WEBVTT - DC Doesn't Have the Collective Will or IQ To Take on Big Tech, Galloway says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Leye. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg I'm

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ready pleased to say that joining us now from China

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is k you Gin, London School of Economics and Political

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Science professor joining us to discuss global trade. Professor, Great

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us on the program. It is

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>some some soothing words from President She. Can it actually

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>materialize into real policy. It's great to be here. Thank you. Um.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that these words are necessary at this junction

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to the cool things down on me. At this point,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I eat China US has really trade frictions, not yet

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>ignited a trade war. What President She's also trying to

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge is that given that China has benefited so much

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>from globalization in the last few decades, it is actually

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>time to give back to the global system. So I

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think that is really good news in the pubic positive signal.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Looking at our reporting over the last twenty four hours

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from the team at Bloomberg News, it seems if there's

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a a point of tension, Professor, it's over the made

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in China twenties five goals and the subsidizing of those

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>industries that China would like to excel at. Is that

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a red line for the Chinese in

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>these negotiations when they do officially start. I think that

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>these are kind of trigger points that have attracted a

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention in China and has kind of, um

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, irritated the Chinese government officials. So these

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be points of of tension. Um. I think

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what is clear is that despite the fact that President

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>she As announced to the world these kind of soothing words, um,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>China is ready ready to stand, uh, you know, to

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>confront if necessary, rising trade tension, even a trade war.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are totally prepared for a contingent strategy. Professor.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there a an understanding on the Chinese side of

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what the minimum condition of successes for the United States,

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what the United States would like, what would actually equal success.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the perspective in China is that if the US,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>particular President Trump's administration is ready to back off in

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>some of these very strong words that have been put forth,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>then China welcomes it, and that China would um prefer

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to have talks and negotiations UM, the outcome of which

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would depend, but I think that the preference is for

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>UH there you know, the US to UH to UH

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to use the tension and then try to to follow suit.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Professor good morning, Tom Keene in New York. When I

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the Chinese culture here in the

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>tapestry that they bring to these debates, it is a

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>timeline that is longer than any American timeline known. Is

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the basic theme of the Chinese to wait all this

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>out um exactly. Very interesting that I think that the

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese perspective is that they are ready and prepared to

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>um to to deal with the rising trade engine, even

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>trade war, and they believe that it's a war of endurance.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>And yet yeah, absolutely right, Tom. There's part of the

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>studies cultural, but also the fact that the government has

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a horizon now with the term limit cancelations of indefinite horizons,

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that they think that they will be able to wear

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this out better than Americans. I mean, part of this

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is their perspective of our president. They look do they

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the president is a one off cultural event.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Do they look at the president? Is a change, is

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a a moment in American history where this will be

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>consistently the American voice? Or is it? Is it something

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>more substantial than that. Well, I think this is actually

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>precisely the problem of this every four or eight years

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and change of president, because they're trying to actually think

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that they want to build a constructive and enduring good

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>relationship to the US. But that's not going to work

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you know, every four eight years there comes a

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>president that is willing to completely destroy what they have constructed.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So there is no consistency or constancy of that relationship.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's very difficult for China US relations

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that it is the most central form

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>relations going forward. Sometimes, Professor, we take quite a simplistic

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>view of things and frame this tension through just one

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>data point, the trade deficit between the United States and China.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>What is the prospect of actually a radicain in that

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>trade deficit anytime soon? Professor um So, I think that

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there is um consue on both sides

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of trade deficits. Uh, this confusion little

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>bit fatal because so long as the Chinese people produce

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>more than it's able to consume, which I can see

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in the foreseeable future, it is always going to run

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a trade surplus. And similarly for the US. Of the

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Americans don't raise their saving rate, it's always going to

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>raise the trade deficits. Though it's not just a bilateral

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>trade agreement kind of issue between the China and the US.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And we have also seen that Chinese you know, R

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and B or the Chinese guardency has appreciated a substantially

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years, and the trade deficits has

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>reduced also substantially. UM and the Chinese have sent you know,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple high level officials uh to uh you know, to

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to kind of ease the trade tension talk, and this

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>has not been enough. So now the Chinese people have

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>been kind of set up and actually the Chinese businesses

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are putting putting pressure on the government to engage. For

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>our listeners, just turning again, the mood music really improving

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 1>overnight with the speech from the President of China. Futures

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>up by twenty eight points on the SMP five positive,

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>about two seventy six on the DOW. As we approach

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the market open about two hours and twenty three minutes away.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Professor keep saying the mood music has improved because the story,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment around this speech gave a sort of a

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>considiatory tone from the President of China. But when I

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>look for real new policy or a suggestion that we

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>would get new policy, I see a president reiterating things

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he said before. Is there anything new in this? Well,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you're absolutely right. I mean there is rhetoric.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>When the Chinese government official puts together these very formal,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a kind of speeches and then those actions,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that the spirit for a greater openness is

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly true. I think they're kind of commitment to open

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>China even more by importing more and giving back to

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the global trading system and especially in terms of financial

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>services is certainly there. But the question is over what

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>time horizon tenders be reached. Is it really going to

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>be executed? Um, you know, in the time horizon that

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.559
<v Speaker 1>is relevant? I think that is a very big question. Marker,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Preson jin thank you so much. Jin Uh with the

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>London School of Economics, Daniel Tannembam has without question the

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>oddest job at Price Waterhouse Cooper's b WC. And that

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he's in the financial crimes unit with a huge history

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of things like sanctions, but yet yet bringing to get

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>over to homeland security and and such, I just got

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to an open question, Daniel Tannembam, and that

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is what was your response when you saw a private

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>attorney have an FBI rate his home, his office, and

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe where he was staying at the Loews Regency

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hotel two blocks away from our office. How did you

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>respond when you saw those headlines yesterday? And it's a

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>fairly significant move by the Southern District of New York

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>by the FBI to move further on an attorney for

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously a facially high profile individual. Philip Bump as a

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>wonderful explainer in the Post today where there was literally

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a team within the team of the Federal Bureau of

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Investigation to protect the client attorney privilege. Have you ever

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>seen this in your career, not in this high profile

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of an instance. I mean, the barrier to entry to

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>obtain a warrant in a situation like this is significant.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people need to bear that in mind, given

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that a federal judge would have needed to

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>approve the warrant to allow this search to happen. So

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't just kind of a decision made by the

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Special Council or even the U. S. Attorney for the

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Southern District. There was a lot more that went into it,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>including Mr Rosenstein at Corday. Let's move on to your expertise.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>What is step two or step three or step eight

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions? I mean, I guess we all get brea

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>cheese is a sanction item. Where do we go next

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on sanctions if we sanction, well, if we're looking at Russia,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think the move that the Trump administration made

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on Friday was by far the most significant since the

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Russia sanctions came out. The Trump administration finally made good

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>on the congressionally requested mandate to designate oligarchs and businesses

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>close to president putin January thirty one. Around eleven fifty

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>seven pm. There was the first oligarch list that came out,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which was really nothing but the Fortune list of the

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred wealthiest people in Russia. What came out

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on Friday was significant. These are businessmen who actually are

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the global economy, who have dealings with the

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>United States, that have global businesses. This was a significant designation.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>What's fascinating about this and it it strikes me as

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>incredible when you have such a huge divorce between narratives

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and reality. The reality is this administration has not actually

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>gone aboff and beyond what the previous administration did on Russia.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>This is really quite strong stuff from this administration against Russia.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's not even just this. If you take the

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>action for the amount of diplomats expelled, it was greater

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>than any European country, including the UK, in terms of

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>how many diplomats from the Russian government were forced out.

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So they've actually taken some fairly significant steps against Russia.

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>You don't hear much narrative outside of the actions and

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the press releases coming out of Treasury, however, so let's

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about what this ultimately means. They've sanctioned twenty four individuals,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen companies, How does this actually play out, and what

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of hotspots you're looking at. So the

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>simple rationale of what this means is all of these

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>individuals and entities and their assets in the United States

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are considered blocked, so they cannot access them, move them,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>do anything with them. It also means that US businesses

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>um and US persons cannot do this with these individuals

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>and entities. Where this gets more complicated and where I'm

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>advising clients very specifically at the moment, is this is

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not an exhaustive list. So if you look at these

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.359
<v Speaker 1>oligarchs and you look at the list of entities designated,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this is not an an exhaustive list of their holdings.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Anything that these individuals own fifty cent or more is

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>also considered a block entity, meaning there's prohibitions and dealings

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with them. So it's a bit of a go fish

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>exercise because you have to do the due diligence understand

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>beneficial owners of your clients to know who actually owns

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>these businesses in Russia and is it one of these

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>designated oligarchs. So for a lot of companies outside the

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>United States of America, now I would assume, and you

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>can correct me if I'm wrong, the bias will be

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just to stop doing business with them full stop. I

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>mean you can't, it's Russia. It's not that simple to

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just wind down. But the reason I asked down is

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>because for many multinationals outside of the the United States, they'll

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>be wondering whether these sanctions apply to them and whether

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>if they continue doing business with them, ultimately, what does

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it mean for doing business with the United States. So

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that is of the questions, and the US has had

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for some time what are called secondary sanctions, and that

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>basically is forcing foreign businesses with otherwise no US presence

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to choose between doing business with the target of the U.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>S Government or the United States. And I think that

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is a point we may get to. It's also pretty

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>clear that this is just the first round of these

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>type of designations. There's likely going to be more to

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>come within this. Do the Russians fear sanctions or do

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they just sort of yeah, yeah, yeah, whatever. The sentiment

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in Russia's I understand it from my colleagues is this

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is having an impact. Obviously, you look at what's happened

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to the ruble, You look at what's happened to some

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of the listed companies, some of which have lost in

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>value over the last few days, and the sixteen billion

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars in personal wealth lost by some of the oligarchs.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>This is having some bite to it. So this will

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have an impact. What it means in terms of the

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Russian response, both either positively in trying to wind back

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the behavior that drove the package or offensively

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>against the United States, that's still unclear. Just take a

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>company like russol Tom owned by like Dea Pasco. They're

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>responsible for seven percent of global aluminium production. I mean,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's huge. So you've now got this big immediate shortage

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>for aluminium supply for so many people. And if actually

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the commodity market just briefly alumin

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you're flipping into backwardation because the front end has just

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>shifted aggressively high. So there's some really interesting market bike

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>points that are taking place here, Dan, I think moving forward,

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just about Russian sanctions off the back of

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the election here in the United States,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's also a conversation around Syria, but it's it's

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>also crimea as well. This is like a huge parge

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of issues that drove the designation to US just briefly

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about how the Syria issue could actually escalate things even

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>further if there is continued pastoring by the Russian government

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what they're calling fake news in the

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>attack that the Asside regime had placed upon its people

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>over the last few weeks. I think that does further exacerbated.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to rub the storage is broken, it's

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been out, but so Cana in a ferraud kozak out

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of Istan will really right it up. And it goes

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>right to the complexities uh Dan Tannebon that you guys

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>have to work with. From Damascus, if you go two

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty miles straight north almost a Turkey, you're

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>running into the old hate province, going back to like

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>World War One and Lawrence of Arabia and all that.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And there is a town called Afron, Syria which the

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Turks have taken over and they're not going to give

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it back even though Russia wants it. When you see

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>geo politics like that, how does that fold into the

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>financial threats and world of Russia. It all feeds into

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand where and which you have interested parties

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that may be prohibited from dealing with certain territories. So

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>where there's heightened Russian interest, these are provinces. These are

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>regions that businesses may want to avoid to ensure that

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't get ensnared in any further sanctions issues themselves,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that they may not find themsel elves as the target

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of a potential investigation. So really, I mean you need

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to understand where you're doing business and where its sanctioned

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>parties or at least neighboring territories to sanction countries are

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in operation to try and manage that risk. And John

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the headline here from Mr Iurdwan. When the time comes,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we will return offering to its people, but we will

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>decide on its timing. And right, i'm que speaking of

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>our contention Turkish laa out to new weakness. Dollar Lira

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>record high, a new record high in dollar era. Not

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a substantial move for the dollar against the Turkish leader

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in the grand scheme of things, of just six tents

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of one percent, but it's certainly a continuing bleed for

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that emerging market currency. In circuits home, this is the

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>interview of the day on Syria. Stephen Cookers of the

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Council and Foreign Relations is he has done long and

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hard thinking about Syria, about French Syria and the greater

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Near Middle East. Stephen Cooks thrilled that you're with

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>us today. Let me begin with an open question, what

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>will you listen for from President Trump and his General's Well,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>First of all, thanks for having me on and I

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think Uh, it's I think the President has been clear

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in signaling that there is an American military strike uh

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in the office. Um, he has said over again that

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>those who are responsible for this terrible chemical strikeer going

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay a price. So now the question is what

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>does the Pentagon planning look like. Uh. We did fire

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine cruise missiles at Syria not long after the

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>President took office. Uh, so it seems that they're going

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to have to do something much larger because those fifty

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>nine cruising hadn't didn't do the job that it was

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do, which was to deter the offsets from

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>music about the weapons. Again, your book False Dawn is out.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>What is the false dawn right now for the Middle East?

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>What is the false dawn for the artificial borders of

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the Mandate of nineteen two big games that became Syria. Well,

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the false dawn is this terrible, horrible civil war that

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>has become a war tex of violence that has destabilized

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>both the Levant as well as parts of Europe. Uh,

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and the the outflow of refugees from Syria has had

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous impact on the politics in Europe. So it

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is really tast this shadow or this false dawn. When

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at the at the outset in March of two thousand eleven,

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>when Syrians rose up against the straw offset and the

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>idea was that he would fall in democracy would follow.

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We have had actually tremendous amount of blood set and

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>signit the can political change um not just in the

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>greater Middle East, but stretching as far as Europe. Help

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>us with the response of the allies of Mr Asad,

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Allen and Jonathan Swan over to actually, as I

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>do think, do a nice job folks of partitioning. If

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we do a they do be. If we do see

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they do d etcetera, etcetera. Does a pro like you,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Cook worry about the responses of these allies to

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>our surgical force. Yeah, that is in part an important

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>part of thinking about what our strategy should be in Syria.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not only how to respond to the actual event,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but then subsequently how the and his allies in turn

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>going to respond. And I think we are in a process,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we are testing each other, and we're at a rather

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>dangerous moment because the Russians have laid the ground work

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for UH indicate saying that this is some type of

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>false black operation, an excuse to the United States UH

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and its allies to take action against Syria, and we

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>are inching ever closer to a real complication. Let me

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>let me give credit to David Lawler over to Access

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It wrote this smart article of the three Thrust Stephen

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Cook to quote, if one idea hitting targets like joint

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Russian Iranian bases or command and control centers, is that

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>even feasible? Now that's a real escalation from what we

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>saw with the previous tomahawk attack, isn't it. It absolutely

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is an escalation. And there is a school of thought

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>in Washington that, um, you need to take this type

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of action. The Russians UH are more capable than they

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>have been in the past, but not as capable. Clearly

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>don't match the United States, so that we could really

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>send a message to them that they need to reig

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>in Charlotte and it would give us significant leverage in

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>any negotiation process. And I think that that I think

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the position that makes sense. But we need to

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind the tremendous risks associated with the first

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>day and the job. I can't imagine Stephen Cook your

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>first day in the job for Richard has it comes

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>on foreign relations. Imagine Mr Bolton, his national security advisor.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Does he change the calculus of these choices or is

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>he someone that's going to be a bystander to Pentagon choice.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that baster Bolton Long has a history

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of being hawkish on both the Russians and Uranians. So

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I uh supposed that he's deeply involved in these discussions

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and evaluating what types of military plans. I would imagine

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that he is leaning more heavily towards sending a stronger

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>message to the Russian recognizing that our capabilities are now

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>remained greater than those are the Russians. Stephen Cook consolant

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>foreign relations. In the time we've got left with you,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to your core abilities. And

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>this goes to the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia with

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr McCraw, and we look over at the old French Syria.

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned earlier, Folks, Damaskus two hundred and sixty

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>miles straight north to Turkey is a town in Syria.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>The Turks have taken over Alfred. They said, no, we're

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>not going to give it back. Help us with the

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>minority calculus of Western Syria buttter stuff against the Levan

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Mediterranean. What does that calculus look like right

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>now for these leaders and particularly soon He dominated Saudi Arabia.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>This is the Syria problem has been UH forefront for

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Saudias, primarily because Siria has had a long standing

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>strategic relationship with Iran, and that has put Syria really

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in play. And the way in which other powers in

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the region have sought to use soon He's with and

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Syria pit them against the minority, but in power UH minority.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>The way in which the courage have been used by

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>outside powers who are trying to advance their own interests.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>That is why we see this fragmentation. There is this

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>central conflict that runs through the Middle East right now,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's between Iran and Saudi Arabia and being played

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>out in places like Syria, in Yemen, less so in Iraq,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>also in Lebanon. So Um, I'm afraid even if the

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>United States take some sort of muscular action in UH

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the region against the Syrians, this type of proxy conflict

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue over a period of time because

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Shoudis are not being killed and Iranians are not being

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>killed in large numbers. They're using others in their own

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>conflict against each other. Then within French Syria, this oddity

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of Mr Assad and his Syria alloyed Syria and next

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>door Lebanon. I mean, the adjacence ease here are extraordinary complex,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't they They are indeed, Uh, And it has been

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a great mystery to many people why the violence in

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Syria hasn't spilled over in a big way into Lebanon.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Part of that has part of it has to do

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that through much of this conflict, the

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Lebanese have not had a government. Uh. They do actually

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have a government now, but is dominated by his Blah,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>which is keeping a lid on my smid. But you

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned French Syria. What we're seeing is a legacy of

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>French colonial policy in this area that had sought to

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>build up minorities at the extent of the Sunni community,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that sought that it was their right to be in

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>control in UH Syria and Lebanon. Um. As a results,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you have an empowered alle white community in in Syria.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The drews were built up specifically on the Marinite community

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>within Lebanon had a special relationship with friends, and this

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>has created these kind of ethnic and religious differences that

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have plagued this part of the Middle East for a

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>very very long time. Stephen Cook, this has been fabulous

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a clinic of your great abilities. Mr Cook is at

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the console on foreign relations. I really can't say enough

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about his work and I we're trying to bring you, folks,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>within our mix of economics, finance and investment, this important

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>international relations at these important times, to provide clarity for

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are you now on the Facebook of your grandparents, your parents,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you and your children? Is Scott Galloway of New York University.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Many of you know his book The Four The Hidden

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google was immediately my

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Book of the Year last year. I can't wait for

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the paperback with the updates. Scott Galloway, page one eleven.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>In your brilliant chapter on Facebook, you talk about the

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>difference of posts and interactions. How will these politicians talk

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Zuckerberg about his thing that makes us interacts?

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Good to be with you, Tom, and thanks to the

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>kind words. It's going to be difficult, just logistically because

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's what's called an open session, and each

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>senator only has four minutes, so they're going to have

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>time to sort of ask a question, and they're gonna

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have to get angry pretty fast, which I think a

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of them want to do. But it's going to

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>be difficult for them to really get any sort of

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what i'd call engagement or conversation going unless one senator

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>more than one yield to someone else. So it's going

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a series of quick hits, is what we're

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 1>likely and store for. Within this is the history that

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you've studied of technology. We had an uproar about radio,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We had an uproar about TV. Bob Moon mentions the

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Paola uproar of the fifties. Now we've got an uproar

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook. Is that the same professor is our earlier

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>uproars or is this time different? That's the right analogy time,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is Facebook at its base case isn't really

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing anything that any media company hasn't done before. Media

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>companies trying to gather information on their viewers and their

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>advertisers and then use it to make the programming and

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the advertising and the targeting more deft. The issue is

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>nobody has ever been this good at it, and the

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>other issue is that it doesn't appear the firm has

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>taken really any steps to protect against bad actors. The

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>analogy of a bank that leaves its doors and its

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>vaults open and then screams, we've been robbed. And you

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>have these old economy firms, media companies policing what is

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the most technologically literate firm or one of them in history.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's just a general lack of regard for the

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>commonwealth that has got everyone angry here, Scott Galloway, you know,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in in reading your book The Four, the Hidden DNA

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google, I am reminded of

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Big Four and that takes us to another century.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The Big Four being the creators of the Central Pacific Railroad,

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Leland Stanford, Collis Huntington's, Mark Hopkins and Charles Crocker. They

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>were all individuals and their empires and their legacy depended

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on individuals. Is that going to be the same legacy

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>for these for companies. Yeah, I'm just sitting here Pim

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and thinking I'd love to see an intellectual dance off

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>between Pim Fox and Tom King on economic history. That

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>would be fun to watch. But yeah, these these guys

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>look we're out of my view a similar part of

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the in the natural and a healthy part of the

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle, where a few firms have aggregated so much

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>power that it requires external intervention and it doesn't necessarily

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>mean they've done anything wrong. That doesn't mean they're bad people.

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It just means the markets need to be oxygenated. PIM.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>If we did that for Scott Galloway into economic history,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we could do that at a paint store up at

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Electington Avenue, when we could watch some paint dry while

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we talk PIM pick it up. Well, I don't know

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. You can find the big the big paint store,

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the black paint store down in the near Soho in

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the East village. We can throw some paint and it

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>will stick and it is exciting to watch because Scott,

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, to your point there was a popular lit

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>backlash against the business tactics of the Big four. Are

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we going to see a popular backlash against these four companies?

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And should we be mindful of the reaction that, once

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>let loose, cannot be controlled. You know, I don't think so, Pam.

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think consumers talk a big game about supply chain

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>ethics and then want that little black dress, and how

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>do you people? A lot of people are upset, A

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of consumers are upset about the scepter fuge of

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>our democracy, and where do they express their outrage? They

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>only go to Facebook for Instagram. So this revolution will

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not be led by consumer. Scott Gello, you have been great.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You're almost professor of arrogance at n y U is

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just gonna pound the arrogance out of Silicon Valley. Maybe

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not Apple, maybe there are a separate beast, but the

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 1>in Bezos as well. But the common theme of so

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>many of these unicorns and want to be unicorns has

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>been business and financial arrogance. Does this event of Mr

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg today begin the pound that arrogance out of him?

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd like to thank so. I'm a bit cynical.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anything is gonna happen. Anything's gonna come

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>out of d C here. DC does not have the

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>collective will or i Q to take on big tech.

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>If the White House takes on big Tech, it's Mayweather

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>McGregor part two, and that is the redhead gets the

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>crap kicked out of him. The only progress here against

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>big tech is happening in Europe. When's your paperback come out?

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for asking. It comes out in September. Tom September,

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect time. He's just so, He's so. Let me? Could

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I be as cynical as Scott Galloway? John Tucker Scott

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Galloway with a paperback out in September, perfect for classrooms nationwide.

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping for summer reading at the beach. At

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the beach, it could be the way, Scott Galloway. The

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>book is the Four the hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and Google. You will agree and disagree with every single

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>page of it. It is so contentious about these four

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 1>giant parts of our life. Him, I don't know what

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna hear today in the hill. That's the summer

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I get from all these interviews. Probably a lot of us.

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. What do you think? I'm sorry? And I

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>won't do it again. I don't know. There it is

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fort, Scott Galloway. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio,