WEBVTT - ASML Earnings Signal AI Demand Holding Strong

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Lolow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Miss Bloomberg Tech coming up ASML says bookings for its

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>most sophisticated chip making machines remain resilient thanks to the

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>AI boom.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 3>That's a whirlwind of data center.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>News and Microsoft cutting a fourth deal. Then Scale among

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 2>others will break it all down, and Apple updates its

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 2>top of the line. I've had pro when other products

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>with its own in house chip first a SML the

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>maker of EUV equipment, the most sophisticated chip equipment that

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>then get sent to key partners around China but also

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>around Asia, and they're showing strong bookings. Let's get the

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>details of Bloomberg's equities reporter Henry Wren And what's so

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>important is it? The EUV Extreme Ultra Violet lithography machines

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>seem to be being still snapped up even as China

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>has to pull away eventually.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so thanks for having me and for this quarter,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 4>which is the market focus. Is this EUV order's number

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>and has risen to the highest level since late twenty

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty three, a huge plus for investors, and that's why

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 4>we've been seeing stock trading higher now. So we know

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 4>that actually mainland China investor chip makers they can't order

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 4>EUV tools directly. They can access a less advanced tool

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>called DUV. But it really is a sign that some

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>other chip makers, including Samsung in South Korea, including TSMC

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 4>in Taiwan, is stepping up, and to investors, it's an

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 4>early sign that this rapid increase in AI infrastructure is

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 4>actually translating to the orders that ASML has been seeing

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 4>so far in this quarter.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Interesting is the dominance of Asia as the demand flow

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>us starting to pick up for ASML's equipment.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>But they're in the heart of the geopolitical tension right now.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 2>They must be exposed to concerns around rare earth metals,

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 2>let alone an ability to have to pull away from

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 2>selling into China.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, a lot of discussions on rare earth in the

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 4>morning as well, and ASML said that it has stacked

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 4>enough rare Earth's materials for at least several months because

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 4>realize that we realize that the market has a lot

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 4>of concerns regarding chip equipment makers reliance on those metals

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 4>because analysts said that although in terms of rare earths

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 4>the total material input for ASML, it just accounts for

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 4>a very small amount, but it's still a very critical

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 4>component for its most advanced EUV machines as you mentioned,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 4>but also for its partners for example, because ASML works

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 4>with other partners for mirrors, for other components for uvs

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 4>as well, so it's a very important ingredient into the

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>EUV machines. But so far the company said that it

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>hasn't seen major impact.

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Most valuable European stock, Henry Ren, we appreciate the breakdown

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>on ASML. Let's stick with that very company in the

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Broader AI conversation. Andrew gardners with us the City Research

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 2>how of European Technology Equity Research, and you have a

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>bio rating on a SML, you have a price target

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of more than a thousand euros.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 3>What takes us there?

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Andrew, good morning, Thank you for having me. Yes, we

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 6>continue to be bullish on ASML, and I would say

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 6>you know this morning's results and the orders in particular

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>that you are highlighting with Henry just now are a

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 6>step in the right direction in terms of the potential

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 6>appreciation of this stock. I really think we've we've been

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 6>on a journey over the last year in terms of

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 6>resetting a base for twenty twenty six, and they have

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 6>confirmed this morning that you expectations are at a reasonable level.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 6>They don't want to yet go so far as to

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 6>call out growth, but at least going to decline next year,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's removed one of the key uncertainties

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 6>for the stock, and that's helped to get us to

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 6>where we are today, just shy of nine hundred euros.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 6>In terms of further appreciation from here, it's all about

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 6>the growth beyond twenty twenty six in my view, and

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 6>that really comes down to some of what you've been

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 6>alluding to with the demand coming from the artificial intelligence

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 6>players into the data center here. Clearly there's a lot

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 6>of momentum in terms of the news flow ASML management.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 6>We're highlighting that just recently on the conference call. It's

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 6>not yet fully reflected in their order flow, but it's

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 6>something that we expect to come in the future quarters,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 6>and so it's really that momentum that we'll drive the

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 6>stock higher.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I love that you say that, Andrew, because I pulled

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>this part from your note, which I think was really

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>important for our viewers because in particularly say sml acknowledge

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>basically the momentum in the chip industry and market more Braorley,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 2>but this is not yet reflected in firm orders, and

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a growing disconnect in the industry between the mirriaud

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of AICHIP deals being announced and the amount of spend

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 2>committed to these equipment companies.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 3>When will it show up?

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Are you really confident that it will show up, because

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 2>many are questioning the absolute financing of some of these orders.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a critical question for this space, as

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 6>it has been talked about already this morning on this program.

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 6>You're seeing all of these deals being announced by the

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 6>likes of Nvidia, open Ai committing to certain volumes at AMD,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 6>in Nvidia, the memory companies, and yet ASML sure was

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 6>a healthy order intake of five billion euros, but nothing

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 6>too out of the ordinary for them. You know, certainly

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 6>they've had stronger quarters in terms of order intake. So

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 6>I do think given the lead times in particular, we

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 6>are going to see need to see orders pick up

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 6>in the coming quarters in order to support the future

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 6>demand that's been talked about by the artificial intelligence sector

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 6>in particular. For example, ASML, on the EUV tools that

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 6>you've already highlighted, their lead times are roughly twelve months,

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 6>So even if you're ordering today in the fourth quarter,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 6>you're not going to get those tools until the fourth

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 6>quarter of next year, ramping production into twenty twenty seven.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 6>So the lead times are quite long, and therefore the

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 6>supply chain needs to be prepared for that ramp to come.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, you don't cover the stocks in particular, but if

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>you are thinking about an announcement coming from Nvidia saying

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be there with thousands of chips ready

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>by twenty twenty six to be put into which have

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>a data center that open Air has just asked for, and.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>The AMD as well, do you think the backlog is.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>There that they've got them the inventory to be able

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to sustain the twenty twenty six dates that we keep

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 2>getting from these companies.

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 6>So in terms of thinking through the supply chain, you

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 6>take ASML as a critical supplier, the only one in

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 6>the world who can supply the EUV tools that necessary

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 6>for many of these chips. They are close to but

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 6>not quite fully booked for twenty twenty six deliveries. That

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 6>will be the case by the end of twenty twenty five,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 6>given that twelve month lead time, and so really the

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 6>capacity that is already planned to be installed next year,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 6>Sure there could be a little bit of upside, but

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 6>we're already getting close to the limits, and really, as

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 6>I described earlier, what you're playing for is the growth

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 6>into twenty twenty seven. SML management this afternoon here in

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 6>Europe commented on the fact that they don't have perfect

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 6>visibility because those orders aren't there yet, but they are trying.

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 6>They're acknowledging the growth in the industry, the demand that

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 6>is coming, and they're trying to prepare themselves and indeed

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 6>their suppliers to be able to make sure that they

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 6>are not going to be a bottleneck into future years.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>What was so notable about this quarter just gone that

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>they reported on for SML was the forty two percent

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>exposure still to China in terms of revenue. How much

0:07:57.840 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 2>smaller will that became lad eventually?

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So they have called that out in terms of

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 6>the expectation for twenty twenty six and saying it's going

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 6>to decline significantly unquote into next year. I would say,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 6>on a year to date basis through September, they're at

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 6>about thirty two percent of system sales into China. As

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 6>you point out, that was higher in the third quarter

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 6>at about forty two percent, So they're still generating very

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 6>strong business in China at the moment. They're just saying

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 6>given the extended level of spend this year, last year,

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 6>indeed the year before that, they think it should normalize

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 6>into the future. At the moment, though, with the restrictions

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 6>in the way that they are, the Chinese companies are

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 6>ordering what they can and so yeah, we'll just have

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 6>to see exactly how that pans out into twenty twenty six.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 6>The lead times for the type of tools that the

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 6>Chinese customers are buying are not twelve months in the

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 6>way that they are for EUV They're much shorter, six months,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 6>perhaps even less in some cases. So again, things could

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 6>as we look into twenty twenty six.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, you cover ASML and the who's who of the

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 2>European hardware sector.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate you being on the show today.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Gardner of City Research, Apple updated this.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Top of the line iPad pro.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 2>As well as this vision pro headset and the fourteen

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>inch MacBook Pro, rounding out a series of product refreshes,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 2>all ahead of the crucial holiday shopping season that the

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 2>new products all use Apple's latest in house chip five.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>US Consumer Tech editor Mark German joins us for more.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 2>How impactful is it that they're going yet more and

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 2>more on their own supply chain, their own hardware.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 7>Well using in house chips, of course, is you know,

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 7>paramount to what Apple has been doing under Tim Cook

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 7>for the last you know, a decade and a half

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 7>or so. But in terms of these new products today,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 7>this is probably the most minor set of Apple product

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 7>refreshes that I could remember in recent history. What they've

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 7>done here is essentially taking design from prior years, the

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 7>iPad pro design from last year, the MacBook Pro design

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 7>they've been using since twenty twenty one. Obviously, the Vision

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 7>Pro rolled out at the beginning of twenty twenty four,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 7>and they put.

