WEBVTT - Trump’s Ukraine Plan Faces New Obstacles After Putin Call 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business finance

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, we are getting ready to kick off

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 3>another year with geopolitics front and center. Now, keep in

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 3>mind that President Trump today saying quote, there has to

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>be a disarming of Hamas as he met with Israeli

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister Benjamin Nett and Yahoo on this Monday. The

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 3>two did me to talk about the ceasefire in Gaza,

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>whose troubled opening months ago are stoking concern that regional

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 3>fighting could resume in the new year. We did see

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Israeli Prime

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Minister talking about regional security, economic co operation, and the

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>fight against anti Semitism during that meeting today That came

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 3>from the State Department.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 4>But it sounded like there was a handful of issues.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Vannie, I known you were covering the event when President

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump made a few comments on this, but also a

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of other things. The reporters asked about a lot

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>of things.

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>But it sounds like it's not quite done yet.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>No, And yeah, as you say, President Trump literally said,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>there were five major subjects that we were discussing, and

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the Gaza was one of those subjects and it was

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a tough place. But you know, he wants to get

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to phase two of that deal. But it doesn't seem

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like Nanyao was comfortable moving off of phase one yet.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But of course Venezuela came out, Brussia, Ukraine a lot around.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>So with that said, let's talk a little bit more

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about that.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well we'll talk about you know, that is certainly

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>on our radar. But let's get to also the war

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 3>between Russian and Ukraine. This is the other geopolitical issue,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>if you will, that's certainly on our minds. It's getting

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>very close to the beginning it's fifth year. President Trump

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>held a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier today.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>That was according to the Light House, and that came

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>one day after the US leader met with his Ukrainian counterpart,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>President Voladimir Zolenski. They talked about efforts to bring halt

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 3>to the Kremlin's war. President Zelenski said he asked President

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Trump for US security guarantees lasting as long as half

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 3>a century to help deter any future Russian invasion.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 5>We discussed all the aspects of the peace framework, which

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 5>includes and we have great achievements to any point piece

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 5>plan ninety percent degree and grade security guarantees, one hundred

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 5>percent degree in the US, Europe Ukraine security guarantees almost

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 5>degreed military you mensioned one hundred percent degree prosperity plan

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 5>being finalized.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>That, of course is Ukrainian President Voldemir Zelenski. That was

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 3>yesterday after a meeting with President Trump. Hey, let's get

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 3>into this and what's going on with you the United

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 3>States involvement between the Russia and Ukraine war. Doctor Angelas

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Stent is back with us. She's senior fellow at the

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 3>American Enterprise Institute, author of Putin's World, Russia Against the

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>West and with the Rest, a former national intelligence officer

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>for Russia and Eurasia. As we said at the National

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Council, she understands the situation so much.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Great to have you back with us.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Angela, I am shocked that we're going into or getting

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>very close to going into the fifth year of this war.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing, if anything, that tells you we

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>are getting maybe closer to an end or not.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, we've had very furious negotiations going on now for

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 6>the past few months with Russia, between certainly a Stephen

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 6>Dkoff Jared Krishna meeting with Putin, and then with a

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 6>President's Landski meeting with President Trump meeting with European leaders.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 6>We have two i think competing peace plans out there.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 6>The twenty eight point peace plan which was leaked a

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 6>few weeks ago and which sounded as if it had

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 6>been largely written in Moscow, but it was a joint

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 6>US Russian peace plan. This would have been unacceptable to

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 6>the Ukrainians and really to the Europeans.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 7>And then we now have apparently a.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 6>Twenty point peace plan which was agreed between Ukraine, It's

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 6>European backers, and I think the United States, which cuts

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 6>back on some of the compromises.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 7>That Putin was demanding that Zelenski make.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 6>Zelensky yesterday of course did say that ninety percent had

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 6>been agreed, but I think it's the last ten percent

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 6>that's very problematic. Putin called President Trump before he met

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 6>President Zelenski. They've had another conversation, and I think the

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 6>Russians are going to string this along. But we still

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 6>have no real indication that Vladimir Putin is interesting in

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 6>stopping this war.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, angel, I feel like we've talked about this

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>so much, and you know it does sound like President

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Putin he wants land. I mean, he got it the

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 3>first time that he invaded Ukraine, and he wants it

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 3>again this time around. Is there any chance he backs

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 3>off of it, because this is what seems to be

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>really a major sticking point.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, he wants the land, but the land is a

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 6>means to what he really wants, which is a subjugation

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 6>of Ukraine. So when he talks about we have to

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 6>get to the root causes. Yes, he would like the

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 6>whole of the Donbass region and is asking Ukraine to

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 6>give Russia land that Russia doesn't control, but that's just

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 6>a means to an end. It would make Ukraine more

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 6>vulnerable if the war breaks out again, and he wants

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Ukraine to say that it's going to remain neutral, that

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 6>it's not going to join any Western alliance systems that's

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 6>what he really wants, and he's using the land question

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 6>and in a way to distract from what the broader

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 6>goals are.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>How much is there a time constraint here, doctor Stener,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>because you know there are elections, I mean, there's elections

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up in Ukraine, and obviously at some point look

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>at the mid terms here, and then at some point

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>after that there may or may not be a change

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of leadership. Is Putin focused on things like that.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, Putin's demanded elections in Ukraine, but of course there

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 6>can't be an elections in Ukraine unless the fighting has stopped,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 6>and you have to have a ceasefire first, and Putin

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 6>has not agreed to a cease fire. Yes, we happened

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 6>in terms coming up here, and a majority of Americans

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 6>now and more Americans support Ukraine and are much more

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 6>wary about what Putin is doing, and that includes Republicans

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 6>not only in the Senate, but Republicans in the rest

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 6>of the country. So I don't think Putin feels any

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 6>time constraints, but the Ukrainians do because they are running

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 6>out of manpower. They do have manpower problems. They need

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 6>more weapons, and the US is selling weapons to the

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Europeans who are then giving it to Ukraine that there's

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 6>not an infinite supply of those weapons. So and we

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 6>have winter coming up now it's already upon us. That

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 6>could be more difficult for the Ukrainians. The Russians are

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 6>bombing all of their energy infrastructure and depriving them of

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 6>heat and light and things.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 7>That they need for the winter.

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 6>So I would say the Ukrainians under our under more

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 6>time constraints than the Russians are. But they're not losing

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 6>this war as the Russians claim they are, and they

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 6>have taken back some territory recently that the Russians claim

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 6>that they hold. But certainly Putin believes that time is

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 6>on his side.

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The security proposal under discussion, it's apparently for a fifteen

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>year term. Zelenski wants that to be a lot longer,

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps as long as fifty years.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Will he get it, Well, we're.

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Not really clear what those security provisions are. I mean,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 6>Europeans are willing to provide troops to enforce any kind

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 6>of peace. The US has said that there'll be some

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 6>kind of backstop. They've talked about Article five type guarantees,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 6>which is what NATO countries have, which means if one

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 6>NATO country is attacked, the rest of them were.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Considered that an attack on all of them.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 6>But it's very hard to see how you get those

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 6>kind of guarantees if Ukraine isn't a number of NATO.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 6>And again, you know, we could have a different government

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 6>in the United States, you can have different governments clearly

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 6>in Europe that from the elections coming up.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 7>So I think a fifty year.

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 6>Guarantee is probably unrealistic, but one understands why Zelensky wants

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 6>it because you know this, as long as Putin's in power,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 6>people like him, they're not going to give up on

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 6>subjugating Ukraine.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 7>That said, they could be another reinvasion in the coming.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Years, Angela, Is it clear what the US position is?

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Especially after President Trump was asked in the earlier press

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>conference when Benjamin Neett Yahu and he were together, President

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump said he was very angry when he heard from

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Russian President Vladimir Vladimir Putin about an alleged attack on

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>one of his residences. Again, allegations were not quite sure.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I believe Ukraine has maybe denied this, but I'm just curious,

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 3>is it clear where the US stands? Or is that

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>part of the negotiating tactic of being kind of friend

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 3>and foe and it changes maybe from week to week

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 3>or day to day.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, what's clear is that Trump wants to improve ties

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 6>to Russia. He's wanted to do that since they wanted

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 6>the second term. That he's offering the Russians economic incentives

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 6>which he thinks may bring them round.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 7>He does want to bring the war to an end.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 6>I think he genuinely wants to end the war, and

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 6>then he also wants to claim credit for it.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 7>But you know, yesterday he said some things.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 6>He equated the Russian bombing of Ukrainian civilian structures, energy

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 6>infrastructures with the Ukraine, the Ukrainians sometimes hitting Russian energy

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 6>installations and so. And then he also said yesterday that

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 6>Putin wanted Ukraine to succeed, which is a rather extraordinary

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 6>thing to say, since they've been making more on Ukraine,

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, for nearly.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 7>Five years now.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not sure what the US position is, but

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 6>I do think that Trump administration wants the war to end.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, ten or fifteen seconds, I'm not going to

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>ask you about the House on this, but do you

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 3>think we wrap up this war. Does it get wrapped

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 3>up in twenty twenty six?

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Just quicktly?

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 8>I could?

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 7>I wish it could wrap up. I'm not sure that

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 7>it will.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Angelistan, thank you so much much. Doctor Anjela sent,

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of Putin's World, Russia Against the West and with the Rest.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>You are listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 2>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we want to stay with all of the geopolitics

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that continue to come at us. Henrietta Trace is with us.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 3>She's Beta Partner's managing partner. She's also director of Economic Policy.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 3>She also served in the US Senate as a tax,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 3>banking and finance legislative assistant, so she understinks from the

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 3>understands the private and the public sector.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>She's done a lot.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta, good to have you back with us. I do

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 3>want to go domestic, but first I've got to go global.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>The President's spending a lot of time on foreign affairs.

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 3>What is is this important in terms of the US

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>economic situation, the US business environment going forward?

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think what's clear from that press conference

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 9>and what we saw from Zelensky's meeting today, and then

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 9>to tie it into China, as the President did earlier,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 9>even on the China front, with all the three of

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 9>these instances, with the US trade deal with China, the

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 9>negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, and the Gaza and Hamas

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 9>and Israel situation, is that there's got to be devils everywhere.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 10>There's devil is in the.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 9>Details, and we don't have any details.

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 7>There are no.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 9>Hard and fast details.

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 7>The President wasn't able.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 9>To give any of them, neither on the Abraham Accords

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 9>or as you just mentioned, on the West Bank. On timing,

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 9>there's daylight between net Yahoo and Trump, and I think

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of daylight between Zelensky and Putin.

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 7>To say the very least, and there's a lot.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 9>Of daylight between the US and China on just our

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 9>terms of trade deal. So I think it's pretty clear

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 9>that all this is going to drag into twenty twenty six,

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 9>and the President is extremely occupied with these issues. The

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 9>issue for the President and then therefore for the Republican

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 9>Party down ballot, is that Americans are not focused and

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 9>they don't even have in their top ten issues that

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 9>they care about foreign policy going into next year's mad

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 9>term elections. What is it to tie in the foreign

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 9>policy part? Is really interesting for the president to double

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 9>down like this on these issues which are obviously important

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 9>to him but are not making forward progress and don't

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 9>impact the US consumer war voter.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I love that you went there, and certainly for the

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>global investing you know audience, this can matter right in

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 3>certain terms of opportunities or relationships. But having said that,

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the midterms, which will also be

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 3>important to financial markets, and what more of the President's

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 3>agenda he can get done in the second half of

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 3>this second term for him, So this focus is surprising.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you think he shifts in the new year. I

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 4>think he tries to do both.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 9>You know, he's tried to do both in the first year,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 9>where he did the one Big Beautiful bill which was

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 9>very economically oriented three and a half trillion dollars in

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 9>deficit increasing tax cuts Prince of to corporations in twenty

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 9>five with some of it coming for individuals in twenty six.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 9>I think the Republican Conference and the President feels like

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 9>they've done their job on the economy and now we

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 9>need to wait and let it work out. That's certainly

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 9>what they're hoping for going into next year.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 7>The trade or.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 9>Rather the tariff dividend that the President touts is four

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 9>hundred and fifty billion dollars of money he's not going

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 9>to get out of Congress to send home to the

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 9>American public, So there's not another physical package coming from DC.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 9>He has to keep an attention on other things while

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 9>touting the one big beautiful bill because there's not going

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 9>to be another piece of legislation that passes.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 7>In twenty twenty six.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 9>In my opinion, Hey, what that's going to keep the

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 9>issue a lot.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, And the other thing like just kind of blown

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 3>away by some of the notes that you guys shared

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 3>with our team. The most controversial view BETA has going

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>into twenty twenty six is that when Scotis rules on

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 3>those tariffs, that they rule against them, the President will

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>not quickly move to replace them with new authorities, as

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 3>he and his economic advisors insist. But he would say

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>that Scotus would be handing the president a domestic gift

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 3>by breaking down the tariffs, which equate to about eighteen

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred dollars per house household at their current levels.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Do you expect Scots to strike them down?

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I do, and I think I'm in a pretty

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 9>good company on that one. As you know, the courts below,

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 9>the Court of International Trade and the Court of Appeals

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 9>have both rejected it. My odds are sixty five percent

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 9>that the Supreme Court's rejected it.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm hopeful that they do it in the first quarter.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 9>And get this binary event, three trillion dollars binary event

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 9>off our backs. But the single best thing that could

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 9>happen to this administration and again to Republicans down ballot,

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 9>is for the president to get the tariffs revoked by

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 9>the Supreme Court. He doesn't have to admit failure or

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 9>anything along those lines.

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 7>You can to say the.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 9>Supreme Court won't let me do it, and then just

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 9>not migrate too. Three three eight or Balance of Payments

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 9>Authority or two thirty twos or three zero ones. They're

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 9>going to be threatened. But look at the ones that

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 9>have already been threatened and aren't yet on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 9>Where's the Critical Minerals investigation? It was supposed to be

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 9>released on the twenty seventh. It might be on the

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 9>President's desk, but he's clearly sitting on it. And that's

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 9>because he can't afford to have prices continue to rise

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 9>by imposing new tariffs, especially on those items.

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's the best.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 9>Case scenario for this president for the Supreme Court to

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 9>take the tarriffs down. That would clear the dominimus tariffs,

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 9>that would clear all the AIPA retaliatory tariffs, and give

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 9>the President the ability to take a more nuanced approach

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 9>to trade instead of the blunt.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 7>Acts that was Liberation Day.

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 9>And I go one step further if I may, and say,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 9>if he takes the opportunity to reimpose all these tariffs,

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be so confusing for small and large

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 9>businesses alike. It will be the equivalent of Liberation Day

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 9>two point zero. You can't just swap them out, so

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, prepare for equl forth again.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, that means it's going to be an interesting twenty

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, no doubt about it. Whichever way it goes.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta always enjoy getting some time with you. Henrietta Trey's

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Vita Partners managing partner and director of Economic Policy joining

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 3>us here.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen each

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car Play

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>York station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, from the fintech sector to the commodity space, we're

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing a major pullback. Well, I would say, you know,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>modest pullback really in gold and silver, but the two

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>medals did top records earlier this week.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they just went on a tear.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Here to break down the recent moves, Mike mcgillan, senior

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>commodity strategist with Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Mike, how much of

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all of this was just pure speculation?

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 8>Just about all of it, I think, Vonnie, when you

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 8>get to these extreme levels, particularly in thin markets, with

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 8>things like gold and particularly silver.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Silver is known as the Devil's medal for a reason.

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 7>But they're up so much this year.

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 8>Silver, as we've both you mentioned, we've noted a lot

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 8>it's the best year since nineteen seventy nine for both

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 8>of those medals, and history has proven when you rallied

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 8>this velocity. My rule as a strategist, as I take

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 8>off that fundamental technical outlook, I switch over to a

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 8>money manager. I say, typically new long seat. These levels

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 8>do very poorly. So give you example. Silver settled nineteen

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 8>seventy nine at thirty two dollars and twenty cents an ounce,

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 8>and the first end of the year to close above

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 8>that level is this year, twenty twenty five.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 4>It's been a long time, almost fifty years.

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 3>What's driving the trade and the selloff? Is it a

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 3>supplied demand metric? Is it investors looking to move assets

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 3>around a safe haven place.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Certainly when it comes to gold, what is it?

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Because I know supply demand can often be a big factor, Mike,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to various commodities and precious metals.

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 8>Well, certain hell, okay, certainly carol and silver it is.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 8>But the narratives that they're using now for pulling up

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 8>silver have been around for years. We've all known about

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 8>the demand from solar and everything. But to me now

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 8>it's in that speculative access in stage. I think people

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 8>are realizing it's much more beneficial maybe to allocates to

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 8>some precious metals where there's only four versus cryptocurrencies where

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 8>there's twenty eight million. As a previous announcer frailed to mention,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 8>there's a nonlimited supply of cryptocurrencies and there's only really

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 8>about ten major medals. So I still think they're going

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 8>to do well. The problems they've just gone too far.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 8>So I like to compare to metals now. Was when

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 8>the Hunt brothers cornered the silver market in nineteen seventy nine.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 8>We had a similar pink this year and cryptocurrencies with

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 8>mister Trump tilting over from antagonists to zealot and it's to.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:26.239
<v Speaker 7>Look forward to next year.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a good chance things like silver can

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 8>get down to fifty and up two one hundred. But

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 8>basically it's the top metal that can go down because

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 8>it went up too much, and even gold. Gold can

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 8>easily trade down blow four thousand and above five thousand.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's a top metal.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 8>They can also drop a little bit, just because they've

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 8>gone up so much and there's so much in the

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 8>mainstream now.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike, a quick word on copper, because we had it

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>rallying above thirteen thousand dollars a ton in London overnight.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Now came weigh off that price.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But there are real concerns surrounding copper and its industrial uses.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 8>Right, yeah, so copper, the main thing is the apply

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 8>constraints this year, it's very rare. Is there going to

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 8>be that industrial demand from places like China which is

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 8>in a basically recessionary a deflation period. So I look

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 8>at copper as completely dependent on the stock market going

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 8>up again next year, and if US stock market drops,

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 8>copper will Tribby drop about twice as much.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 7>But Copple's also auto correlated.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 8>So I'm very worried that it's not going to be

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 8>able to sustain these realities, particularly as you look at

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 8>deflationary forces in China, is indicated by its ten year

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 8>out yield about one point eighty six percent.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Mike, we'd be remissed not to give

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 3>you thirty seconds on crypto, having considering the conversation we

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>just had and how it's say golf.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 9>Did you.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, what are you thinking about when it

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 3>comes to bitcoin in particular for twenty twenty six, and

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 3>just got about twenty thirty seconds here.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 8>More likely to go to fifty and maybe lower than

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 8>stay higher. It's another thing that's completely dependent on stock

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 8>market going up, and it's probably indicating we're going to

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 8>see more volatilely next year.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 4>All right, good to know, and I'm sure we'll be

0:19:58.800 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 4>checking in with you a lot.

0:19:59.680 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Mi.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, Happy holidays.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>He has senior commodity strategist with Bloomberg Intelligence joining us here.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, we are back on Bloomberg Markets were

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 3>across Bloomberg platforms, radio, TV, YouTube, Bloomberg originals.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm Carol Masser with Bonnie Quinn.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, IPO's return kind of in a big way,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe big with quotes, I should say ups us IPO

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 3>volume excluding SPACs and closed end funds exceeding forty billion dollars.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Those deals created twenty one new billionaires. However, many of

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 3>them saw their wealth diminish afterward, and that plays into

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 3>the share price. What happened after those new offerings. Dylan

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 3>Sloan covers IPOs for us here at Bloomberg and he

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>joins us right now in studio. Dylan, Let's talk about

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the good news, because we did see finally the IPO

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:18.239
<v Speaker 3>market open up.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Were not at the record levels that we've seen in

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 4>years past, but nonetheless we saw some activity.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>We did.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it started strong. Venture Global one of the first

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 10>firms to debut this year. It was slated to be

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 10>the biggest energy IPO for over a decade. They downsized

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 10>that slightly, but again things got off to a hot start.

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 10>Expectations really high. This was viewed as an administration that

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 10>would be favorable to a lot of these big deals.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 10>We also closed the year with Medline just a few

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 10>weeks ago, which was the biggest exactly biggest IPO worldwide

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 10>this year, one of the largest medical health IPOs in years. So,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, start and finish were strong. But again, yeah,

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 10>there was a little bit of instability there towards the

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 10>middle that I'm sure we're going too, all.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 4>Right, So we talk about it.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Minted twenty one new billionaires are there still twenty one

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 3>new billionaires that not exactly less.

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 10>Exactly, we did see somewhat of a recurring pattern for

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 10>a lot of these offerings. There was a lot of

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 10>retail interests. For many of these, we saw a bunch

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 10>of offerings and a lot of these buzzy sectors or

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 10>the AI plays crypto, we would see these massive spikes

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 10>in the first day or two of trading. We'd see

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 10>this the you know, the economic value of insiders stake

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 10>spiked to billions or multiple billions of dollars, and then

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 10>often those games would you know, fall just as quickly.

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I always felt bad for the retail

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>investor because on this they had got in beforehand, and

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how would you know, and you can't then they were

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>completely I mean they would have lost a lot of money.

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 10>On these exactly. And some of these ups and downs

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 10>were really big. Newsmax is one in particular that we

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 10>were looking at that was back in late March early April.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 10>Those shares gained, you know, twenty two hundred percent in

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 10>the first two days of trading, massive spike. Chris Ruddy,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 10>the founder former New York Post journalists who said there's

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 10>no money in journalism. Right, he was a billionaire multiple

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 10>times over after that offering. But then again that was

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 10>all gone just as quickly. Shares are now trading blow

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 10>the IPO trading price, and like you're saying, yeah, it

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 10>really was an up and down and a lot of

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 10>people got burned on them.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>It leaves a really bad taste in the mouth. So

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>what the outlook for the beginning of the year, because

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly and to the end of the year.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 4>We were did a deal.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Today we're having deals in almost every single day at

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year.

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, a lot of the reporting that's been out there

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 10>about the outlook for twenty twenty six is around some

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 10>of these really big name deals for companies that have

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 10>been private for a while. We're thinking SpaceX, that's one

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 10>that Bloomberg has been reporting on extensively. You know, we're

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 10>talking potentially about one point five trillion dollar IPO coming

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 10>sometime next year, open Ai and Thropics, Stripe or some

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 10>of these other really big names that have been thrown around.

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 10>So that'll be a bit of a disconnect from this year,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 10>where it was a lot of these again smaller companies,

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 10>many of them sort of holdovers, crypto companies, that had

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 10>kind of waited it out during the crypto winter, and

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 10>we're coming back to the public markets now after a

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 10>few years, So that's something to definitely look at for

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 10>next year. Of course, I'll still up in the air

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 10>a little bit yet to be seen if any of

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 10>those going through, but certainly could be big ones.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 3>The wrinkle I became billionaires this year. I mean, are

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>there any among the could you guys break it down

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 3>by IPO and some of those that became new billionaires,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 3>anybody who held onto their money throughout?

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, relatively few companies that I will note that. You know,

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 10>even though some of these companies have did have that

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 10>massive spike and then down, many of them are still

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 10>trading out or above the offering price. So you know,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 10>for people who got in at the very beginning, they're

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 10>doing okay. But I would say in terms of themes

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 10>to break it down, Crypto's one that I've said a

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 10>few times. That's when we saw Bullish a crypto exchange

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 10>down about half from its opening price, Weebel another exchange

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 10>down nearly ninety percent. It was a circle and Gemini

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 10>to the crypto firms sort of who've lost a lot

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 10>from their high water marks. The energy sector was another

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 10>one where we had a few big names. Venture Global,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 10>which I mentioned at the beginning, Liquid natural Gas company,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 10>they're down a good bit from their IPO back early

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 10>in the year. And then for me also this AI

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 10>data center company recently down about seventy seven percent from

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 10>their high water mark in October.

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>So those themes you got to go to core Weave.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Though we talked a lot about Corey this year, how

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 3>that happened.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 10>It's been enoughing down for Chrorive, a real roller coaster,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 10>you know. Right after the offering, things were a little tepid,

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 10>it wasn't entirely clear where it was going, but then

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 10>we saw a really big run up later through the

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 10>year as again they've become kind of increasingly more involved

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 10>in that AI play and really kind of a poster

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 10>child for a lot of these new neocloud companies that

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 10>are popping up.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 4>But it's amazing you look at the numbers.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 3>So they're up changed since the opening IPO price in

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 3>March twenty eighth, ap almost one hundred percent, are almost doubling,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>but since the high water mark they're down almost sixty

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 3>percent exactly.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it has been a really big up and down

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 10>and not instant for them. It's really kind of been

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 10>over the course of the whole year. But that's one

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 10>that's still playing out for sure.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And then what about these stable coin companies and the

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, those those that whole area because we had

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Circle and that's sort of everybody's eyes popped when that went.

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 10>Public, right exactly. That was one of those that saw

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 10>a massive, massive gain right at the outset, and you know,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 10>it's down about seventy percent from the high water mark

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 10>on June twenty third, but overall it's not actually doing

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 10>that poorly. That's one of those companies where compared to

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 10>the offering price, they're faring relatively well. You know, obviously

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 10>there was a Genius Act passed over the summer which

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 10>helped kind of solidify some of that the regulatory landscape

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 10>around stable coins, which has been a tailwind for them.

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 10>So it's one of those companies where, you know, it

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 10>kind of depends which angle you're looking at it from.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly something the administration has been very, very absolutely interested.

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>In, and there could be some some more legislation tied

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Genius Act next year as well.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Dylan, thank you so much.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a fascinating beat.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 7>Love chatting to you.

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>That is still on sloan covering IPOs for us right now.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal