WEBVTT - Tech News: Apple Announces New iPhones and More

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio. And

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. It's time for the tech

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, September eight, twenty two, and Apple held

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's far Out event yesterday and unveiled its iPhone fourteen lineup,

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as updates to the Apple Watch line and

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to its air pods. So we'll do a quick rundown

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on some of the highlights. One thing that Apple has

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>done is it has ditched the physical SIM card. SIM

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>stands for Subscriber Identification Module, and it's that little micro

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>trip that's typically embedded into a little piece of plastic

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 1>that you have to insert into a new phone in

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>order to port your phone number over to a device.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Or you might go and get a SIM card if

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you're traveling to a foreign country, and this way you

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can operate on that country cellular network without ramping up

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>those massive roaming charges. Well, Apple already had incorporated digital

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>sims into iPhones, but had kept the physical ones as well.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Now that's no longer the case. The physical ones are out,

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>so transferring your phone number from one phone to another

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>requires a slightly different process, and we'll actually a very

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>different process because there's no move of physical components anymore.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's you know, digital rather than physical. And if

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you are an international traveler, you might have a harder

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>time getting an e SIM so that you can operate

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on the native cellular network, so that's kind of a bummer.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, digital sims can let you support

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>more than one phone number on a single device, so

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you could potentially have like a business line and a

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>personal line both going to the same device but using

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>different phone numbers. So there are pros and there are

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>cons to this approach. Another new feature is the addition

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of satellite connectivity in the event of an emergency. So

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're a teenager and you've stumbled into one

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of those ding dang darn slasher movies. You're at a

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>remote camp ground, maybe it's even Crystal Lake, and there's

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>no cellular service, and you need to get an emergency

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>message out to authorities or first responders to come and

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>rescue you. With the satellite connectivity feature, you can use

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone four team to locate the satellite overhead and

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>then connect to it to send essentially an S O

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>S signal so that first responders will know where you

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are and they can come help you. The feature does

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>require you to have a clear view of the sky,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>so if there's cover overhead, you might not be able

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to connect, or it might take significantly longer to connect

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and send a message through. Still, this is a great

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>addition to the iPhone. It's the sort of thing that

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you hope you will never need, but you're happy to

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have it available. Apple introduced four models of the iPhone

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fourteen at this event, and the base model, which has

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a six point one inch screen and still runs on

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the last generation A fifteen microchip, comes in at seven bucks.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The iPhone fourteen Plus is a larger version of the

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>base model, is six point seven inches with the screen,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It has a longer battery life, and it costs eight

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine bucks. It also runs on the A fifteen microchip.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think these models are a modest upgrade to the

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>base iPhone thirteen model. The phones that I think are

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are much more interesting are the iPhone fourteen Pro and

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone fourteen Pro Max. So the Pro is six

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>point one inches, the Max is six point seven. Uh.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>That mostly is the difference between the two. Also, the

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>difference that involves the price, and the you know, pro

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be based at Bucks, the max at

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>one thousand bucks. So yeah, both of those phones come

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>with a forty eight megapixel rear facing camera. That's four

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>times greater than the Base and Plus models, which have

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve megapixel cameras. Now, just as a reminder, the megapixels

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>refer to the pixel density of an image, right the resolution.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>In other words, that's just one component that determines the

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>quality of a picture. But generally speaking, higher resolution tends

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to be better, at least if you want to do

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>things like, you know, blow up the photo to a

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>much larger size, if you want to do digital zoom

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in and that kind of stuff, having higher resolution is

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>important anyway. They also have several other features that set

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>them apart from the base models, not the least of

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that they run on the A six team microchip,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>so Apple's latest microchip. Uh. And for all four of

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>these models, you can start pre orders tomorrow September nine,

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and the phones will start to ship on September. These

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are not quite enough to convince me to abandon my

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>Android phone and switch over to iPhone, But then I'm

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>so deep in the Google ecosystem that it's hard for

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>me to make the move, which, believe me, is all

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the strategy for companies like Google and Apple.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The Apple Watch models that the company showed off we're interesting,

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>but I've only ever owned one smart watch, and that

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was the Pebble back before Pebble got acquired and then

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>subsequently dismantled, so I am not the best person to

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>hype up wearables. Still, one feature I liked was the

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>inclusion of accelerometers that can detect if someone has been

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>involved in an accident like a car crash, and it

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>activates a feature that lets you call for help right

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>away if in fact you were involved in in an accident.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And I love seeing safety features like this become standard

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in devices. Again, you hope you never have to use it,

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but you are thankful that it's there. Apple also unveiled

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>an Ultra Watch, which is meant for folks who are

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>hard on their gear, like those who are into extreme sports,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>so it's more rugged than other models. It also costs

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty penny, starting at seven bucks. Then you've got

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the new Air pods, which reportedly have better noise cancelation

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>capabilities than earlier models. They also have a speaker that

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>lets you find out where the heck you put your

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>darn air pods. You can use the find my app

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and look for your air pods and it will make

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a little noise and you can track them down. And

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a feature I could definitely use because I have

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that whenever it comes time for me to

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>move house, when I start packing stuff up, I'm gonna

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>come across at least seventy pairs of earbuds that I've

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>misplaced at one time or another. So this is definitely

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those features I could use in my earbuds. Still,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not likely to drop two fifty bucks on a

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>air of earbuds. And also I'm not an iPhone user,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not ready to make the leap just yet. SIMI.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Related to this is a little tidbit from the twenty

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two Code Conference. Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple,

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was asked by a journalist if Apple would address issues

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to messaging between Apple and Android devices

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a k a. The Green bubble issue in I message,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>where messages from non iOS devices pop up as green bubbles. Uh,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and there are certain features that I message supports that

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>don't work across platforms. This incompatibility means that certain functions

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like sending videos from one device to another aren't always supported.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Cook's response was essentially, whomever has an Android device in

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this communication chain should just buy an iPhone and that

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>will solve the problem. Like, rather than solve the compatibility issues,

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you should just jump on the iPhone bandwagon, and that

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple customers haven't really pressed Apple to address this issue,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so the company hasn't. Now Google has been pushing Apple

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to adopt the Rich Communications Service or r CS standard,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but Apple has um declined to acquiesce to Google's request. Why. Well, again,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about convincing folks that they need to stay within

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the Apple ecosystem. I Message is another feature that reinforces

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lock in fun times. Oh and uh a different take

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on Apple and lock in. Let's talk about Apple's iCloud

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>data center in China. That's where employees have been locked

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>into a closed loop system within the facility for the

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>last week. They are not allowed to go home, they're

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to see their families. And yes, this has

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>to do with another COVID nineteen issue in China. So

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>China has a zero tolerance approach to any kind of

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>outbreak of COVID nineteen, no matter are how small, and

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>requires regions to lock down whenever a case arises in

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>order to avoid downtime. Some facilities like this iCloud data

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>center will force employees to live at the data center

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for the duration of the lockdown and continue working. We've

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>covered similar situations with Tesla, and this is brutal. Now,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>arguably you could say it's an effective way to limit

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the spread of COVID nineteen, but it's you know, a

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>massive trade off here. Anyway, Apple hasn't had much of

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>an option when this comes down to it, because as

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>long as the company wants to operate in China, it

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>has to play by China's rules. And part of that

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, China requires all companies that have

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that deal with with the private data of Chinese citizens

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to operate solely on Chinese soil. Apple cannot operate a

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>data center that handle is Chinese citizen private data outside

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of China. In fact, the government required Apple to partner

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with a company called cloud Big Data, which the Chinese

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>government owns, so Apple really had no other options when

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this. I don't want to cast too

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>many aspersions. I do think it is a brutal policy

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and inhumane to employees, but uh, at least at least

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>did this part. I mean, I can't fully blame Apple,

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>although you could argue the company could just choose not

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to operate in China. Hard to do that because China

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it represents such a huge market. But which is You know,

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to tell investors, Hey, we're not

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>going to operate in the most populous country in the world.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But um, yeah, it's ah, there's some real tough ethical

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>issues here. All right, We've got a lot more news

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to cover, some of which doesn't even involve Apple, But first,

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. We're back and we're starting

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear about what happened during a court hearing back

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in March of this year when two longtime meta engineers

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>folks who had been working with Facebook had to sit

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>down and answer some questions stemming from an investigation that

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>relates all the way back to the Cambridge analytic affair,

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing that was going on in and

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the court has recently unsealed the transcript of that hearing,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which is why we're now hearing about what happened. And

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>boy howdy, it sounds like the court appointed special master

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>guy named Daniel Gary was really getting frustrated the deeper

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he tried to go into Facebook's labyrinthian systems. So Gary

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was asking the engineers fairly straightforward questions, such as, air

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is a person's data stored within Facebook's subsystems. We know

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is combing everybody for their data, collecting huge amounts

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of data, including generating data from inferences about what people

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like based upon their behaviors, but the engineers answers were

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>unsettling because the engineers admitted they didn't know the answer. Further,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they said that it's likely no one knows that answer

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>because the amount of data collected and the different ways

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's collected, and the different ways that Facebook uses

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>personal information are involving multiple subsystems that are collecting and

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>storing this information, and it's hard to know who is

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>collecting what and for what purpose and how frequently they're

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>using it. So they said, it's essentially impossible for us

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to answer these questions in a meaningful way, like there's

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>no way for me to answer your question. And now

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way I can at least understand how this happened.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Because Facebook is a company that grew very rapidly. It

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>incorporated new systems at an incredible pace, and you had

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of different teams working on different projects all at

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time. These teams were sometimes operating more or

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>less independently of each other, so there's likely overlap between

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>projects as well as unique approaches used by specific subsystems.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And Facebook never adopted a culture that, you know, documented things.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't. It didn't create documents about these systems

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to explain what they were, how they work, and what

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>information they actually use. So there are no official documents

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that detail these subsystems or the types of data that

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>flow into them. Instead, according to the engineers, the code

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>itself is about as close as you can get to

0:13:54.760 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>actual documentation. Now, this raises some very trouble ling questions.

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>For example, how can Facebook assure that it is complying

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>with various data privacy laws around the world if no

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one at the company actually knows where all the data

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is going. And the answer is it can't. It's impossible

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>unless you make the ludicrous argument that there's security through obscurity.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the system is so complex that no

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>one is going to be able to find their way

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>through it, so you don't have to worry about people

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>abusing it. But that is not a really good answer,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and so it looks like there is no way for

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to actually be transparent because no one at the

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>company even knows how to make that happen. That transparency

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is impossible due to the way these various subsystems were

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>designed and no one documented in anything. So this transcript,

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>this court transcript, is available to read, but I warn

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you it's like a descent into madness if you you

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are at all concerned about data security and privacy. Not

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>long ago, the US government passed a bill that will

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>provide federal money to companies that are building out semiconductor

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing facilities in the United States budded. Order to get

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hands on that cold, hard cash, the companies are going

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to have to agree to some firm rules, and one

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>big one is that the companies will not be allowed

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to build quote advanced technology facilities end quote in China

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for ten years now. The purpose for that restriction is

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to protect national security. According to Gina Romundo, the U

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>S Commerce Secretary, and that's definitely a massive concern. I've

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>talked in previous episodes about how China allegedly has a

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>very long history of industrial espionage stealing technology from other companies.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>To curb China's technological advancement, the US is looking to

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>make the States more self reliant when it comes to

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor tech as well as cut off or at least

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>reduce the chance of Chinese spies stealing US design technology.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>That also includes a moratorium on companies sending advanced technology

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to China, so they're not supposed to build facilities in China,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not supposed to ship advanced tech to China. And

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>really there are other related rules that are meant to

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>cut off this flow of technology, and I p to

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese. Now, I have a habit of criticizing Tesla

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty harshly for lots of things. You know, I I

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge I go hard against Tesla pretty frequently, But I

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>do want to give the company its props when they

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are deserved and over in Europe, Tesla's model why ranked

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>first in a European safety test of driver assist systems. Now,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear here, the systems like autopilot

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and full self driving mode are meant to be driver

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>assist features in order to improve safety. They are not

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>meant to be autonomous driving modes. So if you are

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>using the systems the way they are meant to be used,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>then they are incredibly effective. They work very well, well

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>enough so that Tesla took first place in these tests,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't erase the fact that some Tesla owners

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>use these features irresponsibly, nor does it push aside the

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>problem with Tesla's marketing of these features, which at least

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel implies that the tech can do more than

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's actually capable of doing, or that it's meant to

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>perform a job other than what it's actually designed to do. Hey,

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do you remember Travis Killenic, co founder of Uber. He's

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the guy who has a truly terrible reputation as far

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>as how he treats other human beings, and he was

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately forced to vacate his position of CEO of Uber

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and two thousands venteen and to surrender his seat on

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the board of directors in two thousand nineteen when he

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>cashed out of Uber entirely. And a lot of folks

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>point at Kala Nick when they talk about the toxic

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>work culture that was in the spotlight back in two

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen. That was a very, very tough year for Uber,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>at least on the pr front. Kalin Nick has kept

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a relatively low profile in the public eye since then,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's been working on something else that just got

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a big influx of cash thanks to Microsoft. That thing

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is called Cloud Kitchen. Kala Nick has used the money

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that he made from cashing out an Uber, which amounted

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to like two and a half billion dollars, to initially

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fund this project. He has received investments from other parties

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, and he purchased steak in an existing company

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that was called City Storage Systems before converting that over,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and City Storage Systems was buying up warehouse space in

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>various cities. He converted that to Cloud Kitchen, which is

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a company that offers restaurants the chance to operate water

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>called dark kitchens, which sounds you know, scary and stuff,

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really. A dark kitchen in this sense

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is a facility where a restaurant can produce it's dishes,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically for delivery services like door dash. So the idea

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>here is that the home restaurant can really focus on

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>serving customers at that location, whether it's people who are

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>dining in or picking up or whatever. And the dark

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>kitchens will make the same dishes, but in facilities that

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>are inside these warehouses that are dedicated just to producing

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>meals meant for delivery services. So you can order a

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>delivery of that delicious pia from your favorite Spanish restaurant,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but it could be that the dishes actually made in

0:19:55.720 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a warehouse somewhere, not in that restaurant's dedicated kitchen. Anyway.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is reportedly the first US based company that had

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>previously invested in Uber to then go and invest in

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Cloud Kitchen, and according to FT dot com, some folks

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>who were at least at one time associated with Cloud

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Kitchen are saying that the culture there is just as

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>toxic or perhaps even worse as the bad old days

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>at Uber, saying there's this massive issue with turnover due

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to that terrible culture. So I guess some thing's never change,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>all right. We've got a few more stories that we

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>need to cover before we get to that. Let's take

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>another quick break over at Google. The company is cutting

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.239
<v Speaker 1>way back on expenses and we've seen a lot of

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tech companies in particular cut back on things like hiring,

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and some are going much further by being off employees

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at least in certain divisions, all in an effort to

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>reduce expenses during our current economic turmoil. Now, I want

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to say recession, but economists are still divided about whether

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>or not we're actually in one. I say, if it

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>walks like a recession and quacks like a recession, it's

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a recession. But anyway, since there's not consensus, I'm just

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna say economic uncertainty or economic turmoil or whatever. Anyway,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these cutbacks now include company travel at Google, so the

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>company is stressing that all but the most critical company

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>travel should be considered off the table, and that if

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 1>employees have an option to say, attend a virtual event

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>rather than a physical one, they should choose the virtual option. Now,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>if other companies follow suit, that is going to be

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a super tough situation for the airline industry, which heavily

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>counts on regular business travel. And you know, it was

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>just starting to get back into the swing of things

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>after the pandemic effectively eliminated nearly all travel, particularly business travel,

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long while. So we'll have to keep our

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>eyes on this see if this trend expands beyond Google

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and what effects that might cause down the line. Now

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that being said, United is reportedly investing fifteen million dollars

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>into a startup air taxi company. As the name implies,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>an air taxi is a vehicle that flies from point

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>A to point B, and the idea here is that

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this flying vehicle will take passengers from crowded city areas

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to nearby airports, skipping all the terrestrial traffic, all for

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the low low price of a hundred bucks a seat.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>On the low end, it could be much higher than that.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>United has conditionally agreed to purchase two hundred air taxis,

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with the option to buy two hundred more. The startup

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is called Eve air Mobility, and we should see its

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>aircraft in operation sometime around at the earliest. These are

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be v T o L aircraft that's vertical

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>takeoff and landing, so similar to how a helicopter operates,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but not an actual helicopter, maybe more like a quad copter,

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, vehicle sized. That's kind of that flying

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>car concept we've been hearing about for a while now,

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and the hope is that United will find enough customers

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to pony up the cash to skip

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>out on having to navigate through tough traffic in places

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like New York City and Chicago. By the way, there

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.239
<v Speaker 1>are already helicopter taxi services in New York that can

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>take you from say, Manhattan to JFK. There's a company

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>called Blade that does that for the low, low price

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of a bucks per person. And yeah, this is expensive, right,

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of money to pay for a one

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 1>way trip to an airport. But y'all, let me tell you.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I have been in situations in New York where I

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>was convinced I was going to miss my flight the

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>as I was in a taxi that was stuck in

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>stand still traffic. And if taking this option means I

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>can avoid a nervous breakdown, I might be willing to

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fork over a couple hundred bucks, especially if I could

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>expense it. But then we get back to that story

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about companies cutting back on travel expenses and shucks. Also, finally,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I somehow missed the news last week that Twitter announced

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it was going to allow users to edit tweets. This

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is a feature that Twitter users have been asking for

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for years, but now we've learned a little bit more

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>about how that's going to work. So the edit option

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is only active for thirty minutes from the point when

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you post a tweet, and users will only be able

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to edit it up to five times. So if you've

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>edited it five times, or if thirty minutes have passed,

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that's it. You can't touch that tweet again. Moreover, this

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>option is only going to go to a sub of

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Twitter Blue users. Twitter Blue is a subscription tier of

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter service, so that means these folks who are accessing

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it are essentially paying to have access to that feature.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It's initially launching in New Zealand, and Twitter will monitor

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how people use it and whether or not folks start

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to abuse the feature. You can imagine someone using Twitter

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to post something really controversial or terrible, then waiting a

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>bit and then go back in and edit the tweet

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to make it appear innocent. Instigators and trolls would likely

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>use that feature to do just that kind of thing, right.

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you might assume that a posted tweet is

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>most seen within that thirty minutes of posting, because otherwise

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it tends to get buried below other tweets. So a

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>troll might just decide to post something really awful weight

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine minutes and then go in and edit the tweet,

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got your plausible deniability while your followers

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>all saw the terrible things you said and maybe take

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>action base upon it. That's something Twitter is going to

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>have to be on the lookout for. And you know,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time, I was one of those folks

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>who really felt there needed to be an edit feature

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, specifically so you can fix innocent stuff like typos,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly if you made a typo when you were typing

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>out an at reply to someone and your message would

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise go to the wrong person. But as we've seen

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>folks weaponize their Twitter accounts in order to target vulnerable

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people or to spread misinformation, I have grown more concerned

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>than an edit feature will really just help bad actors

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>cover their tracks. Anyway, Twitter has plans to extend the

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>rollout to countries like Australia, Canada, and the US after

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing how folks use it in New Zealand. My guess

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is that Twitter is going to pay very close attention

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to this and make tweaks on the system as they

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>see problems arise. Because I'm certain the people at Twitter

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>are aware of the potential abuse scenarios. That's it for

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the news for Thursday, September eight, twenty two. If you

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for topics I should cover on tech Stuff,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>please reach out to me. One way to do that

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is through Twitter. The handle for the show is tech

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Stuff hs W. Another way is to download the I

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, which is free to download and use.

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Navigate over to the text Stuff page in the I

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app and then you'll see a little microphone icon.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>If you click on that, you can leave a voice

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>message up to thirty seconds in Lincoln let me know

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>what you would like to hear in future episodes, and

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Y text Stuff

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.