WEBVTT - CHAMPIONSHIP WEEKEND PREVIEW, PREDICTIONS, AND MORE...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.720 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever? What's Up? Everybody? Booked the inside studio of

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty four the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Friday edition, January eighteen.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Getting set up for the NFL Conference Championships in the

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs hosting in New England Patriots and the New

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints Hope hosting the Los Angeles Rams. Will take

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you up to the one pm hour when the Fantasy

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>football frenzy will begin. As always, this week, Reg Sussman

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>still out with the flu, still tending to that. I

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>expect Greg to be back next week and that means

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day is here. Jim, how are you doing, buddy?

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>How did you sleep? Hey? I'm doing good. Brac how

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are you doing. That's Friday afternoon. We only got another

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>day and a half to wait for some football. Yeah,

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it feels like it's been forever since

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we've since we've had some games. And I think part

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of that reason was, I don't know if you feel

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.639
<v Speaker 1>this way to Jim, last weekend's games, they just weren't

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that great. I mean, look, if you if you were

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a Chiefs fan, if you were Patriots fans, so on

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and so fourth, yeah they were great for you, but

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>like not really any close games the Saints and the Eagles.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, was it was the most competitive game?

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, yeah, it was definitely the best game of

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. I agree, and you're right. It just didn't

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>live up to the expectations we all seem to have

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for it because we all thought, you know, all the

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>games would be competitive, and that was absolutely not what happened.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not. You know, I referenced the Rams at Saints.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break down both of these games, the Chiefs

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Patriots as well. We'll break them down from

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>betting perspective. I have a few props I want to

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>throw at Jim. We'll talk about dfs. You know, guys

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that you could uh save some salary with this weekend

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, we'll get into all of it, um,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.839
<v Speaker 1>So I guess you know, we'll jump right in, Jim.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>We we'll start off with the Rams and the Saints. Here.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>The Saints lane three and a half points at home

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. The over under four of this game is

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty six and a half. Last time they met, the

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints won this one five. They combined for

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty points in that game. But something has happened from

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that point to now. You know, I think it was

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>right around Thanksgiving for the Saints and then for the Rams.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It was after that thrilling Monday night game against the

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs. They had a bye week and they

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>came back and ever since, to be honest, both offenses

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>have not been great. So uh, you know, I think

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are going to flock to the

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>over because they see fifty six and a half. The

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>game is indoors. There are a lot of betting trends

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that say, you know, it's like the last the last

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Eighth Dome games in the playoffs have gone over. The

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>number easily gone over. The number Um, but something has

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>happened with these teams over the you know, the final

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>six eight weeks of the season, Jim, where the offense

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is just not clicking as well as it was earlier

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on in the season. Well, there's a couple of you know,

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about betting trends here, and you're right there.

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The offenses that have changed. Um, you know, the both

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>teams have gone to a more grinded out, running aisle game. Uh.

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, basically at the tail end of the season.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we saw last week as well. We

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>saw them come out and grind it out on the

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ground and do most of their damage that way. Keep

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the the offense or at least try to keep them

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>off the field for as much time as we can.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're looking at this game and looking

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at the betting frends like he was talking about, Um,

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>almost all the trends point to the over. Uh. You

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>know there's a few. The The over is seven oh

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Saints last six home playoff games. Um. The

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>home team is a perfect seven and oh against the

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>spread in the last seven meetings between these clubs. Uh.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The over is five and one in the last six

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>matchups in New Orleans. You know what my best better

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the weekend is that this game goes under. Jim, you

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>know what's crazy enough? I was I was hoping that

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you would say, you know, you would just keep pumping

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>up the over, and I was basically gonna do what

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you just did. I was gonna say. One of the

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>bets that I like most this weekend is going under

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with this game because you just look, the Saints defense

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>has turned a corner. I mean, like you want to

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about correlation with Alright, the offense hasn't been great,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but this defense has come a long way since Week one,

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>when you know they got you know, they gave up

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>forty plus points to the Tampa Bay Bucks. Like there's

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>been a complete uh switch in philosophy here for the

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>New Orlean Saints. They're not you know, they're not airing

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball out down the field. They're not having monster players,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they're not putting up a ton of points. Their defense

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is getting it done. I looked into this the last

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>eight games at the Saints have played outside of Week

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen against the Panthers, where they rested everybody. They were

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>allowingly just fourteen and a half points per game, Jim.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So the defense has certainly showed up. And this game

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>features the number one and number two run blocking offensive

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>lines in football. That's per football outsiders, you know the

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>grade run blocking, pass blocking. These both offensive lines were great.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>We we saw that last week to uh, not not

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>as much with the Saints against the Eagles, but with

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the with the Rams against the Cowboys a defense coming

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to that game, the Cowboys have been great against the

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>run all year, Jim, and the Rams. The Rams offensive

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>line was just pushing them around. You look at what

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what Todd Gurley and C. J. Anderson were able to

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>do together. They combined for what somewhat two thirty two

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>forty rushing yards in that game. So, I think we

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of running the football here on both sides,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, kind of playing keep away a little

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bit here. And we've seen long drives from the Saints.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>To remember last week they had an eleven minute drive, Jim,

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>eleven minute drive against the Eagles. I think we can

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of long drives in this game as well,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of keep away. I think Jehan McVeigh and

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rams kind of want to I don't I don't

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>know that he wants to have Jared Golf exposed. One

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>might like, I don't know if that's the right term,

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but in this game against one, I think they just

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>want to run the football. Is that is that part

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why you're leaning to the under in

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>this game well as Frew reasons. Like I said, you know,

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they have definitely gone to a more grinded out, you know,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>running the ball offense, and both defenses are basically underrated.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Both defense pretty good, pretty good, and you know, I

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>just expect that they're gonna want to keep the ball

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the other hands. No, I don't think the

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams want to get into a shootout with Drew Brees.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to get Drew Brees into that mentality

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>where you have to pin him his ears back and

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he has to throw, because Drew Brees is Drew Brees.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>You you get him into that mindset and he'll just

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>pick you apart all game long. I like Jared Goff

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and Goff would have a good game. I just don't

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>think if you're the Rams, that's what you want to do. So,

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, running the ball, especially with the success they've

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>been having, uh, you know, not only with Gurley but

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>also with C. J. Anderson coming into town and running

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like crazy. Uh, there's no reason to try and get

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>into a shootout with this Saints offense. So the best

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do is have success early running the

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>ball and then you know, use it to create some

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>other plays the jet sweep and you know those kinds

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of things coming off of that good running, solid start

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and keep the Saints offense off the field. Um. You know,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as far as the Saints gope, that's the kind of

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>thing they want to do as well. And like you said,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have as much success last week as the

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Rams did, but you know, Philadelphia's front played a lot

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>better than Dallas is did, which to me it was

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of amazing since, like you said, Dallas was great

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all year, but they just got blown up last week.

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>How about them Cowboys? Jim Day speaking of the Cowboys

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Eagles defenses, you're right, Uh, it's just the

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Rams were able to just push around that defense and

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>basically run wherever they are. Uh. So it seems like

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we're both in agreeants on the under here right now.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Fifty six and a half over under. UM, I don't

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that has really moved up or down since

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it opened it. They both opened identical and minustry

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and over under fifty seven identical. That's how he started

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a few trends that I've seen regarding the game the

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>side here and we'll get into that now, Jim. We

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>can kind of break down who we like um for

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the game. Sean Payton and Drew Brees now six and

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>oh in the Superdome in the playoffs in their careers

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>together in those games, Drew Brees fourteen to two touchdown

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to i NT ratio. So, I mean that's pretty much

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>been the m O four Drew Brees in his career,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>especially inside the Supernome, just doesn't turn the ball over

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all of that much. You do have some ball hawks

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on the other side there with a key to leave

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and Marcus Peters. But Marcus Peters giveth and take it.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that in the first matchup against the

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints where Michael Thomas basically just you know,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>he run a muck. He ran a muck all over

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters did whatever he wanted. Marcus Peters likes to

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>take chances. He liked you. He likes to try and

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>go for like this pick six ball. But because of

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that he bites on double moves and he gets beat

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>beaten deep for these long passes. So that's something to

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to here. Also another trend home teams in

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>conference championships the last five years Tennan No straight up

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>eight and two against the spread. And I know on

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the morning after Corey Parson he likes to he likes

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to push up against Gabe when Gabe brings up betting trends.

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>And I actually agree with Corey on this because I

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that every trend, every betting trend is created equal.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are some crazy ones out there where

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you if you go to uh, if

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you go to covers dot com and you look at

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>like the matchups, they have a bunch of awesome trends,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>but they also have crazy stuff, Jim. They have. They

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>have like the rams are six and one against the

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>spread when running for ninety yards the previous week. Like

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some stuff that you kind of have to like. Okay,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's pick and choose what we actually want

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to use here. But I think the conference championship home

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>teams tennant Oh the last five years eight and two

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>against the spread. I think that does hold some weight,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at the home field advantage that

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Saints and Sean Payton have had inside the super

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Dome over the years. I just I'm gonna take the

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>home team here. I'm gonna take Threw Breeze. And you

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>know it hurts a little bit, um because I do

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>have a preseason ticket with the Rams. We've spoken about that.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I just I think that the Saints are the better

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>team here. I think experience comes into play here with

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton and Drew Brees. I'm laying the three and

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a half with with the New Orleans Saints. Yeah, I

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>am too, And I'm sorry to say because I have

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that same ticket. We lost our tickets with the Charges

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>last week, and I think we lose it with the

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Rams this week. But hey, you know, great season no

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens. But that being said, look for all

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that you're talking about the experience, all the numbers,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>especially Saints at home have been huge, uh for their

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>entire career. Basically since Breeze has gotten there, they've been

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>grade at home. Um. They love that fast track and

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they have the weapons to play on it. That's what

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the team is built for. So I agree with you.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Sean McVeigh will come out with some new

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>rakles and try to try to give this defense a

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit of fits. I just don't know if it's

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very successful. I think, you know, Breeze and

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>company have more than enough to cover that three and

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a half spread. Jim, something interesting that I was talking

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to Dane Martinez last night spitting speeds. You can watch

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Freestyle here on the network. I know Dane's

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>got some other things coming up. Has hosted the Rotal

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Experts in the Morning and f s T. So make

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sure you follow Dane and all the work that he's

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>doing and putting out there. You brought up an interesting

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>scenario to me. A lot of people when the Rams

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>were riding high bought in, and we did so before

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the season, but a lot of people have Super Bowl

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>tickets for the Rams. Now we're at the point already

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>where you can hedge this. Normally, you know, you'd wait

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Super Bowl where the Rams are in the

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, and you can, you know, take the other two,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you take the Chiefs and you can kind of figure

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out the math and you can hedge it. Well, we're

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>already at the point where if you have a RAM

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl ticket you can hedge them now based on

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>how much you know, based on the wage that you

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have on them to win the Super Bowl. You kind

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>of gotta figure out the math yourself. I think it's

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>worth throwing out there, and I thought it was brilliant

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for Day to bring that up to me because I

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't even thought about it. But at this point, you

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>can hedge if you have a RAM super Bowl winning

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>ticket with the New Orleans Saints this week. Oh absolutely,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's definitely something I've been thinking about myself. So yeah,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. Um. You know, if you're really

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like us, thinking that the Rams can't get through, then

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely taking a shot on the Saints at that point

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is still good business and definitely not a bad move

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to make. Uh. You know, it's not like I put

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money on the Rams or the Charges

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>back in preseason. I'm pretty sure they were just twenty

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>five dollar bets, so you know, it's not like I

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>got a ton to lose, but I probably will take

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a little something on the side with the Saints just

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in case. I think if the Saints get there, they're

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hard to beat you. I just wanted to

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>get into a few player props here on the way.

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But wait before you do that, though, you started mentioning

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>about what Daton has coming up. But I do want

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to get this out there that he actually he has

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a new show starting next Monday morning with Joe Ranieri,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>UM called the Make It Rain Show. Um, that's gonna

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>be on on starting Monday morning from six to nine

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on the f M T S Y network. So keep

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, Folcus. Definitely, that's what I was Ferrands.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>He's got some stuff coming up. I didn't know if

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I can officially announce it yet, so U but yes,

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's all right. It looked. Hey, Jim, you

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>can't cry over spilt milk. It's out there now. So

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday morning six to nine am, you will be able

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to watch Spit and Speeds and hear him in the morning.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Once again, nobody told me I couldn't. Hey, what's the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>saying it's better to uh, it's better to ask forgiveness.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, sing It's something like that. It's better

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask forgiveness and to ask permission. There you go.

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>What Jim said, Um, I gotta work on my sayings.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll look him up during the break, Jim. The prop

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to me most here was Alvin Kamar

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>over thirty seven and a half receiving ours. I think

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a few other that you can here. Whatever

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Robert Woods receptions and receiving yards prop is, I

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>think that makes sense. I don't think that the Rams

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball all that much in this game, but

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I was on Robert Woods over five and a half

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>receptions last week that came through, and I do think

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the place to target the Saints defense is in the slot,

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>specifically against p J. Williams, their slot corner. I think

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he is the weakest of their secondary. You look at

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the outsides for the Saints defense, you have Marshawn Lattimore,

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you have Eli Apple, And I'm not gonna say it's

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>all on Eli Apple, but you can kind of see

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like when the Saints defense kind of made that shift

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>where everything started to turn, it was kind of, uh,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with Eli Apple joining their team. So perhaps, um,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were getting burned on the other side

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>side of the field a lot earlier on the season.

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think Eli Apple has made a difference Robert

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Woods over his receptions and yardards makes a lot of sense,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>meaning Alvin Kamara over thirty seven and a half receiving yards. Jim,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we know the past for rush staff, the Los Angeles

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Rams bring with Aaron Donald and Dominican Sue Dante Fowler,

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. We've heard this for years now.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>The way to beat the pass rushes a lot of

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>dump off quick passes. Alvin Kamara, I do think that

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that can happen? Or were there any props that sit

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>out to you? Do you like any of the ones

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I brought up? Um? Any touchdown props? Like like, who

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do you who do you expect to score in this game?

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I could give you the odds on those as well. Jim.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, I think Sammy Watskins is gonna get a wait,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong game. I'm we're talking to other game. Sorry, not

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>just messing with you. Um look man, trying to pick

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I hate touchdown props. I mean I just hate them. There.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>They are so intervious it isn't funny. But if I

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was gonna take one in this game, boo, I'm gonna

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>take one with C J. Anderson. I like it. That's

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the one. I was looking at too right now you're

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>getting him at plus one forty to score a touchdown

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>any time in this game. Jim plus one forty, Todd

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Gurley minus one thirty the favorite on the ramp side,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara minus one on the Saint side. Look, when

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we're gonna talk more about this game

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>from a DFS perspective, and then we'll transition into that.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>A f C Conference championship game a lot to get

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>into there as well. We like the under we like

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. We're both in agreement, so that means none

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of those things are gonna come through this weekend. Fantasy

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network, We're right back.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodo dot Com. Learn from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>roado dot Com Optimizer. In minutes, build an optimized line

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's

0:17:54.800 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. Join Daily roado dot com. The following

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eighty eight thousand people die

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>every year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>people a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know. Maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one. That's

0:18:55.359 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eight six six four eight four ninety six one quick

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>blawl frantacy. Tell me what you learned about baseball. The

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>one thing I'm learning is that closest are pain in

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the ass. So now it's more about the new bases,

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that the actual players involved a lot of new players

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know. That's true. I know all the

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>players like the back of my hand. Who's gonna be

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the closing of the projects this year? Probably? Uh, that

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>boy what's his name? Oh boy? Oh boys? Ready for baseball?

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You go make sure you draft whole boy, oh boy

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the thirty eight round week dates. What do you have?

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern f N T S Y Radio and on your

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>popular podcast providers, Welcome back to the Fantasy best Friends

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Forever No great Susman Frank Sample here with Fantasy Taz

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day breaking down the conference championship games from a

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>betting perspective. Got profits we already touched on the total

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we touched on the side like the Saints blake the under.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I like Kamara to go over third you seven and

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a half receiving yards him also throughout the c J

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Anderson to score a touchdown in this game at plus

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>one forty. Touchdowns are hard to predict, though, Jim, You're

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. I remember last week every single prop imaginable

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>hit on James White. You know you had fifteen reception

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>names you likedown had I had? I had James White

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>score touchdown? Prop? Jim? How stupid? Am I? Like? God?

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Every prop imaginable James White hit except score a touchdown? Man?

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, yeah, I don't. I don't want to talk

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>about last weekend anymore. I gotta I gotta make up

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for it this weekend. It was it was so brutal. Oh,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>first signs of chronic gambler. I gotta make up for

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>it this weekend. There you go, right, God, I've been

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with Gabe too much. Give me the fish.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>The Daily renaud dot Com partnership with Data Golf is

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>back for with the all new premium Fantasy golf and

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>betting tools. Check out the all new lineup Optimizer with

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>custom settings and advanced grouping, customizable projections for FanDuel and DraftKings,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ownership projections p g A Finished Probabilities and simulator outright

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and top twenty market betting tools, head to head and

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>three ball betting tools p g A Pro Tip, subscriber

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>chat and more. Go to Daily Rhodo dot com click

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>on Go Premium, choose Golf and enter promo code Golf

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen for a ten percent discount. That's Daily Rhodo dot com.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Click on Go Premium, click on golf and enter promo

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>code Golf nineteen for a ten percent discount. Jim, I

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta attack this game from a DFS perspective. I think

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning. Jared Goff the cheapest quarterback on slate.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I think people are gonna want to slop uh attack

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks in this game with Jared Golf and Drew Brees,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>just because it's a controlled environment right there inside a dome.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to worry about whether I will tell

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you that you don't really have to worry about the

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>weather much anymore. With the Chiefs in the Patriots game.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it's gonna be over thirty degrees by

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the time this game kicks off. There's no acipitation expected either,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>so don't overvalue the dome game here. I still think

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes obviously the best quarterback on the slate, but

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he is very pricey. Jared Goff again the cheapest on

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the slate. He hasn't thrown for over two d and

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards. Uh He's actually he's only thrown for two

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or twenty yards just once in his last six games

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and on the road this year. Ten touchdowns, nine interceptions.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of that came in that Chicago

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Bears game. Drew Brees also has not been great as

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of late. He's thrown for multiple touchdowns just once in

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>his last five games. That was last week against the

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. The Rams have been much better and much

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>better past defense with a key to leap in the lineup. Jim,

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>do you like either of these quarterbacks for DFS? Uh? No, Again,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean if it goes to the game script that

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know we're talking about, where we think it's gonna

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>be the under, then no, I'd rather not go with

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>either one of these two quarterbacks. I think the high

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>flying game is gonna be on the other side, so

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I might, I'm gonna pay up a little

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Uh. You know, Brady is not that much

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>more than Golf and and cheaper than Breeze, So I

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like that my homes. Like you said, you know, he's higher.

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He's eight hundred dollars higher than Brady, nine hundred dollars

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>higher than Breed. You know, not not huge numbers, but

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>enough that some people may not want to pay there.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, again, if you're going with a golf

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's more you're trying to be contrarian, and I get that,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>but I just don't see a lot of big numbers

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the passing game on in that game

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's worth mentioning on draft kings of salaries

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for the quarterbacks are as followed, Patrick Mahomes sixty six

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, Tom Brady fifty eight hundred, Drew Brees hundred,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Jared goff Is fifty four hundred dollars on fan duel,

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that is nine thousand for Mahomes, followed by eight hundred

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>for Drew Brees, four hundred for Tom Brady, and Jared

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>goff at eight thousand dollars. Now you did, you did

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>forget to mention one on on DraftKings you you also

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have Taysom Hill Taste the Hill at five dollars. Okay,

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I've gotta get this off my chest once and through

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>it the gym day monologue. I am so tired of

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this team taking one of the best passers in the

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>freaking game out of the game to put this trick

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>kid in there. I hate it. I hate it. I've

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>always hated it. I think it's stupid as hell when

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you got somebody behind the line of scrimmage like Drew

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Brees to take them all out for some kid by

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the name of Taysom Hill that couldn't even land a

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>job anywhere else. You know what, I'm sorry, folks, I

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>hate this trickery. I understand innovation is innovation, but when

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you take the ball out of your best player's hands

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to make it a trick play, that is the stupidest

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do. Asom Hill, Sean Payton get off

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day's lawn. There you go. That was Jim Day's

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>get off the lawn moment of the day here on

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Um, I can't. I can't

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>really make an argument for Taysom Hill. I understand exactly

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying, what you're saying here, and I think

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Sean Payton just trying to like do something creative.

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, seriously, like anytime you see him back there,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of hard to figure out, right, Like

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta look at the jersey numbers because at first

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you might think, well, is that Drew Brees taking the

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>snap under center? He threw a nice ball to Alvin

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Kamara last week that was a touchdown but it got

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>called back. But I'm with you, it's very first two

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago he threw an interception when you didn't have to. Yeah,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I just I hate that kind of stuff. You got

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the best. Look if it's to me if

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a mediocre quarterback back there, I'm all for it.

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I love the innovation, but not when you have one

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of the best guys to ever play the game behind

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrammed. You don't take him off the

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>field for anything. Like maybe if you have Mark Sanchez

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>back there, you know you're try and do something fun.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You do a little wildcats something. Drew Brees a little

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>bit better than Mark Sanchez, Jim, C J Anderson, we

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about him a little bit when we were talking

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>about the prop bets. He's had at least a hundred

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three rushing yards any touchdown in three straight games.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I think what's worth mentioning about him most is the

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 1>fact that a Sheldon Rankings is now out for the

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense. The Saints, you know, their defensive line has

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>been awesome all year in terms of limiting yards per

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>carry and rushing yards to running backs this year, and

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a big part of that was Sheldon Rankins. He is

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>now out. But C. J. Anderson, I think part of

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>why he's running so effectively is, Yes, the Rams offensive

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>line has been great. He has frefresh legs, Jim. He

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>has fresh legs when everybody else. You know, we hear

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it all the time. It's the game of attrition, right

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>with with the with the NFL. To get to this point,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you've battled for the last three four months,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going back even further longer than that. When you think

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about training camp, like guys are tired. C J. Anderson

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>does not have a lot of wear on his body,

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so he's coming in here and he's fresh when everyone

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>else has kind of worn down. I think you're still

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>getting some some value here with c J. Anderson. Nobody

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>knows exactly how much he's going to be used. Last

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>week of the snaps for him, fifty seven percent for Girly,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but he did outtouch Girly three to eighteen. I think

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna keep writing this kind of two headed approach

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>here with CJ. Anderson and Todd Gurley. I do like

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit more on FanDuel, where it's only

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>half point ppr, so the touchdown matters a little bit more.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I know on Draft Kings it's full PPR. C J.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Anderson not really going to catch passes. But I still

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do think there's some value here with him. Oh, I agree.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Look like all the reasons you said he's got. You know,

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>he's fresh, he hasn't played much this year, doesn't have

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wear and tear, hasn't take a lot

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of big hits, and maybe a few extra pieces of

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Sicilian pizza while he was off, but didn't really seem

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to affect him. Hasn't affected him the last three weeks anyway. Um,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not really worried about that that the kid

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is running. I've always liked c. J. Anderson, don't going

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>back to his Broncos days, I always thought he was

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a good running back. Everybody said it was a system.

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, but he's still put up a thousand

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>yards and you know, I like seeing that, and I'm

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>glad he's got to a point now where he's has

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>every chance in the world to go to a Super Bowl.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So good for him. But yeah, I agree with you,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna use him both because, first of all, because

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, why really keep beating on Girley when C. J.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Anderson is going out ripping off rounds like that, you know,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>no real reason whatsoever to keep pounding Girly and keep

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, having the shot of bringing back that injury

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that much quicker. So you know it really. I think

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>last week it really got to a point where, you know,

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>they put him in for a couple of steps and

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he just went off, and they said, Okay, well we'll

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>keep running him because he's doing such a well right now,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll save Girley for later on in the game.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what they did this week. If he

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>gets off to that kind of fast start, I see

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. My only concern is if he doesn't

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get off to that fast start, do we see Girley

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>come back uh that much quicker and get that many

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 1>more carries? So there is a little bit of concern

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for me. They're just not a huge one. Jim. I

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get your opinion on two wide receivers. Two

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>more wide receivers here. Michael Thomas is the highest salary

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver on old sites speak Fandel and DraftKings, and

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I personally feel like the game plan, the defensive game

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>plan for the Rams here and Wade Phillips, who had

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal game plan last week against the Cowboys, which

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was basically, we're gonna we're gonna sell out to stop

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the run and we're gonna make Dak Prescott beat us

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately ended up working out well for the Rams defense.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that they just throw the house at Michael Thomas.

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I think, and typically a keep to leave does not

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>travel around and follow wide receivers. He sticks to his side.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they saw what happened last time against Marcus

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Peters with Michael Thomas, and they're gonna they're gonna send

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a keep to leave at Michael Thomas.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna send a lot of double teams, maybe triple teams.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna ask other play other wide receivers on the

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Saints to go out there, uh and and and beat

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this secondary. So I'm kind of I'm kind of off

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas here, to be honest, because of the salary

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>where he's at, and I think the game plan will

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>be to try and limit him most and then the

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>other wide receiver is Brandon Cooks. I think it's just

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning again the revenge game going back to the

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Super for Doome when he played them earlier this year.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>He went six for one, four tea and scored a

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game. Again, we don't really like the

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>past games much here, but I it wouldn't surprise me.

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>If Brandon Cooks scored another touchdown. So, Michael Thomas and

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks, how do you feel about these guys? Well,

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>look here, here's a great start about Brandon Cooks. Um,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he's had a thousand yards. There's four teams playing this weekend.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>He's had a thousand yards seasons for three of them

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and in the last three years. Interesting, I just don't

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>realize it, but he's he's got a thousand yards seasons

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for three of these four teams. So you know, it's amazing. Uh,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>how well he's done moving around and he just continues

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to get it done. So, UM, I like, uh, you know,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Cooks in this one to have a decent game.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I get what you're saying about Michael Thomas, and I

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>do think they're gonna try and stop him, but I

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>still see him as getting you know, a load of

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>targets in this just because you know, let's face it,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Ted Gain is what he is, Drake Quan Smith is

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>what he is. They're they're guys that you know, are

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>good for a few shots here and there, and if

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they hit, then you're good. If they don't hit, then

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>oh well you're looking at a nothing stat line. So

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know Thomas, well, I do agree that they're gonna

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>try and throw everything at him. You're still looking at

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's probably gonna see, you know, more than

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>ten targets easily in this game. And I think just

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that alone, they're gonna find ways to mismatch them, even

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Rams king on him, because you can't really

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>totally key on him when you have somebody like Camara

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out of that backfield. That's a great point, Jim.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I I want to move on to the Chiefs and

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Patriots here, just so we give ourselves ample time to

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about this game as well, both from a betting

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective and from a DFS perspective. We do know that

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>last time these two teams met, uh, they combined for

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty three points. So you know, one side on the

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>NFC Championship. The last time they met earlier in the season,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it was they combined for eight. The last time the

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs and Patriots played earlier this year, where the Patriots

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>were victorious forty three to forty. The New England Patriots

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>won that game combined for eighty three points in that game. Jim,

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll just throw this off right at the top here,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about this game. I think the total is a

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit harder to figure out with this one, because

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I could kind of see I could see both sides

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>playing out here. I could see again both teams wanted

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of play keep away, maybe run the ball

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Sony Michelle ran the ball extremely

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>effectively last week. We know what Damian Williams has been

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>able to do, and I have some pretty cool stats

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>about how the Patriots defense on the road this season

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically has struggled to stop the run. So I do

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think again that we could see some run. But again,

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like Patrick Mahomes didn't even throw a touchdown last week, Jim,

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and they scored thirty one points. So I can also

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>see a scenario where this game goes over. I don't

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really feel stronger strongly either way. If I had to choose,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I would go with the over. But I feel much

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>stronger about the Saints under than I do. The game

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>total here between the Chiefs and the Patriots don't agree

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with that um, and it's definitely a lot tighter um

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in this side. You know, if I wouldn't make this

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>bet just for the reasons you said, Uh, you know,

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely wrong on the Patriots last week. And

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>while I could be wrong again, you know, this could

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>be a game where the defenses step up a little

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more than either one of us expect, then most

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>people expect. Kansas City's defense has shown they're much better

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>at home. They played an outstanding game last week and

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and just shut down Indy right from the start. I'm

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure they're not gonna be able to do that

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to Brady, but you know, again, if if they can

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>get into Brady's face the way they got into Luck's face,

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>then maybe they can. Because that's the way to be Brady.

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Get him uncomfortable in that pocket, get him having to

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>move outside of that pocket, and he can make mistakes,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you can force him to do things. So you know,

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one of the things they have to do.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So if they can do that again, then I like that.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, if I were to bet this game,

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the over is the bet. But here here's

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>another you know, thrown stats out there at you, but

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in his seventh away playoff games, Tom Brady is three

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and war with eight touchdowns and eights and I have

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>more to touch on that as well. You mentioned the

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Chief's defense at home, it's absolutely right, nine point six

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>percent sacreate at home this year, Jim five point seven

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>percent sacreate on the road. Also at home this year,

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs have allowed seventeen point four points per game

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at home. The defense has played much better UH at

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Arrowhead this year. But regarding Tom Brady, um, and specifically

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, against the Chiefs, I found I found this

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>one interesting. It was specifically an Arrowhead rights three career

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>games at Arrowhead. Jim is a three touchdown six interception

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>ratio at Arrowhead in his career. Small sample size, again,

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>only three games, but that's one of only two stadiums

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that Tom Brady has played in his career where he

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>has more interceptions thrown than touchdowns. So I think you're

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>onto something here. Brady and Belichick together have been under

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>six times in the playoffs in their careers, three and

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>three straight up, both trade up and against the spread.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So look, they're going into unfamiliar territory. Mean, you know,

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>typically the road to the Super Bowl goes through Foxborough,

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know we've seen that for a long time now.

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Um Andy Reid also, you know, he's given the Patriots

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some fits over the years. I mean, obviously that game

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, it was a very close game,

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>forty three to forty. But how about last year Week one,

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen, when Alex Smith was the quarterback. They

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>went into Foxborough and they destroyed the Patriots. I remember

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a couple of a couple of years back.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Monday Night Football. Remember that game

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of that was one of many, Jim,

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 1>where we started talking about is the Patriots dynasty over?

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Why were we talking about that? Because the Chiefs one

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that game and believe it was like seventeen they destroyed them.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>That game was at Arrowheads, So I think, you know,

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of things playing against the Patriots

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Brady here where you know, Arrowhead tough place

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to play. Andy Reid has played the Patriots very tough

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>over the years. This game is closer than usual, and

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>uh and you know for the Patriots playing up like

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the underdog role. Here, give me a break, Jim, come on,

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you the Patriots and two and five against

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the spread in the last seven games against case Um.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They the under is eleven three in the Chief's last

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteen home games. So you know, definitely some trends involved

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>here that could help help sway your thought process if

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, on the fence one way or the other.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But as we all know, you know there's there's lies,

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>damn lies and statistics. Because you know, one way, you

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>got the under eleven and three for the Chiefs, the

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>over has cashed in six out of the last seven

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>for the playoffs, and for the Patriots in the playoffs,

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and the over is four and oh in the last

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>six matchups between the teams. So you know, it's when

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at these trands, it's one thing to you know,

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>take it as a part of what you do. And

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of guys who you know, look

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>at these trends hit lock in a bet just based

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>on these trends, and you just can't do it because

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you can have trends that go both ways. As I

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just discussed. That's absolutely right, Jim. I think it's a

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>good point. I don't think it's right to make bets

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just based on trends, but you kind of gotta take

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>trends from all over and kind of it's like a

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>culmination of things as we've seen. But we get back,

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you our pick on the side for this game,

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs and Patriots DFS as well Fantasy Best Friends

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network. If you're someone that needs

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>has you covered. When you download the n T s

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Y Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the top fantasy

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 1>advice every single day right through the weekend. Be sure

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>to listen to our weekend warriors like College Football Today.

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to College Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update. They call

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>me the Fantasy Jesus in this league is never short

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of exciting at I T L and it's so much more.

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and Google play Store now and keep the best fantasy

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>experts right in your pocket all day long and all

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>week long, from the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rodo

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>dot Com is the place to win millions in daily fantasy.

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>long for a price of one nine nine, or dominate

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the entire daily Fantasy Sports realm with the Elite package

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>at month. If you use the promo code f n

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>T S Y, you get ten percent off your Daily

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL Elite package, enter promo code F N T s Y,

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be on your way to becoming the next

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rhodo Millionaire. Maurice Allan two thousand and fifteen, two

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion, two thousand

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen World number one. Me personally, I keep my game

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>face on me all the time, especially coming out with

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the bucker leaving the range or you're leaving the ports,

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what's your story? Go to game face grooming dot com

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the morning after. The people that go to see Brooklyn

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>next games, those are not net fans, those are tourists.

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Those I totally get it. I totally get it. As

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>cheapers going I'm gonna square gardens or be They're going

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to see the visiting team. I totally get that. But

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you can see, you know, the game against Houston the

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>other night in Houston, there are a lot of people

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in that jerseys. What Sweet Day's not Amista on F

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and T s Y Radio on your popular podcast providers

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>through about the luck Pie. Well, well, well, well and

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the best Friends Forever. On the Fantasy Sports Radio Network,

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I am Frank Stample, joined by Fantasy tas Jim Day. Jim.

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you were gonna jump in there

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>with a little way. Oh, I know, I heard one

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. I felt left. I knew one way or another,

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>i'd get you singing this week, Jim. But before we

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>get into the rest of this game, I do have

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to let you guys know you at the game. You

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>got a good feeling, no problem. Now you can bet

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>from anywhere, anytime with the all new My Bookie Mobile

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>betting platform. With the my Bookie Mobile Platform, you'll enjoy

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the safety and convenience of at home betting and when

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you're on the go. Try it out today and you'll

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>never miss another winning bet. Head on over to my

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Bookie dot a G and open an account with the

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>promo code f and T s Y, and My Bookie

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>will match your deposit up to one thousand dollars. Yes,

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that's right, one thousand dollars. That's my Bookie dot AG

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n T S Y. I didn't want

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to touch on this underdog thing just one more time here,

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I know Julian Edelman has got a hashtag against us.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 1>They're really trying to play this up. It's not working,

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like Patriots, it's not working. They've interviewed Chiefs players throughout

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the week, and everyone knows how good you are, They

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 1>asked Travis Travis Kelsey like he's like, nobody's buying, Like, yes,

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we know how good the Patriots are. We we are

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>taking them seriously. They're not an underdog. Technically, they're a

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>betting underdog. They're getting three points, but the Chiefs are

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>getting the home three here. So basically, when the oddsmakers

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>look at this game and they give the Chiefs, you know,

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the three points, laying three points here, they're just getting

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the home three, which basically means that they think that

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>these teams are even. Are they even? Well, we're about

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to find out. But the Chiefs went twelve and four

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. The Patriots went eleven and five. Meanwhile, the

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs faced a way tougher schedules. So I don't I

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know how they're playing up the

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>underdog thing here, Like you can argue that maybe the

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>spread should be even a little bit bigger based on

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>what I just said with the records and the fact

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>that the Chiefs face a tougher schedule this year. I digress, Jim, Um,

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking a look. The reason it's not higher, it

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is because the Patriots, simple fact. Um. That's when it

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>comes down to any other team going into Casey for

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this game, the spread would have been much higher. But

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the Patriots, and you're hard to give the Patriots

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>too much leeway. No matter how you think what they're

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna do, it doesn't matter. So you know, like you said,

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeeves are just getting the home three. That's what they're getting. Um.

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, basically, it's not really something that's huge

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in this game that we have to worry about a lot. Um.

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I purposely I like Kansas City, And again, you know

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not because I hate the Patriots. I don't hate

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. You know, as a Giants fan, I kind

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of like the Patriots because I know, you know, I

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>know we could beat them. Um. So it's really nothing there.

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And you've got to give respect to, you know, one

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest teams that we'll probably ever see in

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>our lifetimes with the kind of domination they've had. So

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't hate them. I just I really

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to see Pat Mahomes you know, captive season

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>with a cherry on top with that super Bowl win,

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, I think this kid deserves it. We

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we all knew he was gonna be a gun slinger,

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but nobody ever could have seen this coming. The kind

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of season he's had, the plays he continues to make,

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the way he sees the field, uh, you know, the

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>no look passes, the underhand passes, bat cave in the

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>left hand, it passes. This kid is playing such an

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.240
<v Speaker 1>exciting brand of football and he is absolutely the NFL's

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>future that I would love to see him top off

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this great season with the Super Bowl win. So I'm

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>betting on that kid's magic carrying them past the Patriots

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this week. And you know what's crazy, Jim, is you know,

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time people were saying, you know, give

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid a legit quarterback on the Chiefs and imagine

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what they would have done. And you can kind of

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case that they've had better defenses

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and years past than this Chief's defense. Right Like, for

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>most of the season, we were talking about how the

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have you know, uh, that was an area to

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>attack for fantasy. So they've had better. Yeah, and well

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't look that way last week against the Colt

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 1>They did absolutely not. The playoffs, bringing different brando men

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to the field absolutely do. And you know, Bob Sutton

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>had a great strategy last week going up against the Colts.

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he brought a lot of pressure, uh and

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it ended up working out. I think they'll bring a

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure once again against Tom Brady and the Patriots.

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But this is potentially what could happen if you gave

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid, you know, a kind of gun slinger quarterback.

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Mind you, Patrick Mahomes is probably gonna win the MVP.

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like, all right, give Andy Reid just

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>any quarterback besides Alex Smith. Like, yeah, he needed a

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good quarterback in Patrick Mahomes. But this is

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of what we were talking about, Like the sky

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is the limit for this Chief's team with a quarterback

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>of the caliber of a Patrick Mahomes. Just gotta touch

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on like the home road splits once again, because I

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think that does play a huge factor here. Jim Chiefs

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eight and one at home this season, Patriots three and five.

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Strade up. I know, you know, two of their two

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of their wins on the road this year, we're against

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like Josh McCown. One of them was against the Bears

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and that was, you know, a very impressive win for

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots, no doubt about it. But three and five

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>strade up and against the spread on the road this year,

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll be ready to play. It's not gonna you know,

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect there wanted to be a blot either way,

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>but you can't argue, you know, the difference between the

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>home and road for the Patriots and how well the

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have played at home this year. Well, what wasn't

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the Tom Brady wins on the road against

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bills and Nathan Peterman. I think you're correct, Yeah,

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. Does that really qualify? Yeah, that's

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>almost like a below the line type of win. So,

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, good for you guys at the Bills to six.

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that that was the Monday night game right

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where it was either I don't know it was either Navy.

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It was Derek Anderson, That's who was him. It was

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Derek and to two of their three wins on the

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>road this year, we're against Josh McCown and Derrick Anderson

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and the other one was against the Bears, so they

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 1>showed up and that was a great win for them.

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But this this team hasn't been the same on the

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>road this year, and I think it starts with their

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>run defense. Is the stat I wanted to talk about, Jim,

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>where the Patriots have allowed a hundred and twenty six

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>point eight rushing yards per game on the road this

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>year compared to nine point six rushing yards at home.

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that just kind of plays into Damian Williams.

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We've heard you talk about Damian Williams the past couple

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, how much you love Damian Williams, and rightfully so. Um.

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>On the year as a whole, the Patriots allowed four

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>point six nine yards per carry two running backs, that

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was eighth most. Over the last five games, Damian Williams

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>has scored seven total touchdowns. It's twenty three receptions during

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that time. He's averaging over five receptions per game. Jim,

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I love Damian Williams both for DFS UH and I

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like his props as well. You know, give me over

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty one and a half rushing yards. I just don't

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>think he's getting enough respect. Um, and the touchdown prop

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that I know. There's also a prop for his total

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing and receiving. I believe it's somewhere like ninety eight

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So I like the rushing a little

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more here. But I'm kind of he's one of

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the building box from my team this week in terms

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of DFS, Jim, I'm kind of putting Damian Williams in

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and building the rest after that. No, well, I'm with

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, uh again, I'm killing myself and

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>next year's draft with the way I'll talk about Damian

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams because most people are still undervaluing him. But you know,

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>people just get a life and grow up and see

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>what this kid is gonna do. And he is going

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the starter for case next year. I have

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like no doubt in my mind. Um. And the one

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thing though you you talk about him still you know,

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 1>being a value, is that his prices come up dramatically

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:33.879
<v Speaker 1>this week, especially on draftickings. I'll be honest, I haven't

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>looked on Vanduel yet, probably do that tomorrow morning, but

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings, he's only a hundred dollars left now, less

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>now than Alvin Kamara. Um. So obviously you know they're

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>starting to take it into account what this kid has

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>done and how well he's done it. So he's not

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so much of the value this week. But I agree

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with frank Is that he's still going to be in

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my DFS lineups just because, yeah, he's

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 1>an integral part of this offense right now. So on

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>fan Duel, there are four running backs that are priced

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>higher than Damian Williams this week. Remember Fandal half point PPR.

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Jim spoke about how the price has has how it's

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>been on the rise for Damian Williams on DraftKings because

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's full PPR based on what Damian Williams has done.

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But Williams is seventy two dollars. He's three hundred dollars

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>less than Sony Michelle. He's five hundred dollars less than

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>James White. James White another prop I like in this game.

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna take him to score touchdown this week. Jim

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 1>fool me once over fifty three and a half receiving yards.

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I like that for James White. Um, the Patriots are

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously a smart team. Again. The Chiefs are gonna bring

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure. The pass rush the way to

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>beat that, uh, throw it to James White. And this

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is just the time of year where you know, we've

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>seen it the past two three seasons. When it comes

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>January time, it's it's James White time. It's fifteen receptions

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>last week, so you're not gonna project that, but you know,

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd say he's safe for at you know, anywhere from five, six,

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 1>seven receptions. I like the over for fifty three and

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a half receiving yards. Jim, this is really um this

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>game is DFS clore. So I guess I'll just kind

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>of like open it up to you, like, who do

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you like? We know that the Patriots are going to

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.280
<v Speaker 1>try and take away um the top option for the Chiefs.

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.879
<v Speaker 1>The problem is who is the top option for the Chiefs.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna try and stop Tyreek Hill? He scored

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns last time they faced the Patriots, so maybe

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that's something they try to do. Travis Kelsey really the

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 1>only legitimate tight end on the slate, and legitimate no,

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't consider Rob Gronkowsky legitimate tight end anymore. But

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really either pay up for Travis Kelsey or kind

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know, use like a Josh Hill or

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a Rams tight end. You know, good luck, God bless

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>your soul. I don't I don't know who you're gonna

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>use if you don't use Travis Kelsey. Yeah, I'm pretty

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>much with you. I mean, you almost have to pay

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>up for Kelsey this week if you want to shot.

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he is the chalk of the chalk this week. Uh,

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can look see on this DFS slate. Um,

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>no matter where you play, he is uh. Because I

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, Gronk is not Cronk. He's definitely not healthy.

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely not you know, able to run the same

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>way we've seen him run in the past. So I

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 1>get you know, Kelsey is the guy, And you're right,

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>who are they going to take away? They're gonna take

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.959
<v Speaker 1>away Tie Hill, They're gonna take away Kelsey, take away

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams. Well, you know, if I'm nam Damian Williams

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is the last one I'm worried about because the other

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>two can take it down the field and beat you,

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they don't want to happen. Now. The

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing I will say about this game is that

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in the game that they had previous in the season,

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they got roasted. Every time the Patriots went into his

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>own defense, they got roasted. That's where they gave up.

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>The big place is seventy five yard touchdown the hill.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.720
<v Speaker 1>The big play to Kelsey down the sideline was all

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in in when they played the zone. Um. When they

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>decided to get away from that zone and went to

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>cover and man cover, they played much better defense. They

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>made it much harder for Mahomes to find that open

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>spot too, you know, to really be able to get

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball down the field, really her tailed his big plays.

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a lot of that this time.

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's face it. I mean, with Mahomes behind the line

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage scrambling the way he does, trying to play

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.279
<v Speaker 1>zone for that long is incredibly hard, very hard to

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>keep track of where the different players are moving to

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and so easily get lost behind you is a player

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>coming from all the way on the other side of

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the field, but he's got the time because Mahomes got

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time running behind the line of scrimmage. So

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because of all of this, I think we see a

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of man the man by the Patriots this week.

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that may hurt a little bit, but

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that they're looking at that as well.

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City is, and they're gonna come up with a

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>game plan where I think we're gonna be seeing a

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more of the shorter middle type passes as opposed

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to try and go down the field ball game. With that,

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I do want to sign off YouTube now. Thank you

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody for watching and listening on the Fantasy Sports Radio network. Side.

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.880
<v Speaker 1>If you can, please subscribe to the YouTube channel. I'll

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>give us a thumbs up, leave us a comment. If

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the US on demand, whether it's iTunes,

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Google Play, make sure you subscribe, give us five stars,

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>leave us a comment there as well a rating review.

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We really really do appreciate it. Thank you very much.

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And Jim, you know you mentioned, uh, you know, playing

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>zone against the Chiefs probably not the smartest thing. Um,

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy that everyone knew that except for Matt Eiberflus,

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the defensive coordinator gains last week, which you know, they

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 1>were just getting picked apart in that game. So again,

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what the Patriots did against the Charters. If

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you watch that game, they they brought a lot of pressure,

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They went man to man. They have two strong corners

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:39.399
<v Speaker 1>on the outside, with Gilmore and with Jason mccordy, and

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trey Flowers had a big game last week.

0:52:41.880 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So if there's one, you know, part of the game

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>where Patrick Mahomes has struggled and pretty much all quarterbacks struggle,

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and I saw really awesome. Um there was like a

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>chart graphic on the Pro Football Focus Fantasy Twitter. They

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have a graphic where when Patrick Mahomes is seeing pressure,

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he's quarterback reading drops tremendously. We see that with a

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of quarterbacks, but um, I do expect a lot

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>of that this week as well. Yeah, no, and you

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>see that with most quarterbacks. Let's face it, you get

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure on him, you know, the greatest of all time.

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the way to beat him. Get pressure on him, Brady.

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>So you know, absolutely there's a few that seem to

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>play better with that pressure on uh And you know

0:53:20.880 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I saw that chart as well. I get that. But yeah,

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, and you know everybody's forgetting that this

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is really his first season. You know, this is his

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>first season in the league. Um, so yeah, he's gonna

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 1>have some rough points. He's not a dent, you know,

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>be all end all. But you're still talking about a

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>guy in his first season had done that did what

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>only two other quarterbacks in the history of the NFL

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.799
<v Speaker 1>have ever done, and they're both in the Hall of Fame.

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Um So this guy did it in his first season.

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Imagine what he could do when he gets a little

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more experience. Yeah, it is a little bit scary

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about. I know some people who might be

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>listening and who were watching might say, well, you didn't

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about you know the big names here, you know

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman and all these other guys, Well, those are

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the safe options, you know, those are the players who

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we at least I do, uh, I feel

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel strong about those guys. Like, yes,

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you can put guys like Julian Edelman in your lineup.

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting to see if the if the Patriots

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>try and take away Tyreek Hill or Kelsey. I still

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>do like those guys. I like Tyree Hill personally more

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>than Michael Thomas. Thomas probably safer, no doubt about it,

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think Tyreek Hill has higher upside, especially based

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on what he did earlier on in the season. Jim,

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to throw a few names, some salary

0:54:32.920 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>savers right, like everyone wants to pay up and get

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Mahomes and Kelsey and Tyreek Hill in

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>their lineus. But you gotta save salaries somewhere. Sammy Watkins. Look,

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs this blood wolf moon to come through,

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like all the stars are gonna need to align for

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Sammy Watkins to stay healthy and performed. But

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.919
<v Speaker 1>he is cheap. He played of the snaps last week.

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 1>He saw eight of the targets. He saw of the

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 1>targ sharing in games he played this year. Sammy Watkins

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is a name that sticks out to me as well

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 1>as Ted Ginn, Josh Reynolds, Chris Hogan. Um, you need

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to save salary somewhere, Jim, do you like any of

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>those names? Is there anyone else that's cheaper that you're

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:15.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to get in your line up this week? Well?

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>This is you know, not really. I'm in two games slate,

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's not a ton of people you got to

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>play with. Um, you know, when when it comes to

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 1>salary saving, I mean, James White is probably one of

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the bigger, bigger choices. But I do like mark Ingram

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. At I think he is on draft Kings. Um,

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little further off of c J. Anderson at

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>five thousand. Then I was last week. I really liked

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>him last week. Not so sure this week again. If

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get off to the blazing start, I have

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 1>to think that Girley gets starts getting more playing time

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and we don't see as much of him, um, I know,

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>spitting speeds. I'm pretty sure he thinks that James Devlin

0:55:55.840 --> 0:56:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is a play this week to score two touchdowns. Doesn't

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like it, but he likes the prop because it's like

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 1>plus ten thousand something crazy like that. Jim So Yeah,

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he kind of teased it on Twitter. Twitter to me

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Mike is gonna ask me about this

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy prop. So um. But you know, there's a lot

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of guys that you know are gonna be value this week.

0:56:18.880 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just hard trying to figure out who they are.

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins is when I like a four thousand dollars

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings. He looked good last week. He looked like

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:28.360
<v Speaker 1>he was running well, didn't look like the ankle was

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bothering him at all. And with that, they're uh with

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 1>New England probably shadowing Tyreek Hill all game. I think

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I liked Sammy Watkins a lot. Is one of my

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>best bets. Um. Josh Reynolds is another guy that could

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>easily come into play. Uh. I just again because of

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the game script I'm envisioning in my head where it's

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a lower scoring game. You know, you're taking a little

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a chance with Reynolds, and I think

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you are with Watkins. Um, I like game last week

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't really come to fruition, you know. And Chris Hogan

0:56:58.120 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is another one at thirty seven hunderbucks. Why not take

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the shot out of him. He's been getting like four

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so targets a week. He could come into play in

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this one. Jim, I want to thank you so much

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:09.879
<v Speaker 1>for joining me this week. With Greg Sussman out stick,

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if we could do this again in the

0:57:11.600 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>future with Greg Sussman back. But for Jim Day Fantasy Taz,

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanford, thank you so much for watching and listening.

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Stay Classic Fantasy Owners.