WEBVTT - The Fed Decides, Microsoft and BlackRock Team Up

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ed loved.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Love live from New York and San Francisco. This is

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Rumberg Technology coming up.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>All eyes on Powell Markets on Edge and we watch

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>the tech sector ahead of the FED.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Plus Microsoft and black Rocket teaming up planning to launch

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 4>a thirty billion dollar AI investment fund.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And Google wins in court this time EU judges overturning

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the company's one and a half billion euro antitrust Fine,

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 3>but first check in on these markets, I will Gail Doolittle.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, Caroline, we are just hours away from one of

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 5>the most anticipated FED decisions in years.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 6>Because of course.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 5>It's all but likely that they will and backed cut

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 5>at this next meeting for the first time in four years.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 5>But the big question is we'll be twenty five basis

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 5>points or fifty basis points according to probability within the

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg terminal. Right now, we are looking at a fifty

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 5>seven percent chance of a fifty basis point cut. This

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 5>would be one of the first times this has happened

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 5>in a non emergency capacity, perhaps raising questions of what

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 5>are they seeing Why are they going to make such

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 5>a big cut if it happens. Not so long ago,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 5>former Saint Louis FED president James Buller did tell CNBC

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 5>he thinks the chances of a fifty basis point cut

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 5>is actually overblown. So we have seen this probability coming

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 5>in about five percent since those comments at the highs

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 5>on Monday at seventy percent, but the main point is

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 5>more than fifty percent. What has this done for stocks?

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Well over the last couple of months, since we have

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 5>seen some of the sectors, in particular technology peak, We

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 5>have that magnificent seven in the bottom panel of this

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 5>chart that we're looking at down about five percent, whereas

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 5>you have some of the rate sensitive sectors utilities, real estate, staples, healthcare,

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 5>defensive sectors doing better because their dividends will look less attractive.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 5>That is not the case though, since the FED started hiking.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 5>Let's take a look at technology since that time period.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 5>It is clearly the top sector, up sixty percent. In fact,

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 5>all of the sectors a nice rally except for real estate.

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Higher rates, of course lower the values on real estate.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 5>So that is the one loan sector over the last

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 5>two years that has done poorly and then finally ed.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 5>This is mind blowing in a way. In Vidia, over

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 5>the last two years since that FED hiking cycle had started,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 5>up more than seven hundred and seventy percent. We have

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 5>the likes of Meta up nearly three hundred percent. Microsoft

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 5>and Apple not to be left out, both up about

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 5>fifty seventy five percent, big, big rally for tech, but

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.399
<v Speaker 5>more recently, as we've had this rotation into other sectors,

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 5>tech cooling off. But you can see those investors over

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 5>the last couple of years doing quite well.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Abigail Dolittle, thank you. Let's keep the discussion going

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 4>with Megan Horneman's CIO of the Dense Capital Advisors, and

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>we start by asking how significant is today's FED decision

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 4>for the technology sector.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 7>I think it's definitely very important for the tech sector

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 7>as well as the entire market. I think that if

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 7>the yields keep moving higher as we've seen here as

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 7>of late, then that's negative for technology, and technology is

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 7>rallying on the anticipation that we're going to get fifty

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 7>basis points from the FED today. If that doesn't occur,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 7>I think that that's going to put at this rally

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 7>and technology at risk.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>There's a part of the mag seven story, Megan, where

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 4>those names are performing in isolation of everything else that's

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>happening in our world because of the commitment to invest

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>in the infrastructure supporting AI. How closely tied are the

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 4>two stories that and central bank policy?

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think central bank policy and then the story

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 7>around technology. They're separate things. The infrastructure with technology the

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 7>advancements that we're going to see. This is going to

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 7>evolve over time, but the valuations that you're seeing on

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 7>these stocks is linked to interest rate policy and as

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 7>well as yields. If this interest rate policy does not

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 7>deliver with what we're in, with what these heightened valuations

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 7>are anticipating, then you're going to see some valuation correction

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 7>in these names.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Is that limited to the big caps or more broadly

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>across technology in and of itself, Megan.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 7>I think it's broadly across technology and any even some

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 7>of the communications services, any of these growth type of

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 7>names that you've seen with these very high valuations. These

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 7>high valuations are pricing in perfection. They're pricing in that

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 7>the FED will come in deliver with these interstrate cuts.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 7>They'll come in and save the day like we've been

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 7>used to over the past couple decades. And they're also

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 7>pricing in perfection for the economy these things. None of

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 7>this is set in stone right now, so I think

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 7>that there is still there's a big risk here for

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 7>some of these growth and high pe level sectors.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Is that just in the US or do we see

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the wind taken out of the sales of European tactoo.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 7>Megan, Well, well, we don't have as much technology in

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 7>some of the European indices. They're not as tech heavy

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 7>as the US is. But we have seen the correlation here.

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 7>When we have the sell off in the growth or

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 7>technology here in the US, it does tend to filter

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 7>into overseas as well.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Megan, How important to you and the technology investor around

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 4>the world is the path forward thereafter? We can't help ourselves, right,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>We've been waiting for September eighteen and we already ask

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 4>then what increments do we have further rate cuts in

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 4>the path from there?

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 7>That's a great question because they can do several things

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 7>today at this meeting. They can deliver with twenty five

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 7>basis points, which is why I think that they should

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 7>do They should reiterate that they're can going to continue

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 7>to monitor data, they'll act accordingly. It's meeting by meeting,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 7>and then if they could go with fifty basis points,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 7>they could come in and say this is a fine tuning.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 7>We're going to be on hold now, and then you're

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 7>going to get the cuts that are priced into the

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 7>market for the rest this year move out. The most

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 7>important thing today, whether it's technology or the rest of

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 7>the stock market is what are they going to say

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 7>from the dot plots going forward? What are they saying

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 7>for the unemployment, their estimates that they're going to have

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 7>to put out, What are they saying as far as inflation,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 7>because let's keep in mind inflation has come down significantly,

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 7>but it's still in certain areas is very sticky. So

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 7>their press conference and the projections that they put out

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 7>after the meeting, they're more important, obviously in fact, to

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 7>us than whether it's twenty five or fifty basis points.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Today, Megan, there's whole other parts of the capital structure

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 3>you can earn within technology. What does this mean for

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the debt corporate debt of Apple of some of the

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 3>names that have just so much cash on the balance sheet,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>as well. Do bond markets feel the pressure in the

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 3>same way that the equity side will.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 7>I think bond marites do, they will feel the same way.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, let's be honest that the yields have come

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 7>down quite a bit. They're backing up a little bit now,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 7>but yields have come down substantially. And then when you

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 7>look at the longer term over the over yields and

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 7>whether you're looking at long term debt, there's just this

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 7>focus on treasury. There's a main there's a major issue

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 7>from the treasury side of things, that is the deficit,

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 7>and there's not been anything to address that. And I

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 7>don't see even with an election coming up, that there's

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 7>anything that's going to change that. The amount of issuance

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 7>on that long end of the curve. So anybody who's

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 7>focusing on debt or has is debt heavy, and I've

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 7>realized that technology sector is not as debt heavy as

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 7>other sectors going to have an impact on these long

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 7>ends of the of the yeal curve.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Megan, I'd like to end the conversation by trying to

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 4>learn from the year that's gone about what might happen

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 4>in the year ahead. And I use in Nvidia as

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 4>the case study capital expenditures an investment. But the other

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 4>phenomenon that's happened is retail investors have pied piled into

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 4>in video as well. How does a change an interest

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 4>rate environment just kind of change the fanfare of the

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 4>market and the psychology of the market over the next

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>twelve months.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, it all comes down what is the price of

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 7>those stocks.

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 6>And when you look.

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 7>At stocks that have very high elevated price to earnings multiples,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 7>we saw what happened in twenty twenty two. If interest

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 7>rates rise across the board and you see those high

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 7>pe level stocks and that's technology specifically, they end up

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 7>getting hurt by this. So going into next year, I

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 7>still think the Fed has the flexibility to continue to

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 7>cut rates. I just don't think that they're going to

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 7>deliver the way that the market is pricing this in

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 7>right now.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Burn and c IO, Megan Hornemann, it's great to have

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>you today with thank you. Look what's interesting about these

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>markets is perhaps you wish you had the investment vice

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>or decision making prowess of well the investing elite ed

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 3>think Warren Buffett, think Stanley droc and Miller think David

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Tepper and so many more. Today we understand and ETF

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 3>is trying to promise just that sort of power of

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 3>AI fintech startup Internigion Alpha. They're launching a chat pot

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 3>powered by chat Gemini Claude. They call them the Investment Committee.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 3>They're going to act like these hedge fund officionados to

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 3>make decisions.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 8>What do you think?

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 4>We know the obsession of the market of those names.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 4>But what I find astonished about the story is the

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 4>simplicity of it that basically it's a strategy generated through

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 4>a generative AI tool. You listed them, but you just

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 4>go into it and ask what's the strategy here? What

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 4>would Warren Buffett do? And you get a response and then.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 8>The ETF trades off it.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, We'll see how this one plays out,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 3>but it's an interesting launch today.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 8>Meanwhile, coming up, we've got so.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Much more to talk about, and of course there's a

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 3>serious side to what's happening in terms of geopolitics, and

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 3>it affects technology because pages and telecom devices are exploding

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 3>in Lebanon more in the developing situation.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 9>Next this is Blue Meg Technology.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 4>An update from Lebanon More Pages and other telecommunication devices

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>exploding in Lebanon, just one day after a series of

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 4>similar deadly blasts. That's according to reporting by the state

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 4>run national news agency. Bloomberg Television's Jamana Bassecci joins us

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 4>with the latest. What do we know about the events

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 4>of the last hour and what's happening in Lebanon.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 10>Jamana, that's right, So it appears that another attack on

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 10>Hesbala's telecommunication devices has occurred. Just in the last hour.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 10>We are hearing of handheld radio's walkie talkie devices against

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 10>also exploding in people's hands, cars and across at homes.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 10>Even and this of course comes after yesterday the attack

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 10>where more than two thousand pagers when off, simultaneously exploding

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 10>into the pagers that these Himbala operatives have been using. Now,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 10>it is important to note here that Israel has declined

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 10>to take or has not commented on any of the

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 10>attacks that have taken place or the incidents. But both

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 10>Hezballah and the Lebanese governments were quick to point the

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 10>finger at Israel, saying that Israeli intelligence would have been

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 10>behind this very elaborate operation. But what is clear here

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 10>is that this war that has been going on a

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 10>hot war, so to speak. Ever since October seventh on

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 10>Israel's northern border has developed and transformed into a new

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 10>type of warfare as cyber warfare, and lots of questions

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 10>are being asked about how these specific devices have been compromised.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Can you tell us a little bit about the supply

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 3>chain ultimately here, Jeman Or of what you say is

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 3>an elaborate attack, the Taiwanese company gold Apollo has spoken.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 11>Out yes, So the branding on the pages that were

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 11>detonated yesterday can be pointed back to a very not

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 11>well known Taiwanese manufacturer called gold Apollo, and they actually

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 11>issued a statement saying that those sicular models that you

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 11>were used for detonations yesterday were not ones that they

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 11>manufactured themselves.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Instead, it was actually.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 10>A company called BAC that were based in Hungary that

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 10>had obtained the licensing to use the branding on devices

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 10>that they manufactured. Now, Bloomberg did try to reach out

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 10>to BAC for comments, We have not heard back from them.

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 10>But again, all of this is part and parcel of

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 10>a very elaborate plan, and it seems to be the

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 10>case that it's not just the pages that were compromised,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 10>but other telecommunication devices that Hezbollah militants have been using,

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 10>and experts in the field say that the way this

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 10>could have been done is by whoever tampered with the

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 10>devices putting in small quantities of explosive device. They ten

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 10>explosive material ten to twenty grounds that would get triggered

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 10>on a signal that would come through so that they

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 10>would all explode simultaneously. The country is on high alert

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 10>because this is the second such intelligence breach in two days.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Several parties involved and we're awaiting responses from others who

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 4>understanding is that Lebanon and Hezbullah, which is a group

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 4>the United States announces as a terrorist group, have accused

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Israel of being behind the attack. We haven't heard from Israel.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 4>What else do we know about the political situation?

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 10>Yamana, Yes, well, again it is fast moving and as

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 10>I was just highlighting, within Lebanon, now there's major concern

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 10>that we're moving to a new type of warfare and

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 10>that in the past the war had been conducted solely

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 10>on the southern part of the country in borders. But

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 10>now what's happening is there's been a complete intelligence breach.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 10>People are very concerned about what this means for telecommunications

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 10>within the country and the potential for further action or

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 10>further operations coming out of Israel. The background to this,

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 10>of course, since yesterday the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Attaannapolos

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 10>said that there is another new war objective now, and

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 10>that is to return security to the northern border of Israel,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 10>so that citizens within the country can return back. They

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 10>had been evacuated and had been forced to move dis

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 10>plate ever since October seven, and so there is a

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 10>focus from Israel and from the Israeli government to do

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 10>something about the situation on that border. The concern of

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 10>ours is that in the absence of the diplomatic solution,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 10>we may be looking at something like a full scale invasion.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Risk of a serious, dramatic escalation is what the United

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Nations is currently saying. Jamana Bassecci, thank you so much

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>for coming to us from Middle East. It is time

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>for today's AI in action. Well bringing in Catherine Costareva.

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 3>She is the CEO of Creatio. It's a no code

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 3>platform enabling that the automation of workflows and CRN thanks

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>to the power of artificial intelligence. Just announced two hundred

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>million dollars in new funding over the summer. You've got

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a one point two billion dollar valuation. The value of

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>what you provide is well, less engineers and code is needed.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I can build my own application using just creatia.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So true, And first of all, thank you very much

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for having me. I'm excited to be here today with you.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, when we founded the company ten

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the biggest value we brought to our clients

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was time to value the ability to build your applications,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>not being a professional software developer. And right now we're

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>doing that with the help of AI, and that's definitely

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the future.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 6>In the world of technology.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we so ask ourselves about disruption versus what

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 4>the incumbents are doing. And I've spent a lot of

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 4>time with Salesforce and speaking to Salesforce executives and they

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 4>would tell you, Catherine, they're doing exactly the same thing.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 6>How do you respond to that?

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 12>Oh?

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Love the question. So let's start with the evolution of coding. Right,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>if we go back into eighties, it was high coding.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You basically couldn't build the application, not being a professional

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>software developer, and then low code came. It's like rapid

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>application development industry and then no code emerged. So what

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Creation is doing different from our competitors is actually giving

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the ability to design your applications not being a professional

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>software developer, which and not being in tech industry at all,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>which actually allows time to value, time to market to

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be significantly faster. With the help of AI, you not

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>only develop your own apps and automate multiple use cases,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you actually replace people in multiple different rules like case resolutions,

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like sales management, like campaign management, and in comparison to Salesforce,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the biggest difference at Creation is that you build those intents,

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you build those use cases, not being a technical person,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>so you define the use cases where AI is helping

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you to automate tasks without being a professional developer. On

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the creation of platform, you.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 8>Said replace people.

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 3>For many that is the key worry around artificial intelligence.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Most people try to say they'll be augmented. Have you

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 3>known that your clients replaced people?

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 10>I love.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Looking at it through augmentation, right, we actually empower our

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>end users to do their job better.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 8>But you said replace people. So have people been replaced

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 8>at your clients?

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think partially yes? Like if we talk about

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>call center like people are doing more intelligent work, so

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>replaced in a very good way because basically AI is

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>taken over routine tasks while more intelligent work is being

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>done by people like let me give you an example

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>with building workflows, building your own applications with the help

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of AI. AI does this work for you while you

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>do more intelligent work, which is integration of workflow apply

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>keations into the ecosystem of your organization. So it does

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>require more skills, which is a benefit for workers because

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they can grow in their professional skills.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 3>We want to thank you for bringing the pros, the

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>cons and indeed what you're building the creatio and your valuation.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 8>CEO Kevin Custareva, thank you very much.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, now shifting to another part of AI, Blackrock and Microsoft,

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 3>they're teaming up on one of the largest efforts to

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 3>date to bankroll the buildout of data warehouses and energy

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure behind the boom in artificial intelligence. This of course

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 3>being a normous undertaking from an infrastructure perspective, and we

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 3>want to be digging into some of the intricacies around

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 3>this particular deal that has been struck between an enormous

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 3>asset manager and indeed Larry Fink was posting on various

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 3>platforms yesterday ed about how much they are seeing this

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>whole seismic shift and the need for artificial intelligence, the

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 3>shares scale of money needed.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 8>But actually he seemed to think it was relatively easy to.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Come by, Lin Dahn and pleased to say, joins us more, Lynn,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>this is a massive amount of money and expertise coming

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 3>from in video too.

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 13>It is, and thank you for having me. It sounds massive,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 13>doesn't it. Thirty billion dollars sounds massive, But it's just

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 13>the tip of the iceberg. I mean, remember that even

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 13>before this thirty billion dollar fund was announced, Microsoft had

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 13>already had already signed a multi billion dollar contract with

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 13>Brookfield just to build some renewable energy plants that would

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.239
<v Speaker 13>in turn supply the electricity for data centers that are

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 13>necessary for AI. And before this announcement, we had this

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 13>scoop on how Sam Altman, the head of OpenAI, was

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 13>working on his own plan for AI infrastructure and pushing

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 13>for it here in the US. That would have also

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 13>cost tens of billions of dollars. So we are in

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 13>the end talking about hundreds of billions of dollars of

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 13>AI infrastructure necessary to keep the boom happening, and this

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 13>is just the latest announcement exactly.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 4>So when I read this story by Boomberg Center, Rush

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 4>and Dina Bass, it's all the same names really that

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 4>we've been talking about. What's different a little bit about

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the black Rock and Microsoft initiatively seems to be there

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 4>is a more micro focus on energy, but also deploying

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 4>capital outside of the US as well.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 13>That's right, and that is actually something that has been

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 13>a big part of Sam Altman's push too, has been

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 13>going out there abroad trying to attract foreign sources of

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 13>money to fuel this AI boom. It was very interesting

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 13>to see the Abu Dhabi Fund invested in this. But also,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 13>as you said, the energy part of it is the

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 13>critical part. And when our very own Bradstone interviewed Sam

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 13>Altman at Davos a year ago, he said something very similar.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 13>He said, I don't think that the world has yet

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 13>realized how big of an increase we are talking about

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 13>in energy demands.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 8>Because of the AI boom.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 13>By our estimates at Bloomberg Intelligence, we're talking about possibly

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 13>ten times more energy being put toward AI data centers

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 13>by twenty thirty than today's levels. So for sure, the

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 13>focus needs to be on the energy aspect of the equation.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 3>Just briefly, we know that people were the administration at

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the White House last week talking about aim structure.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 8>Is this the fruits of those labor That's right?

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 13>And I mean, I don't know if this fund is

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 13>the fruits of those labors, but for sure, what came

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 13>out of those conversations, as far as we know from sources,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 13>was an agreement for a task force that would look

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 13>at these issues together. And I think that a part

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 13>of that, we'll be looking at all of the permitting

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 13>and the regulatory hurdles that need to be cleared in

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 13>order for these massive power plants and data centers to

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 13>even be fathom for one to even fathom them being

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 13>built in the US, just in terms of like the

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 13>environmental permits and the space.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Blue Boslindann, thank you very much.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 8>I'll come back to Bluebog technology. I'm Caroline Hid in

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 8>New York.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Mamed Lalalo in San Francisco.

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 8>The day is here, ed fed day two pm.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Will we get a rate cut to the junior twenty

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>five or fifty basis points that is what the market

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 3>weighs and watches for and we currently just tread water

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 3>basically on the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 8>We're off by a tenth of a percent.

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Now there is some concerns the risk a version building

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 3>is to what it means for technology once we get

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 3>those rate cuts. Let's move on and look at the

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 3>individual movers, because actually on the higher side, we have

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 3>got Apple powering higher today and this is the biggest

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 3>lift from a points perspective, or up one point seven percent.

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 3>So all eyes on those mags seven names and where

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 3>they can continue to run in the way that we've

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>been so used to even with a hiking cycle. We're

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 3>looking at for you, ed Ubisoft, I do Star Wars Outlaws.

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>There's been a lot of worries about this new game.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 3>And actually for once we've got bmo annas they're saying

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>it is so cheap now this French name of maker

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>of of course in the latest games that we've got

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 3>to be buying in it jumps more than six percent.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Remember it is down about fifty percent year to date though,

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm looking at Alphabet just treading water also ahead

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 3>of the FED. But there's been some interesting micro news. Yes,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 3>there's a YouTube creator's event happening right here in New

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 3>York and some unveilings there. But there's a key event

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 3>that happened earlier in Europe and you got the details.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Google won a court fight with the European Union over

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 4>a one point seven billion dollar fine for illegally stopping

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 4>rivals from placing ads on third party websites. The court

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 4>cited key mistakes in the original twenty nineteen pro Bloomberg.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Sam Stalton joins us from Brussels. So this is a

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 4>positive outcome for Google. Explain the basics of the court's decision.

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so it is actually quite a rare win for

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 14>Google in the European Union's courts. Here, it's important to

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 14>say this is a win in the lower tier court

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 14>as the EU General Court in Luxembourg, So the decision

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 14>can actually be appealed to the European Court of Justice,

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 14>which is the bloc's highest court. Effectively, this one point

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 14>seven billion dollar fine was slapped on Google in twenty

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 14>nineteen after EU Antitrust Chief Magadeta Vestage said that it

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 14>was illegally preventing rival search engines run by the likes

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 14>of Yahoo and Microsoft from placing ads on websites like

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 14>online newspapers, travel platforms and blogs, etc. But now, of

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 14>course that one point seven billion dollar fine has been

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 14>struck out by EU judges, who, as you've just said,

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 14>cited a number of errors in the Commission's investigations, including

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 14>in their definitions of certain things like market definition and

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 14>the duration of the alleged abusive behavior.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean Google itself funnily enough, saying they're pleased

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 3>with this response. They said it really factored on a

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>very narrow subset of text only search ads, and basically

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 3>they've gone back and changed the con tracks from twenty sixteen.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 3>But this isn't the only focus on ad tech and

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 3>its power within that space, not just in Europe but

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 3>also in the US.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 14>Indeed, so you have too parallel I suppose fronts really

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 14>on Google's advertising technology business. So the case today was

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 14>really more about display advertising, but when it comes to

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 14>advertising technologies, there's a much more if you like, existential

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 14>risk to Google's long term sustainability in these types of markets.

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 14>You have the Department of Justice case that's obviously in

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 14>broad in legal proceedings at the moments, but also in

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 14>the European Union they have their own investigation open into

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 14>Google's advertising technologies, which we assume could lead to an

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 14>eventual breakup order potentially in the coming months. That's an

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 14>investigation that still needs to be concluded. That the European

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 14>Commission is certainly making progress on what would be its

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 14>fourth investigation into Google business and potential abuses of dominance.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Samas Dalton me, thank you so much on all things

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 3>EU versus big tech. Let's talk about what's happening on

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the hill in big tech because tech firms will be

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>the focus of a US Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>election threats. Executives from the likes of Google, but also

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft and Meta are all set to appear.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 6>It emerges.

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Davilas joins us from DC with more who expected

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 3>to hear from today?

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 15>Jackie, Well, while everyone's tuning into the FED decision, I'm

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 15>going to be on Capitol Hill at that Senate Intelligence

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 15>Committee hearing, and we're expected to see executives like Google's

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 15>Can't Walker, Metas, Nick Clegg, and Microsoft's president Brad Smith.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 15>And really what the focus here today will be what

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 15>is the role and responsibility of tech companies in detecting

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 15>misinformation and disinformation online, particularly as it relates to foreign

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 15>interference in our elections, and this has been a key

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 15>focus for this bipartisan panel. It's chaired by a Democrat,

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 15>Mark Warner from Virginia, and the vice chair is Marco

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 15>Rubio from Florida. This is an issue that both sides

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 15>of the isle care about, and what they want to

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 15>understand is what have companies been doing to fulfill their

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 15>commitments to detect this kind of interference in elections online. Now,

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 15>just yesterday, very timely, Microsoft published a detailed report that

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 15>showed that Russia was actually spreading phony videos online that

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 15>we're targeting Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign. And this is

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 15>just kind of the type of report that you've seen

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 15>some tech companies come out and publish and say this

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 15>is what we're seeing from our end of things. Open

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 15>AI and May also released a similar report that says

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 15>they detected some foreign interference from actors like China, Iran

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 15>in Israel in trying to change political discourse around the world. Now,

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 15>open ai won't be present at the hearing today, but

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 15>this is the kind of report and action that senators

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 15>want to hear. You know that the companies are proactively

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 15>doing to prevent this kind of disinformation from proliferating.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 4>What the US voter Bloomberg Technology audience member might ask is, well,

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 4>hold on, it's less than two months until the election.

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 4>So is this great Senate hearing with these technology executives

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 4>going to have a focus or an impact on the

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 4>upcoming presidential election or is the idea it's bigger picture,

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the integrity of our election's longer term.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 15>Jackie both ed and that's exactly right. I think Russia

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 15>is such a focus for this committee on both sides

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 15>of the aisle. They've clearly been trying to sway US

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 15>elections even before this upcoming one in November. But what

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 15>you're saying exactly, it's this integrity, you know, our institution

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 15>in people's ability to believe that what they see online

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 15>is actually true. Now, we don't have a lot of

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 15>time before the election, but as you know, things spread

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 15>so quickly online, especially in this new age of generative AI,

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 15>and so whatever they can to do to at least

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 15>put the spotlight on companies so they can proactively move

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 15>and detect and prevent this kind of stuff from making

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 15>it onto our phones in a second. I mean, it's

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 15>an effort, but will it be effective is yet to

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 15>be seen.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift has had rather a lot to say about it.

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Of late Bloomberg's Jackie Devilos, We thank you and have

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 3>we got coming out?

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Some more news headlines from around the world. It's time

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 4>for talking tech us up. Amazon named SAMMYA. Kumar is

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 4>its new head of consumer business in India starting October first.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Kumar joined Amazon in nineteen ninety nine and also leads

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 4>the consumer businesses for the Middle East, South Africa and Turkey.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 6>Plus.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan's in discussions with Apple to take over their

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 4>credit card portfolio from Goldman Sachs.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 6>JP Morgan among a slew of.

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Credit card issuers that have looked to take over the

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Apple card, which launched with Goldman five years ago and

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 4>is now seeking to look elsewhere. And hackers behind a

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 4>cyber attack of drug distributor Senkora were paid seventy five

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 4>million dollar dollars.

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 6>That's according to sources.

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 4>The payment was made in three installments in bitcoin and

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 4>is the largest known cyber extortion payment ever made.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Caroline Wow coming up twenty three and Me's entire board

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 3>so Special Purpose Forward just quit in protest of the

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>CEO's plans.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 8>To take the company private. Details.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 9>Next, this is bluem Meg Technology.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>We're watching shares of twenty three and mes actually rebounding

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 3>after well seven all of them. Independent board members resigned

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 3>yesterday protesting CEO and Rajiski's plan to take the company private,

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>and the directors said that there hasn't been any notable

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>progress on presenting a proposal. Who most Leanna Baker has

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 3>more on this. I mean it's only up two percent

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 3>and it has been under pressure. This is extraordinary. It

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 3>was a special committee to analyze whether or not a

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 3>deal would look good and clearly they're voting with their feet.

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 16>So it's an interesting situation. And Anne Rodjiski actually controls

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 16>the company, she controls the vote, so it's all up

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 16>to her what happens. But a special committee did form

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 16>and they've been waiting for a fully financed offer to

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 16>come in and that just hasn't happened yet. So it

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 16>seems like they're frustrated. And some of these big Silicon

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 16>Valley names are on the board, like Sequoia's role if

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 16>the Botha has resigned in others, so we'll see what happens.

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 16>But Anne wojisk does so want to take the company private,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 16>and really the balls in her court because she has

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 16>a control of the situation.

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 4>It's one hundred and eighty million dollars less than market

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 4>cap company trading at thirty five cents a share, nowhere

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>near it's seventeen dollars sixty five cents peak. Doesn't seem

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 4>that hard. I mean, what do we know about the

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 4>financing package. Who's going to be getting involved in the

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 4>take private Leanna.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 16>At this point, we don't know who would be involved,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 16>but we know that Wajiski has bid forty cents a share,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 16>which is above where the stock is trading, although it

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 16>is sort of a penny stock. You remember that this

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 16>company went public through a SPAC deal and it did

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 16>have high profile backers before, like Richard Branson and other

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 16>big names. But at that point it was worth several billion.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 16>Now it's just a fraction of that. And we'll see.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 16>For now, the special committee has a banker. We're not

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 16>aware if the company itself is exploring a sale, but

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 16>Wojiski has said she is open to other offers. So

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 16>it could make sense for this company, out of the

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 16>limelight of the public markets, to sort of reset and

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 16>potentially restructure to return to growth.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Blom Bose Leanna Baker, who leads our deal's team, thank

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 4>you very much.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 6>Just get some more news.

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 4>KKR and Goldman backed home renovation startup live Space is

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 4>getting closer to going public. The platform connects customers we've

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 4>designed for home makeovers in markets like India and Singapore.

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Expects its first net income in the first quarter of

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five. Live Space skits eighty five percent of

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 4>its revenue from that India market.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 6>Carol, Let's talk.

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 3>About someone who's probably eyeing the IPO market and indeed

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the venture landscape. Some with a lot of expertise, like

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Goreguaz with us Bryden Park Capital partner co founder just

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 3>made a recent JO one and fifty million dollar investment,

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>for example, in the ticketing marketplace Tippic. And you have

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 3>significant expertise having run big tech businesses yourself. Mike, what

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 3>do you think of the IPO landscape? Are we going

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to rev back up post election?

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think it's a it's a strange environment

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 12>where in order to go public now, I think there's

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 12>a bigger burden for quality and I think that there's

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 12>so many companies that have gotten to rule of forty.

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 12>They're proven, the big can managed customers that they're SaaS companies,

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 12>they've been through several renewal cycles. I think we're going

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 12>to see a lot of companies, you know, running out

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 12>to an IPO, and there's a lot of investors that

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 12>are looking for liquidity, So the pressure between the companies

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.479
<v Speaker 12>being stronger proven as well as you know investors looking

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 12>for liquidity. I think you're to see a number of

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 12>IPOs come out in the new year.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 3>All of forty being and your revenue growth rate, profit

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 3>margin being at least forty percent, so looking strong and resilient.

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Where then do you make your bets in the very

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 3>early stages we just talked about how you assigning money

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 3>to take pic to be able to take on the

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 3>nights of oh cee Geek and other areas, to buy

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>tickets to real life events where else looks at appetizing

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 3>right now, Mike, I.

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 12>Think you have to have a philosophy and a thesis

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 12>of where you want to invest in. You don't definitely

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 12>don't want to be investing in what's happened in the

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 12>past or incremental solutions to legacy systems. You want to

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 12>be into difficult, high ip hard problems to solve, and

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 12>when you take a look at that, you know the

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 12>areas that we think are soon exciting is anything to

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 12>do with AI and being on the place of AI,

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 12>where we're trying to help companies solve bigger problems that

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 12>have never been solved before, or adding massive value to

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 12>problems that currently exist, but doing it better, faster, or cheaper.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 12>We have a handful of investments that we've done along

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 12>that those ways. You take a look at a company,

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 12>we have Corelogics. It started off as a logs company

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.760
<v Speaker 12>and they've added three new products that are massive tams.

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 12>Silver Fort in the identity management space. If there's anything

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 12>that you want to be paying attention to right now

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 12>is zero trust and identity management. And when you take

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 12>a look at how Silverfort solved that problem, they've done

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 12>it in a way nobody else has ever been able

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 12>to do it before. You know they can solve you know,

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 12>multi factor authentication, So the same thing that irritates us

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 12>alve where you put in your password and they send

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 12>you a text message. You can never do that for

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 12>service accounts or for on premise systems, and silver Fort

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 12>has absolutely nique technology to be able to do that

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 12>that nobody else really has. So you want to be

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 12>thinking of those types of things. How do you build

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 12>a big company when you start with a company that's

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 12>just got one product.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 4>Having a focus on cybersecurities is not unique, Mike, But

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 4>we have loads of people in the show that say

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 4>it's right for disruption.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 6>But it seems like a crowded field to me.

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 12>You're one hundred percent correct. I think I see two

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 12>or three things happening in cybersecurity. You know, everybody's moving

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 12>through this concept of XDR and the whole notion is

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 12>we've been actually pretty good at detecting, we haven't been

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 12>great at responding. And we have four million people in

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 12>the cybersecurity world right now that have experience in cybersecurity.

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 6>We need eight million.

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 12>There's no way we're going to be able to get

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 12>four million more people that are highly qualified in cybersecurity.

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 12>So it's going to have to come through automation. And

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 12>I think AI is gay play a significant role.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 4>In making that happen, Mike, real quick, because I can't

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 4>resist it's what's it like being on a cap table

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 4>with Rory McElroy.

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 12>Well, Roy's a you know First of all, he is

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 12>an absolute gentleman, and he's actually very good investor in

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's nice to have a celebrity like that,

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 12>especially a quality person of his nature associated.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>With your firm.

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Mike Grebuire of Brighton Park Capitol, really good to have

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 4>you on the program.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 6>It's been more than fifty.

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Years since an astronaut last walked on the Moon, but

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 4>this decade could see a number of countries attempt to

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 4>send humans back. So who's in the race and why now?

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Tom Gibson has more listen to this.

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 17>America plans to send four astronauts into Luna orbit, including

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 17>the first woman and first person of color, as part

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 17>of the Artemist program. This will set the stage for

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 17>the next artem mission to have people on the Moon

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 17>in the next few years. But while Neil Armstrong only

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 17>spent a few hours on the Moon, the Artemis astronauts

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 17>will be there for much longer, spending at least six

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 17>days on the lunar surface. China also hopes to have

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 17>people on the Moon by twenty thirty.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 18>Jane Tongo kum Jiang Kirk with a Triniatian.

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 17>Die and has achieved a series of impressive firsts. It

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 17>was the first and so far only nation to land

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 17>on the far side of the Moon and the first

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 17>to send samples from there back to Earth.

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 18>Going to the fares side of the Moon is especially hard.

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 18>Of course, it never actually faces Earth, and so communicating

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 18>with anything on the farest side of the Moon is

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 18>really really hard.

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 17>All this has America worried.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 19>I don't want China to get to the South Pool

0:38:54.239 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 19>first with humans and then say this is our stay out.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 18>Bill Nelson, the NASSA administrator, has frequently referred to China's

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 18>policies here on Earth, in particular the South China Sea,

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 18>where China has said all these islands in the South

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 18>China Sea, they belong to us. Bill Nelson has said

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 18>in the same way that they did this grab in

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 18>the South China to see their potential that they would

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 18>try to do something on the Moon, and so we

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 18>have to make sure to stop that.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 3>You can catch the full episode at Bloomberg dot com.

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Now let's get back to the tech markets, because today

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 3>or here on Earth, is fed Decision Day primposed Shinani Bassek. Look,

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you're looking across assets as you do on your show

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 3>day in day out. But we want to shine a

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 3>lens and what's happening with technology within the implication of

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the bill market.

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 20>For example, absolutely, let's take a look at what's just

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 20>happened to the two year or for example, over the

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 20>past month, and what it's meant for technology stacks and

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 20>if there's been a relationship. The two year over the

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 20>past month has drastically fallen in terms of the yield

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 20>movement here more than forty basis points. If you could

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 20>take a look at that, you are down now to

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 20>three sixty five, with the market expecting that the Fed

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 20>would cut fifty basis points today. Of course you have

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 20>economists more in disagreement there, but with that pricing moves,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 20>let's flip up the board and see what the SMP

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 20>and the NASDAC have done over that timeframe as well.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 8>And in fact you have.

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 20>The Nasdaq outperforming or the S and P five hundred

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 20>rather outperforming the Nasdaq one hundred, but the S and

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 20>P five hundred really rising marginally and the NASAK flat

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 20>to lower. If you flip up the board one more

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 20>time here, because this is where you actually see that

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 20>move much more distinctly. The SMP equal weighted index, which

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 20>had reached a record yesterday, is up more than three

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 20>percent over that same timeframe. This is really paying more

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 20>attention to those companies outside of tech in a more

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 20>equal way. With a mag seven down one point seven percent,

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 20>even with that yield movement being so drastic on the

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 20>move lower, this Philadelphia Semiconductor Index down five point six percent,

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 20>almost five point seven percent, and only a handful of

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 20>stocks really in the green over that timeframe. So what

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 20>does that say At the beginning of the year, when

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 20>people have thought that a lower discount rate would really

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 20>fuel these tech sacks, that has not happened in the

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 20>past month. So what you really need then is a

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 20>new narrative that is based on earnings, that is based

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 20>on that AI payout and not as related to interest

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 20>rates as we had expected in the past.

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Caroline Shnali I looked up from my desk this morning,

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 4>massive TV screen Bloomberg Open.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:27.959
<v Speaker 6>Interest, the show that you anchor.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 4>Forwards fed's day, is here banner across the screen. How

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 4>palpable is the excitement, tension, anxiety of all the investors

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 4>you have on your show, particularly those that are focused

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 4>on tech.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 20>Listen, it's fascinating because on one hand, the AI story

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 20>has dominated this market, has it not, And you felt

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 20>that excitement to shift away. Actually for a moment this morning,

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 20>ed away from that story about interest rates and towards

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 20>that text story because it is still driving so much

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 20>of the market. I think about what Kate Moore over

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 20>at Blackrock said, and this idea that perhaps people are

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 20>taking the chips off the table right now. They could

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 20>be taking the chicks off for a little bit longer,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 20>but that doesn't take away from today. The idea that

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 20>we are on the precipice of a historic rate cutting

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 20>cycle twenty five or fifty at the end of the

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 20>day could cause some volatility, but the rate and the

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 20>path forward is what really matters at the end of

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 20>the day, complicated even more by an election in November.

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 8>Shanani Massek and thank you so much for talking us

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 8>through it all. That does it for this edition of

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 8>Bluebog Technology.

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 3>But look, as we expect that momentous decision, we're not

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 3>doing all that much. And then as that one hundred

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 3>by three tens percent, a little bit of anxiety ed.

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 4>I think that's what the market is called treading water anxiety.

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 4>But we're very excited a lots recap in the show

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Away from the Fed recap the podcast.

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 6>You know where to find it.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 4>On the Bloomberg platforms, on Apples, Spotify, and iHeart Big

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 4>thanks to the team out in New York City. Big

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 4>thank you to everyone here in SF. This is Bloomberg Technology.