WEBVTT - Alibaba Heavyweights Return and AI Regulation

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation of Money and Power colle in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde at Blomberg's World headquarters in New.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 4>York and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Former Ali Baba heavyweights return to the company as the

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 3>technology giant prepares for its six way restructuring and spin off.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 3>Will it stand? We discussed with Brian Wong himself of

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>previously at Ali Baba, an author of the Tao of

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Ali Baba.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Plus we'll discuss AI regulation and investing in the technology

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 4>as President Biden prepares to meet with leaders here in

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 4>California this week, and.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll bring you updates on the missing titan submarine as

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 3>search as a race to find the diving vessel with

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>five people aboard that when missing on an expedition to

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 3>view the Titanic shipwreckord There.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 4>Is one big technology story in the world and it

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 4>is Ali Barba. A shake up in Ali Barba management overnight.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 4>You can see what it's doing to the ADRs down

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 4>five percent. That's the biggest decline in around a month.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 4>What we see is Daniel Jung moves out of the

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 4>CEO role. He will head the cloud unit. Then you

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 4>have Jozai moving from being executive vice chair to being

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 4>chairman of the board. And they bring in Eddie Wu

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 4>who's basically led the core e commerce units and now

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 4>he becomes the CEO in this kind of split structure.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Lot's happening here is Ali Barba thinks about a complete

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 4>restructuring and hiving off of various businesses.

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Caraen, it really is one to be watching. We've got

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>to dig in more with Wow, someone who's served for

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>a long time at the business has written about it.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Bran Wang and Plica says with us, author of The

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Tower of Ali Baba, he was in fact the fifty

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>second employee to join the Ali Baba Group. Real focus

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 3>on globalization, very close relationship with that of Jack Maher.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 3>And what's so interesting is well, when you look at

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>the analysts reviewing these moves, they feel as though the

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>spirit of Jack Maher is here, his lieutenants for years

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 3>come back. What do you think the signal is here?

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Brian, Yeah, I do think. Well, first of all, it's

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 5>great to be with all of you and thank you

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 5>for having me. I think this decision is really an

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 5>important one and also a strong signal to the market

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 5>but also to the company that yes, it's back to

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 5>the roots of Ali Baba, the culture, the original sort

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 5>of drivers of what motivates the business and bringing in

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 5>those who really have a strong understanding of where that

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 5>all started and also individuals who contributed to building what

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 5>the company is today from the very start.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Brian, how closely did you work with Josiah Edi Wu

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>and Daniel Jung during your time at Ali Baba.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 5>Well, Joe is actually the individual who hired me back

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 5>in nineteen ninety nine, and Jack I served as a

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 5>special assistant for globalization for a number of years. Daniel

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I've known since the time he joined. So all of

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 5>these individuals our people, and Eddie Wu as well.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 6>Eddie has been there from the start. He's one of

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 6>the co founders of the company.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 5>He actually worked with Jack before Jack even started Ali

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Baba when he was at the company at China Page's

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 5>Jack's first internet company. So I've known all these individuals

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 5>during my time at the company.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 3>Let's dig in bron Therefore, with Eddie in particular, he

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>moves really to a focus to leadership. What do you

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>think at this moment we will be seeing from a

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>CEO when we are still thinking of the restructuring of

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>this business. Does that still stand as it had been

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>outlined by Daniel previously.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, obviously I think the decision to split the company

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 5>in six parts remains the plan.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 6>The question is who would need the.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Holding company Ali Baba Group, which now is more of

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 5>an investment holding company than an operation operational comp company.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 5>Eddie brings a number of strengths to the company today

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 5>in the leadership role. Obviously, he has a very strong

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 5>technology background. He's played the CTO role or tech technology

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 5>sort of leader for companies ranging from Alibaba dot Com

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.559
<v Speaker 5>to Ali pay Ali Mama, which was the key driver

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 5>for the AD system for Talbo back in the day.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 5>He's run all of these and also served on the

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 5>boards of companies like Ali Health.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 6>But he also has a strong business acumen.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean to be able to construct this AD network

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 5>under Ali Mama and serve as general manager.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 6>He also during his time has done investments.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 5>He has his own fund that he set up in

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 5>twenty fifteen, so he's he's seen virtually every angle of

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 5>the business. But also not just in China, but he's

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 5>also seen the world outside of China from a technology standpoint,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 5>from a business standpoint, I think Eddie has really gained

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 5>the skill that are required for a CEO in this

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 5>sort of role, and at the same time he brings

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 5>an understanding of Ali Baba's culture, which is so important

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 5>in terms of the longevity of the business.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Brian woe coming to us from Shanghai, Caroline fifty

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 4>second employee at Ali Baba, I find Daniel Jung the

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 4>most interesting. He gets to take the lead of the

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 4>crown jewel, the cloud business. Do we read that as

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 4>a demotion, Brian?

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 5>I would actually see that as a vote of confidence.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 5>I think that any individual who would be the CEO

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 5>and chairman of the most important business within this sort

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 5>of organization and try and run the holding company at

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 5>the same time is a superhuman and probably it's an

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 5>inhuman task to expect them to do both. I think

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Daniel himself had suggested that he really focus on the

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 5>most important.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 6>Operations, that being Ali Cloud and you know, managing that

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 6>business to success.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 5>He's done that, improved he could do that in the

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 5>other businesses that he's run, so I.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 6>Would not look at it as a demotion. I would

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 6>look at it as a vote of confidence and.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Allowing Daniel to really help the company take what is

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 5>most important forward and become successful, particularly when they're spinning

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 5>out the company.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Of those three individuals who can navigate the political landscape

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 4>of China most capably.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, I think that in today's market, what's

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 6>really important is being able.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 5>To build a business amidst a changing regulatory environment.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 6>I think that requires skill.

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 5>And competency and understanding the technology, but also being able

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 5>to kind of work within the system. And I think

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 5>that's going to be a group effort, not one individual,

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 5>but probably a team as a whole that has.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 6>Expertise in understanding different aspects of the fact is involved.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 5>And I think Eddie, as I mentioned, has a collection

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 5>of those skills. But I think this also comes into

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 5>play where where the larger organization will assist in guiding

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 5>and also the six business unit heads, each of them

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 5>will be responsible for the individual units, and each of

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 5>those industries has unique regulatory considerations.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's focus in on the man who hired you, Joe Side,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>because he really understands the relationship between the US and China.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Many know him here more aphably as the Brooklyn Nets owner,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 3>as an owner of some significant real estate here in

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>New York City brand And I'm interested as to what

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 3>he does his relationship with investors, but also his relationship

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>navigating political and geopolitics at large when it comes to

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the tensions between the US and China.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think Joe as chairman is a fantastic choice.

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 5>He's a consummate investor. That's where his or sort of

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 5>original sort of you know focus was prior to Ali Baba.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 5>But he's also a trained lawyer who has an understanding

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>of good governance and you know, how to navigate these

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 5>regulatory systems. And he's, like you mentioned international, you know,

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 5>he's educated in the United States, worked you know, all

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 5>over the world, and he has the sensitivity and understanding

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 5>of how to kind of balance these things. I think

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 5>in a chairman role, that's exactly what an organization is

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 5>big as Ali Baba needs, and one that has international aspirations.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, he's in a very good position given his

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 5>background and skills to kind of play that role and

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 5>really help bridge the company from China to the world

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 5>and vice versa, the world to China.

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Brian wog Or for of the Tao of Ali Baba

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Ali Baba, employee number fifty two live from Shanghai.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much for your time.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 4>Now coming out, we get to that other big story

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 4>AI regulation. President Biden's in town here in San francisc

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 4>go meeting execs and academics from the field of artificial intelligence.

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 6>We'll discuss next.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg, President Biding heading to California for a

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 4>meeting with business leaders and experts on artificial intelligence. As

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 4>later today here in San Francisco. The meeting comes is

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 4>his administration pushes companies to develop new security and privacy

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 4>safeguards for the technology. For more spring in Bloomberg's and

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 4>Edgerson in Washington, we have another meeting. We had one

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 4>six weeks ago, hosted by Vice President Harris. We had

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 4>some frameworks in the interim. Does this mean we might

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 4>get some concrete rules from this administration on the field

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 4>of AI.

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, concrete rules are going to be up to Congress.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 7>So what this administration has been very good at is

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 7>kind of gathering information like the President is doing today,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, talking to industry leaders, talking to the companies,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 7>talking to civil society and trying to understand what we

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 7>hear all the time in Washington, risks and opportunities associated

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 7>with AI. And we've seen that in the framework from

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 7>the National Institute of Standards and Technology, from the White

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 7>House's very own Bill of Rights on AI. So you

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 7>see how they're kind of using this information to frame

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 7>the policies they're putting out. But this is all guiding documents.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 7>It's going to in order to pass binding rules that

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 7>will obligate the companies to certain practices. That's going to

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 7>be up to Congress.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>And what's interesting is sort of the agitation over AI

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>regulation in many ways has the ghost of social media

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 3>policy really in it. And I'm interested as to how

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>much Congress, lawmakers, regulators have got up that hill of

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 3>really what artificial intelligence is, how in ways in which

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 3>it perhaps poses risks and indeed might be regulated.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 8>Really that is so true.

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you definitely see lawmakers kind of haunted by

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 7>the ghosts of social media failures where they haven't been

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.239
<v Speaker 7>able to pass even the most basic underlying data privacy

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 7>standard at.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 9>The federal level.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 7>And the Senators will be the first to say that

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 7>we haven't even done the most basic necessary to regulate

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 7>the Internet.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 9>Since nineteen ninety six.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 7>So there is this kind of defeat US attitude going

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 7>into discussions about AI technology and where they are now

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 7>is really at the education phase.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 7>Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has scheduled three briefings for

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 7>this summer to just explain to lawmakers what AI is,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 7>where we are, the race of the innovation race, and

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 7>how it could we be used in military settings. So

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 7>we're really just still in this kind of information gathering

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 7>phase a lawmakers try to get a grasp on this

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 7>new technology.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Anna Edgerton, thank you for bringing us sort of some

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of the sticking points for Congress and the White House.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about ltificial intelligence a little bit more. Soft

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Bank in particular, the found mss.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 10>On Well's company is in the position to win, he says,

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 10>the race to master AI, thanks to of course of

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 10>dollars a tech investment, some of which some would say

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 10>have gone a little sour.

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Soft bangaling won't be deterred by a few

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>short term losses. He says, we will rule the world

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>in the end. Fighting talk, Let's talk about if you

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>can ever rule the world, and thus far, who's been

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>ruling it in terms of investment. Hillary Fish is with

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>US senior research analyst Technology Software at Clearbridge.

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's great to.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Have you here in the studio and the height cycle

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 3>is clear. Everyone's getting into various AI related names from

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>an investment thesis. How much you're thinking about future regulation

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 3>within that investment opportunity.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 11>Sure, thanks, Caroline, It's so good to be here, thinks said,

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 11>it's a really terrific question.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 8>We think about it quite a bit.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 11>We're very early in the stages of discovering what regulation

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 11>will look like and how that will impact the sector. However,

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 11>I think in this particular case, there's going to be

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 11>quite a bit of help to the government provided to

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 11>the government by the companies that are actually the major

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 11>providers AI services and products Microsoft for one, Open Ai

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 11>for another, in conjunction with Microsoft, or big proponents for

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 11>government regulation. So I think you're going to see a

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 11>somewhat symbiotics situation between commercial and government entities in terms

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 11>of bringing proper, appropriate and.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 8>Effect of regulation to AI.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 3>But of course it's a global question, and as Masioshi

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 3>son of soft Bag, saying, we're going to rule the

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>world in terms of AI, I mean, a large part

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 3>of his investment is in Armholdings, a UK company. Like

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>all of these things are global in nature. Is there

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of a race that's going on or is us

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the dominant force? Does it matter from your investment thesis perspective,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>I would.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 11>Say there is a race going on, and I would

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 11>say that's going to form part of how that guides

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 11>regulation in terms of how it oversees AI's development. But

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 11>at the end of the day, a regulation is global

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 11>in nature as well as we're seeing in a variety

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 11>of instances. So I think we'll see the various governing

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 11>bodies come together to figure out how how to oversee AI,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 11>at least in terms of Western nations, and then we'll

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 11>see who's leading.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 8>In the end.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Hillary, good morning from San Francisco. Good Afsen into you

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 4>in New York. Does your research point you to any

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 4>single one name or couple of names that you think

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 4>are best positioned to win this AI race?

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 8>It's another great question, ed.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 11>I think we think they are going to be a

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 11>variety of names who benefit. We are early on in

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 11>the process, and so far, clearly Nvidia and Microsoft have

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 11>stood out in terms of AI leaders positioning their product

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 11>lines early on for embedding AI services throughout and capitalizing

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 11>on the AI opportunity. But there are a variety of

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 11>them who are going to benefit up and down the chain.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 11>And I think what it comes down to is if

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 11>a company has a unique and important data set, if

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 11>they're embedded in their customers customers processes and workflows, and

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 11>if they're equipped to actually help customers deploy in a

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 11>safe and efficient manner, they should win. And this is

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 11>going to involve all hyperscale platforms, including clearly Microsoft, Amazon

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 11>because of its incumbency in corporate networks, Google because of

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 11>its deep history, and AIML and also Oracle, who has

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 11>an interesting place on AI.

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Hillary.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 4>We actually talk about Oracle much less than any of

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 4>those names on this program Blombow Technology, and it has

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 4>just also hit a fresh record high. So play that

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 4>scenario out for us. Why is Oracle kind of a

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 4>winner in this AI debate?

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 11>Well, Oracle has re architected its cloud, offering its infrastructure

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 11>cloud as a next generation cloud, taking many of the

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 11>best practices that the original cloud providers learned during their process,

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 11>and it has a unique take on how it's architectur

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 11>that infrastructure with some i'd call it network heavy capabilities,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 11>which should actually be quite valuable in because I think

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 11>we're going to have a period of proliferation of need

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 11>of base infrastructure build out to accommodate the very high

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 11>data volumes that AI will bring to us. I think

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 11>Oracle will be well equipped to handle that along with

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft and others. And Oracle also recently announced some important

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 11>AI partnerships with an LLM model company called Cohere and

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 11>with Nvideo, which I think will bring big dividends to

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 11>them over time. So there are a more recent but

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 11>important emerging beneficiary.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, not many people want to talk about how

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>expensive everything is, and we won't want to talk about

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>how expensive stalks are. We don't want to talk about

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 3>how expensive it is to run these large language models,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the amount of GPUs everyone's having to be buying. All

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 3>these companies pricing it right at the moment that seemed

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 3>to be making it up as they go on.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's such an interesting question.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 11>They're thinking quite a bit about how to price it,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 11>and we're starting to see emerging and pricing coming out

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 11>in the marketplace.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 8>I think so far.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 11>They're doing a good job in terms of pricing for

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 11>AI enabled services is actually quite high. In the case

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 11>of APIs on Azure op ai, they were multiples of

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 11>what a traditional AAPI would be to actually access marry

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 11>the data with the models and AI enabled applications or

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 11>priced anywhere from thirty to eighty plus percent what a

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 11>traditional application would be. But there's real value in them

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 11>because of the productivity benefits which will.

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 8>Accrue to the users.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 11>So at the end of the day, I think they're

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 11>starting to do a good job of providing the opportunity

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 11>for profit as well as revenue. Acceleration is due to

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 11>the uptake of as a result of the uptake of AI. Similarly,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 11>Salesforce just introduced their pricing of their AI enabled applications

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 11>last week and those applications are going to have a

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 11>perceipt component.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 8>As well as a usage component.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 11>I think you're going to see more and more creative

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 11>models around AI, and where there are productivity benefits to

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 11>be cornered, customers will pay for them.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 4>Hilly Fresh clear Bridge just deep research in AI. Time

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 4>for talking tech. First up, the can Lines International Festival

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 4>of Creativity is underway, and while it usually attracts the

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 4>most influential executives in advertising and platforms. Two Notebaule names

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 4>will not be in attendance. Elon Musk and Twitter's new CEO,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Linda Yakarino this is the social network works to win

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 4>back spending on the platform. However, on Tuesday, Twitter announced

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 4>that it will explore solutions from companies that specialize in

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 4>tracking the quality of ads and sticking with Musk, according

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 4>to sources, he's likely to meet with India's Prime Minister

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Arendramodi today on a visit to the US. The private

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 4>meeting is expected to take place early evening in New York.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Who comes after Tesla and India revived dialogue in May

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 4>following a year long standoff. Plus, Germany will funk a

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 4>finance a subsidy package worth ten point nine billion dollars

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>for a planned Intel facility in Magdeburg via it's Special

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 4>Climate and Transformation Fund that, according to people, formil of

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 4>the plans for more. Let's bring in Bloomberg's Aggie Cantrell

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 4>out in Berlin. Aggie, what's the latest on this one?

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 12>So this this investment of billion ten billion euros in

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 12>subsidies from the German government is going to be also

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 12>brought forward by thirty billion thirty billion euros as a

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 12>direct investment, the largest foreign direct investment in Germany's history

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 12>from any company. And Intel is going to be putting

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 12>forward thirty billion euros of its own money into this investment.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 12>And that is also critical because actually this is a

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 12>project that has been a long time in the works

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 12>and it was put on pause because Intel said the

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 12>costs were getting too high. Originally they committed to seventeen

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 12>billion dollars with subsidies of seventeen billion euros was six

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 12>point eight billion euros in subsidies from the German government,

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 12>and they went back to the negotiation table this year

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 12>because they were saying that it is costing them too much.

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 12>Economic headwinds are hitting the company and so they needed

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 12>more in terms subsidies. This is a question as well

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 12>for how much Germany is willing to front for these

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 12>companies to onshore a lot of this chip production.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Aggie, great round about. Thank you, Aggie Cantrell Baron Berlin for.

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 4>US, Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Ed Lovelow in San.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Francisco, and I'm Caroline Hider, New Yord.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's stick with the geopolitical. US Secretary of State Anthony

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Blincoln says he expects to see more communications between Washington

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 4>and Beijing following his visit to China, where he did

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 4>meet with President Jijingping. He spoke about it at a

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 4>press conference in London.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 13>The relationship and the communication between the two leaders, between

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 13>President Biden and President she is most important of all.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 13>That's why they've had a number of communications and meetings

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 13>to date, and that's why I expect you'll see more

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 13>of that in the time ahead.

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot to go over in the context of

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 4>foreign relations. Also the regulatory angle to all of this

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 4>that ties in, of course artificial intelligence and joining us

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 4>now for more is Andrew Bradford, professor at Columbia Law

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 4>School and author of the upcoming book Digital Empires, The

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Global Battle to Regulate Technology, coming out this September. Professor Bradford,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 4>thank you for your time. I think we start with

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 4>technology at the heart of what's happening between the US

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 4>and China. What do you make of mister b Lincoln's

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 4>visit to China and what it may or may not

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 4>have achieved.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 9>So thank you Ed for having me here.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 14>And obviously it's a good sign that at least the

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 14>US and China are talking, but the gaps between the two,

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 14>the interest and the ideologies surrounding technology.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 9>Are very part to bridge.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 14>So there are fundamental differences, for instance, when it comes

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 14>to AI. So first there's an AI race, the battle

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 14>for technological supremacy, but there's also a battle on how

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 14>we should think about building digital societies by deploying AI.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 14>So the US and the EU are very concern of

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 14>China's use of AI for digital surveillance and also the

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 14>exportation of those surveillance technologies around the world that then

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 14>increases China's influence and pushes the world towards potentially create

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 14>a digital authoritarianism.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 9>So that is certainly one tension.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>The other tension is how to regulate and protect people

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 3>in their own communities at a time where you also

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>don't want to stifle innovation as usual. It feels like

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the EU is getting their first in terms of thinking

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 3>about and processing actual regulation. We're anticipating the AI Act

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 3>later this week. I mean, can you bring us up

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 3>to speed with just how aggressive they are about not

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 3>only regulating the application of AI, but the underlying models

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the building of artificial intelligence too.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 14>So that is exactly right, Caroline so as expected, the

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 14>EU is ahead of the game and much more willing

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 14>than the US to regulate AI. So the EO wants

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 14>to also be ahead and try to make sure that

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 14>innovation takes place. But there are some really deep concerns

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 14>about how the AI potentially has harmful implications, how it

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 14>might compromise the fundamental rights, how it might then have

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 14>an adverse effect on democracy. So the EO has now

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 14>moved along with a very ambitious I'm not sure if

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 14>I use the word aggressive, but very ambitious AI Act.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 14>It was approved by the European Parliament this past week

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 14>and it's now up for a negotiations between the key legislators,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 14>the Council and the Parliament and the Commission, and potentially

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 14>we might see that law be finalized by the end

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 14>of the year. But the big challenge, as you noted,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 14>was that when we were already far along in the

0:23:55.160 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 14>legislative process, the CHAT, GPT and generative AI really to

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 14>the center stage in the conversations, and the legislative template

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 14>wasn't exactly designed for the kind of technology that generative

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 14>AI represents, so that the focus was really that we

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 14>look at how risky the application of the AI is

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 14>and then we adjust the regulatory applications accordingly. But obviously

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 14>these large language models can be used in very risky

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 14>settings or then in completely safe settings. And that is

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 14>now going to be one of the main conversations that

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 14>will be I believe, dominating the last steps in this

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 14>legislative process. But there will be a legislation forthcoming, and

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 14>the generative AI will not get a free pass.

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and you and I are Europeans, even though

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's not part of the EU. But Professor Bravn

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>wrote before the current book that's about to come up

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 3>about the Brussels effect, about the fact that Brussels getting

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 3>their first in times of regulation does set the standard,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>doesn't I just think of GDPR.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I spent many years in Brussels, Professor. It always

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 4>starts at a lower level. Twenty eighteen, the Expert Group

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 4>starts its work on AI. By comparison, your President Biden

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 4>flying into town this afternoon to San Francisco hosting a

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 4>meeting with these industry leaders. Which pathway is more effective

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 4>to getting actual oversight of the technology.

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 14>So I think whether there is an effective pathway that

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 14>would exclude the governments of the tech company so I

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 14>don't see that one way exclusively can necessarily work. But

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 14>the Europeans certainly are convinced that any governance of the

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 14>AI needs to be entrenched in legislation, in rule of law,

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 14>in democratic governance, and we certainly need to have transparency

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 14>and accountability so that we can have a democratic conversation

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 14>on how these companies are developing their models, how we

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 14>are deploying AI, so that it's consistent with our laws

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 14>and values. But at the same time, even the EU

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 14>is painfully aware of the challenges ahead the EU in

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 14>trying to legislate and to implement effectively this legislation, and

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 14>for that it does need the partnership of tech companies.

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 9>So I was encouraged to see.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 14>That even now, when we don't yet have the AI

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 14>Act in force, the Europeans and Americans are having a

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 14>conversation together with the tech industry trying to come up

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 14>with the kind of code of conduct that we already

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 14>have some guardrails that we all agree upon. And hopefully

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 14>that dialogue will then continue as the eel's legislative process

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 14>moves forward, and.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if that dialogue in any way starts to

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 3>drift between China and the US and Europe as well.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Ernie Bradford, fascinating comeback pieceing. We thank you, professor at

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 3>Columbia Law School. And we're coming up from FTX Ventures

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 3>to Menlo Ventures. Partner Amy Wu tries us to talk

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>about her big move, where she's investing, and how the

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 3>consumer and AI are and twining moment. This is bringing

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>back It's that time BC Spotlight and I'm very pleased

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 3>to welcome to the show today. Amy Wu, you know,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of course, a former head of Ftxpensures and as of

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 3>last week, partner at Menlo Ventures, planning the flag of

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>one of Silicon Valley's oldest bench firms right here in

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 3>New York City, although ironically today Amy are over there

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 3>on the West Coast, and I'm interested therefore your thesis

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>where you're looking for founders, what kind of companies or

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 3>where you want them to be based.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I recently started at Menlo Ventures, very excited, and

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 15>I'm going to be covering consumer and gaming investments over here.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 15>Is actually you know, Menlo doubling down and consumer investments, interestingly,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 15>at a time when a lot of funds for the

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 15>last few years have been rotating out of the category.

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 15>And and so you know, whether blockchain or non blockchain

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 15>ar VR, you know, it's a it's it's constantly an

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 15>area with new platforms and an innovation, new customer and

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 15>user experiences.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 16>So I'm really excited to be focused on the space.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 4>I guess Amy, it takes me to the why be

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 4>the GP for consumer and gaming. I'm assuming there will

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 4>be crossover in your previous work looking at blockchain. You know,

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 4>but I think about video games, as we know on

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 4>this program, video games is life. I think about collectibles

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 4>in games, tokens, things that you buy, security around that,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 4>and blockchain technology is that kind of how you're thinking.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 16>It's one of the areas.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 15>So I would say that, you know, if you look

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 15>at the history of consumer and gaming investing, particularly consumer investing,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 15>it's been driven new experiences have been driven.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 16>By platform shifts. And I would say that, you know,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 16>mobile was the last very large one.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 15>A lot of the you know, most you know, interesting

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 15>companies of like the last ten years.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 16>So if you look at Uber and in Airbnb, et cetera, I.

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 15>Really were created with you know, technology and innovations and mobile. Uh,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 15>Bloching is a promising you know, platform shift I would say.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 16>And still early.

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 15>There's been companies experimenting on you know, on chain, but

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 15>I think you know, it's said to be seen in

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 15>terms of mainstream adoption, and of course, you know, everyone

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 15>is very excited about the promises of Jenny I right

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 15>now as well.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 4>I think about your background, because Menlo is a different

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 4>firm and you firm, you know, reflecting on what's happened

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 4>in recent years, how much of the conversation with Menlo

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 4>was about what happened to FTX ventures. Was it sort

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 4>of any kind of barrier to moving forward working with them?

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 15>The short answer is no, I think that you know

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 15>they they know that you know myself, and to be honest,

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 15>like most employees, uh, you know, unfortunately we're we're misled

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 15>by the founder and and so most of our conversation

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 15>frankly was in terms of what I will be covering

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 15>and uh in my thesis areas for the future.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>You were actually only there for ten months. What do

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 3>you feel you've learned from the experience? An emotional one,

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure, and one of great hurt. But how ultimately

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 3>do you feel you will do business differently post FT extensions?

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 15>You know, I've been I've been a venture investor for

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 15>a long time. You know, I previously spent a few

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 15>years at lf Speed and before that at Insight, and

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 15>so in terms of being an investor, you know, I

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 15>haven't lost any passion for that. Uh and uh and

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 15>you know, excited to continue working with great founders and

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 15>and I think you know, there's been a lot of

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 15>learnings from FTX. I mean, first and foremost, it was

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 15>a very fast growing company that did real revenues and

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 15>uh and you know profits in the years that it

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 15>was in operation. But I think, you know, there's a

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 15>lot of uncertainty and tech and in you.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 16>Know, none of us really expected that to happen.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is we find ourselves in a new AI

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 3>hype cycle. It feels like Crypto was the hype cycle previously.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 3>AI is the new one, and you of course were

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 3>there within. Some of the savvy investments being made with

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 3>FTX Adventures was Yuga Labs, I think Aboard eight Yacht

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Club and just how that sort of became the number

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 3>one NFT. Anyone could really think of Sober Studios, the

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 3>webinary platform to build your own games. Are you thinking

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 3>this feels like a hype cycle? Again, how do you

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>make sure you have long term investments in the world

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of artificial intelligence and where that value rises Right now.

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 16>It's a really great question.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 15>I mean, AI has been a technology and development for

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 15>decades at this point, and it certainly had its iPhone moment,

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 15>I would saying the last fall with the with the

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 15>launch of chat GBT, and so you know, when I

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 15>was at Less, we had long time been invested in

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 15>investing in AI, and Millow has also been as well well,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 15>and so I would say that really the investment cycle continues.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 15>You know, with with jen AI, there is uh sort

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 15>of new surface area I would say in terms of

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 15>both increasing productivity of workers for example artists and gaming,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 15>but then also in terms of defining a new way

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 15>that people interact with computers and also you know converse

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 15>with computers, which is really interesting and has a lot

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 15>of ramifications.

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 16>And consumer experiences.

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 15>So those are all areas, Those are all areas that

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 15>will be really really interesting.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 9>To track.

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 6>Amy within video games?

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Are you interested in startups and companies that that want

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 4>to use generative AI progress on the content side? Where's

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the opportunity in gaming?

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 15>So a lot of tech actually I think originates from

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 15>gaming as a use case and the concepts of I

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 15>would say, like two areas of a lot of intense interests,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 15>which is procedure generation of content and games. And also uh,

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 15>you know, nvcs or interactions with bought players in the

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 15>game has actually been you know, in development for for

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 15>a couple of decades with the first Yablo game, you know,

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 15>with MMOs and uh. And so it's a concept that

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 15>I would say gaming founders and gamers know quite well.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 15>And and as such, you know, they're both sort of

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 15>wary about the hype cycle right now and gen Ai

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 15>investing and the promises of that, but also very very

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 15>keen to I would say, experiment with the technology.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 16>And at a higher level, I.

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 15>Think that you know, in these gaming studios have always

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 15>been uh disadvantage compared to incumbent large gaming companies when

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 15>it comes to budget, in in in sort of game design, marketing,

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 15>et cetera.

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 16>And so if gen Ai tooling is able to help, I.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 15>Would say, like, you know, augment what they are able

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 15>to create from a content perspective at cheaper costs than

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 15>levels of playing ground. I think it allows a lot

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 15>more games to be a release of a really high

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 15>quality and that's a that's a net plus for players.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 4>I love that your your mind went to non player characters.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of discussion around how let's just make

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 4>games better and more challenging and dream up worlds to

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 4>play in. Gotta gotta are gonna get too involved in

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 4>this video game chat. Got to get to your take

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 4>on consumer You kind of start this conversation saying you're

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of pivoting into something that others have pulled back on.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Is there a risk there?

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 16>So there's two things that are someone thinking has well.

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 16>The first is if you look.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 15>At you know, just the Nasdaq and S and P,

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 15>you know, some of the largest market cap companies or

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 15>consumer tech companies. On the other hand, you know, if

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 15>you look at the last i would say six seven

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 15>years or there hasn't been a lot of I would

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 15>say very large consumer tech companies that were newly founded

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 15>that has reached you know the scale Facebook and Amazon

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 15>and others. And I think one of the reasons is

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 15>because you know, incumbents were founded with pretty deep network

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 15>effects that are very difficult, and they have massive distribution,

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 15>and it's difficult for a new company to compete, and

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 15>so it remains to be seen whether you know, jen

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 15>Ai as a platform in new technology is going to actually,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 15>you know, benefit incumbents.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 16>More or new startups.

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 15>And I generally believe that for a new consumer tech company,

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 15>you really need a dream about a very new surface

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 15>of consumer experience to compete against incumbents.

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 16>Otherwise it's it's pretty difficult even today.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, Menlo Benures partner Amy will thank you so

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 4>much for your time in telling us about your new role,

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Caroline pivoting to another story a little bit AI related,

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's reporting that Spotify is bringing out a premium tier

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 4>dubbed Sue Premium internally. According to sources, there will be

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 4>an element that includes Hi Fi audio, not doing much

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 4>though to support the shares down to percentage points or so.

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 4>It's taken over the web. A submersible carrying five people

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 4>to tour the wreck of this Titanic on the Atlantic seabed,

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 4>missing on Sunday, and extensive rescue operations are still underway.

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloombog's John Gilterson joins us, John, what is the latest

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 4>on this search?

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, the latest on the search is that there are

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>more aircraft being dispatched to the region that are capable

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of searching below the surface. They've explored a lot of

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the surface with radar, with other search capabilities, but they

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't found any sign of it. So now they're looking

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>deeper under the surface for this missing submersible.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Has this happened before and could there be a chance

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 3>that satellite starlink is reconnected in some way?

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I suppose there could be a chance. The

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>craft itself has between seventy and ninety six hours of

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>oxygen from when it went down. We're now more than

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours into it, so the clock is definitely ticking.

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's the key thing is, like.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Can they locate this craft if it's still you know,

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a viable craft and bring the people back up to

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the surface and you have to unscrew.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 2>All the.

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 6>Port from the outside.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Those people inside, even if they floated at the top,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>couldn't open it themselves.

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 4>John, A big part of this story is who is

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 4>inside the submersible. That's why so many people are talking

0:37:57.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 4>about it online on social media.

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 6>Who this crew is?

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well it's a really you know, interesting international group.

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy named Hamish Harding who's a jet aircraft

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>broker from He's from the UK, but he lives in Dubai.

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>He also flew on Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin trip once. He's,

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, big explorer guy, the head of the company

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>that runs this diver Oceangate expeditions. His name is Stockton Rush.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>He's like a pilot of this crew. There's a Frenchman

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Paul Enri Narjalais, who is like under sea explorer guy.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a couple of two people from Pakistan,

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a father and son, Shizada and Suleiman Daoud, who are

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a prominent wealthy Pakistani family.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a story we're going to continue to track. We

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 3>thank you for taking some time out to join us

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 3>on television. Sean Girlson, thank you. And let's note that

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the Coast Guard is scheduled to hold a press briefing

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 3>involved the search efforts said in just a few minutes

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 3>from now over in Boston. Meanwhile, and that does it

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 3>for this addition of technology.

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, a lots of recap from the show. Global technology

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 4>stories from around the world. Check out the podcast Apple, Spotify,

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 4>iHeart and on Bloomberg from New York and here in

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco.

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg