WEBVTT - Super Bowl LIV Kansas City Chiefs Player Props,

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Listen se Deity Dunnity, Yeah, right now. Welcome your host

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Friday from My God Rob Say Francis stand ball, ladies

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, you're by with that. We want to be

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>inside of Studio thirty four. This is the b FFS.

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>He is Frank Snapville. I am Greg Salzman. Are you

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>what's happening man, Greggy? Happy Thursday to you, but one

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>step closer to the super Bowl. We've got a lot

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>going on. We want to talk about the Kansas City

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs today as well. If my eyes are not deceiving me, yes,

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems that you did not change the YouTube title

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and description. I thought that was usually something that somebody

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>else does yeah, me, I thought I was hosting the

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Friends you you texted me. So I texted

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you letting you know that the title and description is

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>ready to go, right, And I was all that, you're good.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So I assume that you were going to update it.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>But those who are watching on YouTube, they think that

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they're still watching Fay. You know why because usually when

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not here, I put it in there and Alex

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>does it. So I was, no, he's not here, Alice,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>We'll just do it, you know. So, Alex, if you

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>could help us out downstairs. You know he's still here

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone downstairs, and the titles and descriptions, it is already

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>written out. What you gotta do is copy and paste.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>And we just got a buzzer. Greg, off to a

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>great start, Happy Thursday, buddy, the buzzer. I think so

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it was me probably. I'm sorry you lost you lost

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the ready down rout to a great start. What's the password? Now? Anny?

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You're too good to me. We've we've got life savers downstairs, Greig,

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not the candy I saw. I can do it now.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready. Where do you go? How are you doing?

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you sleep? Last night? Greig? I faked very well.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know why because fill coast to coast, which you haven't.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch yesterday as you watch today four pm

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Eastern right here at sports right. What are you doing

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>if you aren't watching? Dude? I thought it went really well.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I was really really happy and I went about It

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was very, very tired lastnight. It worked hard, long day,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and I heard music this morning. Wait a minute, the

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>music is my alarm. Oh my god. And that's how

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I felt. Just slept straight through, not straight through that

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I woke up from your arm like well when you're

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to wake up, but I couldn't, like believe it.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But no bathroom breaks in between the night nightmares, you know, nightmares,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>No only waking up and looking at the clock. It

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was literally just oh my god, my alarm and it

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was time to go. Huh, this is crazy. Did you

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>watch the Knicks last night? I did. I was there

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in person. It was great. No, was an entertaining game.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Why were you there? Free tickets freakings? Yeah, that's we've had.

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We had. We had a little fiasco last night at

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the garden. Fiasco. You didn't even tackle what did you eat?

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>We were nervous about nothing. I didn't. This is the

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>first time I ever went to a sporting event or

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>any event really. I guess music events included where I

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>did not consume a single thing. Greg, It's weird. It

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was weird. I didn't move out of my seat for

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half hours. My buddy rob Its never fails,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the guy who got us out of our predicament, Robbie anything,

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>rob Ate nothing. We both sat in our chairs for

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half hours. That sounds boring. It was great.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.239
<v Speaker 1>It was me constantly refreshing to see what the teams

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>were on Pace four because I had the under in

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, so that didn't hit, so that sucked. My

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>streak of being to do is just Frank at a

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>nascally and is refreshing his phone on and NBA picks.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get better, Greg, You live and learn. That's

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned, especially when it comes to NBA pick right.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Here's the good news. You're still You're still living. It

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like you've learned. What do I learn? You

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>quit betting on basketball because you were so bad. They

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>got back here yesterday. I'm back. How did you do?

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Next question? I feel like this is the impeachment trial.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I played the fifth We're just we're asking questions and

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not getting as did you like did you like

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the map that I created for the Fantasy Football Friends?

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>But I saw the map. I saw that previously, the

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>map of where all the Super Bowl Number one Super

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Bowl recipes in each state. I had seen that earlier

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the week. Did anything surprise you there? Why is

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>New York chili? Is that? Is that a thing? Really?

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I've never had chili on the Super Bowl. Chili's definitely

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Yeah, obviously the day does it. I was

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>pumped that he's a Jersey guy. We have the Buffalo

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>chicken dip in Jersey. Real helping about that. I like

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo chicken love. Oh my gosh, dips are where it's at. Man.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The dips are underrated for sure, even for chips like

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the French onion dip. Come on, dude, even ranched. Have

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you ever had ranched it. I've had ranched stiff with

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the ruffles, and exactly I got exactly you're thinking, I

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>like blue cheese dipping anything one fact, never had blue cheese,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and oh my god, you like it? Maybe you're like, wow,

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this taste you know, I almost lived through my fiance

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>when she tried it, and like her face was so

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>disgusted and like the way that she described it to me,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I can never try that. It sounds disgusting,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I should try it. You're a big

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>blue cheese guy. Greg is a big any cheese guy.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Like most cheeses. We're gonna talk about the chiefs today.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think like so, I like most like most cheeses,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>although prefer hard cheeses. The soft cheeses in general is

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>deadfast rule. All right? What do you mean by that

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that I don't like Bree, for instance, cheese. I've had

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Bree cheese on sandwiches before. I've never eaten it by itself,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so I don't. I've tasted it on a sandwich. It

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>tastes fine, never just happy. It's it's soft, it's a slice. Okay, Oh,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like a spread. Yeah, exactly. Maybe I haven't had it.

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I've had it though, all right, So you're

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>out on Bree cheese. What are the other soft cheeses?

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of soft cheese, like recorded cheese. You don't

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like recorded cheese Evercorda cheese and big city man, So

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we record it's fine favorites. I don't make

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>my bazzeity with ricotta either, do I fund it? There?

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It is there, it is. Put a little meat sauce

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in there. He has some mots. Let's go. Yeah, you

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>got it man, You got any any vegetables in there? Now?

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Lasagna actually have had a vegetarian Lasagnia, but normally no,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the meat sauce. It's the mutts. Yeah, last year

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>fresh sauce. Last year we made bull. Last year last

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>night made bull and as the cheese like put peas

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in it. Well, that's that's the spicy sauce. You beat sauces.

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It just meat sauce, but not baking the young Yah.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, he's Frank, I'm Greg. They're not talking Super

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Bowl food. We're already talking cheese props. We'll do that next.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Don't

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>go on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and draft kings this season.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>code dunk. Visit daily Rodo dot com backslash dunk to

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>learn more. Alright, so back here the b f F Spranstample,

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I have some news regards to the NBA. Don't talk

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about Chiefs and Super Bowl whatever news. We're never gonna

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>get the Chiefs, the Chiefs, the war Flower. The NBA

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is changing their All Star game format, adding a Kobe tribute.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>The NBA announced major change. According to the AP, NBA

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>announced major change the All Star format Thursday, Attorney every

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter into a mini game for charity before and before

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an untimed final quarter with a target score. They all

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the side which team wins. Scores will be reset back

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to zero zero at the start of the second and

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>third quarters. Then they will go back to where they

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>were at the beginning of the fourth quarters. That I

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>don't get it, Okay, they're what they're just mini games.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Each quarter is a minigame. It sounds like the first

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter and the fourth quarter are the game. The second

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>quarter in the third quarter are minigames. Why are they

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that? It's a Kobe tribute, right, they're saying that

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>will yet So that's where that is not is what

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>related to to Kobe? Okay, that's where the tribute to

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian begins. The team that wins the All Star Game

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>will be the first to reach a target score determined

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>by the total points that team in the lead scored

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first three quarters combined. It seems convoluted. I

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's going on right now. I don't

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>even know what you're saying. It sounds like another language.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>She's for a lot of time considering the right target

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>number to use for the fourth quarter. For the events

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of this week, it came clear to us of the

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>only program number of this season's All Star Game. Right,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they should have just did the thing with the for

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>one jersey and for the other one much easier. The

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>teams that scored the most points in the first quarter

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>will win a hundred grand for its charity. Same will

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>apply the second in the third quarter. That's cool. The

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>scores get added for the fourth quarter, so that target scorer. So,

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, the score is one going in the fourth quarter,

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the team that wins the All Star Game will be

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the first to reach one. Get it? Sure it makes sense,

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like a normal time limit kind of okay,

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so it sounds here right, So I think that I

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think I understand it now as terms. So you start

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the game right, zero zero the score first quarter. First quarter,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you play let's say the All Star Game, so it's

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>five Team Lebron beats Team be on US with mere winning,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>not beating win winning against Team US. At the start

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the second quarter, scoring back to zero zero. Same

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>thing happens at the end of the third quarter as well.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>At the end at the end of the second quarter,

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as the fourth quarter starts, the combined scores the first

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>three quarters are back together, okay, and then the target

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>score will be twenty four points higher than the leader

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>has at that point. So you only need to score

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four points in the fourth quarter exactly, Well, one

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>team only need to I mean it's gonna take only

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take like four minutes in the All Star Game.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>So much scoring in the All Star Game that that

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's it, alrighty, Well, I appreciate that they're trying to

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have a tribute for Kobe Bryant, but they really went

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>about this and really there will be roundabout way. So

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there will be other tributes, they said, a nightfull of

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>them for him and and gianna. Um. So what's the

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>point of resetting the score again, I don't just because

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's for charity. It's for charity, so the winner of

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>each quarter gets dollars for their charity or their charity.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>There's at least you can do that. You can do

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that without resetting the score, Like we have the box

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>score for reason right where kind of shows you the

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>score in each quarter. They don't need to reset the score.

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a one year change, all right. Well. As

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a Kobe Bryant fan, I'm happy that they are trying

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to uh commemorate his life and

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>his daughter's life as well. Um, But it seems like

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a little bit too out there, a little

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>bit too convoluted. This is very strange, very strange. I

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I'm happy that it's for charity as well.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>It's great, But yeah, probably could have done this a

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit different. We go back to the Reds red

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>some date. I really wanted to do the Chiefs here, Greg, Well,

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs and the Reds are both red. Sure, potentially

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>like the color of the gatorade after the game, and

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the Savors before not as well. Free agent reliever Pagro Stroke.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Now remember the Reds Okay signs for a one year

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>deal for one point five million dollars. Well, there's this

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>up to three and a half million. Doesn't really change

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>anything for the Reds all that much outside of the

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bullpen is better now, so that helps their starting pitchers

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially hold onto wins, more so for Luis Castillo, for

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Gray, for Trevor Bauer. Although you know Trevor Bauer

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna win any games. He's just not going.

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I had him like we had him last year. He

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't win many games at all, Greg Um, and I

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>guess he's probably the setup man behind Rice Selly Glaziers

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with you. So if anything were to happen to a Glaziers,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're drafting in a draft and hold type of

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>format and the Draft Champions League in the NFBC, where

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>look fifty rounds off team league, that's a lot of

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>players being drafted, Greg, you're doing it, you might win

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>your handcuffed Rice Selly Glaciers. It seems like that will

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be Pedro Stroke. There you go, Pedro Strop. Now, remember

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>of Cincinnati reds. Is therething else you're supposed talk about that?

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Um No, I mean you could just go anywhere at

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this point, Craig, why don't you give me an update

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on the impeachment? Alright? So so today Kan City Chiefs,

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go Greg. You asked for an update. I was

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>giving you an update the Kansas City cheaps. What about him?

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Where do you want to start at the top. Let's

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>start of the salt. Let's start with the quarterback, that

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is Patrick Mahomes. Mahomes is the favorite to win the MVP, Franky,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed yesterday. When you look at he's passing

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>our numbers. The over under, according to the Vandal Sports Book,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sits at three hundred and a half passing yards. MIGHTUS

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>one eight teen for the over, mightus one oh eight

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for the under. Frank, what do you think I lean

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with the over? I mean, this isn't one of my

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite props. Again, but the way that the Chief's offense

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is playing right now, and we think this is going

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a competitive game, they're not going to take

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>their their foot off the pedal here. We saw that

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a It's the Tennessee Titans too, even when they were

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>up I believe it was ten points at the time.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>There was a deep ball to Sammy Watkins, so you

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>know they're not going to really let their foot off

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the pedal in this one. But it is worth mentioning

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that he did go under three d yards last time

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>out against the Tennessee Titans. The forty Niners defense a

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than the Tennessee Titans defense. I lean

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>over here, Greg, but it's probably one that I'm not playing,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if I'm being perfectly honest. Yeah, I also lean over.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I really like Patrick Mahomes. It's a really big number.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can bet on this one, be

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>honest with you. He has gone over this number in

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly eight of sixteen games. So you want to talk

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>about betting on a coin flips been on tales, never fails,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than touch the Patrick Mahomes over under yardage problem. Yeah,

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing it, but you want to saw Patrick

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes yardage? Do you likemes rushing yard? I do? And

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>before we get into that real quick, the forty Niners

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fewest passing yards in the NFL this entire season,

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's another reason why you might wanna either fade

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes in this spot or maybe just stay away again.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>If I had to play it, I would play the over.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm with you. I do like the over with

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes rushing yards, which is all the way up

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to thirty and a half. Greig, this is not Lamar Jackson,

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is Patrick Mahomes. He still like the over. I like

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the over when it comes to rushing for Patrick Mahomes.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that even though it went up for as

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned from twenty and a half, twenty five and

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a half, that's like thirty and a half. That's what

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was his running the football, and he will do the

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs won't hold anything back, and they'll do anything that

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they end. You get the reference, won't hold anything back. No,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what is that from da It's the water Boy? Oh?

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I like water Boy at the movie? When do they

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>say that, thank you very much? Given the scene? Give

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>me the scene. It's the entire it's the entire movie.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Fousts announced saying he's like, oh, he's doing that

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because he won't have anything back, he can't learn anything back.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And then he Bouchet scores in the championship game in

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bourbon Bowl, right, you know, in the Bourbon Bowl

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>do you know why he scored? Because they'll do anything back.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Guess I didn't really paid much attention to Dan Fouts

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in that movie. Of course, Greg's watching the Waterboys, paying

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>attention to the broadcast as usually who they are there.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You go over three and half rushing yards. He's been

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>running all postseason. I think it continues. I'm with you. Look,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners will have a third most rushing yards

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to quarterbacks this season, three and eighty rushing yards. How

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about this, Greg, They allowed Matt Ryan Matt Ryan to

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>rush for twenty seven yards this season in a single game.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the season high, not only this year, but

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>dating back to the last year and not ever. I

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>actually looked it up because I thought it might have

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>been this is this has to be Matt Ryan's largest

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards output of all time. But it wasn't. He

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has actually done that a few other times. But they

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed Matt Ryan to go for twenty seven. They allowed

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson to average forty one rushing yards per game

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>they played twice. They allowed Kyler Murray to average fifty

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game they played them twice. Lamar Jackson

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>ran for a hundred and one yards homes back to

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>back games with fifty three rushing yards. Greg Over his

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>last eight games, he's averaging thirty point three rush in

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. I don't think this is out of

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the realm of possibility. I'm with you. If I'm gonna

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>get artists props from my homes, give me the over

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing rather than overpassing. All right, let's look more about

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs when we return to the fantasy

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the f as here on Sportscrade. I want to be

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate on fandel

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts, breaking news, lake swap support

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and much more safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot com

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>backslash Dunk to learn more. I know is the best part. Right,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We're alive. Here we are, I'm not talking about fantasy baseballs.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if there's anything that can help Greig

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Sussman's basically, look this another time next week. Probably you

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>want to let the lab on Draft Kings and FanDuel

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is the NHL Draft season. Then join Daily roder dot com.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Learn the best daily fantasy sports players. Get uptimated fantasy,

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>get updated fantasy hockey projections for NHL DFS line combinations

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and build stacks re tournaments in the Daily Road to

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>NHL DFS lat O Boximizer. You're playing DFS hockey without

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>using Daily Roader dot com, You're doing it wrong. And

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to the promo code actiontem sent discounts. Promo code action

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for ten percent discat Daily Roader dot com. Millionaires are made.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm not talking about fantasy baseball, friend, let

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you want it. I have questions. All right, Let's let's

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>continue chatting about the Kansas City Chiefs. Darwin uh Thompson

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>never really popped this year. Why is that? Because Damian

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Williams did. When Damie Williams got healthy, he once again

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was the man for the Kansas City Chiefs. The over

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>under for the Super Bowl sits at fifty two and

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a half according to the FANDULS Sports book on Big

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams guy. But the problem is the Chiefs don't

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to rush the ball. Frank, the two and a half

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seems high to me. Damian Williams fifty two and a

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>half does seem high based on what he's done in

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Now, I will say this, Greg, he is

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>dominating snaps in both games. Absolutely has played or more

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps for the Kansas City Chiefs. So it's

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a one man show right now for for Damian Williams

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Kansas City Chiefs, and this seems to be

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the time of year where he dominates most. The problem

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>is he the Chiefs don't really run the ball all

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that successfully. Greg. As great as their offense is, it's

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of downfield passing. It's over the middle of

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the field, passing the Travis Kelsey. It's if you're trying

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to take away Kelsey and you're trying to take away

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Kill. It's we're gonna throw out to Sammy Watkins,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>will throw out to McCole, Hardman, DeMarcus Robinson. It doesn't matter.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>But the word, the keyword there is throw. So they

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really run the ball all that great. And against

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans, he had just forty seven rushing yards

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Tennessee Titans. He had just forty five rushing

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>yards and that was a game where those are two

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>games where they played with the lead for most of

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the of the So we're still trying to pret the

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>game flow here in this game. Could beat some back

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and forth here, Hi total Eileen under here, But it's

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>probably a stay away from me just because he's the guy, right,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So if you're getting eighty five percent of the snaps,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>let's just say the Chiefs are playing with the lead

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter, like, yeah, there's definitely a chance

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to go over fifty two and a half rushing yards.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not a big number, and it's actually easier to

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>run the ball against San Francisco than it is to throw.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>They allowed four point one four yards per carry to

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs this year. They were much better against

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the past. So it's a stay away from me. But

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>if I had to choose one, I would go with

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the under. So eaty two and a half is a

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>total four totally yards for Damie Williams. I'm much more

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>interested in discussing that than they'll just rushing yard number

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of fifty two and a half. I just think I

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>don't want to rely on the Chiefs to rush them all.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Anybody doesn't care about it at all, And you're right

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in the game flow go as we predict and expect

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it will maybe they will run the ball out in

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter. I just don't see it. I don't

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>want to take that shot. If you want to talk

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about total yards eighty two and a half, I think

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a more viable conversation. Right, this is insane. I

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just looked up Damian Williams receptions. It's four and a half.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a running back. Yeah, the San Francisco four and

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>niners allowed the third fewest running back receptions this Seasoning

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the under, well, it's minus one six, so everyone's taking

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the under. But I mean, look, there's a reason why

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>they moved this number up to four and a half

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>because when I checked it last week, it was three

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So there must be a lot of

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>money coming in on the over there. And that's like

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a perfect number, the three and a half range for

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams. I was on the over three and a

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>half against the Tennessee Titans. The thing is the Titans

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>were susceptible to pass catching running backs. The forty Niners

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are not so for this number two four and a half.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You gotta hammer the under right now that but again

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you gotta lay so much juice, like was the Jews

0:22:55.640 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>worth the squeeze? Greg minus one x uh. For total

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>receptions there with Damie Williams, I do like the under there.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I think if you want anything to do with Damian Williams,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are right, you gotta look at the total yardage there. Uh.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And last week he did have the five receptions for

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>forty four receiving yards against the Tennessee Titans. The week before, however,

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>he's had just two receptions for twenty one yards. The

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>common denominator for both of those games was he's been

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>targeted six times, So he's gonna get those five six

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>targets in these games, Greg. But I'm definitely taking the

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>under on the receptions. Uh. And I'm probably more interested

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the over in total yards rather than rushing yards

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>because we know what kind of dynamic pass catcher he

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is after the catch, So my all, honestly, I don't

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>love those Damian Williams props. The only Damian Williams props

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they want. And it's not like it's good number. It's

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>any time to hunched down a score. I feel like

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams finds the end zones. It's minus one thirty

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>five minus. That's minn drafkings, so it's about it's about

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the same. So it seems like I never do first

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>TOUCHDOWND score. I think such that was anytime. No, no, no,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, if you want to know what the

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>number is, the plus six fifty him and Raheem most

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>are the favorites, so you get a little bit more

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>value with draft kings there. But I personally would never

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>play first touchdown score just because it's so flukey. You

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>have no ridiculously fluke. You're just you're just gonna going

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to be upset. I see that his his rushing attempts

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is at thirteen and a half. I kind of like

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the over that. That's interesting. He's been twelve and fifteen

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the past two games. But again he's playing so much.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Darwin Thompson, one and a half is the rushing attempts.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The under is minus. He had one rushing attempt last week,

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>had zero the week before, So I kind of like

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the under. Anything Darwin Thompson agree, is that anything there?

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I will let you know in a second. I want

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to see what the rushing yardag is for Darwin Thompson

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>five and a half? Greg, can you get two carries

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in this game? Why not go for the six yards?

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the underman. I feel like that's free money, right,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Arvin Thompson under five and a half. He may be

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>an active. Sean McCoy's an interesting prop to there's no

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Shaw McCoy player props. There was a prop on will

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he retire after the game? No, Sean McCoy. There were

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>props on will any of these players retire within the

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>week of after the Super Bowl ends? So it was

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like Lashawn McCoy, there were a few other Drew Brees. No,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just players who are playing this game. I think

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was probably one of them. His name is Escaping Mirror Clark.

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Now the pass rusher. You're you're in the right uh team?

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 1>He's sizzled. Will he retire within the week? Definitely a possibility, right,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>go out on top of the Chiefs. I can seem

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like winning more than a week. And then he signed

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore right like seriously, so yeah, like, why would you

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>do it? I'm not doing that? This is hilarious, all right,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So retirement specials they have. Torell Suggs is yes. Plus

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>one fifty. I actually read something somewhere that said, if

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you ever see a prop that only gives you odds

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on yes, don't even think about taking it. I don't

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>even give you the odds on No. So Terrell Suggs

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to retire within before February, that's the date to cut off.

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Plus one fifty is yes, Lashaw McCoy plus three hundred

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is yes, Emmanuel Sanders, which is not happening. A plus

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred is yes. There are nothing for there's nothing

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>for no, but it just a bond. Finding the retirement specials,

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>greg I found a category on DraftKings fat man t

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>d Yes, any offensive lineman to score a touchdown in

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this game? Yes, it is plus thirty three hundred. Here's

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the issue. There's only offensive lineman the defensive linement in

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the game, and they catch you pass you don't win

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that right, and he's a fat guy, so what is

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't the offensive lineman technically kind of labeled themselves

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as tight end before the what does that mean? There's

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like there's too much there's so many moving parts, so

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>many moving parts with this prop. It's hilarious because it's

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a category that says fast money. We're out on that.

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, what are we doing next? Al right, next

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the receivers right, tyre killing y to you? Yeah, okay, cool,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get the Tyree Hill receiving yarch Tyreek Hill over

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>under seventy five and a half. I think this number

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 1>sounds right to me. This is where it was at

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>last week. And while he had a great game, he

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't go over that, not finish five for sixty seven,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>had the two touchdowns. Happy you know, if you bet

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on Tyree Kill the score touchdown or score two touchdowns,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you were great, You're prosperous. But he did not go

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>over his yardage prop last week. Greg seventy five is

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a good number. We have seen the past couple of

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks some players make some big plays against this forty

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>nine secondary. We saw Stefon Digs have the forty one

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown. He finished with fifty three receiving yards in

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that game. We saw Davante Adams in the second half

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>come out awesome on fire in the second half last week.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I had that monster catch where Aarond just kind of

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>floated up there and it fell right in the bread

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>basket for Davante Adams. News flash, Harry Kill a little

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>bit faster than Vante Adams. Richard Sherman kind of old. Yeah,

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he just blow past them. Well, they ask this now,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I would take the over on this. But again, like

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the process we mentioned to the

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>prop that I'm most confident in that we've talked about

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>all day is Mahomes over his rushing and Darwin Thompson

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>under his rushing. This kind of falls in the same

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>category as like Mahomes passing yards For me, I agree

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with you totally, and they're they're correlated obviously. That Richard

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Sherman born Tyree Hill potentially. Have you seen the clip

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that's been circulating of him knocking the touchdown away two

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Uh? You know, if you you watch it

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in SloMo, he was there early past interference. You think

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that being burned, Right, nobody's faster than Kansas City Chiefs, right,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you Kino and a half. Right, that's got something that's

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a little tasty. So here's what I would do with

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Hard me if I'm gonna bet anything, hard minutes for

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>him to score touchdown, because if he gets behind the defense,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's either going to be a long touchdown or if

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he scored a touchdown as a special teams touchdown. So

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>now you have the kind of if I'm doing any

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>hardman profits for him to score touchdown, I wouldn't touch

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>his receiving Last week he had one catch for eight yards.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>A week before that too for nineteen. Neither of those

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. No, what's the DeMarcus Robinson number.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, uh, twenty and a half, So I kind

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of like the under on that too. Like last week

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he was two for thirty one the week before that

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one for four more opportunities, Like he dropped like seven

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>passes in that game against the Texans. Yes, you're right

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>he did, but hey, then that's a skill set we're

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at. He's good at dropping passes. That means me,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like the under, you wouldn't touch any of those, dude,

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just like so stupid. That's the new That's that's

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the one. That is the Samy Watkins receiving yards is

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>already eight and a half's gone over in both playoff games.

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>He's actually gone over that number in four of his

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>last six games dating back to the regular season. That's

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the one I'm not doing this. You're not doing it, well,

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's your mistake. I have a feeling our buddy Davids

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Maddock coming up next. He's gonna like Sammy Watkins. He's

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna like Verry Chief. He's a Chiefs Fanatic's next. I

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Dunk on

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more safe ten percent on

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more. Talking baseball,

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where right, Oh we're live. We're talking fantasy basically.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Sure you know he's not talking as baseball quite yet.

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Would that be great? I mean, Davis Manick of rot

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Experts dot com is not talking baseball. Let's talk Davis, guys.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I I actually am getting kind of hyped about seasonal

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball. I think that I want to play in

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the NFBC this year. And do a main event team.

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So I actually am starting to get kind of hyped

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>about fantasy baseball. Whoa, whoa, whoa, All right, flow off

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the chiefs talk Greg. You can just leave for the segment.

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna talk with my buddy Davis Maddick here for

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, because Davis actually competed in the main event

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. I'm gonna have two entries in the main

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>event this year. I'm gonna have two Draft Champions entries

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. So, uh, look, if you want to talk

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a little main event strategy, little NFBC strategy, I'm all ears, buddy.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So I I am certainly not well versed enough in

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the market to know, you know, what kind of strategies

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are considered absurd versus what is considered kind of normal.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think my my first thought from looking on the

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>outside in is that people seem super super confident that

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all of these pictures who have not gotten hurt over

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years are not gonna get hurt

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. Like, Okay, Garrett Cole not gonna get hurt,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Max Scherzer not gonna get hurt. But but isn't it

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>true that overall picture injuries it's like running back injuries,

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Like these guys just get hurt at kind of like

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>an absurd clip. Yeah, that is correct, Um, And you

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>know you're you're labeled injury prone or not labeled injury prone,

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know until it happens, But you're right in that regard, right.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>De Grom and Garrett Cole going in the first round. Uh,

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they haven't really been injured the past couple of years.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>They've been quite healthy. But they're kind of like the

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the workhorse running back where they're so hard to find.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Those those two D plus endings of quality pitching are

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so hard to come by, especially if you want to

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>compete in the main event for the overall, you've got

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to have some horses. Maybe not in the first round,

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>second round, but like if you come out of the

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>first five six rounds and you you don't have like

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one or two starting pictures, you're probably screwed. If I'm

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just being honest, Yeah, I mean, and I gotta I

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have to think a lot or about the strategy and

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking and also like, um, you know, I have a

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>dug too deep into player projections or anything like that yet,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But I like my assumption would be that if you

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>can find three or four guys who can put together

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, fact similarly a seasons even even in stretches,

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know, even if they're not able to do it, um,

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, through the whole season, but they're able to

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>put you know, a quarter of this season together where

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they pitch you know, just overwhelmingly positive. My guest would

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>be is that it's kind of similar to like the

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>zero RB strategy where you also have to grind the

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>waivers really hard to find, you know, good spots, starts

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that at starting picture. Absolutely, that's the

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>LIMA plan, Greg Low, invest in mound aces. There you go.

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>That's your your zero RB theory, Greg, Greg, Greg, let's go,

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to make money this weekend, Davis. Not the

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>NFB say, not the main event, none of this. I

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want to win money. Can you help me do that? Man?

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And when some money? Dude, let's just bet. Let's just

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>bet all the Damian Williams overs. Uh. Let's bet him

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>over fifty two and a half rushing yards over three receptions. Um,

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you can get him on the FanDuel Sports book.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's three fifty, uh, like plus three fifty

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to score two touchdowns are more. We're just we're just

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>jamming in these Damian Williams props. So I'm happy you

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>started with Damian Williams. That's where we just left off.

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>And we're basically saying that we would take the under

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on Damian Williams rushing yards, but that we were more

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in his total yardage prop because obviously he could

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>do more in the receiving game. And we've seen that

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks he's been targeted six times. You

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>know that they've moved the reception total for Damian Williams

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>up to four and a half at the fandals Sports

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>book and the under is like minus one right now.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like, why did they move the number that far?

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Like it's crazy, you know. I mean, I think that

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>player props, as we've seen that, it's not really an

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>exact science because these are not the these are not

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the props like these or these are just not the

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>lines that sports books are most concerned with. I would

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine that FanDuel subscribes to some kind of provider that

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>gives them player props, and uh, you know they're they're

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, whoever is in charge of putting them

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out at the fandal sports book probably has some of

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>their own personal opinions that they put into the algorithm

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>before they published them. So you know, you're just gonna

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>get weird discrepancies like that on player props sometimes. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the one is one nineties six is so large

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's so daunting to me. But I need to

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>bring up Davis or he still you know on Harrison, Butker, Look, dude,

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I already I already bet it. I already bet. I

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>already bet him at a hundred and fifty one for

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>game MVP. It's not like it's not like I can

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>email my sports book and ask for that money back.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that money. It's it's it's already in there. It's

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not coming back. Oh my god. Man. Like I'm

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>tell I'm all about these San Francisco defenders, Like I'm

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sold on that. We talked about it yesterday. Bokers they

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't do dude, Yeah, I saw D four. Do

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we keep bringing up D four? He's the one, right,

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like plus fifteen thousand two an m v P.

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So look, if you think the forty niners are going

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>to win, I guess he kind of just sprinkle a

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the UH on some of those forty

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>niners defensive players, but we want to focus on chief

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>players here today, Davis, and we see the numbers for

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes three hundred and a half as the passing yardage,

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty and a half up to thirty now thirty and

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a half for the for the rushing yardage. Here you

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>can some places you can still bet the one and

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdown. You gotta lay crazy juice like minus

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>two fifty, but two and a half passing touchdowns. That's

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>something I personally like. I don't know if you've ever

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>dabbled with this, but the drafting sports book offers you

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>can just bet over under fantasy points. His over under

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points is twenty two and a half decade points.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>He's on that in four of his last five games.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's personally where Eileen, I like the over on

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the rushing as well. Where do you staying with Patrick

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes this week? I do not like the over on

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>his rushing. I think that that is UH certainly a

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>case where UH recency bias is gonna get a lot

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of people that in me over. I think I think

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like thirty two and so in his career. In

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>his career, he has only done that six times. Uh,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's been uh, he's been in negative rushing yardage

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>more times than that. But I do like the over

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on his fantasy points for sure, because I think that,

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I bet I'm the Chiefs minus one and

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a half minus one twenty and I think that this

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>game is more likely to go over than it is

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to go under it. I think the I think the

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs are going to score a lot of points. I

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think it just scores my points. We talked about this

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so often, Frank that, um, the Chiefs are going to

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>score a lot. Patrick Mahomes is going to do his thing.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But three hundred, just like Tyree Hill where his number

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was at, Like, he's just worriessome because you don't know

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>how they're gonna get there, but they're going they're going

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to score points. Obviously, Davis thinks it's gonna be Fromdamian Williams,

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine, But that over three hundred number of

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>fashion Homes, much like the Damian Williams number me, it's daunting,

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he really is. Yeah, look it's a big number,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but look the guy has been putting up massive numbers

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that we mentioned last week. With all the numbers that

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>he put up, he still only had two hundred nine

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>passing yard. So again the three and a half, it's

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a big number, but we said that, you know, if

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>we had to choose what we do lean with the

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>over there when it comes to Patrick Mahomes, look the

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>other two players that we're gonna focus in on for

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Kansa City Chiefs. We spoke about my Homes, we

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>spoke about Damian Williams. It's going to be Tyreek Hill

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and Travis Kelsey. You know, how have you handled Tyreek

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Hill and Travis Kelsey thus far? Davis? And which one

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>are you focusing on having the better match up here

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco forty niners. So there was a book

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>last night and it's gone now, but that had the

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong numbers out on Tyreek Hill in matchups. So they

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 1>were making him a dog to Manny Sanders and Deebo

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Samuel and matchups. So I don't feel that I don't

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>feel that I need to bet tyreek Hill anymore because

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I was able to wager him as an underdog in

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>receptions and receiving yards to those two forty niners guys.

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in general, if I was still looking

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to get more down, I would be betting the overs

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on Tyreek over so over Tyreek. For you, if you

0:38:56.160 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>were a betting man, you are right, well, so, so

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I think about I think about Tyreek like this. So

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a big difference in his projection between the median

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and the mode, which is, you know, the number that

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>occurs most often or the end point between two different numbers. Really,

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we would never really expect him to finish with seventy

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>seven receiving yards, right, because that's just it's not really

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the type of player he is. We think he's much

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>more likely to finish with, you know, two catches for

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards in a game where Kansas City just you know,

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they they steam roll, they don't have to pass that much.

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But if they are going to be passing a time,

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we would expect him to just clear seventy seven by

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a mile, you know, we'd be thinking a hundred and

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty receiving yards because he averages so many yards per

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>target in so many yards perception. So that makes me

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think that his overs. I just think his medians really

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are under price relative to his range of outcomes. We

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>were really too much fright, not needed Travis Kelsey yet,

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and we did a lot of receivers. Last Davis his

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite one of the moment, but on the end of

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey UM four moments, receiving yards for Kelsey is

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy four and a half any times touchdowns plus one

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred the first touchdowns at plus seven fifty. The total

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>receptions is six and a half. That a lot of receptions, man,

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and the over on that is plus money two plus

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>one sixteen at the hand those sports books. So you

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned like the over is on on both of the

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill numbers there, Davis, how about when it comes

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to Travis Kelsey UM six and a half receptions, the

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.720
<v Speaker 1>overs that plus money and the receiving yards at seventy

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. Have you touched anything regarding Travis

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey maybe in any time touchdown score? So I I

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>did bet him in a matchup versus George Kettle and

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the number was not very good minus one fifteen both

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sides for most receiving yards. But I do think that

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey does record on average more receiving yards then uh,

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>then George Kettle would. So that's the only place I've

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>bet him. I think that if you're if you're betting props,

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't bet the over on the whole team, right

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's very unlikely that Sami Watkins and McCole

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Hardman and Tyreek Kale and Travis Kelsey and Damien's unlikely

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they all hit their overs. He should kind of think

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about how the wage jers are going to play off

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>one another. So if I already have these Tyreek hillovers,

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I probably should not be betting a bunch of Travis

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey overs, But I did bet just you know that

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 1>one specific matchup, all right, David. So we've been talking

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about overs and and some of the big

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>names here with Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelsey and Tyree

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Hill and Damian Williams. What unders are you looking at

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Kansas City Chiefs. We spoke

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about this earlier, Like they have Darwin Thompson's rushing yardage

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>prop is like five and a half, and look, anything

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>can happen if Damian Williams gets hurt. I mean he's

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>going over that easily. But last week he had just

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>one rushing attempt. So, like, are you taking any unders

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on any of these players from Darwin Thompson, some of

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the peripheral players right like Mikole Hardman and de Marcus Robinson.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I have a suspicion that you're a big Sammy Watkins

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>guy as well. So what are you doing with these

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>peripheral players of the Kansas City Chiefs, buddy? But it's

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. Yeah, you're not gonna You're not gonna

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>give me. You're not gonna get me. Coming on air

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>during the Super Bowl and telling people to go bet unders.

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>You know how miserable of a person you have to

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be to bet unders in the Super Bowl? Like I know,

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that unders, first of ball, unders are generally

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>profitable blanket in football. There are so many ways that

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>things can go right for unders. You know, guys can

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>get injured, h the game can go radically off off,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the projected script. But just betting on unders

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>makes you a type of person that I am not,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm not. I'm not betting unders on Keith

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>players in this game already. So with that, I've got

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask you just about Sammy Watkins in general. You

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>strike me as a Sammy Watkins guy and his receiving

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>as receiving yardage is at forty eight and a half,

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>his receptions is three and a half. His longest reception

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is at nineteen and a half. We've seen him have

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>some big plays the past couple of weeks as well.

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's actually gone over that yardage number in four of

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his last six games dating back to the regular season

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. What do you think about Sammy Watkins. Are

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you a Sammy Watkins guy? I feel like you are.

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I am a Sammy Watkins guy this year for like

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>his career, I have not been I've been out on him,

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Sammy Watton's Sammy Watkins Martin Gale system, I

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 1>mean finally hit last week. You know, it only took

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>until the nineteenth week of the season for me to

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>get back to even on Sammy Watkins after chasing that

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Week one performance, and uh, it did feel pretty good.

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I I have not bet on any of his lines

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in this game because the juice on them is not

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>where I want to be. If I was getting plus

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>money on the overs, I probably would bet them, but

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>at you know, minus one ten, minus one fifteen, they're

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>not particularly interesting to me. Let me throw this out there.

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>The other guys right, the decus, the Marcus Robinson, Marcus Robinson,

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Mikole Harmon Harmony. I think there's Blake Bell process. Well,

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I want to be no seriously, Davis. Yeah,

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>he's doing he plays four, he plays of the snaps

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for them, he's played and forty seven percent of their

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>snaps in the playoffs. But he's priced like a guy

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't see the field at all. His his receiving

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>yard prop is one and a half yards and his

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdown prop is twelve to one. Like he's like the

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>best bet on the board, Blake Bell. You heard it

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>here for first, Davis Maddick, Oh, fat guy bet, I

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta pull off the odds here. There's so there's a

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>bet on the draft Kings sports book. Yeah, it's like

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 1>plus thirty fact guy to score. But I feel like

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there's so many moving parts right, Like doesn't a fat

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>guy lineup as a tight end, Like he's still considered

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>an offensive lineman when he's on the field. Like what

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 1>happens if it's a defensive lineman who's a fat guy

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that scored a touchdown? Like there's too many moving parts

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for this, isn't there? Well, I mean draft Kings. They

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want bad customer pr they don't they don't want

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>bad r So, like if alignment scores in this game,

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna grade it as successful because you know, they

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want people complaining like that. That's the worst case

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>scenario for a retail sports book like draft games, so

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna pay it out. I think the issue you're

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna find is Kansas City is not throwing a past

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to an offensive lineman. You're you're looking at, is San

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Francisco gonna do it? And you know they have like

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>five fight ends on the roster, So I think that,

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe if the Titans were in this game,

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe it would be something that I would

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 1>wager on. But these are two teams that really do

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:02.919
<v Speaker 1>not strike me. As I canna throw to their offensive line,

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>then he's out of his mind. His name is Madnick.

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why we love him. Name is Maddock. Following on

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Davis Maddock. We'll be back front of the show,

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>come up next. I don't three avantage of the program.

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts,

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more safe ten

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more.

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>You talking about loud of stuff. Have a good day.

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a really weird image. So I just clicked

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on a few things that were trending on Twitter, and Uh,

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>how weird is this? Greg? How weird? Mookie bats in

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a document that's in the Dodgers gear. That looks weird? Man,

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that looks so weird. I mean, it's definitely welcome. It's

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a Yankee fan, Greg, But wow, that looks weird. I

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>don't really think it works that weird. I see it.

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I see that more than I see him in a

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>come on in the nice navy blue Yeah, batting right

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Fernando Tatis Jr. Let's go, Greg, Let's get

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Mooky to San Diego to the Dodgers. Sandio gonna be

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>good Dodgers. We don't want him to go to the Dodgers, though,

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>because that means the Yankees are gonna have a tougher

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>time winning the World Series. Jesus frank On on January thirtie,

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.359
<v Speaker 1>if I'm already predicting my World Series winner? Were worried

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about that? Later? All right? Right? The Super Bowls this week?

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I forgot up bowl is this week? We have we

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:53.240
<v Speaker 1>got two minutes ago that any of the Chiefs problems

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to mention, we have. We have a Bleig Bell.

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:56.799
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, how do I top that? I don't.

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can. How do I top Bell?

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you do. Man, So he actually said,

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you get in my twelve to one to score touchdown?

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Can you look up Blake Bell anytime touchdown score on

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Fandel because on Draft Kings it's eight to one, it's

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 1>not twelve to one. So you might get better odds

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Fandal sports book. So look, it's not crazy, right.

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>If the forty Niners defense is trying to hone in

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>on stopping Tyree Hill and Travis Kelsey, which makes all

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the sense in the world, it's gonna open up opportunities

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for Sammy Watkins, for Blake Bell, for Damian Williams like

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for these peripheral players not named Travis Kelsey and Tyreek Hills.

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's not crazy you want to throw a few

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>long shot bets out there here for the Super Bowl.

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>You're watching, you've got something on the game, have fun

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>with it. Obviously, maybe you put your larger wagers on

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the total or the winner the spread in the game.

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 1>You sprinkle a little bit on some of these long

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>shot bets. Blake Bell is one of those. Another one

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that I like. Greg we spoke about the forty Niners

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and I mentioned this on the Fantasy Football Frenzy.

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I like George Kittle and Tyreek Hill to combine for

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred plus yards and two plus to touchdowns. I

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really like the combination there because they mean so much

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to their respective teams. Hittle himself could score two touchdowns

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and they can easily combine for two hundred yards. Hyry

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Hill could score two touchdowns. He did it last week.

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't need kindle score at all, you

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>just need them to go for two hundred combine yards.

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You get that at the Fandom Sports Book over at

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>plus five fifty. So that is one long shot bet

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>that I'll be looking at for this weekend. Greg, I'm

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>excited tobout more long shot bets, and then basically really

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>break down the Super Bowl in general. Tomorrow right here

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on the BFFs Wait You're Talking is up next, followed

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>by Coast Gods for Frank I'm grind, We'll do it

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>all Gonnamorrow well