WEBVTT - AI Bias, DEI and Tech Law w/ Bärí A. Williams

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Afro tech World, the Child has managing partner and precursor

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Vengures is on the virtual stage talking with Lisa Watson,

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>co founders CEO Squad and it comes to no surprise

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that when you're investing early in the startup life cycle,

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>many will find out what they originally started building has

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to morph into something new. What does Child think about

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>this pivot? Does he get concerned when he invested in

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing and it becomes anohing? Yeah, the pivoting question

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>is a good one. So I do care about the

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>initial idea. I I know some precedency investors who don't

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>care about the initial idea. They're just like, this is

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>an amazing person that The challenge we have is that

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>most of the companies we've acted are raising five two

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. It's not a lot of money in the

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things. So if your first original idea

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is really off base, you might not have enough time

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually pivot to a new idea. Pivot are pretty

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>common for us to precede normally because we're backing somebody

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>pre product with the hypothesis, and sometimes you roll out

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis in the form of a product and it

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the market responds to it in a

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>very different way than you had expected. So whenever that happens,

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I always try to take founders through a set of

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>questions to figure out did we get something wrong about

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>our initial hypothesis, And sometimes it happens. Sometimes the hypothesis

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was correct, but the market is less interesting than we

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>thought once we get interest. So, hey, there's people who

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>want to buy this product. They like it, song to

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>them is kind of a pain. Servicing them's kind of

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a pain. There's a market here, but not one that

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like we as a company are like super excited to tackle.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And then sometimes you launch it and you go the

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>product we launched was okay, and it's fine, but in

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>launching it, we discovered something that we think is way

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>more interesting. So the way I think about is it's

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>always okay, I think to of it if you're doing

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it from a position of knowledge. What I worry about sometimes, though,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is people who are flailing. They launched a product, it

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work immediately, so they launched another product that doesn't

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>work immediately. Sometimes you just have to like take a

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>breath and figure out what did you learn? And sometimes

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer is the product is right, the market's just

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not ready for it. So do we want to hunker

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>down and be patient and wait for the market to

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>catch up with what we think or do we want

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to just say, hey, you know, we're way too early here.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>We should probably abandon this and find something new. So

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what I try to get people to

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>think through is what did we actually learn from this launch?

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>What have we actually learned about the customer? And are

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we doing this from a position of information and knowledge

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and not from a position of like fearer panting. I'm well, Lucas,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>this is black tech, free money. I'm going to answer

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this you to some of the biggest names somebody brightness,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>minds and brilliant ideas. If you black and building simply

0:02:54.280 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>using techis and Chiga back this podcast. This fee Barry

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Williams this chief operating officer of Bandwagon, fan club data

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and identity analytics tech company focus on the sports and

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>entertainment space. She's also a diversity inclusion and corporate social

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>responsibility consultant. Prior to Bandwagon, she held executive roles at

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>companies like al Turtles, Stuff Up, and Facebook. Bar is

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a finger, not a coder, and I wanted to gather

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>her thoughts on why it seems to be harder for

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>black people who are non technical roles at companies that

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bill tech to see themselves as being in tech. Alternatively,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if we say we work in HR are legal at

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare and energy company, we're much quicker to say

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we work in those sectors because there's still some the

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>mystification that it needs to happen about what building tech means. Yeah,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there probably is um level of disconnect. I guess I

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>would call it in terms of are you really in

0:03:55.240 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>tech or are you tech? A Jason and I think

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, particularly in my field, like being a lawyer,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're still in tech because there are

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>certain things that you have to do and double check

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms and make sure the product doesn't violate any laws,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>um that your privacy is kept private, that you know

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>something doesn't happen where the company ends up getting sued

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>because of some discriminatory element of what it is that

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you created, or even if it's looking at it from

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the lens of how inclusive is the product, like kind

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a blind person useless. So if the answers know, you

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>may be opening yourself up not just two lawsuits. But

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>people also neglect the fact that, you know, a tech

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>company can do something and get horrible pr and get dragged,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and that has absolutely nothing to do with whether the

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>product was good, bad, or and different. It could be

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you had a really terrible marketing campaign, but if you

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>might have had a black marketer in that room, they

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>would have told you that that Ancestry DNA where a

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>slave runs away with her masters, not necessarily the best

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>way to get us sign up for Ancestry DNA care. So,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes it's about saving the company from itself,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't think that that is a an

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>adequate tech role. And I'd say that because I'm married

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to a product manager, so he is very in and

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of tech and not tech adjacent. So but I still

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think that, you know, I don't think that those

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>roles are tech adjacent. They're just as important to keep

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the company going is anything else. Do you think there's

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>any level of feeling not included because we may not

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>be able to code if we work at a tech

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>company and we can't say we work in tech. Yeah,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think people will look at it that way.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of people who look at it that

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>way in a sense that oh, well, you're not really

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not really in the industry because you can't write

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a line of code. I sure can't, but I could

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>tell you. You show me how what you've written and

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how it works, and I can tell you whether that's

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>legal or not valuable. So I rebuke that whole idea

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in the name of Jesus, But I understand that some

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>people don't. UM. But I do think that there's definitely

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a there's definitely a hierarchy, and people look

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>at it. The people who can code, or the people

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>who are product managers, are the people who are product designers.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are the people that are really in tech. All

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>your you know, your g n A functions, you're legal,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>your sales, your marketing UM hr dn I. They look

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.119
<v Speaker 1>at that as like it's not really you're not really

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>moving the product forward. You know, you've done a lot

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of advocacy for being in the room and trying to

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>hold the door open for other people to be able

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to get in the room. But how can you admonish

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>other folks to both strategically and successfully advocate for having

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>more faces, you know, brown faces, black faces in the room.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>UM when everybody don't want us in the room. So

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>how how can we do that and not feel like

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in a precarious situation, you know, putting ourselves in jeopardy. Yeah,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they're I wouldn't even say that.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people don't want us. I said, most

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of them probably don't want us in the room because

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna point out things that they don't see because

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these people their coding and building products

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's solely focused on their lens and view

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of the world, which is not the global population. Sorry

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to say that is not what the global population looks like.

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Y'all are actually in the minority. So they don't want

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>us in the room. But I think what's important is,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and I always lead from a diversity standpoint, is if

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you tell people how much money they can make or

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>how much money they will lose, that is when they

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>will listen. That is when they will care. They don't

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>want to hear like I never ever start a conversation

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with oh, well it's the right thing to do. Well,

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I have hell, we all know it's the right thing

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. But if people really cared about doing the

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>right thing, it would have already been done. So but

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>if I tell you, if you put out this type

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of marketing campaign with these visuals and this narrative, you're

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get dragged on Twitter. That ad is gonna have

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to come down. You will have lost five thousand dollars.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And however, many men and woman hours creating this ad.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's that angle. Or it's if you make it

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a product that is inclusive and has multiple use cases

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and functions and also maybe has an audio function, has

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a function that you know will allow that to have

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a blind person use it, you're gonna gain that much

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more traction because now more people can use your product.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>So that's more revenue. You know, you testified before Congress

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about AI bias, artificial intelligence bias, and the congressman asked

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you about how that could be. You know, when you're

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just developing this this this software, and I guess some

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>people might imagine that it's not inherently racist. It's just

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cold and right. But you know, can you speak to

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with the development of AI that should be

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>potentially cause a concern for black and brown people as

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we get more into a world that relies on artificial intelligence. Yeah,

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And when he asked me that question, I kind of

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I just remember sitting in church with my mom and

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>she would just pinch me and say, fix your face,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Fix your face. Because I was like, how, what do

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you mean? How is it? How could it possibly be

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>inherently biases code? Well, who makes the code? People? It's

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>unconscious biases, Like it's not like the code magically came

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>from the sky. A lot of things that go into

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>making these algorithms that will tell you your credit score

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or your availability for a certain mortgage amount. It's based

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on stale data. So the example that I gave was,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are basing this off of data from nineteen

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, well, they were still red lining in black neighborhoods,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>saying we couldn't having restrictive covenants and deeds and said

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't buy in certain areas. So if you're using

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that data, it's going to be inherently biased because it's

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>based on racist laws. And so if you are not

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>updating that data or using additional data to corroborate what

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you have already coded, then you're doing it wrong. And

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the way that the easy summation of that for me

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is who fact checks the fact checkers because in this instance,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the people that are coding the algorithms that will determine

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>your credit worthiness will also determine um. They also use

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this same kind of functionality in policing algorithms to tell

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>police where they should go on certain times of days.

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>And it's based off of previous crime data history. It's

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>based off of moon phases, it's based off temperature records,

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's based off of like randomness. So you're just gonna say,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>because in nineteen eighty five it was a d eight

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>degrees in East Oakland, So now we need to send

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty cars to patrol there tonight. Yeah. Like oh, and

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's also based on sports team records, So I guess

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you gauge that? Because how many cop cars

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>do you send in Order Dame when they win a

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>big game and those kids storm the field versus the

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Warriors lose and you have had a bajillion cars around

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the coliseum, So like, how do you gauge? And a

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is gonna be you know, unconscious bias.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna send the twenty cop cars so where the

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>majority of the black people are, but you know, those

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>white kids storm in the field. Oh, they're just celebrating.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you enlighten things on fire? Can you? Can you

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to me like a little bit about what's what's

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>happening in the actual technology that allows it to be biased,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like seeing certain faces versus other faces, thinking some people

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>look at like versus other people looking at like. Oh, well,

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about like the unconscious bias and their

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>actual test of that where you have to decide and

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that you get like I think three seconds to scroll through,

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>um and I've taken this course. You have three seconds

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to decide if this person is like a good person

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or a bad person. And it's interesting because you could see,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, seek men with with their hair wrapped, or

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you could see a black woman with a natural hair,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>or your who's dark skin, or you could see a

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>lighter skin black woman with straight hair, or you see

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a white lady, or you see a dark skin black man,

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and you literally just have to press the button and

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out, oh is this person not sure? And even

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>just like not just looking at their face, but also

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the clothing. Some of them had on college sweatshirts, which

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna give you a whole difference view of that person, right, like,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so maybe I might be afraid of your face, but

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>if I see the fact that you're wearing a shirt

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and says Stanford, maybe I'm less afraid. And it's little

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>subtle cues like that too. So you you're dealing with

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are taking those tests and to some extent

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>are failing them. Uh, and those are the people who

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are actually doing the coding. And it's then understanding that

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>even little things like the hand dispensers in um in

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>public bathrooms, like you go to the airport and I

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>have to stick my hand under that thing three times

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>before SoC will come out. And it's because it was

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>designed for people with lighter skin hands and little simple

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>things where it's not that you think people are doing

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it on purpose, it's just that is what they're used to,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and so that is how they design the product, and

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is transferred to code. Well, if this

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is the data that I've been given in order to

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>base your credit score off of, and this is historical

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>data of what the credit scores and certain based on

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>your zip code, based on your age, if this is

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the information that we've had for the last ten years, well,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>then that's what I'm gonna use so we've already established

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation that you know, they don't want to

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>send the room in the first place, you know, in

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>order to the people that you're advocating for, they don't

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>want to send the room. And then at the same time,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>having us not in the room causes these biased situations

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to proliferate. You know, if to use a big word,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not respecting the probably a bigger word than necessary. But

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>so the million dollar question is is how do we

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>get more of us in the room in order to

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to solve these problems for our future. I

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>think the answer to that is probably twofold one. It's

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>going to take people willing to bring people into the

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>rooms that are not carbon copies of themselves. And I

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>say that because I think the status something like fifty

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>three of tech employees are referrals. And let's just say,

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like if the company is probably six white males and

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the other is a mix of everybody else. But also

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in that forty percent would be predominantly Asian. Well, that

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>leaves us with at about probably five at best. And

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I know the one thing that I did when I

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>worked at Facebook is every single person that I referred

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was a black woman. Even when I left, I still

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>would float their resumes, give them to people who I

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>knew were allies internally, and the good news is they

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>all got hired. But it's because I knew who to

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>pick and choose in terms of like advocating for them internally.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's one thing that it's hard to It's like

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>nine times I'd attend if you have an internal advocate,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that will get you farther down the line, But because

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a few of us there, it's hard to

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>find an internal advocate. So usually it's a friend of

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a friend or somebody from that went to your college

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>or your law school or your business school or what

0:15:55.280 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have you, and doesn't always have to be a a

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>internal advocate, but somebody who knows how to navigate that

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>system and we'll we'll champion it for you. And I

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think the other piece to that is also just making

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sure that you know if if you get inside, you

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be to me. I always look at um.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>There was a line in my black graduation from Berkeley,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was Michael Eric Dyson who gave

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the speech, and he always said he at the end

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of the speech, he said, be a trojan horse. So

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of how I look at everywhere I go

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is And I've seen two types of black people in

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies. One is the type that's a trojan horse,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna hold the door open and advocate for

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>other people to get inside, or if there are people

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>already there, you advocate for them to get promoted, or

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you advocate for them to get better work assignments. And

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the second type of person I've seen is the type

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that wants to be the special Negro snowflake and they

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure the door slammed because they want

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to be one of a few. Like that makes you

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>feel special. Now that doesn't make me feel special, but

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but for some of those people, it's that is their

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>calling card. That so the less the less of us

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that are there, the more special they feel. And so

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>they want to make sure that the door is shut.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And I have even seen d I practitioners like that,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>which to me is like, how do you have this job? Well,

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know how you have a job because

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be a yes person for the majority. But

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like a a cruel bait and switch.

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But I would say it's it's gonna be that twofold.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You have to have people that are on the inside

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna be trojan horses, and you also have

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you have internal advocates and work

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>your network. You know, tech is still, you know, a

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>very new industry, may in may in the mainstream context.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you think fifteen years ago, you just

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>started to get things like Facebook and etcetera. And then

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, so let's say let's call it twenty years

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that tech has been like in the dominant, you know,

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>mainstream conversation, there are so many attorneys who maybe work

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in real estate law or maybe they work in criminal law,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but they want to be in to this tech thing.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>How can they find their way into helping startups? Yeah,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say there are lots of startups that um

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>can't retain large firms. So like if you think of

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>like a MOFO or Cooley, UM, you know, they just

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>can't afford the larger companies. And so the answer to

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that would be, maybe that person offers them discounted services

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just to get the experience to say that they've been

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>advising startups or helping startups. I think that's one thing

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that actually would be great in terms of bolstering your resume,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and then who knows if that startup actually gets more

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>funding than you would be the person that they would

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>end up hiring as their first attorney, whether that's a

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>general counsel role or some other um. The other thing

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do is I always tell people to make

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>your experience analogous to whatever it is that you're applying for.

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So people tend to look at resumes and they don't

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.959
<v Speaker 1>really or they look at job descriptions rather and they

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>don't change their resume to fit the narrative of what

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the job description is looking for. That is a huge

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>no no. So for every bullet point that is on

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that job description, your resume needs to detail how you

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have either done something that is just like that and

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>here are the results that I got from doing that work,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>or it needs to be an analogous argument meaning I

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't you know, I didn't necessarily do it this way,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but this is something that I did that is very

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>akin to what it is that you're looking for. And

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't even I would start off with I haven't

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>done this. I would just say, you know, in accordance

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>with you know, X, Y and Z type of experience,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I've done something analogists such as blah blah blah blah blah,

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and here are the results from that. So always make

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that you are reading the job description and making

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>sure that your resume lines up with it. A lot

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of people simply just send the same generic resume out

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. And also they need to be

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>mindful that the way the job descriptions are written, it's

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes you can't tell what is I bucket

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>them in three ways something what's a what's a must have?

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>What is a nice to have? And what is a moonshot?

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Like we want you to have these, you know, five

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>imperative skills. It would be great if you have these

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>three that are nice to have. And then like also

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>if you speak Arabic and Japanese like we love it now,

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you probably are going to get that, but the other

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>things you probably can. And um also be mindful that

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>though the words and the phrasings that they're using in

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>those job descriptions, those are the keywords that they're going

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to be searching for in their portal when they're looking

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to advance people to screening interviews. And so again, if

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just sending out a generic resume and it doesn't

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>have any of those buzzwords in it. There you're not

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>going to get past the screen. So let's take the

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>other arguments or the other case to this, and how

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>does it start up that has potential court an advisor

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>who may be a lawyer, like how to like what

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>gets Barri's attention to for you to be an advisor

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to my thing? A good idea, Like honestly, I'm not

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who focuses solely on you know, how how fast

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>can they go public or how much money can they

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>make or how much money have they already raised? And

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for me it's it's also the journey and like how

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>passionate are these these people are this team about what

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it is that they're doing. And also I always try

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask people, you know, what what is the difference

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>ferentiation factor between you and your competitors? Because at that point,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I've probably looked at who who's your competition? How is

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>this different? Like what what's gonna be the factor that

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>gets you noticed and gets you investment dollars and not

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>crash and burn as opposed to these people who are

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>already doing something similar may not be exact, but if

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's similar enough people will pass on it. UM. So

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>those are the things that really catch my attention. And

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>UM and a deck, what is your what does your

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>deck look like? If you have a thirty slide deck?

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not reading all that. And I can

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you from working with UM, working with startups and

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>then working with people working with investors, that's literally the

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>first thing they say they want a deck that is

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.239
<v Speaker 1>in ten slides or less, and ten is pushing it.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>It's the seven that's even better. How should start us

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about compensating advisors? Like is there a compensation

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>for an advisory role? Is there an equity package? Like

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you get you know, folks, really good attorneys

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to come on and give them some incentive to be there?

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Or do you need an incentive to be there? Um,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be on an individual basis. And always I

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>always say you get what you negotiate. So that's something

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that people should always be mindful of. Is it's not

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna necessarily you don't You're not necessarily gonna always get

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>what you deserve. You're gonna get what you can negotiate.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And for me, when I have done it, it's been

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 1>a mix of actual just equity, and in compensation. Some

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>people choose just compensation, some people choose just equity. It's

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really gonna depend on what that person wants and what

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>it is that the startup can provide. I would say

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>nine times i'd a tend it's easier for them to

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>provide equity because they may not have the cash on

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>hand yet because they haven't raised So but if you're

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>getting equity and they're doing a preseed round or anything else,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>like you're you're gonna be one of the few people

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that that's on the cap table, and that's a good

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>place to be, particularly if they end up getting funding

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and they do go public or they're acquired. That's the

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>other thing people don't think about. Everyone's always so like,

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, short term, focused on how how long can

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>we get to I p O? Well, maybe I p

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>O isn't necessarily the best route to go. Sometimes it's

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine to just get acquired by a larger company.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at your website, and so many people

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>have blogs on their website that do not get updated

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>because people got stuff to do. But like, you really

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>go in on on your writing, right, And I wonder,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>like what makes you prioritize the thoughts that you have

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to say to publish them regularly. Yeah, I think because

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>there's always something going on, particularly in the last I

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>would say three years, there's there's always been something going on,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in the tech space or it has to

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do with social justice. And like that was the thing

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that I wrote um last was talking about. You know,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all these tech companies made these pledges like after George Floyd, like, oh,

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we care so deeply, and we're gonna invest in black founders.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do business, you know, we're gonna do have

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>more supplier diversity funds deviated and set aside for black

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>owned businesses, and we're gonna have these hiring targets where

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have of our leadership is gonna be black.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's like okay, And then you read the fine

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>print and it's like by twenty six it's like, okay,

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>well that's fine. At least you gave me something to

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>work with, right, like I have, there's a metric and

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's a day. But that was my gripe. As

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been a year and no one has reported out

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on any of the the things that they've done, and like,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where where is it? Because I could say I'm gonna

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do a whole bunch of things today and but I

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>won't have them done until so. Does that mean you're

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna start working on them until so? For me,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where it should be a

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>constant progress report. And the other thing that gave me

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>such pause about that was the idea of saying, oh, well,

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>we're going to self audit and report out to the

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>press was like, you know, no, that literally is like

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what I said. That's like if I punish my son

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and then tell him, well, what do you want your

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>punishment to be? And he says, I want cookies and

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>ice cream and my Nintendo switch, and I say okay,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm just gonna report out that he was punished.

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna tell you all that other stuff. So that,

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to me, is not a viable option. There need to

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be independent auditors that are coming in and looking at

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that because there's no there's no incentive for the company

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to really tell us the truth, right, Like, they'll just

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>report out the metrics that fit their narrative that makes

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it look like they did something, but they're going to

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>completely bypass and maybe the other are four things that

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they said they were going to do. So we'll just

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you about this one. Just focus on this one,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you ask them, well what about the other four?

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>What about them? We really did really great on this

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>one though. Yeah, I mean when we have I don't

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>want to call everybody in diversity theater, but there's a

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks who do do diversity theater, and we

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>think when we have things like a George Floyd during

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a COVID pandemic happened, and so a lot of us

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>do talk about how to who's holding these folks accountable

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to what they said they were going to do. What

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>has to happen to get to a place to where

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a body that holds people accountable to those promises?

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Like what is it shareholders that have to step in

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and organize, or like what has to happen in order

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to get to a place that we're saying we're no

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>longer having to say somebody has to hold them accountable

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to such and such is holding them accountable? Yeah? I

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>think it should be. It's going to be a mix

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of shareholders and I would love to see like a

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>coalition of independent auditors who kind of do this work

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>um and then make them actually have to sign on

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to handle that. But I think that that's gonna be

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>very difficult because these people they don't want to be

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>held accountable. They want to continue to do what they're

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>doing and do it in the dark. And when they

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>decide to tell you something is when they decided to

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>tell you something, and it's it's troublesome. But I think

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, press asking these questions, and that's why

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you asked why I published as much as I do?

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Because again, who fact checks the fact checkers or in

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this case, who's gonna who's gonna tell me what you've

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>actually got gotten done? You had a year and like

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to see, I want to see the receipts,

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like you don't have any. So what

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that tells me is you haven't started working on this,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or if you have, your results were so abysmal you

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't even want to share them. So but I think

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a fast company like they don't they donated, but

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they they made their entire June issue around this topic.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you have more people continuously asking

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the question, you can only avoid it for so long

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>if they're like eight or nine publications asking you the

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>same question. And that's the other thing I thought was

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>super interesting is then you have people who write independently

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or I'm but I'm a Fast Company contributor. But then

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you have other people who are doing things independently asking

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the question. You have people creating tools that are asking

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the question. My favorite tool last year is one called

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>layoffs dot f y I, where it listed all all

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who got laid off during the pandemic from

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>UM I want to say, starting in March, and from

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of big tech companies down to like

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>some smaller ones, but ones that are significantly funded. And

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases you could see the names of

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the people and a cursory glance of that the names

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and the department that they were in. And it was

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>h people, it will salespeople, it was d I people,

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it was all the people were typically people of color

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and women congregate the most in those departments. And you

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>could look at some of the names and it was

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>very clear I could probably guess what this person is. Yeah,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's the thing. It's like, you have people

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>who are doing it independently you have, you know, actual

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>magazines and press asking the question, there's only so long

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can hide this information. There was a blog

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>post you did about social media and it being an

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>extension of white privilege, and it was a white privilege

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in the office, and I specifically wanted to hone in

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on this one line you wrote. It said, Um, there's

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>an added layer of complexity when you add tech and

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>social media to this mix. Now you don't just get

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to know your colleagues in the workplace, but also by

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>their digital presence and what they choose to comment on

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or avoid. And I particularly asked this because I hire people.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder because the first time I see a resume,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta look at Facebook, I got to look at Twitter.

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to see what you're talking about and who

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>are you really beyond this resume that you gave. And

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder your thoughts on how this continues to play

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>out and the complexity in tech. I think that the

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>complexity with it is like oftentimes you're you know, you're

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>working with these people who are also building the tools.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that they did at Facebook is as

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>soon as you accept your offer, I think within forty

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, of me accepting my offer. Um my soon

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to be colleagues sent me Facebook requests and I was like, oh, no,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>are we doing it? I don't know. I don't And

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>my husband specifically said, why don't you just create the

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>limited profile function and add them to that? And I said, honestly,

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a lot of work, Like that's me

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>maintaining essentially to digital presences on one plant. For him,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that's too much work. If you look, get what you're getting.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you like I remember that might have been

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like the second or third week that I was working

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there and that man who had that really cute mud

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>shot with the blue eyes and everyone loved him, and

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I posted something about it and my general counsel swiveled

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his chair because he sat at the next bank of chairs,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, so that's what you like. I'm like, oh,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you got jokes calling okay? And I said, look, I

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to know. I don't want a felon necessarily.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want him like, but it's a it's a

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>cute picture. Cute what's what they calling prison bay or

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>something's in prison but that's the thing. Well, prison bay

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ended up coming up. He became a model and married

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like a millionaire, so he won, I guess so. But yeah,

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those things where you know, at

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>any other workplace, nobody would have seen that because I

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't if you send me a friend request and like

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you just remain in purgatory. So I think it is

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the digital presence of you know, what are the things

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that you choose to comment on and what are the

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>things that you ignore? And it's not like people don't

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>notice that. So whether it is you know, you didn't

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that there was a string of people that were

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>killed by police or armed vigilantes in the case of

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a mod Aubrey. If there you don't want to talk

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about that, or you don't speak on that, or you

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>don't notice it, but you hear us talking about it

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the break room or something, or you hear us

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about it outside of work, and you happen to

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, join in with something like that, but

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't say anything. Don't think that when you walk

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>away that we weren't talking about the fact that you

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't say anything. And you know, I've been in other

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>workplaces where something like that will happen, and you know,

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people will just completely turned pivot and run from the conversation.

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And but I've also been in a workplace. But then

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the people that I say was

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a great, great ally. When I was at Facebook is

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy named Mark. And it was after Mike Brown

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>had been killed, and I just didn't you have an

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>open workspace? And I just didn't want to. I didn't

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to stand there all day and sit there like

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>where people could come up to me and act like

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this didn't happen, like you're just coming and you know,

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>talking to me about whatever, and I just I don't

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about that. So I went and locked

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 1>myself in an empty conference room, and he went around

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the floor to all the conference rooms looking for me,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and then when he did, he just knocked on the

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>door and I was like sure. He was like, I

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just want to know if you're okay. And I was like,

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>how how long did you go around this building? He

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>was like about ten minutes, and he's like, but I

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to know if you were okay because I

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>saw you earlier this morning and then I didn't see

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you again, and I was like, honestly, no, I'm tired

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's exhausting, and he was like, I know.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, if you want to talk, let me know,

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But like, that's the kind of thing like that. I

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly I noticed that versus everyone else who acted like

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't happen, Versus a different colleague who was like, oh, wow,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody was shot byl I don't even know. Okay, Like

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the luxury to not did not know or

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>did not care. And that's what I mean by the

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>extension of that versus you see people hopping conversations about

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>politics or something else and then it's like, oh, he

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>has a different view than I thought, or she is

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a Karen and yeah. I mean you just look

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at that stuff and you notice it and you just

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>file it away in the back of your head. Right.

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I mean by the extension of like

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.479
<v Speaker 1>you get to when they say bring your whole self

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to work. First off, I don't agree that necessarily everyone

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>should bring their whole self to work, And I don't

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>know one should bring a hundred. If you're gonna get

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>as close as you want, maybe bring eight. Even then,

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that eight I think is reserved for certain types of people,

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and those types of people tend to be straight able body,

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>white man. Yeah. Um, I was intrigued by your post

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the computer generated apocalypse that never happened? And I wonder

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>where you see this particular trajectory progressing, um with regards

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>to like social media, AI, venture capital even and if

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we stay on our current path, there are something that

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, the wealth gap gets brought, the

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>minority communities get hurt even more than they are. Is

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this the same thing as the apocalypse that never happened?

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Or where do you see this progressing as we continue

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to go down the road of AI and certain people

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>getting funded versus other groups of people getting funded and

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and the and the like. Um. I think what you

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>could say in that case, I wouldn't say it would

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be a computer generated apocalypse that never happened. I would

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>say computer generated apocalypse that did happen. Um. And I

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think we we all saw it. It all happened in

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>real time with you know, disinformation all over everyone's social

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>media platforms. It's still happening in terms of just the vaccine,

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and people don't want to take the vaccine because well

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I read they're putting microchips, Like where are you all

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 1>getting this? But it's one of those things that if

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know you are using not you to sational outlets

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to get your information, which I don't think is necessarily

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>always a bad thing. But like, I'm not taking any

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>type of, you know, medical advice from Alex Jones on

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Info Wars. It's just not ever gonna happen. And I

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't need Tucker Crosson to tell me that COVID

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't isn't really real and I don't need a vaccine

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>while you were vaccinated, sir. So to me, it's we've

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>seen this already happen in real time and it's still

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>continuing to happen. And I think if there isn't any

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>type of actual regulation, I don't know that you we

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>can prevent it from getting worse. You. I mean, you've

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>already thrown an election and now you're getting people sick.

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's it isn't that it's not happening. It is happening.

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>The question is how do we stop it? And I

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>think the best answer that you have for that is

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that social media companies in particular

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>will like the answer or is right now, they are

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>distinguished as platforms, which means they're not subject to certain regulation.

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you publishers now they have a responsibility and

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want it, which I could understand. Their

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>attitude is, well, we're just the mechanism and the portal

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for which you post and share whatever cat videos, pictures,

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>or your kids or Trump lost the election or he

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>won the election, whichever you choose, and they don't want

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to be responsible for having to take down information about

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh well no he won the election of stolen and

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 1>you know those were loving tourists that visited on January six,

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Like they don't want the responsibility of that, which I understand.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But at some point you can't just continue to proliferate

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>all of this, like you can't. It's that's essentially the equivalent,

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the digital equivalent of throwing a rock and hide in

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>your hand. That's also why I there's another social media

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>company that I like a lot called Telepath, because you

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>actually have to use your real name and picture or

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you cannot participate versus Twitter. It's like somebody would a

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>cat photo and like don one, two, three four, and

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>he's calling you everything but a child of God. So

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think if they're some of that would be started

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if people could not hide an anonymity. There was this

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>period during COVID and right after the murder George Floyd, Um,

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>where black people, I feel like, had this window of

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to capitalize is the wrong word, but for the

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sake of his conversation, capitalized on the attention that we

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>had from VESI, capitalists, from corporations, for people who finally

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>saw that we weren't crying wolf all these years, but

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that were they were actually actually systemic issues that kept

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>us from being able to progress in many different use

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. Um is that window now close? Are

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we are? We? Are we so far past it to

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>where they don't have to talk about it anymore, they

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to pay attention anymore. That is a good question.

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 1>And I've thought about this for a while myself. Um I.

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>My prediction was that it was probably gonna be over

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 1>either after the election around January, after inauguration. I would

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>say it's not closed, but it's closing. And the reason

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>being is, um, I think there's a course now at

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a different added element to it, where you have all

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of these voting restrictions being written into state laws, and

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you also have these two Democratic senators who refused to

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 1>do away with the filibuster in order to right right

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that wrong and get federal legislation passed. Like they don't

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>want the John exactly, they don't want for other people.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They definitely don't want the George Floyd Policing Reform Act.

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think as long as those things are still

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>churning and on the table, the windows still open, And

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I would just say it was like it was open

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like this last summer, and it's probably open like this now,

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's there. It's just closing. But I also

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think that that's on us to like keep forcing it

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and keep pushing it. Black Tech Green Money is the

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>production of Black and the Afro Tech, The Black Effect

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast Network, and nine Hired Media. It's produced by Morgan

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Debonn and me Well Lucas, with additional production supported by

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Love Visas Lewis. Special thank you to Michael Davis. Since

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the carsa von Jan you know like the Wine. Yes

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that's his real name. Learn more about my guests and

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>other technist as the end of it is an afrotech

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The video version of this episode will drop

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Black Tech Green Money on YouTube next week, so

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll tap in joining Black Tech green money, leave us

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a fire star rating on iTunes. Go get your money,

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>peace and love,