WEBVTT - RockMelt Enters the Browser Wars

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Pellette and

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at house stuff works dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me, it's always his senior writer, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Whatever happened to Saturday night when you dressed up sharp

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and you felt all right, I'm not going to answer that.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's go and talk a little bit about a browser

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that's made the news recently. And by recently I mean

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in early November of two. Thank you. We do have

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of people who catch up, That's true. They go

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>through the entire archive, so somebody awesome. And then that

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>means that every time we get that wave, we get

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the people writing in and saying, hey, whatever happened to

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the old listener mail intro? We wanted to talk a

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit about rock melt. Yes, now I wrote about

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>rock Melts and the blog. You do read our blog,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don't you? Um? Some time ago? At that point, it

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was a few months ago now, and it was one

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of those things that people were sort of starting to

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about the possibility of a new browser coming on

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the scene to compete with the already entrenched Internet Explorer, Safari,

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Chrome and Firefox. Now. Part of the reason that people

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking about this was the involvement of a certain

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gentleman who um is certainly no newcomer to the browser

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>wars and that would be Mark and Yes. Yes uh so. Mr.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Andreeson was one of the people who developed Netscape, the

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Netscape Internet Browser, yes, and before it, the Mosaic Web browser,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>which many of our listeners may not even be familiar with.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a project um that started within basically as

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>a school project, I believe, if I'm not mistaken, um

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty much the first viable web browser. Um.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I say pretty much because I forgot to go look

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and find that out. But I'm almost certain that it

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is the first viable browser. And it did turn in

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it did involve the evolve into the the Netscape commercial

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>web browser. Um and uh. Of course Mr Andreason dropped

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the spotlight for that particular thing, went on

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to become a tech entrepreneur, moved on to other projects,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and now he is one of the investors in Rock Melt. Yeah.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The story was broken back in August of two thousand

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>nine my Miguel Health over UM and and at the

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, and he mentioned that uh, that Andreason

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>had decided to put some money, invest some money into

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this this startup venture, and the product was going to

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>be called rock Melt. Now at the time, back in

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, there were very very few details about

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the browser that that we were privy to. But even

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>then we knew that it was going to be a

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>web browser and that it was going to have some

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>form of integration with Facebook. Yes, that that it was

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>going to require that you sign in through a Facebook

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I D in order to use the browser UM, which

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is interesting that we we actually knew that much detail

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>back then. It was also interesting that it was apparently

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>news to Facebook, or at least that's that's you know.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The executives that that helped tried to contact said that

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they had no involvement with rock Melt whatsoever. Well, I

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things to point out about that

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>UM is that may not be such a big surprise

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>considering the availability of the application programming interface yes a

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>p I UH from Facebook. Basically, you can bake a

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of Facebook connectivity into your project. Of there are

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of project web projects, and in this case

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of software project um without because Facebook has already made

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that available, so they don't necessarily have to have that upfront.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>They can already be working on that without uh, you know,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>giving Facebook the heads up. So you might wonder, well,

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 1>what would possess Mr andrees and to invest a significant

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>amount of money into a new browser? After all, as

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Chris was pointing out, the browser market has no shortage

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of contenders. Yes, I mean you still have Internet Explorer,

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>which is still the dominant browser on the market, although

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>its share is declining. It's no, it's no longer um,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer I would say that it's no longer

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>assured its place as number one. There there's a chance

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>that other browsers could take that over for a while.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Look like it was gonna be Firefox to do that

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>because it was making steady gains, and then Google Chrome

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>hit the the market and that has managed to do

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>quite well as as well. So you might think, well,

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what would possess anyone two support a browser when we

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>already have so many on the market. Not necessarily that

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the browser, the new browser wouldn't be better. It might

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>be better, but sometimes it doesn't matter. You come out

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>with a superior product, but the other product is so

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>entrenched in the market that it doesn't matter. You could argue,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and people have argued that this is the case with

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>MP three players. There are people who say, I'm not

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily one of them, but there are people who say

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Apple line of iPod products our inferior in

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>some ways to similar products. Correct And using that argument,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you might say, well, wait a minute, this, this other

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>MP three player has more features and has a greater capacity,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>lower price point, what or whatever features it might have

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that are different from the iPod, why is it more popular?

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>And really the iPod has just become entrenched in the

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>MP three market. Um, same sort of thing with the

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 1>web browsers. So what could make Mr andrees and think

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that the rock melt was a worthy endeavor? And really,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer comes down to the fact that

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 1>people are using the web differently than they were fifteen

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago. That's true. You know, back then it was

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all about you go to a web page, you read

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the content, and you may not ever go back to

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that web page ever again because the content would pretty

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>much stay the same, right, right, and you might do

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of internet shopping, but there wasn't a

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>lot in the early days. I mean, it wasn't until

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties that started to take off. And then

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of course you had the Internet bubble and uh and

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>after the bubble burst and a lot of companies, well

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>business that that really took a huge that made a

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>huge dent in in online shopping for quite some time.

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So really, the element I think that has changed the

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>web the most in the last few years is social networking,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>right at least that's that's one of the easy things

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to point to when people talk about web two point oh.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>In most cases, what they're talking about is some sort

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of social media technology that is embedded in a web page,

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like for example, blogs were what I think a lot

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of people consider sort of an early web two point

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>oh technology. So you write your blog post and you

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>give you leave the comments open so that other people

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can comment on your site, and it starts a dialogue

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>between the reader and the author and between the readers

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves too, and then from there we've gone through other

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>types of uh web two point oh technologies, but that

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was that's sort of one of those things comments on

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>shopping sites, for instance, and of course the social media

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sites including my Space, friend stir, Facebook, Twitter, and all

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the myriad other sites including you know, things like flicker

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube, where the primary purpose is not necessarily to

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have social networking, but that it's a huge, huge aspect

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I think, uh, you're right. I think

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that is supposed to be the This is the hey,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we haven't used your favorite word in awhile, convergence of

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>social media technology and the browser, so that the social

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>media part is always on, no matter what site you're visiting. Yeah,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the basic idea of rock Melt, and

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that that explains why there's this close relationship with Facebook

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where you have to sign in to Facebook in order

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to use the rock Melt browser the way it's intended

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to be used. Um. Now, Chris and I both have

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>access to the rock Melt browser as we record this.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It's currently in beta test mode and it's invitation only.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Um And and that's just a for for right now.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>That that's actually sort of a new development too. It

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even open to beta testing, uh participation until probably

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>just a few days before recording this. We had a

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>few days to play with it, but it's enough time

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to really kind of get a first impression. Now, the

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>way the browsers laid out is kind of interesting as

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>opposed to you know, most browsers have the main window

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is all the web page, and then you'll have a

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bar at the top and possibly one at

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom that would allow you to do some navigational features. Right,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you have your your web page controls, the browser controls themselves, um,

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and then an information bar at the bottom where you

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>see your address and if you have plug ins, which

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is you know, very very popular for Firefox and Chrome

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>especially as well as other browsers too, but primarily, but

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>primarily those they're they've made themselves very open to that. Uh.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you'll have those you might see those on

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>an additional panel or or toolbar, um. But yeah, for

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the most part, that's you know, it's all part of that. Yeah,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the rock melts a little different. Uh. Now when you're

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at the main body of the browser, when you're

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the actual content. Uh, it's going to look

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>very familiar to anyone who's used Chrome because rock Melt

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is built on Chromium, which is the open source code

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that Chrome itself is based upon so you can think

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of rock Melt and Chrome is sort of cousins. You know,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not directly related. It's not that rock Melt is

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a Chrome built it's just using the same base code

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that Chrome uses. Right as of right now. Um, according

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>to Seth Rosenblad c net uh, rock Melt, the current

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>data zero point eight point three four point eight three

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>three is built on Chromium six. There you go. Um,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you can take that to the bank folks. Of course,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>probably by the time well, I mean it's in beta,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so by the time this goes live, that will probably

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be updated from that point. Um, actually it may have been.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a few days ago from now, so that aren't mean.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Beta's tend to move pretty quickly, and sometimes sometimes they're

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>very tiny changes that are not perceptible to users. It's

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>all on the back end and it you know, we

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>don't ever really notice it. Uh. Well, anyway, that's that's

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the main portion of your your browser. But unlike other

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>or unlike most browsers, rock Belt also has edges or

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>little panels along the side that allow you to access

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>um uh extra content. Uh. And by extra content, I

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>mean things that you have specifically designated as being interesting

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to you. So you have your Facebook friends on your

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>left side, all the ones who are currently online, which

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>allows you to chat with them using Facebook Chat. As

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, it will show you you get

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the familiar, well semi familiar if you're used chat programs

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that will probably be uh comfortable for you. You'll see

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a dot next to their name. Um, I thought I

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>had that turned. Mr Plett needs to mute his iPad. Okay,

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you if you look at the left side,

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll see your your Facebook users, and you'll you'll see

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.599
<v Speaker 1>their photos, you know, the thumbnail photos, and there'll be

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a green dot if they're online and a clear dot

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if they are not. At least that's the way I remember.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe, I believe you are correct, and so you can.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>You can initiate a Facebook chat directly from your browser.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be on your Facebook page in

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>order to do it. And then on the right side

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are some icons that will include things like Facebook status

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is as well as direct um interactions on your Facebook page.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you posted a status update, You'll

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have one icon that will alert you if people uh

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>respond to that stas update or if or like it

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, or if they post your wallpost directly, that'll

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>come up under one icon. Under a second icon, you'll

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be notified whenever your friends are updating their Facebook pages,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so you have two icons for Facebook. Then you you

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can also link to your Twitter account if you have one,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can get Twitter updates that way, and the

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>browser itself will even give you live updates. A little

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>window will pop up with the the update, whether it's

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a Stats update or a Twitter update, um, those those

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>will come in in real time. You can also subscribe

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to RSS feeds this way, and you will have a

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>little icon that will tell you whenever the web page

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that you've subscribed to has been updated, and you just

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>click on that little icon, it'll pull up the most

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>recent content. So the the idea here is you can

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>browse one web page and be alert to all the

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>updates on the other web pages you're interested in, and

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you can keep up to date with them without having

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep popping around to you know, different, you don't

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to physically go to each web page

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to check because you have the little alert system there.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of curious to see how that's gonna

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>play out because in general, websites don't like it when

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>you can find out what information has been updated without

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>actually visiting them, because that can come into some problems

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with advertising deals and impressions. So it'll be interesting to

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>see if that has any if there's any resistance from

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>website administrators to this new browser. Resistance is futile. Yes,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I heard that somewhere. I heard it as well just

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>now in fact, well, um so, reactions from the tech

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>press have been sort of mixed. Yeah, there's there's some

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>people I think who really really dig it. They but

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they're using it in a very specific way. They're using

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it specifically to keep track of all the social networking

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff they do. They are not technically using it as

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a browser, or at least not not relying it upon

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it as their new browser. Almost every review I've read

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that was positive called it a great a great Facebook browser,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a great web browser. Um and that's kind

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of how I use it. I no, I was just

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that. It's sort of funny to say that

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's primary purpose is as a web browser. So

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think basically the difference being the social media aspect.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I think That's why it comes off that way, is that, um,

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, people are supposed to be thinking of it

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in those terms, and of course you know, we're being

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>asked to think of it, you know, especially that the

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>journalists are thinking of, well, what's different about this? The

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the chromium functionality seems to be pretty much the same

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for me, uh, you know, in my experience as it

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>has been. But it does give you a little bit

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more oomph when you're looking at things like, well, do

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to like this thing that you're looking at?

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, sort of. It just makes it more simple

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that without having to look for, you know,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the like button. Yeah, you can. You can share web

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>pages directly to your Facebook page. Let's say that you're

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>visiting a site and you're reading, let's say, um, uh,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>let me get a good website, um, how stuffworks dot com.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you are visiting how stuff works dot com

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're reading a really cool article like how Asimo

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>works by Jonathan Strickland. So you're reading how Asthma works

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>by Jonathan Strickland on how stuff Works dot com and

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, this is a really neat article. I would

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like to share this with my friends and within rock Melt,

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you can do that just by clicking a little share button.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the browser itself. You don't have to

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>look for a share button on the article. You don't

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have to copy the u r L and go to

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>your Facebook stas page and paste it manually. That way,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's built into the browser directly, which is kind of

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a neat feature. You can also do that with things

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like you can you can tweet things directly that way

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. And it has its own built in u

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>r L shortener. I believe, although I haven't really played

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>with that, I heard that there were some problems with

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the u r L shorten or at least other people

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>were experiencing ms. They were testing the links that we're

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>being shortened, and we're having trouble getting to them, especially

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>from browsers that were not rock melt. Um. I have

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not personally tested that, so I only I've only that's

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>secondhand knowledge to me. Yeah, and it's beta too, so

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you should expect there if you if you're trying this

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>out for yourself, if you also haven't an invitation to

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>use rock melt and you've found it to be buggy,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's really to be expected, but we haven't

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>even reached a release candidate yet, so so what we're

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>using is the earliest usable build from outside of its

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>own internal testing area. Uh. It's one other thing I

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>thought I would mention before we talk more about about

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the the our impressions of this UM and I'm sure

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>there's an easy way to get around it. Those edges

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about, the left and right edges, Right,

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they tend to cut off the edge of the web

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>page you're looking at. Yeah, bugs me too. It means

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that you have to you have to scroll horizontally as

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>well as vertically. Well, it depends too. I feel compelled

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to point out that the world seems to be moving

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>toward the UM the wide screen aspect ratio, so I

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to matter less in the future than

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it does for those of us who are you still

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>using some sort of screen with a four to three

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>aspect ratio. Right, that's a good point. Yeah, if I

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>were using a newer computer, then perhaps I wouldn't have

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this issue. I'm not going to say anymore about that

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 1>particular situation. I mean, it's okay that my screen is

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>primitive and that half my keys don't work and I

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have to avoid words with the letter E in them.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, that's fine, I'm I'm all right with them.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>My prediction, my my prediction that you're going to get

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a new computer by the end of the year. I'm

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>running out of time. That happened. Yeah, that's that's looks

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>like that's going to lend in that ex category. Um

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and used to that if you listen to our recap

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>show from the beginning of this year. So, um, there's

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I found interesting that's not directly about

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rock melt. Um. I am somebody who likes to try

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out all kinds of new, uh techie things, which probably

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>surprises very few of our listeners. Um, you know, just

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to to give him a shot. And the browser wars,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>especially since they've become free. Um are I think a

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>really neat opportunity to really compare one piece of software

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to another. So it's every time a new browser comes out,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to give it a shot if it's free,

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And I tried one some years ago that actually has

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this functionality built in already. UM. I'm

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>sure you, Jonathan have heard about it, but some of

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>our listeners may not have. Yes, I'm gonna guess it's Flock. Yes, indeed, Flock,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>which actually has been up for Webby Awards and a

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>number of other awards because it's got a lot of

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the features already built in. It's got social networking capabilities

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for uh, Facebook, Twitter, UM, in addition to others including Flicker,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>UH and YouTube and UM. It actually migrated not too

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>long ago, just a few months ago, from a flock migrated. Yes,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the flock migrated from Nice from the Mozilla platform to Chromium.

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it is using the same build of Chromium

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>six that that UM, the current version of rock melt

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is using. And this again, as according to Mr Rosenblatt

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Um and UH. The thing that I've seen I've seen

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other tech writers say is that, well,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>flock has quite a few users, but really it's not

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>even making much of a dent in the market. So

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>why does rock melt feel like it's browser is going

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to beat that, you know, limited success of Flock. I've

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>tried flock and I like it a lot, I would

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>say that, Andreason's involvement is probably part of it, because

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here you have someone who was behind one

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most successful actually the story of of Netscape

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Navigator would be an interesting one to cover at some

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>point in tech stuff because you talk, you talk about

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a web browser that seemed to be the dominant browser

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't ever going to change, and and then

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>it changed rather dramatically and relatively quickly. Um, the fall

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of Navigator was pretty impressive. Actually. Uh So, I think

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Andreson's involvement probably has something to do with it. And

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and I get the feeling that the Rock Melt folks

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are really media savvy. They're very very good at getting

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>their message out there, and so a lot of tech

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>companies kind of lack that that ability to interact with

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the media in a compelling way. It's because you know,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of them are are very technically savvy,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're very good at putting together the product, but

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not as good at selling the product to the media. Um.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>There are other companies that are phenomenal at selling product

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to the media, like Apple, which also makes amazing products.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that wasn't a knock against their technical savvy,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but they are very very As the day we're recording

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, Apple managed to to to get the media's

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>interest in a big announcement that turned out to be

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles coming to iTunes yep. Um, Yeah, it's funny

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to note, um actually that it wasn't that long ago. Now,

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, this is one of Apple's announcements that

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was pretty quiet and by the terms that they're frequent,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>uh show stopping pr events that they managed to put on.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Um that they opened Safari up for plugins, and I

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think that, uh, Apple probably sees the writing on the wall.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're they're not even third in the browser wars,

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but I mean they have a reasonable market share, but

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still tiny compared to the big guys, and uh,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that's one of the reasons they

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are opening themselves up to allowing plugins is for things

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>like this social networking functionality. Yeah, to kind of head

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>off the impact that browsers like rock Melt and flock

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>could have. Um. I think the rock Melt and flock

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>approaches are really interesting. It it seems like it's a

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>big risk to me because it seems to be placing

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the bet in that social networking is the way the

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>web will continue to grow. It'll be the the evolutionary

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>force that pushes the development of the web into the future, um,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>which it's quite possibly true. But the problem is that,

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the future is really hard to predict, as

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we have discovered every December here at tech Stuff, uh,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and that placing your bets like that can come back

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to haunt you. It may be that two or three

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>years from now, no one would really be as interested

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in a socially a social networking kind of browser that

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like rock Melt because it no longer is relevant, right,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little dangerous in some ways. I would

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>say that the argument of going with a browser that

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you can you can tweak with plugins might be the

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>better way to go. But on the other hand, going

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>with a browser with this stuff is h is built

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>into the browser means that it's at least in theory,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>going to work properly. Because with plugins you can get

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>plug ins that end up interfering with one another and

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can make a browser unstable. And you you know, so

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever had Firefox and you've added a whole

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different plugins and Firefox is really unstable, that's

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>one potential reason for that instability. Doesn't necessar certainly mean

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's what's causing it, but it's possible It's also

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>possible that those the plugins could open you up to

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>security vulnerabilities and other problems, especially if it is a

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>UM developer who may or may not know what he

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>or she is doing very well. Somebody who's new UM

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>may not understand that, or even somebody who's experienced. I mean,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 1>anyone can make a mistake. So, I mean, they're there

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>are all kinds of things that that do that. But

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny that you would you would bring

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>up the big guys comparatively because I read an article

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in Computer World by Greg Kaiser, who talked to several analysts.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Al hilwa At I d C said just that basically,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the big browser companies may very well just go, hey,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're gonna offer plug ins that do

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing as Rock Mountain Flock and basically

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>torpedo them before they can really make a dent in

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the market UM. But Gardner's Ray Veldez suggested that it's

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>possible that Rock Melt is trying to do one of

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the classic small business small tech business moves. He thinks

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's possible that maybe they're going, hey, Facebook, yeah,

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>we got this really cool browser. It's really good. If

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>it had your name on it, maybe you want to

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>buy us. Yeah, we look really good. It's possible I

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>could see that happening. Um the it'll I'll be curious

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to see how it all turns out. There are also

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>other questions that we honestly don't know the answer to yet,

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Like because you have to sign into Facebook, does rock

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Melt get any of that data? Right now they're saying

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're not really they have no interest in that.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>That's they're not looking at selling your data to advertisers.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But you have to wonder you're using Facebook connect to

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>launch this browser, and how much of that information is

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>rock Melt privy to and and and how does that

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>now that that information is actually or that that connectivity

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>is baked in of the browser. Are their security vulnerabilities

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know about, or that maybe rock Melt

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>itself hasn't anticipated that could come to haunt people who

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who are early adopters of this this web browser. I

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think I'll probably find out because I have it. Well,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>here's something that as I was putting this research together

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for this podcast, I would not have anticipated as an argument.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But again, as at the time we're recording it. Just yesterday,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook announced that it was unveiling a new social messaging service. Now,

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if rock Melt can build this into the browser, uh,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, with its integration with Facebook, UM, it would

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>make it basically an email program, a chat program, and

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a social networking program, and then you wouldn't need necessarily

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a separate mail client or a separate web browser. You'd

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 1>have it all in one piece of software. It actually

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of like refined version of what Google Wave wash.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And it just seems to me that in a way

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>rock Mount may have been ahead of its game, perhaps

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>without even knowing it, just simply by you know, latching

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>onto the the Facebook wagon and following wherever Facebook goes.

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So that could be just an added argument for that. Now.

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Mozilla also not too long ago announced F one, which

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is a set of a plug in that will allow

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>UM some functionality for UH social media purposes. I read

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about it in a PC World article

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by I'm afraid I'm gonna mispronounce his name kier Thomas

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>k e I r UM. But basically it allows you

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to share UH links to different websites and UM works

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter, Facebook, and Gmail. UM. But you know, it's

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>again another example of the big guys catching on and

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>going ahead and and and baking that in. If I

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>knew you were coming, I want to bake that into

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>my browser. That was a long way for a bad joke,

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but I've gone, I've gone further distances for weaker payoffs,

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so I can't really criticize. But yeah, I mean, it's

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's weird to see, um, you know, in

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the age of apps taking over

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for the browser in some instances, um, something that's sort

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of like a browser app, um, you know, specifically aimed

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for a subset of web users. So that's, uh, it's

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a zag if you will, to the zig.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'll really be interested to see how rock Melt

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>performs once it comes out of beta and becomes publicly

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>available to everyone. Clearly, all the techy's immediately tried to

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>get an invite. I was very fortunate to get an

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>invitation from uh Mr tom Merritt, who was kind to

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>extend that to me, and then I immediately extended one

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of my three invites to Mr Palette. So you yeah,

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so so we that's how we managed to get into

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that because we were not part of any of the

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>initial announcements or anything. But I can say that, uh,

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a browser. It goes quickly because it's

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>based on Chromium. UM. I don't like the fact that,

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the way my screen is, I have to

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>scroll horizontally. Although I guess I could in theory tweak

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it so that the page is a little smaller and

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>fits on my screen, it's just me. Just means that

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be able to read things as easily as

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>as my eyes are getting old people. UM. So my

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>initial reaction is that it's an interesting way to keep

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>up with all your social networking stuff. It's also interesting

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>way to keep up with all those sites that you

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy and you want to to know when there's

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.959
<v Speaker 1>new content on those sites. But it's not enough for

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>me to adopt it as my primary browser. My primary

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>browser right now remains Chrome. Yeah, I can say, I

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I could see that a night. I fiddle with

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>all honestly a lot of different browsers. UM. I've used flock.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I like about flock is that

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you hide for the most part, you hide a lot

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff um that normally would appear on the uh.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>In this case in rock Melt, where you have that

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>persistent bar on the left, well actually both rails, um.

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can hide a lot of that and

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and and Flock. And I haven't tried the new version

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of Flock that's based on Chromium. I used the one

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that was based on Mozilla, which I liked very much. Um,

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But I don't, you know, if Facebook is something I

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>don't use as often as some other people do, so

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I usually check in two or three times during the

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>day and spend a lot less time on it, so

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I see the value in that. But I

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do like the fact that the browser wars have heated

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>back up again a lot of times. Or right after

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer essentially crushed what was then Netscape, people basically

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>said it was over with, and I'm glad to see

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that people are putting new technology out there. Of course,

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Opera UH, with its tiny, tiny market here, still has

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>some innovative features that others pick up on after that

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and used to their advantage. But I still like Opera

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot. I don't use it as my primary browser. UM,

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I think I think it'll be interesting to

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>see where it goes. I don't know that it will

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>ever be number one, but rock Melt certainly has its

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>place if it can, you know, once the bugs get

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>worked out. Sure, So we're gonna wrap this up. Guys.

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have an access to rock Melt, you

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>want to let us know about what your experience was like,

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you can let us know either on Facebook or Twitter.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Are handled, There is text stuff h s W or

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you can write us an email. That address is tex

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff at how stuff works dot com. Chris and I

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really soon, Jonathan. Actually, this

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was just handed to me. It looks like how stuff

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>works dot Com now has an iPhone app. Sweet awesome.

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah um, I got to to take a look at

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this earlier, and guys, this is pretty cool. The iPhone

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>app is sort of a way to integrate all the

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>cool stuff we do at how stuff works dot com.

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So you guys may have listened to one of our

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and we talked about there's this great article on

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the site, but you're not at your computer, so you

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>can't really check it. Well, the iPhone app actually lets

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you browse articles and blog posts, even lets you interact

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and Twitter, and you can listen to podcasts

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, and it has all the house

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot Com podcasts on it, not just ours,

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know good ones too, so you can listen

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to those and look at the articles and and go

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and Twitter and it should work perfectly with

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>your iPhones and iPod touch it awesome. What's uh? It

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's now available on the iTunes store, so

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's good to know. How much does it cost? It's free, ah,

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by the re invented two thousand twelve Camri.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you