WEBVTT - First Republic Sinks and Disney Cuts

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Asia for this Tuesday, April twenty

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>fifth in Hong Kong, Monday April twenty fourth in New

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>York and coming up today.

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>First Republic Bank is pursuing strategic options as it reports

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a slump in first quarter deposits.

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Credit Suie saw sixty nine billion dollars of outflows last

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>quarter as it near to collapse.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>And China's Poloit Bureau is likely to shift its focus

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>from stimulus to reforms.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>China distances itself from its French ambassador and supports former

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.599
<v Speaker 3>Soviet Bloc country sovereignty. Australia Defense Ministry says the military

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>must make adjustments to be fit for purpose. McCarthy looks

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to be going ahead with debt vote. I'm Ed Baxter

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 3>with Global News.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg day Break Asia, The

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 4>business news you need to start your day in just

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 4>one fifteen minute podcast available on Apples, Spotify, the Bloomberg

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Business app and everywhere you get podcasts.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, I'm Doug Chrisner and I'm Brian Curtiz. Here

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are the stories we're following today. First Republic saying it's

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>pursuing strategic options. Now and seeking to shrink its balance sheet.

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>That's after it reported deposits that fell to one hundred

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>four point five billion in the first quarter. Deposits are

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>down forty one percent from the end of last year.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>The California Lendo was engulfed in the regional banking turmoil

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>that led to the collapse of three of its peers.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 5>First Republic.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Slump also comes despite the largest US lenders injecting some

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars of their own cash into the bank

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to try to help shore up the finances in response

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to the unprecedented outflows of deposits. The company says now

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that it plans to cut its workforce as much as

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent. We heard earlier from Bloomberg's Herman Chen.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 6>They talked about some expense reductions with some employee cuts.

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 6>That helps on the margin, but really instill confidence is

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 6>more focused on stabilizing the balance sheet and getting those

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 6>deposits back that left in the first quarter.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 5>And the bank's shares are down a little more than

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 5>twenty one percent now.

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>In late trading, well clients had credit Sueeze pulled sixty

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 2>nine billion dollars from the bank during the first quarter.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>As the bank neared collapse, and now UBS will have

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>big challenges ahead following that emergency takeover of its biggest rival.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>We have more from Bloomberg's Manis Kranny.

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 7>Over the past six months, one hundred and seventy billion

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 7>Swiss ranks of assets that yield for the bank have exited.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 7>The question now is what can UBS do to stop

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 7>that rot when the deal closes? What can they offer clients?

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 7>How can they make them stay? How can they make

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 7>the rain makers within the institution of Credit Suite remain.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 7>The message was clear, we will make more substantial losses

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 7>in wealth management from Credit Suie. We had to tap

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 7>the Swiss National Bank for one hundred billion and more

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 7>of liquidity. This is far from done. The challenges are

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 7>significant for Colin kalaher Ikbal Khan and Sergio Motty, the

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 7>CEO of UBS, on getting this flow show to stay

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 7>and generate income in Zurich. On Manistrane.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a closer look here at Tesla,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's increasing its forecast for capex again and looks

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to be targeting nine billion dollars in twenty twenty three,

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>according to a regulatory filing as of January Tesla provided

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a forecast range that was a billion less.

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 5>At both the low and the high end.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's capex boost comes while executives have been emphasizing cost

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>cutting efforts. Bloombergs Ed Ludlow says it's being done with

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>an emphasis on sustaining growth.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 8>They're cutting prices on evs here in North America, they

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 8>did recently just re raise prices on Mode less and

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 8>Model X, and internally a view on cutting costs is

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 8>a big focus. But reminder of Elon musk commitment to

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 8>sustaining growth at the expense of margin and profit. That's

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 8>something that he's been relatively clear on.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 5>And while the cell side at least are.

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 8>A little concern about the impact of price cuts to

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 8>products on that bottom line, at least Tesla is consistent

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 8>on the view of investing through periods like this to

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 8>maintain that growth rate.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Tesla shows are down one and a half percent in

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the regular sash and drifting just a little bit lower

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>here in after hours. Not much about an extra four

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tenths of one percent overall, though the stock has risen

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>some thirty four percent this year.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>A second round of job cuts underway at Walt Disney

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>We have more from Bloomberg's and.

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 9>Kate's play also take place in all Disney divisions, from

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 9>corporate headquarters to ESPN, although hourly workers at its theme

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 9>parks will not be affected. It's part of Disney's push

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 9>to eliminate seven thousand positions in an effort to save

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 9>five and a half billion dollars a year in costs.

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 9>The entertainment giant is also racing to curb losses at

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 9>its Disney Plus streaming service, as Wall Street shifts as

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 9>focused from subscriber growth to the expense of operating online

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 9>video platforms. In Washington and Kates Bloomberg day Break Asia.

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>China's top leaders may convene a meeting of the party's

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>politbureau this week to tweak economic policy.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 5>We get the story from Bloomberg's Joan Wong.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 10>Officials are looking to boost business confidence, increase jobs, and

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 10>strengthen the property market without adding new stimulus. Economists say

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 10>they're closely watching monetary and fiscal support now that growth

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 10>is rebounding. Several banks have raised as there are China

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 10>growth forecasts to six percent or higher for twenty twenty three.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 10>That's well above Beijing's target of around five percent, and

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 10>that level of growth would reduce the need for more stimulus.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 10>Some economists say it could be too soon, as though

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 10>as opposed, COVID recovery has been fairly uneven. But the

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 10>PBOC has already signaled it will begin dialing back pandemic stimulus,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 10>and the thinking is officials may pull back further. In

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 10>Hong Kong, I'm joined Wong Bloomberg day Brigeisia.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm Brian Curtis along with Doug Krisner and Rashad Salamat

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and Doug. Nothing's really rattling page right now in markets.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's still the banking turmoil that didn't quite become a crisis,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and yet the stocks haven't recovered.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 5>The regional banking stocks haven't recovered.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the earnings from First Republic today

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>changed that at all.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're right about that, and then there's the FED

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>story on top of that. Right now, it's kind of

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>interesting to see the divergence. On one hand, we have the

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>swaps market continuing to see rates peaking in the coming

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>weeks and then a series of cuts later in the year,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So that seems to be the view of money market traders,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>right and then you look at the other story data

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>from the CFTCS showing that net short positions on the

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 2>ten year rose to the highest level on record this month.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>So the hedge fund community seems to be betting that

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the Fed will continue to raise rates. And look at

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 2>today's data from the Dallas Fed Manufacturing week, but it's

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 2>clear that inflationary pressures remain very elevated. So it's this

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 2>tension in markets right now.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian, Yeah, but the hedge fund position also indicates that

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not expecting recession, and I think that story is

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>still to be written.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>That's another way of looking at it. But maybe it's

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a period of stagflation. That's what Bloomberg Economics is saying, Right,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>you get slow growth, but yet inflation remains persistent. Going

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 2>back to that Dallas Fed stuff, the wages and benefits

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>component of the manufacturing report now at the highest level

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>since August. Ninety nine percent of the firm surveyed by

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the Dallas Fed reported higher or similar wages and benefit

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>cost in the month. So this it remains sticky. Let

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>me just say that.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for most of the people we talked to,

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they acknowledge that this is one of the most difficult

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>times to really understand and or predict whether we're heading

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>toward recession or whether or not you escape this with

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing. It makes it great for us to

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>put these questions to our guests. And we'll have Carol

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Pepper coming up shortly, founder and CEO of Pepper International.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But now it's time for Global news. China has sought

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to distance itself from the firestorm caused by its ambassador

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to France and those comments from yesterday and back to

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with Global News from the nine to sixty newsroom in

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Ed, Yeah, exactly right, Brian. China says the comments by

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Ambassador at Lui Chu that former Soviet Bloc states are

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 3>not sovereign nations was an expression of his personal point

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>of view at a Beijing breast briefing. Spokes One mal

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>And ning through a translator.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 10>Ye, China respects the status of the former Soviet republics

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 10>and sovereign countries after the Soviet Unis dissolution.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm ao saying the media has blown it out

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>of proportion, and former Ambassador to China Paul Volker on

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg sound On earlier said they don't like to contradict themselves,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>but the fact that they took down a transcript of

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 3>loose comments shows they don't approve if you.

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 11>Start playing through the implications, like you're now saying that

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 11>Kazakhspan a neighbor of China and a vast one in

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 11>which China has huge interests, that that should actually be

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 11>part of right. I don't think the Chinese mean that.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, France President Maniu mccron also distancing himself, saying it's

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 3>not a diplomat's place to use this sort of language.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Major Australian Defense Minister report has recommended sweeping changes to

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the country's defense forces as it readjusts to a changing

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>into Pacific region. The Defense Strategic Reviews says Australia's military

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>is not fit for purpose. Defense Minister Richard Marle says

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 3>this will provide for an Australian defense force befitting a

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>much more confident and self reliant nation. Meanwhile, US President

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden will use this week's state visit by South

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Korean President Unsukiol to undersco support there, including being ready

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 3>to step up its efforts to tour North Korean attack

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 3>on the South. US House speaker Kevin McCarthy looks to

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>be going ahead with a vote without the possibility of

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 3>amendments for his debt sealing bill, even though Bloomberg Reporting

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 3>says he may come up short on votes from the

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 3>ultra conservative part of of his party now. Bloomberg's Windy

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Benjamin sent on Bloomberg's balance of power, says, it is

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 3>hard to figure out what he is really thinking.

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 5>And he thinks they're just going to go along with

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 5>the plan. I guess that's what he thinks.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 12>But if he were a speaker who had a lot

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 12>of power behind him, who had a lot of support

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 12>behind him, who wasn't elected on the fifteenth ballot, that

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 12>could be a good play. But it's clear his caucus

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 12>doesn't believe him.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 3>It is dead in the Senate anyway, and the White

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 3>House says we'll only talk about the Deat ceiling as

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a separate piece of legislation. Florida Governor Ron de Santis

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>has met with Japan's Prime Minister Fumio Kishi to today

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>in Tokyo.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>You see a lot of opportunities to build on our

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>business and economic.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Ties that Desanta says good for Japan. What is good

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>for Japan? Is good for America. Cable TV is jettison

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 3>two of their more inflammatory and controversial hosts, Fox News

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>announcing that Tucker Carlson's last show was last Friday. Bloomberg's

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Felix Gillette says Dominion settlement was a takeoff point for

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 3>this and that Rupert Murdoch treats people like Carlson as replaceable.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 13>Murdoch has always felt confident that he can replace the talent,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 13>even if it's someone like Tucker Carlson, who's currently the

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 13>top rated primetime.

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Host for Fox News.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 13>You think back of when Fox News got rid of

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 13>Glenn Beck, Red Events, Sustron, Meg and Kelly. They're always

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 13>this question, Oh, how are they going to recover? And

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 13>yet whoever they plug into those time slots always seem

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 13>to do it.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Carlson was due to testify at the trial, but the

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 3>emails it would have been presented we have shown Fox

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>is knowingly reported lying on the other side of the spectrum.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Almost at the same time, CNN Don Lemon Boom.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 13>Don Lemon has been, you know, going from one controversy

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 13>to the next for the last couple of months. They

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 13>brought him back after he made these comments about Nikki Haley.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 13>That upset people. You know, the problem with Don Lemon

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 13>is not only is the generating negative headlines for CNN,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 13>but also the ratings have been lousy.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 5>Well, I will do it.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Carlson's departure from Fox estimated will cost six hundred and

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>ninety million dollars in worth, shares falling as much as

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>five point four percent. Today, Global News powered by more

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>than twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts and over one

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 3>hundred twenty countries. In San Francisco, I'm at Baxter and

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Brian Curtis along with Rushad Selama, and we have

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it Backstraw News as we just heard there, and also

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Doug Crisner looking at markets. And our guest, a live guest,

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Carol Pepper, a founder and CEO of Pepper International. Carol,

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of anticipation about First Republic's earnings,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so let's take a moment and just have a quick look.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that this is sort of the banking turmoil

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that didn't really develop into a crisis.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Lots of reasons for.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That, but one thing appears clear that it's going to

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be very hard for the regional.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Banks to earn their way out of the position that

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 5>they find themselves in.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you see the regional banks coming back from this, well,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 14>I think there'll always be a place for regional banks,

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 14>but I agree with you, the headwinds are definitely there.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 14>I think it's going to take a long time. I mean,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 14>there has to be some change hopefully coming in terms

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 14>of how they measure the belt and suspenders for the

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 14>regional banks, and I think they will do that, and

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 14>I think that.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if nothing else, they just need a lot

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of time, right because all those unrealized losses, they don't

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>want to have them realized, and so you've got to

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to wait till maturity.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 5>So that could be years and years and years.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 14>Down the road. No, I don't think they're going to

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 14>have to wait to maturity. But I do think if

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 14>we get some rolling back of those regulatory cuts, in

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 14>other words, to put the regulations back in place, that

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 14>will that will increase security for the banks and people's

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 14>ability to be confident. And I think the second thing

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 14>will be if rates start to go back down again

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 14>and give them a little bit of a breather so

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 14>the losses aren't so large. So those are the two

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 14>things that we have to look for.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 5>Carol, though.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 15>I mean, the thing is they're going to be very judicious.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 15>In fact, that is the word that was used by

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 15>the Huntington Banks Shares a CFO to Bloomberg the other

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 15>day when it comes to lending. Judicious means they're going

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 15>to have to raise their standards, which is going to

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 15>be probably the case with most of these regional banks,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 15>which ten of course, means that we have a problem

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 15>with the with the companies and smemes in particular getting money,

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 15>and that is another form of perhaps.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 14>Tightening correct I think, well remember too, First Republic also,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 14>most of their loans were mortgages to ultra high net

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 14>worth individuals. This was not a credit issue on them

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 14>at all. They were doing ten years no interest loans.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 14>So they got stuck with this huge geno bullet at

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 14>the end, which of course flaps around quite a bit

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 14>in terms of value, and the rates went up, that

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 14>went down significantly, So it wasn't really a credit issue.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 14>It was it was how they structured these bonds, which

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 14>seemed frankly a little bit surprising that they couldn't have

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 14>anticipated that some point in ten years the rates would

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 14>have gotten up. So in this case from First Republic,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 14>their credit was stellar. This was not a problem for them.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 14>It was this interest only lending thing for ten years

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 14>that they've got to stop doing.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>In the broader markets, who haven't had a lot of

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>movement of lad although we have had in individual companies,

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but not so much in the broader picture. Are you

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting on a catalyst? Is there a catalyst coming for

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>more direction in markets than what might it be?

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think even this week will be interesting for

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 14>the tech names. You know, I'm a big tech bull,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 14>so I'm anticipating Amazon will give us a good story.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 14>And you know, again, once we get a clear picture

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 14>of when these rate hikes are going to stop, you're

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 14>going to see the rest of the markets start to

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 14>run again. Because generally the economy is doing fine. This

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 14>was a FED induced slowdown. This is not because the

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 14>fundamentals of the companies were bad and they were slowing

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 14>down organically, but because interest rate and cost barring costs

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 14>have gone up. It has given all of the companies

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 14>also frankly, an excuse to lay off a lot of employees.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 14>So guess what happens they do the layoffs those costs

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 14>aren't coming back, and now if the boring costs go down,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 14>suddenly there a much better position. They have more cash

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 14>and they could start moving forward. So I think that

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 14>the catalyst will be, you know, when we see the

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 14>I mean, I just don't think they can keep hiking

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 14>for too much longer because the big ticking time bomb

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 14>is the real estate loans. Honestly, I mean, the real

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 14>estate developers are all hanging on here, but at a

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 14>certain point they're going to run out. You're going to

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 14>see a lot more bank problems if you don't lower

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 14>those rates.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely, So in that environment, who does well. You're a

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 15>fan of tech, You're also find of medicare.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 14>Medical yes, drug companies for example, there's some really exciting

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 14>blockbuster type of drugs that are coming along, the weight

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 14>loss drugs Eli Lilly for example, with Goovy. The minute

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 14>that that gets approved to use for weight loss, that

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 14>thing is going to be excuse me, Monjarno for Eli

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 14>Lilly and then Wagovy for Nova Nordisk. They're actually just

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 14>announced today that they're going to do a head to

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 14>head competition and study which one is going to be better.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 14>But the general thought is probably Munjaro is going to win,

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 14>and that's a multi billion dollar opportunity. There are also

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 14>wonderful new cancer drugs coming along. There's genetic medicine happening.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 14>So I do think there are certain categories like technology

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 14>and drug development that will go do well regardless of

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 14>where the interest rates are, because these are things people

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 14>have to use.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>It is a difficult environment where you have basically half

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the people think we are heading toward recession, and that

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>changes a lot of calculations for sure. I mean it

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>would mean that you know, the twenty five percent draw

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>down last year isn't enough probably if.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 5>You actually hit a full blown recession.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, So it doesn't sound like you're too expecting of that.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.239
<v Speaker 1>But can you outline or you know, give us your

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on where we're heading in say the middle term

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>here on the economy, Well, when you.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 14>Say middletar, I would say the rest of that. Let's

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 14>just look at where you know, let's say we're beginning

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 14>the next quarter here, if we look at by the summer,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 14>if we look at by this summer, if the Fed

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 14>stops raising, which I believe they will at some point

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 14>June or July, the outside outside because things are slowing

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 14>down on their own from what they've already done. And

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 14>it also always happens this way that it takes a

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 14>few months for the raises to actually start to slow

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 14>the economy. Let's say it starts to go through then

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 14>I think, you know, the will be sort of sideways

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 14>through the summer and then maybe take off again in

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 14>the fall. Okay, that's one possible scenario. I personally don't

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 14>see the recession. I don't see enough science to convince

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 14>me that a major recession is happening. However, if you're

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 14>afraid of that, my advice would be throw your money

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 14>into the money market funds and earn four and a

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 14>half percent right now, and just stay out as long

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 14>as you're that frightened. Just stay in the money market

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 14>funds and wait to see what the Fed does. You

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 14>don't have to, you know, the day after the Fed

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 14>moves is still plenty of time for the average investor

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 14>to get into the market. Just sit in those nice,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 14>you know, Treasury backed money market funds and earn your

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 14>four and a half percent right now, and it will

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 14>only go up if you're right. You learn five or

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 14>six percent. Then you can wait so when you feel

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 14>that the pain is over, and then look for some

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 14>period around the month or two when the term is coming,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 14>and then go back in. So for those listeners who

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 14>are very frightened the money markets, there's no shame in

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 14>the money market. Sit over there and wait for those

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 14>who think, eh, I really want to get in now,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 14>I'm afraid it's going to go higher. Then look at

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 14>big tech names. Look at big you know, blue chip names.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 14>Those always do well regardless. So if you want to

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 14>be a little ahead of the curb and you want

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 14>to take the risk, go into bloo chips. If you don't, don't,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 14>All right.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Carol, thanks very much for joining us. Carol Pepper, founder

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Pepper International. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Asia,

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>your morning brief on the stories making news from Hong

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Kong to Singapore and Wall Street.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Look for us on your podcast feed every day on Apple, Spotify,

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live each day on Bloomberg eleven

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>three to zero in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one in Washingtonloomberg one oh sixty one in Boston, and

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty in San Francisco.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Our flagship New York station, is also available on your

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Thirty plus listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg Business app,

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Sirius XM Channel one nineteen, the iHeartRadio app, and on

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm Brian Curtis.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Doug Krisner. Join us again tomorrow for all

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the news you need to start your day, right here

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg day Break Asia