WEBVTT - Mailbag Monday | Furkan Stans, Jo Finishes Week Strong

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is part of the seventy Sixers Podcast network

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>search seventy Sixers podcast wherever you get your pods. Since

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>last we mail Bag, we saw a steady dose of

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid, the MVP candidate, dominated at Boston, then finished

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the week in fine form at OKC Simmons. Would it

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>low to e feed at an LU camp that works?

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>We respond to your thoughts on the big fella, and

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>there's really no one who gets the mail bag going

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>white like Furkon. Corkmont will take some calls about that

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Sixers wing man. We're talking about a six foot seven

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>wing twenty three years old, forty percent from the three

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for an entire season with high volume, Furkon is the goat.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus in the spirit of Matisse thybel some NFT talk. Yes,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 1>there is no limit to what we discuss your DM's

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>mentions and voicemails. As always right here on mail Bag Monday,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there were wins, there were breakout performances. There is impact,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>ending mercifully the end of a road trip, a busy week.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It was Lauren Rosen, how are you. I'm doing well.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling like Dwight Howard this morning. Happy to be alive.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>That was a I'm not sure if it was coincidental,

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was a timely name drop of Dwight Howard.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell me why. I'm not going to spill too much.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Some quality Dwight Howard content coming later on this rainy

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>Monday edition of the mail Bag. Let's do it. You

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>know what else there was this week? Before I get

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>into the mail Bag, I have to bring this up.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go to the Brian Selter mail Bag

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>because I want to clear this right off the bat.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What's happening on the internet right now? I'm seeing things

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin, NFTs, yats. I can't keep up. I'm thirty five.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think that I'm still on top of things.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I have no clue what's happening right now. I need

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you to debrief, so I'll tell here's what I know.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I know some of it, and I'm faking of it.

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of new information is just about

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>buying in and just like being ready to rock. So

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what I decided last night, was that I'm all

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>in on NFT's non fungible tokens. I'm all in on bitcoin.

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any because it's expensive, but I understand

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is, and through conversations with one Darryl Morey

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and a couple other people in the in the Sixers universe,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to understand how this all works. If you

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>don't follow Darryl Morey on Twitter, He's now going to

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>start doing little bitcoin NFT tutorials on his Twitter page.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Last night he did one spurred by Matisse Thybles posting

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>about his own bitclout on his Twitter. Matise, as we

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>now know, is very into the cryptocurrency world, as is

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris, as are some other people around the league.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing it everywhere now, and Daryl Morey's is all

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. So not only are these guys connecting with

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess their boss about basketball, they're now connecting about

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>crypto as well. And I joined the fun. Last night.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I got myself a yat, which is a unique token

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of emojis that now nobody else can have except for me.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I own my group of four emojis. You can make

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it into UURL. It now directs to my Twitter. It

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was like a big decision to decide which emojis I

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get to create this little NFT. I'm all

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>in do I understand everything that's going on. No am,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I learning and trying. Yes, followed Daryl Morey seems like

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he's going to keep doing some tutorials on his Twitter

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about how this all works. And if I trust anyone

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to explain something foreign to me, it's that. Man. Is

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it wrong that I think the most accessible of all

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the stuff for me to understand, between the Bitcoin, NFT

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and yet is the YAT. That's the one that piques

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>my interest the most. I might want to yat. I'm

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>already having some ideas well. So I think the YAT

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is very accessible because you can see it. And that's

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the problem with NBA Top Shot, with Bitcoin, with a

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of other NFTs, you can't necessarily see the thing

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting, and it's it's hard to conceptualize what

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you own and how you own it and nobody else does.

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>That's where I struggle. It's like, how are we sure

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that if you buy an NBA Top Shot play, how

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are you sure that nobody else has it? Because plenty

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of people have the video, plenty of people can look

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it up, plenty of people saw it in person, some

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>people maybe recorded it on their own cameras in person.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So how do you really own the play that you bought?

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but you do get a receipt when

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you buy it, and eventually I would imagine that that

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>receipt becomes valuable like a trading card. Does have trading

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>cards ever been truly valuable? No, they're pieces of cardboard.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But somehow may dispute that claim, Lauren, Now, come on,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>but this is not the slander trading cards here, absolutely

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>asking about modern day currency. But the comparison that was

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>made for me by a friend that explained what an

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>NFT is is. It's like a trading card. You only

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>make a certain amount and when you buy it, probably

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at a low price. You buy a rookie trading card

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>this season, and that rookie ends up being in the

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame in twenty years. That trading card that

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you bought in twenty twenty one is very valuable. So

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe my yat, which is four emojis, the fanciest yats

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>are one, two, three, four five emojis, so mine is

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the second to lease to fancy yat. But I do

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>have one, and I got in early, so if the

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>yats blow up, eventually my yat will become very valuable,

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and if it doesn't, it's still mine. And it feels

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>nice to know that I own a tiny pocket of emojis.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's why I'm in such a good mood this morning,

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is because I got my yat this morning. How do

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I get an invite? It might be yat? I don't

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>even know. Oh, well, you might know someone that has

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple invites. Left. All right, I'm going to try

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and figure out she could help you. I might need that.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I know what I would do. In a

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>perfect world, I might be able to do it in five. Well,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so I wanted to do mine in three, but it

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>was more cost effective to do it in four, so

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I ended up doing four or for the for the

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 1>price reduction. Um you know, what are your emoji combinations?

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us? Yes? I can. Let me just

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>pull it up, make sure I got it in the

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>right order. It's very interesting to like certain certain orders.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Um mine is basketball emoji, microphone emogi, manicure emoji, checkered

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>flag emoji. Okay, I don't think I need to explain,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but basketball microphone, what we're doing right now, manicure what

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I have on my hands? And checkered flag I love

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>formula one for love it and if you go to

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>why dot at dot basketball microphone manicure checkered flag, you

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>get to my Twitter. I have an idea of what

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>mine will be if I'm fortunate enough to claim it. Okay,

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spill the beans here because I

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want any of you out there to get into

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>your NFT zone and go hawk it. But I think

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I know could you and could you potentially announce it

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>tonight on seven six Live Countdown presented by TSO. Maybe

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that. Yeah, either either on seven six five

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Countdown presented by TSO later on this Monday, or perhaps

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Deep Dive on Friday, or maybe maybe on

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the Bag next Monday. If I'm fortunate enough to claim

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this yet, just make sure you go into the experience

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with an open mind, because I had no plan of

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>when I went into mine. I knew what I wanted.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>What I wanted was really expensive, and then I ended

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>up loving this one that was really inexpensive but might

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>one day be very expensive, And now I own it.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Did all of you out there expect this is what

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you wanted? Right? Six minutes forty seconds of NFT bitcoin

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and yat talk before we even start the mail bag

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>without further ado, let's get to it. You have one

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>new message. I think most of you know how this

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>works by now. If you are a newcomer to mail

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>bag Monday, welcome to get in touch with us. We

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>do it every Monday, either drop us at DM, getting

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>our mentions on social media, or the preferred method. I've

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>now changed the policy a little bit. If you leave

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail, you get swag. It's that simple call out

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to us on the podline two four zero three seven

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>six three to seven. We also post a weekly sticker

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on Sundays on the at sixers Instagram story. So get

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch there, respond, engage. We love hearing from you,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>especially your voice. Vince Picaro on Twitter, he was always

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>active in the mansions. Wanted to start this week with

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid. I think that Lauren was one of the

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>big headlines from this week. He was back for a

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>second time. It seems like he's back for good for

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>good this time. Played in the back to back look

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>really strong against the OKC Thunder. But Vince chimed in

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>after the win over the Boston Celtics last Tuesday, in

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which Joel Embiad went off once again. He finished the

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>three game series with one hundred and fifteen total points

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Celtics. Finn says Joel is a matchup nightmare

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for the opposing defense, and his ability to draw the foul,

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>especially from the triple threat position rivals Or could be

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>better than that of James Harden for the most effective

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the league. I think Joel Embiid had two excellent

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>games this past week. He played three. Obviously, the game

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for everyone against New Orleans was forgettable, but I think

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Joel against Boston and then again against the Oklahoma City Thunder,

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he was terrific. Lauren, he sure wasn't. And something that

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I think is worth noting after both really solid performance

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is Joel expressed that he feels that he has a

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more in the tank, that he's still just getting

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>back to things that he wants to be where he

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was prior to the break, and even prior to the break,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he felt that there was more that he could be doing.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that he's back and he looks to

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the level that at least my eye test tells me

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that he looks pretty similar to how he looked prior

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to the break and he feels that there's a lot

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more there. Very encouraging and of course, on a human level,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>if he's not fully comfortable, if his knee brace isn't

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>his favorite thing in the world, you hope that he's

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>able to work through that, because that must be frustrating.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>He's working really hard and clearly has put in so

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>much work on his body and his stamina and his endurance.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>He looks so bouncy out there, so it must be

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of frustrating to get used to that brace.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And I hope for his sake that he can get

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>used to it and thrive with it. Laura, I know

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he said to Doc Riverson passing after the game on

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday versus the Celtics that he thought he was back.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>He had thirty five and six that game, then kept

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in check for fourteen and nine against the Pelicans on Friday.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>To me, the OKAC game, granted against lesser competition, that

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to me looked like semi vintage, if we can even

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>refer to something within the context of the same year

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as being vintage in twenty twenty twenty one, That to

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>me was the level of Joel and b that we

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>saw before the knee injury against Washington, he was doing

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the little head fake, shimmy bassline, fadeaway jumper got inside

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for some really impressive jams. I thought to me, it

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>looked like he had his bounce back a little bit

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>more in that okayc game than any of the other

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>couple he's played in since his return. Yeah, and I

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think that the team's collective performance against Okase, I mean

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they really didn't. At no point in that game did

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers not look like the better team. I think

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that gave Joel a lot of freedom to start getting

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable, to relieve any tension that he was feeling

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>from coming back. It was cool to see him getting

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a rhythm in what turned out to be a pretty

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>low stakes outing and figure out how to really capitalize

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on the stakes that were were not there. Oh, it

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.479
<v Speaker 1>was great to hear from Vince. Thanks for leading us off.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You have one new message. It is time to head

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the podline two on five four zero three seven

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty three seven. As we announce top of the show,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you leave a voicemail. We play it. You automatically win,

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>no random name picker generator or anything like that. Here

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we go. Voicemail number one this week. Hello mail Bag Monday,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I would just like to give a special shout out

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>to the man that's stole my heart and also had

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a career high of five steals, mister Furkhon Corkmon sixers,

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>fill it sixer for life, you know what, in the

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>spirit of great Monday Morning vibes, Furkon to me, simply

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>from a human being standpoint, he is a guy you

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>always want to have around and be around. He is

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the best celts. I think you'll agree with me when

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I say there has not been a day that I've

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been with this organization that I have not rooted for

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Furkon's success. He is just a wonderful dude. President of

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the great vibes. Regardless of what's going on, the team's

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>great vibes. This year, Furkan had those, and he's had

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>those for a very long time. It's awesome to see

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>him succeed. He's a guy that's so easy to root for,

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so delightful. His teammates love him, they celebrate his success,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and so cool to see him succeeding on the defensive

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>end now as well. I think that's an area of

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>his game that I don't know we expected to see

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>him unlock at the level that he has, especially over

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the last couple months. Tremendous game from Firk against the

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Thunder over the weekend on Saturday, twenty points, a season

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>high to go along with a career high five steals,

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>four three pointers in each of his last two games,

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>three straight double figure scoring games. Great to see this

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>from Firk. Staying in the bag. You have one new message.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The fur come slander has got to stop. We're talking

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about a six foot seven wings twenty three years old,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>forty percent from the three for an entire season with

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>high volume, can disrupt the game with steel, and he's

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>finally starting to learn how to handle the ball on

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a pick and roll. Stop it. This guy's feeling is crazy.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about like the ninth player on our team

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with this much challenge at that age. Stop it. Furkon

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>is the goat. Jimmy Caputo bringing it. I know that

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>was Jimmy because he got into the mansions and said,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I left a voicemail, got an injust under the wire,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the all time calls. Huge love for Furkon

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm all about it. You heard me after our

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>last voicemail. But I'm thrilled for fur Con, thrilled that

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the fans are rallying around fur Con. I mean, how

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>wonderful would it be to see him continue performing at

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this level down the stretch into the playoffs. Like I said,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>he's someone that his teammates love, the city loves. It's great.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt side here with Furkon succeeding. Listen, I

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>think that in Jimmy references, if there is slander out

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there about fur Con, I feel that's a vocal minardy.

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>I feel, buy and large, this is a beloved man

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and he's continued to improve again. I mean, I think

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to respect guys that find ways to get better,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>find ways to capitalize on opportunity. I mean, there's a

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of competition for minutes this season, and Furkon has

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>proven over and over why he's deserving of them, and

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been really special to watch. This may sound like

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a not positive comment, but it is one meant in

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a good way. And I think this is something that

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Doc Rivers has talked about too. What am I alluding to?

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Stop drawing it out, Brian here. It is. It's the

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that when Furkon is not asked to do too much,

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be that much better. Like his

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>five steals where they all generated single handedly by himself. No,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but when he's out there with the likes of Ben

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Simmons and Joel Embiid and Matisse Thible I thought that

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>was a great unit, by the way, starting with a

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>six or shorthand against the Thunder on Saturday. But when

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Furk can be out there on the defensive end, you

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>got some of those other guys doing their thing well,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>then fur Con can be that much more effective. Same

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>thing when he's got the ball in the offensive end,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he can handle a little bit. We saw the great

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>dime he laid out for Dwight Howard the other night.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But when he doesn't have to be maybe you're second,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>possibly even third guy, he's going to be an option

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>who can hurt you. I think we've seen that much,

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's been great for him to find

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this this rhythm the last couple of games. I think

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you raise a really good point. He's set a couple

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>time this season that he loves the minutes he gets

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to share with Ben and Joel because it really opens

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>him up to do what he does best on the

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive end. I think in the last couple of games,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the way that it opens him up on

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the defensive end as well. You just said it incredible

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch him just sort of fly around and be

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a disruptor and like you said, capitalize on the defensive

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>movements of his teammates of who's out there. I agree

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. I thought that that unit that started in

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that game was delightful. They all sort of filled in

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>for one another, did a good job of knowing each other.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was an interesting group because Danny and

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Tobias are really sort of the vocal leaders in that

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup, so without the two of them, I was

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how things would go. And they clicked

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>from the jump and they didn't look back. I agree

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>with you. I thought it was a really fun starting

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>unit and I was happy to see the group succeed together.

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The stan for for Con continues. You have one new message,

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>how you've done. Big game coming up this week for

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the nets. I'm Luke. Nice to meet Love the pod

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the stand for Furkon. It's It's truly great. Fur Coons

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is great. You know, you know, he comes out, he

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>shoots the three ball, he fled out to shoots it.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not afraid to get up there. He'll go off

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>there and shoot eight. Three's a game off the bench.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I love it. It's unmatched energy, it's Philly vibes. There's

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing better to it. Go out on Wednesday, pound the nets.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>No one on that team can guard Mbid, drop fifty

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on him and let's go win a championship. Let's do it. Yeah,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready, find me a brick raw. I am prepared

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to just bash through it after Luke's call. Tremendous energy,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot to cover there before we start segueing into

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the nets. Furkhon Philly vibes, I think for as much

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as someone from Turkey can have Philly vibes. With all

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>due respect to Ersani Lusova, who was great when he

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was here. Furkon he's an adopted son and I'm all

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>about it. He looks he's a bit of an underdog character.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>He came in with grit and determination, two qualities that

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this city doors. I'm all about it. Of course, as

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a transplant myself, I love to see outsiders get embraced

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>because that's my utmost ambition in this city. I love

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing the city rally around guys like for Coon, who

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>really have worked hard to get to where they are today.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Awesome to hear all this enthusiasm in the mailback. He's

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>off the roof. He's off the roof. What more can

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you say? All Right, moving along, you have one new message.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Time to go through our Instagram story rapid fire around

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>here on the bag. Our question that we posted to

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the at sixers Instagram story on Sunday was what do

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you think some keys are to Wednesday's big game against

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Brooklyn Nets? So pumped for that one, Lauren. The

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>timing of this one for me, as you get into

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the sub twenty games left in the season range, couldn't

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be better for me, with the alone exception perhaps being

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Nets might not be at full strength. Yeah,

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we've been talking about this game now for

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>well a couple of I'm not sure. This is one

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've had on our calendars for a long time,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>hoping though that everybody would be available. It seems like

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>more folks could be available than the last time these

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>two teams met. Will everybody be available on both sides?

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, but looking forward to it either way.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously a matchup that the Sixers are looking

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>forward to. I think it's interesting that the Nets continue

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to be so heavily favored in general narratives, national, local,

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you are, the Nets tend to be the favorites,

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Sixers have been holding that number one seed

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all season long. Now their neck and neck.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea of either team having the chance

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to prove that they are the better team head to head,

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully healthy, really looking forward to this one, and there's

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>no ambiguity where things are to start this week. They've

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>now played the same number of games, the Sixers and

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Nets. They're both even at thirty six and seventeen.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>The Sixers hold the tiebreaker. They have a better division record,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>They've played more games than nine to Brooklyn six and two.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>The six or the better conference record. It's the key

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>one right there. Twenty four and seven the Nets or

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and eleven. Brooklyn plays Monday at the Timberwolves. The

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy Sixers obviously at the MAVs on Monday, and then

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>it's back at the Center on Wednesday night for that

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>big nationally televised showdown. So the question was keys to

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the game against the Nets. Benz Dot goat says, dominate

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the paint, play bullyball, and most importantly, control the pace.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are three big keys, but I do agree that

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>if the Sixers can do all three, they should be

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in pretty good shape. I look forward to seeing what

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they do with Joel Embiid. I think that's the biggest

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>question mark in this matchup is who is stopping Joel Embiid.

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They've obviously added some front court depth, but can any

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>of the guys they've added really handle Joel. Historically no,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and Joel has better options around the perimeter. Now really

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see how they match up

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with Joel Embiid. And then, of course, the offense versus

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>defense matchup that you and I have talked about so

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>consistently already shaping up to be a pretty classic one.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Even if James Harden is at with that right hamstring strain,

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>They've still got Kyrie Irving, who's been playing at a

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>really high level of the last week or so, along

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin Durant. And this is the thing that is

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so compelling about this game to me, Laura, Not only

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>do you have two division rivals that are at the

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>top of the Eastern Conference, with plenty of star power.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's that the way they're constructed is pretty much at

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>different ends. The seventy Sixers go through Joel Embiid the

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Nets. They've got their prowess, athleticism and scoring punch

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>from the wings and in the backcourt. How can those

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>two things offset one another. Which team can create the

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>better advantage based on its own strength? I think that's

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be the fascinating part of the game on Wednesday.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>G Money underscore two on three zero, just lock in

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Embiid, Swag one underscore, fam underscore a lamb,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Joel MVP. We need the Big Fella at its best

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and need Danny Green and Seth on top of things.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's a good point. The Sixers

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>probably will need some three point shooting to try and

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>keep pay with Brooklyn's second rated offense in the NBA. Well,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, second rated offense in the NBA. You mentioned it,

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the second rated defense in the NBA. We've talked about

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this before, but I think it's worth repeating. The Sixers

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>might struggle a little bit to keep up offensively with

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this Brooklyn team. The Brooklyn team is going to struggle

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep up defensively with the Sixers team. I'm very

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>curious to see which one rules the day, the offense

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>or the defense. But I agree Danny and Seth could

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be major keys. Of course, the three point shot, when

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you might be a slightly outmatched offensively, can make a

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. If they're going in demon underscore trio zero,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>good transition defense, and play smart no turnovers. I would

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. You don't want to let the likes

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>of Kad or Kyrie get out in transition. Obviously, they

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>also brought in Blake Griffin to come off the bench,

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and while he's certainly not the guy he was when

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Doc Rivers coached him, can't overlook that. Let's see Josh

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Rathman says, I want thible on Katie. Let the kid

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>prove himself. We might see some of that. We might

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>see some of that. We might And you just mentioned

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Blake Griffin. Don't forget what a good job Matisse did

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on Blake Griffin in Detroit a couple months ago. I

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know if anyone expected Matisse to have the upper

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hand in that matchup, maybe just based on purely size

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>KD another good one. Interesting I look forward to Matisse

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>getting his shot. You never know. It's very interesting to

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>see the way the rest of the league has started

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>legitimizing Matissa's defense. You can tell that players are a

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>little more on guard when he's around, which is interesting.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if that will transfer over to mister

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Durant because the two of them have not seen each

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>other yet this season. M Preger underscore thirty put KD

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the benitentiary. I think that we can all presume

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that Ben Simmons will certainly see some time on Kevin Durant. Yeah,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that, and Ben will be getting up

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for this matchup. We know that Ben loves a heated matchup.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>He's been priding himself on defense all season long. This

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is a great chance for him to show off what

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to do. Elijah underscore forty four. Ben

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>being aggressive offensively and defensively, he is the key to

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>our success. I do think this is a matchup where

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben could be a swing factor. And listen, I know

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>everyone's saying, well, where's the scoring, Where's the scoring? Personally,

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree with this sentiment from Elijah. If

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>he is aggressive, good things happen when he is aggressive,

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>good things happen. Sometimes that could manifest itself as a

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>forty two point game against the Utah Jazz. Other Times

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it could just be setting the tone for a game,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>getting downhill, being the facilitator and defensive stop or the

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Sixers need him to be. If he's aggressive, I think

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>good things happen. I'm with you, Selts. We say it

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, but Ben's priority is defense we know,

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and getting his teammates involved. If he's able to do

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>both of those things at a high level on Wednesday,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the scoring doesn't need to be relied upon as much

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>as people want it to be. That being said, an

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>aggressive Ben is one of the most fearsome I would

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be fearful of an aggressive Bet in any matchup. So

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>as long as Ben brings that aggression, he brings that

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>trademark defense, trademark facilitating. I think it will be a

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting Like you said, did you call it an X factor, Celts?

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>He could certainly be an X swing factor. No, I

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>think it used too good to be an X factor,

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>But he could be a tipping point, a tip point

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I think in this matchup. I mean, I like the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Sixers chances when when everybody's firing and everybody's intense on defense.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I think this team can beat anyone, as they've proven

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all season long. Urn AVT thirteen lockdown defense on Kyrine

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Katie also letting him beat Feast in the paint dash.

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Could I have a bag? Yes, I'm going to give

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>urn AVT thirteen a bag, he asked, or she asked,

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.479
<v Speaker 1>very politely, And you know what I'm gonna do it.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. Can you shall receive? Those are the

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rules here. I can't say that's gonna happen all the time,

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but ourn AVT thirteen did at the right time. Happy

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you a bag. I'm all about it. That key,

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>all these keys, I mean, if the sixers follow these

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>keys suggested on on I G I think they'll be

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>good to go. But of course, sometimes easier said than done. Obviously,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that defense on KG and Kyrie will be huge, and

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we can probably guess which sixers will divide up those

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities in this big one. Robbie Lee Waters says, the

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Keys are allowing mister Dwight Howard more game now. Listen,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we all love Dwight. Great matchup of the backup bigs

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in this one, potentially between Dwight and DeAndre could be

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and we know that Dwight does a good job of

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>getting the mental edge as well. That could be an

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>X factor in this one. I look forward to seeing

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 1>how Joel matches up with the host of backcourt options

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that Brooklyn now has. Speaking of Dwight Howard, No, we

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>will not play his latest rendition or two of Benjineese,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but we did get a voicemail about Dwight Howard, so

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>let's check in on that. You have one new message. Hi,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm alive for us to White Howard fain super fan.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you should allow to White Howard to play

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>more or even story joy positivity. He's a go getter.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Give a dar Bear chat this time? Getting time? Who Yeah?

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Go with the hour some famous six Ers day? Are

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you doing it? Yes? That is one of the best

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>voicemails we've gotten. Listen, I'm gonna leave all personnel decisions

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to mister NFT Daryl Morey and the head coach, Doc Rivers,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but I appreciate the enthusiastic sentiment about Dwight Howard. Anytime

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>we can have a Dwight Howard lifer on the show

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and getting in the bag, I'm all for it. You

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>our caller says that Dwight brings a lot of joy

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of energy. It's clear that you are

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>matching his joy and his energy. Thank you for that call.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I couldn't agree more. I love the people are

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>picking up on the energy and the vibes that Dwight

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Howard is bringing to this team on a day to

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>day basis. It was interesting. Someone asked Matisse Sybel and

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>his last media availability what he had learned from Dwight Howard. Actually,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm remembering that I asked the question. I was bad

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>way to see it up, but I did ask what

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he had learned from Dwight Howard. That's my bad. And

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>he said that the biggest thing he learned from Dwight

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is the positive attitude that he brings to the office

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>every day, whether or not it's a game day, whether

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or not media members fans are able to see it.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Mattis says that Dwight brings a positive attitude late in

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>his career, understanding that his role has changed, that his

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>abilities have changed, he still brings a positive attitude, joy,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and enthusiasm to work every single day, which, as we

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>all know, anyone with a job knows that that's a

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>challenge to do on a daily basis really cool to

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>hear that Dwight is a doing it and the people

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>are seeing it. I am a huge fan of that collar,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>fan of Dwight. Glad it's working out so well with

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>him in Philadelphia. One more from the podline. Remember two

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and five, four zero three, seven sixty three seven anytime,

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>any day, anywhere, you have one new message. As much

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>as I love to buy his Harris and Danny Green,

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it was so awesome to see the Ogs and Bead

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and Simmons just wreck the Solahoma City team on Saturday night.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I also want to give a shout out to Toby

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and Bob and the Cracker campaign. It is amazing and

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>brings new life to that relationship. So keep up the

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>good work on the pod here. Thank you. Yes, the

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Cracker campaign is legit. The goldfish spots between Bobie and

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Toby so endearing, and yeah, I thought it was cool

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to see some of the Ogs get in there against

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City. Ben and Joel do their thing, and Furk

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who's been around for a while, but listen the goldfish spots.

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>We are on red alert for any new installments when

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>those come out, celts. I get so excited when I'm

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>watching a Sixers game and that commercial comes up. When

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I see Boby and Toby on the couch in that

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>living room wherever that living room was, I get really

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>excited because I know I'm about to laugh. I love

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this commercial. I love the two of them, I love

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>their relationship. It's been such a pleasure to watch the

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>commercial blow up the TikTok challenge about holding goldfish blowing up.

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>The two of them could not possibly be more likable,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and I love the commercials. Tremendous all around outstanding Bravo mailbag,

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>whether you chimed in on social or left a message

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on the podline. Fantastic work everyone. Thank you. Yeah that

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was elite. Thank you guys for swag bag winners. We

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>shall be in touch, Lauren, Thank you very much. As always,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we will do it again next week. Thank you. Coming

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>up later this week on the seventy six Ers podcast Network,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Friday Deep Dive with Divine Givens. Also, if you are

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not yet a subscriber, it's the scoop. Find us and

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>follow us by searching seventy six or scoop wherever you

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>get your pods. Starting with the playoffs, those episodes will

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>only be available on the Scoop Feed, no longer on

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>both Sixers Podcast Network and the Scoop that's it, We'll

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>see you