WEBVTT - Getting Decarbonization Megaprojects Off the Ground

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Tom Rowlands Reese and you're listening to Switched

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast brought to you by b and EF,

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and today we bring you a recording from our b

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and EF Summit Munich, which took place on the twentieth

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of May. The panel featured on today's show is titled

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>getting Industrial Decarbonization mega Projects on their Feet evaluating early

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>success with large scale carbon capture hubs in the UK,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>carbon storage facilities in Denmark, the Netherlands and Italy, and

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>cross border carbon transit facilities being built in Norway. Europe

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>has been making quick work of successfully executing large industrial

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>decarbonization infrastructure facilities. But just how have policymakers managed to

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>facilitate installation of these massive projects and what can other

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>companies and governments glean from their successes. On today's show,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the panelists share their learnings and discuss what forms of

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>policy have proved successful and what more is required to

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>facilitate further growth in the sector. The panels include Kristin Nishka,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Director General and Head of Climate Industry and Technology for

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the Norwegian Ministry of Energy, Andres Hoffmann, Deputy Permanent Secretary

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Danish Ministry for Climate Energy and util is

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Deek ben Shop, chair of the Border Mission Possible Partnership,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and Stephanie Heisinger, head of Unit Low Carbon Solutions for

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>DT Climber at the European Commission. The panel was moderated

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by Martin Tangler, BNF's head of Hydrogen Research. For more

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>information regarding BNF summits, including our upcoming BNF Summit New

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Delhi on August twenty second, and t V recordings from

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>our previous events, head to about BNF dot com slash summit. Now,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>let's say it from our panel.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>At least three things are needed in other Industrial League

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>organization projects to go ahead, and that's government support, infrastructure

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>and demand. And the thing that we will discuss, the

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>question we will discuss today with our four brilliant panelists

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>is if you are a government, how can you best

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>foster these conditions in your country? And let's start by

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at the current situation with a question to Dick. So, Dick,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 2>you are at the Mission Possible Partnership MPP, and on

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>your website there's a beautiful map of more than five

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred industrial decarbanization projects and the one common problem that

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>they all have is that very few of them have

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>actually reached a final investment decision or FID. I think

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it was eight between April and November, if i'm if

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not mistaken. So beyond the three things that government

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 2>incentives infrastructure demand, is there anything else that these projects

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>need in order to go ahead?

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so, thank you very much and good morning.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>The Global Project Trecker is one of the things we

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>do in order, yes, to keep track of the progress,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>we map it against where do we need to be

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty thirty and worldwide in the seven harder to

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 3>abate sectors from steel, ce mental, aluminium, aviation fuel, we

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>need about seven hundred plants in operation by twenty thirty.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps we have around twenty percent now at FID under

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>construction or in operation. And if you quoted the progress

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 3>between April and November last year, it's not going fast enough.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll have an update in a couple of weeks time

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 3>next half year update to see where we are. So

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>it's not that we have not started at the beginning

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 3>is there, But the pace and the question of the

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 3>scaling is absolutely important, and it's not going fast enough.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I think fortunately that the and you see that in

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the European Commission and in national governments as well, that

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the attention for industrial decarbanization is growing. It's thirty percent

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>of emissions. So it's not just the energy sector, it's

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the industrial sector as well. It's and it's in the

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 3>heart of what we are currently living heavy we have

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 3>to have. We have the clean deal, the green deal,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the clean deal. We have finally in Europe attention for

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>competitiveness because green stuff only get built if it's competitive.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Is the Drugy Report.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>We see progress there and I guess with security, the

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 3>whole question of what are we producing in Europe is

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>becoming more and more important. And inside this trilemma between clean, secure,

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 3>and competitive you find the question what's going to happen

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 3>to the European industry in general terms? What we have

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 3>learned and I think the Potsdam Institute did great work

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>on that. On the policy mix, you need three elements.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>You need an element of pricing see carbon pricing, see

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the ets, which Europe has other geographies only to a

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>certain extent. You need an element of support, which Europe

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>has to a certain extent, which others had more at

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 3>least us with now the uncertainty around it. And you

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>need regulations, and for example, one of the things that

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>really worked in Europe was the aviation mandate, the blending mandate,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 3>because if you look at the tracker, the number of

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>sustainable aviation fuel plants is really growing. The investment is

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>happening because of that certainty that is there because of

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the mandate. So get this policy mix right. And in

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>the regulatory part, I would say we have to focus

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>on the demand side because subsidies give it the deficits

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>defense spending, they won't go over the moon in Europe.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 3>You can't do it FIA pricing alone. I think demand

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 3>side interventions, but will probably come to that is the

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 3>key to be looking at now.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so as the government carrots, government sticks, and demand

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>side is what you find to be the most important.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the financing the government carrots for them

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>for a moment, and let's start with you, Kristin. So,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Norway has almost fully financed one massive carbon capture and

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>storage project, which is called long Ship in Norway, and

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>you've pretty much paid for almost the entire project. Now

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 2>that that project is almost about to come online, is

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the private sector going to be able to take over?

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that enough to get the sector going.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, thank you for that question.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 6>I think it takes more than one project for this

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 6>market to come online. But I think it's important to

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 6>keep in mind that this is not sort of a

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 6>static picture. In a way, it's dynamic. We started working

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 6>on the long Ship, which consists of you to capture

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 6>from a cement facility, be hydlriy materials, ways to energy facility.

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 5>And alslow on by Hochlin.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 6>And then it's the Northern Light Storage Solutions on the

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 6>west coast of Norway.

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 5>We started working on that.

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 6>In twenty fourteen twenty fifteen, where we saw that from

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 6>a sort of government perspective in Norway, the Climate Mitigator,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 6>if we are to reach the climate targets in the

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 6>Paris Agreement, it's not possible without CCS. So we started

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 6>working on that as a public private partnership to develop.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 5>The CCS technology.

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 6>And one of the aims for the Longship project is

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 6>that Norway and Europe are to reach sort of the

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 6>climate targets as at the lowest possible cost. So this

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 6>is our contribution to the entire sort of CCS development

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 6>as a technology.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 5>And then what's next and then is this enough?

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, what we've done and what's important to us with

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 6>the longship project is to share the knowledge. We have

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 6>de risked a lot of the CCS chain. Northern Lines

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 6>recently made a commercial Phase two decisions, so they have

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 6>spare capacity. They were open for business for European industry.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 6>It's well, there are discussions on going for C two

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 6>storage on the Norwegian continental shelf. And then we are

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 6>also from a Norwegian perspective, now assess saying so what's

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 6>next for you to capture for the rest of the

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Norwegian industry, which is a debate in our way.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 5>So I think this is it's not a static picture.

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 6>The different countries have sort of different approaches.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 5>It's important to.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 6>See this as a it's a joint solution. We have

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 6>a common target here and then there's an element of competition,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 6>but that is just it's good to have that competition.

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So you said, there's some learnings that you've derived from

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>this for not just Norway but for the global community.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>What are the what is the one thing that you

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>think you did really really.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Well in I think what made this happen is that we.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 6>Had a trust between the government, the authorities and the

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 6>private companies and a common goal that this was a

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 6>project that we really wanted to see happening together. And

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 6>then there are risks in the chain between the capture

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 6>and storage that we need to sort of be aware

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 6>of and deal with. But I think actually from a

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 6>sort of from our perspective, the trust that this is

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 6>something that we all want to see happening was actually

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 6>the most important success factor in that project.

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you were you were one of the biggest

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>first projects out there, and you show that this is possible.

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 2>And the follow up question that is was the one

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>thing you would not repeat?

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 5>Mm hm hm. That's a difficult one. I don't know, actually.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 6>For in the Launschip project, the States serve as a

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 6>cushion between the capture side and the transportant storage side.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 6>That we won't be able to do that for the

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 6>coming projects.

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 5>So I think maybe.

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 6>That that is something that we did to actually make

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 6>this project go or happen. But it's not a role

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 6>that the state can take sort of indefinitely for the

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:12.599
<v Speaker 6>coming projects.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 7>Right, so the market will eventually need.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 5>To the market will have to take over.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 6>And what we've done with this project is sort of

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 6>to get a good overview over the different risks because

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 6>these are mega projects.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 5>It's I don't know in.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Euros, two point five billion euros or something for the

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 6>entire chain. Norwegian State is contributing some roughly two billion

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 6>euros into this, so two thirds of course, so maybe

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 6>three of them. So I think the sort of the

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 6>risk picture is something that we've contributed with.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Great I wonder if Andrews will have any comments on that,

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>because Andrews Denmark is taking a very different approach from Norway.

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 7>Is that right?

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Norway has financed this one big project long ship, whereas

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>what just happened in Denmark is you've shortlisted ten companies

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>on Friday for a three point eight billion euros or

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 2>so of funding and they can all get this funding,

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>but the condition is they actually have to start storing.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 7>They have to store that.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Carbon before they get any money, whereas in Norway that

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>money came up front. So what do you think is

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the advantage of that kind of an approach.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 8>I think we had great lounges in Denmark then when

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 8>we started designing policy back in twenty twenty. I mean,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 8>Norway has been doing this for fifteen years, so we

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 8>could sort of piggyback on some of their learnings and

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 8>also from the UK, and I think when we started

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 8>designing policy, I think we had sort of three main

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 8>things we wanted to solve. I mean, first of all,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 8>we really believe that this should be market based in

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 8>the end, so everything we did on the way towards

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 8>that should enable that.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Market to be created. So I think that was sort

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 4>of the oral A vision.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 9>And then secondly, what we heard was what was really

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 9>challenging in this sector was this whole chicken and egg

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 9>You wouldn't if you had the storage, that wouldn't be

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 9>developed because you know, nobody capturing and nobody would make pipelines.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 9>Because so all of this, I mean, how do you

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 9>have a really complicated value value chain created at the

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 9>same time. So we wanted to fix that. And then finally,

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 9>we had all of these rooms about billions of euros

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 9>being thrown at policy sort of projects that never developed.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 9>So we're quite worried that we would waste CUD out

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 9>of government money. So based on that, we sort of

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 9>had the decision that, Okay, if you don't want to

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 9>waste money, at least we should only pay if they store,

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 9>So if they store it, we pay. By definition, you

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 9>can't lose money. The second one was we really want

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 9>to have that you shouldn't only be storing, you should

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 9>also sort of manage the entire value chain. So the

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 9>winner of our sobsity would be responsible for the entire

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 9>value chain and would have to pay for all of

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 9>these have to create the contracts and all of that.

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 9>So by that we hope in some way to sort

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 9>of solve the chicken and egg problem at least by

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 9>if somebody have all the money they need to have

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 9>all the other parts of the chain aligned with their deadlines,

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 9>and thereby, hopefully by twenty thirty all of these things

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 9>would be aligned. I think that was sort of the

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 9>name thinking about the design.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>And the three point eight billion euros that you'll be

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 2>giving to those companies. Is that enough to get the

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>sector going in Denmark?

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 9>I think it's enough to get quite a lot of

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 9>tons of sew to start. I think if you look

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 9>at it, we had a first subsidy scheme which was

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 9>won by us. Did they would be starting up capture

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 9>within a few months. Actually they would be storing in Norway.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 9>Thank you so much for that for the first part.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 9>And then I think based on that auction that was

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 9>zero point five million tons.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 4>The next one is much much bigger.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 9>So we're pretty sure that this auction would develop enough

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 9>U two capacity to meet our seventy percent climate target

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 9>in twenty thirty.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 4>And that's really the main reason.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 9>And although if you compare to Norway, I mean Norway

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 9>has a bit more policy and creating a new market,

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 9>I think Denmark's policy was really solving a problem with

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.479
<v Speaker 9>too much carbon dioxide.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 4>So it's all a slightly different approach.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 9>Ours is clearly a climate policy. It's just a very

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 9>sort of a cheap way, but a cheaper way than

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 9>some of the other policy we could have chosen.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it will get us certainly a good part

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of the way. And the interesting thing about Denmark is

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>you are looking at onshore storage, whereas the Norwegian project

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>is offshore. So if you're taking it from Denmark to Norway,

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>you need to put it on a ship liquefy it

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>then taking on a pipeline.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 7>That pipeline is pretty long.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>And bears it under the sea, which is quite a

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>lot more expensive than what you're looking at.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Right. Yeah, I think that was the main reason for

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 4>going on shore.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 9>So and then of course Denmark is blitsed with sort

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 9>of a subsurface that is actually extremely useful and it's

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 9>very I mean, we have gas storage already. We're using

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 9>the exact same technology, the same storage formation. So we

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 9>have been given that we've been storing gas for forty

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 9>years without any problem whatsoever. We thought it would be

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 9>sort of a natural thing to move to that, and

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 9>it turned out that there was quite a lot of

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 9>interest on that. And we do really hope that getting

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 9>back to my point about being market based, that this

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 9>could dramatically reduce costs. And then, I mean, we have

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 9>a lot of carrots in the danger policy might put

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 9>we all to have some sticks.

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we do have a very strict see two

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>tax that.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 9>Would sort of kick in, and you have the ETS

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 9>price going up, so you have the two sticks, and

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 9>then if you have the on store short storage, and

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 9>if you have some development of technology, we should be

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 9>able to phase out the need for these subsidies over time.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's great, because the ETS, from my understanding, will

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 2>probably not be high enough for the next five or

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>ten years for serious projects Bible, so you need to

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>have your own additional program like what happened in Germany.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Christian I saw you raise your hands before we go

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>over to Stefinie.

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Just a very small comment because I think in Norway,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 6>one of the reasons why we're developing CCS as a

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 6>technology is that we have the competence. We have stored

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 6>CO two on the Norwegian Continental Shelf since nineteen ninety

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 6>six where they started. That's like I feel, due to

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 6>CEO two tax in posts on the Norwegian or on

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 6>the petroleum sector, so we we know that this works,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 6>we know that it's safe, we monitor it very closely.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 6>So that's also a reason why this is something where

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 6>we had the competence and the knowledge to develop this.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 6>And then on shore in Norway the sand that's hard rocks,

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 6>so it's not possible to store to onshore in Norway,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 6>so the continental Shelf is the only city storage stuff.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>It's closer to Scotland. Then it's Norway right where you're

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 2>staring the COEO two.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 6>It's not closer to Scotland because then it would have

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 6>been on the UK continental but it's in the middle there.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 4>But maybe just to add I mean, we'd also store

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 4>in the norseea.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 9>I mean the first project that they have if ID

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 9>in Denmark is in the North Sea really also want

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 9>to uses incoment, just like Norway in the old oil

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 9>and gas fields.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the EU as well, Stephanie. You told

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 2>me on a call last week when we were debating

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 2>and discussing about this panel, that the EU has realized

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>that industrial decorganization projects are not bankable and that's why

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 2>we have the Green Industrial Deal right now in the EU.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And the question is how is the EU going to

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 2>support the Green Industrial Deal. Is it going to be

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>more like Norway with kapex funding for projects before they

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 2>start storing. Is it going to be more like Denmark

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 2>where you must store in order to get paid.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 7>Is it going to be a combination of the two.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>My understanding is there is a hint, but it's not

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>yet clear how this is going to happen.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 10>Thank you. So I like how the discussion is already

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 10>involving because I think we all want the same thing

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 10>you said, project on a bankable but in the end,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 10>what we want is that those projects get to the

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 10>market and that they are happening by them. So there

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 10>is this gap. We see it in the Innovation Fund.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 10>We have the Innovation Fund that we operate at the

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 10>EU level is a fund that has for the period

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty to twenty thirteen estimated budget of forty billion

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 10>euros estimated because it is contingent on the EU carbon price.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 10>But we already in the four years of operation of

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 10>the fund, we already have around two hundred projects in

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 10>our portfolio and committed around twelve billion euros to those projects.

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 10>And a large number of projects are actually familiar to

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 10>people here on stage because they are related to industrial

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 10>comb management. So now well we will when it comes

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 10>to funding, built on that success of the Innovation Fund.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 10>We have indeed now we had a European Green Deal

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 10>which has now also been going forward into the Clean

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 10>Industrial Deal, as we see that many of the well

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 10>that the industries are not necessarily struggling with the technology,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 10>but they are struggling with building the business case, and

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 10>that's where the Clean Industrial Deal comes in. There was

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 10>a discussion on that this morning already. So there are

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 10>some drivers. In the speech before our panel we heard

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 10>in particular also that affordable energy is one of the drivers,

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 10>and financing as well. So for the financing part, we

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 10>will build on the Innovation Fund and its success.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 9>We have.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 10>The pledge that we will next year, in the context

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 10>of the revision of the EU ETS come forward with

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 10>a proposal for an industrial Decarbitalization bank that is supposed

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 10>to provide one hundred billion euros in funding for clean projects,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 10>not only clean technology but industrial decarbonization projects. The details

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 10>are not yet there. We will this year have already

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 10>a pilot for this industrial decarbonization banks. My team is

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 10>working on a fixed premium option for industrial process heat

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 10>decarbonization that we will launch in the last quarter of

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 10>this year as well. And while in terms of support

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 10>or support mechanisms, we work a lot with grants, but

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 10>we also know that and the Clean Industrial Deal also

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 10>says that very clearly that we need to maybe make

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 10>that a bit more targeted and looking at what does

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 10>the project actually really need to de risk And Kirsten

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 10>said it, I mean this is really we need to

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 10>de risk those projects as long as needed until the

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 10>market takes over. We have a lot of experience now

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 10>with the hydrogen auction that we have been running under

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 10>the Innovation Fund. Actually today I'm not sure the news

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 10>is already out. We are going to announce the winners

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 10>of the second auction on renewable hydrogen today.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Just when my European hygien analyst is on holiday in Thailand.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 10>So there's a lot of experience with different ways of

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 10>providing public support, and in particular this well, it depends

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 10>very much on what it is that you want to support.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 10>For an auction like the hydrogen auction, you need a

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 10>very homogeneous product like hydrogen. We will do the same

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 10>now for as I said, industrial heat solutions, but you

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 10>cannot have a one size fits all. On the other hand,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean the project that we just have been talking

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 10>about and I just mentioned it's full value chain support.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 10>So you need to bring all these actors with their

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 10>different needs around the table. And Dick mentioned one important

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 10>aspect also regulation, So it's not only about funding, it's

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 10>also about setting standards. It's about coming forward. We will

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 10>we are working on ZE to Transport Infrastructure infrastructure package

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 10>as well, so to enable that support to the entire

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 10>value chain, not only with money, but also through other

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 10>ways and means we have.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>And when do you expect the market will take over

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 2>in the EU on these big industrially organization projects.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's of course the one hundred billion dollar question. No,

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 10>I cannot it's impossible to give you an exact timeline

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 10>when these projects will will be taken by the market.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 10>It very much depends on the speed at which the

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 10>technology is mature. It very much depends on other factors

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 10>like the infrastructure in particular, when it comes to C two.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 10>We are working on a ze to Investment ATLAS also

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 10>in the EU, so that we start mapping actually potential

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 10>storage site with the industrial clusters that will actually need

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 10>to store you too. And there are lots of other factors.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 10>If you want me to express a wish, I would

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 10>say as soon as possible, because that would be the

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 10>ideal scenario. But it's really hard to give you an

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 10>exact timeline on this one.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, hopefully as soon as possible.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 7>Indeed.

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 2>And one question that I actually have before we move

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>on to talking about demand is about a different way

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that the government can help. Our government agencies can help

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>projects get off the ground and dig. That's a question

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to you around dead guarantees or other ways that governments

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>can can help. For example, the Stegra project in Sweden,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 2>there's really large green hydrogen steel making project in northern Sweden.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>It's building seven hundred and forty megabats of electualizers.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 7>One of the ways through which it.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Was able to come online, to the best of my

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>understanding is through debt and debt guarantees from the German

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 2>government and from the Swedish government. Could these debt guarantees

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>be used more broadly for other industrial sectors too.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think so, because companies they are looking at

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the policy side and assurrety around it and is the

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 3>right mix in place. Companies are looking at the demand

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 3>site and I'll say something about it, and companies are

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>looking indeed at the risk and the financing site, because

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 3>there's all kinds of hurdles there. For first of a kind,

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>project's insurance, risk, engineering risks, project risk accumulated in a

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 3>way that is almost prohibitive in some cases. So that's

0:24:54.280 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>where an element of government support on the risk side

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>or on the financing site on the being a backstop

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>can help enormously indeed on that part. But Stagger and

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 3>those type of projects are very interesting as well because

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 3>you see that they tend to get the customers in

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 3>as well, even as a shareholder in order to be

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 3>a customer, you get that type of construct which all

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I has to do with that question, can I be

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>certain about the demand and how do I organize that,

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Because if you want to have bankable demand, that means

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 3>something in terms of commercial constructs, long term contracts, and

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 3>are you able to get that and not all markets

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 3>are structured in in that way, So that's really an issue.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Allen just showed the green premium, and it's huge at

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the value chain. For even more, what

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 3>it did not show is that it is not huge

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the value chain when you come

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 3>to the consumer product. Even still in a is in

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the order of magnitude of four hundred or five hundred

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 3>euros for the price of a car, green p amumonia

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>to green fertilizer to your bread, you'll hardly see behind

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 3>the scent in terms of the cost of the bread.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 3>In percentages, ten percent of the new stuff in those

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>sectors in twenty thirty is less than one percent price

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 3>increase at the end consumer end. So that gives another

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 3>perspective on affordability. You have always to be very careful

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and we have to go up the learning curve and

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>bring the cost down. But if you say even a

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 3>ten percent perspective in twenty thirty is rather higher compared

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to where we are today, that is in terms of

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 3>passing it through, not absorbing it by the government, not

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 3>absorbing it by the companies, but getting it to the

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 3>end consumer is doable, and that gives a very great

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>interest in the question and how can we activate that demount?

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 7>How do we do that?

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Because if I go if I buy a new Folvo,

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I can't say I want green steel in my car.

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not on offer if I go to my supermarket, etc.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 3>So something has to happen there. Mandates. We have a

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 3>sustainable aviation mandate, it clearly works. It triggers investment. Why

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 3>not the green fertilizer mandate? Why not other mandates, fuel standards,

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 3>carbon intensity standards. A lot of things to do there

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 3>which could give that certainty of demand in those sectors,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 3>which would then help enormously in terms of creating the

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 3>conditions forever. The next to the government support and next

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 3>to the financing and the risk side. One more element

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 3>that you could consider as well. Then you mentioned the

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 3>auctions that are taking place and h to global broader

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 3>use of market makers of intermediaries, because there are markets

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 3>where you have the need for the financing side to

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 3>have long term contracts, but on the demand.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 7>Side, it's short term.

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Like in aviation, airlines don't buy fuel for fifteen years.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a short term market. But if you want to

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 3>have e fuel project off the ground, you need a

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 3>contract for ten to fifteen years. Who is going to

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 3>do that. Nobody's going to do that. Stuck a bit

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 3>like a chicken and egg. But then on the commercial side,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 3>so create intermediaries where you absorb the risk and the

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 3>intermediation between the long and the short term. You do

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 3>some government support in there as well to de risk it,

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and you can get a market certainly connected. Individual players

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 3>are not able to make that connection. So I think

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot to do there on the demand side

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 3>to create a certainty of demand in my view, a

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>very affordable end consumer prices in a way that can

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 3>trigger a lot of investment. And now the European Commission

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 3>announced that as well as part of the cleaning to

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>deal with the Industrial Decentralization Accelerator Act.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 7>I really hope and.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I think we should all contribute to that effort that

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 3>we can create those demond mechanisms because that I think

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that's very interesting.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the intermediary point is really interesting. We had the

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 2>pleasure of having Susanna Morera from h to Global on

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 2>a panel in our summit in London in October last year,

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and it was a really interesting discussion. How do you

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 2>marry the fact that you need a ten year off

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>take agreement for the producer, but the off taker does

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 2>not want ten years, They want to take max one

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>year maybe two, and they bridge that gap by buying

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>this and then selling it on which it's a fascinating model.

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>It would be great if it can work for other

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>parts of the industrial de carbonization as well. Stephanie, let's

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 2>move to you and the demand question is they was

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>saying something really interesting. I think Andrews was saying the

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 2>same thing about quotas. So the EU has different mandates

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 2>or quotas for sustainable aviation fuel for green hydrogen or

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>renewable fuel of non biological origin RFMBO use with instead

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of gray hydrogen. And the deadline for member states in

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the EU to transpose this quota for forty two percent

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of green hydrogen replacement for gray into their national law

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>is tomorrow, if I'm not mistaken, and also if I'm

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>not mistaken, only about five member states have actually transposed this,

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and probably only about two of them actually fully. So

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>what's the EU gonna do about that? Is are there

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be fines? Are these states going to be

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 2>punished for not meeting it? Or are we just going

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>to let them let them not comply with these regulations.

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 10>So, first of all, I think it's even if it's tomorrow,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 10>it's too early to already kind of throw out the

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 10>baby with the buzz water. Let's let's wait what comes

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 10>our way tomorrow. Usually when there's the deadline, you know,

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 10>things are sent close to the deadline. But I also think, well,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 10>those quotas have been decided by the co legislators. So

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 10>it's the Renewable Energy Directive and its anexes, So the

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 10>co legislature in the EU, that's the European Parliament and

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 10>the Member States. So the decision how to implement those

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 10>targets have been that has been left to the Member

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 10>States in that legislative process. But that's where I think, well,

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 10>if this is agreed between the Parliament and the Member States,

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 10>we should give them the benefit of, you know, now

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 10>telling us first how they are going to meet those

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 10>targets before we talk about what do we do if

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 10>they don't do what they prompt to do so, I

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 10>think it's the only fair from that perspective. But when

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 10>it comes to demand, if you allow me, in the

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 10>Clean Industrial Deal, we have indeed also strength emphasized quite

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 10>strongly the fact that first of all, we need to

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 10>define the clean products, so we're working, for example, on

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 10>the green steel label. But I think that's really important

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 10>that we all know what it is that we're actually

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 10>talking about. And then second, we will also use the

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 10>public procurement rules to create that demand. And that's actually

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 10>quite a strong driver because public procurement is huge on

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 10>certain markets, and that can also be since we spoke

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 10>about public financing a good way on how the public

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 10>can actually finance that demand.

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 3>For the especially interesting for cement, it's about half of

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 3>the cement is subject to public procure Governments alone can

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>de risk green cement.

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 2>That's that's great, Let's do it. What are you waiting for, Stephanie.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>You only answered my question halfway though, so I'm going

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>to probe a little bit deeper. So you said, let

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the Member states figure it out. It's up to them

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>to meet the meet the EU quotas. Now, if the

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 2>majority of Member states at this moment have yet to

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 2>transpose them, I would say there is a relatively high

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>probability that the majority of member states will not meet

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 2>them by twenty thirty. What if that happens, is the

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>majority of the EU going to punish itself for not

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>meeting you quotas?

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think you know that.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 10>You will not get me into speculation here because I

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 10>really think let's wait first tomorrow and then there's five

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 10>years until we get to twenty thirty, so there is

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 10>also time to try progress and to then take measures

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 10>in between. On the side of the member states, I mean,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 10>they they pledged or they agreed to those targets, so

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 10>there's also this drive from the side of the member

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 10>states to make them happen. And I think also the

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 10>in the industrials. I mean, what targets provide you is predictability,

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 10>and and that is what industries strive for. So I

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 10>think we need to, you know, also work towards UH

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 10>giving that predictability through tracking the progress and then if

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 10>if needed, take additional measures. But it's not good I

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 10>find to put in question targets that you know, even

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 10>at that stage when they when the transposition deadline has

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 10>not yet lapsed, and so it's I think it's our strength,

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 10>and Dick mentioned it in the beginning. It's also about

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 10>the regulatory framework in the EU. Will love a climate

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 10>neutrality target for twenty to fifty. It's often forgotten, but

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 10>that is in a law, in legislation. It's a democratically

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 10>agreed climate neutrality target. We not only have that climate

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 10>neutrality target, we have a twenty thirty target that is

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 10>underpinned by a solid climate and energy policy framework, and

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 10>that I think is driving a lot of the action

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 10>that we're seeing today, including CCS because quite frankly, the

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 10>CCS directive dates from two thousand and eight, but for many,

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 10>many years we didn't see anything happening. So now we

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 10>have a fifty million tom C two injection capacity target

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 10>in the natzio industry, and yet that stimulates the debate

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 10>that in not only in industry but also in the

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 10>Member States countries like Austria, like Germany start a public

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 10>debate about CCS, and that's what we actually need. So

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 10>I think targets are important, and it is important to

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 10>of course truct the progress towards meeting them, but not

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 10>speculate on them.

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we'll need to wait five years so five

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 2>years from now, I'll invite you to the summit.

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 7>Thank you so much everyone.

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I think we've established that the carbonizing industry is really hard,

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like with our four panelists, we're a

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 2>lot clearer on what works and what might not work

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>as well. And thank you so much to our great panelist.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with production assistants from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg ne EF is

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates.

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>This recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed,

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>as investment and vice investment recommendations, or a recommendation as

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg anniah not be

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>considered as information sufficient upon which to base an in decision.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance Lp Nor any of its affiliates makes

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in this recording, and any

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 4>Liability as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed.