WEBVTT - A Verdict 

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>No welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westerveldt. This week

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there was some huge news related to our most recent

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>season in Guyana. A verdict came through on one of

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the cases that we covered, the one that Melinda Jenkie

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>filed that had to do with insurance and particularly with

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>something called financial assurance. The case argued that Guyana's Environmental

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Protection Agency it's EPA, had failed to require proof from

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>SOO Exon subsidiary in Guyana and from Exon Mobile itself

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of liability coverage needed for a risky

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>offshore oil project like the one that's happening offshore Guyana

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. The law asks not only for an insurance

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>policy from the local operator, but also for an unlimited

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>guarantee from the parent company, in this case Exon Mobile,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that it will cover any damages related to the particular

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>activity that's being permitted, in this case, oil drilling. Part

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of the argument was that an oil spill offshore Guyana

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>would not only impact Guyana, but could potentially impact multiple

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>other countries nearby. In fact, Exon's own environmental impact assessment

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>for its most recent well indicated that a massive oil

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>spill offshore Guyana could impact up to fourteen Caribbean countries.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Those are all countries that depend on fishing and tourism

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for their economies. What this case argued was that the

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>government was allowing Exon to ramp up production quickly to

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>get around certain permitting requirements, while also not requiring that

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it had this level of liability coverage, opening up the

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>country Guyana to enormous financial risk because imagine if there

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was a deep water offshore blowout and it did impact

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen Caribbean countries, where would those countries go looking to

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cover those damages. If there was no policy in place

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>requiring Exxon to pay for those damages, those countries would

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be coming to the government of Guyana. The judge in

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this case issued an absolutely blistering ruling against Exxon and

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Guyanese EPA. He called what's been happening in egregious

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs that has engulfed the Environmental Protection Agency

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in a quagmire of its own making. He also wrote

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that quote in the course of these proceedings, the court

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>found on the evidence before it that So Exploration and

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Production Guyana Limited was engaged in a disingenuous attempt which

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>was calculated to deceive when it sought to dilute its

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>liabilities and settled obligations stipulated and expressed in clear unambiguous

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>terms while simultaneously optimizing production at the Eliza Phase IE

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>petroleum production project in the Stopwrich Block offshore Guyana. He

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>goes on to write so Exploration and Production Guyana Limited

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a course of action made permissible only by

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the omissions of a derelict client and submissive Environmental Protection Agency.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Elsewhere in the ruling, he writes these matters were not

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>unknown to SOO or the EPA, and consistent with the

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>benefits of its petroleum production activities to which SOO is

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>entitled comes the burden of fulfilling its obligations under the permit,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and the agency sought refuge in silence, avoidance, concealment, and secrecy,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding the grave potential danger and consequences to the state

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and citizens if an event occurred at the Eliza Phase

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I petroleum production facilities in the Stabwrich Bloc offshore Guyana

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in absence of such financial assurances. He concludes that the

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Environmental Protection Agency is in breach of its statutory duty

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>by its failure and or omissions to enforce compliance by

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>SO Exploration and Production Guyana Limited of its financial assurance obligations.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He orders the Environmental Protection Agency to issue an enforcement

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>notice on or before May ninth, less than a week

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>from the date of the ruling directed to SO Exploration

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and Production Guyana Limited to perform its obligations. First to

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>provide within thirty days the unlimited liability parent company Guarantee

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>agreement and or an unlimited liability Affiliate company guarantee to

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>indemnify and keep and debat the Government of Guyana and

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the Agency against all such environmental obligations of so SO

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and its co venturers within the stopwrit bloc. They also

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have to provide proof of environmental liability insurance, as is

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>customary in international petroleum industry, in accordance with the conditions

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of its permit. It says, if they fail to provide

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>both of these things, its permit stands suspended. The judge

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>also tackled the question of standing in this case, which

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is really really interesting. SO had argued that the particular

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs bringing this case to individual citizens, one of whom

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>we actually heard from this season, Frederick Collins, the President

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of Transparency Guyana International. However, the organization that he works

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for was not a party to this case. He was

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a plaintiff in this case as an individual, as was

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>mister Godfrey.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>White also argued that these two men had no standing

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that Guyanese citizens can't bring a case like this because

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>it has to do with the regulatory structure and the company,

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:19.119
<v Speaker 2>and they referred to these plaintiffs as meddlesome, meddlesome busybodies.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>The judge said, yeah, no, Actually, citizens need to be

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 2>able to bring cases that are in the public interest,

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>especially in situations like this where there are major environmental implications.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's a huge precedent to set too. I caught

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>up with Melinda Jenki the day after the ruling came

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 2>out to hear what she thought about it and to

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>hear what kind of message this sends, what kind of

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 2>precedent it sets, both in Guyana and beyond. That conversation

0:06:51.480 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>has come up after this quick break. So first I'd

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>love to get just your initial reaction to the ruling

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>when it first first came out.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's an excellent ruling. I mean, the judge

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>said that the EPA's lax behavior had put this nation

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>and its people in grave danger of calamitous disaster. And

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 3>so immediately what you have is a very strong statement

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>of the situation as it is. Remember Exxon, so the

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Exxon subsidiary has admitted in court that they've been using

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>faulty equipment, and they've admitted in public that they're operating

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>above the safety limits. So that's very dangerous for Guyana.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>And it means that if there's any kind of oil spill, disaster,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to blow out, whatever God forbid, any of that should happen,

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Guyana would be liable for all of that because the

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 3>insurance is not in place and the parent company guarantee

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>is not in place. And the judge has corrected that

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 3>by ordering the EPA to enforce the environmental permit. I mean,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>where else in the world would you have such dangerous

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>deep water operations going on without proper insurance and without

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 3>having the finance in place to protect the home country.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I'm curious. I know that the government has

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>said that they plan to appeal and whatnot, but I'm

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>assuming that the ruling is the ruling in the meantime,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and they are under pressure to correct this fairly quickly.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's just be clear the government cannot appeal this ruling.

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 3>They're not a party to the case.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, it's the EPA that would have to appeal.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>So only the EPA or so can appeal. Yeah, and

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the EPA is not the government. The EPA is an

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>independent statutory authority. Now, if the government is instructing the

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>EPA to appeal, then that's clearly unlawful. And that and

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>if the EPR were to then act on the basis

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 3>of instructions from the politicians, that action would be unlawful

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and it would be open to judicial review on the

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>grounds that the EPO was carrying out instructions that were

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>not part of its mandate.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Right right.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's well, it's a very foolish course of action

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 3>for any government to take, is to say publicly that

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>they're going to appeal a case that they're not a

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>party to, and therefore implying that they have some control

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 3>over an independent statutory authority.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's interesting. That's very interesting.

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 3>It's an independent statutory authority. I mean, I wrote the

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>legislation that set this thing up.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I thought that was really interesting actually too

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that at several points in the ruling the judge mentioned

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>how SOO had tried to sort of tell the court

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 2>what some of these laws meant, and I wanted to

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>get your take on that that approach that they have

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>taken in this case.

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Look, the I mean SO obviously has to be advised

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 3>by its own lawyers, and I can't comment on that.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>We put in our submissions, and clearly the judge has

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>ruled on the basis that he thinks he agrees with

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 3>our submissions, and he's given a judgment that is based

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 3>on law and legal principle. So's views on what the

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 3>law says are completely irrelevant. I mean, so, these are

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>business people. The business model depends on polluting the atmosphere

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and the ocean with greenhouse gases. They make them money

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>out of destroying the climate and making the ocean more acid.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's what they do. Law is not their concern.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>They take advice from their lawyers.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious to hear what you think, like, what kind

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>of message this sends, both in Guyana and beyond to

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>all of the countries that oil majors are operating in.

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 2>What kind of precedent does this sad and sort of

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>message does it sound?

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think there's some really significant messages here, I

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 3>mean the top line. Two ordinary citizens in this little

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 3>country which most people can't find on the map. Two

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 3>of them have gone to court and they've beaten the EPA.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 3>But they've also beaten Exxon Mobile. And this is really

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>a victory for the people by the people. I think

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>we have to give full CDOs to his honor Justice

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Sandil Kisun. He put the rule of law above the

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 3>interests of Exxon Mobile. That's massive. That's what every judge,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 3>every country should be doing. And I think this decision

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 3>sets the standard for judges everywhere, not just in Guyana,

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 3>but across the world.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Is there any sense that the judges ruling will be

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>politicized in some way that you know, it will get

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the sort of oh, he's just against the PPP or whatever,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that kind of reaction from folks.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>This is a decision that puts the interests to Guyana

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 3>and the nation foremost. It's a decision that upholds the

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 3>rule of law. It's a decision that says you s

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 3>so took a business decision to accept this permit, and

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.359
<v Speaker 3>you signed for it, and you agreed to provide the insurance,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 3>and you agreed to provide the parent company, the unlimited

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>parent company guarantee, and you, the EPA, have a job

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 3>to enforce that permit, so you will need to provide

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that insurance and that unlimited parent company guarantee. Now, if

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 3>anybody tries to politicize that decision, they are going to

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 3>look extremely foolish. The government is already looking silly by

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>saying that it's going to appeel the decision, and people

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 3>are asked, why is the government taking this attitude and

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 3>appearing to be on the side of ess rather than

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>on the side of the country. This ruling, once the

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>insurance and the guarantee are in place, means that Guyana

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 3>is no longer potentially liable for billions of US dollars.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>So who would actually question that? Why would anybody question

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>a decision by the judge which says, enforce the permit,

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>comply with your obligations, and make sure that this country

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>does not suffer as a result of your default or

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 3>bad behavior. I mean, he didn't use those exact words,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm saying.

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I thought that was really interesting about

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>this case in general, just the extent to which SO

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 2>SO and the EPA were really partners. You know, talking

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>about this stuff, and I'm curious for your thoughts on

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 2>that too, just just the extent to which the EPA

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be very much, I don't know, just sort

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>of complying with the way that so slash Axon wanted

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to handle things.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think it's clear from the decision that the

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>relationship between the EPA and SO has not been the

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 3>relationship that you would expect from the regulator and the

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>entity being regulated. The EPA has been far too compliant,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 3>hasn't done its job, and so SO has been allowed

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to get away with breaching its permit. And the result

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 3>of that, the judge says that lack of vigilance by

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 3>the EPA and its lack of enforcement has put the

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>quoting now put this nation and its people in grave

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>potential danger of calamitous disaster. So the EPA has been

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>completely irresponsible. The judge has corrected that situation, and everybody

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>in the country should be cheering this decision. Every politician,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 3>every business person, every activist, academic student, everybody should be

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 3>cheering this decision because it's protecting Guyana. It's protecting every

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>single one of us.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, it also really seems like a good proof

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>point that the court is not being influenced by either

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the government or corporate interests, which should make anyone in

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>any country feel like, Okay, we have a functional court system.

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 2>This is good. Yeah.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I think this judge deserves a real recognition and praise

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>from around the world for taking this position. This is

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 3>a country that is very new to oil and gas,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and he says that we've seen politicians across the divide,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 3>whether it's the PPP or the ATNEU or the AFC

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 3>or whoever, all completely pro oil irresponsibly, So throwing caution

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>to the winds over excited about Guyana becoming an oil producer.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>And now you've got the voice of reason coming in

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and saying, wait a minute, there is something called the

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>rule of law, and we're going to uphold it. There

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>are rules here to protect the people of Guyana and

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the environment of Guyana and the Caribbean, and this judge

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>is going to uphold those rules.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought that his stance on standing was also

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>really important. You know this idea that look, especially when

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it comes to things like environmental regulation, it's important to

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>protect the ability of citizens to bring public interest suits.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 2>And I'm curious what you thought about that that part

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I've impressed you really have read the decision.

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've highlighted many parts.

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think what you have there is a

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 4>really good statement of judicial review.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Judicial review is basically the rule of law in action.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>We depend on citizens to go to court and say, look,

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 3>there isn't there is abuse of power by this public authority,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 3>and you, the court, do want you to step in

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 3>and put a stop to this abuse. And by ruling

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 3>on standing in this suaity, the judge is basically saying,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 3>in the modern era, everybody has a right now, every

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 3>citizen has a right to go to court to protect

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the public interest, and the traditional rules on standing are

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 3>inappropriate for the situation that we are in now, and

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 3>that actually we have to have these rules of standing.

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>This is a really good modern decision based on the

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 3>legal principles.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Good. Well, I was just saying someone this morning like that,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I would love to see a ruling like this from

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the US Supreme Court, and it feels like totally wishful thinking.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 2>So so yeah, it was. It was. It was a

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>good read. Okay, excellent, I guess yeah, what are just

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>the next steps for you on this case? Are you

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of waiting to see if if anything gets filed

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and then and then you know, proceed from there. Are

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>you looking at okay? If if the government you know,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 2>is making public statements about this, then possibly that could

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 2>be a case as well. I know there might be

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 2>things you can't discuss, but to the extent that you

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>can share, what's what's next on this for you?

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, to be honest, I think the most important thing

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 3>right now is to get people in Guyana to understand

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>the immense significance of this case. The judge has put

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the root of law above the interests of Excelmobile. So

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 3>all of those people who've been running around saying, oh,

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 3>you can't do anything, you can't do anything, now they

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>don't have an excuse. Red Thread, which is a group

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 3>of activists women, were out on Wednesday protesting and campaigning

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 3>in order to get the insurance in place, and people

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>were saying to them that they support Red Thread, but

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 3>they don't think they'll get anywhere on the insurance. And

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 3>of course this ruling comes out saying that ESSO has

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 3>to provide the insurance. And I think that sense a

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 3>really important message to people, and it says stop giving

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 3>way to despair, stop looking for excuses. Actually, you have

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the power to act, so act because it brings results.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 3>And again this is two people to ordinary citizens who

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>went to court. There's no CSO involved in this sign up.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 3>The Bloomberg article says it's Transparency Institute Guyana Inc. But

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not. It's Fred Collins and God free weight to individuals.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 3>So the next step, I think the really important thing

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 3>is to get people to understand that they have this

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 3>power and that they have an obligation to protect democracy

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>in Guyana, that they have the power to stand up

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>instead of just complaining about things not being right have

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 3>they can act and they will get.

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, and that the court will actually hear them and

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 2>rule accordingly. That is it's so important for people to

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 2>feel like it's not a lost cause to take a

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>case like this to court.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think this also sends a message to the

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 3>judiciary because we have we have had a case, the

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>gains Skin case before the Chief Justice where the Chief

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Justice took over a year to give a decision and

0:20:54.400 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>that's in breach of national law, specifically in breach of

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the time limit for Judicial Decisions Act and in breach

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 3>of the cases in the Caribbean Court of Justice, which

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>is our highest court of appeal. This case, Justice Casson,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>took from start to finish in eight months.

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was shocked at how quickly the ruling came out.

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 3>This is what you want in a judicial review case,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 3>because every day in which you're waiting for a decision

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>is a day in which a public authority, and in

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 3>this case so is acting on lawfully. So judicial review

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 3>is always urgent. The judges are expected to move swiftly,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 3>and the judge in this case has shown that it

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 3>is possible to do that, so that sends a very

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 3>clear message to the rest of the judiciary. We have

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 3>another case before the Chief Justice in which the hearing

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>ended in May last year. It's again May, and we

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 3>still have not heard a decision from the Chief Justice,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 3>even though we've written several letters. So I think looking ahead,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 3>I would hope to see decisions coming a lot faster

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>on these judicial review decisions. Now it's not acceptable, I think,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to be waiting for a year for a decision, and

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 3>it's it's certainly contrary to national law and contrary to

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>the rulings of the Caribbean Court of Justice. So it's

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 3>a most unfortunate situation in these other in the other

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 3>cases that I mentioned.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I also thought it was really interesting how many times

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the judge emphasized that the issue of you know, whether

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 2>or not the law requires financial assurance and this this

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 2>parent company guarantee, Like he said sort of over and

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 2>over again, like it's not complicated because because you know

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 2>s O and the kind of message that like, well,

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 2>the law is really complicated, it's open to interpretition and

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that seemed really important to me too,

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that like he sort of repeated over and over again, like, look,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 2>this is not actually that complicated of an issue with

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the loss as this. It's very clear both sides understood it.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I agree completely with the judge. I have no

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 3>idea why you thought it was complicated, and if it was.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 3>If they did think it was complicated, surely they would

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>have obtained a competent legal advice before signing a document

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 3>that they thought was complicated. So if they didn't, So

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 3>if they thought it was complicated and they didn't get

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 3>proper legal advice, what's going on there? If it was

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 3>complicated and they got proper legal advice, why are you

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 3>coming back and saying you don't understand it or it's complicated,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, yeah, it just doesn't make sense.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I know, it almost it seemed to me more like

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 2>something they wanted to convince the public of that like this, Oh,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 2>actually the problem is that this law is complicated and

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 2>open to interpretation. I don't know, it was Oh yeah,

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. That's what it seemed like to me,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>because they mentioned it in a lot of their marketing

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 2>videos too, that like, you know, it's it's a complex issue,

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 2>but don't worry, we have the right insurance in place,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and and and like I you know, it was interesting

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 2>to me that this so far, of all the court cases,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>this is the only one that I've seen sort of

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>multiple Exon videos about.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>So On is of course entitled to say whatever they want.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 3>The question is whether people believe them. The question is

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 3>whether people trust what Exon Mobil says. And I think

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 3>perhaps a more important question is whether they're investors and

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>the market have confidence in Exon Mobil and its business

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 3>plan and the things that it's saying. I don't know

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 3>the answer to that.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that should be because actually the main group that

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 2>they have messaged to about how great it is that

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>they're moving so quickly is shareholders. So it'll be interesting

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>to see if that tune changes.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean I wonder whether they thought this went

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 3>through because to be operating above the safety levels of

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 3>your fbso your floating production storage, offloading vessels, and to

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 3>be using Faulter equipment, those are not items that would

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 3>fill a shareholder with confidence, particularly when you think that

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 3>this is dangerous deep water drilling. This is one hundred

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 3>and twenty miles off shore, the oil is about a

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>mile below, the ocean is about a mile deep, and

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the oil is you know, I think about another mile

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 3>below the seabed. This is extremely dangerous. And then when

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 3>you add to that, clearly a lax regulator. In fact,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the message to shareholders is not, look, it's wonderful, we're

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 3>moving so fast. It seems to me that one could

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 3>reasonably conclude from the operations and the lax regulation that

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 3>this is a very risky operation, and in fact, shareholders

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>might want to think about the implications.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but again, you know, that's why it's important to

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>have a judge that reminds the EPA of its job.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think this also has implications for business, because

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 3>what business requires above what else is a level playing field,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 3>rules that apply to everybody and that are enforced equally

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>against all of this entities in the sector. Now, if

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 3>you've got one one operator think they have a collaborative

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 3>relationship with the regulator, that's actually really bad for business

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 3>and really bad for the country.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you want to attract investment, and yet you're boasting

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 3>that there's a collaborative relationship between the regulator and one

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 3>of the entities, and the government is saying they want

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 3>to attract investment that they want to develop, and yet

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>they can't even meet the very basic standards that you

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>require for business, which is which is a level playing field,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a market in which everybody, everybody knows what the rules are,

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and all the entities in that market about the rules,

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>and they know that the rules are going to be

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 3>enforced equally against all of them, no favors for anybody.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise you're distorting competition.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this bonus episode. Thanks for listening. We

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>will have a more detailed story on this ruling on

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>our website at Drilled podcast dot com. I'll also have

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a story in the Intercept coming this week. We might

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>have something in the Guardian as well, So keep an

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>eye out. There's a lot more coming on this story.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and we'll see you next time.