WEBVTT - Bond Inflation Gauge Is Distorted by Fed: Jim Bianco

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Ten year treasury yield

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>now down back below one point five percent at one

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>point four percent. That spiking yields yesterday really spooked markets

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think got some people to kind of think

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about valuations here, uh, think about asset allocation here. Let's

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>get the lay of the land with Jim Bianco. He's

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a president and founder Bianco Research. He's also a contributor

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Opinion based in Chicago. Jim, thanks so much

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. What do you make of the

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>action over the past couple of days, again, having yields

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>shoot up here and we saw a lot of commodities flash,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe some inflations of inflation signs. What do you make

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on? I think what you just said

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is right inflation signs. I've been trying to say that

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there is two different words that we need to keep

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>our mind on, and that is reflation, which you hear

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of an inflation if people use those words interchangeably,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>but they shouldn't because there are two different concepts. If

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are rising because of reflation, that is real

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>growth is coming back, earnings are coming back, people are

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>getting jobs. Then Chairman Paul is right, it reflects higher

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>rates reflect a confidence in the economy. But if we're

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>crossing over to that, it is inflation, and that is

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>your loss of purchasing power. Your dollar in a year

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>will buy you less than a dollar now if you

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>own a fixed income security by the name fixed income,

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't get any more dollars in a year. You

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>get the same number, but it buys less. You don't

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>want to touch those securities, and that's why rates could

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be going up and it would be very bad for

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. So I think we're canting this push

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>pull is to yes, we know the economies could come

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>back strong this year. That's not the issue. The issue

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is how much of that's going to be inflation, how

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>much of that's going to be real wealth. And with

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the surgeon commodities, as you've mentioned in other measures. People

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are getting more and more worried that we're going to

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>see something we haven't seen in twenty five years, and

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>that is an actual inflation boom. Jim, I've been thinking

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>about you all morning, and not just exchange messages earlier today,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>but I've been thinking about your read on what we've

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>seen in the bond market. You know, there's a question

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about whether it's just thin trading, or whether it's potentially

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>leverage positions that are getting unwound, you know, convexity hedging,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you name it, technical factor, or whether this is actually

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a belief in inflation that perhaps isn't being reflected in

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a tips market, in a in a securities market that

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is distorted by thin liquidity and a whole host of

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>other issues. Can you just what's going on? Yeah? So,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>so two things. Um, There is the treasury real rates

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>market or TIPS securities, Treasury inflay and protective securities, and

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we look at the difference between those securities and nominal

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>rates to get what's called the inflation break even rate

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as an indicator of the future of inflation. The biggest

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>buyer in that market is the FED. They have bought

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>more bonds in the last year tips bonds than have

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>been issued, and the amount of outstanding for the public

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually declining. That's how many they bought. So my

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>point there is they've got a giant footprint all over

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that market, and I've been doubting the measures that we've

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>been getting out of that market. So that is an

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>inflation indicator that people said, look, there's no problem there. Yeah,

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>but it could also be because the Fed stomping all

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>over it. But to your other point about what's going

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on in the bond market, if you're not a bond

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>geek like I am, and I'm gonna put you in

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the bond, yeah, and you look at yields and you go, oh,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they're on their way to one and a half, and

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>some people say they might be a two by the

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. I'm an equity investor. I own

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a business. Who cares it's two percent, it's not a deal.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And it goes to two and a half, it's not

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. You know, if your bond investor, it

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>matters a lot because you could wind up with with

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>total return losses that could be very, very big. If

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you've owned thirty year bonds this year, you're down on

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the year on the thirty year bond one of the

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>worst first two months of a year in history. And

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying bonds on leverage, because you can do

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that through the repo market, you can leverage your positions

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>all you want. You could have catastrophic losses. If we

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have a two percent yield coming in the next few months,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>and if the bond market is in a bad place,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>all capital markets are in a bad place as well too,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a worry. I don't think at this

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>point that you know two percent on the tenure Treasury

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to crush the economy with super high interest rates.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>War is two percent could create havoc in the credit markets,

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and that could hurt the economy. The ability to raise

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>money ye to do two things that you're you're comfortable

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>with doing that could come into question. We're not there now,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but we've got to stop doing this, so we don't

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>go there. All right, I'm gonna annoy Paul and ask

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a question that's in the weeds. But you mentioned this

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>tips market. You mentioned this sort of inflation expectations market,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is really key because a lot of people

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>keep pointing to it to show that actually inflation expectations

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are going down over the long term even as treasure

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>yields go up. This doesn't make sense in a lot

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of ways. Are you saying the inflation expectations as measured

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>by the market are highly inaccurate based on the distortions,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>based on the amount of that market that's been dominated,

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that's been hoovered up by the Federal Reserve. Yes, And

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll even back up one step further. Inflation expectations is

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a predictor of where inflation is gonna go. We've had

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>these markets for twenty years have not been very good

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. They have not been a very good indicator

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>of what actually happens in the beginning. Now you throw

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that the largest single buyer is the

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve in these markets, and you've seen real interest

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>rates falling all year long. If the economy is going

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to boom at five, six or seven percent, which would

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>be if you believe Goldman's forecast, seven percent real, that

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>would be the fastest yearly growth in forty years. If

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we had that happened this year, real rates should be

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rising in that kind of environment. But the falling, or

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at least the tips market has been falling. Why because

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the fit is relentlessly buying these every day. In fact,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they publish every day how much they buy, and it's

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in the several billions every single day that they buy

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of this market. So I'll quote the British economist Charles Goodheart,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a good friend to John Farrell's. When a measure,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>when a measure becomes a target, it seeks being a measure.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Will look at Yes, we're looking at tips as a

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>measure of where the market things inflation is. But if

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the FETE is targeting it by all of their buying,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer a measure. So that's what I've been saying.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think conceptually it's right. You know, over the last

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>few months, tips break evens have been going up. But

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>when you want to get into the weeds and say

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>well they picked three weeks ago and this and that,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be careful now because you got that big footprint of

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS stomping all over that market, and it might

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be giving signals that aren't the measure that you think

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they are. Jim Bianco, thank you so much for being

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with us, Jim Bianco of Bianco Research. It's always wonderful

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>having you on Honestly, I was actually really looking forward

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to hearing what he had to say because he always

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>has such nuanced views pairing but the technical Paul, with

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental and really that tips market concept. I know

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it's in the weeds, but it's really important. It is.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And we hear a lot of strategists and a lot

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of fun managers talk about that tip tips market and uh,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know it's interesting that you know, kind of bringing

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in also the FED buying and how that's impacting the

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>market and rates across the rake curve. Yeah, honestly fascinating discussion.

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And we want to turn our attention to the medical

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>advances that we have seen which have been turbo charged

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic. And Paul, I do think that one

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>emerging aspect of the pandemic is all the money and

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>all the attention on the need for biopharmaceutical investment as

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>well as research and joining us now is someone very

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>much on the forefront of that. Dr Steve Cutler, chief

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Icon PLC, based in Dublin. Just to

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>give you a sense, Icon had a tie up with

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>p r A Health Sciences. It was the largest healthcare

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>transaction deal this year. Twelve billion dollars, and both companies

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>help basically run the clinical trials for drug makers and

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>medical device developers, and they've been on the front lines

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of some of these medical advancements. Dr Cutler, thank you

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Can you give us

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a sense of just how much the pandemic has turbo

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>charged what really has been in the works for a while,

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>which is investment in biopharmaceutical development. Yeah, Good morning, Paul,

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Good morning Lisa. The pandemics certainly has been obviously a

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>tragic event, you know, across our society, but there have

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>been some silver linings since, at least for us in

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>our business, and the way in which we've run clinical

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>trials now has has fundamentally changed in terms of approval times,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the types of technology we're able to

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>apply to running clinical trials, and quite frankly, in terms

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the awareness of society of clinical trials and the

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>benefits of clinical trials. We think that all plays into

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a very positive environment for our organization going forward, and

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>hence one of the reasons that we've we've we've made

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this union with pr A Okay, doctor, this is a

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>big deal for you guys. Per A is a big

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>company as well. Talked us about the real drivers, the

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>strategic drivers behind putting these two companies together. Here. Yeah,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of them. Certainly, we've seen we've been

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>competing with pra A for for a number of years now,

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years since we've been in existence, and they've

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>been a very strong competitor there and a very a

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>very good competitor over that time. And and they're very

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>strong cultural fits. So so when you bring too large

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>people related businesses together, the culture, the focus, the core

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>values of the organizations are very important. We see a

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of similarities there. We've made an assessment really over

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the last few years in terms of our other competitors

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and the fit we had with p r A really

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>really really brought them to the four in terms of

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>their benefits and the advantages. There's really a couple of them.

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>For us as a large organizer, we moved from being

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we were six, they were seven, or vice versa in

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of our league table in revenues in the organiz

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we now move as a combined organization to number two

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. So we are and we're number one

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in a number of the segments. So we are we

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have the scale now to really deliver innovative solutions and

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>creative solutions for for our customers across the globe. We

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have the depth and the breadth of resources, and that's

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>very important in the clinical trials game because we run

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>trials all over the world in all sorts of different

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>therapeutic areas. The other component is the technology side of things.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>As I said, through the pandemic, we've realized that applying

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>the new technology is the ability to access patient data

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>remotely and to monitor patient data remotely in a confidential

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>and private manner allows us to be much more efficient.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And as we as we run those sort of trials

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and we run what we call more decentralized clinical trials

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>where patients don't have to go to sites we can

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we can monitor patients at home. We have those sort

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of services. Pr A bring a mobile health platform to that.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We can offer a really compelling vision in that space

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for for our customers, so we can be much more efficient,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>I believe going forward. And then finally for our shareholders,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's significant value in this in this union. And you

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>know from an accretion point of view, from a long

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>term revenue and the sustainable growth perspective. Dr Cutler, It's

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>been a real write in twelve months for a lot

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of people around the world, and I'm trying to find

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>silver linings every day for my children, and one of

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>them that I try to lean upon is that perhaps

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get biopharmaceutical research that are cure the cold, or

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>cure cancer, cure all sorts of elm ends that we

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have with us today. Do you see those kinds of

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>seismic advancements that are made because of the money put

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>behind my pharmaceutical research as a result of the pandemic?

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So much? Are we're going to cure cancer because of

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the I think I know, I think we're all very

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>focused on that. That's a very big part of our portfolio.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But what we what we have seen is a real

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>focus on clinical trials and the ability to get clinical

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>trials moving much faster and a much less bureaucratic fashion

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>than we've seen in the past. Of what I'm seeing

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is it would be much more efficient going forward in

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the way we run clinical trials, whether they be decentralized

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>or the more traditional And so what we see is

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>our sponsors will have more opportunity to put more drugs

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>through the pipeline, so to speak, to have more shots

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on goal to get pharmaceuticals and get good drugs to market,

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>whether they be cancer drugs, whether they be pandemic or vaccines,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>whether they be other other drugs. That's what we see.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic has really caused us to rethink the way

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we do things and know that we can do things

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in very different ways. We were involved in the large

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Visor biointech trial that was one of our big, big studies.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>We were able to get that done so much faster

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>than we normally do with these clinical trials, and so

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that that really lays the groundwork, I think for a

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>very very strong future in our business. Dr Cutler, thank

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We appreciate that. Dr

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Cutler. He's the chief executive officer of Icon PLC.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>They are based in Dublin. Just announced this week a

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>big deal, the biggest healthcare transactions so far this year,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Icon acquiring p r A Health Sciences. That's a company

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>based in Raleigh, North Carolina. Total transaction value of twelve

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars um and you know Lisa's As Dr Cutler mentioned,

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it was really great to see how some of these

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>how quickly these tests and these trials were done. I

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, can you tell where my mind's at? And basically,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>what is it done? What is it over? Can we

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>end the pandemic? I mean, how many times gonna answer

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that question from my kids before I start passing it

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on to every guest that comes on, especially people on

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the front lines, to know the answer. That's where we

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>all are. And the good news, Lisa is the metrics

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are really trending in the right direction. So that is

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly good news at a very difficult year. Yes, it

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is that time of year again where we hear from

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett and his faith will parse every single word

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he has to say. Cat chick Lynsky follows Warren Buffett follows,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the finance industry, follows the insurance and Street is really

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the ace on this. She's from Bloomberg News. Cat, we

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't really heard that much from Mr Buffett over the

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>last year with all that's been going on. What do

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you expect is see and hear and read When we

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>do get his letter, well, I think it means it's

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>going to pack more of a punch, because you know, yeah,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we heard from him last May at his annual meetings.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But during that meeting he sort of expressed caution about

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole situation, about the pandemic and especially about the

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>econom outcomes from it. So I think its shareholders are

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>really looking to this letter to sort of provide some clarity,

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the letter does describe how Berkshire did

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>over the past year. But people really turned to Buffett

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>too as kind of a business leader and you know,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a successful investor, and they want to know his thoughts

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on lots of issues, including the presidential election, in which

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he was really actually quite silent about, and the race

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>protests that swept the nation last year, and even more

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>investing type issues like the Reddit mania. You know, depending

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on when he put pen to paper um and actually

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote this letter, I think people will be interested to

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>hear if if he has thoughts on kind of where

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>all that stock market speculations stand. Well, this ninety year

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>old chief executive officer, the Oracle of Omaha, is one

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most famed investors ever to hit Wall Street,

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and yet I do wonder, especially as he takes a

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>less of a role at the company, how much import

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>his views have at this point given the other companies

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that have sort of filled the void and entered the front,

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the front running seat in terms of influence. I mean,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>has this letter waned with respect to how it's perceived

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street? Well so, I I you know, I

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>asked that question to these investors who follow him religiously,

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like why do you keep reading it? Because obviously, you know,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you can look back at his letters at the dot

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>com bubble and that sort of gives you a sense

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of what he might think about with you know, the

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>current stock market um situation we're seeing. But I do

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>think that investors still look to him because he does

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>have this historical perspective and if you've ever watched him

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>speak at these events, I mean you can tell he

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>really has an incredible memory, an incredible recall of everything

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he's read and seen and done, and I think that

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>does lend his words still some weight. You know, he

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can really he can take all that you know, we've

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>had to kind of ingest over the past year in

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of the news and what's happening, and and he

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>can sort of step back and say, you know, compared

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to his you know, ninety years of history of being

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on this planet, here's kind of you know, take on it.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So alright, Cat, one of the things that people really

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>are the last several years have really focused on is

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>what to do with all that cash. I'm looking at

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the f A function on the Bloomberg terminal for Berkshire Hathway,

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, four hundred over four undred billion dollars

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>in cash on the balance. Yes, there's a little bit

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of depth, super super cash rich here. What's the expectation here?

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Can he put that money to work? Yeah? So we

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>actually have closer to a hundred and forty five billion

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars of cash to work, which is actually close to

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a record for Berkshire, and it is hard. I mean,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, he needs to find bigger deals, bigger stock

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>purchases that actually move the needle and kind of generate

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>even higher returns for the conglomerate. And when you're you know,

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>fighting off private equity firms who are bidding for the

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>same company you are, and now the kind of spack boom,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's made it a lot more challenging for

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Bershire to say, you know, here, here we are as

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a clear you know, buyer of these companies. And so

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why we've seen trends like he was

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a massive purchaser of stock, at least through the first

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>nine months. It's one of his biggest years ever for

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>repurchasing stock, which for most companies is so routine, but

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bucket, I think it really underscores this point. But

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 1>he's he is willing to expand his horizons if he

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>needs to to find ways to deploy that cash. But

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously he would love that elephant size deal to come around.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>One thing I'm curious to hear is he's been really

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>adamant about American exceptionalism and the growth of the economy,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about how lucky it is to be born in

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>America and the growth of the nation uh continuing, and

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>he sort of has had complete faith in that for

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time. He's been right to a large degree.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And yet as he tries to diversify his investments, I'm

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>curious to know whether he will change his tune at

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>all when we see some of the dynamism coming out

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of other places in the world. What's your sense of

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that based on the rhetoric out of Warren Buffett's shop,

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>out of his colleagues, UH, just generally at a Berkshire Hathaway,

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I do agree like He's always been very optimistic about America,

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that will continue. I think we'll probably

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>still hear from him about, you know, the positive attributes

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he thinks of this country and our systems and how

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they work. Obviously, it'll probably be tempered with, you know,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you view that in terms of the riots

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw at the capital and some of the other

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>stresses we've had in this democracy over the past year.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do think he is more willing to venture abroad,

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and we saw that last year where he piled the

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars into Japanese trading house stocks. And I think

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>this shows not only the influence of his deputies. I

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>think they do have an influence on him kind of

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>expanding through horizons, but I think it shows that if

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire is really going to be able to deploy its

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>funds successfully and generate these higher returns, they're going to

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have to start looking abroad. They're going to have to

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>figure out different economies and these different types of companies,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like these trading companies in Japan, and figure out which

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>ones are actually gonna fit because Berkshire just is fishing

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in too small of a pond right now. Cat. Thanks

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>very much. We really appreciated Cat Chiglinsky, financial reporter for

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, giving us the latest on Bertrad Hathaway, Hathaway,

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett. Again, it's that time of the year where

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we will hear from the Oracle of Omaha with his

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>annual investment letters. Cat was mentioning lots to parse through there.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's turn our attention to fiscal stimulus. It

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like the House is scheduled to take up the

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>stimulus bill on the floor of the Chamber today, with

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>passage expected late in the evening or potentially Saturday. Let's

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>get the latest on what may or may not be

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>included in that bill. We do that with Eric Wasson,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Congressional reporter. Eric, thanks so much for joining us.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about what are the notable inclusions and

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe exclusions from this one point nine trillion dollar fiscal

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stimulus bill. Well, you know the big debate here in

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours through about minimum wave provision.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>That was the sort of the lightning rod division in

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and a Senate official, obscure Senate official, a

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>seen up parliamentary and rule that they cannot do it.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Through this budget bill. So that's leading to a lot

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of conflict here. House progressives are really urging the Vice

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>President to possibly try to overrule that something she can

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>do with the right House is reluctant to do. The

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>House will include that provision in the bility passed tonight

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>probably around eight or nine o'clock. However, in the Senate

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there's now talk of doing a tax penalty to try

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to force large corporations to raise that wage. So there's

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on there. That's the main thing that's

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>up for change. But as far as the main provision

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that people know about, the fourteen hundred dollar stimulus checks

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for those making lessons seventy five thousand dollars a year,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much locked in as far as I can tell.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That's in the House bill and likely to remain in

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senate bill. We're also looking attention of unemployment benefits

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and a child tax credit expansion temporarily. So can we

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of how committed Democrats are as a whole,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and I realize it's not a cohesive group right now,

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>how committed they are to getting a minimum wage increase through,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>especially now that it would have to tie a two,

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a tax increase or some other provision that would be

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>more directly tied to the deficit. Well, you know, it's

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>just it's just not really clear if they're going to

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>all be on board. I mean putting a tax increase.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>There's a very tiny international tax loophole closer in the

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>bill now, turning two billion dollars of making it a

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>very large descliament of five percent payroll tax on companies.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>That's very easy for Republicans to demondize. And the portrays

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>at tax increase the middle of a pandemic that caused

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>some heartburn for moderate Democrats. So this hasn't really been

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>shopped around, put forward by Bernie Sanders and on Widen's

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>progressives on the left, and the Shumer is now weighing it,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we don't really know yet if moderates

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>are going to go for that. Eric, give us a

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sense of timing here. We're getting very close to, you know,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the point in March where a lot of these benefits

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>from the original or the last round of fiscal stilling

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to start to expire for a lot of people. So

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>time is of the essence here. Yeah, that's right. The

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>expanded unemployment benefits of for gig workers long term on

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the board and those getting that three our plus up

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>from the federal government to their state benefits does expire

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>begin to expire March four, team, You know, the Senate

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>has this two more weeks to act. That's probably enough

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>time to get it done. Although the wrinkle was a

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage is going to cause a lot of negotiating

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and conversations over the weekend early on. If they can

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>resolve that, the Senate could easily pass it on the

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>floor within two weeks. Is a special budget procedures, so

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans can't really drag it out. Do we have

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how much momentum there would be after

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this bill gets passed, and the expectation is it will

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>get passed by mid March, how much momentum there is

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to get working on that infrastructure bill to possibly get

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>something passed again later in the year. Yeah, that's a

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>story that Chris Confident and I I probably did on

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the terminal last week. Their infrastructure has a lot of momentum.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, that could be a Biparson villa, and in

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fact they can't risk necessarily use this budget procedure for

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure for several reasons, including the fact that's the long

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>term spending of proposal. It goes beyond ten years and

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>violate the Bird rule in the Senate. But there's a

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk among Progressive of adding a draft back

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of other things, some expansion of Obama tire to elder tire, childcare,

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and that's going to make it more

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>controversial and make it potentially more difficulty. All right, So

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing, I just want to get a sense for

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>our listeners in the metro New York area and some

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>other high tax areas state and local tax. Uh, that

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>issue that's not in this bility hit home for you. Yeah,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as I start to do my taxes, it's just just

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>goes crazy that that was left out, that that was proposed,

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>proposed by you know, was proposed by some members, especially

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the Northeast delegations, but that did not make it into

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this field. And you know, it's obviously could be a

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>candidate for the second round. There's there's a lot of

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>talk of doing major tax legislation in the second round,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>including an increasing capital gains tax for those making more

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>than one million dollars a year to equalize the rates

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with ordinary and comic etcetera. So we send ull Be

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a large tax package there you might never of a

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>shot of getting that salt deduction again. Eric Wasson, thank

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Eric quass and Bloomberg

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Congressional reporter joining us on congressional matters. Plus the salt text,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which is near and dear. Yeah, we need the salt text.

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Gotta take care of that, and we need the gateway

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and the gateway. Since you have left the shows, certain

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>things never changed that. I was about to say, have

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you been to the Mall of America yet? How do

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you feel about that? I know how you feel about that.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we've got more talking about municipal finance to

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>get some of these local areas backed up and running.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three. Put on false Sweeney I'm on

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio