WEBVTT - Draft Show: Free Agency Shaking Up The Draft?

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>war room for in center news and draft analysis from

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>deep within the confines of Cowboys headquarters at the Star

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in Fresco, Dallas Cowboys like d Lamb and now your hosts,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Dane Brugler, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle Yeomans. We

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are rolling along here on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show, just forty two days away, a Bury Church

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>number away from the Dallas Cowboys and the twenty twenty

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one NFL Draft. We've got plenty to break down as

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got potential scenarios, first, second, third round, We've got

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>plenty of prospects that we're gonna get to and then

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>also some pro days that we're gonna hit in this

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Draft Show. Glad you're with us on

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com in the various streaming platform Jeff Kavanaugh,

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kate t turning Rock in the Mean Green this

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>afternoon or I guess this morning rather as North Texas

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of course playing in March Madness starting tomorrow against Purdue,

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and then Dame Brugler, who's a lot closer to March

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Madness than we are up in Ohio. He's a little

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bit closer to the Indiana madness. But gentlemen, it's been

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a crazy week already with free agency, some new players

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>coming in for the Cowboys, a little bit of depth

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at it, and then of course some starters that have

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>thus walked on and gone elsewhere. But Katie, I know

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you're very adamant on Twitter that this is not the

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>free agency show. This is the draft show. I've seen

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that reply a couple times for you over the last

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours or so. But doesn't free agency directly

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>correlate with the draft? No, No, it totally does. I

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just like when I put out the tweet for everyone

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask their questions to you for Twitter on the

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>twenties so I don't have to look at it and

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you can handle and filter the questions. When people and

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>asking questions about free agency, I'm like, hey, ask questions

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about the draft the free agency questions. You can do,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm want to do that on talking Cowboys or something.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But it does correlate, like, for instance, with the Cowboys

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>picking at ten. I found it to be quite interesting

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Broncos signed Ronald Darby a cornerback. Does that

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that the Broncos would not take a cornerback at nine.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, but it might mean they don't feel that

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>urgency to take a cornerback at nine. I thought the

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Panthers getting Hassan Reddick was very interesting because maybe they're

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>toying around at the notion of maybe we trade pick

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>eight and maybe we could throw Brian Burns into it

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>for maybe a Deshaun Watson package. You know, just at

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>things like that is what I was kind of thinking

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of what the Cowboys have done. We know,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with Cheeto gone, Jordan Lewis stays, you still have Anthony Brown.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You might you might say cornerback is not as gent

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as maybe it was if you had lost George Lewis too,

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>but you still gotta upgrade at that position. So I

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think it changes. I don't think it changed much

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of anything, to be honestly, Jeff, do you think it

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>changes anything from a Cowboys standpoint? The fact of the

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>players that had gone and then those that have stayed.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it changes much, only because I think

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>cornerback is still a really big position of need. I

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think it was this is something that you should have

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>known was going to happen as a Cowboy fan, whether

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be Jordan Lewis or whether it was

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be somebody else. In free agency, they weren't

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go into an NFL draft butt naked. They

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't going to go in there with two with two

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>NFL starting caliber ish corners on the entire roster. So

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jordan Lewis is probably a slot guy. I

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they'll look at him at safety. Probably not,

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but let me just throw it out just in case. Ye,

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you weren't going to go into a draft

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with that big of a blinking light of need at

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a position. They were going to sign somebody, and they did.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So now you, in theory, could go play on Sunday

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because you would have Jordan Lewis and the Slott Anthony

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Brown out wide, Trevant Diggs out wide, and you could play.

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's the goal to get ready for the draft,

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is to sign the free agency that make it so

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>that if you had to, you could go play. So

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>now I can be closer to best player available to

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>get the best value possible in the draft. Free agencies

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>about need. The draft is about value. Let's go find

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the value Dane. Have there been any other moves around

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the NFL that could potentially shake kind of like what

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Kate was talking about, what the Cowboys are going to

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>do in the draft, whether it's because they acquired a

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>certain player or they did something specific in free agency. No,

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean, I do appreciate Katie's

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>imagination with each one of these deals because you know,

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's you know, it's ripple effect whatever. When one

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>thing happens, it affects other moves and potentially on draft day.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, it is interesting to go down

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that that rabbit hole. But I do agree with Jeff

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this is the free agency is about

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>filling needs so you can go out and play tomorrow,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's more about rounding out your roster. So on

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>draft day, you know you can take the best players.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>You can stick to your board and you're not reaching

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for need and targeting a specific position and forcing things

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, and we're just looking at you know,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we still have a lot, a lot to happen in

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>free agency. You know, we saw that first wave and

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>then there's a little bit of a lull, and then

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to be, you know, slowly but

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>surely picked back up a little bit, especially with some

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of these markets like the receiver market, taffle market. But

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the most part, I don't think anything

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>happened in free agency thus far that will necessarily alter

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>what we thought about how the Cowboys are going to

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>attack the draft here in a month and a half.

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Well good, So we don't necessarily have to pivot on

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. We can just kind of continue on

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with what we were talking about prior to this week,

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>which is something that I know some people were worried about,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's exactly what we expected overall. Like

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff said, if you're a Cowboys fan, you knew you're

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna lose a corner keep a corner, depending on

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>which one it was. And Cheeto signed with the Cincinnati

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Bengals within about five hours of the opening of free agency,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so of course it was then Jordan Lewis was the

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>next man up. It seemed like from the corner position,

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and really, in my mind, I think it was probably

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the better corner to keep because of the money, but

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it was something that the Cowboys needed to get done.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Now there have been a lot of pro days that

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have been going on over the last couple of weeks,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>simultaneous with the free agency market and with kind of

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the roster acquisitions. There's the continuation of this draft process.

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>No NFL combine this year. That's been duly noted over

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of draft shows as well. But these

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>pro days are actually happening, and there's things that are

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>official and unofficial, and of course you got to take

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>everything with a grain of salt, Dane. But before we

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>go into the specific pro days, what has been your

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>overall thought of the pro day only process that we've

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really seen for the first time here in twenty twenty one. Well,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's not ideal not having the combine, but you know,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we have something. And you know, the pro

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>day circuit is interesting because obviously we're dealing with on

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>campus workouts. So we're talking about different venues, different tracks.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of these are inside, some of them

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are outside, and you know, so just totally different environments.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they structured it so they made it

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as easy as possible for uh, you know, scouts to

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>hot from pro day to pro day, hitting multiple pro

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>days in one day. Uh, you know, yesterday Illinois had

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their pro Day in the morning. They scheduled Illinois State

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Pro Day for the afternoon so those guys can just

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>zip over. And you know, they tried to make it

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as scout friendly as possible. And you know, as we

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>get these results coming in, some of them are you know, surprising, Um,

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>some of them are more expected. But you know, as always,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's good to have the data because we're

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>missing that from the combine. And so I'm just you know,

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>even if the pro day data isn't you know all

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not perfect in terms of how it's gathered, and

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the is there a degree of you know,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>could could have an error here or there could be

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>offwasher on the CRODA. No. I mean, like I said before,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about fast tracks, slow tracks inside outside, you know,

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's tough, um. You know, it's some of

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>these guys that are running in tougher situations. So you know,

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>and as scouts, you know, you're you're taught to maybe

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>aut a tenth of a second here or there, depending

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on the track, and so there's a lot it's a

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a more of a formula when you're trying to

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>boil down these times and the data, but nonetheless it

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's better than not having any data at all. So

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a We're gonna take Creed Humphries four

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>four six that he ran on the twenty yard shuttle,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna we're gonna add a tenth of a second.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>There is that what you're saying there, Dane, if it's

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a little too fast, because that would have tied as

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>were Cleveland for the fastest of last year's combine. So

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's been numbers that have still stuck out,

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>but you're saying that once again, you got to take

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it with a grain of salt. And I didn't really

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>realize this until you said it a moment ago. But

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a system to it. Oh yeah, definitely. And I

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I wouldn't say take with a grain assault what's

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>reported out there as the drills are happening, because people

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>are doing it with their phones. They're you know, like

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just wait for you know, later on that day

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>when the quote unquote official times, because honestly, the official

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Times is whatever the NFL teams are using. Okay, So

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>even if it's off by a little bit, it doesn't

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>matter because if that's what NFL teams are going by,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that's good enough for me to call it officials. So

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Creed Humphrey, for example, the official short shuttle for him,

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>this is what NFL teams have is four four nine,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So that far off, you know, pretty close to what

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he ran. So um, but hey, that's another reason to

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>get the Beast because all the official times that NFL

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>teams will be using will be in there for every

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>single player. Look, so if you don't, if you don't

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>get the Beast, just watch me on YouTube, and I

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do it in my head. I watched Eric Stokes run

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is forty and I got I got three seven, I

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>got three seven eight, So I just fund three one thousand. Well, no,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>because I watched Henry Ruggs and Jayalen Wattle race on

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the internet and I got that at three point two.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's the record. They both ran a three two

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>just one one thousand's fair two one thousands. And as

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>long as I count at the same speed every time,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm in good shape. It's the capital class,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, friends, stance when it goes to U. But yeah,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like I remember Autostow like talking about how some some

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>fields are like uphill and downhill. Like he's like got

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>this little little pieces up before like where it's not

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the flat land. But like Dan makes a good point,

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't hurt to like wait a couple hours,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like for instance, I will and this is just me.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>This is no offense to anyone who's out there covering

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. But like I'll trust uh Senior Bowl director

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim Naggy's time with a stop watch over. You know

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Steve on Twitter who just put something

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>out whoa, whoa. If Steve is a good dude, Well

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Steve just puts it out there real quick, and you're like, okay,

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>well let's get there, let's get I'll trust the guy

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>who you know runs the Senior Bowl, like and he's

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>got time life. For instance, he had the times for

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Eric Stokes. But this is what's kind of like also,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we like to overrate all these times sometimes too. We

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know Eric Stokes is fast. If Eric Stokes runs a

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>four two five versus four three two, what does it

0:11:55.320 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>matter to me? It comes it twice, don't count it twice.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So this goes back to a joke I've issued on

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this show before. But there's a reason Jeff and Day

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>entitled their old podcast trust the Tape. That's that, Trust

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Day. Trust the Pro Day did that? Well?

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't, but trust the Pro Day you can admit

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>would have gotten terrible ratings. Oh yeah, hard to say,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>really hard to say. Well, Georgia, it's weird because did

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Georgia have half their guys run downhill and have them

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>run uphill? Because safety Richard LeCount running a four eggs

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>probably not good? Yeah, that was real bad. Yeah the

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>official was a little bit better than that. But yeah,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he did not have the best workout. But who did

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>who had a pretty good workout? Several players of the

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas Pro Day. Uh Sam caused me just ridiculous. Came

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in at six six three fifteen thirty three in arms,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so just good enough in terms of the arm length.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But he ran a four eight five with a one

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>six eight ten yards split, which is just unbelievable for

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>that for that size. So he was moving. He helped himself. Um.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Osai I thought ran well at two hundred and

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty six pounds. He ran a four to six two.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But one thing with Osai is it's you always take

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>notice when a guy Alex not to run or to

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>perform a certain drill, and Joseph Osai, who's not the

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>most bendy guy, chose not to run the three cone

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>or the shuttles. And that's if you know, if you're

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>an a valuator, that's a red flag. You know that

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that sticks out like a store firm. Isn't that better?

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Because like what I when I saw the Richard LeCount

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>forty time, Like, if I'm his agent, I'm telling him, Hey,

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna let people assume you run a four

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to six five like we're not running. If I know

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna run a four eight, if I know I'm

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna put up a bad three cone time, I'm gonna

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have a meeting with my agent be like, hey, what

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our NFL team's gonna assume I would run if I

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>don't do this? And am I actually gonna run worse

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>than that? We ain't running. But if you students need

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to not work out, if you and I get that,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>but if you choose not to run, then all of

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you know, okay, we thought Joseph saw was

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>going to run a seven two three cone, but then

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>he chose not to run it's like, oh, well, maybe

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's even worse than that. Maybe it was seven three. Maybe,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like your mind as an evaluator starts to

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>really think, Okay, well maybe maybe it was so bad

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>during testing because obviously they you know, he got three

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>cone time during his training. Maybe it was just that

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't even an average, it was well below average.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's something that definitely stands out and instead

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of putting a number to it, it's gonna leave evaluators

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to the their imagination to come up with a number.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So just it's it's it's something worth noting and paying

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>attention to for sure. I just think like if Orlando

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Brown didn't work out at the combine and didn't run,

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he would have made millions more dollars. Like

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>his his workout was so bad that I was like, man,

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>just let teams imagination be as bad as they want,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>because it wouldn't be that bad. Well, yeah, and he's

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the extreme case because his his numbers were historically bad.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, he's definitely an extreme case. But that and

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why with the like an Osai, because he didn't

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>do the three cone, does that tell me that his

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>three cone times during training weren't even average, you know,

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>were they well below average? And so but it you know,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>evaluators gonna be kept guessing. Now, is that gonna push

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>him down draft boards? No, I highly doubt it. Teams

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>already knew he was a little stiff through the hips. Um.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's just it's one of those things that it's

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's part of it becomes part of his evaluation. Well,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can I throw in one more thing too? And I

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>know we're like just bounced to the Texas about I

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to Georgia real quick with Richard

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>LeCount whose numbers were not great. Um. And but you

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>know he's got questions too because he had the motorbike

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>at to that, you know, in his senior year. But

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got you know, a career, uh, some interceptions, you know,

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ball skills, things like that. But I had written down

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in my notes kind of slow and a little undersized.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So like I saw his numbers and I know the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>official numbers come out later, and I was like, I'm

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>really not surprised, But is there pressure to run when

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyson Campbell's running, or Eric Stokes is running or Monnie

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Rice is running? Like, hey, all these guys are running.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get measured anyway. They're gonna know how, they're

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna know. I'm a little shorty, though he's got decent

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lengked with his long arms. I just kind of like,

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what I think, Richard account is. I

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of had got a little confirmed of what I

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thought about LeCount at least after seeing his time yesterday. Well,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and then on the flip side, with a guy like LeCount,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be some teams that look at that and say, oh,

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a four eight, all right, now, we might be able

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to give him in sixth round. Now, you know, like

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're doing a little fist pump when they see

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that number because instead of being a fourth or fifth rounder,

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I think that's what most teams thought

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he would be, you know, mid season before that injury. Um,

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, now maybe he could be in a later rounds.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the medicals would be a big part of that. Dan,

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you what did you think about him previous

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to the injury, Because I know you've kept up with

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>him pretty much the last couple of years, But previous

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to the injury, was he a different player than he

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>was after that motorcycle accident. Well we didn't. We didn't

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really see him after tra accident unfortunately, um he. But

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I tell you we did see him for one play,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>um he, which wells it was the final player of

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball game. It's which it was kind of like

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the Landed Dickerson situation, you know, where they just put

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>him out there so he could finish his career right,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which speaks a lot to his you know character and

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know the way they think of him in that program. Um,

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I like LeCount to be honest with you, I think

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he plays faster than whatever he was gonna run. Um.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's his pursuit range is outstanding. He could

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>play both sidelines. He plays fearless. Um. So you know,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to live with the inconsistencies that

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he has. But still, you know, he reminds me a

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what of his uh Marquise Blair coming

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>out of Utah a few years ago. Wow, uh kind

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of can do it, can do a little bit of

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>everything as a nickel. Um you know, he's I think

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he's an undersized version of a Marquise Blair. So I

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>do like him. I like that a lot. Any other

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Pro Day's Katie, that kind of stuck out to you,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and that numbers jump off the page at least from

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>either in a positive way or a negative way. Well,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that nothing that happened at the

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Pro Day is gonna make me change about how

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I feel about any of these guys coming from Pittsburgh.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think all these guys at Pittsburgh, and some of

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>them have like some some traits that are very interesting.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>But after watching them, pretty much every evaluation I had

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Pittsburgh guys, I was kind of like a yeah,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, Weaver's okay, uh is that that sound?

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Does that? If that sound means that sound means okay?

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You know you know, no, I'll let someone else have him.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You know that whole thing Like Patrick Jones, you sit

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>there and go, okay, great good explosion off the ball, okay,

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and then that's it. That's that's about it. There. I

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thought Paris Ford's tape the safety was terrible. Um. And

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twyman is very interesting, you know, two hundred

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and ninety pounds, um. But I still kind of just

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on taping like I don't know, if you know. And

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>again like I'm talking about one hundred top one hundred prospects.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>These gonna be guys you you would taken on round three,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I don't think I feel that way

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about any of those guys. The guy I kind of

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>liked from them and it's not it's not like in love,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>but like we're looking for safeties, right. I do like

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Damar Hamlin a little bit. I've got a fourth round

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>grade on him, but you know, I don't know if

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>he holds up as a free safety. I don't know

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>if he moves well enough. So again, that was looking

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>for a little more clarity from those Pittsburgh guys, and

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think you see that with them.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Those Pittsburgh guys. Which is interesting is Twinan and Twinman

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't play this year. He opted out, Paris four opted

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>out mid season. So we're talking about two guys that

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>opted out and still ran those below average times. That's

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's that's saying something when you have all

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this time to train and get ready and you still

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>turn in those times. I mean, it's just another you know,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>dynamic to this draft process. Okay, Can I throw on

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a quick question though, because there's one guy from them

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen. He allegedly ran under a four or

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>five forty four four seven forty was Jason Pinnock, the cornerback.

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And he's the guy that I didn't like focus in

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on room watching them. Yeah, and I need to go

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>go see him again. What are your thoughts on him? Yeah,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a I don't know that he's draftable.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more of a late round guy, p

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>F A M. He did put in turn in some

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>good times and decent size, you know, not the biggest guys.

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he came in what five ten and a half,

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe, But you know he you know, his dad

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>played college football, He played at a high level. He

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>consistency was an issue for him, and I think that's

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest reason why he's not a lock draft pick.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But I thought the times that he turned in yesterday

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a certainly help. Do you think guys like that Dane

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have a better chance of getting drafted this year or

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a lesser chance of getting drafted? And my point being

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that they do run and the fact

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that there is no combine and they are still going

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>out there. They're competing, they're putting their times out there,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the past you would have multiple chances for

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a good handful of prospects to put their times out there.

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think those guys that are bubble draftable dudes

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially up their value just by running and

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>putting out a decent time. I think that, you know,

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>something that is interesting about this class is um watching

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>who who's a combined invite who's not a combine invite?

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Because the combine invites, we know we're gonna get those medicals, okay,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>And so the guys that are on the bubble but

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>are combine invites, they've got a much better chance of

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>getting drafted because at least teams will have some clarity

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on what's you know, what's going on with them from

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a medical perspective. But some of these other guys, it's

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna it's it's gonna be a lot tougher to

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get medicals that they can trust because you know, they're,

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, gonna get all these different information from the

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>agents and from random doctors, and teams aren't going to

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>know what to trust. So I think it's fair to

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>say we're gonna have probably a record low uh not

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in combine guys get drafted this year. Um, and you

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>know part of that is, you know, character wise, not

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>being able to learn more about these guys in person,

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the lack of medicals, m but you know, the putting

0:22:58.400 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>up good times will help. But it's just gonna be

0:22:59.920 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>a tough They're they're behind the eight ball as they

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>go through the process because of you know, not having

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not be getting an invite to the Combine, to not

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>being able to be you know, an official visit, not

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>being able to meet with these teams. It's going to

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>make it tough. It will make it tough, and I

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think scouting departments in front offices are having a tougher

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>job than ever before trying to compile all of these

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>different numbers and all this information. We'll continue talking about

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>pro days here in the weeks to come, but when

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we come back here on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show time Now for some Twitter on the twenty

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>got a ton of questions coming in on Twitter. If

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you have questions in the periscope chat, go and send

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>those in as well. I might answer one of those

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>through the next couple of moments, but we'll do that

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>when we return on the other side of the break

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>here on the Draft Show. Sometimes nothing beats the classic

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Miller Light the original light beer brewed with great taste

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and only ninety six calories available for delivery. Celebrate responsively

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Miller Brewing Company, Butlwaukee, Wisconsin, ninety six calories, three point

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>two cars for twelve outs. We're back in a tasty

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Pepper and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor bag

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda. Is he a new Combone's music to

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>My ears? Okay, doctor time Music to My Ears? And

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>mouse new Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda delas Hey, Cowboys fans,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking about attending a game this season, visit

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Travel dot com to book your travel package today.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Stay at the Team Hotel, have dinner with a Cowboys legend,

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and experience at and T Stadium's exclusive VIP Owners Club.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Also tour the Star, get autographs from your favorite players,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and talk xs and os with me. Mickey Spagnola, the

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>official travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, will take care

0:24:55.720 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of all your travel needs. Visit Cowboys Travel dot com.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing as unique as our eyes, which is why

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Selor pioneers ways to make lenses as unique as you.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Varilux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection, I'm

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Crisolve for freedom from glare. Three cutting edge solutions in

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist on

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Selor visit your local slor experts and find a perfect

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lens for you. Seymore do Moore Selre. Sometimes nothing beats

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a classic Miller Light, the original light beer, brewed with

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>great taste and only ninety six calories available for delivery.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Celebrate Responsively. Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ninety six calories

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>three point two carbs for twelve ounces. Is the Dallas

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Back here on the Dallas

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, We've got Dane Brugler, Jeff Kavanaugh,

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Kevin kat Turner on y'allmen's time. Now for some Twitter

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>on the twenty on the twittery Chris Beam as always

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>punching the buttons in the bank and doing a fantastic job.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've got a lot of good questions coming in today,

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna start with one from Cowboys Coffee Talk,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and i want to talk safety with you. Guys for

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just a moment said Hey, Kyle safety with the highest

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>ceiling Morigg Holland, Grant Cisco, and he says, my apologies

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to Jeff for leaving out his tiny safety aka dar

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Darius Washington from TCU. So, Jeff, I'm gonna let you

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>answer this question first without Washington being the name that

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you say. But what we're out of those four mo

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Rigg Holland, Grant Cisco. So the tough part here is

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the two guys that I don't really like out of

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that group. I can't acknowledge that there is a potential

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for a big hit there, like Andre Cisco. Have they

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>had their pro day yet? I haven't seen the numbers,

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm told that he's going to be a really

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>good athlete and he's got a ton of forced turnovers.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But I don't trust andre Cisco like I wouldn't take

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>him in the first three rounds of a draft. He

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>gives up more big plays than any safety I have

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>ever watched. So and then Javan Holland. I like the

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ball production, I like the way that he diagnoses what's happening.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if he's athletic enough to play

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>corner I don't know if he's physical enough to play safety,

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so I'm kind of scared of him, and so I'm

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>going to narrow it down to the two guys that

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I really like, and gosh, it's a tough question because

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Richie Grant I have tape of him playing a good

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of single high safety and showing the sideline to

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>sideline range. And Merrick played at TCU where they basically

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>ran a split safety system where they both were deep

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have sometimes you're down, sometimes you're up. But Merrick probably

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>has a blend of the physical tools that gives you

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a higher ceiling, and that's I think that's why he's

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>projected to go so high, because I think on tape

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>he's my third or fourth favorite safety. So Dan, you

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me with marriage, is it the blend of prototypical

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>size and you think that he's going to test well

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and he could be good at every aspect that makes

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him the number one safety? Yeah, I think that's fair.

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I personally, I like Richie Grant is my

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>top safety. But if we're talking highest upside, if that's

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the question is which one has the highest upside, then yeah,

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you can make an easy case for Marek

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>because of the range, because the ball skills. You know,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he's he was a corner and wide receiver in high school,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, you still think he's going to

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>get better at safety in terms of recognition, in terms

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of his steps. So yeah, I think in terms of

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>overall upside, Merrig probably the easy answer there. But as

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a just player in prospect, I give Richie Grant the

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>edge just because I feel a little bit better about

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who he is. He's gonna be for me. You mean,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a little bit older than you want. He's gonna

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.959
<v Speaker 1>be a twenty four year old rookie. But uh, you know,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm a big Richie Grant fan and and

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think that his game translates really well. I like Grant

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>more than Merrick. But but because you guys both answered

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with those players, can I throw out a wild card

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's not even on there, even though even

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>though we haven't exactly seen him play safety. What about

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Sean Wade? Everyone's forgotten about it. Molden's a power yeah,

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's a corner, right, I would say for now,

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think which cut the corner? I think? But Sean,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sean Wade just just for having fun here.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's what if he what if he all

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden is drafted, and let's say he's drafted

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the sixth round, which is could happen um And let's

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>say all of a sudden he plays and he's incredible.

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the ceilings there, we've seen him play really well,

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like of a year of really excellent tape now playing inside,

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and then a year of really bad take playing outside.

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just throwing that out there. That's wouldn't be what

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>my answer is. But I'm just wanting to be different

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>than what you guys did because I'm kind of trying

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to come here from a centrist point of view. Yeah

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it was they also thought I go early. We'd be

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>willing to bet on that day three. I mean, that's

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He's such an enigma because if what

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you saw this past year was a guy playing half

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>speed who just looked like a fish out of water outside.

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean based off his two has a

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen tape when he was inside, he played a lot better.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a physical tackler. But you know, I still wonder

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if he has the traits, especially above the neck, needed

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to really thrive there. I don't know he is. He

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the toughest players in this draft to

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out, no question. Yeah, he was one of those

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>guys that, at least last year you're talking about moving

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>him to safety and the potential of him moving to safety.

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Last year, they thought it was a good idea to

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>move him from a slot corner to an outside corner,

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and that didn't really work very well. So I don't know.

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe his versatility just isn't what it appears to be,

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that was just because he wasn't a good

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fit at the corner spot. I think that's more likely,

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. Maybe he just isn't as versatile

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.719
<v Speaker 1>overall as a player. Now, going on to this question

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>from Justin on Twitter, this is an interesting question. I

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see this a lot from Cowboys fans, but he

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>said who are some of the possible mid round tight

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ends to keep an eye on, saying that he wants

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the passing game to be quote unquote awesome in this offense?

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Can the Cowboys pass on the position With Dalton Schultz

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>emergence and Blake Jarwin as a perpetual potential guy. Katie,

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You're excited to answer this question. I like this question.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I think tight ends are very fun to watch. A

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of blocking, a little bit of catching. I

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy value tight ends. Give me Tommy Trimble from

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame all day long. And you know, maybe you

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>know when you say mid round, obviously you don't want

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys this year unless it's Kyle Pitts spending a

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.719
<v Speaker 1>premium pick on a tight end. But and Tommy Trimble

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>probably goes. You know, Tommy Trimble probably doesn't make it

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>today three, but he might. And yeah, so it's kind

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of a guy like I Also, I like Yaboa from

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Old Miss, and I know that he's a little he's

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of an odd player, just like he's six to four,

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about two fifty and he was at Temple for a

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>long time before going to Old Miss. But you know,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some plays that he made on tape, especially

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one was in the Alabama game. It was very interesting.

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got pretty good ball adjustment skills, like

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he showed that he can make catches away from his

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>body and things like that. And uh, and I don't

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>know if he's like an explosive guy. And lord knows,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this team probably doesn't need that lay right now. But no,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's like a top nuch route runner

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or anything. But I think he's a very interesting player

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with pretty good size and kind of a mismatch type

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of guy. I feel like it feels like Carolina is

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good landing spot for him given his history

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at Temple. But that's a Kennyyboa from Old miss is

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy I like in the mid rounds at tight end. Yeah,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not bad. I mean this is an interesting tight

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>end class because it's kind of like there's the big

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>time guys and then there's no middle class, and then

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of intriguing late round guys like Kyle

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Pitts is obviously at the top, and then on day

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two you've got Friar Muth and Brevin Jordan, Tommy Trumbull,

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Long. So those five guys are at the top.

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think all are going to top one hundred. Brevin

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's I think would be the one for the Cowboys.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That would be really interesting. I like that fit a

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>lot what he can add to this offense. Now, again,

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to give him a third round. They get

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a draft a third round tight end. I doubt it,

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know who knows. Um. But like I said,

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't really I don't really think there's a mid

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a mid round tight end market this year. Like you're

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at uh, you know your Boa McKitty, Um, you know,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>guys like that. I don't. I'd rather have them fifth, sixth,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>seventh rounds. So I don't. I actually don't even have

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>a tight end graded as a fourth round pick. Um.

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>And then in like between rounds five and seven, I've

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>got like eight of them, you know, like just really

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>intriguing guys. Uh, you know, like Pro Wells from TCU, uh,

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Briley Moore, Kansas State. Um, you know there's a group

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of these guys that are intriguing and that offers something

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that you know, at least are worthy of draft conversation.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's just I don't think it's a

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>great year for the for a mid round tight end.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pits, that's all you want to say, Pits. Yeah,

0:34:58.160 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're not picking cow Pits, I don't want to

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>tight I got two tight ends. I'm fine. But if

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you want to pick caps, pick Calpits, I'd be cool.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll bring the bell Dozer back as a tight end

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>three I'm gad to go. I think I'm right there

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with you. I don't know if I'm really interested because

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of those two guys, because of, at least at the moment,

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind of discount that you would potentially be getting

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>those two on, and as starting caliber tight ends. Yeah,

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're not picking a big time guy, I don't

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>know if I would necessarily even ways to pick on

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that at this point, but those are intriguing guys. I

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like Tremble a lot actually as a player. I just

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily know if the Cowboys need to spend a

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>pick there, I'd rather spend that on a on a

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>third round corner or a third round safety. I think

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that would just be a better use of it. Now,

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this is another question that kind of perked up my

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eyebrows a little bit, just because I haven't seen this before.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>But Michael Will ask on Twitter, could you guys see

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a scenario and this is gonna make Jeff Cabitall mister

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>captain trade down either extremely happy or not so happy

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. I don't really know yet. Could you see

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where it would make sense for the Cowboys

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to trade completely out of the first round stack. Plenty

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of more premium picks for twenty twenty two, where there's

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a more interesting draft class coming up than using this

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>draft to fill more of the gaps expected next year. Jeff,

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>do you like that as captain trade doown? Or if

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you're captain trade doown, do you have a cap on

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how far you old fall? No, because let me tell

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you a secret about captain trade down. Okay, Captain trade

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>doown likes this draft. Captain tradedown doesn't love the top

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>ten of this draft if you're looking for defensive help.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So I love the idea of trading down, absolutely do.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I do not love the idea of using those picks now. Look,

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as a long term play, you get better value if

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you are trading for next year's picks. So if you

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>are a bad team or a building or rebuilding team,

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>then I think that's a great strategy. The Cowboys planned

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to win. So I think that if you want to

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>trade down at this draft, I want to still exist

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>strongly in the second and third rounds because I think

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good draft there. I think the one

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>place that it's a little bit worrisome is if you're

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>picking around, oh, I don't know ten and you're looking

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for defense. So Captain Traddown does want to ride, but

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Captain Traddown does not want to leave this year. Dan Now,

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I get that personally. You know, if the team's offering

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>me a one next year and a second round pick

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>for number ten, I'm thinking really strongly about that. And

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>trust me, I no one loves drafting more than I do.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I'd hate to draft out of the first round this

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>year because I think even if you don't love the

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>top ten, there's still quality players you'd love to add

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to this roster. But the chance to add another Day

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>two pick, maybe another Day three pick as well, plus

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a one next year, that's you know, you got to

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>think long term, and I think that would you're getting

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>excellent value at that point. So you know, I think

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something to be said about the cap situation, and

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, filling out the roster with Day two picks

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>rather than you know, like a top ten pick which

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know makes X amount of money. You know, you

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to trade back and still get a

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>solid player, and you're getting them for lesser money. So

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that factors into so a lot of moving

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>parts here. It's worth having the conversation. If the offer.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Is there no question I'll be quick on this. I

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>think you start to get to round five, six and seven,

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you've got it narrowed down to five guys

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to draft, and then say, okay, there's three

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>guys that want to take right here, and a lot

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, let's say they didn't play last year

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going off twenty nineteen tape and things like that.

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of where i'd go. You know what, if

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>someone wants to get in back in the fifth round,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a pick for next year. I think I'm

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>more likely to throw around picks in the fifth, sixth,

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and seventh round. But I think there Jeff made a

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>good point there. You're not planning to be picking tenth

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>in each round next year. This is a team that's

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to win and I think likely will be

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. So I think you're probab have a

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:02.959
<v Speaker 1>pick in between nineteen and thirty two. It's a little

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>different right there, but you know, but I'm willing to

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>play that game in the fifth, sixth, and seventh round.

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And Dane also brought up the point of the money

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way that the draft funds are going to

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be allocated. I don't know. Maybe is this

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>year's salary cap going to be better than next year's

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 1>salary cap? That's my biggest question, because at least right now,

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like that's the case. It looks like

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this year is actually going to be a better year

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.399
<v Speaker 1>for the cap and for the different funds that would

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be allotted. Now you have eleven or ten draft picks

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna have to go and dish that out

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>to at some point if you end up keeping all

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of those, which I don't necessarily anticipate happening, but that's

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting point to keep in there as well. If

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys feel like next year is a better year

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to have multiple first round draft picks on your salary,

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>then maybe they do in tree or entertain some of

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>those offers and maybe move back a little bit more.

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So that is something as well. All Right, Dane, this

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one's for you. Jason wants to hear about the centers

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and guards in this class. We've talked a lot about

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the tackle position. We've talked a lot, of course about

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends in the defense, but we haven't really

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>talked a whole lot about those centers in those guards.

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So tell me just kind of a general synopsis of

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>what you think of that interior offensive line. I think

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good group. I think that, you know,

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>starting with the first round and working all the way

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>through the drafts, there's a center or guard, multiple guards

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that you could draft and add to this team that

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to give you immediate depth and im possible

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>future starter. So I'm a big fan of what both

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>positions have to offer. A guy like Kendrick Green from

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Illinois who isn't talked about a lot, but this guy's

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a top one hundred pick all day long. He had

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding pro day yesterday. His movement skills are outstanding.

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>He could play center, he could play guard. Quinn Miners

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 1>from Whitewater, I think he's only he probably wouldn't even

0:40:58.400 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>make it to the Cowboys third round pick. I think

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going top sixty. But even in a Day three,

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, a guy like Drew Dolman from Stanford would

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>be a good pickup. Notre Dame's got a couple of

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>guards with Aaron Banks and Robert Hanzy that I think

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be quality pros. You know, I really like

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioned talking about tight end. How you know

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, top one hundred guys and then

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>late guys, and like the middle class was missing with

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 1>my guards this year, I've got a lot of guys

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the top one hundred. I think have ten guys

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in the top one hundred, and then I've got like

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>eight guys between rounds four and five, and then I

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>don't really like the late rounders. So I love the

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>depth of this guard and center group. So if that's

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a position they want to attack, they're gonna have options

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Jeff, I hate the offensive line. I'll tell

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you that. I remember that I was typing down. I

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was typing down names as Dane was saying, I'm just

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>to use the list together because I have watched the

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>first couple of round guys and um, like for the Cowboys,

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't viewed as a big position of needs. So

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not all that deep into it yet, but I

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>do like some of the guys that I've seen. I

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>think the Ohio State guy is solid. I think the

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Alabama Giant man, Deontay Brown, he's interesting. I don't think

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 1>he really fits here, but I think he's fun. Clemson's

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>tackle I think might be a guard. Leatherwood and Alabama

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think might be a guard. I think the offensive

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 1>line group based on what I've seen, I like, if

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you need an offensive lineman this year, I think you're

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a good ship. Well. And that's that's a good point

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of my guard rankings a lot of

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>more former tackles. With Elijah Vera Tucker from USC he's

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the top guard in this class in my opinion. He

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>played left tackle this past year. Jalen Mayfield from Michigan

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>played right tackle, but I think he's I think he's

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>best inside a guard, Alex Leatherwood, like Jeff mentioned and

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Carman. So that that's a part of what makes

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this guard class really really intriguing. So I

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>throw out a question to you, guys be Oddish at center.

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Do we see enough from him as a rookie that

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we think he's definitely the future or is it more

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of okay, well, he did enough to earn him one

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>more year to figure him out. I mean, what do

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 1>we think about him long term? I think you're going

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in with him as the starter. And I'll tell you this,

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this applies to multiple guys on the roster.

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>If you think that there's a guy available that can

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>beat that guy out at the right value spot. I

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>apply to Donovan Wilson too. I love what we saw

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from him last year. But if you just could magically

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>put Jeremiah usu Cormo on this team, he's taken Donovan

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's job. Yep. If you get to the second or

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>third round and you think that there's a center on

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the board that's going to step in and beat Beyodish

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>out for that job, then you pick him. And I

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>would have no problem with that. Again, I think the

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>draft is about value. If you run into a spot

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>where you think center is the best value and he's

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the best player available, and you believe he'll walk in

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and start for you, be honest, hasn't done anything to

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 1>make me not want to do that. I think what

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>thing too we've seen here is that they're the cowboys,

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes reactionary and kind of look at recent history

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, and there's a couple things that

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder. I wonder, if you know, seeing the Connor

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Williams type of left guard makes them want to go

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>more to a bigger, mawling type. You know, just a

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>guy who plays with a little more power. And I

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>also even wonder about, like where they draft that guy,

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>if that side maybe turn them off to like a

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>sicker round offensive lineman. I know that's a bit of

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a leap and a kind of a broad thing to say,

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you follow their history. We know they're

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>comfortable taking first round offensive lineman. But like there's some

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>guys like I'm interested in, like Royce Newman from Ole,

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>miss who can play all five spots on the line

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:54.959
<v Speaker 1>because the cow was quite frankly, They've got some guys

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>who they just need to figure out. Yeah, Connor Williams

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is kind of being one of them, And I'm comfortable

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>if there's an injury to one of the tackles, I'm

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>comfortable saying that Zach Martin is one of those guys.

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't They'll say right guard, plug him in, But

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like I think I feel comfortable is Zach Marker to

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>play right tackle a guy I M not a good body, um,

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but you want a big guy. And I'm talking day

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>three here, we're pushing him back. Here, We're gonna like

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in a round four here. Aaron Bakes from Notre Dame.

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hate and there's there's just something about the

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and forty pound guy. And again, it's not

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a good body, and it's not it's not always pretty.

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>He gets beat every once in a while, but when

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he does hit his target and finish, it's a it's

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a sight to be seen. And I just wonder if

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's something you might want to take a shot at

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>on day three, you know, in the draft. And I

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 1>actually think Banks, I think, if you want, you gotta

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>take him in the third round. I don't think you're

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it to the I don't think he's gonna

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>make it a top one hundred. Um. I think he's

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna go somewhere on day too. So if he's there

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in the third round, I think that's what you gotta do.

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>And another name was Ben Cleveland, Give it, give it?

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Can I have him in the fourth day? I think

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's borderline. You know, could go late three and maybe

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>still there in the fourth. I think, you know, it's borderline.

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I think, honestly, what I've heard from teams feedback on

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>him is they just want to be convinced that he

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>loves football, you know, kind of because he's a he's

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a big hunter, he's a big outdoors guy, like you know,

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>like there's some things that he loves doing that more

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>so than football, and so team just need to be

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>convinced that football's top on his priority list, which you know,

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm they're finding they're trying to figure that out that

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>answer during the process. Well, top on my priority list

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>right now is getting us to break so that way

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we can come back and hear Jeff Kavanaugh's different first, second,

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and third round scenarios. We're gonna talk about that and

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give you players, which one would you choose?

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a game of this or that when we return

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Sometimes nothing

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>beats Miller Light. The original light there proved with great

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>taste and only ninety six calories available for delivery. Celebrate

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>responsively Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, ninety six calories three

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:15.919
<v Speaker 1>point two cars for twelve ounces. The Cowboys Way, where

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>sixteen Hall of Famers and five championships shows us what

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>success looks like, Where turkey is always the second best

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>part of Thanksgiving Day, where we are all defined by

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>one single thing, the star, where we as fans know

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's our job to keep the tradition going. Bank of

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>America is proud to be the official bank of the

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys and to support the quest of living life

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty twenty Bank of America Corporation. Honey,

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>big news scary? Are you? Okay? Oh? I'm not Gary anymore.

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jackie Flash. What see? I want the latest smartphone.

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But the best deals are only for new customers. So

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to get a new customer deal, I change my name

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to Jackie Flash. Okay, But the best smartphone deals at AT

0:47:56.880 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>AT and T are for everyone, new and existing customers.

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That's huge. Then guess who's getting a deal? Is it

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Flash, Jackie Flash? It's not complicated at AT and

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>t Our best smartphone deals are for everyone. Restrictions apply.

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it att dot com for details? Before there was

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a draft. You get sized up a cowboy by three

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>simple factors. The crease in his hat, the bend of

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.720
<v Speaker 1>his brim, and his unbending attitude. A man. Stetson didn't

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just protect him from what life threw at him. It

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>made with pride right here in Texas. There's still the

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:38.399
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest Hwitt Stetson dot com slash Cowboys. Sometimes

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing beats the classic Miller Light, the original light beer

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>brewed with great taste and only ninety six calories available

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for delivery. Celebrate responsively Miller brewin Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ninety

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>six calories three point two cars for twelve ounces. Is

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show Final ten minutes

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or so Here The Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get into this really quickly because I do want

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to hit all of these. It's a lot of fun

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:17.439
<v Speaker 1>from Jeff Cavanall. He orchestrated three different scenarios of positions,

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and then for each position group that you would potentially

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>choose in the first, second, and third round, it would

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be three different types of players, or maybe even more

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>than that. So we're gonna start things off corner in

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the first round, safety next, and then moving on to

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle, which in my opinion, I think is the

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>most likely of the three. Even though the Cowboys haven't

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>taken a safety in the first or second round since

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two. But we've got the options up

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 1>on the screen here, Jeff, what is your thinking with

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this position group one through three? Okay? So to me,

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the point of the exercise is trying to take three

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>positions that the Cowboys reasonably need that could be their

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>first three picks, and then draw me a map of

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>what that draft could look like so that everybody who's

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>listening or watching can see, Okay, if you went this

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>route and then this position and then this position, or

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what if I put that one first and then this

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.919
<v Speaker 1>one was third, and so just drawing out different maps

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to see what the draft looks like based on the

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>depth of each of those positions and which ones you

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>would like the best. For instance, if you're going with

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a corner, a safety, and a defensive tackle, well here,

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the cornerback first. Would you rather have

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Curtan Richie Grant in the second provided you can

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>get him there? Your free safety? And then my guy

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Marlin Dane say his last name, that's pretty good, all right,

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he's my US, he's my USC nose tackle. So corner safety,

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>d tackle, I go Certan Grant to Apolotu. All right,

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 1>remember that. Now let's take that same group of position,

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>but this time I'm gonna start with the safety. I

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a safety worth a top ten pick

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>unless you're calling Jokay a safety. So in this scenario,

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you're trading down to who cares nineteen twenty whatever. Right,

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>So in this scenario, you're taking Trevan Merrick. And in

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the second round, I'm gonna give you Elijah Molden the

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington corner, and you're getting a bonus of Jabril Cox,

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the LSU linebacker because you trade it down. And then

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you Ohio State defensive tackle Tommy Togi. I

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I knew there was an extra vowel sound Toga. And

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>so now that is the safety going first instead of

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the corner. Now let's make the defensive tackle go first.

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's another trade down because I'm not taking Christian

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Barmore in the top ten. But you get Christian Barmore,

0:51:56.480 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you Richie Grant again. I'm gonna give

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you a bonus of Georgia corner Eric Stokes because you

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>trade it down for Barmore, and I'm gonna give you

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Jaymin Davis, the Kentucky linebacker as the position that's not listed.

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:13.759
<v Speaker 1>But you had an extra pit because you traded down.

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So Sir Tan Grant Toy Polo to Marrig Moulden Cox,

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:28.360
<v Speaker 1>where's the extra vall again to togy I Barmore, Grant Stokes,

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Jaymin Davis, and around the room starting with Dane. Pick

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>your winner. Which one do you like the best? I

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>think the second one with the four um the chance

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to get it the four players with Marden Cox, Yeah,

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I feel really good about now. You know,

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 1>we have to make sure we have someone to play

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>outside corner because Moulden's more of that nickel corner um.

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the players that I'm getting, I

0:52:57.400 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like you can make it Stokes or alf if

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to just trade out a name for a

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 1>name that is a second round wow. Well, and it's

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:08.880
<v Speaker 1>tough because part of why I chose that because of Molden,

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because I like him so much as a player. But

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:14.440
<v Speaker 1>resigning Jordan Lewis is your and Lewis gonna be the

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>nickel probably. I mean, if I think what's gonna happen

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 1>is they're gonna draft a corner in the top ten,

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they're gonna have year five of Anthony Brown

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>versus Jordan Lewis and Anthony Brown's four and oh in

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>those battles so far, so we'll see. Yeah, and you're

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 1>probably right. So, I mean, just on the surface, that

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>second one would be I think the way I would go,

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your safety, you get a really talented corner,

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a good linebacker that can help you, especially on third down,

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and then a defensive tackle give you that defensive tackle depth,

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really good run player Kevin. Yeah. So I mean, look,

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>option one gives you Patrick Surtan, Richie Grant, and Marlon

0:53:56.840 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the defensive tackle from USC. What I would is, I'm

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>going with group three there, Jeff, with the trade down,

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>because how much more do you like Barmore over Marlin

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>compared to how much more do you like Curtan over Stokes?

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>And I like Stokes a lot because the safety on

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>those on the both of those combinations is Richie Grant.

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:21.359
<v Speaker 1>So Barmore or Certan is what you have. And then

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you have on the third part right there, Marlin or Stokes.

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty close. I know about how much I probably

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 1>like Barmore more than Marlin about the same that I

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like Certan over Eric Stokes, but you have a bonus

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of linebacker John and Davis. So yeah, I'm going with

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the third one right there. We're gonna get an extra

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:48.839
<v Speaker 1>lottery ticket. Four players. Eric Stokes plays outside for me,

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So I've got my outside corner, I've got my defensive tackle.

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I still get Richie Grant, who I coveted all along,

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and I get a linebacker to have fun with. So

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a fan of a group three there, Jeffrey.

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>See this is why jeff Cavanaugh is really good at

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 1>these exercises. Because I'm split. I have number one, so

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that means all three of us have picked a different

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:12.919
<v Speaker 1>selection here. And the reason why I'm picking number one,

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll make it quickly. But basically it just comes down

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to which position is a bigger need for me out

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of this draft class. Is it corner or is it

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:25.800
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle? Pick number three says or a corner is

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>not as big of a need as defensive tackle. Because

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Barmore is gonna go first, you'll still get Stokes. And

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I do like Stokes, but I like Sirtan a lot

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more than I like Stokes. And sure, I might only

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.959
<v Speaker 1>get three players. But if you're telling me you're giving

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 1>me a starting corner and then Richie Grant as a

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>starting safety, I think I would take that over maybe

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a depth piece in two PLOTU and I would ride

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with Neville Gallimore and I would ride with Tristan Hill

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 1>coming back as well. So I would pick number one.

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's I mean, I'm okay with any of these three.

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Like Jeff, I think this is a perfect perfect case

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys because if you get any of these three,

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're really really feeling good about your draft.

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Now let's go and move on to the next one

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, since we're running out of time. Offensive tackle,

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>who Jeff, Yeah, Jeff, which one real fast? Which Jeff doesn't?

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff doesn't pick. Jeff designed the game. So all right,

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:25.399
<v Speaker 1>offensive tackle, corner safety, offensive tackle, corner safety. All right,

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>here we go, so in different orders. So you're gonna

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 1>get an offensive tackle, you're gonna get into corner, You're

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a safety. Round one, your tackle goes first,

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Rashaan Slater, Richie Grant, and in the third round you're

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>taking either pauls and Adebo or Tyson Campbell, whichever corner

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you like. Better. Now I'm gonna take the corner first,

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Farley. In the second round, you get Alex Leatherwood.

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.360
<v Speaker 1>In the third round, you get whichever safety you like

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 1>between holland Cisco Washington. So there it is corner, tackle safety.

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Then a train down scenario takes safety first because we

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just can't do it without it. Marrig melofon Wu, your

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:10.839
<v Speaker 1>bonus is Dane, say, the Washington d tackle's last name.

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, you're getting owned Zerike is your bonus. And

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in the third round Walker little Stanford offensive tackle. So

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going safety first. Those are your three options. Man,

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that was tough. What is the five of the third scenario? Again? Who,

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Marrig melofon Wu owns Errick Walker little? Wow? Yeah, my

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:46.920
<v Speaker 1>initial My initial thought was one easy, Um Slater, Uh,

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know plug and play guard can play tackle. Um,

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>getting Tyson Campbell in the third would be a steal

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. Um who is the second oh, Richie Grant, Yeah,

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody loves her, So, I mean one sounds really really appealing.

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But the third one that that's piqued my interest here

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>well in getting that extra player is i mean, obviously

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the safety Trevann marry you feel good about that.

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Walker Little's got so much ability and he's got a

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 1>big discount sticker on him. Yeah, because he hasn't played

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the last two years, but he's so talented that you

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:31.640
<v Speaker 1>see a future starter. Oh man, that's tough. Yeah. First

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna take the first one. But it's like,

0:58:34.320 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you go to a restaurant, you order an

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>appetizer platter or you get You're like, hey, I got

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>my fried pickles and Trevanna Mary right there, I got

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 1>my outside corner. Those are those are my my cheese sticks.

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>We got a little sliders, got my sliders right there?

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And own Zerique and underrating people not talking about him

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>much because he hasn't been around. But the Southwestern Negroes

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 1>comes in and Walker a little like in two years,

0:58:56.840 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I like. I don't know if I want him starting

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>next year, but I like him as a development guy

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for one year just because he hasn't been around. That's

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>my player right there is number three. Now now I'm

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hungry things. Yeah, I know I'm starving. Yeah, I'm picking three.

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking three as well, even though I love Slater

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think number one is the more likely. I

0:59:16.720 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think number three would be more fun for me because

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I think Walker Little as a prospect would

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be something that you could develop down the line, and

0:59:23.360 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's perfect a tackle all right, Linebackers, safety, corner, Jeff Yes, Yeah, linebacker, safety,

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and corner. Group one Michael Parsons, Richie Grant, Paulson, Adibo

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or Dane. You can have Tyson Campbell. I'm letting you

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have a steal. Group two, Certan Jabril Cox, and your

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 1>third round safety it can be Washington, Cisco Holland and

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Group three Jeremiah Usu, Coromoa, Kelvin Joseph Kentucky corner. Or

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you can pick a different second round corner Jamon Davis,

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky linebacker. That's one, two and three. Parsons, Grant, Adbo,

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>certain and Cox, Washington, Jok, Joseph, David Scope. I'm taking one,

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Parsons, I'm taking Grant, I'm taking Tyson Campbell. Um.

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, and it all hinges on like a

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>persons being a good guy, which is up in the air.

1:00:18.040 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But as long as I'm comfortable with the character that

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that, that's That's where I'm going. Yeah. Same, Sorry,

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I would elaborate, but we're short on time, but I

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>agree first one. Mm. I'm thinking two guys. I don't

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>know why, but I like to a lot. Maybe Jeff

1:00:34.000 --> 1:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>talked me in on Washington. Do you like two because

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>two's the best? Yeah, Washington Two's hot. I don't know,

1:00:39.560 --> 1:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I might. I think I like too a little bit.

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Feeling crazy. Oh that's right. You don't pay great of

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, so I don't. I don't. I don't have opinions.

1:00:50.080 --> 1:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Go ACU ACU versus Texas, North Texas versus Purdue. Dane,

1:00:56.720 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you got a school in the fight this year? Uh,

1:01:01.400 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what what's basketball? What do you know? You don't know

1:01:03.480 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>where basketball is? It is draft Seas. What are we

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>doing college basketball? What do we do? It doesn't have

1:01:08.840 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a bracket. You've got a bracket? Oh man, I got

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>three brackets. No, unless you're talking about cover two. No,

1:01:17.760 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about bracket, no brackets whatsoever. For Dane Burglar,

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that means he's picking North Texas to run the table

1:01:24.040 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and win it all this year in March madness. That's

1:01:26.400 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna go for us here on the Draft Show. Thanks

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here over the last hour. I hope

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you learned something. I definitely learned something from these guys

1:01:33.840 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff can sure make a game that was fun.

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to do that again. Jeff, well done on

1:01:38.520 --> 1:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this or that. We'll be back on Tuesday with the

1:01:41.320 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>other crew. This crew back next Thursday, ten am Central

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Time for Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin kat Turner for Dan Burugler,

1:01:47.680 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Beating in the backup. Kyle Yeoman's so long.

1:01:50.120 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us on the Draft Show. This has

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the

1:01:56.160 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Ane