WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fed's Balance Sheet With Bullard

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. To me,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the story that struck out to me over the weekend

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>was about how some drillers are now paying people to

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>take the oil away from them. Basically negative pricing in

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the oil patch given the glut that we're seeing in

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>the lack of storage available, just shocking. Well, let's talk

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>about that with Francisco Blanche Bank America Global head of

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Commodities and Derivotius Research. Lucky to have Francisco join us

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on the phone this morning. Fantastic to have you with us. Francisco,

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>let's start the show. We are we breaching storage capacity

0:00:55.560 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in various parts of the United States. Thanks for having me. Jonathan, Um,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we are. We are not yet, but we are going

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to get there very soon. I remember you were asking before,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the bigger show because the demand show sply shock.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Well it's the demand shok. We think that demand will

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>be down seventeen million barrels a day in the month

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of April globally. Remember that's a seventeen percent decline on

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million barrel base. So UM the supply self,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>by contrast, I think it's probably gonna be about three

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or four million barrels in April. UM. So, so now

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a massive glass that we've never seen before.

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>When when when you say, when you say Francisco demand

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>goes down seventeen million barrels, What demand drops? I mean

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what usage causes that drop? And demand do we stop?

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean is it John stop? And do using ubers

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Bentley and all that? What causes it? Well? So, so,

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>first of all, um, I would say the most impacted

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>sector is UH airlines. In the U s Alone, we've

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>seen traffic traffic down more than eighty five percent um

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>TOM eighty five I mean, we've basically shut down most

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>domestic travel in Europe. We can see similar numbers down

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine percent across most countries. UM. If you look

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at China, however, which is interesting, the drop there also

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was about eighty five percent at the trial. However, they've

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>only recovered to around of normal levels despite having been

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the virus for three months. So so clearly

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the airline sector is the most impacted one. Uh, followed

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>by UM, you know you're asking about Uger's and I

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people are working from home now,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so that's a lot of restaurants are shut down. Uh.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Basically two people are going are losing jobs, so there's

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people staying home either because then at

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>have jobs because they're working remotely. So it's also heard

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>in gulfiling demand. We're in numbers down thirty uh year

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and year in gasoline man here, so it's really across

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the board, but the most impacted sector is the airline sector.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So going forward, Sebastian Gailey of Nordea Bank earlier in

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the show was saying that he expects oil to go

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>back up to forty five barrel at some point in

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the not so distant future. How realistic is that and

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>how long lasting is this period of time where we

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>could see sub twenty dollars a barrel oil? Um. So

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we're we're looking at this crisis into UH looking at

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the two main parameters. One is the depth of the

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>initial drop and then second is the dulation of the crisis. UM.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we have a you know, I think we

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>have a reasonable handle on the droop. We think seventeen

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>million barrels today is the right number. It could be twenty,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be fifteen. Again, it's hard to tell, right, Um,

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of guesswork going on here. But then

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the duration is a little more complete hit it um.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Now in China, as I said before, we started to

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>see a very modest recovery, although for example, traffic, which

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>which also took a big hitting China, is back to

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about normal, so roughly down fifteen percent year and year.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we're not earlier um earlier in in in

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. So those are the key numbers really

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to watch the recovery rate. Do you just assume a

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>week bundled commodity index? Do you just assume weaker Aussie

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar versus the yan or other metrics? I mean, is

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it just a fade away for commodities. Um, it's gonna

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of straight away for a little bit.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>But but then remember the other thing that's gonna happen

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>tom in the in the second half of the year

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe is that we are going to to lose a

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of supply either because in cases like copper, we

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>have fifteen percent of supply at risk, or in cases

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like oil, we're just gonna decimate investment across a broad

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>range of regions, which in turn will lead to a

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>supply decline into one UM and then then as it

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>released to our culture. That's the news about you know,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>news about UH. Potentially the some some agricultural commodity producers

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>facing UM coronavirus risks as well at their at their plans.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think the biggest risk really is

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is UH demand goes down nationally, prices go down. Then

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as we recover, we will have hampered, we will have

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>heard our productive capacity and thus what leads to the

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>price rally at some point in in the recovery cycle.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's end of twenty one, I don't know. It

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>depends on how long this this UH crisis last. Francisco Blach,

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bank America winking on the commodity round. They crew

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>dressed specifically. We would like to welcome to the SIS

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>President Jo Bollard, to Bloomberg Television and Radio Worldwide, thank

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us this morning. I want to see

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if we can't catch up a little bit about ten

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>days ago you predicted we could see unemployment as high

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>as thirty percent in the second quarter, and you call

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>for a massive stimulus program. We got a massive stimulus program.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So does that change your forecast for unemployment and growth? Yeah,

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me this morning. I did want to

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>see pandemic relief. I wouldn't call it stimulus. I would

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>call it pandemic relief. Uh. What I interpret the program

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do is stabilize incomes and stabilize businesses

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as we work our way through this investment in our

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>national health over the next couple of months. Here on

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment, uh, we do have a blog on this. Uh.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>If you read the blog carefully, you'll see that there

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is a way to bound the unemployment rate. It's going

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhere between ten and I think the upper

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bound is like but that's because we're just identifying vulnerable

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>workers in this environment. And what's going to happen is

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that those workers, some of those workers are going to

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have to seek relief so that they can pay their

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>bills through this period. So we're expecting the unemployment rate

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to spike, but let's call that pandemic relieve. Then they

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can pay their bills and once the virus goes away,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be able to return to normal. So hopefully,

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>if this all works smoothly, and there's a lot in

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the legislation as well, UM, we'll be able to come

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>out on the other side and get the economy rock

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and again. Well, Wednesday is April one. Mortgage payments are due,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>rent payments are due, Utility bills are do. Could we

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have a problem if people can't pay their bills on Wednesday? Uh?

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>My sense is, of course, we're in a crisis situation ration.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But my sense is that everyone really understands what's going

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on here now because obviously it's been the topic number one,

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not just in the US but around the world. So

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I think people pretty much understand that, Uh, the relief

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to enable people to pay their bills as

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>best they can. Um, there might be some uh delays

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and things you'd expect that in a crisis situation, but

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>by and large, I think there are plenty of resources

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>in the fiscal package to handle what we're going to

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>go through here. Well, the main street lending program that

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys have announced is in the package. How's that

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>going to work? And when does that start? Uh? That's

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in the design phase right now. So I think from

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a firm's point of view, there are two ways to

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>handle the crisis. One would be the traditional, which would

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be to shut down temporarily and send the workers over

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic relief or unemployment line. And a lot

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to occur. That's already occurred. We

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sell the claims number last week, UH, and that's okay,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you're getting UH, and the the umployment insurance benefit is

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>beefed up, so they're going to get closer to acent

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a dent of what they would would have

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten had they just continued to work. So I think

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that part that's one way to go. But if if

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the firm goes in that direction, they might lose connection

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with their workers. So another direction to go is to

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the Small Business Administration get a loan, which

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately forgivable if you meet certain conditions, mainly that

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you keep your payroll more or less intact. So if

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you go that route as a firm, then you might

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to retain all your workers and then when

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the startup occurs later, you'll be able to have the

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>same workers and you don't have to go higher all

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>over again and get your business ramped up again. So

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that might be a better way to go for many companies.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>If companies decide to go that way, then we'll see

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>lower unemployment and more uptake on sp a loan side.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Your district has a lower incidence of infection rate at

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this point, So what's happening in your district? I normally

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>ask you what the CEOs are telling you, but I

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>also want to know what mom and pop are telling

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you from the mom and pop stores. Yeah, we do

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have a lower rate of infection, but boy, it's pretty quiet,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>uh the you know where I live here in the

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>fameless metro area. You know, most things are shut down.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>People stay at home. So that makes me think, uh,

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and just reading about it across the country that the

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's a lot of regional variation here probably

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>not the right way to think about this. I think

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everywhere has has bought into the idea that

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you should be very careful about going out and very

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>careful about spreading this vibrus. Also, I think another thing

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind, this is not just things that

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>are ordered by health officials. This is individuals and families

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>making their own decisions and businesses making their own decisions

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about how they want to handle the situation. So what

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you have is a kind of private sector and household

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>response to the crisis, which includes them not wanting to

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>get sick and not wanting to get others that are

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in their circle sick. So because of that, um, regardless

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of what the health officials would say, at this point,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone wants to basically stay home until this

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>virus goes away. And so because of that, I think

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>all across the country you're basically in a partial shutdown situation.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you a couple of things about the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>bill that passed and the defense new powers. The language

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in the bill says you can buy corporate bonds down

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to the lowest rating for corporates, and uh, those are

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>obviously the ones who are going to need the most help,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But they're also the ones most likely to see their

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>ratings downgraded into junk, which in theory, you can't own.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So how much risk are you willing to take on? Yeah,

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>well we've got we've got to think about exactly how

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to execute on that one. But the main idea of

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a program like that is to restore basic market functioning.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Which broke down as this crisis broke out here. So

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got backing from the Treasury that's at

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>three program very powerful, and I think we'll be able

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>to keep price discovery going in that in that sector there. Uh,

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you need bus also getting a nod in the bill.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to be a new program to buy

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>immunees or are you just going to use the existing

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>program that you set up last week? Well, again, I

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>think uh. And eventually that kind of market is mostly

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that we want market functioning to occur. So I think

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>investors got so worried about state and local government that

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they started to pull away from those kinds of investments,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>which have historically been pretty solid. So hopefully we'll get

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>price discovery going in and and uh, I think the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>market will actually be fine here. Again, I think there

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of resources in the bill uh to handle

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>our current situation, and that should reassure investors that state

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and local governments will be made whole here. Uh, the

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>law unintended consequences is kicked it in the mortgage market.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>The big massive purchases you've made it NBA are now

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>leading to big margin calls for brokers. Uh. Is that

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>something you can do something about, or there are other

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>possible unintended consequences you worry about. UM. We we have

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>heard reports of that, and I think that uh, the

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>MBS purchases can be adjusted so that we get uh

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of accurate pricing in that in that market to

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>meet the needs of those that are producing mbs. Uh.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how that goes. That's a very uh, minute

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>by minute kind of decision on intervention and purchases of MBS.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But we have a great team in New York that's

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that's working on that. I think we'll be able to

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>get good outcomes there. I'm wondering when you think about

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>where all this leads what you see ahead. You're going

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to have trillions in a aditional national debt. You're going

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to have billions in loans out to companies at very

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>low rates. Can you raise rates? Are you pretty much

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>stuck forever? Now? Stuck forever? Well? I think near term,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as we come out of this, interest rates so will

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>probably stay very low for quite a while. UM. We

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>are taking on more debt as a nation, but we're

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>taking it on a very low interest rate, so that

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>part should work good well for the near term. UM.

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we get further out past the crisis,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to evaluate our fiscal strategy and see it.

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But that'll be up to Congress what they want to do. Uh.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a big country. We can carry, you know, ten

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>percent more debt. You know, it's not ideal, but we

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>can certainly do it. And if there was ever a

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>time where you wanted to uh do something like this,

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>now is that time? Uh? One last question here. Someone said,

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>when you first cut rates and set up lending programs,

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you were throwing the kitchen sink at things. And then

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you cut rates again and set up more programs and

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>through the kitchen sink again. Do you have more than

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>one sink or do you throw the same sink over

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and over again? Basically what's left in the toolbox. Well,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the bottom line is that this these thirteen

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>three authorities that are in the Federal Reserve Act are

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>very powerful and uh because they're they're set up to

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>allow the FED to do lending in unusual and excitent

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>circumstances with the consent of the Treasury, and so you

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>can do a lot with that. And I think that's

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing right now. And if we had to

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do more with that we could. It's a board of

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>governors programs now an FMC programers aboard, and we do

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>need treasury authority, but in special situations like this one,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and what could be more special than this one, makes

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense to go ahead use that power

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh and simply in smooth out this ride as

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>we get to the other side of this virus very quickly.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think baseball season stants this year? You're a

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>big Cardinals fan, I adam, I haven't seen anything about

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>baseball so far, so I was actually I don't know

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about you, but I was. One of the aspects of

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this crisis is I was very shocked when when sports

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>decided to shut down. That really jolted me. So one

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of one of many jolts during this crisis, but it

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was shocking. Jim Bullard, President of the St. Louis Fat

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us this morning on

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and television worldwide. I found myself watching football

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>games from twenty years ago, watching the highlights this seasons

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, over the weekend, just trying to also, yeah,

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I just trying to keep in touch with with sport. Yeah,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.479
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't do that. What I know is Bullard

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned he's a Cardinals fan, and that Bill started barking

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>right away. You know, well that Bill was Red Cells, right,

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>die Hard. Well, you know he loves the Dodgers. He

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>likes love Okay, Yeah, Hayley from Beverly Hills got him

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>into the Dodgers. He's got the coat and the whole thing.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>That Bill can come on and talk about. You know,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Jim Bullers and we gotta go to break,

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we gotta come back and talk about this. I mean,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I just what are these guys supposed to say? I mean,

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they gotta wait to see what happens. We're gonna carry

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on talking about this. We've got missed the castle. Great

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us on the fine, fantastic to

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. In fact, let's talk about the

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve. That a meet again until April twenty nine.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We've learned that that doesn't really matter. Do you expect

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>anything else from them anytime soon? Well, there's a lot

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of details to come out, especially about this main street

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>lending program um and I think they're going to roll

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with the punchers here. And I think you heard from

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Bullard and we've been seeing the set is very creative

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and very aggressive here when it's these problems. So UM

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't rule out more FED action, but we're not

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>forecasting anything specifically at this point. First, we're making it

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>up as we go, and all of our listeners, whatever

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>their level of sophistication, know that what's the attribute of

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>how we make this up as we go that we

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>should focus on. Well, I would say from the point

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of view of government policy, there's there's two pieces to this.

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>One is not making it up. We've gone through the

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>global financial crisis, We've dealt with issues that are threatened

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>systemic uh stability. We've kind of created an infrastructure around that,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're drawing on that and that's a really good

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>thing and it's happening really quickly. The thing that's really

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>unique about this crisis is how much we're hurting individuals,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>small businesses, and a targeted way in a very short time.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's where making things up in terms of getting

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>these loan programs out, having the FED to a remarkable

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>amount to actually become a creditor to the corporate sector

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>at the at the lowest level, UM is really starting

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of really unprecedented, and as you say,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>it's really making things up. So there's some of this

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>which is got a very good toolbox, but there definitely

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is some stuff here which we're we're really responding in

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedented way. I want to talk about that unprecedented

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>function here, the fiscal stimulus function right now. If the

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve, essentially with the four hundred and fifty billion

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars they're being provided by the US Treasury that they're

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>going to lever up and lend out, how are they

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>going to do that given their staffing and expertise. Well,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think to a large degree, they're going to work

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>through banks and other financial intermediaries. The SPA is basically

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>going to guarantee loans taken by banks. The FED is

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>going to oversee it, Treasury is going to oversee it

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in some ways. But you have to work through the

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>channels that exist. If you had to have the Treasury

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed manage the individual loan decisions that we

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>made here, we'd never get things out. And this is

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a big issue. Even going through the banking system. We've

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>been going through channels. As Bullard was saying a few

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago, we know unemployment is rising, people are being

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>laid off. The question is can you get the money

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>into the system quickly enough to limit the damage. Cushion

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>has provide us with a sense that not too much

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>damage is being done once the economy turns on the

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>lights again, Bruce, That's where I wanted to go, this

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>question of speed and the sense that it needed to

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be done last week, two weeks ago, not now, And

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we still don't have the program up and running. And

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, do you have a sense of how much

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of the damage has already been done in an irreversible

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>way in terms of layoffs and small businesses that have

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to shut down. UM, I don't think we know what.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>We can see a hint of that in last week's

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>claims numbers. We know there's going to be a huge

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>rise in unemployment in the next month or two. How

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>many businesses closed, I don't know, but it's going to

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>be a lot. And let me just say, because I

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's an interesting international comparison here. Europe has a

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>system where institutionally it's a lot harder to have that flexibility,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and and I think over long periods of time, flexibility

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>has been very helpful for the US, but in this situation,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>their structures, their programs that actually provided a very important

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>circuit breaker. And I don't think you're gonna see unemployment

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>rise in Europe anyway like what we're expecting to see

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>in the US in the coming few months. Why can't

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we be like that? Man, it's a brilliant insight. Dr

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>kas was great. Okay, everybody out there wants us to

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be like Europe for a cup of coffee, maybe three

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>cups of coffee maybe out of the fourth of July.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we european ee and then pull back and

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>become like we are later on? Well, I think that's

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in some ways what we're trying to do. All those

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to be to be accurate. Here, we are still largely

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>providing the support to income to people who are laid off,

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>providing checks to people. We're not doing what the UK

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is doing, which is providing companies support for their payrolls.

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing the German government is doing in terms

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of subsizing short term work. I mean, that's a good question.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is the institutional side, which you can't change

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point, but the way our approach is going

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on policy, well, it could be different, but but it

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a different one right now than what the

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Europeans are doing. The backdrop to give you guys a

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>window window this listening across this nation is JP Morgan

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>launches off the great work of Robert Melman from years ago,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen page report Friday Evening which is a must

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>read on Global Wall Street, and Faroly Walas is through

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>with the US view, and then Kasmin drops in with

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Global view and it just has you, brother, there,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>how many people put that report together, Bruce, like, literally

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen people right, well globally now we've got actually

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more than thirty economists, Yeah, exactly, And it's

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just extraordinary. And so I I just I'm absolutely fascinated

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>by what the American outcome is. If the EU approach

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>works so well, do you just assume income substitution two,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>income substitution three? I mean, is that where we're heading?

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think the the issue here is you've got attention,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>because just remember when we when we get to the

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>point where we turn the lights on, and that's the

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>big call, when the virus starts to fade, when we

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>begin to take the restrictive policies off, you're gonna get

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge bouncing growth, You're gonna have some rebound. The

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>question really is how much lingering damage is done and

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>whether the cushions we put in place here make it

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>such that we can come mostly back to normal and

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>our our view as we're not. You know, we have

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a big rebound in the second half of the year.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>We have the US growing at all nine pace in

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the year, but that still leaves

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>output three percentage points below where it was on the

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>path we were following. So there's a lot of damage

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we think is going to get done, and this is

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>going to take a long time to heal. Um. We

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hope it's not going to be like the global financial

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>crisis where really we haven't healed fully from that that damage.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's way too early to kind of

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>judge how the path ahead is gonna is going to

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be filled. And you know, the other in here just

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind is the amount of debt that's going

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to be needed, both on the public and private sector

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>side to fill the gap in the next few months

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an overhang issue that the ramifications

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of which we still really I don't think understand and

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that the ramifications of which everyone is trying to understand

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with whatever data, however sports it may be, is that

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we have. We're speaking with Bruce Kasman, JP, Morgan's chief

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>economist Managing director of Global Research UH and Bruce, you're

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the perfect person for us to speak with, given your

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>intersection of working at the New York FED and the

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of mechanics of the market, as well as working

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>globally and covering everything as a senior international economist at

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley Howd of JP Morgan, and I'm wondering as

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we head forward, a key question is are we poised

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for a inflationary or deflationary environment going forward? What's your

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>take on that? Well, I think over the next six

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>months it's pretty clear it's going to be deflationary. Just

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>look at what oil prices are doing. The service sector

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is much bigger than goods producing industries, which might have

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some supply chain pressures, so you look at the entertainment, hotels, airlines,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>things of that. Inflation is going to calm down sharply.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>The question is where do we come out of this.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly for the next couple of years, you

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>have to believe the rise and unemployment. The weakness and

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>growth that's not going to be completely paid back. It's

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be disinflationary. We'll have negative inflation in the

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>near term, will have low inflation, and obviously that's a

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>big challenge for central bankers who have already been having

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a very hard time getting inflation up over the last decade.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean in terms of how much

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>debt some of these developed markets can incur? Well, I

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a real constraint on the public sector side,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>especially given how low interest rates are and how much

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>central banks are supporting in terms of the funding. I

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>think the bigger issue for the next couple of years

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>is really the build up of debt on the private

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>sector side and how much that hinders the recovery once

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we get back to more normal conditions over a longer

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>period of time. The build up in public sector dead

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>has issues that particularly I think in Europe is an

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>important issue where there's not enough burden sharing going on

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>across countries. But that's more of a chronic issue, which

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>has I think hard it's hard to figure out exactly

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>how that's gonna affect us over the next five seven years.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>There's so many things you don't know about the next

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>three months, so it's hard to go there at this point.

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Casmin, thank you so much for joining us today.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Greatly greatly appreciate that Bruce Casmin is with JP Morgan.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>It is also a time to when you get Foreign

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Affairs Magazine, not reading two articles, but because if everybody's

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>stuck at home reading three or four articles, are going

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to what he invented, which is the CFR website, which

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we make light of it now, but folks, when Richard

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Hass invented the modern Council on Foreign Relations website, it

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>was an act of God never before as you had.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's smart programming slammed in front of you on

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>International relations website designer Richard Has the President of the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Council on Foreign Relations. Richard, did you know what you

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>would rot when you were screaming, we've got to do

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a website and do it right? Did you have any

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>idea where this would lead? Not even close? Uh, not

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>even uh close. But it really is an amazing resource

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>now and I feel like I have the right to

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>brag on it. Please so many well because other people

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>doing of of the work. But and it's it highlights

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>our work, but also the best one anywhere. I think

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the reasons it's so good

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is we curate and we've tried to create one stop

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>shopping whether you're an expert or also whether you're also

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're a beginner. We have, for example, the most

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>traffic part of the website, Tom, all these backgrounders and

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>who are not experts, case, okay, let me come me

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>interrupting Ambassador hass and paulse when wants to jump here

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, folks, dirty little secret, Tom Keene, isn't that smart?

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I just go over to see how far and read

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the backgrounders as fast as I can. They go, Paul Richard,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they go, oh god, he's just unbelievable, and Paul, Paul

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>chump in here. But I was reading the backgrounders, right.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>We know that we we know the truth. So Richard's

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>as we sit back and take a look at what's

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>going on around the world here with this virus, what

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>did you some of your takeaways as to some of

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the governmental responses that we've observed. My first takeaway is

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is part and parcel of the world we

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>live in. All these people who talk about it being

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a black swan are coming out of the blue or

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>dead rock. This was predictable, it happened now, and guess

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what if things like this are going to happen again.

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That's my my first takeaway. So governments need to be prepared.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>They should have been better prepared than they were. The

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>international health machinery should have been much more oil than

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it was. We all ought to have had stock files.

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>China ought to have communicated openly and honestly about its

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>uh you know what had happened there, and then moving forward,

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>governments have to have against stockpiles, they've got to have testing,

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they've got to have protocols ready. Essentially, the world was

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>caught flat footed for this, and most of the responses

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have been inadequate at incoherent, ours in particular. Uh So,

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems to me what's inevitable is that

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>there will be COVID twenty or COVID twenty one or

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>some other disease, and that we have to be prepared

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for it much better than we work for this. So

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you think you know life will change after this? Extly?

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We let we get to the other side here. Do

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you really believe that governments can in fact, you know,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of prepare as you were just suggesting. To some extent,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I would think that you're going to see a larger

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>role for government. A couple of areas that come to mind,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as I do think you'll have more stockpiles of say

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>equipment or ventilators. I think something like the Defense Production

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Act that idea will become more of a peacetime or

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>normal things. So we're gonna have relationships established between the

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>private sector and government much more elaborate than they are now.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll see less supply, less supply chain dependency.

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So I would think in a couple of years you're

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to see a policy where the United States will

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>say two things, we are not going to single source

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>anything that's critical it in China or anywhere else we may.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to multiple sources so we're less dependent on

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>an interruption from one source. And second of all, we're

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>going to build a domestic capacity, so we're going to

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>become a little bit more self reliant. I think that's

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in our future. Tell me about Laurie Garrett. You have

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the jewels in our coverage of these viruses,

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and Laurie Garrett, her work on Ebola was original and

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>path breaking as well. I'm sure you're calling up Laura.

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.239
<v Speaker 1>You're running into her in the hallway it's thee far

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and saying Lorie, what's going on? How does she report

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to you? Well, actually, Laurie, while she's still a member

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Council Foreign Relation, is not on our staff anymore.

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Medias's active on MSNBC and she's been an important voice

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in this debate for years, and she was one of

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>those who first said you had better get ready, this

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is coming. We have three people. We have three people.

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>One is Tom Frieden, the former head of the c

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>d C. He's active on our staff. You have a

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guy named Tom Boiki who started up a new really

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>important sight called Think Global Health. It's on CFAR dot org.

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It has become actually the best virtual venue where the

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>leading experts in the world have conversations about global health issues.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It started off just weeks before this happened, coincidentally, but

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's already become a central hub of the conversation. And

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>then we have one other person, youngs and Wang, who's

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an expert on Chinese public health is as it turns out,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so we've actually got three people on staff. As well

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>as any number of members I know my board, for example,

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we have people like Peggy Hamburg, the former head of

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the f D A H. Sylvia Burwell, the former head

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of j J. We've got several former heads of Homeland Security.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out that we have an enormous access

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to resource. So, Richard, what do you think this virus

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>again kind of looking ahead a little bit means for globalization?

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that have we seen peak globalization? Globalization continues. Globalization

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>itself is just a reality. It's about the globalization is

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>simply the reality that an awful lot of stuff crosses

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>borders in great value, of great velocity. That doesn't change

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the real What could change is the collective response to globalization,

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and so far it's been anemic. Whether it's in the

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>health area, obviously, climate change, you name it, global response

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to globalization has been inadequate. I wish I could sit

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>here and say it's going to be a lot better

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at going forwardly with a little in our lesson. But

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried that we're entering a period where a lot

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of countries are going to be looking inward. They're going

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to be strapped for cash. Given everything that this is

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>going to cost. So I don't I don't think this

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a great era of what people

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in my business called global governance. I worried that they

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>will continue to be a large gap between these global

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>challengers and the collective response. I I look at Bessador

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>has at the challenges forward, and they sent her back

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to your book. We should mention that, Richard as Folks

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is a new book coming up May twelve, on the world.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a wonderful briefing forward. Your previous book was on

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>disarray and our fiscal responsibility. I believe the helicopters over

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Central Park are dropping money from what I can observe

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from here, Richard Hass give us an update your report

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on our fiscal responsibility. Well, helicopters are dropping money, and

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to drop a lot more. Not only

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is taking care of the public health directly expensive, UH

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>relief for American firms and citizens and workers. So we

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.919
<v Speaker 1>just passed a two trillion dollar not. My prediction, Tom

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>is that's the first of several and the longer this

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>goes on, the more we're going to need. Now, before

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 1>this crisis even hit us, we were already racking off

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>deficits at the tune of more than a trillion dollars

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a year. So we're gonna start racking up deficits at

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the tune of three five trillion dollars this year. Our

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>debt UH is going to grow well into the twenties

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>or thirty trillions of dollars. And the question is to

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what extent is the world going to be permanently willing

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to to finance it. Richard has thank you so much

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for your time today across this morning. He is the

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>president of the cons on Foreign Relations on LinkedIn and Twitter.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I've just put out this extraordinary compendium of medicine, think

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>global health and look for that and study that in

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the coming days with the Council on Foreign Relations joining

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>us now A step gallon of Northdea Bank, Celia macro strategies.

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That always great to get your voice on this program.

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>A nineteen handle on w T I. Just how much

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>does that complicate things in this market? What's the both

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a negative and a good thing? And it's a huge

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>transfer of wealth not immediately been but in the coming

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>month as things start to normalize. And the question that

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to ask yourself if you're a bank and

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you're letting to shill or the industry is whether this

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>is shock is temporary or not. And behind that, it's

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about whether the Russians and the saalities that will be

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.439
<v Speaker 1>ascate the process and arrive at an agreement they both

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>need to. The problem is they're both authoritarian figures and

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>therefore they would lose if they would back down. And

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.959
<v Speaker 1>that means several weeks at least of this process before

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it happens. And I think this is a part which

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is not expected that eventually we're going to get some

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of normalization. Having said that, there's an oil gl

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever happens. Because of the production right now, uh and

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:57.959
<v Speaker 1>and because of the speed with which will be able

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to reduce some of their output, that should be a uh.

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>It obviously will have an impact. Uh. And that means

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that old prices is probably going to be back up

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to forty five dollars within a few months. So it's uh,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a complex story. It's an important story from the

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>point of view of the bags because whether they kill

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the shield or industry or not is the strategic decision.

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>And behind that there's a lot of backing so from

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the credit facility who which are available, but

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an important conundrum from a high yield perspective,

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course it needs There are a lot of

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>things which are attractive from within the resource sector, but

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>from a yield perspective, from an equity perspective, lots of

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>dislocations which means they themselves were exploited by merging or

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 1>foreign investors like ourselves. We opened a credit fund, for example,

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are actively in this business, Sebastian, I'm you said a

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that are very controversial. A lot of

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>people would disagree that it's a positive right now to

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have lower oil prices just because nobody's going out and

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>spending any money or traveling forty five dollars a barrel.

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>How do we get there, Well, we get there by

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>an agreement between the Sautheast and the Russians. That should

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be enough to squeeze basically a lot, a lot of

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the various positions you have in the old market, and

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that eventually should recenter the market source that and that

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the equivalmrate. I think shouldn't be a surprised too to

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone that the question is how fast we get there

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they is it five months or is it a year

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 1>or is it two years or is it a few weeks?

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And the odds because the escalation processed by definition, it's

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a very slow process. Uh, it'll take probably a few months. Sebasti.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>What are the ramifications of an extension of what I'm

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>going to call a grim virus outlook from March to

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>April and even into May. How does that fold into

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>economic calculations? What it means that the pain from a

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>deficit point of view is it is probably gonna be

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>higher than is currently expected. Having said that, the fiscal

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>package combined with the package one from the set is

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a very impressive one. People should be reassured if they

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if you believe in apple Pie basically should believe in

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the US governments and and the Federal Reserve, then they

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 1>actually will manage the crisis very well. But he focus

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on this not on the United States, some parts of

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, such as India, where the situation is getting

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>dire very rapidly. It's it means it's a difficult environment

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for some better for other. It's probably the US. I'm

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>glad you mentioned this because you know percolating folks in

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the literature over the weekend is what will be the

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>action step for the I m F. I guess they

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>got one trillion dollars available. That's what Pharaoh has available

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>as well. But you know these got one trillion dollars available.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect I m F to be more vocal

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this week in beginning to assist em? So when I shoot,

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>my father was an I m F first, and I

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>guess I was trained in that in that group. But

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the I m F is ultimately that some of its part,

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the biggest part in it is in the United

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.919
<v Speaker 1>States cossion. It's not what it's not what the US,

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not what the IMF wants, it's what the United

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>States want, and what the United States will want is

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize some of its allies and to some extent

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>to help other emerging markets because it's not really good

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for for US products are going forward. So the discussions

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>are probably ongoing, but from a reputational point of view,

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult for India, which whose data is probably questionable,

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is to go to the I m F at this

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>point in time would be seen very badly by the

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>populations and by the government. None that means that delays

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the eventual intervention by by the MS. So you have

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>some major economies such a Danya, which definitely needs some help,

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and you have some economies like Mexico, which has a

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>currency that you've appreciated by is in difficulty, but it's

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 1>extremely well positioned. And once the US rebounds, we've seen

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>record lows for the Randwana Mexican pay. So in the

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, eve I just wanted to finish

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>up by talking about the FED. Last week. Quite rightly,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>we spent a lot of time thinking about where the

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>FED was having success. Let's spend a little bit of

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>time talking about how much they're spending to have that success.

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>The bannet sheet expanded six hundred billion dollars in one week,

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and if George can Carve, as formerly of Namora pointed out,

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the equivalent of QUE two coming out of the

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis SEP. That's huge. Sure. I mean, the center

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>banks learned from the past and they anticipate in the

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 1>They basically become very adaptive and you should expect them

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to to become very original going forward. This is not

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the end process. From a FET point of view, they're

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:22.919
<v Speaker 1>very efficient and if you believe the FET, you believe

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in apple Pie then then believe that they're actually doing

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the right thing, and they definitely are. The shock is

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a brutal one, but they will continue to steadily innovate

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and surprises, and I think that will translate to health

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for moments and pop shops and people who think they

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>won't have access to that credit because they're too small.

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It eventually will happen. So nobody should be discouraged by this. Well,

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it certainly have last week, that's for sure. Sep. Always

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.879
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time, Sep Galty that of not da Bank.

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Radio