WEBVTT - Twitter Making Cuts, Path Forward for Self-Driving Vehicles

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I. Remember we check at San Francisco and

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Technology coming up the next hour. Twitter

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is shrinking Elon Musk, laying off half the workforce around

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven h people as he restructures the entire company. Meantime,

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>brands continue to mull ads on Twitter, and Musk is

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>doing away with policies like a once a month rest

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>day and war plus self driving technology under the regulatory microscope.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>As we ached closer to a future with driverless cars,

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the challenging road ahead with Aurora, CEO

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Urmson, and another tough day for Peloton after

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>revenue fell way short of expectations. Still, CEO Barry McCarthy

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is confident to turnaround plan will work sooner than expected.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>We will discuss all of that in a moment, but

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>first I want to dig into those layoffs that Bloomberg

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>has learned will happen at Twitter. Musk planning to lay

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>off about thirty seven hundred people, half the current workforce.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Our sources telling us he plans to tell the workers

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>who will be affected on Friday. Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner of

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>course critical along with ed to our reporting on all

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of these latest Twitter developments. Kurt, where are these jobs

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>going to come from? What do we know? Yeah? I

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>mean this is company wide. Um, it's not necessarily going

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in any particular area. Well, the one thing

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that Ellen has kind of stressed that the product and

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>engineering seemed to be where his focuses. So it's possible

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know, that might be a little bit less

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>impacted than something like, um, you know, trust and safety

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or policy legal things like that. But you know, this

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is a part of his strategy to try and get

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the company into a better financial situation. Right, he paid

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>forty four billion dollars for Twitter. They now have these

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>huge debt payments that they're going to have to start

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>paying off for these interest payments. Um, and you know

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>part of his plan is let's cut head count. So

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>how are Twitter employees feeling right now? I mean, the

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>acts is going to come down on Friday, and nobody

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>knows if they're going to be cut yet. That's exactly right.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And they're not only that, Emily, they haven't heard from

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk at all since the deal clothes, they haven't

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>heard from any other leadership, right. Everyone's kind of talking

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with their managers, but there's been no company wide messaging

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. All of the C suite um, you know, CEO, CMO, CFO,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>all of those folks were fired last week or early

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 1>this week. So if you're employee at Twitter, you're getting

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>your information from places like Bloomberg or from other media outlets, right,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you're finding out what's happening at your

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>own company. And so that's quite unsettling for a lot

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of people, especially when you're sitting around wondering, am I

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be employed by the end of the week.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is a stressful time internally, to say the least.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Um and a lot of employees we're seeing are sort

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of looking out for each other, trying to give best

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tips on what happens when you get laid off. Hey,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>let let me make references for you, that kind of thing.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're trying to to take care of each

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>other because the company doesn't seem to be doing it

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for them. Meantime, we've just got this headline from Dow

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Jones at a number of pretty prominent advertisers are pausing

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>ads on Twitter. I mean, do you think that this

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>is going to become a bigger thing? I mean, we

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about the potential for a boycott. Does it get

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to that, Well, this is what I think we're talking

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>about yesterday, and I think that the chance of a

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>boycott not only seems possible, but I do think it

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like a really big deal. And again, it's because

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the time we saw this happen with Facebook, all the

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>key executives that the todd the Sheryl Sandberg's and those

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the company on the business side,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they went out and they did damage control for days, right,

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And we're just not going to see that at Twitter

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>because all the people at the top of a company

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are gone. And so when you have these big advertisers,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter is very much a relationship driven advertising business

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because they don't have that, you know, very intimate direct

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>response type stuff. When you have these big advertisers really

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>being cautious or putting things on pause, you don't have

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the people inside of Twitter to necessarily go to them

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and reassure them like some of these other big ad

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>companies might. So I think it's a I think it's

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous thing that's happening here. And tell us a

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what we know about how decisions are

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>being made on the inside, who's making the decisions, and

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>how things that are being communicated are actually being communicated. Yeah, well,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we know that Ellen is making the decisions, right, and

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the best I can I can tell is that a

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of things are being done very quickly and sort

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of haphazardly. Right, I mean, even this change, they're going

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise the price of their subscription product to eight dollars,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to add some new features, including the

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>blue check verification. You know, we saw him sort of

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>like work shopping this publicly on Twitter, right, He's like tweeting, Hey,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>would you pay for this? How much would you pay?

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What features would you want? And then all of a sudden,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>he just announced it the next day. And so we're

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing there's a very small group of folks, including some

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists, who are sort of advising him here. But

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>really it feels like Ellen is sort of um, you know,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of making this up as he goes along. As

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, there's not a lot of um messaging coming

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>from the top of the company at all. So unless

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>you're in a particular group working on a specific problem

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for him, you don't really know what's happening at the company.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Kurt, and I'll let you get back to

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>work in the phone signal, your Twitter, d M s

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and all the ways you're breaking all this news. Bloomberg's

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner, thank you for the update. Last month, a

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>venture capital firm CRV announced one and a half billion

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars and funding across two funds, which means more dry

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>powder to take advantage of low value tions. But how

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are firms thinking about how to deploy all that cash

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and potentially very long downturn. Kristan Baker Spone is a

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>general partner at CRV and joins me now. Kristen, how

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>is crvs strategy evolving in the midst of this downturn?

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>What are you all talking about around the partner table.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Around the partner table, we're talking about how we're continuing

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to play to our strengths. CRV has been in business

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for over fifty two years and focused on backing founders

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at the early stages. We raised one point five billion dollars,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, to continue to do that and invested

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the earliest stages, partnering with founders that are building game

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>changing companies. So are you waiting for valuations to come down?

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And are you finding enough places to put that cash

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>given so many companies out there are struggling. We're seeing

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>valuations compressed across the board. You even just mentioned some

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 1>books out in the public markets that are seeing valuations compress,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that play out again across the private

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>sector as well. That being said, at the early stages,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we're backing founders that are in this journey for the

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>long haul. And as someone who focuses on health tech,

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>healthcare isn't completely recession proof, but it's definitely a defensive

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>place to be in the market where there's continued to

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>be spend an innovation and technology adoption. So let's talk

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about health tech because I know that's your focus. Is

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it as cool as it was in the middle of

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic or not? Well, I continue to think it's

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>very cool. That being said, I think that there was

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting we had a watershed moment during the

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>pandemic where there were a number of trends that were

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>already happening across whether it's consumerism and healthcare adoption of

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>technology bringing AI into healthcare delivery that the pandemic helped unlock,

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and that activation energy and that pent up demand was released.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Now as the market has cooled, we're continuing to see

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>those trends play out, but at a much more at

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a much more um reasonable pay ace of technology adoption.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>A few companies that a highlight, you know, one being

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a company Wheel. You just had the logo up on

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the screen. Weigel is in the health, telehealth and marketplace

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>space where it's helping unlock telehealth for large tech companies,

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for large providers as well as for companies that are

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to put great care in the hands of consumers

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like you and me. So what is it about health

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>tech that you know specifically? It's like to you. We

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have Apple coming into this, Google, Amazon trying to get

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in to health tech. Is that a threat that big

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>tech giants want in or is that an opportunity? I

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's an opportunity. We're seeing a number of large

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>players come into the space. You mentioned Amazon buying one Medical.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing rumors of Apple getting into the health insurance game.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing Google continue to play in the data space.

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a recognition of how technology has been

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in healthcare bit of a laggered into story um and

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so much opportunity to bring healthcare into the hands

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of not only clinicians but also individuals like you and me,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to bring us the care that we need

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>when we need it, so many of us. You know,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for the very first time during the pandemic, did at

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>home Diagnostics had our first telehealth visit. But there's also

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge opportunity to drive better efficiency in the care

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>delivery system across the board. Meantime, more broadly, the world

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is falling apart and Silicon Valley is kind of crumbling.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>We've seen layoffs across the board. We just talked about

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty people about to lose their jobs at Twitter. Does

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this how broader ramifications on the startup ecosystem. They're definitely

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>broad our immifications across the startup ecosystem, and that's why

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know the breadth and depth of the firm like CRV,

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>where we've partnered at the early stage, but also seeing

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of different ups and downs in the market.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is where you know, we're seeing leaders make

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>really tough decisions and the leaders are that are making

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>tough decisions, are focusing not just on growth. Growth is

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>necessary but not sufficient. How are they focusing and investing

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in their companies and in the future R and D

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as the growth to drive scalable business models

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and build the game changing companies that were excited to

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to back. So what advice are you giving startup

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>founders right now given these tough market conditions. As a

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>board member and a partner to many of the founders

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>that I work with, I'm trying to help them see

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>around corners and see what's coming down the pike. And

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the key things that founders are

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>focusing on is not just how can they have clear

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>eyes and continue to focus on their business but also

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>make the tough decisions. You know, oftentimes, uh, it can

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>be it can be tempting to continue to want to

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>see the world play out. But what I see are

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>those folks that are those founders that are making the

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>tough decisions with clear eyes, with advice from their executive

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>teams as well as their investor partners, are going to

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be the ones that cannot just weather the storm, but

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>hopefully emerge even stronger. So talk to me a little

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>bit then about the founders you think that will or

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>can be successful at a time like this. I mean

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>people are calling this, you know, dot com bust two

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>point oh. I mean this could go down in the

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>history books as a tectonic shift in you know, the industry.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the companies that survive and the companies that

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>do not. We continue to focus on backing not only

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>passionate founders, but Emily, you just mentioned how tough the

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>times are. The word that comes to mind is grit.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you founders and companies that can be gritty and

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not just as I mentioned, move through this time, but

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially emerge stronger. I also look for founders that are beacons,

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that are beacons for talent, that will continue to be

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>beacons for customers and for capital even in the tough times.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to continue to see investment in

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really high quality teams and really high quality businesses. Those

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't going away. Um, what we're seeing is that flight

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>towards that really high quality where there's growth but also

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>efficient growth to building these companies. And I know you

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know you obviously you also worked in banking. You helped

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>take some companies public. What is your sense of how

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>long this downturn last? You know, how long are we

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in for here? Is it six months? Is it eighteen?

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it three years? Well, you know, I am continuing

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to be continuously optimistic that will will make our way through.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>That being said, planning for a bit of a stormy

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>weather ahead. So, um, you know, your guess is as

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>good as mine in terms of how long this will last.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think we're continuing to invest in companies and

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>work with founders that are seeing not just a brightness

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon, but hopefully continuing to work through these storms. Um,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>my guess is we're going to be in this for

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a considerable amount of time, and so having folks that

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue to focus on the fundamentals of

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>their business, keep the main thing, the main thing, and

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>build towards the future. Alright, keep the main thing the

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>main thing. We'll remember that. Kristin Baker's phone, general partner

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>at CRV, Thank you so much for stopping by. All Right,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>coming up, Peloton continuing to struggle, but the CEO still upbeat.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll explain why next. This is Bloomberg Peloton rebounding after

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>tumbling earlier with the company posting a weaker forecast than expected,

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>even as the CEO declared it's meeting its own timeline

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for turning the fitness company around. Joining us now Bloomberg,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Smart German Mark Uh talk to us about what's going

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>on here. Investors clearly don't like what they see. Yeah,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we got this morning was the definition of a mixed

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>earnings report or PR putting its fingerprints over some numbers here.

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at the numbers, things are not

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>so great. You're seeing a revenue forecasts as a client

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seven percent UH in the current quarter. That's

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the second fiscal quarter for Peloton. On the other hand,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a letter from Barry McCarthy, Peloton CEO, saying

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that the ship is starting to turn. That is my

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>impression as well. You are seeing some positive direction happening

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in some of these numbers. Gross margins have improved over

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the past couple quarters. Free cash flow has improved, but

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't like our the revenue numbers, specifically for hardware,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they're hard hardware revenue numbers continue to fall while their

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>subscription numbers continue to climb. The good news there is

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you see usages continuing. Churn is very low. Subscriptions are continuing,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but people are not buying the hardware. To me, this

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>raises the question why is Peloton in the hardware business

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at all? Right? Why not completely pivot the company away

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to putting its tablet on third party bikes? As we know,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Peloton probably has the best content, probably has the best

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>software in the hardware bike in treadmill space. Why not

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>us get rid of your failing hardware business and make

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a really big subscription business. So I think that's where

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the company may eventually go. So clearly some really bad

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>news on overall revenue, but some good news in terms

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of how the company is framing what it's calling a

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>turnaround and on the subscription front. How do we measure

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>whether the company is really beating its own timeline? Do

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you agree? I mean, there's really no way to measure

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's beating its own timeline. We have to take

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>their word for it, right. Barry McCarthy says his timeline

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was longer than the one year. He says that you

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>know this has taken right. Remember he joined in February

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's really pulled the company apart. You've laid off

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people already, You've outsourced manufacturing, you've outsourced customer service,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you've outsourced deliveries. Right, So they pulled every lever possible.

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>They've run the company into the ground and really starting

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to start over. But we don't see

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the positive impact there on the stock. Obviously their town

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, over at this point in the last year

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or so. But you are seeing some positive comments and

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>positive momentum. They're really talking up subscriptions. Subscriptions are now

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>well over six of their overall revenue, right, which obviously

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the case that there, you know, when they were

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>high flying at the you know, the top of the pandemic.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think if they continue to move the needle

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and subscriptions, they really try to compete with Apple Fitness Plus, Uh,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they really try to integrate with bundles between hardware and

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>software and ultimately maybe exit hardware, something that I speculate

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they should do, not saying they said they would do.

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they you know, could be on solid ground

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for a little while. Quick question, what about an acquisition

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Apple, Would they ever buy a Peloton? I don't

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>think Apple whatever buy Peloton. They have Fitness Plus, they

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have the Apple Watch, and really you would be buying

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>their hardware business, which is you know, failing at this point.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon maybe for prime. I really think Netflix has not

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>done a good job in expanding beyond their core content.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>They've really failed in gaming. They should probably try to

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>get into music as well, but fitness that could be

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a big way to lock people into Netflix subscriptions. All right,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like some CEOs have some consulting to do with

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark German. Mark, thank you so much for joining us.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I always appreciate you stopping by meantime, Jeff Bezos maybe

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>buying another business in Washington. The NFL commanders, the Amazon founder,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>may bid for this team, according to folks familiar with

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the matter. The news was first reported by The Watchington Post,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>which Bezos also owns. Media entrepreneur Byron Island is preparing

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to sell the team. Amazon currently carries the NFL's Thursday

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>night football package. Welcome back to bloom More Technology, Emily

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>check in San Francisco. I want to get back to

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets and names across e V and mobility on

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the move. Here's at Ludlow back again, Yeah, Nikolas, where

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I was spending my morning and it was really interesting.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The stock up as much as them percent and then

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately closing down pretty reasonable performance in the corner, you know,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>very modest revenues, but what spoot the market was. In fact,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they are not going to reach their original guidance as

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>three battery electric semi trucks this year, and actually sort

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of downgraded the outlook for the rest of the year

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and next year, saying that performance is not going to

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be as good as they hope. Their expectations are being

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>lowered because customers for battery electric commercial vehicles are pulling

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>up back. They're basically saying that the cost is too

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>high right now, the charging infrastructure is too high. You

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>look at that chart and kind of the wild ride

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that we had for Nicola throughout Thursday's session to others

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in that space as well. Fiska also sliding after it

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>reported a loss in RBC cut the stock to sector

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>perform I think there's a lot of interest in Fiska

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>given that they plan to start production of their SUV

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>this month. Of course it's built by a third party,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a raw innovation more focused on

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the autonomous driving space. This is a very much a

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>pre revenue company, but with some fighting talk, they are

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>capitalized to get in and Aurora telling investors that from

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they're on track to launch this commercial autonomous trucking business.

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Fighting talk. The stocks seem to like it is fighting

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>talking up. I think there's a lot of questions in

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this space right now. All right, and hang on, I

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>want to stick with Aurora and the future of autonomy.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Aurora giving some funning talk about the real world prospects

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for self driving tech. But the industry is having a

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>rocky patch with competitor Argo AI shutting down after Volkswagen

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and Ford walked away from backing that deal. Is it

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the first crack and a bigger fissure and self driving technology?

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Or as co founder and CEO Chris Urmson is with

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>us now, So Chris, what do you think is it? Yeah?

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just normal. Right. What we're seeing right

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>now is what happens in any industry that if you

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the automotive industry, at the beginning of the

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, there was two fifty car companies. By the

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties, there was three, and so we've seen a

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies kind of spring up explore this space,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and some of they are going to succeed some of

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>them aren't at Aurora. We positioned ourselves to be independent

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to have the capital we need, the people in the technology,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, I'm actually more optimistic than ever

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>before about the space and where we're going. Well, as

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do you say risk is normal, But if you look

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>at what happened with Ourgo shutting down big investors or

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>potential investors pulling out, is that a risk of our

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.239
<v Speaker 1>faces No, In fact it's been. It's part of our

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>strategic advantage. Right from day one. We wanted to be

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an independent company because we knew we wanted to be

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>able to focus on the thing that mattered, on delivering

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>on our mission getting self driving technology into the market.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 1>When Jim Farley talked about shutting down their investment in Ourgo,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he literally said, we want to place our bets somewhere else, right,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So we don't want to be another bet. We want

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the bet uh And I think we If

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at our investor base, these are folks you

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>get the opportunity, understand the quality of the team, and

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>are excited about the journey. More on, Chris, is good

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to see you virtually at least you know you just

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>said that what we're seeing in the industry is normal.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But what VW and Ford were saying is that actually

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we're pulling out because this is a much more distant

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>technology than we thought. It's too far away. Right now,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing to ensure stability for yourselves in

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of raising money? Are you going to plan head

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>count reduction to kind of preserve cash because you guys

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>still have a little way to go as well. Yeah,

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so I've been in the space for twenty years ish um,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so kind of understand how hard the problem is. And again,

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we we engineered the company from day one to solve

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>these important problems, realizing we were climbing a mountain. So

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the company we have amazing partners. We work with as

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got on the screen here Volvo Trucks. We work

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with pack oar to the top three truck manufacturers, who

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>work with Toyota, the world's number one car manufacturer, Uber,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the world's wonder one right healing platform, FedEx, Schneider Werner,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these amazing trucking companies. So we feel like

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>we're spring loaded on that front to go to market.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, yep, we we raised a lot of

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. We're in a very strong position with one

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>point two billion dollars on the balance sheet at the

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the quarter. So we're we're really excited about

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the path forward here. Is it possible that Apple or

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft buys your company? Chris? We have so so I

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>think you're alluding to a memo that leak that I

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>drafted for a conversation with our board, and so I

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether it's possible or not. Um Uh, you know,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to comment on those kind of things,

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's I think for any company in the in

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the existing marketing conditions, you need to be exploring the

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>span of options from um you know, as you said,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>headcount reduction, acquiring companies, using you know, like they talk

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about a crisis being the worst thing to waste through

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>focus and as a company, that's what we've taken, right

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is the path. Okay, We're going to focus on getting

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the trucking product market. We're going to be more efficient

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>where we can be with the capital we have on hand,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're just going to execute through this. And we

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>have the capital to do that, and we have the

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>team and technology to make it happen. Chris, when you

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and I lost saw each other we were in Texas

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>riding around in self driving semi trucks. Do you remember that?

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, your regional ambitions for Aurora were broadened

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that It seems like very much the focus is on

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the the use case of trucking, delivery, haulage. Have you

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>had talks with some of the big players in that space,

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>like Amazon, like Walmart. So, so we are still building

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a platform that will drive all kinds of vehicles. The

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>right first place first to deploy the technology is in trucking.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We see the opportunity, the market need is there, the

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>economics are there, the market scale is there. Right, it

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is just the right place to deploy this first. But

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we have those partnerships with Toyota and Uber that thus springloaders.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>When we get to right healing, which will be our

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>second product in the space, we expect to be you know,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to to go charge into that, and yes, we have

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing partnerships. Or Anthetics is the largest carrier of lesson

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>truckloaders loads in the US and it's also the most

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>carrier most tractors and trailers of anyone in the US.

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're working with some amazing folks today. You know,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the longer term, you know, beyond trucking.

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Where could this technology go and how long is it

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>really going to take because you know, you know, much

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage recently has been we've been talking and

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>talking and talking about this. You said, you've been in

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this industry for twenty ish years, um, but still hasn't

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>fully come to fruition. Well, we're at this point. So

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to one of the challenges of our technologies. We get

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to develop it like out in the public because we're

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on the roads and people see it. So I think

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you get to see a little bit more behind the

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>curtain of what it takes to actually develop a game

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>changing or world changing technology. I think it's really exciting

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to see some of our competitors and vehicles on the

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>road with no drivers in in places like uh in Arizona,

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. We're on the road every day with

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>our trucks hauling loads for our customers, and so that's exciting.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And we're looking forward to the next two years. And

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been a leader in transparent orency. We've shared our

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>roadmap from here to the launching the product with that operator,

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and we continue we want to continue to do that

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>to build trust through what I think of as the

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>current valley of disillusionment. Can you give me a number

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>how long until long haul trucking is truly driverless? Yeah,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>So we've shared a roadmap for us. At the end

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of Q one, we're working towards having the roar driver

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be feature complete, which means it does everything it needs

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to to be able to drive, just not yet well enough.

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>By the end of next year, we're working towards having

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the roar driver be ready so that if we had

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a truck platform that had the was autonomy enabled, we'd

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to pull the operators out of those trucks

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and have them operate without anybody on board. And we

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>expect to actually launch in the following year, in twenty

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>four Chris, Look, you know, I know at asked earlier

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about the difficulty of the environment, but you know, have

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you thought about cost costs, have you thought about layoffs?

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It seems like everyone is thinking about it, but everyone's

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>strategy is different. For example, Brian Chesky told us yesterday,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>UH to use a car analogy, he said, we're actually

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stepping on the gas, not stepping on the brakes. Yeah.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>For us, we've we continue to focus on being efficient

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>with the capital we have. That will pushes the capital

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we have on hand pushes into mid We've looked at

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>where can we be doing things sequentially rather than parallel,

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the reasons why we're focusing so

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>much on trucking. We're not uh not doing cars, but

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna kind of have that more streamline off the

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>back of what we do in trucks. We've looked at

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>through the organization, how can we restructure things to be

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>more efficient. We've made changes to the way people report UM.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>We've looked for duplications and simplified those and move people

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>in different parts of the organizations. And we've looked at,

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things we need versus one

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the things we want, and we're just getting the

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>things we need. UM. So we're being thoughtful. We're extending

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the runway where we can. But but the opportunity is

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so exciting, the position we're in is so amazing that

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we just need to charge through this drive through alright,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Aroor CEO Chris Urmson and our own let's thank thank

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you both very much. All right, coming up to major

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>power players in Crypto just reported earnings coin Base and

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Square coming up. This is Bloomberg coin based and block

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>chas reported earnings as headwinds for crypto persist Bossi dug

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>through the report, Sinali, what are the highlights. It's a

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty good day when you're looking at these firms and

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at block for example, which had already sold

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>off this year, We're coming in with gross profit above expectations.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>They're really growing their cash up there. I want to

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of hone in here as a pertains of crypto,

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because of course we have a very crypto friendly CEO

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in Jack Dorsey. Bitcoin revenue was one eight billion nearly.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>While that's down about three percent year over year, it's

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>still up a hundred twenty eight percent on a three

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>year compounded growth rate. So if you're looking at the

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto market and how what it means for these fintech firms,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it's really not as bad as it could be. And

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of course that commitment is still there as they grow

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>those other financial services really quickly. Pivoting here even the

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>coin base, they have really highlighted a lot of headwinds here.

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You do see that jump here in subscription and services revenue,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is even larger that jump, it would be

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>two percent when you hold crypto prices constant, they're really

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from that interest incomes. So you're seeing these firms

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>really leaning on the diversification emily of the businesses here

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to show investors what they're worth. Robin Hood

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to point out as well because revenue top

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to estimates, uh, and really they're the stockwise or the

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>down there down the least of the group here. They're

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>only downe about this year crypto decreased twelve percent, but

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>options in equities were up and cost cutting is really

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>helping them drop operating expenses down twelve percent, and you're

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing that helped them really come in with an adjusted

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>profit number that is better than expected. They're coming in

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>with adjusted profit that is rather than a loss. But again,

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>can that can that hold when it's not just on

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>an adjusted basis? You know, Jack Dorcy, of course, the

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Block, has been in the news all gear

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.959
<v Speaker 1>for a totally different reason, given the drama that's happening

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter. You know, did we hear from Jack on

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the call and you know, talk to us a little

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of Obviously he was really instrumental and and launching

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>some of Twitter's early crypto projects. You tell us a

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about the connection, certainly because we know

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Jack himself has really supported a lot of companies in

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the in the Lightning network, for example, and really try

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to integrate it with Twitter. But no, he he was

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>available in the block call, and we know he's focusing

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>very much so on block and financial services. He did

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>not discuss Twitter, a question I would have this kind

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of looming out there in the ether is as it

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>pertains to block in Twitter. We asked Anthony Nodo yesterday

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a sofa a similar question, given his former Twitter background,

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>whether these new fintech firms can partner with Twitter in

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>order to expand financial services to create that great super

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>app that loves to talk about so looming open a

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>question and it's yet to be seen. But no, no,

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday certainly did seem like they were open for business.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Should that be something that Twitter would explore? All right,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomer Snelly Bostick, thank you on that note. We just

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>got another headline on the Bloomberg that Elon Musk is

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>asking Twitter to cut infrastructure costs by a billion dollars.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>This on top of more than thirty seven hundred employees

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've reported will be laid off at Twitter tomorrow

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and that they will be informed of whether or not uh,

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be laid off tomorrow. So again another

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>headline coming from orders that Musk is calling on Twitter

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to cut infrastructure costs by a billion dollars. Pitch Book

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>just released a report on women in venture capital found

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that women founders have posted the second highest deal value

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>figures on record despite volatility, joining us now Sarah Chin Spellings,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>co founder and managing partner of Beyond the Billion UM.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Sarah talked to us about UM the silver linings that

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you found for women run businesses. Here. Hi, Emily, so

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>good to be here, Thanks so much for highlighting. I'll

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>report once again, you know, the data continues to tell

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the same story. And I think you've heard this narrative before, Emily,

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that female founders continue to outperform no matter what the circumstances,

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>despite market conditions, despite their turbulence in the markets, they

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>continued to be resilient, and yet they continue to be

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>under invested. So while we you're seeing higher numbers compared

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to one with with deal value becoming a lot higher

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>UM in the recent months, what's not sort of on

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the upward trajectory that we're really looking forward towards is

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the proportion of deal value and deal count as a

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>whole competitive to the whole venture capital. So really a

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lot to unpack here, you know, from exit value to

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>their performance in general, from even looking at the burn

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>rate of venture capital funding um. And there's been a

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of news as I think you've covered in your

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>last couple of segments as well, right, you found that

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>women founders had lower burn rates, greater valuation growth at

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the late stage versus companies founded by men. You're over

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a year. What do you think behind that? Yeah, you

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.239
<v Speaker 1>know this data. You know, people always ask us, are

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you surprised by the numbers, and the reality is we're

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not because women continue to outperform in leaps and bounce

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is this good news venues

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they've not traditionally had a lot of funding and they've

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>had to work with what they had, and that means

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot more resilient. They've planned their

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>cash management and they're able to weather the storm. And

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>this you know, guess what, it is a little bit

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of a funding winter, and the storm is here and

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>whiles you know, there will be winners and losers. I

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's clear that women have been smart about planning

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>forward and their cash management is showing right now with

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the burn rais being a lot more manageable. And by

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, as you mentioned, you know, the drop in

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>late stage funding in terms of median valuations that we saw,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the crash from from the valuations from turning

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to one which was really you know, Blockbuster year that

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they were starting to sort of see unraveled now was

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>really showing how there were a lot of companies that

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>had valuations that were not sustained. And with female founders

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.239
<v Speaker 1>there are always a lot more UM. I wouldn't call

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it conservative, but there are a lots smarter, a lot

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>more UM realistic about their projections and what they can do,

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and therefore their evaluations are sustained. That sort of explaining

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of why the drop hasn't been as much

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as you've seen for the wider market. I'm not going

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to argue with those adjectives, Sarah about the sectors that

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>are seeing the most growth. You know, we were talking

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about health tech earlier, self driving tech earlier, and the

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>narrative is different for all of them. Yeah, well, Emily,

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the good news is that women continue to

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>innovate in all sectors, right, So of course we see

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the data where there's a lot of growth in retail,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>in B two B sas. In fact, you know, some

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the top unicorns that have female founders at the

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>HELM were women in health tech and women in stas

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. The two decacorns that emerge, so decacorns being

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for those who may not be as familiar, um multi

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>billion companies valued at ten billion dollars and that's talk

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>desk and deal that really brought the valuation up and

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and sort of the numbers and trends that we're seeing.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a lot of growth in retail and

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>health tech, in fintech and SAS and we're excited by

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, you know, for the that we do

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>without consulting with funds over a hundred funds across the globe.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Women continue to innovate across the sectors despite market conditions.

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Even if they're in a sector that's being hit hard

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>right now with market conditions, they are pivoting and figuring

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>out what next. How are dynamics between LPs and GPS

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>changing in this environment, there's a lot of money sitting

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines that venture capitalists have raised. There's not

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a place to put it all. Yeah, Emily, thanks

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for asking all of that. You know, the LP and

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>GP sort of connection is one that we've focus a

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lot on, right, and I think you've picked that up rightly.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Despite what has been said about the fundraising winter, it's

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>clear that there is a dispersion right there, winners and

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>their losers, and there are those multi billion firms that

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>continue to raise billions of dollars and you know, we've

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of dry poutics standing on the sidelines.

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But he this is what's happening. You know, LPs are

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>being a lot more cautious, right. The word is we're optimistic,

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>optimistically cautious about the wave would and therefore, despite money

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>in the bank um, a lot of them are being

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>slow to deploy. So in fact, you know, whilst you're

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of money being passed onto gps, uh,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't necessarily pass on to the founders, which is

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>where they're feeling the crunch a little bit. But you know,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the winners will emerge and I think it'll be more

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and more important to UH see founders really emerge in

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>this crisis, right. I think a lot of the big

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>names that you and I know, Uber, ARABNB all emerged

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from a time of crisis, and I think this is

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good time for gps that are focused

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on what next, the next generation companies to really do

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the right thing, and LPs have a role to play

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>here beyond the billions. Co founder sarag And Spellings, thank

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you for sharing all of that with us. Worth checking

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>out the report and more depth if you'd like. Later

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on the show this week Friday XPED CEO Peter Kerrent,

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to us about the travel rebound or lack there.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Baden,