WEBVTT - Three Sovereign Debt Experts Explain How The World Can Instantly Bring Aid To Emerging Markets

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe wisnal So Joe, Uh,

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that the world is

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty bad place right now. I would not disagree. Um,

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we just had jobless claims. Those are still pretty bad. Obviously,

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a huge question mark over the U S economy.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Europe has been doing very poorly as well. But I

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's also fair to say that some parts of

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the world are doing worse than others. Yeah, it's really

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because, of course you have to disentangle the sort

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of health crisis specifically from the economic crisis. There are

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world that may actually be doing better, uh,

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in a surprising sense in terms of the outbreak of

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>the public health crisis the virus, but obviously not getting

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>spared at all from the fact that so much commerce

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is that a virtual, virtual standstill. So even even places

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that yeah, well the numbers don't seem as bad as

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK or the U S from an economic situation,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they may be even worth potentially. Yeah, but you also

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have some parts of the world where both the health

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>crisis and the financial crisis is pretty bad. And I'm

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking specifically of emerging markets. So these are countries that

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily have a really developed health system, and they

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't have a lot of money necessarily to suddenly

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>direct to containing a pandemic. And now, of course they're

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an economic crisis that is making the money

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that they have even well reducing the amount of money

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>available to them to fight the crisis. So it's really

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>like a double whammy at this point. Right, that's exactly right.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Relatively rich countries or rich countries like the US, for

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as bad as we may be doing on the public

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>health side, there's no real financial constraint to spending a

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, both in terms of helping people pay

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>their bills and also building out a public health system.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It's more of a political capacity constraint. But some countries,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously they simply don't have the fiscal capacity to do

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>what's necessary to really fight the health front, even if

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there worthy desire or the political capacity to do so. Right, So,

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as bad as it gets in the U S, don't

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>forget that the US government can always issue treasuries. And

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>why didn't its deficit for extra fiscal spending, um Sorry

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that sounded flippant, but I don't intend it to be.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That actually is UH an advantage. Okay, well, so today

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be digging into emerging markets. We're going to

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of those fiscal dynamics, but we're especially

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>going to zoom in on this debt question and how

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets can actually handle the spending that they need

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or raise the money that they need in order to

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fight the coronavirus. Exactly right. So, I mean we've talked

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about this before, we had a discussion on it. We

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>talked to brand Setser several weeks ago. That was before

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the I think I'm f meetings, but it's

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>still I think many people still sense that there is

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>much more that needs to be done. And again, because

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the nature viruses and also economic collapses, I think

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>time really is of the essence to move before extreme

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>lasting damage takes place. Okay, Well, on that note, let's

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get straight to it. Then. I'm really happy to say

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have not one, not two, but three guests

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on today's episode. Two of them have been with odd

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>thoughts before one is brand new. I'm going to introduce

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>them all. Uh Midto Glate is a professor of law

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at Duke Universe City and of course one of the

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>world's foremost experts on sovereign debt restructurings. Lee book High

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is the legendary sovereign debt lawyer, now retired from Cleary

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Gottlie but an honorary professor at the University of Edinburgh,

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and Ugo Panizza is Professor of International Economics at the

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Graduate Institute in Geneva. All three of them and X

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are experts in their fields and they've come up with

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a proposal for how emerging markets might be able to

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>weather this crisis. So thank you all for coming on.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, thank you. Why don't we uh

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>set out the scene. I guess how much trouble are

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets actually in at the moment? Very big trouble,

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>if that's the question. If you one, they can give

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you a couple of numbers. So we run some estimates

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and according to our estimates, emerging markets need to um

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>service that in the next twelve months for nearly nine

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. We so this is the public sector and

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the external that of the public sector of

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this emerging market country. So this is UH, this is

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a large amount of money, and there was a not

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>paid by the Prime Minister of Ethiopia in the in

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times last week, we basically said that

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some in Ethiopia and some other discontents, they need to

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>face the choice whether to services that or you know,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>spent for health care of the their own citizens. So

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a difficult choice mhm. So already there are countries

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that have been forced just in these in the short

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's really just been a couple of months.

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Already we're seeing companies forced or started, countries forced to

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>make one priority over the other, either stay good on

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>their external public debt or do the necessary spending to

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>keep the virus in check. Yes, there there have been

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred countries that have asked the IMF for emergency

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>financial assistance. That's more than half the membership of the IMF.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But that money will not be enough and in for

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>some countries not nearly enough to defray the extra expenses

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that are coming with this health crisis. Therefore, they're faced

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with its choice of having to divert funds that had

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>been earmarked for other governmental purposes, including debt service, to

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>divert those funds towards the expenses of dealing with this pandemic.

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>If I can just add one number. So the the

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I m F forecast growth for all of one ninety

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>member countries, and at the peak of the global financial crisis,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it forecasted growth positive growth for seventy seven countries. This

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>year is forecasting positive growth for nine countries. This is

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>really and even for these nine plants, they are forecasting

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>very low positive growth, which nobody about supercent I'm actually

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>surprised at nine countries forecast for positive growth. Okay, Lee,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the number of countries that have approached the

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I m F for help. We've also had an agreement

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>from the G twenty for a temporary debt stand still

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in mid to maybe you could

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about that and what's involved in that stand still.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there have been some efforts to think about

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the global implications of the current crisis, and one of

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the efforts that seemed very positive started with and I

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>MF World Bank Call for Action and was then followed

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>by the G twenty, you know, announcing that there would

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be a debt moratorium for the rest of the year

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on debts on payments that are owed to the bilaterals,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and importantly in that there was a request that the

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>private creditor sector also provide similar relief, and there had

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>been indications that they were willing. The Institute of International

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Finance sort of a lobbying group for the private creditors,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>had agreed that yes, we should provide relief to the

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>poorest countries in the world altogether, all on comparable terms,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and this seemed like a very positive sign that at

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>least we were beginning to think about this providing relief

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Unfortunately, as of today, this seems like it is,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in my skeptical viewpoint, all completely falling apart. All of

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>those enthusiastic statements about providing relief for the rest of

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the year UH seem to be going nowhere. I think

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the official sector will provide the relief. I think the

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>private sector is basically trying to delay and not provide

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>any relief whatsoever. I'm sure I hope that they call

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in and yell at us and say that no, they

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>actually want to provide relief, but I don't see it

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere. Well, Lee, I'm thinking about you know, Tracy,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and I talked with you um several months ago at

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one of our live events and these sort of these

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>debt renegotiations. Even in the simplest terms, if it's just

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>one country trying to renegotiate some of its debt, they

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>seem to you know, these renegotiations can go on for years,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>with different classes of creditors who own different types of

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bonds um all trying to get their share. I can

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>only imagine that it's orders of magnitude more complex when

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it trying to basically do a solution for every country

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world at the same time. Well, the way

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we've been thinking about it is that we have an

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>immediate emergency, and that is the need to get funding

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>into the hands of these countries to deal with the

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>pandemic entering. They were a handful of countries who had

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>already acknowledged that they needed a full scale debt restructuring Argentina, Lebanon, Ecuador, Venezuela. Obviously,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we will leave with a much longer list of countries

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>that need a full scale debt restructuring, but that's not

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the focus right now. The immediate focus in the and

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and the paper that my colleagues and I produced was

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>intended to find a way quickly and uniformly two free

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>up liberate cash that these countries could use for COVID

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen amelioration. This program that me too has described involving

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the official sector and we hoped the private sector, was

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>all intended to focus on that. Everyone knows that within

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a relatively short space of time we will have to

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>confront the broader issue that you've just mentioned. How does

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one deal with full scale debt restructurings, because many countries

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>will exit the COVID period with unsustainable debt stocks. That

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>will be a challenge, frankly, that we have not faced

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>since the and the Latin American debt crisis and the

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>world it was very different back then. Mh. I want

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>to get to that point, but before we do, perhaps

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one of you could just walk us through what your

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>proposal actually entails. As you mentioned, you know, maybe it's

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not that difficult to have a debt stand still for

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>bilateral sovereign creditors. Not that difficult. Maybe maybe that's sort

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of overegging it. But there is a sticking point in

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the form of the private creditors. So what's your solution here?

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Why don't why don't I walk you through it? It's

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really quite straightforward. We propose that the dead are

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>countries that need this relief, and not all of them will.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of them will not be afflicted by the epidemic

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>as badly as others, and some may continue to have

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least have hopes of having market access. But

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for the rest, we propose that they open what we

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>call a central credit Facility CCF with a multilateral development

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>bank that could be the World Bank, but it could

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be one of the regional development banks African Development Bank,

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Asian Development Back, and so forth. The country would then

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>divert the payments that would normally have gone towards interest

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>payments on external debt. It would divert those payments into

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the central credit facility. As the amounts arrive at the CCF,

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the administrator the multilateral Development bank would credit the relevant

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>creditor with a participation interest in the CCF, just like

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a syndicated loan. The country could then borrow from the

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>CCF to deal with COVID nineteen related expenses. This is

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a critical feature because the multilateral Development Bank would be

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>responsible for monitoring the use of that money. No individual

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>commercial creditor or even group of commercial creditors is going

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to be in a position to undertake that monitoring task.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And the last thing anyone wants is money that has

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>been effectively contributed by creditors to deal with this pandemic

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>being siphoned away for other purposes. Put it that way,

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>so the multi ladder of Development Bank would be responsible

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for that. The We don't specify what the financial terms

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of the CCF should be, but common sense is that

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:43.479
<v Speaker 1>they should be. That the repayment terms for the CCFP

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>should not put further burden on the post COVID financial

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>position of these countries. In a nutshell, that's the nut

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Do any of you have an estimate for how much

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>money that could actually free up? Its kind of ends

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on whether the bilateral creditors are also going to participate

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in this bugle would have a better idea. I think

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers, the number is the maximum number. It's

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what I gave you before. If you only focus on payment,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you on long term death. The maximum number is what

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I gave you before. That of course I gave it

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to you wrong, because I always get confused between millions

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and billions. I gave you a number of about nine millions,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>actually nine hundred billions. That's well that's the maximum amount

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>which is owed by all emerging and developing countries. Clearly,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as Lee said, not all countries would need this type

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of help, So is this sort of an upper bound

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and and the amount varies from from the country

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to country. But that's sort of let's say, the the

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>end alope, the maximum memberlope. So we haven't, as Lead

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, where just this first stage which we need

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>immediate cash for these countries to fight the health crisis. Obviously,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the question of where they will be in terms of

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>dead stock sustainability, that's probably a question for next year,

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be infinitely more complex. But in terms

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of implementing the plan put forth by the three of

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you to free up this cash through UH sort of

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>international development a bank or multiple banks, who are the

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>actors that need to make this happen, just to coordinate

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this first step and why is it proving to be

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so challenging to coordinate them? Initially it seemed like everybody

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was going to cooperate, the key actors in coordinate such

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>an effort because we do not have anything like an

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>international sovereign bankruptcy scheme. UH. This all has to be

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>done in a cooperative fashion. And as the historical matter,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the key actors have always been the I m F

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 1>and the multilaterals. Here, the I m F and the

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>World Bank, through their leadership, took early action. I think

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>marchy was when they put out their call to action

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and the private creditor group initially seemed to support this,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>which then resulted in the G twenty taking concrete actions.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So end of March early April, it looked like we

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were going to be able to provide on a global

0:17:53.640 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>scale relief to basically half the world for the rest

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>of massive relief as Google put the numbers in, and

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>then as the question of implementation, so our team was thinking,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody's cooperating, this is just a matter of

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how do we enable the cooperation. And as

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we were working on the enabling the co operation, the

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>willingness to cooperate gradually diminished. Now there are many motivations

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>one can ascribe to this, or maybe this is just

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the natural process, but uh, you know, as the G

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty said we will provide official sector relief to the

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>poorest countries, then the free rider tendencies blossomed, and I

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>suspect that at least some in the private creditor world said, oh, well,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if the official sector will provide all this relief, maybe

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to provide relief. Maybe we need to explain,

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we didn't really mean we were going to

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>provide relief. We want, you know, proper compensation. Oh. You know,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>many of these countries actually can borrow it. Market rates

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are about market rates, and maybe we should just let

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>them borrow. And maybe we have fiduciary obligations, even though

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>many of the people have spoken to don't even understand

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what fiduciary obligations are. Uh. So it is looking like

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the official sector will have to provide the temporary relief.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It won't be enough private Uh. Many countries who have

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>access will continue to borrow, even though I think they

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>should not borrow as this stage. If you read their

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>risk disclosures, you would think they should not borrow. And

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>then the debt restructuring when it comes, will come earlier

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>than it should and will be brutal. I do want

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the issuance that we are seeing from

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, but before we do, I understand the free

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>rider point for private creditors, But do you think private

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>creditors might also be worried that by agreeing to agreeing

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to the stand still, they're basically opening up a Pandora's

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>box of I don't want to say excuses, but extenuating

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>circumstances that countries could use to hit the pause button

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on their payments going forward. Is that a concern? It

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is possibly a concern, But I don't think anyone living

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>through the experience that we're all living through believes that

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this is anything other than a truly exceptional worldwide phenomenon.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>None of us, none of us alive today, have ever

0:20:55.240 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>seen anything like it. And so while there's always a

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>slippery slope concern in these things, I think the official

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sector and the private sector could minimize that by ensuring

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that every time they speak about the relief that they're

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>now providing, they do so in terms that confines it

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>two circumstances of this once in a century variety. I mean,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>just to reinforce what at least said. You know, if

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you post some some policy, you always use the slippery

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>slope argument, right from legalization of marijuana to whatever right

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you legalize marijuana, and the day after everybody is shooting

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>roine or whatever. I mean, you know, the Bank of

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>England just announced that this this is the worth recession

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>in three hundred years. You know, they postponed the Olympic Games.

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there have been we observe so many, so

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>many exceptions actions that the idea of saying, you know,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>if you do something now, then you know next year

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody is coming out with some excuse, or this happened,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you know in twenty twenty, we're going to do it again.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>It seems a bit a sign if you don't want

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to do something or coming up with some some excuse,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>can I ask you a question? And it's kind of

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>falling on mid to his point, and it's a little

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>less academic or less theoretical. But for those who have

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>not of us, who have never been in these rooms

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>where the negotiations take place and these discussions about establishing

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>new facilities and debt pauses take place. You mentioned the

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>G twenty. But when you talk about the private sector,

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the private owners of government debt, how do you mean

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there's thousands that I don't know how many there are,

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But how did they coordinate and who who talks for them?

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And how do they have a voice in the first place?

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>What did those negotiations sound like well, in this case,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a Washington, D c. Based organization, the Institute for International Finance,

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>which has about four hundred and fifty members, most of

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>them are financial institutions. They stepped forward on April nine

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and wrote a letter to the official sector actors, in

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>effect offering the cooperation of commercial creditors in this stand

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>still initiative. So, in this case, they have raised their

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>hand and purported to be the mouthpiece for the private

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>sector community in this Now, there are many institutions that

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>do not belong to the i F and might dispute

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>whether they are a legitimate spokesperson. But in this case,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how it was done. And the G twenty,

0:23:55.119 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in its subsequent communicate, and which had announced that bilateral

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>creditors were going to provide a suspension of payments for

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the balance of this year, actually identified the i F

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>as the coordinator for the commercial creditors. And so you said,

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>initially the private commercial creditors that they're willing to participate

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of program, then have gotten cold feed.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>How do they couch that? Did they? I? Presumably I

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>presume they don't just say, now you know what we'd

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like all our money and we want to be paid. First,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I presume that they have some sort of higher minded,

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>theoretical sounding argument, But what is there, as you say,

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's fallen apart. But how do they how do they

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>put their complaints with your program? Well, they sent a

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>subsequent letter on me the first which said, we've been

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>consulting our members and we feel we should bring to

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the attention of the official sector the many obstacles that

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>private sector creditor as will face. First, in their view,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the initiative must be wholly voluntary. That is, any creditor

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't want to participate is perfectly free not to participate. Parentheses,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>That is somewhat inconsistent with another principle that they espouse,

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>which is inter creditor equity one for all and all

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for one. If everyone can opt out and everyone can

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>negotiate different terms, you're not going to have inter creditor equity. Uh. Second,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they said, in order to do this, individual creditor institutions

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to calculate the net present value

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>cost of this deferment and offset it either by raising

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>interest rates or getting official sector guarantees for the deferred amounts.

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>In addition, each institution or some atituitions these certainly the

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>asset managers will have fiduciary duties. They will have to

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>explain to their investors why they are voluntarily agreeing to

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>defer receipt of interest payments, and that will be a

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>challenge for some of those institutions. So it was a

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>long list. It was not a disavowal of their prior commitment.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a preview of the many difficulties that would

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>attend this, and they said that these arrangements must be

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>negotiated creditor by creditor, maybe instrument by instrument, and that

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>process alone could easily eat up the balance of I

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go back to the issuance point that Mitto

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>made private creditors basically arguing, well, why don't emerging markets

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just sell that normally into the market. Somewhat surprisingly, we

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>have seen in a bunch of e M bonds sold recently.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking at um Sri Lanka's debt and

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's trading at distress levels. But there are some cell

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>side analysts that are issuing by recommendations on Sri Lanka,

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of all things, in the middle of this global crisis.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>How are these countries still able to issue debt and

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>what are the buyers thinking? At this point? I am

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>completely bit fuddled. Maybe Lee or Ugo can explain this,

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but I have been watching this truly bizarre phenomenon of countries.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, take Guatemala, Paraguay, Mexico, countries that are in

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>very deep distress that if you read there prospectuses explained

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to the market. Look, we have no remittances coming in,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>our tourism sector is destroyed. Our primary commodity, say hypothetically

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>oil in Mexico is down in the doll drums. We

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have shut our borders, we do not have adequate health

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>care facilities, and then they're able to raise billions on

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I am there fuddled. But I do not

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>think that the argument that is being made by some

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that oh, this is a sign that everything is well

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and we do not need to provide relief holds. I

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think that is utterly ludicrous and dangerous for us to

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>um use as a projection for what will come. But

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you that argument is being made, especially by some who

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do not want to provide relief. They are much happier

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to sell bonds, to buy those bonds at very high

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:02.239
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, although I should ex caveat that with the

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are not nearly as a high as I

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>would think them to be. But you know, maybe Lee

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>or Hugo has a more sort of rational The markets

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>understand everything at price, every risk perspective. But I am

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just completely the funneled well that the countervailing factor, I

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think is the tsunami of quantitative easing that's occurred in

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the last two months. You just have a wall of

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>money that centered the market. It must go somewhere. Uh.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>The interest rates on the bonds of developed countries like

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States or the Europeans are near zero or

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>below zero. So if you're an institutional investor, you must

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>find a home for all of this money someplace, and

0:29:56.000 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps eclipses you a normal risk aversion in assessing

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these investments. I have to say it sounds

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>me too. And actually both of the both sides of

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this debate feel very much like the debate around basically

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>every asset class in the world right now, including US equities,

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in which you look at the fundamental this makes no sense,

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>unemployment expected to shoot. And then the other side of

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that coin is yes, but there is all this extraordinary

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>intervention happening one way. It's going to have the resolve, presumably,

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but the debate about how the E M bond world

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>continues to trade and raise money feels just like a

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>microcosm of literally every other asset class debate we have

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>these days. I was going to flag one of my

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite countries in good times, which is the Maldives, which

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>are very close to my home in Kerala, just a

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>forty five minutes flight away. And you know normally that

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that their economics are quite good because they have such

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a booming tourism sector. But they are completely dependent on tourism.

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's close to seventy of their GDP comes

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>from tourism or tourism related activities. They have a small

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>portion of their economy that comes from sales of fish

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>uh and they do not have anything resembling a meaningful

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>health sector. Part of the reason I know a lot

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>about the Maldives is people from the Maldives workers come

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to India for even the most basic healthcare needs. Now,

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in the current situation, they are down to zero, no tourists,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>fish prices gone down to the bottom, They're having multiple

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen outbreaks, and they can't send their citizens to

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>India because the flights are all closed. Now, this is

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>not temporary. This country is going to find it incredibly

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to recover even in the medium term. So you

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>know that the estimates from both the official sector and

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the private markets are much more optimistic in this case

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>than I think reality requires. But I wonder whether it

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is a window into what's happening in the rest of

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the world that we are just refusing to face the

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>reality of how bad this is. But I am a pessimist,

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully I am wrong. Um, just on that time

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>horizon point. I mean, this theme tends to come up

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>over and over again whenever people are talking about debt

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>relief or debt stand stills. If you give people a

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>grace period now, um, for instance, in the US, like

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for certain things they are granting grace periods, does that

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>save up the problem for a later date? And how

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>do you manage the exit process? How do you make

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that a borrower doesn't end up owing all of

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the money for the past six months that they should

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>owe and they have to pay it in one big

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>lump sum lump payment. How do you actually manage that?

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do you ensure that you're not saving up

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a problem for the for a later date. Tracy is

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>concern the G twenty, when they announced the bilateral debt suspension,

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>proposed that they deferred interest and in their case, principal

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>payments would be due over a four year period with

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>one year of grace, so one year in which no

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>principle is repaid, and then another three years. That was

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>their proposal for how to smooth out this problem. The

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking on this is that at the moment it is

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>simply not possible for anyone to prepare a debt sustainability

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>analysis for any of these countries, that is, in which

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>one can repose confidence. Put it that way, there are

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>simply too many variables. When does this crisis end? What

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>will commodity prices look like when it ends, What will

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>export markets look like, What will the tourism industry look like?

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>What will the financial markets look like? Those are shrieking

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>unknowns at this point in time. Hopefully by the end

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of this year some of those issues will begin to

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to be analyzed, and that would allow the

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I m F to begin to assess longer term debt sustainability.

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>As I said, a moment ago, we should not expect

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to leave with only four or five countries facing the

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>need for a full scale debt restructuring. I think there'll

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be many more. But who's on the list and how

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>severe is that debt restructuring at the moment, no one

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I think can predict. So, just on that note, if

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we're looking forward and we think that the world and

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets especially are going to come out of the

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>current crisis owing more money, if we think that we're

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get a bunch of restructurings, it's just a

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.479
<v Speaker 1>question of how many and who's first, and who sort

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of needs it most. Is that maybe is that an

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity perhaps to rethink the way emerging markets are funded

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or just sort of hit reset on the way this

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>whole system um actually works. I'm trying to end on

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a sort of optimistic note, But do you see an opportunity?

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>You stole my question, literally the question I was going

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to ask. No, no, no no, it's perfect, it's great, this

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>could be the last that's uh. You You and I

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>were in the exact had the exact same thought at

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So my mouth, my mouth, Yeah, whogo

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>is our optimists? Let's lett him in I don't know.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've been pushing for a long time towards

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>this idea of using more contingent that instruments, and so

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>far they haven't worked. We can tell you of many

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>cases in which countries have paid dearly to try to use,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, issue GDP index bonds in the sense that

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they that price when things were going well, without getting

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>anything when things were going badly. So if we could

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>go in that direction, that would be great. Even though

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm the optimistic guy, I'm not very optimistic, but I

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what Lee put that on this well. The

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>current effort by some in the official community is to

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out a way in which we can

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 1>deal with multiple sovereign debt restructurings going on simultaneously. We

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>did that in the eighties, but of course the creditor

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>universe was a much more hum a genious group of

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>commercial banks. Arguably we did it starting in with the

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Brady initiative, and that's what some in the official sector

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>are looking at. Is it possible to replicate a template

0:37:55.920 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for how a sovereign debt restructuring could be done so

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that if we are faced with the situation in which

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>there are ten or twenty or thirty countries going through

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the process at the same time. They would not have

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to each individually and in the spoke manner attempt to

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to implement a dead restructuring that's right

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>now the subject of investigation by some of the official sect. Okay, well,

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>on that sort of optimistic note, but not necessarily. We're

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>going to leave it there, Ugo, mit too, and we

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being on and for that

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>fascinating conversation. Thanks very much, good to be with you.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you. Yeah, that was great, appreciate it.

0:38:48.600 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so, Joe. I found that conversation fascinating, as

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, and I know you're fond of saying that

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 1>people don't necessarily need to worry about debt. In fact,

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I can see you tweeting that just a few hours ago.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But that really only applies, I think to some developed markets, right,

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and e M, you can and probably should worry about

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the debt. Yes, I think there is a very different

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation when you think about debt sustainability and the cost

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of borrowing and all these countries in the e M

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>versus the developed market context, and what this conversation really

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>drives home is that you know, it's so complicated to

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just get in the short term debt relief or sort

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of that, when, as a lead pointed out, when it

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>actually gets to the point about looking at sustainability of

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the overall debt stock, it really does decided just going

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to be mind bogglingly difficult challenge for the world in

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the years ahead, even if the virus itself fades. Is

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Yeah, I mean, the complexity, you're right, is

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>what really stands out. You have all these different creditors,

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>all these different claims, you have public, private, foreign um

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and domestic creditors. I don't even know how how you

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>would begin, but you know, kudos to the three of

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>those guys. They're trying to put this together. Yeah. No,

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the immediate need, like I think there's

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>an agreement the immediate need everywhere is cash, right, Like

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the cash isn't going to solve the health crisis,

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but cash can keep people solving, keep people paying their bills,

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>keep paying doctors and so forth. And so there does

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>seem to be this recognition that we don't need to

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>make the first part of this too complex. We just

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>need to free up cash, and that's even true in

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the U S. Contact. Yeah, and I guess it would

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see if um the urgency of this

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>particular crisis makes people realize that they do need to

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>create some sort of template or sovereign restructurings going forward,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's been I mean, we've had so many episodes

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on sovereign debt restructurings because each one of the tends

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to be unique in its complexity and in its particular issues. Yeah,

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what I was thinking about too, like a

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit. You know, obviously this was a sovereign debt context,

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but I also think about some of our conversations we've

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 1>had with Chris White of private sector debt, and the

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>consistent theme is that when you start talking about the

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>asset class of debt, it's just infinitely more complex than

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>any other asset classes because of how many different versions are.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about like there's one Microsoft stock

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>right MSFT you want to look at like debt or

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Microsoft has debt. I know, I'm sure

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they do, but it's get it gets infinitely more complex

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>right away, and the number of in the difficulty of

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>trading that and coordinating that and so then you think

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>about this on an international level, all the different things

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that make public sector that way more complex, and it

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>just yeah, it's mind boggling. And that's why there have

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>been certain stories, like say Argentina that have been in

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the news for like twenty years, because and that's just

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>one one, one country. Yeah, and it's the same story

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much over and over and over all. Right, Um,

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>should we leave it there? You know what, I just

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>want to say one other things I love I mean,

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love it, but mid twos comment about you know,

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>he's pessimistic, but he'd like to be proven wrong. I

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like the amount of times I've said some version

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of that over the last few months, I'd like to

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>be shown that I'm wrong. There's a really sort just

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many sort of bleak ways that this

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>could all go extremely bad. Well, I think if you're

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a bear right now and you're going and I hope

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm right, that would probably be a not very popular

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>position to be taking taste Taste Well. This has been

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway, and

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe wisn'tal. You could follow me on Twitter at

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The Stalwart, and you should follow our producer on Twitter,

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson at Laura M Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, as well as

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>all of the Bloomberg podcasts under the handle at podcasts.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to