WEBVTT - Intel's Chips Grant, California Vs. Tesla

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 4>This is Blomberg Technology coming up. Intel's secures an eight

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar grant for its US chip factory expansion of

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the months of trying to convince Washington and Wall Street

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 4>that it can execute on its vision.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Plus California, it proposes.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 4>State in centers for EV buyers, which could exclude Tesla's models,

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 4>and social media companies push back against new legislation in

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Australia that's going through the courts that could limit team usage.

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>But first that's checking on these markets.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Because we're currently hired to the tune of four tenths

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 4>of a percent, we're managing to shrug off some of

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 4>that anxiety once again being built in around geopolitics and

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 4>remid tariffs that we're going to break it down for

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 4>you a little bit later.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>But still big tech managing to lead us higher.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 4>And in fact, the S and P five hundred on

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 4>track for yet another set of records, and the NASUC

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 4>is up for four straight days.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Move on and look at some of the individual movers.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Because we have still got some drip feed around earnings

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 4>that have come after the bell. I want to look

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 4>at what's of course been happening in the world of

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Zoom and another key chip maker. Zoom down some seven

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 4>point nine percent, didn't live up to expectations in terms

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 4>of its growth for its fiscal third quarter, and I

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 4>think most notably is because this stock has run up

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 4>hard since it's bottoming out in August some sixty percent higher.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Many alis saying like it went.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 4>It showed solid numbers, but not as good as a

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 4>market been pricing in analog devices down a percentage point,

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 4>had been rallying earlier in the trade after they showed

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 4>some strength in terms of auto sales and chips, but

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 4>now just taking a turn into the red.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 3>But let's stick with chips now.

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Because Intel securing seven point nine billion dollars in federal

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 4>grants from the Biden administration. The deal is actually marking

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 4>the largest ever direct subsidy from a program, and this

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>is a course to boost US chip production, sources telling

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intel will get the money for projects in Arizona,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 4>in Oregon, in New Mexico. Bloomberg's Mackenzie Hawkins joins US

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 4>now in Mackenzie, Ohio. Not on tap for this particular

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>area of money because it's not far down the road

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 4>enough in terms of well digging in and breaking ground.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Where do we stand in terms of actually building.

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 5>So Intel seven point nine billion dollar ward from the

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 5>hips AP supports projects across four US states through between

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 5>now and twenty thirty, by which time Intel plans to

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 5>send ninety billion of a total one hundred billion CAPEX.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>On US projects.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 6>But projects have.

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 5>To meet certain benchmarks and milestones to qualify for a

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 5>funding dispersement, so it'll take a while for the money

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 5>to actually go out the door and make it into

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Intel's hands. The first roughly one billion of that will

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 5>happen this year because Intel has already made progress on

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 5>projects in Arizona, New Mexico, and Oregon, Ohio. Construction was

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 5>supposed to finish by late twenty twenty six. Now one

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 5>of the facilities won't be online until the next decade.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Paq Helsinger has joined Bloomberg Technology and sort of vented

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 4>some frustration at how slow it's been to get the

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 4>money from the US government.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 3>And also you note.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 4>That this is a little bit less than previously estimated.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 5>So it's been a very long process for Intel and

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 5>for all of the other companies. Intel's award was announced

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 5>at a preliminary stage in March for eight point five

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars, and since then the company has.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Been going through due diligence.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 5>There have been disagreements about how much information Intel has

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 5>to disclose to the government, and also about terms specifying

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 5>what happens if Intel stands off at manufacturing business.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Or is acquired in part or in whole.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 5>That's obviously a pretty tense discussion with Intel when they're

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 5>going through some serious financial problems, and there have been

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 5>conversations with other players in industry about potential m and a.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 5>The haircut that Intel took on its award is actually

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 5>not because of those business problems. It's because the company

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 5>is separately getting three billion dollars to make chips for

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 5>the Pentagon. That program was originally supposed to be mostly

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 5>funded by the Defense Department, but after a big funding

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 5>stat involving various departments in the Biden administration and lawmakers

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 5>on Capitol Hill, the Commerce Department had to use its

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 5>own ship sacked money to support that program, and some

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 5>of that came from the money already set aside for Intel.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Breaking down the numbers and some of the M and

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>A rumors. Mackenzie Hawkins really appreciate it, thank you. Look

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 4>sticking with those M and A reports previously, Colcom's takeover

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 4>interest in the company is actually cooling now, sources are

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 4>telling Bloomberg the complexities associated with acquiring Intel have made

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 4>it less attractive to Coalcom. A deal would likely have

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 4>been one of the largest ever in technology. Meanwhile, more

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 4>on chips and tech more broadly, as bringing in Nancy Curtain,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 4>chief investment Officer and ULTI team and global Nazi. It's

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.679
<v Speaker 4>always so important to have your voice on the show

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 4>talking about the global context here, just dig in on

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 4>for example, M and A hopes around this new administration

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 4>coming in twenty twenty five and deals getting done, chips

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 4>being supported or not supported as a sector.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of it?

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, let's start with M and A first, and we

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 7>do think that M and A will increase. You know,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 7>you have pretty rigorous merger guidelines passed by President Biden

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty three. We reckon those will be undone

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 7>under President elect Trump. And remember they had lowered the

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 7>guidance threshold at a company being seen as anti competitive.

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 7>So we do think it's going to be a friendlier

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 7>environment for regulation, a friendlier environment for M and A,

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 7>and expect that animal spirits M and A and IPOs

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 7>will pick up in twenty twenty five. So we think

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 7>this is one of the positives coming from Trump. Just

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 7>quickly on the Chips Act and Intel, are we back

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 7>in their own horse there? I mean, this is supposed

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 7>to create jobs. They just laid off fifteen percent of

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 7>the workforce, and I kind of look at and think

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 7>in Video didn't get any money from the CHIPSAC and

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 7>it's actually doing a pretty dark good job of actually

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 7>supplying the chips industry. So I think this is a program.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 7>It's hard to change and remove these legislative programs. It's

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 7>not a program the president Electron favors very much. I

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 7>think he called it a really bad program.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so stay tuned on in Video.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Though they basically get TSMC and other chip makers to

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>produce this is all about on shoring and making sure

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 4>that chips can be made in the United States.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 3>When you're looking at in Video, and.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, it's exposure, whether it be selling into China or

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 4>indeed depending on a supply chain that is in many

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 4>ways related to Taiwan.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 3>How does that factor into an investment thesis.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, as you know, Trump has said Tara's the most

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 7>beautiful word in the English language. So you know, maybe

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 7>Trump just used some tariffs here on TSMC because that

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 7>would incur coourage them to think about And by the way,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 7>they were part of the Chips Act as well, so

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 7>they did receive some subsidies there. But you know that

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 7>might encourage them to accelerate production in the United States. Now,

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 7>how will in Vidia respond, I don't know. With seventy

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 7>four percent gross margins and it seems like insane demand

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 7>in Jensen Wayne's words, it seems like they're just going

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 7>to raise prices. So you know, if we get some

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 7>tariffs on TSMC, which I wouldn't be surprised, I just

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 7>think in Video will end up passing that on to

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 7>its demand hungry customers.

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 4>It feels like you've got some nues about which horses

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 4>you should back. But more broadly, the winners I likely

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 4>to continue winning into the next administration is that we

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 4>are articulating. Is it's still good to be longing tech here?

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, let's just talk about a little bit of

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 7>the winners and semiconductor. You know, at the end of

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 7>the day, Nvidia is clearly in poll position monopoly position,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, more demand than supply. But competition is coming.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 7>Remember forty percent of their data center customers are also

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 7>trying to compete with them. Amazon's coming pretty close here

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 7>in developing a chip. Now I understand it's forty percent cheaper.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 7>Not really sure the performance benchmarks with respect to training

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 7>an inference, they haven't been published and it's not clear

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 7>it's in production.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Mode, so to speak. So let's see what happens.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 7>And of course, to a certain extent, AMD and Intel

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.239
<v Speaker 7>are fast trying to be competitors as well. So competition

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 7>is on the way and we should expect to see

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 7>more of that. You know, people are looking at the

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 7>price of Nvidia chips, the fact that they can't get

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 7>access and are trying to diversify their supply sources, and

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 7>that makes sense, right, So we do expect competition to

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 7>come as we look forward. Now, I don't say this

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 7>is a Q one. I think Nvidia should have another

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 7>blockbuster quarter. Certainly they were pretty clear about it. They

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 7>expect revenues to be up seventy percent in the next quarter,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 7>and they normally beat that number. So let's see where

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 7>that comes out.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 4>Customers look at the price of the chips, Investors look

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>at the price of the stock. With an Nvidia trading

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 4>at forty six times future earnings, many have been perhaps

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 4>taking a bit of profit. When you're looking at Tesla

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 4>that's trading at one hundred and forty.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 3>One times future earnings.

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 4>What do you make about the optimism beaked into that

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 4>stock post election?

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>WILLD Tesler is clearly a special child at the moment

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>given the relationship between Eli Musk, you know, and Trump,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in these stocks, these magnificent.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Seven you know, on average there at about thirty five

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 7>times forward earnings at the moment, and that means makes

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 7>them very vulnerable to disappointment.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 7>So one of the themes that we've had on this

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 7>year is, you know, tech is fine. We believe in

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 7>jen Ai, but you need to diversify beyond just those

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 7>magnificent seven technology shares that have fueled the market's advanced

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 7>and we think MidCap and particular trading at about thirteen

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 7>fourteen times earnings up close to ten percent already this

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 7>month is an excellent beneficiary OMAGA, potentially corporate tax rate cuts,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 7>manufacturer renaissance, and a better outlook for growth in the

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 7>United States. So there are other things you can do

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 7>and diversify away from tech. By the way, where earnings

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 7>are expected to decelerate in the so called Magnificent seven

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 7>as we head into twenty twenty five, where they're supposed

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 7>to accelerate in the rest of the market, and so

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 7>I think that's a really way nice way to still

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 7>learn a return, participate, but protect some of that valuation potential,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.119
<v Speaker 7>downside risk and tech.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Massacatain always great to catch up. Thank you, Chief Investment

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 4>Officer for an ltteam and Global I. Meanwhile, let's just

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 4>talk about globally. China's shaw Me preparing a self design

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>mobile processor for its upcoming smartphones. This comes as an

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 4>effort to actually reduce its reliance on foreign suppliers Qualcom

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Media Tech. According to sources, massuction of the chip is

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 4>expected to begin in twenty twenty five. Coming up, well,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 4>deja vu, President elect Donald Trump rattling markets across the

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 4>world with more tariff threats. We discussed the potential impact

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 4>on the tech sector next and we were just looking

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 4>at Tesla with Nancy Nestwell on it a little bit

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 4>more upper percentage point. We will recover from some of

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 4>yesterday's sell off. Will going to dig in on what

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 4>California is currently threatening, how they could be excluding them

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 4>from any future support for EVS if indeed federal support

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 4>is taken away.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 3>This is BlueBag technology.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 4>President's elect Donald Trump took to truth Social to vow

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 4>additional tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, and the comment

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 4>marks his first specific threat to the top trading partners

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 4>of the United States since his election win just three

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, Bloomberg's Michael Shepherd joins us or for more.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 4>He promised it on campaign trail, and now he's once

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 4>again reconfirming.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 9>He's taking a step closer. Caroline, this is what the

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 9>president elect have been telling his voters all along, that

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 9>he would try to bring manufacturing back to the US

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 9>using tariffs as his primary weapon. Now he is threatening

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 9>to use tariffs for something else, and this is to

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 9>extract policy concessions from America's key trading partners. With Canada

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 9>and Mexico. It's his concern about the border and with China.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 9>He is really trying to get Beijing to cooperate more

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 9>in his view to stem the flow of fentanyl in

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 9>the US, which has been blamed for a surge in

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 9>overdose deaths in recent years. So we're seeing tariffs being

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 9>applied in a different since, not purely economically, but to

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 9>actually get a policy goal out of a key US counterpart.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and some of those policy goals the ones we

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 4>heard in the previous administration too. The market more broadly

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 4>is sort of it in its stride, and I'm wondering

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 4>whether people feel that they'll be carve outs, whether or

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 4>not this will specifically hit certain industries.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 9>Mike, Well, there's so many unanswered questions around this, Caroline

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 9>right now, because he really just kind of dropped it

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 9>on truth Social less than twenty four hours ago and

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 9>walked away, and his transition team has not answered any

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 9>further questions about just as you say, will there be carveouts?

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 9>Is this in addition to the Tarasi had already been

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 9>threatening a sixty percent level against goods coming in from China?

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.479
<v Speaker 9>And likewise, what does this mean for the USMCA agreement

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 9>that he forged to replace NAFTA during his first term

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 9>in office? In any case, this will have a major

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 9>ripple effect on the economy and on supply chains. If enacted,

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 9>it would affect autos, It would affect very significantly the

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 9>tech trade with China. We do a huge amount of

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 9>business with Chinese companies, sending them legacy semiconduct, getting finished

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 9>computers back, and all of that would be royal by this,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 9>and we would have to watch for these trading partners

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 9>to assess, as Mexico warned it might do today, whether

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 9>they would retaliate in kind.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Michael Sheppard always such a thorough setup. We really appreciate

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 4>taking us through what is at the moment just a

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 4>statement on truth social but let's try and extrapolate it out.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 4>With Mary Lovely, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 4>International Economics and Mike there was discussing how this will

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 4>affect auto's immediately In the tech industry, we think evs.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 4>But Mary, what are the ramifications on the auto sector

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 4>do you think?

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 6>It's great to be with you.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, first of all, when we're talking trade with Canada

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 10>and Mexico, the first job has to be the auto sector.

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 10>It's the most important export other than fuel from Canada

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 10>that comes.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 6>From our two USMCA partners.

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 10>Production is fully integrated between the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 6>Cars go back and forth.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 10>By some accounts, certain vehicles can go back and forth

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 10>across the border seven or more times before they're sent

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 10>to an auto dealer. So this would be extremely disruptive.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 10>We would imagine that auto companies would be lining up

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 10>to tell the new administration how harmful this would be

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 10>not only to the two countries involved in this, Canada Mexico,

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 10>but to the United States and to the plants that

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 10>are in the United States waiting for those parts. So

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 10>undoubtedly it would lead to disruptions of US production and.

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Increase costs, as many would anticipate from a consumer perspective.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>What about the supply chain when it affects China and

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 4>US technology companies?

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Here how intertwined?

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 4>How dependent does the US remain on Chinese pots and goods?

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, since the First Trade War, US has depended less

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 10>strongly on China. But we have to remember that many

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 10>of the electronic devices that we know and love were

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 10>not actually tax under the First Trade War. So final

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 10>items like laptops, nip notebooks, smart watches, cell phones, none

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 10>of those were actually hit with the first trade war,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 10>tariffs peripherals were things that we may use with these devices.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 10>So that's you know, he has already proposed or promised

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 10>a flat sixty on China. We don't know if this

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 10>extra ten percent that he sent out last night is

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 10>by a social media post, is on top of that

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 10>or part of that. Either way, it's going to be

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 10>extremely disruptive because our companies have not had time to

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 10>move these vast supply chains out of China.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Take Apple for a case study.

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 4>They have been trying to depend more on India, for example,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 4>of the Southeast Asian countries, and we've seen him just

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 4>in China over the weekend, trying to ensure the relationships

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 4>remain strong with the government there. But also many understand

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 4>that Tim Cook has a decent relationship with the incoming administration.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 4>Do you think CEOs are anticipating CoV outs? Do you

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 4>think CEOs are able to manage this without passing it

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 4>on to a consumer.

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 10>I think they understand how disruptive this would be, and

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 10>that if we know that there are constitutional limits on

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 10>what the president can do, he's shown a pension for

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 10>trying to blow past a lot of the limits that

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 10>people have tried to place on him, but he can't

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 10>revoke the law of economics, and there's economics limits to

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 10>what he can do, or at least economic constraints. They're

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 10>going to cause him a lot of trouble, not only

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 10>in individual sectors, but on the macro front. Inflation will

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 10>kick up again, for example, something which voters have shown

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 10>that they dislike intensely. So I think it would be

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 10>wise that C suites are anticipating.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 6>That this will be either set up with carve outs.

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 10>Or it will be rolled back in terms of the

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 10>absolute tex amount.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 6>That he is going to levy.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 10>So I think we have a long way to go

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 10>before this social media quote becomes new taxes on US trade?

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 4>How effective in the first iteration were tariffs on changing

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 4>the flow of goods out of China in the US,

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>reducing perhaps dependence or indeed the overall trade excess or

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 4>lack thereof.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 10>I think we saw the value of trade dropped by

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 10>about thirty percent between well US and China. Remember, China

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 10>also retaliated against the US. We would certainly expect to

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 10>see some retaliation again, not just from China but also

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 10>from our other partners. So it had a significant effect

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 10>on trade flows.

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 6>That said, a lot of that trade was diverted to countries.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 10>There's very little evidence that any of that activity came

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 10>back to the United States. Some of it flowed to Vietnam,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 10>some of it flowed to other parts of East and

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 10>Southeast Asia, and of course some of it went into Mexico,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 10>which is why we've seen our trade, particularly in electronics

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 10>and electrical devices increase with Mexico.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Very lovely and the vets and Institute breaking it all down.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Meta TikTok Google. They're taking aim in Australia's

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 4>legislation to ban children under sixteen from accessing such social

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 4>media platforms. The government in Australia is pushing to pass

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the bill through parliament this week.

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Under the proposed bill, the.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Social Media Chance would be responsible for policing that ban

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 4>under threats of fines of up to thirty two point

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 4>five million dollars. Let's bring in bring those, Kurt Wagner

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 4>and look, thirty two and a half million dollars is

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>but a drop in the ocean for any of these companies.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 3>But what is to fear here for them?

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 11>I think the bigger concern here is that this serves

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 11>as some kind of a blueprint or template that other

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 11>countries are going to adopt. Right, I mean, the last

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 11>thing these companies want, these services want is for teenagers

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 11>young people to not be able to use their services

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 11>because that's how they get that next.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Generation and users.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 11>And so if this ends up working in Australia, or

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 11>it ends up getting passed and sort of effectively ending

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 11>that connection, there would be real concern that other countries,

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 11>especially those in Europe where regulation around these big tech

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 11>companies has been much tighter, that other countries would try

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 11>to maybe follow in their footsteps.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.479
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting that we've had a spate of activity around

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 4>protecting young people, whether it's in gaming with roadblocks, but

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 4>also Instagram for example, they have their teen accounts rolled out.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 4>What is it then when instagram parent company Metro is

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 4>coming out and saying that this is going to be

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 4>really hard to enforce. We had a statement from Meta

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 4>saying that the approach will require each app provider to

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 4>collect personal identification or biometric data from all Australians. Are

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 4>they trying to make out that this is you know,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 4>this is an issue of free speech and identity here?

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean this is kind of an old playbook

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 11>from them, right, which is to really push back and say, hey,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 11>this is impossible technologically, we can't do this, right and

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 11>Meta is not the only company to say those kinds

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 11>of things. At the same time, those team accounts you mentioned,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 11>Caroline are exactly the type of thing that you would

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 11>think they could roll out in Australia, right, which is

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 11>they automatically put teens into two more strict settings. They

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 11>require you know, ID or some other type of verification

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 11>before those teens can age up into an account for

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 11>eighteen plus. And so while I do agree that it

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 11>probably is a very tough technical challenge, I don't think

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 11>it's necessarily impossible, and I think it's in Meta's best

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 11>interests and all these companies' best interest to get across

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 11>the fact that this is a tough chain Andre that's

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 11>their argument is that hey, we can't do this.

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 4>All eyes on how it goes through the Parliament this week.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Wagner being asked to work hard up until holidays.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 3>We thank you.

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to lum Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 4>New York. A quick check in on these markets and

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 4>more specifically crypto, because look, the ecosystem added about a

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars. Since the election of Donald Trump for the

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 4>administration in twenty twenty five, we had seen a bit

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 4>of a pullback from close to one hundred thousand dollars.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 4>We've called down slightly maybe sort of about a four

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 4>day sell off. Eight percent wiped off. We're now recovering

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 4>a little bit up sixt tens percent. Ninety four two

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 4>undred and sixty three is where we trade as people

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 4>lock in profits, maybe question some of the geopolitical risks

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 4>once again, and some risk aversion. But more broadly, let's

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 4>talk about politics post the election of Trump, and in

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 4>particular California Governor Gavin Newsom proposing a state incentive for

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 4>EV buyers if federal support is taken away, but it

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 4>would exclude Tesla's models from a market share limitation perspective

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 4>that this move is aiming to create market editions for

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 4>more car makers to enter the EV market, but confurther

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 4>escalate tensions between these two characters, Elon Musk and Gavin Newsom.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about it all webnomgs Ilia, Yahoo, Keemische who

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 4>joins us for more? And look, this is Gavin Newsom

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 4>trying to front run any change from the new administration.

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 4>If they take away that seven and a half thousand

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 4>dollars tax credit for EV purchases, California will be there

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 4>to step in and support.

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 3>But why limit Tesla's.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's exactly right. This is part of Newsom coming

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 12>out from and saying Trump does take this away, we're

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 12>going to Californians are still going to be eligible for

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 12>electric vehicle tax credits. But the proposal that he gave

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 12>yesterday says that there's a market share limitation which would

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 12>prevent Tesla from qualifying from these credit. It's their reasoning

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 12>for that is that they want to spur competition of

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 12>smaller electric vehicle manufacturers in the state, and they said

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 12>they want them to take root in the state. So

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 12>essentially they're saying, you know, Tesla already has a huge

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 12>market share in the state, and they want some of

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 12>the smaller guys to be able to compete. A lot

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 12>of these other electric vehicle manufacturers are losing money, some

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 12>of the traditional OEM manufacturers are losing money when they

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 12>sell an electric vehicle, so this is kind of an

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 12>incentive for those smaller guys, while Tesla is making money

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 12>every time they sell a car.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 4>I can imagine that Ilia who that this is going

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 4>to be seen as therefore punishment for success, for punishment

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 4>for being profitable. Already, I mean, what do we anticipate

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the reaction coming from Elon Musk because

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 4>he's not been afraid to have pretty tough words for

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 4>Gavin Newsom in the past.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean Elon Musk has already come out swinging

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 12>and he called this proposal insane, and he cited that

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 12>Tesla is the only car manufacturer that is actually producing

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 12>cars in California, and they have a lot of employees

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 12>based in California, even though they did move their headquarters

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 12>to Texas. So I think it really does raise the

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 12>tensions between these two characters. California is becoming this oil

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 12>to the Trump administration, and Elon Musk has taken a

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 12>newfound prominence in Republican politics. So you're seeing kind of

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 12>Elon Musk and Newsome becoming these emerging characters that are

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 12>representing kind of the new state of politics in the

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 12>country right.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Now, California and some massive economy. Elijah who commissa thank

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 4>you for breaking it down. Let's just keep this discussion

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 4>going with Jessica Caldwell, head of Insights at Edmonds, and

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 4>your focus that you can bring us is the underlying

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>data of EV sales, the actual success story that Tesla

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 4>has compared to other competitors. Jessica, what will this mean

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 4>for competition? Could it spur competition?

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's definitely going to spur competition.

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 13>I mean, if you're out there at your shopping for

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 13>a vehicle one adiligible for seventy five hundred dollars rebate,

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 13>when is not I mean you're going to shop both vehicles.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 13>Of course, everyone knows what Tesla is. They have a

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 13>lot of brand recognition, but something like this is going

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 13>to get shoppers to look and consider other things, and

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 13>a lot of times that does ultimately end in a purchase. So,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 13>without a doubt, Tesla will be at a disadvantage if

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 13>this goes through.

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Jessica, just set the context here though, seven and a

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 4>half thousand, what does that mean for the ultimate price

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 4>point of an easy right now? Because well, they're not

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 4>cheap and seven and a half thousand doesn't seem that

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 4>much in comparison.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 3>To the cost of a Rivian for example.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean that is true, but I think as

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 13>we go towards the mass market consumer, they're looking for

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 13>cheaper evs, and in that case, seventy five hundred dollars

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 13>does become probably more attractive because someone that's buying one

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 13>hundred thousand dollars EV they're probably not bothered by these

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 13>rebeates anyhow. And at the end of the day, people

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 13>are buying a lot of times even though they shouldn't

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 13>be on monthly payment, and so when it's calculated out,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 13>you're looking at the monthly payment, the seventy five hundred

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 13>dollars apply, especially for lease customers.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 2>That can make a really.

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 13>Big difference and make that a lot more attractive and

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 13>get consumers to buy.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 4>California, though I'm assuming has been a first adopt early

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 4>adopter of evs. More broadly, when you compare state to state,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 4>so who is how much of the mass market is

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 4>still left to penetrate in California?

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think that's the whole thing, is that in

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 13>California the EV market share over twenty percent, So you

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 13>have a lot of masks or a lot of early

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 13>adopters have already purchased. So getting the mass market is

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 13>probably the bigger challenge here because these people need convincing.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 13>They probably don't have highs income. They're kind of questioning

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 13>whether they even want an EV So now.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a time. If there was ever a time.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 13>To have an incentive on EV's, it is for the

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 13>mass market, not for the people that were early adopters

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 13>that were excited about EV's to start with and probably

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 13>didn't need much incentive to even purchase.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Just compare States to state.

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 4>We know that Newsom has not been afraid to push

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 4>back at a LA musk and indeed perhaps be a

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 4>key supporter of the EC sector. Wouldn't this be replicated elsewhere?

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Do you think if federal support did come away?

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's likely we have things like CARB states.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 13>Other people are following some of the California a Resource Board,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 13>some of the edicts that they have put out, So

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 13>there is a president here of other states kind of

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 13>following California's lead.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the day, this program does

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>sound quite costly, especially if you're to sell a lot

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of vehicles.

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 13>So state's going to have to find funding for this program,

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 13>which may be complicated. I mean, California has a clear

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 13>order zero missions vehicle by twenty thirty five.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if that's the case, then programs like.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 13>This will have to exist to spur that mass market

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 13>to start to buy.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 3>They really want to spur the mass market.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 4>You'd anticipate that you let Chinese EV's in, which are

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 4>much cheaper than US competitors. Who therefore, given that that

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 4>won't be the case, where are the cheaper vehicles, who

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 4>will this end up supporting?

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean, I.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Think any automakers. I mean they're all kind of scrambling.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 13>I mean, in this era of affordability, it costs all

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 13>living increase of inflation, people just feeling a lot less

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 13>wealthy than they have in.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 2>The past has been a big issue for car buyers.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 13>So I think a lot of automakers are trying to

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 13>focus on the lower end. To anyone that is delivering

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 13>good value that kind of has maybe like you know,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 13>a forty thousand dollars price tag, they're probably going to

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 13>get a lot more eyeballs than some of these other

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 13>things that we have seen, you know, like the Jaguar

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 13>coming out in a few years or any of these

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 13>you know, six figure EV type of vehicles.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 4>All eyes on the neis sounds of this world, Jessica

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Cool well, we thank you. Kind of insights over at Edmund's.

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I meanwhile coming up Klana getting ready for that IPO.

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll discuss with.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Headlines Cameron and Sorry, and what it means for other

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 4>fintech companies that may also be mone and going public.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 3>This is what we make Technology.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 4>A group of former Google and Stripe executives who helped

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 4>build the Android platform and raising fifty six million dollars

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 4>for a new company. This one focused on developing an

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 4>operating system for AI agents. Showing KAfari joins us now

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 4>showing every other moment I seem to reading about the

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 4>latest AI agent company, and this one's actually to foster

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 4>an operating system for its adoption.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 14>So the idea is they're not actually building the agents themselves,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 14>but because they believe that the future of computing will

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 14>not be necessarily about apps, that the next evolution of

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 14>these AI agents, that they want to build something that

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 14>will connect all these agents to be able to talk

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 14>to each other and for developers to all build on

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 14>one platform, kind of like how we have Android for OS.

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 4>It's called well, I don't know how it would say

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 4>it slash dev, slash agents or just dev agents as

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 4>they're coming out of stealth.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 3>This is the new name.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 4>They've got some really interesting characters on their cap table now,

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 4>so Alexander Wang of SCALEAI. They've also got Nikesh Aurora,

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 4>who we've been speaking to on the show recently of

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Palo Alto Networks. But who are the vcs behind this

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>and how do they find them?

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 14>That's right, so Index is leading the round and Alphabet's

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 14>independent growth arm Capital G is co leading it.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 3>And what's interesting is that you know, these.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 14>Guys have been known for a long time in Silicon

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 14>Valley helping build the Android platform, and the CEO is

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 14>also a former Stripe executive. You a CTO there, so

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 14>you know these people. These investors have known these these

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 14>leaders for a while. And actually the lead partner at

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 14>Index knew the founder back at Google. They both worked

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 14>together briefly at Google. So yeah, it's a really interesting,

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 14>I think case study of where you see this sort

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 14>of founder market fit. The lead investor told me right

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 14>where people have a lot of confidence in this group

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 14>to be able to execute on this kind of ambitious

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 14>plan to build a new network that can connect this

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 14>future wave of technology we're seeing with AI agents.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 4>David Singleton, who is over Stripe as CTO quoting it

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 4>we need an Android like moment for Ai Shoreen KAfari,

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much for bring us the latest funding round. Meanwhile,

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 4>let's dig into funding rounds to future IPOs and exits. Karana,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 4>for example, another key fintech that we're all getting on

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 4>our mind for its IPO. We understand it almost broke

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 4>even in the first nine months of the year, companies

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 4>stating that as at eyes the markets in today's VC Spotlight,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 4>let's dig in with Cameron and Sary his partner at Headline,

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 4>who understands by now pay later deeply and I'm.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Interested in Kharana.

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 4>How important, how integral to the market opening?

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Will it's IPO be?

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 15>Well, it's going to be huge because we really haven't

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 15>had a major tech IPO in months. We had read

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 15>it and I bought it came out back in the spring,

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 15>but it's been quite since then. I think been waiting

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 15>for the election outcome and also to see what's happening

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 15>with interest rates. But now that we're past that, I

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 15>think Clara is going to be the first real test

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 15>of the market.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 4>And in terms of valuation, like they've been on a

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 4>volatile ride.

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Ro's so too a stripe.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 4>Look, both of these companies will call up and the

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one year Fouria or around fintech I both

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 4>had a sharp realization of what valuations really are. Klan

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 4>has been bringing its way back as that's strong.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely. Look, I think Clarna did a very smart thing.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 15>They got over what I call valuation nostalgia, where you

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 15>feel like I was worth X before I should be

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 15>worth X now it's not true.

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 8>Right, the markets adjusted.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 15>Everyone's kind of worth a different price than they were

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 15>in twenty twenty in a zero interest rate environment. So

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 15>Clarnet was valued at forty six billion and they came

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 15>down and did around the next year at seven billion.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 15>That's a tough pill to swallow, but they did it.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 15>They did the reset. It was a sober, great decision.

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 15>And now they've built their way back up, and this IPO,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 15>by all indicasions, will price probably somewhere in fifteen twenty

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 15>billion dollars sort of range, maybe a little higher.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 8>Their main comp affirm in the US.

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 15>The stock US up like five hundred percent in the

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 15>last couple of years, So I think they're coming out

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 15>at a great time and they're going to get the

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 15>you know, hopefully approach back.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 8>To where they were. But they did that reset and

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 8>that was very smart them.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is that the secondary market has been so

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 4>active and so many companies have a decent chunk of

0:33:58.320 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 4>change they don't.

0:33:59.200 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Need to exit.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 4>So, for example, Stripe has been buying back its own

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 4>stock from previous employees. They so little need to go

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 4>and tap the markets. Why then should a Klan or

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 4>a Stripe eventually come an IPO.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 15>Look and ipl Really, there's three things. It's a marketing event.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 15>It's an opportunity to come out and say here's what

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 15>we do, here's what we are. You know, my parents

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 15>may have not heard of Clara before, but now they will.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 15>You know, Klarana is telling a big AI story that

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 15>I call themselves the AI powered Global Payments Network.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 8>So that's the first thing. The second is it is liquidity, right.

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 15>Dot's provide liquidity in a deeper way than any private

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 15>funding round can.

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 8>To employees to investors.

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 15>And the third thing that's really important is it sets

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 15>a really clear public equity price for your stock, so

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 15>you can use that to then compensate employees to hire

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 15>and to do m and A to buy companies because

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 15>before that it's always this parlor game of well, what's

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 15>the stock really worth? We don't really know, and now

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 15>you'll know every second of every day how much it's worth.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 4>What are you thinking about MNA, because I believe that

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 4>you backed sort of a Klana similar so got bought

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 4>by a bigger tech company.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Aren't we going to see more I'm and A in

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 3>the space.

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 8>I really think so.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 15>I beck to company called Bread Finances, which is bought

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 15>by aline Stata Systems.

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 8>The whole companies now called Bread.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 15>It's a very similar company to our firmand Clarna, And

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 15>in fact, you know, in the fintech space and tech.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 8>Overall, we've seen very little M and A.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 15>Part of it's been the regime and the regulatory process

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 15>where people are afraid that deals will get blocked. I

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 15>think by all indications, in twenty twenty five, with the

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 15>new Trump era, we'll see a more friendly environment for

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 15>M and A and I think folks are kind of

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 15>leaning into that now. And you saw some rumored stuff.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 15>There was like a Qualcom deal that was going to happen.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 15>We've heard about HubSpot, Google, Whiz Google. Those didn't turn

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 15>out to actually happen. But I think in the new

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 15>year you will see M and A pickup as well. Absolutely,

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 15>How do.

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 4>You prep your own portfolio companies then for that new

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 4>era of twenty twenty five, I.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 15>Think, you know, the thing has always been, you know,

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 15>cash is oxygen and auxygen is life, So you have

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 15>to have enough cash on hand to make it through

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 15>whatever period of time. And these last couple of years

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 15>have been tricking in that regard. So companies have been

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 15>raising you know, debt rounds, bank equity, you know, loans

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 15>from banks, convertible notes, things like that to bridge and

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 15>get through to a period where hopefully there's going to

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 15>be more liquidity and better environment for exits.

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 4>What about you and your thoughts on building up holdings

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 4>in companies via the secondary market or going direct to

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 4>when they're doing fresh sales.

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 3>What's the environment been like? How how pure is it.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 4>At the moment or is it kind of it's who

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 4>you know in the back door and therefore you.

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 15>Will access It used to be that way, you know,

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 15>ten tho ten years ago, secondaries was always kind of

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 15>whispered and so forth. And there's famously a massive secondary

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 15>market for Facebook soccer.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 8>You know before it was public.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 15>For many years, but a lot of companies put limits

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 15>on secondary sales and you can only sell a certain portion,

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 15>or some companies don't allow sales at all. They have

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 15>rights of first refusal to stop sales or purchases stocks themselves.

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 8>But now you have all these.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 15>Other markets like Forge and Hive, and while Carter was

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 15>trying to do this where you have a kind of

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 15>more liquid quote unquote secondary market where you can see

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 15>the most up to date pricing, but it's still very episodic,

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 15>where you know, some deal happens and then maybe six

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 15>months goes by, so you're not really sure exactly how

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 15>what the pricing is of these shares in any given

0:36:59.120 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 15>moment in.

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Time, and how difficult is it to understand some of

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 4>the nuances in the deals. The contracts are very individual,

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 4>and some of these very hot companies are able to

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 4>have pretty tough rules on how you speak about.

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Them and how you invest in rivals. What's that looking like?

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 15>Well, you know, the biggest thing is information right, and

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 15>information rights are very limited for investors who come into

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 15>say a secondary in a company like a Klarna or

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 15>whatever before their public you don't get all the rights

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 15>you don't get all the financials, you don't get all

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 15>the documents. You're just told, okay, look this is the

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 15>information you get. There's the price of the stock and

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 15>that's Sydney. You have to kind of live with that.

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 15>Once a company is public, then obviously you get all

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 15>the full information and it's a level playing field for

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 15>everybody and it's a much adding more rich environment.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 8>For folks people to invest with full info.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how that full info comes to beir next

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 4>day at camera And I'm sorry, it's so great to

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 4>have you partner at headline Eon.

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a cloud backup startup and in fact it was

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 3>founded in just.

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 4>January of this year by a group of Amazon Web

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Services alumni and it's just closed a new funding round,

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 4>value in the company at one point four billion dollars.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 4>That's less than a year after founding. So I'm going

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 4>to talk about it with a fair like he's the

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 4>CEO joining us. Now, you've done three funding rounds in

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 4>one year of your first existence. How are we doing

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 4>this and talk to us about what problem you're solving.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 16>Well, it actually four rounds of funding. A first round

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 16>was led by Secoya, second round a light Speed, then

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 16>Green Oaks and lastly Bond And what we're doing we're

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 16>making cloud backup useful because now they're not. And to

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 16>think why should we care about cloud backups? Mean, my

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 16>grandmother have backup on her iPhone for all of her

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 16>kids over only grab kids, So it's not that easy

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 16>in the cloud. You see on premise everyone have everything.

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 16>And in the cloud companies just moved in the last

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 16>few years. They're spending hundreds of billions of dollars annually

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 16>on the cloud, out of which twenty percent is cloud spent,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 16>is backup spent. And this is a huge spent and

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 16>today it doesn't work. It's very cumbersome, it's a mess,

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 16>and it's not useful. You can't even use it when

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 16>you need it. So it's a very big problem and

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 16>we're happy to solve that.

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean aws Or it is a problem. And they

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 3>bought your.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Previous company, cloud Endure.

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 3>So how long have you been fixing this problem?

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 4>How are the ways that the technology is changing to

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 4>ensure that it is less cumbersome going forward?

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 16>So we've seen it. We had a front row seat

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 16>when we're in a previous company in cloud on Door

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 16>and then after being acquired by AWS. In AWS, we

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 16>built the disaster recovery service for enterprises, so we had

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:50.359
<v Speaker 16>a front row seat seeing very large companies either moving

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 16>to the cloud and starting using that for resilience, and

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 16>apparently they encountered many problems related to how you manage

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 16>your data, how you govern that, and then how you

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 16>make sure that it's it's safe and that you can access.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 8>It when you need it.

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 16>So we've seen it for the last I'm doing it

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 16>for the last eleven years and my partner's doing it

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 16>for even more time than that. And when we left AWS,

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 16>it was very vivid that the time is now because

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 16>when enterperse move to the cloud, they form these new

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 16>organizations cloud cloud infrastructure, cloud operations. These are organizations responsible

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 16>for all cloud resilience across the organization, twenty percent of

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 16>cloud spend, which is tens of billions of dollars annually.

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 16>But simply it doesn't work. The same technology and the

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 16>same architecture which worked on premise, it simply doesn't work

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 16>in the cloud. It's like trying to take a square

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 16>peg and fit it into a round hole. And we

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 16>are here to fix it in two ways. One, we

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 16>want to make sure we are able to manage all

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 16>the data for the entire organization, help classify everything, understand

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 16>what's important to back up, what's not to witch retention policy,

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 16>and then we're making it very easy to actually access

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 16>it when you need it. For example, compliance audits, both

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 16>internal and external compliance audits.

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 8>Let's say that you're.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 16>An insurance company and you want to access your data

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 16>from three years back. Who knows if you have backup?

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 16>And if you do, how long will it take you

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 16>to get the data today? It could take days or

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 16>even weeks. Companies are missing compliance audits really bad.

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 3>So you're the fix for the It sounds like you've

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 3>built the offering.

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 4>So when you're going through your fourth round of funding,

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 4>why do you need the funds?

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 3>What is it you're going to be spending it on.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 16>So we found out that as this category category emerges

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 16>and there are very big problems that customers are having,

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 16>we want to make sure that we have everything we

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 16>need in order to support it and solve that quickly,

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 16>and in the enterprise level, because the budget that huge,

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 16>The pain is enormous, and frankly, today what's going on

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.399
<v Speaker 16>is a mess, and we need enough funding to make

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 16>sure that We're building a comprehensive solution fit for the enterprise,

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 16>so that we are well positioned to solve that for

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 16>every company, big or small.

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Engineers marketing sales.

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you'll be bringing on a fair few e

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.919
<v Speaker 4>on CEO, A fair Alex. Thank you for your time

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 4>over in Israel today. Meanwhile, that does it the sedition

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to check out the podcast.

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 4>You'll find it on the terminal as well as online

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 4>on Apple and Spotify.

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 3>On iHeart from New

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 4>York, this is Bloomberg Technology.