Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us. Right
Speaker 1: down are toll free telephone number you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, It's eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one sewn hang on a lotenger. Yeah, my voice
Speaker 1: is a little sore. I'm not sick at all. It's weird,
Speaker 1: but it just happens. And no, I did not go
Speaker 1: to the UFC fight yesterday's. I don't have an excuse.
Speaker 1: What a what a special night. That was so many
Speaker 1: great America, two fifty events that are going to be
Speaker 1: going on around the country. And you know, I watched
Speaker 1: the criticism and I listened to the criticism, and then
Speaker 1: a bunch of liberals, James Fonda and Bette Midler and
Speaker 1: Joy Reid, you know, put on the most insane bizarre
Speaker 1: I don't I guess counterprogramming to it. And it was weird.
Speaker 2: Go on, left, beyes, go on, not this time. No,
Speaker 2: it's getting left, because how do we get there together
Speaker 2: or ever? Get all?
Speaker 3: You fascist? You're bow you're fascist down? Hey there, I
Speaker 3: am fascist. Let me put you straight. When you come
Speaker 3: for the rest of us, we'll fight you at the
Speaker 3: gate and you will lose.
Speaker 1: You fascist down, Lou, I mean this is the most
Speaker 1: heartwarming thing to me. And maybe there's some of you
Speaker 1: saying this is looney tunes. It is looney tunes, But
Speaker 1: this is my biggest argument that I'm making is that
Speaker 1: and we'll get to the Iran deal. I know a
Speaker 1: lot of you want my thoughts on this, but I
Speaker 1: am telling you There's never been a midterm election this
Speaker 1: important in our lifetime, and I don't think there's one
Speaker 1: that I can think of in history where one part
Speaker 1: has gone so far off the rails and so radicalized
Speaker 1: that I think historical trends may not be as impactful,
Speaker 1: because if you look at historical trends, that party in
Speaker 1: power will usually lose seats in the House and Senate.
Speaker 1: Just it's only not happened twice or three times or
Speaker 1: four times, whatever it is, so that would be a
Speaker 1: normal way. But this party is so radicalized, the party
Speaker 1: of Grand Platner, mister Nazi tattoo, you know who said
Speaker 1: the most incendiary things. It's insane six gender tall rico
Speaker 1: and God is non binary, and the right of men
Speaker 1: to play women's sports. And I'm running a vegan campaign
Speaker 1: in Texas, and I don't believe in oil drilling and
Speaker 1: this guy El Sayed in Michigan, you know, campaigning with
Speaker 1: Hassan Piker who blamed America for what happened on nine
Speaker 1: to eleven, which is inexplicable in every way, shape, manner,
Speaker 1: and form. These are the candidates that are winning for
Speaker 1: them and getting the Democratic primary nomination. Now, is there
Speaker 1: going to be any crossover appeal? I don't think so.
Speaker 1: Then you look at the rest of the party. Who
Speaker 1: are the leaders. Bernie Sanders is running a near perfect
Speaker 1: record in terms of endorsing communists, radicals, hardcore left wingers.
Speaker 1: Pocahontas is right there with him. It's now the party
Speaker 1: of mam Donnie Mamdani did such a good job, you
Speaker 1: know with the Knicks game. By the way, congratulations to
Speaker 1: the Knicks after what fifty three years? I guess the
Speaker 1: curse has broken. Steven A if they lost, he was
Speaker 1: going to blame Donald Trump, which cracked me up. I
Speaker 1: didn't know he was that superstitious. But I'm happy for him,
Speaker 1: and I'm happy for New York Knicks fans. But why
Speaker 1: is it if the Knicks win, people go crazy and
Speaker 1: riot and get violent, and if they lose, they go crazy,
Speaker 1: get violent and right, I just don't makes no sense
Speaker 1: to me. But in a city where the mayor even said,
Speaker 1: we continue to be proud of being a sanctuary city
Speaker 1: and defund dismantle Nobel and reimagine the police, and meanwhile
Speaker 1: they're burning cop cars and buses and you know, basically
Speaker 1: half the city to the ground over the weekend, just
Speaker 1: going crazy. But we're in a different times. Hakim Jeffries
Speaker 1: said something very interesting, and I've been pointing this out
Speaker 1: because normally there would be more mainstream Democrats. Normally they
Speaker 1: would reject the squad, Mamdani, all those names I mentioned,
Speaker 1: and they would at least try to forge a more
Speaker 1: moderate path forward to appeal to middle of the road
Speaker 1: voters independence. They're not doing that. And the people that
Speaker 1: are in power in name only, and that's Kakeem Jeffries,
Speaker 1: as people like Chuck Schumer, they don't dare stand up
Speaker 1: to this radical base because they know that they will
Speaker 1: lose their grip on power in five seconds flat. That
Speaker 1: is a big problem for them. Hakeem Jeffries over the
Speaker 1: weekend meet the Press does not rule out impeachment against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump if they take over the House. Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: is now all over the airwaves defending Graham Platner. I've
Speaker 1: not heard anything and anyway I would say to me,
Speaker 1: he's an abusive, misogynistic, anti Semitic person. I'm like, listen
Speaker 1: to him. I mean, I'm not going to go over
Speaker 1: chapter and verse every single day on this program. It is.
Speaker 1: It is mind numbing to me. And then to listen
Speaker 1: Bill Maher even saying his oh, I support Graham Platner. Okay,
Speaker 1: go right ahead, Robert de Niro, I can't love a
Speaker 1: country that's led by Donald Trump. There's no moderation, there's
Speaker 1: no common sense anymore. And it is now it's an environment,
Speaker 1: a midterm election environment that anybody that is telling you
Speaker 1: this day that they can tell you what's going to
Speaker 1: happen in November, they just flat out lying and guessing
Speaker 1: they don't know. However, I don't see any good coming
Speaker 1: out of being that crazy and that radical. I just don't,
Speaker 1: by the way, good news on oil prices. Before we
Speaker 1: get to the actual specifics what we know about this deal.
Speaker 1: Will know a lot more tonight. The Vice President jd
Speaker 1: Vance is going to agree to sit down with me
Speaker 1: and go over this Iranian deal in detail. I have
Speaker 1: been assured multiple times before coming on the air again
Speaker 1: today like I did on Friday, Like I've had many
Speaker 1: conversations over the weekend that what the Iranians have put out,
Speaker 1: and they do this every single time, is not in
Speaker 1: any way indicative of what this deal actually is. Does
Speaker 1: that mean that this deal is the end of everything?
Speaker 1: Of course not. I mean, you're dealing with a death cult,
Speaker 1: you're dealing with radical maulas, but you're also dealing with
Speaker 1: a country that got pounded twice last week because they
Speaker 1: shot at Americans, they broke the ceasefire, and then President
Speaker 1: Trump announced he was going to take takeout or take
Speaker 1: over carg Island, And my horses told me that that
Speaker 1: was the impetus. The Iranians, through intermediaries and directly went
Speaker 1: to President Trump and said, we will sign it. We'll
Speaker 1: even put initials on it. Today's that's maybe the untold story.
Speaker 1: We'll find out anyway. Oil prices now they've been hovering
Speaker 1: around eighty bucks a barrel. They had gone as high
Speaker 1: as one hundred and twenty six dollars a barrow since
Speaker 1: this conflict started. That's as high as it got. Others
Speaker 1: were predicting much higher. Has it been impactful for consumers. Yes,
Speaker 1: was that the one thing President Trump was talking about
Speaker 1: when he said the biggest cause of inflation the slight uptick. Now,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden at this point as presidency had nine percent
Speaker 1: inflation rate. There's plenty of runway, meaning time between now
Speaker 1: and November with all of the other economic growth which
Speaker 1: we've gone in a great specificity in detail on for
Speaker 1: the economy to recover. And that means economic growth with
Speaker 1: energy dominance, the largest tax cuts in history, and trillions
Speaker 1: of dollars in committed investments in manufacturing jobs that people
Speaker 1: like Obama said were long gone. And that means we're
Speaker 1: now going to build semiconductor chips, We're going to build
Speaker 1: automobile factories, we're building out rare earth minerals, we're building,
Speaker 1: but we're becoming dominant again. Those jobs then they never coming, No,
Speaker 1: they're back now. Consumer sentiment rose in early June as
Speaker 1: lower gas prices. Now they've been slowly coming down. University
Speaker 1: of Michigan. They're June index of consumer Sentiment rose better
Speaker 1: than expected nineteen point two percent, the first improvement in
Speaker 1: four months. I think people have seen. This is now
Speaker 1: on the horizon. You see gas prices now dropping well
Speaker 1: below four dollars a gallon, and I think you're going
Speaker 1: to see gas prices get back to normal now here
Speaker 1: we are. It's June, July, August, September, October, and then
Speaker 1: we're in the election month. That's plenty of time for
Speaker 1: gas prices to get back to normal. Now. As it
Speaker 1: relates to the President, what a great event yesterday. We'll
Speaker 1: talk to Jim Gray about this later. I thought that
Speaker 1: event at the White House yesterday, I had a chance
Speaker 1: to go. I just had too much work to do it. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I just couldn't. I couldn't pull it off. We've had
Speaker 1: a lot going on. I have Vice President Vance today
Speaker 1: and so I've got a lot of work to do.
Speaker 1: But here's where we are. Let me just get to
Speaker 1: the nuts and bolts of this. The Iranian parliament speaker
Speaker 1: has officially signed the US deal to end this conflict. JD.
Speaker 1: Vance has been all over the airwaves, and in spite
Speaker 1: of what the legacy media mob and other people have
Speaker 1: been saying, he said in no uncertain terms that there
Speaker 1: are no funds that will be released to I ran
Speaker 1: in exchange for signing an agreement. In this particular case,
Speaker 1: he said it to George Stephanopolos, there's been no money
Speaker 1: released and that is not going to change. That is
Speaker 1: an important point, and the Vice President then went on
Speaker 1: from there. Now, if we see Iranians making, for example,
Speaker 1: taking action to eliminate their stockpile of enriched uranium, which
Speaker 1: this deal we'll call for, then yes, sanctions relief will follow.
Speaker 1: So the way I've had it explained to me is
Speaker 1: like this, and I'll explain it the same way to you.
Speaker 1: If you hire a contractor to build a house for
Speaker 1: you, you usually maybe put down a down payment. That's not happening.
Speaker 1: In this case. There's no down payment. The only monies
Speaker 1: that the Iranians, I have been assured, will ever get
Speaker 1: is their money, not one American penny, not one red cent,
Speaker 1: not one taxpayer dollar. I've been told this, reassured this
Speaker 1: over and over again, and we have money that we
Speaker 1: have sanctioned that again, based on their actions and on
Speaker 1: a lot of other things that are in this deal,
Speaker 1: they'll have an opportunity to actually get their country back again.
Speaker 1: And some people say, well, you know we should have
Speaker 1: had regime change. Well when did the president ever call
Speaker 1: for regime change? Because I don't recall that I remember
Speaker 1: the President his number one messages they can never be
Speaker 1: a nuclear power, just can't. So the messaging is the
Speaker 1: exact opposite of what the JCPOA was. One point seven
Speaker 1: trillion in cash and other currency at the top of
Speaker 1: the deal, and a window out where they can build
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons down the line. That's not part of this
Speaker 1: deal either. But anyway, the short term concessions are buy
Speaker 1: or ran in exchange for permanent sanctions relief by the US. Now,
Speaker 1: if they fulfill their promise, they will then be able
Speaker 1: to sell oil. If they fulfilled their promise, as they
Speaker 1: each task they conclude, they will then get a certain
Speaker 1: degree of their money back or the ability to make
Speaker 1: money for their country. It also includes US inspectors. If
Speaker 1: you go to JCPOA, we're not allowed to participate in
Speaker 1: the inspections. That is the exact opposite here. American inspectors
Speaker 1: will be a part of it. Remember, the Obama administration
Speaker 1: refused to provide the entire agreement to Congress. The verification
Speaker 1: regime was buried in secret side agreements that Congress the
Speaker 1: American public never saw. Oh verification was next to impossible.
Speaker 1: It was never signed by Iran that deal, and most
Speaker 1: people don't even know that. As a side note, so
Speaker 1: the Vice President's been emphasizing and again we'll let him
Speaker 1: say it in his own words tonight on TV. But
Speaker 1: a lot of what you're reading and hearing I don't
Speaker 1: think is accurate and has been accurate and was not
Speaker 1: explained that way to me. Now, there is one big,
Speaker 1: overall overarching question, and that is can you trust the Iranians.
Speaker 1: The answer to that question is no, you can't trust
Speaker 1: the Iranians. I don't think anybody trust the Iranians. However,
Speaker 1: they get nothing unless they fulfill their promises, which I
Speaker 1: think is the best case scenario. Not sure, but it
Speaker 1: gives us the best shot in the end. And what
Speaker 1: was the president's goal? The President is making it that
Speaker 1: they agreed that they will never have a nuclear weapon
Speaker 1: or in Richmond, we'll have Americans looking and keeping eyes
Speaker 1: on it and have eyes on the ground as part
Speaker 1: of the deal. Assuming the deal gets completed. Now let's
Speaker 1: assume for a moment that they break this deal. What
Speaker 1: does that mean? Well, I think then the President will
Speaker 1: go back to where he was last week, and that
Speaker 1: is he bombed the living hell out of them after
Speaker 1: they hit that Apache helicopter and went after ships in
Speaker 1: the straight of Horn moves. I think that is a
Speaker 1: strong possibility because I don't trust the Iranians and I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody should trust them. But that's what makes
Speaker 1: this a little bit different. And I'm just like, it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter whether they ultimately do do it or not,
Speaker 1: because the President's options remain wide open from now until
Speaker 1: any day he wants it. So anyway they digitally signed
Speaker 1: off the administration, you know their key objectives. They are
Speaker 1: very competent, saying that they get nothing from us, only
Speaker 1: their ability to make money or get some of their
Speaker 1: frozen money back, and the straight of horror moves will
Speaker 1: be open. Now, why would we not try it? What's
Speaker 1: the downs? We can go back to bombing in ten seconds.
Speaker 1: It's not that complicated. It's really not that hard if
Speaker 1: you want to. I know some people will have a
Speaker 1: hard time with it. But remember what the Trump doctrine
Speaker 1: in No Forever War. What was the President's consistent message,
Speaker 1: they can't have nukes. Okay, now, as part of this deal,
Speaker 1: we're told that they can't have the nuclear dust. They've
Speaker 1: got to turn it over. And if they don't turn
Speaker 1: it over then basically the deal has been violated, and
Speaker 1: then it will be the next phase of whatever the
Speaker 1: complict emerges into. That's how I see it, all right,
Speaker 1: so much going on eight hundred and nine four one Seawn.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: So we're watching all of this, you know, the administration
Speaker 1: said the memorandum of understanding will be released this week.
Speaker 1: I think we'll know a lot because I felt like
Speaker 1: the interviews that people have given have not been effective
Speaker 1: in as much as the media just wants to play gotcha.
Speaker 1: I mean, George Stephanoppos does not care and Obama's out there,
Speaker 1: there's no way they're going to do as good as
Speaker 1: deal Auzoid did. I'm like, well, at one point seven
Speaker 1: trillion in cash, you know the currency, and pretty please
Speaker 1: don't make a bomb and oh, by the way, it
Speaker 1: sunsets in ten years and you get to build a bomb. Anyway,
Speaker 1: that's not what this deal is. I can guarantee you
Speaker 1: that part. But we'll have all those details tonight, quick
Speaker 1: break right back, eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn.
Speaker 4: When news breaks, you get the inside story that no
Speaker 4: one else has and the behind the scenes chatter that
Speaker 4: the mainstream media doesn't even know about. This is the
Speaker 4: Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Linda, you started asking me a series of questions, and
Speaker 1: why don't you grill me? And if anyone else has
Speaker 1: any questions they want to ask the vice president about
Speaker 1: this deal, I'm gonna ask you tonight because it's really
Speaker 1: going to be the most informative interview because it's not
Speaker 1: a gotcha, you know, legacy media mob interview. You know,
Speaker 1: with the likes of that idiot George Stephan, George Stefanoptos
Speaker 1: is the worst. I mean, he used to get on
Speaker 1: a call every morning with Bill Clinton, Paul mcgolla, James
Speaker 1: Carville and the rest of them, and they and it's
Speaker 1: just John Podesta and give give Bill Clinton talking points.
Speaker 1: And now he's like the face of ABC News. It's
Speaker 1: a joke.
Speaker 3: It's been a joke for a long time. I think.
Speaker 3: I think that's a long time coming. I mean, he's
Speaker 3: kind of lost his way a long time ago.
Speaker 1: And it's long long, it's Linda, a long time ago.
Speaker 3: It's very Uh, it's unfortunate, you know, because people have
Speaker 3: opportunities to do the right thing, but they often chose,
Speaker 3: you know, they choose a different road because it's easier
Speaker 3: and it feeds to the sick offense, which is a shame.
Speaker 3: But yeah, I have a lot of questions. I'd love
Speaker 3: for you to pose as the vice president.
Speaker 1: I'll give you one. I'll give you a couple. I mean,
Speaker 1: they said they're going to release.
Speaker 3: It's not me asking a question, as you've given me
Speaker 3: the question to ask, what kind of interview is this?
Speaker 1: Well, I want to see the memorandumum understanding because.
Speaker 3: About me, I have a question.
Speaker 1: What's a question?
Speaker 3: How do we trust the Mullas of Iran and anybody
Speaker 3: making negotiations on behalf of Iran when they've gotten nothing
Speaker 3: but a history of lies and being duplicitous.
Speaker 1: Apparently the first time they've ever agreed to American inspectors
Speaker 1: to go in there and look themselves. I will find
Speaker 1: out for sure. Again, they haven't released it yet, so
Speaker 1: and it's a sixty day negotiation period. However, that is
Speaker 1: what the understanding says. They don't get money up front,
Speaker 1: in spite of everybody proclaiming that I've been told by
Speaker 1: every single source I have that's not true either. Next question, I.
Speaker 3: Am curious if as of right now, President Trump being
Speaker 3: at the G seven, which God help them. I don't
Speaker 3: know how he can stand all those people, but he's
Speaker 3: there now. Now is he going to make a guest
Speaker 3: appearance at these negotiations or is that going to be handled?
Speaker 1: Just the signing is schedule for Friday. My understanding, that's
Speaker 1: when it takes full force and effect. It has been
Speaker 1: signed by both sides digitally, digitally, and actually it's been
Speaker 1: signed I think in a copycent That was my last communication.
Speaker 1: But I can't I'm just telling passing on what I
Speaker 1: was told. You know, the precise language. The devil's always
Speaker 1: in the details, and trust, but verify, and you know,
Speaker 1: we got to understand one thing too, And I think
Speaker 1: this frustrates me is I think some people thought that
Speaker 1: the President had other motives short of what his stated
Speaker 1: motives were, which is they can never have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: I can go back to long before he was president,
Speaker 1: of him saying they can never have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: This deal will Apparently they've agreed to give up the
Speaker 1: nuclear dust or degrade it with Americans being involved in
Speaker 1: the entire process. That's what I was told, and I'll
Speaker 1: confirm this with the Vice President tonight. I want to
Speaker 1: know the details now if they won't get a penny
Speaker 1: unless they start doing it. There are four separate locations
Speaker 1: we're looking at specifically where we know nuclear dust is okay,
Speaker 1: next question to know what.
Speaker 3: Usha is craving? Now that we know, I want to know.
Speaker 1: You really want me to ask.
Speaker 3: Husband, if he's a good husband, he's going to know
Speaker 3: her number one, number two in number three craving and
Speaker 3: that's going to show us what kind of husband he is.
Speaker 1: Okay, So you want me to ask the vice president
Speaker 1: of our country, whose beautiful wife is pregnant, what is
Speaker 1: she craving?
Speaker 3: Yes, I think it would humanize them. And you know
Speaker 3: you're going to spend forty five minutes talking about terrible
Speaker 3: things in nuclear war and YadA, YadA, YadA. You could
Speaker 3: end it on a high note like is she Rocky Road?
Speaker 3: Is she you know, bananas and pickles? Is she lasagna?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 3: What is it?
Speaker 1: Listen? I mean, this is what we know, and I
Speaker 1: think this is very very critical. And I say this
Speaker 1: with there's a reason I think we got here. And
Speaker 1: what do I mean by that? If you recall when
Speaker 1: the Apache was hit last week, now, we would have
Speaker 1: had a very different I think response. Had those Apache
Speaker 1: helicopter pilots been killed, I think it would have we
Speaker 1: would have had a whole different discussion last week, but
Speaker 1: it didn't explode. Number one. Then a report came out
Speaker 1: that commercial vehicles in the Strait were being attacked by
Speaker 1: Iranian drones. What happened? They were the President unloaded on them.
Speaker 1: Not won two nights in a row. Then he went
Speaker 1: out the next day and said, I'm hitting him again
Speaker 1: today and I think I'm likely taking carg Island. That
Speaker 1: apparently was what got everybody's attention in the region. And anyway,
Speaker 1: he was going to do a heavier third night, said
Speaker 1: it was going to be a heavier third night. There's
Speaker 1: nothing they can do to stop him anyway, and anyway,
Speaker 1: then they decided no. And I was told through intermediaries
Speaker 1: that would be the Qataris in pakistanis and directly through
Speaker 1: the contacts that the president is appointed to negotiate this
Speaker 1: on his part, which I believe is Steve Whitcoff, Jared Kushner,
Speaker 1: and I think Vice President Vance's at it at this point.
Speaker 1: So it was going to be a third night. Israel.
Speaker 1: Then at that point, you know, I don't think Israel
Speaker 1: is ever going to have to worry about a nuclear weapon. However,
Speaker 1: regime change was never on the list, and I'm kind
Speaker 1: of amazed that people have interpreted that even though we've
Speaker 1: had you know, the third pretty much the top three
Speaker 1: tiers of leadership wiped out here. It did happen. Now
Speaker 1: the son of the you know, former Supreme leader is
Speaker 1: still alive. My understanding is he lost a foot or
Speaker 1: a leg and he's blind, then he's you know, I'm
Speaker 1: sure he's scared to live in a cave somewhere, scared
Speaker 1: to death of pop his head out. Anyway, what was
Speaker 1: your point?
Speaker 3: I have another question. I want to know if the
Speaker 3: people of Iran will know freedom and if Persians will
Speaker 3: get their country back, and what is going to happen
Speaker 3: with the government in Iran.
Speaker 1: The president ever, well, the president said help is on.
Speaker 3: Its way, that he made a promise.
Speaker 1: And then the well, but he also said something else.
Speaker 1: The President said to the people of Iran, your moment
Speaker 1: is at hand. Be ready. He told them to be ready.
Speaker 1: He didn't say he was going to send boots on
Speaker 1: the ground to fight that conflict. Ultimately, it's this has
Speaker 1: now got to be in the hands of the Iranian people.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's ninety four million Iranians, and if there
Speaker 1: was one thing that I had hoped would have happened,
Speaker 1: that for whatever reasons have not. I've been told it
Speaker 1: became logistical, logistically night marish for us, especially in light
Speaker 1: of the broader mission and not putting boots on the ground,
Speaker 1: which the President was dead set against, which I agree with.
Speaker 1: It was just problematic. But the people of Iran, They've
Speaker 1: got to figure out how to take back their country.
Speaker 1: I don't think that was ever Donald Trump's state admission,
Speaker 1: was it.
Speaker 3: I don't think that it was his state admission. The
Speaker 3: state of mission was to free us of a nuclear run. However,
Speaker 3: he did tell the Iranian people that help was on
Speaker 3: the way, and he did say.
Speaker 1: They got help, a lot of help.
Speaker 3: They got help. But I would love to know what
Speaker 3: happens now because we still have people being executed, people
Speaker 3: being killed, people being kidnapped. The people of Iran need
Speaker 3: help more than ever, in my opinion.
Speaker 1: You see, look if we play this out and say
Speaker 1: put what the president's main repeated goals have been, and
Speaker 1: it went on I think longer than he wanted, and
Speaker 1: I think for reasons that are very legitimate, and I
Speaker 1: think the President did factor in the humanitarian part of
Speaker 1: this equation, which is ninety four million people. They have,
Speaker 1: you know, a three hundred plus percent inflation rate, they
Speaker 1: have a currency that is zero. They have half the
Speaker 1: adult workforce or more now out of work. And you know,
Speaker 1: the president, as he told me personally, he could wipe
Speaker 1: out their entire infrastructure and obliterate it. And I said,
Speaker 1: you could do that in like an hour. He said, no,
Speaker 1: I can do it in five minutes. And that option
Speaker 1: is still on the table now. The Iranians know they
Speaker 1: cannot defend against what Donald Trump would throw at them.
Speaker 1: There seems to be something. The fact that the President
Speaker 1: hit him so hard twice last week seemed to have
Speaker 1: the big impact. The other part of the equation that
Speaker 1: stands out to me is when he said he's going
Speaker 1: to hit him harder the third night and that he's
Speaker 1: likely taking KRG. I think that got their attention. Obviously
Speaker 1: it did, because they went straight to third party intermediaries
Speaker 1: and straight to the President and said, don't do that.
Speaker 3: Next question, so what happens now if we don't have
Speaker 3: KRK the strait is open and in the Iranians say well,
Speaker 3: we still want to tax everybody that goes through, we
Speaker 3: want a vague for letting you pass through the street, and.
Speaker 1: The blockade goes back up. Deal has wiped out and
Speaker 1: back to where we are today, and that would probably
Speaker 1: be defined as not a ceasefire, but bombing, That's my guess.
Speaker 3: And then what happens as far as Israel has Bela
Speaker 3: Beiru Lebanon. We're looking at all these various other factors,
Speaker 3: and obviously, you know, our friends in Israel are very
Speaker 3: important to a democracy in the Middle East. You know,
Speaker 3: there's a lot of there's a lot of noise around
Speaker 3: what happens next if that side of the Aisle continues
Speaker 3: to have an ongoing conflict.
Speaker 1: The current state militarily and economically of Iran does not
Speaker 1: put a lot of fear in my heart for Israel.
Speaker 1: With I think, pound for pound, the greatest military force
Speaker 1: on Earth, And I'm not diminishing Americans America's great military might.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, pound for pound, they have had to
Speaker 1: build up military technologies, defense systems, things just to survive.
Speaker 1: They've been surrounded their entire existence by enemies. Now, are
Speaker 1: there points where do I think the prime Minister of Israel,
Speaker 1: a thirty year friend of the program, is within his
Speaker 1: rights to determine that this is a threat that Israel
Speaker 1: can no longer tolerate, and as a result, they have
Speaker 1: to do what they have to do. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know the idea that people, you know, became anti
Speaker 1: Semitic after October seventh. They have a population of a
Speaker 1: little under nine million people and they lost on October seventh,
Speaker 1: the equivalent extrapolated out population size versus population size of
Speaker 1: forty thousand dead Americans in a day and murder, rape, torture, kidnapping, beheading,
Speaker 1: taking all those people hostage, all the weaponry that has
Speaker 1: been fired by their proxies, Hamas his Bala, the Huti Rebels,
Speaker 1: the Iranians firing densely populated areas inside of Tel Aviv
Speaker 1: and other areas like that. I think that Israel's going
Speaker 1: to do what Israel has to do. And you know,
Speaker 1: you hear that there's at times disagreement about the timing.
Speaker 1: But I don't think there's ever been a bigger supporter
Speaker 1: of Israel than Donald Trump. There has never.
Speaker 3: Been I would agree with that. What do you think
Speaker 3: about Reza pa Lave? Is he out of the picture.
Speaker 1: Now, I think he's out of the picture. I think
Speaker 1: he was never in it.
Speaker 3: So now, if Reza Paula is not there, and we're
Speaker 3: leaving the ninety four million Iranians to lead their own nation,
Speaker 3: lead their own government, then is there some sort of
Speaker 3: assurance in these agreements that say you have to stop
Speaker 3: torturing women and children, you have to stop killing people.
Speaker 1: I have not seen one report, nor did any of
Speaker 1: my sources ever mention not a part of the equation. Now,
Speaker 1: I think we have the answer from the president's own
Speaker 1: words when he said to the Uranian people, this may
Speaker 1: be your only moment. Be prepared for it. And I
Speaker 1: think he was saying there we paved the way, we
Speaker 1: took out three tiers of leadership. You got to take
Speaker 1: it the rest of the way, which would be consistent
Speaker 1: with what a stated message was and the Trump doctrine,
Speaker 1: which is no boots on the ground, no forever war. No.
Speaker 3: I agree with you. I mean President Trump has always
Speaker 3: said that he doesn't believe in putting efforts, you know,
Speaker 3: in the Middle East, and he's not a forever war person.
Speaker 1: He's not there for regime change. He never said he was.
Speaker 3: I just you know, it's it's if not us, then
Speaker 3: who like, if we're not that, if we're not those
Speaker 3: people that nations can turn to. I am concerned when
Speaker 3: I see so many people being murdered. I mean kids,
Speaker 3: you know, nine year old's, ten year olds that protested
Speaker 3: with their parents, just walking in the storm.
Speaker 1: And what do you think the American people's appetite would
Speaker 1: be for boots on the ground for regime change in Iran?
Speaker 3: I know it's not there, no people.
Speaker 1: This has been the shortest conflict with the most success,
Speaker 1: minimal and every life is precious to us, with minimal
Speaker 1: casualties and damage to us, the most successful military effort
Speaker 1: in the history of this country. And I think the
Speaker 1: President is not going to allow what happened in Iraq
Speaker 1: and Afghanistan to happen again. And he was very clear,
Speaker 1: He's been clear about that and crystal clear.
Speaker 3: Well, I wish you a lot of luck. I hope
Speaker 3: you get the cravings on Usha Vans, and I hope
Speaker 3: you get some clarity.
Speaker 1: On I'm not asking the I'm not asking that question.
Speaker 1: I double dog dare you to double doggie Dare you know?
Speaker 3: I'll be watching?
Speaker 1: All right? We have a lot of ground to cover.
Speaker 1: One thing I want to do is start paying way
Speaker 1: more attention to the midterm election, because it's the most
Speaker 1: important mid term you will ever face in your lifetime.
Speaker 1: Everything is at stake, and you're going up against a
Speaker 1: bunch of radical communist socialists.