WEBVTT - Tesla Earnings and Amazon's Cloud Strategy

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily changing San Francisco in This is

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Tesla beats

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the first major US car makers report first quarter results,

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and they don't disappoint. How the company is weathering supply issues,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>rising costs, and production delays, while it's CEO explores buying

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter plus Netflix still falling down on the day, making

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it the s ANDPS worst performer of the year so far.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Is the solution adds gaming? Just better content or maybe

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a big fire like Apple? Will explore all scenarios and

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>as public markets fall all the CEO of Amazon Web

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Services tells me he's open to deals of all sizes.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Selipski joins me here in the studio on the

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>heels of the AWS summit in San Francisco, will explore

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the future of the cloud, and well, what about Amazon

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as a buyer for Twitter? Lots to get to I

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>want to start by digging deeper into Tesla's results. I'm

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>joined out by Steve Wesley, founder of the Wesley Group.

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>He was an early investor in Tesla and is a

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>former Tesla board member. Okay, Steve, there's a lot going

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on here. The call is gonna start a little bit

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>later in our show. We're gonna hear what Ellen has

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>to say live. Let's talk about the headline numbers. First,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>how is it the Tesla's managing all of these very

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>difficult challenges out there, from a chip crisis to inflation

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, a production shutdown in Shanghai. So well, well, first,

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Tesla Blue Way the numbers once again, posting three d

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and ten thousand vehicles delivered. That's a big number. They

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>were predicted to deliver e seventot six billion, and it

0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're going to beat that by a good

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>marsh And folks, this is year over year growth, annual

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>growth off a big number and posting their eleventh profitable

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>quarter on top of that. The real story is they've

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just opened two new facilities in Austin, Berlin. They're sitting

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on four massive production facilities and they just have capacity

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that others don't. Elon is saying he predicts Tesla will

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>deliver one point four million cars this year. I think

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to produce at least one point six million.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>If they do that, they could be on their way

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to becoming a one point trillion dollar company. We'll see.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>There's been concerned that Elon Musk's interest in Twitter could

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially distract him from Tesla. We've seen Tesla shares take

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a leg down since this whole drama has unfolded. Of course,

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see where markets closed tomorrow. But what's

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>your take on that can he do all of this

0:02:54.680 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at once? Well? Look, if a test to shareholder, you

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>probably wanted to stay focused on Tesla. Only Ellen and

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's board know what is going to happen there. As

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he offered his best and final offer forty

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars last week. They responded with the boys

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and Bill. Look, Elon is not one to take no

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for an answer, But heading test less SpaceX and Twitter,

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it feels like a stretch to me. But people have

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>lost a lot of money betting against Tesla, and I

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>think I know for sure this one's gonna be exciting. Indeed,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>if you can build rockets to Mars, why not try

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy Twitter? It certainly seems much more reasonable. Indeed,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, so let's talk about the challenges that lie

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead for Tesla, given the chip crisis ongoing, given rising inflation,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>given a pandemic that's not over. I mean, there's reports

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that workers at the Tesla pant in Shanghai are planning

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to sleep there to avoid further lockdowns. How well do

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you think the company will continue to navigate all of

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>these things through the rest of the year. Look, there's

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on in the auto industry, and generally speaking,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say if you're investor in auto companies, you

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful because you're seeing huge supply chain challenges.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Most of these other companies don't even have their factories

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>up and running, and we could be heading into a recession.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>And precisely at the same time all that's going on

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>their twenty new EV companies coming into the market, Rivan, Lucid.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>You've heard all the names, but the reality is it's

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to make e vs, and you're seeing Rivan and

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Lucid already backtracking on numbers, pulling numbers down. Ford and

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>General Motors dramatically lower numbers than people have expected. Ford

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>fewer than seven thousands n e vs delivered this quarter,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>General Motors less than a thousand, so I think the

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>takeaway here is touch Slate is lapping the competition when

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the other automakers are just getting buckled in.

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how checks out. There's also, of course, what

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the R word recession inflation on the rise.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Are people going to want to buy new cars right now?

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Tesla is the best at making e vs, but

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if people aren't buying them. So that's the

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>big issue. You know. On the one hand, if you

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>go down to the testa dealership, now they're gonna tell

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you eight, ten, twelve month wait. So there's a huge

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>demand there. The question is will that cool off? In

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Q two or Q three. Looks to me like there's

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pent up demand. Tesla will take advantage

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of it because they have got four plants going now

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, a or in the process of

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>doubling capacity of their plant in Shanghai. By the way,

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just for the viewers, we can picture this. You've all

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have been to a costco. The Tesla facility in China

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is ten million square feet. That's the size of one

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred costcos placed next to each other. These are huge facilities.

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>There's are up and running, others aren't just also do

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>something smart. They've put supply chain contracts with firms you've

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>probably never heard of, like Veil, the world's largest nickel producer,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>so they know where the supply supply is coming from

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and they've got I think a leg up on supply chain. Now,

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>how is and how big a recession is coming? That's

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>hard to predict right now there in the capperl seat. Meantime,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve in the long list of other things that Elon

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Musk has to deal with, there is this lawsuit over

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>that tweet that he sent in funding secured. He's being

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>sued by shareholders over this. He had asked to judge

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>if he could continue tweeting about it, making comments about it. Uh,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the suit is ongoing. A judge has

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>now ruled that yes he can. He's not going to

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be muzzled. What do you make of this particular situation,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this is going on now almost five

0:06:54.920 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>years So, look, you've got a guy who's gonna get

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the park with SpaceX, out of the park

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with tesla Um. Would I advise him to get into

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a a pissing match with the SEC or the government?

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, But Elon is nothing if not genuine. He

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>As I said before, people have lost a lot of

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>money betting against him. We'll see how this shakes out.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really only up to the SEC to decide. Personally,

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see him staying focused on building great vehicles,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because right now he's doing a heck of a good

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>job of that, all right. Steve Wesley, founder of the

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Wesley Group, early investor in Tesla, early Tesla board member.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Always great to have your perspective here on the show.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Some announcements from the Amazon Web Services Summit right here

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Amazon has taken a new step toward

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>getting all of its power from green sources. By the

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>world's large just online retailer, has reached deals to boost

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>its access to renewable energy by almost a third. Most

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of it will come from solar farms in the United States.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 1>It will be used to supply Amazon's offices, warehouses, and

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>data centers. Meantime, Adam Slitsky, CEO of AWS, joined meat

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>here on the set in San Francisco. We're gonna get

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to that conversation momentarily, but first I want to get

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>back to our Ed Ludlow, who's been following testa's results,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're not just minutes away from the Tesla earnings call. Normally,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>how this goes, I believe Elon jumps on, muddles through

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>some prepared remarks, and then goes off the cuff, right, Yeah,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he kind of respectfully mumbles through prepared remarks before passing

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on to Zach kirk Con who's the CFO. Sometimes Shrew Bagnino,

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>who's the s VP of power Train and Energy, but

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he often interjects. But as you know him, today is

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>four twenty. I know nothing's happened yet and being but

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>we were all expecting a big moment exactly. So a

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of Twitter users to Twitter and said, oh, I

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder if Elon Musk tagging him in the tweet at

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musque will be on the cool He replied yes,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>So you know there's a lot going on in Elon

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Must's world right now. The bid for Twitter tests are

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>having a great quarter in the first quarter, SpaceX doing

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>really well. There's just intense interest here. But what is

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it we want to know from him? Probably if he's

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to talk about Twitter, the outlook for Cybertruck,

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the outlook for Semi truck, these kind of new products

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's what he does. He keeps investors looking to

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. So could we hear something more dramatic from

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>him on the Tesla Ernis call. Could that be the

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>moment that he chooses to do some sort of reveal

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or make a move if I was a betting man. Yes,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll be listening into that call as it

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>starts momentarily ed, thank you. Meantime, back to that conversation

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with Adam Selipski, the CEO of a w S AS

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned a slew of new announcements, including thirty seven

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in new renewable energy projects, thirty million dollar commitment to

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.119
<v Speaker 1>startups led by diverse founders. My conversation with Adam Selipsky

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier talking about the future of AWS and the cloud,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and two major Amazon Web Services outages late last year,

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I asked what he learned from that. Take a listen.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Availability is absolutely critical. Our first priority is always security,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and immediately following that, operational performance including availability and overall,

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the sixteen year operating history of AWS,

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and even if you look at you know, shorter periods

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the last year, the last three years, we've been highly reliable.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been highly available. We've had better availability track records

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>than other large cloud providers. Are certainly better than really

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>any enterprise I've talked to has been able to achieve

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in their own data centers. So any evidence you've lost

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>customers as a result of those, No, We've had a

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversations. I mean we Uh, we had a

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of days of course in December, which you know,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not not good operational days and we own that,

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know, we don't we don't run

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>away from that. Um. And uh, we learned from them

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and have been really trying to take whatever lessons we

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>could to make ourselves even more reliable. But as we've

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>talked to customers, uh, they've they've really all you know,

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>understood that. Um. While we don't like what happened on

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a day like that at all, if because of our

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>customers hurt, you know, we we feel to hurt too.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>That we really have a very strong track record and

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that keeps the partnership strong. People have been asking for

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>years whether AWS should be spun off from Amazon. Do

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you spend any time thinking about this or thinking about

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>the hypothetical benefits? Really only with folks like you, m

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, Uh, honestly not. We We have

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>no current plans to spend on AWS. We think that

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>our customers are very well served by having a w

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>s B a part of Amazon. In fact, so many

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>an increasing number of the conversations I have with particularly

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>big inn prizes UH they want to make use of

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the capabilities at Amazon has across the company. Whether it's

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>energy companies want wanting to um sell us power, whether

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's auto manufacturers who have electric vehicles that we need

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for our delivery fleets, whether it's UH telcos who want

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to deliver five G enabled services to their consumers around

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>things like entertainment and and Amazon Prime Video. Okay, but

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Andy Jesse might have said he never thought about a

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>stock split, and recent events show that even in this environment,

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we have to revisit those sacred cows. Has the

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>idea of a split ever come up in a conversation

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>with Andy or Jeff, It's it's really not a topic

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>of conversation. We were very squarely focused on the way

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we're operating today. We we honestly do not have any

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>plans in which I'm aware to uh really entertain split

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>off of AWS. We think the way that we're organized

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>now is actually very good for customers. That said, the

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>market is changing, eulations are dropping. If you look at

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the macro environment. How is this impacting

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>your strategy around acquisitions? We've seen Microsoft be really opportunistic. Well,

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we've We've very consistently done acquisitions over the really the

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>whole history of AWS. I'd say that overall our strategy

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>has been to do smaller, tuck in acquisitions. Part of

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's because we're trying to build a complete infrastructure

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>platform and we want the whole thing to operate as

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a single platform. Casual spectators often point out that Amazon

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have a social play. Does Amazon need a

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>social play? Could it be could a Twitter makes sense?

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Well that I don't know, but we certainly, I mean

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a big part of all of Amazon's businesses and and

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>our strategy into different businesses revolve around partners and our ecosystem.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Certainly to an AWS it's two and other parts of

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the business as well. So we're very close to many

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>companies with a very strong social presence, be it as

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as AWS customers or in our retail business for customer

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>acquisition and UH customer messaging, doing more and more in

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the retail business with the shopping experience using social channels.

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're very intertwined with social media companies, and I

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>would imagine across all of our business what will continue

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to be closely intertwined. One of those is Meta, which

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>recently picked Amazon as its long term cloud provider. I'm

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>curious if Meta is just giving you a piece of

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their business or if this is a step towards them

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>getting out of their own data center business. Well, I

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think you have to ask them that. But we've been

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>working with them for quite a while. But we and

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they did announce recently that they were doing a significant

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of their machine learning workloads on AWS and would

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be doing more that going forward, and UM, we really

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>love that as the next development and our long term

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>partnership with them. UM. I do think there's a lot

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of things so we can do with with companies like

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that together. UM to the economics, the agility, the flexibility

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of parading in the cloud, or are just so strong

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and powerful and even for a large sophisticated UH cost

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>effective companies, there's still a lot of benefits to operating

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in the cloud. How much companies like that move to

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the cloud, move to AWS will be a function of

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>how well do we understand and anticipate their needs and

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>how well can we build in a way that's really

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>effective for them for their own customer acquisition and retention.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of new exciting technologies out there. Andy

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>recently said that Amazon could potentially sell n f t

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>s in the future. How do you think about n

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>f t S, blockchain, web, three, the metaverse. Where's the

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity there for AWS? Where do you want to play Boy?

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of buzzwords in that center, aren't there?

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>There are We're wondering what the actual market opportunity is.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>What fundamentally, you know, what we want to do is

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to enable all of the underlying technologies that our customers

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at AWS. Customers need to build all of those things,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to build the metaverse, to build you know, three D computing, UH,

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to build a blockchain and cryptocurrency applications, and we're currently

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that. So if you look at I mean, gaming

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>companies are often where people start when they talk about

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote metaverse companies. And if you look at companies

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like Riot Games, if you look at epic. Uh, they're

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>both you know, very deep AWS customers. If you look

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at Meta which is of course even had had a

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>name change. UM, we're doing more with them over time,

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>which is which is really gratifying. And so we also

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>do a lot we have blockchain services. UH and if

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at things like Ethereum, of Ethereum workloads in

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the world run on AWS. So we're doing more and

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>more around blockchain, around Ledger technology, around three D and

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>spatial computing, which is going to be an important part

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of the metaverse. And UH at the AW strategies to

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>really again try and be uh as far out ahead

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of where those emerging metaverse company demand ends and blockchain

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrency customer demands are going to be, and UH

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and deliver really great innovative services. M Amazon Web Services

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO Adam Selipsky. There you can catch that full interview

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Let's get an update on the

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Musque Twitter saga continuing to go viral. Elon Musk now

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to potential financing partners across Wall Street. But

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the question is he having any luck. I'm gonna bring

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg's Michelle Davis for more on that, Michelle, who's

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>actually considering this? Yeah, so, you know, as we know,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting one of the most interesting parts about

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>musk S bid for Twitter is that he didn't made

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it public without having the financing lined up. We know

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that as of now, he has started to have financing

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>conversations with potential financing partners. At this point, he's only

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>focused on raising debt UM. It's our understanding that he

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>has yet to initiate conversation around you know, raising equity UM.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>And so it's his bank Morgan Stanley reaching out to

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>other big banks UM reaching out to We understand Apollo

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>has agreed to participate help you know, finance through debt

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>this offer UM. But at this point we also know

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that there are a couple of firms like Blackstone, Brookfield

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and Vista that have at this point said, you know,

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we kind of want to stay away from this situation.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to help provide any financing. Do any

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>context done? How much how these conversations are actually going.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Is he putting pressure on on potential investors here, like, Hey,

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>if you work with me, you get the benefits of

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>working with me, and I've got obviously a huge portfolio. Yeah.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so that's one of the big questions that

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to find out is how exactly what a

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>deal be structured. Um. Some things that have been floated

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>are you know, maybe investors could come in and they

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>might have some certainty baked in that they would have

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>veto power over what Musk says. But at this point

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very you know, very little. We just know that

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they are reaching out to other banks, other financing sources.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley is a bank that's advice saying Elon Musk,

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and so it's our understanding that you know, they would

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>help with provide some of the financing for him. But um, yeah,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>unclear exactly you know, how it will be structured. How

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>long could it take before it becomes clear whether he

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>has money or not. So Elon Musk has indicated that

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants to make an official tender offer at some

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>point soon. You know, he made a cryptic tweet past

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>night that you know, blank is the day. And so

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>before he does that tender offer, he's going to need

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to have the financing gund up. Um, so soon when

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>would they Well, it is four twenty. I was waiting

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for something, had to happen today, but we've still got

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a few more hours. Michelle Davis, thank you so much.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And then it's disappointing for investors, and it is for sure.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just a softer seasonal quarter for us. We have

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this addressable market that's expanding over town. Internally, we're really

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>geared up and this is like our moment to shine.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology Eclipse from the Netflix earnings

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>called I Want to Stick with Netflix, bringing Ross Gerber

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>whose investment from Gerber Kawasaki is also an investor in Netflix. Ross,

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this has got to hurt. Yeah, well, you know, it

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hurts for sure on the short term. But if you're

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a long term investor like we are. I bought a

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit myself today to be honest, Why why do

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you think, why do you see potential? Well, it's what's

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>changed is really in my mind two things. Number one,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see the competition as really being the

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest issue from other streamers. The competition is with real life,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and real life is back and people are going out

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and people are going to Vegas and people are going

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to Disneyland, and the problems are just watching less Netflix,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and and when you look at how many people are

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>getting Netflix for free and what that addressable market is,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>which is actually a third of their total subscribers. Um,

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Netflix still has a lot of room they can grow.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think another thing a lot of people are talking

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>about is this could be a byproduct of the work

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>from home culture. You know, Netflix has really struggled with

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the work from home culture because making movies and and

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>content is a collaborative process and it's been very difficult.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And Netflix is called all their employees back into the

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>office that's starting I think this month, and I think

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Read Hastings and the team there are the smartest people

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood, and they're going to figure out new ways

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>to monetize their brand. And I think we just have

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to change the metrics that we're valuing Netflix with towards

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth and away from subscriber growth. And when you

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>look at that, Netflix is a very cheap store. So

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the ways that they could unlock new growth.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>One cracking down on password sharing. How much growth is

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that really going to unlock? Then of course there's the

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>idea of an ad supported model, a tiered model gaming,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's just making better content, which of all

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of those options seems to be the hardest. Well, better

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>content is sort of a nonsensical thing right now. They

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have the most watched shows on television currently. Uh, I

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>think it's inventing Hannah, which my wife is watching like NonStop.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>They have the best producers in Hollywood, and they have

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>every great project in Hollywood. So the content isn't the issue.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>The issue is monetizing the content in ways that they

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't in the past. And I'm a big believer that

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Netflix needs to reinvent the theater experience around their shows

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and movies. And there's many ways they can monetize, between merchandise,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>events and communities they can build around their content, which

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they currently are not. Secondly, you've mentioned to I think

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>very important areas, which is an AD supported Netflix Light,

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>which they take zero dollars in on ad revenue. And

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at a model like YouTube and how much

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>money they're printing on advertising and the engagement. Netflix has

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the same engagement level as YouTube, and if they ran ads,

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they would be very successful. And I would advertise on

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Netflix for sure, you know. And so that's another thing.

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>And then of course half the people in my office

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>don't actually pay for Netflix. So I asked them, you know, well,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what would get you to pay? And it's the same

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>thing with iTunes and music where people didn't want to

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>pay until it became a hassle to do it. So

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Netflix can employ several strategies to start monetizing these users,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>and we suspect they could capture another million users, maybe

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at a lower rate of cost, but I mean of revenue.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But but certainly there's a lot of growth. When you

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>got a hundred million subs, you aren't paying all right,

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ross You are also a testlate shareholder. And the Tesla

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>earnings call has begun. We've been listening to the CFO

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>deliver some prepared remarks and Elon Musk is speaking. Now.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna bring you headlines as those roll in, But

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>curious what your thoughts are on the results looked. Tesla

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>has had a better report than than certainly Netflix yesterday.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But a lot going on in the world of Elon Musk.

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Does it bother you as an investor that there are

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all of these many distractions, Well, clearly they're not affecting

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's focus. Um, you know, Elon's sort of lives on

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>another planet we call Mars, and he doesn't sleep, and

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>he has a tremendous passion for making the world a

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>better place and doing it profitably. How he's executed with

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>such a difficult supply chain environment and manufacturing environment further

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>shows the dominance and the mode that Tesla's built around

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>their business and in the foresight that Elon hasn't being

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>able to deliver so many vehicles profitably in this environment

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>where no other company is doing that in their industry,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>whether traditional cars or e vs. So where I think

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the lack of focus at Netflix has caused them to

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>drift a little bit and now creating an opportunity for

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>long term investors. Testa obviously is a fully valued company

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that's executing really, really well, and I think we'll continue

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>to for a long time. So this is really a

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>special time for Tesla because next sir looks even better

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>than this year and they're executing beautiful. The CFO has

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>been digging into this idea of you know, the impact

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of the production shutdown in Shakai, saying they lost about

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a month of build volume. They're they're working back to

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to get full productive, full projection as quickly as possible,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But how big of a concern is this ongoing, given

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Shanghai factory is such a lynch pin of

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's production strategy. Yeah, and I don't want to minimize

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the concern because I think this is the biggest risk

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to many companies, not just Tesla right now, which is

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>China's failed COVID policies are creating huge problems not just

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>at Tesla, but also a companies like Apple and others

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in the hardware business in technology, so we're seeing and

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>other industries as well. So we're seeing continued disruption, even

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:03.239
<v Speaker 1>worse than we saw earlier, which sucks. So you know,

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a spin on that. What I do

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think is they are opening. They just opened to new

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>factories and to new markets that aren't it China, and

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there couldn't be a better time for that to happen.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>But what I do suspect is that China is going

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to be challenging for Tesla over the next six months.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a short term issue and I think

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>it will hurt production on the short term, but I

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to make it up in the other

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>factories because I think what we're gonna see is tremendous

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>uh productivity and growth in Berlin and Austin, and so

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think within sixty days they'll have figured out how

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to make up all the production that might be lost.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think for sure we're going to see that

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in the quarter, and I don't think there's any spin

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on it. Elon Musk just give a shout out to

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla China team and the Shanghai factory. Talked about

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>how it's been a record quarter on many levels, but

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>this the latest headline saying Tesla Ross is working on

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated robo taxi with no steering wheel or pedals.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know, el On Musk, because you know,

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>talk quite boldly about things that will come in Testa's future,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and many things have taken a while to come to fruition,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some haven't quite yet. But do you like the sound

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of that? Yeah? I do. And I think this is

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>really more a byproduct of the convergence of the full

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>self driving technology, which is making a lot of progress currently,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>along with the idea of having a cheaper vehicle that

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>would cost less money, like let's say thirty dollar price

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>point instead of fifties sixty price point. But instead of

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>selling that cheaper vehicle, we've seen tremendous demand from the

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>rental car companies for low end Testla's whether it be

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Hurts or others. And so I think test is like, well,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>why should we make rental cars, you know our robotaxis

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>for everybody else, We should make them for ourselves, and

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>especially this new vehicle which is using the new battery

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>cell technology. So what I suspect is that Tesla fields

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>they can build low cost vehicles using all their technology

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in battery technology as well as full self driving to

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>create this sort of master yellow cab without a human

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in it. And and I think that that's a reality.

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just how long it'll take. And I think that's

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really been the challenge with Tesla isn't the vision, it's

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's how long it takes to achieve those visions. So

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how long that's gonna take. But

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be betting against Ellen, That's for sure.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm betting with him, and I'm betting more with him. Well,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he's saying he hopes to reach volume production in and

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>says this will be a massive driver of Tesla growth

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>timing for us. Interesting. I recently sat down with Aisha Evans,

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Zooks on the latest studio One point

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I was Zooks, of course, is the uh self driving

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>robo taxi company that Amazon bought for over a billion dollars.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see a clip of that later in the show.

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Ross Gerber Gerber Kawasaki. Always good to have you and

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>your colorful opinions here on the show. Thank you for

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>stopping by. We're gonna get to our crypto report in

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just a moment. But Elon must speaking right now on

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla ernies call, saying that the first quarter was

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a record quarter on many levels, congratulating the Tesla's team

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>despite facing many headwinds, also giving a special shout out

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Tesla China team at that factory in Shanghai.

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>He also said they're working on a new vehicle, a

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dedicated robo taxi that won't have a steering wheel or pedals,

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but could be a massive driver of Tesla's growth in

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the future. We're continuing to monitor headlines from that column,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>will bring you more as they roll in to our

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto report. Now, I want to bring in Framework Ventures

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital firm that has just raised four million

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a fun focused on investing in early stage

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto startups from gaming and Web three to defy. Cofident

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>founder Michael Anderson joins me now. Michael talked to us

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about the advantages of being a Web three native venture

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>capital firm and competing in an industry where most venture capitalists, uh,

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, go about their business in more traditional ways

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that they've been doing for decades. Yeah, it's it's a

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>great point and a great question. You know. One of

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that really I think separates us from traditional

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>venture investors, especially investors in the web free space as well,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we actually have more engineers on the team

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>than we have venture investors. When we make an investment,

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we're participating by building alongside the investor, alongside the investments

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that we make, and partnering at a really deep level

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to the founding teams that we're backing. And because of this,

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we've been able to really help dictate

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>success of the investments that we make and really help

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>understand where where things are going from new opportunities before

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they rise and before anybody else you notice them. So

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>what are those opportunities? You've just announced a four hundred

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollar fund to invest in new blockchain startups. You've

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>got all kinds of money, including the traditional money chasing

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the startups. You know, what do you believe is out

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>there that's unique that they're not going to see? Yeah,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So when we started Framework with our first fund in ten,

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we were really I think one of the first firms

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to go bet the farm on DeFi and and DeFi

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>has become commonplace at this point, it's really the poor

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>area of engagement for most of the applications that are

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>being developed on top of Web three currently. And what

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we see now and especially with this new fund, is

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that blockchain based gaming and and what we see is

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the potential for blockchain based gaming into the next couple

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of years is really the same opportunity that we saw

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with Defied twenty nineteen. It's really a unique opportunity to

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to get these these game developers that have been developing

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on consoles, on on PCs, on mobile for the last

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty years and and build on a new form

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>factor which has advantages that just aren't aren't possible in

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystems that they're used to today. All Right, well,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching to see where you make your next move.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Framework Ventures co founder Michael Anderson, thanks for joining us

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as we continue to monit our Tesla results. I spoke

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>exclusively with Zooks CEO Aisha Evans, the autonomous driving company

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>recently bought by Amazon for over a billion dollars this

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and the latest edition of Bloomberg Studio. At one point

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>out we talked about what it takes to turn a

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>startup into a global ride hailing giant, including competing with Tesla.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>M this is Silicon Valley. We are, you know, pay

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tribute to disruptors. Having said that, we're not exactly in

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the same business. We don't sell a car to people.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We sell a right to people. Our customers are not drivers,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they are writers, and therefore we use the same types

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of technologies. But they are in the car selling business.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So how does Zooks fit into the future of Amazon, Well,

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that story is yet to be written. First of all,

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we are we hope to deliver on the promise of

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a new segment and uh sort of a big business

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and be one of those in the tradition of

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon. We know there's a world of possibilities, but

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I tell everybody we first have to earn it right

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>before we talk about a sort of synergies and possibilities

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and opportunities together. Zero times anything is still zero and

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it will be for a long time. So we're focusing

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on building our business, getting to market, and then there's

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a myriad of possibilities of things we could do together.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Zoo is going to be dropping off my boxss. Is

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that what I should expect potentially, if that's the right

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>thing to do and if it makes sense to do so.

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But first we're going to make sure to take you

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>everywhere you need to go without having to worry about parking,

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>having a car, and so on. What's it like having

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon as your boss? It's been good put an independent

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>subsidiary of of Amazon. So yes, they are involved. We

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>agree on what's going to happen, why it's gonna happen.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>How often did you talk to Jeff Bezos or do

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you talk to Andy Jasse or maybe it's Dave limp Um.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't talk to them that often. I mean, we

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have a monthly business for you or quality business with you,

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but no, it's not like I'm besties with them and

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we're on the phone and wrapping and chatting. Now, well,

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you must know what their expectations are. What is Amazon

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting of zoos execute get to market scale, and do

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you have the funding to do that? GM? Google very

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>well funded competitors or fellow travelers. As you say, are

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you getting what you need? Yes? More than what I need.

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm funding is not something I even worry about. So

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what's it like to operate in that environment where money

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is not an issue? Well, I mean you have to

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be careful, right, because you also don't want to be

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a drunken sailor and be like, oh now I have

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You still have to be a very disciplined You have

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to manage the phases of the business. We're like, okay,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>how do we execute? How do we make our mouth stones?

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>How do we get to market where things organized properly?

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>How do we hire? How do we retain and so

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth? How do stay mission driven? The

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>public seems to have lost interest in waiting around for

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>self driving cars. I wrote in Google self Driving Car

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in eleven and I'm still waiting to be able to

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>buy or just ride a self driving car on demand.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Why is it taking so long? I think in self driving,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the opportunity is so clear, um the

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so the beach is so broad. We forget that big

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>things do start small. One second, it's a hard problem

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to solve. We talk a lot about safety, uh and

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked talk a lot about human error when it

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to driving, but we also forget that collectively, at

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>least in the United States of America, humans collectively drive

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million miles before having a fatality. That's a

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of mouths. So humans are also pretty good. And

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the thing humans are good at, which is hand I

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>call it exception handling. We all know how to drive.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 1>If you are all fully autonomous, would be deployed already.

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But we're driving amongst human and you have to deal

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>with so many little scenarios. There are so many things

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that you've been learning about driving since births and codifying

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that using AI sensors and computers is turning out to

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>be a lot harder. You can catch much more of

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Zooks CEO. I saw Evans tonight nine

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg Television. The question could as Zooks be

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>delivering my Amazon packages one day? All that and more

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on this edition of Bloomberg Studio One point. Now, I

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to the latest on Tesla's earnings

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>call Now and bring Back are at Ludlow. And it's

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>very interesting since Ela must just just just described what

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds a lot like a Zooks saying that Tesla is

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>working on a robotax seat with no steering wheel, no pedals,

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>neither of which Zooks have. This is a purpose built ROBOTAXI.

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Testa is working on mass production by four. He's had

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>some criticism on the cool as well, some questions of

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>criticism about overpromising on full self driving, but this purpose

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>built car seem the big takeaway, and he says this

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to drive massive growth by I mean, Ellen

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>has made bold predictions about timelines before and he's got

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>them wrong. I think you know this is happening in

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>parallel with other stuff. So Cybertruck goes into mass PRODUCTIONE.

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>They're continuing FSD beta and Elon musk message was, if

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're a Testa owner, try FD beta, but the future

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is fleet based, you don't own your own vehicle. Sounds

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot like zoos. So the thing we haven't heard

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>yet is anything about four joining or Twitter on the car. Yeah, right,

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the only kind of curious thing. Musk didn't start the call.

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Cfo zat kirkwn did and then Musk made made very deliberate,

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>prepared remarks, which is kind of not very Musk like.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So he didn't go off script. He didn't go off

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>script yet, better run back to my desk, right, So

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of how long there's a car go on for?

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's about an hour, right, He's going to take questions

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>from institutional investors, detail investors, from analysts. That's where the riffing,

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and somebody has got to ask what's going on with

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter bit? Elon Musk, They've got, so I hope

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.919
<v Speaker 1>that will manage for Tesla investors. I mean, we've seen

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>shares take a leg down since all of this drama

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>started to unfold. And certainly if you're a Tesla investor,

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe you don't want Elon mustard by Twitter and

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a busy guy. Is he distracted? That's another question,

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like how can he run all these companies and trying

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>by Twitter? Well, multitasking is certainly nothing new to Elon Musk,

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's certainly an argument to be made there. But

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>we will be listening in for all the headlines, So

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned to Bloomberg Television for much more at Ludlow.

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you that does it for this edition of Bloomberg

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Technology