know. It's an interesting

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>thing to consider.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there are possibly people out there who are Yes,

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm for the death penalty, but only as applies to men, right,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is that really?

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Do we really feel that differently about it?

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And if there was a question about execution and it

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>just had to do with women, would we be still

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in favor of it the way we are as a country.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>The numbers go back and forth the people who are

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in favor of the death penalty. But I'm just thinking

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>about that because we don't do it often. Since nineteen

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy six, only eighteen women have been executed in this country.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's one percent of the however many that have been

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>executed in that time. Yeah, I mean that doesn't happen

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. No, it doesn't happen very often.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 2>And look, I think it's because also women are not

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 2>as likely to be murderers as men just period in general,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>statistically speaking. So yes, of course you're gonna have fewer

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>women sentenced to death, but yes, we do.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Numbers there though, I have to do with the discrepancy

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of how many who end up on trial for murder,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>how many of them, the percentage of them who don't

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>get the death penalty that if they were a man

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they might.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, no, that makes sense, that does make sense.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 2>That does make sense, So yes, I do think that would.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 3>You be less likely to vote death penalty for women?

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wouldn't be able to be on a jury.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Full disclosure here, because I am against the death penalty.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be able to send anybody to death row.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 3>No matter who they are.

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Correct. That's just where I am personally, So I would

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 2>have to make that known the moment I was being

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 2>questioned as a juror and they'd say thank you and next,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>because I just I wouldn't be able.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>To sleep the defense Yeah we want her.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>No, So I am somebody who who would not be

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>able to be on that jury. I couldn't sleep at

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>night either way. How about you?

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, we've talked about it. Plaint just not a

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>fan of this ceremony, if you will. For us, going

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>through the process of killing somebody just feels barbaric, no

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>matter what that crime happens to be, and there's been

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>some horrific, horrific crimes the way I would say, if

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>that family member went and killed that person and I

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>was on the jury, I would do a whole agreed

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>with it a time to kill a thing.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Where I absolutely I agree with that sentiment, and by

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the way would have zero problems sending someone to prison

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of their lives to never see the

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 2>life day again, no problem there just couldn't vote to executing.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm just curious that as we were talking about

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's different with a man or woman, know it's

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>no different for us necessarily, but only eighteen women. So

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>ro yes, this will make headlines, Krista gail'pike. How will

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the country feel? Will there be a different conversation leading

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>up to this execution about the death penalty? And there

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>are some actually robe there are she has as a

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>part of her story in her case, if you not

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the crime, but her life leading up to the crime

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 1>to where you would go, wow, you would have at

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take a beat to go man, this person

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had it bad.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>It's true, and look, there are some First of all,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 2>we want to point out this is not an issue

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 2>or not a case of guilt or innocence. She absolutely

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 2>admits to having done this now and as actually we're

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 2>going to get into we are going to hear directly

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>from her, have a couple quotes from her that are

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>very powerful actually about where she is now in her

0:06:54.960 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 2>process of attrition and culpability it is. It's some to

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 2>consider when you're hearing this case. But her crime is heinous.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>This happened thirty years ago, actually more than thirty years ago,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>January twelfth, nineteen ninety five. But here's the deal. She

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>was just eighteen years old. I say just eighteen years old,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>But when you hear what she did, it's tough to reconcile.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>She tortured before she murdered a nineteen year old girl.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Her name was Colleen Slemmer, her romantic rival, or someone

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>she considered to be her romantic rival. She thought this

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 2>girl had her sights on her boyfriend, so she convinces

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 2>her boyfriend who's seventeen years old, and a friend to

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>lure this young woman, this Colleen Slimmer into the woods.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And when they get her into the woods, she apparently

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and even bragged about this later that she cuts Slummer's

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 2>throat six times with a box cutter, cut her back

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>with a meat cleaver, carved a pentagram into her chest,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>and then continued even as Slummer was begging her to

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>please please stop, and eventually she killed her by throwing

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a large chunk of asphalt at her head, which they

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>believe was the fatal blow. And then get this, she

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 2>has a part of her skull that she takes with

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.559
<v Speaker 2>her as almost a trophy and shows to folks.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people would hear those details and say, oh, yeah,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this woman doesn't deserve to live. And that's understandable, that's heinus.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>There is no question there at all. Robes, but some

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the and you've looked into and got into she

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.599
<v Speaker 1>had a very tough and some of her attorneys and

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>others who are advocating for her to not be on

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>death row, she had a history robes of just a

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>horrific upbringing, mental illness, She had problems. Young lady had problems.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Now this is not excuse she made the choices she made,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but this is part of the argument that some are

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>putting out. This is before she's making her legal arguments,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:01.479
<v Speaker 1>but just from a sympathetic standpoint. And eighteen, we don't

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that often sentence people to death who are eighteen, nineteen,

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty years old.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in fact, that exact range of age. I was surprised,

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 2>just looked it up. The state of Tennessee in modern

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>history has not executed one person, male or female, who

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 2>committed their crime at the age of eighteen, nineteen or twenty.

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So that is significant, maybe even more so than the

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>fact that they haven't executed a woman in two hundred years.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>They haven't executed anybody who committed a crime that young.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean you think about eighteen year old, yes, think

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 1>about we got a thirteen year old and a nineteen

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>year old in the house essentially, and.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 4>They're babies, children, they are absolute children. Dus you're a

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 4>nineteen year old at least is a child. Oh no,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 4>she's a No, she is a child.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And look when you think about a child who has

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 2>been abused, neglected, sexually, physically, all of that four years

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and you have a mental illness on top of it,

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and you're eighteen and I think she had just turned eighteen.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Her boyfriend was seventeen. So these were kids, and again

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>does not excuse the viciousness of the crime. But you'll

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>hear from her and where she is now, because when

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you're that young, it's not that you're not responsible. But

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't that be taken into consideration when you were deciding

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>between life and death?

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess the jury did at the time. Right,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this is what our system allows, and this is what

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>justice looks like and these are the rules in that

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>regard Robes.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, have we.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Learned more since she was convicted? Have we done more research?

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Have we become frankly a little more averse to the

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>death penalty? Have we become you know?

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>So that that is part of her attorney's argument. Are

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 2>in this lawsuit among the things, they say, you literally

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>nailed it. You nailed it. Her attorneys are arguing that

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>if she were tried today, she would not have been

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>sentenced to death because of her age, her mental illness

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>at the time of the murder, and her history of

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>sexual abuse as a young child. Period a jury would

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>not have convicted her to death. That she would have

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>been convicted, but not to death. And in terms of

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>her lawsuit, her her attorneys are saying lethal injection method

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 2>violates her religious beliefs and her constitutional right because she

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>says her execution could cause her unnecessary pain and added

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 2>terror and suffering, which is a violation of the Constitution

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>which protects everyone against cruel and unusual punishment. They claim

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 2>she has a condition, okay, it's called thrombocytosis, and it

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 2>can lead to unusual bleeding, and they say death by

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 2>drowning in one's own blood. So because of this condition

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and the lethal injection, they.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Could, yes, be problematic. Yes, do they know for sure?

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do they know she's going to suffer?

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>They say could? That is the word they used. And

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 2>then they also said okay, so and that's specific to

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 2>lethal injection. Then they're saying she can't request the only

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 2>other approved method of dying because in the state of Tennessee,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 2>because it would violate her Buddhist beliefs. Because her Buddhist

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>beliefs teach her that she is not allowed to participate

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>in any process that would lead to her own death.

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>So she can't choose the method of execution because that

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>would violate her Buddhist beliefs. And by the way, the

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>only other method is electrocution. But she can't even make

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that pivot, she claims, because it would violate her religious beliefs.

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 2>That is the foundation of their lawsuit.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so they have two basis for it, right, Yes, Okay,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So her medical condition and her religious beliefs should not

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>allow this to go forward.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what chance she has here, but like

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we say, she is actually doing this a lot, a

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lot farther out from her execution than a lot of

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>inmates to do.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>That's true, that's our scrambling last second.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So yes, that is a very good point. They are

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 2>laying the foundation now because if this doesn't work, I'm

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>sure they'll try something else and then something else. But

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 2>this Eight's response, which they just put into evidence here,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 2>they say, yeah, they have not shown in any way

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>that lethal injection would present an unconstitutional risk to her.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 2>And then they said the Eighth Amendment does not guarantee

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>a prisoner a painless death, and that some risk of

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>pain is inherent in any method of execution, no matter

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>how humane. And they added, for a little fun, we

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 2>wish Pike's commitment to the sanctity of life had arrived

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>in time to save Colleen Slemmer. That shows you where

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>they stand on her lawsuit.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>How did you notice, like legal briefings and stuff are

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>getting snarkier.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's a really good point. Yes, so yes, the

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>state added a little snarky comment at the end. And

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>we should point out because we always talk about what

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the victim's family wants. Colleen Slemmer's mom desperately wants Pike

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 2>to die, like wants her to die I'm going to

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 2>give you the quote that she gave.

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>And the mom at this point has to be how

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 3>old this was? So long?

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 2>This was thirty years ago?

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, I mean maybe sixty seventies at least.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, at least she said. There is not a day

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that goes by that I don't think about Colleen or

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>how she died and how rough it was. I just

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>want Krista down so I can end it, relieve my daughter,

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>so she finally can be resting. There is no question

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Colleen Slummer's mom wants Krista to die, and that last week.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it doesn't matter legally necessarily, but I do

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>think it matters just to know that that is the

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>wish of the victim.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>You know it mattered that family.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I know you said legally it might not have some bearing,

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but it'll have a bearing if it came down to

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the governor deciding to sign or not sign a ford

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or commute or whatever the sentence.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Might be, you make a very good chance.

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I was letting her view be known.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And we have have we not seen some governors taken

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to consideration here in the past year, Yes, and actually

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>go with the families witches So that's pretty powerful.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Also powerful. When we come back, we're going to tell

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>you what Krista Pike has had to say now about

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>her crime. It's a very very I even given all

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the horrific details of what this woman is convicted of

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and has admitted to, hearing where she is now might

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 2>soften your stance on what you think should happen to her.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Come September and.

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back everyone to Amy and TJ Presents, where we

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>are talking about the execution of Christa Gail Pike. She

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>is fifty years old. She is set to be executed

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 2>September thirtieth for a crime she committed thirty years ago,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>a vicious killing of a romantic rival. She was eighteen

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>at the time of the murder. Her victim was eighteen.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And here is what Krista Pike has said one in

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a website that has been created by her supporter. She

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 2>This was her statement that is posted on her website

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>by folks who don't want to see her die. She says,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>there is no excuse for what I did. I take

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>full responsibility for my actions and regret everything that happened

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that night. I only want my situation to be looked

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>at now through the eyes of logic instead of anger

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and answer the question of if I deserve to die

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>for a crime committed by three people. She says this

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>because her boyfriend got life in prison and the other

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>friend who was there testified and was given probation.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>The boyfriend, by the way, this just happened. He was

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>eligible for parole last year. He ain't getting out. I mean,

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible to see she has an execution date set

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>up at the same time the other guy was eligible

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to get the hell out of prison.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that wild? That's she was the one who did.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>She was the vicious acts they stood by. He lured

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>her And look, in a lot of states, that wouldn't matter.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 2>If you're a part of a crime and someone dies

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>in the act of that crime, you are still on

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the hook for murder. But so that was that, not

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 2>that emotional, not that powerful. But the letter she wrote

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to the Tennessee and is what moved me. She said,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 2>think back to the worst mistake you made as a

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 2>reckless teenager, while mine happened to be huge, unforgettable and

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 2>ruined countless lives. I was a mentally ill eighteen year

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 2>old kid. It took me numerous years to even realize

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the gravity of what I'd done, and even more to

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>accept how many lives I affected. I took the life

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of someone's child, sister, friend. It sickens me now to

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>think that someone as loving and as compassionate as myself

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 2>had the ability to commit such a crime.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I hear you and you broke. I will listen to

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides who re that and say, you are full

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. You've had time, you did the crime, this

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was the punishment, and justice has to be carried out.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I will listen to somebody else who said all of

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that is correct, and no matter if you think she's

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just doing this to save her butt or not, as

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a decent human and just some part pulls at your heartstring.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>To have some grace or some sympathy for even a

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>person capable of pulling off as heinous of a crime.

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Is that Robes. It is very difficult. Two.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jesus did it. I guess right, So it

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>was pretty difficult to do. But to be forgiving of

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>someone in the face of the worst type of crime

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>who it asks a lot of a human being Robes

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and certainly asks even more once you hear the statement

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of her mother of the victims.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Stay yes, I mean yeah, you can never put yourself

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>in her shoes, and I could never ever pass judgment

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 2>on how she feels or what she wants in terms

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>of justice for her daughter and for the pain, the

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>life of pain that she has had to endure missing

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>her daughter. I totally get that. I think it's interesting though,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 2>when we've seen, especially folks on death row actually have

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>something of value to add. Maybe it's to other inmates,

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's to the lives of family members who are

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>on the other side, who they can show as a

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>cautionary tale, but at least offers some wisdom or some

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>guidance to prevent other people from going down that path.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 2>That's the other side of it. Is there value? Is

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 2>there something they can still contribute should they be given

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity of redemption and grace and to be able

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 2>to rehabilitate who they are and what they believe and

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>who they stood for what they stood for.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 3>You said redemption and grace. I guess for me and

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of people, that might be a higher bar.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm just talking mercy.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's not seem to be something we have

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a high tolerance for these days broke just mercy. You

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>did what you did, but I am not going to

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be vengeful. I am not going to say you deserve

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the same. I am going to grant mercy. And I

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>know it's not nothing to do with war and things

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, but we have a mindset or an attitude

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>or coming from the highest ranks in this country that

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of attention. No mercy like making a

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>game or a joke out of killing people that we

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think are bad people.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a game.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>The boats I can see the boats, all those hecks

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have kept posting those videos looking blowing these guys out

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of the water like it's fun, like it's a video game.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>And so we don't seem like a merciful country, quite frankly,

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>asking for ropes. Can we extend that to anybody these days?

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Just mer It doesn't look like that's going to happen

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 2>for Pike, and certainly the lawsuit will follow it. But

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the state's response seemed to swift and fairly sound actually

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 2>in terms of what she is claiming and what they

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>are stating. And of course we will follow any ruling

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 2>that may come on this, but she's got some time.

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>There'll be other appeals, most certainly before September thirtieth. And

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>this is the state of Tennessee. Not sure what their

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 2>track record is on granting clemency to folks, but it

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>does happen. This is a pretty vicious crime. I think

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>her age, the fact that she was eighteen, the fact

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>that she was mentally ill and that has been diagnosed.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't know if that would be of consideration by this governor,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 2>but she would be the nineteenth woman executed in modern

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 2>US history. This is also interesting. I didn't realize this.

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 2>There are forty eight female death row inmates in the

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 2>US right now still awaiting getting that execution date. Just

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>for comparison's sake, men, there are about twenty one hundred

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>men on death row right now in this country and

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>forty eight women on death row.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a very low percentage. And you talk of the other.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Women who have been who have gotten the death penalty

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for a crime the committed at eighteen, there are there

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have been.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 3>She's the fourth.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>One of them was exonerated, one of them was commuted,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and the other one is in California where there's a

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>moratory im one executions. So essentially, what you're talking about

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>eighteen year old women who committed crimes. There's only one

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>right now who is eligible to be killed in that

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>group since nineteen seventy six. She's the only one. Wow,

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>She's the only one. One got cleared, one got commuted,

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and one is in California. She's the only one right

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>now who has been convicted as a woman at eighteen

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>who's set to die.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, she's the only one.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>All right. Well, we will of course follow this case

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:01.239
<v Speaker 2>through again. Her execution date September thirtieth, twenty six and

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>without everyone, We appreciate you listening to us. As always,

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I made me robock On behalf of TJ. Holmes. We

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>will talk to you soon.