WEBVTT - Tesla Sheds Billions and Raimondo's TikTok Security Concerns

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde, Oh, I'med Ludlow, both of us in

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology and after day's adventure

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>capital dominating headlines, public market volatility hitting us smack in

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the face, and not to mention the crypto world as well,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>yet more signs of concern there. We have got so

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>much to digest coming up, Tesla shedding tens of billions

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in its market value of its invest today.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>It just fails to energize shareholders. Then why the Commerce

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Secretary told Bloomberg the US concerns over Chinese apps go

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>well beyond TikTok and a live conversation with SEC chair

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Gary Gensler about his concerns over artificial intelligence and crypto custody.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>This is crypto friendly bag. Silvergate continues to plunge after

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>concerns about its viability. But first end, let's go to

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>another key publicly traded stock, Teszler, of course, which look

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't get much love from shareholders. Following yesterday's Invest Today event,

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>which included another third master plan on this time the

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>transition to clean energy, Bloomberg's John O'Cain joins us now

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and look it really feels like we sold the news

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on this. Yeah, I mean, I think people were expecting

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>maybe more specifics on the product side. You know, Musk

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and self had on the most recent turnings called called

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>out that the next generation vehicle platform was going to

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>be a big focus of it. And while we got

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the shape of what that might take and

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>some of what's going into it, especially on the cost

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>production side and the efficiency side, we didn't really get

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>too much on the specifics. And you know, we got

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a tease from lead designer friends from Holshouse

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and saying you're gonna have to wait for a later

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>date to see anything more about it. Sean, you and

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the team out in Austin, editors in New York, myself

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Four hours we followed along which headlines

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>did we get, What did we learn actually from that presentation? Yeah,

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one of the big things for me,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>especially here in Texas, is that they finally confirmed that

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>they broke around on a lithium refinery down near Corpus Christie.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>This is something that we first reported back in September

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>must sort of confirmed on the Q three call in October,

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's been pretty mum ever since. I've had local

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>sources down there for the last couple of weeks telling me, hey,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're in the local government. We ever heard

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>anything from Tesla, and it didn't really look like too

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>much work was being done on the site, so they

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>were actually a little bit maybe afraid that that wasn't

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. But this is their first big step

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>into that sort of mine or that lithium supply chain

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that is maybe on the way to a potential mining acquisition.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>We've had some reports about some of that coming from

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and others, but this is really like a hands

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>dirty sort of thing, and they're going to move really

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>quickly because they want to have product coming out of

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that facility, refined lithium going to other factories by around

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of this coming year, early twenty twenty four.

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think bok Shank and Terriff eight repolting and they

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>lost twenty four hours. Thank you. I want to sit

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with this story and bring in future fun niting partners.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO Gary Black, who was at last night's Tesla event

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>out in Austin and Gary the market selling the news.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you as disappointed by what you heard as the

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>market was. I think there's a couple of things. One,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it was going to go down anyway. As you know,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going into today, Testa was up one hundred percent from

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>its bottom, so you know there were traders and hedge

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>funds playing the name because of this event, So it

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to go down regardless. But I do think

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that the investor day itself was it was very aspirational,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but it was really short on detail, and I think

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're seeing with today's move. And then you know,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the third thing, it was a problem there

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>really was no product unveil, even though there was a

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of rumors in height that there might be a

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>product of veil. And there was no updated financial targets.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So you put those three things together and I think

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why the stock was off like six percent and

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>an up one percent day. Yeah, sorry, Kara, I was

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just going to jump in that because I noticed on

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter and other people's Twitter you were hanging out

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with Ross Gerber while you were at the event. And

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Gary, he made an activist or a

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>friendly activist bid so to speak to the ball, which

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he dropped. His grievance was lack of succession planning, lack

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of other executives. Were you convinced by all of those

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>sixteen names that you heard from that there are others

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>at that company leading the charge. Yeah, I mean there

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are a few things that I think, you know, give

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>tess or some credit for what they accomplished. I think

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they made a convincing case to your point, they have

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty deep team, and you know in the Q

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and A it was I actually took a picture of this.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>They're eighteen people all lined up in shares in a row,

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>elon of course in the middle, and it did look

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like they had a pretty deep ense. So they get

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>coups for that. I think the second thing, they made

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a convincing case that they can actually drive costs down

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty per They didn't but this knew what they called

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Generation three platform, but they didn't give a timeframe and

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>actually two years, it could be ten years, and I

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the again data points that would

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>have been helpful to have. And I think the third

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that you know was very helpful, as they said,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>cybertruck is definitely coming this year. That's a big catalyst.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a million what they call pre orders one hundred

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars deposit, you know, that could add fifty cents to

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a dollar share next year, and earnings if they even

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>got up to about one hundred thousand delivers. So those

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>three things I think were positive, but again there really

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a lot of data to connect the dots, if

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you will. They made the case that their volumes will

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>go from one point eight million this year to twenty

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>million by twenty thirty, and that was a big, bold assertion,

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>but there really wasn't a lot of demand elements, you know,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>by model or by segment to support that. And I think,

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are the things that is institutional investor

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>or We just didn't see a lot of garry. What

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about supply side? What's interesting, they're showing a deep bench

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of executives. They're showing a deep design to

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more in house technology, particularly on their

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>chips actually saw a big move and some of their

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>suppliers today. Do you like that sound? I like that

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do a lot of it internally. Is

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously they cut out the middleman. They're doing

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it themselves. We own Wolf and Wolf, you know, because

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Silicon card by they made the point that they're going

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to cut that by seventy five percent. Look, Tesla makes

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of claims, and you know, one of the

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>things that I don't know who said it, but you

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>know somebody said it last night is you can't always

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>take their claims literally because it takes them a long time.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about Cybertruck. They announced this back twenty

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and here we are twenty twenty three and it's

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>not out, So it could or could not happen. So

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a supplier and you know some of the

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>suppliers got hurt today, I wouldn't get too worked up

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>about it because a lot of times these claims don't

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>materialize with Tesla. So to me, like Wolf, we own it.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think it's still cheap stock, and you know,

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be fine over time. Do

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you get ultimately them frustrated with master plans, with the

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that perhaps master Plan one point zero two point

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>zero on executed and we're already talking about three point nine. Look,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that's Elon is brilliant, and he's yet, you know, unpredictable,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and as an investor, you don't like the unpredictability of it,

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, we get we get frustrated with it. When

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he bought Twitter, we were very frustrated by that because

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in my experience, it's hard to you know,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>run two companies, and Elon runs three or four now.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But Twitter is a whole different animal, SpaceX and more

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in which he built from scratch, right. So it's bad

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>enough that he's got those two, but now he's got Twitter,

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a total rebuild, and so that's frustrating. It's

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is frustrating that you know, he often,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, does it one a. I guess that's what

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>makes him so skilled, and that's what makes him so

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>successful that, you know, one of the things people tell

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>me about when he realizes he's wrong, he will make

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>an immediate turn and go in the right direction. And

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that over and over again. What tells an

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>example is they took radar out of the FSD, and

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess he realized that, you know, high death radar

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>actually had advance and now they're putting the high death

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>radar back in. And I don't know if it frustrates

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>me as investor, he used to do them because he

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>adds a lot of you he's brilliant and he's he ads,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, tremendous you know value from a a you know,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>stock picking standpoint, But at times you've got to be

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ready to you know, tilt when he tilts, investors left

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>wanting more. A future fund managing partner Gary Black were

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>really great to have some time at the thank you with.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>What we're worried about is Chinese backed companies being on

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, tens of millions of American phones, including members

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of the military, and privacy concerns, data concerns, misinformation concerns.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't just apply to TikTok. That was US Commerce

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Gina Ramundo. They're talking about her concerns around TikTok

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and other Chinese social media apps that are said to

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>me threatening national security. Now former NSA David Kennedy, who's

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>now founded two cybersecurity companies, Trusted Set Combinary Defense, is

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>with us, and David, my question to you is, where

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is the vulnerability. Why is Gina Raymondo concern not just

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>about TikTok but other Chinese apps as well. We've seen

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for years that China has created one of the largest

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>surveillance states, not only in its own people, but just

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>globally tracking US personnel for espionage purposes, cyber warfare. They're

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one of our peer competitors on the cyberspace. They're the

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>largest country for intellectual property theft yielding trillions of dollars

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have been electric property efet per year from China. And

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't play by any type of rules whatsoever.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And the big issue that you run into, and I

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think what the big contrast is from you know, social

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>media companies here in the United States versus something like

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>China is that you know, they control the content that

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is delivered to the endpoints or the dephone or the

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>device that is looking at TikTok as well as the

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>information that is collected that could then be used by

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the government itself. That's you know, government employees, locations, um,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, information about you know, specific individuals that are

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to pull or pulling a type of data information on.

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They use this as another source of many other sources

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that they centrally use and they're one of the best

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to large big data analytics and what

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing with if with tracking people all across the world,

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's a major problem and it's a major concern,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>especially from China. David, you are a hacker, but the friendly,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the friendly kind of hacker, as I understand it. What

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand is is this a sort of systems

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability or is this an issue of who has access

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to data? It's it's a combination of bulf actually. So

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if you look at byte Dance, which

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is the you know, subsidiary company that is um you know,

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>out of Beijing, specifically they control the code that goes

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>into the devices. Now you know, Apple for example, has

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty stringent UH policy around you know, inspecting source

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>code and things like that. It's Google a little bit

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>more on the open side. But the collection of the

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>data aspect and where that data it goes to is

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>the most concerning part about it. Could they introduce code

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, could eavesdrop on US citizens, absolutely, um

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. But the main concern is the amount of

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>information that they're pulling back, collecting and then using that

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>information to go against you know, key personnel that they

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>would look to target um you know, or individuals or

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>people that are of interest to the Chinese government, you know, scientists,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>medical research, you know, duty contractors that specifically focus on

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, next generation research or weapons systems, missile defense systems,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>those types of things, as well as their ability to

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>control content that goes to individuals. So obviously, you know,

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you hear the term misinformation quite a bit. I think

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what's most important to understand is that you know, they

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can start to home in and and focus content on

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>individuals and really change their perception of what's actually occurring

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in reality. And you know, we live through our devices nowadays,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, live through TikTok, lift through you know,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter, and through various online news sources. So

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what is presented to us as content is typically our

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>worldview on what's actually happening out there. So can you

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>curb you know, public opinion based on the contents coming

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>out of TikTok And that's absolutely possible, do you Roman though?

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, coming from the administration, there has been much

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>talk the administration doing something about TikTok, maybe we chat

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Ali pay some of the others as well, but dragging

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>their heels and so states have started to step in

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or individual institutions, particularly in the well the education side

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of things, is that the right way to deal with this,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the outright of banning of TikTok is is

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>an interesting and other Chinese owned companies is an interesting dilemma.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know what just recently happened with banning

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it within government employees as a solid one. You know,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we removed Huawei from being able to be purchased here

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States specifically on military basis installation can

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have hardware in those facilities, which is a Chinese based company.

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's been direct intelligence that have shown Huawei has

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, worked on behalf of the Chinese government for

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property theft in other areas. Um. You know, the

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting part is, you know, does the federal government play

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a role in what the US you know, citizens can

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and can't cannot do. And I think that's a pretty

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>large discussion, heavy discussion have They've largely stayed away from that,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're looking at states kind of looking

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at well, personal information is really important. It's not just

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>TikTok for example, I mean social Security number is your

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>personal data that's stored within corporations. You know, Uh, the

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>EU does this very well with protecting personal information. So

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I think states are looking at this and saying, well,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>can we look at this as a personal information issue,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>a privacy issue, and can we put controls in place

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that hold you know that that holds bitte dance specifically

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>accountable for where that data is stored and how it's protected,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily banning it. I think that's probably a better

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>measured approach to say, you know, this data has to

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>stay here. Of course, the continued crackdown, you are still

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>reviewing existing licenses from export to Huawei as well. We

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to keep our communications with that company open as well.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>David Kennedy, we want to thank you so much, trusted

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sec founder and indeed an ethical hacker. Meanwhile, we've talked

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about how the cybersecurity industry, perhaps some would say, is

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing high labor shortages right now in the face of

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that work to be done. But look broadly,

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an issue across the board in America, the labor

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>side that is. Here's what US Commerce Secretary Gena Romano

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>also had to say earlier about some of the top

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>concerns she hears from CEOs. She's in touch with workforce.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable, like workforce, workforce, workforce. We can't hire enough,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we can't hire first enough, we can't hire people with

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the skills that we need. Look, so we went to

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you our audience, and we actually asked them, look does

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this apply to technology, because I'm afraid the labor tightness

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>she talks of. We meanwhile got all these layouts who

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>are closure in congres ideas all we hear is laos

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or service. I do hear from tech executives. There are

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>specific roles. They can't feel like expertise, but pretty divisive

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>subjects in the tech sector as well. Fifty say yes

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>look to tastop concern is talent still in the tech sector.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Even so, we'll keep tracking that one now coming up.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff on the company's pivot away from

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>M and A to provatization. The change in strategy seems

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be paying off for investors. To take a look

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at that shark, Caroline. We'll bring you more of that next.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. As we really focus on our performance,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on our profitability, on the reprioritization back to being a

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>core CRM company. It was really time to put the

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>M and A committee on ice and just mitigate what

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing with M and A and as focused

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>more on our chord as part of the transformation that

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I've put it into the company in the last ninety days,

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>sales will CEO Mark Penny of following the company's reprioritization,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it's back on profits. Some are let's bring in Bloomberg

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Intelligent senior technology analysts Anna Granner and look as he

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>reprioritizes to basically where the activist investors want him to.

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>What should he be thinking of if it's not M

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and A No. I think the organic growth rate is

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>very important for this company. I think that a decail

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>rating for a while that needs to go up. But

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the big thing for us as well as has been

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that they spend way too much on sales and marketing.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we are not the only one that talked

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about in the last few years. Everybody is looking at

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a company like this. Everybody knows Salesforce. It's been around

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for twenty four years. Why is it it's spending forty

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of its sales on sales and marketing compared to

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say Microsoft with eleven percent. I think that's where

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody got excited, and that's where where you see now.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>If Anna Ring you say everybody knows Salesforce, you've written

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on a research date. This is the new salesforce. What

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is so attractive about the new salesforce? If philosophically an

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>every good company should take care of, you know, sales

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and marketing and profit in the same manner as let

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at growth from a salesforce point of view.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the only focus for growth for the past

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>decade and two US and free cash flow was not

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the biggest priority. And I think that's you should have

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>a balance of them. I'm not saying, you know, you

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>need to be on one side or the other. The

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>new salesforce is going to be very, very profitable. I

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think from from the old point of view, the question

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is can we see a decent amount of growth when

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy turns? Hey, Anna, rag is Smartpenny is still

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>under pressure? I don't. I think he has I would

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>say a couple of years without any problem now, because

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>he's delivered in one go. I mean, can you imagine

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>his margin targets are well ahead of time, so I

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>think he has enough time now. I don't think it's

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be an issue. Slim Bag Intelligence Senior tech analyst,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Anna rag Brna, thank you very much. Security and Exchange

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Commission that's been busy as looking into potential conflicts of

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>interest with asset managers using artificial intelligence, specifically predictive data analytics. This,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, this is the SEC is also weighing some

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest changes to American equity market structure nearly

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>two decades, and of course it continues to crack down

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on the crypto industry more broadly following the fall out

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of FTX, joining us to discuss from the BI Market

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Structure Conference. We're very pleased to welcome to the show,

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>SEC chair Gary Gensler. Long day of Blomberg conversations for you,

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and we are pleased to have you live on this show.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Share Gensler, I'm just going to start with the day

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of news and start with Silvergat in particular its shares

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>very much under dr rest at the moment because it

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hand in a ten K filing to you in time,

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>noting that it was worried of course about well, it's

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>ability to remain a going concern. How have you worried

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>about the spillover BACTERA. You're talking to colleagues over the

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>FDIC and some of the other institutions. So let me

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>let me step back caroline from any one company, and

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>for your viewers, we play a role in overseeing the markets,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>overseeing registaurants, and of course we have a robust sort

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of copple on the beat or enforcement and examination functions.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to comment on any one company here,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the overall question about crypto tokens

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and the crypto markets, while they are give or take

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars of worldwide market value, our overall capital

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>markets here in the US are well for one hundred

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars, So that puts it in contexts of scale.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>But it is important that so much of this field,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this crypto field, is highly speculative. It is not necessarily

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the investing public should understand this. It's not necessarily compliant

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>currently with the appropriate laws of our nation to protect you,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the investing public, to get full, fair and truthful disclosures

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand what's happening at these platforms. So that being

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the case, traditional finance, much of traditional finance being compliant

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>has some question and is adverse in dealing with what

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>may well be depending upon the company and so forth,

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>dealing in highly speculative assets that are not necessarily compliant

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>with their laws. Let's talk therefore more broadly about your

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>focus and enforcement. I just want to ring what one

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>particular builder in the ecosystem, the Ripple founder, had to

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>say a little bit earlier. If you could just take

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a listen, the sec is kind of playing offense and

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>attacking the whole industry. This is not a healthy way

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to regulate an industry. Your regulation through enforcement, as opposed

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to where we're seeing in other countries where they're doing

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the work right, they're codifying, they're creating a framework that

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>allows an industry to grow while protecting consumers. And I

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's really what the US is lagging now. Check INSLA.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure you might say, well, look, a founder

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in that sort of business might be saying this, but

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what about some of these players. We've spoken to many

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>who have perhaps been part of previous administrations who are

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>now you know, advises to some of these companies and

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>worried a little bit about the holistic nature of really

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to regulate, and worried that it is more about

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>enforcement rather than the rules of the road. At the moment, Paralyne,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing incompatible crypto in our securities law, our securities

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>laws were brought about to protect the investing public against

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fraud and schemes and manipulation. And it was through this

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of full, fair and truthful disclosure registering with the SEC.

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>When you're raising money from the public and the public's

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>anticipating a profit, it's pretty straightforward, actually common sense approach

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to helping the public and investing. So this broad field,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we have one goal at the SEC is for them

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to come into compliance. Whether it's the tokens, that's basically

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>people raising money or offering these tokens, and it's also

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what i'll call the storefronts, but they can call themselves

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto exchanges or lending or staking as a service or

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>other intermediaries to come into compliance and ensure that they

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't mislead the public. But also they don't commingle the funds.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't take the public's funds and do things we

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just don't allow in our financial markets. We don't allow

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange to also play with the

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>customers funds and make markets run a hedge fund, run

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a dealer, be in the clearing business. We separate out

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>those conflicts missed against. Thank you for your time. You've

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>set out the goal there, and what I want to

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>ask you about is the results of your actions. You

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 1>have asked a number of names in the crypto industry

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to register their products with the SEC. Very few have,

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular those that are most known to us, the

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger names in the industry. Why are they not acting

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>on your requests? Well, the law is the law, and

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they need to come in and properly follow the laws,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and we will work with them to do that. But

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime we will also look out for the

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>investing public and we've been very clear, for instance, about

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what's called crypto lending and what the requirements are there

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about staking as a service. We've also been rather clear

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>about pustodying customer funds and we will continue to do this,

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and of course we would yes most suggests that they

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>come into compliance missed against. There are all types of

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>subject matter crossing your desk at the moment. One of

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>them is artificial intelligence. Caroline and I have been discussing

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>all week what the finance industry is doing in often

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a not uniform way with regards to AI. What are

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>your concerns about artificial intelligence, potentially conflicts of interest in

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the asset management industry for example. I think this is

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the most one of the most transformative technologies of our times.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Honored when I was at MIT to do research and

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>teach both go on AI and crypto, and I think

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>it's artificial intelligence. It's changing how we're going to drive,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>how radiology happens, and yes, how finance happens. Our particular

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>focus is that robo advising, and there's fifty one million

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>accounts in America that has separately managed accounts from investment advisors,

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>brokerage applications. Again, millions of Americans that the applications are

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>using artificial intelligence predictive data analytics where they may be

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>putting their revenues, the platforms revenues. This is ahead of

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>their clients interest and how to deal with those conflicts

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 1>where there's scooping up data on our lives, scooping up

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>data from our potentially from how we drive our cars

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to our fitbits, to the programs we want, and then

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 1>marketing to us differentially, marketing to us rather than thinking

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>putting us first, putting us the clients first, which is

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think really why finance is meant to be about finances. Also,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we hope about transparency and about lifting all boats as well.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And you at the moment are trying to transform regulation

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, trying to ensure that we have this

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>overhaul of regulatory profile so that transparency does come to

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>bear within the equity markets more broadly as well. Check INSLA.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in particular about some of the responses you're

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>getting to that big proposal you'll put out in December,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>in particularly the National Association and security professionals. They're representing

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>women and minorities. As we enter, of course the month

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of where we think about equality in particular for women,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we come out of that for people of color for February,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering about some of the warriors that they have

0:26:54.560 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>about ability for minorities to participate in equity markets. Out

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>four proposals in December addressing four different aspects or problems

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and it was really to make the

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>markets work better for all Americans, working Americans of our

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>great diverse nation, men and women alike, of people of

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all racial and ethnic backgrounds. And it's really about them.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are our clients, and that and that the markets

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>actually when they submit an order to give them and

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>work towards best execution and that we try to level

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this playing field because so much of the market. Now,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a working family and you're just trying to

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in the market and you put an order in,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going not to the transparent market, but it's being

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 1>routed off to wholesalers and what's called the dark market,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and trying to level up that competition for now then

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ASP of course have gone to you and hoping that

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't ensure that we see continued inclusion. Sec Chair

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Gary Ginzler, wonderful to have some time with you, Thank

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Indeed, ed yeah, just you know, fascinating conversation.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know, Chair Against makes a clear point.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't think that these nascent more nascent industries are

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>necessarily odds with the laws of this nation. What we

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>put to him was, well, why why are many of

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>these players not following them currently? And I'm not sure

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got a full answer to that. We will try

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>again in the next opportunity coming up. How the rise

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of generative AI is impacting every industry and that includes gaming.

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>More on that next with Sony AI's COO Mika Spranger.

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg so as we solve real world AI,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>because any I don't think there's anyone even close to

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla unsolving real world AI. That was Elon must They're

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about AI during Tesla's investor day yesterday. Now, Generals

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of AI fever has taken the world by storm since

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT showed just how far this technology has come

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and the possibilities it opens up to many industries, and

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that includes gaming, which, as you guys know, gaming Sony

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>actually just released its own Grand Turismo Sophie game, which

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>now features an improved AI racing agent. Sony's chief operation

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>officer Mika Spranger joins us now, and I love the

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.719
<v Speaker 1>idea of that. I've been playing video games my whole life,

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>where the bot that you're playing against is either incredibly

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>hard or incredibly easy, depending on how good a gamer

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you are. But this seems to be an extension of that.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Have I got that right, Mika? Yeah, absolutely so. There

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is a racing agent. And I was trained to really

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be competitive with the best Espards drivers in grunch Whismo,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>which is an extremely highly realistic racing game, and we

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>did that last year, published on a cover of Nature,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and this year, actually this month, we released it into

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the game in varying levels of difficulty. So if you're

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a beginner, if you're intermediate, or if you're an expert,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you can drive against the agent, but we balance the

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>performance of the car, so you do have a chance

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>against the agent in the beginner mold, but you can

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>also race against its one. We want fullhead, you know,

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>same cars against a fully blown superhuman racing agent that

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we release last year, and so we hope this really

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>can inspire people to learn from the agent, and it's

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an important step for the game because you know, if

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you are an expert in the game, it will take

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>some time for you and you need friends actually at

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the same level to compete against, and that's what the

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>agent actually addresses Mika. A few weeks ago, we had

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>son Ya Huang, who's a partner at VC fans a

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>choir on the show, and she has this thesis that

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty, generated AI tools will be so good

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that they will be used to just dream up video games.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And I wondered, what big picture work is Sony doing

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to that effect in the video game space. So obviously,

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean gaming has always been technology driven, right, and

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so we are looking at new technologies. Obviously there's been

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bus around chat, GPT, mid journey and

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.719
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of models. For us, it's really important that

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this technology is therefore the creator, so we are interested

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in what this does to gaming creators, how it helps

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>them creator fulfill their creative visions. And so, you know,

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>people are starting to take up the technology. I think

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things that still need to happen

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in the technology as well for this to be really

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>useful for gaming, but we do see also, you know,

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people already starting using it, the artists are using it,

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's really important for us because for us, really

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the creator, so we are Creator Center Company is really

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about what the creators are doing with this technology. Delvin

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that maker. What more needs to be done to the

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>technology to make really purposeful, really useful for Sony. Yeah,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>so so obviously what we see today is a lot

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>around to the image in a generation. But you know,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>games are three D. I mean, that's just a very

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>big one and obviously that's something that would need to

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be addressed for this to be really impactful on the

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>gaming production pipeline. But again, you know, I think the

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>technology develops extremely fast. GT Sophie was a Nature paper

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. It's in the game now. So you know,

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the cycles from like high high level technology breakthroughs to

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>actually bringing this to users or creators around the world

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is very very fast. One thing I would say though,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is what is really important for us is really the

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>ethical aspects of this right. So we need to make

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>sure also that the technology is developed in a responsible

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>way from the data that goes into it. It needs

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to be fair and transparent. You know, people have rights,

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>creators have rights. These need to be respected. It's also

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>important what happens on the output side. And so for us,

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>actually aithics is at the core for Sony. I we

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have this, we have a we have a dedicated team

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>at all the projects we're doing from an a ethics

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>perspective and really shaping how we developed a technology. Do

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you need to be hand in hand with governments around this?

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We just have the SEC chair on talking about AI's

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>use within finance and he's wanting to perhaps see some

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>rules of the road in place. Do you need governments

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to work alongside to build this ethical roadmap? I think

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's important for governments to play a role, but I

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is also beyond governments. From a Sony perspective,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a responsibility for our creators. We have you know,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we work with them on a day to day basis,

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in many part ways are part of the

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>company actually, and for us, it's it's not just about

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>government regulation. For us, it's really about making the technology

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>for the creators so that they can unbleach their creativity

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and their imagination. And so the human for us is

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>really center. Yeah, of course governments, you know, play a

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>role in this, but it's also companies that have to

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>step up. Hey, mecare, Caroline and I are having a

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of executives from the world of AI on at

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the moment, a lot of investors, a lot of academic

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>What we're strying to understand is how can we know

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>how competent Sony AI is at its craft? What makes

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you different? What makes you stand out from all those

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>other AI players out there. I would say two things.

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>One is we have extremely high impact projects and we

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>aim also for you know, technology contributions that really are recognized.

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>For instance, Gt. Sophie Agent was featured on the cover

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of Nature and that's really important part of us to

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>raise awareness about the technology, but also a show that

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we are actually able to do that. The other thing

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 1>is really as part of Sony. As I mentioned, for us,

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's important that we focused on the people and how

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>people use this technology going forward to you know, fulfill

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 1>their creative visions. And I think that kind of sets

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>us apart and you know, our voice I think should

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>be heard in this space. Thank you for such a

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 1>global conversation coming live for us from Tokyo Nikos Branger

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sony AI COO. Really fascinating the applications within gaming. Now.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We just talked to artificial intelligence, says talk, well, a

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more share. We chatted with the macy CEO

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's in shout. Indeed, the chairman two Jeff Gannette,

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>earlier today about well how he sees AI impacting his

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>own business. But first I actually talked about the companies

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>expanding digital footprint within the new Macy's marketplace and actually

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the good gaming take listen. So in the fourth

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter we launch the Macy's Marketplace. We did this in September.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>We've added twenty new categories and five hundred new brands

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>as a result of marketplace, and that gives customers a

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>lot more choices. Example, So during the fourth quarter, two

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of the hottest categories for us in marketplace, and we

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>really didn't have in our own inventory from before, was

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>video games and electronics. Those are where customers they trust

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Macy's as a brand and so they're ready to transact

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with us if we have the right content for them.

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So so much of our business starts on digital or

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is transacted on digital. So to have marketplace that a

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>customer they don't know whether it's marketplace or offender direct

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>or owned inventory, they just know that when they come

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to Macy's they can get they can get a broad

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>range of categories at great values. So that's what we're

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so encouraged by. So what you heard us talk about

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>today is we're going to be adding two thousand new

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>brands in twenty three on the Macy's side, and we're

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be adding a Bloomingdale's marketplace in the back

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>half of twenty three. So it just gives us a

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of flexibility because we're a trusted brand. We're a

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>department store that has many categories and about to have

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot more as a result of Marketplace. And you

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>really understood that omni channel balance. I'm going to ask

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you that for maybe a bit of a curveful, but

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe one being asked a lot more of you. AI

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Artificial intelligence it seems to be something that some of

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>your competitors are talking up at least. Is this something

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that you embrace with Macy's. So I'll put that in

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the camp of kind as data and analytics. You know,

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>AI absolutely so. When you look at the technology that

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>we have and that we've invested in, and when you

0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the science that we have that we're putting

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>against the art of the business, it's a combination of

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that that makes a great retailer. So art and science

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is so important. Where are the trends going? You can't

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>always see that an algorithm the boy you can look

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at all the signals you can aggregate them for in

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>real time and what's going on in the balance of

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the industry. We're a customer that where they are on

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and how they're responding to new trends, and how

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do you express that you each of your individual brands.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>What we see is that our customers at Bloomingdale's, they're

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>upfront with trends and when they move off of a trend,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can see where that might cool based

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on trend perds on the macy side. So we're using

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.439
<v Speaker 1>all of the data that we have. You know, we've

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 1>built up our gating analytics capability. We built us on

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>our fixed once over the past couple of years. That's

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>paying dividends. You know when you look at dynamic pricing,

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>to be able to scrape the entire internet on where

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the prices are on commodities and now in real time

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you can make adjustments online and in some respects in store.

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So we were clearly using you know, where science is

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>taking us to better. We're starting to respond to this

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>customer who's got so many choices and they're looking for

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the best combination of value and experience, and we have

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a huge opportunity to get that rate and to do

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that in real time is an important component of who's

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to win. I'm in region. It's been going viral.

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, while heading climate friendly Companies, made a ton

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.959
<v Speaker 1>of trips on his private jets, some even as short

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as thirteen minutes, but in the Business Week spent weeks

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>navigating Musk twenty twenty two travels. In total, he took

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred and seventy flights one hundred and seventy,

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 1>amounting to a dozen trips around the Earth. Carolina December

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was his busiest travel month, not surprised, notching fifty five

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand mars. Look at how he ranks against the pantheon

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of tech grades in his global travel. But what's also

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing is the short distances at times he's doing. At

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>one point, he went what from the SpaceX headquarters Hawthorne

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.479
<v Speaker 1>to six miles to the area before he went to phrase,

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that's it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. We're about

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a very big goodbye to someone special here.

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll be tweeting about it. An amazing week so far,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Balan Swiller, we love you. This is Bloomberg