Speaker 1: Team Buck. Welcome to the Freedom Hunt. Friday, November fifth.
Speaker 1: I am back in NYC. Great to be here with
Speaker 1: all of you. Thank you for tuning in today. Okay,
Speaker 1: we just got a bunch of topics to hate, COVID
Speaker 1: stuff boosters, fourth shots coming for people in Germany. You
Speaker 1: got more election fall out after the Democrats got a
Speaker 1: butt kicking on Tuesday. You have climate change madness. They're
Speaker 1: surrounding mansions, car and screaming we want to live and
Speaker 1: all kinds of stuff like that. So we will. Oh
Speaker 1: and the woke Microsoft employees, I kid forget this. How
Speaker 1: woke do they go? Oh? You gotta hear it, You
Speaker 1: gotta hear it to know it. We'll get to that
Speaker 1: in a moment. For hard working Americans, finding healthcare can
Speaker 1: be an expensive struggle. It can feel like you don't
Speaker 1: have any real choice at all. That's why I'm introducing
Speaker 1: our friends at one Share Health as a Christian health
Speaker 1: sharing healthcare health sharing ministry. They're a nonprofit dedicated helping
Speaker 1: thousands of Americans find affordable healthcare and support their members
Speaker 1: communities through charity and volunteer missions. Sorry about that. Their
Speaker 1: ACA exempt programs are perfect for small business owners, is
Speaker 1: self employed, or anyone who's just fed up with the
Speaker 1: broken traditional healthcare system. Don't worry about ridiculous Obamacare mandates
Speaker 1: or penalties. Get the most out of your hard earned
Speaker 1: money with Healthcare for just one hundred fifteen dollars a
Speaker 1: month for you or two hundred and thirty nine dollars
Speaker 1: for your family. Get seventy five dollars off your enrollment
Speaker 1: feed with promo code buck called eight three three two
Speaker 1: three zero four four five five now, Or go online
Speaker 1: to one sharehealth dot com for a fast quote in
Speaker 1: seconds that's eight three three two three zero four four
Speaker 1: five five or one sharehealth dot com with promo code
Speaker 1: buck for your special offer. Livewell, pay less. See how
Speaker 1: much you'll save. Put the freedom of choice back in
Speaker 1: your hands. All Right, we are heading into a winter
Speaker 1: period here where people are going to realize. I think
Speaker 1: unfortunately we are not nearly in as good of a
Speaker 1: position when it comes to COVID as we had hoped.
Speaker 1: I'm I mean, I'm hopeful that that's not true. I'm
Speaker 1: hopeful that I'm wrong that we're going to sail through
Speaker 1: this thing very very few cases, but I mean, in
Speaker 1: New York City it has been pointed out by some
Speaker 1: of my friends that we have a higher caseload right
Speaker 1: now in New York than we did exactly twelve months ago.
Speaker 1: So think about that for a second. More cases in
Speaker 1: New York City in early November right now then there
Speaker 1: were a year ago, and we have about almost sixty
Speaker 1: percent of the population vaccinated, plus a whole another year
Speaker 1: of natural immunity built up. What's going on? I know
Speaker 1: that they're going to say. I know they're gonna tell
Speaker 1: us that it's it's about keeping people out of hospital,
Speaker 1: and then people aren't dying in the same numbers. Again,
Speaker 1: I hope that that all ends up to be true.
Speaker 1: It's a worrying indicator, isn't it. Think about this. It's
Speaker 1: not like we're comparing semi vaccinated America to highly vaccinated America.
Speaker 1: We're comparing no vaccines a year ago to New York
Speaker 1: City as a high vaccination right and we have more
Speaker 1: cases going on. What are you gonna tell me the
Speaker 1: people that if people haven't gotten vaccine, it also and
Speaker 1: what's the chance that they haven't also gotten natural immunity
Speaker 1: at some point? You know, for the unvacced, what is
Speaker 1: really the number of the unvaccinated who don't have natural
Speaker 1: immunity because they manage to live their lives without being
Speaker 1: mask obsessed and doing all this stuff and not get
Speaker 1: COVID for now going on two years. That seems pretty strange,
Speaker 1: doesn't it. You know, there's also some other COVID news
Speaker 1: that won't get nearly enough attention. One is the pill
Speaker 1: from is it Fiser that apparently reduces hospitalization and death
Speaker 1: by like ninety percent of people who have COVID. That's
Speaker 1: at a pretty fantastic thing, assuming that that's how this
Speaker 1: shakes out, I mean that that's actually the numbers, so
Speaker 1: that's really good. There's also some information now coming out.
Speaker 1: They're doing research. I said this at the very beginning.
Speaker 1: I mean the very beginning. There are some genetic markers
Speaker 1: for greater COVID risk. Not everyone is at the same
Speaker 1: degree of COVID risk, even everything else, you know, being
Speaker 1: the same. In fact, they believe that, for example, South
Speaker 1: Asian individuals, so people from the Indian subcontinent, have predominantly
Speaker 1: have a genetic marker that is more susceptible to severe
Speaker 1: COVID response in the lungs. It just came out today,
Speaker 1: So there's a lot that we still don't know that
Speaker 1: we're finding out about this. But of course all the
Speaker 1: superstition bullcrap from Fauci, wear a mask, do this, do that,
Speaker 1: do all these things, all that garbage is still out
Speaker 1: there because they don't want to admit that they were wrong.
Speaker 1: They don't want to say, you know what, we made
Speaker 1: a mistake, because then we might be able to ask
Speaker 1: questions about, well, what other mistakes have you made and
Speaker 1: where else where else have you been wrong? Fouch. So
Speaker 1: here's where I think this is heading. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: to get a lot of people. They're gonna They're gonna
Speaker 1: tell you this, You're gonna have a lot of people.
Speaker 1: Are gonna have to get boosters. Are they gonna get
Speaker 1: them fast enough? We'll see. Germany is now approving people,
Speaker 1: I believe for their fourth shot. Germany is saying boosters
Speaker 1: for everybody. And I think they're already thinking about their
Speaker 1: Ford shot because they're in the middle of a wave
Speaker 1: right now. They're having a COVID wave at this stage.
Speaker 1: So what are we going to do about this? Governor
Speaker 1: Ronda Santis in Florida, for examples, telling everybody the whole
Speaker 1: notion of fully vaccinated it's going to go away. If
Speaker 1: you don't get a booster, they're gonna say you're not
Speaker 1: actually fully vaccinated. Make no mistake about it, those individuals
Speaker 1: who have been gone through a normal vaccination series for COVID,
Speaker 1: you will be determined to be unvaccinated very soon. They
Speaker 1: will do that. They are gonna tell you you're unvaccinated
Speaker 1: and you have to get a booster, otherwise you could
Speaker 1: potentially face loss of employment or other types of penalty.
Speaker 1: So that is going to happen. They're not putting that
Speaker 1: in the rule, but they're already asking for feedback on
Speaker 1: how to do this going forward. So this is just
Speaker 1: the tip of the iceberg. It's going to get more restrictive.
Speaker 1: There's going to be more power brought to bear going forward.
Speaker 1: If we don't stand up now and fight back. This
Speaker 1: is what we're heading for forever COVID. I've been saying
Speaker 1: it for almost two years now. They're just going to
Speaker 1: keep doing this. They're never gonna stop. They're not going
Speaker 1: to turn it off. They're not going to get tired
Speaker 1: of it. They like the power, they like the control
Speaker 1: that they have. Some people are standing up and doing
Speaker 1: something about it. The governor of South Dakota. CHRISTI nom
Speaker 1: has yet again. It's always amazing. She won't do the
Speaker 1: thing that conservatives want her to do. You know, she
Speaker 1: always she always comes up with some executive order she's
Speaker 1: going to sign. I won't sign the legislation because we'll
Speaker 1: lose lawsuits, but I'll sign an executive order that won't
Speaker 1: really do the thing. That's what she did on the
Speaker 1: transgender sports issue, and then she lied everybody about it.
Speaker 1: It's very very phony, very phony. But she's joining a
Speaker 1: lawsuit against the Biden administration. Oh oh goody oh, that's
Speaker 1: going to be great too. From the very beginning, I've
Speaker 1: told President Biden that I would defend the freedom of
Speaker 1: the people of South Dakota and that if he took
Speaker 1: this action that we would see him in court. I've
Speaker 1: already signed an executive order that protected our people from
Speaker 1: this unconstitutional action. But today I'm announcing to you that
Speaker 1: we are joining several other states in five litigation against
Speaker 1: this unconstitutional mandate. We will be taking actions to ensure
Speaker 1: that the federal government remembers that the Constitution does not
Speaker 1: give them the authority to take this type of action,
Speaker 1: and that people have freedoms and they have personal responsibility
Speaker 1: over their health and that here in South Dakota that
Speaker 1: will be protected and defended. So just I would I
Speaker 1: would want I would want to have it explained. I'm
Speaker 1: sure if I could get her back on the show,
Speaker 1: she would she would speak, you know, in a very
Speaker 1: smarmy way about this and tell me things that aren't true,
Speaker 1: like she did the last time. Why sign an executive
Speaker 1: order protecting this is about private sector shots mandates. Why
Speaker 1: sign an executive order, but say that legislation in your
Speaker 1: state to do this, which was the issue that I
Speaker 1: had had with the government months ago. Say that that's
Speaker 1: not constitutional. That's big government. Oh that's big government. Okay,
Speaker 1: so your executive orders not big government. Of course, fraud,
Speaker 1: total fraud, whatever. Some people were like, yeah, buck, I know,
Speaker 1: I know what's going on here. Others are like, oh,
Speaker 1: she's really pretty, so you have to be nice to her.
Speaker 1: That's not how I treat everybody equally. Men, women treat
Speaker 1: everybody equally. I don't make any distinction among politicians because
Speaker 1: of how they look or what their gender is or
Speaker 1: anything else. So yeah, that's not going to do it.
Speaker 1: The lawsuit against the federal government. Guess what there's gonna
Speaker 1: be a whole bunch of lawsuits, and it's gonna go
Speaker 1: up to the Supreme Court. And I don't think the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court is going to say that the federal government
Speaker 1: can't do this. I know people don't want to hear that,
Speaker 1: but they're gonna say, yeah, well, you know, OSHA. OSHA
Speaker 1: has a lot of authority to make for safe workplaces.
Speaker 1: There's all kinds of rules and restrictions in place already,
Speaker 1: interstate commerce, blah blah blah. So if you think that's
Speaker 1: gonna do it, you say, oh, buck, But then what
Speaker 1: would have state law have done. Well, at least that
Speaker 1: would have created an immediate shield against this, and it
Speaker 1: would have sent a message to other states we're not
Speaker 1: allowing vaccine mandates in the state. And I think then
Speaker 1: the constitutional argument can become, well, actually this is better
Speaker 1: left to the states. The states do have this authority.
Speaker 1: The government does not have this authority. You see, there
Speaker 1: are much much more solid ground there than you are
Speaker 1: to say, oh, well, I'm just gonna say the federal
Speaker 1: government can't do this because we say so, because we're
Speaker 1: good luck with that. If the states don't have the power,
Speaker 1: chances are the federal government does this is an understanding
Speaker 1: of federalism that you know, some people don't have anyway.
Speaker 1: Just leaving that out there, I mean, I have been
Speaker 1: frustrated by a lot of a lot of phonies on
Speaker 1: this issue for a long time, so it does get
Speaker 1: under my skin a little bit. Doctor Scott Gottlieb is
Speaker 1: out there. I mentioned this pill from Faizer, and here's
Speaker 1: some good news from him on this. I guess play three.
Speaker 1: The bottom line is we have an overwhelming toolbox right
Speaker 1: now to come back COVID, and this is a phenomenal result.
Speaker 1: This succeeded any reasonable expectation, with all the usual caveats
Speaker 1: that this was a trial that was stopped early by
Speaker 1: the Data Monitoring Committee for overwhelming efficacy. I think the
Speaker 1: bottom line is the end of the end of the pandemic,
Speaker 1: at least as it relates to the United States in sight.
Speaker 1: Right now, given all the tools we have to combat
Speaker 1: this disease, now, we still have to get through this
Speaker 1: delta wave. Unfortunately, we're not going to be able to
Speaker 1: vaccinate our way out of it. These therapeutics are coming
Speaker 1: too late to really affect that wave of infection. But
Speaker 1: once we get through this delta wave of infection over
Speaker 1: the course of the next two months. I think that
Speaker 1: this therapeutic and the other innovations that we've seen coming
Speaker 1: to market really mark the end of the pandemic for
Speaker 1: the United States. And we need to think about how
Speaker 1: we put that, you know, victory side on the side
Speaker 1: of the White House. Oh, Victor's side on the side
Speaker 1: of the White House, because they've done such a good job. No,
Speaker 1: the pandemic should be over, should be over in terms
Speaker 1: of federal government emergency powers and all these policies and
Speaker 1: mask mandates and masking on planes, and you know, last night,
Speaker 1: sure enough, you know the airline's stewards and walk up
Speaker 1: and down the flight. I'm coming back from Wisconsin, and
Speaker 1: you know, oh, someone's masks lip between their nose. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, the covid nose. Oh my gosh. You know,
Speaker 1: this is so stupid, it's so dumb. They're forcing us
Speaker 1: to act like morons. And I refuse. I refuse speaking
Speaker 1: of act like morons. The climate change stuff. It's just
Speaker 1: so funny to see these people. They they're so syctimonious
Speaker 1: about it. It's so dumb. Even if we even if
Speaker 1: I accept their framing, of the world is in danger.
Speaker 1: Species will all go including the human species, will go
Speaker 1: extinct unless we enact all these policies. Even if we
Speaker 1: did the things, if we accepted that that was true,
Speaker 1: which I do not, and we did the things they
Speaker 1: say we need to do, which is insane, it wouldn't
Speaker 1: stop based on their own prognostications. The catastrophic warming. Notice
Speaker 1: that they have gone back to warming sometimes climate change, whatever,
Speaker 1: the catastrophic climate change that they keep worrying they keep
Speaker 1: you know, yelling and screaming about. I mean, actually yelling
Speaker 1: and screaming. They surrounded Joe Mansion's car because that's a
Speaker 1: great idea. First all, Joe Mansion rocks of maserati. I
Speaker 1: gotta say, it's good to be Joe Mansion, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. Look at him. You know, he got
Speaker 1: the Ferrari in the garage. I was like, hey, Joe, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I was like, is that you know, is
Speaker 1: that the the Joe Mansion we all know and love? Apparently, buddy,
Speaker 1: all right, fair enough, you know, he's got a little swagger.
Speaker 1: But they surrounded his car, and then you're like, we
Speaker 1: want to live, we want to live. Yeah, go get
Speaker 1: a life as in figure outs loving canna do with
Speaker 1: your time other than harass mansion? Because he hasn't voted
Speaker 1: in favor of this climate the climate change provided well,
Speaker 1: the whole package, but it has a lot of climate
Speaker 1: change provisions. That's going on today on Capitol Hill, a
Speaker 1: lot of oh, we've got to pass the infrastructure, we
Speaker 1: gotta pass the build back better agenda. They're gonna pass
Speaker 1: it at some point, so you know, we know how
Speaker 1: the story ends. It's just a question of how much
Speaker 1: they're gonna have in it. That's where it is. So yeah,
Speaker 1: oh here, but here's here's John Carry. John Carry's the
Speaker 1: perfect ambassador for climate change because he's a guy who's
Speaker 1: rich because he married a woman who's rich because she
Speaker 1: divorced a guy who actually made the money. And uh yeah,
Speaker 1: he actually did that twice. By the way, he only
Speaker 1: John Kerry has been married twice. Only manages to marry
Speaker 1: very rich ex wives of other men, not once, but twice.
Speaker 1: It's a remarkable talent he's got for finding a whole
Speaker 1: lot of money in his marriage proposals. So here he is.
Speaker 1: You know, he's a private jet progressive. He flies around,
Speaker 1: he lectures everybody on climate change. Here he is on
Speaker 1: global warming, saying the exact opposite of what any rational
Speaker 1: person would think is true. I believe lots of Republicans
Speaker 1: around the country understand what's happening. Ask farmers in Iowa
Speaker 1: and Minnesota, Oklahoma, ask people who've been flooded out or
Speaker 1: heated out. Look at the numbers of people that died
Speaker 1: in Texas during the winter. I'm you know, this is
Speaker 1: not some made up political thing. This has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with politics. It has nothing to do with ideology
Speaker 1: or shouldn't. This is about mathematics and physics. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1: I think he doth protest too much. This is not
Speaker 1: about the things I'm saying it's not about, but it
Speaker 1: actually is. It's absolutely political. It is all about politics,
Speaker 1: and it is about control. It's about control, and that's
Speaker 1: what they really want to accomplish here. That's the whole point.
Speaker 1: It's also a religion replacement for people who don't think
Speaker 1: that they should have to think about God. But maybe
Speaker 1: that goes a little bit too into into the spiritual
Speaker 1: and the celestial, so to speak. But that's what's going
Speaker 1: on here. Oh some more so, we got some more
Speaker 1: election fallout stuff that I wanted to get to. First
Speaker 1: of all, is there anything that is that is too
Speaker 1: ugly to be said on the air waves of MSNBC.
Speaker 1: Is there anything that is too too much of a
Speaker 1: low blow, too much of a dirty a dirty attack?
Speaker 1: And there's no. MSNBC has no ethics or morals. It's
Speaker 1: a gross place with a lot of g as people
Speaker 1: on the air. Among the more snide and nasty individuals
Speaker 1: will find there as Michael Eric Dyson, who we just
Speaker 1: have a former marine when the first statewide office in
Speaker 1: the state of Virginia. She is black, and she is
Speaker 1: a patriot, and conservatives are excited about the prospect of
Speaker 1: not just what this woman can do for the state
Speaker 1: of Virginia, but perhaps a even bigger political future for her.
Speaker 1: And what does MSNBC say about her? They decide that, well,
Speaker 1: here you go. They want white supremacis. By ventriloquous effect,
Speaker 1: there is a black mouth moving, but a white idea
Speaker 1: through the running on the runway of the tongue of
Speaker 1: a figure who justifies and legitimates of the white supremacist practices.
Speaker 1: We know that we can internalize in our own minds,
Speaker 1: in our own subconscious and our own bodies, the very
Speaker 1: principles that are undoing us. So to have a black
Speaker 1: face speaking in half of a white supremacist legacy is
Speaker 1: nothing new. That's disgusting. I mean he's a moron. I mean,
Speaker 1: I really mean that he is a He's a stupid
Speaker 1: person who tries to cover up his idiocy by using
Speaker 1: words that other stupid people find fancy sounding on TV.
Speaker 1: That's what that's the guy's thing is. He is honestly
Speaker 1: not a smart person, and what he is saying about
Speaker 1: Winsome Sears is just grotesque, But it's also pathetic. Right,
Speaker 1: So it doesn't it's not it's not effective, but it
Speaker 1: shows you how intellectually vacuous the left identity politics really are.
Speaker 1: He doesn't even what has she said? That is, what
Speaker 1: has she said? That is the ventriloquist for white supremacy?
Speaker 1: What is the comment? What is the thing that she
Speaker 1: has done? Oh, she's she's a Republican. She believes in
Speaker 1: limited government, liberty, individual rights. Therefore, that is that now
Speaker 1: white supremacy. They've experied this term white supremacy to be
Speaker 1: essentially meaningless, but it's really just an anti white, anti
Speaker 1: conservative slur that they just throw around now it doesn't
Speaker 1: even matter. Let'll just say it, and they'll say it
Speaker 1: about black people. They'll do this. They just did this.
Speaker 1: That's what happened. Giving mouth to white supremacy is to
Speaker 1: be in effect a white supremacist as a black black person. Right,
Speaker 1: if you are the one that is giving words to
Speaker 1: these ideas, aren't you engaged in acts of white supremacy.
Speaker 1: It's crazy. It's crazy, man, it really is. It's but
Speaker 1: this is what you can expect you want to talk
Speaker 1: about crazy. We got AOC also is running around saying
Speaker 1: that they lost the election because they weren't left wing.
Speaker 1: And she she's perfect. I mean, she's just bless her heart,
Speaker 1: she's she's precious of play five plus. On the election front,
Speaker 1: I actually think we have good news as well. I
Speaker 1: know that Virginia was a huge bummer, and honestly, if anything,
Speaker 1: I think that the results show the limits of trying
Speaker 1: to run a fully one, supermoderated campaign that does not excite,
Speaker 1: speak to, or energize a progressive base. And frankly, we
Speaker 1: weren't even really invited to contribute on that race. Not
Speaker 1: left wing enough, not left wing enough. Um, yeah, that's
Speaker 1: that's what they're saying, Now, that's what AOC is saying,
Speaker 1: which is dumb beyond words, but it is what it is.
Speaker 1: Oh you remember how they said that that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: rather said that they weren't going to pay four hundred
Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars a family. It turns out that that
Speaker 1: they are actually that is with the DJ. The a
Speaker 1: cl use come out said no, no no, that is with
Speaker 1: the DJ's trying to do Underbiden. So I guess as
Speaker 1: falls and the woe Biden doesn't know. So you know,
Speaker 1: how how angry at him? Can you really be? Um?
Speaker 1: This is an excuse they'll use for a lot of things.
Speaker 1: I mean, because he is a man who is not um,
Speaker 1: not up for it, not up for this. One more
Speaker 1: thing here, Microsoft, I just want you to hear this.
Speaker 1: This is at a Microsoft, you know, one of the
Speaker 1: biggest software companies in the world, obviously one of the
Speaker 1: most famous software companies in the world. Here is how
Speaker 1: employees on an official company meeting, you know, online meeting
Speaker 1: speak about themselves and each other. Play twelve. Welcome to
Speaker 1: Microsoft Ignite. First, we want to acknowledge that the land
Speaker 1: where the Microsoft campus is situated was traditionally occupied by
Speaker 1: this some Amish, the Doowamish, the snow Qualmy, the Suquamish,
Speaker 1: the Muckleshoote, the snow Homish, the two Layup, and other
Speaker 1: Coast Salish peoples since time immemorial, A people that are
Speaker 1: still here, continuing to honor and bring to light their
Speaker 1: ancient heritage. My name is Alison Wines. I'm a senior
Speaker 1: program manage in our Developer Tools division. I'm an Asian
Speaker 1: and white female with dark brown hair wearing a red
Speaker 1: sleeveless top, and I'm set Wires program manager of the
Speaker 1: AI Platform group. I'm a tall, Hispanic male wearing a
Speaker 1: blue shirt khaki pants. Today would kick off two days
Speaker 1: of learning. Okay, so so just a little bit on
Speaker 1: this before I send you off to enjoy your weekends.
Speaker 1: First off, you know where they're claiming here? Is that
Speaker 1: the Because the thing that was almost more bizarre than
Speaker 1: thing else was the I'm wearing jeans and a T shirt.
Speaker 1: They say that's for people who are visually impaired. If
Speaker 1: that's true, Okay, fine, obviously the pronounced thing is not
Speaker 1: about that. But I think you can tell you tell
Speaker 1: by someone's voice, believe it or not, what their gender
Speaker 1: is the real thing. But if you're visually impaired, okay, fine,
Speaker 1: I mean, if that's some concession that But let's go
Speaker 1: back to the I can't even remember the name I've
Speaker 1: ever heard of a lot of those of a lot
Speaker 1: of those tribes. I guess maybe they fall into the
Speaker 1: broader designation of a Chinook or that the Chinook tribes
Speaker 1: kind of like the Iroquois, where a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: ero coordination, where a bunch of different But they start
Speaker 1: a meeting by saying we're sorry that I'm sorry this
Speaker 1: is on former Native American land. So should everyone start
Speaker 1: every meeting that way? I'm wondering, do they have deed?
Speaker 1: Do they have title to this land? Can we see? So?
Speaker 1: Is all the land? If they didn't own the land,
Speaker 1: was all of the land theirs? Because there were some
Speaker 1: of them here, there weren't very many of them, by
Speaker 1: the way, compared to how many people are here now
Speaker 1: as we know. But what are the rules here? I
Speaker 1: just want to know. Am I supposed to stand up
Speaker 1: every time I do a radio show and say, hey,
Speaker 1: I'm here in New York the former land held by
Speaker 1: the Iroquois. They're here on the whatever tribes and how
Speaker 1: long does that go on for? How many hundreds of
Speaker 1: years do we do that? For? Wokeness? Is idiocy? Friends?
Speaker 1: Is It is self undermining, self negation, but it is
Speaker 1: a form of brainwashing that is useful to the commies
Speaker 1: to control the rest of us. I say we say
Speaker 1: no as that. For the show today, I'm gonna have
Speaker 1: a quickly one because I want to send you off
Speaker 1: for your weekends. Please get a buckxx and dot locals
Speaker 1: dot com. Become a supporter, throw a few bucks in
Speaker 1: the hat, so to speak. Appreciate it keeps the digital
Speaker 1: operation we got here going. And I will be back
Speaker 1: with you on Monday. She'll tie