WEBVTT - Midterms in Focus after 'No Kings' Rallies, CPAC

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>This Weekend Podcast with David Gura, Christina Raffini, and Elisa Matteo.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us for today's selection of conversations from

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 3>You can listen to our favorite discussions right here on

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the podcast, but also make sure to join us live

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 3>every Saturday and Sunday morning starting at seven am Easter.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 4>We're on Bloomberg Television, Radio and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 4>bringing you unique takes and in depth interviews on news, politics,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 4>lifestyle and culture.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 5>That's CPAC conference was underway in Texas this week. The focus,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 5>of course, was what its Republican Party looked like post

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump, but there was also something of great conversation

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 5>there had to do with Iran warrens where all of

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 5>that is headed and especially top of mind for attendees there,

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 5>including Iranian Americans.

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a listen.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 6>I am fank you on, but I am your citizen.

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 7>Also, maybe do you think why US should be in war? Actually,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 7>I am going to say, is the best time to

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 7>make America great again? And Iran can be the biggest

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 7>part of the puzzle to be disheld but first we

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 7>have to need a freedom.

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 5>David Ben sorry, one of the attendees there at that

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 5>SEAPEC conference in grape Vine, Sexas. Jeff Mason was there

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 5>covering it for us. He's a White House correspondent at

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg News. Jeff, great to have you with us once again.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 5>Talk a bit about the degree to which this conflict

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 5>was reverberating around the halls of that gay Lord hotel

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 5>in Texas. How much was it front of mine for

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 5>those who are participating there.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 8>I think it sort of overshadowed a large part of

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 8>the conference. Honestly, as we've talked about earlier, the support

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 8>for President Trump is still extremely high. But the fact

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 8>that the president went back on a promise with this war,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 8>the fact that the war has gone on for several

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 8>weeks now, and the fact that fuel prices are up

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 8>with no particular site or end in sight are all

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 8>things that are that are concerning to.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 6>People at SEAPACK.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 8>Even if they continue to say they support the president,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 8>they support the war, they're just question marks about it.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 8>And the question marks are both about those promises that

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 8>we that I just mentioned and about the impact that

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 8>it's going to have politically.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 6>Going into the November elections.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>And Jeff, President Trump didn't speak at SEAPAC this year.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that significant? Why did they make that choice? And

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 2>did attendees notice, do they care?

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 9>Well?

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 8>I think I don't think that was a choice by

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 8>SEAPAC organizers. I think they would have been delighted to have

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 8>President Trump come. And there was there was even a

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 8>little bit of rumor milling while I was there that

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 8>they were still trying to get a big name speaker

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 8>like Vice President Vance or Secretary of State Rubio to come.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure they would have been delighted if the President

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 6>had come.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 8>All of that said, there's a lot of forgiveness for

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 8>President Trump in that room, and that would apply to

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 8>both a lack of a tenants as well as breaking

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 8>some promises that he made as a candidate.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Jeff, You've covered a number of these over the years,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 5>and I'm curious sort of how much energy and enthusiasm

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 5>there was this one compared to one's past. They used

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 5>to be in Washington, d C. Then they were in Maryland,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 5>a little ways away from the capital. Now we have

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 5>it taking place in Texas. Does it retain the level

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 5>of energy and enthusiasm among participants that it had in

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 5>the past.

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 6>You know, there was plenty of energy there.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it's interesting in terms of people watching you

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 8>go and people wearing red.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 6>Maga hats or black Maga hats.

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 8>I spoke to one woman who was dressed up in

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 8>a Statue of Liberty costume, all of whom were very

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 8>happy to talk about their love of the president and

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 8>their hate of communism and socialism and the other buzzwords

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 8>that SEAPAC very successfully has associated with the left. You know,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 8>it is You're right, it was in Dallas as opposed

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 8>to in the DC area. But there's a lot of

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 8>conservative energy in Dallas for sure, and people from all

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 8>over the country who came.

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, I didn't notice a dip in energy.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 8>I just certainly noticed at least some concern, and that

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 8>would include at the very top of the organizer level.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 8>I spoke to Matt Slap concern about the impact of

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 8>this war on the elections. And when I spoke to Matt,

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 8>he discussed the fact that this is an interesting and

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 8>tricky political time and the impact on Republicans and the

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 8>impact on the MAGA faithful when it comes to those elections, which,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 8>as you all know, I love to talk about is looming.

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 8>So they're thinking about that, but they're also again using

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 8>they use their time in Dallas to talk about the

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 8>things that they care about, both in the US and

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 8>globally in terms of the conservative movement.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Jeff, we just got about a minute or so left,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>but I do want to let you talk a little

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 2>bit about those midterm elections that you hold so near

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and dear to your heart.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 6>Maybe I love it.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it better you than me, buddy, all right,

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So Steapack is the diehards. Of course, these are like

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the most loyal people to the president, and as you said,

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>they're willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>But as you talk to Republicans at large, maybe outside

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>of that bubble just slightly, are they getting concerned about

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>things like oil prices, about how long this conflict in

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Iran is going, especially as we are coming up on

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>those midterms. There's always another election around the corner, but

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 2>this one, the President keeps saying, you know, oil prices

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>are a blip. It's going to wind down, it's going

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to resolve. It doesn't seem to be going as quickly

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>as he would like.

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 8>I think that's right, and I you know, it's it's

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 8>easy for a political reporter to talk about the next election,

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 8>but this next election is so critical for President Trump.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 8>It will have so many implications for the second half

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 8>of his second term, in terms of legislation, in terms

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 8>of policy priorities, in terms of the potential investigations that

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 8>Democrats would launch if Democrats take over the House and

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 8>potentially the Senate. I think the risks that you just highlighted,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 8>Christina are spot on. I think those risks are present

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 8>both within the Democratic and independent base, but also among

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 8>the magni the magna folks who he will need to

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 8>go out and vote as well.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Mason, who covers the White House forests and the

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Seapac conference, he was there over the course last week.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Mason, thank you very much for the time.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Jeff for you soon.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend.

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Right after this, Emily Gregory went from owning a fitness

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>center for pregnant and postpartum women to defeating a Trump

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 2>back Republican for state representative. The special election surprise victory

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 2>is raising eyebrows, not only because she's a Democrat who

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 2>won a conservative district because she represents marri Lago and

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 2>her most famous resident is, of course, President Donald Trump.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now is Florida State Representative Emily Gregory. Emily,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I understand that you're also a first time politician. You've

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>not run for anything before. What made you want to

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>get involved and why did you think you could win?

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so this has all been a whirlwind. I filed

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 9>last summer, just not happy with the representation we were

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 9>getting out of Tallahassee. I felt that for years they

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 9>have not been focused on the issues my friends and

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 9>my neighbors and I are talking about that we need

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 9>solutions to, and they're focused on distractions. And I thought, hey,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 9>if those dummies, wehy not.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Morning TV, but we can allowed dummies.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 5>Yes, go ahead, let me ask you about what you

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 5>did focus on. You mentioned some of those issues that

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 5>you and your friends were talking about, indeed, cared about Christina,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 5>bringing up perhaps your most famous resident constituent.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 6>How much did you over the course.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Of the campaign talk about him, focus on him, address

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 5>national policies, visa VI him. How large did Donald Trump

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 5>loom in the campaign that you waged.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 9>I would say he did not loom large, not because

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 9>it's not innate, but because it's outside the scope of

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 9>the state House. And one thing our campaign is very

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 9>strong on is staying disciplined on the issues, So right

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 9>you go. I went into the campaign with an idea

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 9>of what issues were affecting me most, and I really

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 9>really listened in all the conversations we had knocking on

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 9>doors and at campaign events to what are the biggest

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 9>issues at the state level that are affecting District eighty

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 9>seven voters, And we heard housing and healthcare and public education,

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 9>so that we were laser focused on those issues.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>It's very tempting, especially those of us who call the politics,

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>to extrapolate from one race and try to make it

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a trend and try to broaden it out. But I

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>do wonder as you look at other Democrats who are

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>struggling to make gains or break through, do you think

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>focusing more on those cable excuse me, kitchen table issues

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and less on the president would be more effective for

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the party if they're trying to gain more seats, especially

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the midterms.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 9>I can say it's the successful formula for me, and

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 9>it just makes sense. Right things that are abstract and

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 9>don't impact your day to day life are just not

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 9>going to have as much of an impact on your

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 9>decision making. And we don't have the final numbers, but

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 9>it looks like a large number of Independents and a

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 9>really significant number of Republicans also voted for me as

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 9>well as you know, large support across political parties. And

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 9>I'm very proud of that because that was my theory

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 9>of the case going into this was that most people

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 9>I talk to, regardless of their political stripe, we're talking

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 9>about the same things. We were talking about property insurance,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 9>we were talking about, you know, the skyrocketing cost of

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 9>health care, we were talking about our public schools being gutted,

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 9>so those really it doesn't it's not a partisan slant,

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 9>and I don't think railing against something is as successful

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 9>as you know, defining what you're for.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 5>We pull back lastly, and I think we could focus

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 5>on the patio at mar Lago and the wealth that

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 5>exists in some parts of the district that you represent.

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 5>The maybe you can kind of introduce viewers and listeners

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 5>who don't know it to a wider audience. What is

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 5>your district like and sort of what are the principal

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 5>challenges that you see at facing here?

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>In the year ahead.

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thank you for asking. So it runs down the coast.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 9>There's a population at the center at the top, so

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 9>Jupiter is where I live, Palm Beach Gardens, North Palm, Juno,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 9>So it's kind of like a circle up there, and

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 9>then Skinny Skinny skinny all the way down the coast

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 9>to Manalapan and hyper Luxo, which is actually very large

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 9>distance wise for a state House district, with some carbouts

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 9>to include downtown West Palm and downtown Lake Worth Beach.

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 9>So downtown West Palm Beach, big, big, number one concern

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 9>is this rapid rapid growth and how you balance that

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 9>with smart growth. And in Lakeworth they have some real

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 9>water quality challenges and infrastructure that really need to be

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 9>addressed through the legislature, and it would have been really

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 9>important for them to have a District eighty seven representative

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 9>in this legislative session that just wrapped up. So that

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 9>is the importance of representation as these local issues that

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 9>need you know, you need a representative to go fight

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 9>fight for that, fight for your needs at the local level.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, local government very important. Emily Gregory, thank you

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining us on this Sunday.

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Great to get that perspective.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 5>Joining us now, Puck News writer reporter Abby Livingston, Bloomberg

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 5>opinion columns, and two time Pulitzer Prize winner Ron Brownstein

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 5>is with us and Brecker's University director of the Eagleton

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Center for Public Interests pulling. Ashley Coening is with us

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 5>here on set in New York as well.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 10>Ron.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Let me start with you, and let's use what we

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 5>heard over the last couple of minutes to kick off

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 5>this conversation. Christina asking the very good question, what can

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 5>you extrapolate from a local race like this one about

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 5>Democrats directionally going into the midterm elections?

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 6>What did you hear there?

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 5>What is your sense of the greet which Democrats should

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 5>focus on Donald Trump going forward or focus more specifically

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 5>on the issues of affordability and healthcare in the light?

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's really good morning, Good to be with you.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 6>First of all, it's both.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 10>And especially in a midterm I think if you look

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 10>at modern American politics, this single dominant force in midterm

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 10>elections is the voter assessment of the performance of the

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 10>incommon president. I mean, in twenty eighteen and twenty twenty,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 10>at least ninety percent of voters who disapproved of Trump

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 10>voted a Democratic each time. We saw that again in

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 10>the New Jersey and Virginia governor's races. Were in the

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 10>exit polls, Mikey, Cheryl and Abigail Spamberger each one over

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 10>ninety percent of voters who disapproved of Trump. So that

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 10>is obviously, you know, a central focus. But she's right

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 10>that you know to get those last few points of

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 10>voters that you need either side, really and this was

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 10>true for Trump in twenty four. They are not voters

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 10>who are fundamentally enlisted into the ideological battle between the parties.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 10>They are voting on results, and to convince them that

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 10>you have an agenda or a plan that can address

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 10>their real material concerns I think is critical. But I

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 10>will say it is probably more important in twenty eight

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 10>than twenty six. As I say, historically, midterm elections are

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 10>predomined a referendum on the incumbent president.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, but I'll be looking at twenty six. You

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and I were talking and you're seeing one of the

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 2>big issues is these republic and retirements. We just had

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 2>another one this week. How big does that factor into

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the map.

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 11>This is a very big issue, and this special election

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 11>could influence that any underperformance might encourage an incumbent. There's

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 11>a few more filing deadlines ahead, and that's sort of

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 11>the go time to make a decision, and so incumbents

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 11>maybe looking at this and going my reelection may be

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 11>a lot harder than I ever expected. And so these

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 11>there are repercussions to this little local race that will

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 11>go national.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 6>That's really interesting, Ashley.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Let me ask you what we're seeing in the public

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 5>opinion data which you study so closely. What is it

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 5>indicating about the issues that are most animating voters going

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 5>into the midterms right now?

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 12>I mean, again, these are things that we saw with

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 12>you know, down in Florida. These are things we just

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 12>saw in New Jersey in the fall. It's all about

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 12>cost of living and that buzzword of affordability and inflation.

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 12>And these are the issues that President Trump, his numbers

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 12>have been failing on. When it comes to approvals of

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 12>individual issue areas, we have not seen a president in

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 12>recent history. If they are not above the fifty percent

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 12>mark going into the mid terms, they will very likely

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 12>lose seats. So that, given with the combination of economic sentiment,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 12>sets a very bad path for Republicans heading into the

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 12>mid terms.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 5>We just head up there that poll Fox News poll,

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 5>and I saw far seventy one percent of voters are

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 5>disapproving of the way that the president has been tackling inflation.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Ron I also want to ask you there's an article

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in La Times today talking about Donald Trump and the

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Latino vote, which was a big part of his win,

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and that those numbers may not hold the next time around.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because you have people who are upset with

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the president about how his administration has handled immigration and

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>enforcement things like that. But then you also have a

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 2>sector of the population, especially in Florida, that would be

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>very happy with the president if he does what he

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 2>is hinting that he's going to do, and that's go

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>into Cuba and make some moves there. Can you talk

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>to us about that voter base. It's not a monolith.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Where do they stand and are they likely to come

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>support the president in the same numbers as the next

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>time around?

0:14:58.000 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean, look, without question, the aspect of the twenty

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 10>four results that was the most discussed in the days

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 10>and weeks after the election were Trump's improvements broadly among

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 10>non white voters, particularly non college non white voters, Hispanics,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 10>black men, to some extent Asian Americans. And the argument

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 10>was that he was now building a cross racial working

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 10>class coalition, that he was making the same kind of

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 10>gains among blue collar non white voters that he had

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 10>earlier recorded among blue.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Collar white voters.

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 10>And you know, you fast forward a year and a

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 10>half and a lot of that virtually all of that

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 10>has rolled back. And because those many of those voters

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 10>who moved toward Trump in minority communities and Latinos were

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 10>certainly among them, I think fit into what I was

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 10>talking about before. They were primarily results voters. They were

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 10>disappointed in the results they were getting under Joe Biden.

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 10>They remembered that their cost of living was more affordable

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 10>under Trump. You know, you would talk to Democratic pollsters

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 10>in twenty four and they would all have the same

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 10>phrase and say what they would describe as the nightmare

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 10>phrase they heard in focus groups, which is that from

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 10>they they would be talking to a group of Hispanic

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 10>or black voters and someone would say, you know, yes,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 10>I think Donald Trump is insensitive.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 6>I think he's a racist.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 10>But if I'm telling the truth, I had more money

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 10>in my pocket when he was president, and that I

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 10>think was what moved a lot of those voters toward him.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 10>And now he's basically overplayed his hand on immigration and

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 10>he is facing a backlash among Latino voters on that,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 10>and he has failed to deliver what they wanted. Most

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 10>the Cuban American and Central and South American diaspora in

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 10>Miami is just a different kind of cohort than really

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 10>any other group of Hispanic voters in the country. They're

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 10>the last ones that will move away. I mean, you're

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 10>looking more at places like Texas, Colorado, Nevada, even Pennsylvania.

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 10>It's going to be really, really important whether Republicans see

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 10>a regression from the games Trump scored in twenty four.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>He had a couple of colorad AND's here at this

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>table actually quickly before we go to break, I do

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>want to ask you about how Iran is factoring into

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 2>all of this. You know, this is the party of

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>non interventionists, not forever wars. Are you seeing those numbers

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 2>impact even the most hardcore of Trump supports. We've been

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>talking a lot about SEPAC this week, Jeff Mason telling

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>us for the most part that support is holding their

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 2>giving the benefits of doubt. But are you starting to

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>see flickers of some doubt in that voter base.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think, like Ron was saying, we definitely

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 12>have seen these key groups that kind of propelled him

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 12>to victory in twenty twenty four breaking away with him,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 12>especially when it comes to white men, white non college

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 12>educated men. And this is also playing into the Iran factor.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 12>The number one thing in polling that adults say is

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 12>that they do not want to see gas prices rise,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 12>and so I think that is a big factor here.

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 12>They do not want to see the repercussions of this

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 12>war come back home, especially when it comes to cost

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 12>of living in affordability issues that are affecting their everyday lives.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 12>So we do see that MAGA voters are predominantly still

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 12>in the corner, but there has been some slippage in

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 12>the polls among Republicans when it comes to things like

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 12>the war in Iran, and that combination of foreign you know,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 12>quagmire abroad combined with prices skyrocketing at home is not

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 12>a good combination for the president with whether it's his

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 12>voters or other voting blocks.

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Habe people only got about thirty seconds, but our den

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>is going to take advantage of that.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 11>I think absolutely. I mean, and they have no political

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 11>blame over this in the way they did with the

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 11>Iraq War when so many Democratic senators and House members voted,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 11>So this is sort of they can have their hands

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 11>clean of this. If this does not.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Go well, all right, Abby, Ron, Ashley, stay with us.

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have a lot more ahead on Bloomerg this week,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna talk about DHS more Ron and where we

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 2>all go. As again, it's always there's always another election

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 2>around the corner. Stay with us for more on Bloomberg

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 2>this weekend.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Right after this.

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Back with us are Appy Lives and Rob Brownstein Ashley

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Coning as well.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 3>Appy, let me start with you.

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 5>We've been through this week where the Senate stayed up

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 5>late and the House stayed up late, and there was

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 5>no resolution. We stayed up late well as we watched

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 5>all this unfil this royal and conflict about funding the

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 5>Department of Homeland Security. Now members of both those houses

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 5>go back to their home districts for a two week

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 5>recess where they're going to hear from constituents. The lines remain,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 5>I assume longer than normal. Who has played this right

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 5>or best in your estimation, the Democrats the Republicans. Is

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 5>this has gone on now for more than a month.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it can go both ways.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 11>They each have an argument to point the finger at

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 11>the other. But I just think it's interesting that this

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 11>hit during spring break and that is a travel season

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 11>for families, and planes will probably been missed, and that's

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 11>going to hit really hard, and so I think those

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 11>things stick with them. And I think that whoever the

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 11>member of Congresses who's out and about in the community

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 11>is probably going to get an earfull and it's not

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 11>a good position to be in. And it just shows

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 11>how dysfunctional our government is.

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And you've got this really interesting thing with TMZ of

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 2>all people, putting a bounty out for photos of members

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of Congress enjoying spring break while the shutdown continues and

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>TSA lines are still long, Ashley, when you look at

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>pulling on Congress, it's not good. Is it getting any better?

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 2>And are there specific places that people want to see

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 2>action that might help it?

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that's a simple answer, Aaron.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 12>It's just not getting any better. And we haven't seen,

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 12>you know, as much iron pulling for this partial shutdown

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 12>as we may have seen in the fall, but it's increasing.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 12>I mean, these are tangible things that people are experiencing

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 12>every day that impacts their lives, and so you know,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 12>it is just kind of increasing the negativity, the dissatisfaction

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 12>with Congress and with the president as well. I mean,

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 12>the buck always stops with the president. So this is

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 12>yet another thing that is not working necessarily in his favor.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 12>But you know, we see that trust satisfaction with Congress.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 12>These are all all time lows. This is not a

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 12>legislative body that Americans are proud or approving of.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Ronie right about the way in which this animates kind

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 5>of insurgent candidates, those who are kind of vying against

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 5>or going against the mainstream and sort of status quo

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 5>and Washington and Graham Platner certainly comes to mind. He

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 5>the subject of latest columns, or what's going to happen

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 5>in main between him and Janet Mills and which of

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 5>the two of them is going to face off against

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Susan Collins. Your sense of the way that this what

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 5>we've become inured to the dysfunction of Washington is going

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 5>to be an animating factor here in the midterm elections.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 10>Look it has become an animating factor in our elections

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 10>for quite a while. I mean, people make the argument

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 10>that virtually every election of the twenty first century has

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 10>been a change election, maybe with the exception of two

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 10>thousand and two, where you know, you're in two thousand

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 10>and four where you're seeing at least some backlash against

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 10>the party in power. I mean, that is the core

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 10>dynamic that we are facing. As I said, midterm elections.

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 10>I think the single the evidence is that the single

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 10>most powerful factor in them of our voter assessments of

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 10>the income and president and it you know, it is

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 10>an ominous a trend for Republicans that Trump is really

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 10>at his lowest point of his second term this close

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 10>to the election. That is a big wave. But there

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 10>is a big wall, David, in front of it, which

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 10>is that, you know, the battlefield is more tilted toward

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 10>red places than it was in twenty eighteen. Democrats have

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 10>won a lot of those easier to win house districts.

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 10>There are only eight Republicans in districts that voted for

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 10>Harris even after redistricting. And to win the Senate after

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 10>you get past those first two in North Carolina and Maine,

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 10>Democrats are going to have to win states that Trump

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 10>won by double digits, So there's no question is weaker

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 10>than he was in twenty four has he receded enough

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 10>that Democrats have a shot on some of these places

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 10>that really are on the pretty far on the red

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 10>side of the fifty yard line.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Abby, talk to us about the primaries to watch. I

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 2>know you want to talk about Maine. What are the

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>other races that you think are going to be impactful

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 2>or that are getting you excited as you get excited

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>about primaries like you half four.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 11>Years, Well, Maine is absolutely fascinating. We have the Texas

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 11>run off, which is an ongoing soap opera. Will he

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 11>or will he not endorse?

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 6>This is corn versus Paxton.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 11>Ken Paxton. Let's see what else Minnesota Senate on the

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 11>Democratic side is going to be fascinating. That's not tell

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 11>August Michigan Senate Democratic primary is probably the race that

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 11>most fascinates the Democratic Party and to an extent, the

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 11>Republican Party because there's so many different issues Israel, the economy,

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 11>but it also seems to be the one that's most

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 11>in the direction of where we can see twenty twenty

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 11>eight going.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And how big of a deal has redistricting played in

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 2>these maps?

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 11>Staggering and it is ongoing, and it is so they're

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 11>about to redraw in Florida and the special election we

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 11>just discussed that might help spook Republican incumbents who don't

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 11>want to give up Republican voters. And then you have Virginia,

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 11>where the credibility of Governor Abigail Spamberger is on the

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 11>line of whether she can get the statewide initiative through

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 11>to redraw their maps. But it is a difficult issue,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 11>it's very toxic and there's a lot of collateral damage.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 5>Ron I want to ask you about these no Kings

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 5>protests that we saw yesterday across the country, in your

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 5>backyard ours as well in many places across the United States.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 5>What do you take away from that when it comes

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 5>to kind of detailing the sentiment, the anti incumbent sentiment

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 5>that's in place among Democrats. Of course, with actual political action,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 5>how much does this that expression dissatisfaction lead to political

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 5>change or the agitation for it.

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's a measure of intensity.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, if the organizers say eight million people showed

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 10>up yesterday, obviously we have to wait for independent sources

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 10>to confirm that, but if it is eight million people,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 10>it's the largest single day of protest in American history,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 10>and it is a measure of the intensity of the

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 10>opposition that the president Trump face and it's kind of

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 10>reinforced by polling him. Even in the Fox Powle last week,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 10>roughly half of Americans strongly disapprove of Trump performance as president,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 10>compared to only about a quarter who strongly approved, and

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 10>that gap is really important because strong disapprovers are different,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 10>particularly in a midterm, than those who say they only

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 10>somewhat disapprove. Strong disapprovers are more likely to turn out,

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 10>and what we have seen in midterm elections pretty much

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 10>through the twenty first century is somewhere around ninety five

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 10>percent of people who say they strongly disapprove of a

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 10>president vote against his party's candidates in the typical House

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 10>and Senate race. So the No King's Rally, I think,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 10>was another measure of the intensity of the opposition that

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 10>Trump faces at a time when the Republican base is

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 10>somewhat fractured over issues like Iran, and that could produce

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 10>a differential turnout problem for them in November. That might

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 10>allow Democrats to get over some of those high walls

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 10>I just talked about in places that have leaned historically

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 10>pretty red.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Asher We've talked a lot about Republican numbers and what

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 2>they're not doing well. People aren't happy with the Republicans, but

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>people aren't really thrilled with the Democrats either. I mean,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>one thing I hear even from people within the Democrat

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Party is do something? Is that reflected in the numbers,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 2>and are you seeing disappointment there as well? Even as

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>we have these no kings rallies, there doesn't seem to

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>be a focus or a purpose or an action item

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of these policies.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, I would say, I think we should point

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 12>to a lot of these special elections or these off

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 12>year elections that we've seen, whether in New Jersey and Virginia,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 12>whether we're talking about Florida, Texas. I think these are

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 12>the Democrats that are emerging for the party, that are

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 12>showing we are doing something when it comes to these

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 12>kitchen table issues, and maybe that is the strategy that's

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 12>the playbook moving forward in the midterms. Right now, Democrats

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 12>have about in the generic ballot three to five percent

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 12>on Republicans that should increase if we keep going on

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 12>the same path, we usually will see five more points

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 12>for the opposing party when it's the fall kickoff of

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 12>the midterm. So you know, this could be a pretty

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 12>big wave. But like Ron said, we also have to

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 12>be careful about where these races would be taking place,

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 12>how competitive these areas are, and how difficult some of

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 12>these races are. Despite what we do see in the

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 12>generic ballot. But you know, we also see that thirteen

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 12>percent of Trump supporters from twenty twenty four regret their vote.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 12>So even if there are silent Trumpers, a big number,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 12>it's a big number and very small in comparison for Democrats.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 12>So you know, there's there's a lot at play here

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 12>that could go either way. But I think there are

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 12>Democrats out there there are forging ahead with some sort

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 12>of platform of doing something instead of just commenting against.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Emily Gregor who flip mar A Lago saying that was

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 2>her strength talking about kitchen table issues and not the president.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 2>So all right, Abby Livingston, Ron Brownstein, and Ashley cunning

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 2>thank you all so much for joining us.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us for more on Bloomberg this weekend. Right

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 4>after this.

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>For the first time in nearly fifty years, NASA is

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 2>sending astronauts back to the Moon.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 5>The Artemists two mission set for liftoff from Florida as

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 5>early as Wednesday of this coming week. Joining us now

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 5>as Ed Ludlow, co host of Bloomberg Tech, He's going

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 5>to be there in Florida for this launch, should it

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 5>regardless of whether or not a transpires, I should say, Ed,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 5>help us understand the magnitude of this, what this means

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of in the history of space exploration.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, this is the great next step in America's ambition

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 13>to have humans back on the Moon. In this mission

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 13>Artemists too, they're basically doing a fly by or a

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 13>fly around the Moon, so they travel deep into space

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 13>two hundred and eighty five thousand miles, go around the Moon,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 13>and come back. But it's you know, it's the great

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 13>dress rehearsal for the technology essentially that's that's planned to

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 13>get humankind and driven by NASA America back to the

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 13>Moon maybe twenty twenty eight. And it is the space

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 13>launch system principally built by Boeing and then the Iran

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 13>spacecraft principle be built by Lockheed and you know, it's

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 13>a project that is way behind schedule, frankly and massively

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 13>over budget, but a big moment if we go off

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 13>this week.

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 2>We know there are four astronauts. I do know one

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 2>of them is named Christina. I also know that neither

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>none of the three of us were invited to go

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 2>on this mission, which we're a little salty about. But

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>what do we know about these individuals and how they

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>got selected.

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so there there's essentially three US citizens and one Canadian.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 13>It's a great international collaboration, you know, beyond the crew themselves.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 13>The European Space Agency has a hand some of the

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 13>technology of the full Stack as well. But you know,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 13>they are people with vast experience. Reid Wiseman is the

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 13>commander of the mission. He's you know, classic former Navy

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 13>test pilot, has has previously been to ISS Victor Glover

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 13>will be the first black astronaut to travel to lunar distance.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 13>So it's you know, it's kind of a significant moment

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 13>in history from that standpoint, but he's been you know

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 13>on prior SpaceX driven mission. SpaceX Crew one. Christina, who

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 13>you mentioned, is the mission specialist electrical engineer. She actually

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 13>holds the record for the longest continuous spaceflight by a woman.

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 13>And then the Canadian is Jeremy Hanson, first Canadian assigned

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 13>to a Luna mission. So a lot of first but

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 13>highly decorated and experienced CREWE specialist.

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I can adopt that for myself here

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomer mission specialist.

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, Davin, and we're looking at live pictures now.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Our viewers on TV and a Blobery Dog common on

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 5>the app can see those pictures there in Florida. What

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 5>can you expect as you make your way there? And

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 5>as I said, there's some uncertainty, of course whether or

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 5>not this is going to and you mentioned that delays

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 5>this program has faced over many many years. Now, Yeah,

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 5>walks through what's going to transpire here over the course

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 5>of the week leading up to that final countdown.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean NASA, you know, is communicating very regularly.

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 13>And whether you take that as indication of confidence, you know,

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 13>it's hard to tell. Space launch when it involves human

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 13>life is complex. There are systems issues. They will run tests.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 13>They are not doing a full dress rehearsal, which they

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 13>had done in the month of March early March, late February.

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 13>They will track the weather very closely, but it all

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 13>gets toward the earliest opportunity to launch, which is six

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 13>twenty four pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, April first. And

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 13>you know, the system is a mix of highly synchronized

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 13>autonomous technology, human judgment call, and again the weather is

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 13>a big factor, you know on the range at KC,

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 13>so that will constantly be launched.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 6>But the crew are there.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 13>You know, they've arrived I believe, Friday afternoon having been

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 13>in quarantine and mandatory quarantine, and it is all tracking

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 13>to that early launch window. But there are backup windows

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 13>over consected days through Monday night.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 2>So this mission is essentially kind of doing a lunar flyby.

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it the next mission that the hope is they

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 2>will actually get boots on the Moon? And why do this?

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it just because as that you know, legendary West

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Wing episode says this is what's next in human progress?

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean there's the politics of it.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 13>Frankly, you know, the Trump administration had put the Moon

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 13>front and center of its own belief of what NASA

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 13>should be doing. The Artemis program has its origins back

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 13>in the Bush era George W. But you know Obama

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 13>didn't really go for the Moon as a priority, and

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 13>then Trump presidency one carried through Biden and Trump two.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 13>You know, Artemis one, which was testing the Orion spacecraft

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 13>and space launch system, was supposed to go in twenty seventeen.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 13>It went in twenty two, and that's had a cascading effect.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 13>But the goal on paper is to get human boots,

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 13>American boots on the Moon's surface in twenty twenty eight,

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 13>with the geopolitics of knowing China has the same ambition

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 13>and they're saying twenty thirty. So you know, I wouldn't

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 13>underestimate that part of the story, the political will to

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 13>do this, which was a big part of Jared Isaacman's

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 13>path to becoming administrator. Maybe we can talk about that

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 13>on another edition of Bloomberg this weekend.

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's seriously important to this administration.

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Very quickly got about a minute left. I'm curious you

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 5>mentioned that this is say Boeing and Lockheed joined project.

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 5>These are kind of old standby government contractors. How has

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 5>the advent of SpaceX and Blue Origin and the rest

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 5>have changed the shape of this this program, this particular mission,

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 5>in any way.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 13>NASA has committed to that those two as principal contractors

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 13>through Artemus five. But as Lauren Grush and I broke

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 13>the story on ten days ago and the administrator confirmed

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 13>on Tuesday morning they have two new proposals from SpaceX

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 13>and from Blue Origin to take over the actual role

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 13>of getting a Ryan from lower four bit to the moon.

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 13>So right now Space Launch System takes to orbit and

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 13>carries it or propels it to the moon. There is

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 13>a you can read about it on Bloomberg dot com.

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 13>But there is now a propose where actually those two

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 13>newer names will probably step in and do what those

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 13>others have struggled to do.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Ed come back if you were that, said Lad Love

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 5>course the ank or Bloomberg Tech, and he said a

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 5>great order. As we said, anytime you can take that

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 5>victory Love for any scoops you have it, we'll have

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 5>you back on the show.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us on today's Bloomberg This Weekend Podcast.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to tune in live for the show every

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Saturday and Sunday morning, starting at seven am Eastern.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>We're on Bloomberg Television Radio and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 3>bringing you unique takes and in depth interviews on news, politics,

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 3>lifestyle and culture.