WEBVTT - IRA, Drug Pricing, Tech Antitrust, EchoStar: Votes and Verdicts

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Votes and Verdicts podcast, hosted

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Litigation and Policy team at Bloomberg Intelligence, the

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>investment research platform of Bloomberg LP on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence has five hundred analysts and strategists working across

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the globe and focused on all major markets. Our coverage

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>includes over two thousand equities and credits, and we have

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>outlooks on more than ninety industries and one hundred market indices,

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>currencies and commodities. This podcast series examines the intersection of

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>business policy and law, and today is our weekly check

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in on the litigation and policy catalysts that we're watching

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and that we think will impact companies across a number

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of different sectors. My name's Elliott Stein. I'm an analyst

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Intelligence covering litigation in the financial sector. Today

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is May fifteenth. It's around three pm Eastern daylight time.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Since things move very quickly these days, we always think

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a good idea to timestamp things because some of

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>what we say maybe out of date within an hour.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm delighted today to be joined by a handful of

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues on the litigation and policy team, and as always,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you can find all of our research on the Bloomberg

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>terminal at big and more specifically on our litigation and

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Policy dashboard, which is available at BI Laws.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Go.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, so Nathan Dean, let's bring you in. Nathan

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is our financials policy analyst, but does a lot more

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>than that. Covers a lot of things policy related, including

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff about reconciliation and tax cuts and the budget. Nathan,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with reconciliation? I mean, there's a

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>lot going on in the news, and I have a

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hard time tracking it, but I know you're all over it.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me like there's a lot of competing

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>interests between the deficit hawks, the Salt Caucus, those who

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are against Medicaid cuts. How are the Republicans going to

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thread the needle here?

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Apologize, folks. I was just on mute, and now that

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I've unmuted, I am going to get into Elliott's question.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty twenty five and people still forget to unmute themselves.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I was up on the Capitol Hill today and the

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>amount of times that the witnesses didn't press the button

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>and the millmakers were like leaning over and going pl

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 3>with the button.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Please, by the way, shout out you were on the

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>hill because our colleague Guy Rid Jersey was testifying there today.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>So if anybody wants to go back, How's Financial Services Committee,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>mateenth one of the most interesting subcommittees that I've ever

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>been a part of anyway. But to answer your question

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>on the reconciliation and Dwayne, feel free to jump in

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>here because Dwayne's covering the Medicaid cuts side of this

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 3>as well, and that's such a really big piece here.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 3>He said, there's three committee that really happened this week,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and that was the House Energy and Commerce Committee that

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>was seeking to cut things like the Inflation Reduction Act provisions,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>the grant provisions, the carrots if you will, of the

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 3>IRA plus the Medicaid portion that Dwayne covers. You have

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the House ad Committee, which covers the cuts of approximately

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and thirty billion for snap Benefits also known

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 3>as formerly known as food Stamp. And then you have

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 3>the House Ways and Means Committee, which is the tax

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>provisions of this bill. Now, the provisions came out, the

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 3>legislation came out, and to make this a two minute

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>answer as opposed to a thirty minute answer, We were

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 3>most surprised by how nice this bill was to the

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>solar and wind industry, the renewables industry. In the IRA

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>portion of this, for example, there's been and look, if

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 3>you talk to some of the folks on the Hill,

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>they will certainly say that this guts the Inflation Reduction Act.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>And they may not be wrong, because it does cut

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the grants and the loans and stuff

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 3>of the IRA. But what they did is and for example,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 3>instead of getting rid of this tax credit called the

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>forty five, which is key for the solar industry, they

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>phased it out one year earlier. Even the wind industry,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 3>which President Trump does not like, the wind industry still

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>has a little bit better of a phase out than

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the elimination. Now there is eliminations in here, though, of

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 3>tax credits like the electric Vehicle tax credit, so for

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 3>like Tesla for GM. You know, under this bill this

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>tax credit for individuals purchasing evs would go away. So

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>obviously there's a lot of moving parts here. For the

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>folks that live in New York and New Jersey and

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Connecticut that are listening to this, you know, the salt

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>deduction is certainly important. The salt deduction is currently a

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand dollars cap on state and local tax deductions.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>In this bill, they've offered it up to thirty thousand

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>dollars with income phaseouts, which means that if you make

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>more than a certain amount I think it's one hundred

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars is when it begins to phase out, then

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 3>obviously that salt deduction goes down. Now, the Salty Caucus,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>if you will, led by Representative Mike Lawler of New York,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>has been meeting with leadership in this speaker House Speaker

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Mike Johnson to try and come up with it's a

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>better solution. The general thought here is a fifty thousand,

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>but I just saw earlier today that the Chairman of

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>House Weeds and Means Committee said to the Salty Caucus

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 3>essentially take thirty or not. So we'll see what happens there.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>But they do have a lot of leverage they being

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the Salty Caucus, So I do anticipate that this will

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 3>go up to about fifty thousand, maybe sixty four thousand,

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>and then way it's potential for income phase outs. Now

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 3>going forward, this is where the challenge is is because

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>it has to go to the House Budget Committee, and

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>one member of the House Budget Committee has already said

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 3>they're going to vote no. And you know, but that's

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>within our expectations. We think there are a lot more

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>political hiccups coming. This bill is not the final bill.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of amendments coming. We think the House

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>can eventually get to a point of agreement. And again

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>this is this is you know, there's a lot of

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 3>other folks around Washington who think it can't get done.

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 3>But if it is going to get done, it would

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 3>probably happen in June. It then goes to the Senate

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Senata says, thank you very much, they throw it out,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>they do whatever they want, They jam the House anyway,

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and then they potentially could try and get this wrapped

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 3>up by the late July if the dead ceiling is included.

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>If the dead ceiling is not included and they can't

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>come to an agreement, the dead ceiling gets stripped out,

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and then this gets pushed off to probably October November.

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately something will happen that will increase or at

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 3>least stave off those tax increases. And as of right now,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 3>our thesis is, you know, there are some cuts to

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>snap benefits, and I'll let towain talking about Medicaid. And

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's the Inflation Reduction Act, but it's not

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 3>as bad as it could have been for the sector's recover.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think they were not as harsh as

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you expected on solar and wind.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it was more of a realistic expectation on

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 3>the Republican part to like, look times of the essence here.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>We could vote to just strip it all out, but

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 3>we know that the Senate is going to jam us

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 3>up anyway. And Senator Tom Tillis in North Carolina has

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>already sent a letter and he had three other Republican

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 3>senators joining him, which is four, which is already puts

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 3>you in the no camp. They sent the letter to

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 3>the House essentially saying, don't touch dan for Reduction Act.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I have a plant being built in my district or

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 3>in my state, don't touch it. And so I think

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>they realized that there were going to be some people

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 3>that are fighting tooth and nail in this. It's much easier,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>and I've said this multiple multiple times, it's much easier

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>to vote to increase the deficit borrow today, pay for

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 3>later than it is to vote to cut somebody's benefit.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 4>That's going to happen today.

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But how do you then get the deficit hawks on board?

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And they're just going to suck it up to give

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>President President Trump will win.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I think President Trump at a certain point has to use

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the bully pulpit, and I think the bully pulpit can

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>get the deficit hawks in line. And look, Senator Ron

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Johnson Wisconsin came out and said this the way they're

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>doing this right now, it does not cut enough. And

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>he said I'd be an automatic no vote. So but again,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you're at fifty three. You can only afford to lose

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>three in the report in the Senate. But that's why

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>for all the discussions we're having on this bill right now,

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>we really have to see what the Senate comes up with,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>because they're going to be the ones that ultimately drive

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>what the final package looks like.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, got it all right? Good stuff, Dwayne, Why don't

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you jump in here too. I don't know if you

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up on any of this related to

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the IRA and Medicaid. And then obviously, the other big

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>issue this week was executive order that President Trump signed

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think on Monday regarding most favorite nation status for drugs,

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and you had a nice note out on the terminal

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>today with the headline quote how Trump's MFN might find

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>its way into IRA drug negotiations end quote. So it

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all sort of ties in together, it seems.

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. So thanks, I'll pick up where Nathan leftoff and

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 5>talk about the Medicaid ACA side of things. I think

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 5>when you think about the hospitals and the health insurers,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 5>they probably did better than folks maybe thought going into this.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 5>So if you think about the hospitals and you know,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 5>thinking about HCA's and tenants of the world, the biggest

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 5>concerns they had were how Medicare pays for services and

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 5>outpatient and patient settings. They're different, and there's been a

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 5>desire to to close that gap, which could have been

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 5>a worst case scenario or outcome one hundred and fifty

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars over ten years. That's a lot of lost

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>revenue coming from the hospital secutor that's not in there.

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 5>There are provisions relating to how states pay for their

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 5>portion of Medicaid spending, the scheme that's called provider taxes.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 5>There are limits in current law, and there was some

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 5>fear amongst providers that there be lower limits on that,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 5>so that requires states to pony up more money to

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 5>fund their program that's not in there. But there's a

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 5>limit on a new provider taxes, so to the extent

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 5>that there is a recession or a budget shortfall, these

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 5>states can't rely on those kind of schemes to fund

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 5>their Medicaid. And there are some other things on the

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 5>hospital side, but by and large they do fairly well

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 5>coming out of this bill. On the health insurance side,

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 5>I think people will gravitate to the number of people

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 5>who will be uninsured compared to if this bill hadn't

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 5>passed or the policies hadn't passed don't pass and it's

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 5>roughly about seven to eight million people over a ten

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 5>year period. Now that's probably on the face of it,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 5>that's not good for those individual people. But when you

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 5>think about how Republicans get there by not going after

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 5>the Medicaid expansion program, which there was some fear there,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 5>block raining was never really a fear, but some other

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 5>issues or other policies. They do implement work requirements for

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 5>the Medicaid population and there are some significant savings there,

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 5>but that by and large everybody assumed what happened. So

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 5>while most of these savings do come from Medicaid. It's

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 5>not as bad as it could be, but it's still

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 5>going to be a challenge, especially when you think about

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 5>for ensures. What's not in this bill and may never

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 5>happen is an expansion of the or extension of the

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 5>ACA subsidies that expire at the end of the year.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 5>So it's probably a good outcome for hospitals, a mixed

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 5>outcome for insurers. But to Nathan's point, this is just

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 5>the first step. We're early innings, and depending on how

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 5>the conversations go with the Deaf sitt Hawks and the Senate,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 5>some of these policies that we're talking about now that

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 5>aren't in the bill may find their way into the

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 5>version that goes to the President for a signature. So

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 5>we'll be following this as this plays out over the

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 5>coming coming weeks and months. But I do want to

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 5>flag two things that are drug pricing related. One of

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 5>them is actually in the Higher or the Reconciliation Bill

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 5>and providing some expansion of protections for operent drugs from

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 5>price cuts in the IRA. I think that's low hanging fruit,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 5>and we may see in addition to that some protections

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 5>for drugs based on how long they've been on the market,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 5>the whole pill penalty, small molecule versus large molecule disparity,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 5>that's not in there, but this could find its way

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 5>in there. I think it will at the end of

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 5>the day now going to Monday or earlier in the

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 5>week where the President announced his most Favored Nations policy.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 5>I think it's let's say a couple of things. One,

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 5>no surprise that the president's going down this wrote. He

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 5>tried to do this during his first term. He wasn't

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 5>able to the court's blockne this time around, there was

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 5>a lot of fear of the worst case outcome that

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 5>he was going to actually implement an MFN on the

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 5>spot and start the rulemaking process. That didn't really happen either,

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 5>which is why we saw the pharma stocks search after

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 5>his announcement. So, like any executive order, it doesn't have

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 5>the force of law. But this executive order is defanged

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 5>in a lot of ways because it really says HHS

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Secretary Kennedy start to discussion on forcing companies to set

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 5>their prices to those overseas and there's little detail as

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 5>to the size and scope of those drugs and there's

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 5>also little detail of what happens if the farmer companies

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 5>don't negotiate those prices down, and so there's the threat

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 5>of rulemaking down the road. In my view, this is

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 5>all is set up for the Inflation Reduction Act, because

0:13:54.640 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 5>negotiation is on the next fifteen party. Drugs are already underway,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 5>and while the IRI Statute doesn't have anything in there

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 5>about mfn or OUs prices, there's nothing stopping them. The

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 5>administration I basically looking over to Canada or any European country,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Australia or whatever, basically saying well, this is what they're paying.

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 5>We'll do an average. We're not going to tell you

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 5>that's what we're doing because that's not in the statute,

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 5>but we'll get there eventually. And if it's all about optics,

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 5>the objects of making demands and the objects of getting

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 5>what you say you want it at the beginning of

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 5>the conversation, this is a perfect setup for in November,

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 5>when those prices are announced, the President basing saying, hey, look,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 5>I told the companies to come in and negotiate prices

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 5>that are closer to what they're paying overseas, and I

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 5>got it now. I think if you're following the IRA.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 5>It's take your or leave it for these drug companies,

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 5>and if you don't like it, you can pull all

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 5>your products from the Medicare program. It's not going to happen.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 5>So we'll see at the end of the day how

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 5>far the President and the White House are willing to

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 5>go to drive down prices, because one central key component

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 5>of this is the IRA sets a ceiling but not

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 5>a floor. So time will tell how they're willing to

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 5>go about this.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you anticipate lawsuits and do you think there's any

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>legal problems with that approach?

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, so we know that there are lawsuits now over

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 5>various definitions of the IRA. I think everything is on

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 5>the table for litigation as it relates to as it

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 5>relates to the law, and pricing in and of itself

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 5>was not an issue once Biden announced. But if we

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 5>start to see huge discounts off of net prices that

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 5>actually do resemble what's being paid overseas, and the rationale

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 5>for setting those prices in really clear, I think the

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 5>door is open to that. But the truck companies have

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 5>been very unsuccessful so far. Lawsuit sure, it's possible. How

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 5>successful they'd be You know we'll have to wait and

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 5>say got it?

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, great stuff, all right, thanks to Wayne. All right,

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in uh Jenree and Justin TREESI our anti

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>trust analysts. They've both been down in DC for I

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it seems like a while now, several weeks. Right,

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you're you're, You're both in the same courthouse, but in

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>different courtrooms, analysts passing in the night. I guess in

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the halls of the what is it the Brett Perryman Building?

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Is that all right? Pretty much?

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Pretty pretty man? Yeah, I always mess that up. Okay,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>which one of you wants to go first?

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I will, This is Jen. I will say that given

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>how many computer scientists from mi T were testifying at

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>my trial, it seemed longer than three weeks.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a set up for a joke.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 2>It was a little bit like an episode of Big

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Bang Theory. So right, switching gears and moving to something

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that's even slower than Capitol Hill. And that's anti dress litigation.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 2>What I was listening to at the courthouse in Washington,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>d C. Was a remedies hearing in the United States

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice lawsuit against Google over illegal monopoly maintenance

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 2>of its search engine. Now it's a remedies hearing because

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>for anyone who may not know, I mean, it's been

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>widely publicized, but for anyone who may not know. Back

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>in the third quarter of twenty twenty four, a judge

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>ruled that Google was illegally maintaining its monopoly and search

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 2>and search search text ads, and it was doing this

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>by basically blocking out search engine rifles, being and Duck

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>dot Go really are the main two rivals it has

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>in the search engine world, and it was doing that

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>by sort of creating agreements, getting into agreements that were

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 2>taking all of the search access points available to consumers,

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 2>search apps, browser apps, sery, alexa, et cetera. They pay

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the browser developers billions of dollars to place Google Search

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>as the default option, right, and they also were giving

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 2>revenue shares for advertising revenues to the OEMs, the makers

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 2>of the Android bones to pre install Chrome and pre

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>install Google Search and not to install rival browsers or

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 2>search engines. And so what this really meant is that

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the only time people used bing or Ductugo was really

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 2>if the person went in and took the steps to

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 2>change their default, which a lot of people don't know

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>they can do or don't know how to do, or

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe they use the Microsoft Edge browser and things already

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the default there. But really those two companies weren't getting

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 2>a lot of searches and they couldn't improve without the

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 2>data that they would get from the searches. So now

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the judge has to decide what to do about it,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and the DJ's really asked for an extensive list of actions.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 2>They want the judge to force Google to sell Chrome,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 2>that would be a big one. They want to force

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Google to share a lot of user and advertiser data

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>as well as it's search index with these rival search engines.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>And they want Google to be prohibited from provider anything

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of value to browsers or OEMs or other third parties

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 2>to essentially favor Google Search and disfavor competitor search engines.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>They want to remove these barriers to entry right and

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 2>break down these walls so that others can new search

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 2>engines could come in, AI can flourish, because because AI

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 2>actually does work with search engines, it's not really a replacement.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.239
<v Speaker 2>I kind of learned in this trial. And and by

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the way, all of these remedies would extend to Google's

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 2>AI products as well, and you know, right and right now,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>we learned that it is currently in the process of

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>asking OEMs to pre install its Gemini chatbot app in

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the Android phones that they make, and also they're trying

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to get an agreement with Apple for Gemini to be

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>part of Apple Intelligence. Apple Intelligence doesn't have a large

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>language model behind it, so it's basically got an agreement

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>already now with open Ai, and it will make agreements

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe with Perplexity, maybe with Gemini so that people use

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Apple Intelligence and want access to that sort of broader

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>AI product, confuse to use one of those others.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a big deal.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a big deal.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>It really is. And of course Google says all of

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 2>this is overkill and it should be able to do

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 2>really whatever it wants to.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, but they were unliable, so I mean

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they must they must have, they must have to come

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>up with sort of some sort of remedy, but not

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>anything that egregious.

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's exactly right, Elliot. What they're saying is, well,

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>we should really be able to keep paying revenue shares

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 2>for companies that use Google Search, but just make it

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 2>non exclusive, right, in the bath past, these agreements were exclusive.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>We should just make it non exclusive. So in other words, OEMs,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to make and put any conditions on

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>you pre installing Gemini. You can you can have Android,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you have the license to Android, you can have YouTube,

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>you can put Chrome on, you can put Gemini on,

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>but we're not going to tell you can't put open

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Ai on or Perplexity or anybody else, right, which is

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 2>what they kind of did before. So you know, our

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>view after listening to the trial and reading transcripts, really

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 2>is that the judge, I think, as you would expect,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 2>is going to meet them in the middle. That's what

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I think, and I thought that going in and I

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 2>still think it coming out. I don't think Google's going

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to have to sell Chrome. I do think it's going

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to have to share some of its search data, which

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 2>it really doesn't want to, but I think it will,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and also stop paying for this preferential and default treatment

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>for Google Search. And I do think the judge is

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>probably going to require Google to provide choice screens as

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 2>well for default search engines. For Chrome users can't bores

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Apple to do anything with Safari, but Chrome is a

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Google product. Now Google internally modeled the impact of loss

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>of default positions at a net loss of twenty eight

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to thirty two billion dollars, So that's a pretty big impact.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised by that because I would think even

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>without paying for those default positions, people will still continue

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 2>to use BING. Nonetheless, it'll be about what people do

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 2>when these remedies have to go into effect. The judge

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 2>said he's going to decide in August, and once that

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 2>decision comes out, Google's likely going to appeal and try

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>to stay the remedy pending the appeal, So we'll find

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>out this year.

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That was going to be my nice question. So decision

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in August, are they still closing all you? And so

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead of that ye?

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>May thirtieth, okay, yeah, and then that's it, and then

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 2>after that some briefing post trial briefing, and then we'll

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>get the decision.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.239
<v Speaker 1>And then a decision when everyone's on vacation exactly, All right,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. And that's judge Meta, right, yes, which is

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>my segue to justin who's covering FTC versus Meta? Not

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the judge but the company.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I haven't heard that joke before, Elliott. That's the first

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 4>time anybody said that the last few weeks.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Noah, I'm sure, yeah, yeah.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, piggyback in what Jen said. You know, I've

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 4>been attending the FDC versus Meta anti trust trial and

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 4>DC and this case really involves the acquisitions Meta made

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 4>over a decade it now a decade ago now of

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 4>WhatsApp and Instagram, in charging that those acquisitions were anti

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 4>competitive in nature, the reason being allegedly that that Meta

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 4>made these acquisitions in an effort to kill competition for

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 4>these nason competitors that were growing rather rapidly at the time.

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 4>So moving forward here, the FTC is resting its case

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 4>now and are our review is largely unchanged from the

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 4>first week of the trial, that being that we really

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 4>do give Meta the advantage here and its effort to

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 4>defeat these claims right now, holding about a sixty percent chance,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 4>we think that Meta is able to do so through

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the conclusion of this trial and the main reasons why

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 4>there are two of them. Number one, you know, the

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 4>FTC really has been able to put on you know,

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 4>a host of evidence through bad documents and some live

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 4>witness testimony saying that look, you know, these acquisitions might

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 4>have been made with this anti competitive intent, right, that

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 4>there might have been this desire to cush this competition

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 4>before it really got off the ground. But even that

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 4>being the case, even if that intent was in fact there,

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 4>in many ways we think that's a bit of relevant

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 4>because the reality is, you know, it's really difficult to

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 4>point to these actual consumer harms here in this case

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 4>that outweigh the actual benefits that have been conferred upon

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 4>consumers through the Metas acquisition of these two apps. We

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 4>don't really know what's app or Instagram would look like

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 4>today in a BUTT four world. If there's a positions

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 4>had never taken place, there's a high chance that neither

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 4>of those apps would even exist anymore today if those

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 4>acquisitions hadn't actually taken place. So that's really been on

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 4>the minds a lot of folks in the courtroom. It's

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 4>been really elicited from the testimony that we just don't

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 4>know what that world would actually look like. But through

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the case, you know, on that point, you know, we've

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 4>really seen the STC put forward this evidence, right, we'd

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 4>have witnesses on this dand saying, look, there was this

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of bad intent here on the part on the

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 4>part of Meta or there were things that Meta did

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 4>once it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp that really wasn't to

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 4>the benefit of Instagram or WhatsApp. But you know, for

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 4>whatever forward kind of whatever, whatever progress the STC has

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 4>made with regard to that testimony, the cross exams have

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 4>been really good, I would say, in kind of dialing

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 4>that back, and really by the time witnesses have been

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 4>done on this dand things have really been a bit

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 4>of a wash, and I don't think the FDC's case

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 4>has really been forwarded in a way where those again,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 4>those antiqu competitive anti competitive conduct might have outweighed the

0:24:58.960 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 4>pro competitive benefit.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It's here, and just to jump in those witnesses are

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>these experts, are these inside company insiders or what?

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Yeah, so both And you know, I'll point to

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 4>the example to two particular examples for witnesses here where

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 4>that's really been the case. The first is Kevin Systrom,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 4>who is the actual founder of Instagram, right, and he

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 4>was at the company for a good six years after

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 4>the sale of Instagram to Meta. You know, when he

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 4>took the stand, he really had expressed his view that

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 4>he thought, you know, whether tubris or not, he thought

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Instagram really could have survived on its own here, right,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 4>and that even though Meta might have conferred some benefits

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 4>upon the company when it made its acquisition that you know,

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Instagram could be alive and thriving today if that buy

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 4>never happened. But across exam, you know, Meta was really

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 4>successful I think in getting system to say, look, no,

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 4>there were these benefits that we actually did receive here.

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, there are all these new features that were

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 4>added to Instagram after that acquisition took place. And you know,

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.719
<v Speaker 4>at the time of the acquisition, Instagram was having a

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 4>really hard time with spam right there. There was a

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 4>huge problem on the app with that and once it

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Meta made the acquisition, they were able to clean up

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 4>those issues really quickly and allowed Instagram to thrive and

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 4>focus on other aspects of its business. So that's one

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 4>example there. The same really from Adam as Ai who's

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 4>heading Instagram right now, same kind of viewpoint that you

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 4>know for all of the kind of detracting in a

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 4>way that Meta might have done from Instagram. Around twenty eighteen,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 4>when it was worried that Facebook, Facebook's main app wasn't

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 4>really getting the traction need of the time, there were

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 4>just all of these different these benefits conferred to Instagram,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 4>they were added reels for example, that really gave it

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 4>the ability to compete against TikTok. So really, you know,

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 4>the witnesses took the sand, they said what they said,

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 4>but by the time cross examination was finished, things kind

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 4>of washed out.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is interesting these two When is the two

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, this is ft This is the FTC's case, right, Yes,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, And they called them as witnesses. Are they

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>call I mean, this is sort of like sort of

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>too nerdy, but are they calling them as hostile witnesses

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and then essentially asking them cross examination questions and then

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>meta comes in and basically does it direct on them?

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you've got it. That's exactly the way that it's

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of gone.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 4>They called Mark Zuckerberg for example too in Shales and

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Berg the first week of the trial. So that's exactly

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 4>how it's been planning out thus far. And the majority

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 4>of the witness is called by the FTC have been

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 4>those company insiders, right, And I think they feel like

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 4>we have these bad documents here, right, So that's how

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 4>we're going to get them into evidence, is to have

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 4>these folks come and talk about these emails that might

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 4>have said, you know, a decade ago, but that's how

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 4>it's rolling out, you know. I think there's also vulnerability

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 4>here for the FTC with regard to its market definition.

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's been a lot of testimony, you know

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 4>about you know, how things have evolved since this case

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 4>was brought, and in many ways, if we were trying

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 4>this case maybe in twenty twenty or twenty twenty one,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 4>before TikTok really got off the ground, you know, the

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 4>FTC might have a better, you know, better chance of

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 4>being victorious at trial. The reason being that so much

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 4>of this activity that you're seeing on Instagram is really

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 4>morphed into this kind of real based you know, consumption

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 4>of content that's not connected to friends and really as

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 4>a head on a head competitor a TikTok, much more

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 4>than it might be to Snapchat or another social media

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of traditional social media service.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So interesting, all right, So just quickly, what what what's next?

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 4>So at the trial should wrap I think within the

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 4>next couple of weeks, probably the first or second week

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 4>of June at latest, and then I think we can

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 4>expect a decision from Judge Boseberg by the end of

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the year in liability.

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. All right, well, thank you Justin and Jen.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, so Matt Shettenhelm, let's we'll move on from

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>anti trust and talk a little bit. Well, well, we'll

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>move from tech anti trust to other tech related issues.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You had a headline in a note that you wrote today.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it was today, Maybe it was yesterday, and

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it was The headline was EchoStar encircled by SCC's inquiry,

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:53.719
<v Speaker 1>but risk of licensed loss low. What what is? What

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is EchoStar? Maybe start there and then what is the

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>SCC trying to do?

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think you know, building off of Jen and

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 6>Justin's discussion, if you go back to the to the

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 6>big T Mobile Sprint deal that had to win antitrust

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 6>approval a couple of years ago, the only way that

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 6>the FCC and the dj would approve that is if

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 6>they said, we need to create a fourth competitor, which

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 6>is Dish to provide broadband service. Dish has since been

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 6>acquired by EchoStar, and so the company has been working

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:32.959
<v Speaker 6>to become a fourth broadband provider to compete with T Mobile,

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 6>AT and T Verizon. It's been building out its network

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 6>since twenty nineteen and it has, you know, thirty billion

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 6>dollars worth of FCC licenses that it's acquired over the

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 6>past you know, decade or so to do that. And

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 6>so that's why this attracted so much attention this week

0:29:54.200 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 6>when Brendan Carr came out with a letter to the

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 6>company and also the opening of two dockets at the FCC,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 6>and the more important of those two was to take

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 6>a look at whether the Biden era FCC properly granted

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 6>an extension to Dish for its final build out deadline

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 6>to finish that broadband network. And so what they did

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 6>last November September, I believe it was was was to say, look,

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 6>we'll give you two more years to finish up that

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 6>the deadline was supposed to be June twenty twenty five.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 6>Everything's operational, You're going to have seventy percent coverage in

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 6>every market. EchoStar came in and said, look, we're not

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 6>quite there because of COVID, because of supply shortages and

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 6>things like that. We need two more years in a

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 6>number of these markets. The Biden FCC granted that now

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 6>there's a risk of a reversal on that from this FCC,

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 6>which is being pushed by SpaceX that want access to

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 6>these licenses, you know, to the same band of spectrum.

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 6>All of a sudden there's pressure from this FCC and

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 6>so what the technical step that's happened is there is

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 6>a reconsideration of that grant of that three year delay,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 6>and so there's the risk worst case scenario. What does

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 6>this mean for EchoStar is that the FCC comes back

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 6>and says, nope, we reconsider that grant to that extension.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 6>June twenty twenty five is your deadline to build the

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 6>whole thing, and FCC rules says if you don't meet

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 6>that deadline, you lose your license. So you invested thirty

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars in these licenses, you lose them automatically by law.

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>How I mean, can Echo start challenge that. It seems like,

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they sort of relied on this previous approval

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Biden administration and now there's sort of you know,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>getting the rug pulled.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Out absolutely, and so that's sort of you know, the

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 6>immediate reaction in the market was pretty severe when you

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 6>saw these headlines because it's it's such an important asset

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 6>to to think about losing these licenses entirely and technically

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 6>it's true that if you don't, you know, I think

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 6>the SCC can reconsider it's deadline, and technically, if you

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 6>don't meet the milestone, you lose the licenses. But the

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 6>technical I think is a little different than the reality

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 6>because there is going to be a court sitting behind

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 6>anything the FCC does here, and I think it's going

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 6>to have major due process concerns. If the FCC were

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 6>to come out and take the hard line that hey,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 6>that extension we granted, forget about it, you're back to

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 6>June twenty twenty five the end. The Court's not going

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 6>to go for that. So I think as a practical matter,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Echo Star is going to have you know, maybe less time,

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 6>maybe not three years that it was granted by the

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 6>Biden administration. It's going to have pressure, but I think

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 6>it's going to the FCC is going to have to

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 6>act reasonably in everything it does here to avoid, you know,

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 6>claims that it's acting in an arbitrary way or violating

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 6>due process. So I think that that's sort of my

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 6>big picture takeaway. Maybe this isn't as severe as it

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 6>initially looked, but it is a risk to the company,

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 6>and clearly the signals are bad. From Brendan Carr, certainly

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 6>he's looking to align with SpaceX, maybe not so interested

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 6>in facilitating this broadband network to be a success as

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 6>much as he has been in the past.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So you think without SpaceX and the picture, this might

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>not have happened.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's that certainly was a driver of it,

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 6>because you can look through recent filings at the FCC

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 6>and see, you know, letter after letter from SpaceX saying, look,

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Echo Stars not not using this frequency the way it

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 6>should be, and we we would and and and so

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 6>I certainly think that it's it's a very likely catalyst

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 6>for for what's been going on at the FCC on

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 6>this issue. I think it will continue to play a

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 6>factor as we go ahead.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And then, I mean June twenty twenty five is coming up, right,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's today's May fifteen, so we're almost there.

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So what happens next is it just like a series

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of letters back and forth and then the FCC decide.

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 6>So what the FCC did this week is it created

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 6>a comment period on that petition for reconsideration of the extension.

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 6>And that comment period runs through from late May to

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 6>mid June, almost right until I think June fourteenth was

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 6>the technical deadline, so I think the comment period closes

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 6>a little bit before June fourteenth. In theory, the FCC

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 6>could act pretty quickly. Then this is all done at

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 6>the staff level, at the bureau level, so you don't

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 6>need a full commission vote on this stuff. So in theory,

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 6>if Brendan Carr really wanted to play hardball, he could

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 6>act in June and just say you know, your deadline's

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 6>back in place. I don't think he's going to do that,

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 6>but that's what we'll be watching is how quickly will

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 6>the FCC act on this. I don't know that it

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 6>will be in June would be, but I think it

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 6>will be shortly thereafter where there's some sort of action.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 6>I think the FCC is probably going to have to

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 6>go for some sort of, you know, a tougher deadline

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 6>than three years from now, but not imminent. I think

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 6>that there will be pressure on the company h but

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 6>but not in an imminent threat of hey, you're going

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 6>to lose your licenses.

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm envisiting Elon Musk getting like a million people to

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>write a letter in favor of a SpaceX.

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it would wouldn't wouldn't surprise me at all.

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, well that's super interesting and mark and market

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>moving right because all right, well, great stuff all around,

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you everybody. I think we'll leave it there. We'll

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wrap up this episode of Votes and Verdicts as always,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for listening. If you have any questions about

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>any of the matters that we discussed on today's episode,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>please don't hesitate to reach out to us with any

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>questions that you have. As a reminder, you can find

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 1>all of our research on the Bloomberg terminal at BI

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>go or on our litigation and policy dashboard at BI

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>laws go, and we always encourage you to listen to

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>other episodes of Votes and Verdicts on whatever platform you

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like to get your favorite podcasts. Thanks for listening and

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>have a great day.