1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,160
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news Now.

2
00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:11,280
Speaker 2: Earlier this month, an AI model called Manus went viral

3
00:00:11,360 --> 00:00:15,040
Speaker 2: for its apparent ability to act more independently than AI chatbox.

4
00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:15,240
Speaker 1: Now.

5
00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:19,040
Speaker 2: The development of the so called artificial intelligence agents have

6
00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:22,160
Speaker 2: raised concerns that they will erode human ability to think.

7
00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:25,240
Speaker 2: But Read Hoffman, the Lincoln co founder, Microsoft board member

8
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:28,840
Speaker 2: and Greylock partner, thinks the opposite. Now He's just published

9
00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:31,800
Speaker 2: a book in which he basically argues that aisystems gain

10
00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:35,880
Speaker 2: greater abilities, they will enhance human agency, hence the book's

11
00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:38,479
Speaker 2: title Souperagency? What could possibly go.

12
00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:39,840
Speaker 1: Right with our AI?

13
00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:41,880
Speaker 2: Feature? And read is here with me? Thank you so much,

14
00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:43,920
Speaker 2: Read Hoffen for joining us. I mean, this is the

15
00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:45,680
Speaker 2: fresh of breath air because there is a lot of

16
00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:47,680
Speaker 2: concern and a lot of worry that AI takes over

17
00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:52,040
Speaker 2: the computers will be in charge and will basically stop

18
00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:53,280
Speaker 2: using our critical thinking.

19
00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:57,120
Speaker 1: Yes, but actually, in fact, if anyone plays with AI today,

20
00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:01,360
Speaker 1: it is the most amazing education technology.

21
00:01:01,040 --> 00:01:02,800
Speaker 3: We have created in human history.

22
00:01:03,040 --> 00:01:05,399
Speaker 1: If you want to learn anything, I use it to

23
00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:09,080
Speaker 1: learn everything from quantum mechanics to like, huh, I wonder

24
00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:12,640
Speaker 1: what cooking souved in this way looks like it's everything.

25
00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:15,520
Speaker 2: But I guess the concern is that, you know, especially

26
00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:18,399
Speaker 2: people that go into a first time job, or students

27
00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:21,640
Speaker 2: or like you know, college kids don't use their critical

28
00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:23,880
Speaker 2: thinking anymore. Because if you just go into chat box

29
00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:25,840
Speaker 2: and say write me a song, it with this, this,

30
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:27,200
Speaker 2: and this, it does it for you.

31
00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:29,880
Speaker 1: Well, it definitely can do a bunch of things for you,

32
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:32,360
Speaker 1: but that can help you elevate your game.

33
00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:33,000
Speaker 3: Right.

34
00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:35,160
Speaker 1: So it's a little bit like if you were just

35
00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:38,520
Speaker 1: copying Wikipedia as handing in your essay, sure you could

36
00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:41,600
Speaker 1: do that, but actually, in fact you should use it

37
00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:44,680
Speaker 1: to inspire you to make you think better, to say, hey,

38
00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,400
Speaker 1: like for example, when I was writing Superagency, I would

39
00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:50,600
Speaker 1: put in sections and say, how at a history of

40
00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:54,400
Speaker 1: technology specialists critique what I've said, and then I understand

41
00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:56,400
Speaker 1: it and I can decide whether or not I change

42
00:01:56,440 --> 00:01:59,080
Speaker 1: your editings or and therefore the book gets better.

43
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:02,200
Speaker 2: So I read and reduce cognitive capabilities. Right, this is

44
00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:05,480
Speaker 2: a big concern that we stop thinking, that we think less,

45
00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:06,520
Speaker 2: that we think differently.

46
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:09,639
Speaker 1: Well, I think it makes it just like all technology,

47
00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:12,800
Speaker 1: you can approach it being lazy, and so if you

48
00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:15,320
Speaker 1: just say, okay, I'm going to outsource it, just like

49
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:17,800
Speaker 1: for example, I'm going to say, whatever the first search

50
00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:20,880
Speaker 1: result on Google is, that's the answer. And if you

51
00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:24,400
Speaker 1: do it that way, then of course that doesn't help

52
00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:27,320
Speaker 1: you extend. But if you do anything in terms of

53
00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:31,000
Speaker 1: having it be a dialogue with you, having it extend

54
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:34,680
Speaker 1: your capabilities asking a question, getting an answer, asking another question,

55
00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:38,560
Speaker 1: then it it greatly amplifies your capabilities.

56
00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:41,000
Speaker 2: How do you get rid of the biases, because if

57
00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:45,399
Speaker 2: you have too many biases then it excus of course democracy.

58
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:50,200
Speaker 1: Well, so all of the major AI labs are trying

59
00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:54,560
Speaker 1: to get it as kind of call it unbiased as possible. Now,

60
00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:57,919
Speaker 1: within human perspective and human knowledge, there's always some things

61
00:02:57,919 --> 00:02:58,280
Speaker 1: a bias.

62
00:02:58,280 --> 00:02:59,120
Speaker 3: We're always learning.

63
00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:02,280
Speaker 1: Like if we kind of look at human beings fifty

64
00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:04,280
Speaker 1: years ago and we are fifty years past and we

65
00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:06,280
Speaker 1: look at them and say, oh, they were biased about this,

66
00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:09,280
Speaker 1: I'm certain humans fifty years from now will be looking

67
00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:11,880
Speaker 1: at us the same way. So it's an ongoing process

68
00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:14,040
Speaker 1: with us as well as the technology.

69
00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:16,160
Speaker 2: Is there anything that worries you about AI?

70
00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,040
Speaker 1: The primary thing that worries me is I call AI

71
00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:23,800
Speaker 1: the cognitive industrial Revolution. It's both for the upside, which

72
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,639
Speaker 1: is this whole society we live in, middle class education,

73
00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:32,639
Speaker 1: medicine all comes from the Industrial Revolution. That same amplification

74
00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,960
Speaker 1: is coming, but the transitions are difficult. So the thing

75
00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:38,840
Speaker 1: that primarily worries me is to say, look, we're going

76
00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:42,200
Speaker 1: to have to navigate this challenging transition, just like the

77
00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:44,360
Speaker 1: Industrial Revolution was a challenging transition.

78
00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:46,640
Speaker 3: But that's how we have.

79
00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:50,200
Speaker 1: Our children on our future generations be prosperous and have

80
00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:52,720
Speaker 1: amazing societies.

81
00:03:52,760 --> 00:03:54,560
Speaker 3: And so that's the challenge we need to rise to.

82
00:03:54,880 --> 00:03:58,520
Speaker 2: So what's the right way of either designing AI or

83
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:00,920
Speaker 2: designing safeguards for AI?

84
00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:05,320
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, part of it, there's kind of a two

85
00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:08,280
Speaker 1: part audience for super agency. One is the people who

86
00:04:08,320 --> 00:04:12,680
Speaker 1: are AI fearful or concerned to help them become AI curious.

87
00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:17,320
Speaker 1: But it's also for technologists, which is design for human agency,

88
00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:19,280
Speaker 1: designed for increasing human agency.

89
00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:20,480
Speaker 3: That should be your.

90
00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:24,520
Speaker 1: Design principle and fundamental And the book is also I

91
00:04:24,520 --> 00:04:25,520
Speaker 1: hope helpful for them.

92
00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:29,240
Speaker 2: So read this is basically putting the human you know,

93
00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:31,800
Speaker 2: at the center still of everything. So how they fit

94
00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:32,880
Speaker 2: into the next decade?

95
00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,680
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, AI, I think can be amplification intelligence, not

96
00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:40,520
Speaker 1: just artificial intelligence and that amplification the superpowers that we get,

97
00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,520
Speaker 1: and it's not just part of super agency. Is if

98
00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:46,480
Speaker 1: you hit a superpower, that helps me too. That's how

99
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:49,000
Speaker 1: we have superagency together, as long as.

100
00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:51,160
Speaker 2: It's democratic and everybody has it or is that a

101
00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:53,159
Speaker 2: question for in a second phase?

102
00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:55,440
Speaker 1: Well, I think one of the good things about it,

103
00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:58,080
Speaker 1: And that's part of the reason why the first chapter

104
00:04:58,240 --> 00:04:59,840
Speaker 1: is about humanity enters.

105
00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:00,880
Speaker 3: The chat at chat GBT.

106
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:04,440
Speaker 1: When we build technologies for hundreds of millions and billions

107
00:05:04,440 --> 00:05:08,599
Speaker 1: of people, that's that's broadly inclusive. So that your uber

108
00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:12,359
Speaker 1: driver has the same iPhone that Tim Cook has. That's

109
00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:14,400
Speaker 1: the kind of inclusion that we're targeting.

110
00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:19,520
Speaker 2: Read I mean, I guess evolution is not necessarily progress

111
00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:22,120
Speaker 2: full stop. So how do you make sure that this

112
00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:24,800
Speaker 2: means progress for the majority of humans?

113
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:25,800
Speaker 3: Well, so I think.

114
00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:29,800
Speaker 1: Look, I think as we iterate and we participate, we

115
00:05:29,839 --> 00:05:32,720
Speaker 1: make progress. And for example, even though you say, well,

116
00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:34,279
Speaker 1: we have a whole bunch of cars and that creates

117
00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:39,039
Speaker 1: climate change, the cars also create our industrial society. And

118
00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:41,000
Speaker 1: by the way, the way that we tackle climate change

119
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:43,880
Speaker 1: is we add carburetor emissions and we add you know,

120
00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:47,760
Speaker 1: we new kinds of clean energy and we do evs

121
00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:50,920
Speaker 1: and so you know, I tend to be very you know,

122
00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:54,520
Speaker 1: as we do iterative deployment and as we bring humanity

123
00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:57,400
Speaker 1: into the loop, I tend to think we do make progress.

124
00:05:57,560 --> 00:06:00,320
Speaker 1: Now I think again, you make better progress by having

125
00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:04,239
Speaker 1: the right kind of design principles, by accepting criticism.

126
00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:05,320
Speaker 3: By talking about it.

127
00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:07,719
Speaker 1: So, you know, I describe myself as a bloomer, which

128
00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:11,680
Speaker 1: is not that technology is just great. It's technology engaging

129
00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:12,600
Speaker 1: with people as great.

130
00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:15,000
Speaker 2: But it also depends on the people in charge. What

131
00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:18,200
Speaker 2: do you think of Sam Altman's performance so far in

132
00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:19,080
Speaker 2: leading open AI?

133
00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:22,839
Speaker 1: Well, so I think, Look, I think Sam's great contribution

134
00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:26,960
Speaker 1: to humanity will be open AI. And that's what having

135
00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:29,600
Speaker 1: done a number of amazing things before and done amazing

136
00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:32,200
Speaker 1: investments like Confusion and all the rest. And I think

137
00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:36,240
Speaker 1: that his ability to think very big and to have

138
00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:38,960
Speaker 1: bet very hard on this, you know a little bit

139
00:06:38,960 --> 00:06:42,919
Speaker 1: of technological thesis of scale compute and scale learning systems

140
00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:46,039
Speaker 1: is what matters. And that's why open ai has brought

141
00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:51,440
Speaker 1: this current revolution to us. And it's these machines learn

142
00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:54,240
Speaker 1: and they learn things that we help them learn and

143
00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:54,960
Speaker 1: help teach them.

144
00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:57,920
Speaker 2: Is there someone I know You've also had your differences

145
00:06:57,960 --> 00:07:01,120
Speaker 2: with Elon Musk. Who's the person in the space that you,

146
00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:04,360
Speaker 2: if not admire or listen to the most well.

147
00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:08,680
Speaker 1: Sam Altman is definitely one of them. Kevin Scott at

148
00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:14,280
Speaker 1: Microsoft is another, Dario Ahmadi ananthropic as another, James Miyika

149
00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:16,800
Speaker 1: at Google as another. I mean, I think part of

150
00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:19,800
Speaker 1: the thing that's very important about making AI for humanity

151
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:22,920
Speaker 1: is people who listen to others and talk to others

152
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:25,160
Speaker 1: and accept criticism. And I think that's one of the

153
00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:27,400
Speaker 1: things that all of these people are very good at.

154
00:07:27,800 --> 00:07:30,360
Speaker 2: Do you need to regulate it or is it something

155
00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:32,960
Speaker 2: that you need to see how it runs and then

156
00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:34,720
Speaker 2: think about regulating afterwards.

157
00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:36,200
Speaker 1: So I think what you do is you start with

158
00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:39,600
Speaker 1: the absolute minimum regulation you could do for the things

159
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:42,680
Speaker 1: that could be really bad, not for oh, look it

160
00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:45,080
Speaker 1: might have a biased picture or might have a bias statement,

161
00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:47,440
Speaker 1: like we can iterate, we can fix those as we're going.

162
00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:50,800
Speaker 2: Really bad is what people taking over planes to crash,

163
00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:51,720
Speaker 2: the things.

164
00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:56,240
Speaker 1: Like that, you know, cybercrime, et cetera. Regulate for that

165
00:07:56,960 --> 00:07:59,440
Speaker 1: right and then do iterative deployment. And by the way,

166
00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:02,440
Speaker 1: even though they deployment, you eventually get to fear the regulations. So,

167
00:08:02,440 --> 00:08:05,040
Speaker 1: for example, if you try to make everything perfect with

168
00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:07,880
Speaker 1: cars before you put them on the road, we'd never

169
00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:10,120
Speaker 1: have cars. So you put them on the road and

170
00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:13,280
Speaker 1: you go, oh, this for bumpers, this window wipers, this

171
00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,600
Speaker 1: for and occasionally, like the market doesn't want seat belts,

172
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:18,520
Speaker 1: the car manufacturers all want seat belts, and then of

173
00:08:18,560 --> 00:08:20,600
Speaker 1: course the regulators going to say, oh no, no seat

174
00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:22,240
Speaker 1: belts is good, We're going to add those.

175
00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:26,360
Speaker 2: I mean, if you regulate for things, I mean terrorism

176
00:08:26,600 --> 00:08:29,720
Speaker 2: is bad actors, bad state actors, or so it's I mean,

177
00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:32,280
Speaker 2: how do you regulate it unless you have to protect yourself.

178
00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:34,920
Speaker 2: So it's basically finding the technology.

179
00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,080
Speaker 1: That blocks them. Well, I think it's the regulation is

180
00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:39,600
Speaker 1: if you're releasing the technology to the general public, which

181
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:42,080
Speaker 1: could be to the bad actors as well, you're doing

182
00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:45,679
Speaker 1: red teaming and safety, you're putting the right security measures

183
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:47,719
Speaker 1: to make sure that you're not bleeding the technology to

184
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:51,080
Speaker 1: rogue states, terrorists, et cetera, that you have a safety

185
00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,120
Speaker 1: plan that if you go, Okay, why is the technology

186
00:08:54,120 --> 00:08:56,920
Speaker 1: I'm building if it does leak or anything else, why

187
00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:57,319
Speaker 1: will it.

188
00:08:57,320 --> 00:08:57,959
Speaker 3: Still be safe?

189
00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:00,719
Speaker 1: And how do we continue to have the technology that

190
00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:04,920
Speaker 1: makes anything that's in the wild as safe as possible.

191
00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:06,920
Speaker 2: On Nilon must Do you think he has too much

192
00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,000
Speaker 2: power being so close to the president.

193
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:13,000
Speaker 1: Well, so, look, I think he's a celebrated entrepreneur.

194
00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:13,920
Speaker 3: But I think that.

195
00:09:15,400 --> 00:09:19,840
Speaker 1: Governments are not companies, like, for example, risking a company

196
00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:22,719
Speaker 1: like for example, to say, oh, our ten rockets blow up,

197
00:09:22,920 --> 00:09:26,640
Speaker 1: who cares, it doesn't matter the financial system of a

198
00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:30,560
Speaker 1: country blows up. That's the cultural revolution that's terrible. So

199
00:09:30,600 --> 00:09:33,000
Speaker 1: you actually have to say we take less risk here,

200
00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:35,920
Speaker 1: even at the price of some inefficiency, because it's more

201
00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:38,800
Speaker 1: important for us to not have things blow up.

202
00:09:39,280 --> 00:09:42,120
Speaker 2: Do you worry that things are going too quickly with

203
00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:43,920
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, Well, I.

204
00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:47,559
Speaker 1: Worry that very bad risks are being taken at speed.

205
00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,160
Speaker 3: Is not a problem. Risks are a problem.

206
00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:52,120
Speaker 1: And you know, for example, it's like, well, we're just

207
00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:54,000
Speaker 1: going to fire a whole bunch of people. Oh oops,

208
00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:56,600
Speaker 1: we fired a whole bunch of nuclear safety inspectors. Like

209
00:09:56,880 --> 00:09:59,960
Speaker 1: that's the kind of thing that's taking risks that is unwarranted.

210
00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:00,719
Speaker 3: Read.

211
00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:02,280
Speaker 2: I also want to talk to you about China because

212
00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:04,360
Speaker 2: Deep Sea kind of got everyone at the edge of

213
00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:08,000
Speaker 2: their seat. But where do you have a good understanding

214
00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:09,520
Speaker 2: about where China is on AI.

215
00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:11,960
Speaker 3: I have a reasonable understanding.

216
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:14,760
Speaker 1: I do a fair amount of talking to various people

217
00:10:14,760 --> 00:10:17,920
Speaker 1: in China in order to make sure. Part of the

218
00:10:17,920 --> 00:10:19,560
Speaker 1: thing that when last year I was going around saying

219
00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:23,679
Speaker 1: there was actually an economic race with AI between the

220
00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:26,040
Speaker 1: West and China, people are like, oh, no, you're overblowing

221
00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:27,400
Speaker 1: that because you just simply don't want.

222
00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:27,920
Speaker 3: To be regulated.

223
00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:29,880
Speaker 1: And I think with deep Seak and everything else, we

224
00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:33,360
Speaker 1: see that that race is there, and the Chinese government

225
00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:35,800
Speaker 1: has said that they want to be you know, AI leaders,

226
00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:37,000
Speaker 1: like leading the world.

227
00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:39,080
Speaker 3: By twenty thirty. I think the race is on.

228
00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:41,960
Speaker 1: I think it's very important for US and our industries

229
00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:43,800
Speaker 1: to actually in fact be winning.

230
00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:46,360
Speaker 2: Is this an r Is this the new arms race?

231
00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:48,839
Speaker 1: Well, I don't call it an arms race because it's

232
00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:51,800
Speaker 1: primarily an economic race. There is arm stuff components with it,

233
00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,560
Speaker 1: but yes, it is the economic race.

234
00:10:54,880 --> 00:10:56,280
Speaker 2: Read thank you so much for joining us. That was

235
00:10:56,280 --> 00:10:59,160
Speaker 2: Reid Hoffman LinkedIn co founder Gray Luck, partner and of

236
00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:03,280
Speaker 2: course author of Super Agency. It's a good book. It's

237
00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:05,160
Speaker 2: well written, and it's to the point