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 5>New processors inside.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 7>So for the Vision Pro, going from the M two

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 7>to the M five, that is a size of a leap.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 5>The UI should be a bit smoother.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 7>The device is now more comfortable, but still thirty five

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 7>hundred dollars. So the fundamentals of the product have not

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 7>changed to any major extent the MacBook Pro. What they've

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 7>done here is they've split the line in terms of

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 7>rollout timing between the entry level and the high end.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 7>So the high end machines with higher end versions of

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 7>the M five chip that won't come out until early

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 7>next year, and then of course the iPad pro that

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 7>got a gigantic upgrade with the M four version last year.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 7>So this is about just bringing up to the latest

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 7>processor in terms of upgrades. Very unlikely that anyone should

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 7>or will upgrade if they have the last generation versions

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 7>of those products, but ahead of the holiday season and

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 7>they keep everything humming.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So if we want something really new, we have to

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>think about the new home devices eventually coming on tap.

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>There's a great story on the terminal about where these

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>are coming from. It seems as though they're leaning less

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>on China all at the same time as Tim Cooks

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to say he's going to invest more in the country.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, both can be true.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 7>They're going to up their investment in China, but at

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 7>the same time, for some newer products they're going to differentiate,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 7>they're going to diversify. They're working with BYD obviously known

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 7>as a electric car maker predominantly in Asia. They also

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 7>do mass manufacturing. They've been doing some final assembly for

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Apple for some iPads over the last year or so.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 7>They're going to do these new devices. Why is that interesting?

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 7>Typically when Apple rolls out an entirely new product category,

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 7>they start with China. This time around, they're starting with Vietnam,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 7>where they already, like I said, make some iPads. They

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 7>make the vast majority of Apple watches and air pods

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 7>for the US market, and they also make.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Some home podsloomg's Mark German always with the latest, We

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:08.239
<v Speaker 2>so appreciate it. Meanwhile, in China, a fatality involving Shaomi's

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 2>SU seventy and v saidan when it's renewed. Scrutiny on

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>flush door handle designs bystanders were unable to open the

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 2>doors for the vehicle to rescue a suspected drunk driver

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>during a collision, who died when the vehicle burst into flames. Now,

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>flush door handles they've recently come under scrutiny globally, Tesla

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 2>now facing an investigation after the Bloomberg reported incidents related

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>to the door design, and Rivian also saying they'll be

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 2>redesigning their handles in an upcoming future model. For more,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Creatudel joins us and your team have been so

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>on top of what has become a global concern about

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>the design of door handles in the latest evs.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and the big concern here, I feel like in

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 8>these issues of crashes and battery fires is particularly the

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 8>troubles that people are having with getting into these vehicles

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 8>from the outside. Yes, there are issues with mechanical releases

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 8>that are different from inside the inside the vehicle and

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 8>different from the typical way you get out of the vehicle.

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 8>But what's really I think alarming for people and particularly

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 8>for first responders, is if these door handles are built

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 8>from the outside to where they just aren't operable when

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 8>the low voltage battery fails or sort of you know,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 8>purposely goes out of commission to sort of prevent against

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 8>these battery fires. You're just not able to get into

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 8>the vehicle without bashing through a window or some other means.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 8>And so to have built a vehicle where the external

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 8>door handles are inoperable without low voltage battery, that's just

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 8>a problem and sort of on its face a concern

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 8>for regulators.

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, why we might see a rush of buying many

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>hammers and cutters to go inside vehicles At the moment, Craig,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 2>which the latest purchase I've just made, It might be

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 2>focused on the regulatory pushback, and you're seeing China in

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>particular looking for feedback open comment by November twenty ten,

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>November the twenty second. But what else are we expecting

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Chinese regulators to do here?

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's interesting that you know this is

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 8>this has been spurred. This rulemaking and this soliciting of

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 8>views from the industry got underway because there was a

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 8>similar incident back in March, also involving a Gaomi vehicle.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 8>And so we've seen the regulator in China move pretty

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 8>quickly here in terms of you know, there was an

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 8>incident that got a lot of attention, there's this second incident,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 8>and I think interestingly we may see some manufacturers not

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 8>necessarily wait for the regulator to change the rules. I

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 8>think Linda LUs a story about this latest incident out

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 8>today goes into this idea that you know, some manufacturers

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 8>already are changing their their door handled designs to take

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 8>into account that this is a concern. And I think

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 8>one of the things that we've seen in China's car

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 8>market is just the level of competition is so intense

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 8>that any way you can sort of sell your cars

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 8>being incrementally better from different performance aspects, including safety. You're

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 8>going to jump at that opportunity.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Zeker jumping at it.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>The nine exports utility vehicle already going back to an

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>old school kind of handle and a return to common

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>sense is for one consultancy called it.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Blooms Creatudell. Thanks so much.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, we're going to be talking all things quantum.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 3>The CEO of d Wave joins us. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>News out of Europe from d Wave, which develops quantum

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>computing systems. Today the company announced an agreement with the

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Swiss Quantum Technology to deploy a D wave advantage to

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>quantum computer in Europe. It's expanding access to the technology.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Glue DA CEO Alan Ratz joins us now from Lake Como,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 2>which of course very close to Switzerland. In Italy where

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the announcement comes from. Alan, what does it mean to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>be deploying this right.

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Here right now?

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 9>So we are going to be deploying an advantage to

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 9>quantum computer here in the region. And it will be

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 9>available to researchers, scientists, businesses in Italy to basically explore

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 9>how to make the best use of quantum computers. This

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 9>is a part of the Q Alliance which was announced yesterday.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 9>The WAVE is a founding member of the Q Alliance

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 9>and that's all about bringing quantum to Italy and support

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 9>of their Digital Transformation initiative.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the FOY four hundred plus cubit advantage

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 2>shoe system. What can it do that is more sophisticated

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>than classical computers today.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 9>Alan So, our four four hundred cubit advantage to quantum

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 9>computer is arguably the largest and most powerful quantum computer

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 9>in the world. At over four thousand cubits. We have

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 9>almost ten times more cubits than anybody else and with

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 9>respect to the power of the processor, we recently published

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 9>in Science a paper showing that we are able to

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 9>compute properties of materials on our quantum computer in minutes

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 9>that it would take nearly a million years to compute

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 9>on the fastest supercomputers in the world. So this is

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 9>literally computing properties that can't be computed classically. This is

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 9>what everybody in the quantum industry has aspired to, namely,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 9>the ability to do something important and useful on a

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 9>quantum computer that can't be done classically, and this advantage

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 9>to quantum computer has achieved that goal.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 2>I believe you solved a physics problem on the behavior

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 2>of magnetism, particularly in certain solids. What's interesting is a

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>ton of phrase arguably, Alan, Why is it only arguably

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the most powerful at the moment? How is your technology

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>differing or or still try to measure itself out versus

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>others out there.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so when it comes to the ability to perform

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 9>a computation on a useful problem that can't be solved classically,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 9>we have the only quantum computer in the world that

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 9>is capable of doing that today. I use the word

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 9>arguably in the context of largest when I talked about

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 9>four four hundred cubits, and the reason why I did

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 9>that is because DWave quantum computers today are what's called

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 9>annealing quantum computers. Everybody else in the industry is pursuing

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 9>a different approach called Gate model quantum computers, and while

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 9>they have many fewer cubits, the nature of the cubits

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 9>is a little different between annealing and gate model. So

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 9>we believe that at four thousand and four one hundred

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 9>and knealing cubits, we are significantly larger than anybody else

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 9>because all these other gate model systems have tens to

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 9>a few hundred cubits. But there is an academic debate

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 9>around the difference between the cubits.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is you are making and generating real revenue.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 3>It's small, but it's there.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 2>But the market capitalization of yours and many other quantum

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 2>computing companies has just gone so far up into the

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 2>right Allen, is the promise and hope being shown up

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 2>in reality from orders because this is Europe taking a

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>ten million euro step forward.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 3>What about other deals?

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So we announced at the end of last year

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 9>that we had sold a quantum computer to the Ulick

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 9>Supercomputing Center in Germany. They purchased that system to connect

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 9>it to their Jupiter exoscale supercomputer to explore new AI workflows.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 9>And then earlier this year we announced that we had

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 9>signed a memorandum of understanding with Yansai University and Incheon

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 9>City in South Korea for the acquisition of a quantum

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 9>computer there. And we have frankly a number of other

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 9>countries and research centers that are interested in acquiring our

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 9>quantum computers as well, and that's just with respect to

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 9>purchasing of the quantum computers. Our quantum computers today are

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 9>also used commercially in support of a broad array of

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 9>business applications. For example, North Wales Police is using us

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 9>to compute the best way to forward place police vehicles

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 9>to be able to arrive at incidents in a timely fashion.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 9>These customers use us over the cloud, so we have

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 9>both a cloud based business and an on premise.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Business North Wales UK or Australia.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 5>UK.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating, absolutely fascinating. Thank you very much for data, Alan Barats.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>It's learning about the European focus that you seem to

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>be having with the business in particular US based company

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 2>and the new announcement out of lake Como.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 3>We wish you well over their d Waceo. Welcome back

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to Blue Beg Tech. Let's tack in on these markets.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Because we are trading higher once again, new AI deals,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>AI compute deals helping push up then as that one hundred,

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>we're at one point two percent. Amid some of the

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical risks, we continue trading higher. Let's go onder the

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>hood and look, what's really moving from a points perspective.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 3>We know about the AIRSMEL numbers, we.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Know about the optimism that chip equipment is still selling strong.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's have a look.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>At AMD and indeed in video both of them getting

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 2>some more mighty price target raises over at HSPC today

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>more than eight percent. In fact, AMD is your leader

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>in terms of points moves on the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Again, this hope that yet.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>More AI compute needs means more desire for their chips,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 2>and they are making an indent on the likes VideA,

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 2>but in VideA could go high to the tune of

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>what an eight trillion dollar company is what HSBC is

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 2>currently outlining or one hundred and eighty one as we speak,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>up nine ten percent on the day. Let's dig into

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that particular report a little bit more and just the

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 2>AI further more broadly with Bloomberg executive reporter Ryan Lastelica

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and Ryan they are seeing significant market cap accretion.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>To invidea on what over at HSBC.

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's not going to come as a surprise of

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 10>many people, but they are touting the growth potential of

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 10>artificial intelligence. Specifically, they see the total addressable market of

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 10>these AI chips expanding beyond the hyperscalers, which are the

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 10>major Nvidia customers right now, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 10>so forth, and really sees that expanding beyond them into

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 10>other parts of the economy. So as this continues to grow,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 10>they see in Vidia's earnings continue to grow and eventually

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 10>leading it to the market cap you said before, I

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 10>think it was about nearly eight trillion dollars, so certainly

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 10>a significant jump from where it.

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Is right now.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 2>That the most bullish when it comes to the overall

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 2>analyst recommendations ran how much you're seeing portfolio managers echoing

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 2>that sort of well further and excitement, because we've had

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk of bubbles just yesterday with discussing

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 2>them all.

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 5>Hm.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So I do hear some people talking about, you know,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 10>having a certain amount of skepticism, can this continue to

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 10>go on the way it has been going on? But

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 10>even when I ask them specifically, do you see maybe

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 10>new competition threats from A and D or Broadcom just

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 10>given some of the deals that those companies have announced

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 10>this past week, they still continue to like in Vidia.

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 10>They still see it as the market leader. It continues

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 10>to have a dominant market share in the market for

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 10>these GPUs, so no one is very barre. I think

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 10>there is one analyst on Wall Street right now who

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 10>has a cell equivalent rating on Invidia, but other than that,

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 10>people are pretty positive about it. I'd also note that

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 10>as it continues to grow, the multiple has been coming

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 10>in a little bit, so these are not the kind

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 10>of dot Com era multiples that you know, some of

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 10>the bubble concerns might be indicating. These are certainly a

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 10>little bit above their medium term average, but certainly not

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 10>at the level set would be you know, real nosebleed.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's round plus Selca thank you so much for the breakdown.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk more about the AI compute demand right now,

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 2>because it's time for talking tech and Microsoft data center

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 2>builder developer en Scale, Well, they've.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Just reached a fourth.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Deal, this time to build a site in Texas with

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>power capacity of much as two hundred and forty megal watts.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 3>The UK startup.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Says the site will have over one hundred thousand new

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>in video chips. The GB three hundred is scheduled to

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>open in the third quarter of next year. Plus an

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 2>investment consortium including black Rocks Global Infrastructure partner, Abu Dab's MGX,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft and Video, and many more.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm gree to buy Aligned data centers for forty billion dollars.

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 2>This is the first deal for that partnership that the

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>investors established a year ago to invest heavily in AI

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 2>data centers and energy, and Coreyeve is partnering with startup

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 2>poll Side to develop a massive data center complex.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 3>In West Texas.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 2>The site will be powered using local natural gas and

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>is expected to generate as much as electricity for hooverd APT.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk more about all this AI investment news. Thomas Martin's,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 2>with their senior portfolio manager at Global Investments, got north

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>of three billion dollars in assets under management.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Thomas, is this a bubble?

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, thanks for having me on your program. And of

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 11>course that is the question that people are asking when

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 11>things like this just go you know, parabolic, to use

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 11>a word that captures the imagination. People wonder, you know,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 11>how long can this go on, and they start comparing

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 11>it to the past. We don't believe that it's a bubble.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 11>The underlying factor and force is the usefulness that can

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 11>be gotten from these AI models.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 5>And we're only at the very very beginning of that.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 11>You know, companies are having varying degrees of success at

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 11>implementing these and the compute.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 5>Power that's needed is prodigious.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 11>It's already been said, and all of these deals really

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 11>articulate various aspects of what is going on with bringing

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 11>this kind of compute to the folks and companies.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 5>That need it.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 2>But Thomas, what fundamental data you're looking at that shows

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 2>productivity and revenue.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Will be there?

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's kind of the rub is that that data

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.959
<v Speaker 11>is not really there yet in a way that you

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 11>can put your finger on it and count on it.

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 11>And I think that's why you're getting some of this questioning.

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 11>So a lot of what's going on is betting on

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 11>the future that problems are going to be solved and

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 11>this is going to be productive, and you see that

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 11>in the beginning parts of what's going on. Just anybody

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 11>as a consumer who is using AI to just ask

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 11>it questions about anything can see the improvement.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 5>But that's not what really is going to drive it.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 11>It's going to be very complex things driven by businesses

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 11>and agents and automation that is still very much to

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 11>come and which will require more chips than we have

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 11>and more connectivity that we have.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 5>So the need for that compute is gigantic.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Mid supply chain headaches and more is and anxiety around

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 2>China whether or not can keep buying some chips the

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 2>US makes more broadly whether we'll get the rare earth

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>metals that are needed for a lot of the supply chain. Thomas,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 2>how do you factor in the risks of geopolitical.

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, they're very significant. And the issue with the rare

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 11>earths and the magnets that they go into is that

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 11>when you have one country like China that possesses a

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 11>very high level call it seventy eighty percent depending on

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 11>what we're talking about, of that, they have a lot

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 11>of leverage to be able to shut that down if

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 11>they want to or to extract from the markets. And

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 11>they know they have that power, and so does the

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 11>United States. So if they decide that they're going to

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 11>start using that and escalating, it will take a bigger

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 11>escalation to kind of resolve that. I think what the

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 11>markets are looking at is the opportunity is so great

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 11>that that will not be allowed to happen.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Look, you have been managing money for a long time,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean even just twenty fourteen over at Global and

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Thomas, you are kind of talking a narrative

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 2>where we have to believe, you have to ultimately have

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 2>hope that this all comes to bear. Is that kind

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of the narrative You have to talk to your own

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 2>clients about that. Ultimately, there aren't that many tangible fundamental

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 2>data points you can use.

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>You just have to use a product and know how much.

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>What productive it's made you as an individual, even if

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you're not paying for it.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, concepts are very difficult, and they're very easy to

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 11>get excited about and to capture the imagination. But where

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 11>you really get the where the rubber meets the road, right,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 11>is are they actually being used? And if you point

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 11>back to the Internet and to connectivity back then with

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 11>the laying of fiber et cetera and the switches that

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 11>got ahead of itself and it wasn't really implemented. It

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 11>was easy to imagine, but the implementation took a long

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 11>time to get to where we are now. But where

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 11>we are now is absolutely using all of those things

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 11>and is enabling this revolution and.

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 5>This one is just happening a lot faster.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 11>And so yes, you have to believe, but of course

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 11>you have to look for proof, and in the third

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 11>quarter earnings and as we go forward, that's what everybody

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 11>is going to be looking for. But these deals that

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 11>you just talked about our concrete evidence that real money

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 11>is being put to work by a diversified number of

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 11>very sophisticated and well capitalized players.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Real money of money.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>To Thomas Martin's senior portfolio manager at glow World Investments,

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>great speaking with you. Now, let's talk about billionaire Filanginis

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Mackenzie Scott reducing her stake in Amazon by forty two

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.479
<v Speaker 2>percent over the past year, according to regulatory filings that

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>was on Tuesday, the latest disclosure from the end of September,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 2>so she now holds eighty one point one million shares,

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 2>was down fifty eight million from a year earlier. Scott

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>had ended up with about four percent of the tech

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 2>giant after her twenty nineteen divorce from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, Salesforce pushes its Agentaki experience in this year's

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Dreamforce conference or on that next This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 12>We love agent Force and we're investing huge amounts Force

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 12>huge amouse. But listen to this, we've gone fast with

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 12>the agent Force, and we have gone with any other technology.

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Salesforce CEO mart Beni are speaking yesterday at their Dreamforce

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five conference, during which Salesforce revealed it's AI

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>customer service tools saves its own company one hundred million

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars a year. Who makes Brodie Ford covered this story

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and joins us now, And that's basically the sales pitch.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 2>We're using it, we're saving.

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, should do it too, right, But to me, the

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 13>fact that they're leaning so heavily on internal implementation, internal savings,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 13>it could be a bit of a red flag, right.

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 13>I mean, traditionally companies like to lean on their customer stories.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 13>And it kind of brings us back to the whole

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 13>question of the moment, which is which companies benefit from

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 13>the AI boom in the enterprise? Is it the old

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 13>school leaders like Salesforce, Is it the young ones like

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 13>Open Ai? Right now, the anxiety is towards companies like Salesforce.

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>The question also the moment is any of this making

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 2>real productive gains for other companies? And we've heard time

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>and time again the n MIT report the ninety five

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of pilots aren't working.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 3>How is Salesforce able to combat that narrative?

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeap, Yeah, there's this huge gap right now where a

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 13>lot of people anegotally will say AI has made my

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 13>own life much more effective. I can use chat GPT

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 13>for all these things and it's great in the enterprise.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 13>There is just still this big.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 5>Gap right now.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 13>And so Salesforce is saying that, look, we have new

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 13>features all the time. We're making it easier for her

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 13>to use pricing wise and all these other ways, and

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 13>here's how you can adopt. But still adoption has been

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 13>a little more tepid than most would have thought maybe

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 13>two years ago.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>And looking at the share price that tepid adoption, it's

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty painful. Stock is down twenty eight percent so far

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>this year. And still Dreamforce is a dream and they've

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 2>got Metallico and they got Zimboon and they're throwing all.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>The money at the situation.

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 2>How is that reading for those in San Francisco and

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 2>more broadly.

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 13>I mean, Salesforce is a cash flow monster. Right Let's

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 13>say that they aren't able to capitalize in this next wave.

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 13>They're still making tons of money, but the question is

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 13>are they losing the mind share are they losing the

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 13>growth potential for this new investment wave? And investors can't

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 13>decide every six months the narrative changes right now, application

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 13>leaders like them, like Adobe, even like a service Now

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 13>they're a bit in the penalty box right and so

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 13>so far Benioff hasn't been able to convince them otherwise.

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 13>But there is an analyst day today, and you know,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 13>maybe we'll tomorrow be able to say, actually, they're doing great.

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we've just had SAP, You've got Oracle

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 2>talking up. But it's a particular event at the moment.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Can you steer as as to who of the new

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 2>guard they're almost worried about.

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, who of the new guard? It's the AI native

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 13>workplace tools. I mean, I would even throw a chat

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 13>GBT into this. I would throw people using anthropic models

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 13>and coding their own apps. I mean, what's so interesting

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 13>is that there aren't a lot of super clear competitors

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 13>this point. But it's more the conceptual idea that a

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 13>company like Salesforce will is the center of gravity for

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 13>so long and enterprises and that maybe that paradigm is changing.

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 13>It's not a tangible competitor yet, but it's this kind

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 13>of creeping anxiety.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, while Salesforce is trying to get itself integrated

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 2>within chat ept and doing that success to see who

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 2>uses it in the product in begs, Brodie Ford is

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 2>always breaking it down brilliantly. Look as Salesforce works to

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 2>sell its agent Force experience, the next guest says customers,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not really ready for it yet, and quote Salesforce

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 2>knows it, Rebecca Wetteman, Why allow our CEO principal analyst

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 2>joins us. Now, what's you'll read on Dreamforce and Agent Force?

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it being adopted?

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 14>Hey, Caroline, great to be here, Thanks for having me.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 14>So I'm here in San Francis great Dreamforce and I

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 14>will tell you that there's a lot of talk about

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 14>the agentic enterprise and what that means for customers, and

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 14>what we saw yesterday was exactly what With all due

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 14>respect to Brody, we're talking about the need to show

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 14>real customer adoption with real recognizable brands talking about real

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 14>business results.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think what we've seen.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 14>With AI is we went from sort of the fear

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 14>of missing out in the beginning to what we're calling FOMU,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 14>the fear of messing up. Now customers are really concerned

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 14>because they experimented on those big projects that you talked

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 14>about that didn't necessarily yield results.

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>And so are they more willing to experiment with a

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 2>non trusted partner that's already part of their overall spend

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 2>from an internal software basis, or are they more willing

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 2>to go out on a limb and try the new

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 2>recruits that are coming intens of startups.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 14>All we definitely heard from Salesforce customers yesterday was that

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 14>trusted partner is really important. But I think we're probably

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 14>seeing the biggest innovator's dilemma that we've ever seen in tech.

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 14>Salesforce knows and when I was talking to Mark about

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 14>this yesterday, we talked about it.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 3>They have to.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 14>Bring all of those customers along, which means not just

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.959
<v Speaker 14>innovating and driving the latest and greatest in AI technology,

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 14>but really providing those safety nets, providing that guidance, providing

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 14>those examples of customers like them who have achieved real

0:35:58.080 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 14>business success with AIS.

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Can you brag about that are making that sort of leap?

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 14>Well, I've talked to probably twenty or thirty Agent forced

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 14>customers from small to large organizations across multiple verticals that

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 14>have really achieved success today. The poster children yesterday were

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 14>folks like Pepsi Williams and Sonoma Pandora Dell. So really

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 14>across both consumer brands and more tech brands, would you say,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 14>really focused on how they're delivering success today?

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I compare and contrast what you've learned at some of

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 2>the other big bring together moments that we've had. You've

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 2>been over an SAPs, You've also been an Oracles AI world.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Is there s reality that they're.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Vindicating the overall market capitalization of these companies and the

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 2>AI bubble narrative that's brewing.

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 14>You know, I think that the challenge is customers don't

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 14>want to be educated, they want to be successful, and

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 14>those vendors that are really able to show and not

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 14>tell how they're our customers are achieving AI success today

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 14>are ultimately going to be the ones that win.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Can I can I ask a little bit about what

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 2>your view is from the what that you're doing with customers,

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.439
<v Speaker 2>with people as to whether too much money is being

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 2>thrown at this for the amount of productivity games we're

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 2>getting in the heir now.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 14>You know, I think we've seen a lot of folks

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 14>sort of dip their toe in the pool and get

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 14>incremental results. They really need to be comfortable diving in

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 14>to get those kind of exponential benefits that we're talking about,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 14>and most folks simply aren't there yet.

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 3>So how are they getting that?

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 14>Well, it's it's like I talked with Mark about yesterday.

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 14>The vendors have to bring customers along and that's not

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 14>about delivering the latest innovation, which is important. It's about

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 14>providing those baby steps to help them get there, to

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 14>help them understand what the payback is, to help them

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 14>understand what the business cases, to help them focus their

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 14>efforts not on that shiny AI object, but on the

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 14>one that's likely to deliver the most real value for theiranization, Rebecca.

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Is an organization doing enough wholesale change in terms of

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 2>interlacing human resources, people management with the CTO and the

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 2>technical sides of the business to actually implement this right now?

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, Caroline, the short answer is no.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 14>I mean, we see fewer than twenty percent of companies

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 14>have a policy on the use of AI today, and

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 14>fewer than ten percent have training and reskilling in place,

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 14>not just to train people on how to use AI effectively,

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 14>but how to train them for what their future job

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 14>is going to look like, and that's going to be

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 14>a key part of.

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 2>This moving forward to is there a standout company that

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 2>you think has been taking its clients along and helping

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 2>them edicate at the pace you think is necessary.

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Who's doing the best job today?

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Again, if we go back to the narrative that

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 14>you have to show them, not tell them. In terms

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 14>of being able to show actual customers receiving results with

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 14>a gentic AI today, Salesforce is way out ahead.

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Rebecca Whiteman Balois.

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 2>We thank you very much being an optimism optimistic voice

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the agentic dream ever at Salesforce. Meanwhile,

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 2>coming up Weimo and it plans to launch its driver

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 2>US ride hailing service in London next year. We'll have

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 2>all those details. That's next. There's bloombg tech.

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 15>M.

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Weimo is planning to launch its driveris ride hailing service

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in London next year, marking its second international expansion and

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 2>it's first in Europe, whom most Natalie Lung covers the

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 2>gig economy for US and joins US. Now what's interesting

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is they're not going to be partnering with Uber and Lyft.

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Longer term here, they're going to have their own app offering.

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 15>Yes, Wymore is going to work with an Uber backed

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 15>company Move. They were found in Africa and they used

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 15>to do vehicle financing and now expanding globally. They're going

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 15>to manage these fleets for Weimo and they actually were

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 15>gonna planning to raise you know, more than three hundred

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 15>billion dollars at like two billion valuations according to report

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 15>by colleagues last month. So there's real business here for

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 15>fleet companies like Move.

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 2>But London seems to be welcoming with open arms. Both

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 2>we got Weimo and also Uber seems to be on

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a similar flight path right in terms of having robotaxis

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 2>in London.

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so what happened was earlier this year the UK

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 15>government moved forward their regulatory framework to pilot these autonomous

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 15>vehicle trials to next year. So both companies are eyeing

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 15>sort of that same timeline.

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting do you go back to the days when

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Uber was first coming into London and the backlash from

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 2>black cabs over there at the time. Are we anticipating

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 2>lobbying or is it the government just so wants to

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:58.760
<v Speaker 2>be all welcoming to innovation right now.

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 15>That's really part of what's need to be done and

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 15>what needs to be seen as these trials go on.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 15>As these trials start, you know, what does the community,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 15>how how do they respond and how do you know regulators?

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 15>You know sort of consider all you know, all kind

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 15>of voices from different.

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's not Waym's first rodeo.

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 2>They've been piloting and successfully unrolling in plenty of cities already.

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 3>What is it?

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 2>How are they going to do it in London? How

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 2>will we see that integration into the ecosystem.

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 15>So they're starting with a very small fleet of vehicles

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 15>around a one hundred square mile radius in London and

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 15>so in the coming months and so this will sort

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 15>of lay the groundwork for when they launch it commercially

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 15>next year.

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think were broadly, how are they doing elsewhere?

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you said, this is the second international destin.

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 15>Nice, and so the first international city was in Tokyo.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 15>They're currently still testing with the local app and local

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 15>taxi company. They haven't launched commercially yet. But in the

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 15>US we've seen different launch approaches, whether it's launch exclusively

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 15>on the Uber app in Austin and Atlanta or on

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 15>their own app in San Francisco, in LA So we're

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 15>seeing different approaches.

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 2>They're trying horses for courses, robotaxis for courses.

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Natalie Lang, we appreciate it.

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 15>Now.

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Remember to keep checking these markets, AMD and Video on

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 2>a high. We get an upgrade for HSBC on both

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 2>of these stocks.

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 3>But don't forget to check out.

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Our podcast Digest all the AI data center news on

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 2>your terminal, as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart.

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg