WEBVTT - Scottish Open: Odds, Predictions & One-And-Done Picks | Presented by Underdog Fantasy (Ep. 481)

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Betting pros PGA Podcast. I'm Pat Fitzmorris

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>here with Bau mcbrair. Are you ready for two weeks

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of golf tournaments in the United Kingdom because we have

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the Scottish Open this week, the British Open next week,

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and today we'll preview the Scottish Open. We'll also recap

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the John Deere Classic, and at the end of the

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>show we'll give you our one and done picks for

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the week. The Betting pros PGA Podcast is sponsored by

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Underdog Fantasy. Underdog is the place to go for fantasy

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>football bestball contests, but you might not have known that

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Underdog has golf contest too. Visit Underdog Fantasy dot com

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>or find Underdog in the app store, and don't forget

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to register with the promo code BP Golf to claim

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>your special pick and to get a first time deposit

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>offer of up to two hundred and fifty dollars in

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>bonus cash. More on Underdog and It's golf contest. A

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>little later, Davis Thompson wins the John Deere Classic bow

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and he does it without a lot of drama. The

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five year old Thompson scorched TP deer Ron for

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>four days, finishing twenty eight under par. Thompson had rounds

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of sixty three, sixty seven, sixty two and sixty four.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He wound up winning by a comfortable four shot margin.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Bow and I had talked about Thompson last week as

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>an intriguing betting option. He'd finished top twenty in four

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of his previous six starts and was coming off a

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tie for second at the Rock and Mortgage Classic. Thompson

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>had also tied for second at the Myrtle Beach Classic

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in May, so he'd shown that he could be a

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>serious contender, at least in events with lesser fields. Unfortunately,

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bo I did not add Thompson to my betting card.

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, sort of kicking myself over what about you?

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Did you did you bet him?

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have as much as I should have had

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>because when we when we published the show, we were

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>both really on it. One of our listeners, Eric at

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>E twelve two, did tail us on our based on

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>what we gave last week, based on Davis Thompson's recent

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>how he fits with this golf course against this field,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and he came up with a big win. He also

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>had Michael Thorpyjornsen. I know you had some thor Byjornsen,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>thinks to me, and I had all of thor Bjornsen,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>who cast top five, top ten on top twenty tickets

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 2>for me, I think, I think Eric did the same thing.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>So winners all around except for Fitz who was He

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>talked about it, but he wasn't all about it. We

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>need to get on that train.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I did have a top five for thorb Bjornson,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>so while I'm not as wealthy as you and Eric,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that paid off at sixteen to one, so

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it did give me a little bit of a profit

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>for the week. Thor Bjornson finished in a three way

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>tie for second with ct Pan and Luke Clanton. Bo,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you've yeah touted the twenty two year old thor Bjornson

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as a rising star and future winner of majors, and

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the tie for the second his best finish of his

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>brief PGA Tour career. Speaking of young stars, Bo, Luke

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Clanton no relation to the Clinton family of the Okay

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Corral shootout as far as I.

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Know, No, I don't know.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It seems pretty seems pretty coincidental at best.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So young mister Clinton three putted from five feet on

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>his final hole at the US Open, blowing a chance

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to tie Neil Shipley for Low amateur honors at the

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>US Open. But since then, Clanton has finished tenth at

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the Rocket Mortgage Classic and now second at the John Deere.

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>He's another young player we're gonna have to watch closely

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's making some noise. Not much else to talk about, really,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>John Deere Classic was indeed the birdie fest we expected

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it to be.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>The cut line was minus five.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Springer had an opening round fifty nine and could

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>only manage to finish tied for seventh. Follow any reflections

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>on the John Deere.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>It was everything we said. It would be another shout

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>out to another guy who helped cash tickets, Chan Kim

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>with the top twenty finish, that's a good one for

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>us to pick. He was one hundred and twenty to

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>one outright. But those placement bets on those deeper shots

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>have been paying all seasons. So pay close attention. And

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>when we're talking about long shots, it's not necessarily that

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>we think they're going to win. We just think that

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>if their odds are so long outright, you're probably getting

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>really good odds on them performing well in general. Top twenty,

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>top thirty, top forty bets, you can do made cut

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>parlays on most of these books. Get with some of

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>these long shots just to get a piece of them,

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>can can really turn a profit each week, so it's

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>a really good way to build bankroll. And every once

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>in a while you get one that just hits and

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>they win. The whole thing like we got with the

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Aukshebatia earlier this season, or where we got with Jake

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Knapp earlier in the season, is sometimes the long shots

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>do win. Most of the time. They're just there so

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 2>we don't get skunked every week because sometimes it's really

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>hard to pick who's going to win. We've been having

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>a really good season on the outright market, but it's

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>been those base bets at plus four fifty to plus

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 2>eight to fifty in your case, plus eleven fifty on

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a top five on the rookie, those really add up,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and that you can hit those at a lot higher

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 2>clip than picking out rights in the game of golf,

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>where honestly we're just playing a game of probability.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes sir, And now we cross the Atlantic for the

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Scottish Open. We'll get to the preview in just a minute,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but first our friends at Underdog Fantasy are letting you

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>make picks on your favorite golfers all season long. Just

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>pick higher or lower on selected stats for two to

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>five golfers and you can win up to twenty times

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>your money in a single day. You can also make

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>rivals picks, where you choose, for instance, which of two

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>golfers will shoot better scoring around golf. Picks can be

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>combined with stats player stats from other sports too. Go

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>sign up an Underdog Fantasy with the promo code BP

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Golf to claim your special pick and to get a

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>first time deposit offer of up to two hundred and

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus cash. So The Scottish Open will

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>be played at the Renaissance Club in North Barrick for

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a sixth time. Located on the east coast of Scotland

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>along the North Sea, this event is co sponsored by

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the DP World Tour and the PGA Tour, so we're

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>getting a field with players from both tours. The Renaissance

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Club is a par seventy that plays two seven and

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven yards, was designed by Tom Doak and opened

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. It's a link style course,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but the Renaissance Club isn't quite as linxy as Royal Troon,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>host of the British Open in two weeks, But after

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>two weeks of tournaments played on Midwestern parkland courses, the

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance Club will certainly offer a different style of golf.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>The ground in Scotland is.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Rock hard, as I can attest from a couple of

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>golf trips there, so players are going to get a

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of runout on their t shots. On links courses,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you typically won't find bunkers directly in front of the green,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 1>so players have the option to play bump and run

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>approach shots. Sometimes keeping the ball on the ground is

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the way to go on a links course. And we're

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna see some creativity around the greens this week. Some

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Texas wedges, you know, some bumping runs from you know.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Just off.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>The fairways at the Renaissance Club aren't easy to hit,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but the fescue rough isn't all that punishing. What can

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>be punishing, however, the twenty two fairway bunkers scattered around

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the course. A lot of the greenside bunkers are pot bunkers.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>That can be steep and more difficult to navigate than

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the green side bunkers and US courses. The greens at

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Renaissance Club are big, and like the greens on

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>many of the courses in the UK, they're on the slow.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Side, at least by PGA Tour standards.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's see the Renaissance Club has three par fives, all

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of them reachable, and five par threes. Three of those

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>par threes are longer than two hundred yards, and there

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of shorties, one measuring four one and

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>forty seven yards, one measuring one sixty one. They're four

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>long par fours measuring or eighty or longer than. The

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>fifth hole is a short driveable par four, coming in

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>at just three hundred and thirty eight yards. Rory McElroy

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is the defending Scottish Open champion. He finished minus fifteen

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>last year to edge Robert McIntyre by one shot. Xanders

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Schoffley won a windy Scottish Open in twenty twenty two,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>finishing one stroke better than Bo McBrier favorite Kurt Kitty Yama.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Minwoe Lee was the Minwu Lee was the champ in

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. He finished minus eighteen and best did

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Dietrie and Matthew Fitzpatrick in a playoff. Let's see

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty it was Aaron Rye at minus eleven

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he beat Tommy Fleetwood in a playoff, and in twenty

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Burned Weisberger won the first Scottish Open at the

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance Club, finishing twenty two under and beating Benjamin Abart

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in a playoff. So the all important weather forecast for

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>North Barrick, where the wind off the North Sea canreek havoc,

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be that bad.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Temperatures are expected to.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Be in the upat now.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We say that now, and it is unpredictable, granted, but

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as of now, the forecast calls for temps in the

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>upper fifties the first three days, with chances for occasional showers.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You'll get pop up showers in Scotland all the time.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunday things should dry out and be a little warmer,

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with tempts in the low sixties. The wind is expected

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to be ten to fifteen miles an hour on Thursday

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and then only five to ten miles per hour the

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of the tournament. The winds are that benign bow.

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I would expect to shoot out with a winning score

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around minus twenty, but again, weather conditions can be

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>very unpredictable in Scotland. Bo your ancestry traces back to Scotland,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on the Renaissance Club and Scottish golf in general.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, without whether it's a very very easy course, these

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>guys are going to just light it up. I've always

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>gone back to this old app that a Scottish meteorologist

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is just a sheep with a rope tied to its tail,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's basically basically what the weather is going to

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 2>be like is based on what condition that rope is in,

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and that's it's really you can't predict the weather like

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a weather forecast, even I with ACI Weather and Doppler forecasting,

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>especially on the North Sea side of Scotland, it's impossible.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>You have no clue. Nobody has any clue what the

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 2>weather's going to be even in three hours, and so

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 2>that's I think that's completely irrelevant. I have to expect

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that there's going to be inclement weather at some point

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 2>this week, especially with wind. I really don't care about

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the rain because it's just going to make the course easier.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>This course is right for the picking, but if that

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>wind picks up like it did last year in the

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>year before where it was predicted to be good weather incoming,

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean Rory hit that famous two iron from two

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>oh six into the teeth of that wind forty mile

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>an hour gus. I believe the forecast set a max

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>gust of fifteen miles an hour at the time, and

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>we did the show last year, so yeah, none of

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that forecasting matters. We want to predict who's going to

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>be able to play, whether play and whether when it's bad,

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>not if it's bad. I want to prepare for the

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>worst and put golfers together that are artists. This is

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a course that requires a lot of care, a lot

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>of touch, a lot of finesse, and just creativity. Like

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned it the bump and run game. You can

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>still get around this place with flop shots that the

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>wind isn't blowing, but you have to be able to

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>adapt with the conditions. And that's why we've seen winners

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 2>like Rory and Xander and even guys that have competed

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>here year over year like Thomas Dietrie. All these guys

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 2>are creative ball strikers. They're good when the conditions are good.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 2>They're even better when the conditions are not good. That's

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>who I'm looking for. This tournament's going to be gonna

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>hinge on if there's one or two days of bad weather.

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Who's going to rise to the top.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>The two iron into the wind that Rory hit last

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>year so memorable and so heroic that there is no

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a plaque on the course honoring that. And I don't

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>think I mentioned Xander Schoffley's winning score in twenty twenty

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>two when the wind was up it was seven under par.

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this course was a east.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>This course is nasty when it's bad, and it's super

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 2>easy when it's not.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>If you want a chance to win a free one

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>year premium Betting Pro subscription, subscribe to the Betting Pros

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel right now, comment below on this video and

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's it. We'll be announcing a winner right here on

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the channel. So turn on your notifications so you can

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be alerted when new episodes are up and to claim

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your prize. And speaking of prizes, Betting Pros is giving

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>away a signed Julio Rodriguez jersey for free, courtesy of

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>our friends at Pristineauction dot com. Entering the contest is easy.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Go to www Bettingpros dot com slash contest again Www

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Bettingpros dot com slash contest and complete the entry form.

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Then download the Betting Pros app, leave a review for

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, or subscribe to our social media channels. More

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>actions you complete, the more entries you get. Every follow

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and review helps and boosts your chances of winning just

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>by sharing your feedback on our podcast. The entry deadline

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is July thirty first, so go visit www dot bettingpros

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash contest for your chance to win a

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>signed Julio Rodriguez Mariners Jersey okay bo. So let's get

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to the odds for the Scottish Open. All odds courtesy

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of DraftKings. As of Monday afternoon, Rory McElroy opens as

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the betting favorite at plus eighty plus eight hundred Xanderschoffley

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>plus eight fifty Colin Morrikawa plus fourteen hundred, Ludwig Oberg

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>plus sixteen hundred, Tommy Fleetwood plus two thousand, Victor Hovlin

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty two hundred Tom Kim plus twenty eight hundred

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Minwu Le plus three thousand, Padeki Matsiama plus thirty five hundred,

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Justin Thomas and Matt Fitzpatrick plus four thousand, and at

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>plus forty five hundred, Sung JM, Robert McIntyre, Aaron Raye,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and we've got Brian Harmon at plus five thousand. Who

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>do you like from this group?

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Right off the top our defending champion Rory McClory's coming

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>in with excellent form. I think the odds are a

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 2>little short. They've shrunk to plus seven to fifty on

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 2>by my look right now on Monday afternoon. However, that's

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 2>still fine for a favorite. It's a non Scotty favorite.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>No Scotti Scheffler in this field either. We'll see him

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>next week for the Open Championship. But Rory coming into

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>this field is still going to be top five in

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 2>most stat models. He's just on a really good run

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>of form right now. This course does kind of ben

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the need to power players. Distance does have an advantage here,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and Rory McClory showed that last year where even when

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the wind picked up, it even gained his another advantage

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>because he could cut it through the wind and hit

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>it into places where nobody else could get This is

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a big advantage for long hitters who also have good

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>short games. Rory McElroy obviously a great short game, and

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>that's why he's been on such a run this past

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>two months. He's especially he's just on fire. So Rory

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>mclroy's a great bat. At plus seven fifty or plus

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred, anywhere in that range is fined with me.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going right to Victor Hovelin because when things

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>get tough, when things are a little bit inclement, that's

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>when he vaults to the top of the rankings. One

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>of the best ball strikers on planet Earth, especially in wind,

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>especially when you have to move the ball around. And

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>as mediocre as his short game has been, it's better

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>when the course demands creativity. It's just the straightforward chips.

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't seem like he gets too much detailed down.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think his best form around the greens is

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 2>when he's forced to be creative, and he gets to

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 2>do that this week.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I will tease my betting card. I took

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ror early well, it was late Monday afternoon at plus

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred. Earlier in the afternoon he had been plus

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>six hundred, a price I didn't like nearly as much,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so plus seven fifty plus seven to fifty not a

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>bad price. Still, I think I would have locked that

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in as well, but I feel lucky to have gotten

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>him at plus eight hundred. Yeah, you just wonder like

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been dialed in for months. He knows golf in

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the UK quite well, the Northern irishman does. We haven't

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>seen him since the US Open, and you know the

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>tournament he let slip away in painful fashion. How scarred

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>will he be by that experience? Probably not very.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to be, if anything, hungry and

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>pissed off. Yes, if it's me, I'm betting on Rory

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to come back with guns of blazing, going off and

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to just destroy that golf course, defend his title.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 2>He's got everything to gain. We've seen him at his

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>lowest point right now, where he was so close to

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>winning that major and breaking that long, long drought. He's

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>got a chip on his shoulder this year, especially with

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>defending the Scottish Open and getting a shot at Royal

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 2>truon the next week. I think Rory's gonna go scorch

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Dearth this week and next to he's gonna be really

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>tough to beat at both places, especially with there's a

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>distinct European advantage to these next two courses. I mean,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 2>we are on sacred, hollowed grounds for golf, and this

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 2>field in particular has seventy five DP World Tour players

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and seventy five PGA Tour players. That's the unique mix,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>is the conjunction of this two tours building this Scottish

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Open field for the first time, it's gonna be unique

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to see the best of both tours. I think there's

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talent in the European field, even if

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 2>they're PGA Tour players. The Europeans have a distinct advantage

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 2>on these types of golf courses because they're not anything

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>like what we see over here. We don't have link

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 2>style golf courses in the United States. They might be

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 2>link style asterisk parentheses, seek immunity notes. Even even Royal

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Barrick or North Barrick is a link style course, but

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it's on the ocean, in on the North Sea. It's

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>it's definitely as close to links as you're gonna get

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>anywhere in the United States, and I just there there's

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 2>nothing like it. So a lot of what I'm going

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>to be going over in my slip is going to

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 2>be European style players or just guys from Europe who

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>are used to this kind of golf.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>To your point, I mean the courses in the US

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that we call link style course. It's Whistling Straits in Wisconsin,

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>which I've had the privilege of playing.

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>It's a great course.

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing like Scotland. It just doesn't play like a

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Lynx course.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 2>That's that's on a great lakes. I mean, it's it's

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 2>cool they built the course on the lake in a

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>similar fashion. But I think the closest you can get

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 2>in the United States would be like Pebble Beach because

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>it's on the northern part of the ocean, cold water.

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 2>You get some really nasty way other every once in

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>a while, but it's not anywhere close to at that latitude.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Right now, in Scotland you can play golf at ten pm.

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>It's it's north enough to where in the summertime it's

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>not gonna get dark. These guys are not going to

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 2>get suspended due to darkness in the next two weeks,

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 2>just because golf is everything in Scotland in the summertime

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>in the squalls. The squalls are always on the horizon.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, sir, let's go over some of the other favorites.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So Xander Schaffley the other player with odds shorter than

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ten to one. Xander's finished inside the top fifteen in

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>each of his last five events, and he won here

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two under those harsh conditions, so understandable why.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 3>His odds are so short.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Colin Marikawa He's also finished top fifteen and five straight events,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but in two previous appearances at the Scottish Open, he's

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>finished seventy first and missed the cots. It's hard to

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>tell whether links golf suits Morikawa or not. B poor

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Scottish Open track record, He's missed the cut in his

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>last two British Opens. He also won the British Open

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one at Royal Saint George's, So he's

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>an interesting case. Do either Xander or Morikawa appeal to

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you at all?

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Xander if it gets nasty, Morikawa if it stays calm.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 2>He won the Open and Rose Saint George is in

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty nice conditions. He's a high ball hitter. He hits

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the ball very high trajectory wise, are's the reason why

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Scotti Scheffler hasn't even come close to winning the Open Championship.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 2>It's because he's a high ball hitter. He doesn't flight

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the ball down very well. When the wind is up.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a very important part of that kind

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>of gulf, and I'm looking for guys that are better

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 2>at flying the ball down, better at getting creative on approach,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 2>better at getting up and down from weird, really weird

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>places where it's not there's nothing in front of you,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>but maybe you're in a gorse bush or nearby or

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 2>in a pot bunker, and you have to be able

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 2>to get the ball up and down on a green

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that's gigantic. You might be ninety feet away from the

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 2>pin in a pop bunker, and you got to find

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>a way to get up and down. And some of

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 2>these guys just aren't equipped for that. Their game is

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>built for over here, and it's it's just so different.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 2>So I think I'll go more towards guys who we've

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>seen do that, like Hideki Matsuyam at thirty five to one.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 2>He's played out of his mind well this year, especially

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in tough conditions, and this course is a lot tougher

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>than the last three weeks so we've seen on the

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour. Even if the conditions are benign, you're not

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna see a birdie fest, even if the weather's temperate.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I do also like Matt Fitzpatrick. It's thirty five one, yeah,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 2>but if things get a little tougher, like if the

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>weather changes, then I'm gonna expect guys like him to

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 2>rise to the occasion grind it out. He comes in

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>third in my model when I filter for wind. That

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that really raised my eyebrows on him. Thirty five to

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 2>one on a guy that good at those odds, I'll

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>take it.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got a weird vibe about the big oberg Oh,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like this could be a good week for you missed

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cot last year in his debut at the Renaissance Club.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, does he have the experience to give him

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the sort of creativity he might need this week?

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Is that your concern, I am.

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 2>My concern is his style is he's a high ball hitter,

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>likes he hits the ball really high, and that's it.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It plays a big part when greens are fast and

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you need to be able to tuck it into certain spots.

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Like here, you just have to hit it close. You

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 2>have to be able to hit it close whether the

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>wind is up or not. And I don't know that

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 2>he can do that. I don't. I don't like his

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 2>style with this type of golf understood.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yet it was the weather forecast that's sort of emboldened

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>me to take him. But as you said, the weather forecast,

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>how much stake should we be putting in that? Maybe

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting a little too much into it by taking Olberg.

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Fleetwood has finished top twenty six in six straight

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>events over the last two months, but he has no

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>top tens in that time. But he does have a

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>strong record at the Renaissance Club. His finishes in his

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>last four appearance here second, twenty sixth, fourth, sixth, Minwu

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Lee tied for second at the Rocket Mortgage Classic two

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. One here in twenty twenty one, when conditions

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>were pretty benign.

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's see.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Kim has finished third and sixth in his two

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>prior Scottish Open appearances. Lost a playoff to Scottie Scheffler

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Travelers three weeks ago, although he then missed

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the cut at the Rocket Mortgage Classic. Aaron Raye something

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you liked enough to take in our one and done

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>bow last week one here in twenty twenty, and has

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>been in fine form lately. Second at the Rock and Mortgage,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>seventh at the John Deere. Let's see he sung j

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>M four top tens in his last seven events, plus

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 1>a twelfth last week at the John Deere. However, he

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has missed the cut at the Scottish Open in each

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the last two years. And one more guy I'll

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>mention Robert McIntyre finished second here last year in his

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>two other top twenties at the Renaissance Club, and he's

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a scott obviously, but he's had a wild season. Man

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>won the Canadian Open, finished top ten at the PGA

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>bod McIntyre has also missed the cut in six of

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>his last twelve tour events. So do any of those

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>guys appeal to you or not?

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Really?

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Not really? Maybe minwe Lee at fifty five or thirty

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to one right now, I think that's too short for him.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 2>He's had such a terrible season on approach that his

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 2>win and top five finished the last couple of years

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>at this golf course. I don't really put stock in

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>it because he was playing better golf at those times.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 2>This is very much what have you done for me

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 2>lately type of golf course where if you come in

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and you have the right mindset and you're also playing

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>good golf, you can take this thing down. Minw Lee

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>played well last week, but he kind of fizzled out

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>at the end. His approach game has been so bad

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 2>that I really don't feel great about it. He's going

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 2>to have to score a lot better on par four's,

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and he's gonna have to avoid Bowie's a lot better

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>than he has been. He's way down in my model,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 2>so is Tom Kim. Tommy Fleetwood always rates out well.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>He should do well, but if you're if you keeping

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>score at home. He has never won a PGA Tour event.

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 2>He has never won anything. He hasn't won anything in

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the last three years, other than being part of the

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup for Europe, which was a landslide. But yeah,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately for Tommy Fleetwood, unless you're betting him to make

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the top ten, you're not going to make any money

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>because Tommy Fleetwood doesn't win.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at mid range plays at plus fifty five

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred are Wyndham Clark Davis, Thompson, Corey Connors and ben On.

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And let's see at plus six thousand, we've got Sepstraka,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Christian Bazudin, Howes, sahiit Degala and Max Homa. Jordan Speith

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 1>is plus sixty five hundred. Thomas Detree and Adam Scott

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>are plus seven thousand, Ryan Fox and Eric van Royan

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>are plus seventy five hundred, and at plus eight thousand

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are Tom mckibbon, Tom Hogue, Seewu Kim and Alex Norin.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>How about the mid range options ball.

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 2>This is more my speed. Ben On has the distance advantage.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 2>His putting has been a lot better this season. I

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>think ben On's got a really nice number at fifty

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 2>five to one. His power is going to be an

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>advantage here. Same goes for Ryan Fox. Ryan Fox is

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 2>a bomber and a half. He annihilates par four's that's

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>going to come into play a lot on this golf

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 2>course where the par fours are tricky. You have a

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 2>vast array of them. And so I did take a

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 2>really broad stroke on strokes gain par four and he

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>rated thirteenth in this entire field. So Ryan Fox is

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 2>very high on my list. Deetree has a great track record.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 2>He's a horse for this course if I've ever seen one.

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 2>The Belgian obviously European. He's played well in tough conditions.

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 2>He's played well in European golf course conditions. I think

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that's he's in really good form right now to pay

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 2>off at seven to one. So those two guys are

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of my favorites in that range.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So On was third here last year, and the last

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>time we saw mister On he was missing the cut

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>at the US Open and then withdrawing from the Travelers.

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.239
<v Speaker 1>But he did record back to back top fives at

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Byron Nelson and the Wells Fargo two months ago.

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Dtree second here in twenty twenty one, tenth in twenty

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, five for five, making the cut at the

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance Club.

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the Belgian hasn't really.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Made much noise lately, but he does have three top

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>fives this season.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's see Max Homa.

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It's had kind of an up and down year, but

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he's shown some aptitude at the Renaissance Club, finishing sixteenth

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and twelfth in two previous appearances. And Tom mckibbon is

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>someone American fans might not be familiar with. He is

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a twenty one year old rising star from Northern Ireland

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who has finished top ten and four of his last

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>six DP World Tour events. He was second at the

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Italian Open a couple of weeks ago. What about long

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone with odds of ninety to one or longer who interested?

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Number two in my entire model is Danny McCarthy. It

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>comes in handy that he's a great approach player, he's

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>a great putter, He avoids bogies like crazy. He plays

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 2>very well in wind. That's that's right at the very

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>top of my of my whole board, and going back

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to Dorcal Kurt Kittyama, he's played well here over the years.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 2>You know why, because it's dry and windy here all

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 2>the damn time. So yeah, I think that he just

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 2>feels at home, especially when the wind picks up. He's

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>he's well equipped to his stingers all day. I'm pretty

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 2>sure we kind of as soon as we learn to

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>swing a club, we're hitting stingers off the tee just

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to get it under the wind. So I think that if,

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>especially if the conditions worsen, you're going to see players

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>like Kurt Kittyama rise because they are so adept at

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>grinding out pars and making making birdies on holes where

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>nobody else is. He's he's that kind of player where

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>he buckles down and get and makes makes u and

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 2>holes out when it's tough. I really like that, especially

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>at his odds. I think he's at one hundred and

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 2>ten to one right now. That's a that's a really

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>nice number for a guy of his caliber. That's that's

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty much in that range where I go. Justin Rose

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>is another guy that when the conditions get tougher, another

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>English golfer who's played these kinds of golf courses his

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 2>entire life. He's ninth in my model, and I'm gonna

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 2>go all the way down, all the way down, and

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna you're gonna laugh this. This is a good one.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna go to Antoine Rosner. Antoine Rosner is four

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred to one, and he's very high on my list.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>The Frenchman. I believe he's a he's that kind of guy.

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just this this kind of golf course brings out

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>some wild ones. I have a couple of other deep

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>shots and I'm kind of hesitant to throughout there because

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 2>my model is a little bit shaky at the moment.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>But one of them is Vincent Norman. I believe he's

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a Swede two ours. He's a bomb and gouge type

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 2>of guy. So if the conditions are good, I can

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.479
<v Speaker 2>see guys like Vincent Norman rise to the top. If

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not good, you're gonna see guys like a Rosner,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the crafty, bump and run guys. They're just ball strikers,

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 2>they're creative, they're the artists.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 3>I was considering a different Frenchman, Bo, Matthew Pavan. It

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 3>seems like ninety to one, just seems like a value there.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Finished twelfth here in twenty twenty one and was in

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the Hunted the US Open obviously last month, finishing fifth.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'll mention one more European Ewan Ferguson is a

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight year old scott who obviously has some experience

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 3>with Scottish golf. He was twelfth here a year ago

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 3>and coming off a win at the BMW Invitational Open

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 3>last week. All right, Bo, what do you have on

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 3>your betting card as of this moment?

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, so I do have some Rory McIlroy at

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 2>plus seven fifty, Victor Hovelin at twenty two to one,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Hideki Matsuyama at thirty five, and we're going all the

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>way down to I did throw in some Jordan Speith.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of shaky on it because he's played so badly,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>but I think that Jordan Speed, for some reason in

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 2>my head, is gonna pull it around. Danny McCarthy at

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 2>ninety to one, Kirk Kittayama on ten to one, Justin

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Rose at one hundred and fifty to one, and then

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna we're just gonna throw it out over while

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 2>five dollars with Antoine Rosner.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're both going hard this week. I've got Rory

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>at plus eight hundred. I did go with Olberg at

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>plus sixteen hundred, and I went with Tom Kim here

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of making me regret it.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Should have put that money I've been on instead. But

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got Tom Kim at plus twenty eight hundred. I

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do have Thomas Deetree at plus seven thousand and top

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>five at plus fourteen hundred. I bet Tom mckibbon a

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>little something at eighty to one and a top five

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen to one. I've got Pavon to win outright

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety to one, and I've got you and Ferguson at

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ten to one with a top five

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>kicker at twenty to one. Now, before we get to

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>our one and done picks, if you're playing in a

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one and done golf pool, or if you're playing in

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>any sort of tears based majors pool, this year, our

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>friends at pool Genius a new product that gives you

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>an edge using objective data like betting odds, course performance,

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and national pick trends.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>The tool highlights the top.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Value picks that give you an edge, and it can

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>all be customized specifically for your pool. If you're doing

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a one and done pool or major's pool, let pool

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Genius be your secret weapon. And by the way, pool

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Genius is not just for golf pools. You can use

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it for March Madness pools, NFL Survivor pools, and more.

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>For ten percent off on the Majors tool, and for

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent off on yearly packages that include all golf,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>football and March Madness tools, visit poolgenius dot com slash

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros. Again, that's poolgenius dot Com slash Fantasy pros

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Now for the one and done picks. Last week, Bo

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>took Aaron Raye, who finished tied for seventh, good for

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:24.239
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty two thousand, four hundred dollars. I

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>took Sepstraca, who tied for sixty first, good for seventeen

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>thy two hundred. I'm not sure I could buy a

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>decent used car for that. The money Scepstraca earned me

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>last week.

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Now much so Bo.

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Extends his lead. He's at about eleven point seven million

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for the season. I'm about four million back at seven

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>point seven million. You are up first this week, Bo,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Who you got?

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I'm in cruise control at this point,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, the Tour Championship could throw me off

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the season. But I do feel

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>confident that I got this thing. As long as I

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>can keep my head on my shoulders, I'm going to

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>play it relatively safe with Matt Fitzpatrick this week.

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fitzpatrick, Oh, and what am I gonna do here?

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with Oberg.

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Him I have, and I'm not sure if this is

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the right spot to pull him out. I guess I'm

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>counting on that He's mild weather forecast.

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's talented enough for sure. I just don't know

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 2>about the fit.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 3>And that's gonna do it.

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>For this week's show, thanks again to our sponsor, Underdog Fantasy.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Sign up for Underdog with the promo code BP Golf

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to claim your special pick and to get a first

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>time to posit offer of up to two hundred and

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus cash, and please come join Bo

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and I again next week when we'll be previewing the

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>final major of the season, the British Open at Royal Troon.

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Until then, so long everyone.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 4>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros