WEBVTT - SAP and Carahsoft Get Probed, OpenAI Pitches the White House

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>From Mahard where innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Vallet NBN.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York and San Francisco.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. SAP and IT solutions

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 5>provider Carasoft get probed by the US for potential price fixing.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Open Ai makes a pitch to the White House. This

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 6>is France gets ready for its own AI summit.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 5>In cybersecurity, startup Whiz is mulling selling shares and a

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty billion dollar valuation.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 4>First, let's get to our top story.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 5>German software giant SAP, product reseller Carasoft and other companies

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 5>and being probed by the US officials potentially conspiring to

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 5>overcharge government agencies over the course of a decade SAP

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 5>shares as you can see currently training lower on the

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 5>report bloomgs. Jake Bleiberg joins us on the story you

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 5>broke it? What exactly is being investigated here?

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 6>Jake, thank you for having me.

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 7>The investigation is into what is a potential scheme to,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 7>over the course of ten years, overcharge the US government

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 7>and primarily the Department of Defense for purchases of SAP

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 7>technology through a variety of resellers, including Kerosoft, that total

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 7>up to two billion dollars.

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 6>Jake, what a karasof spokesperson told you is important in

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 6>this story. In the context of a raid that took

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 6>place at Karasoft. They gave you details, but did not

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 6>go as far as to confirm that it related to

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 6>a relationship with SAP. Please explain the reporting absolutely, and

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 6>that is a very important detail.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 7>Yesterday, FBI and Department of Defense investigators searched Carosoft's offices

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 7>in Virginia. However, we don't know whether or not that

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 7>search is related to this separate civil investigation of Carosoft

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 7>and SAP over the potential price fixing.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's dwell a little bit and also some other

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 5>comments that have been coming. SAP says it's been cooperating

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 5>with the DOJ in terms of the civil investigation since

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 5>the beginning. We understand Eccentia is also involved in this

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 5>in some way. A spokesmerson for that company, a subsidiary

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 5>of Accentia, that's Accentia Federal Services, is responding to an

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 5>administration subpoena as cooperating with the DOJ, and the Justice

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Department didn't respond to requests for comment. What's interesting is,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>of course the money you say, and the amounts that

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 5>are involved here. Ultimately, how will this investigation continue and

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 5>what could be the fine on the back of it.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, so it's a great question. We don't ultimately know

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 7>whether there will be a fine. But what we do

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 7>know is that federal investigators are continuing their work trying

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 7>to understand what happened here, and that they're framing this

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 7>as a potential wrongdoing related to a very large series

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 7>of purchases, hundreds of contracts totaling as much as two

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars over you know, since twenty fourteen. And again

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 7>I should really emphasize we don't know that anyone will

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 7>ultimately be accused of any wrongdoing, but this is being

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 7>investigated under the False Claims Act, and that allows the

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 7>government to seek or to recover as much as three

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 7>times it's damages plus a penalty. So we're that to

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, we're litigation to sort of commence there. The

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 7>government could be looking at a lot of money.

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 6>Blomberg's take by Bay, thank you now a key interview

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 6>with Bloomberg Alphabet CEO sunderpitch Ey says the company's legal

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 6>battles of antitrust could drag on for many years. He

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 6>was commenting on the federal anti trust trial, which the

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Justice Department is alleging Google manipulates the roughly six hundred

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 6>and seventy five billion dollar display advertising market. Pitch I

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 6>sat down with David Rubinstein for an upcoming episode of

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Peer to Peer. Listen to this.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 3>That case is just getting underway, So I expected to

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>take take some time. And you know, but look where

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 3>we can figure out, you know, constructive solutions. I think

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>we will where we think it really harms our ability

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 3>to in it on behalf of our users or you know,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 3>we are going to be vigorous in defending ourselves and

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it's going to take time for it.

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 6>To play out. And just today Google is in turn

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 6>ramping up a legal fight with Microsoft over the lucrative

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 6>cloud market, accusing the US software giant of abusing its

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 6>market dominant. In a formal complaint to the EU's antitrust watchdog,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 6>Google alleges that Microsoft's licensing terms for Azure cloud services

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 6>restricts customers accessing rival platforms including Google Cloud and Amazon

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 6>Web Services.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Caro Let's talk open AI.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 5>It's pitched at the Biden administration on the need for

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 5>massive data centers that could each use.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 4>As much power as entire cities.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Framing the expansion is necessary to develop more advanced AI

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 5>models and compete with China.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 4>In MEGS, Seth Feynman joins us.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Now, Seth, the context of how massive, we're talking with

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 5>each dentist data center as many as three nuclear plants.

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 9>As many as five nuclear clients. Now, how do you

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 9>power that? Where does that power come from? Is it

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 9>nuclear or other clean andergy resources? Nobody can really say it,

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 9>but it speaks to the tremendous scope of ambition here

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 9>that Sam Moltman and have. We've reported for a lot

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 9>of this year that he's been trying to build up

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 9>a coalition to support infrastructure development in the US and globally.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 9>This is really the clearest, the most explicit indication we

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 9>have of what he's thinking in the US and abroad.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 6>It's based on a document the Bloomberg reviewed, right, But

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 6>I do think back to February when we reported and

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 6>I think you edited the story about this idea that

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 6>Sam Outman also went to the US government and said, well,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 6>I kind of want some green light to take money

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 6>from other investors because we know seth this is going

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 6>to be really capital intensive. What do we know about

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 6>that side of the story.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I think there's two different things happening here. At

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 9>One is if they go overseas or they work with

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 9>overseas and Middle Eastern investors, that brings a whole set

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 9>of complications. But the document that we've seen suggests that

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 9>in the US they're thinking about probably issues around permitting

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 9>and streamlining and construction and approval, getting these data centers

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 9>on the grid, and ultimately trying to get all the

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 9>stakeholders from grid operators to data center operators to agree

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 9>on how to build this stuff. And I think what

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 9>they want to see from the US, in no uncertain

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 9>terms as more favorable policies. And I will say that

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 9>some of that seems clear in what the White House

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 9>has said after a meeting earlier this month with Sam Altman,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 9>the CEO, and Vilia and other AI executives. They are

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 9>putting together task forces and engagement teams and others to

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 9>help begin thinking about that streamlining process. But will they

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 9>move as fast as Silicon Valley likes to move. That's

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 9>very much a question.

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Silicon Valley is already moving the Microsoft deal that was

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 5>done with Constellation, but that.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Is but one nuclear plant that can be refired back up.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 5>How many years is this subultimately going.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 8>To tell you?

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 9>I think that's the question everyone has. Even that facility

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 9>that you're describing could take years to come up online.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, Altman himself is investing in nuclear fission and

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 9>other breakthrough technologies that may never actually come to fruition,

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 9>But it feels like if you can't get it through that,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 9>how else are you going to get this much power?

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 6>Some Altman's talks about how every other day he meets

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 6>with a government official. This is the most important AI

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 6>company in the world. Probably, so we actually have a

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 6>sense of the people in the White House or in

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 6>federal agencies that are responsible for interacting with him.

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think frun and Center for Altman is probably

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 9>Gina Raymondo. I think Doug is his key point person

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 9>that we've heard and seeing him reporting here. But I

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 9>think he's probably dealing with people across government, and I'm

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 9>sure that he's thinking about what would meaning if there

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 9>is a change an administration going forward to continue to

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 9>kind of really smooth over the path towards these kind

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 9>of investments.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 6>So Bloomberg Cephoeman, who leads our AI coverage, thank you

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 6>very much. Now coming up, China is complicating the electric

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 6>vehicle outlook for Wall Street, with Morgan Stanley changing its

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 6>tune on the auto sector at large and some analysts

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 6>anticipating a stellar quarter for Tesla. And later today I'll

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 6>be heading to Meta Connect where the company is likely

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 6>to show off some new VR and mixed reality technology.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to sit down with metas CTO Andrew Bosworth

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 6>or bozz for an exclusive interview. With Metas shares currently

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 6>trading very near to a fresh record high, there's a

0:08:49.400 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 6>lot more to come. This is Bloomberg Technology, All streets

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 6>changing its tune on US electric car makers. Morgan Stanley

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 6>analyst Adam Jonas cutting his overall auto outlook amid competition

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 6>in China and concerns around the US consumer. He cut

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 6>Rivian to equal weight today and also downgraded GM and Ford.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 6>On the other side, there's Tesla. At least four analysts

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 6>have boosted their estimates for Testa's third quarter delivery numbers

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 6>which are due next week, all points to signs that

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 6>sales are starting to pick up for Tesla, particularly in China. Caroline, Yeah, and.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 5>We want to discuss China evs and what, of course

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 5>regulation is happening in Europe with Transporter Environment Senior Director

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 5>Julia chlis Conover. Julia, we hear of some of the

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 5>analyst reactions to Tesla, to Rivian, to EV's. More generally,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 5>we're also seeing governments react to the worrying from their

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 5>side that EV's are very cheap when they're coming from China,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 5>and it's because they're subsidized. Just set the con text

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 5>where we's done right now?

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 10>Right Well, I think that's a really big debate, and

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 10>right now in Brussels where I'm based, basically at every

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 10>minute of the day, this is what politicians and everyone

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 10>is discussing. I think the bottom line is is that

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 10>China had a long term vision as well as subsidies

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 10>for over a decade now to build their expertise not

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 10>just in electric vehicles but the entire supply chain. They

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 10>had policies on demand side, on supply side, and on

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 10>this just entire ecosystem. So today they simply have excellent

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 10>high quality technology, dominance of the supply chain, as well

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 10>as problems domestically leading to oversupply that they want to

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 10>sell across the world. I'll just put one fact for

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 10>you which I think really underscores why the current ev

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 10>tariff negotiations in Europe are so important. Almost sixty percent

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 10>of all Chinese IVY global exports are actually go into

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 10>day to Europe while the US market is closed to them.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 10>That's why the current negotiations in Brussels over the higher

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 10>tariffs are so tense and really really still just heating

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 10>up right now.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Those duties, those tariffs can be as high as about

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 5>thirty five percent on addition to the ten percent tariffs

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 5>that are already existing.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 4>The breaking news today.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 5>Is that we understand the EU and China will continue

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 5>negotiations even as the EU looks to perhaps pass through

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 5>these tariffs as.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Soon as the beginning of next month.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Julia, how likely do you think it is that these

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 5>tariffs will go into place?

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 4>And need to go into place?

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 6>So, first of all, whether or not they will go

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 6>into place.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 10>As we see the situation today, it still seems likely

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 10>that there is no blocking majority of Member states against

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 10>the tariffs. So the vote can take place any day

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 10>now until the end of October, and as of today

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 10>it seems that the additional tariffs would go through. However,

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 10>what we do understand is that there might be a

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 10>clause put into that agreement that the European Commission and

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 10>the Chinese officials can continue negotiating and if they reach

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 10>some sort of deal, either on prices or volumes of inputs,

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 10>this might be reversed. Now that's number one, but number

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 10>two is also important. Do we need those tariffs? And

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 10>when we talk about tariffs on Chinese evs in Europe,

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 10>I think we always forget the other big part.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 8>Of the picture.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 10>What is missing is the affordable supply of electric vehicles

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 10>in Europe by European manufacturers. Some of this is planned,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 10>so about twelve models cheaper models are planned for next

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 10>year that coincide with the next set of European clean

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 10>car regulations, the so called CARCO two standards. So as

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 10>part of the package EV tariffs make sense. If you

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 10>have standards, you have locallyvs and then you have higher

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 10>tariffs if you don't have.

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 6>Supply, let me jump in. Let's talk about that. Package

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 6>tariffs is one factor Earlier today, Bloomberg spoke to the

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 6>ACA Director general basically said there's a perfect storm for

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 6>the EV industry in Europe right now. Just listen to

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 6>what was said.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's all coming together at the same time.

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 11>We sometimes call it the almost perfect storm happening together,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 11>and we need to deal with that. And I think

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 11>now also with the green transition moving from paper to reality,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 11>reality starts to hit and we see how difficult it

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 11>is to not just have mandates, regulatory mandates and models

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 11>on the market manufacturers making cars, but also needing a

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 11>market to pull. And that's what we are missing at

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 11>the moment in Europe.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 6>That's the chief of Europe's biggest autos lobby group saying

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 6>things are very hard right now for our industry. A

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 6>perfect storm. Do you see a perfect storm?

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 10>I do agree that things are really hard. What I

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 10>think we miss in Europe is a comprehensive green automotive

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 10>strategy that would have the vision industrial policy to support it,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 10>be it investment support, bit trade policy. That is not happening.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 10>And that's what we're now discussing. Following the famous drug report,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 10>so that the senior report that was presented in Europe

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 10>on competitiveness. But I do have to say that all

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 10>of this didn't just arrive as a complete surprise. Carmakers

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 10>knew about the EVY targets for years, and we always

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 10>expected the market to stagnate in twenty twenty three and

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty four, then to pick up in twenty twenty five.

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So, Julia, what is the consumer's attitude to electric

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 6>vehicles in Europe?

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 10>When the vehicles are brought at right prices, consumers are

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 10>flocking to buy them. The French social leasing model, where

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 10>smaller affordable evs were made available, was all but subscribed.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 10>So the demand is there, but it's there at the

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 10>rightly priced vehicles, and that's what we're missing. We are

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 10>missing affordable models. As I said, their planned for next year.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 10>So we just need to get those models, ramp those up,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 10>bring them to consumers, and actually see how the market reacts.

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 10>It's too early to judge that today in twenty twenty four,

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 10>when those models are not there.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 6>Transport Environment Senior Director, Julia Poliskanova, thank you very much.

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 6>The global market for AI related products will hit as

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 6>much as nine hundred and ninety billion dollars in twenty

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty seven. That's according to Bain's latest Global Technology Report,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 6>saying the market will grow forty to fifty five percent

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 6>annually from one hundred and eighty five billion dollars last year.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 6>The consulting firm says growth will be fueled by bigger

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 6>AI systems and larger data centers to train and run them,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 6>driven by companies and governments using the technology to boost efficiency.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Caract, how are they using the technology?

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 5>We're going to discuss that today's AI in action. We're

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 5>speaking with Accelerant. So Global risk Exchange platform for speciality

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 5>insurance market is booked one than four hundred million dollars

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 5>in revenue over the last twelve months. So let's talk

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 5>about that growth. CEO Jeff Redkey is with us. What

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 5>exactly are you doing? You're trying to seek out inefficiencies

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 5>in the insurance market.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Just explain for us.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 8>I think that's right.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 12>So Accelerant is trying to replatform that specialty insurance market

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 12>for the benefit of everyone. Let me unpack that a little.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 12>Inside that gigantic insurance industry, there are millions of policies

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 12>that aren't quite standard. Something makes them unique. That's the

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 12>specialty insurance market and what we do is unlike the

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 12>traditional insurance industry tech, which is so inflexible that it

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 12>doesn't make sense to sort of adjust and to modernize

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 12>for these specialty products. We are nimble enough that with

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 12>data and technology, we provide the infrastructure that replatforms the

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.239
<v Speaker 12>specialty insurance onto a more modern, efficient platform.

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 6>Jeff. The proof is in the numbers, it always is, right.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 6>So how does the infusia as for the technology and

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 6>use of the technology translate into sales for you? The

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 6>proof that people are willing to pay for it?

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, we mentioned the revenue four hundred and forty four

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 12>million over the trailing twelve months, and that's up over

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 12>sixty percent, So certainly we're pleased with the growth. The

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 12>growth of the business through the platform has been very,

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 12>very strong, as both specialty underwriters as well as the

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 12>risk capital partners adopt the platform and find it incredibly helpful.

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 12>So I think that would be the proof.

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 5>How is AI and machine learning the key to all of.

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 12>This though, Well, it all starts with the data, I think,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 12>and so week by week over the past six years,

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 12>the Risk Exchange has been squirreling away data, proprietary data

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 12>on policies on claims on exposure and over the course

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 12>of six years that's turned into tens of millions of

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 12>rows of data with over eleven thousand unique attributes. And

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 12>when you point the state of the art, and that's

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 12>always changing. But as you point the state of the

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 12>art models, whether they're machine learning or artificial intelligence models

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 12>at that data, really exciting things start to happen. You

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 12>know where to grow the portfolio of insurance policies, you

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 12>know where to shrink the portfolio of insurance policies, You

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 12>adjust the claims much more effectively. In total, we figure

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 12>that twenty percent, we're picking up a twenty percent improvement

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 12>in the gross margin of the business that transfers through

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 12>the risk exchange because of the machine learning and AI.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 8>That's significant.

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 5>The funny thing is everyone gets so caught up with

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 5>generative AI, but actually you're just you're not needing that.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 5>But will that be interwoven in some way? How will

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 5>you see your model progress?

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 12>Do you think the generative piece, if you use that

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 12>as the classic definition, I think that usually has its

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 12>best use in improving other people's the customer experience, Right,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 12>I'm not sure it'll be about insight for the portfolio.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 12>So I think it'll be instead of running a query

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 12>about how your portfolio is performing, you just get to

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 12>ask it in natural language, and that should speed things

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 12>up and probably be more enjoyable.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 8>For the users.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Jeff, we talked a lot about the AI side of

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 6>the story. I'm kind of actually curious about the specialty

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 6>insurance side of this story, and what does that mean.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 6>Where I am in California, issues like wildfire or like

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 6>mob theft in the city of San Francisco. Believe it

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 6>or not, is that what we're talking about.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 12>Here, among other things. So I guess specialty insurance means

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 12>that there's a risk or an insured that in some

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 12>way does not fit into a standard category where a

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 12>standard product with standard rates doesn't fit. So maybe that's

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 12>wildfire exposure. That's a great example, but there are many others.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 12>Maybe it's a business that's too new, or maybe it's

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 12>a business that's suffered a loss in the past three

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 12>to five years. There are many things which can take

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 12>and insured and put it into the specialty marketplace. The

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 12>underlying notion of the specialty marketplace is you need incredibly

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 12>tailored data sets, and there aren't millions and millions and

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 12>millions of data points about each product. There are many fewer,

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 12>so you have to work harder to make the data

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 12>give up those insights.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 6>Does that help? Just very quick? Are more things now ensurable?

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 6>Because of this?

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 12>I think more things are insurable, But more importantly, products

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 12>are becoming tailored to the specific needs of various insurance

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 12>so it's much less of a one size fits all market.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Acceleranc CEO Jeff Radke. Great to have you on the show.

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Thank you. Okay, more news, It's time for talking tech

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 6>and first. Reddit is hiring former Google ad executive Rit

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 6>Roumoff to take on the role of chief revenue Officer.

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 6>This is the social media company looks to push for

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 6>a wider range of ad clients. Reddit it's been investing

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 6>heavily in its ad tech as it looks to compete

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 6>with the likes of Alphabet and Meta Plus. Japanese memory

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 6>chipmaker Kiyoshia is delaying its IPO amid a slide in

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 6>semiconductor stocks. According to sources, the company is now targeting

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 6>in IPO in November or December instead of October and

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 6>could raise about five hundred million dollars. And Uber expands

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 6>its Robotaxi fleet. The ride sharing company will partner with

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Chinese autonomous car company we Ride to offer robotaxis in

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 6>the United Arab emorates. Uber says users in Abadabi will

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 6>be able to book rides later this year.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 5>New York.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 6>And Amed Ludlow in San Francisco. All Right, a super

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 6>super well read story on Bloomberg Banking Group NG is

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 6>starting to use AI to price currencies, replacing jobs traditionally

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 6>performed by traders and adding to its global head of

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 6>electronic trading. It performed beyond their expectations. Bloomberg's Alice Watkins

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 6>joins us now and has the story and the details

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 6>interesting because the AI outperforms, it replaces jobs, but there's

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 6>still an element of human oversight. What do you learn

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 6>about what ing is actually doing well.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 13>For the FX traders at ing, adjusting currency prices for

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 13>volatility was a very time consuming task, so that's why

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 13>they've built this AI model to make things easier for them,

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 13>and it's actually performed a lot better than they were expecting.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 4>So they were looking at getting.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 13>Grads on the desk to perform this role, but now

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 13>they're going to use the model instead. It uses reinforcement learning,

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 13>so it pretty much mimics how a human would use

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 13>a trial and error process.

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 4>And so it will get better over time.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 13>And they're now looking at deploying this technology across other

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 13>asset classes too.

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 5>This is a seven and a half trillion dollar day market.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 4>How are we seeing other banks leap in on this.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Because I mean being able to reduce costs, reduce people

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 5>music to the management zieres at least.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 13>So it really depends on the approval process within a

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 13>bank as to how readily they're going to deploy these technologies,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 13>and that will vary from firm to firm. So at

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 13>an industry conference at ours app recently, there was quite

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 13>a lot of anxiety about who will ultimately be responsible

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 13>for this AI technology. You know, is it the person

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 13>who built the model, is it compliance? Is it the

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 13>trading team? So sort of sorting that out within the firms,

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 13>it is often seen as the first step before you

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 13>could embrace the technology.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 6>IMG.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 13>They said it was a relatively quick process. They built

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 13>the model within three months, tested it for six weeks,

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 13>and then because they've got such strict governance process around

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 13>it that's how they got the approval. So they assured

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 13>me they's still going to be a big red button

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 13>they can press if anything is to go wrong, and

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 13>that there's still be that element of human oversight.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Alice Atkins in London, thank you very much. Back

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 6>in the US, AI regulation is top of mind for

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 6>big tech executives, Ruth Porat, president and CIO of Google

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 6>parent Alphabet, spoke to Bloomberg's Eric Shatska about her hope

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 6>to see bipartisan AI policies emerging in the US. She

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 6>spoke at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum yesterday. Listen to this.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 14>Right now. In the Senate, there's a bipartisan approach around

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 14>an AI framework that Senator Schumern around and others have.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 8>Proposed, and again it looks at.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 14>All elements of how do we invest to be competitive,

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 14>how do we prevent working on the downside. So I

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 14>would hope it's a continuation of this and that it

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 14>continues to be bipartisan because it's such a critical issue.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 5>It's not just corporate leaders. AI is key for world leaders.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 5>At the United Nations General Assembly as well, President Biden

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 5>issuing a warning on AI risks during his final speech

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 5>and calling for global standard, Biden saying quote, we must

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 5>make certain that the awesome capabilities of AI are used

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 5>to uplift and empower everyday people, not to give dictators

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 5>more powerful shackles on the human spirit.

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 4>We want to talk about this more.

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 5>France is special Envoy for AI, and Bouvrel joins US.

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 4>Now and you are talking with Macron his.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 5>Special Envoy to discuss AI governance regulation. You've got a

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 5>summit coming up in February where you want not just

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 5>nice to have, but actions to have. Is it governable

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 5>from a world perspective?

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 15>Well, that's a great question. Thanks for having me. We're

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 15>at early stages of AI, and I think this is

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 15>now is the time where we need to put all

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 15>our efforts into this, into looking at how we want

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 15>to govern it, how concrete action can be taken, can

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 15>be skilled, can be catalyzed to get AI to be

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 15>developed in the interest of people. I mean, I very

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 15>much agree with a lot of what has just been

0:25:58.760 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 15>said recently.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 8>We need to redouble our.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 15>Efforts and get heads of states but also civil society, startups,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 15>large companies, researchers very importantly together to best address those subjects.

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 4>What's the number one concern?

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 15>Well, there's been lots of discussions around AI safety at

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 15>previous summits like at Bleedgsday Park and Saul. We want

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 15>to take a broader approach because we do think those

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 15>are important topics, but we also think we need to

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 15>discuss things like future of work. You had an example

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 15>on that just before, Innovation and culture.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 8>Of very important topics.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 15>But most of all, it is what can we do

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 15>to make sure we put into perspective the potential harms

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 15>of misuse and then the benefits and opportunities and help

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 15>steer things in the direction of these very concrete opportunities.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 15>And when I say very concrete, you can say AI

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 15>is going to benefit help for example, Yeah, but not

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 15>everything in health very specific cases for example orientations, speeding

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 15>up taking care of patients or speeding up drug development,

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 15>but not everything, not replacing doctors or nurses on everything.

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 6>And good morning, miss Strau in France is the private

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 6>sector leader in AI. How closely are you working with

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 6>me Strau in your efforts?

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 15>So first of all, this is a global summit that

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 15>we're preparing, so I'm really keen to work with all

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 15>AI companies and startups like Missprau, but also the ones

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 15>in the US which you know super well, the ones

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 15>like Saka and I in AI in Japan, or alif

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 15>Alfa in Germany. And yes, we work very closely with Mistrial,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 15>but I'm also very pleased that we have other great

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 15>startups in France like Poolside or h just to name

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 15>a few, So yes, we're working with them.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 6>I'd like to know about mccorn's attitude towards leadership. How

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 6>important is it for a global leader, a Western world leader,

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 6>to have a firm grasp on artificial intelligence, the technicalities

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 6>of it, the implications of it, and how does he

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 6>feel about that?

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 15>So it's really a subject that he's been deeply interested

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 15>in for years. France had a first report and set

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 15>of recommendations on AI in twenty eighteen, led by Cedric

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 15>villani Are, a field medalist. I just recently co shared

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 15>the second report with economist Philipeagyon. We delivered our recommendations

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 15>in March. This is really something that the French President

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 15>Macron is very interested in and following on quickly, I

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 15>mean strongly and regularly. He's speaking at a number of

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 15>events on the topic. He's listening to people as much

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 15>as he can. Yes, he strongly believes this is important.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 5>It's all very well for a Western leader, as Ed says,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 5>to be on top of AI. But what the United

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Nations has been trying to say is there's a whole

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 5>load of other countries who are impacted.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 4>By this have no seat to the table.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 5>We look towards your summit, which yet again involves a

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 5>lot of the people who've been in the UK and Seoul,

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 5>and there's a lot of the same G seven countries.

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 5>What about involving Africa, the Global South.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 8>This is super important.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 15>We have a bit more time, luckily to prepare our summit.

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 15>The UK and South Korea had to really do things

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 15>quite quickly because we have more time. We really want

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 15>to be as inclusive as possible. We've already sent save

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 15>the dates to more than sixty world leaders. We're really

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 15>opening this up to as many countries as want to come,

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 15>as well as startups, enterprises, civil society organizations. We hold

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 15>the webinar recently with more than two hundred and fifty

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 15>of them from around the world researchers. Of course, France

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 15>has this at heart to really take into account the

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 15>perspectives and interests of countries around the globe. I completely

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 15>agree with you. If AI is only being developed by

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 15>a few actors in a few.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 8>Countries, we will have failed.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 15>We really need to involve and everyone and make sure

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 15>we steered it towards towards peoples and the society.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 6>And look forward. What are the objectives that you're setting

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 6>for yourselves as a result of the summit.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 15>So we're at the same time very ambitious and also

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 15>very humble and pragmatic. We want to use the dates

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 15>of the Stommach to catalyze to scale, to take specific

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 15>actions that are as pragmatic and concrete as possible. We

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 15>want to have examples of specific use cases in specific

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 15>countries versus a general discussion on science fiction or potential impacts.

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 15>And we also want to have concrete actions on standards

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 15>on introperability, on specific initiatives involving a number of countries

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 15>and private actors and public actors. You'll have to wait

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 15>a little bit until February, but I very much hope

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 15>that you can be there and that we can have

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 15>these concrete actions and results be presented there.

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 6>Please, and you must come back on Bloomberg Technology and

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 6>review the results of that summit. France Special Envoy for

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Ai and Bouvaureaut, thank you very much. Now coming up,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 6>Wiz is in discussions to sell existing shares at a

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 6>very high evaluation. We're gonna have those details on the

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg exclusive.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 8>Next.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Technology cybersecurity startup Whiz is in discussions

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 6>to sell existing shares and evaluation as high as twenty

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars. That's all according to sources and Bloombas Katie

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 6>Roof broke the story joins us. Now let's do the basics.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 6>This is a tender offer. What do we know about

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 6>the terms and the numbers involved?

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so we can't wind of it really early, so

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 2>it's still being sorted out. But it should be between

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 2>fifteen and twenty billion valuation, which would be a premium

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to the twelve billion that they raised that earlier this year,

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>but less than the twenty three billion that they notoriously

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 2>turned down from Google. But you know, that's what's being

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 2>sorted out right now for a tender offer.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Who's involved?

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 16>The names Katie, so it would be led by g

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 16>squared and then also light Speed and Thrive might be

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 16>involved in this as well, and then potentially some of

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 16>the other existing investors.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 6>So this is in and of itself particularly curious because,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 6>as was reported, Google did try to buy Wiz and

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 6>we said no, thank you. We're okay as an independent

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 6>company and a but the broader environment's been difficult. I

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 6>feel like the cadence of deals might be heating up

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 6>a little bit. That's a part of it.

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there's still plenty of capital available in

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley to invest in these things, and they need

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to put their money to work because the last few

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>years there haven't been a lot of late stage growth

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>rounds to invest in, and so you know, all the

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 2>money is getting poured into either big AI rounds or

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 2>other hot companies that are doing really well, and so

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>this is one of those companies, and.

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 5>It feels as though there must be pressure from well employees,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 5>early investors.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 4>This is a liquidity event.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Katie, Yeah, so yeah, it would be a tender offer

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>or secondary where existing shareholders could sell some of their shares.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 2>We think there also might be a primary round that's

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 2>still being decided, and so that would mean the company

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 2>would also be able to add money to its balance sheet.

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Katie roof. We thank you.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Now, let's discuss Netflix co CEO Ted Surroundos has been

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 5>considering the use of AI in the creative process. He

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 5>sat down with David Rubinstein to discuss this and the

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 5>company's evolution future of entertainments.

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Take a listen.

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 17>I really mostly think of AI as a create tours tool,

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 17>not a creative tool. So I think creators will use

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 17>it to make to tell better stories. We're not using

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 17>it to tell stories instead of them. And I don't

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 17>think and I don't think we'd be very effective at it,

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 17>or AI would be very effective at doing that instead

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 17>of people.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 6>You can catch the full interview of Ted Sarandos on

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Peer to Peer Conversations tonight at nine pm Eastern Time

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 6>on Bloomberg Television. Plus in two weeks, tune in for

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 6>David Rubinstein's full interview with Google CEO Cinder Pitch Eye.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 6>That's on Wednesday, October ninth on Bloomberg Television. We played

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of that earlier on This is the

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 6>PS five Pro and side Note PS five Pro thirtieth

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 6>Anniversary Edition retro badge. We got hands on with the

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 6>new console, which is PlayStation's most expensive ever six hundred

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.280
<v Speaker 6>and ninety nine dollars ninety nine cents in the US.

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 6>The main update is inside a supercharge GPU with juiced

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 6>up RAM and faster rendering. It boosts the gaming experience

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 6>in four K and offers more gameplay at sixty frames

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 6>per second for the tech officionado or the premium buyer.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 6>Those are great selling points. Let's see how it compares

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.959
<v Speaker 6>to a standard PS five with games I already own

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 6>on Hogwarts, Legacy ray tracing offers amazing reflections, shadows, and

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 6>crisp distance shots around the castle. The last of US

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Part two was more detailed. You could see further into

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 6>the game's environment. But one big point. I played on

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 6>four K even eight K TVs, and you really need

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 6>that ultra high definition resolution to see any difference at all.

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 6>For the experienced gamer or the average person, it will

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 6>be hard to tell the difference. No doubt, these are

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 6>top top high fidelity vivid graphics, but they kind of

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 6>already were on the PS five and even the PS

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 6>four for some titles. The size of the console is interesting.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 6>There's more power packed in it, but it's not that

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 6>much different to the prior generation PS five, So gamers,

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 6>could you tell the difference a lot of fun. Micron

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 6>is set to release earnings after the closing bell. Here

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 6>with what to expect on a serious and important technology

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 6>story bloomberg'sy and King. Micron is important, and what's weird

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 6>about it is it has a central role in the

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 6>AI story. When we think about data centers, we obsess

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 6>over in Nvidia and the GPU part, but it's almost proportionate,

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 6>and so that's kind of what we want to hear about.

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 6>Right when is that part going to take off?

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was certainly what we were looking at

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>three months ago. Is AI? Are they another AI beneficiary?

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>This time? I think things are a little bit more nuanced.

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We were kind of disappointed that we didn't have this

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 1>massive explosion in AI, even though the projection was good.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>This time around, it's like, oh, okay, how much is enough?

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And it really depends on the kind of expectation level

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're bringing towards it. So, yes, there'll be a

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about AI, but smartphones PCs where those

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>market are really important as well.

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Just giving us the context of sheer scale of growth

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 5>in because we almost become numb to trillions of dollars

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 5>and almost triple digit growth.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 4>We're expecting what ninety one.

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Percent increase in revenue here, and that is largely driven

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 5>by the AI focus.

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That's an absolutely perfect point, I think, which illustrates what

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about. Sounds amazing. I mean, if

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>my salary went up ninety one percent, I'd be very happy.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But if the other way to look at this, and

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the more kind of glum Lancashire viewpoint here, is

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that things were down. Things were down a lot last year,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So being up ninety one percent from where we were

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>last year sounds fantastic. Well, maybe that's because we were

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>at such a low point. So is ninety one percent

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>enough might be the other way to look at it.

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Some basics for our Bloombay Technology audience. Micron makes memory chips.

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 6>Lancashire is a county in England notorious for raining all

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 6>the time, which accounts for Ian's attitude. The important point

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 6>is that Micron has historically been a little bit of

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 6>a crystal ball about the world of electronics and technology.

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 6>Is it still a crystal ball in that respect?

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is, but there are some dynamics within

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>its own market that are also kind of distorting things.

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And typically, as you say, in the past, this was

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a company that's products are essentially commodities. If the price

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is going applical, great, If the prices are going down,

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>bad sign right for everybody. This time, though, that is

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>more of a technology play, right, who's ahead in a

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 1>specific type of product that goes into these AI systems.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>In the past, Samsung was a massive leader here, somebody

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like Micron or esque Hennix will get squashed. Samsung arguably

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't in the lead this time. Micron has a technology play,

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:47.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe a value play too in how much.

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 5>We're going to want to hear about their own investment

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.399
<v Speaker 5>use of money. We think about Micron, you know, fabricating

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 5>more manufacturing places here in the United States, and there'll

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 5>be questions.

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 4>On that.

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. I mean, everybody has had their CHIPSAC

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>award announced from the Biden administration, but nobody's actually received

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 1>a check yet. So this is a big thing, right,

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't want How hard do you commit to new plants?

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>How hard do you commit to filling out new plants?

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that will definitely crop up on the call today

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in King we.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Thank you and the Glum Lancashire attitude.

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 8>We love ed.

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, you're not feeling too glum.

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 8>You're about to.

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Head out to Meta Connect and it's an important interview.

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we're going to speak to Andrew Bossworth, the CTO, right,

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 6>and all the things you'd expect them to talk about

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 6>will happen progressing in Lama model on the AI side,

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 6>ray bands and mixed reality headsets. But I just say

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 6>one thing real quick, carry tune in later, because sometimes

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 6>I think we forget these are technology companies and they're

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 6>trying to push the limits of hardware and software, and

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 6>that's where i'd focus today.

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 5>We focus also on basically, as share price that is

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 5>near a record high, Meta has become the AI play

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 5>for many.

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 6>It's so weird because like six years ago, this was

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 6>a social media company, then it was a metaverse company,

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 6>then it was an AI company, but everyone was mad

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 6>about all the money they were spending. Now they're not mad,

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 6>and you look at the share price and the chart

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 6>on your screen. They're being rewarded for this commitment to it.

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 6>I guess the question, without giving it away, is what

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 6>is Meta now? Is it all of those things or

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 6>has it a more narrow focus.

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 5>We wait for that question to be posed to BIZ

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 5>a little bit later. Meanwhile, that does it for this

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 5>addition of Bluemoy Technology.

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 6>ED and I will speak to Andrew Bosworth metas CTO

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 6>later today. Tune in four pm New York time, one

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 6>pm here in San Francisco. A cracking show today. Check

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 6>out and recap on the podcast. You know where to

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 6>find it from the team out in New York and

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 6>the team here in San Francisco. Thank you. This is

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 6>bloombay Technology.