WEBVTT - Esperanto: Tre Mojosa

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is stuff you

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>should know. I don't know how to say that. And Esperanto,

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 2>now that I think about it, I really should have

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>looked that up.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you were gonna do that.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe I didn't. I feel kind of jerky,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>jerk woddy. I guess I don't know how to say that.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 2>And Esperano either.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, jerkwad would be jerk wado, yeah, exactly, or something like.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>That, something similar to that. Yeah, it actually would make

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>sense because Esperano is taking root words jerk wad and

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 2>putting them together and then conjugating them in a very

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>uniform way. We should probably tell everybody what we're talking

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 2>about here, because we just kind of accidentally got into it.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a language, not.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Just a language. It's a con lang, a constructed language,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>which is a language that you sit down and make up.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Some people actually do this, and apparently it's addictive when

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you start, as opposed to, like I guess, a natural language,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 2>one that just kind of develops organically over time as

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a group of people start talking to one another.

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Esperanto itself means one who hopes, and that will

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>all make sense once you hear the story, because it's

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty wonderful story. Actually, I didn't know much about it.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was kind of one of these

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>goofy fringe things, and it is a fringe thing. They're

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>about a thousand people who are native, not just Esperanto speakers,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>but where their first language that they learned was Esperanto.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>They are native speakers. Dave Rus helped us with this,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and he dug up George Soros, billionaire. Oh, I don't know.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>People describe him in a lot of ways depending on

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>who you are, but as the most famous Esperanto speaker.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But I did poke around a little bit and found

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that Tolstoy j R. R. Tolkien spoke Esperanto and lemaire,

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>basically the father of modern cinema. And as this will

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>become as a surprise when you see later on what happened,

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but Joseph Stalin apparently knew how to speak Esperanto.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Huh, that is kind of a surprise. The thing I

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>think that differentiates George soros so is he was a

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 2>native speaker, like that was his first language was Esperanto.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I looked over the list of just speakers, right,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>notable speakers, and there are a lot of people in

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the list, but I just hadn't heard of many of them.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Stilln' to big surprise, I'd like to add one more

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to that list of notable Esperanto speakers, our own ben

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>bowling from stuff they don't want you to know.

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought he spoke Esperanto, that tracks he did.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I emailed them just to make sure that I wasn't

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>just making something up in my head, and he said, yeah,

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 2>he used to, you know, be into it, and he

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>just kind of fell out of it, and then he

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>emailed me like hours later, and it was like, damn it, Josh,

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>now I'm back into Esperano. So he's back into it.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Everybody, Well, learning Esperanto is about as ben bowling a

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>thing as I can imagine.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 2>It is, because it's inclusive, it's intelligent, it's curious people,

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 2>it's witty. It seems to be like one of the better,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 2>most more nicer kind online communities that you'll come across

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>from what I can.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's fringe, and that's that's Ben for sure.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and again that's Ben Bolan from stuff they don't

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>want you to know.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So you said it was a constructed language.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll talk a little bit about why people

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>would construct a language and a little bit of the

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>history of these languages. There are a lot of reasons

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for doing that. Most of them are because they want

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to create a language that's easier to learn, that's simpler.

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times there might be religious reasons or

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>philosophical reasons. Some people just do it for fun. A

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of them were designed to be a universal language.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>In Esperanto, Actually, Esperanto takes a lot of these boxes,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>as we'll see, but a lot of them are created

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for like, hey, wouldn't it be better if everybody could

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>speak a language?

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? What a universal language? A language where I guess

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the whole point of a universal language is there's definitely

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the point of Esperanto. The idea is that if you

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>can speak a common language with anybody else on the planet,

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>that should conceivably do away with a lot of different

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 2>conflicts that probably arise from disputes over language, from differences

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>in language from an inability to see one another's viewpoint

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 2>because we're having trouble talking with one another. And that's

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of the basis of a lot of the constructed languages,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that idea that if we can all speak a universal language,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>there'll be a global human family or world, which that

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>does sound like you'd be up. George Soros's allly yeah.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you just could create a language that

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>where all it was was don't shoot and how about

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a plate of cookies and a glass of milk?

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, how far we go, it'd be a much

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 2>better world.

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So admitted languages of you know, people have always sort

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of been doing this here and there, but in the

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century it seems to have really hit its stride.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>There were more than one hundred constructed languages that decade

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that century alone, and Esperanto is far and away the

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>most popular today, although for a long long time it

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was a language created by a German priest name Johann

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Schlayer called vol Vollapuk.

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Vallapuk. Apparently God told.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Him to do it, sure mission from Gad.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what else are you gonna do? You're gonna make

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>that language? And I'm sure he was like, are you

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>sure you want to call it vollapuk, And guy was like,

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 2>get busy, and he did, and it actually caught on

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>really well. There seems to have been kind of a

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>bug in the late nineteenth century, at least in the

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 2>West of invented languages, and vollapuke apparently the fit the bill,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and it spread you far and wide. I can't not

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 2>say it like that.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, that's fine.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>They started having like international congresses or conferences of vallapuc.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>President Grover Cleveland's wife Francis named their dog Vollapuke. Like

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>it was. It was a worldwide phenomenon. Even if you

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't know it or had no interest in learning it,

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>you knew about it.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's because that dog threw up all over the place. Though.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>We had a cat nam Underfoot. Literally, my dad named

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this cat underfoot.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a very good name.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'll give you two guesses why.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Because the cat had very long legs, okay, and no

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>feat to speak of. That's right, it was underfooted.

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So that conference you were talking about for Vatapuke was

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty nine, but a couple of years before that,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so it was, you know, cruising and doing pretty well,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>but two years before that, Esperanto was created and really

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>took it over, you know, over the next like thirty

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>forty years or so.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, imagine there being a trend today of like

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>a universal language is catching on, like on TikTok oh God,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>like it would just take off. But it's such a

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>bizarre thing to think of, and this is what people

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>were into. And this was long before social media, so

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 2>it was hard for something to become a global phenomenon.

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>And yet not one but two universal languages took hold

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 2>in the eighteen eighties. Yeah, so Esperano apparently just totally

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>supplanted vollapuke. But there is a little footnote of it.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Apparently the Danes say what we would say, like, it's

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>all Greek to me, Like, I don't understand what you're saying.

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>The Danish expression is it's pure vollapuke.

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's great. I love that. I love learning Danish expressions.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start saying that. I don't say it's

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all Greek to me much anyway, but if that ever

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>comes up, I'm gonna say it's pure ballapuke.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and no offense for a Greek list. There's just

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 2>just something someone says here.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder what Greek's think about that.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Actually don't know. I don't know if it's gotten back

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to them yet.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So should we talk a little bit about this

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the creator of Esperanto? Who was I tried to find

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>out bad things about this guy, but he seems like

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty remarkable, humble, well intentioned fella.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>And I also read that he was one of those

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>rare people and who would sleep just a couple hours

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a night rather than sit around and stare at the wall.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>He did interesting things. He was a polyglot, He learned

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>tons of different languages, He was well read, he was

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 2>an optometrist. He did all sorts of stuff. But along

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 2>the way, one of the things he did was create Esperanto.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>And he had a pretty great, well not great, but

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a pretty heavy backstory to it.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. His name, we haven't said his name yet. He's

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>known as l el Zamenhoff or Soamenhoff, but his full

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>name was Ludwik Leitzer Soamenhoff. Born on December fifteenth, which

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is National Samenhoff Day. Oh sure, yeah, in eighteen fifty nine,

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>born in bi Alishtock, Poland. He was Jewish as was

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of belishtock about seventy percent, also some Germans,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>some Russians, obviously Poles, and growing up there was pretty

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>rough because there was a lot of ethnic violence going on.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>There were Jews being attacked by Poles, there were Germans

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>being attacked by Russians. In eighteen eighty one, there was

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a false, I guess, accusation that Jews were behind the

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>assassination of Alexander the Second of Russia, and that started

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the Pograms, which were these organized massacres of Polish and

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Russian Jewish communities.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because Poland was annexed by Russia from eighteen oh

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>seven to nineteen twenty one, which is why they would

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>have cared that was their czar. And apparently it wasn't

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the Jews at all or anybody who had anything to

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>do with Jewishness. It was anti Autocratics, a group of

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>called the nouradnya volya people's will, and they threw a

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>bomb and blew him up. And apparently his successor, his son,

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Zari Alexander the third, was even worse. But from those

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>pograms that el Zamenhoff was alive to witness, and even

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 2>before that just the ethnic violence that I was endemic

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to Biaalistock. That had a really big effect on him,

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>and that's where he developed this idea that humanity is

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 2>way more connected than we realized, that we have all

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>these false constructs that separate us, that don't have to

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>separate us, but do time and time again. Language is

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 2>one of them. He cited religion as one of them,

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and he was very Jewish. He was a very religious

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Jewish person, but he still recognized that religion creates conflict

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it has historically, and he felt like you could

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of you could keep the religion, you could keep

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the different nations, you can keep the things that do

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 2>divide us, as long as they had something like a

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>universal language laying over the whole thing that could defuse

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the conflicts that grow up from those things that divide us.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which was and he was a kid. I mean,

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this is remarkable stuff for a preteen and then teen

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>nature to sort of understand. So he's clearly a brilliant, empathetic,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>passionate human being. I think, as the you know, family

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>story goes, at least he was ten years old and

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a play called The Tower of Babel colon

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Beilishtock tragedy in five acts as a ten year old.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So just this idea of sort of stripping away these

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>divisions and realizing, like, hey, we're all human beings. That's

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the one like at the root, that's what we are,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and we all literally have that in common, yet we

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>divide ourselves like. It's just a remarkable thing for a

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>kid and a lesson for everybody of all ages. Still.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, as he was raised, he learned Yiddish, which apparently

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>grew out of a German dialect that's written in Hebrew.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize that, but it's the universal language of

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the Ashkenazi Jews, the Jewish people in Central and Eastern Europe.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>So he already understood what a universal language could do.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>You could take a Jewish person from Poland and a

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Jewish person from Czechoslovakia and put them in a room

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>and they could speak to one another through that second tongue, Yiddish.

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 2>So he set about kind of trying to modernize Yiddish,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe he can spread that, and then he stopped pretty

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>much in his tracks because he realized that what he

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>was trying to do was say, hey, everybody, let's all

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 2>learn the language of the people you consider criminals and spies.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It was like a really hard sell that he just

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 2>realized wasn't going to go anywhere. So he abandoned trying

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to sell Yiddish or create a universal language out of

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Yiddish and just set about creating one from scratch, which

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>is what Esperano came from.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>What a setup it is.

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>It's going pretty well so far. We should release this

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>as this show.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Best setup ever. I'm gonna say it, even though it

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>annoy some people. Should we take a break.

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say it, even though it annoys everybody. Yes,

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 2>we should.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll be right back, all right, so we're

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>back really quickly. That sort of made me before we

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>left and talked about people being annoyed by asking to

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>take a break. That came to mind because I jumped

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit recently, on our subreddit and actually started an

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>account because there was so much just sort of bad information,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like Jerry doesn't even work with him anymore, and just

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all these weird things that people sort of assume that

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we're wrong. And I've since learned that that's and even

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>redditors kind of said, like that's kind of a thing.

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>People like surmise a lot. Yeah, so I'd signed up

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for a few days and answered like geez a lot

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of questions for like a full day and then got

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>right back off. But just wanted people to know if

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they thought I was some phony, that that was really me.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And most people were awesome.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>You had Jones stunt AMA, Yeah.

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Sort of. You know what I don't like about AMAS though?

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it this just that rapid fire sort of thing, right,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So this was like a slow burn AMA and it's

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>all still there, a lot of answered questions, like with

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>correct information, and like I said, almost everyone was really

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>really nice, but not everyone is.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>But that's just the nature of online interactions the internets.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 2>That's silly that they think Jerry doesn't work with us anymore.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't exist. Someone was really annoyed though, about like

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>every time they ask if it's time to take a break,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, we do that because we don't

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>script this out and I'm genuinely wondering if it's a

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>good time to take a break.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what a weird thing to be upset about.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a conversation anyway, Thanks to everyone who participated, and

0:15:58.360 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you can go there and check it out if you

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.479
<v Speaker 1>want back to esperanto.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you want me to pick it up because we

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 2>don't script this stuff.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Why did you ask me that? That's so annoying?

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>So we said that that l. Zamenhoff had said, Okay,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start from scratch. I'm going to create

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 2>a language that doesn't come from anywhere, that's not spoken

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>by anybody. I'm going to make this universal language from scratch.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And so his nineteenth birthday party, he had already done

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 2>enough that he handed out pocket dictionaries and grammar charts

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to the guests.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Man of his birthday, which a swinging party. That's right

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>for a nineteen year old.

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>He called the new language lingo Internacia or no inter

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Nazia because that sees its remember, yeah, yeah, And he

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>composed a little hymn, and I kind of taught myself

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 2>how to pronounce it, even though I'm going to completely

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>screw it up.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But may I you gotta sing it though?

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>No, yeah, no, you'd don't. You have to say it

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>solemnly like this, Mala mikite de las nazis, cado cado

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>yam tempesta la tote holmose in familia co une gare sodebe.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Nice work can I tell everyone what it means?

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but you have to sing it.

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Let the hatred of the nations fall, fall, fall.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>The time is already here. All humanity must unite in

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>one family.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't rhyme? Yeah, So when I'm ready to send him,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it didn't rhyme.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>So he's cruising with this thing. He has this banging

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth birthday party where he's given out this stuff to

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>his friends. I'm sure they're just like, who is this guy? Even?

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>This is amazing? And in eighteen eighty seven he self

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>published a pamphlet, a forty two page pamphlet called uh

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna pronounce this stuff?

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 2>Unua libro?

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay? I thought that was right. It means first book.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And as you'll see, if you notice some of these

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>words sound like other languages, it's because, like other constructed languages,

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 1>it's usually based on like the words are based on

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>some other words. So when you hear esperanto, like if

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you go to watch a scene from the Esperanto William

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Shatner movie that you can watch on YouTube, yeah, I

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>think from him, Well when was that sixty sixty six?

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Everybody says, but Turner classic movies listed as sixty five,

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 2>which I find confusing, but everybody else is sixty.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Six a side with tcm always. But if you go

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to and you hear or just you know, I looked

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 1>up on YouTube, just like Esperanto conversations, or if you

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>bump into Ben Bowlin somewhere in Atlanta, you'll you'll sit

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>there and you'll go, oh wow, that sounds a little

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>bit like Spanish some and maybe it might sound Italian,

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>which Spanish also sounds kind of Italian sometimes, and so

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it might sound a little bit familiar,

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like libro for book, like that makes sense, like the

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>word library. So just pointing out that when you hear

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Esperanto words and you think it sounds familiar, it's not

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>by accident.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The reason why, especially if you are a Westerner.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Three quarters of the root words he started out with,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred of them, as we'll see, are taken from

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Romance languages. So it's yeah, if you're an English speaker,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 2>it's very easy to pick up.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a much simpler way to say what it says.

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So in the in the that first book, unua libro,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 2>which I can I can understand what that means just

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>from the little primer, which I have to say, hats

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 2>off to Dave. He put together a primer for us

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>in this article that like, when you go back and

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>research it more widely, you're like, this is really difficult

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to like kind of wrangle into one small little ball.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And he managed to do that really really well. So

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 2>way to go, Dave. But that first book, Unuwa Libro,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>it had some sample translations. It said, here's here's how

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you say this this stuff. Here's the grammar rules, here's

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 2>the dictionary, here's how you pronounce it. And he said

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 2>that his pen name. He wrote it as a pen name,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>doctro esperanto or doctor hopeful is what it.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Loved it.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 2>And he called again his language the lingvo inter Nazia,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>and that's what he thought everybody was going to call it.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>But instead everybody said, I like this doctor hopeful cat.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's just call his language.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Esperanto, yeah, which is sort of ironic because from the

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>beginning he was a very humble guy and didn't want

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to be like he didn't name it, you know, Zamenhoffer

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, like he didn't want it to be named

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 1>after him. He didn't want to own it. No, we

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>would call something like this open source today. He didn't

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>want it to be about him, So the fact that

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he made up a name and that they named it

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>after him anyway is kind of funny. I get the

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sense that it probably didn't bother him too much because

0:20:58.160 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he seemed like a good guy.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But his goal, and we'll talk about sort of the

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>other stuff that came along later, as far as his

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of desire to attach other meaning to it, But

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>his sort of root goal at the beginning was I

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>want a language for the love of whoever you worship

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that is easier to learn than everything else out there. Yeah,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and I want it to be a language, like you mentioned,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of from the get go that can unite people

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and promote peace, like two very sort of noble pursuits,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So, okay, let's talk about goal one. A language that's

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>for the love of whatever you worship, easier to learn

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>than most of the other languages out there. Right right,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Apparently you could learn Esperanto in something like about forty

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>hours of class time, one full week of learning. You'll

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>walk out of there on the end of the day

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Friday being able to converse basically in Esperanto. Tell people

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 2>where you live, who you are, what you like, point

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to class and identify them correctly.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>That isn't don't shoot? How about to play a cookie

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and some milk?

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Exactly? They should teach that first, for sure. Apparently that's

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can just know without even knowing anything

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 2>about learning languages. That's really a short amount of time.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 2>It takes about one hundred to two hundred hours to

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 2>learn French or German to the same degree. There's another

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>person who estimated that for English speakers it's five times

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>easier to learn Esperano than French or Spanish, ten times

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>easier than Russian, and twenty times easier than Chinese. And

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 2>again a large part of that is because the root

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 2>words are taken from Romance languages. So just recognizing generally

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>being able to make a guess in almost every case

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>were what that word means, that's a huge leg up,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's why it's so much easier in part. But

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the other part is the grammar that he created is

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 2>so standard and with such regularity that that that's the

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 2>part that makes it that much easier to learn, especially

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 2>for Romance language speakers.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the hard part about learning a language

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is usually not memorizing root words and learning basic grammar.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the irregular verbs. It's all these exceptions to rules.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Fritch has more than two thousand irregular verbs. English is

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>notoriously tough to learn as a as a non native speaker.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, think about those, just about irregular verbs real quick, chuck.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>For the English to be pretty basic stuff. It's conjugated

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>as b being, been, r am is was and were. Now,

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 2>if you were just approaching those words as a non

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>English speaker to begin with, you wouldn't think was had

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>anything to do with b or r has anything to

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 2>do with b. And that's that's what causes the confusion.

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And not just English, but almost any language. Irregular verbs

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and exceptions to the standard rules.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know we did, and we did a

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>whole episode on language acquisition, right.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm pretty sure sure we did.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, because I'm just consistently knocked out that

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>babies into toddlers and so on just just pick up language.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really remarkable to me still to see that kind

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But esperanto, and we're just going to go

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>over some sort of the base rules here, and I

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>think you will find yourself like we did. Just saying,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, that's amazing and it makes so much sense.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>There are sixteen grammatical rules, there are no irregular verbs,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>there are no exceptions to rules, and these are just

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this isn't everything, but these are just a few examples

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of kind of like how much sense it makes. All

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>nouns are going to end with the letter oh. That's

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>why I said jerk wado at the beginning. Adjectives all

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all of them end in the letter A. Adverbs all

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>end in the letter E. There are no genders. That's

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>another place where learning a foreign language can be confusing,

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is you know, the different cases and genders and stuff

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>like that, and having to change things around. Not an esperanto,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>my friend. And then this is sort of just a

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>fun one. La la is the only word for the right.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Not la lay low ill, none of that stuff. L yeah,

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 2>none of that. It's all la the everything. And then

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 2>it's up to the conjugation of the verb that that

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 2>that changes that or the adverb or the adjective or whatever.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Because it's standard when you see like an o or

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>an a or an e, you can identify a word

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in a sentence as a verb and adverb. And now

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 2>in that kind of thing. So the infinitive form of verbs.

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, I had to look most of

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 2>this up, like I was, like, what's.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>An adverb again English?

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 2>An verb is something like above clearly hourly it it.

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>It describes an adjective, a verb, or some other stuff.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>An infinitive form is like to something to do, like

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the basic form like to eat. It ends in an eye,

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>so it's mangy okay, okay, present tense like I eat,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 2>that would be as mangas it ends in as yeah.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And we should point out that it doesn't matter who

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is eating, if he is eating or I'm eating, or

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>she's eating or they're eating, it's all. It's all the

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>same exactly.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 2>There's no irregular verbs. It's beautiful right in past tense

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 2>instead of something like sing sang song, where it should

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 2>all just be sing singed, singed. Uh, that's what he does.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I know it sounds weird, doesn't it. Well, sure, but

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 2>that's what he does. In this Everything in past tense

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 2>ends in ees, so manges, yeah, I ate, you ate,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 2>they ate. It's all. It's all mangaz. And then with

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 2>future it's man Joe's. And then with command you just

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>add a you ooh manjou, and that's it. That's how

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 2>you conjugate verbs. There's no exceptions to that rule at all.

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's pretty amazing. I guess it just

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that because I kind of struggled with why

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>other languages are so irregular. But if it's organic in

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>its growth, then that's just bound to happen. I think

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I looked up why, and it's actually fascinating. It's because

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>these languages often absorb other people from other language groups,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 2>and they bring their words with them, and so languages

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>grow by adopting other words changing, and so rather than

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>completely altering, you know how something that usually ends an

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>ed like sing, instead of just totally altering how it

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>used to be, you just kind of change it to

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the new form like sang or song. It's that's how

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>irregular verbs come up. Nobody's like, I really want to

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 2>screw people up in the future. I'm going to add this.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 2>It just happens, you know, organically, So when you set

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>about creating a constructed language, you can purposely deliberately avoid

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>any irregular verbs and make it that much easier to learn.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>My question that came up, Chuck, is how long, yes,

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I set up, Chuck, how long does it take until

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>a language like Esperanto starts developing irregular verbs?

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have a strong feeling and I'd love to

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>hear from some esperantists that they fight that tooth and

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>nail because that defeats the whole purpose and spirit of it.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, hasn't happened yet, then, is that answer?

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be my guess. Yeah, I'm on record.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'd love to hear from them too.

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>There, but if you haven't noticed that Esperanto and this

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is a word you might not know, but it's called

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>an agglutenative language, which is the words are formed from

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>combinations of short words basically which English has a lot

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of those. All language has a lot of those, but

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Esperanto has all those.

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you've got your root word and then you

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>have affixes, prefixes and sufffixes and kind of like how

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>you conjugate it with the eye for to eat or

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 2>an as for you eat. That's that's it, that's the whole,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the whole grammar. Right. So the reason why he

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 2>did this again because not just like irregular verbs, but

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>weird words that all describe the same thing is another

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>thing that creeps into language organically. They've used the example

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>of tree. Right. You know what a tree is an

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>English it's one of those plants that's got the wood

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>in the bark and the leaves, and they're tall and everything.

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Everybody loves to hug them.

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh, tree makes sense. But rather than young tree, we

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>have the word sapling, which combines proto Indo European and

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>proto Germanic words in English. Cute word though, sapling it

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 2>is because it means young tree. It's the young version

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of a tree. It's very cute. A bunch of trees

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>is called a forest. That's old French from Latin. And

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>then a botanical garden that has a bunch of trees

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>is arboretum. That's just straight up Latin. All of those

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>are English words sapling, forest, arboretum, and none of them

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>sound like tree. So by creating roots that just describe

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>one thing and then adjusting what they mean by adding

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a prefix or a suffix, but keeping that root word,

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>he got around that kind of conundrum.

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, for instance, tree and esperanto is arbo. That

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>young tree, which is a sapling for us is an arbito.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And as we'll see, ido is sort of the suffix

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for any kind of baby version of something which is taken,

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and a Spanish does that, like there were two Chucks

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at my job at a Mexican restaurant, and I was

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>chuck Eto cute because I was younger than the original chi.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't that a taco bell menu item in the nineties?

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably so two chuqitos in and another chuquito, three chuquitos.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>A young tree instead of a sapling is an arbido.

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of trees instead of a forest is an arborrow.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And then that botanical garden instead of an arboretum is

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>an arboretto. And you might think, well, that sounds a

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lot like our arboretum. Well it does, but it also

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds like arbo, arbido and a barrow exactly right.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So you see any of those words and you know

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 2>it's talking about a tree. And then when you learn

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>edo means a younger version of it, or r means

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the the like a group of whatever you're talking about,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 2>you just learned a ton of grammar just right off

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 2>the back. And then also note that all those in

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>an oh because they're all nouns. And again all nouns

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and in oh in Esperanto.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we mentioned edo id o as a suffix

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning like the small version of something or a baby something.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And we also mentioned that there wasn't gender. That there

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is but uh not in terms of like you know,

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>how you will conjugate a sentence. Uh, it's just a suffix.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's i n o is a female version of something.

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>You also have a r O, which is a group

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>like vorto v o r t o is a word,

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>vortarro is dictionary. Uh, it just makes a lot of sense.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.239
<v Speaker 1>E j o and uh, the ja's a pronounced as

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a y. Isn't that right? Uh? E j oh is

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a place for something? So k u I r I.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>How would you pronounce that?

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Cooerio cooler? Oh, corey cool? Why do you ask me

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to pronounce this?

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Because I got it.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>A couery is to cook, and then what's kitchen? Cooer

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ao right, So you add the e j o So, uh,

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that is the place where you would cook.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense. Right. That's not to say that Esperando

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have words that you just have to memorize, because

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't quite work. Because, for example, there's a couple

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 2>of places where you'll find a lot of books, like

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 2>a library or a bookstore. Right, So a library, you'd

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 2>think would be called the librereo or place of books,

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>but actually it's called a biblioteco. A libreo is the bookstore.

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like just kind of nitpicking. But if

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you ever arranged to meet your friend at the libreo

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and they don't they think that that's the bookstore, you're

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be sitting there waiting in the library for

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 2>them a long time.

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and in fact, you know adding and I find

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this like part of the spirit of Esperanto is super cool,

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and that they encourage you to create words as long

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as they follow the rules and make sense. So to

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>attack these effixes and suffixes under root words and Dave

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>uws this, this is so great. Gosh, this just makes

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>me crazy, how great it is. Hospital. The word hospital

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in Esperanto is mal sanu lejo, right, yes, does that

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>make sense? So m al and Esperanto is opposite of

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the s, a n is healthy, The ul means people.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>The e jo, remember, as we said, means the place

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>where something is. And so a hospital directly translated is

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>not healthy people place, which could be a lot of

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>places here in the West.

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 2>But so it's kind of like Esperantos like to put

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>words together like you do in a scrabble game. And

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the reason that it's encouraged is because out of the

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 2>gate Zamenhoff, like like you said, made this open source

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 2>and said, here, take this and just do what you

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>will with it and make it grow. And that's how

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>that's why esperano is still around. And one of the

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 2>reasons it's the planted vollapuke puk because the guy who

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 2>created valla puke, he he was very controlling, kept a

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>controlling like grip on it, and so that made it

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 2>like a dying language right out of the gate, because

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 2>you you have to let language grow and become organic

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>on its own. Apparently he was like, Nope, God told

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>me to do this, so I really need to keep

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>a sharp eye on it.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think we should also talk about the word

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for jet lag because it's also just super fun. Yeah,

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and we could do this all day long, but just

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>these two examples are really great. Horror zo noso horzonozo

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 1>h o r z in o zo exactly how it sounds,

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that is, h O r's time zone is z O

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>N and then illness is ozo. So the Esperanto translation

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is time zone illness.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it makes a lot of sense.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I love that, and that sounds it's a lot of

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like how it would be transcribed or subtitled

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in like China or something from English.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, I came across something. Did you see

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 2>what I sent you about English translated into English is

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of hilarious.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, oh you didn't.

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I found a I don't remember what paper it was,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 2>but as an example, they translated I do not understand

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 2>into several languages, and one of them was English. And

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 2>if you literally translate I do not understand into English,

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 2>it's I may not understand. I think about it like

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what that means, But it's not at all

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>what you think of. Like I do not understand sounds right,

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>even though what you're saying literally is I may not understand,

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 2>because do means make I literally.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I do not understand.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I just I had to mention that. It just cracked

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 2>me up.

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>No, that's really funny. All right, So let's take our

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>second break. I'm not even asking this time, and we'll

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>come back and talk about where Esperanto went from there

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>right after this.

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 2>So, Chuck, we talked a lot about how how doctor

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Esperanto Zamenhoff the reasons why he created Esperanto, and that

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>was goal number two was to to create like a

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 2>language that united the world, right, easy to learn, united

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 2>the world. And he originally based it on something he

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 2>called Hillalism, after hillel the Elder, a Jewish stage from

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the first century BCE, and Hillelle's teachings can basically be

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 2>summed up as the golden rule, like treat others as

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 2>you'd like them to treat you. He changed that name

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 2>very quickly to homara nismo, which means basically humanitarianism, but

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 2>the whole idea was the same. He called it the

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 2>internal ideo the internal idea of Esperanto, which is that

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 2>it can remove those language barriers, those culture burials, barriers

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 2>between people and to by doing so, you make people

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 2>recognize that we're all humans.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he I think realized at some point again

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that sort of attaching an ism to something maybe might

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 1>keep people from wanting to learn it. And I think

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they were also Esperantis. Dave said that a lot of

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>them were French intellectuals that were like, no, no, no,

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to attach this to an ism. So

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it officially wasn't attached to an ism. But I do

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think the spirit of all that is a big part

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of Esperanto still. Yeah, some people who want to learn

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it even though it's not an official like ethic.

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:53.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so I mean, just right off the bat,

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 2>they had the first international or Universal Congress of Esperano

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen oh fives, and in that conference a schism

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 2>created or was created in like a whole other language,

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.439
<v Speaker 2>like a version of Esperanto called Edo that was even

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 2>easier to learn, was introduced, and that group just went

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 2>off and did their own thing, which kind of hamstrung

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Esperanto as it was really starting to take off. But

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Edo you don't hear about any longer. You still hear

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 2>about Esperanto. I'm not one hundred percent sure why. Maybe

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 2>it is because it had an ethic or a moral

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 2>to it in addition to being easy to learn. That's like,

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 2>that's my guess. But Zamenhoff died in nineteen seventeen, and

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 2>what Sad Dave points out, he lived long enough to

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 2>see World War One, which I didn't read anything he

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 2>wrote about it directly, but he would have been really

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 2>bummed by that, because that is not that's what he

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>was creating Esperanto to avoid.

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, during his life he was now dominated fourteen

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>times fourteen never won, unfortunately for the Nobel Peace Prize,

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and post World War One, when the League of Nations

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was created, to know, to stop something like that from

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>happening again didn't work. In that very first meeting, there

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was a proposal to teach Esperanto in schools to member countries,

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>which was pretty remarkable. It didn't happen because the French

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>delegation vetoed that and they said French is already the

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>universal language, which is so haughty, but that's they literally

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>kept Esperanto like who knows where it would be now

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>if they hadn't to stop.

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 2>That same thing with the US at the United Nations

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in the forties after the UN was founded, somebody said, hey,

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 2>we should all learn Esperanto, and the US said, no,

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 2>English is already a universal language. And that actually shows

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>how language can like enhance the standing of the countries

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 2>that speak that language that the rest of the world

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 2>sees is basically a universal language and why Esperanto didn't

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 2>do that because it didn't come from any country, didn't

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>come from any ethnic group or any region. It was

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 2>a from scratch universal grammar that wouldn't enhance one nation

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 2>over others.

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not everyone loved it. If you think, like who

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe wouldn't like it? Who wouldn't like this language created

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>from a Jewish man Hitler, you would be correct. It's

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>written about n mind comp he said. Hitler said that

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>it was a secret Jewish language he used to plot

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>against Germany. And I don't know if anyone ever went

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>over to him, probably not and said, DeFi you can

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>actually it's not secret at all. You can learn it

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in fearsick hours conversationally. So I don't know. Hitler being Hitler,

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>there were and of course you know, I'm sort of

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>joking about that, but it was no joke at all,

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because Hitler and others would round up Esperanto speakers and

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>jail them or kill them. And in fact Hitler took

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>his family, his surviving family, that is, to the Warsaw

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Ghetto and all three of Zamenhoff's children were killed by Nazis. Yeah,

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's brutal.

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Stalin did the same thing, which I guess is why

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>it seems at first surprising that he learned Esperanto, but

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 2>he called it the language of the spies, so I

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 2>guess he was just.

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>That's probably why I learned exactly.

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 2>But even if you were a loyal Communist Party member,

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you would be killed for knowing Esperanto, which is funny

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 2>because it was frequently accused of being a secret Communist

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 2>plot itself, so right, that kind of goes to show

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 2>you just how nationless Esperanto actually was.

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, if you get online today, if you're interested

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.479
<v Speaker 1>in this and you want to know, like, who's how's

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it going today with Esperanto? Who's speaking it? Are people

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>into it? Yeah? People are into it. There is. It's

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>not a huge community, but it's a very passionate community

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of people all over the world. People like Ben Bowlin,

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>they find each other online. It's very easy to do that.

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Obviously before the Internet, they would they would have local

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>clubs and stuff like that. They would have pen pals

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way that people would spread any message.

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Pre Internet, they were doing that in Esperanto. And there

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are you know, there are conferences. I think there's one

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty four Universala Congresso is in Tanzania this year,

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty cool, and it sounds just like they

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>get together, they speak Esperanto. They work hard to keep

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>this language and this idea alive, which is a very Again,

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still a noble pursuit.

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 2>And Esperanto has its own teaching app, learn new with

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:49.879
<v Speaker 2>an exclavation point at learnu dot net. You can also

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 2>pick it up on Duo Linguo and Babble. But I've

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 2>looked on Duo Linguo. They have three hundred and eighty

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 2>one thousand people signed up to learn Esperanto, which is

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 2>more than cling on, more than Navajo, and more than Yiddish.

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.959
<v Speaker 2>It's toward the bottom, but it's still not the last one.

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Three hundred and eighty thousand people world wide is nothing

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 2>to sneeze at.

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Heck no, it's more than klingon.

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 2>There's also a couple of podcasts Radio Esperanto. Radio, by

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the way, is the same word in English and Esperanto. Oh,

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 2>I already ended within an US persone American in person. Okay,

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 2>but you have to probably kind of know already a

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit of Esperanto.

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I meant to check that out. I'm going to

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to one of those and just see if I

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>can understand anything like.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they said radio again, I know what that means.

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 2>One other thing before we leave. Do you have anything else?

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I got it? One and so two things.

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well you go first, Okay.

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen oh five we mentioned that year earlier. What year

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>was that? Was that? The first year of.

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 2>The first Congress, the Universal Congress.

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>The first Congress. Well that makes sense then, because that

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was the year that the Esperanto flag was debuted. It

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is called the Verda stello or the green Star, and

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it. It's nice. It's a green rectangle. It's got

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a little white square in the upper left corner and

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a green star inside that white square. And apparently that

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was a big part of the branding the color green. LLL.

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Early On wanted it to all sort of look the

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>same and feel the same. So his pamphlets and books

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and everything was in green. And I think green's just

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a big esper or I'm sorry, verdo is a big

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Esperanto color. Yeah, Verda.

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 2>That's that's branding, one oh one, branding, one on one. Okay,

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Well I'll say mine, then you can finish with years.

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to talk about Incubus real quick, that

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty five sixty six Shatner.

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Movie I watched a little bit.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I did too, and it is really hard to follow.

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And when you're listening to them speak, you're like, oh,

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 2>this is okay. It's esperanto. If you speak Esperanto, it

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 2>drives you up the wall because apparently no one in

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the film knew Esperanto. I learned their dialogue in two

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 2>weeks and there was no one who knew Esperanto on

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the set to coach them. So it's just a moment

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 2>after moment of bad Esperanto pronunciation. And I saw in

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Quartz there was an article that quoted like a film

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 2>reviewer from the age who said that Incubus is like

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 2>a foreign film from a country that never existed.

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>What a great dissa.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 2>I thought so too. We're checking out five minutes of it.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, that's it. That's it.

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, if you want to know more about Esperanto, everybody,

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 2>go check it out. You do worse than starting No,

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 2>actually you couldn't do worse than starting with Incubus, but

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 2>start there anyway. And since I said Incubus, it's time

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:37.919
<v Speaker 2>for listener mail.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this eight quite right. Hey, guys, listen

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to the latest episode. I got a kick out of

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Josh saying that people who requit and this is on

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>dry cleaning, who request a double crease in their pants

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>ain't quite right.

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 2>I stand by there.

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like a Southern itsm I guess. I used

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to live in Miami. Now I'm back in Maryland, where

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I've along go Hagar's town flying box cars. And I

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:08.240
<v Speaker 1>worked as a housekeeper for the opulently wealthy one woman

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I could name drop, but I won't requested from her

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>housekeepers that her bed sheets be ironed, no joke. She

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted her flat and fitted king sized bed sheets laundered

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and ironed every day. Wow, here's the kicker. This woman

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>almost became my mother in law. But I digress. Definitely

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not quite right. Love the show, guys. It's my news source,

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>my companion, my teacher, and has given an otherwise awkward

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>me plenty of knowledge to be able to connect with

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>someone on almost any topic. And that was a lovely

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>email from the wonderful Ashlan Powers.

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot, Ashlan, that was great. I would divide

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 2>you against using us as your news source though, but

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 2>other than that, thank you very much.

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Agreed.

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 2>If you want to be like Ashlin and tell us

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a great little anecdote leaving out the names to protect

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the not necessarily innocent, but you know, just out of tact,

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you can do so via email send it off to

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff Podcasts at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.