WEBVTT - From the Vault: Oh Goat, You Devil - Part 3

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday, so we're

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>heading on down into the vault to bring you part

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>three of our series on the Goat and its Devilish implications.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 2>This was originally published on October twenty fifth, twenty twenty two.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we are back with

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Part three of our series on the Goat and the Devil,

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>where we are exploring reasons for the some would say

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>unfair association in especially Christian cultures, between the ordinary domestic goat,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful animal, and the monic realm of sin and flames. Now,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>in previous episodes, we've talked about the basic biology of

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the goat as a browsing bovid that was once adapted

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to harsher environments like mountains and forests, but sometime many

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>thousands of years ago was domesticated by the humans who

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 2>used to hunt it. We talked about mythical inspirations for

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>later goat man devils, possibly lying in the figure of

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the Greek god Pan and in the satyrs and fawns

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that bore his image. We talked about goat reproduction and

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 2>goat voices, how it's possible that goats could be interpreted

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>as sinful by judgmental human eyes because of the he

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 2>goat's reputation for being very enthusiastic about mating, and the

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 2>idea that it's possible people have seen goats as uncanny

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>because sometimes some goats, when they kind of moan and scream,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they sound freakishly human. In the second episode, we talked

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>about the role of goats in the Hebrew Bible, where

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>they could be associated with demonic forces because of the

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>ritual of the Day of Atonement, where it is said

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that one goat is sent off into the wilderness to

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>carry the sins of the people off for Azazel, and

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that name is sometimes interpreted as some kind of demonic power.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>We also talked about goats in the Christian New Testament,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 2>where Jesus is said to have given apocalyptic preaching that

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>when the Son of Man comes to bring the end

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>of the age, he will separate the righteous from the

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 2>unrighteous and what's the image used there. It's as the

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 2>shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. The goats are

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 2>the bad ones. And finally, we also talked about goat

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 2>lore from around the world to point out that the

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>association between goats and evil is by no means universal.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>There are some very interesting counter examples in Chinese mythology,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>in Basque mythology with this figure of the black billy

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>goat deity who protects livestock and so forth. So it's

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>been a wild ride so far, a wild goat ride.

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>But to kick things off today, I wanted to come

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 2>back to our discussion about the particular features of goat

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>biology that people of centuries past might possibly have interpreted

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>as devilish or sinful in one way in one way

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>or another, And the example I wanted to look at

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 2>here is goat eyes. One might argue that you haven't

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 2>really been stared at until you've been stared at by

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a goat, and part of the reason for that is

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>when you're being stared at by a goat, you're not

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 2>quite sure if you're being stared at by a goat.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It comes down to the inhuman shape of

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the goat pupils.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And before I get there, I want to

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>say that the goat stare does not have to be

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 2>imbued with any kind of menace. I came across a

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>very sweet, whimsical little poem I wanted to read a

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>bit from. This is by the British Canadian poet Robert Servis,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 2>who wrote a poem called The Goat and I, And

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>it goes each sunny day upon my way a goat iPad.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He has a.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Beard of silver gray and a bell of brass, And

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>all the while I am in sight, he seems to

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 2>muse and stares at me with all his might, and choose,

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and choose upon the hill so timy, sweet with joy

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>of spring, he hails me with a tiny bleat of welcoming,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>though half the globe is drenched with blood, and cities

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>flare contentedly, he chews the cud and does not care.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh gentle friend, I know not what your age may be,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 2>but of my years I'd give the lot yet left

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>to me to chew a thistle and not choke, but

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>bright of eye gaze at the old world, weary bloke

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>who hobbles by.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>This is great. I love how this drives some like

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an overall interpretation of goat physiology that I think we

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>can often fall into, and that is of the goat

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as the old goat, Like there's even if a goat

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>need to see some goats that look very virile and

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>young in a goatish fashion, but oftentimes encounter goats who

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>do kind of hobble about. They have all these likenesses

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that we attribute to elderly human individuals. You know, you'll

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have the beard and so forth. But yeah, this is

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a neat little poem summing up the independent and relatable

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>spirit of the goat.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh I also I left off a final stanza where

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 2>essentially the last stanza is just like, why am I

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>writing a poem about a goat? It's not great so

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, anyway, the gaze of the goat has often

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 2>been observed to have a strange character in one way

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>or another. Sometimes it's more like what service is saying here?

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Almost narcotically placid and unmoved. And yet other times people

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>notice that the gaze of the goat is kind of

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>thrillingly alien, because, unlike with a dog or a cat,

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 2>it can be hard to tell if a goat is

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>actually looking at you, or at least for me, it can.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Despite the efforts of Robert Service, the eye of the

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>goat has often been characterized as creepy, and I think

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 2>there could be a couple of reasons for that. It

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 2>might be because it's a bit harder to tell where

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the goat is focusing than it is with some other

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of animals, like our predatory companion animals. Or maybe

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>it's just because the eye of a goat sort of

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>looks weird. It looks unusual if you're not used to it,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>because instead of a round pupil, as you alluded to earlier,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>rob the goat has a horizontal pupil, sometimes described as

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>rectangular in shape I think sometimes kind of described as

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 2>like elongated capsule shape, so it's like a rectangle with

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of rounded edges. I've also found some photos where

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 2>it looks like a horizontal capital eye with a hint

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 2>of those cross beams or slight bulges at the ends

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 2>of the rectangle. And the question is why do goat

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>pupils look that way? Well, funny enough, we actually did

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>an episode just a while back which contained a segment

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>about the evolution tionary reasoning behind different pupil shapes. In

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>The Animal Kingdom, the episode was The Three Pupil Die,

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think the study we talked about in that

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 2>show is still a good one to inform us on

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the question I've just raised. So to bring up the

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>same paper again. This was by Martin S. Banks at All,

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 2>published in the journal Science Advances in twenty fifteen, and

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it's called why do Animal eyes have pupils of different shapes?

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Basic conclusion is that an animal's pupil shape is usually

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>determined by what its ecological niche is, what its role

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>in the food chain is. So animals like humans, tigers,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>and wolves have round pupils. Round pupils appear to be

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>common a common shape for active hunters who chase down

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 2>their prey. Meanwhile, predators that are lower to the ground

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>or hunt by way of ambush, So a predator that

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>might lie in wait and then pounce suddenly on a

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>prey animal, these tend to have vertical pupils vertically oriented

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>slit pupils, and the vertical slits seem to be adaptive

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 2>for low down ambush predators because they're helpful in using

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>tricks called stereopsis and defocus blur to very precisely judge

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the distance needed for a single exact medium range pounds.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>But herbivores prey animals are more likely to have horizontal

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>pupils like the goat. To quote from the study, horizontally

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>elongated pupils create sharp images of horizontal contours ahead and behind,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>creating a horizontally panoramic view that facilitates detection of predators

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>from various directions and forward locomotion across uneven terrain. So

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>these horizontal pupils are good for scanning the whole panorama

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of the environment, seeing at all angles all the time

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 2>to watch out for any approaching predators, which might be

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons you can get that creepy feeling

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 2>where you can't tell if the goat is actually looking

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>at you. The goat is sort of designed by nature

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to be looking everywhere rather than to be looking at you.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>But I also thought it's an interesting note about the

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>forward locomotion across uneven terrain given the evolutionary history of

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>goats occupying mountains and craggy landscapes. Though again, less craggy

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 2>creatures like horses also have horizontal pupils, So that made

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>me wonder about the question why do we tend to

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 2>notice the horizontal orientation of goat pupils more than we

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>notice it in horses and other herbivores. I think this

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>must be a common thing. It's at least true for me,

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and so I was looking into this and I want

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 2>to make two non expert observations just by looking at

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of photos on Google. One is that the

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>horse pupil seems less noticeably elongate in the horizontal dimension

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>than the goat pupil. So they're both horizontal, but the

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 2>horse pupil seems a little bit shorter usually, or the

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>goat went often looks visibly stretched out. Second, and I

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>think this might be even more important, there seems to be,

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>on average, a stronger color contrast within the goat's eye.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>If you just look at a bunch of pictures of

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the eyes of horses and the eyes of goats, it

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>seems goats on average have lighter colored irises, which really

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 2>makes the pupil pop. That makes the pupil stand out,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>which makes it look more noticeably alien, at least to

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>me interesting.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember in that episode on The Three People Die,

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about pupil changes in the shape of the

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>pupil with predators tended to vary as well depending on height.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's right, But I don't remember.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Any such distinction being made in the materials we were

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>looking at then regarding herbivores, like a goat versus cow,

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>versus horse, etc.

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't recall any distinction like that either. But

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>definitely there was a change in height in predators, because again,

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the taller predators have round pupils and the shorter predators

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 2>have vertical slip pupils, and so part of that has

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to do with a difference in hunting strategy like chasing

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 2>versus ambushing, but part of it has to do also

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>with just I think, managing the angles at which you

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 2>would be observing your prey.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Now, this instantly makes me think of something that I

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>guess we got into a little bit in the Three

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>People to Die, is what sort of eyes do we

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>expect knowing all of this of divine beings and divine emissaries,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the Irish and some Chinese traditions that we

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>discussed in that episode. We talked about the idea of

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>someone with three pupils or three irises being in some

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>way enlightened and having superior vision and perhaps wisdom as well.

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>But taking all that we've discussed here into the scenario,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like, Okay, if we have some sort of god

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>or god like being or anti god taking on the

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>head and eyes of a goat, well, in a way

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems more fitting. It's like, this is a being

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>that can look in many directions at once and doesn't

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>need to focus its attention and maybe doesn't focus its

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>attention all that much, and hey, being a god, maybe

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't want its attention focused too heavily.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Well. Also, though, thinking about the predator prey distinction, I mean,

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't the horizontal pupils make it less dangerous? Like wouldn't

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>round pupils really be the most dangerous?

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? But then I guess it comes down to the

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>human scenario, right. We want to we want to connect

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with the human in the superhuman, and therefore we want

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>them to have pupils. Though I guess we see, especially

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in modern depictions, you know, we love to black out

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of inhuman beings, you know, often with those

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>really cool contact lenses. So we'll have various there's so

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>many treatments of this where various fallen angels and so

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>forth will have all black eyes or maybe all white eyes,

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and that tends to note some sort of strangeness of

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>vision as well.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're right about that. Like sometimes otherworldly

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>beings are just depicted as having eyes like that, Sometimes

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 2>their eyes change into all white or all black or

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 2>something when they are exercising a type of second sight.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>When it sometimes works quite well, though sometimes you're kind

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of I think you're kind of inconveniencing your actors by

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>taking away their eyes or taking one of their tools.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe we should look at a little bit more,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>goat mythology and goat symbolism and history. I think if

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to figure out why, especially a lot of

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>say Continental European Christian cultures made an association between the

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>devil and goats, I think we must talk about the

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>figure known as Baphomet.

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And this is a fascinating but also kind of

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>convoluted situation because it involves multiple different cultures either appropriating

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or interpreting, or miss interpreting or outright right slandering something

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that other culture, the previous cultures or different cultures believed

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in or believe in. And the end result is this

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>strange satanic goat creature that you're more likely to encounter

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>now in a TV show or on a heavy metal

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>T shirt, that sort of thing. So I covered some

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of this in a Monster Fact episode about the Goat

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of Mendis that came about shortly after we recorded a

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>weird House cinema episode on the film The Devil Rides Out,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>which prominently features this satanic goat man appearing at a

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>black mass. And so this entity of Baphame or the

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Goat of Mendes is essentially a Western occultist distortion of

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a Greek interpretation of the god of Egypt, the Egyptian

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>god known as beneb Jujet that was worshiped in Mendays,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the Greek name for an ancient Egyptian city

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>named Jadet, also known today as Tel el Ruba. Fifth

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>century Greek historian Herodotus wrote of this god and his

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>practices and made veiled references to sexual aspects of the worship,

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and also compared the entity to Pan, of course from

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Western traditions. So already I know this sounds like some

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a You can imagine like the different pins

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>on a board with the different bits of string colored string,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>showing you where all this is going across a map

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of Europe and North Africa. So here's a quote from

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Herotodus via S. Birch's translation. Quote. Now, the reason why

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>those of the Egyptians whom I have mentioned do not

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice goats, female or male, is this The Mendicians count

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Pan to be one of the eight gods. Now, these

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>eight gods, they say, came into being before the twelve gods,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and the painters and image makers represent in painting and

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in sculpture the figure of Pan, just as the Hellenese

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>do with goat's face and legs, not supposing him to

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be really like this, but to resemble the other gods.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>The cause, however, why they represent him in this form,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I prefer not to say. The Mendisians then reverence all goats,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and the males more than the females. And the goatherds

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>too have greater honor than other herdsmen. But the goats,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>one especially is reverenced, and when he dies there is

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>great mourning in all the Mendisian district. And both the

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>goat and Pan are called in the Egyptian tongue Mendis.

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So not knowing exactly what's going on here. I

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>would wonder if Herodotus is seriously misinterpreting reports he has

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>heard about Egyptian worship in light of Greek religion.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, there's clearly a lot going on, like using

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Greek religion to try and understand what individuals in this

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>region and are worshiping going. You know, there's so many

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>ways that the information here can become skewed. We have

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this veiled reference to I believe other critics have pointed

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>out that he's referencing a supposed beast reality in worship

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So already we're engaging in various levels

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of mis interpretation and perhaps slander. Now. As Geraldine Pinch

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>explains in her excellent book Egyptian Mythology, the word for

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>ram bah and the word for soul or manifestation sound

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>much the same in Egyptian to the ancient Egyptians, so

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they were often regarded as manifestations of other deities such

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>as Osiris, and Pinch writes quote, the sexual aspect of

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>occult admindis made it particularly disliked by early Christians. Benetjedet's

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>form as a ram or goat headed man was reinterpreted

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>as a devil figure who entered Western tradition as the

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Horned King of the Witches.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 2>A classic example of literal demonization, taking a god in

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>another mythology, in this case one having the head of

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a sheep or a goat, and saying that, well, actually,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 2>this is just a demon in our mythology, right right.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But of course it gets more complicated than that. There

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are all these other additional threads going on here. Because

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>as for the actual name Goat of Mendes, this is

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the name given by French writer Elfius Levi in the

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, most likely referencing the writings of Erotodus. The

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>most well known image of this particular monstrous humanoid is

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen fifty sixth edition of Levi's book Dogma

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and Ritual of High Magic. And as with any many

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>examples of divine and occult imagery, the image of Baphame

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>here Is, or the Goat of Mendes, is highly symbolic,

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's been incorporated into various occult traditions, subcultures, new

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>religious movements, and so forth. I think everyone's probably seen

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a goat being with the upper body of

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a female but sometimes like half the chest is female,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>halfs male. They're like black angelic wings, the goat head,

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the pentagram on the forehead, a middle horn that is

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>like a torch, various other symbols going on in the image.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Is loaded with stuff to look at.

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so, I mean as far as images of

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the divine or the demonic, it's a pretty great one.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>There's lots to focus on, lots to try and figure out.

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>And at the very least, you know, as we've discussed

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>many times before, the basic symbolism involved here of combining

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>beast with man or beast with woman, et cetera. Like,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it instantly starts forming patterns in the mind. You can't

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>look at it and not have some sort of reaction. Oh.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I've noticed this before, but at

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>least in Levi's depiction, it incorporates a symbol that is

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>like the Cadusius or like the rod of Esclepias. It

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>has the rod and the snakes intertwined around it. Yeah.

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, as for the name of Baphomet here, this

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>gets us into something that we've we've touched on a

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>few times on the show before, never devoted like full

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>episode to it, but it involves the Templars, the poor

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Knights of Christ, and the Temple of Solomon. So just

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to get the basics out here again, this was a

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>religious military order of the Catholic Church during the Crusades,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>which ran about roughly ten ninety five through twelve ninety one.

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>See they were This organization was intended to serve as

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a way to protect pilgrims on their way to the

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Holy Lands, but a sort of power creep occurred. They

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>were given free rein to move across borders, They were

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>made exempt from taxes and ended up playing key military

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>roles in various battles of the Crusades, and even the

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>warriors became important, managing the movement of funds across vast

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>distances that were involved in the Crusades and setting up

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a kind of proto banking system. They became powerful, and

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so they made powerful enemies. And as the Crusades failed,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the Templars were blamed, and finally Philip the Fourth of France,

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with the aid of Pope Clement the Fifth, who was

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>then based in France, they suppressed the order and falsely

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>accused them, or generally every I think most sources and

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>historians agree that these are false or trumped up charges

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of blasphemy and heresy, saying that, among other things, they

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>worshiped a severed head called Bahamet and there's a whole

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>litany of charges against them. Some of them were burned

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>at the stake, I think fifty six in total, and

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that included Grand Master Jacques de Malay and others. Other

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>members of the order were absorbed into different militaries and

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Now the name Bahame here is generally understood

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>be a French corruption of the name Muhammad. The monstrous

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>templar god Baphomet is therefore a product of trumped up

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>charges that the templars had converted to the Islamic faith

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of their enemies, and the French and papal accusers invoked

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this fanciful and grotesque degradation of Islam to make their case, because,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, nowhere in Islamic traditions do you find

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a creature like this.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's essentially the monster at the heart of a

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 2>xenophobic conspiracy theory created to slander one's political enemies. In

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the Middle Ages.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, pretty much. And there's a lot more to all

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of this as well, and certainly when you get into

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>writings about the templars, there are added theories, some perhaps

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>worth talking about, some worth skipping over unless you're engaging

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in just like pure entertainment, I suppose. But yeah, this

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the most straightforward explanation. And it is

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting how in this you have something that

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>is put together as a corruption, as a slander, and

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>over time it kind of takes on life of its own.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It becomes used as a symbol of liberation, it becomes

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>used as a symbol of a rebellion against organized religion,

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it becomes used as a part of new religious movements.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Even so, it's always fascinating the life of symbols and

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the life of ideas like this.

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, speaking of rebellion, there is one more biological feature

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 2>of goats that I wanted to talk about. If you're ready, Robert,

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>or are you ready to get into goat intelligence, let's

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 2>do it. I think this one is interesting because while

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is a primary reason that goats

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>would be identified with devils or with the legions of Hell,

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 2>I do think there is some interesting resonances here, and

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 2>we can come back to that. But basically I was

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>just thinking, what is more identified with evil than intelligence? Right,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 2>because intelligence is often associated with a tendency toward rebellion

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>or a tendency maybe to think a little too critically

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 2>about what somebody is telling you to do. And while

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 2>goats are not generally a species known for how smart

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 2>they are, there's some evidence that at least in some ways,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 2>they might be more clever than we give them credit for,

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>but that it's also a kind of intelligence that is

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>sort of alien to human primate intelligence. So I want

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to look at a paper by LEDF. Briefer at All

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 2>published in Frontiers in Zoology called Goats excel at Learning

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 2>and Remembering, a highly novel cognitive task, published in twenty

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>fourteen to explain the context of what the authors were

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out here. They begin by highlighting a

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of competing frameworks for explaining the evolution of higher intelligence.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 2>One you might call the social intelligence hypothesis, and the

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 2>other you might call the ecological competence hypothesis. The social

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis argues that the evolution of intelligence and higher cognition

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 2>is primarily for managing relationships between individuals within a social species.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>So there are obvious huge survival benefits to being social

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>and working together, and I think there's a very good

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>case to be made that that is what primarily explains

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the success of humans as a species of animal. But

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>there are also a lot of unique problems that arise

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>when animals congregate in social groups and perform or try

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 2>to perform any cooperative behaviors. The social hypothesis would say

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>that animals need intelligence in order to get as many

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>benefits as possible from social cooperation and to negate the

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 2>possible downsides of social cooperation, so to do things like

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 2>maintain group cohesion and reduce conflict between group members. Meanwhile,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the competing ecological competence hypothesis would say that the evolution

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>of intelligence is mainly for increasing survival advantage when faced

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 2>with the problems posed by the environment. In a sense,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the world is a puzzle, and the better you are

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 2>at solving that puzzle, the more likely you are to survive.

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 2>So examples would be finding ways to extract difficult to

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 2>access nutrition during foraging, remembering the locations of important resources

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and threats, and things like that. And these views would

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>tend to also have implications for the type of learning

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that we see in different animals because creatures with social

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 2>intelligence tend to be capable of social learning. This is

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>a very important concept. Social learning is the ability to

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 2>learn not only by doing, but to learn by watching others.

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>So when you learn how to do a task by

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>observing someone else doing it, that's social learning, and it's

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a very important ability. That is arguably what makes it

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>possible for human beings to have technology, civilization, and culture.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Animals with the largest brains and the most advanced cognition

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 2>tend to usually be social animals, and the authors right

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 2>that quote. The prevalent view today is that intelligent species

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:27.239
<v Speaker 2>should excel at social learning. But the authors argue that

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this research is focused on primates, which

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>we already know are very smart, they have relatively large brains,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and we already know they're very social. But what would

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 2>happen if we studied this on this question on relatively

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>smaller brained mammals. What if we test this theory on

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 2>the goat. Goats have a few interesting characteristics. They not

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>only have relatively smaller brains than primates. Also, the domestication

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 2>process itself tends to lead to a decrease in brain

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>size when compared to wild ancestors, I mean domestic animals

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>have fewer puzzles to solve, let's say, and this could

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 2>also affect cognition and the author's write quote. Goats possess

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>several features commonly associated with advanced cognition, such as successful

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 2>colonization of new environments and complex fission fusion societies. To

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 2>briefly explain both of those, I guess colonization of new

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>environments is fairly self explanatory. I mean, you know goats

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that have a pretty adventurous relationship with the natural world,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 2>and they can they can spread into areas where it's

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>harder for other animals to survive, but they thrive there,

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 2>so that they're they're getting something out of the environment

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that some other animals can't quite get. But the other

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 2>thing that's interesting is the complex fission fusion societies. This

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>means animals that live together in groups, but they are

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>able to sort of alter those groups in a fluid

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 2>way and then come back together. So an example would

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>be humans live in fission fusion societies. We live in groups,

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>but those groups separate off into subgroups. They separate, and

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 2>they come back together. The groups change sizes. People separate

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>on their own and do different tasks and then rejoin.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>That's fission fusion. So the authors here tested out goat

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>intelligence and memory on what they call a food box

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>cognitive challenge pretty much a puzzle box with a special

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 2>lever that a goat had to learn how to operate

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>in order to access food, and there were different conditions

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in this experiment. Would it make a difference to a

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>goat's ability to learn how to use this box if

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the goat were able to watch another goat opening the

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 2>box successfully aka social learning? And the authors in their

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>result section right quote the majority of trained goats nine

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 2>out of twelve, successfully learned the task quickly on average

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>within twelve trials at intervals of up to ten months.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 2>They saw the task within two minutes, indicating excellent long

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>term memory. The goats did not learn the task faster

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>after observing a demonstrator than if they did not have

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 2>that opportunity. This indicates that they learned through individual rather

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 2>than social learning. So goats pretty smart. They learn the

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 2>task pretty well, they can solve the puzzle most of

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the time, and they're able to remember that solution pretty

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>well in the long term. Ten months later, he give

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 2>them another puzzle box. They get into it pretty fast.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But the goats did not seem to benefit from watching

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the struggles of other goats at all, so they did

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>not display signs of social learning. And I think that's

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of interesting because goats are to some degree social

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>they live in herds, but biologically they are not oriented

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to learn in a cooperative way. They can't learn, at

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>least according to this finding, by watching other goats do

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the way we can. And the authors say that this

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>would provide some evidence that the evolution of goat cognition

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>is driven more by ecological competence pressure than by social

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>intelligence pressure. So they think, you know, what's pushing goats

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to to be able to think more efficiently is probably

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 2>more the stuff about trying to extract solve puzzles in

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the environment. How do you extract the maximum amount of

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>forging resources from this area? How do you remember where

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>caches of food are? How do you remember where threats are?

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 2>And things like that, rather than using that intelligence to

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>try to maintain relationships within the group like you might

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>see in chimpanzees.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now that makes sense. Based on my limited experience

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with with goat mischief, it tends to be things like

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you're at a petting zoo and oh, you have a

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>map of the zoo sticking out of your pocket. Somebody

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>decides to sneak that out of your pocket and start

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>eating it, you know, Or I've spoken.

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>That's problem solving, that has problem solving.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's curiosity, it's pure curiosity. Is it food? I shall investigate.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I know other situations that have come up from some

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>goat farmers that I've spoken to in the past have

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>been like the goat wants to find out how to

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>get on top of something and doing that may well

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>find its way out of an enclosure.

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So that sort of thing, right, so clever problem solving

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>within the physical space, but less so within the social arena.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So one might be tempted to say that crafty antisocial

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>goats cast long in sinister shadows. However, I wanted to

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 2>put another weight on the scale, sort of on the

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>other side of the scale. And this was a study

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I was looking at by Christian Nowroth at All published

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>in Biology Letters in twenty sixteen called goats display audience

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 2>dependent human directed gazing behavior in a problem solving task.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>And the background of this one is the observation that okay, domestication.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>When you domesticate a wild animal, this clearly affects the

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>animal's brain and its cognition. A domestic dog simply does

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 2>not think and solve problems the same way its nearest

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>wild relative. Would you know, dog thinking is way different

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 2>than wolf thinking. But how much of this difference is

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a result of straight domestication and how much is the

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 2>result of the fact that dogs are domesticated specifically as companions.

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, certainly we get into the whole scenario where

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we often talk about dogs and cats and other close

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>domesticated animals as we talk about how they look at humans,

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>what do they think humans are? And I know there

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are different interpretations, but I know that it's often said, well,

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.959
<v Speaker 1>like a cat thinks you may think that you are

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>another cat. I've heard, you know, they think you're another kitten,

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>or they think you're its mom, that sort of thing. Dogs,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe, tend to look at their humans kind of

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like their dogs.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, to some extent, I mean you can tell

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 2>that there is a there's a very natural, inclusive kind

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>of social relationship with dogs to humans, so they acclimatize

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 2>easily to humans.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, there seems to be a kind

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>of special thing with humans, right, where like you have

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 2>these studies where you give a dog a puzzle that

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 2>it cannot solve, like it can't get the treat out

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>of the puzzle box, And is it going to look

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 2>at the other dog in the room for help or

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 2>look at the human for help? It's going to look

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 2>at the human.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Right right. And I don't have any studies to back

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>this up, but I mean this seems to be the

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>case with cats as well. Like the cats will come

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to the human, they will use their special meal that

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is a way of communicating with the humans, as if

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they are like the mama cat that will fix things. Yeah,

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>but with a goat. Yeah, where do we go with that? Because,

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as we've already established, like there's a different underlying social dynamic.

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, But what the authors here found, just to read

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>from their abstract, they say, quote, we investigated human directed

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 2>behavior in an unsolvable problem to in a domestic but

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 2>non companion species goats. Okay, so they're giving goats sort

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>of like a puzzle box that they can't solve. There's

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 2>clearly an outcome they want, but they can't achieve it

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 2>on their own. It's not like they, you know, the

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 2>lever that they could figure out with few tries in

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 2>the other experiment. They can't win this game, so the

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 2>author's write quote. During the test goats experienced a forward

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>facing or an away facing person, they gazed toward the

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>forward facing person earlier and for longer, and showed more

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 2>gaze alterations and a lower latency until the first gaze

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 2>alteration when the person was forward facing. Our results provide

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 2>strong evidence for audience dependent, human directed visual orienting behavior

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 2>in the species that was domesticated primarily for production. And

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 2>they also say their results quote show similarities with the

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 2>referential and intentional communicative behavior exhibited by domestic companion animals

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 2>such as do horses. This indicates the domestication has a

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 2>much broader impact on heterospecific communication than previously believed. So

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the study is finding that even though goats were domesticated

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 2>for production for agriculture, meat, milk, hide, and fur things

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 2>like that, as opposed to dogs, which were domesticated as

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 2>companions and helpers. Nevertheless, goats do this dog like thing.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>When they have this unsolvable problem task. They are more

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>likely to look up for presumably for help at a

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 2>human who is looking at them as opposed to the

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 2>control of a human that is looking away from them.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is kind of the impact of the goatherd yeah,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>over the goat.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I don't know exactly what all this adds up

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 2>to about, you know, how this would affect humans over

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the years looking at the goats they're familiar with, and

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 2>whether they would imagine that this goat is having crafty,

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 2>devilish designs on them or is thinking impure thoughts. But

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I did find it interesting.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like maybe there is a long underlying realization that

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the goat thinks and behaves differently when we're looking at

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it as opposed to when we're not looking at it,

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>which reminds me of that ridiculous idea that we folks

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>will tell that we brought up in the last episode

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>about how you can't keep tracking the goat's not even

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>there all the time. Sometimes it's there, but the rest

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of the time it's going to hell so that Satan

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>can clean its beard for it.

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 2>You know what you call that, It's a fission fusion society.

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, it's like, all right, what's your day look like, Carl, Well,

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna eat a bunch of a bunch of grass.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna climb some rocks and then oh, I've got

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got a one PM with Satan. Got

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to get this beard taken care of now. As previously mentioned, goats,

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, are really good at figuring out how to

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>make use of new and environments. And as a result,

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that reality and a result of

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>human domestication of the animals, goats are a common sight

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. They're one of our oldest domesticated animals.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>As we discussed in the first episode, They've traveled long

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and far with us. And yeah, the goat is especially

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>good at sustaining itself even in places where nothing like

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the goat has ever lived. And I want to go

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to a particular place. And part of this is because

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I just physically return from this place, and so it's

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on my mind a lot. But I want to go

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to the Galapagos Archipelago. This is a cluster of volcanic

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>islands located five hundred and sixty three miles or nine

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred and six kilometers off the coast of Ecuador. It's

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a place famous for its biodiversity and for the examples

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of evolution found there in various species, many found nowhere

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>else in the world, that have evolved to thrive in

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>isolated environments. And while there is some dispute over whether

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Inca ever reached the island, we can be certain

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that Europeans discovered the islands in fifteen thirty five, and

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>outside of Charles Darwin's visit to the island three hundred

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>years later, the history of human contact with the island

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>has frequently been a bloody one, entailing at times penal colonies,

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>utopian communities, whalers and pirates. Sailors infamously made off with

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>many of the smaller female Galapagos tortoises, which they used

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to restock their food supplies of these islands, and later

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>these sailors that were visiting the Galapagos Islands would see

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the islands with food species like goats and pigs, so

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>drop off some goats and pigs, knowing that these are

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>hardy creatures that will find out how to survive, that

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>will breed, and then when you drop back by, we

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just send some of some sailors ashore and say, hey,

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>go get me some goat meat. Go get me some

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 1>pig meat.

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you bring back thirty to fifty faral hogs.

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And given how good these creatures were at thriving in

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>new environments, and given that these islands had never seen

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>goats or pigs before, yeah, they did quite well. And

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine, this sort of willful introduction of

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>invasive species had a huge negative impact on the environment.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>In addition to feral goats and pigs, also feral cats

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>feral cattle have along been an issue along with of

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 1>course rats, Cats are of course terrific killers of birds.

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Pigs will consume hidden eggs, including Glopaco's tortoise eggs, iguana eggs, etc.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And our problems in other parts of the world as well.

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>But you might well wonder why feral donkeys and especially

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>feral goats would be an issue. Like what ultimately is

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>so destructive about the goat? Yeah, well, think back to

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the browsing dietary habits of the goat that we discussed

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in the first episode. Again, the goat excels at consuming

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>vegetation and ultimately actually outperforms the giant Galapagos tortoise, munching

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>down parts of the plant that would ultimately be inaccessible

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to the tortoise and in doing so, they also end

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>up loosening the underlying soil. They also, along with donkeys

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and cattle, can trample eggs for the eggs as well

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as just young tortoises, feral pigs, dogs, cats, and black

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rats can serve as deadly predators, and so for these

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons along with human hunting, we saw the extinction of

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the Floriana Island subspecies of the Glapagos tortoise during the

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteenth century, and of course all of the Galapagos

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>tortoises have kind of had an uphill battle to regain

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>successful numbers. Another important thing to keep in mind here,

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and this reminds me of our discussions of the moa,

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the giant flightless bird in the past. We have to

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>remember that, okay, Glapagos tortoises are notoriously slow, but they

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>do move around quite a bit, and aided by a

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>slow digestion, they're able to spread seeds across vast distances.

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So the Galapagos tortoise isn't just this amazing curiosity to

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>be found on the Glapcos Islands. They're a crucial part

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of island ecology. They've evolved to thrive within these isolated ecosystems,

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and those ecosystems have evolved to depend upon them and

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to live alongside them. There are other examples of this

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>as well, like one in particular, you see these very

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>tall cactus varieties that have evolved to climb high enough

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to where they're above the tortoise's reach, and then you'll see,

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the fruiting parts of the cactus up there,

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be more like this hard bark on the

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>lower portions of it, a very tall cacti. So, anyway,

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we end up with this situation where on we have

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.959
<v Speaker 1>we have islands here that have lots of goats, and

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the goats are destructive. The goats are in competition with

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the animals that we want to help, that we want

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to see survive, and have no other place in the

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.240
<v Speaker 1>world where they can survive, where they can call home.

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And so this led to goat removal efforts, a war

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on goats. And there had been prior goat removal efforts

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in other islands, but this was the largest at this

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>point in history. We're getting into the nineteen nineties here,

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So according to the Galapagos Conservancy quote, prior to nineteen

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven, the largest island with a successful goat eradication

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was Auckland Island in New Zealand, where only one hundred

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and five goats occupied a mere four thousand hectares. The

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>next two the largest islands with successful goat eradications were

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Lenai in Hawaii and San Clemente Island in California. And

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this and San Clemente Island they removed apparently twenty nine

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand goats.

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah. By the late twentieth century, some real movements

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>were being made to eradicate feral populations from the Galapagos Islands.

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 1>This included the nineteen ninety seven Project Isabella Plan, which

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>aimed to eradicate goats and donkeys from northern Isabella Island,

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>also pigs, goats and donkeys from Santiago Island and goats

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from Penta Island. And with international funding, they waged a

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>war against the goats and their feral kin and the

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>results are pretty staggering. By two thousand and four, eighteen

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand pigs were removed from Santiago Island. The same year,

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 1>roughly fifty five thousand goats were eliminated on Isabella. And

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting when you start, when you start getting into

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>this sort of problem. When you have thousands, tens of

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of goats, how do you get rid of them?

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you round them all up? I'm to understand

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>some of this was done via aerial hunting and some

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the pig removal. I think it still goes on today.

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm to understand with hunting efforts, but with the goats,

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they used judas goats to help carry this out, some

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and seventy of them. Now what is a

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>judas goat, you might ask, Well, these are trained goats,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and in these efforts, they are also sterilized goats, because

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't you're not going to solve your goat problem

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>by releasing seven hundred and seventy greatable goats into the population.

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But these are trained goats that there were traditionally used

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in previous times to lead sheep to slaughter, but they

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>can also be used to lead feral goats to their destruction.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So in the case of the Galapagos efforts, sterilized goats

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>were used. And yeah, yeah, they were used to help

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>round up many of these goats so that they could

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be eliminated. But I think this whole scenario is it's

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a testament to so many of the properties

0:45:54.160 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of the goat that we've discussed, their tenacity, their great

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.439
<v Speaker 1>ability to thrive in an environment, and in this case,

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they're too good at it. Again, they just outperform everything

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that's already there. Then you have to get rid of them.

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>And how do you wrangle them up? Well, you've got

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to use goat against goat. You've got to You've got

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to enlist trader goats or Judas goats to go out

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 1>there and help you lead them in to the kill.

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I had heard the phrase judas goat before, but I

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think I ever knew what that meant. So it's

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 2>a goat that it takes advantage of the social herding

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 2>behaviors of goats by being trained by humans to lead

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 2>goats where you want them to go off into a

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 2>place that's not in the interest of goats themselves.

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, so that they can be rounded up and

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in this case eliminated. And I believe that they still

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 1>keep Judas goats around on some of these islands for

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>monitoring purposes.

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, how do you train a goat that other

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 2>goats really want to follow? Like, what is the most

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>followable type of goat.

0:46:58.320 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I didn't go in deep and

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of like the making of a Judas goat, Like, how

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>does it come together? Since you're training an animal to

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>betray it's its own species, it instantly you can't help

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>an anthropomorphize the scenario when you start thinking of various

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Outer Limits and imagining like aliens brainwashing

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>human captives so that they'll betray their the human species

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>or something. But I don't think it's quite that complicated.

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But thank goodness, we can do it. I mean, you

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 1>think of other problems species like the rat. To my knowledge,

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no such thing as a Judas rat. The rats

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>are too clever for that. I suppose we've got to

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:42.479
<v Speaker 1>resort to, in some cases more basic methods, but also

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>methods that are perhaps just incapable of solving a large

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>scale rat problem. All right, Well, as we reach the

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>end of these three episodes, how does this change the

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>way we feel about goats?

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 2>But change is nothing for me. My allegiances to the

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>goat and to the goat alone as it has always been.

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, obviously, we'd love to hear from everyone out there

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about all of this. Yeah, did these episodes change the

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>way you think about goats. Yeah, perhaps, perhaps not. And

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of course I feel like we do have listeners who

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>raise goats, or have raised goats, or have been around goats.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost certain of it, if I'm thinking, if I'm

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>remembering correctly. So if you out there, if you are

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a goatherd, we would love to hear from you. Let

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>us know what your thoughts are about the way of

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the goat. So, if you've ever worked at a petting zoo,

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have any experience with goats, the lines up

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with anything we've discussed here right in, and we'll discuss

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>them on future episodes of Listener Mail. It's also not

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>impossible there'll be another episode concerning goats in the not

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>too distant future, because we were just wrapping up our

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>work on this and I got a press release from

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody who had it like a new study regarding the

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>behavior of goats and rams, and it's like, yeah, I'm like,

0:48:57.239 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 1>oh man, maybe I'll have to Maybe we'll have to

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>have them on the show and chat with them. So

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>this may not be the end of the goats in

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the long run, but it is the end of this

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>three part series. Oki Dokie as a reminder you can

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>find all the episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed. We

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are primarily a science podcast with core episodes on Tuesdays

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and Thursdays with listener mail episodes and Mondays. On Wednesdays

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we do a short form monster fact or artifact episode,

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and on Fridays we do a little something called Weird

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 1>House Cinema. That's our time to set aside most serious

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>concerns and just talk about a strange film.

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:39.839
<v Speaker 2>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 2>say hello, you can email us at contact, stuff to

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Blow your Mind dot com.

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:59.760
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.