1 00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:08,080 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:11,200 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether at the grocery store or 5 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg pm L podcast on iTunes, 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:28,479 Speaker 1: SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I would like to 7 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 1: learn more about what we have actually learned about healthcare 8 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:36,520 Speaker 1: under President elect Donald Trump. There has been a lot 9 00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 1: talked about about possibly provisions of Obamacare that could be repealed. 10 00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 1: But but I want to dig into what we have 11 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:45,680 Speaker 1: learned so far. Susan Dvore, she's the CEO of Premiere. 12 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:49,080 Speaker 1: It is a company that advises on how to reduce 13 00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:53,040 Speaker 1: healthcare costs and improve outcomes at hospital systems around the country. 14 00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:54,880 Speaker 1: Here in the studio with us. Thank you so much 15 00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:57,040 Speaker 1: for being with us. Thank you. So what have we 16 00:00:57,080 --> 00:01:00,560 Speaker 1: actually learned about the concrete proposals that are likely in 17 00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: a Trump administration that could change the outlook for hospitals. Well, 18 00:01:04,319 --> 00:01:07,480 Speaker 1: we have heard over and over again repeal Obamacare, and 19 00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:10,800 Speaker 1: while I think that's legislatively pretty easy to do, the 20 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,840 Speaker 1: question is how do we not go back to what 21 00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:16,920 Speaker 1: we had before Obamacare? And how do we actually take 22 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:20,320 Speaker 1: waste out of the system, Have consumers involved in their 23 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:24,039 Speaker 1: health care pay for healthcare based on the value it's delivering. 24 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:28,399 Speaker 1: And so how do we replace Obamacare with something that works? Yes, 25 00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:32,480 Speaker 1: and before President Trump takes over, we still have a 26 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 1: few weeks left of the current Congress and administration. Can 27 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 1: we expect anything from this lame duck Congress or is 28 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:42,039 Speaker 1: it just write it off? At this point? There is 29 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 1: one really important thing that we Premiere think needs to 30 00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:48,760 Speaker 1: happen in the lame duck Congress, which is how do 31 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:53,240 Speaker 1: you make these healthcare systems interoperable? How do you have 32 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 1: your data as a patient, uh, get connected to all 33 00:01:57,320 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: the other pieces of data about you? So right decisions 34 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 1: are being made. You just talked about big data. Um. 35 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 1: The question of interoperability is in a bill could pass, 36 00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:08,799 Speaker 1: probably will pass, and could be done in the lame 37 00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 1: duck Congress that would move us forward uh faster. So 38 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:15,600 Speaker 1: basically would force hospital systems to get on a specific 39 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 1: grid to It would force vendors, It would force all 40 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 1: of these technology vendors to make their systems talk to 41 00:02:23,160 --> 00:02:26,400 Speaker 1: one another. It's like having an iPhone that that you 42 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 1: can't put any apps on today because none of it 43 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:31,120 Speaker 1: can be connected. They need to be forced to connect. 44 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: What's the counter argument? The counter argument that often they 45 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,920 Speaker 1: will make is that patient privacy issue. So you have 46 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:41,600 Speaker 1: to make sure you can protect the patient information and 47 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:45,639 Speaker 1: the price privacy, but allow the patient to have connected information. 48 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:48,600 Speaker 1: And if you really want to solve big health care 49 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 1: problems like the problem of stroke, the problem of diabetes, 50 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,240 Speaker 1: you need population based data, so you need to be 51 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:59,119 Speaker 1: able to connect the data at a population level as well. 52 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 1: So it's like for a lot of people out there, 53 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 1: the big question is we've seen our health insurance premiums 54 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:10,040 Speaker 1: go up year after year pretty alarming rates, and you know, 55 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:13,920 Speaker 1: you blame whoever you want on that um. President Trump 56 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:18,040 Speaker 1: has sort of promised to stop that um. But the 57 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,399 Speaker 1: question is something has to give in the whole chain there. 58 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:25,840 Speaker 1: Where do you expect the pressure to be uh focused 59 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:28,919 Speaker 1: in a Trump administration as far as lowering prices? What 60 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:32,240 Speaker 1: what sector of healthcare or the insurance industry do you 61 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:35,400 Speaker 1: expect to sort of come under the most scrutiny. Yes, 62 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 1: So there's no simple answer here, right, this is like 63 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,480 Speaker 1: a game of Jenga where you have all these interrelated 64 00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:43,000 Speaker 1: wooden pieces and if you pull one out at the 65 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:48,280 Speaker 1: wrong time, the whole thing collapses. Right. So the question is, well, 66 00:03:48,320 --> 00:03:51,440 Speaker 1: the question is, how do you have all the participants 67 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 1: in healthcare UH participate to to solve this problem. So 68 00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:01,400 Speaker 1: from the perspective of hospitals and physicians and provider delivery systems, 69 00:04:02,040 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 1: they are building value based systems. They're saying, pay us 70 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:12,040 Speaker 1: based on the clinical and economic value we deliver to consumers. 