WEBVTT - US Consumer Confidence Rises, Super Micro Slips

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on applecar Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Business app. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station just say Alexa playing

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to that consumer confidence number, super strong

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>coming in one of three point three. The estmate was

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>for one hundred point seven. It's a better view of

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the economy and inflation, it looks like. So we wanted

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to go right to the source. Here, Stephanie Guchard, a

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>senior economistic Global Indicators at the Conference board, joining us. Stephanie,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>what led the optimism?

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, so let me get this trait. It's an improvement,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>but I wouldn't qualify it as a strong improvement. The

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>index is still in this narrow range, right, it has

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>been for the past two years. So that's the first

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>thing I wanted to say. But if we go into

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the improvement, so what has been driving the improvement is

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>more positive views by consumers about business conditions right now

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and business conditions in the future. So this is really

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 3>what us driving has driven the improvement in August.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 4>And looking at the measure of expectations for the next

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>six months, it looks like the increase, so that's an

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 4>eighty two point five from an eighty one point one

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 4>similar increased relative to present conditions. Kind Of, how do

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 4>you view the consumer right now, given you know, six

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 4>months from now we could have three, four, five six

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>interest rate cuts and on election in the rearview mirror.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 3>So consumer feelings about the economy are really mixed. So yes,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 3>they views about business condition improved, but at the same time,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>if you look into the details, they are getting more

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 3>dicerned about employment both currently and in the future. So

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of it's really a mixed view about

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the economy. There are still concerned about high prices. At

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the same time, the inflation expectations have declined, the more

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>they're expecting rate cuts more than they were a month ago.

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 3>So some things are moving on the positive size and

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>something are moving on the less positive sides, especially regarding employment.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, we really appreciate you breaking that down and

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, putting it all into perspective for us, particularly

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the job's part, it feels like that's very much what

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>the Fed's also worried about. Stephanie Gushard, senior economist Global

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>in Caters at the conference board. It's interesting. It's like

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the FED seems to be pivoting to be worried about jobs,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like that is very similar now to

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>how consumers are feeling.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it does make sense as she put it,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 4>that it's kind of mixed read and that's why the

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>S and P is still down one to one percent.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, sure, it's summer Friday vibes on a Tuesday,

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 4>but we're taking it Instriday.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 2>It is my Friday, so it definitely Friday vibes for me.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Card playing Android

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to some of the market moves here. Super

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 2>micro computer shares just just humbling like crazy today. This

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>is after Hindenberg Research said it's short the maker of

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 2>service or of server equipment. We want to get more

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on this with Woujin Hoo Bloomberg Intelligence, a senior technology analyst,

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 2>did you read, Like, what did you make of the report?

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>It said it was glaring accounting red flags, evidence of

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>undisclosed related party transactions, sanctions and export control failures, and

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 2>customer issues.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Yikes, there was a lot in there. I'm actually glad

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 5>they sided our report than Jay.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know that one.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay, look a lot of the stuff that we've what

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 5>I've read, they're non issues, right. They've been in the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 5>ten K and the ten Q filings as part of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 5>the risk and disclosures. They sided the delisting back in

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 5>twenty nineteen. They also cited a related party issues as well,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 5>and these are all all known. I almost get a

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 5>sense that they're trying to kick a dog while the

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 5>dog is down. A short report because they had gross

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 5>margin issues because of some aggressive pricing and supply chain issues.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 5>So you know, I do question the timing of this report.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just keeping in mind super Micro from July twelfth

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 4>down more than forty percent. But my question automatically goes

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 4>to there's a difference between known issues and issues that

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 4>people actually factor into their valuation or their expectations, Like,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 4>does Hindenberg releasing this report in your view make analysts

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe revisit the Bear case.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 5>And that's a great question, Bailey, and I do think so, right,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 5>because there were some I guess questions in terms of

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 5>who they were selling to in terms of sanction related

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 5>uh parties, Uh, the Russia in particular, and that's going

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 5>to raise yellow flags or red flags of the US government, right,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 5>And and if that's going to draw a greater scrutiny,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 5>you never know what might behind that be behind that closet.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>So you said that they cided your research. What what

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>else did you guys pick out from like the ten

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.679
<v Speaker 2>K and stuff in terms of their risks for super Micro.

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Look, one of one of the things that that I

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 5>picked out was the the related parties.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Two of their suppliers, Uh, the CEOs of two of

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 5>the suppliers are the CEO brothers of the super Micro CEO, right,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 5>And that's something that I'm not thrilled about quite frankly.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 5>You would like a little bit of diversity in terms

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 5>of the supply chain versus some of an episistic relationship.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 5>And you know, uh, that's the big glurring one. But

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 5>also they've had accounting issues in the past which prompted

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 5>the uh, the delisting the hope is is that with

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 5>the CFO that they have currently, they've cleaned all of

0:05:58.160 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 5>that mess up.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, because if it feels like in super Micro obviously

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 4>everyone knows in video, but this is a stock that

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 4>from over three years is up fifteen hundred percent, went

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 4>from you know, one point six billion to a peak

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 4>at fifty eight billion. Like when these companies go from

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 4>small cap to large cap, it feels like incorrect me

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 4>if I'm wrong. It feels like investors sometimes gloss over

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 4>diving in Dick's disclosures and just kind of take them

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 4>as a component, yes and B five hundred and let

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 4>that be their investment.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, well, let me take that a stuff further. When

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 5>when you go for a management team from a small

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 5>cap management team to and SAP five hundred listed company,

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 5>you know, you're you're still in your preteen years, and

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 5>all of a sudden you have to act like a

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 5>grown up.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's so brilliant analogy.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 5>Right, So when you have that like a grown up,

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 5>the management team have to act like a grown up,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 5>the irt IR has to act a little bit more professionally,

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 5>would sense. And then look, you you have a broader

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 5>range of investors that are looking at the company right now.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm not saying that they didn't do the work right,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 5>but there probably was some momentum in there, because.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 4>I do want to call out. So super micro nine

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 4>buys nine holds one cell. That's nineteen analysts with the

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 4>biggest shops on the street covering it. You look back

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty one, five buys, it was Northland, Loop Capital,

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 4>SUSQUEHANNASCJS and vertical groups. So to your point, your management

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 4>growing up, and also I imagine the street following has

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 4>to get caught up to speed on a stock very quickly. Yes, right,

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>does that enable some of these things to maybe be

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 4>glossed over?

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 5>And I will tell you if I see if I

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 5>saw some of the research reports for this past earning

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 5>season after they had that gross morgin, let's just say hiccup.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Theoretically right, the commentary behind that was a lot more

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 5>critical than somebody who may have been let's just say,

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 5>an avid supporter of super micro over prior to the

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 5>big AI boom.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the preteen adult thing is like perfect analogy,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think that that just sums it all up.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 2>And for a question, because I know you can't actually

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>answer it. But how much more downside do you think

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that there is? Based on the fundamentals? Like, where's a

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>good way to think about it?

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 5>So I'll answer it in this way. Yes, if I

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 5>look at the valuation of the stock right now, right,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:22.559
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about zero point three times forward sales, I

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, give given the AI momentum. Typically I like

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 5>one time's forward sales. But historically they've traded at points

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 5>seventy five forward sales, so they're playing their their value

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 5>at a discount to the historic evaluation.

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 2>That's a great answer to that question. I love that.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 2>All right, Booge, thanks a lot. Also, good to see

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>you in studio. I think it's been a minute, all right.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Ujinho joining us from Bloomberg Intelligence. He is a senior

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>technology analyst over there talking about Hindenburg research report that

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>quoted Wu Jinho's research in Bloomberg Intelligence. Let's not forget that,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 2>so get your information there first.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast live weekdays at

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android Auto with

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Business at You can also listen live on

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 2>You got the equity market doing a whole lot of nothing.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Volume also quite light as well. What do you do

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>when you wind up having Nvidia and you also have

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the jobs at a next Friday and liquidity is going

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>to be super late at the same time. All right,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 2>let's get a professional view Kathy and Whistle Managing director

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management joins us. Now, Kathy your

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>private wealth management right, like, you're looking for the longer term.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>You're not a trader yet. How are you looking at

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>the results on four to twenty on Wednesday afternoon when

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia comes out.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me, Bailey, great to be with you both.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 7>I would say, look at anytime you've got a company

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 7>that has or you know, any sort of companies that

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 7>have an edge in their industry, you have to consider

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 7>that for the long term as well. So I would

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 7>say in terms of you know, people who are holding

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 7>the types of stocks are coming out with earnings today

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 7>that might have you know, special access to parts of

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 7>the market, or you know, you know, like a technology

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 7>that other companies do not.

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 6>You have to that's.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 7>Important and listen if you own it or any company

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 7>in an IRA or returnment account, it's easy to sell

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 7>it and take your games off the table because you

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 7>don't have any tax consequences.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 6>You really have to think about that when you.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 7>Own it in an individual account. So that's something that

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 7>we think about when we're thinking about our clients with

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 7>their long term view and also how to leg out

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 7>of positions as well as leg into positions.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, how are you positioning for an advising clients to

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 4>position for this AI wave When we look at obviously

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia the most important company in the US market, if

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 4>not the global market. But we have super Micro, we

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 4>have arm we have Broadcom, you name it that are

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 4>either beneficiaries or have some exposure to a print that

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 4>not only will move the stock in the market, but

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 4>all of these peers.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 7>So for companies that I think are going to, you know,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 7>do well for the long term and have a competitive edge,

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 7>I would say holding it in retirement accounts is probably

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 7>a better way to go at the moment because of

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 7>the large tax implications when and if you need to take.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 6>It out, you shouldn't be a trader. You shouldn't be

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 6>going in and out.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 7>People don't realize what that does in terms of the

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 7>tax impact and how it affects your overla over all

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 7>profit margins. So in terms of that, yeah, I want

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 7>clients to have access to AI, and it's not just

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 7>the companies that are providing AI, but it's the companies

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 7>that are using AI as well. Right now, the market

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 7>has you know, had quite a run up, and we

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 7>want to be more cautious. We're a little bit more

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 7>underweight on equities as a whole, and we're also you know,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 7>trying to keep people away from the quote unquote over

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 7>indulging in you know, the top seven or ten stocks

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 7>that are out there. But at the same time, it's

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 7>very hard to do when we see some of these

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 7>companies running up. So it's a balancing act and it's

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 7>important to really think about how that affects, you know,

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 7>your full portfolio and not just one part of it.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 7>I always say never put more than five percent of

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 7>your assets into one holding anyway, So you want to

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 7>really be that you're not overextended in any one stock.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned that it's not like you were crazy

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>invested in the equity market. What is your allocation right now?

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, I don't take clients out of their

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 7>equities that are in there for the long term unless

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 7>there's a specific reason why we're doing so. So I'm

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 7>typically looking for clients to have fifty to sixty percent

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 7>in equities, to have twenty percent to twenty five percent

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 7>in you know, taxble accounts, municial bonds typically, and the

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 7>balance in some sort of alternative investment. There's a lot

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 7>of liquid investments alternative investments available now to clients, and

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 7>I've you know, heard a few times today people talking

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 7>about the bank stocks and you know banks in general,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 7>and basically with all of the regulations that are out there,

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing a lot in the private market come in

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 7>and take over for some of that credit access.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 6>So it's interesting too.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 4>And when you talk about some of those alternative investments

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more detail on that. Are you talking

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 4>about like you know, privately funded companies investing in hedge funds?

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 4>Like what are those opportunities?

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 8>Like?

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 7>No, different opportunities for different different people, different you know,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 7>levels of sophistication and also of wealth. So you want

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 7>to make sure that you're targeting your asset allocation and

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 7>the actual implementation according to that client's particular situation. But

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 7>generally speaking, I would say, I'm talking about private equity,

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 7>private markets, you know, different types of private credit, and

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 7>there's ways for clients. They've democratized it in a sense

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 7>alternative investments, and they've brought the industry has created investments

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 7>that are now accessible to clients that were not accessible

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 7>to three four years ago. So that's very interesting and

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 7>it's a great way for individuals to add differentiation into

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 7>their portfolio non correlated assets. And I'm a big fan

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 7>of that.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 2>When you take a look at what the Fed Willer

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>won't do, do you care in your investor allocation whether

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>it's twenty five or fifty in September, and whether it's

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>seventy five or one hundred this year, or is the

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 2>moment for you just when they start doing it.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 6>No, I care ahead of the game.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 7>I think that perception is really baked into the numbers,

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 7>and if you don't start making some moves ahead of

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 7>the decisions, you'll probably miss out on a big opportunity.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 7>And for example, municipal bonds still look really attractive right here.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 6>At some point they're.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Going to become less and less attractive as those rate

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 7>cuts start to happen. So for clients with cash, I

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 7>am putting them in municipal bonds, not legging in, and

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 7>trying to get them in as thoughtfully and as quickly

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 7>as possible, because I think that's a great opportunity for

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 7>clients right now.

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you think the market's ahead of its skis when

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at six cuts being priced in between now

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 4>in March?

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 6>It's possible, it will be interesting. I think that.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 7>I think we're definitely getting cuts. You know, this year

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 7>we're getting we are expecting cuts this year. We're expecting

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 7>about three.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 6>Cuts this year.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 7>And then I would say I would just take a

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 7>pause and see what's going on in the reaction, you

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 7>know what the Fed is saying. But it is likely

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 7>that we could have those cuts as well. And again

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 7>with the economic environment, political environment, everything that's going on,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 7>there's a lot of stake in terms of your personal

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 7>portfolio and your individual wealth, and we really want to

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 7>be mindful and thoughtful about that for clients and make

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 7>sure we're addressing it and we're discussing it.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>When you're talking to clients right now, what are they

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>asking in relation to the election?

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 7>Just basically, is there a way to position the portfolio

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 7>one way or another based on like what the potential

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 7>outcome would be. And I think you know, certainly overall

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 7>clients are invested like clients are invested, and we don't

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 7>want to make any huge moves ahead of the election.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 6>We can make some thoughtful moves.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 7>I think minimizing tax impact for clients at any time,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 7>regardless of who's running the country or what the economic

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 7>position is is a great idea. So menis are a

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 7>great idea right now using you know, direct indexing, where

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 7>you have portfolios that are trying to minimize tax impact

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 7>by you know, sort of buying and selling and matching

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 7>those off throughout the year in order to minimize gains

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 7>going forward. I think that's also a great way to

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 7>help clients get a little bit more alpha in their portfolio.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 7>And the last thing I would say too is there's

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, there's going to potentially be some tax changes

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 7>sunsetting of some tax laws that.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 6>Occurred a few years ago.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 7>And if you have an estate or you know net

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 7>worth over you know, five six seven million dollars, you

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 7>want to you might want to start thinking about some

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 7>speaking your estate planning attorney about some trust you know,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 7>sort of implementation.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 4>And to bring it back to the equity market. Since

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm a I'm a big stocks guy, that's what I do.

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm like talking about tax and trust and you're like equities, man, Like.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 4>What about the lines that go up and down? You

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 4>talk about taking a measured approach. Are there industries sectors

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 4>that you see more kind of fairly valued or at

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 4>least more of a better buying opportunity instead of chasing

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 4>some of those growth e tech names.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I do.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 7>I think basically, anytime you look at different companies, you know,

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 7>growth at a reasonable price.

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 6>So you want to look at.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 7>The valuations of a company and see whether or not,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, it's overpriced for what they're earning at the moment.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 7>But we like healthcare, we like financials, we like you know,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 7>consumer So there's other areas that you can look at,

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 7>I would say, dividend paying growth a reasonable price, and

0:17:58.480 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 7>income producing.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 6>It's interesting.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 7>I know you like stocks and we all do. We

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 7>love equities. We're owners, right, not owners. But at the

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 7>end of the day, there could be some really interesting

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 7>opportunities in the fixed in code market as well.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 6>Don't dismiss that.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't discount that, all right, Kathy, thanks a lot. We

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate it Kathy and Whistle, Managing director at Morgan

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Stanley Private Wealth Management, with her outlook on the market.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on fo car Play and

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the top stories of the day is also

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Eli Lilly now selling some zepbound bials at a fifty

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>percent discount to the shots. Michael Shatz, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Pharma biotech analysts, can we just make help me understand

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 2>why this is easier for Eli Lilly to produce than

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the actual shots?

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, I mean the announcement state doesn't really come as

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 8>a supply surprise on the aack of you know, the

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 8>type supply. So yeah, they're providing a valve for relation.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 8>It's something that they've talked about, you know, for a

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 8>while now on their calls. Now, the reason why these

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 8>are easier to produce produce is you know, the fill

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 8>and finished capacity, So the capacity needed to actually put

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 8>the drug in the pens and the capacity needed to

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 8>manufacture at the pens of the subcutaneous ejection. So overall,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 8>I think, you know, the move is you know positive

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 8>for Lily clearly broaden's access or patients access you know

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 8>to ze bound and also from you know, compounding pharmacy standpoint.

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 8>The fact that the improved supply means that could you know,

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 8>possibly combat you know, competition from you know, companies such

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 8>as Hymns, Hymns and Hers.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Lily not so subtly saying that they want to

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 4>aim to protect patients from quote, counterfeit, fake unsafe for

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 4>untested knockoffs. So how does that impact kind of the

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>business and demand If we're seeing a cheaper version being

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 4>sold and maybe try and to court some of those

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Hymns and Hers g LP one users, how does that

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 4>impact kind of the total addressable market and expectations for

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 4>sales of zepp out.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think if there's you know, if there's a

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 8>branded bile formulation out there and there's obviously guarantees around

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 8>kind of purity, et cetera, I think that's going to

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 8>be the preferred choice. The fact that you're introducing these

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 8>valves into the market would suggest that you know, some

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 8>of that supply burden and supply shortage which is needed

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 8>for a compounding pharmacy to produce a drug that is

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 8>on pattern. You know, some of that will be alleviated there.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 8>So that's kind of why we think it's positive for Lily.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 8>As to whether you know, companies like him and hers

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 8>will continue producing you know, their versions of the GEO

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 8>beyond ones, I mean, that remains to be seen. But

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 8>I imagine if they do, you know, Lily would you know,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 8>probably challenge it.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>When people then do their own shots, like administer it,

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>like is there a risk in that? Like, well, what

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 2>what kind of uptake are we expecting from that? Because

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I would be scared to do it. But maybe that's

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>just me.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 8>I mean I think judging by you know, what we

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 8>saw for uptake of these compounded drugs, there's clearly a

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 8>appetite for injectable therapy injections. Now, you know, we looked

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 8>at the diabetes market. You know, some of the incidents

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 8>used to be injections, So I mean, I think it's

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 8>not I mean, there's clearly kind of an increased kind

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 8>of dosing burden associated within these injections, so they're probably

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 8>not going to be suitable for all. But you know,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 8>I think there is going to be an appetite for it.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 4>What does this mean for the competitive landscape? So you

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 4>have Lily, you have Novo. To your point, you have

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 4>hymns and hers like, is this going to create a

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 4>pricing war? Am I reading too much into that?

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean when we look at the I mean the

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 8>headlines had fifty percent you know, discount, but we need

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 8>to remember that, you know, on a net price basis,

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 8>so you know, after taking account all the rebates and discounts,

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, the pricing is probably you know, fairly similar

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 8>to the current net prices that we're seeing now at

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 8>the moment. You know, it's an under penetrated market. You know,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 8>there's massive demand out there, there's tight supply. So I

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 8>don't think it's gonna change too much in terms of

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 8>the dynamics between you know, Novo and Lily. I think

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 8>I think prescribing decisions are you know, less about kind

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 8>of the profiles of the drug at the moment and

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 8>more about you know, what is ensured, what can people

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 8>get their hands on? So near term, I don't see

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 8>you know that that changing from a Lily perspective. You know,

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 8>as they ramp up supply over the over the midterm

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 8>of their you know, their pens you know, you could

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 8>potentially see you know, patients switching from the injectable onto

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 8>the pen as and when that supply comes comes on board.

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough, all right, Michael, thanks a lot, really appreciate it.

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>Michael Shot joining us Bloomberg Intelligence senior Pharma biotech analyst.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>So markets are definitely quiet, there are some catalyst in video.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>We still have some data coming out. We get retail

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>numbers from many stores coming up the next few days.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And you have the jobs at a next Friday. So

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 2>we want to check in with Rubin Hovanacion, his general

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 2>portfolio manager at TCW's fixed income group. Hey, Rubin, what's

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 2>my position right now headed into the next week and

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, good morning, and thanks for having me on. Well

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 9>our position is that, well, I guess it's it's probably

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 9>worth mentioning that we've seen a significant reprising in the

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 9>rates markets over the last month month and a half.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 9>So we've basically gone from pricing in only two cuts

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 9>this year and a terminal rate of three point seven

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 9>percent in mid twenty twenty six, to pricing in about

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 9>four cuts this year and a terminal rate of about

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 9>three percent again in mid twenty twenty six in the

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 9>second quard of twenty twenty six. That's a sixty seventy

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 9>basis points repricing in the forward rate curve. And what

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 9>we find interesting is that when you look at the

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 9>credit markets and equity markets, there was some weakness in

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 9>the first week of August in those markets as well,

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 9>which would be consistent with that reprising, but by now

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 9>all of that weakness has been retraced. So if you

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 9>look at the credit markets, for example, credit sprates both

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 9>IG and high yield have retraced all the widening and

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 9>they're back to their mid July levels or end of

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 9>July levels. And if you look at equity markets, equities

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 9>are retesting the old time highs reached in mid July.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 9>So we look at that and we think there's a

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 9>little bit of a disconnect, a little bit of discontent inconsistency,

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 9>because if you believe that the rates market has reprised

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 9>because the investment community thinks the economy is weaker now

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 9>and it's going to be weaker on a go forward basis,

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 9>in fact, so much weaker that would require the FED

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 9>to intervene, intervene sooner and cut more. Then you would

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 9>think that some of that weakness should also be reflected

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 9>in equity markets and credit markets. But we don't see

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 9>that currently, so that I guess one reasonable one explanation

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 9>for that would be that the market or one takeaway

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 9>from that, is that the market has gone from price

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 9>pricing in no lending to pricing in some sort of

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 9>a perfect soft lending. In other words, this notion that

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 9>the FED has a lot of room to cut, the

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 9>FED will be able to navigate the cycle, the slate

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 9>cycle perfectly and calibrate the rate just right to the

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 9>right level to forestall the slowing economy and not not

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 9>and at the same time not cause reacceleration of inflation.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me, and obviously, yes, were.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 4>We surprised at all when we hear jaypow Will say

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 4>the time has come. I mean it seemed like maybe

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 4>with the expectations around Jackson Hall would be keeping kind

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 4>of giving the all clear, but maybe not necessarily signaling

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 4>that we're going to have at least as the rate

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 4>market is implying what five or six straight cuts.

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 9>We at t CW were not surprised because we have

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 9>been of the opinion for a long time that the

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 9>economy has been slowing, although the headline numbers sometimes may

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 9>not lead you to that conclusion. But when you peel

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 9>off a few layers and you look under the hoot,

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 9>you would you would see slowing, you know, labor market

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 9>for example, based on the forward looking indicators, you know,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 9>starting from the from for a year now, I guess

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 9>we have been seeing slowing off consumption. For six months now,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 9>we've been seeing we've been seeing the slowing of the

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 9>credit creation in the economy, and all of those were

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 9>indicative of slowing economy for some time. Yet I think

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 9>I tend to agree with you that declaring victory over

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 9>inflation and telling that the time has come to shift

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 9>to the second mandate of the Fed at the time

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 9>when core CPI is a three point two percent and

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 9>core PCE as a two point six percent indicates that

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 9>they get it. They do understand that the downside risks

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 9>are now real and they have to shift and they

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 9>have to act to try to arrest the declining economic growth.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Rubin, we're gonna leave it there, Thank you

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 2>so much. Rubin Hovnacian a general portfolio manager with TCW's

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Fixed Income group. And just to point out, we get

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 2>the two year auction today coming at sixty eight billion dollars,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 2>then we get a five year for seventy billion, seven

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 2>year and forty four billion, So lots of ways to

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of wager on the FED and supply over the

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>next couple of days as well.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and royd

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Outo with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Dlex Steel here alongside the Ellipshalaltz. Paul Sweeney is off today.

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Moving Intelligence Radio. We are broadcasting to live

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 2>from an interactive broker studio right here in Midtown Manhattan,

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>so Paul's not here so we can talk about shopping.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I love shopping. I love shopping on sales. I will

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>only shop on sales. I will only pay full price

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>for face care, birkenstocks and bionics because I have to.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 2>I have bad feet, so I like I don't have

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a choice discretionary spending. Not I can wear heels or

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 2>birkenstocks are bionics? That's it, John Twners details. You don't

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>really have to tell everybody about do you want? I'm no,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 2>come on, I love it. Didn't you talk about the

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 2>whole fan and ice thing or was that in commercial break?

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a commercial excellent.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's a different story. I've had a cool year

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>home without air conditioner. Anyway, I wanted to get an

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 2>expert on this because I'm personally interested in what the

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 2>sales are going to be like for the summer, which

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>just begs the question how much our luxury and other

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>goods and other stores have to cut prices to get

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 2>consumers in there in the store when they really are

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to splice and dice where they're spending is Sarani

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I said Home is managing partner at said Home Law Group.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>She joins us now. The law group provides the ability

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to immediately access counsel to provide practical solutions on critical

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 2>issues for all kinds of kinds of companies, particularly though

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>most of their clients tend to be in fashion, luxury goods, technology,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>and food and beverage. It's good to have you in

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>the studio. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>So, what's the common question you're getting right now?

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 10>Everyone is asking when is the economy going to improve?

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 10>And how can I mitigate any risks because people are

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 10>afraid they're going to have to file for bankruptcy.

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow, okay, so it's that bad for some of these

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>guys that bankruptcy is on it is.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 10>I mean, retail is hurting. If you just walk down

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 10>the street. Most people are walking around without bags. There's

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 10>a lot of window shopping or whatever it's called when

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 10>you enter and don't buy other kinds of shopping. But

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 10>buying is on hold. And I think consumers are being

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 10>pickier because they don't have as much disposable income.

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 4>And we've been tracking and talking to economists about the

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 4>k shape recovery post pandemic, So people who are affluent

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 4>can still buy whatever they want, and others are having

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 4>to seek deals how does that impact potential clients or

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 4>companies that could be going bankrupt? Is that kind of

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.479
<v Speaker 4>skewing more towards the middle of the road, those are

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 4>the companies that are worse off.

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 10>I think so, yes, you know, it's it's very dangerous

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 10>in the middle. Those who are catering to the one

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 10>percent or the point one percent generally or fine like

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 10>Ermez and Chanel and those brands, and those who are

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 10>catering to people with no disposable income that sell food

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 10>or things like that are generally okay because you have

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 10>to eat. But when you're going into the mid market

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 10>and trying to get Henry's or you know, middle class,

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 10>whether it's middle middle class or upper middle class, it's

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 10>very very difficult.

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>So what's the strategy before we get to bankruptcy here?

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Because that's where the price cuts come into play.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Can they cut enough to get enough consumers in the

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 2>stores to buy enough to make up for the revenue

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 2>lot from the margin cut.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's been working for Target. You know, Target cut

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 10>about fifteen hundred of their goods buy substantial amounts, you know,

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 10>over twenty percent, and I think they just reported earlier

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 10>this week or maybe last week, last week. Yeah, because

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 10>it's only a lens. Yeah, it's only Tuesday. Yes, that

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 10>they're up finally, and they have a better forecast for

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 10>the remainder of the year. So it does seem to

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 10>be working for them. Whether it's working for luxury brands,

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 10>it's too soon to say, but you know Burbery and

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 10>YSL for example, Saint Laurent, they've cut their prices I

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 10>would say by at least ten percent on many products,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 10>and I don't know yet whether it's going to help them.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm just gonna ask the dumb question to someone who

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 4>is not buy a lot of nice goods. Does ten

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 4>percent really move the kind of people who would be

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 4>buying a four hundred dollars belt off the sidelines to

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 4>buy one?

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 10>It certainly can be because the ten percent also reduces

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 10>your tax in New York, right, so we're spending what eight,

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 10>eight or nine percent, So ten percent reduction is more

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 10>than a ten percent reduction in a way. So yeah,

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 10>it can move the needle.

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't move my needle, But I guess I'm just

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking from my put. I'm not their customer like to

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 2>begin with, but you know, I like sales like you know,

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent like ten percent, ain't gonna cut it.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 4>That's why I asked, because like Macy's had underwhelming results.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 4>If I go to Macy's, I immediately go to the

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 4>sale section, and if it's twenty percent to me, I'm

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 4>like skeptical, so I think they aren't actually giving me

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 4>a deal. But if you give me fifty or seventy

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 4>five percent off like the last shirt in my size,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 4>that I'm gonna buy it.

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 10>Yes, Well, this is the issue, right, These are the

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 10>questions we're constantly discussing. At what point do the consumers

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 10>think you're going to keep reducing your prices and wait

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 10>and not purchase. You know, it's not holiday season yet.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 10>When holiday season comes around, people will be buying. What

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 10>it is they're going to be buying. We're gonna find out.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 10>But you do have to ask yourself, how how many

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 10>cuts do you need? Is it better to keep cutting

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 10>a little bit at a time, you know, sort of

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 10>like the FED with interest rates, a quarter point at

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 10>a time, a teaser, or is it better to just

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 10>cut the price. But these price cuts that we're discussing today,

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 10>they're permanent, They're not on sale. These are the new

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 10>prices that you will be paying, so when you walk

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 10>into these stores when it's on sale, it should be

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 10>even lower.

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's interesting to Bailey's point earlier, does any of

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 2>this do you expect M and A and where?

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's a great question. I think that if you're

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 10>in a niche market, your product is niche or your

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 10>messaging is niche, you likely get picked up an M

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 10>and A. But otherwise no, I think it's more you know,

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 10>cannibalization and you know, Darwinism with.

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>The niche guys. Aren't the niche guys doing okay because

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 2>for the fact that their niche or it just still depends.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 10>No, it depends because the niche brands typically don't sell

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 10>high volume, and so their cost of goods is high

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 10>and they can't manipulate their pricing as much as larger

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 10>corporations can.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, you mentioned target cutting prices in that bringing consumers

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 4>through the door. We spoke with Brooks Southerland about a

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 4>story on commercial real estate and pointing out that fast

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 4>food chains are being able to kind of weather different

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 4>trends from a return to office, whereas maybe a mom

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 4>and pop shop can't handle that as well. With target

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 4>cutting prices and drawing and consumers and seemingly more people

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 4>going to stores like Walmart or a Costco or Sam's Club.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 4>How does that impact some of these other either small

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 4>businesses or even just less global retailers.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 10>I think it's tough out there, and I think it's

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 10>going to get tougher. And unfortunately, where we stand right now,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 10>the economy is so uncertain because we don't know who

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 10>the next president will be, and once we do know that,

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 10>people can start planning. This is probably the worst time

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 10>typically in any election year, because there's so much uncertain

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 10>and this election in particular, we have two candidates who

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 10>are on complete opposite sides of the economic spectrum, and

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 10>so we are in a wait and see holding pattern,

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 10>and that makes everything a lot more difficult.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Target. What other companies do you think have

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 2>been doing the price cutting and managing this environment?

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 10>Well, certainly Ikia. I mean they not only cut their prices.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 10>You can go online and you can see the price

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 10>before and the price now, so they're really speaking to

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 10>consumers and showing them, you know, you no longer have

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 10>to pay. I'll make these numbers up three hundred dollars

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 10>for this lamp you can pay, you know, two twenty

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 10>five and this is our permanent new price. So I

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 10>think they're doing a great job in showing the consumers

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 10>exactly what it is they're doing to help them and

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 10>drive their own sales.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 4>Of course, about ten seconds, if we're shopping, should we

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 4>be going to the stores now or waiting for some

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 4>of those holiday sales.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 10>That's such a tough question. I mean, I try not

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 10>to buy things at full price if I can help it, so, I,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 10>you know, confession.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Usually wait for sales, but if you need something.

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 10>Try to go to those stores that have already reduced

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 10>their prices.

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she sees me, she sees me, She gets me.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, thanks, not really appreciate a Runnias at home

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 2>managing partner at set Home LG Group joining us. There

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 2>are you done, Bailey with your home furnishing? I mean,

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 2>it's been a year.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 4>It's never it's never never ending. Well, because we got married,

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 4>so we had to plan the wedding and then we're

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 4>still as JT know is trying to address a leaky

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 4>roof fireplace to the living room.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Still, yeah, he's not helping. He already said that.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast available on Apples, Spotify,

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal