WEBVTT - How the Scientific Method Works

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, There's Jerry Stuffy. Should know

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>why grinning. It's been a while, man. Know it's funny,

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like those words come pouring out of my mouth and

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>then it's cool. You wake up in the middle of

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>night saying that, and you mean like slugs you in

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the face. She's sleep She has to dry my brow. Yes,

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>we prerecorded some for December, as we like to do

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to take a little time off at the end of

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the year and not explain things for a few weeks

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in our real lives. Like people ask me things like

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what happened to that stick of butter? Yeah, I don't know,

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>don't ask don't even ask me. I could tell you,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not gonna exactly. That's how it goes in

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>my house. Find your own butter. December was find your

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>own butter money. That's a good that's that's a good one.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That should be a T shirt. Stuff you should know

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>find your own butter or December is find your own butter.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>M Yeah, that's right. Maybe a stick of butter and

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>some Garland on it. Yeah, I like that. So it's

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>good to see you again. Man's gonna be back in here. Yeah,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it is nice to be back. As much as the

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>break was great, I'm happy to be explaining things again.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Well that's good because if we got in here and

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I can't do this, I can't do it again,

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we'd be in trouble. Yeah. So I'm glad we're all

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling good. Jerry, you're feeling good. Jerry's got two thumbs

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>up in a big goofy smile, two of her three thumbs.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>She looks like Bob from that male enhancement pill ad.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh see the guy, the old man that's like super Buff,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I would call him old. He was middle aged. He

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>looked like kind of a Bob Dobbs type dude. I

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of who he was modeled. You see

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's super muscling. Now I'm thinking of someone different.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, are you thinking of Jack lo Lane? No? No, no, no,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>just there's some ad. There's some old man that looks

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like really creepy because from the next super Buff looks

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's twenty five year old. No, remember that was

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like a male enhancement pill and I'm making air quotes

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>here for erectile this unsion. Well, there go the air quotes.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But yes, And it was like in the early two thousands.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe late nineties, but I think early two thousands,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and these ads were everywhere, and there was Bob and

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like all these great things happened to him because he

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>started taking this pill. I can't remember the name of

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the pill. But the company like got into a lot

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of trouble because it was basically like a subscription service

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and like you gave him your credit card and you

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>got this free trial, but then they started sending it

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to you and it was like next to impossible to

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>cut off service. Interesting, They're like, no, we want your

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>mailness to be enhanced. So you you've seen these ads.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna start asking questions, but why bother? I

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>will I will YouTube. I will find it on YouTube.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be like, oh, Bob, yeah you will. You'll go, Oh,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back in and record an insert

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's on the back of all these pill

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>bottles in my bathroom. Oh, chuck, I don't even remember

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>how we got Oh yeah, Jerry did that. That was

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's fault. But um, you remember we did the Enlightenment episode. Okay,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about how there's this kind of

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>um tug of war over the human psyche between rationalism

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and mysticism. I guess you could you could put it well,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're talking today about the scientific method.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Great idea, by the way, Thank you very much. It's

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>been a long time coming. Um, because I realized, like

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it as fully as I don't understand science.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand the scientific method because it's pretty cut and

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>dry and it's beautiful and elegant and simple. But then

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you just take this thing and it came out of

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the birth of rationalism, and when you place it into

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the world and make it function, there's a lot of implications.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it being used properly? Is it being used responsibly?

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Like are we putting what constitutes f E than to that?

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, like it just raises all this other stuff.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And it made me realize, like I don't understand science

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as much as I want to, So researching this it

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. Yeah, and this is a cool episode, I

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>think because not only are we going to talk about

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method, but we're going to talk about just science,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like what is science in general? And some of the

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>rock stars along the way, who really you know, laid

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>out the path remarkably in like many many years ago,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like coming up with these amazing discoveries that still like

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>hold you know, you can like hold their feet to

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the fire for a lot of this stuff. Yeah, because

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>if you come upon a universal truth, you know it

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is what it is, like you got to be the

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>person who discovered it because you know, you saw it,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you realized it a certain way, but ultimately it was

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>there already. Yeah, like Newton, I mean, we'll talk about

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, but it's not like now we're like,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>oh Newton, most of what he said was wrong, But

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that's understandable because it was a long time ago. Like

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>his stuff holds up really well. I was wondering if

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>he on his deathbed was just like, oh, man, I

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>contributed so much to humanity it's mind boggling, but I

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't enhance my malehood. Well, Bob hadn't come along yet,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So Chuck, let's let's just quit stalling and talk about science,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like what is science? Well, I hate the old elementary

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>school uh defined as, but it's a pretty good place

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to start here to get a base definition of science. Yeah,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Old William Harris did a great job with this. Yes,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>William Harris did a great job. Uh. Science the intellectual

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and practical activity encompassing the structure and behavior of the

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>physical and natural world through observation and experimentation. Uh So

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the first part of that is science is practical and

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it is you know, they make a good he makes.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Bill Harris makes a great point in here. It's not

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just stuff you do in a lab, and it's not

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just for scientists. It is all about being hands on

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and active, and it's about discovery and asking questions about

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how everything is ultimately solved, is by

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>someone looking at something and having a question about it exactly.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the scientific method comes in when you say,

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and this is how you properly get to that answer exactly. Um.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And he makes another good point to that. The idea

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's a method, a scientific method, makes it seem

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's secreted away among the the fraternity of scientists.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, any anybody can use it. It's

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>just kind of part of being a curious human is

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not even anyone can use it everyone does use it,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you just might not even know that you're using it,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like if you I mean one of the examples that

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>use later is if like your car overheats, when you

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out why and fix it, that's the scientific method, right,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>playing out exactly based on reasoning. Yeah, okay, and deduction

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and induction. Man, there's so much to talk about. Okay,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's talk about that definition that you had.

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So the first part is that science is it's a

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>practical activity. So science is practical, right, It's it's this, Um.

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>The basis of the whole thing is discovery. Right, you

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>see something, You see birds in flight, and you say,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>where are those birds going? And if you just went

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and laid down on the ground and went to sleep

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>after that, then you're not you're not carrying out science.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you went, I want to find out where

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>those birds are going, and you follow them and you

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>start taking notes, that's that is the basis of science

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is discovery. Yeah, and that's the observational part as well. Um,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you're using a microscope or a telescope, sometimes you're

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>using your eyeballs. But no matter what your tool is, uh,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be watching something and recording. What's called data

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or data depending on I don't know what kind of

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>person you are. What do you say I think? I

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>say both. I think data. Yeah, I don't think I've

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I say data data, I say data data. Yeah,

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll go with data. You say both. I

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like it just comes out of my mouth one

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>way or the other, and I don't really think about it.

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's like being ambidextrous. Yeah. Yeah, I'm a

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>data datas Yeah. Uh so once you are observing this data, well,

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of kinds. There's quantitative data, which

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are numbers, like you know, your body temperature is point six,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>although I think that's changed slightly now, didn't it. Yeah? Yeah, there.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You used to be like, if you were a human being,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>your body temperature is point six, and they it's like, no,

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more variation than that. But any kind

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of just numerical representation is quantitative, whereas qualitative is behavioral,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like I'm gonna watch that bird um eat in poop

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>for the next week, right, or what happens if I

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>what will the slug do if I put a bunch

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>of salt on it? Do you know I don't do that. No,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you really should not do that. No, it's awful. But

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the reaction of the slug is gathering qualitative data. And

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on who you talk to, there isn't qualitative data

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and science that it should all just be quantitative because yeah,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because quantitative data is reproducible. Qualitative data is. It's not

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>necessarily reproducible. You can observe the same phenomenon, but you're

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily controlling it. Okay, well, I guess I get that.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with Bill here and that they are both.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>They go hand in hand, and neither one is more

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>important than the other. You need to have both. Well,

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people do, and we'll talk more about

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it later, because without the idea that qualitative data is

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>acceptable and scientific, you don't have the social social sciences,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like they don't exist. Yeah, that's a good point, but yes,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we have quantitative data and qualitative data. I agree with you.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>They're both useful. Uh. It is an intellectual pursuit um,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So you can make observations on data all day long.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But until you bring reason, in this case inductive reasoning,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>which is driving a generalization based on your observations, then

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just data sitting there on a piece of paper

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like it's supposed to lead you somewhere right exactly, And

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>so we should talk about inductive and deductive reasoning and

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it depending. Again, it's really weird, But one of the

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.239
<v Speaker 1>things that came across is that there's not a universal

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement on how science is carried out. Like I saw

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>some places where there's like there's no place for inductive

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>reasoning in science. Then other places they're saying, well, you

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>have to have science using inductive reasoning. Everybody seems to

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>agree that deductive reasoning is the basis of science, but

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>that you also have to have inductive So deductive is

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>basically taking a big, broad generalization and saying that it

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>applies to something specific more specific. Yes, Uh, inductive is

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the opposite where you say, I've noticed these different data points,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and uh, that means that this broad generalization is true.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So you go from specific, small observations to a broad generalization.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that a lot of people say, well,

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>inductive reasoning doesn't have any place in science is because

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you're saying those birds over there are all brown, Therefore

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>all birds of that type of brown, even though I

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen every single bird of that type in the world.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that all those birds are brown. And a

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say there's no place for that in science. Well,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go out and prove that, then

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's your business. You know. You can't just say that

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and be like and I'm done, right exactly. I guess

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you could. But much of scientists, right, but the the

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you can use it to formulate hey, hypotheses. Right, so

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>you can say I've generated all these data points, I'm

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna put them together and see if this broad generalization

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is right. Okay, so there is a place for inductive

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing science. But everybody says deductive reasoning is the basis

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of science. Well, Bill Harris does. Uh. He offers a

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 1>great example for inductive reasoning with Edwin Hubble of the

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Hubble Telescope. Uh. He was looking through the Hooker telescope,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>which at the time at California's Mount Wilson. Is that

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the one from Rebel Now that's um Griffith Park Observatory,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>which has been redesigned, and uh, it is really cool now, yeah,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was kind of cool before, but it

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was definitely like, uh, sort of the bass music in

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the time forgot. Oh really, so they've updated it. I'll

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bet that was cool though in its own way. Yeah,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it was neat. I used to live near there, so

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of But that's like the famous one,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at least in the movies. Yeah, that's where they have

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the big knife fight. Yeah, and there's this James Dean

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>statue there too. I didn't like a bust um. So yes.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Edwin Hubble he's at Mountain Wilson and he's looking through

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Hooker telescope, which was the biggest one. And at

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the time, everyone said, the Milky Way galaxy is it?

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what we've got going on. Did you know this? Uh? Yeah,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I knew that because we're talking. Yeah, not that long ago.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Did not realize this. And he started looking through this

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>telescope and said, you know what, these nebula that everyone

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>says are part of our galaxy look to me like

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they're beyond our galaxy. Not only that, they look like

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they're moving away from us. So he made this, uh

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with through inductive reasoning, made this observation that you know what,

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there are many many galaxies out there, and

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>not only that, I think they are expanding, and uh,

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>through technological advancement with telescopes over the years, scientists, you know,

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it proved to be true. Yeah, pretty cool. So this

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is a really good example of him saying, like, I've

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>made some observations, and now I'm going to say this

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>broad generalization. Right, So these these galaxies appear to be

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>moving away from me, not another. So the whole universe

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is expanding. Right, that's inductive reasoning. It's a pretty brave thing, uh,

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>especially back then, because you're really putting your reputation at stake,

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. So what Hubble was, what Hubble did was

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've come to see as science. He made some observations,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he came up with a hypothesis, um, and then it

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was tested later on. It's not you don't necessarily as

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a scientist. You're a part of a larger collective of scientists, right,

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And every scientist needs one another. It's why there's journals

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and and um conferences and things like that to share information, right,

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And the party and the party, and and Hubble came

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>up with his own observations. And rather than just experimenting, experimenting,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>experimenting himself, which I'm sure he continued to do, he

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>created this basis of work that he probably realized is

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>going to survive him. Right, And then later on scientists

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>came down the road and they tested his hypothesis and

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>they found it was correct, and so his hypothesis became

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a theory. It eventually became part of the basis of

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang theory that the universe started as a

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>huge explosion and it's expanding still because we're because it

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>exploded at one point, right, And they did that by

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>carrying out other tests or experiments exactly. So this is

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>how science works. Like some guy back in in nineteen

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>nine makes some observations in California, he proposes this big,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>broad generalist generalization, and over the next like ensuing half

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a century, more and more scientists all around the world

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>start testing his hypothesis and find it to be true,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so it becomes a theory. Yeah. Well, well let's finish

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up here with science. The last part of the definition

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is that it's systematic and it's methodical, and it requires

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>testing and experiments, and it requires those experiments and tests

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>uh to be repeated and verified, and it is is

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a system. It's a way of working things out.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a way of working That is the scientific method basically, Yeah,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you have your idea, you pose a question, you theorize

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>hyper you put a hypothesis out there, and then you

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>go about trying to either prove it or disprove it. Yeah, exactly.

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And then the way that you go about proving or

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>disproving it, that's the scientific method. Everything else is just

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific inquiry. The way you go about, the standardized way

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of going about scientific inquiry is the scientific method. And

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we friend, we'll talk about the scientific method right after this.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, you brought up a point. I think we

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>should go ahead and just get right to my friend.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's do hypotheses and theories. One thing to say together, No,

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>One thing that really chase my hide is, uh, when

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 1>you hear poopo ors of whatever scientific theory say, well,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just a theory. And you where was this thing

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that you found that poo pooed that? Do you remember

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what website that was? No? No, although I do want

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to give a shout out now that you mentioned it.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Two explorables. It's like an online university basically of free courses,

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there is one on scientific reasoning that is

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>just amazing. It's like a huge rabbit hole. You go

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>down and you start clicking on the embedded links and

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 1>you end up like understanding all sorts of stuff. So

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>go check that one out if you like understanding stuff.

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the things that bug me if

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>someone says it's just a theory, and this does a

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>great job of kind of throwing that out the window. Um,

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's basically mixing up the two definitions of theory. Yeah,

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>there's like a colloquial definition that people use every day

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't really have much to do with the

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific use. Like, I got a theory that Jerry entered

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one hour bathroom breaks every day is really playing uh

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>words with friends in the lobby. I think your theory

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is correct. So that's a theory in the colloquial meaning.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>As far as science goes, the theory is not just

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>something you postulate, say if this may or may not

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>be true. The theory is beyond the hypothesis, and it's

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>something that is strongly supported in many different ways and

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>all there's all kinds of evidence to support something that

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>eventually becomes a theory. Right, So, um, what you your

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>theory about Jerry's bathroom breaks in the scientific world would

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>be a hypothesis. In fact, yeah, it would be a

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>scientific law, but ultimately it would begin as a hypothesis,

0:18:54.480 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a hunch based on intuition, based on the data you've collected, observeyations,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. Where like, you know, you've seen

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that Jerry goes to the bathroom for like an hour

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to stretch frequently. When she comes back, she's um finishing

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>up a game of words with friends. You've heard that

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>she's been spotted in the lobby during these times. So

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis is that while she is gone for these

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>hour long bathroom breaks, she's actually down the lobby playing

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>words with friends. Right, based on knowledge, observation, and logic. Right,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you decided to set up an experiment,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and you experimented, and you went and you found Jerry

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>playing words with friends five different times, and you told

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>me about it, and I was like, I'm going to

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>run that same experiment exactly the way you did, Right,

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I would test that same hypothesis. If I found the

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>same results to be true, then what you would have

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>come up with, your hypothesis would move to basically a

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>theory that is, this widely accepted thing, this explanation that

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is not actually in the bad room, she's downstairs

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>playing with friends. Would be the Jerry bathroom break theory,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And then if it turns out that you

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 1>find that Jerry spending an hour a day pretending to

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be in the bathroom but actually being downstairs playing words

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with friends, if the universe couldn't exist without her doing

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>that every day, you would have a scientific law. That's right. Yeah,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a good example you came up

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with as a great example. As it turns out. Uh,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess the point here is when you hear someone

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>say in an argument, well, that's just a theory, just

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>punch him in the head and then tell them what

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we just said about the bathroom breaks and they'll say,

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who's Jerry? Or just just queue up that whole bit

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and stand outside of their window wearing a trench coat

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and holding a boom box over your head with the

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>smug look on your face. Uh all right, So should

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>we go back in the old way back machine a

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit and just talk a little bit about how

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method came to be? Yes, man, this this thing,

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>what are you running this on these days? Straight? Kerosene?

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>The fumes in here killing me. Sorry about that? Trying

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to go green? You know, kerosene is not green diesel.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm choking bio diesel. How about that? Okay, the

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>way Back machine will run French freed grease. That would

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be fine. I'll get to work on that. I could

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>handle this. So you you tease us with the Renaissance,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and the reason the Renaissance was so awesome and necessary

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it was because of something else we talked about, which

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was the Dark Ages, Uh when, which you remember, that's

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the rationalists disparaging term for this era. That's right, but

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I think sort of rightfully so because right before the

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Dark Ages until about a century after, there was not

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>much advancement at all in the realm of scientific advancement.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, it's it's true. That's hard to argue with that,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and and the reason why is again, science wasn't really

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>born yet, and there is a huge struggle between rationalism

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and mysticism, and ultimately we're living in the age of

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>rationalism now. Yeah, and we should point out too that

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this was mainly in Europe over the Islamic world. As

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we had a listener mail point out, there

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of advancements being made uh just sort

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of flying under the European radar at the time, because

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>some say the Catholic Church kind of kept science under

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>its thumb for a while, and it's a pretty big threat.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He said, you know, you can't do this stuff, you

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can't experiment like this, and don't ask these questions because

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>here are your answers. But eventually the Renaissance came about

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in the twelfth century and people woke up and I

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>saw some of the work in the Islamic world and said,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what, maybe let's start reading up on Aristotle

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>and told me and euclid it once again. Yeah, they're like,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we forgot about these guys. I mean, it literally kind

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of vanished for a while. It did from the West. Yes,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>fortunately it was still around, you know, and in its

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>home places. But yes, in the West they were lost.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The Roman stuff was almost entirely lost because it was

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>being suppressed by the locals, and I think the Greek

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>knowledge was completely banished. Yes, somehow somehow they got there

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was some um. We got another listener mail after the Enlightenment.

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>One they said that it was an Islamic scholar who

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>was the one who translated Aristotle into Latin. Or something

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like that, and that without this guy, like the West

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have had much to start with, because that's where

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that birth of rationalism came from from, was this rediscovery

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of Greek and Roman classical thought, and this was the

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>basis of scientific inquiry of rationalism, of saying, like, okay,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>there's there's set rules to things, and we need to

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>discover these rules and how the principles of how the

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>universe works, like there has to be principles, and we

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>need to find this in a rational, methodical way. And

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>right out of the gate Europe said, oh, okay, well

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever you say is right then, Aristotle. We're used to

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just believing everything without questioning it. And luckily Albert Magnus,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is who it was. Um Albertus was Albertus Magnus.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Roger Bacon, who said, no, it is Bacon, Roger Bacon,

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>who just has this great name, Roger Bacon, the Bacon brothers. Yeah,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he's they weren't brothers though, but they were they related

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>at all? You know. I looked that up and I

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think people know either way. I don't think there's

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>any proof, but a lot of people think because of

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>their names and the way things went back then, that

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they may very well have been. And I mean they

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>were separated by three or so years. Although Roger was

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a was a monk, so he would not have had children.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So if they were, it's an excellent point. It wasn't

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily through line, you know. Yeah, it could have been

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a nephew or something, or his brother Kevin might have

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>had the line that matched. So Roger was the one

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>who said, everybody stopped. Just because Aristotle wrote something doesn't

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it's fact, especially when we find contradictions to it.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't oursells not automatically, right, And this is a

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>huge advancement. Yeah, And Albertus Magnus was the one, I

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>believe who said, you know, this thing called revealed truth,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>which is basically God says this instead of a truth

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>found by experimenting, is maybe we should experiment instead and

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>not take this revealed truth as the truth. Right. And

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned in that Enlightenment episode as well about scholasticism

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>about using scientific inquiry to explain theology, which was, you know,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you're still working from a theological standpoint, right, but you're

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to use scientific inquiry and the the idea that

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't just accept things as truth. That was again

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge, huge breakthrough. Yeah. Uh. Francis Bacon, the other

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Bacon brother, he's one of the heroes of this story. Yeah.

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>He was an attorney and philosopher and possibly Shakespeare. Oh really,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I never heard that? Interesting, So what do you mean

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like wrote those under the pseudonym? Huh? And there the

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare sister was the other theory too, right, it was

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a woman. I've heard that, and she couldn't like, you know,

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>women couldn't be the play right, so was her dumb

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>brother William? That's good? Was it a brother? I think

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the theories. This is a good

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Smith song too. Uh, Shakespeare sister was that the name

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of it? Wouldn't it a band to you? I think

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it was? What was it? Maybe? Uh? So anyway, he

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>was a philosopher and a lawyer, and he said, you

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>know what, the Baconian method basically became the scientific method.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>He was the first dude who really said, this is

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>how the steps that you should take to uh investigate science.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>There has to be a framework. And the whole point

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of this that we take this so for granted now

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's so intuitively and on its face right as

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>far as science inquiry, he goes, but this is an

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>enormous breakthrough to say, follow this step, these steps, this framework,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and if everybody who carries out science follows the same framework,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>then science will be universal and interchangeable and anyone in

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the world, and not just now, but anytime, we'll be

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>able to carry out the same experiment and we'll be

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>able to verify or disprove it. And that is amazing

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that that happened. That's why Francis Bacon is one of

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the heroes of the story. And he didn't come up

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>with this entirely on his own, but he was the

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>one who said, this is what we're gonna do. I'm

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna give it a name. I'm going to spell it out,

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and from now on you can call me the dad

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of the scientific method. Yeah, and that's why Newton was

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>such a rock star, because he so rigorously stuck to

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method that all these centuries later, his uh,

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, his systems of laws are they have stood

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the test of time. And uh, I think it's a

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>good point to bring up to that the collaboration of

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>scientists is really the hallmark of advancement and moving forward.

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not working in a vacuum. It's sharing your ideas

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and working with one another and the whole uh little

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sidebar here on celth here I thought was pretty cool,

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>which was when science quit. We're not quit, but started

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at small things instead of looking at the universe

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>around them and at the stars. And uh said basically,

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, through the advancement of lens grinding, Antonio van

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Levin Hook specifically Dutch tradesman was pretty good at making

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>simple microscopes, and all of a sudden, contemporaries like Robert

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Hook said, you know what, let's start looking at tiny

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>things because they're in might lie the answer too many

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>many things. Yeah, and they're right. Robert Hook found cork

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>or he discovered cells by looking at cork through an

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>early microscope. So in this story, science is hastened by

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>technological advancement lens grinding to make microscopes, and then this

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>new technology is used to further science. Right. Yeah, it's

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like mutual inspiration between Levin Hook and Hook n Hook.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>It was neat because Hook heard about Leavin Hooks microscopes,

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>got his hands on one or a microscope, looked at

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>him like cork and said, oh, there's such a thing

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as cells. Levin Hook said, oh, that's pretty neat. Let

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>me try, and he said, oh, there's such a thing

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>as quote little animal, which we call protozoan bacteria. And

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the Royal Societies. After Leavin Hook presented his findings,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>turned back to Hook and said, hey, Hook, we know

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty handy with the microscope. You confirmed Leavin Hook's

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>findings are their little animals? Hook said, there are. Indeed,

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I can see them with my microscope. That's right. And

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that inspired a German botanist name Matthias Schleiden ah to

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of plants and he was the

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>first guy to say, you know what, plants are composed

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of cells. And he's having dinner one night with his

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>zoologist buddy. Yeah, and this is about a hundred years later. Yeah,

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Theodore schran and said, you know what, dude, Uh, order

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the wine and order the steak. Trust me, because this

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>place is fantastic. And uh, also, plants are made of cells.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't tell anyone. And he went, you know what, dude,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I have been investigating animals with microscopes and they're made

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of cells too. And so they figured out at this dinner, Yeah,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that everything is made of cells. All living things are

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>made of cells. Boom. Okay, so this is huge. This

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is a big advancement, right that we're hitting upon right now.

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But it laid the further foundation, right, So initial scientific

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>inquiry led to further scientific inquiry and further scientific conclusions

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and generalizations. All living things are made of cells, and

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>then it was extrapolated elsewhere. Right. Yeah, Like twenty years later,

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph Virtual said, you know what, not only is everything

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>made of living cells, but they all come from pre

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>existing cells, which was a huge deal at the time

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because people believed in spontaneous generation at the time, Like

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if you left some um wheat seed and a sweaty shirt,

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it would spawn mice. I think it was one of them.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of weird ones pressed basil between some

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>bricks and you'll get a scorpion. Was one, like they

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>were really out there. Yeah, well the one that is

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>well not true, but the one that you could actually

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>see was rotten meat would eventually, uh spawn maggots. How

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>did they possibly get there? Yeah, spontaneous generation. But that's

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the obvious explanation. And if you think about it, they're

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>working from Okam's razor and ocams. Razor says, the simplest

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>explanation is usually the right one, all all other things given. Well,

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing is is spontaneous generation has never been shown

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to be possible. If we get the sell thing over here,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>let's investigate that. So this uh what was the guy's name? Virtual? Yes,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, okay, well, wait a minute, I get this

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>cell theory I'm working on that's been around for a

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades. Hypothesis probably the cell hypothesis at the

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>nice catch. Don't feel bad though, because this article that

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you sent said that scientists today like still like confuse

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>those terms just and there. The House of Works article

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>makes a good point in saying that science and everything

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with it is in the scientific

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>method is very luid and open new interpretation and experimentation. Obviously,

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>but so he says, um, okay, this cell hypothesis, this

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good explanation for what we now call

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous generation. He didn't do anything about it, He just

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>put it out there. Yeah, and then along comes Louis Pastier,

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>who does do something about it. He figures out a

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>great experiment to try to disprove spontaneous generation. Yeah, it's

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple too. Um. He basically took a broth uh,

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>put equal amounts in two different beakers. One had a

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>straight neck and one had an S shaped neck. He

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>boiled it just to make sure everything and it was killed,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and then just let it sit there in the same conditions,

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>open to the to the world and are open to

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the room like. It wasn't corked in other words, nor

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he noticed that the one with the straight neck eventually

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>became cloudy and discolored, uh, meaning there was some junk

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>growing in there, and one in the S shaped neck

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>did not do anything. It remained the same. So think

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>what well, he thought that germs, that there were such

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>things as germs which leaving hoke and hook had already

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>shown um, And that if that in the S shaped

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>flask they had gotten trapped in the neck, in this

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the open neck, they had been able to just enter

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>unobstructed and had generated there. The reason that the S

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>shape flask was still sterile was because there is no

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>such thing as spontaneous generation. If there were, then no

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>S shaped neck would impede anything like that, and boom,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>there you have it. So he disproved that spontaneous generation

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is a thing right through the scientific method. Exactly. Here's

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the leap that a lot of people make, scientists included,

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that really is a great disservice to science. He didn't

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>prove cell theory, right. What he did is take that

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>cell hypothesis and present some really persuasive evidence that it's

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>probably right. Yeah. But like this article you sent points out,

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>disproving something is just as important as proving something. So

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing that's the most you can hope for

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a science is disproving sure with science, unless you're talking

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about math. With science, there's no such thing as proof.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>A theory, even a law, universal law still has the

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>potential for being undermined by one single experiment, one single observation,

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there is no real ultimate proof in science.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>There's just theories and support for theories, and then ultimately

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>laws aim further and further support for laws, right, but

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not proven. What science does ultimately is disproved things

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or lend support for existing theories, are existing interpretations of

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>why things happen the way they do. And that's what

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Pasture did. So if you look at the experiment, he

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>disproved spontaneous generation, but he lent support to the cell theory,

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and probably with his experiment it went from the cell

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis to the cell theory because it was just so persuasive.

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's what a theory is. It means that a

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people out there who are reasonable say this

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>explanation is probably the right one. Yeah, it's predictive. If

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you do it over and over, you're probably going to

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>get the same result. But that's not to say that

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Pastures showed that if you do this a million in

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>one times that the S shaped flask won't turn cloudy.

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>He didn't prove that. You can't prove that, which is

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>again science can disprove and lent support can't prove a

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>very good point. So right after this message break, we're

0:36:48.440 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>going to get into the actual steps of the scientific method. Alright, dude,

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess that long last we're there. Like you mentioned before,

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method is fluid, and it's not like when

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your science degree they hand you a little

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.959
<v Speaker 1>laminated card like the Miranda rights that cop scary that

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, list out all the different steps you have

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to take. Um, But generally maybe I would we should

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>carry those around, all right, we should make little wallet

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>cards of the scientific method just to carry stuff you

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>should know about. Go on it. Oh yeah, I'll make

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a million buttons random and sell them. Uh. Generally speaking, though,

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it follows these steps. The first thing you do, like

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned earlier, is you observe something. You ask a question.

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh next, Like Darwin was known, I think when we

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>did our podcast on him too, he would spend like

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a week on three square feet of ground. It was

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>like even longer than that. Remember, remember, wasn't it he

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>said that he did. He wasn't gonna MOA's lawn for

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.919
<v Speaker 1>like three years because he wanted to see what what happened? Yeah,

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's the ultimate and qualitative data of just observing,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>writing things down and asking questions. And the reason you

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>ask your question is so you can narrow something down

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think the example they use in here

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>is on Galapa ghosts, like the beaks of what bird?

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Was it? Yeah? The finch bird. He noticed a bunch

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of different beaks, so he finally posted a question like, um,

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think these beaks are different for a

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>very specific reason, and I to find out why. Yes,

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>he said, what caused the diversification of finches on Gallopagus?

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Who you should have done that with an accent. Well, yeah,

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he would have had a British accent. Huh yeah, unless

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he was pretending to be someone else. I think of

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>him as like, um, sounding like Hemingway or something. Oh yeah,

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>just drunken, violent kind of. But he wasn't. He was

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like the opposite of that. Yeah. Well I saw that

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Saw a picture his voice as the dude

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that played him, who I can't remember right now, ed Norton. No,

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I finally saw a birdman. Tho did you see that? Yeah?

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Great movie? Um, I disagree you didn't like it? What? Wow?

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>That surprises me. Um, we'll get into that off year.

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>So uh sorry, you just threw me with that. And

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's on galapagost and he's like, what the heck with

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>all these different finches one small island? Why would there

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>be different species of finch so and why are they

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all seeming to survive and coexist so? Well, what's what

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>makes Yeah? Then he leads to the question, what's making

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these species of finches so diverse? Right? Or?

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Bill Harris uses a pretty good example. That's something everyone

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can understand, Like what car body shape is the best

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for air resistance? Like one the shape like a box,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or one the shape like aerodynamic, like a bird, and

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he carries that out. In the next step, you formulate

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis based on your you know, for knowledge and

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe observations, like so, you know what, I think that

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a car shaped like a bird is probably more aerodynamic

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>than one shape like a box. Yeah, if you're thinking,

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're the type of person who's sitting around asking

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>questions about aerodynamics, you probably already have some sort of

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>sense that a box is less aerodynamic than a bird.

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Boxes rarely fly unless they're carried by one of those

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>delightful Amazon delivery drones. They don't have those yet, right,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna do that, are they. There's like a

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>pizza delivery drone service. Man, I think where you have

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>PiZZ are grilled cheese in New York and you go

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>stand on an XF you order and it like comes

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and drops it. That is the dumbest thing of it.

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And I can't wait to do it where they're making

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. Let's pretty funny. Um, Yet we

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can't get food to the homeless somehow exactly, we can

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>drop a grilled cheese on someone's head. They're like you

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>homeless guy, get off that X exactly. Um, alright, So

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis, I don't think we ever mentioned, is typically

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>represented as an if then statement. Yeah, if you're doing

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>good sciences, Yeah, like if the cars profile. Uh, well,

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the the example he uses if the body's profile related

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to the amount of air it produces, which is the

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>more general statement. Yeah, that's like based on a theory. Yeah,

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna get more specific than the car designed

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like the body of a bird will be more aerodynamic

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>than one like a box. So that's inductive reasoning, starting

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>with a broad statement and going to something narrow, and

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's if then at the same time. Yeah, and now

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a test. You have a question that can

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be answered, you can figure out a way to answer it. Yeah,

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And he points out to this is pretty important that, uh,

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis, if it's formulated correctly, means it is testable

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's falsifiable, which are often one and the same,

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, And that's again we go to the

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people who say that they're they're soft sciences aren't real science.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>There's pseudoscience because a lot of the data that they

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>come up with, a lot of the hypotheses they come

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>up with aren't falsifiable, they're not testable. It's a it's

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a thing, it's an issue, it's a thing. So next

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>up in the steps, you're gonna experiment. And when you experiment,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you can't just go in there willy nilly and do

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want. Um, you have to set up specific

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>conditions and they must be controlled, and you want to

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>everything that's supposed to be identical needs to be identical.

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So basically, you have two variables. At least, you have

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>an independent variable and you have a dependent variable. And

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about car shape, that is the independent

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>variable in this study, that's the one that's manipulated exactly,

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the one you're controlling. The independent variable is the

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>one you, the researcher, is controlling. So in this case,

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you're controlling the shape of the car. You have yourself

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a bird shaped car and you have yourself a box

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 1>shaped car. So the shape of the car changed because

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you made it change. Now, when you blast a bunch

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of air over it during your experiment, what you're measuring

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is the dependent variable. So you're measuring what happens based

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>on the change that you made. That's right, and you

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to you, you want to study one single variable

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>at a time, basically, yeah, don't get fancy, just just

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>do good science, step by step methodical. You also have

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to have your control group in any experiment, uh, and

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>an experimental group and the controlled group is what's gonna

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>allow you to compare the test results to that baseline measurement. Yeah,

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>and you need that baseline measurement, so it's not just

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like chance. Basically exactly like if Pastor had just done

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the S shaped now can nothing happen? He wouldn't have

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily been able to say that he was right, even

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>though he was right, he needed that control, which was

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the open flask, right. Or with the cars, you need

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>two cars, like you said, one bird shaped and one

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>box shaped, right, Or then maybe in this case, since

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the bird shape and the box shape both show up

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the hypothsis, you need a third like egg shaped

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one or something like that. I bet that would be

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty streamline. Yeah. Yeah. But the key though, is all

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of those variables have to be um. All the other

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>variables have to be the same, like you have to

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>have them. They have to be the same weight, they

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have to be painted the same, the tires, everything, the windows,

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 1>one can't have an antenna on the other not They've

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>all they've got to be identical other than the one variable, right,

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the independent variable that you're that's the one you want different.

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Everything else you want the same, or else it's possible that, oh,

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 1>well this one had bigger tires, so that actually made

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>it more aerodynamic. Yeah, and you're just doing yourself a

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>favor by doing all that stuff. You know, you want

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to rule out everything else but that one variable. After that,

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to analyze your data so you can draw

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>your conclusion. And sometimes it's kind of straightforward and easy.

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes takes a lot of work and a lot of

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>various tools. Let's say you're just blasting a car and

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a wind tunnel. You're measuring the wind resistance using certain

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>awesome instruments and that kind of stuff, and you're taking

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that data, and then afterwards you're gonna analyze. You're gonna

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.280
<v Speaker 1>compare the data that you gathered from the bird shaped

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>car the box shaped car, and then the control the

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>egg shaped car. You're gonna compare them and you're gonna say, well,

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the wind resistance was less for the bird shaped car

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>then the box shaped car, which means that my hypothesis

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.479
<v Speaker 1>was correct, and here all the data points, whereas Louis

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>paste or could just say look at the beakers exactly.

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't be an idiot it I'm a scientist. That one's

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>got gross stuff. You can see it, right. But the

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 1>other thing about science to chuck ideally is let's say

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that egg shaped one turned out the control group turned

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out to have better wind resistance than anything. Well, just

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>by virtue of carrying out this experiment correctly, you would

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>have stumbled upon an even better aerodynamic design, and you

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>would have come up with that little egg shaped Mercedes

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>suv that was so huge, like ten years ago, the

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes egg coming to a store near you. So um.

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a big, big part of the scientific method is

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 1>carrying out a a an experiment, controlling the variables, analyzing

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the data. And then there's a step that he missed

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that is very rarely part of a scientific method list

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that is to share your data. And this is a

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>huge problem with science right now. The article you said

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it was really eye opening. Uh, scientific research has changed

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. Now it needs to change itself. It's an

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>economist article. It's up on the internet. Yeah, it was

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary that it's I mean, here's some of

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the data he points out is one rule of thumb

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:21.839
<v Speaker 1>among biotech venture capitalists is about half published research can't

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>even be replicated. And on the biotech firm and Jin

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>found that they could reproduce only six of their fifty

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>three landmark studies in cancer research. So you can't repeat

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>these things. It's like everyone's fighting for dollars in fame,

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not fame, but to some of our career

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:43.240
<v Speaker 1>advancements such that they're kind of not doing that final

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>step any longer. No, and it's not necessarily just them,

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the other scientists aren't going back and saying, well,

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>let me see if your results are reproducible. People are

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just taking it on faith. We need another Roger Bacon

0:47:58.040 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to come along and be like, dude, we can't as

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>blindly accept that one person carried out this one study

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and then just go do clinical trials on it without

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>anybody reproducing it to see if the results can be

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>verified independently. Yeah. Because uh, and this is a good

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>time to mention bias. There is such a thing as bias,

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and it still happens. Um. A scientist is usually out

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to prove something or disprove something that they want a

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>specific result. Like, even if you're super open minded, you're

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>probably hoping to disprove or prove something one way or

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the other, and your confirmation bias might you know, even

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't think you're doing it, you might nudge

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 1>out some results that don't support your hypothesis, and so

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you won't make it into that awesome journal um which

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 1>this author points out that journals need to start uh

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>putting in what he calls uninteresting results and experiments right

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>or like this if it's not sexy, right, or studies

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that failed to show that their hypothesis was correct. Stuff

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is disproved. Those things still need to well not even disproved. Well, yeah,

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is disproved, but yes, like the guy

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>set out to say, like the red balloon uses less

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>helium than a silver balloon, and it turns out that

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>now they use the same amount of helium. Well, if

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that study gets published and put out there into the

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>scientific literature on helium and balloons, then it's going to

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>prevent some other scientists down the road from wasting time, money,

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and helium, which, as you'll remember, is an increasingly needed commodity. UM.

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:43.800
<v Speaker 1>By carrying out the same experiment, whether whether the results

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are positive or negative, or what the study is meant

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be shared. And that's the point of the scientific method,

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is to to reduce bias. And if you follow it

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>all the way through ideally and do all of the steps,

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>including share your research whether it's happy or sad, then

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:03.359
<v Speaker 1>science benefits. The world benefits, and by not doing that,

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the world does not benefit. Yeah. He points out that

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 1>these days only four percent of published papers are quote

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote negative results, and it used to be like or

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>more um And he says, because it's a lot of

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with this sort of you know,

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>getting in these journals and you're the rockstar scientists and

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this study is super sexy. Like if they kind of

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 1>quit going that route and made it what it should be,

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>then research dollars would be better spent and people could

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said, the peer reviewed thing isn't even

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.720
<v Speaker 1>all extract up to know that. He mentioned to study

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>from a medical journal that gave a bunch of peer

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>reviewers some stuff with deliberate errors inserted into the research,

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:51.719
<v Speaker 1>into the studies, and even when they were told that

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they were being tested to find this, they still missed

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. Yeah, so, yeah, the science used

0:50:57.520 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to kind of re evaluate the way it's carrying out

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 1>sciences not science. The problem isn't science itself. The problem

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>isn't the scientific method. It's the way that it's being

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>used or not followed through. And a lot of it

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:11.919
<v Speaker 1>has to do with academia and the people funding science. Yeah,

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, these days there's a seven

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>million researchers, and back in the day, even in like

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, there were like a few thousand maybe, right,

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.879
<v Speaker 1>So there's just a lot of career competition, he calls

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it careerism. And so you fake a result or two,

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>or you just nudge out some results that don't support

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:34.439
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis. You want the bigger paycheck or the fame

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or notoriety, and all of a sudden, science is not science. Yeah,

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's pseudoscience exactly. And speaking of pseudoscience, I

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think we've reached the point where, um, we should talk

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 1>about the limitations of the scientific method, because it does

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have its limits, right, Like the way that the scientific

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>method is set up, especially if you go through, um,

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>if you include falsification, which most science is now, say

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is a thing like falsifiability of your hypothesis means that

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you have a real scientific hypothesis there if it can

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be disproven by some observation or some measurement or whatever,

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.919
<v Speaker 1>then it's falsifiable. And if it's not falsifiable, then it's

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not really science. So the thing is for something to

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be falsifiable. And it was actually a philosopher that came

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 1>up with the concept of falsification, a guy named Carl

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Popper in the ninet thirties, and he was the one

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that said, like, you're you have to be able to

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>falsify something for it to be disproven or supported, and

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>if not, then it's pseudoscience. Well, part and parcel of

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that is that what you're saying has to be able

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to be detected empirically. There's some way that it has

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to the presence of it has to be measured or inferred.

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of people say, well, then with

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method it reaches it's the limits of its

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>current usefulness when it tries to explain the supernatural role.

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 1>When somebody says, like, are real exactly you can't prove that, well,

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you also can't disprove it either, right, and So if

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you are a scientist who says, uh, because the scientific

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>method can't prove or disprove the existence of ghosts or God,

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there is no such thing as ghosts or God, you're

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>making a leap of faith just as much as the

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>same person who says science can't prove or disprove the

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>existence of ghosts or God, therefore God's and ghosts are real.

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:37.359
<v Speaker 1>They're both leaps of faith. And that really the most

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 1>scientific approach to the existence of the supernatural, whether it

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is a ghost or God, is that we simply don't know,

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and that we cannot know scientifically. And but that doesn't

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that it does exist or doesn't exist. And that's

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>saying that science shows that it does or doesn't exist,

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is by by definition, the opposite of what science shows.

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Science shows neither. It's not capable of showing or showing

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that something doesn't exist. That's a good point. Uh. The

0:54:07.000 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>other place where science can get corrupted is when it

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>blurs the lines, or when people blur the lines between uh,

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 1>moral judgments and science value judgments. Like you can study

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 1>global warming, you can study cause and effect, you can

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>report data, But when you make that secondly to say,

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is a scientist. I mean, someone can come

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>along and say global warming is bad, shouldn't drive your suv.

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, But a scientist can't do a study and

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 1>say that because that's uh, that's a value judgment. And

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where science can get corrupted pretty much. Right. You can.

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You can study global warming and results until the cows

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>come home, but you can't assert that if you use

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this lightbulb, you're a bad person, right, or um ocean

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and acidification is bad. It's not good for humans, but

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a jelly fits it's awesome, you know. So, yes,

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and again you made a great point. It's not science,

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's people using science to make value judgments. So ultimately,

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method, although it does have its limitations in

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that it needs empirical data, uh to prove or disprove something,

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not that it's not flawed. That's not a flaw.

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a limitation, and it's it's when it's misused then

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it its results become flawed or skewed, and that's the

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:34.360
<v Speaker 1>people doming it. Man, not science, that's right. It's pretty

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff. Yeah, man, this is a good one. I

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>thought so too. Man. Let us start out with a

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bang boom all downhill from here. If you want to

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>know more about scientific method, check out that article on

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the economists, check out explorables uh, and then of course

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.239
<v Speaker 1>check out the scientific method in the search bar at

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com. And since I said that

0:55:55.719 --> 0:56:01.439
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mail, that's right, but quickly before

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. Uh. We get asked by listeners all the time,

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what can we do? Since you have a free podcast,

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we can't pay for it. What can we do to

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:13.400
<v Speaker 1>help you? Guys? And one thing you can do that

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we would appreciate is, uh, go to iTunes and leave

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a rating and a review for us. That makes big,

0:56:20.960 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>big difference in keeping us up there in the rankings,

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>which means more people find stuff you should know after

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they listen to Cereal they'll just say, well, jeez, there's

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>other podcasts in the world, what is this pod? So

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ratings and reviews really help us out and it doesn't

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:39.480
<v Speaker 1>cost you anything but a few minutes. Um, be honest,

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying go leave us some great review, but

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 1>go leave us a great review. You said it, uh,

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and told tell one person about stuff you should know.

0:56:48.360 --> 0:56:50.720
<v Speaker 1>We would appreciate that. To turn somebody onto the show

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and um, that's it. That's our version of a pledge drive. Wow,

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we do what once every three years. Not not very

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:03.439
<v Speaker 1>obnoxious and it last alright. So on the listener mail,

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:06.319
<v Speaker 1>this is from my sister in law. Actually, oh yeah,

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there's some nepotism. Yeah, Jenny, Jenny Bryant, she mentioned in

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the home school episode homeschooled her kids for a little while,

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and she sort of corrected me. Uh, love the homeschooling episode, guys.

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>One very big trend these days in the home schooling

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>community is what Abbey, my niece does, which is hybrid homeschooling.

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So two to three days a week she is at

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>school and then the rest of the time she does

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a plant. She's not a plant. Uh, the rest of

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>time she's at home. So she says it's a great

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 1>option with curriculum provided and new topics sought at school

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and then worked out at home. Many of these schools

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are accredited making getting into college, including Ivy League schools,

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Hassle Free and Abbey School has sports teams homecoming. Abbey

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is actually an excellent volleyball player. Beta club newspaper staff

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all the good stuff. The flexibility is great, for families,

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and we are huge fans of how the hybrid approach

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>prepared students for college by allowing them time outside of

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>class to manage their work and life schedules. So that's

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 1>from Jenny Nice actually via text. The first listener mail

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>via text. How did you print that out? Did you

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>retype it and print it? No? Dude, are you serious?

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You can print from texts? No, you just copy pasted

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to an evening. Oh yeah, yeah, I forgot about that. Men, then,

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.440
<v Speaker 1>how in the world did you did you do that?

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 1>With your thoughts? I have a niece who is excellent

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at volleyball too. Yeah, how would we should get them together?

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>He's I don't know, it's time of eleven, okay, something

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. Abby just turned thirteen, so there. Oh, maybe

0:58:43.560 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they face off against Yeah? Is she in Atlanta? Yes,

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>she's something Canton. You never know where's Evie. She's in Roswell.

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But they I think with volleyball they kind of have

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:56.919
<v Speaker 1>played all over the state. Bizarre if they played each other. Yeah,

0:58:56.920 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll just see each other at a match one day,

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on opposite sides of the court with our arms folded. Yeah,

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:06.479
<v Speaker 1>what else? I got nothing else? Well, like Chuck said,

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 1>go leave us a review, and if you want to

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us, you can tweet to us

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast. You can join us

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook dot com, slash stuff you Should Know. You

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 1>can email us. Can we still do that? Ye? You

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>can't text me at uh stuff podcast at how stuff

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 1>works dot com and has always joined us at our

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:34.280
<v Speaker 1>home on the web, Stuff you Should Know dot com.

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, is

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff Works dot com