WEBVTT - Musk and Twitter - Will He or Won't He??

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it on or is it off? That's the question

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been asked about Elon musk deal to buy Twitter

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for the last six months. Now, Musk says it's on

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>in a letter on Monday. The world's richest man made

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the proposal to go ahead with the forty four billion

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar deal to buy the social media network on the

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>original terms. But Twitter has not dropped its lawsuit to

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>force Musk to go through with the deal, and the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>trial date is still set for October. So what's going

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>on here? To tell us is Eric Talley, a professor

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia Law School, why do you think Musk came

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in at the original offer price instead of trying a

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lower price. Well, look like any situation in which you

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>know the parties are a party is reaching or trying

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to find resulution. There could be a whole bunch of

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. One of them, boast practically probably is the

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>fact that everything is lined up to close the deal

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>at twenty cents. The shareholders have voted, proxies have been

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>sent out, the lenders have signed up to a deal

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go off with that price. So if

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going to change the price from that, like if

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to go for a settlement at fifty

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>three twenty or something like that, pretty much all those

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>things have to be put back in place again, and

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that can take some time. And you know, in the

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>current market conditions, no one really is the biggest friend

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of trying to stall so long as you're trying to

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>get this deal done. So that may be one of

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the main reasons why there's some attraction to getting exactly

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the same financial terms as we're with the initial deal.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And what drove Musk to make this all for now.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other things almost certainly drove him to

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>do this now as opposed to two weeks ago. The

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>first is just, you know, over the last couple of weeks,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it has become clear that several of the defenses that

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Mr Musk was trying to put forward and those windows

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>were starting to close a little bit. You know, his

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bought hunt that he was engaged in didn't seem like

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it was yielding the types of gross disparities between Twitter's

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and what the data scientists were finding. That he

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>could walk away because that was a material adverse effect

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that probably was also going to imperil some of the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>situations related to fraud. A lot of the earlier discovery

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>motions dealt with communications back and forth, and seems pretty

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>clear that Mr Musk was well aware of bought issues.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's why he was going to go into

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this deal, and he was telling everyone about it. So

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the off ramps that he

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>had kind of hoped he'd be able to get those

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>windows started to narrow considerably, and it made it look

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>more and more like, well, this may be a company

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that I end up owning. When you combine that with

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the fact that a He's about to go into a deposition,

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that deposition was probably going to be excruciating long and

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly a little bit embarrassing, because there are a lot

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of claims that he or his lawyers had made that

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>had been almost fully rebutted by other witnesses, and it's

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>clear that he was going to be called and and

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>may still be called on a lot of those inconsistencies,

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know that would be videoed and shown in court.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that going into that deposition there

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>never fun, but this one was going to be a

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly unpleasant one, and then you finally combine it with

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that if things are starting to shape up

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to look as though Mr Musk is now overwhelmingly likely

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that be owning Twitter. However, this thing settles how much

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>more does he want to try to ncap this company?

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Because most of his defenses you pretty much boiled down

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to saying Twitter is a terrible company. Who would want

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy it, who would want to own it, who

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>would want to work for it, who would want to

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be a customer of it? And if that's going to

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be his booby prize at the end of the day,

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe he sort of thought it's best I stopped being

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the saboteur and start being the booster of

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this company. And so it's not terribly surprising that at

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>some point, well, once he real is that he's going

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to be trying to recruit people to stay, the employees

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to stay, another investors to come in. That involves telling

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a positive story, not a negative story, and and the

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier he can pivot to doing that, perhaps the better.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>His offer was made with a proviso that the Delaware

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Chancery Court enter an immediate stay of Twitter's fight and

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>adjourn the trial. His offer came with the proviso that

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there be an immediate stay of Twitter's legal fight and

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>an a german of the trial. Twitter has not done that.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Is this a case of fool me once, Shame on you,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>fool me twice, shame on me, fool me three, four

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>or five times, shame on Twitter. Well that was a

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>nice try by Mr Boss, but quite frankly, you know,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the imagery of Lucy holding the football and Charlie Brown

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>running up to kick the football again I think is

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely in play here, right. The fact of the matter

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is that letter sort of says I am gonna undertake

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to agree to do what I've already agreed to do

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>in was trying to back out on. And so when

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you really read that letter closely, yes, it signals that

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he's had a change of heart, that he's willing to

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>try to close this deal on its original terms. That's

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>great news for Twitter, but it doesn't really put his

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>money where his mouth is. It's conditioned on an immediate

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>stay of all proceedings and on the debt commitments closing. Well,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fact of the matter is that doesn't

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>really change any of the positions that he was in

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>All it does is it signals that he's now more

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>open to closing on these particular terms. So Twitter would

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be foolish if they said, Okay, now that you've signaled

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this relatively limp willingness to go forward, we should just

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>put everything on hold, even though we're careening towards this

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>October seventeenth day. You know, if part of what was

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>motivating him to issue this letter was sort of a

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>fear of walking into that deposition room, well, if that's

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, has come to Jesus moment and deciding he's

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>going to soften up on the steal, why would Twitter

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ever want to put on the brakes on their lawsuits.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm Twitter's attorneys and it seems like this

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is what they've been doing, you know, you're telling your associates, no,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't plan a trip to the Bahamas that week.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>We're planning to go to trial and until and in

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>less the ink is dry on a deal that's much

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>more credible than the first one. We're not gonna let

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this slow down, you know, any or at least not

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>very many parts of the schedule that we put in

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>place to get us ready for trial. What happens next.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Is the deposition going to go forward? Well, the deposition

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is scheduled to be on October six and seven, I think,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is absolutely still in the books. Now, they

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>might push the deposition by a couple of days. It's

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>conceivable they would, particularly if it's the queasy feeling about

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that deposition that is in fact um inducing a little

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of softening up with Mr Musk. That is probably

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna mean that other things get accelerated into its place,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>and that would give them maybe, you know, forty eight

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>hours to try to work out whether they can get

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>all of their box in a row to close the deal.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if they are negotiating in the background

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what this closed deal is going to look like, I

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>would expect that Twitter is trying to make sure that

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there are concessions there that are a little bit more

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>concrete than merely a repetition of the promise that he

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>made back in April to close the deal. So, for example,

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they might have him stipulate the various legal outcomes and

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially say I'm going to agree that the specific performance

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is in fact the right order here and concede my

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>liability on the issue, or alternatively, they might say, Okay,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go through this deal, it's going

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to take a few more days or weeks to get

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>things lined up. We would like you to immediately put

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>enough cash and stock in other companies like Tesla and

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX into an escrow account so that if you try

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to back out on it, we don't have to try

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to haul you into court for a specific performance degree.

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have a judge attached that account and have

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it empty out to us and have that will kind

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of put your money where your mouth is. So there

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are ways that they can try to put a few

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>more teeth into this undertaking to close this deal at

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents, But I can't imagine that they would simply

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be happy to both delay and just reaffirm the the

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of the provisions as they are now.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>They can't do too much to the deal to change

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it around, or else they're gonna have to go back

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, issue new proxies to shareholders, get another

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>shareholder vote, and you know, go back to the to

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the debt commitment letter and and and hope to get

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a new one of those as well. So these will

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be mainly sort of um, you know, additions or writers

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to ensure prompt payment by Mr Musk uh and and

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>adding on something like an escrow account or um an

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>admission to liability wouldn't necessarily require changing the other terms

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the agreement. What might the judge do to make

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>sure that this deal happens before she decides to you know,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>before she said, decides to cancel the trial. Well, typically,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, when parties go into deep negotiations about a

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>potential settlement, the judgment will give them a little bit

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of room to do it, but not infinite room to

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do it, because you know, chance McCormick is pretty savvy

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to this as well, that one of the part Mr

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk has been alleged to already have been engaged in

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, stalling tactic in this litigation. So I think

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense in which the courts and Twitter would

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of say, okay, look, we'll give you enough room

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to see if we can negotiate a settlement of this deal,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>but not if all it really is is a pretext

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to put everything on hold. So I suspect that Chancellor

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>McCormick will give them a little bit of leeway, particularly

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>if they both show up saying we really think we're

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>close to a deal, your honor, she might bump a

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of the depositions. I doubt she's going to bump

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the trial date, quite frankly, because you know that's been

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>set for months now, and you know, Chance McCormick is

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>not the only case that she's hearing. She's scheduling all

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>these other cases around it as well. So that week

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>has been reserved and dedicated to this case, and I

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that it's going to be the matter that goes

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>forward at time. You know that there are still pieces

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to put together. One of the big wild cards in

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this case is whether suddenly the lenders in the deal,

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get cold feet and show up and

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>say we're not willing to go forward, which then could

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>throw things into even more chaos. So my guess is

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that these discussions aren't just between Twitter and Musk, but

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the lenders are in the room as well, just trying

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that every you know, all the remaining

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>pieces that have to be put in place can be

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>put in place. Enough assurances can be given to Twitter

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that the deal will close and they can execute any

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>additional paperwork that they need to make that happen. What

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>else could happen to trip up the deal? Well, there

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>still is this wild card about the lenders. Now, the

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lenders don't have a lot of outsum in this deal,

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but there is a set of dominoes that could fall

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>over if the lenders somehow legitimately back out. The most

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>critical one is that if the lenders back out, while

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't forgive Musk entirely of his obligations, it would

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at least per the terms of the contract limit his

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>liability to money damages, which is probably going to be

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the termination fee of a billion dollars. So the lenders

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>backing out for independent reasons, not goaded on or coached

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.359
<v Speaker 1>by Mr Musk, has always been kind of an interesting

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>wild card in this situation, and there aren't too many

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>outs that the lenders have, But it could well be

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that one of the things that is going to be

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, really critical for the lenders, and he is

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>actually part of the deal itself, is that there has

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a solvency certificate that is issued for for Twitter,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's got to be assured that it's going to

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>be solvent upon the closing of the deal, that it

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>won't have liabilities and excessive assets or won't have cash

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>flows that are incapable of meeting its debts. Someone's got

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to sign onto that, and weirdly enough, the entity that

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>has to sign onto that solvency certificate is Elon Musk himself.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So there could be some kind of odd fun and

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>games that take place in which Musque says, I don't

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>think I can sign on to a solvency certificate, and

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>therefore the banks are going to pull their lending, and

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>therefore he doesn't have to close under the contract. I

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>do think that there is a danger that if that happens, though,

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be perceived by Twitter and probably the

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>judge is being a little bit too cute, see, So

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I have some reservations about whether they're even going to

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>try to go down that road. It is a theoretical possibility,

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so that might be something to keep our eyes out on.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>And the letter that Mr Musk sent about his offer

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to you know, come back to the table also says well,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>provided that the debt gets funded as well, So he

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>has kind of worked in some wiggle rooms some margin

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of error on that front as well. And it's something

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you kind of look at, you say, okay,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>this is a letter that has some concessions in it,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is not yet the paragon of predictability that

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Twitter would want or the Judge Eric. Is

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it just coincidence that Musk was getting blowback for his

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>peace plan proposal on Ukraine and then news breaks the

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>next day that he's going forward with the Twitter deal.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there there, you know, have been,

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, in addition to a bunch of the other distractions,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>right um, Mr Musk's decision that he's going to engage

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in foreign policy initiatives for Ukraine being only one of them,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, some bad news for Tesla in terms

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of their production numbers and so forth. I do think

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense that the number of other distractions have

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>grown sufficiently large that maybe Mr Musk sort of thought, Okay,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this was fun for a while, this was entertaining for

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a few months, but now I got other things on

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>my plate, and you know what, I kind of see

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>where this is going anyway, so I might as well

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>close this deal. I think you combine that with the

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know this was not destined to be

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a walk in the park, this deposition, I think there

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>would be a lot of cringe worthy moments for Team

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Musk during this deposition of staments that are just outright

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent and by Twitter's account, just lies about what Mr

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Musk did and didn't do in his communications back in April.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>That no one really wants to have to sit through

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that squirm fest of a deposition, And thanks so much. Eric.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That's Eric Tally, a professor at Columbia Law School. Tom Barrick,

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Colony Capital and a close ally of

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, is on trial in Brooklyn for using his

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>access to the former president to secretly help the United

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates to try to gain influence over American foreign policy.

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutors say that Barrick and his former assistant Matthew Grimes

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>were the eyes and ears and voices of the u

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a E, providing the country with sensitive information and access

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to the highest levels of US government. But the defense

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>says Barrick was a globe trotting businessman who ran a

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>forty billion dollar investment fund and called the prosecutions allegations

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that he was an illegal foreign agent nonsense. Joining me

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as Bloomberg Legal reporter Patricia Hurtado, who's covering the trial

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>tell us what prosecutors are accusing Barrack of well. Tom

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Barrick is a longtime friend of Donald Trump's who acted

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>as one of his campaign finance guys in sixteen. The

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>government alleges that during the run up to the election,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as Trump's election as president, he and his

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>former assistant gentleman named Matthew Grimes basically conspired to act

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as unregistered foreign agents for the government of the United

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates, and the allegations are that he agreed to

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>do the U a e. S bidding to help influence

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the new presidency and the new the new administration, arranging

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for meetings talking points. He denies it all. He said

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>he was just a business fan doing his business. The

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>government alleges he made money. According to the government, the

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Emirati Sovereign Wealth Funds later invested about three seventy four

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>million into a fund and real estate projects he backed.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>So was there any formal agreement or anything that the

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>government can point to to specifically show the agreement. No,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>which you have to do. And so if you are

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>acting as a foreign agent, it's a violation section. And

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>according to this you're supposed to tell the US government

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're doing lobbying for the foreign country. The US

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>says he failed to tell them that he never registered.

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Neither did Grimes. Meanwhile, they charged an Emirati who is

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>now a fugitive, of acting as the point man basically

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for the United Arab Emirates in the US with Barrick

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and Grimes. And then the minute he understood that the

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>US was investigating, that he left the country. And what

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>about barracks associate that's on trial. Yeah, he's his young assistant.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>He was twenty two when he started working for Barrick

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>right out of Wharton, and he's accused of helping arranged

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>these meetings and helping arrange these communicates. But his lawyer,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Abby Lowell, has said he was just a gopher for Barrick,

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>arranging for making sure he had his bosses smoothie every

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>morning and the coffee was hot, and that the Colony

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Capital private jet had the right food in it. So

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>he was basically his assistant. Nothing more. So is the

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>defense he didn't do it or he didn't get money

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for it, or what. It's both that he didn't do it,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and if he got money, it was because of investments

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that were just separate and apart from any kind of activity.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Basically that he denies any wrongdoing. He denies being an

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>unregistered foreign agent, he denies acting and lobbying on behalf

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of the United Arab Emirates, And in fact, he's argued

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that there were actually points where he was advocating for Cutter.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>There was a blockade to ends Cutter, and he was

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>advocating for Cutter, which is another Gulf country which was

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>violently opposed by the UAE and they were basically sworn enemies.

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So why would you support one country and then support

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>another country when their enemies? What would you say from

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the opening statements is the best piece of evidence the

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>prosecution has. Well, I mean, the other thing that he's

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>charged with is lying to the FBI about this investigation

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when they question him point blank. Now, a lot of

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the evidence has been alluded to, but it's under steal

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's classified. So there's apparently information there that has

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>been redacted half of the documents that get filed or

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>blacked out, according to the defense, but they expect to

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>call people in the former Trump administration to discuss that

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump and high ranking officials and the Trump administration were

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>away error that Barrick was talking to the Emiratis and

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this was just the way they did business, and they

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>were using Barrack because he was well known to them.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the arguments is that Trump gets elected

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>as a businessman and a former reality TV sheet show host, right,

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so he doesn't have the traditional avenues of knowing who's

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a former foreign policy advisor. You know,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that can be a conduit to reaching the newly elected president.

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So he would still have to register as a foreign agent, though,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't he? Yeah, he would, And but I think the

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>argument is if Trump maybe knew, and maybe high ranking

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>members of the administration knew that this was being done,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess there is an argument of plausible deniability as

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>far as the defense is concerned, right, because if they knew,

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem here, and that perhaps another administration is

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing different because Trump is no longer in office. It

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like lying to the FBI is one of the

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>prosecution sort of fallbacks in these cases. And that's an

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>easy case for the prosecution to make because the FBI

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>usually has the answer is before they asked the questions. Yeah,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting because they're arguing the same defense Martha

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Stewart made, which is you guys didn't take notes. I

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mean you took notes by hand, but you didn't record it.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you know you didn't write the questions down?

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>How do we know that the answer was wrong when

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the question? He answered, you know you

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>have an answer, but you don't know what the question was.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.479
<v Speaker 1>And so how's the jury supposed to infer the worst

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>possible interpretation and take the worst inference? Well, we know

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that defense did not work for Martha Stewart. How is

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>jury selection? One of the interesting things that happened during

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>jury selection is jurors were questioned closely about their feelings

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about Donald Trump himself and how closely they followed the

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen campaign, and um, the judge actually asked prospective jurors

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>how did they feel about Trump? Donald Trump himself and

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>what would they think if he came in to testify

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>as a witness in this case. So that was extraordinarily

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>unusual to hear that, especially at a time when we're

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>having the Moral Lago investigation and whether or not, you know,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the January six hearings are going on and what transpired there.

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's quite interesting that there's some possibility that

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump or high ranking members of his administration could

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be called in to testify, including Jared Kushner and possibly

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and um former

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Steve the Nuchin about what did Barracks say

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and what did you know about it? Did the judge

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>let jurison who had any negative thoughts about Trump negative

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>feelings about Trump? For the most part, it was almost

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like if they were very discreet, they did not get

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>kicked off the jury for cause. You know, there's peremptory

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>challenges where both sides get to object to a certain

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>juror for whatever reason. They don't have to cause. But

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>there are times when the judge could struke someone for

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>prospective juror for cause if they seem to be they

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't speak English, well, they're hard of hearing, they have

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a hardship for childcare, for example, or a job hardship, right,

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so they can't sit on a five week trial without

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>losing income, which would be devastating to their household or

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So there were people that were very

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>articulate critics of President Trump, including prospective jurors that had

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>said he was a crook. Now, those people got struck

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for cause immediately, or people who are very loquacious and

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>talked at length about how closely they followed the election

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and that they wanted Hillary Clinton to win. They were

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously candid, and they got struck for cause. But there

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>were other people that said, oh, yeah, I closely follow

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the election, but I didn't care about the outcome,

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a head scratcher. Was like, are

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they not being forthcoming to tell you the truth about

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>what they who they wanted to win. So sometimes those

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people were struck. There was one woman who said she

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was upset about the outcome of with Michigan Governor Gretchen

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Whitmer's case. So immediately the government is raising a red flag, going, uh,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>this is a person who might believe in conspiracies and

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Q and on or whatever. So um, finally I think

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the government struck her. But so that's the kind of

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>thing where the judge made the prosecutors sometimes use their

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>peremptory challenges to people who might be stealth Republicans. So um,

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>these are the same charges that former National Security Advisor

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Michael Flynn faced. This case was actually started out of

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Mueller's investigation. It started there and then it ended up

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in main Justice, So started with a special prosecutor and

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>then it went to main Justice and eventual late now

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's in the Eastern District of New York with a

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice component too, out of prosecutors. So how

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>many witnesses so far? Any interesting witnesses so far? There's

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>been at this testimony from an expert and he's a

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>professor of um Middle East studies basically, and he's talking

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>about the history of all these countries and sovereign wealth funds,

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>which to me was fascinating because he's talking about these

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Gulf states who have principalities. They're run by sheikhs or

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>princes or kingdoms, and they are oil rich and some

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of them, like the UAE United Arab Emirates, was interested

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in using soft power and they use their sovereign wealth funds,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>some of them with you know, unbelievable amounts of cash

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>behind them. One of the sovereign wealth funds has something

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like eight hundred billion dollars in assets, and they they

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>do things like to win soft power and win good

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ill around the world, investing in things like sports teams

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>like Arsenal or Manchester United UM. They built the United

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates built a stadium in downtown London based with

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, for goodwill UM. You can also see the

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Saudias doing this with Live Golf, which has decided to

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>invest and have UM golf tournaments, to the criticism of

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>some people. So it was fascinating to me to hear this,

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, soft power influence and what they're trying to

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>do UM to buy goodwill including also back in doubt

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 1>chairs at universities for academic and research as well as

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>a think tanks. So fascinating to listen to. So this

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>next week I think we're supposed to listen to more

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>experts to set the ex stage of what was at stake,

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>why would have done this and why the government thinks

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Barrick did this. You have the two defendants, they both

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have their own attorneys. Does their defense contradict each other

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in anyways? No, essentially a joint defense. And you know

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Grimes's defense lawyer showed jurors pictures of his client. He

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>apparently met Tom Barrick as a sixteen year old. He

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>started a DJ business in Santa Barbara when he was

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and when he was sixteen, he got hired by

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Barrack's wife to be the DJ at Barrack's sons graduation

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>party from eighth grade. So they have a picture from

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Grimes at that young tender age of sixteen. He's all

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nine now and he looks very young. So,

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, they seem to have a joint defense. That

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>seems to be, you know, working hand in glove together.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Patty. That's Patricia Hurtano, Bloomberg Legal Reporter, and that's

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you can always get the latest legal news on our

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast Slash Law,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and remember to tune in to The Bloomberg Law Show

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>every week night at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>June Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg