WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: January 22, 2025

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and a Marie Hordern. Join us each

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>day for insight from the best in markets, economics, and

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>geopolitics from our global headquarters in New York City. We

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Joining us now

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a happy man, Daniel Pinto, JP Morgan Chase President. Daniel,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 2>It's good to see you, sir.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for me.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 4>It's great here.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel happy? Do you feel lighter now you

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>know you're stepping down and Retiringhi have it.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm in the company for more than four years.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 5>I add my contribution to the success of the company.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 4>The company is in an amazing place at the moment.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 5>It is the right time to embrace the next generation,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 5>to work with Jamie and prepare the company for the

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 5>future and his succession. So I feel good about the

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 5>opportunity company gave me my contribution and looking forward to

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 5>a very violence life going forward.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>You are living the life that we all aspire to.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 6>Why now and what do you expect the next twelve

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 6>to eighteen months.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>To look like?

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 5>So it's very simple in the next This has been

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 5>planned for a long period of time, and now is

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 5>the time for me to transition a very very smooth way.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 5>This transition will go over a couple of years. I

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 5>will my job will be to help the management team

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 5>to continue advising Jamie and the war in issues that

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 5>there is strategic and important for JP Morgan and for

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 5>the future of the company. So it is a right time.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 5>It is the right group that I helped Jamie.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 4>To build up to.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 5>So I think that I feel good about where the

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 5>company is and where I am now.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 6>I've been a JP Morgan and it's Affilia Banks for

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 6>poor decades. It's a long time.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>You've been to a lot of Davoss.

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 6>You've seen a lot of different cycles of enthusiasm. How

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 6>enthusiastic is the optimism around the deal making and some

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 6>of the mergers and acquisitions that could come down the pike.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that is quite enthusiastic.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 5>It was twenty four was a very good year too,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 5>So you think about them. An historical average of volumes

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 5>around four trillion a year in twenty three, it was

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 5>around three point two, last year three point five. We

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 5>think that this year could get to around for trillion,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 5>which is historical average. And most important, we hope that

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 5>the timing but there in the US to approve transaction

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 5>is not as long. It's moved from six months in

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 5>the bus to running eighteen months.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully we go go back.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not just to announce new lys, also to close

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 5>new There's an environment is said for that.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the environment. Is it just a regulatory

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.839
<v Speaker 2>shift that we need or do you find that four

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 2>percent five percent interest rates of how people back as well?

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 5>I think that if you think about the US economy

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 5>has grown very well in twenty four over three percent.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 5>It's likely to grow over two percent this year, So

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 5>the environment is good. I think that even that is

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 5>an economy that you don't see and balances that tell

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 5>you that it is an economy that is about to

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 5>go into recession. This cycle could continue for a period

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 5>of time. There is plenty of monetization that needs to

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>be done in the sponsor space.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 4>That is like essentially the evaluations.

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>In the US that are much higher than any other places.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 5>It's also incentivizeding merging into US companies, So I think

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 5>that it would be a good environment.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Which way to one bank yesterday who suggested that maybe

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>these US companies could go on a bit of a

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>shopping spread in places like Europe with evaluations were depressed.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>You engage any active conversations right now in companies looking

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 2>to do those kind of things.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 5>So we are always engaged with clients all over the world,

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 5>and there is a lot of optimism everywhere about where

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 5>the US could do.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 4>So therefore, yes, there is dialogue everywhere.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 6>So everyone sounds very optimistic, and then you go to

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 6>some of these forries in the evening and people say

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.239
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of enthusiasm. What actually will get done

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 6>we're less clear on, just simply because there is that

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 6>question mark to John's point about benchmark rates, about the

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 6>fact that the economy isn't slowing down so much, so

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 6>why would they go any lower? And what happens if

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 6>they go higher still because of debt and deficit.

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>I tell you how I think about it.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 5>When you think about the US economy, isn't a good

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 5>place there not imbalance is consumer is in a good place,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 5>the corporate sector is in a good place. Inflation hasn't

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 5>yet got to the levels that it should be, and

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 5>the deficit is high. And then you have policies coming

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 5>from immigration, policies started physical the policies and others.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>So at the end, the government is about growth.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 5>So therefore I hope they will balance the implementation of

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 5>those policies in a way that it doesn't either overhit

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 5>the economy or triggers a recessions. So I think that

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 5>the hope is because of that, because the economy is

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 5>in a good place, and certain things like rational revelation,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't like to talk about the regulation. Rational regulation

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 5>in our sector, in any other sector could be good

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 5>for growth, but if things go too far, then the

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 5>fact will have may.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Have to hydrate and deal with inflation. Hopefully doesn't happen.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 6>I guess what I'm getting at. Some people are asking

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 6>what potentially derail this optimism? Is there anything that you

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 6>could see derailing this optimism this year at a time

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 6>where people are basically counting on this sort of rational

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 6>regulation or some of the other growth measures.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 4>It's an extent, is what I said like inflation.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Could be that economy goes a bit too fast and

0:05:58.279 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 5>doesn't allow inflation.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 4>To to come down.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 5>That geo political space is still in a challenging place,

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 5>though there is some signs of potential improvement there. And

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 5>at the end is like any other policy, you can

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 5>do the right amount, you can do too much of

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 5>do little. Hopefully the right amount, the right amount is

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 5>done in a way that doesn't really derail. An economy

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 5>that is not ready for a recession is an economy

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 5>that is ready to continue to grow at a decent pace.

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Daniel, A lot's changed in your banking career, tremendous amount,

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and now a bunch of alternative asset managers are looking

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>for the activity that traditionally was on a bank balance sheet.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Can you walk us through as you depart, how different

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>banking might look in the years ahead compared to when

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>you first started.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's very different.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>I think that is in a better place, with more scale,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 5>better quality of service, is a better quality of products,

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 5>and a safer industry that probably has ever been. I

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 5>think that you are referring to private credit. I think

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 5>that banks we've been lending for two hundred years, and

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 5>private credit is no more than a normal loan. So

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 5>I think that we feel very good and where we

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 5>are in order to compete in that space. And at

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 5>the end, so what is how we're rejected to be

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 5>able to provide the best possible service to a client.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 5>So therefore, what is it is in a certain transaction

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 5>you will be able to offer a syndicative facility or

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 5>you will be to offer that a lending facility. Both

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 5>markets will tend to converge some way or the other.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 4>And we are in an.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Amazing position to compete because we do have relationship with

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 5>all those clients and we offer them not just the loan,

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 5>We offer them a bunch of activities.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>We saw a relationship developed between Mark row AND's Apollo

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and Jane Fraser City and that'nced the end of last year.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you exploring similar partnerships we have?

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 5>We have plenty of partnerships, several where we have coll

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 5>landing facilities. We rather as a managers and that they

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 5>want to participate in the origination. The issue for all

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 5>these funds at the moment is that they are getting

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 5>a huge amount of influence and they may not be

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 5>enough accests to deploy.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 4>So therefore to.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 5>Have a partnership with someone like us, a city or

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 5>any other to be able to participate in the origination

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 5>of these banks. It is a good thing we are

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 5>doing the same, not just with one, with as many.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 4>As we can.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 6>That kindt dynamic gets people worried. Not to be negative

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Nelly here, but you know, going to worries we're going forward.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I realize, okay, I.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Realized that I'm sounding pretty negative. But I'm wondering, given

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 6>how much the flows have come in to the private

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 6>credit sphere and how they've been searching for ways to

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 6>be deployed, is there anything that makes you nervous within

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 6>this ecosystem that's grown up.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 5>At the moment now, I think that when you look

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 5>at these funds, they don't have too much leverage. Their

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 5>leverage one one and a have times so from that

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 5>point of view, particularly in the more in the bigger space, bigger.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Loans and not so much.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 5>The only thing that made me post and think about

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 5>it is there is a lot of direct lending going

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 5>into small business. There is a lot of direg lending

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 5>going into the smaller side of middle market, and this

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 5>industry in the current form hasn't been tested through a

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 5>down turn cycle because when COVID happened, it was all

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 5>subsidized by the different governments. So how these funds are

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>going to behave in a downturn with small business is

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 5>something that you want.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 4>To be concerned about. It you want to keep an

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 4>eye on.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think that there is a systemic re.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Issue in this space in the short term. The components

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 5>are not there for that to happen.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Then you find a question. That's the golf game, It's.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay, it's been deteriorating's a very really worse.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the handicap now?

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 4>It has gone from five to eight? Wipfully to do it?

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 7>Now?

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Can you appreciate your time, sir? Congratulations on a fantastic career.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Now I can do a more formal introduction to the

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 2>former US Secretary of State John Carey, also co executive

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 2>chair of Galvanized Climate Solutions. Secretary carry good to see you, sir,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>start again. We're starting can help be more rugby. I'm

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 2>happy to see you, you know I am.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, sir.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>The new president says, drill, baby, drill. I want to

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>understand how you feel about that and what kind of

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 2>trajectory you think we might be going on through the

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>next four years.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think I think the President's correct that we

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 7>need an abundance of what we call firm energy.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 3>We need to make sure that America.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 7>Is leading in the technologies of this this transition to

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 7>new energy, clean energy.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>But I would say that build.

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Baby, builder, I mean drill mayby drill ought to be

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 7>replaced by build, may be build, because that's what we

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 7>need to do in all aspects of energy. There will

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 7>be higher demand. He's absolutely correct, and I'm glad to

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 7>see a five hundred million dollar infrastructure announced because that's

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 7>going to be the key to our doing it, and

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be the key to leading in AI

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 7>BUTT and there's a huge butt. Data centers demand a

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 7>massive amount of energy, and.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>That's going to become very competitive.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Will that energy be provided by clean energy or is

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 7>it going to just add to the problem we have

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 7>of a warming planet with increased intensity to our storms,

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 7>more damage all around the world. We haven't suddenly lost

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 7>the connection between the choices we make about how we

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 7>provide energy and its impact just because we elected a

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 7>new president. So we've got to stay tuned into the science.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 7>We have to stay tuned into the marketplace, and the

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 7>marketplace is going to move predominantly in the direction of

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 7>this new energy. To wit, last year, about almost two

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 7>trillion dollars went into venture capital for new energy, clean

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 7>energy systems. One trillion went into fossil fueld. It's a

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 7>two to one first time ever shift in the marketplace.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 7>And if you look at what's happening in that marketplace,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 7>other technologies are coming on, like wind Texas, the home

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 7>of fossil fuels in America, that is now the leading

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 7>state for the deployment of wind turbines. So I think

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 7>the marketplace is going to continue to invest in moving

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 7>this direction on a global basis.

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 2>Is that the marketplace or government intervention.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 3>Last the marketplace. It's happening all around the world.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I've been recently in the Far East in Singapore, and.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Recently also in the Middle East.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 7>In most of the Middle Eastern countries, everyone is engaged

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 7>in this transition. UA a major producer of oil and gas,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 7>is also a major producer of new nuclear plants.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>They've got four new nuclear plants.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 7>They have a vast array of solar one of the

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 7>largest fields in the world, and they are determined to

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 7>have a higher level of energy produced by renewable energy.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 6>The building on John is talking about, I'm thinking about,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 6>let's say, the electric vehicle credits, and there was this

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 6>idea that we would really transition people to vehicles that

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 6>were considered cleaner. And yet China did it successfully because

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 6>they have the resources to do that.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>The United States doesn't.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 6>They need to import them, and it actually makes it

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 6>in the US more dependent on other places or some

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 6>of the government policies misguided in what was necessary to

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 6>actually tackle the problem. From an economic perspective.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 7>I think we've worked very hard to open up new

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 7>supply chains, and we did open up new supply chains

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 7>India as an example, we were invested at about five

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 7>hundred million dollars in trying to build, not trying to

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 7>in building the largest production plant in the world. And yes,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 7>China has in fact captured much of that market, and

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 7>they captured it frankly with unfair trade practices, which is

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 7>one of the reasons that's a legitimate issue.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Between US and them, and we have to work that out.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 7>Solar was really worked on and developed by the United

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 7>States and Germany and then China stepped in. There was

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 7>a massive amount of dumping into our country and.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>The production gravitated towards China.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 7>But today China is now I mean, many people complain,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 7>including the President. President said China is not doing what

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 7>it should be doing well. China is the largest producer

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 7>of renewable energy and deployer of renewable energy anywhere in

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 7>the world, including more than all the rest of the

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 7>world put together. So China is now commanding the market

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 7>just by virtue of its production level.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 3>We need to get into that and compete.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 2>But it raises this.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Question national security versus cleaner energy. It kind of pits

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 6>two of your babies together. It sort of raises this question,

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 6>which do you prioritize.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 7>The climate crisis is a national security crisis. The fact

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 7>there's are about thirty nine million people wandering around Africa

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 7>elsewhere trying to knock on the door of places where

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 7>they think they can live because they can't live there anymore.

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 7>They can't produce the food anymore, it's getting too hot,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 7>you can't work outdoors, so that's going to increase that challenge.

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 7>We had about a million people come in from the

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 7>desert into Damascus, which changed the dynamic of the Arab spring.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And of the war in Syria. So there's a linkage.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 7>What happens when water starts being reduced in spread, what

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 7>happens when the food basket of Africa implodes as they

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 7>can't grow it anymore. These are real threats that smart

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 7>people are spending a lot of time analyzing and understanding,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 7>and within the Pentagon, the Pentagon has called the climate

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 7>crisis a threat multiplier. It presents serious challenges to all

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 7>of us, and we need to treat it like the

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 7>security issue that it really is.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>You understand to Lisa's point that we have become more

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>dependent on an adversary on China for all the reasons

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>that you describe, and yet we have some of these

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>critical minerals, these resources within the United States. I'm sure

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 2>you're familiar with the resolution copper deposit that Rio's explored.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 2>It's ready to go, can support twenty five percent of

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the copper demands of the United States of America, and

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>yet for some reason it's been dragging along and hasn't

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 2>been greenlit in a way that it should be.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 7>We have a problem in the United States, which I

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 7>hope will be cured. It's a bipartisan challenge. We need

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 7>Republicans and Democrats alike to come together in order to

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 7>do permitting reform. Two thousand gigawatts, a huge amount of energy,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 7>almost as much as China has today. We have that

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 7>backed up at FIRK Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, that has

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 7>not been improved over these years.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 3>Why politics.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 7>So I hope we're going to get the politics out

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 7>of the way, and I think President Trump understands that

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 7>that is a way to accelerate the deployment of the

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 7>energy that he has now said.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 2>It didn't happen under a Democratic president.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 8>Didn't come pa Sis, Why didn't the immigration bill? Why

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 8>didn't the immigration bill that had been put together with

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 8>you know, Senator Langford from Oklahoma, he worked hard at that.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 7>It was bipartisan, it was ready to be passed. And

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 7>President Trump then then, you know, former President Trump called

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 7>up and said, don't pass this. It will help the Democrats,

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 7>it'll help the divide administration look good.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to get involve themselves.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Look, I'm not here the start of this conversation. Do

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 2>you think do you think they helped themselves for the

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 2>last four years, the Democrats over the last four years

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>did the party have themselves.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 7>I think there were serious questions about the message and

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 7>so forth. But I'm not here to be political. I'm

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 7>here to talk about the energy crisis.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that something very political about this crisis? Though it

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>is by.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Starting nation, it seems to have been weaponized, and unfortunately

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 7>that's a loss for all Americans.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 3>For instance, if you.

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Decide, as president has to pull out of Paris, we

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 7>are not at the table. We lose the leverage of

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 7>being at the table. We lose the protection of our

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 7>country in terms of something that might be passed or

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 7>not passed by.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Not being at the table. Moreover, you know.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 7>Last time he pulled out, there was only one person

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 7>in the entire world of all the leaders in the

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 7>world that pulled out of the Paris Agreement. And by

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 7>the way, the Paris Agreement was still implemented in the

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 7>United States because we have thirty seven governors who implement

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 7>renewable portfolio laws and they did that. We had over

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 7>one thousand mayors join into something called the worst stell

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 7>In movement. And that's exactly what's going to happen now.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 7>And by the way, in this Bloomberg obviously understands.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Better than anybody.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 7>The power of the marketplace is what is going to

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 7>make determinations. Air oil is a commodity and hasn't really

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 7>changed much in price for over one hundred years. But

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 7>technology is what is really driving these changes that are

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 7>taking place, and I think rather than being driven by

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 7>commodity prices, this revolution is going to be driven by

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 7>technology prices, which are now lower than the prices of

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 7>fossil fuel.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 6>You've been a big proponent of not exceeding this one

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 6>point five degree increase in the global climate. You've said

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 6>that you think we're going to blow past it. You're

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 6>working with Tom Steyer of Galvanies try to raise money.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>There's been a huge.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Vibe shift away from ESG where people are saying, well,

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 6>if we can't solve it, whatever, how do you sort

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 6>of see the enthusia siasm to invest in things that

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 6>have been highly politicized.

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Really, that is a great question.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 7>I'm really glad you asked it because it's central to

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 7>what we're doing. Nothing that we're doing is based on

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 7>reliance on the government to do something, or reliance on.

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 3>A subsidy of some kind. We're not in there to find.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 7>Or to be the source of concessionary funding or to

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 7>find the concessionary funding. We are investing in portfolio companies

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 7>that have the ability to affect this transition just on

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 7>basic fundamentals of business, just looking at the marketplace, and

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 7>we will show people how, in fact, and there are

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 7>other companies doing this now, how this transition will allow

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 7>you to invest and make money and you will be

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 7>able to make better returns than some other things that

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 7>are out there today. That's the basis of this investing.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 7>And when the market sees the way that a whole

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 7>bunch of people or in fact turning this around making money,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 7>AI is going to be a big part of this.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Geothermal may be a part of it, but you need

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 3>an all of the above.

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 7>Investment effort now because the science is telling us we

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 7>have to move faster and ultimately that demand is going

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 7>to change people's attitude about this. You know, electric vehicles

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 7>grew by fivefold last year, in sales grew by about

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 7>fourfold last year. Solar has now had a sixty percent

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 7>reduction in price. So whereas oil is affected by the

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 7>economy as a commodity, the renewable portfolios are going to

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 7>be affected by the technology change which is lowering their costs.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 7>And I'll tell you what right now, there is no

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 7>question but that the reduction in price of wind and solar,

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 7>and the new fibers that's available to transmit higher levels

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 7>of energy at much lower cost, all of these things

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 7>that come together to say it is cheaper one point

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 7>seven since per kilowatt hour in some contracts that are

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 7>being let now on solar. So I think the marketplace

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 7>is going to make this decision, and no one person.

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 2>You'll feel me to jumping in because we're up against

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the clocks. But I just wanted to fit in one

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>final question because your voice is important on this issue.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Are you encouraged by recent developments in the Middle East

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and the agreement strung between Hamas and Israel.

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, obviously, I think it's great that we've got an

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 7>agreement that a lot of people worked extremely hard on

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 7>for some period of time.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Things are always tentative and difficult in that part of

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the world.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 7>A lot will depend on the government of Israel and

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 7>how it approaches the future. I saw a debate this

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 7>morning on TV about the meaning of the West Bank,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 7>and if efforts are made, I think to move to

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 7>the sort of greater Sumaria today a Samaria.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Philosophy.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 7>Without resolving what's going to happen in the long term governance, it's.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Going to be a real problem.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 7>So hopefully wiser heads will prevail and people move forward.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 7>But you have to begin to build, build in building box.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 7>This is the first step. Build a little confidence, make

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 7>some things happen, but then hopefully have a shared vision

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 7>for the long term future of Gaza and of the

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 7>West Bank, and obviously for Israel security, which is paramount.

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 7>You've got to be able to resolve that as you

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 7>move forward.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I think we all share that hope. Thanks for being

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 2>with this. I appreciate your time.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 3>As always to be here with you.

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Don't carry that the former US Secretary of State joining

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>us not to discuss. It's the Guggenheims, Cio and Welsh

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 2>and it's going to see you. Good morning, welcome to

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>the studio. Let's talk about it. The salespeople running around

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Davos trying to sell saying things are really good in

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>America right now, get even bets. You've got to put

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 2>money to work. We're already priced for a lot of that.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 2>How challenging is it for you and the team.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, it is an interesting time. You've got rates that

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 9>are range bound the ten year trading between we'll call

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 9>it three seventy five and four seventy five. You have

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 9>credit spreads that are tight relative to history, and you

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 9>have stocks that are stretched and valuation relative to expectations

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 9>and at a risk premium that is less than zero.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 9>So it can be very tricky at this particular juncture.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 9>But fundamentals remain pretty strong, and so there's opportunity for

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 9>investment in maybe a wide array of selections and sectors,

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 9>so there's things.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 10>To invest in.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 6>I remember this sort of pendulum switching from bonds to stocks,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 6>people saying that stocks really seem like the dynamic place

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 6>to be in a pro growth administration at a time

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 6>where inflation hasn't completely gone down. Do you agree with

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 6>that that stocks are preferable to bonds at a time

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 6>or really growth is the main theme?

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that does give a lift to stocks,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 9>and as long as earnings per share projections turn out

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 9>to be accurate, I think that there's still room for

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 9>opportunity inequities. However, we also have to remember that not

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 9>all markets.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Are exactly the same.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 9>So if you look at the Russell two thousand, you

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 9>still have a very high percentage around forty percent that

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 9>are non earners, and the mag seven of course as well,

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 9>below risk premium levels that we've seen not since the

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 9>late nineteen nineties where we had negative negative risk premiums.

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 9>So I think that we have some risk associated with

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 9>the market that it is priced for perfection. So I

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 9>would be cautious, but cautiously optimistic. And as long as

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.239
<v Speaker 9>and we still see earnings per share rising, maybe not

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 9>at the level that is priced into the S and

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 9>P right now at fifteen percent earnings per share growth,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 9>but nonetheless still a fairly positive environment.

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Stocks are priced to perfection in your view, our bonds

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 6>price to perfection.

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 9>No, Actually, I think there's some real opportunities in fixed income.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Still we have a risk premium.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 9>That's positive relative to certainly relative to equities. And also

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 9>you're getting a real rate of return that is much

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 9>better than we had pre COVID, and you're getting a

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 9>nominal rate of return in any number of areas that

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 9>make a lot of sense. So we like all sorts

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 9>of credit stories, structured credit, corporate credit, even high yield,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 9>and particularly the high quality portion of the high yield market.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 9>So there's still some real, real fundamental value that can

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 9>be found in fixed income.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you say the same thing about treasuries?

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, like I said, we're range bound in treasuries, and

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 9>there's a trade that's actionable there. As we go up

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 9>towards the top end of the range on the high fours,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 9>if you will, four seventy five, you can extend duration.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 9>You can then also as we've moved back shorten after all,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 9>we saw one hundred and twenty basis point rise in

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 9>the ten year and we were able to play that

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 9>trajectory really quite nimbly, if you will, during that window

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 9>of time.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 2>The incoming government might have to look at extending duration

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>as well. Will that complicate things? How do you think

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>about the deficit concerns of the moment and do you

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>think that's been responsible for the pickup and yields we've

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 2>seen through December and into the new year.

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a couple things that have really influenced

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 9>the rise and rate. One is the deficit, and it's

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 9>a real concern who's going to buy all these bonds

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 9>that we have to issue in the US. Right now,

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 9>we're still being able to be financed through both US

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 9>investors as well as international investors. So that story is

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 9>still playing out pretty well. But at the same time,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 9>you also have a FED that is sending mixed signals

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 9>with regard to the rate trajectory. Now, our belief is

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 9>that rates are still going to be moving down over

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 9>the course of twenty twenty five, and we're going to

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 9>move towards a neutral rate, and I think it's going

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 9>to be tricky for the FED to really find that

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 9>perfect neutral rate. But at the same time, they are

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 9>also still slowly reducing their balance sheet, so they're sending

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 9>mixed messages messages, and they're also acting in mixed ways.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 6>You know, John alluded to this idea that the US

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 6>has to finance all this, and you are mentioning this, right,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 6>where's the money going to actually come from?

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 2>And we've talked.

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 6>About how that sucking sound of cash going into the

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 6>United States to feel this crowding out some of the

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 6>debt issue ins and other assets and other regions. How

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 6>destabilizing is it to have one economy accelerating so quickly

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 6>and diverging from the rest of the world.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, it is unusual. But what I would also say

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 9>is that because the strength of the US economy has

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 9>definitely been there if we continue to see an inflow

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 9>of capital, and I think we're going to continue to

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 9>see that, and the opportunity for investment is going to

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 9>go beyond the markets necessarily and into infrastructure, investment, manufacturing,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 9>build out, real.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Estate or the US for the US, not for the

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 9>Not for the rest of the world so much, and

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 9>so there's going to have to be some real balance there.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 9>For the meantime, the US is going to continue to

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 9>attract capital.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Can we get you excited about Europe in any way,

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 2>shape or form. Were sitting care in Switzerland. It's beautiful,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it's beautiful. A lot of people say it's a great

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 2>place for vacation. I've always been sold that by US

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>based investors. Can we get you excited about Europe at all?

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 9>I think that Europe has some real opportunity, but they

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 9>have to really make some structural changes and we'll see

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 9>if Europe is able to do that.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 10>One of the areas of.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 9>Maybe concern or caution is that previously very stable governments

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 9>are seeing some turmoil. France, Germany elections coming up, and

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 9>so I think that as we come through those and

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 9>we see more evidence of the trajectory.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 10>And if we see a real desire for Europe.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 9>To engage in structural reforms, then I think we might

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 9>be able to see an investable opportunity.

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of facts and I appreciate your time as always,

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it's good to see it and Welsh the Cockenheim Cio.

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Lots of changes overnight on the trade front once again,

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 2>lots of threats that we can explore with the former

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>US House Speaker Paul Ryan speaker run it's going to

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>say you sir, it good to be with you. Let's

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 2>think about the ideology at the sitting president. What is

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the ideology? What's your familiarity with the ideology around things

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>like trade.

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the best way to describe as America first.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he's articulately in America first on trades, a

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>little more more caantilistic, say than the traditional Republican you

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 1>know Reagan free trade. But America first is the quickest

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>way of describing it. A lot of good fiscal policy,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, regulatory policy, tax policy.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of optimism.

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, but on trade, I mean, I'm sure you have

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>an international audience here. There's going to be some trade friction,

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>no two ways about.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 2>It, without a doubt. How do you feel about the

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 2>mccancil has taken over the Republican Party. It's not the

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>right step.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's different kinds of Republicans. I'm a classical liberal,

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>free market, free trade Republican, so I'm a different breed

0:30:55.520 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Republican. His breed of populist Trump Republican is

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is the ascendant breed. They're basically the dominant force in

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. Donald Trump is the dominant force in

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, no toys about it. But we have

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a coalition that is playing nice with each other right now.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, I'm optimistic on a lot of policies that

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>are coming together. And all of those policies will not

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>happen if you have Republican disunity. So I think it's

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>very important that Republicans stay unified.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 10>The executive branch.

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Has an enormous amount of power when it comes to

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>trade policy. That's something that one hundred years ago Congress

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>seated to the White House. But on all this other

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy, Congress has a huge role to play, and

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really important that Republicans stay unified with these razor

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>thin majorities we have.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 6>One of the initiatives that they need to deal with

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 6>is the deficit. And I'm focused very much on the

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 6>bond markets, and I'm sure you are too as a

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 6>free market Republican. And I just wonder how much conviction

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 6>you really see in both camps of the Republican Party

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 6>as you just laid out to truly combat some of

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 6>the deficit concerns that we feel here at DAVA.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>They're definitely definite hawks, and Congress no toys about it.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>The people running the various committees in charge of this,

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the budget, the ways the means can be, definance can be, they.

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 10>Are deficit hawks.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, you can't do well on your

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>debt servicing if you don't have don lal GDP growth

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>outpacing your debt servicing costs. So number one, fast economic

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>growth is paramount. That's why this deregulation is very necessary.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.959
<v Speaker 1>That's why extending tax reform is necessary. We don't want

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to hit the economy with a wet blanket like Biden

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>did with the promise to higher taxes and more regulations.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 10>Really important on the debt.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>The only way to get the debt under control is

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to do in titlement reform that's more of a comprehensive thing.

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what I spent most of my time in Congress

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>working on.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a way to do it.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>There's the most bipartisan solution that's out there right now

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are these fiscal commissions.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of talk about that.

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't surprise me if Congress acted in a bipart

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is a way on a fiscal commission, not like Wull Simpsons,

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which I served on, but one with teeth that requires action.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the biggest talk in town right now about

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>real debt reduction, but in reconciliation.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 10>Who knows, you could see some debt reduction occur there too.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 6>We've already heard though from this administration. They're not going

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 6>to Social Security, they're not going to cut Medicare, they're

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 6>not going to cut any of those titlements that they

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 6>really want to cut. And I just wonder what.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 10>I wouldn't say they really want to cut.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, everybody who ran for president lately has been saying

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not touching these things.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 10>I don't agree with that. I'm a different, like I said,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 10>reading and.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 6>It's going to hit the wall that there's going to

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 6>be a real challenge to undermines some of the optimism

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 6>that we're hearing here.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, within a decade you have both the Medicare part

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a trust fund and the Social Career Trust Fund going

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt and solve it. So you have to do something

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. You've got to step in front of that.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you don't need to cut these programs

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to fix this. You can grow them a little more slowly.

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You can reform these programs, and you can do it

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in a prospective way so that you don't affect people

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in or near retirement, but do it for the younger

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>generation like my ex generation.

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 10>So there are good reforms.

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Out there that I think are politically palatable that move

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the needle on the debt tremendously. The question is whether

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or not. And by the way, if it were easy,

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we had already done it. I pass four budgets in

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the House when our budget shair that did this, but

0:33:58.320 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>they did meant nowhere in the Senate.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 10>So this is really hard to.

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Do, which you have for an extension of the tax

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 2>cuts and jobs that absolutely why.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Does not make sense because we want growth.

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 10>If you don't do this.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>The kind of tax increases that are going to hit

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy. First of all, immunia, expensing, R and D, amortization.

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>These are very important business tax relief. But what people

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who aren't Americans don't necessarily see is more than two

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>thirds of our businesses are not CEA corporations. They're passed

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>through LLCs sub sub Chapter A S corporations.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 10>They pay their taxes as individuals.

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a massive tax increase on those businesses the engine

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of job creation in America if you let those things expire.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 10>So that's really important. It's this thing we call Section

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 10>one nine A. I don't want to get too deep

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 10>in the details.

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 2>We haven't got signed.

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 10>You're going to hit. You're going is gonna be.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Bad for the economy if you let those tax cuts expire.

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 10>So you do need to extend.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Sous And said the same thing. They said, it could

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 2>be an economic calamity. Could you describe that colomacy for us?

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Just how about I'd say about eighty percent of small

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>businesses would have a massive tax increase, over twenty percent

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>tax increase. And oh, by the way, you'll put them

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at a massive competitive disadvantage against corporations, huge job dislocation,

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and most of our jobs come from small and medium businesses.

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You cannot hit those with a big tax increase.

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's difficult to re import together these bills.

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 2>That's only one piece of a tax eff.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wrote the last one night you're it was

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I had a twenty two seat margin.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 10>Easier to play with the twenty and.

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 2>A half dozen montins this time around. How difficult is

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 2>it going to base it to an I think above

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 2>and beyond just extending. This is why I.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Say Republicans need to stay unified because all of us

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>agree on this, this fiscal this type of fiscal policy.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We may have different agreements on trade, we don't have

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>disagreements on this. Really important that Republican factionalism doesn't occur.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They stay unified and get this done. The country's counting

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on us. Donald Trump promised it, and one of the

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>reasons why people are so optimistic is because they believe

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this is going to happen.

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 10>At Tanao, we pulled.

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Seven hundred CEOs ten trillion dollars a wealth and it's

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a thirty two point swing in optimism from last year

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to this year.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 2>We've seen it on the US E Konda can tye

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 2>spake Iron. We hear it repeatedly every single out that.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Optimism has to be translated into policy for it to

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be realized, and that means past this bill Speaker Ron, Thank.

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 3>You, sir.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the best

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, and geopolitics. You can watch the show

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business opp