WEBVTT - Cara Knott

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Facing Evil, a production of iHeartRadio and

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Tenderfoot TV. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are solely those of the individuals participating in the show

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and do not represent those of iHeartRadio or Tenderfoot TV.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>This podcast contains subject matter which may not be suitable

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. Listener discretion is advised.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Hello, everyone, welcome back to Facing Evil. I'm Rossia Faccerrero.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Evet gente Lay. This week we are talking

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 3>about the murder of Karen Not and this case is

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a very surreal and creepy one because it's one

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 3>of those where you say, this could totally happen to

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>any one of us. It's when the person you trust

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 3>in to protect you ends up being the person you

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>should be the most afraid of.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sadly, you're so, writ Evet. And of course, for

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>those of you who have been with us from episode

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>number one, this case, at least for Yvetni, reminds us

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 2>of our very first case from our hometown and Honolulu, Javaii,

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 2>the cold case of Lisa Ao. And it's sad this

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>was only four years later after the case of Lisa

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Ao happened Lisa Ao is still a cold case. She

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>was murdered on the side of the road in nineteen

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 2>eighty two and this happened in nineteen eighty six. But

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 2>there's differences in this one. And we get to talk

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to an amazing expert who's going to walk us through

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the entire case. And his name is Jim Treinam. He

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>is an expert in forensic evidence and criminal procedure and

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>he's going to talk to us about everything, and so

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>thankful he's such an open book and an open heart.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and it's going to be an amazing conversation. But

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>now our Trevor is going to walk us through today's case.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>A twenty year old San Diego State student was murdered

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 3>by an on duty CHP officer in the North County.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>The main unanswered question is is how she was able

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 4>to be either duped or or con in. Who's stopping

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>and we don't know why. It was two and a

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>half weeks after the murder that homicide detectives went to

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 4>pyrs Powway home and led him away in handcuffs. Every

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 4>day of the trial has been like attending Kara's funeral,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 4>over and over and over again.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Karen Nott was a twenty year old woman who was

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>mysteriously found dead in nineteen eighty six in a ravine

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>near San Diego, California. Nott was a student at San

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Diego State University. She had plans to get her doctorate

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and become a teacher. On the night of December twenty seventh,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six, she was visiting her boyfriend in Escondido

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>who was sick with the flu. Who knew Kara said

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>she was very considerate and often overly cautious. For example,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>she always locked her doors and never picked up hitchhikers.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Just before eight pm that night, she called her parents,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>who lived forty five minutes away, to let them know

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>she was coming home, but she never arrived. Kara Nott's

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>family set out to find her that very night. Around

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>five point thirty in the morning, they found her car

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>parked off of the Mercy Road off ramp. Three hours later,

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>police found her body strangled and thrown from a bridge,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but there was no sign of sexual assault or robbery.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The passenger door was locked, but the driver's side window

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was partially rolled down. Earlier that night, a witness saw

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a police officer pull over a car at the Mercy

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Road off ramp. They described it as a VW light blue.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Kara drove a white VW and just before ten pm

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that night, two women said they saw a police officer

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>named Craig Pyre at a nearby gas station. He had

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>blood and scratches all over his face, and according to them,

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>he was acting incredibly nervous. When he returned to the

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>police station a half hour later, his co workers say

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he was quote bloody and disheveled. He told them he

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>had slipped and fallen into a chain link fence while

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>getting gas. Pyre had been with the California Highway Patrol

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>for thirteen years, and by all accounts, his career was

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing to him. Pyre's fellow officers called

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>him quote hot pencil. This was because he gave out

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>more traffic tickets than anyone else, about two hundred fifty

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>per month. He would often rant to his colleagues about

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>highway safety and keeping the public safe. Soon, though, it

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was revealed that there were two sides to Officer Pyre.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>There was devoted police officer and something else, something more nefarious.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The California Highway Patrol was getting reports from young women

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that he pulled over, saying he was engaging in off

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>putting behavior. After pulling them over, he would sometimes order

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>them to his favorite spot off the I fifteen Freeway.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>At that point he would ask them about their love lives,

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes get into their cars and take them on

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>rides deeper down a vacant lane called Mercy Road. Two

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>days after her murder, Officer Pyre appeared on a TV

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>news special giving tips on how to stay safe as

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a driver at night. Scratches were still visible on his

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>face as he talked, and on January fifteenth, nineteen eighty seven,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Craig Pyre was charged and arrested for Karenat's murder. After

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>two trials, he was convicted and sentenced to twenty five

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>years to life. But to this day, Pyre, his family,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>and his friends all claim he would never commit such

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>a violent act. However, others claim differently. And so what

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>happened to Karen Not? Was Officer Craig Pyre actually guilty?

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And what does the debate surrounding his guilt tell us

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about the reliability of evidence versus witness testimony?

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>So the murder of Karen Not brings up a ton

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 2>of questions, questions about procedure, evidence. The list goes on

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>and on, and today we have an expert with us

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>on all of these things. His name is Jim Trainham

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and he's a retired homicide detective for Washington, d C's

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Metropolitan Police Department. But his resume goes far beyond that.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>He's written a book called How the Police Generate False

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Confessions and he is a recipient of the Ethics and

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Law Enforcement Award. Jim A. Komo may are welcome to

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 2>Facing Evil.

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you very much.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>So I just told our listeners just a tiny bit

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>about you, but I am hoping that you can tell

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit more about your career and how

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>you got started and how you got into doing all

0:06:58.520 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of this today.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I spent over half of my twenty seven years

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 4>with PC as a police department in the homicide branch,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 4>and what happened early in my homicide career actually shaped

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 4>the rest of my life, really and that was in

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>a very high profile case, one of the first cases

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 4>I had, I obtained a false confession from a totally

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 4>innocent person, and I did so using the standard interrogation

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 4>techniques that we were taught, and that would pass muster

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 4>in any courtroom in this country. And I wanted to

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 4>find out not only how did I convince this person

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 4>to confess to a crime that they didn't commit, but

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>also how did they know all the details about the

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>crime that, as we love to say, only the true

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 4>perpetrator would have known. And so that kind of started

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>me into looking into how things like confirmation bias and

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 4>other factors can adversely influence the way that we do investigations.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 4>And so I began teaching other law enforcement officers how

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>to avoid the same mistakes that I made, and I

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 4>began working on other alleged wrongful conviction cases doing case

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 4>reviews in general, and yeah, I was just finding out

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 4>there is so much that when it comes to how

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 4>we analyze evidence, so oftentimes we make mistakes and the

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 4>way because of the way that we think and the

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>way that we process, and and also other pressures like

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the pressure to close the case quickly and things along

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 4>that line. So since I retired in twenty ten, I

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 4>began to use what I learned in reviewing cases not

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 4>only active murder cases cold cases, but also cases that

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 4>were alleged wrongful convictions. Testified in several of those cases.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 4>That's all around the country, and I continue to teach

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>and learn as well. I'm still taking classes. In fact,

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm taking more coming up very soon from the UK

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 4>on basically how to think like a detective.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Something we wow even though it's something you already know,

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 2>but you can always evolve and already learn.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, there's so much out there that, like I said,

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 4>we're basically taught the mechanics of how to do our job,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 4>but there's so much lacking in how to think about

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 4>how to do our job. And that's one thing that

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 4>they excel in and over there, and so I'm hoping

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 4>to use that in order to help create more training

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 4>programs and help improve long coork practices here in the US.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful. I love that, Jim. That's so powerful that you

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>said that, because you know you're retired, but yet you're

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 3>still evolving and still learning. And I just do have

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>one question. When you were talking about the technique. I

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>was listening to you on a podcast and it was

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>called the Trust and Justice podcast, and you were talking

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>about that particular technique, which was the read technique, And

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>is that what you were taught early on? You know,

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>in the very beginning when you got that false confession.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I was taught not only the read technique. But

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, the thing is, there's a lot of different

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 4>interrogation schools out there, but the majority of them teach

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 4>a variation of it, and it's an accusatory approach, and unfortunately,

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the way that it's designed, they promote it as a

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 4>way of getting to the truth, but unfortunately, the way

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 4>it's set up, you're trying to get to the truth

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 4>that you believed it to be, and so what you're

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 4>looking for so much is not information but confirmation. And

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 4>if you happen to have the wrong person to begin with,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 4>then you know, that just sends you further down the

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 4>wrong path.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 4>There's been this movement within the criminal justice system that

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 4>they're trying to set up what they call the sentinel

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 4>event reviews. It's like, if there is a failure of

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 4>some sort, either maybe a case goes unsolved or a

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 4>wrongful conviction, rather than look at the individual causes like

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 4>we're so good at and blaming individual people, we're trying

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>to look at the big picture because let's say, like

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 4>in my case, you know, yes I got a false confession,

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>but you know, let's also look at all the other

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 4>things that influenced my decision. At the time, there was

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 4>some faulty forensics or supervision pressure to close the case.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 4>It is a high profile case, things along that line.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 4>And so when you look at the big picture and

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 4>understand all the contributing factors and you're transparent about it,

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 4>then not only can you work to correct all of

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 4>those things that contribute it to the problem, but you

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 4>also gain more trust from the pals the cards. You're

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 4>willing to admit that, yes, we made a mistake, here's

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 4>a mistake, and this is what we're going to do

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 4>to fix it. I believe that's the way in the

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 4>future to go towards helping to resolve the trust issue

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 4>that we have.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, so let's just jump right into it. Let's talk

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>about Karen Not How familiar were you with this case?

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, for us, like when we first started researching

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 3>this case, immediately you think the CHP officer he had

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 3>to have done it. Was that your first reaction as well?

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's never my first reaction. I reviewed all of

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 4>the public information that's out there as much as possible.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 4>I've dug into it as much as I can, and

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 4>so I haven't been privy to a lot of the

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 4>internal reports and things like that that oftentimes offer really

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 4>important nuggets. But when I start looking at a case,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't really have any preconceived notions as to whether

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 4>or not it's him. I'm going to look at the

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 4>evidence and see, first off, the evidence, was it obtained

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 4>reliably and was it analyzed properly because that's where you

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 4>tend to have your failures, and so going into it, Yes,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 4>he was convicted and all of that, But I've worked

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of cases where it looks like a slam

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 4>dunk at the beginning, but once you get into the

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 4>nitty gritty of it, the evidence kind of starts to

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 4>not be as clear as people try to make it

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 4>out to be.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So Jim, with all of that being said, full transparency,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I am married to a retired police officer. You know,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>She's asked me not to say what cities she worked for,

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>but she did work in the state of California. But

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to her about this case and I

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 2>told her we were interviewing you, and I was like, Babe, like,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>what do you think, Like do you think like one?

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Like why would the DCHP officer you know, pull Kara

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>not over and like, why would he be driven to

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>do this and then go if he did do it right,

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and then go right back to the rest of his shift.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>And she told me, she said, you know, I feel

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>like it's more common than we'd like to think because

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>it's about power. And I was like, really, like it

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>just for me, my mind doesn't think that way. So

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>do you think that it is about power?

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Looking at it at first, I try not to go

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 4>in there with that perception. That doesn't mean that I

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 4>haven't formed.

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 2>An opinion, right, you're a human, yes.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 4>And the sports actually you know, have convicted him. Now,

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 4>this is a very circumstantial case. I mean, this is

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 4>old school they saw at the old school way. They

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 4>didn't have cell phone tracking stuff. You don't have surveillance videos,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 4>you don't have you know, the DNA, all the stuff

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 4>that we rely on so heavily dissolved cases today, And

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 4>it is very circumstantial. However, it is a very strong

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 4>circumstantial case. Even if you want to discredit some of

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 4>the evidence that would no longer even be considered in

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 4>a court today, such as the evidence about the rope.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Forensic Dennis said that he was able to match the

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 4>rope that was found in the car to the marks

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 4>on her neck, and there were identical links and things

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>like that. All that stuff has pretty much been discredited.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I see, it's not you know, accepted as you know,

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 4>scientific evidence anymore. Fiber evidence is highly questionable, and there's

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 4>been a lot of abuse of finding about fiber evidence

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 4>in the pasting court. But even taking all that away,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 4>my first thought is that, you know, this is probably

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 4>the first time he ever killed anybody. This is you know,

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 4>but we know, based on the evidence that he did

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 4>lure or did take several women down there, And if

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I was a betting person, I would bet that at

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 4>some point in his career, you know, before all of this,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 4>he actually engaged in sexual encounters down there, that this

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 4>was something that I mean, why would you keep doing it? Yeah?

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, that's the point.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 4>If you failed, you know, each and every time, why

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 4>would you keep trying this? And in this case, something

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>just went wrong. Even though he was a patrol officer,

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, he probably didn't have any comprehension about how

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 4>homicides are investigated about you know, what kind of clues

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 4>he could have left behind because he wasn't trained, He

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 4>didn't have any experience in that, and so I mean

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 4>he just panicked and he did his best to cover up.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 4>But he didn't have any other option but go back

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 4>to work.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, to continue on like normal.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 3>But the fact is, though there were witnesses that actually

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 3>saw him. You know, there were people at the convenience

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 3>store of the gas station that saw him in there,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 3>and they visibly saw scratches on his face. And there

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 3>was another witness that saw him take her down, you

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 3>know that Mercy Road or saw the car there. I mean,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't that say like a whole lot right there? You know,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 3>And then he goes on television and you know, gives

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 3>this statement with the scratches on his face. After he's

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 3>done this.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 4>He probably didn't have much of an option. I mean,

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 4>the scratches are there, and so he had explain them somehow.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he can't avoid that whatsoever. I mean, he

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 4>tried to cover his tracks. He tried to modify his

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 4>logs and things along that line in order to make

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 4>it look like he was somewhere else. He did what

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 4>he could. He did what he could to let's create

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 4>an alibi. However, some things he just could not hide. Yeah,

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 4>But like the TV thing. I mean, that was the

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 4>area that he patrolled. And so I suspect that his

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 4>supervisors just put him up and say, look, we want

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 4>you to do this. It's not like he volunteered for it,

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 4>and so he just had to put on a brave

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 4>face and go about it. And if he had refused

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 4>to do it, I think that would have caused more

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 4>immediate suspicion at the time.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Right. For sure. I do want to ask you, Jim,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and I know you were telling us about you know,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the fibers. Not that forensic evidence not necessarily holding up

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in court today, but the other thing that I'm curious about,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 2>so like would it be considered part of again, like

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 2>is this circumstantial evidence or is this actual forensic evidence?

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Pire's blood type is a rare blood

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>type and is type AB and that was on Karra,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that's not just a coincidence.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Right, Well, there's also circumstantial evidence, because it's not like

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 4>DNA today where you can say, like the odds of

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>it being anybody else is one in however many trillion

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 4>quad grillion or whatever along that line. You know that

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 4>blood type is about eighteen percent of the population. Uh,

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 4>And so that's that's a lot of people that it

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 4>could be. However, the defense attorney fallacy they call it,

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 4>is when you look at an isolated piece of evidence

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 4>and you try to discredit it, like they did by saying, look,

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I s eighteen percent of the population. There could have

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 4>been thousands of people who could have left, or millions

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 4>of people who could have left that. But yeah, but

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 4>there weren't millions of people who were taking women down

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 4>into that area, who were acting inappropriately with them, who

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 4>were there that night, who did a B and C.

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 4>So all of that combined makes a very tight case, like.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 2>The perfect storm. As one of our former guests told us, Yeah.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>It's so interesting to me. You know, I just want

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>to talk about the fibers, like, because you know, we

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 3>do know that from his little badge, you know, on

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>his uniform, that yellow fiber was actually found on karra.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Why can't they use fibers?

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>What is the argument against it? I guess I should say.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 4>The main argument is that one, it's kind of subjective,

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 4>it's based on a visual examination. That material could potentially

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 4>come from thousands of different sources and all of that.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 4>But the problem has been is that examiners have overstepped

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 4>their bounds when they're testifying. Now, in this case, from

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 4>what I read, its pairs like, they didn't do that.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 4>They said that they were visually similar. However, in the past,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 4>other examiners have said, no, it's an exact match, or

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 4>I've never seen anything you know like this, right, and

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 4>so that's why, you know, fiber evidence what has led

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 4>to exonerations of the past, primarily because the examiners have

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 4>overstepped their balance, got it. However, in this case, from

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 4>my understanding, there was also the addition of the dye

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 4>in the fiber itself. The color die after matched up

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 4>right there. So not knowing anything about the die part,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, I would say that that that's a very

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 4>interesting piece of evidence right there, and so I'm not

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 4>really sure how admissible that would be today. But even

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 4>without that evidence, take the fiber evidence, throw it away,

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 4>you still have a yes, yes, I mean, I think

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 4>the behavioral evidence is one of the the strongest pieces

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 4>of circumstantial evidence. I mean, in looking at a diagram

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 4>of how the road was laid out and all of that,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 4>him going down there on a regular basis, and really

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 4>there was no need for him to do that. I

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 4>would find fault with the supervisor at that point if

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 4>they had complaints, which they did, women down to that

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 4>isolated area. Well, first off, I mean for officers safety,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know whether their policy is you're during that

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 4>time period. I was working as a uniform patrol officer

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 4>during that time period. If you had a traffic stop,

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 4>you called it in.

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, That's what my wife was saying, Yeah.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 4>You call it in because you want backup. Is for

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 4>your safety so that if something happens, they know who

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 4>you're stopping and where you are.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 2>And he didn't do that in this case, if I recall, right, I.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Don't think he did it in a lot of the cases. Yeah,

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 4>because you're not going to spend you know, thirty minutes

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 4>talking to somebody like you did with a lot of

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 4>these women and all of that, because your supervisor is

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 4>going to call you out. So that should have been

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 4>a red flag if he got complaints from at least

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 4>two women that I know of, that he was taking

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 4>them down to that. Look, Plus, you don't want to

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 4>get yourself in an isolated spot, you know, where it's dark.

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 4>That just increases the danger to you. Right outside of

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 4>everything else, that should have been a huge red flag

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 4>for them to go, wait a minute, you know, why

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 4>are you doing.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 3>This doing our research? There was even like a you know,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 3>a joke with other officers, you know, other CHP officers that, oh,

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, how many people did you pull over today?

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 2>He had a high rate, didn'ty.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was known for pulling over and especially women.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, that was also a different time.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Back then, true, it was the eighties.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean people would make jokes. Remember during that

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 4>time period or maybe maybe before, there was a dj

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 4>in DC that would do these a skit where it

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 4>would involve officers actually know, in certain terms, committing rape

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 4>during traffic stops. Yeah, they were making jokes about it, right,

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 4>And so I mean, as horrible as that was, that

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.479
<v Speaker 4>that was kind of like, you know, something that people

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 4>really didn't take seriously. They make kind of made fun

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 4>of it, right, and that kind of makes like I said,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 4>it makes me believe that he was at least successful

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 4>in having some kind of sexual conquest in the past,

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 4>and that's why he continued to follow this pattern. Right,

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 4>So it was basically a shotgun effect, you know, he

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 4>would just try it and it worked at work.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 3>So Jim, you know, one of our first episodes that

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 3>we did was a case in Hawaii about a young

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>woman by the name of Lisa Ao. And this was

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 3>in eighty two, and this is still an open case.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>It had to do with supposedly a police officer or

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 3>somebody impersonating a police officer, where this young woman got

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>killed and she was left in the hills of Tantalus

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 3>and she was there for approximately about ten days. But

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 3>this goes to the question of forensics, right, there are

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>so many things that they did wrong in that case,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 3>and now we're in eighty six with the Karenat case.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Right in that timeframe, would the forensics like had it

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 3>advanced at all in those four years, not all that much.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I think the disadvantage that you had in eighty two

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 4>was the fact that the body wasn't found for quite

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 4>some time.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, ten days is a long time.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 3>And it was in the rain, and yes.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but you also had that gap between you know,

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 4>when she went missing and when she was found. And

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 4>here you didn't have much of a.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Gap at all, No, because her family went out searching

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 3>for her asaph.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 4>And they had a lot of good luck. Yes, the

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 4>fact that she stopped at the gas station so they

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 4>were able to put up a timeline. But yeah, I

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 4>mean we were still I mean, stuff really had advanced

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 4>all that much during that time period. And also remember

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 4>different agencies had different provincic capabilities.

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's JUNO, LUPD or CHP very different.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 4>I'd say, Yeah, we really don't have any kind of

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 4>standards across the country in law enforcement.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it still that way now, Jim?

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 4>It is still that way now. I mean it's not

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 4>like the UK, where they can come up with a

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>single set of operating procedures and best practices in all

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 4>of that. Here you've had eighteen thousand different kingdoms across

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 4>the country with different levels of capabilities, training and everything else,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 4>and so sometimes it's just a look of a draw.

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so true. Though you have to think about that,

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 2>like they did have so much luck. I mean, of

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 2>course you don't want to think about it's lucky to find,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, a beautiful young human dead. But at least

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>they were able to find Kara and seemingly get closure

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>because you know, Officer Pyre was convicted. But all of

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 2>that put aside, I am curious, Jim. I mean, you've

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 2>alluded to the fact of course we think that, you know,

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Pire may have sexually assaulted other people, but for all

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>intents and purposes, he wasn't convicted of anything prior to this.

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>What do we think would make a seemingly I know,

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 2>there's no such thing as normal, but a seemingly normal

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>CHP officer be capable of this.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a hard question.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 4>It's not really a hard question. You know. Uh, one

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 4>is power. Yeah, power, It's possible. Like one of the

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 4>first encounters was one that was consensual, and I mean

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 4>that is possible. And so he just got this idea

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 4>in his mind that you know, hey, there are women

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 4>out there who are turned on by this, by coops

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 4>and all that sort of stuff, and there are women

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 4>who are attracted to male police officers and also vice versa.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 4>But so yeah, I mean they're attracted to the power

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 4>thing and all of that. But for him to have

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 4>killed her, like I said, I think that something just

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 4>went totally wrong. He had no plans. Yeah, there's no

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 4>indication that he got any plans to do this whatsoever,

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 4>or that he would have done have done this again

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>in the future unless he got kind of caught up

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>in this situation. I just think whatever happened. He panicked

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 4>and he did what he did, and he just did

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 4>not know how to cope with it afterwards. You can

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 4>really get away with murder, I mean if you really

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 4>think about it. I mean, a stranger on stranger cases,

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 4>no connection with them, make sure nobody finds the body,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, that sort of stuff. But he didn't have

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 4>time to do all that now, so he had to

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 4>do something because he was also an nerve conference raint.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that is really interesting is his family. You know,

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 3>his family really believed that he was innocent because they

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 3>truly believed that the evidence wasn't strong enough. What do

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 3>you think. I mean, I think we are all in

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 3>unison and of what we believe. But his family still

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>believes that he didn't do it because again, like you

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 3>said earlier, right, it was all circumstantial evidence.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Before I went to homicide, I work burglary cases, and

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 4>I loved working burglary cases because there are a lot

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 4>like serial killers, oh, because there's no witnesses. You know,

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 4>because a burglary makes it's careful. They don't have to

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 4>commit the burglary, and so they do it in such

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 4>a way that if there's a witness there go back

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 4>off or whatever. And so typically what you do is

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 4>you rely on forensics, and you rely on patterns and

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 4>things along that line, circumstantial evidence if you tie them

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 4>to the stolen property because they sold it, stuff along

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 4>that line. And so people think circumstantial evidence is a

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 4>dirty word. It really isn't. You don't need to have

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 4>an eyewitness. You don't have an eyewitness, and a lot

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of murder cases true, true, So that's the best you

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 4>can do. But of course you know they believe them,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 4>just like the confirmation. But the confirmation bias just just

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 4>a clarifying case that people don't understand. What it is

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>is when you get a belief and then you begin

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 4>to search for evidence that confirms that belief rather than

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 4>search for evidence that you know impartially and so you're

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 4>very selective. And so a lot of times you'll see

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 4>family members on both sides whatever they will kind of

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 4>cherry pick, you know, what they.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Want to hear and what they don't want.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 4>To cherry pick, you know, or kind of well she

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 4>said this this time and this that time. Well it

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 4>might not be relevant, it might not make any difference.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 4>But because they come up with a little indistress, a

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 4>little discrepancy. They think that wipes away, you know, all

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 4>of the evidence right there.

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which of course it does not does not.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 4>But I feel for them. I understand you know, uh,

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 4>what they're saying. And so they're victims too well of.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Course, of course, of course, yes, I couldn't agree more.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>With all the cases that we cover on facing evil,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 2>we know that there's not only one victim. Ever, it

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>always affects all of the families involved, whether guilty or not.

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, it can be heartbreaking at times, it absolutely is.

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>It is because it changes lives on both.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Ends, everybody's. But like in wrawful conviction cases and exonerations,

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times you have the family members who

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 4>are just devastating. Yeah, because they have put so much

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 4>faith in the prosecution and in the police officers and justice.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.239
<v Speaker 4>The potential for exonerations first comes up. That's who they

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 4>turned to. And so a lot of times the cops

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 4>in a prosecutor wo say no, this is BS, it

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 4>is trying to pull some shady stuff. There's actually organizations

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 4>out there now that work with family members who are

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>going through this just to kind of help them through

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 4>the process, which is a good thing because that's isolated,

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 4>and everybody was concentrating on the person getting exonerated, but

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 4>nobody was thinking about the victim and the victims.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Stanley, Yes, that's beautiful. I love the more support there

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 2>is out there for people going through anything. This especially,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I think is beautiful. Jim, I would like to ask,

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 2>with all of your expertise, can you tell us did

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you agree with the final verdict.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Based on the evidence that I've seen. I do agree

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 4>with the verdict that you know there is that beyond

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 4>a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Certainly.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>That's such an interesting question that Rasha ask And then

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 3>when you put that in there, because the fact is

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>that the jurors weren't they like seven to five the

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 3>first go around with him.

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 4>So funny because I've actually had cases where it was

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 4>eleven to one jury for a conviction and then the

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 4>second time around it was a straight up acquittal. Really wow,

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 4>I think is a lot of times people will ask

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 4>me during a trial, what is the jury thinking? What

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 4>do you think about? I have no clue.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.479
<v Speaker 2>If you can understand every single human on the face

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of the planet, then maybe you'll have a clue.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, probably not even then, but so much of it

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 4>depends on their own personal experiences. You know, their own

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, biases and things along that line, you know,

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 4>their own life stuff. But also oftentimes, and I hate

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 4>to say it, you know, the way the evidence is presented.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 4>I know that they switched attorneys, and so all of

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 4>that comes into play. That's why the system is so imperfect.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 4>It's also one of the reasons why you know, I'm

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 4>not a believer in the death penalty, because there's so

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 4>many variable that go into a jury's verdict. As much

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 4>as they're told you're only supposed to consider the evidence,

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 4>each person considers differently, you know, based off their life.

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, their own experiences.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 3>We know that pire. He's been up for parole a

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 3>few times, right, and he's been given an opportunity to

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 3>present DNA to the Innocence Project. And I'll let you

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 3>speak to that, because I know you said you you've

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 3>worked with this particular nonprofit. But he has denied to

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 3>take it. Doesn't that say that I'm guilty?

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, not only has he he refused to take it,

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 4>but he also refuses to give an explanation as to why,

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Oh he hasn't said why it's a clarifisse. I think

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.439
<v Speaker 4>there's not just one innocence project. There are multiple ones

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 4>around the country, you.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Know, Okay, okay, And I can.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 4>See why, like, on the surface, they may want to

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 4>look at this case, especially when they start seeing things

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 4>like you know, the evidence about the marks on the

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 4>neck in the fiber stuff, they might want to consider it.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 4>But when it comes to DNA stuff, I mean, that's

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 4>the low hanging fruit for them. And you wouldn't believe

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 4>the number of cases that I've worked where there is

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 4>DNA evidence that could be tested, but the prosecutor fought

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 4>it too thin nail, mainly because we have this belief

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 4>in this country that verdicts should be final, that the

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 4>family shouldn't have to go through this stuff once it's

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 4>done gone. So that's something that you always have to

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 4>fight against. So if he's being offered a chance to

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.280
<v Speaker 4>do something that could really potentially clear him one hundred

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 4>percent and he's refusing, I think that's good circumstantial evidence

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 4>in and of itself, But like I said, he's not

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 4>giving a reason. And you know, the other thing going

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 4>against him is all of these people who have been exonerated,

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 4>who've been up for multiple parole hearings. One of the

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 4>reasons that they oftentimes were refused parole was that they

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 4>kept saying, no, but I didn't do it. They want

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 4>them to accept the responsibility, but they won't do it.

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 4>In his case, he still says that he won't do it,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 4>but he doesn't take the chance that's offered to him.

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>To exonerate himself or to explain.

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I say that, but it might come back inclusive just

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 4>because of the way the evidence was kept, or all

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 4>kinds of things that might not allow testing of the evidence.

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, we always like to look for the light,

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 2>of course, on facing evil, and there have been a

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>few positive developments that came out of Kara's case. So

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Sam Not, who was Kara's father, he lobbied to pass

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a bill which at the time would have allowed women

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 2>motorists to stop at places that they felt more comfortable

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 2>or more safe being pulled over. Now, sadly, although it

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't pass, I think it started the conversation. At least,

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 2>what do you think.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 4>I know that a lot of places, if you're pulled

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 4>over by an unmarked unit, that you're able to go

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 4>to a place that's well lit, that's safe. You know

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing, just because in the past they've

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 4>had people posing as police officers yep, who have the

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 4>lights and all that kind of stuff. Now, yeah, the car,

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 4>but the car isn't visibly marked. The problem is is

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 4>that you have a rogue coppier. So typically if you

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 4>have a unit that is highly marked as you know,

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 4>as a police officer, that sort of thing. But even

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 4>these days, you have the extra advantage of if you

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 4>are pulled over, you can get on your cell phone.

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 2>We did not have that in nineteen eighty six.

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 4>You did not have that. See one of the things

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 4>you can do. Okay, you're pulled over by the California

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 4>Highway Patrol, you can down nine one one saying I'm

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 4>being pulled over? Is this is this legit?

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 3>I believe we can absolutely and you correct me if

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:57.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong. Give credit to Kara's father, Sam not again,

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 3>because he he fought for this. You know this eighty

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 3>three million dollar communication system that enforcement agencies now have

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and emergency agencies have to help coordinate where you know

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 3>something may be going wrong. Unfortunately, you know, Karen didn't

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:18.919
<v Speaker 3>have that back then.

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 4>I would not have been aware of any kind of

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 4>system like that that existed. So you know, once you

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 4>have a problem like this, and once you identify, just

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 4>like I talked about before, you can then come up

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 4>with solutions to the problem. And oftentimes, you know, law

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 4>enforcement unfortunately is very slow to responding. You know, they

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of dig their heels in. They're going to blame

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 4>it on the one individual rather than realize that this

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 4>could be part of a larger problem, or if we

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 4>did have the system in place, then this one individual

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 4>couldn't have done this anyway. And so a lot of

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 4>times it does take pressure from family members, from the media,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 4>from politicians, and all of them. Law enforcement. They hate

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 4>two things basically the way things are and change is.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>That an oxymoron?

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, So they're going to be you know, we don't

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 4>have a problem because we fired them. Well, yeah you do,

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 4>because anybody else could you know, do this similar you know,

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 4>falling into this pattern of inappropriately pulling over women and

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 4>engaging in inappropriate conversations with them. So there's a system

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 4>to that not only protects the driver, but also protects

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 4>the officer as well.

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 2>I would love to know, because I see that that

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 2>glimmer and hope in your eyes. I would love to

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:49.800
<v Speaker 2>know what light in the darkness of Care's story that

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you can take away or give to our listeners.

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, one of the things that you had

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 4>mentioned earlier is to mention that the family got closure. Yeah,

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.760
<v Speaker 4>and unfortunately. I mean I work with a lot of families,

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 4>especially in these unsolved bases and all that, and I

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 4>would meet with them on a regular basis and talk

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 4>to them. And one of the things I kind of

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 4>cautioned them about is, you know, you're looking for closure,

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 4>but it's not going to come because you know you're

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 4>going to get a conviction. You know they're going to

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 4>go to jail, and your loved when it is still dead. Still. However,

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I encourage them, just like with her father, to try to,

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, do something meaningful. Now. It doesn't have to

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 4>be as big an event as what he did. But

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 4>it's just like there's organizations out there to support organizations

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 4>for other you know, crime victims and you know family

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 4>members of homicide victims and things like that, and they

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 4>can help you with your pain. But you can also

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 4>turn around and share your experience with other people who

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 4>are also in that similar situation, and you can turn

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 4>this around and actually, you know, help somebody else and

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 4>do good and make that part of your loved one's memory.

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't care what they were doing when they died.

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't care you know about any of that stuff.

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 4>It's still a tragedy. And you can still improve somebody's

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 4>life or improve the system. Yes, still going that extra mile.

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Body together and working as a group.

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 3>So beautifully said, paying it forward and working together. Jim,

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 3>It's been a true honor to have you on this show.

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for being here with us today.

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Well my pleasure and I hope that I did add

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 4>something to this case and kind of explained a few things,

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 4>and thank you for having me. I appreciate it.

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Today's EMA is dedicated to Kara's parents, Sam and Joyce,

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and the entire no Ohanna. After her death, Kara's father,

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Sam Knott, successfully lobbied for a bill that allowed women

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 2>to stop at places they felt most comfortable when being

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 2>pulled over. Instead, the state Senate voted in a bill

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 2>that further punished drivers for not pulling over us directed sadly.

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 3>But Sam Knott he persisted, and he convinced several local

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement agencies to change the way they handled nighttime

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 3>stops for women.

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And because of Sam Knot's work, San Diego County now

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 2>has an eighty three million dollar communication system that allows

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement to communicate with emergency services in a way

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't possible on the night.

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 3>That Kara was killed. And the memorial nature preserve where

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 3>he planted and raised oak trees from acorns is still there.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 3>It is called the Kara Nut and San Diego Crime

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Victim's Oak Garden.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Today's final message of hope, and he goes out to

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the memory of Sam Knot as well as to Joyce

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Nott and the rest of the family who, in the

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:13.240
<v Speaker 2>aftermath of the worst tragedy of their lives, persisted for justice,

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:29.479
<v Speaker 2>persisted for hope, and persisted for humanity. Onward and upward. Emua, Emua. Well,

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 2>that's our show for today. We'd love to hear what

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 2>you thought about today's discussion and if there's a case

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you'd like for us to.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 3>Cover, find us on social media or email us at

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.959
<v Speaker 3>Facingevil pod at Tenderfoot dot tv.

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And one small request if you haven't already, please find

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 2>us on iTunes and give us a good rating and

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a good review.

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 3>If you like what we do.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Your support is always cherished.

0:44:53.160 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Until next time Aloha.

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Facing Evil is a production of iHeartRadio and tenderfoot TV.

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The show is hosted by Russia Peccuerero and Avet Gentile.

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Frederick and Alex Williams our executive producers on behalf

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio, with producers Trevor Young and Jesse Funk, Donald

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>albright In Payne Lindsay our executive producers on behalf of

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Tenderfoot TV, alongside producer Tracy Kaplan. Our researcher is Carolyn Talmadge.

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Original music by Makeup and Vanity Set. Find us on

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>social media or email us at facingevilpod at tenderfoot dot tv.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio or Tenderfoot TV, visit the

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:45:56.640 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows,