WEBVTT - Tech News: Twitter is Full of Musk

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. It's time for the tech

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>News for Tuesday, November one, two thousand twenty two, and

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start off with some semi stale news. When

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I published the last news episode, which was on last Thursday,

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk had yet to finalize his acquisition of Twitter,

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>but that actually did happen later on that day last Thursday,

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and Musk changed his bio on Twitter to Chief Twit.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He's changed it a couple of times since then. Since

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that moment, a lot has happened and continues to happen

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>over at Twitter. Musk fired former CEO Paragugrival, former Chief

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Finance Chill officer Ned Siegel, policy head vi J. Gutty,

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and general counsel Sean Edgett to start. Musk subsequently named

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>himself CEO, which makes Musk the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter. At the same time. He has also dissolved

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's board of directors and named himself sole director. So

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>now Musk answers only to himself as both CEO and director,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>though I gotta be fair. Twitter is now a private company,

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so it has different needs from a publicly traded company,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>so a board of directors isn't necessarily performing the same

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>function at Twitter as it would have when it was

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>still a publicly traded company. The Washington Post, which previously

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>reported that Musk planned to lay off as much as

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy of staff, which Musk later refuted, says now that

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>up to the company could be laid off shortly, with

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a possible overall cut in the long term. In fact,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>according to several reports, the plan was to have some

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of those cuts take effect before today, because November one

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>marks when several Twitter employees will receive grants of shares.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But Elon Musk has straight up denied this news said

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. It was never the plan. He is

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>also considering changing the verification process at Twitter right now.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The way verification works is Twitter looks into accounts held

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>by quote unquote notable people, and then in at least

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>cases where Twitter agrees that they're notable, will go through

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the process to verify that the Twitter account actually belongs

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to the person claiming to be that person, right, like

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in my case, to make sure that it's me, not

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>someone posing as me. That's why I put notable in

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in quotes kind of because my personal Twitter handle does

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have a verification check I've got that little blue check mark,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and I do not and I qualify as notable, but

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>there I am. Anyway, Musk is considering making this whole

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>verification process a paid for feature wrapped into another subscription service,

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and that the service, which currently goes for about five

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month, would then be twenty dollars a month

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and you would have to pay that in order to

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>maintain your verified status. We don't know much more about this,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like would this mean that anyone with the financial means

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>could get the verification tick? So it's not whether or

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>not you're notable, it's whether or not you're willing to

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>spend two bucks a year to get it. If so,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>would that mean that the tick even has any real

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>value anymore? For those power users still on Twitter, are

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they going to cough up the cash to maintain their status?

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can tell you that I'm not going to,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But then I've used Twitter maybe four or five times

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last half a year, so it would be

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a waste of money for me to do that, no

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>matter what, or could it mean that someone could actually

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>pose as someone else, pay the money, get the verification tick,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and then be seen as a legitimate voice for that

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>person when in fact they have no connection. Is that

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a possibility? According to the Verge, which cited internal emails

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as a source, Currently, verified accounts like mine will have

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety days to subscribe to the new process or else

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>lose that blue tick mark. Shucks, I guess it'll be

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>gone for me. Musk also hinted that he's interested in

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>bringing back the short form video platform Vine, which Twitter

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bought in two thousand twelve and then began to sunset

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen. It would take a few years before it

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was dead dead. Uh. Kind of interesting because you could

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>argue that Vine in many ways presaged the arrival of

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.119
<v Speaker 1>platforms like TikTok, although Vine was a very short form

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>video platfor form um and it took a lot of

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>work to make a really good Vine. Reports say that

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Musk has given various teams within Twitter extremely tight deadlines

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to see these projects through, like the overhaul of the

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>verification process and the resurrection of Vine, like a crazy

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>aggressive deadline, at least in some cases, like by the

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>end of this week kind of stuff. Musk has also

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>really pushed hard on the Twitter staff already, and we

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>know more about the folks who helped fund Musks take

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>over a Twitter, which is causing other kinds of scandal. Uh.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>The people who helped Musk get the financing to to

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>make this purchase include the former CEO of Twitter, the

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>co founder, Jack Dorsey, investor Jason Kellicanis is another one,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and a company that represents the interest of the Prince

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi Arabia is a major investor in this new Twitter.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You might remember. The Prince of Saudi Arabia is the

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>same guy who's been accused of ordering the assassination of

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>journalist Jamal ka Shogi and is currently leading a country

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that has a horrifyingly long list of human rights crises

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to its name. The Saudi Arabian angle, in particular, has

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>prompted U S Senator Chris Murphy to ask for a

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>government review of Twitter's deal on the grounds of national security.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So this story is not yet over. I expect we're

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>going to see a pretty tumultuous time for Twitter in

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the near term. Let's switch gears, which is a pun.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But you don't know it yet. We're gonna talk about Tesla. Okay,

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>now you know. Anyway, Reuters reports that the Electric Vehicle

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Company hopes to go into mass production of its cyber

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>truck by the end of next year. Elon musk Are

0:06:55.160 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>initially unveiled the cyber truck back in twenty nineteen two. Well, well,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say it was not too universal acclaim. Some folks

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>found the design to be puzzling. Uh. The event also

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>had some technical issues. For example, after proclaiming the armor

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>glass windows on the truck to be virtually unbreakable, Franz

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>von Holshausen through a metal ball the driver's side window

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate this, except the metal ball shattered two of

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the windows. Musk said the reason for that was because

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the demonstration they showed how tough the doors

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on the truck were and they struck it with a sledgehammer,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that subsequently weakened the windows and that's why

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they shattered with the metal ball. Anyway, it was one

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>setback in that unveiling, but another was that a lot

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of folks found the angular design of the truck's body

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be unusual and not in a cool way. Tesla

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>stock dropped a bit in value after the unveiling, but

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>according to the company, around a quarter of a million

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>pre orders came in just five days later, so it

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>seemed like it was finding its audience. The plan was

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to go into production by late one, but delays, not

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the least of which came courtesy of the pandemic, have

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pushed that back a few times now to late twenty three.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Acquaint reuters, I'm curious if the folks who plopped down

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to Ben Franklin. Uh, that's a hundred bucks to y'all

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>non Americans out there to reserve a cyber truck are

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>still excited about the prospect of potentially owning one by

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of next year. At least a hundred bucks

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't really that much money when you compare it to

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the final selling price of the cyber truck that's likely

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>going to range between forty dollars to seventy thousand dollars,

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the truck's configuration, as the truck will come

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in single, double, and triple motor versions. Now for a

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Meta news. On Monday, Meta's company Instagram dealt

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>with a software bug that impacted thousands of users around

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the world, people reporting that Instagram suspended their accounts for

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>no reason and others were just unable to access their

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>accounts at all. Whatever the bug was, it took several

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>hours for Meta to fix it. By the end of

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the day on Monday, reports from affected users had dwindled significantly,

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>indicating that people were able to get back to watching

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>reels and wondering why they don't see photos of their

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>friends on there anymore. An activist group called Some of

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Us That's s U m of us published a report

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend titled stop the Steal two point oh.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>How Meta and TikTok are promoting a coup. This time,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the focus was not on US elections, but rather the

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that happened this past Sunday in Brazil. In that contest,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the incumbent President bolson Aro, a hard right conservative, faced

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>off against a former president, Lula da Silva, a leftist candidate.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The report alleges that Meta and TikTok both pushed forward

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>false narratives promoted by boson Naro, namely that the election

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>process wasn't to be trusted. If he lost, it would

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be indicative that the system doesn't work, that kind of thing,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like if I win, everything's great, and if I lose,

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's because the system is broken and corrupt. The group

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>accused both Meta and TikTok with allowing baseless conspiracy theories

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to spread across their platforms, and that since these messages

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>included calls for a military coup, that the platforms were

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>taking a prominent role in the destabilization of Brazil. A

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>campaign director with the group named Flora rebell oh Ar

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Dwine did not mince words. She said, at this point,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it is safe to say that Meta has become Bolsonaro's

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>official disinformation machine. Their report comes in on the heels

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of another one from the human rights group Global Witness,

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>which submitted political ads in Brazil containing misinformation to both

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Meta. They found that YouTube accepted every single ad.

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook was a little better. They only accepted half of

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the ads. So I guess good for Facebook for performing

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>better than YouTube, which just accepted falsehoods without question. Anyway,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the election finally happened this past Sunday, and Lula da

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Silva squeaked out a win over Bolsonaro, and I mean

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>squeaked out like a percentage point. It remains to be

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>seen if the incumbent president will actually peacefully hand over power.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>One bit of news I missed last week was that

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Business Insider reported employees at Meta are facing some really

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>tough conditions, maybe not quite as chaotic as Twitter staff are,

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but not that far behind either. Reportedly, managers are telling

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>employees they need to up their output significantly if they

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>want to make it through potential layoffs. One unnamed worker

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the report said, quote, you have three months to

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>prove your worth, put in two effort, or you can

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>resign now if you don't like it. End quote. That

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty harsh. Mark Zuckerberg has indicated recently that he

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thinks Meta staff is bloated, that there are more folks

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that are there than are needed to get the work done,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and that the company is not being nearly as productive

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>or efficient as it can be, which may well be true,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like employee morale is generally pretty low

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and lots of folks are trying to line up other

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>options should they find themselves in the job market in

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the near future. When you take this news and stride

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>with Zuckerberg being absolutely dedicated to his metaverse, vision even

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the face of skepticism and resistance, it starts to

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>look ugly because people begin asking if Meta is even

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on the right course, or if Zuckerberg is chasing after

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>a vision that's never going to be the big hit

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>he's banking on. One thing is clear, the company's reputation

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has taken a massive beating over the last couple of years.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>The stock price for Meta is down to around nine

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars per share, which sounds like a lot, don't get

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, But if you look at the high point

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last fifty two weeks, the high point for

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that stock was three hundred fifty three dollars per share.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it's down to ninety four. The company has lost

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a ton in market capital as a shan and investors

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are clearly worried about where Meta is headed. Will layoffs

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>help the company or is this a bigger issue that

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>requires Mark Zuckerberg to reevaluate his position on the metaverse initiative?

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Smarter people than I have to answer that question. All Right,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go to a quick break, but we'll be

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>back with more news. Right after this. We're back, we

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get some more Meta news, and you know it was

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the prolific poet Carly ray Jepson, who once said, Hey,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I just met you and this is crazy, but here's

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>my number, so call me maybe. Well, we know that

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>c r J didn't need to say that to Meta, because,

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, Meta has lots of people's phone numbers,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>even if they never signed up for an account on

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>any of their platforms, they probably have your phone and

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>your email, whether you've ever been on a Meta platform

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or not. So it turns out Meta has tons of

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>phone numbers and emails all of people who have never

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>had a Facebook or an Instagram account. And you might

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>wonder how did that happen? Well, if someone you know

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>has your contact information in their contacts and then they joined,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>say Facebook, and in the process they allow Facebook to

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>access their contact list, boom, your information has gone from

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>their contact list into Meta's database, even without your consent

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or participation. Isn't that awesome? It actually reminds me a

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the Cambridge Analytica scandal from several years ago.

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>If you recall that all got started when an app

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>developer took advantage of a loophole and Facebook's API and

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>created an app that people could download and use they

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>would get paid for using it. It was a survey app,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and what they would do when they when they downloaded

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it installed it is they would share of their access

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to their Facebook context, which gave the developer the chance

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to view all of the downloaders friends as if the

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>developer were one of those friends, like they could see

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it as if they were the account, the primary account. Anyway,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a decent chance your contact information is in this database,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>even if you've never touched Facebook or Instagram. Earlier this year,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Meta actually created a tool that lets you check to

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>see if your info is in that database, and it

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>gives you the option to delete your information from that

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>database and even block Meta from ever including it again. Curiously,

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Meta has not advertised this tool. They have not alerted

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>people that it exists. In fact, a link to it

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is buried in a very long page about how the

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>company handles non user information, which means, if you don't

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>use Facebook, you would have to navigate to this page

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for people who don't use Facebook to learn about how

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>your information may have been collected by the company, which

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds counterintuitive, right, How many people are gonna do that?

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You're onto something there? But anyway, if you would like

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to see if your info is in Meta's clutches, and

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to delete it, you can do so

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by going to this U r L Facebook dot com

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>slash Contacts slash removal that will let you check your

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>phone number and your email address against the database, and

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if the info comes up because someone shared their contact

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>list and you happen to be in it, you can

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have it deleted and scrubbed from Meta's databases. Again, they

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>don't really let you know that this thing exists, but

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it does. Today, Google kills off yet another product. Hangouts

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to join other Google casualties like Wave and

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus and honestly countless others. There are entire websites

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that are dedicated to documenting all the projects Google either launched,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are acquired, and then subsequently shut down. There is no

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>shortage of them. Hangouts was sort of Google's attempt at

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>unifying various messaging services across the company. You know, the

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>company had launched a whole bunch of different ones under

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>different divisions because Google didn't really structure messaging as a

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>central pillar of product development. Instead, messaging would fall under

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the domain of different departments. So you've got a bunch

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of separate products that were all geared toward messaging, like

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Android had one, and Gmail had one, and Google Plus

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>all had their own messaging systems. Hangouts started as the

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus entry and was ultimately an attempt to unify

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all these disparate strategies into a single product, and for

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a short while, Hangouts managed to do that, Like You

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>managed to have all these other things folded into Hangouts,

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>which unified Google strategy and arguably was a really good move. However,

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem was Hangouts was under the domain of Google Plus,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and Google Plus was a massive failure. Despite an initial

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>spike in interest as the service launched, it failed to

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>get a sustainable user base going. So once Google Plus

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>got struck that man, Hangouts was kind of without a

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>parent anymore and it languished, and so you didn't really

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have this centralized position, the centralized strategy when it comes

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to messaging, and Google would then also capitulate to the

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>demands of cell phone carriers because the cell phone carriers

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the idea of SMS being lumped in with

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>other messaging services. They wanted an independent SMS app in

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>order to maintain a hold on that type of messaging.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want it to be lumped in with all

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the other kinds of messaging services. So the a placement

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for Hangouts today, at least in Gmail, is Google Chat.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It is not as good as Hangouts was at its peak.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely an inferior product. I use it all the

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>time with my co host aerial Casting for our show

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Large Neugron Collider. We use Google Chat to stay in

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>contact with each other, but it is not the same

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as Hangouts at its peak. Now Hangouts has not been

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>good for ages. It really suffered once it lost its

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>lifeline with Google. Plus. The simple fact is Google really

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>fumbled the ball when it comes to messaging. It cannot

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>hold a candle to Apple, which has made its own

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I message platform a bit of a status symbol, not

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just a bit is a status symbol, and in fact,

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it has a very quick way to identify those poor

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>schlubs who are messaging with an Android phone rather than

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone by having that different color little bubble pop up.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Now I say this as an Android user, I have

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>no interest in switching to iPhone, but I do admit

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like iPhone has a lock on the status of messages

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and you can be looked down upon for using an

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Android phone from Apple users. And you know what, if

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I cared about what they thought, I bet that would

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hurt my feelings. And other Google news, the company will

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>no longer require app developers in India to use Google's

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>own billing system for in app purchases. We've seen this

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>story unfold all around the world at different speeds and scales.

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>More and more regions are pushing back against both Apple

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and Google for their policies that require app developers to

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>only use the in house building systems of the respective platforms.

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's because those in house building systems guarantee a

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>cut for the platforms themselves. So we're typically talking about

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a thirty percent cut. It can be lower, like as

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>low as fifteen percent, but it's typically a thirty percent

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>cut of every in app purchase goes to Apple or Google,

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on what platform you're on, um as sort of

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the cost of doing business. This is why Apple CEO

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook has been so bullish on adopting a services

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy rather than focusing on hardware production the way Apple

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>typically was thought of, because services provide a steady stream

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of revenue and all you really have to do is

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>provide the platform right, and in many places we're starting

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to see governments labeled the policy as anti competitive and unfair.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen lots of calls for the companies to

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>allow developers to use whichever building service they want. They

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>can go with the in house building service, or they

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>could choose a third party building service. That's a move

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 1>that both Apple and Google have repeatedly resisted around the world.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, we've seen stories where a company has

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>placed like Apple has placed restrictions so that a developer

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>technically can choose a third party building system, but we'll

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have to spend even more money if they use the

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>alternative then if they stick with the in house method.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, apples like, oh, sure you can

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>choose a third party, but now you're gonna have to

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>pay us. That kind of approach, which obviously doesn't fly

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>well in the face of regulators. India's Competition Commission ordered

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Google to make this change, allowing developers to choose whichever

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>building system they wish, and now, at least in India

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>they can. We may see such things roll out to

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world. Like I said, the European

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Union has really been pushing on this, We've seen sub

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>movement here in the United States. Um, it's not the

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>same everywhere, but we are starting to see a growing

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>movement to prevent companies like Apple and Google from dominating

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the space using you know, this in house approach. Over

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on the same Brain YouTube channel, Microsoft Xbox head Hauncho

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Phil Spencer said, quote, We're not taking Call of Duty

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>from PlayStation that it's not our intent. Our intent is

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not to do that, and as long as there's a

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>PlayStation out there to ship to, our intent is that

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>will continue to ship Call of Duty on PlayStation, similar

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to what we've done with Minecraft since we owned that

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>end quote. You might think why would Phil Spencer say this, Well,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>there's been this growing concern since Microsoft is pursuing an

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of the company Activision Blizzard, that Microsoft would then

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>restrict the distribution of titles from Activision Blizzard to either

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>just PCs and Xboxes or essentially anything other than Sony

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>PlayStation because Sony is the biggest competitor in the video

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>game space from Microsoft perspective. So by using that Minecraft example,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Spencer is pointing out that Microsoft has really expanded access

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to Minecraft, and it really does seem these days like

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anything with a screen can run a Minecraft game.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So Spwer is making a case that Microsoft plan to

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>acquire Activision Blizzard does not represent a threat to the

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>greater video game landscape, that a company like Sony could

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to expect Activision Blizzard titles having PlayStation versions. Why

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>is he doing that? Well? Over in Europe, Microsoft is

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>facing some potential government investigations into its acquisition deal, and

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>those investigations could scuttle the whole deal or at the

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>very least delay it. Neither outcome is something that Microsoft

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is particularly interested in seeing. So the chief concern appears

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to be that Microsoft consolidates and becomes an anti competitive

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>video game company, preventing Sony from access to titles that

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are really popular with gamers and forcing gamers to buy

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft platforms if they want to access those games. And

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is saying that's not on our plan at all,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense, will make way more money if

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we continue to make titles for the PlayStation. Uh. Microsoft

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>supporters have claimed that Sony is fueling the fear in Europe,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's Sony representatives who are talking to regulators and

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>getting them concerned about this deal and effort to investigate

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and potentially derail it. Uh. I don't know if that's

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>true or not, but that's the reporting that's going on

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>over in Europe. As for what I think, well, I

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think Sony definitely has a bias here. I mean, Sony

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>has an interest, a vested interest in seeing that this

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go through because they don't want to see Microsoft's

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>influence grow in a competitive market in the video game space. Uh.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that the arguments are completely earnest

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and sincere. However, I also think that consolidation leads to

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bad outcomes in the long run, and that increased competition

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>leads to the best outcomes for consumers. So it's complicated,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in the video game space, like we're seeing more

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and more really big companies absolute really dominate that market,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>where you you're getting down to just less than you know,

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you could count the number of massive companies on one hand,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and when you start to see that competition dwindle. Uh.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>The consumer typically is the person who suffers the most

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in the long run. So while I don't think Sony's

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>argument is particularly genuine, I also am a little concerned

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about seeing fewer and fewer players in the video game space.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's not even touching on all the the controversy

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Activision Blizzard in the various reports we've

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>heard over the last year and a half. Really, Okay,

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a couple more stories to go through before

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:55.959
<v Speaker 1>we get to those. Let's take another quick break. Before

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the break, we were talking about Microsoft. I mentioned that

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a suspicion and that Sony has been influencing regulators

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and the EU too kind of view the Activision Blizzard

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>acquisition with a skeptical eye. But we also have some

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>specific Sony news to cover. The company's latest earnings release

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>call has some bad news in it with regard to

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>video games. The company revealed that saw a drop in

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>PlayStation Plus subscribers. So, for those of you all who

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are not in on the whole PlayStation lingo, PlayStation Plus

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is a monthly subscription service for PS four and PS

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>five owners. That service gives those owners access to online play.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't have this service, you can't play

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>online games on the PS four and PS five. There

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are three separate tiers of subscriptions. The basic tier is

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>called Essential, then you have Extra, then you have Premium,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and Obviously, these are at three different price points, and

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>as you would imagine, the more expensive you go, the

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>more benefit as you get, mostly in the form of

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>access to additional PS four and PS five titles. It's

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot like Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass service. The two

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>are similar in many ways, and Microsoft has really been

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>pushing hard on Xbox Game Pass, kind of positioning it

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in an attempt to make that model the future of gaming.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And you can understand why because if you get people

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hooked in on subscriptions, you've got a guaranteed ongoing revenue source, right,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you're just focused on producing games, your next

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>title might be a clunker and a big failure and

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't make that much money. You might lose money

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on it because you spent so much in production you

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>weren't able to recapture that in sales. If you're switch

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>your your bottle around where you're selling subscriptions as opposed

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to focusing on selling games, well yeah, you might release

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>some clunkers, but you still have all the great titles

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that that subscription has access to, which keeps people coming

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>back over and over again. So Sony is trying to

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing and in fact, both companies have

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>been trying to do this for for years. But Sony

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is losing some traction because while the division still managed

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to increase revenue year over year, it did lose some subscribers,

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a few million subscribers, so at least it's not losing money,

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just losing people. The earnings report also revealed that

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Sony's sales of the PS five have remained flat year

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>over year, which is not a surprise. You can really

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>chalk that up to being the fault of the supply chain.

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Ever since its launch, PS five has kind of trickled

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>into stores here and there, and ear gamers just scoop

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>up units as quickly as they hit store shelves. The

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues Sony has faced since the pandemic began

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have not improved significantly. Sony has subsequently adjusted its profits

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>forecast for this year. They reduced it from two hundred

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty five billion in down to two hundred twenty five

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>billion year, so reducing it by thirty billion yen that's

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about oh two million dollars. I think anyway, the company

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 1>will find ways to increase production on the PS five eventually,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at least I hope so because if it does, I

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>suspect that will go a very long way towards turning

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>things around. With a larger PS five user base out there,

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to find more developers who will focus on

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>producing games meant just for the PS five, because right

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>now a lot of developers are kind of straddling console

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>generations because there just aren't enough PS five users out

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there to justify a fully committed production of a current

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>generation game. So instead we're seeing companies make games that

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>could be played on either the PS four or PS five,

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>which means they're they're pulling their punches, they're holding back.

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They haven't really focused on making games that take full

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>advantage of current console generations capabilities. And again, it makes sense.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>If your user base is small, you can't pour the

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>same amount of money and effort into making games for

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it because you'll never get a return on that investment.

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is kind of a chicken and egg problem here.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Until there are more PS five units out there, then

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no real incentive for developers to really go all

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in on creating current generation games. This, by the way,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>also applies to Microsoft, not just to Sony. It's just

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this was specifically about the Sony's Earnings Call. Finally, researchers

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Florida have discovered a potentially catastrophic

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability in LDAR systems that are used by several companies

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as they're working towards creating autonomous vehicles. Namely, the researchers

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>found that by using a well aimed and precisely timed laser,

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a person could create blind spots in ALDAR system and

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that would mean that an autonomous vehicle could potentially be

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>unable to detect obstacle, including pedestrians, that are masked by

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this blind spot. So it's not that different to having

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>someone shine a very bright light in your eyes. You

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>can't make out anything that could be behind that light.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Same sort of thing. Now, the research makes it sound

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like these pieces that you would need to create this

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of system are pretty cheap and easy to get,

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so it would not be hard to put together something

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be capable of fooling light our systems or

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>masking light our systems. But the actual attack sounds like

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it would require a certain level of sophistication and skill

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because you would need to accurately track the vehicle, aim

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and time the firing of the laser in order to

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>mask the light are properly, but it is possible the

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>researchers were able to do it, and if they're able

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it, then a bad actor would be able

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this. So it is a vulnerability, and so

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the researchers are urging companies that produce and use these

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>kinds of light our systems to factor that in and

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to build in protections against such attacks, effectively patching the vulnerability.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the scientists who worked on this project even

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>suggested upgrades that would protect vehicles and their passengers from

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>such attacks in the future, which is great, right, It's

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not just pointing out a problem, but saying here's the

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>solution to that problem, so that we're not just automatically

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>striking this from being a possible technology in the future. Rather,

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's being aware of the limitations and taking steps to

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>overcome those limitations before it becomes like a potential target

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>where we could have a tragedy occur as a result

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of failing to address this vulnerability. All right, that's the

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>news for Tuesday, November one, two thousand twenty two. Hope

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you're all well. If you'd like to get in touch

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with me. Well, there there's currently two ways. We'll see

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>how long the second way lasts. The first one is,

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, to download the I Heart Radio app. It's

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>free to download, it's free to use. There's a little

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>microphone icon if you navigate over to tech Stuff. You

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>just put tech Stuff in the search bar, it'll pop

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>on up. You see that microphone icon that lets you

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>record a voice message up to thirty seconds and link

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for us. Let me know what you would like. Uh.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>If you would like me to play the audio from

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>your your request, you just let me know. I'm not

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it without your permission, So if you don't,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it. Just tell me what you would

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>like me to talk about. The other way, as of now,

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>anyway is Twitter. I keep making that joke, but one

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of these days it's gonna be real. But yeah, it's

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Twitter for now, and the handle for the show is

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff hs w uh. As of now, services still

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>something I'm on. I realized that more and more people

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are kind of migrating away from it for various reasons.

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of different reasons to be concerned

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>about it, and then I'm concerned about it too, obviously,

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But I still check it, so if you do still

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>use Twitter, and no judgment. By the way, if you

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>want to use Twitter, I don't. I think that's fine.

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That's your right you do it. I don't judge you

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>at all. I think it's fine. But if you still

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>use it, leave me a message on there, let me

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>know what you would like me to talk about in

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the future, and I'll talk to you again really soon. Yeah.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.