WEBVTT - The Rise of Organized Retail Crime at Big Box Stores

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.420
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Odd Lodge listeners. I'm Joe Wiesenthal.

0:00:06.620 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:07.700 --> 0:00:10.270
<v Speaker 1>We're the hosts of the Odd Lodge podcast, and we've

0:00:10.310 --> 0:00:11.489
<v Speaker 1>got something exciting for you.

0:00:11.770 --> 0:00:13.970
<v Speaker 2>That's right. So one of the best parts of hosting

0:00:14.070 --> 0:00:16.830
<v Speaker 2>our podcast is we get to actually meet and interact

0:00:16.950 --> 0:00:19.709
<v Speaker 2>with our listeners. And we know we have some listeners

0:00:19.850 --> 0:00:20.989
<v Speaker 2>over in Los Angeles.

0:00:21.170 --> 0:00:21.550
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:00:21.570 --> 0:00:24.290
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in L.A., we're going to be recording

0:00:24.470 --> 0:00:28.100
<v Speaker 1>a live show, some live recordings at the Vermont Theater

0:00:28.140 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood on September 17th.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 2>We have some really exciting guests lined up, have some

0:00:33.140 --> 0:00:36.450
<v Speaker 2>really great conversations planned. So go ahead and get your tickets.

0:00:36.470 --> 0:00:39.890
<v Speaker 2>You can find those over at Bloomberg.com forward slash oddlots

0:00:40.030 --> 0:00:42.529
<v Speaker 2>or click the link below in the show notes and

0:00:42.690 --> 0:00:43.750
<v Speaker 2>come and say hi when you're there.

0:00:49.490 --> 0:00:53.970
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news.

0:01:05.340 --> 0:01:08.069
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:01:08.250 --> 0:01:09.030
<v Speaker 2>I'm Traci Allaway.

0:01:09.230 --> 0:01:10.369
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Weisenthal.

0:01:10.630 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe, we did an episode recently with Reid Lustelo, the

0:01:14.459 --> 0:01:16.940
<v Speaker 2>chief marketing officer over at the Truck Parking Club.

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:17.140 --> 0:01:19.220
<v Speaker 2>And that was a great episode about the— Super fun.

0:01:19.260 --> 0:01:23.380
<v Speaker 2>The rebound in trucking. But he mentioned one thing and

0:01:23.420 --> 0:01:25.979
<v Speaker 2>he did it in a sort of offhand way. And

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.259
<v Speaker 2>it really piqued my interest. He basically said that cargo

0:01:29.300 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>theft had become this huge deal. And it wasn't just,

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.700
<v Speaker 2>you know, some guys stealing boxes off the back of trucks,

0:01:36.770 --> 0:01:38.330
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of what I have in my head.

0:01:38.350 --> 0:01:38.630
<v Speaker 4>Same.

0:01:38.910 --> 0:01:42.590
<v Speaker 2>It was people spoofing actual carriers or pretending to be

0:01:42.610 --> 0:01:47.190
<v Speaker 2>a carrier and then picking up entire cargo loads of inventory.

0:01:47.209 --> 0:01:47.289
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:47.630 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>And presumably reselling it.

0:01:49.630 --> 0:01:53.060
<v Speaker 1>No, that totally blew my mind. I mean, it makes sense, right? Like, okay,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking in the U.S., there's tens of thousands

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.100
<v Speaker 1>of trucking companies. And so the degree to which any

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.350
<v Speaker 1>shipper could really know any carrier is probably kind of loose,

0:02:02.390 --> 0:02:04.650
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. It's like, yeah, why not just sort of

0:02:04.690 --> 0:02:07.290
<v Speaker 1>like spring up one day and you know, get some

0:02:07.330 --> 0:02:09.269
<v Speaker 1>shipments and then take them on your own way. It

0:02:09.570 --> 0:02:11.570
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense, but definitely not what I

0:02:11.610 --> 0:02:14.230
<v Speaker 1>would have had in mind, as you said, about what

0:02:14.310 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a cargo theft meant up until that point.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, since then, I keep seeing these headlines popping up.

0:02:19.540 --> 0:02:21.740
<v Speaker 2>There was a great Bloomberg story the other day actually

0:02:21.780 --> 0:02:26.060
<v Speaker 2>called The Great Modern Train Robbery Thieves Steal $ 200 Million

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.690
<v Speaker 2>a Year Off of Railway Cars. And so you can see, like,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.429
<v Speaker 2>This seems to be a big deal. We know, living

0:02:33.530 --> 0:02:36.730
<v Speaker 2>in New York, that it feels like shoplifting has become

0:02:36.770 --> 0:02:40.290
<v Speaker 2>a bigger deal in recent years after the pandemic. And

0:02:40.350 --> 0:02:42.609
<v Speaker 2>we can debate whether or not the statistics bear that out.

0:02:42.650 --> 0:02:44.670
<v Speaker 2>But certainly, if you walk down the street and you

0:02:44.710 --> 0:02:48.500
<v Speaker 2>go into our local Duane Reade, everything's locked up, right?

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the sort of core thing. There's probably various ways

0:02:53.260 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to massage statistics and all kinds of stuff.

0:02:57.500 --> 0:02:58.030
<v Speaker 4>But whatever.

0:02:58.669 --> 0:03:00.330
<v Speaker 1>It's not good. I see them locking this stuff up.

0:03:00.350 --> 0:03:02.690
<v Speaker 1>They're locking it up. They must know that customers, by

0:03:02.710 --> 0:03:05.450
<v Speaker 1>and large, hate it, right? They must know that it

0:03:05.870 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>decreases labor productivity, having to have staffers in the store.

0:03:10.940 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You have to ring the bell and wait.

0:03:12.139 --> 0:03:14.579
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, get a deodorant. They can't think that that's a

0:03:14.620 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>great operation. So if they're doing it. I presume there

0:03:17.900 --> 0:03:18.700
<v Speaker 1>are some real issues there.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.530
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're going to get into all of it today.

0:03:20.590 --> 0:03:22.829
<v Speaker 2>We'll do the sort of low level locking stuff up

0:03:22.990 --> 0:03:25.910
<v Speaker 2>on shelves all the way to the high level pretending

0:03:25.990 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 2>to be an entire trucking company and stealing someone's inventory

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.860
<v Speaker 2>that way. And I'm glad to say we have the

0:03:31.900 --> 0:03:34.579
<v Speaker 2>perfect guest to try to understand all of this. We're

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.220
<v Speaker 2>going to be speaking with Scott Glenn. He is the

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.170
<v Speaker 2>vice president of asset protection over at The Home Depot

0:03:41.250 --> 0:03:44.750
<v Speaker 2>and an organized retail crime expert. So truly the perfect

0:03:44.790 --> 0:03:46.940
<v Speaker 2>person to speak to. Scott, thank you so much for

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>coming on Odd Lots.

0:03:48.150 --> 0:03:48.970
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks, guys.

0:03:49.010 --> 0:03:53.150
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me. I appreciate the expert designation. I'm

0:03:53.730 --> 0:03:55.330
<v Speaker 3>not so sure I can live up to that, but

0:03:55.350 --> 0:03:55.990
<v Speaker 3>I'll do my best.

0:03:56.270 --> 0:03:59.170
<v Speaker 2>I love that you're wearing the Home Depot apron as well.

0:03:59.590 --> 0:04:01.670
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, it's part of our culture. It's part of

0:04:01.710 --> 0:04:02.170
<v Speaker 4>what we are.

0:04:02.190 --> 0:04:04.450
<v Speaker 3>You can see our values over our heart is an

0:04:04.490 --> 0:04:08.290
<v Speaker 3>intentional thing. Today's earnings day for Home Depot, and so

0:04:08.330 --> 0:04:09.710
<v Speaker 3>we're all supporting the cause.

0:04:10.430 --> 0:04:12.750
<v Speaker 2>All right, first question, and then we can get into

0:04:12.870 --> 0:04:17.060
<v Speaker 2>maybe more serious topics. But what's the most stolen item

0:04:17.300 --> 0:04:18.059
<v Speaker 2>from Home Depot?

0:04:18.540 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Volume or dollars?

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:20.820
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's do both.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:21.779
<v Speaker 2>Let's do both.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.260
<v Speaker 3>So I would say volume, it's typically something like a

0:04:26.300 --> 0:04:26.900
<v Speaker 3>power drill.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:28.460
<v Speaker 4>You see a lot of that.

0:04:29.100 --> 0:04:31.940
<v Speaker 3>And then when you start to get into dollars, believe

0:04:31.980 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>it or not, copper and wire have a lot of

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the commodity.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Value out there.

0:04:37.260 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 3>And so we see people come in, they'll take a

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.140
<v Speaker 3>lot of that stuff out of the building and try

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 3>to resell it or use it on jobs, things like that.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.310
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, so certainly those are certainly two of the

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>bigger ones.

0:04:46.930 --> 0:04:50.050
<v Speaker 2>Joe, someone broke into... There's a museum close to where

0:04:50.089 --> 0:04:52.909
<v Speaker 2>I am in Connecticut called the Nathan Hale Museum, an

0:04:53.010 --> 0:04:56.330
<v Speaker 2>old colonial homestead. Someone broke into it recently and stole

0:04:56.350 --> 0:04:57.409
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of copper pipes.

0:04:57.470 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Are you serious? Like old pipes that were.

0:05:00.580 --> 0:05:04.300
<v Speaker 2>Apparently it was in the house next to it, but...

0:05:04.460 --> 0:05:06.580
<v Speaker 2>It was still pretty upsetting for everyone, you know, a

0:05:06.620 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>historic home getting.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:08.820
<v Speaker 1>Hit for copper.

0:05:09.180 --> 0:05:11.950
<v Speaker 4>It happens everywhere. When I joined Home Depot eight years

0:05:12.029 --> 0:05:13.190
<v Speaker 4>ago and I moved into.

0:05:13.050 --> 0:05:15.610
<v Speaker 3>My house, between the time I closed on my house

0:05:15.650 --> 0:05:17.850
<v Speaker 3>and the time that I moved into the house, they

0:05:17.870 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 3>took all the copper out of the HVAC units and

0:05:21.620 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>all the pieces of it. So it is definitely a

0:05:25.060 --> 0:05:28.180
<v Speaker 3>commodity that fluctuates in price. And when the price goes up,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>it becomes really valuable to the bad guys.

0:05:30.140 --> 0:05:32.740
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's actually a great thing. So you mentioned you've

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.930
<v Speaker 1>been at the Home Depot for eight years. But why

0:05:35.940 --> 0:05:38.170
<v Speaker 1>don't you give us a quick like sort of overview

0:05:38.190 --> 0:05:40.950
<v Speaker 1>of your career, what your role is, why we're talking

0:05:40.990 --> 0:05:44.070
<v Speaker 1>to you, like what's been the main thing that have

0:05:44.390 --> 0:05:45.310
<v Speaker 1>landed you in this chair?

0:05:45.810 --> 0:05:46.510
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:05:46.589 --> 0:05:50.410
<v Speaker 3>So I would tell you, surprised that I'm in this chair.

0:05:50.430 --> 0:05:51.890
<v Speaker 3>I went to school to be an architect when I

0:05:51.910 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 3>was going into college and realized that I wasn't very

0:05:55.860 --> 0:05:58.740
<v Speaker 3>good at math. So I decided to maybe go work

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 3>for the FBI. And I got into the criminal justice

0:06:00.900 --> 0:06:03.300
<v Speaker 3>side of the business. I was always fascinated by the law.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I ended up going to law school after college and

0:06:06.100 --> 0:06:08.469
<v Speaker 3>did that route. But I started working with the Treasury

0:06:08.490 --> 0:06:10.810
<v Speaker 3>Department right out of law school and worked for the

0:06:10.850 --> 0:06:13.770
<v Speaker 3>Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. realized that I did

0:06:13.810 --> 0:06:15.290
<v Speaker 3>not like government service.

0:06:15.450 --> 0:06:16.729
<v Speaker 4>It just wasn't my gig.

0:06:16.770 --> 0:06:18.650
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't what I wanted to do forever. And so

0:06:19.270 --> 0:06:22.090
<v Speaker 3>I had during summers, during school, I had worked at

0:06:22.150 --> 0:06:24.979
<v Speaker 3>Target and caught shoplifters. So just kind of a side,

0:06:25.250 --> 0:06:27.779
<v Speaker 3>you know, make some money gig. And luckily, I was

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.020
<v Speaker 3>able to get back my foot in the door with

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Target after I left the government and worked for them

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.099
<v Speaker 3>and just worked my way up through the ranks. So

0:06:34.700 --> 0:06:38.140
<v Speaker 3>Been here, been at Kohl's department stores for 10 years.

0:06:38.220 --> 0:06:40.460
<v Speaker 3>I was at Sears for 10 years as a CSO.

0:06:40.540 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 3>And then I came back here to Home Depot eight

0:06:43.060 --> 0:06:43.500
<v Speaker 3>years ago.

0:06:43.700 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>So before we go any further, why don't we define

0:06:46.170 --> 0:06:48.770
<v Speaker 2>our terms? When we talk about retail theft, I imagine

0:06:48.810 --> 0:06:53.130
<v Speaker 2>this covers a range of activities from, you know, someone

0:06:53.650 --> 0:06:59.310
<v Speaker 2>innocently perhaps forgetting to scan their deodorant at self-checkout to

0:06:59.650 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 2>really organized, seemingly very ambitious heist. What are we talking

0:07:05.620 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 2>about exactly here? How do you kind of categorize retail

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 2>theft in your head?

0:07:09.620 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a spectrum to your point. There's definitely low

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>level opportunistic, I'll even call it the need shoplifters that

0:07:16.660 --> 0:07:18.260
<v Speaker 3>are out there. They just can't afford things.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:19.340
<v Speaker 4>And we know that happens.

0:07:19.420 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's not what I would say acceptable to us,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.580
<v Speaker 3>but it's also not our focus. It's not the place

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.100
<v Speaker 3>where we spend a lot of our energy and our

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 3>tactics up to the most sophisticated criminal organizations that are

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>out there. And I mean, sophisticated, cartel-related, transnational gang-related international

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:42.370
<v Speaker 3>organizations whose sole existence is to monetize theft to do

0:07:42.510 --> 0:07:47.610
<v Speaker 3>other bad things, whether that's money laundering, drug trafficking, human trafficking.

0:07:47.790 --> 0:07:50.530
<v Speaker 3>And these are absolutely known things that are happening out there.

0:07:51.110 --> 0:07:54.260
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of space in between that, and

0:07:54.420 --> 0:07:56.580
<v Speaker 3>it runs the gamut. But we tend to focus our

0:07:56.620 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>time and our energy and our resources on the higher end.

0:07:59.980 --> 0:08:02.420
<v Speaker 1>While we're in the business of defining terms here, I

0:08:02.460 --> 0:08:06.020
<v Speaker 1>think this is helpful. A word like shrinkage is one

0:08:06.050 --> 0:08:09.950
<v Speaker 1>that comes up. Would shrinkage only apply to, okay, the

0:08:09.990 --> 0:08:12.450
<v Speaker 1>person who walks into a store and manages to walk

0:08:12.610 --> 0:08:15.190
<v Speaker 1>out with a power drill or something like that? Or

0:08:15.630 --> 0:08:19.420
<v Speaker 1>is it counted in shrinkage statistics if it's like a very–

0:08:19.670 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>complex heist of an entire truck that never makes it

0:08:22.100 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to the destination.

0:08:23.190 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>When we talk about shrink in retail, we're talking about

0:08:26.900 --> 0:08:29.180
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, I have inventory on

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>my books. And when I physically go to count that inventory,

0:08:32.140 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 3>it's not there. There's a lot of different ways that

0:08:34.260 --> 0:08:36.940
<v Speaker 3>could happen. That is not just the bad guys coming

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 3>in and stealing stuff. So when we talk about things

0:08:40.740 --> 0:08:43.220
<v Speaker 3>within our world here, when I talk with our leadership

0:08:43.260 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 3>and I talk to our board, We break it out

0:08:45.220 --> 0:08:49.630
<v Speaker 3>into what we call operational or controllable administrative types of strength,

0:08:50.030 --> 0:08:52.310
<v Speaker 3>and then what we call the malicious. And another way

0:08:52.350 --> 0:08:54.070
<v Speaker 3>to look at that is might be like things we

0:08:54.110 --> 0:08:57.170
<v Speaker 3>do to ourself versus things people do to us. And

0:08:57.190 --> 0:08:59.730
<v Speaker 3>that's the way we tend to categorize that ratio.

0:08:59.790 --> 0:09:00.260
<v Speaker 4>And for us.

0:09:00.670 --> 0:09:02.530
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say this is for everybody at retail,

0:09:02.570 --> 0:09:05.580
<v Speaker 3>but for us, we're pretty good at controlling the operational

0:09:05.620 --> 0:09:08.380
<v Speaker 3>side of the business. So about 30 percent of our

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 3>shrink is falls into that operational administrative things we do

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>to ourself type of category. And then the balance of

0:09:15.340 --> 0:09:17.530
<v Speaker 3>it falls into more of the malicious side or things

0:09:17.570 --> 0:09:18.650
<v Speaker 3>that people do to us.

0:09:19.010 --> 0:09:21.450
<v Speaker 1>That's very helpful. And then one more question on this

0:09:21.710 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the broader category of retail theft. Do you have

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:31.740
<v Speaker 1>a split on how much happens in store versus somewhere else,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's one of the distribution center, warehouse, et cetera,

0:09:34.420 --> 0:09:35.929
<v Speaker 1>versus somewhere else on the supply chain?

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we actually break out our shrink in the

0:09:39.260 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>supply chain separately. Then we break out our shrink in

0:09:41.820 --> 0:09:44.340
<v Speaker 3>the retail environments versus the way we break out our

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.420
<v Speaker 3>shrink in our online environment. So we actually have three

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.550
<v Speaker 3>different buckets of where the shrink can happen that roll

0:09:50.630 --> 0:09:52.949
<v Speaker 3>up to our larger. Now, in the supply chain, you

0:09:52.970 --> 0:09:55.510
<v Speaker 3>can have operational, financial, and malicious shrink. In the stores,

0:09:55.530 --> 0:09:57.990
<v Speaker 3>you can have operational, financial, and malicious shrink. And online,

0:09:58.030 --> 0:09:59.270
<v Speaker 3>you can have operational, financial.

0:09:59.309 --> 0:09:59.929
<v Speaker 4>And malicious shrink.

0:10:00.030 --> 0:10:02.530
<v Speaker 3>So that all rolls up to the big number. But

0:10:02.590 --> 0:10:05.580
<v Speaker 3>the biggest chunk of it, to your point, does exist

0:10:05.620 --> 0:10:08.780
<v Speaker 3>in the 2,400 stores, retail stores that we have out there.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Got it.

0:10:09.860 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 2>So give us a sense of the overall shrink problem

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>versus how much of it is malicious, how much of

0:10:15.220 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it is operational across the industry. And is it true

0:10:18.500 --> 0:10:21.860
<v Speaker 2>that that retail theft has become more of an issue.

0:10:21.900 --> 0:10:24.780
<v Speaker 2>Because again, you see these statistics, you see the headlines

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:29.350
<v Speaker 2>target closing two stores because of rising crime, or you

0:10:29.390 --> 0:10:31.630
<v Speaker 2>see a company come out and say, oh, our shrink

0:10:31.670 --> 0:10:34.230
<v Speaker 2>has gone up this year. But to your point, it

0:10:34.309 --> 0:10:37.410
<v Speaker 2>could be because maybe they're just worse at keeping track

0:10:37.450 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>of their inventory than they were the year before. So

0:10:40.380 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 2>give us some context around how big a problem this

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.580
<v Speaker 2>is and whether or not it's been getting worse.

0:10:45.429 --> 0:10:49.330
<v Speaker 3>You're getting to probably the most debated question in retail

0:10:49.410 --> 0:10:53.500
<v Speaker 3>asset protection, loss prevention, which is... And I wish I

0:10:53.530 --> 0:10:56.540
<v Speaker 3>could give you a clean answer on that.

0:10:56.580 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 4>I can't. I can tell you... Maybe I'll start at

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 4>the top and say... How big is it? It's in

0:11:02.220 --> 0:11:02.740
<v Speaker 4>the billions.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>It's in the tens of billions. The shrink problem. There's

0:11:06.540 --> 0:11:10.380
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different estimates out there. Our cohorts, my peers,

0:11:10.470 --> 0:11:14.150
<v Speaker 3>my friends and peer retailers, we all talk about this.

0:11:14.210 --> 0:11:15.929
<v Speaker 4>We work with Rilo. We work with NRF.

0:11:15.970 --> 0:11:17.290
<v Speaker 3>We work with all to try to get the best

0:11:17.370 --> 0:11:21.620
<v Speaker 3>estimates on what this number is, but how people categorize shrink.

0:11:22.220 --> 0:11:26.380
<v Speaker 3>What somebody calls operational shrink versus administrative versus malicious can

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 3>vary by retailers. And so you've got the retail component of...

0:11:30.740 --> 0:11:33.860
<v Speaker 3>We are a retail accounting operation. There are companies that

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>are on cost accounting. And so making that transition between

0:11:37.070 --> 0:11:39.970
<v Speaker 3>the dollars and how do you include markup and to

0:11:40.010 --> 0:11:42.770
<v Speaker 3>get to a number, very, very complicated number.

0:11:42.809 --> 0:11:44.110
<v Speaker 4>What I can tell you is that.

0:11:45.010 --> 0:11:46.670
<v Speaker 3>There's these numbers that have been around as long as

0:11:46.710 --> 0:11:50.290
<v Speaker 3>I've been doing this in retail, which is like 40%

0:11:50.290 --> 0:11:53.500
<v Speaker 3>of shrink on the malicious side is done by associates

0:11:53.700 --> 0:11:54.699
<v Speaker 3>working for the company.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.380
<v Speaker 4>They cause 40% of your loss.

0:11:56.380 --> 0:12:01.050
<v Speaker 3>35% are people walking into your store and causing it.

0:12:01.140 --> 0:12:05.370
<v Speaker 3>And 20, 25, whatever the balance is, is that self-inflicted

0:12:05.490 --> 0:12:09.950
<v Speaker 3>operational administrative types of shrink. And so Those numbers add flow.

0:12:10.010 --> 0:12:12.710
<v Speaker 3>They go every year. There's surveys that are done. They

0:12:12.750 --> 0:12:14.250
<v Speaker 3>might go up a couple of percentage. They might go

0:12:14.270 --> 0:12:17.330
<v Speaker 3>down a couple of percentages. What I can speak to

0:12:17.929 --> 0:12:22.010
<v Speaker 3>is when I got here at Home Depot in 2018,

0:12:22.010 --> 0:12:24.050
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't even really a big believer in what you

0:12:24.070 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>would call the organized retail crime problem. Also pre-COVID, also

0:12:29.340 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 3>before Omni really took off and has blown up to

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>what it is here. Places where you can resell very impersonally.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Wait, what's Omni?

0:12:37.100 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Online.

0:12:37.580 --> 0:12:38.140
<v Speaker 4>Online sales.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:12:38.580 --> 0:12:39.459
<v Speaker 4>Omni Channel. Sorry.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.100
<v Speaker 3>But when you think about the kinetics of all that

0:12:43.140 --> 0:12:46.110
<v Speaker 3>and how that's changed over time, and I would tell

0:12:46.170 --> 0:12:49.390
<v Speaker 3>you that I have become a believer in one, organized

0:12:49.429 --> 0:12:50.790
<v Speaker 3>retail crime exists.

0:12:51.470 --> 0:12:54.970
<v Speaker 4>It's become more lucrative. It's become more pervasive. And it's

0:12:55.010 --> 0:12:55.910
<v Speaker 4>become more dangerous.

0:12:56.150 --> 0:12:58.310
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to how it impacts the customers and

0:12:58.330 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the associates in the stores. So while those numbers have

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 3>generally estimated stayed in the kind of same buckets, I

0:13:05.540 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>believe they're starting to drift up. And I also believe

0:13:08.860 --> 0:13:11.770
<v Speaker 3>since COVID, they've been underreported. And so I think that

0:13:11.790 --> 0:13:14.130
<v Speaker 3>there's a big piece of that, that it's just not

0:13:14.510 --> 0:13:17.710
<v Speaker 3>necessarily reflecting in all the numbers that you see showing

0:13:17.790 --> 0:13:21.250
<v Speaker 3>up in police reporting, FBI uniform crime reports, things of

0:13:21.290 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>that nature.

0:13:37.630 --> 0:13:40.589
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this is a good opportunity to sort of

0:13:40.730 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>dive into some details. But you said earlier in the

0:13:45.140 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>episode that you're more interested in the sort of more sophisticated,

0:13:49.740 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>organized drivers of shrink than perhaps a random person who

0:13:54.620 --> 0:13:58.010
<v Speaker 1>maybe they can't afford an item, etc. Can you talk

0:13:58.030 --> 0:14:03.190
<v Speaker 1>to us about in a given theft, etc., someone goes

0:14:03.250 --> 0:14:05.890
<v Speaker 1>into a store and they walk out or they take

0:14:05.910 --> 0:14:08.990
<v Speaker 1>something that they didn't pay for. What are the fingerprints

0:14:09.140 --> 0:14:11.949
<v Speaker 1>that look like, okay, this we have reason to believe

0:14:11.990 --> 0:14:16.790
<v Speaker 1>was part of something sophisticated and organized versus this is like, yeah,

0:14:16.830 --> 0:14:19.460
<v Speaker 1>we don't support that, but it's one random person and

0:14:19.500 --> 0:14:21.420
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be the main thing we prioritize.

0:14:21.820 --> 0:14:23.820
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you guys asked some great questions to get right

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.860
<v Speaker 3>into the details of how some of this becomes difficult.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.180
<v Speaker 4>So in an individual instance, it's almost impossible.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.450
<v Speaker 3>If you talk to somebody, if we have people in

0:14:34.490 --> 0:14:36.730
<v Speaker 3>our stores, their whole job is to stop theft. That's

0:14:36.790 --> 0:14:39.450
<v Speaker 3>what they do, that they detain people, they prosecute, they

0:14:39.790 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>work with the law enforcement, and they deal with that.

0:14:42.580 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 3>And then we have groups of people here in Atlanta

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>whose job is to handle the more sophisticated components of this.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:48.330
<v Speaker 4>Piece of it.

0:14:48.780 --> 0:14:51.420
<v Speaker 3>But it all starts locally. It all starts in the stores.

0:14:51.500 --> 0:14:54.110
<v Speaker 3>And so some of that is, hey, I see somebody

0:14:54.170 --> 0:14:57.270
<v Speaker 3>steal that drill. And you sit down and have a

0:14:57.310 --> 0:15:00.370
<v Speaker 3>conversation with that person before they end up going to jail.

0:15:00.990 --> 0:15:02.490
<v Speaker 3>And they were really using it to work on a

0:15:02.530 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 3>project on their deck on their house.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Whereas you might have.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:07.940
<v Speaker 3>That conversation with them and say, yeah, I was asked

0:15:07.980 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>to come in and steal this and I was going

0:15:09.460 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>to go take it to another place. And I was

0:15:11.660 --> 0:15:13.090
<v Speaker 3>going to get money for that or I was going

0:15:13.110 --> 0:15:14.530
<v Speaker 3>to get drugs for that or I was going to

0:15:14.550 --> 0:15:16.130
<v Speaker 3>get something and I was going to get given a

0:15:16.190 --> 0:15:18.190
<v Speaker 3>list to go to another store and go get something else.

0:15:18.730 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>And so we cultivate that intelligence. We cultivate those resources

0:15:22.060 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>and report that back to our folks here. who are

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.260
<v Speaker 3>organized retail crime experts and do this for a living,

0:15:27.340 --> 0:15:30.700
<v Speaker 3>most of whom are former federal law enforcement agents or

0:15:30.860 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement agents at state and local agencies. And their

0:15:33.540 --> 0:15:35.630
<v Speaker 3>job is to figure out which is the wheat and

0:15:35.650 --> 0:15:37.170
<v Speaker 3>which is the chaff and what are the things that

0:15:37.190 --> 0:15:38.910
<v Speaker 3>are the most important thing for us to go. So

0:15:39.330 --> 0:15:41.650
<v Speaker 3>we have video analytics, we have other technologies that we

0:15:41.690 --> 0:15:44.250
<v Speaker 3>work on to kind of say, okay, Now, I know

0:15:44.290 --> 0:15:44.950
<v Speaker 3>this person.

0:15:45.010 --> 0:15:46.790
<v Speaker 4>I know this car. I know this vehicle.

0:15:46.850 --> 0:15:48.650
<v Speaker 3>I've seen them in store A. Now, I've seen them

0:15:48.700 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>in store B. We've got a report from that building

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:56.260
<v Speaker 3>that says Johnny with driver's license 123456 has been in

0:15:56.300 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 3>now four stores apprehended for theft because... they're going to

0:15:59.300 --> 0:16:01.450
<v Speaker 3>get apprehended. They might be put in jail and they'll

0:16:01.470 --> 0:16:03.110
<v Speaker 3>be out the next day. You know, they're going to

0:16:03.310 --> 0:16:05.030
<v Speaker 3>make bail or there's going to be no cash bail

0:16:05.050 --> 0:16:06.550
<v Speaker 3>or whatever the case may be. And they're just going

0:16:06.570 --> 0:16:08.090
<v Speaker 3>to go back to doing what they're doing. And so

0:16:08.450 --> 0:16:11.270
<v Speaker 3>that's how we try to like stitch these cases together

0:16:11.290 --> 0:16:13.390
<v Speaker 3>and understand which ones are the ones that are more

0:16:13.910 --> 0:16:16.780
<v Speaker 3>valuable to pull on versus the ones that are like,

0:16:17.060 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 3>this is really a one-time occurrence and this is not

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.550
<v Speaker 3>something that we need to spend a lot of resources on.

0:16:20.700 --> 0:16:23.020
<v Speaker 2>To what degree do you actually work with the police?

0:16:23.140 --> 0:16:26.100
<v Speaker 2>Because when you talk about, well, we observe these people

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.010
<v Speaker 2>going to different stores and we try to see if

0:16:29.030 --> 0:16:33.830
<v Speaker 2>we can identify patterns and stitch the sort of ring together.

0:16:33.850 --> 0:16:36.030
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like something the police should be doing.

0:16:36.590 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it's hard enough to get the police to show up.

0:16:38.470 --> 0:16:40.650
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not blaming in this case. I mean, we

0:16:40.700 --> 0:16:44.140
<v Speaker 3>know that police departments are under-resourced, stretched very thin. When

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:49.820
<v Speaker 3>you talk about retail theft versus robbery versus carjacking versus

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.780
<v Speaker 3>murder and the escalation hierarchy, where are they going to

0:16:52.820 --> 0:16:54.900
<v Speaker 3>spend their time right so they're they're not going to

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>always be able to have the capability to come to

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.739
<v Speaker 3>our store and deal with this so i would tell

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.370
<v Speaker 3>you our i'll call it our internal behind the scenes

0:17:02.420 --> 0:17:04.210
<v Speaker 3>as we our job is to do the work for

0:17:04.250 --> 0:17:06.790
<v Speaker 3>them our job is to hand them a case file

0:17:06.830 --> 0:17:10.450
<v Speaker 3>that is 80 complete that says i've given you everything

0:17:10.470 --> 0:17:12.510
<v Speaker 3>that i can possibly do for you to then walk

0:17:12.570 --> 0:17:15.410
<v Speaker 3>into a judge get a search warrant get an arrest

0:17:15.470 --> 0:17:18.750
<v Speaker 3>warrant do everything that i can't do and i they're

0:17:18.770 --> 0:17:20.929
<v Speaker 3>going to respect that. They're going to say, if I

0:17:20.950 --> 0:17:22.340
<v Speaker 3>don't have to do all the hard work, I don't

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.740
<v Speaker 3>have to do all the behind-the-scenes labor, and all I've

0:17:24.780 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>got to do is walk in front of a judge

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>and say, this is a great case, and we believe

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 3>everything that's here, and put their hand up and swear

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 3>on the Bible, then they're going to take those cases

0:17:34.030 --> 0:17:37.470
<v Speaker 3>much more regularly than somebody that's kind of saying, hey,

0:17:37.810 --> 0:17:38.929
<v Speaker 3>you just go figure it out for me.

0:17:39.210 --> 0:17:41.610
<v Speaker 2>Just one more question on this. Is it true that

0:17:41.770 --> 0:17:48.149
<v Speaker 2>some retailers... will not stop shoplifting until they observe the

0:17:48.190 --> 0:17:52.590
<v Speaker 2>shoplifter getting to a certain threshold of goods stolen, because

0:17:52.630 --> 0:17:55.310
<v Speaker 2>then they can go for like an actual meaningful charge.

0:17:55.590 --> 0:17:57.770
<v Speaker 3>You know, I would be hard pressed to speak to

0:17:57.810 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 3>that for what the policies of some of my compatriots

0:18:01.460 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 3>are there. But what I would say is, is we

0:18:03.420 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 3>don't do that. When people say that, I feel like

0:18:06.340 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 3>they're kind of looking at things in a very narrow scope.

0:18:09.980 --> 0:18:12.550
<v Speaker 3>And going back to our point earlier, this may be

0:18:12.609 --> 0:18:16.190
<v Speaker 3>something where we're already working on this person. We know

0:18:16.230 --> 0:18:19.369
<v Speaker 3>they've been in 50 stores over the last 30 days

0:18:19.430 --> 0:18:21.869
<v Speaker 3>stealing from us. And if they walk out the door,

0:18:21.890 --> 0:18:23.860
<v Speaker 3>it may be because we're going to go watch them

0:18:23.890 --> 0:18:25.580
<v Speaker 3>go to where the fence is or where they're going

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to resell the product or where they're storing the product.

0:18:28.300 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 3>That might be part of an operation versus a, hey,

0:18:30.700 --> 0:18:33.260
<v Speaker 3>we're letting you go get to a threshold. And that's

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.290
<v Speaker 3>really what, you know, at least from our end, we're

0:18:35.310 --> 0:18:37.390
<v Speaker 3>not trying to like build up big charges on people.

0:18:37.430 --> 0:18:39.369
<v Speaker 3>We're trying to say, I want to get the complete

0:18:39.410 --> 0:18:41.980
<v Speaker 3>picture of what's happening, because when I wrap this up,

0:18:42.250 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I want it to be completely wrapped up.

0:18:44.030 --> 0:18:46.830
<v Speaker 1>Intuitively, it seems like it would probably be pretty hard

0:18:46.910 --> 0:18:51.780
<v Speaker 1>to prevent someone from like stealing a... a washer, like

0:18:51.820 --> 0:18:53.780
<v Speaker 1>the little disc or something like that, you know, like

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>put it in your jeans pockets or whatever. It seems

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:01.939
<v Speaker 1>like technology should make it very hard intuitively to steal

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a power drill because I imagine you could put tags

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.780
<v Speaker 1>on it that would set off alarms, that you could

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:13.179
<v Speaker 1>have video surveillance that could simply set off something if

0:19:13.220 --> 0:19:16.449
<v Speaker 1>a person was in one aisle, trigger. I have to

0:19:16.470 --> 0:19:18.750
<v Speaker 1>imagine it's not that hard to train a model to

0:19:19.150 --> 0:19:21.850
<v Speaker 1>identify someone, take it off the shelf, and then that

0:19:21.910 --> 0:19:25.150
<v Speaker 1>person makes a route out the store without ever having

0:19:25.450 --> 0:19:30.260
<v Speaker 1>gone to the register. This seems solvable by technology alone.

0:19:30.380 --> 0:19:34.300
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it? What is it makes such that, A,

0:19:34.500 --> 0:19:37.020
<v Speaker 1>it must still happen all the time, or B, It

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>only gets stopped if a person at the end happens

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:39.710
<v Speaker 1>to notice it.

0:19:40.420 --> 0:19:43.210
<v Speaker 3>I love your thought process. That is a really expensive

0:19:43.230 --> 0:19:43.890
<v Speaker 3>thought process.

0:19:43.930 --> 0:19:44.770
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:19:44.790 --> 0:19:46.830
<v Speaker 3>And you think about a Home Depot store, 140,000 square

0:19:46.869 --> 0:19:52.510
<v Speaker 3>feet of a working warehouse. to put the cameras that

0:19:52.550 --> 0:19:54.869
<v Speaker 3>I would need to do that. And by the way,

0:19:55.270 --> 0:19:57.630
<v Speaker 3>there are places where we do that. There are places,

0:19:57.690 --> 0:19:59.820
<v Speaker 3>you know, in some aisles we're able to do that,

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:01.780
<v Speaker 3>but we have a lot of valuable stuff in our stores,

0:20:02.170 --> 0:20:03.940
<v Speaker 3>in different parts of the store. At the front end,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.580
<v Speaker 3>we have AI, you know, base cameras and We have

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.239
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different, I would say, video analytics that

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.449
<v Speaker 3>are continuing to evolve and we're really leaning into. But

0:20:12.490 --> 0:20:14.889
<v Speaker 3>it is expensive and it's a lot of processing power.

0:20:14.910 --> 0:20:16.250
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot of hardware that you have to put

0:20:16.290 --> 0:20:19.570
<v Speaker 3>into your stores. We have some advantages with our scale

0:20:19.609 --> 0:20:21.149
<v Speaker 3>and our size to be able to do some of that.

0:20:21.290 --> 0:20:24.590
<v Speaker 3>Not everybody does, and certainly not everybody has. Sometimes it's

0:20:24.609 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a tradeoff, like how much are

0:20:26.420 --> 0:20:28.780
<v Speaker 3>you willing to take and shrink versus how much you

0:20:28.820 --> 0:20:32.820
<v Speaker 3>would have to invest in hardware, capital expense, operating expenses

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>to be able to put it to zero. I mean,

0:20:35.180 --> 0:20:38.010
<v Speaker 3>the number we aspire to is zero. The number we'll

0:20:38.030 --> 0:20:39.969
<v Speaker 3>get to is somewhere north of that.

0:20:40.230 --> 0:20:42.710
<v Speaker 1>But just like, what about tags and stuff that are,

0:20:42.790 --> 0:20:45.810
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are clothing items in many stores that

0:20:45.850 --> 0:20:49.139
<v Speaker 1>have tags that will set off an alarm. Why at

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.500
<v Speaker 1>a level of a power drill, is that an insufficient

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.500
<v Speaker 1>technology to get the number to zero?

0:20:55.290 --> 0:20:58.750
<v Speaker 3>It's not insufficient. We've played around in the bricking of

0:20:58.850 --> 0:21:02.690
<v Speaker 3>product space. When you think about the margins in some

0:21:02.730 --> 0:21:05.109
<v Speaker 3>of these places, does it make sense to do it,

0:21:05.190 --> 0:21:08.820
<v Speaker 3>to go have to redefine your entire production line for

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:13.700
<v Speaker 3>a Milwaukee drill in order to insert a technology, a

0:21:13.740 --> 0:21:15.420
<v Speaker 3>Bluetooth chip of some sort?

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.100
<v Speaker 4>We've tried that. It's very, very hard to scale up.

0:21:19.310 --> 0:21:21.290
<v Speaker 3>And again, you still have to put hardware in your

0:21:21.330 --> 0:21:23.770
<v Speaker 3>stores to be able to detect those tags. that that's

0:21:23.810 --> 0:21:26.889
<v Speaker 3>the piece that typically is very expensive. Again, none of

0:21:26.910 --> 0:21:30.179
<v Speaker 3>this is impossible. It's just like there's always trade-offs and

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:31.420
<v Speaker 3>you're working towards that.

0:21:31.940 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 4>It's going to take some time.

0:21:32.780 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, to be honest with you, RFID has a

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.730
<v Speaker 3>lot of promise in terms of tracking, not just the

0:21:38.790 --> 0:21:41.149
<v Speaker 3>theft side of product, but like, Where is this product

0:21:41.190 --> 0:21:41.609
<v Speaker 3>in the store?

0:21:41.630 --> 0:21:42.429
<v Speaker 4>Has it been sold?

0:21:42.750 --> 0:21:44.730
<v Speaker 3>What's the replenishment look like? How do you get your

0:21:44.790 --> 0:21:48.730
<v Speaker 3>on-hands corrected? There's a ton of business opportunities on those pieces,

0:21:48.770 --> 0:21:52.170
<v Speaker 3>but I think that RFID hardware costs have always been

0:21:52.210 --> 0:21:54.899
<v Speaker 3>so expensive, it's almost impossible to put it in a

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.900
<v Speaker 3>Home Depot store where we have eight separate entrances.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 4>In and out of our building.

0:21:58.940 --> 0:22:01.379
<v Speaker 2>How much of this is a liability issue in the

0:22:01.420 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 2>sense that, okay, I can tag an item and I

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 2>can hear an alarm ring if someone is going out

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.300
<v Speaker 2>with it without paying, but... There's still an issue over

0:22:10.340 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>whether or not you want your employees, even your security guards,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.370
<v Speaker 2>going after people who might actually fight back and be dangerous.

0:22:17.410 --> 0:22:20.619
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure we've all seen, you especially, Scott. the

0:22:20.859 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>videos of some guy who just fills a massive shopping

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.660
<v Speaker 2>cart and walks out of the store with the security

0:22:27.700 --> 0:22:28.899
<v Speaker 2>staff looking on.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.899
<v Speaker 3>It's the bigger issue than the financial, right? Like at

0:22:31.940 --> 0:22:34.470
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, there's a certain level of,

0:22:34.660 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 3>we understand there's going to be some shrink in our stores.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 3>There's a certain cost of doing business. When you open

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:40.820
<v Speaker 3>up to the public, you're going to have some of this,

0:22:41.220 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 3>this type of pieces of it. But this is the

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>problem specifically with the organized retail crime folks, the professional

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.990
<v Speaker 3>criminals who, A lot of times they're using homeless folks,

0:22:52.270 --> 0:22:56.169
<v Speaker 3>addicted folks, people that are maybe on the down and

0:22:56.250 --> 0:23:00.409
<v Speaker 3>down low, and they are monetizing them to go in

0:23:00.430 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 3>and do this. And their only thought process is, I'm

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>leaving with this product because I need to get my money.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 3>I need to get my whatever. And they will do

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>violent things. And they have done violent things. And not

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.859
<v Speaker 3>only has it happened in retail, it's happened specifically to us.

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.939
<v Speaker 3>And we've actually had people injured. We've had people killed

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 3>in our stores in these types of incidents where that

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 3>is just– we're not going to allow that. So our

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.899
<v Speaker 3>security folks, our asset protection people in stores– They're trained.

0:23:29.109 --> 0:23:31.510
<v Speaker 3>They're trained not only on how to do what they do,

0:23:31.570 --> 0:23:34.870
<v Speaker 3>but also how to de-escalate, how to observe and pull

0:23:34.930 --> 0:23:37.649
<v Speaker 3>away from those situations when they start there. But we

0:23:37.670 --> 0:23:41.850
<v Speaker 3>also have 400,000 store associates who are very passionate. They

0:23:41.869 --> 0:23:44.330
<v Speaker 3>don't like to see stuff stolen. And we train them

0:23:44.410 --> 0:23:47.030
<v Speaker 3>very clearly on like, you don't get involved with these things.

0:23:47.070 --> 0:23:49.170
<v Speaker 3>You back away and we do give them the same,

0:23:49.369 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, a slightly different, but still de-escalation type training.

0:23:53.380 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Because that's the problem. I'll trade the shrink for the

0:23:56.340 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>safety of the people every day of the week. And

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:00.939
<v Speaker 3>my leadership team and our board would back us on

0:24:00.980 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 3>those decisions all day long. We're never, ever going to

0:24:03.580 --> 0:24:06.020
<v Speaker 3>put people in jeopardy. Our associates and our customers are

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the number one priority.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.990
<v Speaker 1>I've been hearing, we've been hearing about RFID tags. For

0:24:11.990 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>25 years now, I would have assumed that the price

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of this hardware would have come down dramatically such that

0:24:20.740 --> 0:24:24.300
<v Speaker 1>you slap a little tag on and it's not very

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.290
<v Speaker 1>easy to remove. And then by the time you go

0:24:26.310 --> 0:24:29.250
<v Speaker 1>through some gate or entrance, it sets off an alarm.

0:24:29.590 --> 0:24:33.609
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about why in 2026 that technology is

0:24:33.670 --> 0:24:36.100
<v Speaker 1>still actually expensive and hard to scale?

0:24:36.660 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 4>No, I can't.

0:24:37.740 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand it. It's your lips to God's ears, right?

0:24:41.020 --> 0:24:43.510
<v Speaker 3>Like it's one of those things where I'm with you.

0:24:43.570 --> 0:24:47.010
<v Speaker 3>And I will say a Home Depot environment, a little different.

0:24:47.350 --> 0:24:50.610
<v Speaker 3>We are a hardware store with basically a Faraday cage

0:24:50.710 --> 0:24:55.530
<v Speaker 3>of steel throughout our stores. We do a passive RFID

0:24:55.550 --> 0:24:57.750
<v Speaker 3>does not work in our stores. You have to go

0:24:58.090 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 3>to an active store. pinging RFID technology. We've tested it.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.659
<v Speaker 3>We know it can work. Again, it's all about typically those.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.060
<v Speaker 1>But can you just explain that it does not work

0:25:09.100 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in your stores? Actually, I don't know anything about this.

0:25:11.180 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Can you clarify that?

0:25:12.109 --> 0:25:12.830
<v Speaker 4>It's difficult.

0:25:12.869 --> 0:25:15.929
<v Speaker 3>The signals are blocked by the steel. That's typically the

0:25:15.970 --> 0:25:19.189
<v Speaker 3>way it works in our stores. It's more passive technology

0:25:19.230 --> 0:25:22.230
<v Speaker 3>like that. There is an active version of RFID.

0:25:21.770 --> 0:25:22.290
<v Speaker 4>That's out there.

0:25:22.690 --> 0:25:25.450
<v Speaker 3>But again, it's typically... And it's not like they're not

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.300
<v Speaker 3>coming down. I mean, tag costs are nil at this point.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 3>That's not really the issue. It is truly the hardware

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.100
<v Speaker 3>capabilities to be able to put it everywhere you want,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.460
<v Speaker 3>to be able to read the way you want it to.

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 3>It's still a very expensive technology to this point. Three

0:25:40.580 --> 0:25:41.220
<v Speaker 3>years from now.

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Who knows?

0:25:42.619 --> 0:25:45.530
<v Speaker 2>So why don't we talk about what happens after the

0:25:45.890 --> 0:25:49.270
<v Speaker 2>goods get out of the retail environment? And maybe we

0:25:49.290 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 2>should talk about the distribution environment at some point, too.

0:25:51.540 --> 0:25:51.700
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:52.430 --> 0:25:54.500
<v Speaker 2>What is fencing? Not the sport.

0:25:54.540 --> 0:25:57.900
<v Speaker 3>So again, I kind of mentioned what we call the boosters.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>And we're specifically now talking about organized retail crime. Boosters

0:26:01.940 --> 0:26:05.780
<v Speaker 3>are the people that do the stealing. Typically, they are recruited.

0:26:06.140 --> 0:26:08.590
<v Speaker 3>They are given a list. They are given money. They

0:26:08.609 --> 0:26:11.669
<v Speaker 3>are given, in many cases, drugs or the promise of

0:26:11.730 --> 0:26:14.550
<v Speaker 3>drugs to when they come back with the product, which

0:26:14.609 --> 0:26:15.909
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the hook to make sure that they

0:26:15.950 --> 0:26:19.129
<v Speaker 3>don't just walk away with the product. And their money.

0:26:19.150 --> 0:26:20.730
<v Speaker 3>And these folks are the ones that go out and

0:26:20.790 --> 0:26:22.590
<v Speaker 3>they take the risk. They pull the product out of

0:26:22.609 --> 0:26:24.850
<v Speaker 3>the stores and they do it. Like I said, they

0:26:24.869 --> 0:26:27.429
<v Speaker 3>can be very aggressive. They could be very violent in

0:26:27.470 --> 0:26:30.020
<v Speaker 3>many cases. And all they're thinking about is how do

0:26:30.060 --> 0:26:31.619
<v Speaker 3>I get out of this building and go to where

0:26:31.660 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm supposed to go? And they take it to what

0:26:34.900 --> 0:26:37.300
<v Speaker 3>we call the fence. The fence is kind of the

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.770
<v Speaker 3>consolidator of the product. So this could be somebody's house

0:26:40.830 --> 0:26:43.790
<v Speaker 3>in their garage. This could be a warehouse facility. This

0:26:43.810 --> 0:26:44.790
<v Speaker 3>could be a flea market.

0:26:44.830 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 4>This could be you name it.

0:26:46.790 --> 0:26:49.330
<v Speaker 3>I'll get back to it. There's another interesting twist on

0:26:49.390 --> 0:26:51.190
<v Speaker 3>this piece of it that I'll get back to what

0:26:51.230 --> 0:26:54.210
<v Speaker 3>the boosters are doing and fences are doing here. But

0:26:54.250 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 3>then these fences are the folks that actually clean the

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 3>product and then offer the product for resale. So when

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.380
<v Speaker 3>I say clean it, to your point, some of these

0:27:02.420 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 3>have electronic tags on them. They might have identifying, this

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.409
<v Speaker 3>is a product that's sold at Home Depot. This is

0:27:07.430 --> 0:27:09.590
<v Speaker 3>a product that's sold at Target. This is a product

0:27:09.630 --> 0:27:12.690
<v Speaker 3>sold at CVS. Stickers, identifying, price tags, things like that.

0:27:12.970 --> 0:27:15.510
<v Speaker 3>They want to clean all that product. And then they'll

0:27:15.630 --> 0:27:20.550
<v Speaker 3>offer it for sale somewhere. More and more since late teens,

0:27:20.609 --> 0:27:24.250
<v Speaker 3>early 20s, that's online. In the past, I would say

0:27:24.270 --> 0:27:26.350
<v Speaker 3>it was some of the bigger online folks, the Amazons

0:27:26.390 --> 0:27:28.409
<v Speaker 3>of the world, the Ebays of the world, the bigger places.

0:27:29.090 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Since the Informed Consumers Act was passed in 2023, I

0:27:32.890 --> 0:27:35.460
<v Speaker 3>believe is when it came effective. we've seen less of

0:27:35.500 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that on the bigger places. And now it's moved to

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 3>more of the peer-to-peer markets. So the Craigslist, the Facebook

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.859
<v Speaker 3>marketplaces of the world, that's where a lot of that

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>product is then offered for sale. And so that's the

0:27:46.660 --> 0:27:49.619
<v Speaker 3>fencing operation. And then the money is then kicked up

0:27:49.859 --> 0:27:52.100
<v Speaker 3>to wherever, or at least a portion of it, just

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>like your traditional organized crime. It's kicked up to some

0:27:56.420 --> 0:28:00.250
<v Speaker 3>bosses that are managing this whole operation from the top.

0:28:00.690 --> 0:28:03.550
<v Speaker 3>And whether that's a Five guys that are sitting in

0:28:03.570 --> 0:28:05.970
<v Speaker 3>an apartment or a house that just kind of decided

0:28:05.990 --> 0:28:09.130
<v Speaker 3>that they want to be organized retail criminals certainly fits

0:28:09.170 --> 0:28:11.500
<v Speaker 3>the definition of all those types of things. And they're

0:28:11.580 --> 0:28:15.820
<v Speaker 3>using the money to furnish a lifestyle or a cartel

0:28:15.940 --> 0:28:19.590
<v Speaker 3>or a Chinese transnational gang or a South American whatever.

0:28:20.090 --> 0:28:21.810
<v Speaker 3>That could be any of those people that are the

0:28:21.890 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 3>ones that are sitting at that top level. supervising the fences,

0:28:25.740 --> 0:28:27.940
<v Speaker 3>making sure that the product's getting moved and making sure

0:28:27.980 --> 0:28:28.859
<v Speaker 3>that the money's coming in.

0:28:29.220 --> 0:28:32.300
<v Speaker 1>So I've heard, you know, there have been stories about

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Marketplace and frustration that Facebook hasn't done more. I'm

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.950
<v Speaker 1>not sure what the status of that, you know, if

0:28:39.990 --> 0:28:44.250
<v Speaker 1>you see for sale on Facebook Marketplace, like a 10

0:28:44.250 --> 0:28:47.970
<v Speaker 1>pack of unopened Hanes t-shirts or something like that, There

0:28:48.010 --> 0:28:50.570
<v Speaker 1>might be legitimate reason to think that this was stolen.

0:28:50.970 --> 0:28:53.790
<v Speaker 1>It could also be a legitimate sale. Someone bought T-shirts

0:28:53.850 --> 0:28:56.670
<v Speaker 1>and they never wore them like it's plausible. What is

0:28:56.730 --> 0:29:02.410
<v Speaker 1>the optimal role for an owner of a peer-to-peer platform

0:29:02.770 --> 0:29:05.690
<v Speaker 1>to play? And then what do you perceive right now

0:29:05.790 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is the gap between what would be a sort of

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like optimal role for them and contribution to fighting this

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>versus what they're doing right now?

0:29:13.610 --> 0:29:17.150
<v Speaker 3>The short answer is it's very expensive to patrol your platform,

0:29:17.430 --> 0:29:19.570
<v Speaker 3>to know your seller, to make sure that you really

0:29:19.610 --> 0:29:21.930
<v Speaker 3>understand that they're a legitimate business and that they're a

0:29:21.930 --> 0:29:26.130
<v Speaker 3>legitimate reseller. In form, the federal bill that was passed

0:29:26.350 --> 0:29:33.130
<v Speaker 3>earlier required the traditional marketplaces to actually do that, take

0:29:33.170 --> 0:29:35.950
<v Speaker 3>that step and make sure that they did. Just like

0:29:36.010 --> 0:29:37.810
<v Speaker 3>I have to know who my suppliers are here at

0:29:37.830 --> 0:29:40.270
<v Speaker 3>Home Depot, they had to know who their suppliers are

0:29:40.290 --> 0:29:43.030
<v Speaker 3>at the Amazons and the Ebays of the world. There

0:29:43.050 --> 0:29:45.550
<v Speaker 3>was a loophole in that bill that did not cover

0:29:45.590 --> 0:29:49.770
<v Speaker 3>the peer-to-peer resellers. Can't explain why it happened, just it happened.

0:29:50.130 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 3>And so that loophole has continued to exist for it.

0:29:53.810 --> 0:29:55.870
<v Speaker 3>And they're not going to put the governance in to

0:29:55.910 --> 0:29:57.990
<v Speaker 3>do it unless they're forced to, just like the bigger

0:29:58.030 --> 0:30:02.020
<v Speaker 3>boxes didn't have to before InForm. And so we spend

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time governing those marketplaces. So we have

0:30:06.340 --> 0:30:09.700
<v Speaker 3>technologies that are looking at that and say... If Home

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.430
<v Speaker 3>Depot sells this combination drill kit for $ 499, how in

0:30:13.810 --> 0:30:19.130
<v Speaker 3>the heck is Tommy1234 selling it for $ 200 at volume?

0:30:20.010 --> 0:30:22.030
<v Speaker 3>How can he sell new in-box product at a price

0:30:22.070 --> 0:30:24.870
<v Speaker 3>lower than my cost? And so we will look for

0:30:24.890 --> 0:30:26.550
<v Speaker 3>that type of stuff. And that's where a lot of

0:30:26.610 --> 0:30:29.790
<v Speaker 3>our investigations also will start. We'll actually start on the

0:30:29.830 --> 0:30:32.690
<v Speaker 3>marketplace and work backwards to the person coming into the store,

0:30:33.150 --> 0:30:35.020
<v Speaker 3>going back to kind of our earlier discussion.

0:30:35.540 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 4>But it's whack-a-mole to a certain degree, right?

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're really patrolling millions and millions of sellers

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.820
<v Speaker 3>that are out there. So we build criterias. We build

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.460
<v Speaker 3>models that kind of look and say, boy, this person

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 3>sells a lot of drills. This person sells a lot

0:30:48.500 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 3>of drills new in box. This person sells a lot

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.330
<v Speaker 3>of drills new in box under our cost for the product.

0:30:53.370 --> 0:30:55.930
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of the way we tend to do that.

0:30:56.010 --> 0:30:58.450
<v Speaker 3>But it's an uphill climb. It's a big battle.

0:31:14.380 --> 0:31:16.860
<v Speaker 2>This might be a very niche question, but do you

0:31:17.100 --> 0:31:20.460
<v Speaker 2>observe any interesting trends when it comes to the prices

0:31:20.500 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 2>that fences are actually choosing for these items? Because they could,

0:31:23.980 --> 0:31:25.420
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you have something new in a box,

0:31:25.460 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you could maybe try to charge almost full price for

0:31:28.980 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a power drill or something. Or you see them with

0:31:32.540 --> 0:31:34.820
<v Speaker 2>like massive discounts as well, and they're leaving money on

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the table.

0:31:35.740 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't tell you that I've done a lot of

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.620
<v Speaker 3>research into what the specifics are. What the general consensus is,

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.470
<v Speaker 3>the more technology-laden the product is, the more it sells

0:31:46.550 --> 0:31:51.310
<v Speaker 3>closer to retail. That plus gift cards. Gift cards tend

0:31:51.350 --> 0:31:54.610
<v Speaker 3>to sell very close to retail. So we see a

0:31:54.650 --> 0:31:57.580
<v Speaker 3>lot of our products selling in the 70% to 80%

0:31:57.580 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 3>of retail range. Whereas in some cases, you'd think about

0:32:00.940 --> 0:32:04.220
<v Speaker 3>the deodorants and the t-shirts and the The Tylenol and

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 3>some of that tends to be in the 30 to

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.830
<v Speaker 3>40 cents per of retail market. So there's some broad

0:32:09.930 --> 0:32:11.630
<v Speaker 3>strokes on that. But honestly, I don't spend a ton

0:32:11.670 --> 0:32:13.790
<v Speaker 3>of time doing that. Just it tends to be like

0:32:13.830 --> 0:32:16.950
<v Speaker 3>if it's Internet connected, it sells very, very close to retail.

0:32:17.110 --> 0:32:20.850
<v Speaker 3>If it's technology driven, it's got some resale capability to it.

0:32:21.170 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Efficient markets finding the right price of anything on any platform.

0:32:24.860 --> 0:32:27.900
<v Speaker 1>So you talk about this loophole in the law that

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed the peer to peer sellers. What would be that

0:32:30.900 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>additional step? okay, if they were to close this loophole,

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.310
<v Speaker 1>what would they then be required to do? And are

0:32:37.350 --> 0:32:42.250
<v Speaker 1>you either surprised or disappointed given, I mean, a company

0:32:42.290 --> 0:32:46.030
<v Speaker 1>like Meta is gigantic. Are you either, would you have

0:32:46.070 --> 0:32:49.020
<v Speaker 1>been surprised or a little disappointed that they would not

0:32:49.100 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>feel the impulse to do this voluntarily without being required

0:32:52.820 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>by law?

0:32:53.460 --> 0:32:55.580
<v Speaker 3>They'll tell you that they do a lot of policing

0:32:55.620 --> 0:32:59.410
<v Speaker 3>of their site. And I'm not arguing that they don't have...

0:32:59.610 --> 0:33:01.010
<v Speaker 3>I know they have departments that do that.

0:33:01.030 --> 0:33:01.590
<v Speaker 4>We work with them.

0:33:01.690 --> 0:33:04.450
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so they're not completely willfully blind. They're not

0:33:04.850 --> 0:33:07.030
<v Speaker 3>completely out there just saying, no, it doesn't happen on

0:33:07.070 --> 0:33:10.130
<v Speaker 3>our site. We think they could do more. And again,

0:33:10.170 --> 0:33:13.260
<v Speaker 3>it comes back to if they had information, if they

0:33:13.300 --> 0:33:17.260
<v Speaker 3>had policing in place that said, how in the world

0:33:17.300 --> 0:33:20.460
<v Speaker 3>does this guy undercut Home Depot or Target on pricing?

0:33:21.290 --> 0:33:22.810
<v Speaker 3>That should be a flag for them to say, I'm

0:33:23.130 --> 0:33:24.750
<v Speaker 3>going to pull you off the site. I'm going to

0:33:24.790 --> 0:33:28.170
<v Speaker 3>suspend you from the site versus us having to come

0:33:28.190 --> 0:33:31.530
<v Speaker 3>to them and say, this guy is undercutting us on pricing.

0:33:31.750 --> 0:33:34.930
<v Speaker 3>He's selling at volume. He's selling at scale. We've bought

0:33:34.950 --> 0:33:37.390
<v Speaker 3>the product for it. We know what store it came from.

0:33:37.930 --> 0:33:39.650
<v Speaker 3>We know that this guy's involved in crime.

0:33:40.170 --> 0:33:41.470
<v Speaker 4>Now you go pull them off the site.

0:33:41.970 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 3>And so your answer is both disappointed and surprised.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:47.820
<v Speaker 4>Do I think they could be doing more? For sure.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Do I think that I should be the one that

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 3>has to come? It seems a little backwards to me

0:33:51.140 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 3>that I should have to come and tell them that

0:33:52.340 --> 0:33:55.340
<v Speaker 3>they've got somebody selling stolen product on their site versus

0:33:55.380 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 3>them knowing who their suppliers are, knowing that tax records

0:33:59.330 --> 0:34:02.310
<v Speaker 3>exist and that there's filings that are out there that

0:34:02.350 --> 0:34:04.590
<v Speaker 3>they should be held accountable to the same way the

0:34:04.670 --> 0:34:06.050
<v Speaker 3>Amazons and the Ebays of the world are.

0:34:06.290 --> 0:34:09.150
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little bit more about the balance

0:34:09.230 --> 0:34:13.580
<v Speaker 2>between trying to shrink the shrink in various ways and

0:34:13.660 --> 0:34:18.950
<v Speaker 2>customer experience. Because again, we've all experienced the frustration of

0:34:19.010 --> 0:34:22.830
<v Speaker 2>going into, usually it's a drugstore of some kind and

0:34:22.989 --> 0:34:26.150
<v Speaker 2>hitting the plastic wall and having to press the button

0:34:26.230 --> 0:34:28.510
<v Speaker 2>and wait for someone to come and then You're standing

0:34:28.530 --> 0:34:30.330
<v Speaker 2>there for 10 minutes and then they don't have the

0:34:30.370 --> 0:34:32.770
<v Speaker 2>right key. And sorry, this happened to me recently.

0:34:32.870 --> 0:34:37.219
<v Speaker 1>No, keep going on. So they don't have the right key.

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.540
<v Speaker 3>I get a few of those emails every week from

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 3>our from our leadership. So I got to.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 2>But stores, some stores have clearly made the decision that

0:34:44.620 --> 0:34:46.810
<v Speaker 2>it's worth it to them economically to do this.

0:34:47.290 --> 0:34:50.890
<v Speaker 3>We have. It is not an easy conversation with your merchants.

0:34:50.950 --> 0:34:53.770
<v Speaker 3>It's not an easy conversation with your operators. It's a

0:34:53.810 --> 0:34:59.529
<v Speaker 3>very arduous data-driven discussion. And so I can think back

0:34:59.570 --> 0:35:03.370
<v Speaker 3>when I got here in 2018, middle of 2018, and

0:35:03.950 --> 0:35:06.450
<v Speaker 3>we were on a trajectory of shrink that was not good.

0:35:06.690 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 3>It was going way the wrong way at that point.

0:35:10.219 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 3>And we started to have some of these conversations. But

0:35:12.980 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm a data guy and I'm a test and learn guy.

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 3>I like to have my facts. And so we did

0:35:17.860 --> 0:35:18.470
<v Speaker 3>some testing.

0:35:18.510 --> 0:35:18.969
<v Speaker 4>We did this.

0:35:19.330 --> 0:35:21.590
<v Speaker 3>We did a lot of looking into what products we

0:35:21.630 --> 0:35:25.730
<v Speaker 3>were losing very, very specifically under the microscope. We found

0:35:25.770 --> 0:35:30.100
<v Speaker 3>that one particular combination of kit that we were selling

0:35:30.140 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 3>for $ 799, we would buy it 4.2 times for every

0:35:34.580 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 3>time we sell it.

0:35:35.460 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:35:35.980 --> 0:35:39.049
<v Speaker 3>Now, go have that conversation with your finance folks. And

0:35:39.090 --> 0:35:41.690
<v Speaker 3>they go, that's a gross margin mix we don't like.

0:35:41.710 --> 0:35:45.670
<v Speaker 3>That's a real business opportunity. If you can get me

0:35:45.710 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to break even, if you can get me to slightly

0:35:47.580 --> 0:35:50.100
<v Speaker 3>positive on that, you know, from a gross margin perspective,

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 3>then they go, OK, there's a little bit of a tradeoff.

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:57.009
<v Speaker 3>But it's also we're in a unique business. We're in

0:35:57.030 --> 0:36:00.450
<v Speaker 3>a business that 50% of our revenue comes from pros

0:36:00.489 --> 0:36:04.109
<v Speaker 3>and contractors. If they leave a job site because their

0:36:04.130 --> 0:36:06.489
<v Speaker 3>drill broke and they go to the store because it

0:36:06.510 --> 0:36:08.950
<v Speaker 3>said we had one and we don't, that's a problem too.

0:36:09.469 --> 0:36:11.310
<v Speaker 3>And so, you know, as we kind of walked through

0:36:11.390 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 3>and we worked through this, we got to a very

0:36:13.500 --> 0:36:16.549
<v Speaker 3>curated list of products where we said, We're going to

0:36:16.570 --> 0:36:18.489
<v Speaker 3>probably have to do something. And if we do it,

0:36:18.969 --> 0:36:20.509
<v Speaker 3>we can do it the right way and try to

0:36:20.570 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 3>minimize the friction. We use QR codes on all of

0:36:24.260 --> 0:36:27.819
<v Speaker 3>our lockups that summon somebody through our phone that they come.

0:36:27.860 --> 0:36:31.069
<v Speaker 3>And it takes, on average, about 90 seconds for that

0:36:31.130 --> 0:36:33.509
<v Speaker 3>lockup to be unlocked by a person. I want to

0:36:33.550 --> 0:36:36.390
<v Speaker 3>be in a place where customers can self-service. If they

0:36:36.430 --> 0:36:38.210
<v Speaker 3>scan the QR code and I know that they're a

0:36:38.250 --> 0:36:40.810
<v Speaker 3>pro that's in our loyalty program, Why can't I give

0:36:40.830 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 3>them access to that? So we're working through the friction.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 3>That's always going to be an opportunity for us. And

0:36:45.820 --> 0:36:47.460
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to minimize it to the best we can.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 3>But it's not perfect. And it's definitely a little bit

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 3>of a balancing act that you walk on some of

0:36:52.820 --> 0:36:56.460
<v Speaker 3>those particular products. You can't do everything. That's just buy online.

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 3>If that exists, that's Amazon. If you don't want to

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:00.460
<v Speaker 3>go into a store and you don't want to be

0:37:00.900 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 3>held up and you can wait three hours to get

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.780
<v Speaker 3>a product, go to Amazon. That's something we do. Thankfully,

0:37:05.820 --> 0:37:08.500
<v Speaker 3>they don't necessarily operate in our space. Don't sell power

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:09.620
<v Speaker 3>drills like we do.

0:37:09.980 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you notice that sales actually go down for items

0:37:12.980 --> 0:37:14.029
<v Speaker 2>that have been locked up?

0:37:14.590 --> 0:37:15.330
<v Speaker 4>Not necessarily.

0:37:15.710 --> 0:37:19.110
<v Speaker 3>There are some categories where that is true. There's also many,

0:37:19.150 --> 0:37:22.050
<v Speaker 3>many categories where actually sales go up because you're in stock.

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting.

0:37:24.380 --> 0:37:26.779
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't thought about that, but that makes a ton

0:37:26.820 --> 0:37:29.299
<v Speaker 1>of sense. It's funny when I go into pharmacies and

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all locked up, I always say to myself, oh,

0:37:31.820 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to start shopping online for all this stuff.

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.549
<v Speaker 1>But I never actually do. I'm always back at the pharmacy, like,

0:37:36.610 --> 0:37:40.149
<v Speaker 1>every week. But I am curious. You mentioned Omni. Like,

0:37:40.270 --> 0:37:43.500
<v Speaker 1>what is the sort of modal mode of.

0:37:45.910 --> 0:37:49.290
<v Speaker 1>Shrink when we're talking about the e-commerce context?

0:37:49.610 --> 0:37:50.570
<v Speaker 4>There's a couple of ways.

0:37:50.630 --> 0:37:52.970
<v Speaker 3>I mean, a lot of this falls back to payments fraud,

0:37:53.070 --> 0:37:55.620
<v Speaker 3>you know, credit card fraud, gift card fraud. You know,

0:37:55.860 --> 0:38:00.259
<v Speaker 3>the payment process oftentimes is the way that they're defrauding

0:38:00.300 --> 0:38:03.910
<v Speaker 3>the Omni space. There's a, to use your word, a

0:38:04.010 --> 0:38:08.049
<v Speaker 3>niche piece of people buying product taking the product out,

0:38:08.210 --> 0:38:10.770
<v Speaker 3>using it, putting something back in and then doing returns.

0:38:11.310 --> 0:38:13.710
<v Speaker 3>So they get back on the return side. So they're

0:38:13.730 --> 0:38:16.009
<v Speaker 3>getting credits for the product that they actually have and

0:38:16.030 --> 0:38:18.140
<v Speaker 3>then send back to get their full refund price on.

0:38:18.180 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's a part of the business that we deal

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 3>with in many cases that we're working through. But it's

0:38:23.260 --> 0:38:26.020
<v Speaker 3>typically around the payment side and the gift card and

0:38:26.060 --> 0:38:26.700
<v Speaker 3>credit card fraud.

0:38:27.219 --> 0:38:30.980
<v Speaker 1>Isn't there some like e-commerce like incidents for people where

0:38:31.020 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they They're like, I want to return this and they'll

0:38:33.060 --> 0:38:34.899
<v Speaker 1>get the refund and they're like, but don't bother sending

0:38:34.940 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it back. It's not worth it for the ingest.

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:37.100
<v Speaker 3>Oh, sure.

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:38.580
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Sure.

0:38:38.860 --> 0:38:42.070
<v Speaker 2>I realize we've been very focused on the retail side

0:38:42.210 --> 0:38:44.009
<v Speaker 2>of theft, but can you talk a little bit more

0:38:44.070 --> 0:38:48.069
<v Speaker 2>about what happens on the back end with distribution? Because,

0:38:48.110 --> 0:38:50.090
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, you're shipping a bunch of stuff

0:38:50.230 --> 0:38:53.989
<v Speaker 2>from its production center over to the store itself. I

0:38:54.050 --> 0:38:57.340
<v Speaker 2>imagine there are many, many avenues along the way that

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a smart criminal could exploit.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.219
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's growing, to be honest with you.

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I think there's, I would say, three main modes, go

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.219
<v Speaker 3>back to the modal piece of it, but there is

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:13.180
<v Speaker 3>pure diversion. So whether that's en route from vendor into,

0:39:13.620 --> 0:39:16.069
<v Speaker 3>if you're an importer that bring it into the US,

0:39:16.110 --> 0:39:19.750
<v Speaker 3>you go into your transload facilities, your port facilities, there's

0:39:19.790 --> 0:39:23.710
<v Speaker 3>people that divert full trailer loads back someplace else from

0:39:23.770 --> 0:39:26.230
<v Speaker 3>that port, could be back onto a container ship to

0:39:26.270 --> 0:39:28.430
<v Speaker 3>go right back over someplace else that's been stolen.

0:39:28.850 --> 0:39:30.310
<v Speaker 4>There are breaking.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.690
<v Speaker 3>In terms of actually just as truck drivers drive eight

0:39:34.710 --> 0:39:37.050
<v Speaker 3>hours across country and they got to park their trailer somewhere.

0:39:37.130 --> 0:39:39.150
<v Speaker 3>And during the time they're sleeping, they're breaking into the

0:39:39.190 --> 0:39:41.509
<v Speaker 3>back of the trailer and just taking the boxes off

0:39:41.530 --> 0:39:43.770
<v Speaker 3>the back. And then there's the one you mentioned a

0:39:43.770 --> 0:39:46.180
<v Speaker 3>little bit earlier, which is the diversion on the supply

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:50.060
<v Speaker 3>chain side back out. So we're seeing a lot of

0:39:50.180 --> 0:39:55.060
<v Speaker 3>fraudulent bill of lading, fraudulent pickup paperwork. AI is playing

0:39:55.100 --> 0:39:57.420
<v Speaker 3>a space in this where they're able to duplicate some

0:39:57.460 --> 0:40:00.700
<v Speaker 3>of the capacities that allow a driver to just drive

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.490
<v Speaker 3>straight in and say, I'm here to pick up trailer 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

0:40:03.489 --> 0:40:07.150
<v Speaker 3>And they dribble right out because their paperwork looks really real. Now,

0:40:07.190 --> 0:40:09.390
<v Speaker 3>we're moving away from that with the electronic billing and

0:40:09.410 --> 0:40:10.969
<v Speaker 3>some of the new ways that we're.

0:40:10.890 --> 0:40:11.390
<v Speaker 4>Dealing with it.

0:40:12.230 --> 0:40:15.950
<v Speaker 3>It's not necessarily the scheme that's new. It's the volume

0:40:15.989 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 3>that seems to be new because it's a very difficult

0:40:18.540 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 3>thing to go after. Rail has become an issue. Rail

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>has definitely become a bigger issue over the last probably

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.219
<v Speaker 3>five or six years where we're seeing, you know, as

0:40:28.260 --> 0:40:31.910
<v Speaker 3>the cars are parked in yards, they're being broken into

0:40:31.969 --> 0:40:34.750
<v Speaker 3>by mobs of people that just kind of strip them

0:40:34.790 --> 0:40:37.550
<v Speaker 3>down for what's in it. But they have really good intelligence,

0:40:37.590 --> 0:40:39.730
<v Speaker 3>which is interesting. So, you know, we think They have

0:40:39.770 --> 0:40:43.450
<v Speaker 3>people working inside the companies, the shipping companies, the trucking companies,

0:40:43.510 --> 0:40:47.380
<v Speaker 3>because they don't hit every trailer or every car on

0:40:47.420 --> 0:40:50.140
<v Speaker 3>the rail. They hit the car on the rail that

0:40:50.180 --> 0:40:52.379
<v Speaker 3>has the product that they really want to go after.

0:40:52.420 --> 0:40:56.739
<v Speaker 3>And so whether that's firearms, whether that's electronics, connected devices,

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 3>you name it, there's a lot of, I would say,

0:40:59.940 --> 0:41:03.710
<v Speaker 3>kind of a new– opening up on the rail space.

0:41:04.310 --> 0:41:06.650
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of dead track, by the way, out there, too. So, like,

0:41:06.890 --> 0:41:07.529
<v Speaker 3>it's wide open.

0:41:07.989 --> 0:41:10.130
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting you mentioned, you know, showing up with a

0:41:10.230 --> 0:41:12.910
<v Speaker 1>fake invoice or a fake bill of lading. I wonder

0:41:12.930 --> 0:41:15.430
<v Speaker 1>if you, like, put on an orange smock, et cetera, like,

0:41:15.489 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>how much, you know, you just, like, just blend right

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in and, like, fit in and no one... No, I'm

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.859
<v Speaker 1>sure people are trained to be suspicious. But you mentioned AI. Like,

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.900
<v Speaker 1>how much of, like, the tools... I'm sure there's, you know,

0:41:28.940 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about cameras that could theoretically detect when someone

0:41:32.540 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>has put something in a pocket, et cetera. But the

0:41:35.460 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>tools that we call AI, like, have you found uses

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:43.070
<v Speaker 1>for them in, I guess, sort of offensive deployment, whether

0:41:43.130 --> 0:41:48.890
<v Speaker 1>the models can autonomously just scan through Facebook marketplaces and

0:41:49.210 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>look for anything that we at Home Depot had found suspicious.

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.740
<v Speaker 1>How much sort of have you found that the models

0:41:55.820 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>can be sort of applied towards general tasks and find

0:41:59.380 --> 0:42:00.299
<v Speaker 1>helpful info for you?

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, I'll say it this way.

0:42:02.860 --> 0:42:05.770
<v Speaker 3>We have more cases than we can investigate. And so

0:42:05.910 --> 0:42:09.290
<v Speaker 3>for us, it's an efficiency play, right? So the more

0:42:09.350 --> 0:42:12.170
<v Speaker 3>we can shorten the duration of these cases, like our

0:42:12.230 --> 0:42:16.250
<v Speaker 3>typical ORC case takes about 70 days from discovery to

0:42:16.310 --> 0:42:19.469
<v Speaker 3>closure to handing off to the police department. And so

0:42:19.660 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 3>if we can compress that timeframe, we can turn more.

0:42:22.739 --> 0:42:24.820
<v Speaker 3>And so we believe that the video... We just replaced

0:42:24.860 --> 0:42:28.299
<v Speaker 3>our entire video analytics, our video management system in all

0:42:28.300 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 3>2,300 stores to an upgraded version that allows us to

0:42:31.620 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 3>now put edge analytics on our cameras, the ones we have.

0:42:36.020 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't get necessarily to the point where you're talking about where...

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>This action or this set of actions now becomes suspicious

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.029
<v Speaker 3>and identify somebody. We'll get to that. There's a place

0:42:45.070 --> 0:42:47.569
<v Speaker 3>for that. I just don't have enough cameras in all

0:42:47.630 --> 0:42:49.230
<v Speaker 3>my stores to do that. But the cameras that I

0:42:49.290 --> 0:42:51.650
<v Speaker 3>do have, we are putting edge analytics around there that

0:42:51.670 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 3>help us identify persons that were walking in this store

0:42:56.780 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and they were lingering in this space too long or

0:42:59.580 --> 0:43:01.620
<v Speaker 3>they were avoiding associates or they were in a place

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.259
<v Speaker 3>where they shouldn't have been. That's definitely out there. You

0:43:04.300 --> 0:43:05.380
<v Speaker 3>mentioned the web crawling.

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.810
<v Speaker 4>That's out there. That capability is out there.

0:43:07.870 --> 0:43:09.810
<v Speaker 3>We have our own company that does web crawling and

0:43:09.870 --> 0:43:13.489
<v Speaker 3>identifies these things that absolutely looks for all that. So

0:43:13.950 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 3>anything we can do to kind of compress that investigative

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 3>cycle is how we're using AI to deploy against the

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 3>bad actors that are out there today.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:27.819
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously, like shoplifting theft, it affects all of us.

0:43:28.300 --> 0:43:32.089
<v Speaker 1>It hurts your profit. It hurts my experience. It probably

0:43:32.180 --> 0:43:35.620
<v Speaker 1>raises my prices, etc. There is a cost that we

0:43:35.660 --> 0:43:39.370
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for taxes to increase the amount of

0:43:39.710 --> 0:43:44.350
<v Speaker 1>police capacity, etc. This is a classic example of very

0:43:44.390 --> 0:43:48.529
<v Speaker 1>bad externalities for almost everyone involved. And yet, you know,

0:43:48.590 --> 0:43:51.810
<v Speaker 1>we see like this sort of like public backlash towards

0:43:52.330 --> 0:43:54.910
<v Speaker 1>video cameras and so forth. There's been the last month,

0:43:54.969 --> 0:43:58.069
<v Speaker 1>everyone's talking about the flock cameras, et cetera. What do

0:43:58.110 --> 0:44:02.549
<v Speaker 1>you perceive as the sort of appetite among law enforcement

0:44:02.630 --> 0:44:04.930
<v Speaker 1>or the politicians that would have to set laws to

0:44:05.150 --> 0:44:08.470
<v Speaker 1>actually move the dial, et cetera, on some of this

0:44:08.489 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>today in 2026?

0:44:11.900 --> 0:44:14.540
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I would tell you is I am super

0:44:14.580 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 3>bullish on where this is going. We talked about INFORM,

0:44:19.219 --> 0:44:24.069
<v Speaker 3>which was probably the first major ORC-driven act out there.

0:44:24.130 --> 0:44:27.010
<v Speaker 3>We are now working on COORCA. COORCA is the Combating

0:44:27.050 --> 0:44:30.710
<v Speaker 3>Organized Retail Crime Act. We are Home Depot. Retail in

0:44:30.730 --> 0:44:32.530
<v Speaker 3>general has been a supporter. This is actually a very

0:44:32.610 --> 0:44:36.460
<v Speaker 3>bipartisan act. It's passed the House. It has been attached

0:44:36.500 --> 0:44:39.439
<v Speaker 3>to the NDAA. It's waiting on the Senate to sign

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:41.770
<v Speaker 3>it or to pass it. The president will sign it.

0:44:41.780 --> 0:44:45.310
<v Speaker 3>He's already indicated that he will. This is like literally

0:44:45.350 --> 0:44:48.170
<v Speaker 3>the first organized retail crime act at the federal level

0:44:48.190 --> 0:44:54.620
<v Speaker 3>that provides resources, prosecutors, coordination centers, defines changes to USC

0:44:54.620 --> 0:44:58.570
<v Speaker 3>182314 that says here's how you have dedicated federal resources

0:44:58.610 --> 0:45:01.190
<v Speaker 3>to go after this. Here's the issue. This is not

0:45:01.230 --> 0:45:04.029
<v Speaker 3>a local crime. This is not a– it happens in

0:45:04.090 --> 0:45:07.420
<v Speaker 3>the county of Cobb here in Georgia. It goes to Cobb,

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and it goes outside the state of Georgia, and it

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 3>goes into South Carolina, and it goes into North Carolina.

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.810
<v Speaker 3>That is now a federal crime. This is interstate commerce.

0:45:14.830 --> 0:45:17.810
<v Speaker 3>This is interstate transportation of stolen goods. all these things,

0:45:17.850 --> 0:45:21.669
<v Speaker 3>yet there's no federal resources dedicated to this. So this

0:45:21.750 --> 0:45:25.350
<v Speaker 3>gets ORC, this gets cargo theft, this gets gift card

0:45:25.390 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and payments fraud, all wrapped into one bill that is

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.700
<v Speaker 3>going to really change the way we as retailers can

0:45:32.820 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 3>address this problem of organized crime. So The short answer

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely, I think the tide is changing. It's not

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 3>just one-sided. There's, I want to say, 100 to maybe

0:45:43.380 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 3>200-plus House sponsors, both from the Democrat and Republican side.

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 3>There are many, many bipartisan sponsors in the Senate for Cawarca.

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:56.340
<v Speaker 3>There are 35-ish states that have organized retail crime task

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 3>forces led by their attorneys general, both in Democrat and

0:46:00.100 --> 0:46:03.980
<v Speaker 3>Republican states. So, Seven years ago, I was doom and

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:07.540
<v Speaker 3>gloom on this. Nobody was taking this seriously. Nobody thought

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.620
<v Speaker 3>this was a big problem. This was petty shoplifting. This

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:12.930
<v Speaker 3>was not a thing that anybody really wanted to go on.

0:46:13.180 --> 0:46:15.050
<v Speaker 3>In fact, in many cases, I think you guys know,

0:46:15.110 --> 0:46:18.650
<v Speaker 3>it was decriminalization was happening. Lots of defunding, the police

0:46:18.690 --> 0:46:21.589
<v Speaker 3>talk that was out there. I think that this has

0:46:21.670 --> 0:46:24.989
<v Speaker 3>helped us move much more in the right direction over

0:46:25.030 --> 0:46:26.850
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years, particularly.

0:46:27.390 --> 0:46:30.969
<v Speaker 1>What is the state of the art with facial recognition?

0:46:31.030 --> 0:46:34.649
<v Speaker 1>What are the expectations that people should know when they're

0:46:34.690 --> 0:46:38.220
<v Speaker 1>like walking into a major public space, the degree to

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:43.460
<v Speaker 1>which either the cameras in major retail establishments either are

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>able to or are able to identify who they are

0:46:47.420 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and how long that data is stored and so forth?

0:46:50.300 --> 0:46:53.740
<v Speaker 3>That's a conversation that could probably go for another two hours.

0:46:54.570 --> 0:46:56.370
<v Speaker 3>I would say that at the end of the day,

0:46:56.590 --> 0:46:59.189
<v Speaker 3>video analytics in general are getting really, really good about

0:46:59.350 --> 0:47:03.610
<v Speaker 3>recognizing people. And we don't talk about specific technologies that

0:47:03.630 --> 0:47:06.030
<v Speaker 3>are out there. I'm not an expert in facial recognition,

0:47:06.070 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 3>so I don't know. What I would say is that...

0:47:09.180 --> 0:47:11.660
<v Speaker 3>I think it's fair to have conversations about privacy. It's

0:47:11.700 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 3>fair to have conversations about misuse. It's fair to have

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 3>conversations about balancing the good versus the bad that can

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:20.330
<v Speaker 3>come from any technology that's out there. But I'm probably

0:47:20.370 --> 0:47:23.130
<v Speaker 3>not the person to really talk about facial recognition.

0:47:23.610 --> 0:47:25.790
<v Speaker 2>All right, Scott Glenn, thank you so much for coming

0:47:25.830 --> 0:47:27.170
<v Speaker 2>on All Thoughts. Really appreciate it.

0:47:27.450 --> 0:47:29.069
<v Speaker 4>No, thanks for the time. I appreciate you guys.

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.450
<v Speaker 2>So, Joe, that was a fascinating conversation. It definitely helped

0:47:45.469 --> 0:47:49.750
<v Speaker 2>me understand the whole lockup issue. I hadn't considered that.

0:47:50.110 --> 0:47:52.220
<v Speaker 2>I kind of assumed that sales would go down because

0:47:52.260 --> 0:47:54.339
<v Speaker 2>so many people would be inconvenienced and you just walk

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:56.420
<v Speaker 2>away and say, whatever, I'm going to get my toothbrush

0:47:56.460 --> 0:48:00.819
<v Speaker 2>from Amazon. But if the inventory isn't there anyway because

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:04.569
<v Speaker 2>people are stealing it, then that's a lost opportunity for sale.

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:08.700
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that stood out for me is there

0:48:08.739 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 2>are some slightly dystopian aspects in there. So the idea

0:48:12.540 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of videos with edge capabilities might be looking at your

0:48:16.540 --> 0:48:20.580
<v Speaker 2>behavior and classifying this person as a risk. Like, oh,

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:22.859
<v Speaker 2>this person has been standing over in that corner for

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a while, looks kind of suspicious. That doesn't sound great.

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.859
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that was very briefly mentioned is this

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:32.450
<v Speaker 2>idea that Well, maybe there's a way around the lockup

0:48:32.530 --> 0:48:36.060
<v Speaker 2>program where you could just scan a QR code from your,

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't know, Walmart or Home Depot loyalty app.

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 2>And it would automatically open the shelf for you.

0:48:42.140 --> 0:48:42.580
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:48:43.100 --> 0:48:47.140
<v Speaker 2>Which sounds very convenient. Not very convenient, but more convenient

0:48:47.380 --> 0:48:50.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're a shopper, a regular shopper at those stores.

0:48:50.300 --> 0:48:51.940
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, you're kind of getting close

0:48:51.980 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 2>to an almost identity system for shopping.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>All great points. But yes, you know, it does feel

0:48:58.060 --> 0:49:01.620
<v Speaker 1>like we're probably going to increasingly be headed in that direction,

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:05.490
<v Speaker 1>that whether we want to or not, the technology itself

0:49:05.650 --> 0:49:10.410
<v Speaker 1>will be the driver. Like if edge AI works, if

0:49:10.450 --> 0:49:13.090
<v Speaker 1>you could just have a model embedded onto the camera

0:49:13.150 --> 0:49:17.850
<v Speaker 1>itself that could just say, identify suspicious behavior in real time,

0:49:18.250 --> 0:49:21.730
<v Speaker 1>it will be implemented, right? Like there is, people might complain,

0:49:21.770 --> 0:49:25.489
<v Speaker 1>but if the technology exists, it will eventually be implemented.

0:49:26.150 --> 0:49:29.489
<v Speaker 1>I'm very anti-shoplifting. So I think like, you know, and like,

0:49:29.530 --> 0:49:32.850
<v Speaker 1>I don't really, I think, you know, things would be

0:49:32.870 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>better if there were less of it, et cetera. And

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.380
<v Speaker 1>I'm not particularly worried about like, well, if I'm in

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a public space.

0:49:39.010 --> 0:49:40.950
<v Speaker 2>But what if you just want to stand around for

0:49:40.969 --> 0:49:43.189
<v Speaker 2>a couple hours admiring the power.

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:47.460
<v Speaker 1>Tools without being harassed? No, look, there are obviously clear

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>issues that are going to arise and they're going to

0:49:49.500 --> 0:49:53.899
<v Speaker 1>be very uncomfortable and unsettling. But I believe that the

0:49:54.030 --> 0:49:58.609
<v Speaker 1>technology will lead the way rather than anything that we prioritize.

0:49:58.670 --> 0:50:00.870
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. I think the question you have to

0:50:00.969 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 2>ask of the technology is whether it leads to... Good

0:50:04.900 --> 0:50:08.180
<v Speaker 2>outcomes in the forms of more people being caught because

0:50:08.300 --> 0:50:11.290
<v Speaker 2>part of this is like, OK, you can install surveillance

0:50:11.370 --> 0:50:15.150
<v Speaker 2>in the store. You can stick tags on every individual item.

0:50:15.650 --> 0:50:18.989
<v Speaker 2>But if security can't actually stop people from exiting the

0:50:19.030 --> 0:50:23.620
<v Speaker 2>store with stolen goods because of liability issues, then. It's

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:25.940
<v Speaker 2>not really doing that much, right? Maybe it'll help in

0:50:25.980 --> 0:50:29.900
<v Speaker 2>the investigation, but then you're still dependent on a potentially

0:50:29.980 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 2>strained police force actually taking up the case and using

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:34.300
<v Speaker 2>the evidence that you've gathered.

0:50:34.460 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>It does feel, he used the term whack-a-mole, and I

0:50:37.900 --> 0:50:41.980
<v Speaker 1>feel like one of the meta-phenomenons that has happened is

0:50:42.060 --> 0:50:46.390
<v Speaker 1>over time shoplifting or theft. has switched on these various

0:50:46.469 --> 0:50:50.060
<v Speaker 1>online frauds, et cetera. But you would think like, oh, well,

0:50:50.180 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>if you just get rid of the retail stores, then

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that takes care of the problem. But the crime finds

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a way and new forms of crime will emerge. And

0:50:57.660 --> 0:51:01.180
<v Speaker 1>one day we'll probably have robot security guards who don't

0:51:01.219 --> 0:51:03.380
<v Speaker 1>have like a personal safety issue because it's a robot

0:51:03.420 --> 0:51:05.620
<v Speaker 1>and they'll like reach out and apprehend the person. But

0:51:05.660 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>then there will be a theft on the robot supply

0:51:07.620 --> 0:51:10.620
<v Speaker 1>chain and so forth. And like it'll probably never go away.

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:11.540
<v Speaker 1>But it was interesting.

0:51:11.580 --> 0:51:14.100
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the robots will need liability insurance. You don't know.

0:51:14.570 --> 0:51:15.660
<v Speaker 1>They very well might.

0:51:15.739 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:51:16.060 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But the robots will be shoplifters. That's right. The misaligned

0:51:22.219 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 1>robot security guard.

0:51:23.420 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 2>That bolt over there is really shiny.

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:27.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. All right. Shall we leave it there?

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:28.190
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

0:51:28.370 --> 0:51:30.770
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:51:30.930 --> 0:51:33.810
<v Speaker 2>I'm Traci Allaway. You can follow me at Traci Allaway.

0:51:33.930 --> 0:51:36.810
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart.

0:51:37.050 --> 0:51:40.510
<v Speaker 1>Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Ehrman, Dashiell Bennett

0:51:40.610 --> 0:51:43.890
<v Speaker 1>at Dashbot, Cale Brooks at Cale Brooks, And Kevin Lozano

0:51:44.030 --> 0:51:46.969
<v Speaker 1>at Kevin Lloyd Lozano. And for more OddLots content, go

0:51:46.989 --> 0:51:49.950
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots. We have a daily newsletter on

0:51:50.050 --> 0:51:52.140
<v Speaker 1>all of our episodes. And you can chat about all

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of these topics 24-7 in our Discord, Discord.gg slash OddLots.

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.890
<v Speaker 2>need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple

0:52:04.910 --> 0:52:15.899
<v Speaker 2>Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening. so

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 2>so