WEBVTT - 5/6, Part 1: Modica Monday, FAAB Results, Two-Start SP

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, To to to Dia, to do too, to

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>do Dina too. Yeah, this is the Fantasy best Friends

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Forever here in the Fantasy Sports Ringing Network alongside Raggy staff. Well,

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sauceman that Moodica here as well from

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Medica Monday. How's going, Frankie? I'm doing all right, you know,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I have a little banged up like

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this fluctuation and weather like kind of like one day

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's warm, one day it's cold and rainy. It's all

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Uh. Drank a decent amount this weekend too,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So I've been better overall though, like yesterday seeing endgame,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>thought Game of Thrones was awesome. All right, how do

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you sleep? I was the weekend? My weekend was miserable. Man,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it was long. I so you want a long weekend? No,

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>not not this kind of long weekend. So like last Thursday,

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>I came on Friday and so I had a few

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>beers on Thursday night and it wasn't feeling good like

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw me. We all went out Friday night and

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, drank there as well. Then Saturday I had

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this party, drank some wine, came back, drink some beer.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>I was drinking all night. Then yesterday was saying to

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>my I went to my dad's who had shots lined

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>up for us when we got there, Like you said

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there would be Like I said, there were be healer shots. Well,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>but the thing is you do one and then he

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just he just pours the next one. That's what happens.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not it was fright. I just felt like my

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>friends were over like two thirty on Saturday night and

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I had to be my dad's like pretty early. I

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was like exhausted from this week, exhausted. I was probably

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>doing He's doing well, man, he's doing well. But I

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sleep last night. I had some trouble falling asleep. Um,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and they went to sleep and I woke up very refreshed,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>which is nice. I feel good now. But I did

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend. I was just tired all weekend.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you had fun. It sounds like you're

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just complaining because you're kind of old. Maddiemo. What's going

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on you man? Happy Monday? Frank, would you like your

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>shout at tequila? I'm down now, bring him down, Bring

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>him on down Happy Britos. Yeah what, but no, I agree.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I took Game of Thrones was actually really good last night.

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>UH won some fat bits and you know we got

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>an early game this week. Give me honest with you.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I really like Thrones last night. I really didn't. They

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>were just telling me downstairs and said, oh yeah, Greg

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>hated last night's episodes. I really, I was really disappointed. Bot.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>It was better than last week. I thought it. I

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>thought it dragged a lot. I thought that there was

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>way too much like fan service and Brandon Jamie's literally

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>just all the fans want to Brann and Jamie. Let's

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>give him Brandon. Jamee me, this is stupid. As a

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>wrestling fan should be able to appreciate service. But didn't

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you love the second episode, which basically all service? Agreed,

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with the fan service now, Matt. We did it.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't need another episode of it. I completely agree.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>And then I said this last season, in the season

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>before that, but you can't spend the first three seasons

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>going from point A to point B like it takes

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the entire season to get there, and then in this

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>season because it's the last few episodes, like they go

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to King's landing by the staff of a finger and

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's literally in the water using arrows to

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>kill a dragon is then back with Cercy within five minutes.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>They're like bothered the crop out of me. And I thought, Matt,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that would bother you too. I mean it does. But

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we're at the point I think once the old man

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>when they ran out of his material, I know he

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>still consults. It hasn't been the same and good. I

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>still enjoy it tremendously, but I was pretty I thought that.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought the the moment of the whole show was

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Arias Stock breaking hearts. I like that. That was great.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I loved it. I I actually read a pretty interesting

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>analogy about um, the guys who took over writing the

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>show after George R. Martin. Yeah, it's it's like it's

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like an artist who it's really good at sketching

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>other people's work, but now they have to do their

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>own work, and you can just tell that it's noticeably different, Like, yeah,

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>it's actually like a total that's great. Like the like

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>season six, seven, and the first six seasons were really good, right,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Season seven and eight seem like they've been a little

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>bit rush and a little bit more Hollywood overall. Exactly.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I really last night just because I felt like it

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>was a call back to we had a bunch of

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>different things that we saw earlier on. We had that

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>all season long, will be fair to me, it felt

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like more so than every before, like we had all

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>these callbacks like old things that used to happen, Like

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the conversation between Tyrian Andvaris that was like so old

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>school Game of Thrones. I mean that that was I

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't agree that's having everything arras Barrats hasn't been like

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the Spider in a while, sure, but like you have

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the last week, you have Milissandre and already have a conference,

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the same conversation they had. It seem two that the

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing, right, It's just overall it just felt like

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>they were It was just they give you a little

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of everything, Like there was a little bit of comedy,

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>There was drinking, there was a sex scene. There was

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like multiple deaths. Like also it was ridiculous the dragon

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>died from these arrows after they had a hundred thousand

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>weights on them last week, like a billion things trying

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to kill this dragon and he just swapped them away. Yeah,

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's a little bit easier to

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>like shake off some like dead people other than getting

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the dead. The dead people was pounding on you. There

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was the question I had, how if she's flying over

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know, she over the ocean, how do you

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>how do they not see the ships? So that was

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>my first That was my first day, you, Matt. The

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>second issue is one dragon goes down. Right, she sees this,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>she's next to the dragon it goes down. Why doesn't

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>she immediately just blow fire and kill everybody immediately? I'm

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of with you. My wife was very sad, though

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>very sick. Really, yeah, she was sad about the dragon.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Mr Modco set about the drag. We had to press

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>pores for a minute. We got the mad the Mad

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Queen has arrived. Some would argue that the mad Queen

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>has been in How are all along, Greg, No, mad

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Queen's about to Well, I'm just referring to sure, she's

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy, so do we? So I guess with two

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>episodes ago, who do you think ends up on the throne. Well,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>my my pick before the season was John Snow and

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sticking by it. See, I'm just hoping it's not

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>John Snow. Ordinarius. That's just too obvious. The show has

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>never been about being obvious. I felt reading the books

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>she years ago, it would be Gendri and Aria. But

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>are you know, kind of killed that one for me.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>So I think, in a crazy way, a great ending

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>would be winning. It would be nobody expects. Everybody's expecting

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to see how she dies and how Aria kills it.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I'm really being Songs is gonna

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>end to the throne at this point. Who can't keep

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a secret? But who look at secret? But like that

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>she that was another issue right like in seven at

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>one point of this one, I didn't notice this one.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It was like, tell Songs of the secret, sons, I

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hold the secret for one scene. The next scene

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>she tells the Darian. Well, I mean I've read a

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lot about it. It's very like what she's doing right now,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>little finger. So that's cool. So I like that, Like

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that to me is awesome. She's clearly little fingering the

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>crap out of this, which is awesome. Maybe we should

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>talk Basbo why I don't know. People are getting mad

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at it. I don't know. And every other podcast, the

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Athletics podcast Game of Thrones, Pat Mano podcast, Game of Thrones.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't Game of Thrones for the first twelve minutes.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Too bad, We're gave Thrones in right now. Well have

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>two more weeks to do this anyway, Hey man, I'm

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'm cool with it. Maybe it's a start

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>today that I don't know people are all upset about.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand how people are playing on platforms

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>still in twenty n team that the whole week's lineup

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>locks on first pitch. That I don't get. You don't.

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that. It's kind of similar to the

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>way fantasy football works too, Like if your players are

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>playing at one, those players should lock. The rest of

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>your players if they played four, if they played eight,

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>if they play on a night football, it shouldn't lock.

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>It should be the same thing for fantasy baseball. So

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree, yea, I'm completely with you. Let's get to

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the waivers now, though, because I feel like you s

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>thought my momentum friend, So um, I'm gonna let's go.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into waivers now. High bid this week we

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>said it wasn't a great week of bids. Who in

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the main event was the highest bid this week? Frank.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The highest bid this week was in my league in

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>my main event was Griffin Canny for a hundred and

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dollars all right, number one Vivin Cannon. We

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>thought we had talked about him. Make makes sense. Not

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount by any means, but Griffin Canning goes

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for the most matt where you went on him. I

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>listen on him in several leagues. I got him in

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a few. In the main event with Frank, I had

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Low and Canning. I forget who I had on top

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of each other. I had them. I was like the

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>top two picks. I had it at ninety nine. I

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>moved it to one on nine. I should have just

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>left it at ninety nine. But I think you know

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what a guy like Canning. It's the strikeout upside. Uh.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>It's a team that's so desperate for starting pitching, and

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>in this landscape, everybody you know, you just you have

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep adding strikeouts. There's more strikeouts. Everybody's striking people out,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>so in order to be competitive, especially in the fifteen

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>team league, you gotta keep adding that factory. I agree,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>i'm i'm I liked what I saw from Griffin Canning

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the first start too. He wasn't terribly efficient in that

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>start creak. He could, he didn't go deep into that game.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But no prout with the fast bill. He has to

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitches that he used, and I like the bite

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen on those on those two breaking pitches

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that he was using. And he's got a two start

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>week this week or two. So that's just adds a

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit, you know, adds a little more uh price

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>there on the fab bid a little bit more. But overall,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean they think he has someone that should stick around.

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>The Angels are desperate for pitching. Their pitching staff has

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just got awful. They continue to throw Matt Harvey out there.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Modica, but the days of the Dark Knight

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are long gone. Oh yeah, no, I'm with you on

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the days of the Dark Knight. One quick thing is,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so certain Canning has a too start week

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think Sunday Nick Tropiano is a very real

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>possibility and a six man rotation, So you know, it

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a little dependency how that works out, but I think

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for now I have it as Trupiano on Sunday, others

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>having his Cannon getting the start, So we'll see, Yeah,

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I've heard some rumors about this too, that he might

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not have a two start weeks, so yeah, something to

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to. But either way, um, he does have

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>some upside and I don't hate the price that he

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>went for here, a hundred and thirty five dollars. But

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>big Nicky T. Huh Nick Tropiano, that's coming in? God,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a thing again. I wish it

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>confused with Nick Triviano and Nick Tefish's about big nicky Man,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Big Nicky T. Yeah, both guys don't deserve a nickname.

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Not great starting pitchers. But for whatever, we're still rolling

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>out with that. Well, that would suck if he ruins,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if he's the one to ruin to star to star

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>week here for Griffin Kenny overall, I mean, you know,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>if they go with a six man rotation, it's gonna

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be pretty hard to get two star weeks out of anybody.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just a matter of do they continue

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it week in a week out. I guess

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out. Ye absolutely all right, who's next? My

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>friend set up? Is your boy Matt Modica fitting on

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Nate Low got him for a hundred and nine dollars,

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>which I don't. I don't hate the price either. I've

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>seen other leagues where um, you know, we play in

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the league together. The g D D D fifty team

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>total lead, he went for thirty five dollars out of

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred. So that's thirty of your fab and uh,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Modica get them here for for one or nine. What

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do you like about a Modica? I just think he's

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's hit at every level. Uh, he should

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be in the heart of that lineup. One up that

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>As of the other day when I was watching the

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Raised game, they had scored in the first inning nineteen

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>times out of in their first thirty two games. So

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's something thing you have to you know,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take shots. I think the guy has. You know,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna be a batting average drain.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he can produce runs. And you know, one

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>thing I will have to do going forward is really

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>tighten the wild. This is where I'm usually at in

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like mid June as far as when I have left hand,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm like a month I had a schedule this

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>year and pretty much with most of my teams. But

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think once you hit that spot, you just gotta,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, reassess and restrategize. But I'm happy with the

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>players I've got good, you know. So Nate Low, you

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in our just hely went for one sixty three, so

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not just similar, um, not too dissimilar to say to

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what Matt throughout one oh nine. And in the main

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>event Nate Low, Uh, well, we'll see. We we we own

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>him in the island. It in a couple of leaks actually,

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so let's hope it goes well. Yeah, he hasn't put

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>much together yet, but I agree with, you know, everything

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that Matt said about him. He's hit across all levels.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Last year across I believe it was two or three

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>different levels, he had three thirty seven home runs, So

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the hit tool seems pretty legit. And he's got a

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of pop two and its Tampa Bay Ray's lineup.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pretty good one all season long. I

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think they've been pretty surprising. They always find ways to

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of just put together a scrappy line up. Scrappy's

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>probably the word that you're always gonna use when associated

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Rays. They is kind of piece things together,

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but it works out. And this is all with Austin

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Medals on the I L two. So he'll be back

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at some point and that will make the lineup even better. Great,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope, so, I hope that's that's the case. Frank,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's um. I think it's funny. I'll say

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this rafter the break when hitting to the closers here

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with David Steo has a robos. I want to get

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Kelly as well, So I'm gonna save that um

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for after the break to go to Hudson went for

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven dollars Matt in your main event. How come

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>almost ten percent was spent? Hudson? I mean, I guess

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the two start week. He was somebody I wasn't

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>sure I was gonna get it. I thought maybe Daniel

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>pont de leone Frank just in the uh in over

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, But it looks like Hudson, we'll get that.

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>To start. He did beat up and pitched very well

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>against a beat up on nationals Aline per meant to say, so,

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too crazy about him. I think maybe his

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>best attribute for this team at some point is a

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple inning reliever. I think he could really excel in

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that aspect. But right now, Sair Lewis has given him

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the chance and it's not somebody I said, I just

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>don't trust him really, going, uh, don't really trust him

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this week? Yeah, the it's one matchup against Philly. It's

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one matchup again and Pittsburgh here, So obviously really like

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh matchup. Although the lineup has come around a

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Brian Reynolds is playing well, starring Marte Hits

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the walk off homer yesterday, Gregory Polanco back in the

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>lineup as well, so it is a lineup that's coming around. Overall, Um,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>still a favorable matchup, but against Philadelphia, I don't love

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that one. I kind of agree with Matt like he

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a guy that I was adding, I guess in

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team or if you're just you know, you're

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>just tasting the two star weeks. I get it. I

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have spent that much money on him, and overall,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>just I don't really like the player that much either.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So I wasn't in on the bidding on Dakota Hudson anywhere.

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't anywhere either. That was he was honestly just

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not even on my radar here. Um this week I

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>kept saying it was a not a huge, huge pitching

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>week or it really hit her week. Either. Some of

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the names that we went over, the names we've gone

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>over for a while. One more name before we hit

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the break. It's Rani Rodriga As We started a DFS

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on Friday night because he was super cheap. But he's

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>betting like fifth for the Tigers. He's a pretty good guys. Yeah,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he has been. I text you about you, thisterday. Um,

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he's interesting. I looked at his numbers, only twelve games,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but he has three homers, nine runs scored, eight rbi.

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Is depending on where you play. He has eligibility everywhere too.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh so eight percent walk great, twenty six percent line

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>drive rate, forty four percent flyballs, fifty percent hard hit rate.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So he's hitting the ball hard. He's hitting enough flyballs,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting line drives. The Tiger's lineup is not a

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>great one, but it seems like for the time being,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Greg he's gonna play quite regularly and he's hitting the

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>ball extremely hard. So I understand people wanted to jump

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in here. Matt, did you have any bids on Ronnie Rodriguez?

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I did not, Um, I remember that game A week

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>or two ago versus the Red Sox. So it was

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a Monday or Tuesday earlier game where he just went

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>off put on a show versus I remember that, Uh

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>first thing I came to Mars would have a guest

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>was a short stop. You know, I doubt it if

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to spend a couple of dollars, you know,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>if it's like a free bid, why not. Right, If

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a free bid, why not forty bucks um

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in one league? That more than more than I would

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>have expected, though, you know, maybe like a two percent

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that out of a thousand. But don't underrestate.

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't underrestate. I like him, but what do you We'll

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>get into the closers are picked up in the latest

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>injuries as well to BFFs. I'm on that. Hey, thanks

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.239
<v Speaker 1>for downloading the podcast, and remember if you want to

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download the

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports Radio

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guessed it Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoyed the show and thanks for listening.

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports, Ragdio Network. A couple

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>of starting pitture injuries I want to get to in

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a few moments out of nowhere ridiculous and David Price

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and Jamison ti On I was very annoying, very terrible. Um,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get to that in a little bit. I

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go over the relievers that went for a

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of money in all of our leagues. We

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>begin UH in the main event once again with Diego

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Castillo for the Tampa Bay Raised. It's been a mess

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt this season in Tampa Bay with Alvarado and Castillo

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and Jose Alvarado. UM, there's been very very little clarity here.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think cast you? I mean everyone wants closers, Well,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>why cast you at eight? I get I think he's

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>very talented. I thought I'm a I don't had a

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>shot to be one of the best closures this year.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Given a full opportunity with the role. UH starting off

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>good the first week, it's quickly evaporated. UH. Pagan was

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy I got for forty nine dollars the week prior,

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and I had Diego as my top uh big for

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that week, but then Bagan went out and saved three games,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so I flipped them, and I probably want casteod Agant.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was not really a Progott believer, but I thought

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd go from more than forty nine at eighty one

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>with CASTEO. I'm fine with. Yeah. And it's not just

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what he does with the saves too, because he doesn't

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get a ton of strikeouts. Greg he has a good

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>e r A, a good whip. He's got a two

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>two O e r A. He's got twenty strikeouts in

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and a third endings pitch, so he's being used

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He's got a one oh four whip. Um,

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you know there there's been let's see here, there's between

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>those three there's been eleven saves and it's been flick

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>quite evenly. I mean, Jose Alvarado has four, geokst has

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>four and Emilio Pagan has three. So wouldn't surprise anyone

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>if if this continues to happen, you you get maybe

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fifteen saves out of the guy, but really

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>good numbers outside of that too. It's frustrating for fantasy overall.

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>They're they're using three different closers here, but it's working

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for them. It always works for the Rais. They know

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing there. Um, they're kind of ahead of

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>their ahead of the pack when it comes to stuff

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like this. So uh, it's again, it's just frustrating, But

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I us understand why he went for that much. Everyone's

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to get saved and it's not like saves the

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>only thing he gives. It gives you good er a

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>whapons strikeout, no, no doubt about it. And our GST

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>league Shawn Kelly was out there. He went for three

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars. Wow, Wow, that's crazy. That's a lot

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of money. That is a lot of money, much more

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>than you know, I think he should have been in

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe eight nine range. Maybe Yeah, if you need a closer,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you go over a hundred for them. But it weson

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>go about this with Brad Ziegler last week. Greg, do

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you don't know how long he's going to

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have this closer job for now? As long as he

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>performs well, he should hold on to it for the

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>time being. But they gave le Clerk a contract extension

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>before the season for a reason. He's younger. They're they're

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>tied to him, and wouldn't surprise anyone if this team

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is out of it a mid season and they trade

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>away Shawn Kelly to another team that needs a reliever,

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't surprise me at all. I mean, I get

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick up you know, maybe and twelve saves

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>something like that, but I mean, there's just there's not

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>much reassurance here when it comes to Kelly. Three fifty dollars,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. That's probably three times as much as

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Easy probably so givers. You know, yeah, it's crazy, it's

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of cash for Sean ll. You have

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>any shares with Shan Kelly, what do you do? I

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think sure, I might have one, not that I

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't h you know, when he was going for cheap

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when you can get up for like twenty bucks before

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he was named the closuring Clark was struggling. I understood

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that I had him in one spot and dropped them.

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So that wasn't a good move. But I still think

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the clerk is going to get a shot at the

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>job back. I mean, for anything, if your Texas you won't.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, they gave him a contract, but you want

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this guy performing and the possibility of being able to

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>flip him at the break along with a guy like

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Marnin and try and build his team up, saving

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>several pictures for their future. I was surprised again at

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that much money um for me. The next guy in

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the main event was Hansel Robless at sixty three dollars.

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>He had another reliever, Saith Lugo. I go at sixty one.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I assume that was because familiar gets hurt and said

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Lugo be the next guy up and when he has

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>get hurt, is that is that the idea? So there

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>was no backup bit on this. So its just I

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>think everyone was kind of thrown off a little bit

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>by it. He went for as much he did. But

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the only thing I can think about for the six

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there is the Stephen matt snews that broke and would

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they give him a shot in the rotation or something

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. Bus I mean, I don't I don't him

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get any shames. Yeah, so I thought about that too.

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>No matter, you always loved you, you love lu But

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with with without Steven Matts for the next start or

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>two or three, someone's in a replacement one I don't

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's just gonna be Lugo. I think they like

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen. How how it's been for the most part.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't see them as making that movie and throwing

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Lugo in the rotation. That would surprise me a bit. Yeah,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I think to surprised all of us. Again, there was

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>no backup bids, so you know, maybe if you speculate,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you throw like twenty bucks on him, something small like that.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But hey, I guess you look, you want to go

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>out and get your guy. You think he's really talented,

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>which he has shown the past couple of years. He's

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a talented picture, but hasn't really had his opportunity to

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>start all that much. It seems like he's kind of

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>adapted well to this, uh, this reliever role where he

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>comes in, maybe gets used for an ending, maybe two innings, um,

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's you know, he's got the eleven case for

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>nine this year. He's performing very well. So I understand

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's always had a guy who has the high

0:23:58.400 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>spin rate on the curveball. He has a very good

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>cur a ball. But overall it could be a short

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>term stay in the rotation if you were to get there.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>We don't even know. He's not just she's not stretched

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>out enough. I really would be surprised if if Seth

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Lugo up Marcus got hurt too. Maybe it's a little

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more likely now. I mean it's it's that might

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be additioned by subtraction. That's fair. They should. He hasn't

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>been awful this year. I know, it's like his past

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>three or four stars hasn't been awful. It's been serviceable.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But you heard, you heard over the weekend that Blake

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>trin And had some elbow soreness and like, oh god,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like he's gonna be okay. Felt much

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>better yesterday. Took some uh Adville has an m r

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>R today. But everybody picks up Luke Trevino and like

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>forty six dollars at say, a nice five for Trevino

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>if he was available. He wasn't the main event. He's

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in my other leagues. Trevino's out there. But the crazy

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>thing about what Trevino was he pitched like once last week.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>That was the first time he pitched like two weeks

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>even though he wasn't on the if dealing with an

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>injury himself. So as good as Trevino is He's definitely

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the handcuff here. You do have a little injury worry there.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought Trevino at forty six, Matt and your main

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>event was actually very goodbye. Oh no, it was I

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>was trying to get Trevino. I treated that last night.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>He was the one that got away. I'm still really

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>concerned about Blake try and the thing with Trevino is,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>much as I love him and all the ratios that

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>come with it, would the A's give story a shot.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I know he hasn't pitched well this year, especially walk

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Park, but you know guys that have that experience,

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>managers for some reason always go to them and maybe

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>still used Trevino in his role. That was my one

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>thing I was concerned about. But Trevino was a guy

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I had forty four dollars one league. I was tired

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and lost and pretty much around that price. But uh,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he was a good this week. Even if

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>even if everything's all right with Blake Charling. It was

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a great speculative when have two responses to Madiga. First,

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>when he said the one that got away, instantly thought

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 1>of Katie Perry, so to throw it back there and

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then too, I actually agree with you. I wrote about

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this on my Patreon Greggy ding that, Um, I think

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if something were actually happen to Trying, and I think

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they would keep lu Travino in the role that he

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>has been in, which is you can use him in

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a multiple inning set up role. He's been really good

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at that role. Kind of reminds me a little bit

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the High Butchery and Handsel Robost situation in l A,

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>where they have guys like Soria and Fernando Rodney. While

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been good and there honestly not very good anymore,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they do have closing experience, and I think Trevino, being

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as good as he has been in his role, I

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they would take him out of that.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's an okay by at that price.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It is not like you break the bank and Trevino

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>as another guy who gives you strikeouts. He gives a

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>good ar a good whip. So if they just want

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to put the best reliever in there, if something were

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen to Trying in like long term, then um,

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that wouldn't make sense. I wouldn't blame them,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>but I also could see the other side of that,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>as Mett Moodiga says, they could go to one of

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>these veterans, whether it's Soria or Rodney. I know Rodney

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>blew another one yesterday, but for whatever reason, he still

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>gets the same opportunity wherever he's seventy five years old

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and still still pointing the arrows to the sky. Can

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I send one thing real quick? Frank? You the reference

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you got when I said the one who got away

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>was Katie Perry for me? That was from l A

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Confidential when Kevin Space about to die, and it says

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Rollo Tomassi, the one who love it. Frank doesn't know

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what confidentialist. It's fantastic film. Excellent, excellent film. I do

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like good films. Great it is. I don't know you

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like this one? That? Why is that? It's not really

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>your time? It's like a it's like a no war film. Yes,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it definitely filmed the war. That's right out. Okay, it's

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>fantastic film. I can't give it a hall enough ready

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>l A Confidentially. I'll write it down and write it

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>down in the notes. Always down for some good movies.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Saw Endgame yesterday. No spoilers. I'm not saying anything it

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>was all I thought. It was that I enjoyed it.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It was though, really I thought the what was the

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>one previous? If in any war? I thought that was better.

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a tough act to follow. They're both

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>really damn good, but it's just, uh, the way that

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they basically wrapped up the past, like eleven twelve years

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of Marvel movies. I thought it was really really well done.

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It was a good movie. I liked it a lot.

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>At what point do you guys like to give spoilers

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to this? I don't know what's what's the ruling. I don't.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't even I don't want. I don't want

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to say anything because it might be you know, some

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>people might not be able to like go to the

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>movies and go see it and might have to wait

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>till it comes out on whatever, you know, DVD, Netflix, whatever.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm probably just not going to talk about it

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for like the next year anything that happens to be fair.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't want. I don't want to. I

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to, you know, running the producers saying that

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>when I can say spoilers, can give it out. Yeah,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sign for jumping in there. But one of the producers

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>said this Monday, you're allowed to reveal spoilers. I don't

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with that too. I'm kind of like with Frank,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one of my friends who came with me to the

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>movie on the list Tuesday, it's like half price tickets.

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I paid for them, and uh, He's like, you can't

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>tell anybody in my family because you're waiting for my

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>daughter to come home from college. We're going to a family,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, some people still won't be able to

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>see it for another week or two. So I don't

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's right to say anything. And I say all that,

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and we just poke about everything to happen in Game

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones, so that was fine. Line TV. It's different, yeah,

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, you should have watched Game of Thrones

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. I'm sorry. Yeah, it's a little bit different

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for you. It's it's such an a point where it's like, musty,

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I wait till ten o'clock because of Fab but you know,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>oh fab before Game of Thrones? Really MOI, yeah, I

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>have to do. Yeah. I saw Matt actually tweeting about

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, gave of Thrones time like at ten thirty

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that last night. Yeah. I actually I texted and make

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sure he was coming on today, and good thing. I

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>didnt say anything at first, like or did you watch Thrones?

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Like no, well I'm watching it now, so all right,

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say anything. Really good episode though, yes, right, Greg,

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to not spoil stuff. I mean, man Um

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple other relievers before get back to the injuries.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw in your Great Fantasy baseballationally had a mere

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Garrett go. He's very very good for the Reds, but

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'll do anything get saves Frank

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and Wrestley Glaciers blew another one yesterday and it funds

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like gup, like there are a few names. He has

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a lefty, so it's tough to normally give Um a

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>lefty the closer job if someone were to struggle. I

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>still think that they have a lot of confidence and

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a decent leash when it comes to Rice

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Ley Glaciers but again blows another saved yesterday. A mere

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Garrett has been awesome at one point eight four year

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>A has got over eleven case for nine. It's been

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>really good. But I believe like Robert Stevenson has been

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in that bullpen. No David Hernan has picked

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>up a save earlier on in the year UM for

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati as well, So I don't know that he's the

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>next man up. I think it's uh, it's kind of

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about. Um, you want to be one

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>week earlier rather than one week late. So I think

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of speculation. And especially if that owner,

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>uh it's actually clay link of rotal wire. If he

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>owns Rightley Glaciers, it probably makes even more sense for

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>him to own a mere Garrett. Um, is this anything

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that you've thought about? Mad? Do you think, uh, we're

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in danger of losing saves here for Riceley Glaciers. I mean,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if we're endangered just yet, and maybe they decide to

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>use him more, uh in in in a different role

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point. They hit that at that before the season.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But I still think he's gonna get the opportunities. I

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't disagree with Garrett. Garrett has been awesome.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I hate that. You know, it's it's right to say it,

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but I don't understand why. If you're a left handed

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>pitcher and you're dominant, Uh, you know you should get

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. But Robert Stevenson has been a very good

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>surprise this ship. So even one of those two are

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>nice options. And I get it. If I don't Garrett,

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I would want to go one or the two. I

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>might have want Stevenson just because of that stupid, you

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>know rule with the left handers. The other reliever not

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>really relieving we ever started it. You wanted everywhere, Frank,

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you got him anywhere, but you

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>asked about him constantly. That was Jalen Beaks, And I

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's worth bringing up as we get into

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the starting pitching now for this week, because Jalen Beaks

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is not a starter for the race, but plays the

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>multi inning role, essentially the Ryan Yardboro role um for

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, and he does not start with pitches three,

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>four or five innings, and he's actually been very very good.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a former Red Sox, one of their higher level prospects,

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and was traded away in the Eovaldi deal last season.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Why did you want Jalen Beaks, who in our G

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>S T League went for a hundred and twenty six

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars just for the reasons you mentioned, right, So he's

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>playing that role where he comes in and and last

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>time that he came in technically for relief, you know,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>six and two thirds and he pitched six strikeouts. He's

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>been really good overall in the year ago. He's got

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a two four or five year, he's got twenty six strikeouts,

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty five and two thirds and he's pitched. So

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better in roto than and like head

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to head points leagues, just because you don't know how

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>many anything he's gonna throw roll. But I do think

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that when he pitches, he's gonna give you strikeouts. He's

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you pretty good peripherals. He's got a swinging

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>strike right that's right around twelve percent. So overall, I

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just think he's a good picture. And as long as

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going with these multi dings. I mean, the last

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>time before h this one when he went six and

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:16.719
<v Speaker 1>two dirts, he went four and two thirds and had

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts. So he's been really good when they're giving

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>him an opportunity. And he had really good numbers in

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues last year as well with the Red Sox.

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So overall, I just think he's a good picture. So

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any problem with him how much did

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you say you went for He went for one hundred

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six dollars. Yeah, that's probably too much. I

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>would have settled in maybe like fifty sixty bucks something

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like that and half the prices. But I do think

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.959
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna give you quality innings whenever he's in there. Okay,

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>any answers in you and Jalen Beaks here met let

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank said, I would have maybe capped out out of

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty bucks. I get it for the you know, if

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a winds league as well, and he comes

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>into the second inning or so and gives you three

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>four innings and could be the guy who qualifiers to win,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>plus get you the strike ats and ratios. So I

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>do get the appeal. I just don't get the price.

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just way too much. And I'm somebody

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>that's not afraid to spend, but I think that's going

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit too high. Kind Yeah, process is too high. Greg,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know you you're just smiling with it. Was funny,

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I love, so they laughed. Jalen Beeks has been, uh,

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the guy pitching after Ryan Static and when the static

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>starts constantly, guess he's like, isn't the fourth starter. Maybe

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>next year will turn into a real starter. Jian Beeks

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>h someone who have on your radar other starters that

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>were picked up. We talked a lot about Anthony DeSclafani

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>last week. Two starts this week against San Francisco. UM.

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 1>We had to pick up Zach Eflins. We idiotically dropped

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>him last week. That was on me for falling asleep,

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so I apologize. So I thought you pulled a quick

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>one last night to Greg, I did it. So you

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>stopped answering us for about twenty minutes. So he Flory

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and Greg, we we put our bids in after Game

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones, around like ten thirty eleven. I started that conversation,

0:34:58.080 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, let's do this now before we fall asleep.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Times Greggy falls asleep. I mean, come on, you know

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. So I'll be very honest with what happened here.

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>So I started the conversation. I was like, I want

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this before we start falling asleep. It's like

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>about ten thirty now, and frankly, I'm here. Let's do it.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So he asked the first player, I immediately give a response,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, before if anyone can respond, next player, I

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>give response. Next player. Judy comes down and goes, I

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about some wedding stuff. I'm like, oh god,

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and there goes Greggy. It was honestly perfect, Matt. I

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>had Barrier on in the background. I was doing waivers

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and there comes Judy. Barry gets paused. Next thing you know,

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a half hour later. She goes back into the

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bedroom and these guys are basically done with waivers, and

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I felt bad, like, guys, drop the f bomb. I'm here,

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready, here's my thoughts and these bids and it's like,

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, cool, all right, cool, completely honest. I texted

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Floria on the side, I said, can you believe this guy?

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's do waivers and many leaves. It wasn't my fault.

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I was there. Hey, we still got it.

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I was there, all right, the injuries and what do

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>we do next? From the NFL to the NBA. Daily

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Rohodo dot com is the place to win millions in

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>daily fantasy. You can get the best DFS NFL coverage

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>all season long for a price of one nine nine,

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm with the

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Elite package at month. If you use the promo code

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>f n t s Y, you get ten percent off

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily rodo dot com,

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pick your NFL Elite package, enter promo code f n

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>t s Y and you'll be on your way to

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>becoming the next Daily Rhodo Millionaire. Yeah, yeare top forty

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>h It's mid yet time for those taking in the

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine NFL Draft as they get introduced to their

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>new teams, playbooks and start starting up twenty NFL season.

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The fantasy foball enthusiast and NFL bettors, you guys need

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to start doing your homework too. You're serious about fantasy

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>football and wagering on the NFL futures or contest is

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>never too early start preparing with season. Roto Experts has

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you cover with their NFL three sixty five Fantasy football

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>package becausely the best math based seasonal projections and rankings

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>available anywhere on the internet. Our guy Davis Maddock and

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Roto Experts providing NFL at dynasty season long betting

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>bestball and you have content each and every day and

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they give you an edge regardless of what type of

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football you played. While they also provide you with

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all the data and insight you need to be successful

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at the betting window. Same temper said everyone who Experts

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com with the promo code fmcs why Deeptember sent

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>off with the promo code fcs Y. The NFL three

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>six five Fantasy Football package is available right now only

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at roto Experts dot com. There you go, So let

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>me start over the weekend. We'll get more from doctor

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>right on Thursday. But Jamie tie On out of nowhere

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>elbow discomfort, which turns into going to Andrews and then

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>all check and he's not coming back anything that soon.

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>This is called that modica a disaster. They say, no bueno,

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>no bueno. Uh, funny enough. Right before the season that

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>weekend tout Wars Weekend, I was having lunch with Michael

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Salfino and he mentioned that Um Thailand was one of

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the leading candidates for an arm injury, which I really

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hadn't heard elsewhere due to his velocity and stuff like that.

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is unfortunate, doesn't sound good, And you know

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this has gotta be at least six weeks before you

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>see him throw a pitch, even if it's good, so

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he might be out for like two months. If that's

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the best Cats scenario. Yeah, he's not taking up a

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ball for the next four weeks. That's terrible. So he's

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not to get a ball in the next four weeks.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So he takes up a ball in the middle of June,

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and you gotta how everything feels right. Then you gotta

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>hope that he's fine. Realistically, it might be post All

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Star break. I just hold him out through that almost

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like Yeah, I mean, look, this is a guy who's

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously dealt with a lot already in his career um

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven years old. He was not pitching up to

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>what we expected so far this season. Greg. I wonder

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if part of the reason why he was a candidate

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>for an arm injury this year he does so hard.

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He throws mid nineties. But he so he introduced the

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>slider last year, Greg, But he's like, really up to

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>his slider usage just here, it's up to thirty two percent.

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about a guy who just introduced a

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>slider last year mid season and then starts throwing it

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as much as he is this year. I guess it's

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>really not all that surprising that he's dealing with an

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>elbow injury right now. So it sucks. Look, it seems

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like every single day there's players dropping like flies, not

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>just Yankees anymore, because you know James Paxton dealing with

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the knee injury, and I know that's that's gotta be

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 1>one that hits Modico right in the heart there because

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I know he's a big packing guy. But overall, these

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>these players are just dropping greggy it. See, we talked

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about every single year, but it just feels like it's

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta be recently biased. But is here more than ever?

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Is this every single day there's someone new We're gonna

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get to him right now. To David Price out of nowhere,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean elbow tendonitis, and this is the guy who

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>has like the slightly torn what is it you see

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>el in his elbows dating back till last year. So

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible news going around man with with these pictures

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and their elbows really bad. It's very very frustrating that

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>tend the Nights played trying Jamison ti on Uh and

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>now David Price, and it is it is out of

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>nowhere that you're seeing this. It's very very frustrating. We

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we all hear elbow and we're all like, crap, this

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>is this this is not good. Um, Matt, if you're

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a Jamison ty On owner, if you're a David Price owner,

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? I mean, right now with tie On,

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you just team leagues. You cannot drop in twelve team leagues.

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You gotta hold on. And you know, do you hear

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>some more news, some more updates. I think he's too

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>talented to uh give up just yet. But as far

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>as Price goes, you know, this is kind of a

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>shame because we saw last year. I think it was

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like in May, it was early on last year he

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>really kind of you know, changed the pitch, pitch mix up.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He was being really effective. He pretty much to me,

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>should have been the m v P of the World Series,

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least co m v P, because if he

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't take that team on his back in the playoffs,

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>they would not have won it. And uh, you know,

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>this was something you had in the back of your mind,

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>was always a concern with Price because what Frank mentioned

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>about having the torn with the UCL. So look, you

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta hope it's just uh maybe a couple of weeks

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you just get some rust and they give him a

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>shot at PCP whatever and all is good. Yeah, but

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you gotta you gotta keep him out of

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>your lineup. Obviously right now we get this update right

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>before the start the Red Sox obviously don't play utill

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>later on tonight, so get him out of your lineup.

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't drop either one of these guys, Greg, I

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 1>know it's a little bit tougher. Someone asked us early

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>here today, you would you drop Jamison ty On in

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a ten team league. Now, that's where you're really starting

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to like push the envelope, because there's gonna be some

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>really really good talent out there. Uh inten teamers overall

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum. Look, if you don't have I L

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>spots or if they're already all taken up, I mean

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to weigh is Jamison Tyo's upside better than

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other injured players that you have. But in

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a ten team league, Greg, You're gonna be able to

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>find some talent out there. So that's really pushing the envelope.

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would have to see some names, but

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I would say you probably get pretty close to being

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to drop ty On in attention, And that was

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the question that we got on Twitter earlier today, Right,

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>can you drop him? And I think would you would

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have to know who for? That's obviously what it comes

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>down to, Like am I gonna drop Matty? You're gonna

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.919
<v Speaker 1>drop tyn four? Like Martine Perez for example, who's pitched

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really well. He has a two star week dropping it

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for a Griffin Canny? Are you know? Are you doing

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>any of those? No? That a kid? You know there's

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be you know options. And every time I get

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a question on Twitter, you know, how long do you

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>wait for a guy? Can I drop this guy? It's

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all league context, attemp teamer. Obviously you have a

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>lot short of the leash. These are so many good

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>players out there in league. You know you can't. You

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>gotta let guys go. You gotta hang out to you

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>guys until at least June or later. And in a

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve team, you know it varies. Those are tougher calls.

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So everything has its own context. Greg you asked me

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good question during the break regarding Pirates prospect

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller and whether or not he could be a

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>candidate jump into the rotation here obviously with tie On

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>out now and Chris Archer dealing with an injury. And

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I told you, I don't think so. He's been pitching

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in Triple A and he's twenty three years old, so technically,

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's that far off from the timeline

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>when they would want him to get called up. But

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he still has had a lot of issues with walks

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of seasons, and I think that's something

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they would want to see him get better at before

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately calling him up to the majors. You want to

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>make sure he's ready, But I mean they might be

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>getting to a point where they don't really have a choice. Yeah,

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, they got all these guys getting

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>hurt and it would be a serious long term injury

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for Jamie Tyone. What do you think here, Matt, you

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's any chance that Mitch Keller is a candidate

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to get into the Pirates rotation? Here? If it's an

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>excellent that you brought him up. I just heard an

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>update uh over the weekend for the Pirates GM stating

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that Mitch Keller has developed a sliter this season similar

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to Jamison tie On, and he's really it's becoming an

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>effective pitch. But they want They're not gonna rush him

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because they want him to hone it and completely own

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that pitch. So I think if the news in a

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>month with tie On is, look, he's gonna you know,

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not pitching the rest of the season, or there's

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a very slim chance he's gonna pitch, then I think,

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, post All Star break, Mitch Keller could be

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 1>uh pitching for the Pirates. Yeah, so post All Star break,

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit further down the line. If you

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have minor league spots in your league, I think he's

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the names that makes sense to stash. What overall,

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have minor league spots, Greg, given all

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the injuries that teams you're suffering right now, I don't

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>know that you can afford to stash Mitch Keller. We

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about this last night. We talked about potentially stashing

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>your Don Alvarez where everyone's trying to pick up right now.

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Of the Houston astros. Zach Galen is another name that

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that I brought up. I tweeted about him over the weekend.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>This guy's absolutely crushing Triple A and he's pitching in

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the PCL right now, in the Marlins minor league system.

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>He's got a sub two years he's got a zero

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>point five five whips because Zach Galen has been awesome.

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's gonna take either an injury or or continued

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>under performance from guys like Trevor Richards or whose Uranius,

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So I just don't know how he fits into it.

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard to stat these prospects right now, greg

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>given all the injuries that a lot of teams. Yeah,

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you name some of the players, the prospects

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the injured players like Addy Gregorys and Aaron Hickson, for

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's dropped, but like like Severino's outside

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Severnos gave us an update over the weekend that he's

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be back until the second half of the year.

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>We know what he can be. It's just really hard

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to stat these guys when you know we have Stanton

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on the yell on the team, we have we have

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Austin Meadows on the ile, so a lot of people

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have have multiple hurt players. It just it's really hard

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to stat these prospects. Yeah, it's it's it's very very frustrating.

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Aaron Hicks was just so this come across um,

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>come across my my timeline, and that is um. Aaron

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:24.439
<v Speaker 1>hicks rehab assignmon begins today, so he could be back

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>as soon as probably next week. He's gonna be a

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.399
<v Speaker 1>bunch of rehappy Friday, maybe over the weekend. I don't

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:29.919
<v Speaker 1>think you've seen next week because I think you're gonna

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 1>need a bunch of rehab games from him because he

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played in months at this point. So probably next

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>week it's great. Okay, Yeah, so Monday, do we get

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>anything on stanting yet? I haven't seen anything on stating Quay.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna like do activities today. Yeah, like we've been hurting.

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Hicks is doing activities for the past you know,

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>two months. What does that mean? Like, you know, me

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>playing video games on my couch is an activity. It

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help me get closer to playing baseball, greag, I

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think so one are these guys? Actually that's what

0:46:55.600 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to know. Where is staying stand up? That's

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I mean, aren't you concerned? I am sure,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of course. Two weeks ago and all systems go, So

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what to think anymore. I gotta

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's a lot more serious than we will. We

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>will let on, I know it was supposed to be

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>something else that was bothering him. But you know, looks

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees. I gotta say, as a met fan, Yankees

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have been stellar and staying in this thing and not

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 1>like falling behind and everybody stepping up. And a guy

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted this week, but I got like Canning or

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I got low was Jonathan. Uh. If you wanted to

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>say Lasagna as an Italian, that's acceptable, fair enough. I

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is foreshadowing. We're gonna get a picture

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of Matt Modiki eating lasagna right after the show if

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I had something that would be posted immediately flood some

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Lasagna. But I did see some people pick him up.

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And he's got nasty stuff. He hasn't been able to

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go deep into games, and any of his starts that

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>he's had this year, he made two starts earlier on

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg he went four innings, he went three innings. This

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff is absolutely legit. Though he's got electric fastball, he's

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there their top pitching prospect, I guess technically outside of

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Domingo Herman, who has been great as well. But I

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.359
<v Speaker 1>saw Jonathan Lwise gonna get picked up in a few

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues and I don't have any problem with it.

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna have upside. He's gonna be in

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the rotation as long as uh Paxton is out. But

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if you do play in quality start leagues, just no,

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not gonna go deep into games. Yankees are

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are very cautious when it comes to by the way

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the Reds game, it was supposed to. Yes, they're in

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a blay. What happened? You know what happened? Uh ten

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Greg, when we had when we had a

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Yankees pictures, where was the where was the bug delay?

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Then when we needed to come my poor guys come on?

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't Then it was serious started? They started, it started.

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I do like him, Yeah, they find he's doing some

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>great things this year. I looked into his pitch usage.

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>He's using his he's using his curveball more this year.

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>His past three starts, he's been really good. The strikeouts

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have been up, swinging strike rad is up. You get

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>two starts against the Giants, Matt it doesn't get much

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.280
<v Speaker 1>better than that unless you have two starts against Miami.

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really get better than that. It really doesn't.

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't have the scientific proof to back it up.

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:32.439
<v Speaker 1>But even when an espression, it's the same exact week,

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>usually like overlaps a week. But I always find that

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's one good start and one bad start like it

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just for most cases, like outside of like elite pictures,

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it just always seems to work out that way. Like

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, I don't have the uh scientific stats to

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>back it up, just a generalization. No, I agree with you.

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:53.879
<v Speaker 1>It feels like that's uh normally the kid. You don't

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>normally see the two really good starts. Do you even

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>get two really bad starts? Or you get one good

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and one bad? Greggy let we asked Maddy Moe about

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>some two star pitchers. I feel like we should since

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that's his four. Right ahead, Frankie, all right, let's let's

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>let's scroll down the list here. We already went over

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to Sclafani. I know that Matt likes Martine Perez a

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>lot as well. At Toronto versus Detroit, those are two

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty good matchups. Well that how about a Jolisa seeing

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>here going up against the Nationals and the Cubs both

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:23.839
<v Speaker 1>matchups not really that great. No, I I don't look

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I was made to look like a full week prior.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been smirched his good name in my article. He

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>went out and spun six shutout. INA's having no hitter going.

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm I'm taking a past year. I agree with

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you on that one. How about Vinny Alaska's Greggy. That's

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your boy, Big Vinny v at St. Louis at Kansas City.

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So there you go right back into the theory. You know,

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 1>one okay start and one uh one not great start

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>against St. Louis, very good line. What do you think here? Uh?

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>In deeper leagues and like a fifteen teamer, I'm gonna

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna roll him out. But in quality start leagues,

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I am not going to pitch him. He's only completed

0:50:57.680 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>uh six innings and three of his last seventeen starts.

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh that is uh a very alarming number there, Greg

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 1>from your boy Vince the last. You know what? So

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually had a choice this week between go with

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:09.840
<v Speaker 1>any vas By the star pitcher or Merrill Kelly. So

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 1>who would you have chosen or neither? Obviously, Matt, what

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>do you think Merrill Kelly this week? Well? I got

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Merril Kelly going in a couple of weeks. I'm not

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>happy a battle. There's a fifteen team leagues. I I'll

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>go with the Lasquez and hopefully the strikeouts are there.

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hope he's got you know, one of those

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 1>five and five and a third where he strikes out

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:32.279
<v Speaker 1>eight or nine. Yeah, he is capable of doing that.

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You see that. You see a lot of lines when

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to any Alaska's where he doesn't go deep,

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:37.479
<v Speaker 1>but he gets you a lot of strikeouts. Merrill Kelly

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>really the opposite. He doesn't get a lot of strikeouts,

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>not like he's a great you know, has a great

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>e r a great whip either. It seems like there

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is some regression coming from Merrill Kelly at Tampa Bay

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and versus Atlanta. I don't love the matchups, but I

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do have him going. I think I have him going

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in one twelve team league too, So I'm rolling him

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>out there, Matt. What about Kevin Gausman, the gas man

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at L A. D and at Arizona on fact Greg,

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I use him on FanDuel on Friday ur BF Vandal

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>contest guy leaves in the second ending. I guess tomorrow's

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot. Kevin Gausman. What do you think, Matt?

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But you should have been expecting that after what happened

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>earlier they were there was talk. They look at the

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:13.800
<v Speaker 1>front at him and I guess the umps were on

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it and tossed them his uh start, his to start

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now bumps Mike Fulton. Evitt's out of having a to start.

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it. I'm gonna be honest with you,

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do like the fact that at least it's

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at Dodger Stadium. The Dodgers themselves are not ideal. The

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>offense has been really good, and pitching out Arizona. Arizona

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 1>has been much better on the road, and Chase Field

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is a much better pitching park. What so, it sounds

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>like you're kind of you know, guysman, if you had

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's like one of those if you must,

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, certain people have to play. The two start

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:50.280
<v Speaker 1>pitchers that emo. I know another one you love Aaron Santez.

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:51.879
<v Speaker 1>You said you're willing to die on the hill. He's

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:54.959
<v Speaker 1>going against Minnesota this week at home both home starts

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and Chicago. What do you think here? When I

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>was I'm on that hill, somebody take me down. When

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>he's starting in Minnesota. I don't like that one at all.

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:06.879
<v Speaker 1>But the White Sox you gotta love matchups versus then

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he's another guy in a quality start league. It's really

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>tough to start him. As much as you know, I

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>want to believe he doesn't really get past a five

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>inning mark, and he's got to figure out these walks. Yeah,

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>he does. Matt CC Sabathia. The past couple of seasons,

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he seems like he's out pitches peripherals going up against

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Seattle at home and at Tamba Bay. Not really the

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>best matchups here. No. Uh, look, Ceci has been a warrior.

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>He's been great. He's got a three thousand strikeout. I'm

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>staying away here. There's a lot not to like about

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>his game. Uh So, I don't want to knock Sabathia,

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not starting him in this two starts Maddie

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:50.360
<v Speaker 1>mo Modica Monday, follow on Twitter at CCN Baseball. Maddimo,

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>what do you have going on at the Athletic? Uh?

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The two start article is up podcast as well. Real quick,

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you one guy to start this week, and

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that is Lucas Giulio Lucas Geel a little bit further

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 1>down going up against Cleveland and at Toronto. I like

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>him too. That's what like, Jelio, all right, mean strike

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>rate is there, the strikeouts are there, Greggy all right, Jeerlio,

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it is okay, Maddie, Mollie. That's talk to him next week.

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>That shore's up next, we hope