WEBVTT - Sentenced to Death, Again

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Dear Governor is a production of I Heart Media and

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>three Months Media. Dear Governor Newsom, Dear Mr Governor Newsom,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this is an open letter to Governor Gavin Newsom, Dear

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Governor Newsom. After the California Supreme Court, here's a habeas

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>corpus appeal for a capital crime. They have nine d

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>days with which to file their opinion. We had already

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>surpassed the nine week mark following Jarvis Master's appeal, so

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>we knew the decision was impending, soon to be delivered

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to our inboxes. Anyone can stay apprized of ongoing Supreme

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Court cases by signing up at Courts dot c A

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>dot gov. At the sixty six day mark, we all

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>received an email with a subject line Supreme Court of

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>California Case Notifications for s one three zero four nine five,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the body of which read notice of forthcoming opinion to

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be filed in three days and three days later, twenty

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one days before their deadline, the eagerly anticipated email read

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court of California Opinion available online and then

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in parentheses concurrence. I lost the English unanimously. That heard

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it real bad, you know, but I mean just you know,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sucked it up for a while. I did a lot

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of meditation and a lot of sitting in, a lot

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of thinking, and one thing I was very very confident

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in months out of this decision was that I will

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>try to feel in the same place ready to accept

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever outcome that is. Jarvis's lawyers had filed his habeas

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>petition in two thousand five. It took the California Supreme

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Court fourteen excruciatingly long years to address the petition and

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>then sixty nine short days to reaffirm what they had

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>already decided. Had the court moved with any sense of

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>urgency or a bare minimum respect for the goal of

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a speedy trial, there's a possibility, however remote, it might

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>have been, that Jarvis could have already moved through the

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal appeals, a far less politically fraught system, and inhaled

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the wonders of freedom. When I heard about the decision,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>my immediate reaction was I was crushed. I felt crushed

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to the ball. Yeah. I was hoping that no one

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>asked me these questions about what it felt like, you know,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>because to me, it would have been like I was

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a specive than a subject card, uh, something to look

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>at you. I any want to be that way mm hmmm.

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I described it as having just had your wisdom keeeth

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>pulled out and someone's trying to hold a conversation with you.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it hurt it in that way. So that

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was my first you know, That's how I responded to it,

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and over the next ten fifteen hours, and so I

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>had to straighten up, you know, I had to figure

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>out how to straighten up off this, you know. And

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes down to your freedom, epis so long,

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you really, deep down inside you know, want this. You

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>want to win this. And they caught up to me

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of losing is one more long, long

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>time of being in prison for zero, for nothing, and

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>no one knew how. And I was saying this to myself,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>No one knows how long a day is. I'm fucking

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>with someone that doesn't know what a day feels like,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>innocent on the death throw. They have no idea. Then

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they get upset because I'm upset. You know, what world

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are you guys living in? Concerns that were key in

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand five petition included, but we're not limited

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to prosecutorial misconduct. Newly discovered evidence and ineffective counsel. His

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 1>appellate attorneys at the time wrote that his death sentence

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>rested on evidence that the prosecution had known or should

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have known was quote inflammatory, unreliable, untrue, and or misleading.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>In so many words, I had now hold everybody up.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I had now played the role of don't worry about this, okay,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. You know that was just that was

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>role playing because I knew no one would understand where

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I was really at. You know, silence for me was

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest hug I could have gotten, just so like

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>every time someone talked to me, I was able to

0:04:54.560 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>call somebody I had. I had to explain people were

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>calling you, but you felt like you had to comfort

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>them all the time. It just feels like I was

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the strongest shoulder for people to lean on. And if

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I was fillion upset, they were phillips. So Mynes, who

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>was not the shill upset because I knew it would

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>create a lot of unhealthy ways for me personally. The

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>star witness against Jarvis was a black guerrilla family member

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>by the name of Rufus Willis, who testified under grant

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of immunity from prosecution at the trial that he had

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>been in the prison yard when the b GF gang

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>were planning the assassination of Officer Birchfield, where it was

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>agreed he said that Jarvis would provide the tip of

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the spear. In the preliminary hearing, Rufus Willis described Jarvis

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as standing five seven, chubby, with a stomach, wearing glasses,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>clean shaven, and free of tattoos. Note in fact that

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis masters is six ft one, slender, didn't wear any glasses,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>had a mustache and goatee with a tattoo on his

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>left cheek. An inmate named Harold Richardson, however, confessed to

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>playing the role in the crime that Rufus had attributed

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to Jarvis, and fit the physical description Rufus had articulated

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to a t seems like a slam dunk for reasonable doubt.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Right just have him testified before the jury. Not so fast.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Harold Richardson refused to testify, citing his right against self incrimination.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Jervis's council pleaded with the judge to grant immunity for prosecution,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>but for whatever reason, the judge refused. Jervis's council also

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>pleaded with the judge to allow expert testimony regarding the

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>unreliability of jail house informants, and for whatever reason, she

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>refused that plea as well, do you feel like you're

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>losing hope? You know what? And there you're talking about, Well,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>can you hear the Buddhist here? I'll I don't want

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>to get into what hope post to do for me

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, you know, I don't. I don't think hope

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna that's gonna help me resolve where I'm that.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think hope is a necessary thing to

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have right now. I think it's really unhealthy. I think

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it has no real value to it. Yeah, I think

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'll be chasing something that you know, I don't

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>know where it would go one way to other, and

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Hope is not going to be responsible for that. I

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>would not let that be my response. I would not

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>give Hope that responsibility. In other words, I really don't

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>want to put hope o front street, you know so,

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a very very Buddhist way of saying,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, hope is not an issue that you should

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>put everything into. Okay, what do you want to put

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on street? If not hope? The idea of not expecting anything.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Work with that? Why do I need to spend time

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to effect one outcome from the other. To not

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>be that smart to know and to live in that

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>space of unknown, not knowing. That's a very comfortable space

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if you can control it, if it can be maintained.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? Oh man, I don't really know.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know what the practice is. I really

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to do that. I can give you

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the basic instruction, but I don't I don't know how

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it works. And that's what they call it. What a

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>practice is. You get better at it, you discover more,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it becomes more of a way of thinking. It supposed

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to create balance in your life. H Quit trying to

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>tell yourself what you don't know. I mean, that's just

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the way I see it in prison. On me, I

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I cheech this kind of stuff to people. So I

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>mean my way of saying it to a lot of

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>guys in here is, you know, quick trying to tell

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know yourself you know something. When you don't, all

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do is fall asleep and want some bit

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>once some timely lost because of it, leave it alone.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Trying to be in the best place when it happened.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So just be in the place of not knowing what

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you what you really don't suppost and know anything about,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and be smart enough to think that you don't need

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>to know what you're not gonna be told to you

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>until it happens. Lawrence Woodard, the man who was accused

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of masterminding the murder of Sergeant Birchfield, was sentenced to

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>life without possibility of parole. Andre Johnson, the man who

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was accused of a single stab wound that severed Sergeant

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Birchfield's pulmonary artery, was sentenced to life without the possibility

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of parole. Jarvis Masters, accused of manufacturing the tip of

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the spear, was sentenced to death after a penalty phase

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing at which a prisoner named Johnny Hose, a member

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Black Guerrilla Family, testified that Jarvis had bragged

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about murdering a San Quentin prisoner in nine four, though

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>this case had never been adjudicated. Subsequent to the trials

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and sentencing, all three States witnesses Rufus Willis, Bobby Evans,

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and Johnny Hose have recanted and sworn statements saying that

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they had lied at the trial in hopes of obtaining

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>favorable treatment for themselves. The rufus Willis statement also said

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that he had coerced Jarvis, out of fear for his

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>own safety, to write the incriminating kites, which Masters copied

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>from the writings of Willis and Woodard. Finally, Andre Johnson,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis's co defendant convicted of actually stabbing Birchfield to death,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>provided a sworn statement saying that Masters had no role

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the murder. Were you surprised when they came back

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>with the death penalty? Yes, Jeffrey Rockline, lead defense counsel

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for Jarvis Masters from nineteen eighty six to nineteen Jarvis

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>testified and he was very compelling, very believable, very likable,

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>very human, very warm, sympathetic. You know, he told a

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>story about his life that was, you know, really sad,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>very upsetting, and you know, he testified to the jury,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought, in a very communicative way. And then we

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>had other experts on the stand about you know, his background,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Craig Haney was was excellent. So yeah, I was surprised

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>that they came back with death, very very surprised. Do

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you remember talking to Jarvis about it after? Oh? Sure,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, how was that to him? Well, it was hard,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it was difficult thinking with him. But you know,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he Jarvis is a is a tough, strong guy, you know,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's a real fighter. And I really grew to

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like Jarvis, you know, and like him very much like

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>him and feel for him and have sympathy for him

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and as as a human being, as a person who

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was able to actually pull himself out of you know,

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that whole gang prison culture and the criminal culture. Um.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So I have a great deal of respect for him.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And number one number two, there was so much evidence

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that was kept from us. Um, there's so much of

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the bad evidence that has flipped over, has reversed that.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he were tried now, whether I would

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>handle it or another defense lawyer would handle it, you know,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they'd get an acquibble. I think there's this overwhelming reasonable

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt that Jarvis was was guilty of the crimes. That's

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what I feel. So I'm glad you're doing this work.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very important. He should not be on death row.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He shouldn't be in prison actually for this crime. You know,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really a tragedy. Um, it really is. You know,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really unfair. How do you hear the decision? Who

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>told you? How did you find out? Art from at

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>least a dozen people, you know, they were coming at

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>me from all over the place, and what I noticed

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>about most of them was they wanted a response. They

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know my first reaction, and they wanted to

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>know it in a way that it's so really really

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>sickening to me. It's almost like people are looking right

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>down you, right down your throat and wanting to know

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>what aposted to feel like, you know, how does it

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>feel for that to happen? I'm sorry, but I really

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>want to know how you're dealing with this. I wanted

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to look in your eyes and see something you know

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that that all, yeah, I can see, I mean that

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. So I think what happened was I

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>dealt with it by trying to fear show I was

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not defeated, you know, and I was ready to take

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it to the next level that it's not as bad

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>as it was supposed to be. You know, the court

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>basically preached us with some really good issues, and that

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was the issue by Blue and the other justice speak

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the two issues that really we can really really build

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on the two issues that Jarvis is referencing that may

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>help as he navigates the federal appeals process. Written by

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin lou in his concurring opinion

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on Jarvis's habeas corpus petition, he writes, we have no

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>occasion in this posture to consider whether, in light of

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the trial evidence, as well as the reference hearing and findings,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.239
<v Speaker 1>we can be confident of the verdict beyond a reasonable

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>doubt and to quote, nor do we have occasion here

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to consider whether, in light of all of the relevant circumstances,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Masters was sentenced to death while his

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>co defendants were not maybe indicative of arbitrary nous in

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the application of the death penalty. I had the last

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>god I killed executed was on my watch with my

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>client in two thousand and six. And that's another thing

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that makes me so sick death. I'll tell you when

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you have that kind of direct experience of it, as

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>well as the experience of standing up there next to

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>my client, Jarvis, and having the judge condemned him to death.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Attorney Michael Satras sat second chair on Jarvis's defense team

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen through nineteen nine, and his death penalty sentence.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I've always been against that penalty. I get a add

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>taste in my mouth from it, and every experience that

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I have of it to me, just shows how wrong

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and arbitrary and capricious it is. And for Jarvis to

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>end up with the death penalty when wood or jury

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>hangs on the issue, which is the same jury we had.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Woodard is the he's the true believer. If anybody is

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in participation in the gang, he is indisputably the leader

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of those three. So the jury hangs on him and

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>then comes back with the death penalty for Jarvis. And

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>then you have Johnson, the actual killer, who gets the

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>death penalty by his jury, and the judge modifies it

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>because it is kind of arbitrary. He's sort of a

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fall guy in some ways from Woodard and the higher

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>ups picking him as as the good soldier who wants

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to make his bones and whatever to commit the killing.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But he's kind of just this not very bright, innocent

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>young man. And so the judge, to me, that was

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a very good move on her part. And then we

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>come up for pronouncement of judgment, and by all rights,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>by all signs of justice and whatever should have been modified.

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>In reference to the three States witnesses recanting their testimony,

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the California Supreme Court wrote that while Jarvis had demonstrated

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>them to be generally liars, he does not offer any

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>persuasive reason to credit their recantations over their trial testimony.

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>In other words, we know that prison snitches are prison snitches.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We know that prison snitches lie when it benefits them.

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>We know that there was a chance that they were

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lying in the original trial, and there's an equal chance

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that they lied in their recantations, and because of that,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>we unanimously endorse the execution of a man because you know,

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know in this prison context. Yeah, I mean,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you're accurate in observing that these people, many of them,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the snitches, are unreliable. They tell different stories. Jeffrey Rotwine,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>again lead defense counsel for Jarvis during his murder trial.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>We attacked Ruvius Willis. We attack you know, Johnny Hoes,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Evans, the people that were, you know, cooperating with

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the government. And typically there's a whole history of cooperation,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and and requests for leniency or money

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>or reduction and sentences or dismissal of cases, and you

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have to kind rely on the institution, the district attorney

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, the prison and the Department of Corrections,

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, to disclose and and produce all the records

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and information varying on that person's character and background and

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>motives for testifying. I asked Larry Marshall, a professor of

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>law at Stanford who happens to be consulting on Jarvis's case.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that the habeas corpus opinion has been rendered on

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the state level, what is next for Jarvis? So the

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>next step, after one goes through the state system of

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the direct appeal and then the habeas is we give

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a defendant capital or otherwise the right to go into

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>federal court. And two show that the state court was

0:19:55.840 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable in rejecting his or her ca institutional claims. So

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not enough to convince a federal judge that my

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>rights have been violated and that I should have been

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>given relief. You have to show, and this is since

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>since the anti terrorism and effective death penalty app you

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>have to show that the state court was reasonable, that

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it unreasonably applied settled law, Settled Supreme Court, United States

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court precedent. So it's a very high burden. But

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, it's a burden that has met

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at times in outrageous cases. And it also has to

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>be the claims have to be federal constitutional claims, and

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a very This federal habeas is a very

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.719
<v Speaker 1>odd bird in the structure of our court system because

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it kind of puts it does put a federal district

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>court judge and then a federal Court of Appeals in

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the role of reviewing the reasonableness of what the state

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>supreme court has done. We don't do that in civil cases.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And civil cases, if there's a federal issue, you go

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>straight to the Supreme Court. You don't get to go

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>into federal court and have a judge sort of second

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>guess at some level what the state court has done.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, because we do recognize that constitutional rights in

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the criminal setting are particularly cherished, we do provide we

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>do provide this remedy. And just as an historical note,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it was born in large part over the fact that,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>let's say, during reconstruction, a lot of states in the South,

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not respecting the constitutional rights of black defendants. Congress

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>had a mechanism, they had those defendants had a mechanism

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of going into court um and saying to the federal

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>court book, our constitutional rights are being violated, and there

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was a sense that the federal courts would be more

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>independent and more willing to recognize those constitutional rights. I've

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>told Jarvis that I will work very hard to help

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>put together a terrific team of the lawyers pro bono

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyers who will take on his representation in federal court.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>That I will be more than willing to consult with

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>those lawyers as they as they as they work through

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the case and to the you know, part of the

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>team in that sense, um, in an informal in an

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>informal way, but I do believe they play that he

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to get some lawyers who are both passionate and

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>brilliant and and very eager to get involved in a

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in an injustice like this. I asked Larry what he

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>believes that we as a society oh to those who

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>have languished on death row and in prison in general,

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>only to be found innocent years, if not decades later

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>after their incarceration. I believe that and this might sound corny, um,

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>which I guess is appropriate, but I'm pumped there you go.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I I believe that the main thing we owe them

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is to learn from our mistakes. Is the main thing

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we owe them is that their pain have not been

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in vain and that um other people will not suffer

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because of what they went through and what we've learned. Now,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not all that we were. We owe them, We

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>owe them, we need to make them whole as best

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.239
<v Speaker 1>we can really can't. Part of the way we do

0:23:55.320 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that is through money, uh, and judgments and the ability

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to try to rebuild or build a life. Um and

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I think those are vital as well. But it does

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>seem to me as a society that if we go

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>through that with an individual, we learned that the individual

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was wrongly convicted, and then we nonetheless just go back

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to business as usual. That is just this massive slap

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the face to the person who has been exonerated

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and two people coming down the pike. The late Geronimo

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Pratt served two tours in Vietnam, where he earned two

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>bronze stars, a silver star, and two purple stars. When

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>he returned to the States, he became a high ranking

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>member of the Black Panther Party and was eventually imprisoned

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>in San Quentin for twenty seven years for a murder

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he did not commit, and was awarded four point five

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollars from federal and local governments as settlement in

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a wrongful imprisonment suit. Here we have Geronimo on tape

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>decades ago bearing witness to his friend Jarvis J. Masters,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>at the launch party for Jarvis's first book, Finding Freedom,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Writings from Death Row. Hey, UM, met Jarvis Masters in

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>prison while we were in the hole in San Quentin's

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>adjustment center, shortly after he was charged with the murder

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of Sergeant Burstville. No, I should say, wrongfully charge. And um,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a very beautiful brother. I kind of two did

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>like I do with Uh. I did, but most youngsters

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of took him under my way for a minute

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the brief time we were together, and uh I noticed

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that specialness about him that made him stand apart from

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>most youngsters his age. And uh later on when I

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>learned that he had written a book and that he

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>had continued just practices and to his disciplines that we

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>had been trying to promote as older prisoners, and I

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>was very proud of that. And then when I got

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the book and read it, and I knew he was there,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and so uh, even though he sits on death row

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and facing death, I was also up there for eighteen months,

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but I was not facing officially the death. I know

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>what it's like. But now that I know, he has

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>reached this nirvana at this level, and I'm sure that

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jarvis is this in a safe place, even though

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he still physically needs our help to get him off

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of death row. And hopefully through these methods and channels

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>now we'll we'll be able to generate enough support, enough

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>funds or whatever to effect his release from uh the gallows.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And I want to encourage all of you to get

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this book. Read it. You will find a lot of

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and a lot of freedom in this book. And

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it might sounds fames that you will find freedom from

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy locked up, but take my word from it.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Read this book. You will find a lot of freedom.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Where do we find our freedom? I describe situations where

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>someone has a very very beautiful home or two door

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>garage right off the beach, great job, a trained dog,

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and how their lives are so miserable. At the same time,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>their life is so miserable, and every time they pull

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>out the parking lot, they don't. There's a stretch of

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>beach that they never get to see going to work

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and coming back, and to think that you have all

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>these proper tilities two find your own freedom, to be blessed,

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to be fortunate to not have that, but always with

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense of being on death row is doesn't have

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in prison, you know you can't. Don't do that.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't learn just from people in prison on death row

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in San Quentin. We'll learn from the misery that you

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>see other people have when they when they're alcoholics, when

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they are dope finds are very abusive to their spouse,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>where Vinus is right in the next door, not necessary

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. You know, just because you're out doesn't

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that they're free. That's a myth. That's a very

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>very clear myth to me. And I learned that they

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>beat me in the Buddhist I really did that. There's

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>something that I can directly relate to. Having exhausted his

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>state appeals, Jarvis now heads to the federal courts. Brian

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson of the Equal Justice Initiative introduced Jarvis to Stanford

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>professor Larry Marshall, who in turn introduced Jarvis to the

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>prestigious international law firm Kirkland and Ellis. They have recently

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>committed to represent Jarvis pro bono and his federal habeas

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>proceedings and other post conviction proceedings. His lead attorney, William F. Williams, said,

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>after decades of litigation in the California state courts, we

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>now have the opportunity to raise in federal courts the

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>serious constitutional issues that deprived Jarvis of a fair trial,

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and we look forward to presenting his claims to a

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>federal judge. We will continue to support Jarvis and help

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>tell his story far and wide as the riveting details unfold,

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and we remain optimistic that Governor Gavin Newsom will hear

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>our open letter and revisit the unjust case of Jarvis

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>j Masters. The vast majority of legal insights into Jarvis's

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>substantial claims of innocence were published in the article Unrequited

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Innocence in US Capital Cases Unintended Consequences of the Fourth

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Kind by Rob Warden and John Seasley, published in the

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy in the spring

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nineteen. Not only does this fascinating read profile

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis's case, but the cases involving twenty four more condemned

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>men and women whom the authors believed to be innocent

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. We linked to the article in our show notes.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to Alan Sinaki for providing legal insights into

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis's case as well. Today's episode was written and produced

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>by Donna Fazzari and myself, Corny Cole. Our theme song

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sentenced is compliments of the band's stick figure from their

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>albums Set in Stone. Stu Sternbach has composed the original music.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Nate Defort did the sound design. Visit free Jarvis dot

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>org to find out more about Jarvis's case and to

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>sign your name to our dear Governor Newsom petition. And

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have questions for Jarvis, please leave a message

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on our hotline at two zero one nine zero three

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty five seventy five. That's two zero one nine zero

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>three thirty five seventy five. For more podcasts from my

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.