WEBVTT - Ares Management CEO Mike Arougheti Talks Record Breaking Fundraising Year

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Shanali bask I'm sitting here at the Goldman Sachs

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Financial Services Conference. Welcome to our Bloomberg television and radio audiences.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm standing by now with Michael Araghetti, the CEO of

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Aris Management, and you broke records, record after record, really

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 2>nothing for record, nothing but records. So how do you

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>even begin to set up for twenty twenty five when

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>it was a record breaking fundraising year for you.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>In many ways?

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, the year's not over, so hopefully we'll have

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>a good, good push to the end of the year.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>This will be a record fundraising year.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 3>But what's nice about the way that our business has

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>evolved and developed Ten fifteen years ago, we and others

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>like us were very dependent on the traditional institutional market

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 3>for fundraising. If you look at twenty twenty four, about

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent of our capital raising is actually coming from

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>that traditional institutional part of the market.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>The other two thirds.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Just coming from places like wealth and retail, our publicly

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 3>traded permanent capital vehicles, our insurance business, our COLO franchise.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>So there's been a broadening out and deepening of our

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>products set and our fundraising capability, which means that when

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 3>we're going into a new year, we're doing it from

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>a much higher base, so we're equally as optimistic for

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 3>what next year.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Holds as well.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating, what is the look on the other side.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're raising all that.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Money, you need to put it somewhere. Are you finding

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 2>enough investment opportunities? You know, even with the record breaking

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>fund that you just had, did you find a way

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>to put a lot of that to work yet?

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>It's actually it's the as we grow, we keep investing

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 3>in our deployment, which is the big driver of our business.

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the last couple of years, as

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>our dry powder has grown, so has our deployment, almost

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>one for one. So we need to keep investing in

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>new products, new markets, people, et cetera, which we're doing

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>organically and inorganically. So my expectation is deployment will pick

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>up in twenty twenty five m and a market feels

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>like it's picking back up. Transaction volumes are accelerating. So

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>we had a really good year, but I think twenty

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty five is setting up to be another big.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>What role is em and A going to play?

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>There's an expectation of this big return, but of course

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you have a lot of concerns from private acute sponsors

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>still out there. There's also a lot of uncertainty around

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>interest rates, particularly if those Trump tariffs come to play.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 3>I think that is the big question in my mind

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>for twenty five is the trajectory for rates and the

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>impact of tariffs. We have believed and now continue believe

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>that rates will stay higher for longer. That's actually really

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>good for our private credit businesses just because we capture

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>all of that excess return. It's not so good for

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the M and A market, and so I think twenty

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty five will have to strike that balance. That said,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of pent up demand to transact, right.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>You have people that have largely been sitting on the

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 3>sidelines for twenty four months plus. The capital that they

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 3>manage has you know, a timestamp on it. It needs

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>to get invested, It needs to get returned to their investors.

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's more important that we have rate

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 3>stability at this point as opposed to needing to see

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 3>rates come down dramatically in order to see the transaction values.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But do investors have it totally wrong? You look at

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the expectations for rate cuts.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You get to as low as.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Three point five percent, and do we get there or

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 2>do you think that there's actually a risk that rates

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>go higher next year.

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's a risk that they go higher.

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's a real possibility that they stay high.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 3>A lot needs to go right or wrong, depending on

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 3>which side of the market you're in to see them

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>actually move back up. But I think that there's a

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>real strong case roumit that they will stay higher for longer,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and probably higher than the forward curve is predicting. But again,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>we've lived in a three and a half and four

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>percent based rate environment before, and so it's not as

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>though the markets can't function well there. The key is

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>how do we transition, And we're already beginning to see

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>the markets transitioning to the new cost of But that's

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 3>really all you need to see volumes.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Pick up now.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Mike, a week ago, the big elephant in the room,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>HPS sells to Blackrock, huge, huge deal.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>In the industry. What did you make of it? From

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>where you're sitting.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that it changes the competitive landscape in

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>a significant way?

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, first, I'm super happy for all of them.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a great partnership, two great companies coming together.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it necessarily changes the competitive landscape.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Right If I look at we've been in this business

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 3>for thirty years, and we've seen our competitors get bought before.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>We've seen Okill get bought by TIRA, we saw an

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Terry's get bought by CPP, we saw Churchill get bought

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 3>by Neuvene. Right, that doesn't necessarily change the competitive dynamic.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Competitors are the competitors more importantly. From my lens, and

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's self serving, I view it as a real

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>validation of the competitive advantages that you create through scale

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in private credit. Right, So when a company as well

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 3>positioned as black Rock chooses to buy HPS for thirty times,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 3>it's really for me a validation of the private credit

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>investment thesis. And so, viewed through that lens, I think

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>it's a great thing.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>What does this make of consolidation across the industry? You

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>yourself have been a significant consolidator, but you have looked

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>really outside that traditional private credit business of late. You

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>went into real estate in a much bigger way.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>For example.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that the direct lending businesses as we

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>know it is kind of at its peak and you

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>need to look elsewhere to consolidate in order for the

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>real growth in private market.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So from the areas perspective, I don't think so.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>We are capturing a growing share of a growing market

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 3>in the core corporate lending business, but we're also seeing

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the opening up of new markets real estate lending, asset

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>based lending, infrastructure lending. We're globalizing the business, so we

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>have a significant runway in Europe and Asia. So even

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>if people believe that there's a maturation in the core

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>US direct lending business, that's really just a small fraction

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of the investable market and we've already set ourselves up

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>to grow in other parts of the world. I do

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 3>think though, that consolidation in asset management will continue. We

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>have learned over the last ten or twenty years.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Size matters in this business.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 3>You need to be able to invest in growth, origination,

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>portfolio management, technology, fundraising, and that's a sizable investment, and.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So the big will get bigger.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>They'll do it organically, but they'll also fill in gaps

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.799
<v Speaker 3>in their products, set in capability by making.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Acquisitions as well well.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of those other capabilities, you're talking about real estate

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 2>for a moment here. I mean, what is the biggest opportunity,

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>particularly when people are looking around some of the parts

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 2>of the industry and still seeing some pain, either pain

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>on the office side or maybe you could argue over

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>exuberance on the AI data center side in some ways,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>how do you feel about the opportunity?

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Real estate is always talked about as a hyper local market,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>we would agree, and it matters not just what market

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>you're in, but what street in what street corner you're on.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 3>And so I think in order to be great at

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>real estate, you have to be broad in your footprint

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>and broad in your capability. You're right, there's distressed opportunity

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>or transitional opportunities in office, there's growing opportunities in data centers.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>We're making significant investments in industrial real estate to take

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>advantage of what we perceive to be a realignment of

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 3>global supply chain. So there's a lot of different ways

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to play real estate. I will say, though, the things

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>that drive value in real estate going forward are going

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>to be rates again, whether.

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>They come down fast or not.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Stability and rates is a positive for real estate growth,

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>economic growth, and.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>We're continuing to see strengthen the.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>US economy that will drive transaction volumes and then supply.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the things that people don't.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Fully appreciate is because of the headwinds that the real

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 3>estate market has had over the last couple of years,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>the market is fundamentally undersupplied.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Which does two things.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>It supports the value of the existing assets of people,

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's going to create demand for new development and

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>new capital coming into the market.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to pick your spots.

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>But I think generally when you view it through the

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>lens of rates and supply, there's a tail when going

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 3>into twenty twenty five.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Five rates are staying higher for longer. Then you also

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>set a potential distressed opportunity in real estate. How big

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>is that distressed opportunity and would you play in it?

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Would you want to.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Invest in it? Yeah?

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>We cover the waterfront in terms of our real estate positioning.

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Multifamily and industrial have been our two largest exposures, but

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>we also play to an increasing extent in data centers,

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 3>student housing, self storage, so other growth markets. We have

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>largely avoided office in the primary market. We have large

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>pools of capital that are geared to invest in opportunistic

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 3>real estate equity and opportunistic.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Real estate debt.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So what we've learned in past cycles is the way

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 3>that distress plays out is sometimes it's a secondary market.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Opportunity where you're buying good assets at good basis.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it's just to shift in the competitive dynamic in

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the primary market.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So you have to be prepared for both.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, if banks who are over exposed to commercial real

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>estate office don't sell those assets, that probably means they're

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 3>going to be less competitive in the primary market. So

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 3>you have to be prepared for either outcome.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Mike, we're running out of time. We have to leave

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>it there. Of course, a big setup for twenty twenty five.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>That is Mike Arrogetty of Areas Management