WEBVTT - How Instagram Turned Into a Giant Market for Food

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But knowledge to work and grow your business with c

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>i T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>T dot com Put Knowledge to Work. We want to

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>take a quick moment to let you know about something

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>really new that's cool from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>can use our io s app or Google Chrome extension

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to scan the news, look at any story on any website,

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and instantly bring up news and information from Bloomberg relevant

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>to what you're reading about. Yeah, it's pretty cool. So

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it means that no matter where you're reading the news,

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you can basically bring all the data information that's on

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg with you. It's kind of fun to test out, right,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Right. So if you're reading a story about Tesla

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or Microsoft or Apple or Facebook, you can immediately bring

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>up news and data from Bloomberg. And of course we

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have all the news and data in the world. It's

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>really all awesome. You should check it out by downloading

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the iOS app or search the Bloomberg extension on the

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Chrome Store to try it out. Yeah, and it's called lens.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>We should probably say what it's called, right, all right, right,

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's called lens. Learn more at bloomberg dot com slash lens.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allowitt and I'm Joe Wisenthal. Uh. The other day,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I was walking home and I saw this huge line

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 1>outside of a new store slash restaurant that was about

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a block away from me, and it was just this

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>massive line around the block. And I was said, Oh,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what's what's this line for? Uh? You know, are people

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as it sneakers? Is it some celebrity Inside? It turned

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out that everyone was buying this ice cream that was

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>wrapped in a gigantic, fluffy waffle and they had all

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>these sprinkles and other crazy toppings on it. And I

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>was just certain that the only reason people were standing

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in line to buy it, because it just looked like

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>ice cream and a waffle, was because it was gonna

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>look really good on their Instagrams and they were going

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to rack up a bunch of Instagram likes. And that

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was a reason that people were lining up in a

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>fairly chilly day for what looked like a line that

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I lasted about an hour Uh, yeah, well you don't

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>need to tell me. Um. When I lived in New York,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I lived right next to the Dominic and Sell Bakery,

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the place where they sell crow nuts, and I got

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to witness the craziness every morning firsthand. So I would

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>see the people lining up at six am in the

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>freezing cold. I would see the people that those people

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hired to wait in line for them and then deliver

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>crown nuts. That was interesting. Um. But the reason we're

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about this slightly random subject is because we are

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>actually devoting this entire episode too. I guess we could say,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like the economics of Instagram. Is that a good way

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to put it, yeah, Or Instagram is sort of this

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>food marketplace. You know. The other fascinating, fascinating thing about

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the chronut phenomenon, to me, it was not just that

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>people that are essentially a food went viral and all

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>these people lined up to buy them, but that it

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>would it then it happened globally almost instantly, so all

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>around the world, whether it's other parts of the country, London, Korea,

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>everyone had their chron nut knockoff within a matter of

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>days or weeks. And I really think that the sort

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram phenomenon is indispensable to understanding what's going on

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in these this new world of viral foods. Yeah, indeed,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and I mean I have so many questions. My major

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>question is like, what makes your picture of avocado toast

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>better than the millions of pictures of avocado toasts that

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have come before you? And why do human being seemed

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to have this like relentless interest in pictures of food

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram? And Joe, Before we start, I'm just going

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to give one big caveat, which is that this subject

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>might make me slightly grouchy. As you know. Wait, I

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thought you were really I thought, well, we'll see. We'll

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>see what part of it sets you off and makes

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>you grouchy. But we'll leave everyone in suspense for that,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>all right. So we actually have two people who are

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us today to talk about the subject. We have

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Julie Verhage. She's a reporter at Bloomberg and she's managed

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to turn herself into a little bit of the hipster

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>slash Instagram correspondent. And we also have Amanda Topper. She

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is a food blogger and a prolific instagrammer, so she'll

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be able, hopefully to tell us all about how this works.

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you both, Hei there, thank you, Good morning, Julie.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we start with you, Um, you've been covering

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>this and you know, we talk about taking pictures of

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>food as this kind of funny, amusing thing that's been

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>happening for a while now, but you actually wrote an

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>article the other day about how this trend is impacting

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 1>physical commodities prices right, everything from color flower prices to

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>cream cheese to vanilla even it's all skyrocketing up, some

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of them even hitting record highs. And it's a bunch

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>of these what you kind of dubbed hipster foods. So

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to have fancy looking avocado toast and stuff

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. And because everybody is so eager to photograph

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves eating various ingredients, that's having a real world impact

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on commodity prices basically. Yeah. I mean when I bought

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>avocados this past week and it was three dollars and

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents per avocado, which just seems outrageous, and that

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was on sale. Normally be like four four fifty apiece. Amanda,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>give us a little introduction who you are. You're a

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>food publicist. You also are a influential food instagrammer and blogger.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>How did you get into this industry and how do

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you actually make a living? Sure? Yeah, so my life

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of all encompassing around food. So my day job,

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you will, is predicting trends in the food service industry.

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So I am associate director of food Service Research at

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Mintel and then we also have um a lot of

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>work with agencies and brands, So at my day to

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>day job, I'm kind of helping brands navigate some of

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this territory with social media, but kind of on the side,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I also write a Chicago based food blog where I'm

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>reviewing restaurants, and then i also have a food Instagram

0:06:55.240 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>where I'm covering local dishes, local events, restaurant openings, and

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of them fully immersed in this whole Instagram world.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So can you give us I realized this is probably

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big question, but can you give

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>us like a sort of high level overview of how

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the rise of social media and Instagram in particular has

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>changed the food industry. That's definitely a big question. Um.

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that especially over the last few years, we're

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>really seeing Instagram take over as the social media platform

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to be on. So it's not relatively it's not super new.

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been around since. But I think now we're seeing

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>more restaurants really recognize the impact that Instagram and photos

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of their restaurants food can have on their on their business.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think we see the operational side of it

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>where restaurants realized the potential here, and then we also

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>see from the consumer perspective that really consumers, and especially

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>younger consumers, including millennials, are seeing the impact of how

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>fun it can be to share pictures of their food,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and in general, we know that millennials especially just love

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sharing those experiences and being able to go on their

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>app and search for different restaurants and look at geo

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>tags and see exactly what they're gonna get when they

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>order food at a restaurant is really powerful. So we

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have a resident millennial here in the studio who like

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>sharing photos of food and does exactly what you describe.

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>An addition to reporting on it, Julie explained to us

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the appeal of sharing food pictures as you see it,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and you even mentioned this morning that your new apartment

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>has a really great light for taking photos of toast,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>which I imagine is now a selling point in apartments, like, oh,

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>this has great light for your Instagram photos, So what

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is the why the urge to do that? And I

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>do it too, but I'd like you to, uh, you know, elaborate.

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean I even picked out a perfect coffee table

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for setting the food out and being able to style

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it that way too, So I really went overboard this time. Um.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean in general, like they do really well on Instagram.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You have like the right hashtags and everything. You have

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the right coloring, the right lighting. Um. I mean I've

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>always taken really good photos of just scenic shots in

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>New York too, but food photography just does so well

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. It's crazy. You post French toast, you post

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the avocado toast with the poached egg, and then you're

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like cutting into the egg and seeing it all eat.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That's going to do really well. I mean I think

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Amanda touched on a lot of it. Having the geo

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>takes and everything to always help. Like whenever I go

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>out to eat, I already know what I'm going to

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>order at the restaurant before I get there because I

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>looked on Instagram, yelp, fort Square, anything to see what

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the best food is, and then I just order it

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that way too. Yeah, I've definitely ordered food based on

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what I see other people having taken photos of at

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant, Amanda. So you know, we talked about you know,

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked avocado toast. That's pretty old hat by now

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this your job is to find the next big thing.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So as a you know, not in your sort of

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>professional capacity of looking at food trends, how do you

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>figure out what's going to blow up next? How do

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you find the next cauliflower, the next kill or whatever

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ingredient restaurants need to start serving. Well, I think it's

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really important to look at not only what is happening

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in restaurants. So a big part of what we do

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is we look at menus and we analyze menus. But

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>at the same time we also see a lot of

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>trends stemming from recipes and even recipe bloggers. So I

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>think in the beginning, we saw a lot of of

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.479
<v Speaker 1>these food trends really start in the fine dining restaurants

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of the world and kind of trickle their way down

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>into your fast casuals and your fast food and even

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>um retail as well. But now it's not necessarily following

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that same trajectory, So we kind of look at a

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>three sixty perspective really of what's going on in food service,

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but also retail and also kind of just seeing what

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of pops on social media. It's definitely a big

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>part of that. How quantitative are the techniques? So I

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>could imagine if you're doing recipe or menus, you could

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>theoretically just download massive word clouds or word databases and

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>theoretically see which ingredients are rising and falling over time.

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Do people do any stuff like that? Yeah, So basically

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>my day to day is we actually have a database

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that collects menus from restaurants across the US, So it's

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>very quantitative. So we're looking at menu mentions of every

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>little thing on the menu, from the ingredient to the

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>preparation method to the flavor, so we can really get

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a good read on what is trending over time. How

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>do you guys find different food bloggers or instagrammers that

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to work with? Two? How do you decide

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many of them out there. Well, that's

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of more falling in line with what I do

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>outside of work, So I kind of play both roles,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of on both sides of this, so UM.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that personally, I've worked with a lot of

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>major brands that are really doing a good job of

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>targeting who they're their audiences, who that core audiences at

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>their trying to reach. Um. So, I think one great

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>example of a brand that's doing this really well recently

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is Taco Bell. So when they are launching new food products,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like they are really focused heavily on not only what

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that food is going to look like on Instagram, but

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>also how they want to get that message across or

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the introduction across. So I think a couple of months ago,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they released the Naked Chicken Chiloopa taco and instead of

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>doing or using traditional media, they went the Instagram route.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>So they specifically targeted millennial food instagrammers and a few

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>key cities across the country and had these launch events

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to really create authentic buzz around this product without having

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay for a single ad spend. Okay, I have

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a question on that because you say authentic buzz around

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the food, um, but like it's it's so coordinated, Like

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>everything about this is so um coordinated and like planned

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, you know, Julie just spoke about how

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>she's picked out a coffee table that will look good.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some of the setups of her food, Like

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly a lot of effort has gone into this. And

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I bring up the subject as well because we just

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>had a kind of controversial thing happened with social media,

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>which was, of course the Fire Festival, this music festival

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that was going to be held in the Bahamas, and

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that relied on getting a bunch of social media influencers

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to advertise that thing before it happened. It turned out

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a disaster, and now some of these influencers

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>might be in hot water because they violated some rules

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on sponsored content. So how exactly does this work and

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>how authentic can it be given that ultimately you know

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you're reaching out to specific people, you're targeting specific people,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and you might even be paying them or at least

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>giving them free food. I think we found what sets

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy a sorry. Yeah, I think it definitely works in

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a variety of way. So there's definitely that very direct

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>communication where a brand reaches out to an influencer and

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>offers a certain amount of money for a post. But

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also other events like the tackle Bell event where

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll invite influencers and encourage them to post, but they

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>won't require them to post, so really kind of relying

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on the instagramm er. If they like it and want

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to post about it, then they'll go ahead and do that.

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And obviously that's the end goal. Um, but it can vary,

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's there can be a lot of issues,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as you said, with being transparent about sponsored posts. I

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think lately as well, there's been a lot of focus

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on like FTC guidelines regarding this type of thing. So

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think people are kind of treading lightly in this

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>area and knowing that there could be consequences for not

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>fully disclosing posting a sponsored post. Let's take a quick

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>break now for a word from our sponsor. But Knowledge

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to work and grow your business with ce i T

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i T offers

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for small and

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>middle market businesses. Learn more at c i T dot

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>com put Knowledge to Work and we're back talking about

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the role of Instagram and social media in the modern

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>food industry with us as Bloomberg reporter dou leever Hage

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as Amanda Topper, Associate director of food service

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Research at Mentel News and a food blogger and instagramm

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>er in her own right. Amanda, in the beginning of

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the episode, we're talking about the Crown Nut, which I

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think of is sort of one of the first examples

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of this era of food sort of literally going viral

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way that has become more commonplace. What are

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the most extraordinary things you've seen where some

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>restaurant introduces a new uh, a new dish or a

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>new product and you just see it, you know, copied

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>instantly everywhere around the world. I think one that kind

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of jumps to mind is the Black Craft milkshakes or

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Black Tap milkshakes in New York, So I think those

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of roads of popularity. And then in Chicago we

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>saw a bunch of restaurants trying to recreate the same thing. Um.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But what's really interesting is there's a similar dish called

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram Sunday at a restaurant here in Chicago, And

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that just shows you that restaurants aren't aren't

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>really shying away from the fact that there's specifically creating

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>these menu items for the sole purpose of having diners

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>come in and take a picture of them. So that's

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not a very subtle name, is it? The Instagram Sunday?

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>How fast did that happen? So after the milkshakes were

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>introduced in New York, how quickly were similar milkshakes popping

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up in Chicago? I think within a matter of weeks. Um.

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think people are very well traveled, especially that millennial

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>generation and even restaurateurs, so I think they go out,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they see these trends, and obviously, with the power of Instagram,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be in New York to see

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the food scene in New York.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's a matter of weeks sometimes

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>where these trends kind of evolve and emerge in different

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>major cities. Another example of that, though, is that Starbucks

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just did that unicorn for appuccino, which I just looked

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and it has a hundred and fifty eight thousand hashtags

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram right now. But there's a coffee shop in

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn that's been making a unicorn latte for let's see,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a few months. It says December of last year it started,

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually suing Starbucks for copying their idea. Have

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you seen something like that happened before, where a smaller

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>chain is doing something in some big conglomerate like Starbucks

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>copies it. I did just see that article as well.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Um No, No other examples really come to mind, and

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it'll certainly be interesting to see the outcome of that.

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue there was that both beverages do

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>not contain coffee, even though one must call the latte um.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>But no, I haven't seen a time of other examples

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of that now. Okay, So here's my major question with

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>all of us, and with um food Instagramming in particular.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>So you create something like an Instagram Sunday, which is

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly made to be photographed, why the endless fascination with

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the same thing over and over and over again. Because

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>there are only so many variations you can have of

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a picture of an ice cream Sunday or a crow

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>nut or you know, some avocado smear it on toast,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>why do we keep consuming that? Well? I think a

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the types of food photos that perform very

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>well on Instagram, or foods that are really relatable. If

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you post some really fancy plate from a five star

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>restaurant that might not resonate with everyone in your audience.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But something like an avocado toast or a milkshake or

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>ice cream Sunday is something that people can relate to.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And even with the Sunday for example, they do a

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>great job of innovating constantly from month to month by

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just shifting that Sunday just a little bit. Um Sometimes

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter of incorporating a seasonal element or flavor,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or incorporating a holiday themed candy or cupcake on top

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. So they're kind of making it a little

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>bit different, but still kind of riding the wave of

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the popularity of that particular dish. But I really think

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with food being relatable, and especially

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>things like um, the agile corn, like that is something

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that people can relate to. It's something that they could

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>do at home, and it's it's kind of this interactive

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>experience that people want to look at and people want

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to share themselves. That reminds me my friend Derek Thompson,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>he's a writer at The Atlantic, and he recently wrote

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a book called hit Makers, which is all about what

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>becomes popular, and he was talking about it in the

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>context mostly of sort of music and entertainment, but one

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of his key ideas is that the most successful things

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have a high element of familiarity with them, so they

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>don't push the bound to read too much. They innovate,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they do something new, but there's a strong element of

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this before. So it's interesting, is you know,

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's I've seen I have friends who have post images

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>from extraordinary five star restaurants, but they clearly don't get

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the same level of likes as a really over the

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>top Sunday or milkshake. And there's probably an element where

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the milkshake feels at the same time new and interesting

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but also familiar and something that I could relate to

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly as you say, Yeah, and I think, um, it's

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not to say that we aren't we are not adventurous eaters.

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that when it comes to trying new flavors,

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>those flavors are really well executed in familiar formats. So,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we're interested in trying something new, but

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>not if it's completely out of out of the realm

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of something we've had before. So it's got to have

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>that sense of familiarity with it. So this leads into

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>my other pressing question on the matter which is what's

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate end game in instagramming all your food? Um,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone talks about turning themselves into a personal brand,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>but so few of these personal brands are actually able

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to turn it into a money making thing. And I

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>was actually reading some first person accounts from people who

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have kind of managed to do that, and they were

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's super difficult to monetize their social media presence,

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>partly because people want them to be relatable and as

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>soon as they start making money from being a social

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>media celebrity, uh, that seems to go away a little bit.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So there seems to be a catch twenty two. So

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe Julie, maybe you have some insight into this because

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you've been instagramming for a long time now, Like what's

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate goal? I mean, I think I would be

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>more worried about traditional advertising versus advertising on social media

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's still as long as you're someone that's posting

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>from these brands, but you still engage with your followers,

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>such as replying to their comments on your post or

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>going to their profile and liking different things on their page,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you're always going to have that follower base, and then

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the brands are still going to want to continue to

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>work with you rather than paying some traditional advertiser, like

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>way more than what they end up paying you. But

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a struggle of like the advertising business keeps

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>changing those people that were blogging five years ago, and

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>blogging five years ago is way different than what it

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>is now. There's fewer ads on the actual blogging page

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can make money from, so it is pushing

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more towards working with brands versus just letting the brands

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>advertise on your profile. Amanda, where do you see all

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this going? What is the endgame here in terms of

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>like are people going to burn out? Are they going

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to get tired? Are they eventually do people worry that

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just people are going to stop just turn their

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>phones down when they're at the restaurant and just enjoy

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the food. Is sort of a backlash to all this.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we'll see that anytime soon. Um.

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're kind of always looking at what's coming

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>up next, And I think so I started a blogger

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>in and so now I sort of see as Julie

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>said that that's kind of shifting away from what it was.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely more short, short form content. Now, and I

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think we're looking at Instagram and deciding, Okay, what's going

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be next, And I think a lot of that

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is related to video and shorter videos. So I don't know.

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too early to say like what's going

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to be next, but I will definitely say that we're

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking at what's going to be the next platform.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And I agree that it is really hard to monetize

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>your Instagram page because there is so much competition. But

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the the accounts that do perform well are

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>ones that kind of found um an interesting hook. They're

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>very open about their personal lives and really try to

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>form unique connections with their followers, and I think there

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>can be a little bit of that catch twenty two

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when these instagrammers are working with a lot of brands

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and posting continuous sponsored content and makes it a little

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bit hard to trust them and you under if they're

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>really supporting this brand or if they're just doing it

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>for the compensation. But at the end of the day,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if those people don't want to follow that person, they're

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to and we're not really seeing people drop

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>off a ton, So I think that there's kind of

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>that balance between maintaining a unique identity, but also working

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with brands to kind of help elevate yourself and push

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>your personal brand forward. I'd say another example of that though,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>there's one girl I follow she's actually used with my

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>former neighbor, but she has two followers on Instagram, Rachel Mansfield.

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And something that she does that I think really has

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>helped drive her business is that she hosts different sort

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of meetups. So one that I went to it was

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like a bar class, plus you got like these amazing

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>goodie bags with a bunch of food from the brands

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that she works with. There was a little Q and

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a afterwards, And you know, if I'm going through my

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>profile saying that I follow too many people and I

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>want to get rid of some, She's not going to

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>be one. Because I've engaged with her. She takes the

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>time to actually know who her followers are, understand what

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to see on her profile, and really she's

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>done a great job of just turning this into a business. Okay,

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I have another big question, sorry, which is I mean

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the food trend on Instagram. Amanda, would you say that

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>broadly it's been good for the industry or are there

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>some people who have lost out because maybe this is

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of a loaded question, by the way, but like

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some like tiny kitchen somewhere and they do

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing food, but it's not that photogenic. Like, has this

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>changed the food industry so much that the way something

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>looks is now more important than the way that it tastes.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Um. I think though, that restaurants

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>are realizing the importance of what their restaurant looks like

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and what the food looks like, and they're taking that

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>into account. Um. I know that Julie was saying, you know,

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>she has this coffee table on this natural light, and

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that restaurants are doing the same thing. They

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>know that when an influencers coming in, they want to

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have that table by the window reserve for them and

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>they want to have that natural light. Um. But at

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I think the restaurants that are are

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>doing a good job with social media are ones that

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are recognizing that they're able to leverage those images that

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they're diners are posting. It's basically in a way, free

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>marketing for them, and so they can utilize those images

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and promote them and it's kind of a win win

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>situation for the diner and for the restaurant. So I

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know if it's gonna necessarily go

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the route of food having to look better than a taste.

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think both sides of it, the diner side

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and the restaurant side, are seeing the impact and the

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>potential for the business. All right, final question here, So

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I am really into food. I like posting into pictures

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of food, particularly Chinese food, which is my favorite cuisine

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. So give me your top two hips two

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tips Amanda for becoming a Chinese food Instagram influencer. Well,

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely make sure you have a good a

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>good place set up to take your images, So if

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it's either at home for cooking Chinese food or for

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in a restaurant, make sure you get that natural light

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and a great background. I think that's kind of the

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>majority of the battle is really the lighting situation and

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the background. Um. And I also think posting maybe dishes

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>from some of those off the beaten path Chinese restaurants

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that maybe your friends haven't heard about, and then they

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>might tend to see you as an authority in kind

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of these off the beaten path Chinese spots. Well, I

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>will try to do that any excuse to try new

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>restaurants I'm into. So I really like that second tip.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>The first one I might be too lazy to set

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>up good photos, but I could definitely do the second one.

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate you both coming on. Manda Topper, she's

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a associate director of food service at Mente and she's

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>uh a social media food mayven in her own right.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And Julie Verheig of Bloomberg News, who is a millennial

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and post Instagram of food and other things. I really

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you both joining us. Thank you so, Tracy. I

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of have a feeling that you're anxiety about all

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this isn't isn't exactly a leaved well. I feel like

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I have a love hate relationship with all this because

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I do the same thing, right, Like, I have two

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Instagram accounts now and I do take photos of food.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But I just like the whole thing strikes me as

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>slightly ridiculous, particularly when I've been in the position that

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Julie was describing, where you know, I'm arranging my plate

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on a table trying to get the best light, and

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I've also been sitting in restaurants where I've seen people

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do nothing but take photos of their food for about

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>an hour, and the topic seems slightly ridiculous. But sometimes

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, if you know, when people talk about product

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the productivity paradox in the economy, like sometimes I wonder

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's social media, if we're all just like spending

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>more of our time taking photos of our food, and

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where it's all going. I don't know.

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I've definitely had moments in restaurants while I'll order something

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll bite into it, and then as soon

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>as I buy it, I'm like, oh, shoot, I should

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>have taken that photograph first, and now the plating of

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the dish is completely ruined and I should have taken

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a photograph. And then other times I'll be like wait, wait,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Or if it's a family style and everyone's eating out

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the same dish, I'll be wait, wait, I gotta take

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a photo this, and everyone's just sitting there waiting for

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>me while I stand over the dish really loomingly trying

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to get the perfect light and also not have the

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>phone cast a shadow onto the food, which is referring problem. Um.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think I have the discipline to really

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>take the great photos that you have to take, because

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to sort of take them for posterity

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>more than influence. But maybe that's that's my problem. I

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want it bad enough. The other thing is like

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it is actually shaping tastes about food and restaurants. So,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you say you like Chinese food. I'm sorry

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to tell you, Joe, but a lot of Chinese food

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't that photogenic. You should really start liking ice cream

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and doughnuts and cookies and cakes because people love those photos.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's also just a fascinating example of the way that

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the medium shapes what's conveyed over the medium. I mean,

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that's essential we're talking about. But it's a recurring phenomenon.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's you have, you know, you take every

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>take anything else. Take Twitter where it once you start

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to you know, at first it becomes this place where

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you sort of dash off short messages. Then everyone's doing it,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly everyone just sort of thinks in short

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>messages and likes to make week argue mints that just

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>fit well in a characters, but aren't that sound? And

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so essentially the medium starts to redefine the underlying thinger

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to get across. I think you see example after

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>example of that. So, oh absolutely, yeah, it's a it's

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating it's a fascinating phenomenon. And the fact that

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it literally is driving prices of avocado and vanilla and

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Cauliflowers certainly takes to the market store and you can

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>see it in the broader consumer spending figures. Right. So

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was actually reading a city group note before we

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>came on the show, and they say that restaurants spending

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is up let's see more than thirty over the past

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>five years, and food spending is up about ten percent.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is the classic You know, people are spending

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>more for experiences than for goods, but I often wonder

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if they're spending on experiences because a lot of those

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>experiences allow them to take nice photos. Yeah, I think

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any question that that's a big

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>part of it. All Right, Um, we should probably stop

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>before or I get really worked up. I'm also getting hungry. Yeah,

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Let's go get some crown nuts. Maybe I

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know unicorn fract I don't think we have them

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg in the Bloomberg Pantry. Unfortunately. Anyway, this

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at the

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Stalwart and my Instagram is at the Stalwart. I'm the

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>same name, and I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and you can follow me

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram at Tracy dot Alloway. And you can follow

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>our guest Amanda Topper on Twitter at Amanda Topper and

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Julie Verhig on Twitter at Julie Verhigue. Thanks for listening.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Put knowledge to work and grow your business with see

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>i T. From transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>T dot com. Put Knowledge to Work