WEBVTT - A Look At Markets And ESG Investing

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We're gonna bring in

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Thriyan Smallock right now. He is a principal and portfolio

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>manager at hood River Capital Management. They have three and

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollars under management and UM on a

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>day like today, when we're seeing some volatility but not

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of movement in stocks, does it feel peaky

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to you? Does it feel like we're hitting um the

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>top As far as this market is concerned, we don't

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's peaky. We're constructive at this point. I think

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the market has just been digesting huge games over the

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>last twelve to eighteen months. Folks are worried about inflation

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>starting to pick up with with the economic backdrop flowing somewhat,

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but we think earnings revisions are gonna be positive from here.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Most companies that we talked to, we talked around four

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>public trade companies every quarter. In small cap, we think

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>demand is really strong and costs are relatively contained. Street

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>estimates to move up and valuations three attractive. So we

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think as earning season plays out this quarter and over

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of quarters, the market will move up

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with earnings and and you want to be in stocks.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You guys are in small caps, smaller caps, small big caps, Bryant,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>UH give us a sense of how those performing, how

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you think they should perform going forward. So year today,

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>small cap has lagged the S and P five hundred,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the Rustle two thousands behind approximately five basis points of

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rustle two dozen growth, which is our primary benchmark,

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>where small cap growth investors is only up five per cent. UH.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>We think that the value we should for small cap

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>versus large cap is particularly attractive, especially we look at

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>small cap growth valuations on a relative basis or a

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>parody on a pe basis for next year, usually at

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the premium because you have higher growth. Which comes back

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to what I said earlier, where if earnings come through

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in small cap companies and in large cap companies, they're

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>both what they're gonna move up, but small cap is

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna move up more than large cap. What are the

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest head winds to that? To earnings growth, Inflation is

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest headwind um. Also, if you get to

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down internationally in places like China, that that that

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>would be a that would be a head wind um.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And so far companies are managing it pretty well, especially

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in small cap. They're pretty nimble. They've been able to adjust.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But if wages move up significantly and demand slows down,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that would also be a bad recipe. But right now

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>we aren't seeing evidence that that tilts us negative. The

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Phillips this morning said his problems are chips

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>and ships, so he's having a real problem getting stuff

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>shipped around h Prices are very high for that and

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 1>he's having a real problem getting the chips he needs

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>to put in his products. Yeah, so I don't think

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a surprised anyone or any of the companies we

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>talked to at this point. They've been able to navigate

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that situation. And that's baked end of people's estimates going forward,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>which again that's why I come back to it. Demands

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>better and supply chains us enough, which I think in

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>general that's going to happen. Uh, then you can see

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>an upper provision to earnings estimates as that works through

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the system over the next nine to twelve months. All right, Brian,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earnings were just starting to get really into

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the thick of things here. We had some good numbers

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out of some of the big financials last week. What

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be listening for and looking for

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this quarter? So what we like in small cap is

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can find stocks that are and efficiently priced,

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>where the analysts estimates uh tend to be a little

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bit stale, you have less analysts are covering them, and

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>so you can buy good companies with good valuations where

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals for the companies that we buy or be

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>better that with embedded in street expectations. So we have

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>around a hundred stocks of the portfolio and we're gonna

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be monitoring the amount a case by case basis bottoms

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>up as to whether or not delivering on the on

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the key performance metrics for for that particular business and

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>in general, I expect things to be really strong across

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>the board, which which I think is good in almost

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>every sector. UH, based on a lot of macro factors

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that you've talked about, kind of baked in the numbers,

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>demands super strong. When you look at I mean speaking

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of consumers, when you look at the savings rates here,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do do they spend it back down to the historical average?

0:04:54.880 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so, Um, we're overweight consumer right now. UH.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of UH stocks in small cap

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>where they're priced at median or historical valuations, and we're

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>seeing the consumer come back and a lot of stocks

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that we are one of our biggest positions to Sea World,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, which which has been a really good stock

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and demand is accelerating. They're based on consumers wanting to

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>get back out and about evaluations attractive and they've really

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>worked through a good margin profile business. I like that one.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, thank you so much for joining us.

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate chatting with you. Getting an update on

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the world of small cap stocks. Brian Smaller. Brian Smaller

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>principal portfolio managered Hood River Capital Management three point three

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management. Looking at the small

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>cap stocks and again is Brian was mentioning they've underperformed

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>UH this year. But I think a lot of you know,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>fund managers have exposure to the small caps, particularly if you,

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of your cyclical trade, particularly part of

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the reopening trade. A lot of fun managers looking for

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>exposure with small cap stocks think that they can get

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>some better bank for the buck in terms of a

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>reopening economy and the impact that that could have on

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>smaller companies. Now, let's bring in David Diets out of Summit,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey's a managing principle and senior portfolio strategists at

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Peapack Private Wealth Management, where they have nine point eight

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of assets under management. David, I find today's

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>market really interesting, as we're seeing such a jump in

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>rates globally on the short end of the curve in

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>it mostly in two years and in some five years

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>UM and we saw here in Europe a sell off

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in stock so it was bonds down, stocks down, and

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone this morning was talking about the sixty forty portfolio.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on the age old construction? Well, I mean,

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think stocks are making at least the

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>United States here hugging the flatline after one of the

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>strongest weeks since July. Pretty good showing, given um those

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>concerns on on inflation and and so forth, that you

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned Um, you know, I think equity investors have

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to take a long term view here. Valuations are high,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>blasphemy all the time. Is this the right time to

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>invest in? All I can say is this is the

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong time to be in cash and and most of

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, because of course, you know, the only thing

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than stocks are our bonds, the fidel cash

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>reserves yielding one hundred of one percent. And we know

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation is here. Inflation is gonna get worse. We don't

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>know how transitory or permanent maybe, but this is a

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>tough time to just be sitting there in cash. And

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think we're seeing, particularly among retail investors that

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>continuing by the diet mentality, and of course we just

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had to kick off their earnings week last week. Um

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of the companies of reports so far top earnings per

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>share expectations that should be a great earning season, and

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in so things actually look reasonable for equity investors going forward. Here,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>David I c W T, I Crew Oil and North

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Barrel, How do I play this in the stock market?

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So Um, I think that UH investors should of course

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>stay diversified, and of course energy stocks are up six

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>year to date, but there may be more room to go.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And and here's why. Although normally the cure for high

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>prices is higher prices, we've got a situation here where

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>energy producers don't want to produce because um, you know, governments,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>policy makers, banks are telling them, no, you've got to

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>go green, and so they're saying, well, why should I

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>invest it? Take advantage of these higher prices, because that's

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not the future. So you could have a situation and

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we do have a situation where supplies kind

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of dwindle or stay constant. Meanwhile, and and therefore, but

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>consumers and users cannot switch over to green sources as

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly as possible. And of course, what we've heard from

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the UK is some of the hope for green sources,

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, wind have not been as productive as hope

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>because wind speeds have died down. Who knew, but that's

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>what we have. It hasn't been very windy here. Apparently.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to your stock picks, David, Um, what do

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you like in the US? We'll gets you pumped in

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the morning. What do you what do you what are

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you excited to recommend when somebody asks um for a pick?

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, tying into that energy theme. We do

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think that UM energy stocks are still well off their

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>all time highs, have great dividends, are being very conservative

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>about spending money for new production and rather returning money

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to shaubles in the form of higher dividends and stock buybacks.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the bluest of all the blue

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>ships is Chevron Um, you know, with about a four

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>percent dividend, very low price to earnings ratio. The stock

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>was at one point well over on thirty. I think

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's in low hundreds right now. UM even if some

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>energy even if there's volatility and some energy companies go under,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, that just works out better for your your

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ultimate blue chip here, which is Chevron. So that's one

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we would like. The other areas, I think investors have

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at his healthcare and I'm not quite sure why.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a couple of reasons, but a lot

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the healthcare stocks, despite the fact that is the

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>healthcare companies that are getting us to the other side

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>of the valley in terms of COVID nineteen, are just

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>way out of favor by investors. So one I would

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>say here is Bristol Myers squib is at a fifty

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>two week low. Uh, you've got like a three point

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>seven percent divid in which is more than twice which

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the yield on the s trading about eight times earnings.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And what I like about Bristol Myers is they fine

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>tune their focus onto oncology into immunology. Those are the

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>areas of the healthcare thing where people don't worry about prices.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>When you've got cancer, people will pay what it takes.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And so they've got the highest origin focus here. And

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>what I like is they've got a great R and

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>D pipeline, but they're great in terms of acquiring other

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>companies to augment that pipeline. Of course, they made a

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>big deal with Selgy not too long ago, which gives

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>him all the cell gene products. So Bristol Myers fifty

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>two week old, great dividend. What's not to like here?

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>David Diets, thank you so much for joining us. We

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate chatting with you, getting your thoughts on these markets,

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on some specific names that you like at this time.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>David Diets is a managing principle and senior portfolio strategist

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at Pepeck Private Wealth Management. They about nine point eight

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets on their management. Uh, and he

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is located in the bucolic town of some of New Jersey. Matt,

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should think about Summit. We come back to

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the do you know I absolutely love Summit and um no, seriously,

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and some of my closest friends lived there. The thing is,

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to commute to Penn Station. Yeah, good point.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine the worst place to go than Penn Steve,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'll give you this, mat there really finally finally

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>doing a huge renovation of pet Penn Station. So we

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>can only done by the time my daughters in college. Exactly.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting for this for thirty years, but they're

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>finally starting to get it done here, so we'll see

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Now, let's get over to Janelle Woodword, president

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of Mackay Shields. They have hundred six two billion dollars

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management, and Janelle, I think it's interesting

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you have tested some market correction scenarios, all of which

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>don't seem terribly unlikely. A resurgence of the virus, persistence

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of inflation, credit problems in China. What's your biggest concern?

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest headwind. Yeah, sure, I think that's a

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>great point. I mean, I think if we look back

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>over the third quarter of those scenarios, we tested um

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and we saw some volatility of the market, but really

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw investors continue to engage in sponsor risk assets.

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So because there's some competence as we see some headline

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>related noise that investors are going to to need to

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>stay engaged. But to your question, what are we watching?

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Certainly right now, we're watching inflation data, UM, We're watching rates,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're watching the fed UM as we look forward

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to really you know how we'll wait expect markets to

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>unfold over the bounce of one and into twenty two.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually a big believer in the wall of warrior.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a natural warrior, Janelle. Given that, how should I

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about these markets? What are you guys doing

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>in terms of positioning your portfolios here given what we

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>do know about all those macro issues you just mentioned. Yeah,

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're really thoughtful about is is creating

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>flexibility and optionality, And I think one of the things

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that matters right now a lot is liquidity. Both as

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>we think about the unknown to the market is as

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you rightly highlight UM but also appreciate that that markets

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to trade to trade pretty well. But we want

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we have liquidity freed up to

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>take take advantage of volatility as it presents itself. UM.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think actually when it comes to fixed income, we're

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>looking for some inflation protection structures and portfolios staying a

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit shorter interest rate UM. But we do remain

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally constructive, and we think that there's still significant opportunity

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in in credit markets in particular, we're we're in credit markets. Yeah,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, some some areas that we're really

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>focused on is on the consumer side, the housing side, UM,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and we still think there's some select albeit less opportunities

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in some of the COVID recovery sectors. UM. So some

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of those are some areas that that we're focused on

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>UM as we kind of construct portfolios, But we certainly

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate when we step back and look at aggregate

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>spreads and what things look like that markets are certainly

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not as cheap as they were several months ago. All Right,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>given that valuation concern, which I think a lot of

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>people certainly have, UM, it makes this earnings period that

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we're really starting to get into the teeth of right now.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>This week all that more important for many investors. Do

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are you looking for from these earning reports?

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We had the fanciers last week, pretty strong numbers across

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the board. What are you looking for going forward? Yeah,

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd hadlight two things that we're looking for.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>The first things we really are watching the margin story,

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and this ties back to the earlier conversation on inflation,

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>on how supply team pressures and energy price pressures in

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>particular are really flowing through earning statements and to what

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>extent those are not being passed on to the end customer.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing that we're watching from a

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>fixed income perspective is really thinking about balance sheets. The

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>strength of corporate balance sheets has been really important for

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the overall credit sector to whether this period, and now

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we're at the point of time where we're looking how

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>how our entities redeploying cash um and are they doing

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way that that is supportive of both long

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>term business trends but also savor bolt of creditors. What

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>um how much return can you back to be from

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>real focus on E s G. I mean, do you

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>give up some return in order to do the right thing,

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>or can you still make as much money as you

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>want to and you know, um not invest in big

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>E S G centers. You know, it's it's a great question,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>especially if we think about credit markets through that lens

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and recognize who issues in those markets and what does

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it look like. And I will say, you know, going

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>back to portfolios, we are seeing a broadening of what

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it means a fiduciary duty and what it looks like

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and how do we think about materiality specifically within within

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>fixing com portfolios. And it's something we're very thoughtful about.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the academic studies have been mixed and are

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>still evolving in terms of this potential trade off between

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>returns and E S and G factors. But it's really interesting.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've recently I worked with Excellnal consulting firm

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to do a survey of some of our institutional clients

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that Mike, that that begin to shift.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that investors actually believe you can get both

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and on a risk adjusted basis, investors are better awful

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>or at least uh position the same to include E

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>S G factors within their investment mandates, and you know

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that was something that really stood out to us. Do

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know one of the issues I hear about E

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>s G investing is, you know, the data is just

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>not great to help me make a decision here, like

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for traditional financial analysis of my income statement, balance sheet,

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>casual statement, but nothing comparable in terms of breath and

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>depth on the E s G side. How do you

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guys think about that? It's a great point and something

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we ask ourselves every day. You know, we've been investing

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot in our E s G data architecture and

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>making sure that we get that in and the truth

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is the data is still very much evolving. One of

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the things we're looking for UM is really looking for

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>more guidance from regulators in terms of providing clarity on

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>terms and death A missions and objectives to bring some

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>better clarity to some of these data points. UM. So

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>we've been really thoughtful on what we've seen to be

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>material to date, UM, but make sure that we're continuing

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to build that out and think about it UM and

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>not be too prescriptive as we look forward. Right, And

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll note on the f A function on the Bloomberg

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>terminal financial analysis. There is a data tab for E

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>s G data, so Bloomberg certainly contributing to the data

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and analysis there. Janelle Wouldward, President McKay Shields located in

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>New York City. We'll have more coming up. This is Bloomberg. Now,

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to Tim Gortney joining us now

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>out of Oklahoma. He is a chief investment officer at

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Essential Wealth Advisors. They have four billion dollars in assets

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>under management. And uh, let me first get your take

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on what we see today. There's not a lot of

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>action in stocks, Tim, but there is a big uptake

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in rates, especially at the shorter end of the curve,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think increasing concern about lingering inflation and rising rates. Yeah, yes,

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably overdue, you know. I think so many

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>other metrics have been showing these price pressures and and

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly uh, company managers have been talking about it now

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for several quarters. Um, and uh, you know, they've confirmed

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like it's going away anytime soon. We've

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>seen it in the in the prices of so many

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>goods and services across the whole economic spectrum that I

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think now you know, rates are finally just acknowledging and

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>reflecting the reality that that we've all kind of seen

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and known for for several quarters. And it's healthy. It

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>needs to go up. I think for not only investors

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>who are in those fixed income investments who need to

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>hold them so they can actually have a slightly better

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>return and hold onto more of their per just in power,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but um, it's also I think just healthy to have

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>some rates move higher so that so many other assets

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>like home prices and certainly the prices of stocks, can

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>start to be valued more more fairly and not based

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on you know, in essence zero interest rates. You know, Tim,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>when I when I think of Oklahoma City, I think

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of you know, oil, natural gas and w T I

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>crude oil here over two of barrel. You're in energy country,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>oil country. What's the feeling in Oklahoma City when they

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think about where we are in the energy cycle. Yeah, well,

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, um, I think so many people

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are feeling a little bit better about things. You know,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we had a really rough stretch and in many ways,

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the energy industry was was victims of their

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>own success. They were so successful at getting energy out

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ground that the supplies, you know, drove the

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>prices down, and it was great time for con sumers.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>As prices you know, between basically two thousand and fifteen

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand twenties stayed really low um, and you know,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as such, producers were not as uh you know, not

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>as incentivized to go invest in new products and open

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>up new, um, new sources of a production. And so

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing the price move up, I think is is kind

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of like a bitter suite ending to what's been a

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>really rough time period. People are are are feeling much

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>better about things, and because there have been such you know,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>so little investment in these areas and because companies are

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>so hesitant to go open up new sources, I think

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's likely to stay maybe higher, for for longer.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>As we've been talking about inflation just in general, do

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you get the sense that people are still conservative? I know,

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>saving rates, savings rates nationwide have gone up, um. You know,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>even as government spending has soared, is is concerned about

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>future tax increases and you know, just the volatility situation

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>holding people back from investing in the future. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not sure exactly why there is so

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>much cash and why um, so many people have made

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the decision to hold cash and and hold things like

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like short term bonds or bank deposits. Clearly, the banks

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>um are over you know, over capitalized. They don't necessarily

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>need those extra deposits, and that's why they're not earning

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>anything on those, um you know. I think we're probably

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>going into a period of time in the markets where

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve to eighteen months have been very easy.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had any corrections. Everybody has enjoyed the ride higher.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It's been a fairly smooth ride. But now because of

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>those things that you just mentioned, um, you know, the

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>government has spent, the government has gone into debt. It's

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>likely that we'll have higher taxes moving forward, everything else

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>being equal, that's going to be a drag on growth.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I think people and companies have held a lot of

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>cash reserves because they don't know exactly what's coming and

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be that, you know, growth is going to

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>be slowing and then they want to have some some

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>more conservative holdings. So I think markets are going to

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>find in the economy is gonna find we're gonna have

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to earn our growth going forward more than we have

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last year and a half, where it's been,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, relatively smooth sailing. Tim, you mentioned higher tax rates.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling your clients as they think about

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>positioning their portfolios for an environment that will likely have

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>higher personal and corporate tax rates. Yeah, so, you know,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we still obviously don't know the specifics. We know in

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>general that the the trend is going to be higher,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as you say, both on the corporate side. On the

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate side, that's going to lead all the other things

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>being equal to slightly lower earnings than than they would

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have been otherwise. And then on the personal side, changes

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and things like capital gains rates, UM are going to

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>probably move markets in in some way as people reposition

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios for the for the new tax rates that

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be living under. UM. You know, we're going

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to probably wait and see on on on portfolio management

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the way that these things come out.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>There has been some talk about the removal of the

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>step up in basis rule, although I think that's that's

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>probably dead. More more concerning to us are the planning

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>text rules and UM, so we're gonna be watching more

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.239
<v Speaker 1>heavily on that side to see if people might need

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to make changes in their estate planning first and then

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>probably look at portfolio management second. All right, Tim, thanks

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us and really appreciate you lending

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>some of us learning your time to us. Tim Courtney,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Chief Investment Officer, Except Wealth Advisors, located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller. Put on fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You can always catch

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio