WEBVTT - My Coworker Gets Away with Everything

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>My colleagues, We'll stop commenting on everything I get. My

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>assistant rolls his eyes at people and meeting. Why does

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>my coworker keep taking credit for all my ideas? Have

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>any wisdom for me? Hi? I'm Alison Green. Welcome to

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the Aska Manager Podcast. Right answer questions from listeners about

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>life at work, everything from what to say if you're

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>allergic to your coworkers perfume to what to do if

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you drink too much at the company party. Let's get started, Hi,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the show. Today. I'm going to answer

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of shorter questions from people. The first question

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>today is from someone with a terrible coworker. Hi. There

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>so a little bit of back story. My coworker has

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>a family member who is a pretty big deal in

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the company. Said relative has since retired, but her legacy

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of lives on. UM. My co worker seems to

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>get away with everything. She treats her superiors with no respect,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>does whatever she wants, never has any consequences. Have literally

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>heard her say to our manager, no, I'm not going

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that and then just walks away. She's constantly

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>complaining about how busy she is. I think in hopes

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that no one will assign her more work, but she

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>never even does the work because she's assigned to her,

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and I end up getting stuck with it. I'm constantly

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing her on a computer looking at real estate, shopping,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>just browsing the internet. Stop doing that, She's socializing with

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>other people. She just never does any work, and it

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all falls on me. I'm getting sick of it. Whenever

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I try to go to my manager, I get I

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything about it. My hands are tied. If

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I try to go to above my manager, I get

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>scolded saying that she's not your problem, stay in your

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>lane and do your own work. You know, I'm just

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>looking for what I can do to I don't have

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to pick up her slack. Getting a little fed up

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>with it. Signed at a loss and drowning and someone

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>else's work. Okay. One of the biggest things to realize

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like this is that while your co

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>worker is terrible, your manager is the problem too. Because

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>your manager is not managing, she's not doing her own job,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.559
<v Speaker 1>which is too deal with a situation like this now,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not your manager herself who's the problem. Maybe

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it's someone above her who's made it clear that this

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>co worker is untouchable, but someone somewhere in the management

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>above you is just as much of a problem as

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this co worker is, if not more, because they're being

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>negligent about the situation when they are the person who

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is charged with dealing with it. Usually, when that happens,

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>it's because the manager in question is a whimp and

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't willing to deal with the hassle and the awkwardness

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of addressing this kind of situation and going through the

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>process of firing someone. I'm assuming firing would be the

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>solution here because she sounds so far gone that it

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound salvageable, although who knows. Maybe if someone in

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>authority were willing to address the situation head on, maybe

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>she'd shape up. But for our purposes here, it doesn't

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>really matter. What you need to know is that A

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>people above you are aware of the situation, and b

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they've told you pretty clearly that nothing is going to

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>change now. If you were asking me, how do I

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be okay with this? That would be a different conversation,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>one about how to find a way to be comfortable

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with such an obvious double standard for you and your

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>coworker but I don't think that's your question. I think

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you're asking about how to not get stuck with her work.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>There are some things that you can try that might

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>work beautifully, or you might try them and discover that

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't work at all. But either way, if you

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>do give them a shot, at the end of this process,

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have better data about your situation than

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you do right now, and you'll be able to make

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>better decisions about where to go from there. So here's

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>what I would recommend. You. Presumably have a full time

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>workload of your own, so when your boss asks you

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to take on your coworkers work, don't look for a

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>way to cram it all in, especially if that would

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>lead to you being overworked or stressed or pushing back

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>other deadlines. Instead, when that happens, what you want to

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>say is something like, I've got my hands full with X, Y,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and Z right now, so I need to take some

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of that off my plate to make room for this.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>In other words, don't be endlessly accommodating. Spell out for

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>your manager all of the work that's keeping you busy.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Be clear when you don't have room for more, be

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>clear about what the trade offs are that you and

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>she would have to make if she wants you to

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>take it on and put that problem squarely back on

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>her plate, which is where it belongs. Does she want

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you to do less of something else to make room

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>for this, or does she want to find some other solution,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>such as perhaps managing your coworker or bringing in other help,

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it might be that she decides to do.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You're conveying here the solution to this problem is not

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be you. Now. Once you do that, you

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>may get told that you just need to do it all,

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which would be tremendously unfair if your coworker is doing nothing,

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but it could happen. If that happens, then at that

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>point you need to accept, Okay, this is the situation.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to do all of my coworkers work

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>plus my own, And then you can decide if you're

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in staying in the job. Knowing that those are

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the conditions that you've pretty much tried what you can

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>try to determine that those are indeed the conditions, and

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then you can decide if you'd rather go elsewhere or not.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Now there's one exception to this that can complicate things.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>A little bit if you actually do have plenty of

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>room on your plate to do your coworker stuff in

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>addition to your own. In some ways that makes this harder,

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways it makes it easier. It makes

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it easier and that you can actually physically do the

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>work without hardships, so you're not stuck trying to figure

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>out how to cram it all in or taking on

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of additional stress. But it makes it harder,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and that it's harder to push back on your boss.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't really say, well, if you want me to

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>do X, then I can't do why when it's really

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>clear to both of you that you actually could easily

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do both. So if that's the case, this is less

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about workload problem and more about just the fundamental unfairness

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of the situation, And that would mean that you've got

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to decide can you find a way to be okay

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>with that? Or maybe you can't. Sometimes it's doable, I

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>mean sometimes you can sort of internally roll your eyes

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>your coworker and at your management and know that it's

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous and unfair, but also no, okay, this is part

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of the package of working here. And maybe you decide

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that as frustrating as this is, it's worth it to

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you to stay there for other reasons. You know, you

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have a great commute or a good salary, or you

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>love the work, or whatever it might be. And in

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that case, maybe you focus on the fact that you're

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>building yourself a great reputation while you're terrible. Coworker is

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>building herself a pretty bad one, and that's going to

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>limit her options if she ever wants to work somewhere else,

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>or if her management at your company ever changes and

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>someone more competent comes in to manage her, she's going

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to be in a very bad position. So you might

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>find that just by focusing on that you can be

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>okay enough with the situation. Or you might decide that, no,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this is too frustrating and you don't want to deal

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with it long term, and so you're going to look

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. Either of those is a legitimate way to go.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really just about getting really clear in your own

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mind on what will and won't change about the situation,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>making sure you test those assumptions by doing the sort

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of conversation that I described to your boss, and then

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>making decisions accordingly. But do try pushing back on the

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>extra work first and seeing what happens, because if up

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>until now you've just been taking it on with no pushback,

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that might be the element here that you can play with.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break here and then we'll come

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>back with another question. This next question is from someone

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who's coworker might be leaving and she's interested in her job,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>but nothing is public yet. Here's the question. I book

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>co worker who is generally pretty nosy and shares a

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of gossip around the office, and she mentioned that

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one of my co workers who was in a position

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that I've been wanting is talking about leaving. My supervisor

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know this yet, and my coworker keeps calling me

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>into her office to advise me on dropping somethings to

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>my supervisor, so that when the time comes from this

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>person says that she's going to leave, that I'll already

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be talking to him about wanting to physician. I feel

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a little uncomfortable about this. It's not really my style

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't really fit UM in general the conversations

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that me and my supervisor have UM, so I would

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>really love some help. My first reaction here is that

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>your coworker seems weirdly invested in this, not the one

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>who's leaving, of course, the one who's to shing you

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>about this. It's one thing to mention to you that

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>your other coworker might be leaving and that you could

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>speak up since maybe be interested in moving into her job.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>That's fine for her to suggest once, but the fact

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that she keeps pulling you into her office to push

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about this is strange, and it makes me wonder what

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>her agenda is. Maybe she's just a busy body. There's

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly lots of people who are just busy bodies. But

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm put off by how pushy she's being, and that's

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>something that is really none of her business. And I

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>also wonder if you're other coworker, the one who might

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be leaving, even knows that this is happening, you know,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>if she talked to your pushy coworker and confidence. It's

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>really not cool for your pushy coworker to be sharing

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that news with other people. That's just speculation, though, since

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know all of those details. But those are

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the first two things that I was thinking about when

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I heard your question. As for what to do, I

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>do think it's fine to mention to your manager that

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you're really interested in moving into a position like your coworkers.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't mention that you heard she might be leaving. That's

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not years to share. And I know that it doesn't

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sound like that's something you're contemplating doing anyway, but I

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>just want to emphasize that. But you could say something like,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm really interested in moving into a role

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>like jeans. If that kind of position ever opens up here,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to talk to you about it. That's it,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just that. Don't keep bringing it up or anything like that.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But now you'll have planted the seed in your boss's mind,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you are really interested in moving into that

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>type of job. It's a good thing to mention anyway,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what might or might not be going on

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with your coworker, because you never know. I mean, they

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>could plan to add a new slot and hire someone

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>for it without every realizing that you would have been interested.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's good to mention regardless. And it's not at

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>all weird to say something like that to your boss.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But do tell your pushy coworker that you appreciate the

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>heads up, but you respect your other co workers privacy

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and you don't really want to keep talking about it

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>until she's made a public announcement that she's actually leaving.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And then if she doesn't really listen to that, and

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>she still keeps ling you into her office and kind

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of hounding you about this, it's okay to just say,

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've got this. Thanks for giving me the

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>heads up, but I'm on it. Let's do another question,

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and also, if you would like to record your own

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>question for the show, you can call eight by five

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>four T six work. That's T six nine six seven five,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can leave a voicemail for me to play

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Okay, here is the next listener question.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>This one is about food at work. Hey, Alison, this

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is Kelly um my question. So every day I take

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>my breakfast to work. I definitely bring my lunch, and

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I usually have a snack in the late afternoon, um

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the exercise after work, and usually don't eat dinner until

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty late. Lately, I've been running into an issue with

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one of our HR managers. She commented about a month

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>ago that she feels like she's used me eating all

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the time and wonders where it all goes, and she's

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>taken to making a comment every time she sees me

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>with food, if any kind, even if it's at a

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>normal time like lunch. These comments make me super uncomfortable. First,

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's anyone's business but mine when, what,

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>or how much I eat, and I don't think I

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>should have to justify anything any of my habits. Second,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I have kind of a rocky relationship with food, and

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I used to struggle with disordered eating. So when she

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>makes these kinds of comments, I just want to scream.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>When I used to not ear anything. Um. She makes

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>them directly to me and around other people too. Shout

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>back with things like it's lunchtime, but it doesn't seem

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to stop the comments. I get into a point where

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to eat or even carry my food

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>where she can see me because I know she'll make

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a comment. But she sits near me, near the kitchen

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and has even stopped by my desk to make these

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>kinds of jokes and comments I didn't notice. Seems like

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>such a petty issue, but for someone who hasn't does

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>struggle with their relationship with food, comments like this kind

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of get to you. Um, how do I shut this

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>down without screaming? Crying or completely losing it. You know,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like a petty issue at all, I mean,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly in your case because of the history of an

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>eating disorder. But it's crazy how many questions I get

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that are some version of coworkers being inappropriate about food,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>commenting on other people's food, pushing food on them that

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't want, making judge comments about what they're eating,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that they eat too much, saying that they eat

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>too little. It's like a weird national pastime. And I

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think this question that you're asking is especially important because

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a reminder that these comments, as annoying as they are,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they can be more than annoying too. If someone is

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>dealing with disordered eating or has a needing disorder in

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>their past, that kind of comment can go beyond annoying

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and actually be really harmful. And frankly, I mean, I'd

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>argue that they're harmful no matter what, because as a

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>society we're just so incredibly weird about food and diets

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and bodies and it's not helpful to play into that.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's a separated plus. Let's take a moment to

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>note that the person doing this to you is in HR,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>not that HR people all get training in this kind

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of thing, because loads of them don't. In fact, most

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, I think don't. But it would be nice

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>if people in HR did hold themselves to a higher

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>level of accountability about this sort of thing. But tons

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of them don't, even in big companies where they should

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>know better. It's very strange. Anyway. If you want to

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get this to stop, you've got two basic options, and

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they both revolve around being more direct. So the first

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one is to just be direct in the moment, and

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the next time she comments on your food or you're eating,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you could say, really directly, could you please stop commenting

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on my food? It's gotten uncomfortable. Or you could say, hey,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>please stop commenting on my eating and just leave it there. Now.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>This is going to feel awkward and uncomfortable. If you're

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting here listening to this thinking, oh my god, that

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds so rude, I would never be comfortable saying that.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, the fact that something feels awkward

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is not in itself a sign that you shouldn't be

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>saying it. Sometimes things are just awkward and that is

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just how they're going to go. And in this case,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>she is actually the one making things awkward, not you.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You've tried nicely hinting for her to stop, and she's

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>refusing to pick up on what you're saying. So you've

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>tried giving her the benefit of the doubt. You've tried

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being kind. It's not working, and at this point, if

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to get through to her, you're going to

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have to be more blunt. And I know that lots

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of people really really don't like doing that because it

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>feels rude. So I want to emphasize you are not

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the one being rude here. She's forcing you to be

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>more direct than you would normally want to be by

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>being rude herself. The Captain Awkward Advice blog has a

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>great phrase for this. She calls it returning awkwardness to sender.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you'd be doing here. You'd be putting

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the awkwardness backhere it originated from, which is with your colleague.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And really there's nothing wrong with a very simple hey,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this bothers me? Can you stop it? So that is

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>option one. You would have like a minute or two

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of feeling awkward and uncomfortable, but it would probably get

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>her to stop. The second option is something that you

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be up for, and that would

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be stopping by her office and addressing this in a

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly more serious way. This might feel like making a

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger deal out of it than you want to, and

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a completely fine reason to decide not to do it.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But there is some value in this approach if you

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do it, because it would allow you to

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have a more meaningful, potentially more meaningful conversation with her.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So you could stop by and you could say something like, Hey,

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make a request of you. I've noticed

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that you really frequently comment on my food and other

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people's food, like saying that you don't know where I

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>put it all or so forth. I'm sure you're just

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>making conversation and you mean well, but I want to

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>ask you to stop making those comments, at least to me.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>You probably haven't thought of this, but a lot of

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>people have disordered eating in their pasts or are struggling

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>with it currently, and those kinds of comments can land

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>much differently than you intend them. Now, that language isn't

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>revealing anything about yourself specifically, although she may read between

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the lines and realize that it's likely that you might

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be talking about yourself, and that might be more than

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to do, And if you don't want to

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's totally fine. You still have option number one. But

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to take on the conversation, it might

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be a real service both to her because she's unknowingly

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>walking around alienating people and making them feel uncomfortable, and

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>also to other people who are bothered by those comments too.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if she is a kind person, she

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>might feel a little stung in the moment, but she

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>will appreciate the feedback and she should come to realize

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're pointing out something that's important and that she

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>hadn't thought about. And if she's not a kind person,

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not much that can be done about that, no

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>matter what you say to her. But it's worth starting

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>from the assumption that she is kind or at least

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>reasonable and seeing what happens. Let's take our last break

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>here and then i'll be back with another question from

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a listener. Here's our next question. Dear Alison, I'm a

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>librarian and I've always wanted to be one. Now I've

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>been one professionally for more than twenty years, and I

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>am so unhappy. Current job has been rough in the

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>past four years in this toxic I'm excellent at what

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I do, get good annual reviews, and want to do more,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but the opportunities for internal advancements have dried up. In fact,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard more than once you've been here too long.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not unusual for academics to stay in a job

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>due to location. But it's getting to me, especially when

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm being passed over. The stress has gotten to be

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>too much and often shows up as any which I

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>don't show it work, but bleeds all over my personal life.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I'm seeking help. I've been on the job

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>market for nearly three years, both locally and nationally. While

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I had several really good interviews, none of that worked out,

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and now my husband has achieved the equivalent of tenure.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So moving would have to make it the perfect job,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>not just the next job. So I'm looking at leaving

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>librarianship my vocation and identity. For twenty years, you've wrote

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>often on figuring out how to stay in a toxic

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or bad or limited job if you need to. I'm

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>not sure I can do that, which has turned into

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a real soul searching issue. With the exception of ubiquitous

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>teenage jobs. I've never worked anywhere but a library. I

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>have a fantastic skill set that would hold me a

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>good stead outside of academia. But how do I come

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to terms with going from a vocation to a job? Oh?

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>This is so hard. It's terrible to feel like you

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>found work at fulfills you and then realize that you

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>can't do it anymore for whatever reason. For the purpose

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of answering this question, I'm going to take it as

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a given that you really do need to leave librarianship.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have enough details to question your conclusion there,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know your situation far better than I do,

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>so we will assume that you do, indeed need to

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>move into another field. I would not assume that you

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>will be going from a vocation, something that feels like

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>a calling, to something that's just a job. Maybe you

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>will be, but it's very possible that you'll end up

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>doing something else that also does bring you some fulfillment.

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not in exactly the same ways or the same quantities,

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but I suspect there's more than one type of work

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>out there that you can find happiness in. I think

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it can be really hard to see that when you've

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>been doing something for a long time, and your identity

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is wrapped up in it. In some ways, it's like

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>ending a long marriage. But I want to urge you

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>not to look at it as I was doing this

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that I loved and now I'll just be working

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>for a paycheck and nothing else, Because it's very likely

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are other things out there that you will

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>find satisfaction in. But let's do worst case scenario here

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and talk about what if you don't. I actually kind

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of love figuring out worst case scenarios for myself. I

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>know that sounds weird, but for me at least, there's

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>something very comforting about figuring out what's the worst thing

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>that could happen here, and then Okay, how would I

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>deal with that if it does happen for me? If

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't do that, and then I just have this

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>free floating worry in my head and it just makes

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>me feel worried and anxious. But if I have a

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>plan and I know what I would do if the

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>worst happens, that's pretty reassuring. In most cases, I end

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>up realizing that I would be fine. You know, things

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>might not be ideal, but they'd be survivable. So in

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>your case. The worst case scenario I think that you're

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>worried about is that you never find satisfying work again,

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and you end up going to work every day just

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for the paycheck, and you have to figure out an

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>identity that makes you happy that's totally separate from your

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>professional life. That actually isn't too bad. You would be

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>joining the tens of millions of other people who have

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>jobs like that. It's very, very normal to be invested

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>in your job primarily for the money and not be

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>super into it beyond that. That's actually most people in

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think that when you're in a field

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people go into because of passion

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>for the work, like librarianship, it can be easy to

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>forget that because you're surrounded by people who are also

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>very wrapped up in what they do. But there really

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't anything wrong with just working for the money, and

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there are still ways to find satisfaction from your job

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>even when that's the case. Sometimes it's like the satisfaction

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of just making something work well or solving a problem,

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, being the really competent go to person

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on your team who gets a lot of respect from

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues. There's a lot of ways to feel good

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>about your work, even when it doesn't feel like a calling.

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we do people in our culture or this

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>tremendous disservice by teaching them that they're supposed to find

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>work that they're passionate about, because I mean, it's amazing

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>when that does happen. That's a wonderful thing, but it's

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like winning the professional lottery. It doesn't happen

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for the majority of the world's population, and we need

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to do a better job of letting people know that

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't failed if it doesn't happen for them. I

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>think that by telling people that they should expect to

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to follow their dreams professionally, we set them

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>up for a lot of angst and despair when that's

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to do or in a situation like yours. We'd

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>all be so much better off as a culture if

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>we had a different model for work, a model that

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>says it's okay for work to just be the thing

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that supports the rest of your life, and it's okay

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to find your fulfillment from friends or family, your hobbies

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>or pets, or whatever it might be. It doesn't have

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to be like this professional bliss that we've been told

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to be striving for. So if that is

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>how it turns out for you, that's okay, And there

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>can even be something that's very liberating about realizing that

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it can take some of the pressure off. But also

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and not to undermine that message. I also think it's

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>very likely that coming from a field like librarianship, where

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of skills that are going to

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be very valuable and transferable, like research, you have a

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good chance at finding work that does bring you

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>some measure of fulfillment. Maybe it won't be your identity

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that librarianship was, but maybe that's not such

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a terrible thing. Maybe you'll find that there's a different

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>type of fulfillment, maybe even a better type, from building

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 1>your identity separately from what you do for money. I

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth going into it being open to it

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>playing out that way, or at least not devastated by

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a belief that it won't, and then just see what happens.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>That's our show for today. Before we wrap up, I

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to note you may have noticed that all of

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>these colors were women. I get way more ca calls

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and letters from women than for men, both here on

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the podcast and also on my website. I think to

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>some extent that is just how it tends to be

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with advice columns. But I want to make sure that

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>any men listening know that the show is for you

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to so call it in with your questions as well.

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>You can record a question for the show by calling

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>eight five five two six work. That's eight five five

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>two six nine six seven five, And you can leave

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail for me to play on the show. Or

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have a longer question, a question where you

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>want to actually come on the show and talk with me,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>email it to you podcast at ask a manager dot org.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>That's it for today. I'll be back next time with

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>more questions. M