Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from buckheat buck
Speaker 1: Sexton dot com. Repeat after me. The system is rigged.
Speaker 1: You need to know that, You need to understand that.
Speaker 1: What is Rick, Let's get into the details. The social
Speaker 1: media platforms clearly rigged journalism, news media publishing like the
Speaker 1: major book publishers rigged, elections censored. I can't say it right,
Speaker 1: can't say it. That's how censored they are that you're
Speaker 1: not even allowed to talk about it, or else you'll
Speaker 1: be banned from Google, there'll be a boycott against you,
Speaker 1: you'll cease to exist online. We want to talk about
Speaker 1: something being rigged. When you're not even allowed to talk
Speaker 1: about it, then it's really clearly set up against you.
Speaker 1: But then we have what's going on on Wall Street. Now.
Speaker 1: I want to explain this because this is the most
Speaker 1: fascinating story in many ways in America today. And I
Speaker 1: know a lot of you probably don't own stock, or
Speaker 1: if you do, you only have a four oh one
Speaker 1: K and the stock market. We often think of it
Speaker 1: the way the media talks about it. It's all a
Speaker 1: bunch of Republicans chomping cigars. You know, making millions. No,
Speaker 1: the stock market, in fact is what allows people to retire,
Speaker 1: whether it's a four oh one K or define pension plan,
Speaker 1: because those pension obligations can only be met with the
Speaker 1: returns you get on the market has a massive influence
Speaker 1: on employment, on wages, who companies can hire, how many,
Speaker 1: what they can pay them. Right, so we know that
Speaker 1: it's not just Wall Street fatcats running around with wads
Speaker 1: of thousand dollars bills slapping their butlers. That's not what
Speaker 1: Wall Street is. But let's take this as symbolic of
Speaker 1: our overall thesis today for this system is rad or
Speaker 1: that this is perhaps the prime example of it. Right now,
Speaker 1: there is this trading app called robin Hood. Of course
Speaker 1: interesting the name because as we know, the apocryphal, apocryphal
Speaker 1: figure of robin Hood stole from the rich to give
Speaker 1: to the poor. But in this era we live in now,
Speaker 1: it is possible for anybody who has a smartphone or
Speaker 1: a computer with internet access to set up and start
Speaker 1: trading stocks, to start buying and selling a whole slew
Speaker 1: of different commodities, and you can get into short selling.
Speaker 1: You can get into buying puts and calls and options
Speaker 1: and bonds, all kinds of stuff, right, And as people
Speaker 1: grow older, they tend to be more interested in this
Speaker 1: because they have generally accrued more assets and they want
Speaker 1: to build more comfort in their retirement years, and they
Speaker 1: perhaps want to leave more for their families and future generations. Okay,
Speaker 1: what's going on with game Stop right now and AMC
Speaker 1: and BlackBerry these? Why does it matter so much? Here's
Speaker 1: here's the basic story we're told about Wall Street that
Speaker 1: there are these megahdge funds that are making unbelievable amounts
Speaker 1: of money, you know where where a single hedge funder
Speaker 1: will make ten twenty fifty maybe one hundred million dollars
Speaker 1: personally in a year, and some of the principles at
Speaker 1: these big hedge funds, they might make in the billions
Speaker 1: in a year in one year. And they're not building
Speaker 1: some company that gives products to the whole world. They're
Speaker 1: not creating some service that everybody wants or needs. No,
Speaker 1: they are just a giant gambling machine. It's just a
Speaker 1: really sophisticated casino system. But the story that you whether
Speaker 1: you're you know, waiting for the kids to come home
Speaker 1: from school right now, or your you know, your your
Speaker 1: husband or your wife's coming home from from the office,
Speaker 1: or you're driving a truck cross country. The story you're
Speaker 1: told about Wall Street. And by the way, I come
Speaker 1: from a Wall Street family. I had a father who
Speaker 1: went to Harvard Business School and graduated, went right into
Speaker 1: Wall Street and spent over thirty years as a Wall
Speaker 1: Street guy. My older brother, my little brother. I mean,
Speaker 1: we've got I've got Wall Street all over my family.
Speaker 1: I have the only one of the guys who's never
Speaker 1: worked for Wall Street. And they're all very clear eyed
Speaker 1: about what really goes on there and how it's changed
Speaker 1: over the years too, and how yeah, there are there
Speaker 1: are good things that happened. There's markets that need to
Speaker 1: be made, there's companies that need to raise money that
Speaker 1: then provide thousands of jobs. And you know, this is
Speaker 1: not a one sided story. But there is a component
Speaker 1: of the story that you need to know right now,
Speaker 1: because it's also the story of the Democrat Party, of
Speaker 1: the elites of the apparatus. And remember that these Wall
Speaker 1: Street mega billionaire funds are the big money machines for
Speaker 1: the politics, the policies, and the culture that we oppose
Speaker 1: here on this show. Right all those annoying things. George Soros,
Speaker 1: Where do you think he got his money? Massive financial speculation.
Speaker 1: So you may think this doesn't really affect you, But
Speaker 1: if you got kids in school, if you've got a
Speaker 1: mortgage you're paying, if you are just operating in American society,
Speaker 1: I mean maybe if you live fully off the grid,
Speaker 1: solar panels, well water, storable food, this lesson planned today
Speaker 1: is not necessarily applicable to you. For everybody else, this
Speaker 1: really matters. And I've been talking to the smartest people
Speaker 1: I know in finance about this, in particular this story
Speaker 1: of the last twenty four hours, and it's remarkable. So
Speaker 1: here's what's happened. You have these megahege funds, and the
Speaker 1: story that we're told is that they are just so
Speaker 1: smart and they understand things so much better that they
Speaker 1: can almost predict the future right ordly, predict the future
Speaker 1: of stocks, of companies, of earnings, and they're tend to
Speaker 1: be right now. A lot of a lot of hedge
Speaker 1: funds go bust, they go out of business, but they're
Speaker 1: really big ones. Somehow, year after year you're told they're
Speaker 1: just so much smarter than the general public. So you know,
Speaker 1: you should just put your money in an ETF you
Speaker 1: should put your money in a CD, you know, don't
Speaker 1: don't get too uppity with thinking that you can also
Speaker 1: make decisions about stocks to buy. Well, now you have
Speaker 1: all these people who have been stuck at home for
Speaker 1: a year. Some will call them the robin Hood Bros,
Speaker 1: named for the robin Hood app. But you know, I
Speaker 1: have different apps that I use as well, and I
Speaker 1: become very involved in trading in recent years of my
Speaker 1: own accounts. Not a lot of money, but I do
Speaker 1: think it's an interesting way to understand economics and finance
Speaker 1: in a much more fulsome way. So the robin Hood bros.
Speaker 1: Steal from the rich, give to the poor. They recognize
Speaker 1: something that there are these huge hedge funds that put
Speaker 1: these shorts on companies, which means that they are selling stock,
Speaker 1: and they're even sometimes where they're at least allegations of
Speaker 1: naked short selling, where they're essentially selling assets they don't
Speaker 1: rd own. Now, the mechanics of this don't really matter
Speaker 1: all that much except understand that this suppresses or depresses
Speaker 1: the price of the stock and question, and it can
Speaker 1: destroy companies, including companies that have been very harmed by
Speaker 1: the pandemic that are just getting by. So these hedgephonds
Speaker 1: go around, they go, well, that company's really struggling. Let's
Speaker 1: put a big short on that one, which is essentially
Speaker 1: betting that they will fail, that they'll go down, perhaps
Speaker 1: even go bankrupt, and they make it more likely to
Speaker 1: happen because the stock price falls more expensive for that
Speaker 1: company to borrow, you know. They they're really kind of
Speaker 1: these hedgephones are walking into companies, the companies that you know,
Speaker 1: you know, AMC, BlackBerry, game Stop, and it's like the
Speaker 1: companies are on life support and the big hedge funds
Speaker 1: are grabbing, you know, grabbing the IV bag and and
Speaker 1: pulling them out of their arms, saying let's let's speed
Speaker 1: this along. Oh okay, Well, these individual investors have all
Speaker 1: come together now on places like Wall Street, Bets, Reddit threads,
Speaker 1: and a you know, did different different platforms online, and
Speaker 1: they've just said, you know what, we are going to
Speaker 1: go the opposite direction because they're so short that what
Speaker 1: they're doing is reckless. They're in fact selling more shares
Speaker 1: short of these companies then exist for the company out
Speaker 1: on the open market. So what happens is then they
Speaker 1: start buying and pushing the price up and up and up.
Speaker 1: The companies, the hedge funds then have to cover the
Speaker 1: short and they start losing. And they are losing. Here's
Speaker 1: the fun part of the story, friends. These hedge funds
Speaker 1: are losing billions and billions and billions of dollars. And
Speaker 1: you know what they've done. I thought that they were
Speaker 1: the masters of the universe. I thought they were the
Speaker 1: Titans of Wall Street. They're going and crying to regulators,
Speaker 1: crying to web based communications companies, saying, this isn't fair,
Speaker 1: this isn't fair. We're losing. We're supposed to be the
Speaker 1: rich ones. We're not supposed to lose money. Wait. I
Speaker 1: thought this was a market. I thought this was you know,
Speaker 1: you win some, you lose some. Oh no, they're not
Speaker 1: allowed to lose some. That's what you're seeing. And they've
Speaker 1: already gotten this. I mean, this is as clear a
Speaker 1: rigging of the financial system as you could see anywhere.
Speaker 1: They've gotten robin Hood to stop trading, stop allowing trades
Speaker 1: of game stop, which is sort over seventeen hundred percent.
Speaker 1: I think it hit five hundred dollars today and then
Speaker 1: it dropped way way way down. But they've stopped trading
Speaker 1: of it. So they're effectively creating almost an artificial crash
Speaker 1: in the stock because people can't buy it. And so
Speaker 1: then you have all these people that are the short
Speaker 1: sellers and and they're manipulating the market. This is overt
Speaker 1: manipulation of the market on behalf of rich jerks. But
Speaker 1: they're rich jerks who have a lot of power, have
Speaker 1: a lot of lawyers, send a lot of political donation
Speaker 1: money around, and they really don't want people to figure
Speaker 1: out that they don't have some magic sauce. They're not
Speaker 1: a bunch of geniuses. They just have leverage and they
Speaker 1: use it. They just have the ability to manipulate, and
Speaker 1: they do it and people get hurt in the process.
Speaker 1: You know, you look at even somebody like Mitt Romney.
Speaker 1: I mean, there is a dark side to this finance.
Speaker 1: And there's a reason Mitt Romney it did hurt that
Speaker 1: he was a vulture capitalist, as they said, not a
Speaker 1: venture capitalist when he was at BADE. Because yeah, what
Speaker 1: some of those private equity firms did as their business model,
Speaker 1: they'll say they turned around the company a lot of
Speaker 1: the time. What they did is they come in, they
Speaker 1: slash and burn, they fire a lot of people, and
Speaker 1: they clear up the balance sheet a little bit, and
Speaker 1: then they take out a tremendous amount of debt pay
Speaker 1: themselves and then they exit. And then they leave and
Speaker 1: they say, all right, you know that we're out of there,
Speaker 1: see you later. Well, it's like they've run up the
Speaker 1: company's credit card, gotten all the goodies, and now they
Speaker 1: leave somebody else holding the bag. That's what private equity
Speaker 1: often does, not always. Sometimes they do really turn companies
Speaker 1: around and build great businesses. And I don't understand that.
Speaker 1: But this hedge fund short fund, this hedge fund short
Speaker 1: selling situation is the clearest example that you can see
Speaker 1: right now of this is rigged. And that's a word
Speaker 1: you need to understand, because social media is rigged, the
Speaker 1: economy is rigged, the markets are rigged, elections are censored,
Speaker 1: not allowed to say it. Right. You see this happening
Speaker 1: right before your us. There is no other explanation for it.
Speaker 1: People from these funds go on TV day after they
Speaker 1: go on CNBC. You know who's watching CNBC. Other people
Speaker 1: in the stock market, other hedge fund traders and people
Speaker 1: go on and they're all colluding. They have these conferences,
Speaker 1: idea dinners they call them, Well, they'll all say, you
Speaker 1: know what, we should all buy this stock, and they
Speaker 1: all buy. The price goes way up, and then they
Speaker 1: try to tell the general public, look at a great
Speaker 1: company it is. And then then you and me, using
Speaker 1: our apps or whatever, we put our you know, five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars or a hundred dollars whatever in the stock,
Speaker 1: and then oh, enough of us do that, and the
Speaker 1: companies this is a simplification. But then a lot of
Speaker 1: them will just sort of sell and they'll take their winnings.
Speaker 1: So hedge fund owners and representatives can go on cable news,
Speaker 1: national news and tell everybody to buy something. But if
Speaker 1: you and your friends gathered together and said, I think
Speaker 1: we should all buy this stock, I think we should
Speaker 1: all buy you know, game stop for examples, the big
Speaker 1: one of the news right now, you'll get kicked off
Speaker 1: the internet or at least your your forum will get
Speaker 1: shut down. Your app will decide that you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to do that, You're not allowed to buy it anymore.
Speaker 1: Why because the rich powerful buddies at the hedge funds
Speaker 1: are crying because they're losing money. This is just what
Speaker 1: the Biden administration does. This, This is exactly what you
Speaker 1: see playing out in our politics too. You want to
Speaker 1: win an election, you know, it's a really good way
Speaker 1: to do it. Change all the rules in the election year,
Speaker 1: Change the rules about mail in balloting, change the rules
Speaker 1: about eligibility and who gets it sent to them, and
Speaker 1: what signature matches happen. Control the system, and then when
Speaker 1: it goes your way, say you must abide by the system.
Speaker 1: That's what the hedge funders do. That's what Biden, that's
Speaker 1: what the Democrats do. The system doesn't work out for you,
Speaker 1: which we're seeing right now for these hedge funds, then
Speaker 1: you know what you say, it's not fair. We have
Speaker 1: to change it so it does work out for us.
Speaker 1: See this, friends, see how many places in American public
Speaker 1: life now it is in fact rigged. And this is
Speaker 1: one of these great stories where it's not about it's
Speaker 1: not about intersectionality. This isn't about you know, one group,
Speaker 1: one gender, one race, one anything, you know, being exploited
Speaker 1: or being oppressive of another group. This is just about
Speaker 1: those with it, those with a lot of money, those
Speaker 1: with power versus everybody else. They want to continue to
Speaker 1: be able to extract from you with impunity. But as
Speaker 1: we saw in the bailout in two thousand and eight.
Speaker 1: Their losses, you pick up. Their losses are your problem.
Speaker 1: This has become the philosophy of the elites and the
Speaker 1: governing apparatus in this country, whether it's Wall Street, the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, yes, even the Republican Party or anything else.
Speaker 1: And it's one area where we can all come together
Speaker 1: and say enough is enough. It's time we turn the tables.
Speaker 1: Stop letting the house always win even when the House
Speaker 1: should be losing. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Joe Scarborough has
Speaker 1: become a full on lunatic over at MSNBC. It's not
Speaker 1: even performative anymore. I think the man is having some
Speaker 1: kind of an emotional and psychological crisis on national TV.
Speaker 1: But here he is telling all of you. If you're
Speaker 1: wondering whether it's an exaggeration to say that there's a
Speaker 1: vindictiveness and a score settling at the heart of the
Speaker 1: Democrat mentality. Right now, Joe Scarborough puts any of those
Speaker 1: doubts to rest because he's telling you, oh, no, they
Speaker 1: are coming after you. That's the whole point of this play.
Speaker 1: Seventeen What if Ted Chris's turned the test set after
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. Let's you know what, let's just pretend
Speaker 1: it's going to go away. Let's just forget about it.
Speaker 1: You know, nine to eleven. Where would Ron Johnson say,
Speaker 1: let's just forget about it. Yeah, they attacked the Pentagon,
Speaker 1: Yeah they attack Let's just forget about it. That's what
Speaker 1: Linzy wants us to He wants us to forget it
Speaker 1: about the fact that people were bludgeoned in the head
Speaker 1: with an American flag because of Donald Trump. He wants
Speaker 1: us to forget that a cop was beaten to death
Speaker 1: and the reason why the cop killer beat the cop
Speaker 1: to death was because they were inspired by Donald Trump
Speaker 1: to do so. Ted Cruise wants us to forget because
Speaker 1: he led this edition along with Josh Holly and Ted Cruise. Forget, forget.
Speaker 1: You're out of your mind and you're not a conservative.
Speaker 1: That's how conservatives do not talk. We don't forget. If
Speaker 1: you attack our country, we go after you, we jell you,
Speaker 1: we throw away the key. What a meniac. You needed
Speaker 1: to hear that just to see this guy's on MSNBC.
Speaker 1: They're paying a millions of dollars a year to be
Speaker 1: a moral on and he's comparing. Look, the Capitol Hill
Speaker 1: riot was a riot. A riot is not a mass
Speaker 1: casualty terrorist attack that killed three thousand Americans in one day. Okay,
Speaker 1: can we stop with the idiotcy But no, we can't.
Speaker 1: The same way that they'll call detention facilities at our
Speaker 1: southern border concentration camps, which they did under the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: as you recall, they will continue to say that this
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill riot was our nine eleven of domestic terrorists
Speaker 1: or something. Now, you can try to ignore the rhetoric,
Speaker 1: but that's really not in our interest right now because
Speaker 1: ultimately what they're hoping to do with this is mobilize
Speaker 1: it so they can actually come after us. This is
Speaker 1: not just rhetorical. Now, Friends, you're listening to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast, make sure you subscribe to the podcast
Speaker 1: on the iHeart Radio act or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: So long as Donald Trump is the head of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party, they are going to find themselves in the minority.
Speaker 1: They are going to lose races for the House and
Speaker 1: the Senate, especially after the insurrection attempt. But it's also
Speaker 1: important to note that the threat to the country is
Speaker 1: not over right. We still have five thousand National Guard
Speaker 1: members surrounding the Capital complex. Why because there are still
Speaker 1: existing threats present threats to the security of the capital.
Speaker 1: And so so long as Donald Trump is empowered by
Speaker 1: Senate Republicans, there is still the chance that he is
Speaker 1: going to incite another attempt at the Capitol or stirrup
Speaker 1: similar trouble at the state legislative level or in a
Speaker 1: governor's election when things don't go his way. The threat
Speaker 1: is still very real to American democracy. It absolutely is not.
Speaker 1: This man is a joke and a liar. But the
Speaker 1: Democrats are doing this on purpose. This is creation of
Speaker 1: a perpetual emergency situation based solely on the preparations for
Speaker 1: an imaginary threat. There is no threat of a white
Speaker 1: supremacist insurrection takeover of the United States government in DC.
Speaker 1: It does not exist. But they're keeping thousands of troops
Speaker 1: there saying that, oh my gosh, we need these thousands
Speaker 1: of troops there because of this imaginary threat. And now
Speaker 1: it's turned into see, see what a threat we're under
Speaker 1: look at all those troops, Well, they're the reason the
Speaker 1: troops are there, but they're justifying the perception of a threat, right, See,
Speaker 1: this is a chicken and egg situation. What's really happening here?
Speaker 1: They're just going to continue this. Oh, look at how
Speaker 1: bad the security situation is because of Trump supporters. We
Speaker 1: have to have thousands of troops on the streets of DC.
Speaker 1: It's horrible, it's awful. No, they don't have to have
Speaker 1: they don't have to have any troops. They're lunatics. But
Speaker 1: they're also doing this for a purpose. They gain from this.
Speaker 1: There are benefits that they get from this, namely that
Speaker 1: they are mobilizing the government apparatus to go against Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: disfavored individuals, people that are on the wrong side of
Speaker 1: the elite establishment right now. And that brings me to
Speaker 1: the perhaps the most jaw dropping example of this, and
Speaker 1: there are plenty of them. You could point to Douglas Mackie.
Speaker 1: He is apparently I'd never heard of this guy before
Speaker 1: yesterday they say he's a notorious Twitter troll and he
Speaker 1: was arrested yesterday on federal charges of election interference stemming
Speaker 1: from allegations over a voter disinformation campaign during the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election. Okay, The charge says that he conspired with
Speaker 1: others to disseminate misinformation to deprive individuals other constitutional right
Speaker 1: to vote. According to the newly unsealed criminal complaint, the
Speaker 1: charges are potentially a this is from NBC News a
Speaker 1: tectonic shift and how the federal government tries to enforce
Speaker 1: laws against election interference. False claims about the election on
Speaker 1: the Internet and social media have been a major platform,
Speaker 1: but there are a few examples of such social media
Speaker 1: posts having been used as the basis for criminal charges.
Speaker 1: Did you realize what they're doing here? They're they're threatening
Speaker 1: to send and a're not just threatening, they're trying to
Speaker 1: send somebody to federal prison for up to ten years
Speaker 1: for posting election memes that are considered disinformation. Right, this
Speaker 1: guy put up memes apparently telling people, Hey, you know,
Speaker 1: vote by text message at this number. Okay, that's this
Speaker 1: is now a federal criminal offense. Yeah, clearly you can't
Speaker 1: vote by text message. But is now is just lying
Speaker 1: in general? Now, I mean it used to be had
Speaker 1: to lie under oath, or you had to lie in
Speaker 1: a kind of transaction. So if you say something that
Speaker 1: is untrue about the election, and of course you're a Republican,
Speaker 1: this guy's not a Democrat. They're gonna come after you,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna consider locking you up. I mean he
Speaker 1: was posting memes. He wasn't he wasn't defraud he wasn't
Speaker 1: defrauding old people of their life savings. He wasn't, you know,
Speaker 1: posting child pornography. He was posting memes about an election.
Speaker 1: And they're going to send into federal prison for ten years. Really, yes, really, Now,
Speaker 1: I've often said to you, and it's important to remember
Speaker 1: that they don't have to burn down all the villages.
Speaker 1: They only have to burn down one, all right. They
Speaker 1: don't have to make an example of everyone. They just
Speaker 1: have to find a person, pick that person, and then
Speaker 1: that becomes the message for everybody else once they've destroyed
Speaker 1: his life. And that's what they're doing to this guy.
Speaker 1: He's apparently a Douglas Mackie as a journalist. I believe
Speaker 1: in some capacity. You know, they say that he tricked
Speaker 1: forty nine hundred Democrats in vote by phone scheme. Look,
Speaker 1: he lied about people being able to vote a certain way.
Speaker 1: But I just want to know where does this election
Speaker 1: and interference claim end? Then? Could you be criminally charged
Speaker 1: for saying that the Hunter Biden laptop was real, and
Speaker 1: that people shouldn't don't vote for Joe Biden. The Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden laptop is real because we know social media companies
Speaker 1: were saying that that was hacked or stolen information. It
Speaker 1: wasn't true. Is that election interference? Is that disinformation? The
Speaker 1: attack on free speech right now in this country is
Speaker 1: unlike anything else we have ever seen in our lives.
Speaker 1: And yet they are going after people in ways that
Speaker 1: are just out in the open. They're not even really
Speaker 1: trying to not even really trying to hide it at all. No,
Speaker 1: they're they're telling you this. They want you to know.
Speaker 1: Do you think it's an accident. This was the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election, so it was four years ago. Four years ago,
Speaker 1: and now they're bringing these federal charges. Now they're telling
Speaker 1: us about this. What the heck is going on? Well,
Speaker 1: what have I been telling you for years? Republicans get
Speaker 1: into power, Republicans run the DOJ and we say we're
Speaker 1: going to be good stewards at the Constitution and we're
Speaker 1: going to give everyone equal protection under the law, and
Speaker 1: we're not going to do anything politically vindictive, and that's
Speaker 1: just who we are. And Democrats get into power. They
Speaker 1: have prosecutorial authority. They have the DOJ. They can investigate,
Speaker 1: they can bring charges, and they think, hmmm, who can
Speaker 1: we crush? So we are more powerful and our opponents
Speaker 1: are more fearful. That's how they approach government authority. And
Speaker 1: we wonder why we keep losing control of institutions, losing elections,
Speaker 1: even when the candidate they put up as a moron.
Speaker 1: We wonder why this keeps happening. They play rough, they
Speaker 1: play dirty, and we don't this keeps happening. What do
Speaker 1: you think this begins? Now? What do you think the
Speaker 1: precedent is here? You can be sent to federal prison
Speaker 1: for ten years for means right now, you can lose access.
Speaker 1: And people have built whole businesses based upon on Twitter
Speaker 1: and on Facebook and these In these platforms, you can
Speaker 1: be completely booted off for disfavored political narratives about the election,
Speaker 1: about about COVID. That's where I get into trouble. Who's
Speaker 1: right about COVID? More me or Fauci? The answers me,
Speaker 1: and I'm just some you know, Rando doing a radio show.
Speaker 1: But Foucci's just not that smart, and he's a corrupt
Speaker 1: little bureaucrat hack and he's a stooge for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: That's what's really happened in this country. He was he
Speaker 1: was a deep state health authority, don't you see. He's
Speaker 1: the James Komy of the National Institute for Infectious Disease
Speaker 1: and Allergy or whatever. That's who he is. But if
Speaker 1: you disagree with him, you get kicked off the platform.
Speaker 1: If you say the wrong thing, you're done. If you
Speaker 1: trade the wrong stock, if the riches you see him
Speaker 1: bringing this full circle, you trade the wrong stock. Nothing
Speaker 1: illegal about it. But hey, we have important friends who
Speaker 1: are losing a lot of money because you want to
Speaker 1: buy this thing. So it's not really an open market.
Speaker 1: You can't buy any more game stop. Sorry, that's what
Speaker 1: the robin Hood app has said. And the head of
Speaker 1: the New York Stock has changed in NASDAC, in all
Speaker 1: these places. Oh, we're gonna look into this, look into
Speaker 1: what the greedy hedge fund bros got smacked around by
Speaker 1: the Reddit robin Hood bros. End of story. Too bad
Speaker 1: for them, Maybe they need to get Maybe the hedge
Speaker 1: funders need to get a job where they contribute to
Speaker 1: society instead of to borrow from att Taiebi being the
Speaker 1: giant face attached bloodsucking squid that a lot of the
Speaker 1: financial services companies really are. I think his line was
Speaker 1: the bloodsucking squid on the face of the US economy,
Speaker 1: to get it right. But it's a great line. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's where that's where this is. Right now. They're changing
Speaker 1: the rules of the game executive orders. Biden was saying
Speaker 1: last month or two whatever, three months ago, Oh, you
Speaker 1: can't Candre's rule by executive order, No, sir, Candres do it. Nope, nope,
Speaker 1: not allowed. Gotta pass legislation period, no joke. Then he
Speaker 1: gets into power, what does he do? A flurry of
Speaker 1: really serious executive orders that are just usurping the authority
Speaker 1: of the legislative branch and and almost taking upon himself
Speaker 1: two branches into one, the legislative and the executive merged
Speaker 1: into into the unitary executive. This is this is not good, folks.
Speaker 1: This is all very troubling stuff, and it's happening even
Speaker 1: faster than I thought it would. But if they can
Speaker 1: lock somebody up for memes, I mean, if someone's dumb it,
Speaker 1: first of all, what's the what's the charge? If he
Speaker 1: says this was a joke, and I really mean that
Speaker 1: all these gonna say, I mean, who's who's really stupid
Speaker 1: enough to think that you can vote by tex because
Speaker 1: of something you saw on the internet. You know, I
Speaker 1: would want to know who is really that dumb and
Speaker 1: is it their fault for being that dumb? Or are
Speaker 1: we really going to blame people who are you know,
Speaker 1: being provocateurs online about things like this. You know, if
Speaker 1: you say, hey, I'm gonna I'm gonna send you a
Speaker 1: product just you know, give me your credit card, that's
Speaker 1: fraud if you don't send it to them, right, That's
Speaker 1: that's a that's a contract, that's an agreed upon transaction.
Speaker 1: If you put something online that's not true. Look, I
Speaker 1: don't think that's ethical. I don't support this, but you're
Speaker 1: going that's election interference. Lying about an election on your
Speaker 1: personal social media page. Lying about an election is now
Speaker 1: a federal criminal offense, according to the Biden d OJ.
Speaker 1: Do you think that that's something we should pay attention to,
Speaker 1: especially considering they're also talking about the expansion of a
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism statute explicitly for the purpose of targeting Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: who they refer to with this preposterous white nationalist slur
Speaker 1: all the time. If voted for Trump. You're a white
Speaker 1: nationalist terrorist. You know you're you're one of those. That's
Speaker 1: what they're saying. This is all coming together, friends, This
Speaker 1: is still the purge. This is just another phase of it.
Speaker 1: The elites can count on the Democrats, the super rich
Speaker 1: hedge funders. They're still gonna you know, they're still gonna
Speaker 1: throw ten thousand dollars plate dinners to raise money for
Speaker 1: Kamala for when she's gonna be president. And they're gonna
Speaker 1: have celebrities show up and play their music. And Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: They're gonna act like Joe Biden's cool. Joe Biden's a tool,
Speaker 1: but they're gonna act like Joe Biden's so cool. That's all.
Speaker 1: That's all still fine. You and me, we better shut up.
Speaker 1: We better not ask too many questions, or Biden's FBI
Speaker 1: men may come to our door. You want to tell
Speaker 1: people the system is rigged, They'll show you how rigged
Speaker 1: it is from inside a cell. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show Podcast. Join the conversation and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: or email Team Bucket iHeartMedia dot com. He may read
Speaker 1: it on the show. Well. Part of the lesson of
Speaker 1: the first impeachment trial for him was that he could
Speaker 1: shoot holes in the Constitution on Pennsylvania Avenue and get
Speaker 1: away with it because Senate Republicans were prepared to bury
Speaker 1: their heads in the sand. So that would be unfortunate.
Speaker 1: Although there are a variety of other investigations, some civil,
Speaker 1: some criminal, that I believe have the President in their sights,
Speaker 1: and we'll see what happens with those investigations. But every
Speaker 1: available option to hold him accountable for his actions should
Speaker 1: be undertaken. But we're going to proceed in doing the
Speaker 1: business of the American people, both in terms of defending
Speaker 1: our democracy and building back better under the leadership of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader Schumer. And we're not
Speaker 1: going to be cowed by the domestic terrorists and the
Speaker 1: white supremacists and the enemy combatants who want to stop
Speaker 1: us in our tracks. That would be giving in to them,
Speaker 1: and that's not going to happen. Enemy combatants, he's sang that,
Speaker 1: referring to Trump supporters. You get that right. You will
Speaker 1: recall I was a CIA officer from two thousand and
Speaker 1: five or two and ten. I know what people mean
Speaker 1: when they talk about enemy combatants. When politicians use that phrase,
Speaker 1: how long before they start saying that there should be
Speaker 1: like military tribunals for people involved in the insurrection at
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill? How long do you think it goes before
Speaker 1: that happens. They've still got thousands of troops deployed in DC.
Speaker 1: It's all theatrics. It's absurd. You don't think they're willing
Speaker 1: to do it. Nancy Pelosi AOC AOC acts like there
Speaker 1: was about to be a mass slaughter of members of Congress.
Speaker 1: Have you seen the video of the riot? Because the
Speaker 1: people that got inside the building were for the most part,
Speaker 1: walking around taking selfies like idiots. Now, I've condemned it,
Speaker 1: and I'm not going to keep saying I condemn this.
Speaker 1: I can demn this, but be very clear. It was
Speaker 1: wrong and dumb, but it wasn't an insurrection. And to
Speaker 1: call people who were involved in an enemy combatants, they
Speaker 1: were unarmed and how are they enemy combatants? They weren't
Speaker 1: fighting a war. It's it's amazing to see this, this escalation.
Speaker 1: So what are we going to send them to? Gitmo?
Speaker 1: Is that the next move? That's where all this is going.
Speaker 1: Can't you feel all the unity? By the way, all
Speaker 1: the healing. Oh you want more of that? Here you go,
Speaker 1: Fake Tapper, the worst, the worst man in the corporate media.
Speaker 1: Here he is. He loves to use this term. Um,
Speaker 1: Maga terrorists play fourteen? So how did these domestic terrorists
Speaker 1: storm the nation's capital? The capital ransacked by Maga terror
Speaker 1: at the assault perpetrated by the Maga terror as terrorists,
Speaker 1: the Maga terrorists, Maga terror deadly attack by Maga terrorists,
Speaker 1: a Maga terrorist, a terrorist attack on the US capital?
Speaker 1: Are right? Domestic terrorism a huge problem in this country.
Speaker 1: Nobody supports terrorist attacks, or I used to think that anyway,
Speaker 1: but nobody rational supports terrorist attacks. Should there be repercussions
Speaker 1: for your colleagues who played a role in inciting this
Speaker 1: terrorist attack? You can't have presidents of the United States
Speaker 1: inciting terrorist attacks on the capitol? Can there be any
Speaker 1: doubt about what their intentions are? Here? Is this how
Speaker 1: you speak about people that you seek reconciliation and unity with?
Speaker 1: You know what, one of the issues that that's in
Speaker 1: the background of all this is intelligent people are already
Speaker 1: seeing and are going to see even more that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is a moron and the Democrats in charge are
Speaker 1: a bunch of ideologically driven snowflakes, their imbeciles, they're not
Speaker 1: good at their jobs, and it's going to be worse
Speaker 1: for the country. So that's going to be happening. And
Speaker 1: in the meantime they're going to try to get us
Speaker 1: all the shut up by telling us, oh, you're all
Speaker 1: a bunch of domestic terrorists and taking action against us.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow Fuck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: and Twitter. I've known all along that John Kerry was
Speaker 1: going to be one of my favorite targets of criticism
Speaker 1: in this new administration because he's such a pompous half
Speaker 1: wit who loves the sound of his own voice and
Speaker 1: has really no accomplishments to point to other than marrying
Speaker 1: a very rich lady and running for office in a
Speaker 1: very safe district. John Kerry is a jackass, but he's
Speaker 1: the ultimate limousine liberal too, so he's really useful as
Speaker 1: the climate changes are, because if you were ever gonna
Speaker 1: have somebody giving you gaseous speeches about the need to
Speaker 1: reduce gas in the atmosphere, John Kerry is he is
Speaker 1: in a class by himself. The Biden administration has come
Speaker 1: in and let's Let's be very clear. They're they're making
Speaker 1: dramatic changes to the economy with executive orders that are
Speaker 1: going to affect a lot of people. They're gonna hurt people.
Speaker 1: They're gonna put people out of work. They're gonna have
Speaker 1: people who are going to be losing sleep, their health
Speaker 1: is going to deteriorate, their alcohol consumption, their weight is
Speaker 1: going to go up, their families are gonna be in restrained,
Speaker 1: they might get divorces. I mean, economics affects lives, folks.
Speaker 1: We all know that. And the Biden administration comes in,
Speaker 1: we're already suffering after twelve months of the pandemic and
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, which have made it all worse. They made
Speaker 1: it all worse. They have not made anything better. They
Speaker 1: made it all worse. Look at what's gone on. It's
Speaker 1: very clear anybody who was honest is now, including people
Speaker 1: that disagree with the beginning or saying, wow, Buck, you
Speaker 1: were right about this. I know, but I didn't want
Speaker 1: to be right. I wanted this to not happen. But
Speaker 1: here we are. But while that's all going on, there's
Speaker 1: all these job losses, in economic despair. What do they do.
Speaker 1: They around and they say, now, we're gonna add to
Speaker 1: those losses. We're gonna make everything more expensive. We're gonna
Speaker 1: hurt an essential domestic energy production industry. And when you're
Speaker 1: at when they're asked about it, what they're what they're
Speaker 1: going to say. And this is just remarkable. Is there
Speaker 1: a new version of learn to code, except now it's
Speaker 1: learned to make solar panels? That's the smug detached We
Speaker 1: don't care about you. Go blank yourself, approach you get here.
Speaker 1: Here's John Carey talking about oil and gas workers who
Speaker 1: have already lost their jobs. These are union folks. By
Speaker 1: the way, I thought the Democrats cared about I thought
Speaker 1: blue collar Joe cared about unions. Union folks. Listen to
Speaker 1: John Carey play ten. Then what do you say to
Speaker 1: those who may be unemployed workers? Now? How do you
Speaker 1: get them into the mix? And how do you speak
Speaker 1: to the concerned oil and gas workers as well. We
Speaker 1: need to put them to work. We need to absolutely
Speaker 1: put them to work. We need to keep them in
Speaker 1: their communities where they live. We need to make sure
Speaker 1: that the factories are coming to those communities, whether it's
Speaker 1: a new electric car factory or it's making blades for
Speaker 1: windmills or turbines or whatever. We have great need for
Speaker 1: people to work in this field, and it's critical. I've
Speaker 1: had conversations with some of my friends involved in this
Speaker 1: about how we could create some demonstration projects in those
Speaker 1: communities so people can see it's not just political talk,
Speaker 1: it's actually real economic policy that has a consequence, a
Speaker 1: positive one on their lives. How long before they start
Speaker 1: talking about shovel ready jobs again, remember that in the
Speaker 1: Obama aministration there weren't no shovel ready jobs. Remember when
Speaker 1: the Obama administration, which we're just this is just Obama reducts,
Speaker 1: is what we're getting now, We're we're back to two
Speaker 1: thousand and nine. That's where we are, except instead of
Speaker 1: a financial crisis, we have a pandemic crisis that's being
Speaker 1: exploited to the maximum by the Democrats, and we could
Speaker 1: be on the press of a financial crisis too unless
Speaker 1: some things turn around. But conversation more for another day.
Speaker 1: They talk so much about how green energy was, all
Speaker 1: these jobs, all this prosper as if they know a
Speaker 1: damn thing about the markets, As if the people talking
Speaker 1: about this stuff really know what it means to be
Speaker 1: a worker, A laborer, in any of these industries, you know,
Speaker 1: John Curry, Oh, just go from you know, you go
Speaker 1: from working on a on a pipeline to building solar panels.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, because that's just that easy, huh. Like like
Speaker 1: these people don't have any skills, seniority relationships, things that
Speaker 1: they've built up in their business. You know, you know
Speaker 1: what a petroleum engineer makes average salary nationwide? About one
Speaker 1: hundred grand a hundred grand, not bad, that's nice. Do
Speaker 1: you know what in a petroleum engineer makes coming out
Speaker 1: of school year one on on average? Just shya? Eighty
Speaker 1: about eighty about eighty k oh? All right, so the
Speaker 1: solar panel guy is gonna be making that, No, of course,
Speaker 1: not manufacturing jobs and things like solar panels are going
Speaker 1: to be a very different pay scale. They're a much
Speaker 1: smaller market. But does John Kerry, No, he doesn't care
Speaker 1: aboutny this. He's saving the planet. You're a little rinky
Speaker 1: dank petroleum job. As far as John Kerry's concern at
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. They got a planet to save. Shut up, peasant,
Speaker 1: be grateful, be thankful that this is where it is.
Speaker 1: I gotta say, this is not exactly what a lot
Speaker 1: of us had in mind with this new technocratic Biden administration,
Speaker 1: where probably all knew that was a joke. We all
Speaker 1: knew that was a laugh. Nobody's really gonna take that seriously.
Speaker 1: John Kerry did say one thing I wanted to point out,
Speaker 1: and that is that while we are doing all these
Speaker 1: self inflicted on necessary wounds to our economy in this country,
Speaker 1: the truth is that it doesn't do it. It doesn't
Speaker 1: do a darned thing to the global emissions rate, really
Speaker 1: not in a meaningful way. Play eleven stakes, the stakes
Speaker 1: on climate change just simply couldn't be any higher than
Speaker 1: they are right now. It is existential. We use that
Speaker 1: word too easily, we throw it away. But we have
Speaker 1: a big agenda in front of us on a global basis.
Speaker 1: And President Biden is deeply committed, totally seized by this issue,
Speaker 1: as you can tell by this executive order and by
Speaker 1: the other the initiative of getting back into Paris immediately.
Speaker 1: That's why he rejoined the Paris Agreement so quickly, because
Speaker 1: he knows it is urgent. He also knows that Paris
Speaker 1: alone is not enough, not when almost ninety percent of
Speaker 1: all of the planet's emissions, global emissions come from outside
Speaker 1: of US borders. We could go to zero tomorrow and
Speaker 1: the problem doesn't solved. We could go to zero emissions tomorrow,
Speaker 1: the problem is not solved. But isn't it funny how
Speaker 1: Californians think, Oh, I'm just lessening my CEO two footprint.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna save the world. I really believe that it's
Speaker 1: it's a it's a lunacy. I mean, this is a
Speaker 1: disorder of sorts. Climate change does have so many similarities
Speaker 1: to mass cults of the past, and people think that
Speaker 1: there there are you know, it's very similar religions. There's
Speaker 1: an end of Day's myth, there's a there's a system
Speaker 1: of indulgences, there are high priests, right, it's there's a
Speaker 1: lot that goes on here. They've even had, as you know,
Speaker 1: these weird videos where people will apologize to trees and
Speaker 1: plants and things that actually exists. I know you're thinking,
Speaker 1: that's dude, It's actually is real. I'm sorry, Mother Earth
Speaker 1: for cutting down your trees. And I just wish people would,
Speaker 1: if they're going to be spiritual, find something worthwhile to
Speaker 1: be spiritual about, you know, but they won't do that.
Speaker 1: And this is enormous when it comes to the economic
Speaker 1: implications for the country, because what Biden's doing is he's
Speaker 1: sheltering the Democrats in Congress from having to actually deal
Speaker 1: with the backlash against their stupid decisions if they were
Speaker 1: to go with climate change. Biden does it himself. He's
Speaker 1: locked in for four years or until Kamala decides to
Speaker 1: take over for him and he steps down, so that's
Speaker 1: he's got free reign to do all these things. They're
Speaker 1: even telling you this that you got Michael Mann saying,
Speaker 1: not the director of movies, but saying that Biden's Green
Speaker 1: New Deal is coming through executive order in a sense
Speaker 1: play fifteen. You know. Again, there were some critics even
Speaker 1: in the environmental community, who, for example, want to see
Speaker 1: a very expansive climate plan, a Green New Deal like
Speaker 1: climate plan, and frankly, in a divided Congress, a fifty
Speaker 1: fifty Senate, it may be very difficult to see that
Speaker 1: sort of legislation pass Congress. But what Joe Biden has
Speaker 1: done is basically go as far as one could go
Speaker 1: through executive actions to implementing something that looks a lot
Speaker 1: like the Green New Deal. And one of the things
Speaker 1: I really like about this plan it you know, it
Speaker 1: does recognize that there are folks who may tend to
Speaker 1: get left behind when we undergo a transition away from
Speaker 1: our current energy systems towards a renewable energy economy. And
Speaker 1: so there are very tangible efforts that are outlined in
Speaker 1: this plan to make sure that we help out those
Speaker 1: communities through retraining programs and through assistance so that they
Speaker 1: don't get left behind as we make this necessary transition
Speaker 1: away from our reliance and burning of fossil fuels. What
Speaker 1: he means is the government's going to spend a whole
Speaker 1: lot of money and give it to favor constituencies and
Speaker 1: identity groups and so on and so forth while they're
Speaker 1: making this transition, because it puts the government charge of
Speaker 1: so much. Energy is the lifeblood of our economy. Fossil
Speaker 1: fuel is the lifeblood of our economy, but they want
Speaker 1: to move that over to this green and renewable nonsense.
Speaker 1: Which look, do I think that in fifty or one
Speaker 1: hundred years, you know, we'll we'll we'll have new energy
Speaker 1: sources and there won't it'll be very clean. And yeah,
Speaker 1: of course it's been that. I keep saying this because
Speaker 1: it's true. Our energy sources go and look at the
Speaker 1: history of what we have used from the origins of
Speaker 1: the Industrial Revolution to present. Look at how much cleaner
Speaker 1: are our primary energy sources and the way we use
Speaker 1: those energy sources, even as importantly have become We used
Speaker 1: to we used to be all coal. You think of ships, trains,
Speaker 1: early Industrial Revolution, machinery. Coal was the way that we were,
Speaker 1: which is, you know, is very dirty and bad for
Speaker 1: the environment and all right, So it was coal, and
Speaker 1: then we moved more into oil, and then we had nuclear.
Speaker 1: But the left shut down nuclear because they were scared,
Speaker 1: even though nuclear is a wonderful power source and the French,
Speaker 1: i mean, European countries have used this with a tremendous effect.
Speaker 1: But we had and our nuclear reactors should be several
Speaker 1: generations advanced beyond where they are. Because the environmentalists left
Speaker 1: the bunch of you know, pink Paradise, put up a
Speaker 1: parking lot, you know, the whole left wing seventies Kumbaya.
Speaker 1: We can't have you know, big oil, and we can't
Speaker 1: have nuclear power plants in this country. They shut down
Speaker 1: nuclear power plant growth, and which was terrible and bad
Speaker 1: for the environment anyway, But we had that power source.
Speaker 1: Then then for political reasons, we didn't use it. And
Speaker 1: now we're at natural gas, which as far cleaner as
Speaker 1: it burns than oil. So I mean, this process is
Speaker 1: already happening, and if you want to go even earlier,
Speaker 1: the industry revolution, we used to use whale oil, which
Speaker 1: is a really inefficient and really hard to get an
Speaker 1: expensive that was used for lighting, for candles and for
Speaker 1: you know, the lamps. Then we switched to kerosene. The
Speaker 1: discovery of oil in Pennsylvania was really one of the
Speaker 1: first places that we had a real oil business in America. Anyway,
Speaker 1: fascinating history of energy in this country exists. But nonetheless
Speaker 1: they're trying to do this great leap, this great green
Speaker 1: leap forward with technology that isn't there yet for mass usage.
Speaker 1: If you care about quality of life, if you care
Speaker 1: about standards of living, if you care about making money
Speaker 1: and efficiency, it's not there yet, but they want to
Speaker 1: try to force it at the government level. Let me
Speaker 1: tell you this. Do you think a government that cannot
Speaker 1: distribute vaccines to people in a way that is anything
Speaker 1: short of a debacle. Do you think that government is
Speaker 1: going to make really smart investments with your tax dollars
Speaker 1: about the green technologies of the future. John Kerry's never
Speaker 1: run a business. These people don't know what the heck
Speaker 1: they're doing, but they do know, and this is what
Speaker 1: this guy says. They're getting what they want. They're just
Speaker 1: getting it through executive order, which was always the way
Speaker 1: this was going to be. And the usual checks and
Speaker 1: balances on this no longer apply because people in the
Speaker 1: media are completely on board for whatever the Biden agenda is,
Speaker 1: and people in the people in the rest of the judiciary.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know there was a fifth Circuit judge
Speaker 1: in Texas, but in general, judges are going to be afraid.
Speaker 1: They don't want to disappoint their peers. They don't want
Speaker 1: mean things said about them. They're not going to stop
Speaker 1: the Biden overreach. Yeah, Joe Biden, such a moderate, going
Speaker 1: to do all the really smart, good things. We're getting
Speaker 1: a green new deal here with a stroke of Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's pen, and it's every bit as stupid and counterproductive
Speaker 1: and economically costly as many aspects of the AOC Advanced
Speaker 1: Green Deal would be, which anybody with an IQ over
Speaker 1: a poster nose doesn't really include. AOC was a document
Speaker 1: that was laughable, but yet now they're implementing it. You're
Speaker 1: listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure you
Speaker 1: subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Let me be clear, and
Speaker 1: I know it's always comes up. We're not going to
Speaker 1: ban fracking. We'll protect jobs and grow jobs, including if
Speaker 1: you're stronger standards like controls from methane leaks and union
Speaker 1: workers and willing to install the changes unlike previous administrations.
Speaker 1: I don't think the federal government should give handouts to
Speaker 1: big oil to the tune of forty billion dollars and
Speaker 1: fossil fuel subsidies. And I'm going to be going to
Speaker 1: the Congress asking them to eliminate those subsidies. Yep. Biden
Speaker 1: says no ban on fracking, but he's gonna make it
Speaker 1: more difficult, gonna make it more expensive, and you're gonna
Speaker 1: You're gonna pay for this. We're all gonna be paying
Speaker 1: for this. It's just lighting money on fire, like lighting
Speaker 1: gasoline on fire, except it's your money. And here we
Speaker 1: are seeing what it means to put this Joe Biden
Speaker 1: clown in this position of authority. Um, you know, doubling
Speaker 1: offshore wind by twenty thirty. I mean you look at
Speaker 1: all this stuff. This is absurd, doubling off you know,
Speaker 1: expensive and difficult. That is a set of these offshore
Speaker 1: wind and where's the how is the energy stored and
Speaker 1: the lines and how is it distributed? This whole thing
Speaker 1: is a mess. It's just one endless, stupid boondoggle after another.
Speaker 1: It's just the Cylindra ization of our economy. Remember remember Cylindra,
Speaker 1: You know that was a brilliant idea the early stage
Speaker 1: of the Obama administration. Um Cylindra was a solar panel
Speaker 1: company that lost five hundred million dollars. Okay, but it
Speaker 1: had a Department of Energy five hundred and thirty five
Speaker 1: million dollars loan guarantee. Do you know who was on
Speaker 1: the hook for those losses? You were, that's right. The
Speaker 1: federal government backed this with your tax dollars. It's really unbelievable,
Speaker 1: and it went bankrupt. The Obama administration, though, gave the
Speaker 1: country money with a stimulus pro for the stimulus program,
Speaker 1: and then backed with the federal loan guarantee. It's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: You know, they had loan guarantees, which meant that they
Speaker 1: didn't even have to suffer the consequences you did of
Speaker 1: their mismanagement. And this is just the cylindarization of the
Speaker 1: entire American economy. Putting people in charge who don't understand
Speaker 1: these things, Putting people in charge who aren't real and
Speaker 1: realistic and clear eye about what's going to work and
Speaker 1: what's not. They've got idealogues now running the show. They've
Speaker 1: got people that ultimately want to have a nice story
Speaker 1: written about them in the Atlantic, and they want to
Speaker 1: go around with their fancy buddies on their yachts and
Speaker 1: talk about how they're involved in the green energy revolution
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. If people really believed that we
Speaker 1: were going to do all this green energy and it's
Speaker 1: gonna work out so well, it wouldn't require the government
Speaker 1: to make people do this stuff. Actual individual companies and
Speaker 1: investors and the market would react in a way that
Speaker 1: showed that this is what this is, you know, a
Speaker 1: viable path. But nope, who needs viable paths? Who needs
Speaker 1: reality when you can have these lunatics in charge with
Speaker 1: their government mandates and their green new deal by Fiat.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're getting. The whole, the whole, the
Speaker 1: whole thing is a disaster. But you know that's what.
Speaker 1: It hasn't taken long to find out what Joe's really
Speaker 1: all about. At least we got that going for us.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation
Speaker 1: and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team bucket
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com. He may read it on the show.
Speaker 1: Doctor G is in the house. That's right. Sebastian Gorka
Speaker 1: is with us now. He's the host of america first
Speaker 1: syndicated radio show. Follow him on various social media platforms
Speaker 1: before they get all shut down, Doctor G. Good to
Speaker 1: have you back. Great to be back with you, Buck,
Speaker 1: And yes that's not an empty promise. Just this week,
Speaker 1: YouTube channel for our national radio show was suspended for
Speaker 1: a week for the crime of having a new freshman
Speaker 1: congresswoman come on our show and say that a large
Speaker 1: number of Trump voters don't believe in the results of
Speaker 1: the last election. That expression, that practice of your first
Speaker 1: amended rights. We'll get you suspended on YouTube, which is
Speaker 1: of course owned by Google. So it's real and it's
Speaker 1: happening every day. Now. Which member of Congress was this
Speaker 1: and were you able to go back to YouTube and
Speaker 1: say that this is a this is a United States
Speaker 1: politician who is expressing an observation on a news platform
Speaker 1: as a newsmaker. I'm just wondering how this all went down. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so this is this is Marjorie Taylor Green from where
Speaker 1: is she from? George, Georgia. And we went to YouTube.
Speaker 1: We said, okay, what's happened? Why is this? They gave
Speaker 1: us the exact time stamp of the sin we committed,
Speaker 1: and they said, sorry, you have violated our post inauguration
Speaker 1: rules against scams. I'm not joking, scams and disinformation. And
Speaker 1: when we said this is a live radio show, this
Speaker 1: is a member of Congress who is expressing her opinion,
Speaker 1: they said, well, you know if we if we get
Speaker 1: you back on, you can always have our work around.
Speaker 1: Here's the workaround for YouTube. This is how Stalinist and
Speaker 1: Orwellian in the future, if somebody says something that they
Speaker 1: disagree with, you know, the masters in Silicon Valley, we
Speaker 1: immediately have to put a chiriron up. We have to
Speaker 1: put a subtitle on the screen for a live radio
Speaker 1: broadcast which says the AP or the Washington Post disagrees
Speaker 1: with this assessment. But I'm not joking. That's what YouTube
Speaker 1: told us unbelievable. But I guess increasingly these days it
Speaker 1: is believable because this is what they keep doing. You know,
Speaker 1: I've had similar problems. I got dinged on Facebook, doctor
Speaker 1: g for sharing a news post where Marco Rubio was
Speaker 1: quoted saying something about the election that they did not like.
Speaker 1: That's where we are now. And then and then I
Speaker 1: had my account you know, throttled and shut down for
Speaker 1: weeks and had to go through the whole thing. It's crazy,
Speaker 1: and and I think that the problem we're all recognizing
Speaker 1: now is that it's not even that that they'll allow
Speaker 1: us to have other platforms either. We know, Parlor. I've
Speaker 1: still got the Parlor app on the front page of
Speaker 1: my smartphone, still shut down. Yeah, well, look, this is
Speaker 1: this is a much, much bigger story we can talk about.
Speaker 1: You know, well, which YouTube channels were suspended or canceled
Speaker 1: or had demands put upon them for disclaimer chirons in
Speaker 1: the last four years when you had talking heads or
Speaker 1: guests two shows us spout off about the Russia collusion hooks,
Speaker 1: Not one, fuck, I guarantee you not one was suspended
Speaker 1: for disinforming of the American public about a scandal that
Speaker 1: never happened. But look, this is part of a much
Speaker 1: bigger story. Look what's happening on Wall Street right now?
Speaker 1: I just figured it out. If you don't, if oh,
Speaker 1: this audience is very up to speed on Game Stop
Speaker 1: and Raminhood by the way, so go ahead. Yeah. But
Speaker 1: the point here is, you know, I'm so amused by
Speaker 1: all the experts on the fine all shows who are
Speaker 1: trying to get their heads around this don't understand what's
Speaker 1: really going on Wall Street. So you know, Citron versus
Speaker 1: Wall Street Bets and Robin Hood is exactly the same
Speaker 1: phenomena as Maga versus the deep state and the establishment.
Speaker 1: And if you don't see that, you're a cretin. So
Speaker 1: this this seventy billion short sale liability that the hedge
Speaker 1: funds have seventy billion buck This is this is a
Speaker 1: massive story, and it is it is all part and
Speaker 1: parcel of trumps um America first, you know, the little
Speaker 1: guy versus the embedded establishment. And when I say em
Speaker 1: betted establishment, you know as well as I do, I
Speaker 1: mean the GOP and the Democrats. Speaking of Sebastian Gorka,
Speaker 1: doctor g He's the host of America. First with doctor
Speaker 1: Sebastian gorka syndicated radio show, follow him, listen to his
Speaker 1: podcast and and doctor g that end. I mean, I
Speaker 1: do think this is the most important story in some ways,
Speaker 1: at least for this week in the in the country.
Speaker 1: I mean, we haven't gotten to the impeachment force yet,
Speaker 1: so obviously that'll take up a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of time and heating a few weeks, you know, the
Speaker 1: continuation of that trial. But in the meantime, the fact
Speaker 1: that what we've seen is Wall Street is there is
Speaker 1: no way around the conclusion that it is a rigged game.
Speaker 1: When powerful people can shut down the system because they're
Speaker 1: losing money legally within the system, that's not you know
Speaker 1: that this is this is somebody if we were playing
Speaker 1: a basketball game. This is like all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you know, the ref comes out and says, well, when
Speaker 1: they shoot, it's worth five points. That's what's happening. Yes,
Speaker 1: and the backstory is crucial to understanding all of this.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, this is a generation. You know,
Speaker 1: I can't tell you how many Saturday mornings I wasted,
Speaker 1: it's not wasted, but spent waiting outside game stop while
Speaker 1: my young son was waiting in line for the latest
Speaker 1: versions of Assassin's Creed or latest Star Wars gain to
Speaker 1: come out. That generation of non commission traders that we're
Speaker 1: using the latest app were disgusted when they found out
Speaker 1: that the big boys, the hurch funds, the Wall streeters
Speaker 1: who buy the political parties, were betting to destroy game Stop,
Speaker 1: literally shorting it to destroy a company with thousands of employees.
Speaker 1: So what did they do? Like Robin Hood's Mary Band
Speaker 1: of Men, they said, no, We're going to buy stock,
Speaker 1: and they made They made game Stop the fastest growing
Speaker 1: stock on the planet. And now when those who are
Speaker 1: betting to destroy an American company had lost billions, what
Speaker 1: happens They shut it down. You're absolutely right. It's like
Speaker 1: paying off the reft to say that three pointer is
Speaker 1: actually a minus three pointer and the points go to us.
Speaker 1: And this is the little man fighting back and the
Speaker 1: establishment common standard. Doctor G I've got to say I'm
Speaker 1: a little frustrated right now with what I'm seeing from
Speaker 1: some of the still in office big names in the
Speaker 1: gop ted cruise has come out on this. He agrees
Speaker 1: with AOC. I don't know if you saw this on Twitter.
Speaker 1: He agrees with AOC that what's going on here with
Speaker 1: this Wall Street rigging is completely outrageous. Republicans have got
Speaker 1: to be all over this because you know, we're supposed
Speaker 1: to be the free market people. This is the antithesis
Speaker 1: of free market, right. This is fixed market. This is
Speaker 1: the big government, big establishment, big money, tilting the playing
Speaker 1: field in their favor. But if we don't see this narrative,
Speaker 1: it's going to be blamed on Wall Street Republican fatcats.
Speaker 1: When all these Wall Street hedge funds, as you and
Speaker 1: I both know, they give money to Joe Biden, the
Speaker 1: money to Hillary Clinton, they're not maga people totally. Well, look,
Speaker 1: here's the problem, and I discussed this on my show yesterday.
Speaker 1: American First, you know, I had an epiphany. I've had
Speaker 1: it with the GEOP. Look, I understand we can't have
Speaker 1: a third party because that's how we got built Clinton
Speaker 1: when Ross Perot ran. But I've had it with the
Speaker 1: establishment GOP. Why. You know, Yeah, it's great that Ted
Speaker 1: Cruz is making noise about this. You know, Rand Paul's
Speaker 1: speech about the fast of a of a impeachment trial
Speaker 1: was great, But I don't care about speeches anymore. But
Speaker 1: what has the establishment done for the forgotten men and women.
Speaker 1: One guy for four years represented ironically, a billionaire from
Speaker 1: Queens represented the forgotten men and women, including the working class.
Speaker 1: That's why we have the XL pipeline. That's why we
Speaker 1: built the wall. And what has the establishment GEOP done?
Speaker 1: I love the Freedom Caucus guys, but look, there's one
Speaker 1: guy in Congress, one guy, Matt Gates, who refuses to
Speaker 1: take money from packs. Why is that, Buck, Well, we
Speaker 1: all know it's because people like to get money so
Speaker 1: they can stay in office. Right, So we have to
Speaker 1: take back. If you're a conservative, we have to take
Speaker 1: pack the GOP. I've started a new hashtag. It's new
Speaker 1: hashtag new GOP. We need more congressmen and women like
Speaker 1: Marjorie Green, like Lauren Bobbert, these fighters who are true.
Speaker 1: This is how a merit who was founded not by politicians,
Speaker 1: but by citizens who temporarily became politicians. Remember when they
Speaker 1: offered Washington a third term. They wanted him to become
Speaker 1: a quasi de facto king of the New Republic, and
Speaker 1: he refused. He went back to his farm. That's the
Speaker 1: American way. Could you imagine, Buck, if the founding fathers
Speaker 1: had been told that You're going to sacrifice your treasure,
Speaker 1: your blood, your sacred honor. And two hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: years from now, there are going to be people on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill who have been in politics for thirty years,
Speaker 1: like Nancy, like Schumer, like Biden for forty seven years.
Speaker 1: You know what, they wouldn't have actually fought the British
Speaker 1: and you'dn't be speaking real English like me today talking
Speaker 1: to Sebastian Gorka. He's the host of America First. But
Speaker 1: you can watch on YouTube, especially when they get unbanned
Speaker 1: for some time. You've got to watch this on Rumble
Speaker 1: and on Facebook because we are still suspended on you Okay,
Speaker 1: Rumble and Facebook. There we go, this still suspended, but
Speaker 1: so watch seb show. It said, before we let you go,
Speaker 1: I do want to ask you what you think about
Speaker 1: this flurry of executive orders, specifically on the environment. I mean,
Speaker 1: I know that there was there was a pretty broad
Speaker 1: consensus among people like you and me looking at what
Speaker 1: we're going to be dealing with this Biden administration that
Speaker 1: they had this oh you know, grinning rolled up sleeves, grandpa,
Speaker 1: blue collar joe guy that was supposed to be not
Speaker 1: scary you know, the flyover state voters in the swing
Speaker 1: states and everything else. And what we're getting is a
Speaker 1: guy who's effectively trying to push the Green New Deal
Speaker 1: with executive order. What do you see happening here? Well,
Speaker 1: I'll just quote Joe Biden from eighteen months ago on
Speaker 1: the campaign trail when he said, you know your listeners
Speaker 1: could download the video. He said, we mustn't. We mustn't
Speaker 1: governed by executive order because that would be a dictatorship.
Speaker 1: He has already issued three dozen executive orders in eight days. Well,
Speaker 1: by his own definition, he's a dictator. But these are
Speaker 1: really bad for America. But on the medium term, that
Speaker 1: actually good for conservatives. Think about the insanity not only
Speaker 1: having at least eleven thousand jobs been destroyed in America
Speaker 1: because of the Excel cancelation. I was talking to Lord
Speaker 1: Conrad Black from Canada. Canada has lost forty three thousand
Speaker 1: jobs because of the unilateral cancelation of the Keystone pipeline.
Speaker 1: They are fuming in Canada. Look at the track. I
Speaker 1: think the biggest one, the most significant one for conservatives,
Speaker 1: is the transgenderism they have destroyed with one executive order.
Speaker 1: They have destroyed Title nine and where are the feminists,
Speaker 1: where are the civil rights activists? That women will now
Speaker 1: be trounced in track and field, in sport, men will
Speaker 1: be going into female locker rooms. I think that's going
Speaker 1: to make the seventy four million Americans who voted for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump turn into eighty four into ninety four because
Speaker 1: these are political issues are these are issues that every
Speaker 1: normal American cares about, and it's going to change the
Speaker 1: political landscape. And doctor Gorka, what do you what do
Speaker 1: you make of the push from the left for this
Speaker 1: domestic counter terrorism law, which they seem very I mean,
Speaker 1: they have members of Congress referring to enemy combatants as
Speaker 1: that's their political opponents in this country. Now, that's people
Speaker 1: that were in DC for the protest enemy combatants. Look,
Speaker 1: you you're a former CT professional. You know I work
Speaker 1: for more than a decade with our CT agencies. This
Speaker 1: is and I don't use this word, this is frightening.
Speaker 1: When you read the DHS Terrorism bulletin yesterday and they
Speaker 1: talk about domestic violent extremists who have issues grievances to
Speaker 1: do with the last election. Wow, who are you talking about?
Speaker 1: Are you talking about seventy four million American voters that
Speaker 1: we have never seen language like that come out of
Speaker 1: the intelligence community, out of any any agency. And it's
Speaker 1: not just you know, one of crazies. When you have
Speaker 1: a retired general who by statute does not satisfy the
Speaker 1: requirements to have a secretary of Defense be out of
Speaker 1: uniform for six years, be confirmed by ninety three Senate vote.
Speaker 1: Who in is testimony and this is horrific. A form
Speaker 1: of four star general says we have racists in the
Speaker 1: military and they are our enemies. You know what that
Speaker 1: language means when I use the word enemy, it means
Speaker 1: somebody who must be destroyed. That is a retired general
Speaker 1: who's talking about American citizens as if they must be destroyed.
Speaker 1: And now he's our secretary of Defense. You need to
Speaker 1: keep your eye on this all Americans do, because, as
Speaker 1: Jim Hanson said recently to me, the goal is very simple.
Speaker 1: This administration wants to criminalize being a conservative, and we
Speaker 1: can't let them. Doctor Sebastian gork everybody follow him, watch
Speaker 1: download Listen to America First with Sebastian Gorka, Doctor g
Speaker 1: Always a pleasure, sir, Thank you, God bless you in
Speaker 1: the listeners. Thanks Bud. This is The Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. What exactly did
Speaker 1: you mean to the enemy within? What exactly it means
Speaker 1: that we have members of Congress who want to bring
Speaker 1: guns on the floor and have threatened a violence on
Speaker 1: other members of Congress. The enemy is within? Pelosi says, yeah,
Speaker 1: just like we heard from a doctor Gorka before criminalizing
Speaker 1: being a conservative, that that that's the ultimate goal. Will
Speaker 1: they get there or not, We'll have to see. But
Speaker 1: you know, they're using very clear, very clear language meant
Speaker 1: to harm our political prospects and to make us afraid,
Speaker 1: and to use this system, use the apparatus of the
Speaker 1: government as a weapon against us. That is what they
Speaker 1: are doing. That's the whole purpose of this, that's the reason,
Speaker 1: that's the rationale. And to say that, oh, yeah, he'll
Speaker 1: get a fair he'll get a fair trial in a week, well,
Speaker 1: what are what are they even going to show with
Speaker 1: the trial? We've all seen the as in speech. We
Speaker 1: all know what he said. He didn't incite an insurrection.
Speaker 1: End of story. Like, well, what do they really think
Speaker 1: they're gonna do? Oh, they just got to keep trashing Trump,
Speaker 1: That's what they're gonna be going with that's the idea.
Speaker 1: And for Pelosi to suggest that some members of Congress
Speaker 1: are are an actual physical threat to her, this is
Speaker 1: this is absurd, This is this is dangerous to suggest
Speaker 1: that this is going on. But you know, AOC says
Speaker 1: similar stuff here you go play seven, but this term
Speaker 1: there are legitimate white supremacist sympathizers that sit at the
Speaker 1: heart and at the core of the Republican Caucus in
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives. And when you see someone like
Speaker 1: the like the House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party respond to white supremacist vitriol coming from his
Speaker 1: own members, not with censure like they did with UM
Speaker 1: representatives Steve King of Iowa, not with you know, being
Speaker 1: stripped of committees, not with any consequence. You have to
Speaker 1: wonder where who actually has that power. And it increasingly seems,
Speaker 1: unfortunately that in the House Republican Caucus, Kevin McCarthy answers
Speaker 1: to these qann members of Congress, not the other way around.
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy answers to q Anon congressman. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is these people are insane. Look what I mean. Look,
Speaker 1: AOC is in so many ways the ultimate she's the
Speaker 1: epitome of the Democratic Party of today. It's a lot
Speaker 1: of flash and a lot of media attention and self
Speaker 1: indulgent you know, Instagram posts, and she's just just an
Speaker 1: income poo, I mean really just a but dangerous and
Speaker 1: powerful people listen into her. She is not smart. She
Speaker 1: is not a smart person, but people believe that what
Speaker 1: she says is intelligent for reasons that are I mean,
Speaker 1: you'd have to really try hard to figure that one out,
Speaker 1: because the culture tells them so, I guess because the establishment,
Speaker 1: the institutions are all aligned with these points of view.
Speaker 1: But if you hear somebody like her making the case
Speaker 1: and you say, she's a blathering idiot, why does anyone listen? Well,
Speaker 1: this is what we're up against now, a Democratic party
Speaker 1: run by fools who want to crush dissent. That's the
Speaker 1: whole approach. You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from
Speaker 1: Buck at buck Sexton dot com. We are still in
Speaker 1: the midst of lockdowns. We still have a pandemic. What
Speaker 1: is the latest on all of this? Got to go
Speaker 1: to the man himself, mister Alex Berenson. He's the author
Speaker 1: of three books he can get on Amazon, Unreported Truths
Speaker 1: about COVID nineteen and Lockdowns. He's got a book on masks,
Speaker 1: and now he's doing a lot of work on vaccinations. Alex,
Speaker 1: good to have you back on the show. Thank you
Speaker 1: for having me book. Let's just start with this. What
Speaker 1: have we what have we learned in let's say, the
Speaker 1: last few weeks, about what's really going on with the
Speaker 1: response to all of this. I mean, doctor Fauci's out
Speaker 1: there now saying that two masks are logical. And I
Speaker 1: was making jokes about this months ago because I knew
Speaker 1: that this was going to happen. You got n ninety
Speaker 1: five mask mandates in Germany now and at least in
Speaker 1: Bavaria and I think a few other states. They're saying
Speaker 1: that those work a lot better. Why aren't wearing those
Speaker 1: all along? What's going on here, Alex, Well, what's going
Speaker 1: on with the mass is that the mass have completely
Speaker 1: failed to work. Right. So you know, cloth and surgical
Speaker 1: masks have been mandated in most of the country for
Speaker 1: most of the last year. They're basically worn everywhere inside.
Speaker 1: Americans have been very, very compliant with this, as we've
Speaker 1: been compliant with everything in parts of the country in
Speaker 1: blue states that they're often worn outside by most people.
Speaker 1: And if you don't wear one, you you know, you
Speaker 1: sometimes get a hard look if you're on the streets
Speaker 1: in New York or you know, or elsewhere. Um and uh,
Speaker 1: they've they've made no appreciable difference to the course of
Speaker 1: the epidemic anywhere. Uh. You know, California had a huge
Speaker 1: surge in cases of US as a whole, had a
Speaker 1: huge surge in cases in November and December, which thankfully
Speaker 1: now seems to be passing. Uh. And so instead of
Speaker 1: admitting that masks have made no difference, is obvious to
Speaker 1: anybody who's paid the remotest bit of attention to the statistics,
Speaker 1: much less the you know, the the scientific evidence around this. Um.
Speaker 1: Now we're doubling down and we're trying something new, which
Speaker 1: is two masks. Now, I've always said N ninety five,
Speaker 1: which you know, which which medical professionals called respirators. Um,
Speaker 1: they may have some benefit, it's it's not clear how
Speaker 1: much benefit, but they can't have less benefit than cloth
Speaker 1: and surgical masks. But those masks and ninety fives, that
Speaker 1: is wrestiers. You need to wear properly, you need to
Speaker 1: have them fitted, and a lot of people don't like them.
Speaker 1: They're kind of uncomfortable, you know, if they're properly fitted,
Speaker 1: and they and they do make breathing more difficult. So
Speaker 1: it's and they're expensive, you know, where to wear a
Speaker 1: new and ninety five every day or a couple new
Speaker 1: and ninety fives every day is expensive. So whether that's
Speaker 1: a realistic suggestion or not, and whether it would make
Speaker 1: any appreciable difference on a national level or not, we
Speaker 1: don't know. But what we do know is that one
Speaker 1: mask has basically made no difference. So so so I need
Speaker 1: you to explain to me. I've got a theory that
Speaker 1: I've been telling everybody about on radio for the last
Speaker 1: week or so, and it's fouciese claim. And I even
Speaker 1: know somebody who interviewed him specifically and asked him about
Speaker 1: this and was told the clip. Fauci's claim about the
Speaker 1: masks is that because he very clearly said the general
Speaker 1: public doesn't have to wear masks, even during this pandemic.
Speaker 1: This was back in March. General public doesn't have to
Speaker 1: wear a mask. It might make people feel better, but
Speaker 1: it really won't make much difference. His answer now as
Speaker 1: to how he could say that is, I was worried
Speaker 1: that we would run out of masks. So on the
Speaker 1: one hand, he is absolutely admitting that he lied to
Speaker 1: the public because he thought it was in their own
Speaker 1: interests to not know the truth. That's just a fact.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's no way around that. That's his response.
Speaker 1: So he lied to the public because he thought it
Speaker 1: was in our best interest to be lied to. But
Speaker 1: beyond that, where was if this is such an obvious issue,
Speaker 1: and people treat me whenever I have questions just about
Speaker 1: the affectiveness. I'm not even saying zero, but I'm saying, hey,
Speaker 1: how effective is this really? Guys, let's get serious about this.
Speaker 1: They get so angry, they say, how could you be
Speaker 1: so stupid? Everybody knows that a mask is going to
Speaker 1: be effective. And I say, when Fauci lied on a
Speaker 1: national platform in March, lied by his own admission, if
Speaker 1: it was so obvious and so clear, why did not
Speaker 1: a single person Alex say, wait a second, that's irresponsible.
Speaker 1: Doctor Fauci shouldn't say that about mask. We know that
Speaker 1: masks work. Nobody said that. But because what he was
Speaker 1: saying then was true, you know, and you can go
Speaker 1: back and look at it. I think it was a
Speaker 1: sixty minutes interview where he said it. He said it
Speaker 1: in another place too. He's very specific about it. He
Speaker 1: and and he's he's no idiots. Okay, he's he's a
Speaker 1: lot of things, but he's no idiot. And he knows
Speaker 1: what the science around this is. And you know, he
Speaker 1: says it may make you feel a little better, but
Speaker 1: we know that there's a lot of transmission that's not droplet.
Speaker 1: I can't remember exactly how he phrases it, so I
Speaker 1: shouldn't I shouldn't say exactly. But he's very clear on it,
Speaker 1: and he's and he's very correct on it. And this
Speaker 1: this sort of after the fact notion that that masks
Speaker 1: do some good. See. See what seems to have happened
Speaker 1: is there were a couple of data points that came
Speaker 1: out of China and Hong Kong and they and they
Speaker 1: sort of toppled the century of science on its head.
Speaker 1: And you know, and people were sort of so desperate
Speaker 1: to have something to tell people. I'm talking about the
Speaker 1: public health establishment um that they jumped on these points
Speaker 1: where okay, a mass seemed to have worked in Hong
Speaker 1: Kong and lockdowns seem to have worked in Wu Hong
Speaker 1: and um and and and uh they didn't. They didn't
Speaker 1: uh you know, they didn't consider everything else. They didn't
Speaker 1: sort of consider the totality of the evidence, um and
Speaker 1: so so. Uh you know, for a century people said, well,
Speaker 1: you know, lockdowns and travel bands, all this stuff, it
Speaker 1: is not going to do any good. It's just gonna
Speaker 1: you know, it just it feels good and feels like
Speaker 1: we're doing something, but you can't stop the respiratory virus
Speaker 1: that way. And then the Chinese lockdown, you know, sort
Speaker 1: of one large city, one province, and they did it
Speaker 1: in a way that we could never get to in
Speaker 1: terms of you know, sort of totalitarian efficiency and by
Speaker 1: their own reports, uh, you know, the virus stops spreading,
Speaker 1: although you can never really trust the data out of China,
Speaker 1: but that's what seems to have happened. And nobody stopped
Speaker 1: to say, A, A, can we really trust this data?
Speaker 1: And B is it possible that they was just the
Speaker 1: normal course of the virus anyway and it would have
Speaker 1: stopped spreading anyway. Instead, the world said we better do
Speaker 1: what they did, We better lockdown, and you know, masks
Speaker 1: seems to have worked in Hong Kong, although there's about
Speaker 1: a dozen different explanations you can give for why that
Speaker 1: might be that aren't mask related. So we better make
Speaker 1: everybody wear masks. And unfortunately, for whatever reason, it turns
Speaker 1: out that what happened in China is not generalizable to
Speaker 1: the rest of the world. And so for the last
Speaker 1: year we've chased our own tails around on this thing.
Speaker 1: And I don't want to say they've laughed at us,
Speaker 1: but the Chinese have done great in the last year.
Speaker 1: Their economy has grown, they're not under wide lockdown. They've
Speaker 1: just watched the world, you know, try to replicate what
Speaker 1: they did in Wuhan in February, and none of it's worked. Now,
Speaker 1: why is it that there are still people who are
Speaker 1: clinging I've spent considerable time in Florida in the last
Speaker 1: two months, you know, lucky me. I've been down in Florida,
Speaker 1: and I'm in New York now and I see what's
Speaker 1: going on and there that are still clinging to Well, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, California or or New York is better in
Speaker 1: some way than Florida. Look at them, I say, Florida's
Speaker 1: open businesses all open, restaurants all open, you can go
Speaker 1: to them. I did you spend time with them? How
Speaker 1: can anyone argue that the California lockdown, for example, was
Speaker 1: worth it, Alex, given the data? I mean, are people
Speaker 1: starting to come out to you and say, maybe I
Speaker 1: was you know, maybe I shouldn't have said all those
Speaker 1: horrible things about you, and we should rethink this. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's kind of what I'm getting to here, Like, are
Speaker 1: people starting to nobody Nobody says that, Nobody says that
Speaker 1: they just they just moved to the next thing, you know. So,
Speaker 1: so California proved to be a disaster in the last
Speaker 1: two months, right, more positive cases than anywhere, and so
Speaker 1: that gets covered as well. People got tired of lockdown
Speaker 1: and nobody says, hey, there is no lockdown in Florida,
Speaker 1: and Florida, you know, has done much better than California
Speaker 1: in the last three or four months, whereas you know,
Speaker 1: when cases were higher in Florida, uh, you know, over
Speaker 1: the summer, DeSantis was getting waked every day. Right, So
Speaker 1: so people just ignored. Here's the here's the most infuriating
Speaker 1: aspect of this. It's not actually about the states. It's
Speaker 1: about the schools. So I have been and look, there
Speaker 1: have been there have been things I've done in the
Speaker 1: last nine months that I'm proud of. There are things
Speaker 1: that I've done that I wish, you know, I could
Speaker 1: change or you know, or places where I've made mistakes.
Speaker 1: That's you know, everybody makes mistakes. The thing that I'm
Speaker 1: the most proud of in my own advocacy or reporting
Speaker 1: or however you want to call it in the last
Speaker 1: uh nine months is pushing on the schools. Okay, the
Speaker 1: schools should have been open. They should have been open
Speaker 1: last spring. They certainly should have been open from September.
Speaker 1: And and it's crystal clear that kids don't spread this
Speaker 1: thing very widely, that they don't get very sick, and
Speaker 1: the teachers are no more risk teaching school than you know,
Speaker 1: going to Florida, which they like to do too, by
Speaker 1: the way, So um so so right now, even the
Speaker 1: New York Times is openly coming around to the idea
Speaker 1: that the teachers unions are you know, are sort of
Speaker 1: behaving monstrously here and are not following the science. But
Speaker 1: does the Times admit the role it played eight months
Speaker 1: ago trying to scare people with you know this mostly
Speaker 1: apparently non existent pediatric inflammatory syndrome and other you know,
Speaker 1: these very rare cases when kids got sick and died
Speaker 1: of COVID, which were highlighted on the front page or
Speaker 1: highlighted in The Times on other places. No, the Times
Speaker 1: will not admit it. They've just moved on and so
Speaker 1: and nobody has said to me, you know, hey, it
Speaker 1: looks like you're pretty right about this, and this is
Speaker 1: kind of important. Not that I expect anybody too, Okay,
Speaker 1: you play the game. It goes on. But the fact
Speaker 1: that the people who are so responsible for this panic,
Speaker 1: for driving this in the last nine months won't admit
Speaker 1: anything they've done. Forget congratulating me, Forget that that's stupid.
Speaker 1: That they won't admit anything they've done is sickening. You're
Speaker 1: listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you
Speaker 1: subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Alex Barns and Everybody. He's
Speaker 1: got books on Amazon Unreported Truths about COVID nineteen. Alex,
Speaker 1: You've don a lot of work on vaccines, haven't been
Speaker 1: able to you know, sometimes I'm able to reach out
Speaker 1: to you offline and throw ideas your way. My father
Speaker 1: waited for four hours in freezing temperatures outside in New
Speaker 1: York City. He's seventy four years old, and no vaccine
Speaker 1: for him at the end of it. Right told him
Speaker 1: he's got to wait for hours more. I've got other
Speaker 1: friends I know who are teachers in their twenties who
Speaker 1: are getting vaccinated in New York City. They show up,
Speaker 1: It's right there for them, no problem. What the hell
Speaker 1: is going on? You know? So there's two there's two
Speaker 1: separate issues. One is this problem with distribution, okay, and
Speaker 1: and you know, this is a lot of Partially it's
Speaker 1: a problem because some states, I know, Minnesota is one
Speaker 1: of them, but there have been others have priorities quote
Speaker 1: unquot equity. What that basically means is old white people
Speaker 1: are not getting the vaccine first, even though old people
Speaker 1: of all races, black or white or you know or
Speaker 1: other are the ones who should get the vaccine first,
Speaker 1: because they've larded it up with underserved communities or people
Speaker 1: at higher risk. You know, once you ignore age, which
Speaker 1: is a nonsense way to do this, age is the
Speaker 1: primary driver of death when you're infected with COVID. It's
Speaker 1: almost the entire risk is stratified by age, and those
Speaker 1: older people like your dad are the people who should
Speaker 1: be getting the vaccine first. But unfortunately it has become
Speaker 1: clear in the last two weeks or so that there
Speaker 1: is potentially a deeper problem with the vaccine, which I
Speaker 1: don't even like to get into because I'm not an
Speaker 1: anti vaxer. I don't like being called an anti vaxer.
Speaker 1: I go on data, clinical trial data, and real world data.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately, the country that has vaccinated the most people
Speaker 1: in the world by far per capita, I should say,
Speaker 1: including older people, where nearly all the older people are
Speaker 1: vaccinated right now is Israel. And Israel right now has
Speaker 1: a terrible problem with COVID. Okay, they have not seen
Speaker 1: the decrease they had a you know, they had sort
Speaker 1: of a November December surge, but they have not seen
Speaker 1: a decrease in cases as the US and other countries
Speaker 1: have in January. And their deaths are very high right now.
Speaker 1: They're the most deaths they've ever had, you know, during
Speaker 1: the epidemic by far, and hospitalizations are very high. And
Speaker 1: no one can offer meet a good coherent explanation for this. Okay,
Speaker 1: there's there are the best explanation from the vaccine point
Speaker 1: of views that the vaccines just haven't had enough time
Speaker 1: to work that even though you know these are sort
Speaker 1: of promoted as you get this thing and you're immediately immune,
Speaker 1: in reality it takes probably at least two weeks after
Speaker 1: the second shot, so that's going to be five to
Speaker 1: six weeks after you start this process before you're immune.
Speaker 1: But the other explanations are actually less i would say
Speaker 1: comforting than that, and we don't have time to go
Speaker 1: into all of them. But let's just say in the
Speaker 1: real we have been promised for the last year a
Speaker 1: variety of interventions, lockdowns, masks, business closures, school closures. None
Speaker 1: of those things have really worked. Now we are being
Speaker 1: promised vaccines, that the vaccines are really the answer here. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: the clinical trial data is actually much more limited in
Speaker 1: terms of what it says about the vaccines than we've
Speaker 1: been told. We really look at it and the problem is, Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe the vaccines do work. I'm not saying they don't work.
Speaker 1: I'm saying we don't really have the proof that they
Speaker 1: do work that we've been told. The problem is the
Speaker 1: vaccines are they're not lockdowns, it's a shot in your arm.
Speaker 1: It is a real pharmaceutical treatment you are getting, and
Speaker 1: it comes with side effects, and we don't have those
Speaker 1: fully measured either. So to me, we're kind of at
Speaker 1: a perilous place right now with the vaccines because if
Speaker 1: in the next i would say, week two weeks, the
Speaker 1: data in Israel doesn't get a lot better, we're gonna
Speaker 1: have to really ask what is going on? Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: what's telling and just give me the short version of
Speaker 1: what's the the fore voting, I mean, what's what's the
Speaker 1: really crappy So the really crappy scenario is, well, the
Speaker 1: medium scenarios that the vaccines just don't really work that well.
Speaker 1: In other words, they generate, they work for everybody except
Speaker 1: the people they need to work for SOS. If you're
Speaker 1: reasonably healthy and you can generate an immune response to COVID,
Speaker 1: then the vaccines will get you. I do know from
Speaker 1: for the people listening, they didn't stratify the data. I
Speaker 1: mean they didn't sort of focus. They didn't clinical trials
Speaker 1: on senior citizens, that's correct. They didn't test enough people
Speaker 1: who were old, so they don't know whether the vaccines
Speaker 1: work in old people. That's the that's the core problem
Speaker 1: with the testing. Okay, but beyond that, um uh so
Speaker 1: so so so so there's no data from the clinical
Speaker 1: trials showing that the vaccines actually reduce the risk of
Speaker 1: serious clinical cases of covid or of deaths. So it
Speaker 1: may be the vaccines, even though they seem to work,
Speaker 1: don't actually work that well. That's that's actually the problem
Speaker 1: of the flu vaccine. By the way, flu vaccines do
Speaker 1: reduce the risk of flu, but they don't seem to
Speaker 1: reduce death by flu in people over sixty five because
Speaker 1: they don't work in the people they need to work for.
Speaker 1: And that's a real risk with the covid vaccine. But
Speaker 1: there's but there's a worse risk, which is that the
Speaker 1: covid vaccine actually has off target side effects that other
Speaker 1: vaccines don't because it's different than other vaccines. It's formulated differently,
Speaker 1: it works differently. And anybody who tells you that we
Speaker 1: have long term data on the type of vaccine this
Speaker 1: is is lying. mRNA vaccines didn't exist until a few
Speaker 1: years ago, and none has ever been approved for widespread
Speaker 1: use until this so I'm not saying that. And there's
Speaker 1: there's there's issues with how the vaccine is formulated. It's
Speaker 1: basically a piece of genetic material inside what's essentially a
Speaker 1: fat shell. The reason it has to be in a
Speaker 1: fat shell is because your immune system would destroy it otherwise,
Speaker 1: and that fat shell in and of itself can cause
Speaker 1: what's called immunogenicity immune reactions. So there is a lot
Speaker 1: of really complicated science going on here that essentially we've
Speaker 1: been told just ignore it. It's gonna be fine. We
Speaker 1: know this isn't dangerous. No, we think it's not dangerous,
Speaker 1: and the clinical trials were just good enough to tell
Speaker 1: us that it didn't look terrible. But unfortunately, real world
Speaker 1: evidence is not suggesting that this vaccine right now is
Speaker 1: doing any good. I want to be clear. That could change.
Speaker 1: It could change in a week in Israel. It could
Speaker 1: change in a month in Israel. If cases go way
Speaker 1: down in a month and desk go way down, you'll
Speaker 1: be able to say, hey, it looks like a vaccine
Speaker 1: is doing some good. But right now Israel is an
Speaker 1: outlier in the wrong direction. It's had tons of people vaccinated,
Speaker 1: and the course of the illness is bad there right now.
Speaker 1: Alex Barrens and everybody, Alex, we gotta have you back
Speaker 1: in a few weeks. So we got we gotta follow
Speaker 1: up on this one. This is I haven't been hearing
Speaker 1: this anywhere in the media. What a shot. You know.
Speaker 1: That's right, you haven't heard it anywhere, and none of
Speaker 1: this is conspiratorial. You can go to the Israeli government website.
Speaker 1: You can look at the number of deaths and the
Speaker 1: number of cases right now. It's all public, all right.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm not I'm not making any of it up.
Speaker 1: It's all checkable. Alex barrens and unreported truths about COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Go get his books on Amazon. Folk support the work
Speaker 1: that he's doing. Alex. We appreciate you man, Thanks so much. Bucks. Thanks,
Speaker 1: Let's talk soon. Absolutely, Alex is a brave guy, and
Speaker 1: he's been right on a lot of this stuff. And
Speaker 1: I've been following his work very closely, and I certainly
Speaker 1: let's let's all pray that this country and and in
Speaker 1: Israel we see this huge decline in hospitalizations and deaths
Speaker 1: as a result of the vaccine. We need to see
Speaker 1: it soon. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join
Speaker 1: the conversation and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email.
Speaker 1: Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com. He may read it on
Speaker 1: the show Liberty, Truth and Great. Here it's now roll call.
Speaker 1: I don't know, we won't have to change so this music, Cruiser, Mark,
Speaker 1: what the heck is this stuff? Uh? You know, I
Speaker 1: missed the old like the dubstep roll call and the
Speaker 1: big band roll call and this this music is so weird.
Speaker 1: It's almost tropical for you. Yeah, exactly. I feel like
Speaker 1: I'm in like a is it a congo line? Is
Speaker 1: that right? Yes, it's called the congo line? Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I haven't been one of those in a long time.
Speaker 1: Remember when the limbo is really cool? That was really
Speaker 1: a thing, you know, in like ninety sitcoms. If if
Speaker 1: a party was really going well, I would, oh, everybody limbo?
Speaker 1: Remember that? Who thought that was a good idea? I
Speaker 1: don't know. I'm sure a lot of people, you know,
Speaker 1: slip discs in their back trying to do a limbo.
Speaker 1: I know I would. I'm not a bendy, flexible fellow.
Speaker 1: So it is what it is. Richard kick us off
Speaker 1: on roll call here, Buck, I'm so sorry your dad
Speaker 1: had a horrible experience with getting a vaccine. My parents
Speaker 1: live in North Carolina, in the county you visited. They
Speaker 1: scheduled it with the hospital called when they got there.
Speaker 1: I waited in the car when it was their turn.
Speaker 1: They went in twenty minutes. Tops. Kim Cooper is the worst,
Speaker 1: but at least he's getting out of the way for vaccines.
Speaker 1: We have a family friend who went down to Florida.
Speaker 1: They got their vaccine in six days. They aren't even residents.
Speaker 1: Are your parents want to go on a vacation? Cuomo
Speaker 1: sucks shieldsy Well, Richard, I'm glad you you and yours
Speaker 1: were able to get the vaccine, because, yes, indeed it is.
Speaker 1: It is a challenge for some other folks out there
Speaker 1: to get this thing as it has been for my dad.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, are you, like, are you trying to get
Speaker 1: to the vaccine for yourself? I mean a sap or
Speaker 1: are you a little more wait and see mode? I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't think I'm gonna be eligible for a very
Speaker 1: long time, No, I know, but as soon as possible.
Speaker 1: I'm saying, like, when you can, like when they open
Speaker 1: it up to uh, you know what a year, You're like,
Speaker 1: you're like twenty, you know, when they open up to
Speaker 1: the youth. Are you gonna be out there in line
Speaker 1: to get it right away. Are you're gonna kind of
Speaker 1: just see when you feel like getting it? If I
Speaker 1: have to wait in a line, No, If I can
Speaker 1: just make an appointment online and make it a simple,
Speaker 1: easy process, maybe a drive throw or something, then yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: I don't care. I just I'm a type of person
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna wait in the line for it if,
Speaker 1: especially if the government is screwing it up like they
Speaker 1: are now. Like if I was your dad, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: have waited more than twenty minutes. Yeah, but I'm also
Speaker 1: the most impatient human alive. Yeah, he waited two hours,
Speaker 1: and they told him when he's freezing his butt off,
Speaker 1: gonna be at least two more hours standing in line
Speaker 1: outside by yourself. That's a that's a lot of patients,
Speaker 1: I gotta say, a lot of patients that they're demanding.
Speaker 1: Robert Hey Buck Shields Hide. I've been listening to you
Speaker 1: over the last year. The way you describe the rest
Speaker 1: of the country sounds like a whole different world compared
Speaker 1: to down here in Florida. We closed down for two
Speaker 1: weeks and I lost my job over the shutdown. But
Speaker 1: I'm lucky found another one. After that, we've been pretty
Speaker 1: much business as usual. Well, a few changes to things,
Speaker 1: nothing too bad. Mask mask off if you mask, if
Speaker 1: you want to, social distance if you want to. But
Speaker 1: kids in school, people at work, everything seems to be fine. Robert, No,
Speaker 1: I know, man, That's why I keep going down to
Speaker 1: Florida whenever I can for visits. I'm gonna be at
Speaker 1: Sepack this year in Florida, in Orlando at the end
Speaker 1: of February, so I'm probably gonna be checking out some
Speaker 1: real estate there too. Yeah, I'm going down to Florida
Speaker 1: for sure, more and more. It's just it's like it's
Speaker 1: like visiting America in twenty nineteen. I mean, yeah, people
Speaker 1: have masks. There's some differences, but you know, you're like
Speaker 1: in a real place. It's amazing. So I know, for
Speaker 1: a w FLA and w IOD listeners, you know, you
Speaker 1: guys have a guys and gals have a much better
Speaker 1: setup than we you up here in New York, in California,
Speaker 1: in a lot of places, so way better situation. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get back into it. Mike bucking Mark love the
Speaker 1: show here in SC I've been listening since you took
Speaker 1: over the America now slot. Wow, I haven't heard any
Speaker 1: say America now in a long time. I'm really concerned
Speaker 1: about the left constantly calling what happened to the Capital
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism. Now they want to establish a government agency
Speaker 1: to fight domestic terrorism, which they will use against anyone
Speaker 1: who disagrees with them, primarily Trump supporters. This is why
Speaker 1: they still have so many military at the Capital. It's
Speaker 1: all about the optics. It's all in the reflexes. As
Speaker 1: Jack Burton says in Big Trouble in Little China, we
Speaker 1: need to get the media on the right, on the
Speaker 1: right to start calling antiphon BLM rights domestic terrorism, to
Speaker 1: move the targeted narrative away from being Trump supporters. Specific
Speaker 1: The left uses very specific terms that evoke high emotion, reaction,
Speaker 1: and fear. We have to loot their ongoing narrative. Mike,
Speaker 1: I mean, you're you're totally right. I agree with you.
Speaker 1: Your assessment is correct, and that is I think part
Speaker 1: of what we're doing now. But I don't think we're
Speaker 1: doing it just to dilute or as a narrative thing.
Speaker 1: I think that anti fall and BLM riots are every
Speaker 1: bit as much domestic terrorism as what happened at Capitol Hill,
Speaker 1: you know, and in some ways even more so. I mean,
Speaker 1: when you've got actual assassinations of police officers, targeted assassinations
Speaker 1: of police officers by police officers, by BLM activists. I
Speaker 1: know there was a cop killed on Capitol Hill and
Speaker 1: it was horrible and I've I've absolutely condemned it from
Speaker 1: the very moment it happened. But it seems that it
Speaker 1: was you know, it was someone through a fire extinguisher
Speaker 1: at a police officer. They didn't It doesn't seem like
Speaker 1: they meant to kill the police officer. Now that doesn't
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean you don't have criminal liability for that death.
Speaker 1: But I'm just saying that that's a different thing. It's
Speaker 1: a different thing to throw a fire extinguisher at a
Speaker 1: crowd of people in a riot than it is to
Speaker 1: a lot of gun and shoot somebody in the head.
Speaker 1: It's not the same thing. And BLM activists have shot
Speaker 1: cops killed them, So yeah, I think that it is
Speaker 1: it is important to point out that this is going
Speaker 1: on on the left and what's happening there. But you know,
Speaker 1: I told you right from the beginning, and I know
Speaker 1: some people didn't want to hear it. I said, the
Speaker 1: left is gonna the way they're gonna mobilize and leverage
Speaker 1: the Capitol Hill riot against Trump supporters all across the
Speaker 1: country using the federal government. It's gonna be awful. And
Speaker 1: that's exactly what is happening. You know, I saw it.
Speaker 1: I told you, And for those who were mad at me, look,
Speaker 1: I know we're gonna sometimes. This is a family here,
Speaker 1: Tembuck is a family. I know they're gonna be the
Speaker 1: occasional disagree. Producer Mark even gets a little grumpy with
Speaker 1: me sometimes when I'm like really late to start the show.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark gets a little bit grumpy. So you know,
Speaker 1: there's gonna be some some stuff that we don't know
Speaker 1: we see on Eyeon. But be fair, and when I
Speaker 1: tell you something that you don't want to hear and
Speaker 1: then it turns out I'm right, just please make a
Speaker 1: mental note of that, because I'm telling you what I
Speaker 1: see as the truth all the time, even if the
Speaker 1: truth is not going to drive the ratings, even if
Speaker 1: the truth is not going to make it sound like
Speaker 1: you know, I'm I'm the exact person that's that people
Speaker 1: want to. You know, I'm saying the exact message people
Speaker 1: want to hear from at any point in time, then,
Speaker 1: writes Buck, do you think that Tulsie Gabbard could be
Speaker 1: persuaded to join the Republican Party? A recent statements that
Speaker 1: she has made in the past few days make me
Speaker 1: believe she has She has some sense, a sense I
Speaker 1: think you needed this type here sense about her. If
Speaker 1: she and Christie nom ran on a ticket together, we'd
Speaker 1: have a couple of common sense leaders, but also the
Speaker 1: hottest administration ever to run for the White House. Um. Yeah, Van,
Speaker 1: I cannot comment on that latter part about the the
Speaker 1: hotness commentary, sir, these are female politicians, sir, so I
Speaker 1: will not say anything about that, I know, being a
Speaker 1: big whim. But as for Atulsie joining the Republican Party, uh,
Speaker 1: I don't know. She might be an independent, and she's
Speaker 1: not a Republican. She likes big government, she likes big spending,
Speaker 1: she likes, you know, really enlarging social welfare programs, Medicare
Speaker 1: for all. I mean, she's not a Republican. So I
Speaker 1: don't think she's going to enjoy the Republican Party. But
Speaker 1: as I've said, the reason the left hates her or
Speaker 1: she doesn't hate us, and that's that's not acceptable. You're
Speaker 1: not allowed. You cannot be in good standing on the
Speaker 1: left unless you hate the other side. It is, it
Speaker 1: is a necessary precondition for your your membership on the
Speaker 1: left wing of politics, just the way it is. John,
Speaker 1: the answered your open question, what if the Democrats done
Speaker 1: for us? Well, if it wasn't for them, we wouldn't
Speaker 1: be getting a stimulus check for fourteen hundred dollars. If
Speaker 1: you remember, the Republican Majority leader Mitch McConnell tabled three
Speaker 1: stimulus checks and wouldn't even put up put them up
Speaker 1: for a vote. That's the Republican Party. At least the
Speaker 1: Democrats are going to give us something to get us
Speaker 1: through this pandemic, to help us buy food or for
Speaker 1: our home or at least we should get that and
Speaker 1: be thankful for it. John, it was a big mistake
Speaker 1: for Mitch McConnell the block the stimulus, the extra stimulus
Speaker 1: money that Trump wanted to get to people as well.
Speaker 1: Big mistake. No, I don't think there's really any question
Speaker 1: about it. Huge error in judgment from Mitch McConnell and
Speaker 1: from the GOP establishment. I mean to decide that you know,
Speaker 1: this is where they're going to take a stand. Oh
Speaker 1: we can't. We can't give people who are really hurting
Speaker 1: right now a little extra money from the government after
Speaker 1: we shut down all their businesses and shut down the economy.
Speaker 1: Can't do that, you know. I agree that was a
Speaker 1: real error. But the Democrats, John are also doing a
Speaker 1: lot of other things, my friend. They're gonna make it
Speaker 1: harder for people to get jobs. They're gonna make jobs
Speaker 1: go away, as they have with the Keystone XEL pipeline.
Speaker 1: They're gonna drive down wages. They're gonna legalize millions of illegals,
Speaker 1: which you're gonna put even more pressure on wages in
Speaker 1: the labor market. They're going to rise the price of energy,
Speaker 1: which goes into everything keeping your home a certain temperature,
Speaker 1: to the products you're buying in the stores. They're going
Speaker 1: to be pushing and pushing harder on the dollar and
Speaker 1: with the debt, so that the value of what you
Speaker 1: got in your bank account is going to be less, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, so, yeah, the Democrats write you a check,
Speaker 1: but they're they're taking there, They're taking their stuff from
Speaker 1: you in a whole lot of other ways. So while
Speaker 1: I agree that the stimulus check is something Democrats do,
Speaker 1: that Republicans weren't willing to do. I think that the
Speaker 1: Democrats overall, you'll find out, are much a much bigger
Speaker 1: drag than they are a benefit on your finances, on
Speaker 1: your prosperity, and that's that's something you got to remember.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on
Speaker 1: Instagram and Twitter. Dave next up here. I'm a long
Speaker 1: time listener, but first time participant in roll call. I'm
Speaker 1: a mail carrier and I listen to you you while I'm
Speaker 1: out of my route. I gotta say, when you started
Speaker 1: with the seven squirrels on a branch bit, I was
Speaker 1: laughing pretty good. I wonder if other listeners thought of
Speaker 1: there's something about Mary as quickly as I did. I
Speaker 1: also wonder what my customers thought of me delivering their
Speaker 1: mail while audibly chuckling. Well, thank you, Dave. I'm glad
Speaker 1: I could give you a laugh, my friend. On the
Speaker 1: political front, I firmly believe that there was enough unprovable
Speaker 1: fraud to steal the election. I, however, am a realist
Speaker 1: and know that ship set sail long ago. I hope
Speaker 1: for success for the Biden administration because that translates to
Speaker 1: success for the American people. But again, I'm a realist.
Speaker 1: I see nothing but four years of big tech pandering
Speaker 1: and far left policies forced onto the people. We are
Speaker 1: a fractured country and all this empty talk of unity
Speaker 1: is only pushing us further apart. My hope is that
Speaker 1: people will come to their senses and vote red for
Speaker 1: the coming midterm elections. Until then, we patriots need to
Speaker 1: affect change at our local levels. Keep spreading the good word, Pepperworth,
Speaker 1: those light moments that make us laugh, Dave, thank you
Speaker 1: so much for the really supportive and kind note, and
Speaker 1: thank you for carrying the mail, my man, We appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Neither rain nor snow, nor sleet, nor tropical miss nor
Speaker 1: what else, producer Mark, what is it? You know, the
Speaker 1: just all weather? Yeah? No, none of that weather stuff
Speaker 1: gonna stop our mail carriers, darn it. You know, neither
Speaker 1: wintry mix nor hail nor you know, minor tornado warning. No,
Speaker 1: you know, none of that stuff gonna stop on our
Speaker 1: mail carriers. Darn it. That's right, Steve. I want to
Speaker 1: thank you for keeping your spotlight on the fight to
Speaker 1: reopen public schools. I'm writing to you from deep in
Speaker 1: Blue Terry in the deep in Blue Territory in the
Speaker 1: San Francisco Bay Area. It's been inspired to be part
Speaker 1: of a growing movement of parents in a straight Democrat
Speaker 1: couneiy who are coming together to push back against the
Speaker 1: teachers unions and uniformly democratic governing structures to call for
Speaker 1: public schools to reopen. Now. Despite their traditional political leanings,
Speaker 1: families here are increasingly bristling at the byzantine reopening plans
Speaker 1: that teachers unions and government bureaucrats have backed us into.
Speaker 1: These families just want their children to be free from
Speaker 1: suffering under distance learning. To an honest observer, this looks
Speaker 1: like a grassroots conservative movement, but we just can't really
Speaker 1: say that out loud. I agree with those like yourself
Speaker 1: and some of your guests who have said part of
Speaker 1: the path forward for the movement is at the local level.
Speaker 1: School Board meetings are brutally boring, but they're where important
Speaker 1: decisions are being made for the future of America's youth.
Speaker 1: My wife and I joined an unprecedented number of like
Speaker 1: minded parents and spoke and both spoke for the first
Speaker 1: time at our school board meeting last night. I encourage
Speaker 1: other listeners to get even more engaged in their communities
Speaker 1: and requests that you please continue to keep tabs on
Speaker 1: this critical fight. Well, Steve, thank you so much. And yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, you got to start somewhere, and starting at
Speaker 1: the school board level is important. It is, it is worthwhile.
Speaker 1: And that's this is how they're churning out these armies
Speaker 1: of leftists from our school system, is that they control,
Speaker 1: they keep getting control of what's being taught in the
Speaker 1: school system. And then we wonder, well, why why is
Speaker 1: it all? Why are they all such a bunch of
Speaker 1: libs coming out of the schools. The kids are being brainwashed?
Speaker 1: Well we know why. Next up here, Mark so as
Speaker 1: the snow Princess. Actually, Tulsi Gabbert just kidding. I appreciate
Speaker 1: or not hating all Republicans like most of her peers,
Speaker 1: keep up the good work. Producer. Mark is the Peyton
Speaker 1: Manning of producers. Whoa producer? Mark? What do you say
Speaker 1: to that? That's Peyton Manning's pretty great? Yeah, that's certainly
Speaker 1: a compliment. I'll take it. I gotta ask you, though,
Speaker 1: would you rather be the Peyton Manning or the Tom
Speaker 1: Brady of producers? I can't bring myself to be the
Speaker 1: Tom Brady of anything. So I'll take Peyton Manning. Okay,
Speaker 1: Not not that I deny that he's the best ever.
Speaker 1: I just can't bring myself to call myself that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I hear you, man, fair enough? All right, Going into
Speaker 1: some more of the Instagram messages here, Buck, I'm sending
Speaker 1: you some crazy messages, and I apologize that said. When
Speaker 1: Biden resigns, is removed, or whatever happens, who becomes vice president?
Speaker 1: We know Commy Harris will be president, but who takes
Speaker 1: up the VP job? Thanks Man, great job on the show.
Speaker 1: First thing I listen to every day, Shields High not
Speaker 1: more than ever. Well, Bart, thank you so much for
Speaker 1: writing in. That's a good question. I don't know who
Speaker 1: would be the vice president if Kamala Harris ascended to
Speaker 1: the presidency. You got a lot, a lot of possible options,
Speaker 1: a lot of choice in there. I have to think
Speaker 1: about that a little bit more. Here we go, We
Speaker 1: have next up. Next up in the mixed here, Michael Allot,
Speaker 1: mister Saxon producer, Mark, I have two quick points. First
Speaker 1: of all, like most of listeners, a blue collar father
Speaker 1: and a diehard American, how do I explain to my
Speaker 1: kids we have to trust our constitution when they see
Speaker 1: those in control disregard it like a Walmart receipt. Second,
Speaker 1: thank you for your honesty and your diligence. We've all
Speaker 1: seen the conspiracy and side of this election. I hear
Speaker 1: more and more, but I also know if it doesn't
Speaker 1: get brought up on your show, it probably isn't real
Speaker 1: and it's just that conspiracy. So thank you for your
Speaker 1: open and honest content you provide. You're doing us all service.
Speaker 1: Shield sigh ps. Ohio would welcome you back with open arms.
Speaker 1: And we have several hockey teams for producer Mark to enjoy. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Michael. What's the best hockey team? And Ohio
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, Well, there's only one. It's the Columbus Blue Jackets.
Speaker 1: How are they doing? They're okay, They've never really been great,
Speaker 1: benmin Bead, there you go, So there you go. All right,
Speaker 1: everybody that's gonna be it for the show today, please
Speaker 1: do us a solid, do us a favor. Pass the buck.
Speaker 1: Tell somebody in your life, hey, you gotta this guy
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton. Listen to him on the iHeart app, Spotify,
Speaker 1: wherever you listen to podcasts. The Buck Sexton Show, Shield
Speaker 1: Tie