WEBVTT - Thinking Sideways: The Kensington Runestone

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Thinking Sideways. I don't know. You never know. The story

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is of things we simply don't know the answer too. Hey, guys,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome to an episode of Thinking Sideways the podcast. An episode. Well,

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say another because maybe this is

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>their first good point. It's an episode. Yeah, I'm Devin,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by and and we're going to talk about

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>an unsolved mystery. In case that's not how you found us.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a big one too. It's you know what,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually think this one is really really interesting. It

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>is not so big, but it was heavy. Yeah. I

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>had a really hard time in the research of this.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Just there's so you and I talked about this earlier.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it? There's a lot of minutia in it, and

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I did I started to get ahead. Ye happen. Yeah,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the Kensington runestone today. R

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It's runestone. In eighteen nine, a Swedish immigrant named Olaf

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Allman found a two hundred pounds slab of sandstone also

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>called graystone because it's gray but it's sandstone, in Solemn, Minnesota.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It was found when he was clearing an area of

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>what some websites report is unclaimed, but upon further digging.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Was totally his property, but it was just kind of

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>an empty unreclaimed yeah, reclaimed maybe, um. But he was

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>clearing trees from it, and he fell a tree and

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:50.639
<v Speaker 1>there was a stone that was entwined in the roots.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Probably again the stories and I'm inclined to believe that

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it was entwined in the roots, but well, there's some

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence to show that there were roots growing against it,

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it was on the ground and they were directly

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>under or it was underground. It was it was underground,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't you couldn't see the top of it. You

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't see any part of it from the ground. But

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it was actually entwined in the roots or if

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of just nearby, hard to tell. And

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this is this is not like a oh the Internet retelling.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to tell. Literally, the three people that were

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there when I was discovered, none of them can agree,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Like they don't remember actually what day it was found,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or like what time of day or what exactly they

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>were doing or anything like that. One of those situations.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>One of those. So that's why you know, I witness

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>testimony is it's hard, Well, it's so varied. One person said, oh, yeah,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it was November eight, and the other one said, no,

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it was August eleven, right, eleven eight or eight eleven. Think, yeah,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell, so we're just gonna say I

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think it was entwined in roots in the fall of

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the Fall of eight. He named this stone after the

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>closest settlement, which was Kensington, because I thought Minnesota he was,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's like the county area. The closest settlement was

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>town Village. I guess it was very small, large settlement

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>with that grouping of people. The stone was covered in

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>ruins and was said to be from about thirteen sixty two.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry the year at thirteen sixty two. It apparently

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>tells the account of some Scandinavian explorers, and if this

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is the case, many of our listeners will have already

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>realized that means that these Scandinavian explorers managed to quote

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote discover right the New World like a hundred years

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>before Christopher Columbus, actually well over a hundred years because

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a little because I wait, if you think about Europeans

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>coming here, you know, like the British and everybody like that,

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they settled on the coast. But we didn't actually penetrate

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>as far into the interior. Is this for a long

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>time after that? Right? So yeah, so yes, you're right,

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred years before, way back. So the

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>stone inscription has been translated a number of different ways.

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to use the text that's on Wikipedia

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to start with, and then we'll talk about some of

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the discrepancies later. Got it. So this is our baseline.

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>This is our baseline. What I would say is pretty

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>much accepted as the translation. Uh, the sorry, and I

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>should mention the front of the stone and then one

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the sides of the stone are carved, so we've

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>got it's kind of a monolith in terms of shape,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a rectangle. We've got four faces too, you know,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the front and back that are larger, and then two

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>slimmer sides, and then the top and the bottom. Yeah yeah,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's nothing on top and nothing on top and bottom,

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing on the back one of the sides or the back,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but something on the well, I guess you know what

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>you'd call the front and one of the sides. Okay,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the front, then they is it the

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>right side? If you were looking directly at the inscription,

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's the right side. The left side, is it?

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think so? Okay. So the front says eight Gotlanders

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>or Swedes and twenty two Northmen or north Norwegian Norwegian.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>On this acquisition, journey from Vinland, far from the west,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we had a camp by two shelters. One day's journey

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>north from this stone, we were fishing. One day after

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we came home we found ten men red from blood

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and dead. Maria saved from evil. And then the side says,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>there are ten men by the inland sea to look

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>after our ships. Fourteen days journey from the peninsula or island,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>year thirteen sixty two, the inland see referring perhaps to

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the Great lakes. It's possible there's some theories

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>out there that actually this little parcel of land that

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>it was found on, it was found on an incline

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>or like a little grassy knoll area, and that it

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>could have it was kind of rounded by wetland's much

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>further away, but that at that time it could have

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>been that it was more of a wetland lake area,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so the waters had receded since receded, but that the

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>place that the stone was found was in fact a

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>small island on a small body of water, but it

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>could also be a great lake. It's not specified. I've

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>also seen stuff that to answer part of what your

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>question is is that to get there, they went north

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of the United States where our borders are, came in

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>through Canada, and then that runs you into the Great Lakes.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the name of the inlet or the

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>channel that you can use, but they use something like

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I mean, there is there was a

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>way to do that. I'm not sure that the lakes

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>naturally interconnected, and I should know this. You know, they

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>taught me the stuff, and I believe that for the

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>most part, they were maybe not enough to do large

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>shipping vessels like today. That was that man altered that.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But they were connected in some fashion, and so I

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think that that is the research that I was doing

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>about how did they get there. It's that the lakes

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>are loosely interconnected, and so they they theoretically could have

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>made their way. Doesn't explain where the stone was found,

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but it gets him into the area. Is yeah, that's

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a big kind of close to that area. And then

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>then they got to hoof it overland for quite a

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>long ways for me, A little ways for sure. So

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this stone was found and then kind of held onto

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and then allman kind of thought, well,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't know that it says it's from thirteen

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty two. This was This was his actual thought pattern.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>In case you guys were wondering, he wrote it down

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in his diary. He said, I don't know, like it

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>was kind of from I'm kidding. Sorry. When when he

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>found it was he able to read the ruins himself

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or decipher them. So this is kind of one of

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the things about this story that's interesting. Most of the

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>stories that you'll hear there's so there's two camps that

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you hear this story from, and they're both sure that

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they're right. One camp is this is a huge hoax,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>This isn't actually from that time. The other camp is, no,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this is real. And most of the people who say no,

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this is real, they say it was real because the

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who found it was totally illiterate, which is not

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the case. This this guy omen was actually he was

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a Swedish immigrant. He went to school in Sweden where

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>he would have learned runes. So word for word, perhaps

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>not were the US in common usage in the end

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the eighteen hundreds and Sweden. Still. Yeah, that's that's

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what I wasn't sure because I had seen some stuff

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that said he would have had books with runes, but

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have necessarily been reading. I mean, it wasn't the

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the number one of the languages, but they

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>were still it was still taught in school, kind of

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like cursive is still taught in the United States, but taught. Yeah,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>they still teach it. Yeah, So it's one of those

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>things right where it's like, well, nobody uses that, but

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you learn it. And well anyway, so he probably likely

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>would have been able to decipher at least some of it. Regardless.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It was an old stone he found on his property

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and he thought, hey, maybe we should get this assessed

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by somebody. So it was first assessed for authenticity by

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a professor at the University of Minnesota. And it's unclear

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>if this professor saw the actual stone, like they actually

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>took the stone to him to look at, or if

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>one of these copies of texts written copies of the

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>text were just sent to him. That would be a

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lot easier, and if it would be a lot easier,

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's been mentioned that most of the written copies

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of the text were kind of poorly and crudely done.

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Well were they handwritten copies or were they rubbing? I

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think they were handwritten copies, like somebody who sat down

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and tried to write them, and that it may have

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>been copied by somebody who didn't actually write rooms that

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>often or didn't know so that it seems to be

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely some speculation that, uh, the written copies of

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>these rooms were not good, maybe to the point of

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>detrimentally to people being able to tell if linguistically it

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was correct or not. And a lot of the copies

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>written copies of these have like very big differences in it, uh,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of discrepancies happening. So I think it's likely that

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he actually just saw a piece of paper. Um, but

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he dismissed it immediately. He said it was a really

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>poor attempt at forgery. And like I said, I can't

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>tell with accuracy if if he you know, saw the

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>paper or not, but if you saw the real thing, yeah,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if it was the paper, I I just want to say, like, well,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>how would he know? And professor of linguistics linguistics, yeah,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>specializing in um, Norse and Swedish, Scandinavian ruin and language studies.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>So he didn't like it. He didn't what next? Then?

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>The stone, the actual stone, as far as I can tell,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>uh In, was sent to Northwestern University. The opinion there

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as that while the stone itself was pretty weathered, the

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>inscription seemed to be lighter and done more recently. The

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>stone was photographed, and um, apparently some archaeological venture was

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>done kind of near where the stone was lightly but

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was any It wasn't like a

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>huge scale. They weren't, you know, thinking, oh, there's a

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>huge settlement here, we gotta dig six No. I think

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it was just kind of some slight excavation around where

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he said he found the stone, just to see. But

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he had been clearing the land, so it's not as

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>though he wasn't preserving it. You know, he didn't find

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the stone and go oh oh, no, I better stop

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>felling all these trees and make sure that somebody could

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>find something if there is anything. Oh yeah, I can

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>see A year later, Um, I think it was over there.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But that is literally what happened. I mean, they started

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 1>interviewing the three people right and as I said, like,

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't even agree on what month they had found it,

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>let alone where they had found it. So well, if

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>he's if he's working the land and he's clearing trees

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's changing the topography. I don't know if either

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of you have ever been to a construction site where

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they're doing major grade work. But you go on on

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>day one and you've got a good idea where things are,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and and then if you leave for a week, you're

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost because by the time you come back

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>everything has changed. But stretched that over the course of

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a year, and you just kind of keep getting used

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to it a little bit by a little bit and

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't quite remember where things were before. That's easy to

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why they had no idea where they found it.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>True that I don't know if they all saw. They

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't even see the ruins to begin with, right, I mean,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>when when they first covered the stone, you know they

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>saw they saw they did, actually they saw a part

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of it and they tried to clear This is another

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that affects the They the ruins on the side

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>were cleaned off with a nail. They just took a

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>nail and scraped away, which would obviously alter the ability

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually accurately date when that had happened. Um, and

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason that they had a different

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>color because they were freshly scraped. So again it's you know,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell with that if they just did

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a really good job scraping the runes Queen so they

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>could see what was going on or what happened there. Regardless,

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing was reported to be found from this excavation, exploration,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it. And the stone was

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>returned to Omen in March of eight and since everybody

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>said it was pretty much just worthless, it wasn't really

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>an artifact. It was you know, totally fake. He just

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>used it as a stepping stone, uh, like the kind

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of entryway stepping stone to his granary. Just stuck it

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>right in there, ruins down. He wasn't treading on the runes,

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but he did. He just used it as a as

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the entry stone. Well the backside is the flat side, Yeah,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so of course they'd be the one he uses a

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>step Yeah, so he just did that. Yeah, don't get

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>no respect. Yeah, so interest waned in this rude stone.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But it had been kind of a big media you know,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>been shipped around a little bit. Yeah, but there, you know,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there had been some newspaper articles. It had been kind

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of a big deal. Everybody said, that's a hoax. And

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, all right, fine, it's a hoax. I'm going

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to use it as a stepping stone. A historian. Mr.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Holland was investigating the possibility of a Norwegian settlement in

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and became aware of the stone and became, of

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>course very interested in the stone as it might provide

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>some I don't know, evidence or something like that. So

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>he uh went over to the Kensington area and spoke

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with Almond about the stone, um, and they pulled it

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground and he examined it, and at

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>about this time, the Minnesota Historical Society decided, Oh, I

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>guess we'll investigate this too. Okay, guys, oh I guess

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we should because it's popular again, Yeah, that people are.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Holland got interested in it, he kind

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of really drummed up a lot of support for it,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for its authenticity. He he thought it was real really

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of from the get go, you know, it was

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of those confirmation bias things where he

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he thought, oh, yeah, the Norwegians totally settled this area

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>way earlier than we think. And then he heard about

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the stone and he said, see, it's totally it's real.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course that's real, because I've been thinking this thing

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and now I found some proof for it. The Minnesota

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Historical Society hired a man named Newton Winchell, and he

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>started collecting Affidavid's from the people who were there when

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the stone was found and then also family and friends. Yeah. Yeah,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to, you know, collect the stories of

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it and see if maybe they had created this forgery

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Uh. And he was also a geologist,

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so they thought that he would probably be a pretty

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>good person to carry out this investigation. I don't I

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know why, but he interviewed a lot of locals

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as omens family, and interviewed Holland and some linguists.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And the linguists pretty much to a one said no,

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a hoax. But Holland and Witchell,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we're both really convinced that it was real. For a

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>number of reasons that will lay out in a couple

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of minutes. Holland and Winchell definitely thought it was real.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The reason that they think it's real is because linguists

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>by and large are saying that this, the language used

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on this stone is not consistent with with eleventh century

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Scandinavian grammar, which is fair. The linguists were saying that

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a poor forgery of eleventh century Scandinavian grammar,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, uh, it should be fourteenth century. So

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not totally sure why it's the eleventh century that

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about in terms of grammar. And you know,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>as we know, language is a living thing, so it

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>does change. It allows people to be able to pinpoint

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and say this is when this language is from, based

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on the slang or the way that grammars used, or

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>cases or things like that in some In some languages,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that is true, I know, for both the written and

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the verbal form. For some other languages, though, I know

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that though the spoken version may you know, ebb and

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>wane back and forth and change, the written version is

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not to make a pun here, but it's set in stone.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>It is one way. This is how it's done, and

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not built to be flexible, and it's not allowed

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to be flexible. So I wonder if that's why they're

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>saying it's not consistent with the eleventh century. And I

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately I read this as well in the research and

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>never thought to look into that. But I wonder if

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason is that there was they say from

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>time A to B it didn't it did never change. Yeah,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I I think probably that's the case. I also think

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you've to take into consideration how long this group would

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have had to have been traveling to make it to Minnesota.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think they, you know, kind of backlook obviously

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not three years. They weren't. They weren't obviously for three years.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you can say, you know, maybe fifty years

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>then or even ten, I don't know. I don't know

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>how long it takes Scandinavians to get across the ocean

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>at this time and then and then make landfall and

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>then make it all the way to minnesotaeh he was.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I could take a while. It would take it's it's

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 1>about a six to nine months journey. I'm ballparking here.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing to get from one to the other across

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the ocean, and then from there the exploration process would

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>be long and drawn out. So I can see where

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I could see where ten maybe even fifteen years maybe,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but I would imagine guys would get homesick after a while. Yeah,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>you would think. But also they were here. If they

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>were around that long, you think there'd be more artifacts

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>left over. Yeah, yeah, yes, that's true. The stone's ownership.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You may be wondering, well, who owned the stone, because

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Olman owned it for a while. Well, he owned it

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>until nineteen o seven, at which point Holland purchased it

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>for I believe it was ten dollars. Well it was,

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten dollars in early nine hundreds, so that's

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than we normally think of it. But

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>when you hear how much he tried to sell it for,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you will galyze it was absolutely a good deal. He

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>tried to sell it to the Minnesota Historical Society for

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars in nineteen ten. Holland and, well, that's

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some serious appreciation. It is. Obviously they said no, thank you.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But in nineteen forty eight on the I guess I

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't really mentioned that the authenticity of the stone has

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>never really been like a yes, everybody says it's uh

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>this it's a hoax, or it's not. It's never been

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon. It's always had this huge ebb and flow.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's gone through periods of legitimacy, validated by this

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that in nineteen forty eight, the stone was on

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>display at the Smithsonian Institute in d C. For a

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>full year. And they don't really they don't put things

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they think are fake in the in the usually not

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>normally not Usually they've displayed things they've discovered later on

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we're fake. But everything they can discern it's real. That's

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the only reason to go up. Yeah. So the curator

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>actually said of the stone that it is quote probably

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the most important archaeological object yet found in North America

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>unquote when it was in the Smithsonian apparently, so he

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>really thought it was real. Obviously, after the year long

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>display in the Smithsonian, the stone was set up as

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a permanent exhibit or I guess, the only exhibit at

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the room Stone Museum in Alexandria, Minnesota. I was just thinking, man,

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this to be. It can't be the most exciting museum

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to go to. Hey, kids, we're gonna take field trip. Okay,

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>next stop is this thing that's our only stop? Actually

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a stone? Yeah? And next up a stone? Yeah? Yeah,

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of an interpretive center as well, right,

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it can't. It's not just a stone in

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a room. Um, it did. It also

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was shown at the New York World's Fair. It got around.

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It did get around it. Uh. It also went to

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Norway for a year or two. It's so it's been

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>around and again, you know, it's been this evan flow

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of how you know, when people are like on the yeah,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's real train and goes to interesting places, and when

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people are on the no, it's fake train, it stays boring.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I say it's real. It's a rock for sure. It's

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>definitely rock. I would agree with, Yeah, that's it. Okay,

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's rock. So if you want to email us, you know,

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about theories. Okay, there's many of them.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a few, you know, my mo and I was

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about to say, I'm looking at this, I'm like, wait

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a minute, you broke this up into two very big categories.

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>There's four categories. Yeah, just look harder, Steve, there's four categories. Technically, yeah, yeah,

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a technicality. Yeah. But as I've said, I will

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>say again, I will continue to say. Everybody who's ever

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>written about the Runestone is a percent sure that they

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are right, that it is either totally a hoax or

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>totally not. There's very little stuff out there about somebody's saying, well,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it could be this, and I did find two theories

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and both of them are good. I think that kind

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of land sort of in the middle. But pretty much

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is in their camp. All right, let's let's

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>camp one. Camp one is it's a hoax. Okay, here's

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>why this word that I'm gonna make Joe pronounce them

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna spell, but I I know I'm mispronouncing that. Well,

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a Norse word. Yeah, it's spelled O p d

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>A g E l s e f A r d,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which was the word that's translated into voyage of discovery.

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And apparently it did not occur in the Norse language

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>until several centuries after the thirteen sixty two inscription date,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>putting it in approximately the sixteenth century. There's a bit

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of controversy regarding this issue because one of the ruins,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the thirst room the theory as run it,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>so it can be used in a number of different ways.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Ruins are kind of tricky that way. Ruins are phonetic

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in that right, So it's not like each room equates

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to one letter in the English language that spells out

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a word that probably doesn't even sound like you think

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to sound because we don't say words the

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right way. It's each room represents a sound. Okay, nodding

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>slowly in this student, Yes, I'm on, I'm on board

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>with that, all right. So there is a run that's

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>used in that word. Um, the thirst run is how

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pronounce it, and it could have been

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>used to represent a t sound, which would have made

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the word that we spelled earlier, the obstacle per credit card,

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>into a different word, which means journey of acquisition, which

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was a standard word that was used in the century,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>instead of the journey of discovery, which is the word

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's commonly translated as, which wasn't common until the

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth century. Okay, because as you say, I know I

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>had seen some sources that when I saw the translation,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it was really weird because it was it was a

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>word slash word slash word slash, you know, voyage of

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>something something something something something and pick it was like

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>choose your own adventure. Yeah, and so I will mention

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that if this run is used to represent the t

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sound it's used, it's the only place it's used to

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>represent that sound in the on the entire rune stone.

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>They use the more standard runes to represent that sound

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else. But it is speculated that it was that

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>use of that word. I don't know. Maybe it's like

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't spell available to save my life, right, everybody

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has those words where it's like I think it's spelled

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>this way, which I don't know. Maybe that so this

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>guy had a little block when it came to that word.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And you're carving in stone. It's not like you can erase,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>go back. You know, that doesn't exist. It's just whatever

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it is. The next issue is the issue of cases

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on the stone as No, it's that in like tenses. Okay,

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just trying to make sure because I never noticed.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I always think of cases as upper and lower case

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like we do in English, so that's why I was

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just I never saw anything like that. Runs are very uniform,

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's why I was confused by that. Yeah, it's

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>it's um like the you know, plural singular I we

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>view them. Okay, that that that makes more sense, and

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I always struggle with linguistics, so this is why I

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>asked this question. Until the fifteenth century, there were four

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>cases in the North Scandinavian language that the Ruin Stone

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is written in UH, and that was later abandoned for

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>two cases, which is simpler. It's a good idea, yea think.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So please don't ask me a lot of detail because

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I am not linguistics person. I didn't want to delve

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>too deep into this because it would be an hour

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half on is why these cases are this way? Yeah,

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this is not such a inter shattering mystery. I agree,

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely agree. You can afford to spend weeks and

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 1>weeks and weeks learning about this stuff. Yeah. Anyway, apparently

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the stone uses just the two cases instead of the

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>more common four cases, which would have been common at

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the time. Again, not really, as Joe was saying, a

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>problem for me, as much you're carving in stone, you

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>got like ten dead people next to you. It's not

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that long. It's not that long of a it's not

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that long of a text. So while people who are

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>way better versed in linguistics than me may shout, yes,

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that is totally shattering and it's strong proof against this

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>being real. I don't think it's that big of a deal.

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It's what what was it? Ten lines eight lines long?

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Is what this is? That's it. Yeah, it's there's not

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of room for messing around anything kind of yeah. Yeah,

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>so you're not going to get all fancy with it.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they I don't think they had

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the corpses right next to them. I think they were

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>like a day's ride away or something like that. Okay, sorry,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll forget about painting a beautiful picture. Okay, waxing pot.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>You had a bunch of corpses. Yeah, apparently I don't

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>read runes, so I cannot confirm or deny this. But apparently,

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>according to some sources, the inscription uses the English spelling

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of dead, not d E A D, but d E

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>D with runes phonetically instead of what the Norse world

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been. Again, I can either confirm nor deny,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but this is something that people say. Yeah, no, I

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>also have to ride through the middle of that one, okay,

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>or maybe maybe dead beats something else in Scandinavian. One

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>would presume that the people who were translating it wouldn't

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>know that though instead of saying no, it's spelled the

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong way, you would hope. Yeah. And finally, as we

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before, the stone itself was weathered, but the inscription

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't weathered. So the stone was obviously a very old stone,

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but the inscription itself looked much newer. So, you know,

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the edges weren't as degraded as you would expect to

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>see given the age, and where that you would expect

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to see on fine lines like that Steve's looking, and

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not cut very deeply into the stone really, so you

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>would see a lot of where if it was exposed

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to the elements, like on the edges of what's the

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>ruins that have been carved, they wouldn't it was if

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it was above ground the whole time. Yeah, I can

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>see that. That's exactly my point to write. It was buried,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it was meant to be buried.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was originally buried. There's a lot

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of evidence to suggest that it was put upright like

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a like a headstone almost. Yeah, Yeah, so it was

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>part of it was buried and then the rest of

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it got buried over time. You would expect to see

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>probably more where than necessarily you see currently on it.

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>But again it comes back to you know, they cleaned

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it off with a nail, like who knows? Who knows?

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So if this is a hoax, the next big question

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is who created the hoax? Who created Well, he has

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>been number one suspect right then, of course is the

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>number one suspect, And I don't think it was him.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>What would you know? The is one of those things

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I asked this every time we talked about a hoax.

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>What are you going to get out of the hoax?

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Like he actually made ten bucks? Well, no, ignoring the

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>financial gain, I mean easy trying to to get some

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>notoriety out of it, like I never understand what people

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>hope to gain from from pulling the wool over people's else. Well,

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that for me is I think the biggest reason that

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's Almen, right. I mean, he found

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it eventually brought it to people's attention. They said it's

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a hoax. Here have it back, and he said, okay,

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to use it as a stepping stone.

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Then yeah, exactly. He didn't. He was never a vocal

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>advocate for its authenticity. He was always throughout the entire

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>time just kind of standing back saying I found this thing.

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it? What is it? And people said, here, it's

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and he goes Okay. You would think that

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if somebody had the wherewithal to make a hoax like that,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they would be brazen enough to keep pushing that it

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>was real. I mean we see this all the time.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>How many books have come out in the past decade

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that are supposed to be pure fact and they turn

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>out to be pure fiction, But the person who wrote

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it just continually, you know, goes on TV and does

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>everything they can to defend that it's real. Those people

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've got big brass ones, they are just they're

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>holding it up and this guy didn't do that at all. Yeah.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.479
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think that if you're gonna if you're

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull off a hoax that involves carving things in stone,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to what you want to do is you want to

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>carve the eleventh fift Commandments into a stone tablet. I've

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>found the Lost five Commandments. That's what I would do. Yeah,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that's what you would do. Yeah, maybe some

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>cool commandments in there too. Uh No, I think it's

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely not Alman. I think he definitely

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't the one. So who else created? Right? And I

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think you know, the other big question is exactly that.

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And the only other option is that somebody spent some

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>time created this hoax, dropped it off on some abandoned

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>land for a while because it was buried near a tree, right,

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and the tree was like forty years old, and hoped

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>someone would find it and recognize what it was and

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bring it to people's attention. So who was the historian

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>was so fascinated by the prospect of Norrisman coming to Minnesota.

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Mr Holland, Yeah, so you suspecting him? I don't. I

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't because I don't think that he would have left

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it up to chance as much as that, Right, that's

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a big risk to take. And he wasn't that old

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of a man. I mean, if it's if it's in

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the roots of a forty year old tree, it's had

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to have been there at least forty years. I got

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the we'll talk about that, well, ballpark is we'll talk

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. But my my point is I got the

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>impression that he was a forty something to fifty something

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>year old man, not an eighty year old man. Yes,

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that's true. He was a younger man, which means that

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>he would have had to done it as an adolescent. Yeah. Well, okay,

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so the tree itself was forty years old. And again

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those facts I go back and

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>forth on in terms of if I what I believe.

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But apparently, and I don't know how, because they uprooted

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the tree and it was gone, they didn't count the rings.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I assume they did count the rings, so they said

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the ring They said, Okay, it's a forty year old tree.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Most of the trees around here forty years old. But

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>apparently somebody came and examined the roots and said, oh, no,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the roots were disturbed about ten years ago where the

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>stone was. I don't know how. Okay, I don't know

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>how they would have found that out, But some somebody said, no, no, no,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>something was buried here, something big was buried here, like

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, disrupting the way that the roots were

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>growing or something like that. I could see somebody being

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>able to figure that out today with you know, all

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of the computer technology that we have, because I what

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting I'm understanding this to mean is that some

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>yo yo went out to the bottom of that tree

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>dug a big ditch or trench pushed the roots out

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of the way through the stone, and then covered it

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>back up to make it look like it had been

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>there for longer than it had. Okay, that's that's what

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought. Man. Roots, It's like a tree branch, you know,

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it takes a long time before it becomes very very

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>obvious that somebody has tied it up and it's been

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, altered in its growth pattern. Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I don't know, I totally agree

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with you. I um yeah. And I'm also not not

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so sure that the roots would have survived that long

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because usually when you clear land, you saw that, you

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>saw out the wood, you know, and take it home,

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>throwing the woodpile or whatever, and then all the all

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the stomps you're throwing a big pile, you burn them. Yeah.

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I I absolutely agree with you. There's no

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>way that somebody could have unless they examined it on

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the day. This was an affidavit from somebody who for

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, examined the roots on the day. Uh, there's

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>no way that they would be able to know. This

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>also worth mentioning this whole forty year thing. The settlements

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that were in Minnesota in that area at that time,

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>they were very new. White people were buying large not

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>living there forty years ago, so interesting fact for the era.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>So for somebody to just create this hoax, drop it

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and hope that somebody finds it someday, hounds stone into

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what could be considered hostile herritory and just trying it

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the ground and then right away, So that's our

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 1>segue into it's not a hoax. We touched on the tree,

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>which was kind of one of my first points in

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's not a hoax situation, but it can go wherever.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. Yeah, we kind of arguing that, yeah, we

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>can move away from it. And then the knoll. We

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>also talked about that it could have been an island

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>almost sorry, the knoll, that the tree with the stone

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>underneath it. This is like, right, the sounds like a

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>very Lord of the Rings description. I think it's that

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like bog and the frog on the log and the

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>bog and of anyways, Uh, it could have been and

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>likely was, in fact, an island in the middle of

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>swamp way wetland kind of area, assuming as one should,

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that the water table was different in Minnesota six hundred

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago because uh the water, the water could have

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>been about fifty feet higher than it currently is, which

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would have put water surrounding that knoll. Okay, Does that

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>make it anywhere likely that a chunk of sandstone is

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be sitting there? Though? I think there are

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>two possibilities that it affords. One is that the rock

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was moved by water to this place, right with rising

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and lowering lowering tides. So you think the rock was

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>just bobbing in the water and just sort of washed upon. Yeah,

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, two hundred pound rocks to float.

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Just science, there are no nautical hazards. No, yeah, they are,

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>They totally are. It's that that in h icebergs the

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing, right, No, I mean water has been it

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>moves things. It's course, it absolutely is. But also that

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it could explain that they could have been camping there,

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that that would have been a place that some people

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>would have been camping. They would have ended up there,

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's why that stone was there, because they could

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have gotten there with a boat. It also you also

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>got to think about it from and explorer's point of view.

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm in this body of water, It's an area I

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. There are people who I don't understand who

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially are hostile. It's safer to make camp on an island,

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on a high ground, on the high ground rather than

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on the surrounding mainland because it's nobody. It's harder to

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sneak up on you. Almost impossible in fact, to sneak

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>up on somebody because you make a lot of noise

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>waiting through that. Yeah, and also you can see people

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting through them. I mean, you know it's on a

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 1>little canoe or a boat or whatever it is. Yeah. Yeah,

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>that's I think a pretty good solid fact for why

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be there, except that it just sort of

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 1>happened to be there and they did some carbon out there.

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that? Is that the idea? Yeah, it's yeah, I

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>guess yeah. Okay. The prayer to marry the Maria that's

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>on the stone. People cite this as something that is

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty important little bit of history regarding its authenticity. It's

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a Catholic prayer, but the Swedes of Minnesota, we're

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>all Lutheran pretty much, but for the most part at

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the time, that was the prevalent religion at the turn

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of the century. But way back in the day, the

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>turn of the Okay, just making sure I knew which

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>centree we were talking about here. So this is the

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>turn of the century when the stones, when if it

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>were a hoax, when this thing would have been made?

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Because is it the turn of the nineteenth century? Is that?

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that the year? Is that the year? I never

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>can understand it. I don't even understand why the hell

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteenth century is in because it's the eighteens.

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It totally makes sense. I mean, I get it, but

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's dumb. It's confusing. The further we get away from

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the first century, the stupider against Yeah. No, but so

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's But an interesting fact is that Swedes of the

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth century, their hundreds were Catholic, So it makes sense

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that the prayer that would they would have had would

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>have been all all a maria, not that the Lutheran

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>version of what that might be, which I think is

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>an important fact. I also don't know how much you

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>know that as a Swede in the you know, nineteen hundreds,

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that's fairly sophisticated fake. If it's a fake, yeah should know.

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh it happens that these people were a different, totally

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>different religion than me. So I'm going to add their

0:39:56.360 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>prayer into my hoax of this thing. That's fairly sophisticated.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not strong, but anyways, I think that's a fair

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>thing to mention. What else have we got here on

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>your bullet point list of it's not a hoax? I

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 1>love my bullet point list. I love to make fun

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, I know you do. Next is that there

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are some scholars who attest to its authenticity. The not

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the linguists as much, but historians. There are some Well,

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I've actually seen some really interesting stuff. So this stone

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>has got is it mica that's in the stone? I

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>want to say? And they talk about the weathering of

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it when you're you know, when you take a microscope

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to it and you can see how it's weathered. And

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they've actually figured out how much the difference of the

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>weathering between the grooves that were cut in the stone

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.879
<v Speaker 1>versus what is on the face, and it's pretty consistent

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with the thirteen sixties some year date that's on, which

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>is really compelling. I agree. Again, they're saying that the

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>weathering of the ruins, it's consistent with being six years old.

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>There's six there's a difference between them. So the face

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that is exposed has completely weathered away. The mica on

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is completely weathered out, but the stuff that's in the

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>grooves has about his shows about six hundred years worth

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of weathering. Now, I can't explain how that works, but

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what I read, and it was like, wow, well

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really scientific. I'm inclined to believe that it sounds science.

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's probably true. I would have said that he would have.

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Another point that people bring up is the dotted R.

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I hate the dotted R. I like the dotted R.

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what the dotted R? Yeah, but I

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think they just must took their R for an eye. No.

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So the way that the R run is done, it

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like an R pretty much like if you we're

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>just going to carve an R in straight lines. Yeah,

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in straight lines. So it's a've got a vertical line.

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got from left to right at an approximate degree angle,

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and then from right to left at a mirror of

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that angle back into that vertical line, and then you

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing to make the tale of the R.

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what an R is. An R is that, well,

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a dot in the middle in the absence area,

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the negative space, the negative space, thank you, you know,

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>art stuff in the negative space on the top bit

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the art. This is why I always described letters. Yeah. No,

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so there's a dot there. And apparently this is a

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that only happened really in medieval times, so the hundreds.

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But that could have it could have just been a

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>defect in the rock face. It's you can see it

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 1>in all of the rs that are used in the inscription.

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not just one little dot and this of it

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>because I've only seen one are called out and because

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a huge fight over that are, a

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:12.280
<v Speaker 1>stupidly huge fight and it all all of the images

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that I see are of a single R. I you know,

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the inscription, I I think I

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>see them around. I mean I think I see it

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>in all of them. But I could just be that

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>could be wishful thinking. Okay, Because because I agree with

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you now that you say, oh, it's always the same are,

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I realized, yeah, that the one that they do the

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>close up of is always the same ARE. But I'm

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure when I look at it, it looks like

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there's the dotted ARE and all of it. Because you know,

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say it's a single one, because there's

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>always the what's that what do they call it? The

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>dropped tool theory? Somebody dropped a tool and it just

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>happened to strike there and just happened to mar the stone.

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I'm surprised to hear that there are

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you saw at another place. But you know, I didn't,

0:43:56.719 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I didn't really try to scan it

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>really well. I was just kind of briefly looking at

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it as as reading the words that I can understand

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>English self. Sure, Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, you know,

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't really seen enough good close up photos of

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the runs to really examine them closet problem. That's the

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>other thing that's hard with it is it's not as

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>though they're taking close ups of, you know, every single

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit. It's just the you know, call out the

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>one room that has this weird thing going on, or

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as we're about to talk about this one X that's

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. It's actually all of the x is. But

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this this theory is angle. It's angle theory, sub theory, whatever,

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the knights templar angle or the hooked X theory.

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it when the Night's get involved. Yeah, me too.

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 1>This this theory posits that the Night Templar, Knights Templar,

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Nights Templar, we're running from something I think religious persecution

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>about that time for whatever reason. There's some for some

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>reason in the middle of the US um way earlier

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 1>than any other European descendants would have been. There is

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>some there's some stories that suggest that the Knights Templar

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 1>they were. There were a substantial amount of them that

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>were rounded up in the early hundreds and killed, and

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of them all disappeared again. This is

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those like that. I don't even know. That's

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>where the Knights Templar. Knights Templar are so popular because

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a mass execution and a mass disappearances they did,

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of theories that suggests that

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they came to America or the New Land and it

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>ties into this other unsolved mystery in the United States

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>called the Newport Tower, which is in Rhode Island, which

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 1>most people think is a tower that was built, you know,

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>after Columbus got here, but some people say was built

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>earlier by the Knights Templar. It's I didn't do too

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>much research into that. It's probably its own episode, maybe

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>someday if we feel like it. But so, but anyway,

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that but the Knights Templar didn't speak Swedish or Norwegian,

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>right they some of them did. They wrote in ruins,

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.919
<v Speaker 1>some of them. Yeah, according to this theory, I don't.

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know any of them personally, so I don't

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>know what they wrote and what they didn't write. And

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:29.879
<v Speaker 1>if you did, you couldn't say. I couldn't wink. There's

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this website that I put up on the research that

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, Steve loved. Yeah, if you mean loved equals loathed. Yeah.

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It was one of those black background white texts websites.

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I didn't spend a whole lot of time on it,

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but it just I don't know why you did that.

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a real source. Okay, that was

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, Steve. It's always a mistake. Uh. It takes

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>aerial photos that they've enhanced of the area surrounding where

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the stone was found, and they say they're carvings in

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the earth and if you just draw these lines, they

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>point directly to the temple or the tower in Rhode Island,

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and also all these other places that are totally knights

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>templar places. So the stone was actually just like a

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>cipher that the Templar Knights left for people. So it's

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>actually a coded message. Act. It is an insanely detailed

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>encoded message, Like there are numbers and coordinates and degrees

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in all of this stuff buried in it. And I

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was reading through the descriptions and I actually started laughing

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out loud when at one point it said something something, something,

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 1>which is referenced in the room Stone, and I went

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>back to their translation and couldn't find that in their translation,

0:47:56.560 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a it's a lot of leaps of faith. Yeah,

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a parody. No, no, no, that's a lot

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of work for a parody website, those huge seven pages. Anyway,

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that if they were if they arrived in

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.919
<v Speaker 1>America sometime in the fourteenth century, is this the Night's

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Templar fleeing persecution, they really didn't need to go as

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>far as as far as Minnesota, because remember, nobody in

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Europe had any idea that America was here. Well that's

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>not true, but well yeah, but I means still, they

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>could have just chilled on the coast for quite a

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>long time. They could have. But you know, maybe they

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:32.760
<v Speaker 1>were bored. Yeah, you know, maybe they just thought curious,

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they were driven off of the coast by

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the indigenous people. Yeah, I mean, that's that's the thing,

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>is that we've got to remember they weren't the only

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ones there, and being an alien culture, they're going to

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be a pariah. They're gonna be chased away every time. Yeah,

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, no matter where they go. So this is

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason that this is also referred to as the

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>hooked X theory is because the X run has a

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>very it's a distinct little hook that you apparently only

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 1>see with Knights Templar writing. Oh, I didn't make that connection. Okay,

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a distinct style apparent allegedly, I don't. I don't.

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't say for certain if that's true or not.

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess. The last little interesting bit about the Knights

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Templar is the Scottish prince slash Templar Knight Henry Sinclair

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>apparently tried to explore North America in thirteen sixty two,

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So meaning why you got up to a ship and

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>attempted to crossover. Yep, it never was heard from again, Yep,

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 1>got it. So that's kind of interesting. That isn't true.

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why a Scottish prince would write in

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Norse rooms, but okay, sure, yeah, we don't even know

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>if you made it to America. Maybe that's what ascribe

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote in maybe. So here are my two favorite theories. Well,

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>these are the ones that are not it is or

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is not a hope. Well they are kind of well

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 1>under the main bullets. Yes, that I'm making fun of again.

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 1>This one is it's not a hoax, but it was

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>carved somewhere else. Well, it's a pretty good theory. It

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is documented that Newfoundland was found by Norse explorers in

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>uh year one thousand or something like that. Uh, it

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't explored. I mean, it wasn't settled or anything, but

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.399
<v Speaker 1>they kind of thought, but oh look there's land over there. Cool. Yeah,

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that they've found some smart effects, haven't they. Yeah,

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>they have. So it's not impossible. I mean, how it

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>would have made its way all the way to Minnesota,

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>who knows. But it's not impossible to think that interesting

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>journeys had been made back to the New World from

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Scandinavia over the course of the years, and that they

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 1>just happened to leave this stone. Wait, so if I

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>understand what you're saying, you're saying that it is a

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:53.919
<v Speaker 1>stone from their native land that they brought with them

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>somehow as a ballast or something. No, I'm saying that

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it would have been carved like on the coast in

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>new in Newfoundland, in Newfoundland, Yeah, and then brought over, right,

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So they brought it from their native land. Not necessarily,

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't even know, but sandstone possibly is

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>indigenous to Newfoundland's I don't know. Somebody go check a

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:18.759
<v Speaker 1>website because that just seems I mean, other than a

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ballast stone, which I don't know if they used I

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know why they would have packed that stupid thing

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>all that way. They might have. They might have actually

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>had it for a ballast stone. But typically speaking ballast

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and ships, back in those days, the rocks were used

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but you don't usually use enormous ones like that. Yeah,

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that's that's my point. Yeah, they take up a lot,

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of space. There's a lot of air gaps,

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and they're really hard to get down below decks without

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>breaking your back. And you're in your ship. Yeah, exactly,

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:47.840
<v Speaker 1>when guy slips and well that chips under yeah, but

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 1>so you know, but I maybe they just got it

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in Newfoundland and maybe they were actually in places

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>other than Newfoundland, not just maybe they actually had other

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>parts of North America also, Well, I know that type

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of stone is owned in New England. Yeah, so I

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:04.879
<v Speaker 1>know that it is. It is found in more than

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:08.919
<v Speaker 1>one place. It's you know, rocks or rocks. Yeahstone is common. Yeah,

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and and that that kind of I think they called

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it what a greystone? Is that right Devon? Yeah? Yeah,

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>greystone is found in a lot of different places. But

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know, is it do you know if

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it's found in Newfoundland? Yeah, it is. I just just

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, in Newfoundland is like Northern Canada. It's like

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Canada, eastern northeastern Canada. Right, I'm just I'm just

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out if for the geology. B oh yeah, yeah,

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.399
<v Speaker 1>it's found all over yeah, so it could have been there.

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:38.399
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, so I can I can see it's

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's carved there and it's like left there, and there's

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 1>certain certain settlers later on find it and they just think,

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they happen to be Scandinavian and they

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>think I've got a great idea. Let's let's ship it

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to the mainland, and I will pass it on to

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>other Scandinavians and essentially move it far inland as far

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and known as we can, and and then whom we'll

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:01.879
<v Speaker 1>bring it to a lot and say, hey, look how

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>far the Northman went. It's kind of kind of a

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>matter of ethnic pride. Yeah, you know, I can also

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>see there being a settlement, you know, in Newfoundland, and

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:14.359
<v Speaker 1>then as they kind of migrate through, somebody's like, well,

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this is important, we're abandoning this area, so let's take

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it with us, you know. But as as you were saying,

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>they found artifacts, and there have been no artifacts found

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>except for the stone in this area, so that's pretty

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 1>big issue for me. Yeah. Next theory is it's not

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>a hoax, but it's not from thirteen sixty two either.

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe this one. It is a historical fact that

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:46.359
<v Speaker 1>ten Norwegian settlers were killed pretty close to the spot

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>where that stone was found as part of the Sioux Wars.

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>About this, the Sioux Wars that happened in eighteen sixty two. Vaguely,

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that that actually makes a lot of sense. Yeah,

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for me, that was kind of. I read that and

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Oh, that's an AHA moment for me

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that it happened close by. You know, there weren't officially

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of white people living around in that area,

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but likely there were some, given that some white people

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>died in that area at that time. The carbon the

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers match up pretty well. You know, it could be

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's the typo essentially, is what this all boils

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>down to, Either a typo or maybe a little bit

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of erosion, Yeah, something like that, And that it was

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>left there as the marker for their fallen comrades. Yeah,

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense got buried. It would have been there

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.840
<v Speaker 1>forty years, which would fall in line with the whole

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tree root thing. Yeah, I guess that's what thirty six years.

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It would explain the weird grammar stuff that's going on right,

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that it was a mix, because it would have been

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a thing that continued to happen. They're like

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>carving of ruin stones. Run stones were used as like

0:54:55.600 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 1>headstones and markers of important events. So it would have

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>been something that somebody would have harved as a tribute

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and that they would have probably tried to be hearkening

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on the traditions of old but probably not knowing enough

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to do it accurately. Well yeah, well, I mean a

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were not that well educated. There were

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:16.439
<v Speaker 1>lots of people who could read and sort of read

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and write, but lots of bad grammar and spelling and stuff.

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's I would say, it's similar to people

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to do Old English today. You know, for me,

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I've seen those tattoos. Yeah, I mean everybody has, and

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not good old English, but it kind of

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like old English, And I don't know. For me,

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's my I'm done. That's my theory. Okay,

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like microphone drop right now, don't drop the mic, please canace.

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 1>But no, I think that's a really solid theory. I

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>think that really explains it all pretty well. Yeah, I

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think so too. Yeah, I'm with you. Look at that

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:58.879
<v Speaker 1>wrap up, Steve, not convinced. I'm still not convinced. Why not, West,

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:02.360
<v Speaker 1>what's not convincing you? Because if if it's a simple

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>typo of the three should have been an eight, Yeah,

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a big typo. Oh. No, they're not like number

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:16.319
<v Speaker 1>like English numbers. They're yeah, not Arabic numerals. There their

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>room numbers, so they're actually ruins. There's no like Arabic

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>numerals on there. Uh. And as it turns out, I

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 1>can show you a picture if you would like. But

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 1>three and eight they're like almost exactly like it's like

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the it's it looks kind of like seriously, yeah, it

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of like the P right. But so the

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 1>three the protrusion, I guess it looks like yeah, the

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>flag is half mass yeah, and the on the the

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:51.439
<v Speaker 1>eight it's full mast. Yeah, it's like they've moved it.

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:53.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like they just moved it down about ten percent

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of the distance. You know, it's like our of the distance,

0:56:56.840 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not even half very small. Okay, yeah, I'm I'm done.

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Microphone drop boom. So yeah, I think we solve this one. Yeah,

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>would yeah, we agree, we're in total agreement. Wow. Well

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually just hot and tired. Yeah. Yeah. Well, you

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>can find some of our links on our website Thinking

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Sideways podcast dot com. You can leave us a comment

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there if he would like. Um, I'm don't feel like

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I need to tell you where to find this episode,

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because y'all know where to find stuff these days. But

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if you are unless you're new, but then you found

0:57:37.120 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us somewhere. Um. You can listen to us on the website.

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:42.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to us on iTunes, do us a

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:44.080
<v Speaker 1>favor and leave us a comment and a reading. That's

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how people find us. That's why we're in the top

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>forty podcast on iTunes our category. No iTunes, but um

0:57:56.680 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>find us on Facebook, group and page, as Joe would say,

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and just friend us, like us. Lots and lots of

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on there these days. It's it's insane. Yeah.

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I really regret taking a day and a half off.

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you should. I know. I regret having done that.

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm catching up. Yeah, No, I mean I regret you

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that too. You can find us on Twitter. We're

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Thinking Sideways. Uh send us an email if you would like.

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:27.919
<v Speaker 1>The email address is Thinking Sideways podcast at gmail dot com.

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>You can send us suggestions, comments, just random, fan girl, fanboy,

0:58:33.480 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>praise that, whatever you want. We also have a subreddit.

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Just just search Thinking Sideways. Um, that'll pop right up.

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We're also on Patreon now. It's a pretty cool website

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to help support the show. There's a link on our

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>little sidebar thing, but you can also just go to

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Patreon dot com slash thinking sideways and we'll pop right up.

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:59.439
<v Speaker 1>There's a little video explaining everything how the monetary system work. Yeah,

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that is totally optional, of course, totally totally option.

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely Yeah. I don't wan anybody feeling like they have

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that, not at all. But after Donald Trump,

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, Donald actually has to I'm looking for him. Yes, yeah,

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So that all having been said, I think we're going

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to scoot on out of here, hopefully to someplace cooler.

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That's rocket. We'll see you all next week, by everybody.

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>God bye, guys,