WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2022 NFL MegaPod Super Wild Card Weekend Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Check it down, Man, Down Man, Thursday morning, January two.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It is the Beating the Book Podcast Megapod live from

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the d Our home for the Megapod. Each and every

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>week it is wild Card weekend. It is the playoffs.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Gill Alexander pumped to be here. Mikey Palm, the vice

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>president Operations and Circuit Sports alongside here at the d

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishnev from his mom's cork Attic in Pittsburgh, b A.

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>And our rotating guests first return guests unless we consider Parlay,

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>who like did one and a half our first returning

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>guests of the year. We do. The all Stars in

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs is Drew Densick from the Deep Dive and

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Edge podcast. How are you doing, Drew? I'm

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>doing terrifically well. Very excited for this playoff field. Um,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as excited as a guy who runs a

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>sports book like Mike, because these lines, these lines look tight,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and I got a funny feeling. You're doing a pretty

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>decent handle with some two action this week. But interested

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to hear your takes. Well, let's start with Mikey, if

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you could the final thing on your contest, both Circle

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>millions and survivor what a year was for both of those. Yeah,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we can start with the millions. And you know, it

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>was interesting because two gentlemen, each with two entries, were one, two, three,

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>four going into the last week, and they chose opposite approaches.

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Hannibal Barka, who had had the lead and was in

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>first and third and had been going same picks, right,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>identical cards all the way along, took identical cards the

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>last week and did not did not do well derbify.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Tony Gordon, who was in second and fourth, chose to

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>go appo. He picked his five games and went Apple

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and did the worst he could do three and two

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and two and three and still still one and still one.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to kill anybody, because I'm sure

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Hannibal Barker did a lot better than I did, and

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he's a wonderful person, But like has anybody

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>talked him afterwards about it and said, why did you

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do it? That? Isn't that why you have two entries?

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think that all these guys are going to

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be here tomorrow night in the ballroom at the d

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>when we give out the checks and actually pay them

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and do interviews and i'm i'm I'm going to get

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a chance to interview all the million dollar winners on stage,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want to talk to Hannibal Barkett. I know,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>PSI was pretty rough with him on Twitter about well

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not you know, but he's he's right, He's right, and

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know because that's why you have two entries, right

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if you especially if you played it same way for

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen weeks and then U The interesting thing is the

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>mad Russian goes five and oh the last week, and

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he actually tied derby five. It went to the tiebreaker.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>They both went sixty three and twenty seven. The first

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tiebreaker was how many winning weeks out of eighteen did

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you have derb if I had seventeen out of eighteen

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and mad Russian had fourteen, So he won.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the only position. There's the tiebreaker, right, Everything else

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>just share if you tie from the spot. One follow

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>up question on Hannibal market, did either of the two

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>entries finishing the money so no, he finished third at

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty two, he finished a half game back at sixty

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>seven and one for two seventy five, and then he

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>had another entry um that got in the top ten

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as or all or something like that got money as

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>he got over three hundred thousand. Hannibal Mark Yeah yeah, right, okay,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and then derb if I got one million and then

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand. His other entry that went two in three

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>fell down a bit, but it is amazing and that

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that's this side of it. The Quarterly. The quarterly winner

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>went twenty two and three to get singularly get the seventy.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You guys happy that you did the quarterlies this year

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for Booby as well? The Booby I think that was

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the best edition was doing the quarterly Booby Prize. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you had to bed, even if you were

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you had to make a decision. Let's say two weeks

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>into the quarter you're you know, two and eight, but

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you're still like in the Hunt for the Top fifty,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do you go for right? It forces you. But Joe

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is my dear friend. But I even said I had

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>him on a numbers game. I said him because he

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>said he goes. You know, I did the I got

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one in four the first week of the quarterly. That

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>was trying to do well. But then once I had

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the one in four, I tried to do bad and

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I went oh and five oh and five, oh one

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and fourth then and I'm like, how do you try

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to do bad if you could if they picked the

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>opposite of their picks, But then if you're that I mean,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand, I love I love that he won, But

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, then don't you have to have some kind

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of regret that if you were that good at being bad,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you could have been bye bye? It follows that you

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>could have been that good being good, right, So yeah,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>but he just had a bad week, Gilly. So once

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he had that bad week, he he he targeted the

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>other side. I mean, he was still trying to do

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to pick winners both ways. He was

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>still using this process. Now unless you think you can

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>still win the big deal, the guy Jiggy Jack, that

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was the clear winner of the Booby Prize for the season.

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.239
<v Speaker 1>They had him on following the Money this Morning, Minchon

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and Maddie. It's interesting he didn't decide to go for

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom until after week seven. He started out, he

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>started out three and two, then he had a two

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and three, and then in week seven he went oh

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in five and decided to go oppo his picks. In

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the week A, the extually went three and two, but

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>then he in on a run of eight, eight and

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven over the next week. But has anybody figured

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>out if he had gone thirty seven? And what do

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>you have made the top fifty? Have made the top fifty,

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>because that's what I would say, No, in the top fifty. Yeah,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Booby Prize was was like being seventh, right, it

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was a hundred thousand and something like that. It's so

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to get in the top fifty once you have

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a bad weekly that what did you end up? Todd

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>In you ended up with a one unforce I ended

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>up fifty and forty West West and too far out

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the money, right, and then West was telling me,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he goes, we we feel like we did everything right.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>PAULI Howard finished one game out of the money. They

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>finished like tied for fifty eight or whatever it was.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Though you need tremendous luck. Does this make sense from

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a game theory standpoint? Like there's two aspects. You want

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>winning picks, but you also want to be differentiated from

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the field, right, And if you are winning picks are

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>also sort of consensus or at least kind of top

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, just generally broadly picked going APO would give

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you not very likely unlikely picked and also potentially losing. Right,

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So there is you know, if you are picking kind

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of you know, if in general you're with the with

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the majority on your winning quote unquote, your high plus

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>TV picks and you go apo those, you should be

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>in the minority with your losing picksures she would have

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a better chance at getting a Booby prize than landing

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>in the winning and all right, and all of that

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>assumes you have the skill level right two to to

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to like be able to manipulate that to do well

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>or to do poorly. Right, sure if I'm understanding, because

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>speaking as the guy who won the a t S

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>on this year podcast for the regular season, thank you

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>very much. I just want to say that if I

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>tried to get a five and oh I'm equally like Drew,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>I could try and get a three and two and

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I could not try and get a three and two.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And I could try and get it two and three

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>and I could not try and get like I Still

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are are tanking are still using the games

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they picked. Just get an opposite team. Right, here's a

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>good example, Like you got to get hot either way,

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you got to get hot. Either way. Yeah. Yeah, But

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but if you're going for the win and there is

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>an easy pick on the board because quarterbacks scratched and

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you have seven points of wind value contest versus closing market,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're putting your picks in outside going opo that

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>no one is picking that you are going to only

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>people going for that are the people going for the

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Booby prize. You're in a very small pool of people

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>who are getting your likely losers. So you can juice

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>your you can juice your pot losing more easily than

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you can um differential yourself winning. But remember Gregor Richard

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Baker talked about this last year, um saying in the

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks they would go and play the opposite

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of the state a line moves because they knew that

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>because they needed they had to make up games and

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the lines. Well, obvious example was the Vikings right with Cousins,

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and we had the most people ever picked the Packers

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>off the six and a half point difference in the

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>contest to the closing line people. You would you would

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have taken the Vikings that week if you're trying to

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>make up ground. Yeah, that's a gift if you take

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to go for the good booby price because you

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>were you were among ten people that pick the Vikings

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>millions is going to be the exact same next year, right,

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no charge. Now, I don't think there'll be any changes.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Survivor maybe I don't know. And survivor, we had five winners.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Five I mean those that came out of the Sunday

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>after Christmas. They survived the last two weeks and so

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>one point two million. Three of the five got the

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>bonus for having used to one of the last year

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl teams, either the Chiefs of the Bucks the

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>last we did anyone do a spincter check on the

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on the two guys with the Kansas City when I

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was when down to put it in the Chiefs are

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose. I I was with one of them, right,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because he was with Derek and I on Saturday watching

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the game. Remember, he did not only not hedge, he

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>asked for an alternate line chief minus twenty and a

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>half plus two forty and he bet it. I mean,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you even like? What do you even say

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to that? Like? Good for you? Because he said, I

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you're doing. But all right, he did

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>not believe that he the hedgean was was bad juju

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>against your pick. He had saved Kansas City all year

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for that spot. Bad Juju was very scientific. Now here's

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what we do know. But we only know what they

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bet with us, right, But we know he didn't. We

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>know the other guy that had Kansas City made a

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>money line bet on the Broncos with us. We don't

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>know what the guy with the Buccaneers did because he

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>may have hedged somewhere else, but he didn't do anything

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>with us. We know that, um, the player, the player

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that had the Wolfdie guy made a significant hedge both

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on the Giants plus the points and the Giants money line.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Giants shouldn't all five of those? I mean, this was

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>not like the Joe Peter came on the show with

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight survivors left and talked about how is a

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street guy, how he wanted to manipulate it so

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>we lose equity week after week after week. That's a

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>little more complicated. That's different. It's multi leveled. This is

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the last week of the season. They all had five

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>big favorites. Isn't the play for all of them? Just

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the underdog plus the points? End of story? That would

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have been worked out perfect with the Broncos, right, I mean,

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>knew had the biggest scoop of all. But then on

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Sunday they did bet the money line parley of their

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>opponents teams, right, yes, which was what Peter was doing

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. Because they were already in the house with

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the with the Chiefs, so they knew they were getting

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a share line. It was a lot easier to figure

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that out right. The math on that they got Lucky though,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't know before the season started that the

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs were going to be on Saturday. They know, they

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>had no idea, but what a great break it was

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for them that they got the game on Saturday. Did

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they know Drew luck decided to be a regular quarterback Saturday?

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm sure they was. I'm sure they were getting

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit nervous by the way that shoulder throw

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>was unbelievably bad. When, oh my god, Todd, I thought

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the key though, was the roughing the punter. I thought

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the crowd had already turned on Drew Lock after the

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>horrific first two drives, and the crowd was just the

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>roughing the punter changed the whole game. It got the

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 1>crowd back into the game, and then I just felt

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that was good. I said, that's probably the putter is

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna cost you one point five three million night, But

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they get the whole game? Was that one play? Right?

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>What chances you have gone for two to go up

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>nine and that spot and a million? Never in a

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>million years. But let me ask you, because what was

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy doing? What was the guy doing when they

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>were driving down there? Were you with him watching? He was?

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Was he losing his money? At halftime? I moved a

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>little further away. Yeah, you can't. It's because I wanted to.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, I was reacting. Was he freak?

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>He was frustrated. It was very frun He was very

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>frustrated that Lock was playing so well. That was what

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>he was most frustrated with. He said, where if you

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>could do an in game seven? He watched, He watched

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>every time we posted the end game the endgame numbers.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know he wasn't gonna bite. That was that

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was his thing. That was his things. Yeah, what was

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the best price he could have gotten? H Actually when

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the when Denver was driving um, when Denver was driving

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there before that fumble, they actually they actually were one

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorite in that spot. That was

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the worst of it, right, that was the worst. That

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was the worst of it. Think think of I mean,

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but now that we have like some but he after

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>after the Chiefs went out ahead in the game, he

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>he actually had the number back up to where he

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>could have got off the twenty and a half, right,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>because then I think the number was like eighteen or

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and a half at that point. Yeah, to see

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a question, what if somebody had Indianapolis Colt. Nobody had

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>them because they had all been used off. Can you

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine if somebody had just think about that, you would

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>have lost your mind because they totally would have been Yes,

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they totally. Yeah. Well if you just cover yourself with

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the money line Jags with the tie in uh in

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the in the Chargers game. Yeah, of course you're covering.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows that cover Jagson's eyes the way to go.

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>It's easy. Oh my god. They bet that tie down here.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>They bet the tie in that game down to eleven

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half to one. Wow. The tie start was

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a nine figure It was a nine figure sports book

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>um exposure for us and part of that for us.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>How much was it for you guys? It would say

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>high six, high high six. That's just one place. Yeah, no,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I get it. So they all start out a hundred

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy to one. Basically in that range, Tie is somewhere

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>between a hundred one. After the Colts lost, we moved

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it down to thirty five to one because it came

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>into play and they bet it down to eleven and

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. And you know what, the people that were

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>doing the Jags money line with the tie Parlay's right,

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a correlated parlay, but they were doing had one

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>for over I believe. But that shouldn't have been you know,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a sports book. Yeah, there's too much cause and

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>effect there. And by the way, I will go to

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>my grave. I don't want to do like thirty minutes

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on this because we've done enough on radio about it,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>but I will go to my grave thinking with the

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Raiders that they slowed that pace down. It didn't look

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like there was any urgency at all. And in the end,

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>whether Brandon's Daily called the time out or not, I

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think the Raiders were just gonna do whatever the result

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of that play was. If they got two yards, I'm

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not so sure they kicked the field goal at the

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>end Let's say, by the way, what about Syrianni. Nobody

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>even said one thing about the risk of kicking a

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>field goal there. I still don't understand why you kick

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a field goal there, because when you want to, I

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>don't care if they were thinking about that at all.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's a crazy no, here's a crazy question for you

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about the bookmaking side of things. And the nine figure

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>liability that I brought up. Let's assume that that's right.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's hundred million dollars was a stick for the big

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>boys in the East Coast on this That's two weeks

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of ad revenue. But they have been spending this fall

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on NFL weekends. They're spending fifty million a weekend advertising. Okay,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So the liability is is two weekends of running ads. Okay.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>If that's a national story, if it's like, oh my god,

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the sports books lost a hundred million dollars on this one,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, doesn't that entice? Like everybody reads it and

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they're like, well, I gotta get involved in this. Books

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are making errors. I mean, like, is it even that

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal, that bad of a thing being

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on NFL games? True? Is there anybody left who's not

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>betting on NFL games in the world. I saw you

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>saw what they were given bonuses in New York. Apparently

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>there's apparently there's a there's there's customer acquisitions. They're just

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to each other. They're just trying to steal each

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>other's customers. But I don't think there's anybody else who

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know they're gonna have a sports book already. Is

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it getting ridiculous? There's a commercial every seconds alright. How

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they're working on that at the American Gaming Association just

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>had a big conference call yesterday about that, just like

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy DFS thing when it started. You know that

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the objection from the research um to the sports advertising

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the frequency of it, but the exposure to

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to miners is the bigger objects I would imagine. So

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>from the research, here's another objection. If the girl from

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lily commercials on one more time, I'm going to

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>kill myself. She's a world does the commercial have to

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be it's on more than the than the gambling commercials.

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's like if while you're there, Mikey, when you're

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at the gaming place by the way, throwing the lily,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Lily can't be on more than one every three commercials

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because she's driving me crazy. They're Toody, I gotta step

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in here because Mike's gotta go. We gotta start with

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this soap todd Our records for the regular season were

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Jilly Ice with the regular season victory at twenty eight

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six after a nice two and one, a

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>nice two in one week. He got hot late in

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the season. His beloved organization, the Woof, he's covered for him.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>He did have the Chargers in the Sunday nighter, and

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then he did get quite fortunate in that Niners game. Um,

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Mikey went, oh, I needed it too. I was with you.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I was very fortunate too. I did either of us

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think that Jimmy g was going eight nine yards. I

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't think I was doing it, and I needed him.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Mikey went, oh, in three h with the Philadelphia Eagles

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that didn't really decide to play, very unfortunate in the

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams Niners game that we just talked about, and the

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs minus ten, which we also talked about. So Mikey

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>go and one. I went one and two and finished

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at twenty two and thirty two. In the teaser category,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the ever more important category, went. Of course,

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, I actually lost my teaser to go to

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a leven in seven. Mikey one is teaser and one

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of the most fortunate teaser wins in the history of

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>teaser wins when the Atlanta Falcons and and the Iceman

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on fourth and ten somehow punched it in and he

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>got the Atlanta plus ten and a half. So he

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>goes ten seven and one on teasers. Gilly also with

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a win at nine eight and one in teasers. So

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>now we continue the records. We continue the records. Yes,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we continue with all the records. That's right. So the

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>questions are we doing three picks and a teaser again

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this week? A lot of game three to three picks

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in a teaser because there's six games drew your first

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>best bet, sir sider total. Oh Jesus, this card is

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so tough. I'm gonna go with the side. I'm gonna

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>take the l a rams here. Um, I've I don't

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have a strong angle. I just know that there's only

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>one chance I will have in my life to fade

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury in his first ever playoff game and maybe

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>his only ever playoff game. I do not believe even

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the pieces around Kyler Murray. I do not believe in

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the coaching. Uh really on both sides of the ball.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I knows advance Joseph has made, you know, has made

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>have come He's come up with a couple of pretty

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>solid game plans this season. Um. But overall against this

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Rams team that has so many players available in the

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>past catching uh and uh, you know Stafford at home

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>relatively comfortable confines there, I do think the Rams are

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to put up thirty points in this one. Uh.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't love the ability for Kyler Murray to

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>play comeback mode if it comes to that. I'm not

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>buying the impact that J. J. Watt is gonna be

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>able to make after having missed the last ten plus

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>ish weeks. Uh. And realistically, this is the only game

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that I see across the board that I think is

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>lined like it's going to be a competitive contest. But

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a long tail to the favorite covering with margin,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say Rams minus four unless you're gonna give

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>me consensus three and a half. I know it's three

0:19:58.359 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half, only had a couple of spots, but

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>yeah for Aaron Shots, the founder of Football Outsiders, is

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on the numbers game this morning. That is the one

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite he likes as well, giving the points the only

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>favorite he liked. The only favorite he likes giving the points. Yeah, uh,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Mikey number one. You know, I like the under in

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the very first game on Saturday, the Raiders in the Bengals, Uh,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be well. One is whether it's going

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to be cold to Zach, Taylor played this game very conservatively.

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>When they were out here at a legion that game.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I kept telling people, is they're running clock in this game,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>because it never seemed like the clock stopped. And and

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>remember with five minutes to go, the score was in

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>favorite the Bengals. It's misleading what happened at the end

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>with the car turnovers and that, um, we're seeing money

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>coming on the Raiders. Maybe it's a little Nevada bias

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>here or West Coast bias with the Raiders on this game.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think this number is too high. I think,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Bengals haven't been able to win in

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. They have a home game here. I think

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Taylor of plays it just as conservatively as he did

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the first game against the Raiders. I really like the

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>first half under twenty four and a half more, but

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't have that option on this show. I'll take

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>under forty eight and a half under. We're giving what

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a mench Ye, Well, I'm only doing I'm only being

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a mench because I like the same pick self surveying mench. Well, Mikey,

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to be honest. I think credit where

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I deserve credit is that your number one, that is

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>my number one. Number one is also under forty nine.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And Cincinnati against Vegas, Mikey made a lot of points.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that basically, uh you know, bears out what

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>mike he was saying was there were five drives in

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this game over five minutes, and there was a couple

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of six minute drives. It was a lot of mixing left,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>mixing right, mixing left, mixing right. There was just tons

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and tons of running and it was just a grinder game.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a total grinder game. And like Mikey said,

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>it got away at the end for final I just

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like it. I think also, Cincinnati is just gonna line

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>up and it's gonna be cold too. It's gonna be

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>like thirty degrees. Uh you know that that that cold

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>weather doesn't really you know play for a real high

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>scoring game in my opinion, So I I don't see

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>any reason why Cincinnati won't just line up and try

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to push them all over the place like they did

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in the first game. So I'm going under forty nine

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Vegas. I had Eric Eager on this morning from

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focused Total nerd Fest on the numbers game

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning and Eric Eager dr Eager. He cited some

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Derek car stat were like under like freezing conditions. He's

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just got awful. So throw that into the mix of

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in the Bengals. I didn't know they kept

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>those kind of stats. My number one pick, Todd, brace yourself.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>The Pittsburgh Steelers, get out of you're off. You're kicked off.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You know what. You're kicked off the mega pond this

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>year and this is like the target for half of

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>next season. You're also kicked off, So you can't just

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>be kicked off. You're out, by the way, Thank you

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>guys for doing the megapon last week. Thank you both

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>very much. Uh Schwab Frank Schwab was a guest. He's terrific.

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I had him on prime time or we had him

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>on prime time last night. Thanked him as well for

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>doing and he was like, yeah, maybe next time when

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you're on week I could be on. I was like, sure, absolutely, Frank.

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Frank texted me at ten thirty last Thursday night and said,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope you weren't upset. I disagreed with your pick

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the chiefs. I said, of course not. It makes

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>for it makes for a better megapod if we I mean,

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if we all agree, it sucks. He and I'm the

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>first one to say, Mike these things, but he was

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>excellent um on the hosting of the megapod last week. Mikey,

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to give you a tip of the hat thing.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank I did it, John Fox like job he did?

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>He really did. Didn't turn He didn't turn over the ball.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>He was a game manager and he did not turn

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball over. We got the points we were supposed

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to get and we got out with the nineteen sixteen victory.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Did he go did he go on in an infective,

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>rant laced rant about analytics or ran It was a

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>nice meat sandwich of football analysis. I think it. What

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>was it about forty three minutes, Todd, I mean it

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was there was some Frank Schwab said to me he said,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank god I didn't go in three. I was so nervous.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>They weren't gonna let they weren't gonna let Mike. You

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>just throw the ball all over the field, he said, Duncan,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I took Pittsburgh plus thirteen. I know I'm only getting

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a half here now, I'm still taking it. Uh. Look,

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I know they suck football outsiders, as it was their

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourth ranked team dv O A. I'm still trying.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you deserve the Actually, Todd is so nice today.

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm still trying to figure out how that big bend

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>passed in the in the overtime, that fourth down play

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>got to Ray Ray McLeod I have It's the most

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing Remember that. Remember that Kauai Leonard shot against the

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Sixers and games bounced off the front and then off

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the back. But even before it bounced off the rim

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>three or four times. If you watch that replay, it's

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like the ball change direction in midio. I have no

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>idea how that happened. That was that Ray Ray McCloud pass.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, how did it looked like it was gonna

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>land two yards in front of bed? Is like and

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>somehow like it got to his ankles, and why is

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he even open? Unfortunately, ridiculous, simple pass. Here's the thing,

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason I took Pittsburgh ultimately is one I'm not

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>as high on Kansas City as people. Although Tyreek did

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>show up at practice yesterday, he was banged up with

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the heel um. But my thing is I subscribe to

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Christie and Andrews theory about the Steelers, which is,

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's a lifelong Steelers fan. Two, which is, say

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what you will about the Steelers, and there's a lot

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of negative to be said, but they do have one thing,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe as good or better than any other team, which

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is they have three or four unbelievable players on defense.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>T J. Watt, Minka Fitzpatrick, Cameron Hayward will throw Joe

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Hayden in as well, and there's something about just their

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>presence that is enough to disrupt what the other team

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is doing in a very impactful way. And for me,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that's enough to take the thirteen points. I'll take the

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers drew number two. Oh boy, I'm gonna go

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the Raiders game. I'm gonna take the dog here,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>even at five and a half I think it's still value.

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I make fair price in this one four and a

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>half assuming you have a fully healthy Joe Burrow, and

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not entirely convinced you will. UM. There is a

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>specific angle here against the offense for the Cincinnati Bengals

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>looking as good as the market currently has priced them. UH.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>In general, they do well against defenses that are blitz happy,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>defenses that are aggressive, UH, and not necessarily against defenses

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that basically just put a ton of guys out in coverage. UH.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Gus Bradley defense is somewhat predictable. I think

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the first matchup. It did limit Joe

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Burrow's ability to really kind of get going through the air,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and I would expect similar output here, particularly given that

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.479
<v Speaker 1>this is an outdoor contest. Tee Higgins dealing with an

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>injury as well. I think it's going quietly and talked

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>about UM. And I know that Raiders defense was on

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the field a heck of a lot Sunday night, but

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that strush is absolutely violent. UH. And they're going up

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>against a delightful matchup with the Cleveland past ob see

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati passed pro. That's a UM, you know, bottom half

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of the league, maybe even bottom five, depending on whose

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>rankings you're looking at. So, um, I think Burrow is

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be under Darreuss here. I think the fact that

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not, you know, so much of his success, really

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like has come. Um when you know he's

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.719
<v Speaker 1>making the hot read, he's uh, he's evaluating the blitz

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>pre snap uh. And he's you know, he's utterly dissecting

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the defense because there's just too many good athletes in

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that among his positional players that can create separation in

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>those you know, in those bang bang moments. Uh. And

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just hasn't ever really worked against the Raiders. You

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be more like a Pat Mahomes. You need

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to thrive out of structure to really put up points

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on this defense. And I don't see Burrow being able

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So I think this is a closely

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>contested contest. I agree with both of your guys under plays. Uh.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'll grab the Raiders here expecting them to keep

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it close. Um. Only I bet this at six earlier

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>this week. Uh. And I had a conversation last night

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>where I pooh poohed the six and five and a

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>half being worth much. I was like, Oh no, don't

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. If I have, and it's not a

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>huge deal. And then I was thinking, the Raiders have

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>had some unbelievable overtime karma this season, unbelievable. And if

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>they somehow, if the Bengals somehow score a touchdown to

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>win in overtime and this land six, I'll be pretty disappointed.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But despite all that, I'll still I'll take the five

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half with with the Raiders. All right, Raiders,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, how great is this weekend of football?

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I cannot wait? Do you like the format? Three? Two

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>three one? Having having a show, having a show to

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do Monday night? Selfishly, yes, because we get a game.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>If I did not have a show, no, three, Yeah,

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>three and three is the way to do it. You

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do the two three, I mean, come on, And

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, when do you guys anticipate opening all the markets,

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>because we're not going to know the NFC man chips

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>until then. So no. So that's so I figured this

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>out this morning. I was doing some some thinking about

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it on the way into work. I'm like, why did

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they end up with the Rams and the Cardinals on

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night? The reason isn't because that's the five four game,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and so by that kickoff, by the end of the

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night games, they will know every matchup already perfectly

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Division Round, except for the winner of that

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>game gets to play the you know whoever they get

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to play moving forward, so they will be able to

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You could open the NFC markets at five o'clock on

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Sunday at the Cowboys game. They can announce all the

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule for the Division Round by the end of Sunday,

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so that in NFL I forgot the reading. So that's

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what also makes the Vegas Cincinnati games so interesting to

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>me is because the Titans worst matchup next week, at

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>least to me, is Cincinnati. That's the worst if the

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Raiders win that or if either the Patriots or let's

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>say the Stealers one than the Titans like even with that,

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's why that by is. So it's not only

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the by The biggest thing is you don't have to

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>play a game, but it's also that you get the receding,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so you could end up with an

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>even more ridiculous matchup come to Vision Round. So um,

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>all all very interesting. Your number two. I will give

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you a full disclosure. I wouldn't bet anything else other

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>than what I gave you. Um, I want to take

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, but I just you know, Matt Stafford's never

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>won a big game. He's just it's just hard to

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>get around the fact that the best victory of his

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>career is over Hawaii and the Sugar Bowl. Um No,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean it really, it's hard. That would be my

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>next pick. Who could forget that. I'm gonna, I'm gonna.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take a number I don't love, but I

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good matchup. I'll take the Bucks

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and lay the points just because, Look, the one thing

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to have against the Bucks is depending

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on a running game. And I mean, if you think

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts can drop back forty five times and beat you, okay,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think so, because he can't run the

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>ball on him. That's the one thing. They don't have

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a secondary They don't but you cannot run the ball

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on him, Hurts. We'll have to be good. I like

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Brady in the playoffs. I think this is the worst

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>possible matchup for the Eagles, So I'll take the Bucks,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>though in life I would only tease them. I'll lay

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the points here on this show. By the way, I

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>agree with you about Stafford. I was thinking, exactly, I

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>want to take the Rams. I feel like the Cardinals

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are fading over the last five six weeks. It's a

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>different Cardinals team. They're falling apart, and I'm thinking, oh, yeah,

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>let's take the Rams. But then in the back of

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>my mind, I've got that Matthew Stafford in the back

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of my mind. There's something about that guy who's not

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, has never been a winner. Do you know

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that he's do we agree? Like no player has more

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure on him this week than matt than Matthew Stafford does,

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because of no player has more pressure on him this

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>weekend of any player on any team than Matthew Stafford.

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Because of the fact that the Golf Stafford trade. He's

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the difference, right, He's supposed to be

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole difference with that franchise. And if they crap

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>out on Monday night, I would argue second, I would

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>argue a clear second. Is Garoppolo Okay, yeah, yeah, But

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like even Wolfford, even Wolford one is first ever start

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Ramps, can't do it. That's right. Right. Um,

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I will say Stafford probably should have one playoff one.

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>He should have beat the Cowboys when they picked up

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that flag. That was he should he should have beaten.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>You should have beaten Tony Romo's cowboys when they picked

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>up that flag. Who could forget that? What was that?

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>The game with that? That was the game before the

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>des brand It was it was a linebacker, a linebacker

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. I can't remember who it was, and

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 1>they threw a flag and then they decided, yeah, right,

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it was like that. That's right. Um, all right, Todd

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>number two, my number two is going to be the

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>under forty six in the Steeler game. Um, I just

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think the first on in the first game, Kansas City

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>scored on almost every single possession. They just went right

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>down the field almost every single time. They were up

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to nothing. That happen, and the game still

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>should not have gone should not have finished forty six.

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But there was like a fumble late that got an

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>extra field goal, and that's why they ended up thirty six.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That game should have gone under even with Kansas City

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>scoring at will, and it was because Pittsburgh can't do anything.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the thing. Gilly. I sort of agree with

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it can't be this easy, right now. I here's the

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thing there, It's it can't be that easy that you

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>could just look at the board and go. Kansas City,

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, is going to kill them. They always kill them.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think you actually have have you

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know something here, because we've seen this a million times

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>when it's so obvious, when it's absolutely obvious right in

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your face, it never comes in. So I'm thinking, well,

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>how can the Steelers even in a stay in this

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>game at all? It has to go under. I think

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh if they can figure a way to slow Kansity

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>down just a little bit. I still don't think that

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh can score. I mean, look at the road games

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. They were down twenty nine to nothing against Minnesota.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>They were down a million to the Chargers and didn't

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>deserve to be back in that game. There was like

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred games that the Steelers were down, like it

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was Ohio State against Oregon State. It was ridiculous. And

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they they got back in some of those games very nice,

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're not good enough. And I just think that somehow,

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>um maybe they can slow him down. Like you said,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we we do have. Look, we have a couple of

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ensers down there that really know how to stop people

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>if we really need to get a big stop in

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a big you know, a big time situation in that.

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's more don in Hinesville when we get them

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>yellow towels swinging and the people can't see you not.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But now we're going down Arrow, I don't see it.

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see it. I'm just gonna help this

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>final thirty one three under forty six, Thank you, thank you.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Can I get an impression of what your reaction is

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be when the Chiefs are up and Tom

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>linnelects to kick a field goal in the waning moment? No, no, no, when? When? When?

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>This is what? Well, this is what he does every

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>year he's he'll be down nine with four minutes to

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 1>go and one time out or none left, and he'll

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>punt on fourth and twelve. He does this at least once,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>he does that, at least once a year. Oh, he

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 1>has to keep it in the On the other hand,

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, maybe his finest coaching job in history. Well,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the year how about the year with no no Roethlisberger

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 1>when he had duck Hodges. That's that's hard to argue

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>against that year, duck. So who's who's better than Mason Rudolph?

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, and number number two for me a

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>rare total for young Gil. You never played totals, never

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>played totals. I think you all are playing the wrong

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>game on the under Philadelphia Tampa Bay. For me, there's

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 1>some weather involving. Yeah, forty six is what I'm saying

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. Or forty six and a half. What do

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you got, Todd? Forty six? Half half at each number? Alright,

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>so Mike you make the call, O Tempily forty sixty

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. I have half. We'll give you

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>because I see forty six and a half still too.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, go ahead, Actually no, I don't see. You're right.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's forty is rule though where I'm looking, So we'll

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>give Here's first of all, I agree with what Mikey's saying.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Phil Tampa Bay strength is their run defense. Philadelphia strength

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is their running game, number one running team in football.

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's strength against strength. Either Philadelphia is wildly unsuccessful

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>against them, or they're unbelievably surprisingly successful and they actually

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do something. Either way that's great for my for my

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>under because either the clock just churns or Philadelphia ain't

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>scoring squat. And so here's the weather right now for

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Sunday at Tampa Bay, sixty eight degrees but eight percent

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>precipitation and twenty three mile per hour winds which could

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>get gusts of as high as thirty to thirty five.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's the case. I like my under forty six.

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I will I will venture into the total waters and

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>go under forty six in that game. And I'm quite frankly,

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that that total hasn't come down more. But

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's the maybe it's the Tom Brady short passing

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>thing where everybody says that it doesn't matter Tom Brady,

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he'll still score fifty against him. But I'm gonna bet

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>against that number three, Drew. I love that. I love

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>what mine are greeted with nothing but silence. You guys

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are like that sounds like the dumbest thing I've ever

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>It's not, it's just true. Go ahead, Sorry, No, I

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think you're honestly, you can probably still

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>capture some line value on that, even though that's been

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 1>good from forty nine and a half to forty six

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I bet you you flip that game on Sunday morning.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, people get a taste of what's going on there,

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that could that could close and half UM last play,

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with the total as well. I know it's

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be cold. I know Josh Allen has circulation issues

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in his does not bother me in the slightest. I

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>like the over forty four in the Buffalo New England matchup.

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I see these two defenses as both slightly overrated UM

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in general inflated a bit by the week schedules that

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they played over the balance of the season. UH. And

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I look back at their UM second head

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to head and just the general aggressive nature that both

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>coaches brought to that particular contest, I think speaks to

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what you can expect from game planning from UH. You know,

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>from a coaching standpoint here, would you believe that there

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>were ten fourth downs attempted in that Buffalo New England

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>game that Buffalo ended up winning, and you would say, well,

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo got the lucky bounce right, Buffalo converted all the

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>high leverage plays. I remember, you know Josh Allen scrambling

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>for touchdown for fourth down conversions, and you know, hitting

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>some lucky passes on fourth down. Well, amazingly, New England

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was four of six on fourth down, and that if

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I have five of six on fourth down in that game,

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>which is something that I completely missed until I went

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>back and rewatched, and ultimately I think you're um, you know,

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with the state is being relatively high, with both teams

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>coming in with an aggressive approach, and and really likelihood

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that Buffalo is going to be able to get uh

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, to be able to sort of dictate this

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>pace of play and the game state here, New England

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is likely going to have to play some catch catch up.

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think New England's gonna be able to kind

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of institute a keepaway, um you know, run the ball,

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, possession type of approach here. Um, I

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>bet into this at forty three. It's up to forty four.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>My fair on this one is forty seven, even considering

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the cold weather. So I think over forty four is

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a fair look for the third play of the day.

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Already had it written down same same, yeah. I I

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about this with them all yesterday. I think the

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>number is suppressed a little bit because of that swirling

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>win games at Orchard Park on Monday night, and that

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that relatively low score. But take a look at the

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>second game, which was not great weather conditions, and there

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>were no punts, right Andrew Drew reference to all the

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fourth now, no punts, no punts in the game. So

0:39:57.960 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I just think this number is too low. I think

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>it could played into the into the mid twenties. And

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually a little maybe a little bit

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>too many points here. I think this is a field

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>goal game, a very entertaining game. Looking forward to it

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday evening. You guys aren't afraid. And I think

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew said it before, but I want to hear him

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>say it one more time. You know, it's supposed to

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>be colder than any cold game in the history of

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>cold games or something bullshit like that. What you're talking about,

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to be really cold and cold and Buffalo.

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It is not cold and Minnesota. It's not negative ten.

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's I'm sorry, sorry, it's gonna be balmy, my bed,

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Western and baldy and Buffalo. It's still gonna be damn cold. Mikey.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They'll calm down. You're right, it's not gonna be seatt

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all against the vikings minus eight hundred. That's okay. Anyway,

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be crying when it's cold and they're running

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball every five seconds. I honestly think that actually

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 1>helps the over And I don't think we're gonna see

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of longfield goal attempts right Like, I think

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got the recipe now. It's not going to be

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a ball control kind of a game. They're gonna go

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for it on fourth down if you're on your opponent's

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>forty yard line. Um, you know, I think that leads

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to more more scoring, more touchdowns generally, as opposed to

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in that win game, where it was

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>entirely ball control. But I don't hate it. It's not

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>like I'm saying I like the under. I'm just saying

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard it's gonna be super damn cold. But anyways,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 1>my third okay, UM, here's the problem. I want to

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>take Jimmy G to really do everybody. I know, that's

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem. I hate everybody like that. That's the problem.

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Everybody likes Jimmy G. They saw him go eighty nine

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>yards to tie, which I still can't believe actually happened

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>when I had niners plus to do an APPEND game.

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I still can't believe he did it. Uh, I just

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I just can't get there, especially when everybody loving it.

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I just can't do it. So now I'm forced to

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just find something ing, and I'm gonna go with a

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>little coach that some people call the greatest of all time,

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Bill Belichick. And here's why I want

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to go with Bill Belichick. He's won a couple of

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls. He's not too bad in Super Bowls. Uh.

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that now you put him in a

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>playoffs situation and he he knows he doesn't have the

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>better team. He knows we all know he doesn't have

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the better team. But he's gonna get into his kitchen

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and cook up some you know, google losh for Mr

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for Mr Josh Allen. And I just think that four

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>points in an NFL game with and I get Bill

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Belichick on my team, Um, it's a lot of points.

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>You know. Granted, they were not the winner, they were

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>not in that game. They did not deserve to be

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near the winner of that second game, I'll give

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you that. But the first game with the creative running

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>every single down situation was quite kind of interesting. But look,

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's plus four. If we're down ten late, we get

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the back door touch down we finished, we lose, and

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone goes home happy. So I'll take the greatest coach

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the National Football League in the

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 1>freezing cold, even though it's gonna be balmy, and I'll

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>take the Pats plus four. Yeah. I'm not gonna add

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>anything more to that other than when the lines first

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>came out, I immediately grabbed New England plus four and

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a half. It was all about Belichick figuring out a

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>way to keep this close. That's my number three pick.

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I also bet the Niners, even though it's not one

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of my three official ones here. It troubles me tremendously

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 1>that everybody loves each other, it really does. I got

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a note for you on that one. Yes, please, the

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys money is coming professional, the professional Cowboys money. And

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>if you like the Niners, if you support Jimmy wait, wait, yeah,

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>wait until he throws this first interception in the first quarters. Wait,

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>don't wait that long. Don't wait that long. I mean, here,

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>here's a here's a genuine, genuine opinion question, because I've

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>been asking another smart can I get can I interrupt

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike's got a gotta go, so I just want to

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>get my teaser. Yeah, Buck's Patriots game. You want no

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>part of. I want no part of I want no

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>part of Cardinals Rams because of Stafford concerns. Favorite that's

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose most likely any of them, any of them,

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>any of them will go, any of them, but not

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>not Cowboys. Okay, thank you, thank you, Mike Palm, everybody

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>heading the odds on the worst Name show ever. Yeah,

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>with them all show. Okay, what was the question, Drew?

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. So there was a lot of bally Hood

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>reporting discussion about Jimmy got the injection at halftime made

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>his thumb feel a lot better and he played a

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lot better obviously in the second half and over UM

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I believe the quote was something along

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lines of not gonna wait for halftime this time and

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get the get the thumb shot pregame UM number one?

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that give you any more interest incentive in getting

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>involved with San Francisco? First half, it doesn't wear off

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>at halftime. The he get worse as the game goes on,

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:03.959
<v Speaker 1>as the thumb starts, you know, the pain starts to creep.

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Because I believe I don't believe you're allowed to get

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>two shots and maybe they to do this show every

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:17.280
<v Speaker 1>week and that's how painful it is for him. Um,

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting question. I mean, my thing is this

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>an Aaron again. Aaron Shots from Football Outsiders was on

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this morning. He he did a ran on his Twitter

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where it was like, here's what the cow here's what

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the Niners are good at, and the one thing that

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they're glaringly bad at is deep down field passing by

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>their opponents. So it's like it's all laid out there

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for Dallas, like this is how you beat them, Just

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>heave it down field kind of thing. But I do

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.919
<v Speaker 1>worry about like Dack's chemistry with those whiteouts right now

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like there's much to it. His most successful

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>deep threat connection was with Gallup. Who's gone, Who's gone?

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, do you guys look at Zeke Elliott

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and looks like he's running in slow motion? Yes, he

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:02.720
<v Speaker 1>just looks up of years now. But it's even worse

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>than the last last part of the season. I feel

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's so slow, but that's running bikes. Man. Like

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we're just saying about the colds being knocked out of

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, Like what's their window with Jonathan Taylor? Three years?

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Four years? I mean, you don't know, these got the

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>running backs just when they fall, they fall off a

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>cliff Man, but a fresh Derrick Henry for the Titans. Baby,

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>let's goose. I love man. I can't wait. I have

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>taken so much incoming from my Titans futures wagers this year.

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's get it done. Let's get it done. I know, Drew,

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I know they're all telling me I'm crazy. Well, I

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you're chairing for the Steelers. You want the Steelers knock

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>knock the Chiefs out. I don't know why? Why why

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 1>are they Why are they saying you're so crazy? Rabel

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is an excellent coach. You've got it good because it's

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not that bad. Because I'll tell you why. It's multi prone.

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Because analytic sites, let's take that have the Titans to

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this day, right, they have the Titans twentieth at Football

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Outsiders right, um, Pro Football Focus has an eighth. But

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>my whole thing was very clear. Wait, this is when

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry went down, When A. J. Brown went down, specifically,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>when Derrick Henry went down, I said, look, they have

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>beaten the toughest teams in the league already that part

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of their schedules behind them. The easy part is coming.

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:27.839
<v Speaker 1>They will be able to remain afloat. The bet here

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for both the a f C and the Super Bowl

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is not for them to win the Super Bowl, right

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>because none of us knows who actually ends up winning it.

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But the point is that they remain afloat and get

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the number one seed. And if they get the number

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>one seed, by the way along that arc, we'll get

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones back, who by the way, hasn't meant shipped

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to them. We'll get a j Brown back who instantly

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 1>made a huge difference if you remember in the second

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>half of that primetime game. Um. And then by the

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>time they get to week eight teen, or if they

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:58.839
<v Speaker 1>get that by even more comfortably, they'll get the buy

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and they'll play in a divisional round two home games.

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>If they win that round, then they'll get Derrick Henry back,

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 1>who's the unicorn of all unicorns. That's the bet for

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>them to get the number one seat. And at that

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>point you're set up perfectly and you let the gods

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>determine what they determine. But that was the whole bet

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and that bet has come through, and so we will

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>see now if it all works out. But it's set

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>up perfectly. So wait, can you guys answer how modeling

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>says that the Tennessee Titans are best team in the NFL.

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's backwards looking and their last half of the season

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 1>they didn't play anyone and they didn't do especially well

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not playing anyone, and so it's not you know, they

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:40.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't they beats when they got a j. Brown back,

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But remember they lost to the Texans. Beat the Texans

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the second time. Didn't they lose to some other clunker

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in there? You know, So yeah, there's you know, it's

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not a strong case. For sure, the

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Steelers beat them, you know, I mean like they they

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they've had Patriots got the better of them, buy a

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>long shot. Obviously that game Week one stinker against the

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals is still in the sample, so you know that's

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>dragging them. Um, But yeah, it's they beat Miami thirty

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.439
<v Speaker 1>four to three, right that that that's the thing. They're

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>there just to give you a point of comparison. So

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like the Packers that Football Outsiders are ninth. But the

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>reason that their ninth is that they had the they

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.399
<v Speaker 1>had the Jordan's Love Game and the very first game

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the season. If you look at their full season,

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not the way to d v o A,

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but the full season one. They had that first game

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the season where they got clocked by New Orleans. Right,

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>was that the game where jamis through five touchdowns with

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>less than a hundred fifty yards passing? Right? And then

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>they had the Jordan Love Game, and then there was

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>one other I think was there another Jordan? I don't

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>know it was those two. But if you take those

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>two games out, they go from ninth to third. So

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's those kind of things that make people go,

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean ninth? By the way, you know

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what their number one team, one number one rated team

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make the postseason was, if I gave you

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ten guesses, Todd ten asked me again, Now, what's the question?

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What was? What was Football Outsiders number one ranked dvo

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>A team for the year that did not make the postseason,

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that did not make the postseason. Yes, and I'll give

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you Chargers quicker. So it's so it's some kind of

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like quaker quicker, stop looking it up, quicker. Ul Colts

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>at Denver Vikings at Seattle. There it is. You got

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it on the fifth Seattle eight. I couldn't believe that.

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. And let me just one second. You guys

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>said that Tennessee didn't beat anybody at the end of

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. I'm not sure here if I'm reading this correct.

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 1>That okay, so real quickly, generally, their offensive efficiency from

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>week eight through the through week seventeen, they only had

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>They only had the one game against Miami where they

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>were a little bit better than uh like neutral, and

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>then the Houston Texans game they had a very solid

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:15.919
<v Speaker 1>offensive game, but mostly it was kind of turnover luck,

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>fluky stuff that really supported them in a lot of

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>these games. Defensive stuff that's not necessarily predictive. Um, you know,

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have any receivers in a lot of those games,

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't they, Right, That's the thing. So I think I

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think the key really is though that like almost all

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff is backward looking and not and how

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you use it in a forward sense is a little

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bit You have to be a little bit conscientious. Like

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if you take their ratings from week three and they'll

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll own this, like I think they had after three weeks,

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers were like the number one d b O

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 1>A team, right, and so like you know, you gotta

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you gotta, um, you know, but you know, to that

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>point in the season had performed really well in three games,

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so backward looking you were saying, yeah, this team has

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>done really well. So I'm saying that you can't. You

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have to take this stuff with a major grain of salt.

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>If the if the Green Bay Packers are the ninth

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>best team looking forward backward sideways north, south and east

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and west, that's wrong. The Green Bay Packers are not

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the ninth best team. Do you guys think that the

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ninth best team? No, but I'm just trying to explain

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.760
<v Speaker 1>why they are what they are. And yes, so can't

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the modeling fix that somehow? Not the way they do things,

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the answer, because it's taking every play. No, yeah,

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's so that's the difference between the So like Dr

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Bob for instance, right, he who who picks games on

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a week to week basis, he will manually extract player

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:43.879
<v Speaker 1>play data that is meaningless, right, So like if there's

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 1>kneel downs, you know quickly, which is what I always say, right, Um,

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.359
<v Speaker 1>so yes, it's a little different. It's in coming upon

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you to know exactly. That's why, that's why I always

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>feel bad for Erin or I always feel bad and

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I love Eron he's my guy, but I always feel

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bad because people will immediately react to those numbers right

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>without having two or three thoughts after that. They're like, oh,

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? This is bullshit? And so

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>but I did say, he did say to me this morning.

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>He goes his worst case scenario, just in terms of

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a like feedback perspective and people going after him, is

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if the Titan, if the Patriots meet the Bills and

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then the Titans crushed the Patriots, He's got the Patriots

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>four and the Titans twenty. So he will take a

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of incoming for that if that happens. But

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, doesn't he end up? That could very well

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>end Yes, but he wouldn't he acknowledge that. Like a

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect example, the Chiefs are winning twenty three nothing against

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers in that game, the Chiefs second half, it's

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's it's it's completely doesn't make any sense whatsoever,

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's not football, So just throw it the hell

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>out but he does would he would he agree with that? Agree?

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Super smart? Yeah, he's saying there's nothing, so there's nothing

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you could do. He just wants to say, look, all

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>plays are all plays, and all plays are equal, and

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that's it, and that's the way we have to do it.

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that what he's basically saying. I don't want to

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>put words in his mouth, but I don't think they're

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:01.719
<v Speaker 1>in the business of manu really extracting, right, They're just

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at the whole data set. Yeah, and they're they're

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to normalize everything with context of down and distance.

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Like they're giving you a ton of credit for converting

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a third and one with four minutes to play in

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>your own territory because that adds a lot of wind probability.

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:18.879
<v Speaker 1>If you convert that third and one, if you gain

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:21.359
<v Speaker 1>two yards, like like, it's you know, a two yards.

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But even if you're winning thirty five seven at that point, No, no, no,

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for sure, it's all it's relative to game state, etcetera.

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you if you're yeah, if you gain if

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you get two yards on our first and ten in

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter means nothing. If you gain two yards

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on third and one in the fourth quarter with a

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in a one possession game in your own territory, that's huge.

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:44.399
<v Speaker 1>And so they're trying to kind of come up with

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a flat space where you know, everything everything that is

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:51.920
<v Speaker 1>conducted on the field has a relative way to kind

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of getting to the end result there, and it's you know,

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to also kind of wait it for opponents

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and take some of the lucky stuff out of there.

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I wouldn't be surprised at all with the Titans.

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you remember their Sunday night football win against

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams where that was that was Yeah, but you

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 1>know on paper box score, you're like, wow, you know,

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>huge dog goes into l a. Uh, it gets this

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 1>huge win. Like when are people going to finally buy

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it into the Titans? I would bet you anything. Their

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 1>model probably downgraded the Titans, you know, analytically based on

0:55:21.120 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that game because just because of the way it happened. Uh,

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know you break it down play by play,

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:27.359
<v Speaker 1>they were very lucky to win that game. They had

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple other thing like that as well over the

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>balance of the season. Um, but then on you don't

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>think that team, you don't think where would you put

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You just had to Drew Dinsit Goulash ratings. Yeah, they're

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.279
<v Speaker 1>like nine. They're like nine for me. All Right, I

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta step in, guys, because Drew and I gotta do

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a little minutes of tennis. So we have to do

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>our teasers teasers, and so I could ask you what

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>your favorite teaser of the week is, or I could

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:53.720
<v Speaker 1>just ask you another way, which is Tampa and who

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking Tampa? What do you think of them apples?

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm scared of Tampa. I think there's something wrong with

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the team. And I know everything you guys said was true,

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and the whole running and all that other nonsense. I

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with you in all of it. There's something wrong

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:13.319
<v Speaker 1>with that football team. And I'm not sure what the

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>deal is. You can't be losing to the Jets, and

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't get zero against the Saints and you can't

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>just something is up. And even the Panthers game, they

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>weren't really that impressive to me, so I'm staying away

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 1>from I think Jalen Hurts has gotten a lot better also,

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but I understand why you can't take the Eagles. But okay, fine,

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Pats plus ten and I'm gonna take

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Niners plus nine because I don't want to trust

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy g on the spread. But if you're gonna give

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>me the extra six, I'll take the Niners. So give

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:44.799
<v Speaker 1>me the Pats plus ten and the Niners plus nine.

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm telling you, it looks like something's wrong with Tampa.

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>This is not the Tampa Bay we've seen of old.

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Something is wrong. I don't know what it is. What's wrong?

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>He like, huge deal? I okay, whatever it is, something

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is up. I guess you know what, even if they

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:04.800
<v Speaker 1>even if they clean the clocks of the Eagles, who

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially just happy to be here, um potentially, you know,

0:57:09.440 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>because Tampa Bay strengths match up exactly with the strengths

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 1>of the Eagles. So this might not be a competitive game.

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't lose, but don't lose faith. Stick with

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>your pins, stick with your guns. Don't go and pick them, right,

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I won't. I won't know. You're you're business saying this

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is a bad matchup for the Eagles and Tampa. They

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 1>might just coast because of the bad matchup. But the

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>truth is it could still be. There's a problem with

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers. And I really do think there's a problem

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with Buccaneers. I don't know what you guys think, but

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's definitely a problem. Yeah. I think almost

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly there's gonna be some momentum to pick against them

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:46.920
<v Speaker 1>next week, be at the Rams, the Niners, the the Cowboys,

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>whoever heads to Tampa. I think it's gonna be the

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hot side next week. All right, Drew, yours is Tampa

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and Chiefs. I'll be the square, don't mind. I don't

0:57:57.800 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>mind the general case here teasing you know, getting across

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>seven I think is getting across tenants seven for a

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 1>team like the Chiefs seems uh, that seems advantageous to me. Um.

0:58:13.280 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that. I don't love the Chiefs to

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>cover this number, um, but certainly um and the idea

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Steelers come back and either win or that

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this becomes a field goal type of game is pretty

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>low likelihood in my By my opinion, I have I

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 1>have the Steelers at about a fift chance to win,

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 1>um and in the cases where they are losing, I

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have it over a touchdown by about seventy percent, So

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not quite a plus EV teaser leg. But there really

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't a second leg this week. Yeah, I'm I'm looking

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for a dance partner for Tampa Bay, and I settled

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on the forty Niners. So Tampa Bay and the forty

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>niners for me, because surely Todd they can cover the

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>teaser leg right, just nine, it's not that much. As

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as long as Jimmy g us and throw. No, as

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:03.240
<v Speaker 1>long as Jimmy g doesn't go all Jimmy g on

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>us and we and we get at least a couple

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas drops of interceptions, will be fine as long

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as he gets his dabbit luck. You know, even though

0:59:13.720 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you took your taking your land, you're taking the points

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of the paths. You're not going to tease him out

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>past You're not gonna tease him out to ten. Uh.

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's my thing. Scared, he's scared. I know why he's scared.

0:59:27.160 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Wait where I'm scared. No, it's scary. It's perfectly right.

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>If I took tim if I took New England with

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the points, but I also took San Francisco with the points,

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they just ended up as my number four, right, I

0:59:38.280 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>took them both, but the But I'm scared of my paths.

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Pick two. I'm scared. But you know what's what's the

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more valuable six point move through the four in the

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>seven or through the seven in the ten? Right, is

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 1>what you're asking yourself basically, Yeah, and so went with

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Niners. Just one with the Niners. Watch it now.

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course the Patriots will come through, but the Niners. Well,

1:00:03.880 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, final two questions. Guys, Uh, six games? You're

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you're forced to bet five sides? What's the one you want?

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>No part of? Drew Cowboys Niners to me is the

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>most correctly priced game on the board. I mean, I

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bet any of these games, but I'll

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>take the Steelers game. I don't want to bet the

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Steelers game because I I don't think anything's that easy.

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not that easy, and I don't want to take

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, but I just don't believe you can just go, oh,

1:00:37.360 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. Of course that's gonna win for me. I

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's the Rams and the Cardinals. Like I just

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no DeAndre Hopkins, maybe J J. Watt. But would

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it shock me if the Cardinals put up a performance

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and Matthew Stafford had that one horrible mistake and the

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals showed up at all, not at all, and then

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>would it shocked me if the Rams be them handily?

1:01:00.920 --> 1:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Not at all. I just want no part of that

1:01:03.120 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>game none. It was between that and Philly Tampa Bay.

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Todd, to your point, even though I

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:09.919
<v Speaker 1>think Tampa Bay could roll them, because that I could

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>see that being a slaughter or close game. Also. Uh.

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the final question. We usually do it with

1:01:14.840 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the big favorites every week, who's the most likely to

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>lose out right? Let's do it this way this time

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>every game but the Cowboys because it's the shortest line.

1:01:23.720 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's the favorite you think is the most likely to

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>lose out right? True? Cincinnati for me? Wow, Todd, I

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like your Raiders passion there, Drew. Well, see, here's the

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>funny thing about that game, real quick, it's a it's

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a it's to me, it's a bimodal kind of deal.

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Either the Raiders win, you know, they're close, they hang,

1:01:47.640 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they win because they are a very resilient, tough team

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been through hell and back the season and

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>still somehow in the playoffs. Or they or they get

1:01:56.000 --> 1:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>their doors blown off one of two ways. The big

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>sports thing. Yeah, sorry, I'm sorry. What I was gonna

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>say is you have the big thing in sports going

1:02:06.560 --> 1:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for you that nobody believes in US thing which is

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a which is a gigantic thing in sports. And the

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have had nobody believes in us for how many weeks?

1:02:15.120 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Now in our rowny they're playing with house money. That's

1:02:17.760 --> 1:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about it. I mean, what a story, right,

1:02:20.640 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible story, this team incredible. But they they played the

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>tough by my numbers, they played the toughest schedule in

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the a f C. They had the most adversity there

1:02:30.000 --> 1:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>here with a with an interim coach for crying out loud.

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They did get a little quarterback luck, right, They got

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins followed by Drew Lock followed by Carson wentz

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Off of a week of COVID. So that one all

1:02:42.120 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>four overtime games they played, they won all four overtime games.

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Say no more? Yeah, okay, but that makes sense. So

1:02:48.760 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that so the one, So the big, big favorite most

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>likely lose out right for you, Cincinnati and Todd, who

1:02:53.320 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>did you say Buffalo? I said that Bills, just because

1:02:55.880 --> 1:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe Belichick can you know, come up with

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>some kind of potion to figure out how to pull

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>off shock wood shock you right, Buffalo. Buffalo would be

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>mine by definition. If I can't choose Dallas, Buffalo would

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be mine as well. You guys are scaring me. I

1:03:10.240 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have the Bills in this in the high stakes Calcutta,

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so sweating. But what what kind of money are we

1:03:15.960 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>talking here? High stakes? Like for the bills? Alright, I'm I'm,

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm out on a limb here in bills and rams um.

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But I was. I was happy with my beds um

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we'll see, We'll see how it plays out now,

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>very very cool. Hopefully if the Bills lose, it's a blowoutlaws.

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all. Scoop scoop some something out of one of

1:03:40.720 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the side pots there. All right, gentlemen, can't wait six games?

1:03:45.240 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Cannot wait for this weekend? What a great country that

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:49.439
<v Speaker 1>we have this sport. So let me ask you a question.

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you can you wait? Or can you not wait? What?

1:03:52.960 --> 1:03:55.439
<v Speaker 1>You can't wait? Right? You just keep saying I can't wait?

1:03:55.440 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So I was going to that. Really, that was the

1:03:57.240 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>second time I said it. Yes, I can't stop saying it.

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, Wai twice. You said it earlier in the

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>show as well, my friend. Yeah, that's the second time

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I said it. That's what I'm saying. I'm with you.

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, buddy, I I can't wait. Till Man

1:04:10.880 --> 1:04:14.479
<v Speaker 1>can't say he can't wait for football, count for Todd

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>wished them from his mom's cork attic and Pittsburgh p A.

1:04:17.520 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Drew did say from the Bet the Edge NBC Sports

1:04:20.000 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Bet the Edge podcast, which he does with Sarah Peerlman

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Wherever podcast distributed, and the Deep Dive podcast didn say Classic,

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>which he does with Andrew Andy Molitor. Thank you, Drew

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciated as wait wait wait, and Lily from and literally

1:04:34.080 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>from A T and T who is not fair that

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>she got the smaller lollipop and Mikey Palmer, No, no, no, Lily, Lily,

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the lady and the little girl, the little girl. I

1:04:45.360 --> 1:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>love that girl all right, appreciate it. Good luck with

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>all your bets this week at Wild Car Weekend. From

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>all of us at the Megapod, thank you for listen.

1:05:02.760 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>The b