71 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:17,000 Speaker 1: Insurance companies have to take all of this regulatory reporting 72 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:22,000 Speaker 1: and all of this administrative paperwork out. Um, the suppliers 73 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:26,159 Speaker 1: and device companies have to find a way to help 74 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:30,400 Speaker 1: us curb the cost of high pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Well, 75 00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 1: you know, I'm looking at Tenant Healthcare's stock, which just 76 00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 1: plunged in the wake of UH Donald Trump's election as 77 00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:41,960 Speaker 1: the next US president. I'm wondering what traders are looking 78 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:46,360 Speaker 1: at right now that's making them so barish on hospitals. 79 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 1: I mean, what are they worried about in the in 80 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:52,480 Speaker 1: the new administration? You know, I think what they're missing 81 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 1: is they're viewing hospitals as hospitals and they're not viewing 82 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:00,279 Speaker 1: hospitals as health care systems, so a lot of hospit battles. 83 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:04,160 Speaker 1: Most of the hospitals across the country have employed physicians, 84 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 1: affiliated physicians, nursing home surgery centers, and they're taking care 85 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,719 Speaker 1: of populations, and they can move patients around into the 86 00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:15,640 Speaker 1: delivery system to optimize the value and to lower the cost. 87 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: If you look at a more pure hospital company, people 88 00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:24,280 Speaker 1: are worried about the external pressure on cost in the 89 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:28,039 Speaker 1: hospital setting. If you look at an integrated delivery system 90 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:31,480 Speaker 1: where they can optimize how the patient is taken care 91 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 1: of to lower the cost, that's a different thing. And 92 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 1: I think that people are are pretty shortsighted in just 93 00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:39,960 Speaker 1: the view of hospital in other words, just to sort 94 00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:42,320 Speaker 1: of give some specifics, in other words, having urgy care 95 00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 1: centers and specific neighborhoods are sort of getting targeting high 96 00:05:45,839 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: risk populations and getting them screenings earlier, and having these 97 00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:52,480 Speaker 1: sort of other programs to to your point that committize costs. Right, 98 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:55,840 Speaker 1: So if you look at health care systems in communities, 99 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 1: they're taking care of all these patients. These patients are 100 00:05:58,440 --> 00:06:00,640 Speaker 1: going to show up in their emergency rooms, show up 101 00:06:00,640 --> 00:06:03,160 Speaker 1: in their urgent care center, show up at their doctor's offices, 102 00:06:03,720 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 1: and so we have to move to a system where 103 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:10,040 Speaker 1: they're paid based on the value across the continuum of care, 104 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:13,159 Speaker 1: not go back to a view of the world that 105 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 1: you pay in silos. You pay a hospital silo, you 106 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 1: pay a nursing home silo, you pay a physician silo. 107 00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 1: And I think that's what the new replacement to Obamacare 108 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:27,120 Speaker 1: will continue to do. One of the elements of Obamacare 109 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 1: that created so much of the backlash was the notion 110 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 1: that employers be mandated to provide coverage. Um, do you 111 00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:37,480 Speaker 1: see that surviving Trump and and sort of what are 112 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:41,760 Speaker 1: how would you prioritize the changes we can expect under Trump? Yes, 113 00:06:41,839 --> 00:06:43,680 Speaker 1: so there are no free lunches. So you can take 114 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:46,560 Speaker 1: away the individual and the employer mandate. But if you 115 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 1: take that away, you've got to have a way to 116 00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:53,720 Speaker 1: incent consumers to have healthcare coverage and to have it continuously, 117 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:56,360 Speaker 1: because what you don't want is people staying out of 118 00:06:56,400 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 1: the system and then jumping in when they need healthcare. 119 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:02,279 Speaker 1: It's a very high cost way to do it. So 120 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 1: I think what the Republicans will do is they will 121 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:09,320 Speaker 1: incent consumers by what it cost you if you jump 122 00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: in versus what it costs you if you have continuous coverage. 123 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:15,600 Speaker 1: So I think there are all are alternatives to the 124 00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:19,640 Speaker 1: individual and employer mandate um that will drive continuous coverage. 125 00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:21,400 Speaker 1: But we've got to we've got to have a system 126 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:24,400 Speaker 1: where people have coverage. Thank you so much. That was 127 00:07:24,440 --> 00:07:26,840 Speaker 1: really fascinating. This is definitely one of the most important 128 00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 1: things to watch going forward, as as the population in 129 00:07:29,160 --> 00:07:33,000 Speaker 1: the US does get older and as people increasingly depend 130 00:07:33,080 --> 00:07:36,559 Speaker 1: on the health care system going forward, Susan divorce CEO 131 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:41,160 Speaker 1: of Premier, a company that goes into hospitals around the 132 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 1: country and hospital systems and all of the outlying businesses 133 00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: that are related in order to make sure that quality 134 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 1: is consistent and that costs are minimumized and that it's 135 00:07:51,760 --> 00:08:06,200 Speaker 1: made more efficient. For some more direction, I want to 136 00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:09,040 Speaker 1: bring a Mike Underhill, portfolio manager of the rich Worth 137 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:13,080 Speaker 1: Capital Innovations, Global Resources and Infrastructure Fund, to get some 138 00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:16,200 Speaker 1: sense of this. Mike, is it time to invest in 139 00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 1: real assets or is it time? Is there going to 140 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:20,480 Speaker 1: be sort of a slow waning of that as people 141 00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 1: cycle into stocks. Well, it's a great question. When I 142 00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 1: look at the world we're in today, we continue to 143 00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:32,679 Speaker 1: see investors posing questions around four themes volatility, uncertainty, complexity, 144 00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:36,319 Speaker 1: and ambiguity. And you look at volatility, complements and ets 145 00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:39,040 Speaker 1: other types of structured products. You look at the uncertainty. 146 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:40,959 Speaker 1: We've we've just passed the U S election, but we've 147 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 1: got other milestones of uncertainty. You've got an OPEC meeting 148 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 1: next week. You've got a bunch of different regulatory and 149 00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:51,040 Speaker 1: policy shocks that potentially we're going to be experiencing over 150 00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:54,480 Speaker 1: the next twelve months. The complexity and financial structures and 151 00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:56,839 Speaker 1: the markets. And then the ambiguity. You've seen it in 152 00:08:56,920 --> 00:08:59,480 Speaker 1: the bond market and you've seen it with the steepening 153 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:03,360 Speaker 1: of the yield. So what we're starting to see both 154 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:05,760 Speaker 1: in the equity markets and fixed income markets, you're seeing 155 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,679 Speaker 1: a need for more real asset income. And so investors, 156 00:09:08,720 --> 00:09:12,439 Speaker 1: institutional investors and also individual investors are really focusing on 157 00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:15,320 Speaker 1: what's going on with the reflationary trade. As I said, 158 00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:17,760 Speaker 1: we've we've gone past the US elections now where we've 159 00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:19,680 Speaker 1: removed some of that uncertainty. We look at some of 160 00:09:19,679 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 1: the fiscal policy things like infrastructure investment, a potential investment 161 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:27,679 Speaker 1: package of upwards of one trillion dollars of infrastructure benefits 162 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:31,839 Speaker 1: Companies that are in the materials think base metals and steel, 163 00:09:31,880 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 1: but you know gold and oil in particulars. Go back 164 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:35,640 Speaker 1: to your question. I look at gold, it's more of 165 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 1: a it's a currency plan, and you look at the 166 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:39,319 Speaker 1: basement of the US dollar, and you look at the 167 00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:42,320 Speaker 1: volatility and uncertainty in the market. Goals a great investment. 168 00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: The other question you had about oil, it's the largest, 169 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 1: most liquid commodity in the world, and you look at 170 00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:50,280 Speaker 1: the least amount of spare capacity the OPEQUE meeting and 171 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:53,520 Speaker 1: the positioning going into the OPEC meeting, Oil is trending 172 00:09:53,559 --> 00:09:56,080 Speaker 1: towards fifty five a barrow, possibly sixty by the end 173 00:09:56,120 --> 00:09:58,560 Speaker 1: of the year. I'm like, I'm looking at some of 174 00:09:58,600 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 1: the giant moves we've seen. I'm looking at copper right 175 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:08,000 Speaker 1: now up uh rally started before the election, but towards 176 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:13,640 Speaker 1: mid October it's up that much. Uh SMP industrial stocks 177 00:10:13,679 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 1: about nine this month. Has the optimism about this stimulus 178 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:24,400 Speaker 1: spending gotten a little ahead of itself. I think all 179 00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 1: that very valid points. I think what you're seeing is 180 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:31,640 Speaker 1: a few things. You're seeing a rotation out of defensive names. 181 00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 1: So thank utilities and reats and and telco type companies. 182 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 1: You know, those equity income place into more cyclicals and 183 00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:41,920 Speaker 1: so names like you look at Southern Copper and you 184 00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:43,559 Speaker 1: look at some of the other names like US Steel, 185 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 1: beneficiaries of the industrial and manufacturing renaissance that's going to happen. 186 00:10:48,960 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 1: Have they gotten ahead of themselves? I would say they 187 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 1: have not. Actually, when you look at what's gone on, 188 00:10:53,400 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 1: a lot of money has come off the sidelines. You've 189 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:59,160 Speaker 1: seen short covering and copper, You've seen short covering in steel. 190 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:01,520 Speaker 1: You look at iron ore and things like that. Some 191 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:04,400 Speaker 1: of these names are up in the last month. They're 192 00:11:04,400 --> 00:11:06,160 Speaker 1: going to take a breather. You're gonna see some trades 193 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:08,200 Speaker 1: and people do some short term profit taking. If you 194 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:12,840 Speaker 1: look at the longer term secular trends, there's a trend 195 00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:15,480 Speaker 1: towards this not only infrastructure stimulus, but you're going to 196 00:11:15,559 --> 00:11:18,520 Speaker 1: see more manufacturing and production. So I think the trend 197 00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,080 Speaker 1: line is very bullish, particularly for copper and some of 198 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:22,679 Speaker 1: the base metals. And when you look at what's going 199 00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:25,280 Speaker 1: on in China, you know there's an industrial base there 200 00:11:25,280 --> 00:11:29,240 Speaker 1: that's starting to recover, albeit slowly. Are there any sectors 201 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:33,079 Speaker 1: were commodities that have people have missed that they should 202 00:11:33,080 --> 00:11:37,319 Speaker 1: have loaded into recently but but haven't taken off. Well, 203 00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:39,480 Speaker 1: I look at timber. Timpers at a great example. If 204 00:11:39,520 --> 00:11:41,240 Speaker 1: if you look at a company like wire house or 205 00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:44,240 Speaker 1: it's a timber reat, you know you can you can 206 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:47,280 Speaker 1: get access to timber. And when you look at timber 207 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:50,760 Speaker 1: as a commodity, you've got deforestation and climate change, and 208 00:11:50,760 --> 00:11:53,200 Speaker 1: you've got things like in British Columbia the Mountain pine 209 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,280 Speaker 1: beetles killed one of every three trees in BC, and 210 00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:58,880 Speaker 1: so you've got decreasing supply of timber as a commodity. 211 00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:02,319 Speaker 1: You've got increasing to man. You've seen most recently existing 212 00:12:02,360 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 1: home sales five point six million. That's that's significantly over 213 00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:08,920 Speaker 1: the five point four four expected. And so the autumn 214 00:12:08,920 --> 00:12:11,280 Speaker 1: revival of housing market is there for not only existing 215 00:12:11,280 --> 00:12:14,120 Speaker 1: but you look at single family starts in October sixty 216 00:12:14,160 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 1: nine thousand, So you know timber commodity price inflation, decreasing 217 00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:22,040 Speaker 1: timber as a commodity, increasing demand. So that's the definition 218 00:12:22,040 --> 00:12:24,880 Speaker 1: of commodity price inflation. Wirehouse is a great way to 219 00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:26,920 Speaker 1: play it. You get some divided income while you wait 220 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 1: as well as you get some good upside and leverage 221 00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:32,720 Speaker 1: to the US single and multifamily housing recovery. You know, Mike, 222 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:37,480 Speaker 1: I'm looking at a story right now about the priorities 223 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:41,559 Speaker 1: laid forth by President elect Donald Trump, and this Baron's 224 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:44,480 Speaker 1: reporter is noting that he really did not talk about 225 00:12:44,520 --> 00:12:49,319 Speaker 1: infrastructure spending very much, and that currently in the markets 226 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:53,560 Speaker 1: there is sort of a reduction and expectations for what 227 00:12:53,720 --> 00:12:56,440 Speaker 1: some of his infrastructure plans may be a let alone 228 00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:59,440 Speaker 1: what he might actually get across. I mean, hasn't one 229 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: of the the main drivers of the UH take up 230 00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:06,760 Speaker 1: in commodities, with the exception of gold, hasn't it been 231 00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:10,480 Speaker 1: really driven by these infrastructure expectations And how much could 232 00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:13,600 Speaker 1: there be a sort of decline in commodities should there 233 00:13:13,640 --> 00:13:17,400 Speaker 1: be some disappointment on this front. Well, again, good question there, 234 00:13:17,400 --> 00:13:20,920 Speaker 1: and I would say it's it's not just the infrastructure 235 00:13:21,080 --> 00:13:24,600 Speaker 1: the potential infrastructure spending, because I think whether if it 236 00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:28,640 Speaker 1: was Trump or or Hillary Clinton, you're looking at infrastructure 237 00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:31,760 Speaker 1: as being one of the last great ways you can 238 00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:34,960 Speaker 1: stimulate the economy because you look at monetary policy and 239 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:38,679 Speaker 1: artificially low rates that experiment over the last decade, you know, 240 00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:42,160 Speaker 1: we've run the course on on monetary policy, fiscal policies 241 00:13:42,200 --> 00:13:46,240 Speaker 1: and next logical progression. You've seen it in Australia, You've 242 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:48,280 Speaker 1: seen it in the UK over the last thirty years, 243 00:13:48,280 --> 00:13:51,600 Speaker 1: what they've done with fiscal spending and investing in infrastructure. 244 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 1: There's a multiplier effect, and so infrastructure plus some of 245 00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:58,400 Speaker 1: these tax cuts financed via deficit. You know, infrastructure investment 246 00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:05,120 Speaker 1: both economic infrastructure, energy, utilities, transportation, as well as social infrastructure, 247 00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:08,240 Speaker 1: so think about schools and hospitals. There's a multiplier effect 248 00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:10,720 Speaker 1: that creates jobs as well as it it increases the 249 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:15,319 Speaker 1: overall GDP and economic output. Has the base metal commodity 250 00:14:15,360 --> 00:14:19,200 Speaker 1: trade has it has its out outlasted the short term trade? 251 00:14:19,360 --> 00:14:21,960 Speaker 1: I don't think so. I think what you're seeing is 252 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:25,800 Speaker 1: there's short term speculation as well as short covering by 253 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 1: some hedge funds in the material space. And admittedly, if 254 00:14:28,640 --> 00:14:31,200 Speaker 1: you were to look at natural resources and medals in 255 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:34,640 Speaker 1: two thousand fifteen, a year ago, some of those asset classes, 256 00:14:34,680 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: some of those companies were down, so the asset class 257 00:14:38,680 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 1: was washed out. You've seen a reversion of the mean, 258 00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: and that's started in February, really February eleventh, two thousand 259 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 1: and sixteen, when you saw oil and equity sort of 260 00:14:47,280 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 1: hit their technical market bottom. We saw the dead cat bounce, 261 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 1: and then you've seen this. This fits and starts of volatility. 262 00:14:53,240 --> 00:14:56,120 Speaker 1: So it really started. Natural resources and material started ramping 263 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:59,200 Speaker 1: up an energy in February sixteen, so this started quite 264 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 1: some time ago. But I think again, you're gonna see 265 00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 1: volatility as well as significant upside, So it's not going 266 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:07,520 Speaker 1: to be a smooth ride, right. Mike Underhill, portfolio manager 267 00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 1: of the Ridgeworth Capital Innovations, Global Resources and Infrastructure Fund, 268 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:14,880 Speaker 1: on the outlook going forward for commodities of all type, 269 00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:18,000 Speaker 1: of all types. And Lisa brown Woods. Uh, Mike Reagan 270 00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:20,800 Speaker 1: here with me today Bloomberg calumnist filling in for Pim Fox, 271 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:36,680 Speaker 1: who's on vacation. This is Bloomberg. I'm seeing people smile now, 272 00:15:36,880 --> 00:15:40,760 Speaker 1: clients of mine where I didn't even know they had teeth. 273 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:45,720 Speaker 1: That is a quote in a story, truly phenomenal story 274 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:49,520 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg by Max Abelson and Tacan Campbell. Uh. 275 00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:51,760 Speaker 1: And Lisa brown Woods here with Mike Reagan filling in 276 00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:56,240 Speaker 1: for Pim Fox. Max Abelson, really great read. What are 277 00:15:56,280 --> 00:15:59,040 Speaker 1: you hearing from these Wall Street types at this point. Lisia, 278 00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: First of all, thank we're saying that about the story. Second, well, 279 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:03,680 Speaker 1: I have to give full credit to Dacon Campbell and 280 00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:07,120 Speaker 1: my colleague forgetting that awesome quote. I always I was 281 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 1: proud of my ability to get good quotes, but that 282 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 1: one is like, that was pure Deacon. When he showed 283 00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:14,160 Speaker 1: that to me, I was so excited because what we 284 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:17,920 Speaker 1: were interested in finding out was how these guys are 285 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:21,640 Speaker 1: viewing Trump after he spent like months just openly mocking them. 286 00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:26,440 Speaker 1: Trump Trump called bankers, um at Wall Street people, hedge 287 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:29,080 Speaker 1: for managers, you know, basically the members of like a 288 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:34,040 Speaker 1: criminalistic cabal. And you know, it took them. They told 289 00:16:34,080 --> 00:16:36,680 Speaker 1: us like basically twenty minutes, you know, the twenty minutes 290 00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:40,040 Speaker 1: after the election, they were sad that Hillary Clinton didn't win, 291 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 1: you know, the Clinton supporters that is. And then they 292 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:45,400 Speaker 1: moved on because at least they think, you know, they're 293 00:16:45,400 --> 00:16:47,280 Speaker 1: they're made in the shade that their industries is gonna 294 00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:50,920 Speaker 1: be deregulated, their taxes are gonna go down, and uh 295 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:53,200 Speaker 1: it's gonna Trump is gonna help usher in this like 296 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:56,360 Speaker 1: free willing new era. So Max, what are they basically 297 00:16:56,400 --> 00:17:00,760 Speaker 1: anticipating just the complete destruction of Dodd Frank. I mean, 298 00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:04,160 Speaker 1: is that is that a realistical I think that anyone 299 00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:06,920 Speaker 1: on Wall Street or or or anywhere else who thinks 300 00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:09,200 Speaker 1: they know what's gonna happen like under President Trump, is 301 00:17:09,760 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 1: you know, really is going to have to be surprised. 302 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:17,200 Speaker 1: Because I feel like we was very diplomatic. I was about, yeah, 303 00:17:17,240 --> 00:17:20,200 Speaker 1: you know, look, people have had the wrong idea about 304 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:22,359 Speaker 1: this guy for a really long time, going back to 305 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:25,640 Speaker 1: when he basically was nearly ruined in the early nineties 306 00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:27,359 Speaker 1: and managed to bounce back is a sort of like 307 00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:30,480 Speaker 1: new reality figure, and then of course during the primaries, 308 00:17:30,520 --> 00:17:32,639 Speaker 1: of course during the presidential run. But I think that 309 00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:36,400 Speaker 1: to answer your question, there's an expectation because he's said 310 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:39,680 Speaker 1: so that a lot of Dodd Frank is going to disappear, 311 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 1: is going to be rolled back. Now. The thing that 312 00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:43,920 Speaker 1: we also have to talk about that's kind of complicates 313 00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 1: all this is that he's also said totally contradictory things. 314 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,200 Speaker 1: He suggested that, for example, like glass Stagel will come back, 315 00:17:51,320 --> 00:17:54,320 Speaker 1: or at least that is literally in the Republican platform 316 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 1: for for this year. So what's giving bankers confidence that 317 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,440 Speaker 1: Donald Trump had been station will be positive for Wall Street. Well, 318 00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:05,000 Speaker 1: came up during my interviews UM and and interviews that 319 00:18:05,040 --> 00:18:09,640 Speaker 1: Dacan Campbell, My colleague ran, is this you had as 320 00:18:09,680 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 1: the closing ad for Trump's campaign that remember that image 321 00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 1: of Lloyd Blank fine uh and Donald Trump's voiceover was like, 322 00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 1: you know, a a criminal group is trying to steal 323 00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:23,800 Speaker 1: your money. Um. By the Friday after the election, the 324 00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:25,960 Speaker 1: team that was in charge of Trump's transition, that is 325 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:30,280 Speaker 1: in charge of Trump transition included Golden sax Alum, Steve Bannon, 326 00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:35,480 Speaker 1: Goldman sax Alum, Steve Manuchin, Goldman sax along Lam, Anthony Scaramucci. 327 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:37,680 Speaker 1: So he is surrounding himself with these people and I 328 00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:40,560 Speaker 1: think that's incredibly comforting. And then you know, even beyond 329 00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:43,159 Speaker 1: who's going to be Treasury Secretary, Zach Mider and I 330 00:18:43,160 --> 00:18:44,919 Speaker 1: wrote that long profile about Steve Manuch and it's kind 331 00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:46,159 Speaker 1: of it's kind of feeling like it's going to be 332 00:18:46,240 --> 00:18:50,440 Speaker 1: him Treasury secretary. Side my colleagues UM, Jesse Hamilton and 333 00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:53,120 Speaker 1: Robert Schmidt had a great story today that folks should 334 00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:56,760 Speaker 1: read as well. That's basically about Wall Street licking their 335 00:18:56,760 --> 00:19:01,600 Speaker 1: lips to UM expecting that Tarulah. Of course that at 336 00:19:01,640 --> 00:19:04,760 Speaker 1: the FED is going to sort of be out of 337 00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:07,440 Speaker 1: the unofficial role that he's kind of been in over 338 00:19:07,600 --> 00:19:08,960 Speaker 1: the last couple of years, and that they'll have a 339 00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:12,280 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve Vice chairman overseeing Wall Street who's like incredibly 340 00:19:12,280 --> 00:19:14,680 Speaker 1: sympathetic to bankers. That that's that's what Schmith's story is. 341 00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:16,520 Speaker 1: You know, how much of a surprise really is this? 342 00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:20,400 Speaker 1: I mean, isn't this always what people suspect that presidential 343 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:23,760 Speaker 1: candidates will sort of talk a hard line on Wall Street, 344 00:19:23,760 --> 00:19:25,560 Speaker 1: then they'll get into office and they'll forget everything. And 345 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:29,639 Speaker 1: isn't that the sort of classic cliche, you know the differences. 346 00:19:29,720 --> 00:19:33,360 Speaker 1: I think that Reagan and Bush one and Bush two 347 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:38,840 Speaker 1: came in with, um, you know, nothing but but mostly 348 00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:42,560 Speaker 1: nice things to say about the financial services industry. Um, 349 00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:44,719 Speaker 1: this is the old guy over here. We would remember 350 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:49,080 Speaker 1: if George W. Bush was insulting Wall Street, had to 351 00:19:49,119 --> 00:19:57,040 Speaker 1: go there with the old guy. Listen. I'm I think 352 00:19:57,080 --> 00:20:02,000 Speaker 1: it's fair to say that even um, you know, even Obama, 353 00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:04,520 Speaker 1: even Obama when he took over at the height of 354 00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:08,680 Speaker 1: financial crisis, didn't have nearly the same kind of populous 355 00:20:08,720 --> 00:20:11,919 Speaker 1: tone that that that Donald Trump had. So on the 356 00:20:11,960 --> 00:20:17,359 Speaker 1: one hand, you always expect Republicans and frankly even Democrats 357 00:20:17,400 --> 00:20:19,679 Speaker 1: to be much softer on Wall Street because of the 358 00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:22,040 Speaker 1: financial power of Wall Street. But and and and then 359 00:20:22,040 --> 00:20:24,119 Speaker 1: of course people are disappointed. But but then on the 360 00:20:24,160 --> 00:20:28,040 Speaker 1: other um, you know, Donald Trump is is just so inconsistent. 361 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:29,720 Speaker 1: It's just so hard to hard to know what's gonna come. Max. 362 00:20:29,800 --> 00:20:31,800 Speaker 1: Let me ask you, from all the reporting you've done 363 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:34,520 Speaker 1: on Wall Street and Trump, and it's been excellent reporting 364 00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:37,200 Speaker 1: for for sort of a junior rookie reporter like yourself, 365 00:20:37,440 --> 00:20:40,480 Speaker 1: young a young man like yourself. Have you talked to 366 00:20:40,520 --> 00:20:43,440 Speaker 1: many bankers who have actually done business with Trump? And 367 00:20:43,840 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 1: is there a difference in perspective from those that have 368 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:48,719 Speaker 1: actually done deals with them and those that are just 369 00:20:48,880 --> 00:20:51,280 Speaker 1: you know, watching along like the rest of us. You know, 370 00:20:51,520 --> 00:20:55,159 Speaker 1: I think that um one real pity is that the 371 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:58,359 Speaker 1: City Group banker who was really in charge in the 372 00:20:58,400 --> 00:21:00,960 Speaker 1: early nineties passed away. I think she was actually hit 373 00:21:01,480 --> 00:21:05,240 Speaker 1: riding a bicycle just just before Trump's run really took off. 374 00:21:05,720 --> 00:21:08,439 Speaker 1: So well, we don't know, um. I would love to 375 00:21:08,440 --> 00:21:11,080 Speaker 1: know what she has to say about I think it 376 00:21:11,119 --> 00:21:14,080 Speaker 1: was sort of partially her decision to keep Trump alive, 377 00:21:14,119 --> 00:21:16,680 Speaker 1: to keep Trump above water um that they really could 378 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:18,800 Speaker 1: have brought him down, that he had skinning him, so 379 00:21:18,800 --> 00:21:20,680 Speaker 1: he basically could have had to go personally break right 380 00:21:21,240 --> 00:21:22,960 Speaker 1: rather rather than the company's going back roup. But but 381 00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:25,520 Speaker 1: I have whenever you speak to people who have done 382 00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:28,760 Speaker 1: business with them, they speak with it with incredible anchor 383 00:21:28,800 --> 00:21:31,840 Speaker 1: and sadness about about the betrayals that that they've had 384 00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:33,600 Speaker 1: to go through. There are people who love him, but 385 00:21:33,640 --> 00:21:35,120 Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who feel betrayed after 386 00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:50,600 Speaker 1: spending time working with Donald Trump. Donald Trum. We got 387 00:21:50,680 --> 00:21:54,120 Speaker 1: some home sales data this morning at ten am. Existing 388 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:58,719 Speaker 1: home sales came in higher than expected, just sort of 389 00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:03,159 Speaker 1: showing that there might just be momentum behind the housing market. 390 00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:06,320 Speaker 1: But is that momentum about to stall out? I want 391 00:22:06,359 --> 00:22:10,080 Speaker 1: to bring in Logan Mota Shoppi, a senior loan officer 392 00:22:10,119 --> 00:22:12,919 Speaker 1: at AMC Lending Group, to give us a little bit 393 00:22:12,920 --> 00:22:17,920 Speaker 1: of color. I'm forward leading indicators. Logan. When we look 394 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:22,400 Speaker 1: at existing home sales, that's a backward looking indicator. Correct, yes, 395 00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:25,879 Speaker 1: it's a backward indicating look indicator. But what what I 396 00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:29,399 Speaker 1: would uh emphasize today on the existing home sales report 397 00:22:29,720 --> 00:22:33,240 Speaker 1: is that existing home sales are at psycho highs, as 398 00:22:33,359 --> 00:22:37,880 Speaker 1: mortgage demand is at psycho highs, and the housing community, economists, 399 00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:41,920 Speaker 1: analysts and everybody has been telling people that low inventory 400 00:22:42,160 --> 00:22:46,720 Speaker 1: is holding housing back. It's exactly the opposite. All the 401 00:22:46,800 --> 00:22:50,600 Speaker 1: data showing demand is at psycho highs and home sales 402 00:22:50,680 --> 00:22:54,680 Speaker 1: are at psycho highs, and existing home sales UH what 403 00:22:54,720 --> 00:22:57,800 Speaker 1: we've seen as cash buyers have been falling, but mortgage 404 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 1: demand has been rising. But yet mortgage demand is basically 405 00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:05,640 Speaker 1: back to levels. And there's your issue with the home 406 00:23:05,680 --> 00:23:07,879 Speaker 1: sales in this cycle is that we don't have that 407 00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:11,840 Speaker 1: kind of strong demand curve, So we shouldn't be using 408 00:23:11,960 --> 00:23:15,520 Speaker 1: excuses as low inventory or tight lending that are holding 409 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:19,439 Speaker 1: sales back based on certain economists as metrics look, then 410 00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:22,840 Speaker 1: I'm wondering how elastic can we expect that demand to 411 00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:28,280 Speaker 1: be given the recent jump in UH interest rates. Mortgage 412 00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 1: rate have been higher in and twenty fifteen than where 413 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:36,000 Speaker 1: we are today. So when we look back at what 414 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 1: happened in was that mortgage rates were working from four 415 00:23:40,040 --> 00:23:43,240 Speaker 1: and a half percent levels, Existing home sales went negative 416 00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 1: year over year, New home sales had the biggest miss 417 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:47,719 Speaker 1: I've ever seen in twenty years, and an up cycle. 418 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:51,959 Speaker 1: So even though we could see sales be impacted, in 419 00:23:52,040 --> 00:23:55,879 Speaker 1: reality we only lost two hundred thousand homes at A 420 00:23:55,920 --> 00:23:59,159 Speaker 1: five point three million when rates were higher in t 421 00:24:00,600 --> 00:24:04,600 Speaker 1: UH sales still grew, but the rate of growth was impacted. 422 00:24:04,600 --> 00:24:06,120 Speaker 1: So I don't think it's going to be as big 423 00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:10,160 Speaker 1: as people think because demand is low already, so we're 424 00:24:10,200 --> 00:24:13,800 Speaker 1: not working from an elevated level to where UH low 425 00:24:13,880 --> 00:24:16,720 Speaker 1: rates were boosting home sales. This has been the worst 426 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:19,360 Speaker 1: demand curve we've ever seen world War two. Well, let's 427 00:24:19,359 --> 00:24:22,080 Speaker 1: talk about that. Why has demand for mortgages been so low. 428 00:24:22,320 --> 00:24:26,359 Speaker 1: Because the fundamental core backdrop you need for a housing market. 429 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:29,520 Speaker 1: For strong housing markets, you need good demographics. We we 430 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:32,600 Speaker 1: have terrible demographics for housing in this cycle, ages seventeen 431 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:35,240 Speaker 1: to twenty nine or massive, ages forty nine to sixty 432 00:24:35,240 --> 00:24:38,600 Speaker 1: five or massive. This is a renting profile. Second, you 433 00:24:38,600 --> 00:24:41,240 Speaker 1: have no more exotic loans in the system, so that 434 00:24:41,400 --> 00:24:45,560 Speaker 1: facilitates demand that's gone. Everybody has to have the ability 435 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:48,400 Speaker 1: to own the debt right now, That takes some demand off. 436 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:53,720 Speaker 1: Wait until years four when you have a higher ages 437 00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:57,520 Speaker 1: thirty one to thirty four in the systems. Either millennials 438 00:24:57,520 --> 00:25:00,040 Speaker 1: are buying but the millennials that are ages thirty in 439 00:25:00,119 --> 00:25:04,639 Speaker 1: the thirty four are buying ages of the biggest in 440 00:25:04,640 --> 00:25:07,320 Speaker 1: America right now, they're still too young to have a 441 00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:11,119 Speaker 1: strong housing market. Now. Are the homebuilders going to adjust 442 00:25:11,240 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 1: to the needs of millennials? Um? Is that part of 443 00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 1: what's keeping things in check to some degree that there 444 00:25:17,480 --> 00:25:20,560 Speaker 1: there there's not as many starter houses being built as 445 00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 1: perhaps there should be. The builders have been building bigger 446 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:25,800 Speaker 1: and bigger homes since nineteen seventy five. Back in nineteen 447 00:25:25,800 --> 00:25:28,600 Speaker 1: seventy five, medium square foot was about fifteen hundred. Today 448 00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:31,640 Speaker 1: it's over. They're not building because they can't really make 449 00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:33,840 Speaker 1: money off of them. So if you want new home 450 00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:38,160 Speaker 1: sales to go over eight nine hundred thousand, you're gonna 451 00:25:38,160 --> 00:25:40,440 Speaker 1: need to build smaller homes. This year was the first 452 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:43,919 Speaker 1: year that we saw median home sales price fall for 453 00:25:44,040 --> 00:25:46,520 Speaker 1: builders for the new home sales market. That is actually 454 00:25:46,520 --> 00:25:49,440 Speaker 1: a very bullish data line because that means they're building 455 00:25:49,480 --> 00:25:51,840 Speaker 1: more of the smaller homes and that's what you would 456 00:25:51,840 --> 00:25:55,719 Speaker 1: need to get more first time home buyers in that market. 457 00:25:56,320 --> 00:25:58,359 Speaker 1: Local Where do you think that we are in the 458 00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:01,800 Speaker 1: housing market? Site on the year, Well, it's this has 459 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:04,480 Speaker 1: not been a very strong cycle, so I wouldn't look 460 00:26:04,480 --> 00:26:08,520 Speaker 1: at economic cycles to work with housing. UH two thousand 461 00:26:08,600 --> 00:26:10,719 Speaker 1: eight to two thousand nineteen we're going to be soft, 462 00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:13,680 Speaker 1: but in the next decade you're going to have a massive, 463 00:26:13,800 --> 00:26:19,479 Speaker 1: massive UH demographic homeownership age bracket, but also you're going 464 00:26:19,520 --> 00:26:21,760 Speaker 1: to have your first time homeowners would be a lot better. 465 00:26:21,800 --> 00:26:25,440 Speaker 1: We've had over seven million loans delinquent because we had 466 00:26:25,480 --> 00:26:28,840 Speaker 1: people with exotic debt. The home buyers now in this 467 00:26:28,920 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 1: cycle are the best I've ever seen in my life. 468 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:33,359 Speaker 1: So the move up buyer is it's just been a 469 00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:37,880 Speaker 1: much more solid UH position to move up years down 470 00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:40,879 Speaker 1: the line. But now it's just been a very soft cycle. 471 00:26:41,000 --> 00:26:44,800 Speaker 1: Don't expect anything to really change until and is the 472 00:26:45,640 --> 00:26:49,320 Speaker 1: sort of maybe not the death but the definitely reduction 473 00:26:49,640 --> 00:26:56,520 Speaker 1: in adjustable rate mortgages. UM. That's something different in this cycle, 474 00:26:56,920 --> 00:26:58,640 Speaker 1: right that we won't have to sort of worry about 475 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:02,760 Speaker 1: we have we We do not have any exotic recasting 476 00:27:02,800 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 1: debt in scale. There's some home equity lines that are 477 00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:08,920 Speaker 1: going to recast, but we don't have this massive debt 478 00:27:09,000 --> 00:27:12,399 Speaker 1: leverage bubble as we did in two thousand seven. But 479 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:14,840 Speaker 1: one of the main points is that people forget. In 480 00:27:14,840 --> 00:27:18,320 Speaker 1: two thousand and seven, primate labor force growth peaked and 481 00:27:18,359 --> 00:27:20,720 Speaker 1: then it declined. We had we didn't have that in 482 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:23,720 Speaker 1: the nineteen eighties or the nineteen nineties. That is a 483 00:27:23,840 --> 00:27:27,639 Speaker 1: very big metric for housing. We're not going to have 484 00:27:27,720 --> 00:27:30,960 Speaker 1: that problem anymore. Primate labor forces is starting to grow again, 485 00:27:31,440 --> 00:27:34,280 Speaker 1: so we have no more adjustable rate risk in terms 486 00:27:34,320 --> 00:27:36,119 Speaker 1: of in big scale, There's always going to be a 487 00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:39,160 Speaker 1: few out there, but our demographics are starting to get stronger. 488 00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:41,800 Speaker 1: So the future of housing look actually looks a lot 489 00:27:41,840 --> 00:27:43,840 Speaker 1: stronger than it did from two thousand eight to two 490 00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:47,240 Speaker 1: thousand sixteen. Logan Mota Shami, thank you so much for 491 00:27:47,320 --> 00:27:50,560 Speaker 1: joining us senior loan officer at a MC lending group 492 00:27:50,600 --> 00:27:52,800 Speaker 1: talking about perhaps we shouldn't call it the housing cycle, 493 00:27:53,080 --> 00:28:01,280 Speaker 1: maybe just the housing plateau. Thanks for listening to the 494 00:28:01,280 --> 00:28:04,679 Speaker 1: Bloomberg pien L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to 495 00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:09,960 Speaker 1: interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. 496 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:13,520 Speaker 1: I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox. 497 00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:16,520 Speaker 1: I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one 498 00:28:16,800 --> 00:28:19,560 Speaker 1: before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on 499 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:20,359 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio,